Next Article in Journal
Preface to “A Commemorative Issue in Honour of Professor Nick Hadjiliadis: Metal Complex Interactions with Nucleic Acids and/or DNA”
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Systemic and Local Acidosis on Insulin Resistance and Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
NQO1 is Required for β-Lapachone-Mediated Downregulation of Breast-Cancer Stem-Cell Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chronic Exposure to Palmitate Impairs Insulin Signaling in an Intestinal L-cell Line: A Possible Shift from GLP-1 to Glucagon Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms19123814
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Emerging Role of Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Implications and New Perspectives

by
Veronica Vella
1,2 and
Roberta Malaguarnera
3,*
1
School of Human and Social Sciences, “Kore” University of Enna, 94100 Enna, Italy
2
Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, 95122 Catania, Italy
3
Endocrinology, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(12), 3814; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123814
Submission received: 26 October 2018 / Revised: 26 November 2018 / Accepted: 28 November 2018 / Published: 30 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insulin and Insulin Receptor in Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most common endocrine tumor. Although the majority of TCs show good prognoses, a minor proportion are aggressive and refractory to conventional therapies. So far, the molecular mechanisms underlying TC pathogenesis are incompletely understood. Evidence suggests that TC cells and their precursors are responsive to insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), and often overexpress receptors for insulin (IR) and IGF-1 (IGF-1R). IR exists in two isoforms, namely IR-A and IR-B. The first binds insulin and IGF-2, unlike IR-B, which only binds insulin. IR-A is preferentially expressed in prenatal life and contributes to development through IGF-2 action. Aggressive TC overexpresses IR-A, IGF-2, and IGF-1R. The over-activation of IR-A/IGF-2 loop in TC is associated with stem-like features and refractoriness to some targeted therapies. Importantly, both IR isoforms crosstalk with IGF-1R, giving rise to the formation of hybrids receptors (HR-A or HR-B). Other interactions have been demonstrated with other molecules such as the non-integrin collagen receptor, discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1), and the receptor for the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), Met. These functional networks provide mechanisms for IR signaling diversification, which may also exert a role in TC stem cell biology, thereby contributing to TC initiation and progression. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms by which deregulated IR isoforms and their crosstalk with other molecules and signaling pathways in TC cells and their precursors may contribute to thyroid carcinogenesis, progression, and resistance to conventional treatments. We also highlight how targeting these alterations starting from TC progenitors cells may represent new therapeutic strategies to improve the clinical management of advanced TCs.

1. Introduction

Thyroid cancer (TC) is the tumor with the fastest increasing incidence in the western world [1,2,3]. The increased TC risk is attributable not only to an improvement in thyroid-based diagnostic procedures, but also to some rising risks factors, such as insulin resistance conditions [4], therapies [5,6,7], and environmental carcinogens [8], which are responsible for molecular alterations that are specific to TC [9].
The increasing incidence involves mainly well-differentiated TC histotypes, which are considered to be low risk tumors, because patients outcome is excellent, with a 5-year disease specific survival of >90% [10]. Appropriate thyroidectomy, followed or not by adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy and active surveillance, is the common treatment against these tumor histological variants and associated distant metastases [10]. However, roughly two thirds of patients become RAI-resistant [11]. Rare, poorly-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) are often unresponsive to RAI treatment and, therefore, highly aggressive. For all TC subtypes that have lost RAI uptake ability, nowadays, optimal clinical management is still lacking, even though new perspectives are appearing [12]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for therapies that can slow down the progression of these aggressive tumors.
Evidence from the literature suggests that TCs resistant to RAI are dependent on the activation of specific signaling pathways for the maintenance of their malignant phenotype [13]. Thus, these tumors may only be responsive to therapies targeting the molecular signals important for their growth and survival. Although thyroid function and proliferation are primarily regulated by the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), other pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and the insulin growth factors (IGF) system play an equally important role for the proliferation and growth of thyrocytes as well as their precursors/stem cells. Recently, genetic or epigenetic alterations preventing the normal process of self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation of these progenitor cells have been considered as the possible origin of thyroid malignant transformations (4). The best studied and already identified molecular alterations in TC include conditional or constitutive deregulation of MAPK/PI3-K/mTOR/IGF cascades.
Activation of the MAPK cascade via mutations and/or rearrangements of genes REarranged during Transfection (RET), Rat sarcoma (RAS), and proto-oncogene B-Raf (BRAF) occurs in ~70% of well-differentiated TCs. Among these abnormalities, BRAF is the most frequently mutated gene in TC, and a predictor of poor clinical prognosis and recurrence [14]. TC also shows mutations in PI3-K signaling effectors, such as Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) [15]. The PI3-K pathway may also be over-activated in TC by non-mutational mechanisms, such as dysregulation of the IGF system. In fact, we have previously demonstrated that both IGFs are locally produced in TCs: IGF-1 by stromal cells and IGF-2 by malignant thyrocytes, with higher values in malignant tissues compared to normal tissue [16]. In addition, IGF-1R and IR have been found to be overexpressed, especially in PDTCs. As a consequence of this overexpression, IR/IGF-1R hybrid formation and increased IGF-1 response occur. Another important finding is that overexpressed IR is predominantly present as the fetal IR-A isoform, and that malignant thyrocytes acquire the ability to produce IGF-2. This autocrine loop involving IGF-2 and the isoform IR-A is activated in different cancers and particularly in the PDTC histotypes [16,17,18], and exerts a crucial role in regulating stem-like properties, metastases, and resistance to therapies [19,20,21,22]. Indeed, IR-A, IGF-1R, and their ligands IGF-1 and IGF-2 are overexpressed in human thyroid progenitor cells, with a prevalence in progenitors from TC cells, where IGF-2 exerts a role in stimulating self-renewal and thyrosphere volume [20]. Furthermore, besides the formation of IR/IGF-1R hybrid receptors, the functional crosstalk between IR-A and other tyrosine kinase receptors such as the non-integrin collagen receptor, discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1), the receptor for the Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) Met, and other still unknown partners might add more complexity to the contribution of IR-A in TC pathogenesis.
Based on these experimental observations indicating that deregulation of survival pathways and tyrosine kinase receptors-dependent signaling may play an important role in TC development and progression, multikinase inhibitors (MKI) (i.e., sorafenib and lenvatinib) have been approved for use in treatment [11,23]. These MKI have been shown to enhance RAI uptake via sodium iodine symporter (NIS) upregulation [24,25]. However, so far, the real efficacy of these drugs, showing also an antiangiogenic activity, is uncertain. Indeed, they can improve the progression free survival, but not the overall survival [23]. Therefore, new therapeutic options are needed for aggressive TC subtypes.
Given the well-recognized role of IR-A/IGF-2 overexpression/activation in thyroid malignant transformation, TC de-differentiation, and stem-like properties, this pathway could represent a new target for TCs that are unresponsive to RAI therapy, or to re-differentiation therapy using MKI [23,26]. However, a selective inhibition of IR-A is hard to reach, given the very little difference in structure between IR-A and the “metabolic“ isoform IR-B. Likely, the identification of new molecular partners of IR-A, recruited after insulin and/or IGF-2 stimulation, could open new and valuable therapeutic perspectives.
Here, we highlight the role of IR isoforms, especially IR-A and its molecular partners, in TC stem cell biology, and as consequence, in TC development, progression, and resistance to conventional treatments. Targeting the overactivated IR-A/IGF-2 loop could sensitize stem-like cells to classical therapies and reduce relapse rates for the most aggressive TC histotypes.

2. Thyroid Tumorigenesis

2.1. Onset of TC

Cancer of the thyroid gland is the most common malignancy of endocrine organs and the fastest increasing tumor worldwide [1]. More than 95% of thyroid tumors originate from the neoplastic transformation of the thyroid follicular epithelium, and include a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with specific clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Well-differentiated carcinomas (including papillary and follicular histotypes) and poorly-differentiated and undifferentiated tumors (including anaplastic cancer) are the three main histological subgroups of TCs. Well-differentiated TC is the most frequent and indolent type, representing more than 80% of all thyroid tumors, with a mean 5-year overall survival rate of 90% [2]. By contrast, undifferentiated or ATCs are very rare and are the most advanced and aggressive histotypes [27].
The pathological molecular mechanisms explaining the origin of TC and the different behavior between the different subtypes are currently only partially understood. The evidence in tumor cell biology and genetics has provided some hypotheses to explain the onset of thyroid oncogenesis. The classical multistep model assumes a stepwise process of de-differentiation [28]. According to this hypothesis, normal differentiated mature thyrocytes give rise to papillary or follicular, and finally, to most undifferentiated ATCs, by accumulating multiple somatic mutations in genes such as RAS, RET, Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK), Gs-protein (GSP), TSH-Receptor (TSH-R) and alterations of tumor suppressor p53 family members [29,30,31,32,33,34]. In this stochastic model, TC initiation is monoclonal, and tumor heterogeneity is acquired by multistep mutations that deregulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival processes [28].
The recently proposed alternative hypothesis relies on the presence, within the thyroid gland, of cells with fetal/stem-like features [35]. Based on this “cancer stem cell (CSC) carcinogenesis” model, undifferentiated and pluripotent cells, which under normal conditions represent a source for regenerating cells, may acquire mutations or epigenetic changes, altering their self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation abilities. These modifications could give rise to malignant transformation from adult stem cells or their committed progenitors toward specific TC stem cells, which in turn become the origin of cancer cells [36,37,38]. This model postulates a hierarchy of thyroid precursors cells as the potential cause of distinct TC histotypes, and is supported by the observation that several signaling pathways involved in adult stem cells biology (i.e., the Wingless–type Mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family member (Wnt) pathway, Hedgehog (Hh) and Notch signaling pathways) are also deregulated in TCs. Furthermore, there are close relationships between gene expression profile detected in main components of the solid cell nests (such as oncofetal fibronectin, p63, Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and Cytokeratin 34 beta E12 (CK34bE12) and some thyroid malignancies, suggesting that such undifferentiated remnant embryonic stem cells may be the niche for thyroid cell survival, and may play an important stem cell-like role in the origin of several thyroid disorders, including TC [39,40].

2.2. Molecular Abnormalities and Deregulated Signaling Pathways Involved in Thyroid Oncogenesis

Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular alterations responsible for thyroid carcinogenesis provide compelling evidence for the crucial role of mutational or non mutational abnormalities in components of survival-signaling cascades, such as TSH-R, MAPK, PI3-K/AKT, mTOR, and the IGF pathways [41] (see Table 1).

2.2.1. TSH-R

TSH has long been recognized as the major stimulus for thyrocytes function, differentiation, and proliferation [41]. TSH induces thyrocyte growth directly by binding to its own receptor, and indirectly by stimulating the autocrine and/or paracrine production of other growth factors such as Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) [42] and amyloid precursors [43]. Additionally, insulin, IGF-1, and serum factors are essential for TSH-mediated thyrocytes proliferation [41,44,45]. The crucial role of TSH-R and its downstream signaling in TC onset and evolution comes from large epidemiological studies showing a strong association between serum TSH levels and increased TC incidence in patients with thyroid nodules [46,47]. Furthermore, in vivo experiments in mice harboring BRAF mutation have shown that TSH cooperates with oncogenic BRAF to induce thyroid tumorigenesis, partially via cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) [48]. The exact mechanisms responsible for TSH contribution to BRAF-induced transformation are largely unknown. The TSH-R engagement induces the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) via cAMP, and consequent cell cycle progression and cell proliferation in response to growth factors, especially IGF-1 or insulin [41,49]. A variety of targets have been associated with the mitogenic output of TSH-dependent signaling. These include PKA dependent and independent signals, as well as other proliferation pathways such as MAPK, PI3-K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, and the IGF system. This well-regulated signaling network and the heterogeneity of TSH targets further amplifies and diversifies the final response of TSH-dependent pathway [49,50].

2.2.2. MAPK

The most common molecular abnormalities responsible for papillary TC (PTCs) initiation and progression include chromosomal alterations generating chimeric oncogenes or point mutations in proto-oncogenes such as Ret, NTRK, RAS, and BRAF [51,52]. Each of these events is linked to specific TC etiologic factors and to specific histotypes. In particular, rearrangements of RET gene (RET/PTC) (especially RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3) occur in 5 to 30% of PTCs, and have been associated with DNA fragility consequent to radiation exposure [53]. RAS mutations are uncommon, except in the follicular variant of PTCs, which also show Paired-box gene 8/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma (PAX-8/PPARγ) translocations. The most common mutated gene is BRAF, which appears activated in 35–60% of PTCs [53]. The origin of point mutations in BRAF and RAS remain largely unknown. BRAF mutations, as well as alterations in the p53 gene, have often been found in ATCs, suggesting that these molecular abnormalities may be involved in TC progression to poorly-differentiated and aggressive phenotypes [53]. Moreover, constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway may be responsible for TC resistance to MKI [54]. Common features of all these molecular abnormalities along the MAPK pathway are that they do not overlap in the same tumor, and are involved in signaling from the different growth factors and membrane receptors that are responsible for TC formation, maintenance, and progression. However, in a significant proportion of TC cases, alterations involving MAPK cascade are absent, suggesting that other signaling pathways may play a role in thyroid carcinogenesis.

2.2.3. PI3-K/AKT/PTEN

Enhanced signaling through the PI3-K/AKT pathway has been recognized as a common feature of thyroid follicular adenoma and carcinoma. PI3-K is activated in thyrocytes by several growth factors such as insulin/IGF-1, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) [41]. Furthermore, PI3-K is essential for thyrocytes proliferation under TSH stimulation [45,55,56]. Roughly 40% of well-differentiated TCs and more than 50% of highly aggressive TCs show PTEN inactivation consequent to downregulation or gene silencing [57]. Point mutations or copy number changes of PIK3CA and Protein Kinase B (PKB also known as AKT) are found in ~23% of ATCs, sometimes together with either RAS or BRAF mutations [58]. AKT activation may be required to inhibit apoptosis in TC, and is likely present in tumors harboring RAS mutations. AKT activation is more evident in the invasive regions of TC and in lymph nodes or distant metastases [58]. Furthermore, it has been observed that PI3-K/AKT deregulation leads to upregulation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which induces or promotes retention of the de-differentiated status commonly observed in advanced TCs [59].

2.2.4. mTOR/p70S6K

Among the crucial shared downstream effectors of both MAPK and PI3-K pathways, the kinase mTOR has directly been associated with a hyperproliferative phenotype [60,61]. Human PTCs show increased levels of p-p70S6K and ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6), the two major mTOR targets. Highly phosphorylated p70S6K and rpS6 exert a potential role in thyroid proliferation and activity downstream TSH-R by increasing the protein levels of cyclins D1 and D3 [62,63]. These mTOR downstream effectors are required for the mitogenic response triggered by TSH/cAMP and PI3-K on thyroid follicles both in vivo and in vitro [55,62]. Compared to normal thyrocytes, TC cells are unresponsive for growth to TSH, forskolin, or cAMP [64] and do not require PKA for mTOR activity [65]. Many TCs may have modified the upstream control of mTOR activity from TSH/cAMP-PKA to either RAS-RAF-MAPK and/or PI3-K/AKT [65]. Indeed, most human TC cell lines showing mutations in effectors of MAPK and/or PI3-K pathways, are cAMP/TSH independent and unresponsive to PKA control. This is in line with the observation that patients affected by advanced TC entirely lose TSH dependence on tumor growth. However, targeting only MAPK and/or PI3-K is often insufficient to completely block mTOR activity. Therefore, a combination therapy using mTOR inhibitors with drugs that directly target the driver-oncoprotein opens promising doors for the treatment of advanced and the most aggressive TCs.

2.2.5. Insulin/IGF System

Another signaling pathway contributing to generating proliferative responses in both normal and tumor thyrocytes is the insulin/IGF axis [41,45].
In vivo evidence shows that in physiology, the stimulation of thyroid growth by TSH is partially dependent on other growth hormones including insulin and/or IGF-1 [66]. Indeed, both hormones in concert with cAMP modulate the expression of Thyroid Transcription Factor-2 (TTF-2), which mediates the transcription of thyroid-specific genes such as Thyroglobulin (Tg), Thyroperoxidase (TPO), and TSH-R [67].
The crosstalk between TSH and the insulin/IGF axis appears to also play a role in abnormal thyroid cell proliferation. In fact, the pro-tumorigenic role of TSH is irrelevant in the absence of growth factors, but it is greatly potentiated by the presence of insulin and/or IGF-I [68,69]. Multiple molecular alterations in the IGF system make more efficacious the pro-tumorigenic actions of TSH. An early event in thyroid carcinogenesis [16,70] is represented by the overexpression of IGF-1, IGF-1R, IGF-2, and IR in TC cells, which is responsible for cellular transformation, proliferation, and apoptosis suppression [71]. In TC, IR is predominantly expressed as the “pro-mitogenic” isoform A (IR-A), which binds—with high affinity—to not only insulin, but also to IGF-2, which is produced by cancer cells in autocrine manner. The activation of the IGF-2/IR-A loop has a recognized role in tumor progression, de-differentiation, and resistance to therapies. Indeed, the overexpression of IR-A is a feature of poorly-differentiated anaplastic or stem-like TC cells [16,20]. Conversely, IGF-1R expression decreases with cancer de-differentiation [72], suggesting that the IGF-2/IR-A loop exerts a more important role than the IGF-1/IGF-1R loop in thyroid cells de-differentiation, stemness, tumor progression, and metastasis [73].
Furthermore, the coexisting presence of IGF-1R and IR in many tumors including TCs causes the formation of IR/IGF-1R hybrids receptors [74]. Both IR isoforms can equally combine with IGF-1R, leading to the formation of hybrids containing IR-A (HR-A) or IR-B (HR-B). HRs, likely HR-A as consequence of the overexpression of this isoform in TCs, have been found both in well-differentiated and in poorly-differentiated/undifferentiated PTCs [18,75]. In these tumors, the presence of HRs has important consequences for cancer responses to both insulin and IGFs [18,74]. (see also Section 3.2).
Another mechanism through which the IGF system regulates TC development, growth, proliferation, invasion, and biological behavior, thereby contributing to thyroid tumorigenesis, is the collaboration with other pro-mitogenic signaling pathways such as MAPK, PI3-K, Janus kinase/signal transducer, and the activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) cascades [70].
In the following paragraphs, we will pay particular attention to the role of IR isoforms, especially IR-A, and their interaction with other signaling pathways in TC initiation, progression, and maintenance.

3. Crosstalk between IR Isoforms with Other Signaling Pathways and Molecules in TCs

It is now well accepted that insulin/IR-mediated signaling relies on heterogeneous molecular networks composed of various membrane molecules and transmembrane and matrix receptors. This crosstalk contributes to modulating IR isoforms physiological functions and, when deregulated, may play an important role in pathological conditions such as diabetes, insulin-resistance, and cancer [44,72,76]. This complicated signaling network could play an important role also in thyroid tumorigenesis (Figure 1).

3.1. IR-A/DDR1 Crosstalk

Among IR-A molecular partners, we have identified the non-integrin collagen-binding tyrosine-kinase receptor DDR1. DDR1 is involved in cell adhesion and proliferation. Usually, it is expressed in tumors with invasive phenotypes, suggesting a possible role in tumor progression and metastasis [77]. The first evidence for functional crosstalk between IR signaling and DDR1 comes from a Stable Isotope Labeling by/with Amino acids in Cell culture (SILAC) proteomic analysis conducted in mouse fibroblasts overexpressing only IR-A [78]. This study identified DDR1 as a novel IR-A molecular substrate, preferentially recruited after IR-A binding to IGF-2 compared to insulin [78]. Thereafter, in human breast cancer cells, we confirmed that DDR1 is a signaling partner of IR-A [79]. Indeed, DDR1 was able to physically associate and co-localize with IR-A after insulin or IGF-2 exposure. In turn, exposure to IGFs induced DDR1 protein up-regulation through a PI3-K/AKT/miR199-5p circuit which was able to modulate IGFs biological responses [80]. DDR1 specific silencing reduced breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and the activation of IR downstream signaling. Furthermore, DDR1 knock-down markedly inhibited IR protein and mRNA expression through both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms, while DDR1 overexpression elicited the opposite effects. Similar results were obtained in mouse fibroblasts lacking IGF-1R and transfected with IR-A and DDR1 [81], in SKUT 1 myosarcoma cells [81], and in TC cells [82]. All these findings suggest that this functional crosstalk between IR signaling and DDR1 could be a general mechanism contributing to IR signaling diversification in several types of cancers, including TC [79].
Therefore, in TC cells or precursors overexpressing IR-A and showing over-activated IR-A/IGF2 loops, the functional crosstalk between IR-A and DDR1 may be important in modulating the biological response to insulin and IGF2, or to regulate stem-like features. Interestingly, the inhibition of this network may potentially provide a new opportunity to selectively inhibit unwanted mitogenic IR-A mediated effects without affecting IR-B metabolic functions.

3.2. IR/IGF-1R Interaction

The existence of physical and functional crosstalk between IR isoforms and the homolog receptor IGF-1R was proven by the observation that in cells and tissues overexpressing both receptors, such as breast tumors and TCs, IR may heterodimerize with IGF-1R leading to the formation of HRs. HRs behave more similarly to IGF-1R than to IR as they show a high binding affinity for IGF-1 but not for insulin [83]. Both IR-A and IR-B isoforms may randomly combine with IGF-1R (HR-A and HR-B) with the same efficiency [74]. Therefore, the content of hybrids containing IR-A or IR-B correlates to their relative expression. In TCs, especially poorly-differentiated histotypes and in TC progenitor cells, where IGF-1R is overexpressed and IR is mainly present as isoform A, it is reasonable to expect a high content of HR-A. This latter receptor binds with high affinity to IGF-1 and IGF-2, and with lower affinity to insulin, in contrast to HR-B, which behaves as a selective receptor for IGF-1 [74]. These differences in ligand availability and binding capacities confer to each HR different functional features, and may give rise to different biological responses. Indeed, HR-A, but not HR-B, mediates post-receptor signaling and biological effects, such as migration and cell proliferation, stimulated by both insulin and IGFs. Furthermore, the hybrid containing IR-A, and not IR-B, exclusively activates the IGF-1R phosphorylation cascade and IGF-1R-mediated biological functions also after insulin binding [74]. Therefore, the signaling pathway mediated by HRs is unique and differentially activated in a tissue-specific manner and in particular pathological conditions such as hyperinsulinemia. In summary, in TC, the increased expression of IR-A and IGF-1R represents a mechanism to over-activate the biological effects stimulated by insulin, IGF-1, and IGF-2, to induce diversification of the signaling mediated by IR-A homodimers, and to favor the crosstalk between IR-A and IGF-1R, thereby giving a selective growth advantage to TC cells.

3.3. IR Crosstalk with Met

The oncogene Met is a trans-membrane tyrosine kinase receptor with a high affinity for the HGF. Met is overexpressed and activated in several human malignancies including PTCs, where it has been found to be deregulated in approximately 70% of tumors, and has been proposed as a negative prognostic factor [84,85]. In PTCs, Met may regulate HGF-mediated biological effects such as survival, morphogenesis, angiogenesis, cell adhesion, and invasive growth. Met may also affect the tumor microenvironment by modulating inflammatory cells, tumor-associated fibroblasts, blood vessels, and extracellular matrices (ECMs) [86].
A cooperation between IR and Met was originally demonstrated in hepatocytes, where IR/Met interaction involves preferentially IR-B and controls liver glucose metabolism [87]. However, IR/Met cooperation has been also described in several human malignancies, including PTCs [88,89,90], which overexpress Met, IR (preferentially as isoform A), and the corresponding ligands. In these cancers, it is possible that the crosstalk between IR and Met not only leads to the physical formation of IR/Met hybrid receptors, but also induces the simultaneous activation of both IR and Met-downstream signaling pathways involved in cell motility, growth, and morphogenesis [72]. So far, no studies have been performed to investigate whether both IR isoforms are equally able to combine with Met. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that the involvement of one or the other IR isoforms in the crosstalk with Met is dependent on IR isoform expression levels in a given tissue rather than on IR isoforms specific properties [87,88]. For example, in TCs, which overexpress IR-A, it is possible to suppose that the hybrid formation with Met involves preferentially this “more mitogenic” IR variant. Therefore, it is possible that in this tumor, IR-A/Met hybrids, amplifying the biological response to HGF and insulin/IGFs, may contribute to cancer progression, chemotaxis, and haptotaxis [86]. Interestingly, an important relationship between the Met and AKT pathway has been described in TC stem cells derived from aggressive histotypes, where an increased phosphorylation status of both Met and AKT confer motile and metastatic features [91]. These findings further support a role for targeting Met/IR signaling interactions as a valid therapeutic option to treat invasive and aggressive TC. However, further studies are necessary to better clarify the biological significance and implications of IRA-Met interaction in TC.

4. Role of Insulin and IRA/IGF2 Loop in TC Cells and Stem Cells Biology

As previously mentioned, it has already been demonstrated that human TCs often overexpress IR-A [16,19,70]. In TC cells, IR-A may be activated by the autocrine production of IGF-2. Alternatively, the cancer-associated stromal cells, located in the tumor microenvironment, can produce IGF-2, thus activating IR-A in a paracrine way. The activated IGF-2/IR-A loop has been associated with tumor aggressiveness, loss of differentiation [70], and the acquisition of a stem-like phenotype [20]. Indeed, TC cells under specific culture conditions in vitro may form thyrospheres enriched with stem/progenitor cells, which are strongly positive for several stem cell markers such as Octamer-binding transcription factor-4 (Oct-4), ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2), CD-133, CD-44, and Homeobox protein NANOG (Nanog). Thyrospheres also have the ability to self-renew, giving rise to a new generation of spheres. In addition, under proper conditions, they can re-differentiate into cells with strong expression of the specific thyroid differentiation markers such as Tg, TPO, TSH-R, Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 (TTF-1), and PAX-8. Compared to thyrospheres obtained from normal thyroid tissue, cancer thyrospheres express higher levels of stemness markers and almost absent levels of thyroid differentiation markers. In addition, thyrospheres derived from PDTCs exhibit high levels of IR/IGF-1R, in terms of both transcripts and proteins, and have a high relative expression of IR-A. In particular, we found that IR-A relative expression ranged 65–86% in cancer thyrospheres, 50–65% in normal thyrospheres, and 40–45% in normal thyroid primary cultures or differentiated sphere-derived thyrocytes. Moreover, poorly-differentiated cancer thyrospheres produce a high amount of both IGF-1 and IGF-2. This latter growth factor has a role in cancer progenitors’ biology due to its ability to activate high expression of IR-A and IGF-1R. Specifically, IGF-2 stimulates the self-renewal properties of the thyroid precursors, thus favoring cancer thyrosphere expansion. Interestingly, the IGF-2 production decreases under cell differentiation culture conditions [20].
The IGF system analysis of cancer thyrospheres is further complicated by the possibility of the generation of IR/IGF-1R hybrids by random assembly IR and IGF-1R hemidimers [72,92,93]. As a consequence, hybrids formed by IR-A dimers are expected to have a higher affinity for IGF-2, thus further increasing the tumor progression abilities of the TC progenitors.
Overall, these data suggest that the IR-A/IGF2 pathway plays a critical role in self-renewal and proliferation of TC stem/progenitor cells, and that a high IR-A:IR-B ratio is a feature of stemness, while a decrease in IR-A:IR-B ratio is associated with thyroid cell differentiation. In support of these data, we have previously found that, in PDTCs, the elevated IR/IGF-1R expression and the high IR-A/IR-B ratio concur with the over-activation of the IR-A/IGF2 loop, and are associated with the acquisition of stem-like features, a more invasive phenotype, and de-differentiation [82]. So far, the molecular mechanisms by which IR-A overexpression/activation in TC are associated with cell stemness and de-differentiation remain poorly understood. Moreover, the means by which the two IR isoforms may differently regulate thyroid cell differentiation is also unclear, although it is likely that the two isoforms activate different intracellular signaling, regulating EMT and stemness, and recruiting different molecular partners [94]. These considerations have some implications. Indeed, targeting IR-A/IGF-2 activation starting from the TC precursor cells may represent a viable option for inducing a re-differentiating program in advanced and RAI-resistant TCs. However, to better potentiate conventional therapy and obtain tumor regression, we likely need at the same time to target other effectors of the network connected to IR signaling, such as those regulating the EMT process, cell stemness, and the tumor niche (Figure 2).

5. Clinical Implications and New Perspectives

Several lines of evidence support the observation that in the last few years, TC incidence has increased across all countries [1,2,3]. Although most cases of well-differentiated TC show a good prognosis, two thirds of them become resistant to current RAI therapy. RAI resistance is also a feature of ATC, which is the most aggressive TC variant.
Therefore, new therapeutic options are needed for these TC subtypes. MKI has been proposed and approved as a new re-differentiating therapy for aggressive TCs, but so far, the results have been unsatisfactory. In this scenario, combined therapies could open new perspectives for the clinical management of advanced and RAI-refractory TCs. Based on preclinical data, the insulin/IGF system is often deregulated in PDTCs and in TC stem-like precursors, which usually show increased expression of IR-A, IGF-1R, and IGF-2, and as a consequence, increased formation of hybrid HR-A and over-activation of IR-A/IGF-2 autocrine loop. The activation of this circuit is often associated with the loss of differentiation, stem-like features, tumor progression, and resistance to oncologic therapies [20]. In light of these considerations, future anti-TC strategies aiming to block IGF axis overactivation and its interactions with several components of the pathways involved in stemness and EMT programs will need now to be considered as potential new approaches to safely targeting IR-A activation and inducing a re-differentiating program in TC, without interfering with IR-B metabolic function.
Furthermore, another concept to be highlighted is that hyperinsulinemia, present in insulin-resistant conditions, may favor IR-A/IGF-2 loop activation, thereby potentiating IR-A-dependent mitogenic functions via MAPK/PI3-K/mTOR signaling activation, and worsening the prognosis of TC [4]. Yet, hyperinsulinemia by increasing the bioavailability of IGF-1 and IGF-2 may favor tumor progression and the activation of IGF-1R, IR/IGF-1R hybrids, IR-A, and their interaction with other molecular partners [79,81,95].
Based on this observation, it is reasonable to expect that healthy diet, physical activity, insulin sensitizers (i.e., metformin and PPAR-γ agonists), or inhibitors of SGLT2, could exert beneficial effects on the prevention and treatment of TC developed in insulin-resistant patients [96]. In support of this hypothesis is the observation that metformin inhibits the growth, volume, and size of the thyroid nodule [97,98,99]. Moreover, metformin reduces the effects of insulin on the growth and formation of thyrospheres obtained from undifferentiated TC cells, and potentiates the anticancer effects of doxorubicin and cisplatin [96]. However, so far, studies aimed at evaluating the efficacy of all these therapeutic options as add-on therapies for patients with TC in the context of insulin-resistance are lacking.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.V. and R.M.; writing—review and editing, V.V. and R.M.; supervision, R.M.; funding acquisition, R.M.

Funding

This work was supported by FFABR-Fondo per il Finanziamento delle attività base di ricerca, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) to R.M.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank John Milton English School of Catania for the helpful editing of the English language.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish it.

Abbreviations

TCThyroid Cancer
IGFsInsulin-like growth factors
IRInsulin Receptor
IGF-1RIGF-1 Receptor
HRHybrid receptor
HR-AHybrid receptor isoform A
HR-BHybrid receptor isoform B
DDR1Discoidin Domain Receptor 1
HGFHepatocyte Growth Factor
RAIRadioactive Iodine
MKIMultikinases Inhibitors
TSHThyroid Stimulating Hormone
TSH-RThyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor
MAPKMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
PI3-KPhosphoinositide 3-Kinase
mTORmammalian Target of Rapamycin
BRAFproto-oncogene B-Raf
RASRat sarcoma
RETREarranged during Transfection
PDTCsPoorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas
ATCsAnaplastic Thyroid Cancers
PTCsPapillary Thyroid Cancers
TCSCThyroid Cancer Stem Cells
CSCCancer Stem Celsl
ECMExtra-cellular Matrix
EMTEpithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
PKAProtein Kinase A
PKCProtein Kinase C
RTKsReceptors Tyrosine Kinase
SHCSrc Homology domain C-terminal
GαsG-protein (s) subunit alpha
GaqG-protein (q) subunit alpha
IRS1Insulin Receptor Substrate-1
AKTProtein Kinase B
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
ERKextracellular-signal-regulated kinase
p70S6Kp70S6 kinase
p90RSKp90 ribosomal S6 kinase
NFkbnuclear factor kappa-B
PTENPhosphatase and tensin homolog
TFsTranscription Factors
NTRKNeurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase
GSPGs-Protein
CEACarcinoembryonic antigen
CK34bE12Cytokeratin 34 beta E12
VEGFVascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EGFEpidermal Growth Factor
cAMPcyclic adenosine monophosphate
TPOThyroperoxidase
TgThyroglobulin
TTF-1Thyroid Transcription Factor-1
TTF-2Thyroid Transcription Factor-2
PAX-8/PPAR-γPaired-box gene 8/Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma
MEKMitogen-activated protein kinase kinase
SILACStable Isotope Labeling by/with Amino acids in Cell culture
P53Tumor suppressor p53
WntWingless-type Mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family member
HhHedgehog
JAKJanus kinase
STATSignal Transducer and Activator of Transcription
Oct-4Octamer-binding transcription factor-4
ABCG2ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2
NanogHomeobox protein NANOG
PI3KCAphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha

References

  1. Hundahl, S.A.; Fleming, I.D.; Fremgen, A.M.; Menck, H.R. A national cancer data base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985–1995. Cancer 1998, 83, 2638–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pathak, K.A.; Leslie, W.D.; Klonisch, T.C.; Nason, R.W. The changing face of thyroid cancer in a population-based cohort. Cancer Med. 2013, 2, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Roman, B.R.; Morris, L.G.; Davies, L. The thyroid cancer epidemic, 2017 perspective. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2017, 24, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Malaguarnera, R.; Vella, V.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Belfiore, A. Insulin resistance: Any role in the changing epidemiology of thyroid cancer? Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sciacca, L.; Vella, V.; Frittitta, L.; Tumminia, A.; Manzella, L.; Squatrito, S.; Belfiore, A.; Vigneri, R. Long-acting insulin analogs and cancer. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 28, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sciacca, L.; Cassarino, M.F.; Genua, M.; Vigneri, P.; Giovanna Pennisi, M.; Malandrino, P.; Squatrito, S.; Pezzino, V.; Vigneri, R. Biological effects of insulin and its analogs on cancer cells with different insulin family receptor expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 2014, 229, 1817–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sciacca, L.; Le Moli, R.; Vigneri, R. Insulin analogs and cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2012, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tavarelli, M.; Malandrino, P.; Vigneri, P.; Richiusa, P.; Maniglia, A.; Violi, M.A.; Sapuppo, G.; Vella, V.; Dardanoni, G.; Vigneri, R.; et al. Anaplastic thyroid cancer in sicily: The role of environmental characteristics. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Malaguarnera, R.; Vella, V.; Pellegriti, G.; Belfiore, A. Editorial: Clinical and molecular epidemiology of thyroid cancer of follicular origin. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The american thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Narayanan, S.; Colevas, A.D. Current standards in treatment of radioiodine refractory thyroid cancer. Curr. Treat. Opt. Oncol. 2016, 17, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ciavardelli, D.; Bellomo, M.; Consalvo, A.; Crescimanno, C.; Vella, V. Metabolic alterations of thyroid cancer as potential therapeutic targets. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 2545031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kondo, T.; Ezzat, S.; Asa, S.L. Pathogenetic mechanisms in thyroid follicular-cell neoplasia. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 292–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. He, G.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, X.; Gong, R. Prognostic value of the BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 7, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nozhat, Z.; Hedayati, M. PI3K/AKT pathway and its mediators in thyroid carcinomas. Mol. Diagnosis Ther. 2016, 20, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vella, V.; Pandini, G.; Sciacca, L.; Mineo, R.; Vigneri, R.; Pezzino, V.; Belfiore, A. A novel autocrine loop involving IGF-II and the insulin receptor isoform-A stimulates growth of thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Avnet, S.; Perut, F.; Salerno, M.; Sciacca, L.; Baldini, N. Insulin receptor isoforms are differently expressed during human osteoblastogenesis. Diff. Res. Biol. Diversi. 2012, 83, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Frasca, F.; Pandini, G.; Scalia, P.; Sciacca, L.; Mineo, R.; Costantino, A.; Goldfine, I.D.; Belfiore, A.; Vigneri, R. Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 3278–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Malaguarnera, R.; Belfiore, A. The insulin receptor: A new target for cancer therapy. Front. Endocrinol. 2011, 2, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Malaguarnera, R.; Frasca, F.; Garozzo, A.; Giani, F.; Pandini, G.; Vella, V.; Vigneri, R.; Belfiore, A. Insulin receptor isoforms and insulin-like growth factor receptor in human follicular cell precursors from papillary thyroid cancer and normal thyroid. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Malaguarnera, R.; Morcavallo, A.; Giuliano, S.; Belfiore, A. Thyroid cancer development and progression: Emerging role of cancer stem cells. Miner. Endocrinol. 2012, 37, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sciacca, L.; Costantino, A.; Pandini, G.; Mineo, R.; Frasca, F.; Scalia, P.; Sbraccia, P.; Goldfine, I.D.; Vigneri, R.; Belfiore, A. Insulin receptor activation by IGF-II in breast cancers: Evidence for a new autocrine/paracrine mechanism. Oncogene 1999, 18, 2471–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ito, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Ito, K.; Imai, T.; Okamoto, T.; Kitano, H.; Sugitani, I.; Sugino, K.; Tsutsui, H.; Hara, H.; et al. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors to treat radioiodine-refracted, metastatic, or recurred and progressive differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Endocr. J. 2016, 63, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chakravarty, D.; Santos, E.; Ryder, M.; Knauf, J.A.; Liao, X.H.; West, B.L.; Bollag, G.; Kolesnick, R.; Thin, T.H.; Rosen, N.; et al. Small-molecule MAPK inhibitors restore radioiodine incorporation in mouse thyroid cancers with conditional BRAF activation. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 4700–4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ho, A.L.; Grewal, R.K.; Leboeuf, R.; Sherman, E.J.; Pfister, D.G.; Deandreis, D.; Pentlow, K.S.; Zanzonico, P.B.; Haque, S.; Gavane, S.; et al. Selumetinib-enhanced radioiodine uptake in advanced thyroid cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vella, V.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Giuliano, S.; Bellomo, M.; Belfiore, A.; Malaguarnera, R. PPAR-gamma agonists as antineoplastic agents in cancers with dysregulated IGF axis. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tiedje, V.; Stuschke, M.; Weber, F.; Dralle, H.; Moss, L.; Fuhrer, D. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Review of treatment protocols. Endoc.-Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R153–R161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Acquaviva, G.; Visani, M.; Repaci, A.; Rhoden, K.J.; de Biase, D.; Pession, A.; Giovanni, T. Molecular pathology of thyroid tumours of follicular cells: A review of genetic alterations and their clinicopathological relevance. Histopathology 2018, 72, 6–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Malaguarnera, R.; Vella, V.; Vigneri, R.; Frasca, F. P53 family proteins in thyroid cancer. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2007, 14, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Malaguarnera, R.; Vella, V.; Pandini, G.; Sanfilippo, M.; Pezzino, V.; Vigneri, R.; Frasca, F. TAp73 alpha increases p53 tumor suppressor activity in thyroid cancer cells via the inhibition of Mdm2-mediated degradation. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2008, 6, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Malaguarnera, R.; Mandarino, A.; Mazzon, E.; Vella, V.; Gangemi, P.; Vancheri, C.; Vigneri, P.; Aloisi, A.; Vigneri, R.; Frasca, F. The p53-homologue p63 may promote thyroid cancer progression. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2005, 12, 953–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Frasca, F.; Vella, V.; Aloisi, A.; Mandarino, A.; Mazzon, E.; Vigneri, R.; Vigneri, P. P73 tumor-suppressor activity is impaired in human thyroid cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 5829–5837. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Vella, V.; Zhu, J.; Frasca, F.; Li, C.Y.; Vigneri, P.; Vigneri, R.; Wang, J.Y. Exclusion of c-Abl from the nucleus restrains the p73 tumor suppression function. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25151–25157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vella, V.; Puppin, C.; Damante, G.; Vigneri, R.; Sanfilippo, M.; Vigneri, P.; Tell, G.; Frasca, F. DeltaNp73alpha inhibits PTEN expression in thyroid cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 2539–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nagayama, Y.; Shimamura, M.; Mitsutake, N. Cancer stem cells in the thyroid. Front. Endocrinol. 2016, 7, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zane, M.; Scavo, E.; Catalano, V.; Bonanno, M.; Todaro, M.; De Maria, R.; Stassi, G. Normal vs cancer thyroid stem cells: The road to transformation. Oncogene 2016, 35, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ciavardelli, D.; Bellomo, M.; Crescimanno, C.; Vella, V. Type 3 deiodinase: Role in cancer growth, stemness, and metabolism. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bhatia, P.; Tsumagari, K.; Abd Elmageed, Z.Y.; Friedlander, P.; Buell, J.F.; Kandil, E. Stem cell biology in thyroid cancer: Insights for novel therapies. World J. Stem Cells 2014, 6, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Srbecka, K.; Michalova, K.; Curcikova, R.; Michal, M., Jr.; Dubova, M.; Svajdler, M.; Michal, M.; Daum, O. Spectrum of lesions derived from branchial arches occurring in the thyroid: From solid cell nests to tumors. Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol. 2017, 471, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Manzoni, M.; Roversi, G.; Di Bella, C.; Pincelli, A.I.; Cimino, V.; Perotti, M.; Garancini, M.; Pagni, F. Solid cell nests of the thyroid gland: Morphological, immunohistochemical and genetic features. Histopathology 2016, 68, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kimura, T.; Van Keymeulen, A.; Golstein, J.; Fusco, A.; Dumont, J.E.; Roger, P.P. Regulation of thyroid cell proliferation by tsh and other factors: A critical evaluation of in vitro models. Endocr. Rev. 2001, 22, 631–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hoffmann, S.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Scharrenbach, V.; Wunderlich, A.; Hassan, I.; Lingelbach, S.; Zielke, A. Thyrotropin (TSH)-induced production of vascular endothelial growth factor in thyroid cancer cells in vitro: Evaluation of TSH signal transduction and of angiogenesis-stimulating growth factors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 6139–6145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pietrzik, C.U.; Hoffmann, J.; Stober, K.; Chen, C.Y.; Bauer, C.; Otero, D.A.; Roch, J.M.; Herzog, V. From differentiation to proliferation: The secretory amyloid precursor protein as a local mediator of growth in thyroid epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 1770–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Malaguarnera, R.; Morcavallo, A.; Belfiore, A. The insulin and IGF-I pathway in endocrine glands carcinogenesis. J. Oncol. 2012, 2012, 635614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Medina, D.L.; Suzuki, K.; Pietrarelli, M.; Okajima, F.; Kohn, L.D.; Santisteban, P. Role of insulin and serum on thyrotropin regulation of thyroid transcription factor-1 and pax-8 genes expression in FRTL-5 thyroid cells. Thyroid 2000, 10, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fiore, E.; Rago, T.; Provenzale, M.A.; Scutari, M.; Ugolini, C.; Basolo, F.; Di Coscio, G.; Berti, P.; Grasso, L.; Elisei, R.; et al. Lower levels of TSH are associated with a lower risk of papillary thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodular disease: Thyroid autonomy may play a protective role. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2009, 16, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Haymart, M.R.; Repplinger, D.J.; Leverson, G.E.; Elson, D.F.; Sippel, R.S.; Jaume, J.C.; Chen, H. Higher serum thyroid stimulating hormone level in thyroid nodule patients is associated with greater risks of differentiated thyroid cancer and advanced tumor stage. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Franco, A.T.; Malaguarnera, R.; Refetoff, S.; Liao, X.H.; Lundsmith, E.; Kimura, S.; Pritchard, C.; Marais, R.; Davies, T.F.; Weinstein, L.S.; et al. Thyrotrophin receptor signaling dependence of BRAF-induced thyroid tumor initiation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1615–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. De Felice, M.; Postiglione, M.P.; Di Lauro, R. Minireview: Thyrotropin receptor signaling in development and differentiation of the thyroid gland: Insights from mouse models and human diseases. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 4062–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Garcia-Jimenez, C.; Santisteban, P. TSH signalling and cancer. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2007, 51, 654–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. DeLellis, R.A. Pathology and genetics of thyroid carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006, 94, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nikiforov, Y.E. Thyroid carcinoma: Molecular pathways and therapeutic targets. Mod. Pathol. 2008, 21 (Suppl. S2), S37–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nikiforov, Y.E.; Nikiforova, M.N. Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Frasca, F.; Vella, V.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Messina, R.L.; Giani, F.; Lotta, S.; Vigneri, P.; Regalbuto, C.; Vigneri, R. Thyroid cancer cell resistance to gefitinib depends on the constitutive oncogenic activation of the ERK pathway. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 2502–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cass, L.A.; Summers, S.A.; Prendergast, G.V.; Backer, J.M.; Birnbaum, M.J.; Meinkoth, J.L. Protein kinase a-dependent and -independent signaling pathways contribute to cyclic AMP-stimulated proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 5882–5891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Coulonval, K.; Vandeput, F.; Stein, R.C.; Kozma, S.C.; Lamy, F.; Dumont, J.E. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein kinase B and ribosomal S6 kinases in the stimulation of thyroid epithelial cell proliferation by camp and growth factors in the presence of insulin. Biochem. J. 2000, 348 Pt 2, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gimm, O.; Attie-Bitach, T.; Lees, J.A.; Vekemans, M.; Eng, C. Expression of the PTEN tumour suppressor protein during human development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 1633–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ricarte-Filho, J.C.; Ryder, M.; Chitale, D.A.; Rivera, M.; Heguy, A.; Ladanyi, M.; Janakiraman, M.; Solit, D.; Knauf, J.A.; Tuttle, R.M.; et al. Mutational profile of advanced primary and metastatic radioactive iodine-refractory thyroid cancers reveals distinct pathogenetic roles for BRAF, PIK3CA, and AKT1. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4885–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jin, S.; Borkhuu, O.; Bao, W.; Yang, Y.T. Signaling pathways in thyroid cancer and their therapeutic implications. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2016, 8, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Giguere, V. Canonical signaling and nuclear activity of mTOR-a teamwork effort to regulate metabolism and cell growth. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 1572–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Tee, A.R. The target of rapamycin and mechanisms of cell growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Brewer, C.; Yeager, N.; Di Cristofano, A. Thyroid-stimulating hormone initiated proliferative signals converge in vivo on the mTOR kinase without activating AKT. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 8002–8006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Paquette, M.; El-Houjeiri, L.; Pause, A. Mtor pathways in cancer and autophagy. Cancers 2018, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rocha, A.S.; Paternot, S.; Coulonval, K.; Dumont, J.E.; Soares, P.; Roger, P.P. Cyclic AMP inhibits the proliferation of thyroid carcinoma cell lines through regulation of CDK4 phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19, 4814–4825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Malaguarnera, R.; Chen, K.Y.; Kim, T.Y.; Dominguez, J.M.; Voza, F.; Ouyang, B.; Vundavalli, S.K.; Knauf, J.A.; Fagin, J.A. Switch in signaling control of mtorc1 activity after oncoprotein expression in thyroid cancer cell lines. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, E1976–E1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dumont, J.E.; Lamy, F.; Roger, P.; Maenhaut, C. Physiological and pathological regulation of thyroid cell proliferation and differentiation by thyrotropin and other factors. Physiol. Rev. 1992, 72, 667–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Santisteban, P.; Acebron, A.; Polycarpou-Schwarz, M.; Di Lauro, R. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I regulate a thyroid-specific nuclear protein that binds to the thyroglobulin promoter. Mol. Endocrinol. 1992, 6, 1310–1317. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Milazzo, G.; La Rosa, G.L.; Catalfamo, R.; Vigneri, R.; Belfiore, A. Effect of TSH in human thyroid cells: Evidence for both mitogenic and antimitogenic effects. J. Cell. Biochem. 1992, 49, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. van der Laan, B.F.; Freeman, J.L.; Asa, S.L. Expression of growth factors and growth factor receptors in normal and tumorous human thyroid tissues. Thyroid 1995, 5, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Vella, V.; Sciacca, L.; Pandini, G.; Mineo, R.; Squatrito, S.; Vigneri, R.; Belfiore, A. The IGF system in thyroid cancer: New concepts. Mol. Pathol. 2001, 54, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Belfiore, A.; Malaguarnera, R.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Lappano, R.; Ragusa, M.; Morrione, A.; Vella, V. A novel functional crosstalk between DDR1 and the IGF axis and its relevance for breast cancer. Cell Adh. Migr. 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Belfiore, A.; Malaguarnera, R.; Vella, V.; Lawrence, M.C.; Sciacca, L.; Frasca, F.; Morrione, A.; Vigneri, R. Insulin receptor isoforms in physiology and disease: An updated view. Endocr. Rev. 2017, 38, 379–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Giani, F.; Vella, V.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Fierabracci, A.; Lotta, S.; Malaguarnera, R.; Belfiore, A.; Vigneri, R.; Frasca, F. Thyrospheres from normal or malignant thyroid tissue have different biological, functional, and genetic features. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E1168–E1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pandini, G.; Frasca, F.; Mineo, R.; Sciacca, L.; Vigneri, R.; Belfiore, A. Insulin/insulin-like growth factor I hybrid receptors have different biological characteristics depending on the insulin receptor isoform involved. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39684–39695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, Y.J.; Qiang, W.; Shi, J.; Lv, S.Q.; Ji, M.J.; Shi, B.Y. Expression and significance of IGF-1 and IGF-1R in thyroid nodules. Endocrine 2013, 44, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. De Marco, P.; Cirillo, F.; Vivacqua, A.; Malaguarnera, R.; Belfiore, A.; Maggiolini, M. Novel aspects concerning the functional cross-talk between the insulin/IGF-I system and estrogen signaling in cancer cells. Front. Endocrinol. 2015, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rammal, H.; Saby, C.; Magnien, K.; Van-Gulick, L.; Garnotel, R.; Buache, E.; El Btaouri, H.; Jeannesson, P.; Morjani, H. Discoidin domain receptors: Potential actors and targets in cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Morcavallo, A.; Genua, M.; Palummo, A.; Kletvikova, E.; Jiracek, J.; Brzozowski, A.M.; Iozzo, R.V.; Belfiore, A.; Morrione, A. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor II differentially regulate endocytic sorting and stability of insulin receptor isoform A. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 11422–11436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Vella, V.; Malaguarnera, R.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Palladino, C.; Spoleti, C.; Massimino, M.; Vigneri, P.; Purrello, M.; Ragusa, M.; Morrione, A.; et al. Discoidin domain receptor 1 modulates insulin receptor signaling and biological responses in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 43248–43270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Mata, R.; Palladino, C.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Lo Presti, A.R.; Malaguarnera, R.; Ragusa, M.; Sciortino, D.; Morrione, A.; Maggiolini, M.; Vella, V.; et al. IGF-I induces upregulation of DDR1 collagen receptor in breast cancer cells by suppressing mir-199a-5p through the PI3K/AKT pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 7683–7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Malaguarnera, R.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Sacco, A.; Morcavallo, A.; Vella, V.; Voci, C.; Spatuzza, M.; Xu, S.Q.; Iozzo, R.V.; Vigneri, R.; et al. Novel cross talk between IGF-IR and DDR1 regulates IGF-IR trafficking, signaling and biological responses. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 16084–16105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Vella, V.; Nicolosi, M.L.; Cantafio, P.; Massimino, M.; Lappano, R.; Vigneri, P.; Ciuni, R.; Gangemi, P.; Morrione, A.; Malaguarnera, R.; et al. DDR1 regulates thyroid cancer cell differentiation via IGF-2/IR-A autocrine signaling loop. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2018. [Google Scholar]
  83. Soos, M.A.; Field, C.E.; Siddle, K. Purified hybrid insulin/insulin-like growth factor-I receptors bind insulin-like growth factor-I, but not insulin, with high affinity. Biochem. J. 1993, 290, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Belfiore, A.; Gangemi, P.; Costantino, A.; Russo, G.; Santonocito, G.M.; Ippolito, O.; Di Renzo, M.F.; Comoglio, P.; Fiumara, A.; Vigneri, R. Negative/low expression of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor identifies papillary thyroid carcinomas with high risk of distant metastases. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 2322–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mineo, R.; Costantino, A.; Frasca, F.; Sciacca, L.; Russo, S.; Vigneri, R.; Belfiore, A. Activation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-Met system in papillary thyroid cancer: Biological effects of HGF in thyroid cancer cells depend on Met expression levels. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 4355–4365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ruco, L.; Scarpino, S. The pathogenetic role of the HGF/c-Met system in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Biomedicines 2014, 2, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Fafalios, A.; Ma, J.; Tan, X.; Stoops, J.; Luo, J.; Defrances, M.C.; Zarnegar, R. A hepatocyte growth factor receptor (Met)-insulin receptor hybrid governs hepatic glucose metabolism. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Di Renzo, M.F.; Olivero, M.; Ferro, S.; Prat, M.; Bongarzone, I.; Pilotti, S.; Belfiore, A.; Costantino, A.; Vigneri, R.; Pierotti, M.A.; et al. Overexpression of the c-Met/HGF receptor gene in human thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene 1992, 7, 2549–2553. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Matsumoto, K.; Umitsu, M.; De Silva, D.M.; Roy, A.; Bottaro, D.P. Hepatocyte growth factor/Met in cancer progression and biomarker discovery. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, Y.; Xia, M.; Jin, K.; Wang, S.; Wei, H.; Fan, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Li, G.; et al. Function of the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase in carcinogenesis and associated therapeutic opportunities. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Todaro, M.; Iovino, F.; Eterno, V.; Cammareri, P.; Gambara, G.; Espina, V.; Gulotta, G.; Dieli, F.; Giordano, S.; De Maria, R.; et al. Tumorigenic and metastatic activity of human thyroid cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 8874–8885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Belfiore, A.; Frasca, F.; Pandini, G.; Sciacca, L.; Vigneri, R. Insulin receptor isoforms and insulin receptor/insulin-like growth factor receptor hybrids in physiology and disease. Endocr. Rev. 2009, 30, 586–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Belfiore, A.; Pandini, G.; Vella, V.; Squatrito, S.; Vigneri, R. Insulin/IGF-I hybrid receptors play a major role in IGF-I signaling in thyroid cancer. Biochimie 1999, 81, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Leibiger, B.; Leibiger, I.B.; Moede, T.; Kemper, S.; Kulkarni, R.N.; Kahn, C.R.; de Vargas, L.M.; Berggren, P.O. Selective insulin signaling through A and B insulin receptors regulates transcription of insulin and glucokinase genes in pancreatic beta cells. Mol. Cell. 2001, 7, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Belfiore, A.; Malaguarnera, R. Insulin receptor and cancer. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2011, 18, R125–R147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, G.; Xu, S.; Renko, K.; Derwahl, M. Metformin inhibits growth of thyroid carcinoma cells, suppresses self-renewal of derived cancer stem cells, and potentiates the effect of chemotherapeutic agents. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E510–E520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Anil, C.; Kut, A.; Atesagaoglu, B.; Nar, A.; Bascil Tutuncu, N.; Gursoy, A. Metformin decreases thyroid volume and nodule size in subjects with insulin resistance: A preliminary study. Med. Princ. Pract. 2016, 25, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Karimifar, M.; Aminorroaya, A.; Amini, M.; Mirfendereski, T.; Iraj, B.; Feizi, A.; Norozi, A. Effect of metformin on thyroid stimulating hormone and thyroid volume in patients with prediabetes: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Rezzonico, J.; Rezzonico, M.; Pusiol, E.; Pitoia, F.; Niepomniszcze, H. Metformin treatment for small benign thyroid nodules in patients with insulin resistance. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2011, 9, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 03814 g001 550
Figure 1. A simplified representation showing the interplay between the major signaling cascades activated by tyrosine kinase receptors (RTKs) and TSH-Receptor (TSH-R). Activation of TSH-R on the cell surface by TSH results in the activation of two major classes of G proteins, namely Gαq and Gαs. Gαs, through the second messenger, cAMP, activates the major signaling pathway PKA/Mek/Erk. In addition, PKA may directly stimulate transcription factors in the nucleus, resulting in the activation of target genes involved in thyroid follicular cells function, growth, and survival. Gαq activates the signaling cascades PKC/Ras/Raf/ERK/p90RSK, PI3-K/AKT/mTOR/p70S6k, and PKC/NFkB. RTKs (i.e., Met, IR-A, DDR1, IGF-1R and HR-A) directly or via IRSs, induce MAPK (Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk) and PI3-K/AKT/mTOR/p70S6k signaling cascades. All these pathways interact with each other, resulting in a multitude of cross-talks. MAPK and PI3-K cascades are common to both TSH-R and RTKs downstream-mediated signaling, and are represented with big arrows, as they are the major players of follicular cell proliferation.
Figure 1. A simplified representation showing the interplay between the major signaling cascades activated by tyrosine kinase receptors (RTKs) and TSH-Receptor (TSH-R). Activation of TSH-R on the cell surface by TSH results in the activation of two major classes of G proteins, namely Gαq and Gαs. Gαs, through the second messenger, cAMP, activates the major signaling pathway PKA/Mek/Erk. In addition, PKA may directly stimulate transcription factors in the nucleus, resulting in the activation of target genes involved in thyroid follicular cells function, growth, and survival. Gαq activates the signaling cascades PKC/Ras/Raf/ERK/p90RSK, PI3-K/AKT/mTOR/p70S6k, and PKC/NFkB. RTKs (i.e., Met, IR-A, DDR1, IGF-1R and HR-A) directly or via IRSs, induce MAPK (Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk) and PI3-K/AKT/mTOR/p70S6k signaling cascades. All these pathways interact with each other, resulting in a multitude of cross-talks. MAPK and PI3-K cascades are common to both TSH-R and RTKs downstream-mediated signaling, and are represented with big arrows, as they are the major players of follicular cell proliferation.
Ijms 19 03814 g001
Ijms 19 03814 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of possible therapeutic strategies targeting thyroid cancer initiating progenitor cells to eradicate TC. Thyroid cancer stem cells (TCSC) are considered to be responsible of TC initiation, progression, therapeutic resistance, and recurrence. Conventional therapy fails to destroy these cells, contributing to tumor relapse and metastases. TCSC-focused therapies may include strategies aiming to inhibit IR-A/IGF2 overexpression and activation, IR-A-mediated mitogenic signals, the crosstalk between IR-A and other molecular partners, signaling pathways regulating survival, stemness, EMT programs, and the tumor niche. This strategy combined with conventional therapy could allow us to eradicate tumor cells and obtain complete remission.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of possible therapeutic strategies targeting thyroid cancer initiating progenitor cells to eradicate TC. Thyroid cancer stem cells (TCSC) are considered to be responsible of TC initiation, progression, therapeutic resistance, and recurrence. Conventional therapy fails to destroy these cells, contributing to tumor relapse and metastases. TCSC-focused therapies may include strategies aiming to inhibit IR-A/IGF2 overexpression and activation, IR-A-mediated mitogenic signals, the crosstalk between IR-A and other molecular partners, signaling pathways regulating survival, stemness, EMT programs, and the tumor niche. This strategy combined with conventional therapy could allow us to eradicate tumor cells and obtain complete remission.
Ijms 19 03814 g002
Table
Table 1. Molecular abnormalities and deregulated signaling pathways involved in TC.
Table 1. Molecular abnormalities and deregulated signaling pathways involved in TC.
Signaling PathwayResearch FindingsReferences
TSH-RTSH stimulates the production of other growth factors (VEGF, amyloid precursors)[42,43]
TSH/cAMP cooperates with insulin and IGF-1 to regulate thyroid cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and the expression of Tg, TTF-1 and TSH-R mRNA levels[41,45,49]
Serum TSH levels directly correlate to TC incidence in patients with thyroid nodules[46,47]
TSH cooperates with oncogenic BRAF to induce thyroid tumorigenesis, partially via cAMP[48]
MAPKMAPK is activated as a consequence of aberrant expression of proto-oncogenes such as Ret, NTRK, RAS and BRAF[51,52]
RET/PTC rearrangement is present in 5–30% of PTCs[53]
Ras mutations and PAX-8/PPAR-γ translocation are present in PTCs follicular variant[53]
BRAF is mutated in 35–60% of PTCs[53]
BRAF mutation and p53 alterations have been found in ATCs[53]
PI3-K/AKT/PTENSeveral growth factors such as insulin/IGF-1, EGF, HGF activate PI3-K/AKT/PTEN signaling pathway[41]
PI3-K/AKT/PTEN signaling is essential for thyrocytes proliferation under TSH stimulation[55,56]
PTEN inactivation is present in about 40% of PDTCs and more than 50% of highly aggressive TCs[57]
Point mutations or copy number changes of PIK3CA and AKT1 have been found in ~23% of ATCs sometimes together with either RAS or BRAF mutations[58]
AKT1 activation is more evident in invasive region of TCs, in lymph nodes or distant metastasis[58]
PI3-K/AKT deregulation upregulates Wnt/β-catenin pathway, inducing de-differentiation[59]
mTOR/p70S6KTSH proliferative signaling involves mTOR kinase without activating AKT1[62]
mTOR downstream effectors are required for the mitogenic response triggered by TSH/cAMP and PI3-K on thyroid follicles[55,62]
Many TCs modify the upstream control of mTOR activity becoming cAMP/TSH independent and unresponsive to PKA control[65]
Insulin/IGF systemInsulin/IGF system contributes to generate proliferative responses mediated by TSH[41,45,66,68]
Insulin/IGF system together with cAMP, modulates the expression of TTF-2[67]
The overexpression of IGF-1, IGF-1R, IGF-2 and IR in TC cells induces cellular transformation, proliferation and apoptosis suppression[71]
Overexpression of IR-A is a feature of poorly differentiated, anaplastic or stem-like TC cells[16,19]
IGF-1R expression decreases with cancer de-differentiation[72]
IGF-2/IR-A loop exerts a more important role than the IGF-1/IGF-1R loop in thyroid cells de-differentiation, stemness, tumor progression and metastasis[73]
HRs (likely HR-A) are present both in well differentiated and in poorly differentiated/undifferentiated PTCs[18,75]
HRs affect cancer responses to both insulin and IGFs[18,74]
Insulin/IGF system crosstalks with other pro-mitogenic signaling pathways such as MAPK, PI3-K, JAK/STAT cascades[70]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vella, V.; Malaguarnera, R. The Emerging Role of Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Implications and New Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123814

AMA Style

Vella V, Malaguarnera R. The Emerging Role of Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Implications and New Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(12):3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123814

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vella, Veronica, and Roberta Malaguarnera. 2018. "The Emerging Role of Insulin Receptor Isoforms in Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Implications and New Perspectives" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 12: 3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123814

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop