Next Article in Journal
Low-Resolution Models for the Interaction Dynamics of Coated Gold Nanoparticles with β2-microglobulin
Previous Article in Journal
A New Approach for Spontaneous Silver Ions Immobilization onto Casein
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms20163867
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Sugarcane Host Factors Interacting with the 6K2 Protein of the Sugarcane Mosaic Virus

by
Hai Zhang
1,
Guangyuan Cheng
1,
Zongtao Yang
1,
Tong Wang
1 and
Jingsheng Xu
1,2,*
1
National Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Protection and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(16), 3867; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163867
Submission received: 22 July 2019 / Revised: 3 August 2019 / Accepted: 6 August 2019 / Published: 8 August 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The 6K2 protein of potyviruses plays a key role in the viral infection in plants. In the present study, the coding sequence of 6K2 was cloned from Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) strain FZ1 into pBT3-STE to generate the plasmid pBT3-STE-6K2, which was used as bait to screen a cDNA library prepared from sugarcane plants infected with SCMV based on the DUALmembrane system. One hundred and fifty-seven positive colonies were screened and sequenced, and the corresponding full-length genes were cloned from sugarcane cultivar ROC22. Then, 24 genes with annotations were obtained, and the deduced proteins were classified into three groups, in which eight proteins were involved in the stress response, 12 proteins were involved in transport, and four proteins were involved in photosynthesis based on their biological functions. Of the 24 proteins, 20 proteins were verified to interact with SCMV-6K2 by yeast two-hybrid assays. The possible roles of these proteins in SCMV infection on sugarcane are analyzed and discussed. This is the first report on the interaction of SCMV-6K2 with host factors from sugarcane, and will improve knowledge on the mechanism of SCMV infection in sugarcane.

1. Introduction

Potyviruses, which account for 30% of known plant viruses, include many agriculturally important viruses, e.g., Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), Turnip mosaic virus, Tobacco etch virus, and Potato virus Y [1,2]. The genomes of Potyvirus members consist of single-stranded, positive-sense RNAs of approximately 10,000 nucleotides that encode two polyproteins, which are self-cleaved into 11 mature proteins, which are P1, HC-Pro, P3, P3N-PIPO, 6K1, CI, 6K2, VPg, NIa-Pro, NIb, and CP [2,3,4,5,6,7]. To establish systemic infection on host plants, potyviruses have to employ the 11 functional proteins to interact with host factors and interplay with the cellular pathways [8].
The replication and intra/intercellular movement of the viral genome are key steps for the potyvirus to establish a systemic infection on host plants, in which 6K2 plays important roles. In the early stage of potyviral infection, 6K2 localizes to and remodels the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane into convolutional structures, which mature and bud off into vesicles harboring the virus replication complex at ER exit sites in a coatomer protein I (COPI)-dependent and COPII-dependent manner [9,10,11]. These vesicles may fuse with chloroplasts for efficient replication [12]. The intracellular and intercellular movement of potyvirus is in the form of vesicles induced by 6K2 [13,14,15]. P3N-PIPO recruits CI to the plasmodesmata [5,10,14,16,17], while CI interacts with 6K2 and serves as a docking point for the intercellular movement of virus replication vesicles [14]. Besides involvement in potyviral replication and movement, 6K2 participates in the autophagy induced by potyvirus infection. 6K2 accompanied by VPg antagonizes the degradation of HC-Pro, thereby allowing potyviruses to participate in a trade-off with host antiviral autophagy [18,19].
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) is the most important sugar and energy crop worldwide. SCMV, Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV), and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus are the main pathogens that cause severe mosaic disease in sugarcane and result in heavy yield loss in the sugarcane industry. However, the mechanism of mosaic pathogen infection on sugarcane remains in its infancy. Plant viruses are too simple in structure to establish systemic infection on host plants without interaction with host factors [8]. Considering that the potyviral 6K2 protein plays a key role in viral infection [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,17,18,19], we hypothesize that SCMV-6K2 might extensively interact with sugarcane host factors. In the present study, SCMV-6K2 was used as bait to screen a cDNA library prepared from SCMV-infected sugarcane plants by using yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays to identify the interacting proteins from sugarcane. This is the first report on the identification of the sugarcane host factors interacting with SCMV-6K2, and will benefit the pathogenesis of SCMV infection in sugarcane.

2. Results

2.1. Cloning and Subcellular Localization of SCMV-6K2

The coding sequence of SCMV-6K2 was cloned from the FZ1 strain. SCMV-6K2 is 53 amino acids in length, and contains a GXXXG motif (‘X’ being any amino acid) (Figure 1A) that is vital for potyvirus infection and is needed to produce replication vesicles [20]. TMHMM analysis showed that SCMV-6K2 is an intrinsic membrane protein consisting of a central transmembrane domain (Figure 1B). To determine the subcellular localization of SCMV-6K2, SCMV-6K2-CFP was coexpressed with the ER retention signal marker mCherry-HDEL in leaf epidermal cells of N. benthamiana. The results showed that the cyan fluorescent signal of SCMV-6K2-CFP merged with the red fluorescent signal of mCherry-HDEL on ER and the fluorescence of chlorophyll, indicating the ER or chloroplast localization of SCMV-6K2, respectively (Figure 1C), which is consistent with previous studies [12,14].

2.2. Construction and Evaluation of the pBT3-6K2 Bait Vector

Using SfiI digestion, SCMV-6K2 was infused with the pBT3-STE plasmid to generate a pBT3-STE-6K2 recombinant plasmid. The yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strain NMY51 and synthetic dextrose (SD) medium SD/-Leu/-Trp (DDO) and SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/-Ade (QDO) agar plates supplemented with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D-galactoside (X-Gal) were used in this study. Yeast cells co-transformed with pBT3-STE-6K2 and pOst1-NubI gave blue colonies, which indicated no toxicity of 6K2 to yeast cells (Figure 2). Yeast cells co-transformed with pBT3-STE-6K2 and pPR3-N produced colonies on DDO+X-Gal agar plates, but did not grow on QDO+X-Gal agar plates, which indicated no auto-activation of 6K2 (Figure 2). Therefore, the pBT3-STE-6K2 bait plasmid is suitable for cDNA library screening.

2.3. Screening of the Sugarcane cDNA Library and Gene Cloning

A total of 157 yeast colonies were collected from the QDO agar plates. Yeast plasmids were extracted and individually transformed into competent E. coli DH5α cells. Seventy cDNA fragments were obtained by colony PCR detection and sequentially sequenced. Based on the sequence information, special primer pairs (Table S1) were designed to clone the corresponding full-length gene from sugarcane cv. ROC22. Homologous sequences of 29 genes were found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information or Phytozome v 12 by BLAST; however, five cDNA sequences were uncharacterized (data not shown). Therefore, the 24 genes and their putative coding proteins were used for further analysis (Table 1).
Based on the main functions, these 24 proteins were roughly classified into three categories: stress and defense response proteins, photosynthesis-related proteins, and transport-related proteins (Table 1). Eight proteins were involved in the stress and defense response. These proteins were ScH2A.2 (histone H2A.2), ScRNS4 (ribonuclease T2), ScULP5 (ubiquitin-like protein 5), ScSERINC3 (serine incorporator 3), ScVAMP727 (vesicle-associated membrane protein 727), ScTET18 (tetraspanin 18), ScPMP22 (peroxisomal membrane 22 kDa protein), and ScHSP82 (heat shock protein 82). Twelve proteins were involved in transport: aquaporins including ScPIP1; 2, ScPIP2; 7, and ScTIP1; 2, ScZIFL1 (zinc-induced facilitator-like 1), ScNCX1 (sodium/calcium exchanger 1), ScVHA-C (V-ATPase subunit C), ScSULTR3-3 (sulfate transporter 3-3), ScGONST4 (GDP-mannose transporter 4), ScPPT2 (phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator 2), ScTMEM208 (transmembrane protein 208), ScTPT (triose phosphate/phosphate translocator), and ScBGlu31 (beta-glucosidase 31). Four proteins were involved in photosynthesis: ScPsbS (photosystem II S subunit), ScPsbR (photosystem II R subunit), ScVTE3 (2-methyl-6-phytyl-1,4-hydroquinone methyltransferase), and ScCAB1 (chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1). The coding sequences of these genes were deposited into GenBank (Table 1).

2.3.1. Stress and Defense Proteins

Eight proteins involved in stress and defense responses were screened from the cDNA library. Histone ScH2A.2, ScRNS4, and ScUPL5 were found to be involved in gene expression and regulation. H2A.2 is the variant of histone H2A, which is a highly conserved component of eukaryotic chromatin along with H2B, H3, and H4. There are 13 members of H2A in Arabidopsis. H2A.2 is mainly expressed in the veins of leaves and shows a low expression level, similar to that of H2A.1, in whole plants compared with other members [51]. Members of H2A variants have been implicated in the regulation of DNA repair, transcriptional activity, recombination, and response to water stress [21,52]. RNS4, an S-like RNase, belongs to the RNaseT2 family, in which many members are associated with defense responses [53]. The homologue OsRNS4 from rice is involved in responses to many biotic and abiotic stresses such as insect attacks, wounding, and infection from Xanthomonas oryzae or Magnaporthe grisea [22]. The homologue AtRNS3 from Arabidopsis plays a key role in the biogenesis of tRNA-derived RNA fragments, which are presumed to be involved in stress responses, cell proliferation regulation, and as a primer for viral reverse transcription [54]. Homologues of RNS4 from tobacco were upregulated under the challenge of Phytophthora parasitica [55] or the tobacco mosaic virus [23]. ULP5 is a component of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), in which the members play a critical regulatory role in most cellular processes [56,57,58,59]. Different from other ubiquitins, ULP5 contains an ubiquitin super-fold with the C-terminal sequence containing of a pair of tyrosines, but not a double glycine [24]. ULP5 was shown to mediate the susceptibility to strip rust in wheat at the seedling stage, and knockdown of the ULP5 increased the expression levels of the biotic stress-related genes PR1 and PR2 [25]. The yeast HUB1, which is a homologue of ULP5, is involved in the alternative splicing of pre-messenger RNAs by ubiquitination of the spliceosome [56].
VAMP727, SERINC3, and PMP22 are involved in biotic stress. VAMP727 is an R-SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor). SNAREs are the key regulators of the control trafficking of cargo proteins to their final destinations, and play a key role in plant development. VAMP727 is involved in vacuolar protein deposition, targeting of the plasma membrane of the brassinosteroid (BR) receptor BRI1 [60], and the response to root-knot nematode infection [26]. SERINC3 belongs to the serine incorporator (SERINC) family, which comprises five members, from SERINC1 to SERINC5, that are structurally characterized by having 11 transmembrane domains. SERINC proteins are involved in the biosynthesis of sphingolipids and phosphatidylserine by incorporating serine into membrane lipids [61]. SERINC3 and SERINC5 inhibit human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection as restriction factors [27]. However, the exact function of the SERINC family in plants is still unknown. PMP22 is an integral membrane protein of peroxisomes in all organs of the mature plant, and directly inserts into peroxisomes with the N-terminal and C-terminal parts facing the cytosol [28,62]. PMP22 is important for the biogenesis and function of the peroxisome [28,62]. Some tombusviruses deploy peroxisomes to generate multivesicular bodies for viral replication, which is a biological process that usually happens on the ER or chloroplast for potyviruses [63,64]. Peroxisomes can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) to counteract viral pathogens [29,64,65].
TET18 belongs to a superfamily of small integral membrane proteins with four transmembrane domains. Most of the TETs localize to plasma membrane with several localizing to the ER [66]. There are 17 and 15 TETs in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice, respectively [66,67]. TETs interact with each other and other proteins to form TET-enriched microdomains, which are important in plants for development, reproduction, and stress responses [67,68]. Based on molecular mass, heat shock proteins can be classified into six families: Hsp100, Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp60, Hsp40, and small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) [30]. HSPs are involved in the response to a wide variety of stresses including cold, drought, salt, UV light, wound, and biotic stresses [30]. HSP82 belongs to the Hsp90 family, in which the members promote the final maturation of a selected group of proteins including protein kinases, transcription factors, nuclear steroid receptors, and regulatory proteins [69].

2.3.2. Transport-Related Proteins

Twelve transport-related proteins were screened from the cDNA library. Three aquaporins, ScPIP1; 2, ScPIP2; 7, and ScTIP1; 2, were identified. Aquaporins are highly conserved and present in all the living organisms [31]. Based on sequence similarity and subcellular localization, plant aquaporins are classified into five subfamilies: plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs), tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs), nodulin26 (Nod26)-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs), small basic intrinsic proteins (SIPs) [32,33,70], and X-intrinsic proteins (XIPs) [71,72]. The management of PIP intracellular localization appears to be an important process by which plant cells modulate the plasma membrane water permeability [73]. PIPs reach their final destination via secretory pathway trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane. PIP1; 2 and PIP2; 7 localize to the plasma membrane (PM), while TIP1; 2 localizes to the tonoplasts [32,33,70]. PIPs and TIPs are involved in the response to water stress [74,75], thereby affecting the assimilation of CO2 [76,77,78].
Three proteins involved in ion transport, ScZIFL1, ScNCX, and ScVHA-C, were screened. ZIFL1 is a transmembrane protein that belongs to the major facilitator superfamily [35]. In Arabidopsis, ZIFL1 localizes to the tonoplast, and is involved in Zn homeostasis [34], H+-coupled K+ transport, and polar auxin transport by modulating K+ and H+ fluxes [79]. The membrane-bound sodium–calcium exchanger (NCX) proteins regulate Ca2+ homeostasis in many cell types, thereby being involving in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes [80]. In rice, NCX1 contains one NCX domain and one EF-hand domain, and NCX1 was found to be highly expressed in all plant parts and at various developmental stages [36]. VHA-C (V-ATPase subunit C) is required for V-ATPase (vacuolar-type H+-ATPase) assembly and proton channel formation, and is directly responsible for the binding and transmembrane transport of protons in plant cells [81].
ScSULTR3-3, ScGONST4, ScPPT2, ScTPT, and ScBGlu31, which are involved in the transport of compounds or metabolic products, were screened. ScSULTR3-3 is a sulfur transporter (SULTR), which is a class of carrier proteins that is required for active sulfate transport [82,83]. There are five members of the SULTR3 family in Arabidopsis, and SULTR3-3 is localized to the chloroplast envelope [38]. The SULTR3 family are involved in sulfate transport into the chloroplast and influence sulfate assimilation, abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis, and sulfate-induced stomatal closure [38], thereby being involving in plant stress response [84]. ScGONST4, a GDP-mannose transporter, is a nucleotide sugar transporter that imports the nucleotide sugars synthesized in either the cytoplasm or the nucleus into the Golgi and ER lumen across the organellular membranes for glycosylation [85]. There are five members of the GDP-mannose transporter family in Arabidopsis, which are all localized to the Golgi apparatus [39]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the VRG4 protein, the homologue of GONST4, transports GDP-mannose into the Golgi for mannosylation. Mutant Candida albicans VRG4 strains have defective hyphal formation. Since the VRG4 gene is essential for yeast viability but does not have a mammalian homologue, it is a particularly attractive target for the development of antifungal therapies [86]. ScPPT2 is localized to the inner envelope membrane of both non-green plastids and chloroplasts, and it reverse exchanges phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) with inorganic phosphoric acid [40]. PPT (phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator) belongs to the family of phosphate translocators that are localized to the inner envelope membrane of both non-green plastids and chloroplasts and reverse exchanges phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) with inorganic phosphoric acid [40]. Mutants deficient in PPT2 slightly retard the growth of Arabidopsis plants [87]. TPT (triose phosphate/phosphate translocator) is localized to the chloroplast inner envelope and plays key roles in photosynthesis by catalyzing the strict 1:1 exchange of triose-phosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate, and inorganic phosphate across the chloroplast envelope [41,42]. The mutation of tpt significantly reduces the maximum rate of O2 evolution in CO2-saturated conditions in Arabidopsis plants [88]. BGlu31 is localized to the vacuole, and is involved in glucose metabolism to supply acyl and glucosyl for glycosylation in rice [43].
TMEM208 is an ER-located protein that is involved in both autophagy and ER stress [44]. TMEM208 is highly conserved among eukaryotes and represents the third pathway, i.e., the SND (SRP-independent targeting) pathway, for transporting proteins into the ER besides the SRP (Signal Recognition Particle) and GET (Guided Entry of Tail-anchored proteins) pathways [89].

2.3.3. Photosynthesis-Related Proteins

Four proteins that are directly involved in photosynthesis were screened. The PsbS monomers form dimers at a high lumen pH, whereas they stay as monomers at a low pH, thereby allowing the monomeric PsbS interacting with LHCII (light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein complex II) [45,46] to activate the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), thereby protecting the photosynthetic organisms against excess light by dissipating the excess absorbed energy into heat [90,91]. PsbR, along with PsbO, PsbP, and PsbQ, are the four extrinsic subunits of the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) protein of the PSII in higher plants [47,48]. PsbR is involved in binding PsbP [92], and is essential for the optimal oxygen-evolving activity of PSII [47,93,94]. PsbR is required for the binding of LHCSR3 to PSII-LHCII supercomplexes, the efficiency of NPQ in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [95], and the tolerance to cold stress in rice [96]. VTE3 is involved in a key methylation step in both vitamin E and plastoquinone synthesis [97]. VTE3 is localized at the chloroplast envelope membrane, and plays an important role in chloroplast development [49]. The knockout of VTE3 causes mutants with a pale green phenotype, abnormal chloroplasts, and non-survival beyond the seedling stage [49,97].
The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1 (LHCB1) binds the pigments chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoids to form the LHCIIb complex, which targets the thylakoid membrane, thereby playing a key role in the photosynthesis [50].

2.4. Verification of the Interaction between the Screened Proteins and SCMV-6K2

To verify whether SCMV-6K2 interacts with the 24 proteins identified based on the library screen, the Y2H technique was applied. The cDNAs of the 24 proteins were individually constructed into the prey vector pPR3-N to generate the pPR3-N fusion plasmids. Then, the pPR3-N fusion plasmid was co-transformed with the bait vector pBT-STE3-6K2 into yeast NMY51 cells and cultured on DDO and QDO culture media supplemented with X-Gal. The results showed that the yeast cell co-transformations of pBT-STE3-6K2 with pPR3-N-ScBGLU31, pPR3-N-ScHSP82, pPR3-N-ScCAB1, and pPR3-N-ScTPT could not produce blue colonies on the DDO and QDO culture media. Yeast cells co-transformed in pairs with other prey vectors and the bait vector pBT-STE3-6K2, and the positive control gave blue colonies on DDO and QDO media supplemented with X-Gal (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

The plant virus genome is too simple to establish systemic infections on host plants without interacting or interplaying with host factors and cellular processes [8]. The higher eukaryotic plants employ a complicated membrane system to compartmentalize the biological process in different organelles. When infected by compatible positive strand RNA viruses, the membranes of organelles, including the ER, chloroplasts, vacuoles, peroxisomes, mitochondria, Golgi, and endosomes, are drastically rearranged to form viral replication complexes [98]. In the present study, 20 proteins were identified from sugarcane to interact with SCMV-6K2 by Y2H assay (Table 1) and were classified into three categories based on their functions, i.e., eight proteins in the stress and response group, 12 proteins in the transport group, and four proteins in the photosynthesis group. Since 6K2 is an integral membrane protein and the screening of cDNA library was based on the membrane system, most of the identified proteins are localized to PM or the membranes of the chloroplasts, vacuoles, or peroxisomes (Table 1).
Although SCMV is compatible with the sugarcane cultivar ROC22, SCMV infection causes a defense response in sugarcane. Seven proteins interacting with SCMV-6K2 by Y2H assays are involved in the stress and defense response (Table 1): RNS4, ULP5, VAMP727, SERINC3, PMP22, and TET18. The stress responses of the sugarcane plant to SCMV infection include the regulation of gene expression, signal transduction, and the ROS reaction. HTA2, RNS4, and UPL5 are involved in DNA repair, transcription, recombination [21,52], microRNA biogenesis [54], and alternative splicing of pre-mRNA [56], respectively. Thus, the interaction of SCMV-6K2 with these three proteins might interfere with gene expression and sugarcane plant regulation. VAMP727 and SERINC3 are involved in signal transduction. VAMP727 interacts with SYP22 in response to root-knot nematode infection via the control of abundances of BRI1 on the PM [26,60], while SERINC3 is involved in the biosynthesis of sphingolipids and phosphatidylserine [99], which are the main components of PM [61], with the former playing a key role in the formation of the membrane raft [100]. The membrane raft is the main signal transduction platform on PM, and is extensively involved in cell processes including response to viral infection [101]. Therefore, the interaction of SCMV-6K2 with VAMP727 or SERINC3 might interfere with the BR signal cascade or the membrane raft, respectively, to respond to SCMV in sugarcane plants. TET18 might be a component of membrane raft, as TETs interact with each other and other proteins to form TET-enriched microdomains [67,68]; thus, we presume that TET18 might be involved in signal transduction or membrane contact between the VRC and the ER or PM. PMP22 localizes to peroxisomes and is important for the biogenesis and function of the peroxisomes [28,62]. Some tombusviruses deploy peroxisomes to generate multivesicular bodies for viral replication, which is a biological process that usually happens on the ER or chloroplast for potyviruses [63,64]. Peroxisomes can produce ROS to counteract viral pathogens [29,64,65]. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with PMP22 might interfere with the biogenesis, or at least with the function of peroxisomes, to suppress the production of ROS, thereby facilitating viral infection.
Ten transport-related proteins—aquaporins including PIP1; 2, PIP2; 7 and TIP1; 2, ZIFL1, NCX1, GONST4, SULTR3-3, PPT2, VHA-C, and TMEM208—were found to interact with SCMV-6K2 by Y2H assays. These proteins are involved in the transport of water, ions, metabolites, and proteins, which are important for maintaining the normal biological process. Three aquaporins, PIP1; 2, PIP2; 7, and TIP1; 2, were identified. PIPs and TIPs are involved in the response to water stress [73,74], thereby affecting the assimilation of CO2 [76,77,78]. The interaction between SCMV-6K2 with these aquaporins may limit the water supplement for CO2 assimilation during photosynthesis, thereby inhibiting the growth of infected plants. ZIFL1, NCX1, and VHA-C are involved in the homeostasis of H+, Zn2+, K+, Na+, and Ca2+ [34,35,79], while ZIFL1 is also involved in the polar transport of Auxin [79]. VHA-C is a key subunit of V-ATPase, which plays an important role in the acidification of subcellular organelles, pH and ion homeostasis, and endocytic and secretory trafficking [81]. PutVHA-C from Puccinellia tenuiflora is distributed throughout the secretory pathway, as the endosomes containing PutVHA-C can fuse with each other and simultaneously transport and fuse with the plasma membrane, tonoplast, and cell plate [81]. The overexpression of PutVHA-C enhances V-ATPase activity and promotes plant growth by influencing V-ATPase-dependent endosomal trafficking in transgenic Arabidopsis [37]. Therefore, the interaction of SCMV-6K2 with VHA-C might interfere with the transport of membranes for cell growth, membrane proteins, extracellular proteins, and components of the cell wall, thereby exerting an influence on the plant cell growth. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with ZIFL1 or NCX1 might interfere with the homeostasis of Zn2+, K+, Na+, and Ca2+, or the transport of Auxin, thereby impacting the normal biological process, such as through the regulation of vial cell-to-cell movement, as Ca2+ has been extensively reported to be involved in virus infections in plants by regulating callus accumulation or degradation in the plasmodesmata [5]. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with GONST4, SULTR3-3, or PPT2 might interfere with the transport of GDP-mannose, sulfate, and phosphoenolpyruvate, thereby interfering with mannosylation in the Golgi or photosynthesis, ABA biosynthesis [38], and the shikimate pathway [40,102] in chloroplasts. In addition [74], SULTR3; 3 is involved in sulfate-induced stomatal closure [38], thereby being involved in plant stress and the plant stress response [84]. PPT2 might mediate the fusion of VRC with the envelope of chloroplast, producing efficient multiplication [15], as mutants deficient in PPT2 slightly retard the growth of Arabidopsis plants, leaving photosynthesis, leaf constituents, and transport unaffected [87]. TMEM208 is localized to the ER, and is involved in the transport of proteins with the transmembrane domain in the central position [89]. Interestingly, the transmembrane domain is in the central position of 6K2 from potyviruses [20]. The ER is very important in the viral infection of plants. Usually, viral infection causes ER stress and an unfolded protein response [103]. SCMV-6K2 might interfere with protein transport into the ER, autophagy, or ER stress via interaction with TMEM208 [44]. However, the exact function of TMEM208 has not been identified in plants.
Chloroplasts are important organelles for photosynthesis. The potyvirus 6K2-mediated VRC vesicle fuses with the outer envelope of the chloroplast for efficient multiplication [15]. Three proteins are directly involved in photosynthesis: PsbS, PsbR, and VTE3. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with PsbS and PsbR may impair the interaction of monomeric PsbS with LHCII [45,46], or with the binding of LHCSR3 to PSII-LHCII supercomplexes [95], thereby inhibiting the efficiency of NPQ [90,95,104]. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with PsbR might interfere with the oxygen-evolving activity of PSII, as PsbR is required for the assembly of the oxygen-evolving complex [47,48,93,94]. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with VTE3 might impair the synthesis of vitamin E and plastoquinone, which are required functional chloroplasts [49,97]. VTE3 knockout causes mutants with a pale green phenotype, abnormal chloroplasts, and non-survival beyond the seedling stage [49,97]. Considering that these three proteins are important for functional chloroplasts, their interaction with SCMV-6K2 might contribute to mosaic symptoms, thereby attracting aphids for SCMV dissemination.
The results of cDNA library screening and the interaction between SCMV-6K2 and the identified proteins verified our hypothesis that SCMV-6K2 extensively interacts with sugarcane host factors. The identification of 20 proteins that interact with SCMV-6K2 enhances the understanding of the macular mechanism of SCMV infection on sugarcane and provide potential molecular targets for genetic improvement of sugarcane germplasm or cultivar. Since the genomic structure of SCMV is similar to that of SrMV or SCSMV [5,103,105], this study might increase the knowledge on the mechanism of SrMV or SCSMV infection on sugarcane. However, it should be noted that the evidence for interaction is based on Y2H assays, which indicate the interaction in vitro. To confirm the interaction of SCMV-6K2 with these 20 proteins in vivo, bimolecular fluorescence complementation or coimmunoprecipitation should be performed. In addition, the library might not cover all the genes that interact with SCMV-6K2. The interaction of SCMV-6K2 with the sugarcane host factors might be dynamic and affected by the developmental stage of sugarcane plants or the infection process of SCMV infection in sugarcane plants. The subsequent work will focus on the verification of the SCMV-6K2 interacting proteins in vivo and their functions in SCMV infection in sugarcane.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Plant Culture

A cDNA library prepared from the leaves of sugarcane cultivar ROC22 infected by SCMV and SCMV strain FZ1 (KR108212) [105] were provided by the Fujian Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Fujian, China). SCMV-FZ1 was propagated on sugarcane cv. ROC22, which was planted in a greenhouse under controlled temperature (28 °C) and relative humidity (60%) conditions with a 14–10 h light–dark cycle. Sugarcane plant leaves with typical mosaic symptoms (Figure S1) were put into liquid nitrogen immediately after sampling and transferred to the −80 °C refrigerator for RNA isolation. N. benthamiana plants were grown in soil at 22 °C and 60% relative humidity under long days (16 h light/8 h dark). Two-week-old N. benthamiana plants were used for agroinfiltration experiments. After agroinfiltration, the plants were maintained under the same growth conditions.

4.2. RNA Isolation and Gene Cloning

Total RNA was extracted from the leaves of SCMV-FZ1-infected sugarcane cultivar ROC22 using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, New York, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration was determined using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China), and the first-strand cDNA was synthesized by using the Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian,China). Specific primer pairs were designed based on the sequences of target genes using cDNA as the template.

4.3. Bioinformatic Analysis

The gene sequence or corresponding deduced amino acid sequence was used as a query to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) or Phytozome v.12 (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#). TMHMM Server v. 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) was used to predict the transmembrane domain of the target protein [106].

4.4. Plasmid Construction

To construct the plasmids for subcellular localization, the coding sequence of SCMV-6K2 was amplified with a special primer pair (Table S1) and infused into the plasmid pEarleyGate102 to generate SCMV-6K2-CFP.
To construct the SCMV-6K2 bait plasmid, the coding sequence of SCMV-6K2 was amplified using primers 6K2-F and 6K2-R (Table S1). The PCR product was recovered and subcloned into the pPOTO-Blunt Simple vector (Aidlab, Beijing, China), which was used as a template to amplify the coding sequence of 6K2 with the primer pair pBT3-STE-6K2-F and pBT3-STE-6K2-R (Table S1). The amplified fragments were digested with the Sfi I enzyme (Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China) and fused into the pBT3-STE plasmid to generate the pBT3-STE-6K2 plasmid. The same procedure was followed to construct the prey plasmid with the target gene infused into the plasmid pPR3-N. All the recombinant plasmids in this study were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

4.5. Transient Protein Expression and Confocal Microscopy

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient protein expression assays of N. benthamiana leaves were performed as described previously [5]. SCMV-6K2-CFP and mCherry-HDEL were co-agroinfiltrated into the leaves of N. benthamiana using needleless syringes. The agroinfiltrated plants were maintained under normal growth conditions for 48 to 72 h. For confocal microscopy analysis, plant samples expressing recombinant proteins were imaged using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Beijing, China) with an Argon laser. CFP was excited with 442-nm laser lines, and the emitted light was captured at 450–500 nm. mCherry was excited with 552-nm laser lines, and the emitted light was captured at 590–630 nm. The fluorescence of chlorophyll was excited with 552-nm laser lines, and the emitted light was captured at 650–680 nm. Images were captured digitally and processed with LSM software.

4.6. Evaluation of the SCMV-6K2 Bait Plasmid

To evaluate whether the plasmid pBT3-STE-6K2 is suitable for cDNA library screening, yeast cells were co-transformed with the pBT3-STE-6K2 and pOst1-NubI pair or the pBT3-STE-6K2 and pPR3-N pair, respectively. Yeast cells co-transformed with pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 were used as positive controls; pTSU2-APP and pPR3-N were used as negative controls. The co-transformed yeast cells were cultured on DDO agar plates at 30 °C for 3–5 days. Then, the colonies were suspended in DDO liquid medium to an OD600 of 0.6. A 10× dilution series of 10-μL aliquots of co-transformed NMY51 cells were spotted onto DDO and QDO agar plates supplemented with X-Gal, and they were incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days. If yeast cells co-transformed with pBT3-STE-6K2 and pOst1-NubI gave blue colonies on the DDO and QDO agar plates, this indicated that the expression 6K2 was not toxic to yeast cells. If yeast cells co-transformed with pBT3-STE-6K2 and pPR3-N gave colonies on the DDO but did not grow on QDO agar plates, this indicated that there was no auto-activation of 6K2.

4.7. Screening of the cDNA Library and Positive Colony Sequencing

The yeast NMY51 strain was used to identify interactions between expressed proteins. The plasmid pBT3-STE-6K2 was used as bait to screen the cDNA library based on the DUALmembrane system (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), as described by Song et al. [107]. The colonies that grew well in QDO liquid medium were harvested. Plasmids were extracted using the TIANprep Yeast Plasmid DNA Kit and transformed into competent E. coli DH5α cells. Then, the E. coli cells were grown on LB medium with 50 μg·mL-1 of ampicillin to identify the transcription-activating domain (AD)/library plasmids. Six colonies were randomly selected from each plate for PCR detection using the primer pair pPR3-N-F and pPR3-N-R (Table S1). The amplified fragments were recovered and sequenced for identification.

4.8. Verification of Protein Interaction by Y2H Assays

The DUALmembrane system was used in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols. The prey vector pPR3-N, infused with the target gene to be tested, and the bait vector pBT3-STE-6K2 were co-transformed pairwise into the yeast strain NMY51. Yeast cells were spread on DDO agar plates and incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days after transformation. Colonies grown on DDO plates were suspended in DDO liquid medium to an OD600 of 0.6. A 10 × dilution series of 10-μL aliquots of co-transformed NMY51 were spotted onto DDO and QDO agar plates supplemented with X-Gal to test the expression of the LacZ marker. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days. pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 interact in the Y2H assay and were used as positive controls. pPR3-N and pTSU2-APP do not form complexes, and were used as negative controls. All the Y2H assays were performed in triplicates.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/16/3867/s1.

Author Contributions

J.X., H.Z., and G.C. conceived and designed the research. H.Z. and G.C. prepared the materials. H.Z., G.C., Z.Y., and T.W. conducted the experiments. H.Z., G.C., and J.X. analyzed the data. H.Z., and G.C. wrote the manuscript. J.X. helped to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371688) and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CXZX2018026).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koonin, E.; Wolf, Y.; Nagasaki, K.; Dolja, V. The Big Bang of picorna-like virus evolution antedates the radiation of eukaryotic supergroups. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 925–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Urcuqui-Inchima, S.; Haenni, A.L.; Bernardi, F. Potyvirus proteins: A wealth of functions. Virus Res. 2001, 74, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olspert, A.; Carr, J.P.; Firth, A.E. Mutational analysis of the Potyviridae transcriptional slippage site utilized for expression of the P3N-PIPO and P1N-PISPO proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 7618–7629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Olspert, A.; Chung, B.Y.; Atkins, J.F.; Carr, J.P.; Firth, A.E. Transcriptional slippage in the positive-sense RNA virus family Potyviridae. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cheng, G.; Dong, M.; Xu, Q.; Peng, L.; Yang, Z.; Wei, T.; Xu, J. Dissecting the Molecular Mechanism of the Subcellular Localization and Cell-to-cell Movement of the Sugarcane mosaic virus P3N-PIPO. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riechmann, J.L.; Laín, S.; García, J.A. Highlights and prospects of potyvirus molecular biology. J. Gen. Virol. 1992, 73, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chung, B.Y.; Miller, W.A.; Atkins, J.F.; Firth, A.E. An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5897–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, A. Dissecting the Molecular Network of Virus-Plant Interactions: The Complex Roles of Host Factors. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2015, 53, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, T.; Wang, A. Biogenesis of cytoplasmic membranous vesicles for plant potyvirus replication occurs at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites in a COPI- and COPII-dependent manner. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 12252–12264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.; Patarroyo, C.; Garcia Cabanillas, D.; Zheng, H.; Laliberte, J.F. The Vesicle-Forming 6K2 Protein of Turnip Mosaic Virus Interacts with the COPII Coatomer Sec24a for Viral Systemic Infection. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 6695–6710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cotton, S.; Grangeon, R.; Thivierge, K.; Mathieu, I.; Ide, C.; Wei, T.; Wang, A.; Laliberté, J.-F. Turnip mosaic virus RNA replication complex vesicles are mobile, align with microfilaments, and are each derived from a single viral genome. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 10460–10471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wei, T.; Zhang, C.; Hou, X.; Sanfacon, H.; Wang, A. The SNARE protein Syp71 is essential for turnip mosaic virus infection by mediating fusion of virus-induced vesicles with chloroplasts. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grangeon, R.; Jiang, J.; Wan, J.; Agbeci, M.; Zheng, H.; Laliberté, J.F. 6K2-induced vesicles can move cell to cell during turnip mosaic virus infection. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Movahed, N.; Patarroyo, C.; Sun, J.; Vali, H.; Laliberté, J.F.; Zheng, H. Cylindrical Inclusion Protein of Turnip Mosaic Virus Serves as a Docking Point for the Intercellular Movement of Viral Replication Vesicles. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1732–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Movahed, N.; Sun, J.; Vali, H.; Laliberté, J.F.; Zheng, H. A Host ER Fusogen Is Recruited by Turnip Mosaic Virus for Maturation of Viral Replication Vesicles. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wei, T.; Zhang, C.; Hong, J.; Xiong, R.; Kasschau, K.D.; Zhou, X.; Carrington, J.C.; Wang, A. Formation of complexes at plasmodesmata for potyvirus intercellular movement is mediated by the viral protein P3N-PIPO. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ping, D.; Wu, Z.; Wang, A. The multifunctional protein CI of potyviruses plays interlinked and distinct roles in viral genome replication and intercellular movement. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  18. Nakahara, K.S.; Chikara, M.; Syouta, Y.; Hanako, S.; Yukiko, K.; Wada, T.S.; Ayano, M.; Kazunori, G.; Kazuki, T.; Kae, S. Tobacco calmodulin-like protein provides secondary defense by binding to and directing degradation of virus RNA silencing suppressors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10113–10118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Hafrén, A.; Üstün, S.; Hochmuth, A.; Svenning, S.; Johansen, T.; Hofius, D. Turnip mosaic virus counteracts selective autophagy of the viral silencing suppressor HCpro. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 649–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cabanillas, D.G.; Jiang, J.; Movahed, N.; Germain, H.; Yamaji, Y.; Zheng, H.; Laliberte, J. Turnip Mosaic Virus Uses the SNARE Protein VTI11 in an Unconventional Route for Replication Vesicle Trafficking. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2594–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Biterge, B.; Schneider, R. Histone variants: Key players of chromatin. Cell Tissue Res. 2014, 356, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Macintosh, G.C.; Hillwig, M.S.; Alexander, M.; Flagel, L. RNase T2 genes from rice and the evolution of secretory ribonucleases in plants. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2010, 283, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kurata, N.; Kariu, T.; Kawano, S.; Kimura, M. Molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding ribonuclease-related proteins in Nicotiana glutinosa leaves, as induced in response to wounding or to TMV-infection. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 66, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wilkinson, C.R.; Dittmar, G.A.; Ohi, M.D.; Uetz, P.; Jones, N.; Finley, D. Ubiquitin-like Protein Hub1 Is Required for Pre-mRNA Splicing and Localization of an Essential Splicing Factor in Fission Yeast. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feng, H.; Wang, Q.L.; Zhao, X.Q.; Han, L.N.; Wang, X.J.; Kang, Z.S. TaULP5 contributes to the compatible interaction of adult plant resistance wheat seedlings-stripe rust pathogen. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 96, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, X.F.; Liu, Y.; Gai, X.T.; Zhou, Y.; Xia, Z.Y.; Chen, L.; Duan, Y.X.; Xuan, Y.H. SNARE proteins SYP22 and VAMP727 negatively regulate plant defense. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1610300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Usami, Y.; Wu, Y.; Göttlinger, H.G. SERINC3 and SERINC5 restrict HIV-1 infectivity and are counteracted by Nef. Nature 2015, 526, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pause, B.; Saffrich, R.; Hunziker, A.; Ansorge, W.; Just, W.W. Targeting of the 22 kDa integral peroxisomal membrane protein. FEBS Lett. 2000, 471, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yang, M.; Li, Z.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Han, C.; Yu, J.; Xu, K.; Li, D. Barley Stripe Mosaic Virus γb Interacts with Glycolate Oxidase and Inhibits Peroxisomal ROS Production to Facilitate Virus Infection. Mol. Plant 2017, 11, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Muthusamy, S.K.; Dalal, M.; Chinnusamy, V.; Bansal, K.C. Genome-wide identification and analysis of biotic and abiotic stress regulation of small heat shock protein (HSP20) family genes in bread wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 211, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gomes, D.; Agasse, A.; Thiébaud, P.; Delrot, S.; Gerós, H.; Chaumont, F. Aquaporins are multifunctional water and solute transporters highly divergent in living organisms. BBA-Biomembr. 2009, 1788, 1213–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chaumont, F.; Barrieu, F.; Wojcik, E.; Chrispeels, M.J.; Jung, R. Aquaporins constitute a large and highly divergent protein family in maize. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 1206–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ishibashi, K.; Morishita, Y.; Tanaka, Y. The Evolutionary Aspects of Aquaporin Family. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 969, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Haydon, M.J.; Cobbett, C.S. A novel major facilitator superfamily protein at the tonoplast influences zinc tolerance and accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1705–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Sperotto, R.A.; Menguer, P.K.; Sperb, E.R.; Lopes, K.L.; Fett, J.P. ZINC-INDUCED FACILITATOR-LIKE family in plants: Lineage-specific expansion in monocotyledons and conserved genomic and expression features among rice (Oryza sativa) paralogs. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Singh, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Tripathi, A.K.; Gupta, B.K.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. Genome-wide investigation and expression analysis of Sodium/Calcium exchanger gene family in rice and Arabidopsis. Rice 2015, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, A.; Bu, Y.; Takano, T.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S. Conserved V-ATPase c subunit plays a role in plant growth by influencing V-ATPase-dependent endosomal trafficking. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Z.; Zhao, P.X.; Miao, Z.Q.; Qi, G.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Ahmad, N.; Cao, M.J.; Hell, R.; Wirtz, M.; et al. SULTR3s Function in Chloroplast Sulfate Uptake and Affect ABA Biosynthesis and the Stress Response. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Handford, M.G.; Sicilia, F.; Brandizzi, F.; Chung, J.H.; Dupree, P. Arabidopsis thaliana expresses multiple Golgi-localised nucleotide-sugar transporters related to GONST1. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2004, 272, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fischer, K.; Kammerer, B.; Gutensohn, M.; Arbinger, B.; Weber, A.; Häusler, R.E.; Flügge, U.I. A new class of plastidic phosphate translocators: A putative link between primary and secondary metabolism by the phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate antiporter. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 453–462. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, Y.; Nishizawa, T.; Takemoto, M.; Kumazaki, K.; Yamashita, K.; Hirata, K.; Minoda, A.; Nagatoishi, S.; Tsumoto, K.; Ishitani, R.; et al. Structure of the triose-phosphate/phosphate translocator reveals the basis of substrate specificity. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Takemoto, M.; Lee, Y.; Ishitani, R.; Nureki, O. Free Energy Landscape for the Entire Transport Cycle of Triose-Phosphate/Phosphate Translocator. Structure 2018, 26, 1284–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Luang, S.; Cho, J.I.; Mahong, B.; Opassiri, R.; Akiyama, T.; Phasai, K.; Komvongsa, J.; Sasaki, N.; Hua, Y.L.; Matsuba, Y.; et al. Rice Os9BGlu31 is a transglucosidase with the capacity to equilibrate phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, and phytohormone glycoconjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 10111–10123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, Y.; Hu, J.; Miao, G.; Qu, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, G.; Lv, P.; Ma, D.; Chen, Y. Transmembrane protein 208: A novel ER-localized protein that regulates autophagy and ER stress. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Correa-Galvis, V.; Poschmann, G.; Melzer, M.; Stühler, K.; Jahns, P. PsbS interactions involved in the activation of energy dissipation in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 15225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Daskalakis, V.; Papadatos, S. The Photosystem II Subunit S under Stress. Biophys. J. 2017, 113, 2364–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Allahverdiyeva, Y.; Mamedov, F.; Suorsa, M.; Styring, S.; Vass, I.; Aro, E.M. Insights into the function of PsbR protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Allahverdiyeva, Y.; Suorsa, M.; Rossi, F.; Pavesi, A.; Kater, M.; Antonacci, A.; Tadini, L.; Pribil, M.; Schneider, A.; Wanner, G.; et al. Arabidopsis plants lacking PsbQ and PsbR subunits of the oxygen-evolving complex show altered PSII super-complex organization and short-term adaptive mechanisms. Plant J. 2013, 75, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Motohashi, R.; Ito, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Taji, T.; Nagata, N.; Asami, T.; Yoshida, S.; Yamaguchishinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Functional analysis of the 37 kDa inner envelope membrane polypeptide in chloroplast biogenesis using a Ds-tagged Arabidopsis pale-green mutant. Plant J. 2003, 34, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Horn, R.; Grundmann, G.; Paulsen, H. Consecutive Binding of Chlorophylls a and b During the Assembly in Vitro of Light-harvesting Chlorophyll- a/b Protein (LHCIIb). J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 366, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yi, H.; Sardesai, N.; Fujinuma, T.; Chan, C.W.; Gelvin, S.B. Constitutive expression exposes functional redundancy between the Arabidopsis histone H2A gene HTA1 and other H2A gene family members. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1575–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sura, W.; Kabza, M.; Karlowski, W.M.; Bieluszewski, T.; Kuś-Slowinska, M.; Pawełoszek, Ł.; Sadowski, J.; Ziolkowski, P.A. Dual role of the histone variant H2A.Z in transcriptional regulation of stress-response genes. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 791–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Luhtala, N.; Parker, R. T2 Family ribonucleases: Ancient enzymes with diverse roles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Megel, C.; Hummel, G.; Lalande, S.; Ubrig, E.; Cognat, V.; Morelle, G.; Salinasgiege, T.; Duchene, A.; Marechaldrouard, L. Plant RNases T2, but not Dicer-like proteins, are major players of tRNA-derived fragments biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hugot, K.; Ponchet, M.; Marais, A.; Ricci, P.; Galiana, E. A tobacco S-like RNase inhibits hyphal elongation of plant pathogens. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002, 15, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mishra, S.K.; Ammon, T.; Popowicz, G.M.; Krajewski, M.; Nagel, R.J.; Ares, M.; Holak, T.A.; Jentsch, S. Role of the ubiquitin-like protein Hub1 in splice-site usage and alternative splicing. Nature 2011, 474, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. van der Veen, A.G.; Ploegh, H.L. Ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 323–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ammon, T.; Mishra, S.K.; Kowalska, K.; Popowicz, G.M.; Holak, T.A.; Jentsch, S. The conserved ubiquitin-like protein Hub1 plays a critical role in splicing in human cells. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 6, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sundaramoorthy, S.; Vázquez-Novelle, M.D.; Lekomtsev, S.; Howell, M.; Petronczki, M. Functional genomics identifies a requirement of pre-mRNA splicing factors for sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 2015, 33, 2623–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, X.F.; Jung, J.H.; Sun, Q.; Li, T.Y.; Chen, L.; Duan, Y.X.; Xuan, Y.H. SYP22 and VAMP727 regulate BRI1 plasma membrane targeting to control plant growth in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Inuzuka, M.; Hayakawa, M.; Ingi, T. Serinc, an activity-regulated protein family, incorporates serine into membrane lipid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 35776–35783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Murphy, M.A.; Phillipson, B.A.; Baker, A.; Mullen, R.T. Characterization of the targeting signal of the Arabidopsis 22-kD integral peroxisomal membrane protein. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 813–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Laliberté, J.F.; Sanfaçon, H. Cellular remodeling during plant virus infection. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lazarow, P.B. Viruses exploiting peroxisomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rochon, D.; Singh, B.; Reade, R.; Theilmann, J.; Ghoshal, K.; Alam, S.B.; Maghodia, A. The p33 auxiliary replicase protein of Cucumber necrosis virus targets peroxisomes and infection induces de novo peroxisome formation from the endoplasmic reticulum. Virology 2014, 452–453, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Boavida, L.C.; Qin, P.; Broz, M.; Becker, J.D.; Mccormick, S. Arabidopsis tetraspanins are confined to discrete expression domains and cell types in reproductive tissues and form homo- and heterodimers when expressed in yeast. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 696–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mani, B.; Agarwal, M.; Katiyar-Agarwal, S. Comprehensive Expression Profiling of Rice Tetraspanin Genes Reveals Diverse Roles During Development and Abiotic Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Reimann, R.; Kost, B.; Dettmer, J. TETRASPANINs in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ding, G.; Chen, P.; Zhang, H.; Huang, X.; Zang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Wong, J. Regulation of Ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING Finger Domain 1 (UHRF1) Protein Stability by Heat Shock Protein 90 Chaperone Machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 20125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Maurel, C.; Boursiac, Y.; Luu, D.T.; Santoni, V.; Shahzad, Z.; Verdoucq, L. Aquaporins in Plants. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 1321–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bienert, G.P.; Bienert, M.D.; Jahn, T.P.; Boutry, M.; Chaumont, F. Solanaceae XIPs are plasma membrane aquaporins that facilitate the transport of many uncharged substrates. Plant J. 2011, 66, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kammerloher, W.; Fischer, U.; Piechottka, G.P.; Schäffner, A.R. Water channels in the plant plasma membrane cloned by immunoselection from a mammalian expression system. Plant J. 1994, 6, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hachez, C.; Veselov, D.; Ye, Q.; Reinhardt, H.; Knipfer, T.; Fricke, W.; Chaumont, F. Short-term control of maize cell and root water permeability through plasma membrane aquaporin isoforms. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 35, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pawłowicz, I.; Rapacz, M.; Perlikowski, D.; Gondek, K.; Kosmala, A. Abiotic stresses influence the transcript abundance of PIP and TIP aquaporins in Festuca species. J. Appl. Genet. 2017, 58, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Hachez, C.; Laloux, T.; Reinhardt, H.; Cavez, D.; Degand, H.; Grefen, C.; DeRycke, R.; Inze, D.; Blatt, M.R.; Russinova, E.; et al. Arabidopsis SNAREs SYP61 and SYP121 coordinate the trafficking of plasma membrane aquaporin PIP2;7 to modulate the cell membrane water permeability. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3132–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Heckwolf, M.; Pater, D.; Hanson, D.T.; Kaldenhoff, R. The Arabidopsis thaliana aquaporin AtPIP1;2 is a physiologically relevant CO? transport facilitator. Plant J. 2011, 67, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kaldenhoff, R. Mechanisms underlying CO2 diffusion in leaves. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kaldenhoff, R.; Kai, L.; Uehlein, N. Aquaporins and membrane diffusion of CO2 in living organisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 1592–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Remy, E.; Cabrito, T.R.; Baster, P.; Batista, R.A.; Teixeira, M.C.; Friml, J.; Sá-Correia, I.; Duque, P. A major facilitator superfamily transporter plays a dual role in polar auxin transport and drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 901–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Giladi, M.; Shor, R.; Lisnyansky, M.; Khananshvili, D. Structure-Functional Basis of Ion Transport in Sodium-Calcium Exchanger (NCX) Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhou, A.; Takano, T.; Liu, S. The role of endomembrane-localized VHA-c in plant growth. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 13, e1382796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Leustek, T.; Martin, M.N.; Bick, J.A.; Davies, J.P. Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Leustek, T.; Saito, K. Sulfate Transport and Assimilation in Plants. Plant Physiol. 1999, 120, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Vatansever, R.; Koc, I.; Ozyigit, I.I.; Sen, U.; Uras, M.E.; Anjum, N.A.; Pereira, E.; Filiz, E. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of sulfate transporter (SULTR) genes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Planta 2016, 244, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Parker, J.L.; Newstead, S. Structural basis of nucleotide sugar transport across the Golgi membrane. Nature 2017, 551, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Akiko, N.; Poster, J.B.; Yoshifumi, J.; Neta, D. Molecular and phenotypic analysis of CaVRG4, encoding an essential Golgi apparatus GDP-mannose transporter. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 29. [Google Scholar]
  87. Hilgers, E.J.A.; Staehr, P.; Flügge, U.I.; Häusler, R.E. The Xylulose 5-Phosphate/Phosphate Translocator Supports Triose Phosphate, but Not Phosphoenolpyruvate Transport Across the Inner Envelope Membrane of Plastids in Arabidopsis thaliana Mutant Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Walters, R.G.; Freya, S.; Rogers, J.J.M.; Rolfe, S.A.; Horton, P. Identification of mutants of Arabidopsis defective in acclimation of photosynthesis to the light environment. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Aviram, N.; Ast, T.; Costa, E.A.; Arakel, E.C.; Chuartzman, S.G.; Jan, C.H.; Hassdenteufel, S.; Dudek, J.; Jung, M.; Schorr, S.; et al. The SND proteins constitute an alternative targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 2016, 540, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kiss, A.Z.; Ruban, A.V.; Peter, H. The PsbS protein controls the organization of the photosystem II antenna in higher plant thylakoid membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 3972–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, X.P.; Björkman, O.; Shih, C.; Grossman, A.R.; Rosenquist, M.; Jansson, S.; Niyogi, K.K. A pigment-binding protein essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature 2000, 403, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Shi, L.X.; Schröder, W.P. The low molecular mass subunits of the photosynthetic supracomplex, photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1608, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Suorsa, M.; Sirpiö, S.; Allahverdiyeva, Y.; Paakkarinen, V.; Mamedov, F.; Styring, S.; Aro, E.M. PsbR, a missing link in the assembly of the oxygen-evolving complex of plant photosystem II. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, H.; Frankel, L.K.; Bricker, T.M. Characterization and complementation of a psbR mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 489, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Xue, H.; Tokutsu, R.; Bergner, S.V.; Scholz, M.; Minagawa, J.; Hippler, M. PHOTOSYSTEM II SUBUNIT R is required for efficient binding of LIGHT-HARVESTING COMPLEX STRESS-RELATED PROTEIN3 to photosystem II-light-harvesting supercomplexes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1566–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Li, L.; Ye, T.; Gao, X.; Chen, R.; Xu, J.; Xie, C.; Zhu, J.; Deng, X.; Wang, P.; Xu, Z. Molecular characterization and functional analysis of the OsPsbR gene family in rice. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2017, 292, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Cheng, Z.; Sattler, S.; Maeda, H.; Sakuragi, Y.; Bryant, D.A.; DellaPenna, D. Highly divergent methyltransferases catalyze a conserved reaction in tocopherol and plastoquinone synthesis in cyanobacteria and photosynthetic eukaryotes. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2343–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Laliberté, J.F.; Zheng, H. Viral Manipulation of Plant Host Membranes. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2014, 1, 237–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, D.W.; Deng, X.G.; Fu, F.Q.; Lin, H.H. Induction of plant virus defense response by brassinosteroids and brassinosteroid signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2015, 241, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cacas, J.L.; Buré, C.; Grosjean, K.; Gerbeaupissot, P.; Lherminier, J.; Rombouts, Y.; Maes, E.; Bossard, C.; Gronnier, J.; Furt, F.; et al. Revisiting Plant Plasma Membrane Lipids in Tobacco: A Focus on Sphingolipids. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Thomas, O. Membrane nanodomains and microdomains in plant-microbe interactions Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 40, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  102. Tzin, V.; Galili, G. New Insights into the Shikimate and Aromatic Amino Acids Biosynthesis Pathways in Plants. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 956–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dong, M.; Cheng, G.; Peng, L.; Xu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Xu, J. Transcriptome Analysis of Sugarcane Response to the Infection by Sugarcane Steak Mosaic Virus (SCSMV). Trop. Plant Biol. 2017, 10, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, Z.R.; Wakao, S.; Fischer, B.B.; Niyogi, K.K. Sensing and responding to excess light. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xu, J.S.; Deng, Y.Q.; Cheng, G.Y.; Zhai, Y.-S.; Peng, L.; Dong, M.; Xu, Q.; Yang, Y.Q. Sugarcane mosaic virus infection of model plants Brachypodium distachyon and Nicotiana benthamiana. J. Integr. Agric. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Song, P.; Chen, X.; Wu, B.; Gao, L.; Zhi, H.; Cui, X. Identification for soybean host factors interacting with P3N-PIPO protein of Soybean mosaic virus. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 03867 g001 550
Figure 1. Subcellular localization of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV)-6K2. (A) The schematic diagram of the amino acids of the SCMV-6K2 protein. GXXXG motif (‘X’ being any amino acid) was highlighted by the red color. The predicted transmembrane domain (TMD) was marked by an underline. (B) Prediction of SCMV-6K2 TMD by TMHMM. The horizontal axis indicates the amino acid position. (C) Subcellular localization of 6K2-CFP in the leaves epidermal cells of N. benthamiana by 48-h post agroinfiltration. White arrows point to endoplasmic reticulum (ER), yellow arrows point to chloroplast. Scale bars, 25 μm.
Figure 1. Subcellular localization of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV)-6K2. (A) The schematic diagram of the amino acids of the SCMV-6K2 protein. GXXXG motif (‘X’ being any amino acid) was highlighted by the red color. The predicted transmembrane domain (TMD) was marked by an underline. (B) Prediction of SCMV-6K2 TMD by TMHMM. The horizontal axis indicates the amino acid position. (C) Subcellular localization of 6K2-CFP in the leaves epidermal cells of N. benthamiana by 48-h post agroinfiltration. White arrows point to endoplasmic reticulum (ER), yellow arrows point to chloroplast. Scale bars, 25 μm.
Ijms 20 03867 g001
Ijms 20 03867 g002 550
Figure 2. Evaluation of the pBT3-STE-6K2 bait vector. Plasmid combinations of pBT3-STE-6K2 and pOst1-NubI, pBT3-STE-6K2, and pPR3-N were co-transformed into yeast NMY51 cells in a 10× dilution series of 10-μL aliquots, which were then cultured on DDO+5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D-galactoside (X-Gal) or QDO+X-Gal agar plates to evaluate the toxicity or auto-activation of 6K2, respectively. Yeast cells co-transformed with pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 were used as positive controls, pTSU2-APP and pPR3-N were used as negative controls. DDO+X-Gal: SD/-Trp/-Leu, supplemented with X-Gal,; QDO+X-Gal: SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/-Ade, supplemented with X-Gal.
Figure 2. Evaluation of the pBT3-STE-6K2 bait vector. Plasmid combinations of pBT3-STE-6K2 and pOst1-NubI, pBT3-STE-6K2, and pPR3-N were co-transformed into yeast NMY51 cells in a 10× dilution series of 10-μL aliquots, which were then cultured on DDO+5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D-galactoside (X-Gal) or QDO+X-Gal agar plates to evaluate the toxicity or auto-activation of 6K2, respectively. Yeast cells co-transformed with pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 were used as positive controls, pTSU2-APP and pPR3-N were used as negative controls. DDO+X-Gal: SD/-Trp/-Leu, supplemented with X-Gal,; QDO+X-Gal: SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/-Ade, supplemented with X-Gal.
Ijms 20 03867 g002
Ijms 20 03867 g003 550
Figure 3. Verification of protein interaction by yeast two hybrid assays. The coding sequences of 24 proteins were individually infused into the prey vector pPR3 and co-transformed with the bait vector pBT3-STE-6K2 into the yeast NMY51 cells in a 10× dilution series of 10-μL aliquots, which were then plated on non-selective medium (DDO+X-Gal) or a high-stringency selective medium (QDO+X-Gal). Yeast cells co-transformed with pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 were used as positive controls, pTSU2-APP and pPR3-N were used as negative controls.
Figure 3. Verification of protein interaction by yeast two hybrid assays. The coding sequences of 24 proteins were individually infused into the prey vector pPR3 and co-transformed with the bait vector pBT3-STE-6K2 into the yeast NMY51 cells in a 10× dilution series of 10-μL aliquots, which were then plated on non-selective medium (DDO+X-Gal) or a high-stringency selective medium (QDO+X-Gal). Yeast cells co-transformed with pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 were used as positive controls, pTSU2-APP and pPR3-N were used as negative controls.
Ijms 20 03867 g003
Table
Table 1. Classification of proteins interacting with SCMV-6K2.
Table 1. Classification of proteins interacting with SCMV-6K2.
Protein Name
(Coding Protein)		Accession NumberSpecie and Accession Number of HomologueFunctional DescriptionHomology
(%)		Clone NumberSubcellular LocationReference
Stress and Defense Response
ScHTA2 (Histone H2A.2)MN16790 Sorghum bicolor XM_002460779.2Involved in DNA repair, transcriptional activity, recombination96.811N[21]
ScRNS4 (Ribonuclease T2)MN167902Sorghum bicolor
XM_002462696.2		Biogenesis of tRNAs derived RNA fragments and viral reverse transcription94.361N[22]
ScULP5 (Ubiquitin-like protein 5) MN167908Setaria italica XM_004977457.2Involved in mRNA splicing and cellular protein modification99.101Cyto, N[23,24]
ScVAMP727 (Vesicle-associated membrane protein 727)MN167893Sorghum bicolor
XM_021465361.1		Involved in the vacuolar protein deposition and brassinosteroids receptor BRI1 PM targeting96.832V[25]
ScSERINC3 (Serine incorporator 3)MN167907Sorghum bicolor
XM_002454643.2		Synthesis of phosphatidylserine and sphingolipid98.151PM, ER[26]
ScPMP22 (Peroxisomal membrane 22 kDa protein) ScPMP22Sorghum bicolor
XM_002466831.2		Import of peroxisomal matrix proteins and the transport of metabolites across the membrane96.543P[27,28]
ScTSPAN18 (Tetraspanin 18)MN167910Sorghum bicolor
XM_002437610.2		Involved in the development, reproduction, and stress responses in plants96.161PM[29]
ScHSP82 (Heat shock protein 82)MN167911Sorghum bicolor
XM_002447368.2		Involved in cellular response to heat, protein folding, and protein stabilization95.221Cyto[30]
Transport-Related Proteins
ScPIP1; 2 (Aquaporin PIP1-2)MN167891Sorghum bicolor
XM_002454463.2		Maintenance of cellular water homeostasis99.081PM[31,32,33]
ScPIP2; 7 (Aquaporin PIP2-7)MN167895Sorghum bicolor
XM_021453930.1		Maintenance of cellular water homeostasis93.114PM[31,32,33]
ScTIP1; 2 (Aquaporin TIP1-2)MN167901Sorghum bicolor
XM_002459138.2		Maintenance of cellular water homeostasis94.791V[31,32,33]
ScZIFL1 (Zinc-induced facilitator-like 1)MN167900Sorghum bicolor
XM_002457622.2		Maintenance of Zn homeostasis. Transport of [34] H+-coupled K+ and the polar transport of auxin96.081V, PM[35]
ScNCX (Sodium/calcium exchanger) MN167906Sorghum bicolor
XM_021457777.1		Maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis95.141PM[36]
ScVHA-C (V-type proton ATPase C subunit)MN167894Sorghum bicolor
XM_002441847.2		Required for the assembly of V-ATPase and proton channel formation and transmembrane transport of protons96.391V[37]
ScSULTR3-3 (Sulfate transporter 3-3)MN167903Sorghum bicolor
XM_002448617.2		Transport of sulfate into chloroplast96.481Ch[38]
ScGONST4 (GDP-mannose transporter 4)MN167897Sorghum bicolor
XM_021454048.1		Transport of GDP-mannose into Golgi for protein glycosylation96.671V[39]
ScPPT2 (Phosphoenolpyruvate/phosphate translocator 2)MN167904Sorghum bicolor
XM_002454771.2		Transmembrane transport of phosphoglycerate94.731Ch[40]
ScTPT (Triose phosphate/phosphate translocator)MN167912Sorghum bicolor
XM_002454822.2		Transport of triose phosphates derived from the Calvin cycle in the stroma into the cytosol for sucrose synthesis and other biosynthetic processes97.541Ch[41,42]
ScBGLU31 (beta-glucosidase 31)MN167896Sorghum bicolor
XM_002438540.2		Involved in the glucose metabolism to supply acyl and glucosyl for glycosylation90.611V[43]
ScTMEM208 (Transmembrane protein 208)MN167890Sorghum bicolor
XM_002452735.2		Transport of protein into ER 97.521ER[44]
Photosynthesis
ScPsbS (Photosystem II S subunit)MN167889Sorghum bicolor
XM_002456659.2		Involved in nonphotochemical quenching96.413Ch[45,46]
ScPsbR (Photosystem II R subunit)MN167892Sorghum bicolor
XM_002443957.2		Involved in the assembly of PSII, particularly that of the oxygen-evolving complex subunit PsbP94.661Ch[47,48]
ScVTE3 (2-methyl-6-phytyl-1,4-hydroquinone methyltransferase 2)MN167899Sorghum bicolor
XM_002443518.2		Involved in the synthesis of vitamin E and plastoquinone94.383Ch[49]
ScCAB1 (Chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1)MN167905Sorghum bicolor
XM_002455856.2		Involved in the formation of the LHCIIb complex 97.111Ch[50]
Note: Cyto, cytoplasm; Ch, chloroplast; PM, plasma membrane; P, peroxisome; N, nucleus; V, vacuole.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Cheng, G.; Yang, Z.; Wang, T.; Xu, J. Identification of Sugarcane Host Factors Interacting with the 6K2 Protein of the Sugarcane Mosaic Virus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163867

AMA Style

Zhang H, Cheng G, Yang Z, Wang T, Xu J. Identification of Sugarcane Host Factors Interacting with the 6K2 Protein of the Sugarcane Mosaic Virus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(16):3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hai, Guangyuan Cheng, Zongtao Yang, Tong Wang, and Jingsheng Xu. 2019. "Identification of Sugarcane Host Factors Interacting with the 6K2 Protein of the Sugarcane Mosaic Virus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 16: 3867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop