Next Article in Journal
Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage
Next Article in Special Issue
miR-216a Acts as a Negative Regulator of Breast Cancer by Modulating Stemness Properties and Tumor Microenvironment
Previous Article in Journal
Osteoclast-Like Cells in Aneurysmal Disease Exhibit an Enhanced Proteolytic Phenotype
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differentially Expressed microRNAs in MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 Pancreas Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines are Involved in Cancer Stem Cell Regulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms20194687
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Exo-miRNAs in Cancer: A Focus on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications

by
Francesco Ingenito
1,†,
Giuseppina Roscigno
2,†,
Alessandra Affinito
1,†,
Silvia Nuzzo
3,†,
Iolanda Scognamiglio
2,
Cristina Quintavalle
1,* and
Gerolama Condorelli
2,4,*
1
Percuros BV, Albinusdreef 2 - 2333ZA Leiden, Percuros BV, Zernikedreef 8. 2333 CL Leiden, The Netherlands
2
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, “Federico II” University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
IRCCS SDN, IT-80143 Naples, Italy
4
IRCCS Neuromed – Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Pozzilli, Via Atinense, 18 – IT-86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(19), 4687; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194687
Submission received: 9 August 2019 / Revised: 12 September 2019 / Accepted: 19 September 2019 / Published: 21 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MicroRNA Biology in Cancer Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles released into biological fluids where they act as carriers of various molecules, including proteins, lipids, and RNAs, between cells, modulating or perturbing specific physiological processes. Recently, it has been suggested that tumoral cells release excessive amounts of exosomes that, through their cargo, promote tumor progression, stimulating growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, insensitivity to chemotherapy, and immune evasion. Increasing evidence highlights exosomal microRNAs (exo-miRNAs) as important players in tumorigenesis. MicroRNA (miRNA) are a class of small non-coding RNA able to regulate gene expression, targeting multiple mRNAs and inducing translational repression and/or mRNA degradation. Exo-miRNAs are highly stable and easily detectable in biological fluids, and for these reasons, miRNAs are potential cancer biomarkers useful diagnostically and prognostically. Furthermore, since exosomes are natural delivery systems between cells, they can be appropriately modified to carry therapeutic miRNAs to specific recipient cells. Here we summarize the main functions of exo-miRNAs and their possible role for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

1. Introduction

Over the last decades it has been shown that cells, in addition to soluble mediators like hormones and cytokines, release more complex messages, including a particular type of secreted vesicles called extracellular vehicles (EVs) [1].
EVs are highly heterogeneous and therefore their characterization and classification has resulted tricky. According to their biogenesis it is possible to distinguish two big groups of EVs: exosomes and microvesicles. Exosomes are generated upon inward budding of the endosomal membrane with the plasma membrane; in contrast microvesicles are generated upon outward budding of the plasma membrane [2].
EVs carry functional molecules, such as membrane and cytosolic proteins, lipids, and RNA, and with their cargo contribute to metastatic niche formation and resistance to therapy [3].
In terms of quality and quantity, EV cargo is cell-type specific and changes according to the physiological or pathological state of the cell [4]. For this reason, EVs have been deeply investigated in body fluids such as serum, plasma, saliva, and liquor as novel biomarkers of human diseases. Once released into the extracellular space, EVs reach target cells and deliver their cargo, promoting phenotypic changes [5].
Since exosomes are a more homogeneous group among the EVs, they have been intensely investigated.
MicroRNAs are a class of small, 17-24nt long noncoding RNA that induce post transcriptional gene silencing by binding the 3’UTR (untranslated region) of target genes. They are frequently dysregulated in cancer [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Extracellular microRNAs released by cells are packed in exosomes and microvesicles in order to gain greater stability and hinder their degradation.
Since exosomes are potential diagnostic biomarkers, characterization of microRNAs transported and transferred within exosomes could highlight new mechanisms in cancer progression and lead to the identification of new biomarkers. In this review, we discuss the functional role of microRNAs on tumor progression and microenvironment equilibrium, focusing our attention on exosomes as vectors for intercellular delivery of microRNAs.

2. Exosomes: General Features

Exosomes are endosome-derived extracellular vesicles with a diameter between 30–100 nm [13] that act as carriers of different biological materials, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids between cells located also in distant regions of the body.
Exosomes originate from the maturation of endosomes within the cytosol, and part of the endocytic cargo consisting of extracellular and cellular components can be incorporated into small vesicles born by inward budding of early endosomes, generating a new type of cytoplasmic vesicle known as a multivesicular body (MVB) [3].
Since MVB formation requires internal invagination of the endosomal membrane, membrane proteins retain the same orientation they have on the plasmatic membrane, enclosing the inner endosomal components into the small vesicles [14]. The fate of MVBs is fusion either with lysosomes, for degradation processes, or with plasma membrane (PM), which causes the release into the extracellular space of these inner vesicles, known as exosomes (Figure 1) [3,15].
The selective sorting of distinctive proteins and nucleic acids into exosomes is mediated by a variety of mechanisms, most of which are not fully characterized. Concerning proteins, their specific sorting is controlled by mechanisms that involve ESCRT, tetraspanins, and lipid-dependent machineries [16]. Much evidence shows that RNA sorting is mediated by proteins that recognize specific sequence regions, like in the case of hnRNPA2B1, which recognizes specific cis-acting elements of miRNAs, controlling sorting in a very precise way [17].

The Role of Exosomes in Cancer

Cancer cells secrete a higher quantity of exosomes compared to healthy cells, and “tumoral exosomes” may transfer factors involved in cancer progression, perturbing the activity of receiver cells and favoring tumorigenesis through regulation of proliferation, escape from immune control, drug resistance, and metastatic processes [18]. Riches et al. described that, during 24 hours of incubation, normal breast epithelial cells release 4.5 ± 2.3 × 108 exosomes per 106 cells, while a breast cancer cell line produced 53.2 ± 1.6 × 108 exosomes per 106 cells during the same period [19]. Similarly, a study conducted by W. Zhang et al. reported that healthy ovarian cells were characterized by a sharp increase in exosome release for only up to 10 hours of incubation, while the tumoral cells taken into consideration produced exosomes for 10–16 hours [20].
Excessive release of exosomes can be induced not only by intrinsic cell properties, like mutations of genes involved in exosome biogenesis, but also by microenvironmental conditions.
H.W. King showed that hypoxia led to the induction of exosomal release in breast cancer cells. The exposure of these cells to modest (1% O2) and severe (0.1% O2) hypoxia led to 32.3  ±  4.8% and 90.9  ±  7.1% increases of exosomes into the media as compared to healthy cells [21]. A study on melanoma cells proved that exosomal release and uptake are improved in an acidic microenvironment: In particular, the rigidity and sphingomyelin/ganglioside GM3 content of exosomal membrane was higher at low pH, which involved increased fusion efficiency [22].
The importance of exosomal release and transfer have been validated in different types of cancer; in particular, they are emerging as key players in glioblastoma (GBM) genesis and progression. Exosomes in the central nervous system (CNS), which move factors between myelinating glia and neurons, are involved in processes such as neuronal survival, synapse assembly, and plasticity, [23].
However, GBM cells release exosomes that differ from those released in healthy conditions. An analysis conducted by J. Skog et al. identified various proteins such as angiogenin, FGF, IL-6, IL-8, TIMP-1, VEGF, and TIMP-2 involved in GBM angiogenesis and able to increase malignancy. Most of these factors presumably are released into the extracellular microenvironment (ECM) upon the lysis of the exosomes due to the acidic tumor environment and interacted with cognate receptors on the surface of endothelial cells to promote angiogenesis [24]. Furthermore, under hypoxic conditions, GBM cells release exosomes rich in VEGF-A, which increases permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), reduces the expression of claudin-5, and facilitates angiogenesis [25].
Another example of an oncogenic factor loaded in exosomes is EGFRvIII, which has been detected in serum microvesicles from GBM patients [26]. The uptake of EGFR-expressing exosomes leads to the integration of the receptor to the plasma membrane of receiver cells and to subsequent activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, such as the ERK1–ERK2 and AKT pathways [27].
Tumoural exosomes promote cancer development and escape from immunologic control [28].
A study by Domenis R. et al. suggested that GSC-derived exosomes can inhibit activation and proliferation of T cells and production of Th1 cytokines, without perturbing their suppressive ability, by acting on monocytes by promoting a Mo-MDSC (monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell) tumor-supportive phenotype. Indeed, they demonstrated that GSC-derived exosomes are internalized by CD14+ monocytes, inducing the release of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 [29].
Qu et al. showed that gastric cancer derived-exosomes facilitate metastasis by disrupting the mesothelial barrier through apoptosis and mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (MMT) of peritoneal mesothelial cells [30]. Furthermore, Hu et al. indicated that exosomal miRNAs from malignant ascites induce an invasive effect on gastric cancer cells; in particular, when ascites exosomes are released into the peritoneal cavity and internalized by circulating gastric cancer cells, they provoke an abnormal activation of the EMT signaling pathway, enabling peritoneal dissemination [31]. Another study by Qiu et al. underlined the role of exosomal long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in metastasis progression. In particular, they demonstrated that metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer cells transfer the lncRNA MALAT1 via exosomes to umbilical vein endothelial cells, stimulating angiogenesis-related gene expression and empowering metastasis formation [32].
New evidence suggests that exosomes can alter the chemosensitivity of cancer cells by manipulating cellular signaling pathways. Liu et al. determined that doxorubicin resistance can be transferred from gastric-resistant cancer cells to non-resistant cancer cells by the horizontal transfer of exomiR-501, which seemed able to downregulate the cell-death inducer BLID (BH3-like motif-containing protein) [33]. Likewise, Fen et al. indicated that pancreatic tumor exosomes can transmit gemcitabine chemoresistance to sensitive cells within the same tumor or at other anatomical locations. This study proposes that the presence of EphA2 on tumoral exosomes could be responsible for this ability, revealing a previously unknown property of this protein [34].
Other than the presence of oncogenic proteins in tumoral exosomes, nucleic acids can take part in carcinogenesis. In particular, there is increasing evidence for miRNAs playing a role not only in cancer cell growth, but also in creating a favorable microenvironment for tumors development.

3. MiRNA and Exosomes

3.1. Extracellular miRNAs

The human genome is made up of coding and non-coding regions. Some non-coding DNA is transcribed into regulatory RNA molecules, the best studied of which are long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are over 200 nucleotide long, and microRNAs, which are short sequences (20–25 nucleotides) known to regulate 50% of protein-coding genes. MicroRNAs regulate gene expression post transcriptionally by binding to the 3′ UTR of target genes and inducing translation repression or RNA degradation.
MicroRNAs are known to be deregulated in cancer, and several microRNAs are reported to act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. For example, miR-221 and miR-21 are well-documented oncomiRNAs that exert anti-apoptotic effects and induce cell proliferation and an aggressive phenotype [35].
On the other hand, the miR-34a and let7 families inhibit tumor growth and stimulate apoptosis [36,37]. Other miRNAs are able to confer resistance to chemotherapy, as in the case of miR-24, which increases the resistance to cisplatin of breast cancer stem cell by inhibition of its pro-apoptotic target Bim L [11], and miR-221/222, overexpressed in high-grade GBM patients, not only inhibit the expression of the tyrosine phosphatase PTPμ, regulating positively cancer cell migration [9], but also increase temozolomide resistance through modulation of expression of the DNA repair enzyme MGMT [10].
While the majority of miRNAs are found in the intra-cellular compartment, recently a high number of miRNAs (known as circulating miRNAs) have also been detected in the extracellular compartment: They have been found in body fluids, such as serum [38,39] or plasma [40,41], saliva, urine, breast milk, cerebrospinal fluid, and seminal fluid [42]. Surprisingly, these circulating miRNAs are remarkably stable and can survive under unfavorable conditions for long time. Interestingly, the stability of endogenous miRNAs contrasts with that of synthetic spike-in miRNAs, which are rapidly degraded in plasma.
MiRNAs are protected from RNase activity by different mechanisms: wrapped in membrane vesicles (exosomes, microparticles, and apoptotic bodies), associated with proteins, or enclosed in lipoprotein complexes [43,44]. The first authors reporting on exosomes carrying miRs were Valadi et al. In their pioneering work, they found that exosomes contain heterogeneous RNA species, including miRNAs. Furthermore, they discovered that exosomes can contain higher concentrations of miRNAs, such as let-7, miR-1, miR-181, and miR-375, compared to the cells of origin, indicative of selective wrapping of miRNAs in the exosomes. [45]. Then, in 2008 Hunter et al detected microRNAs in peripheral blood vesicles. These two discoveries opened up the path for a revolutionary theory: microRNAs can be loaded and transported to distant sites through exosomes [46]. Since then, in addition to their role in intracellular signaling pathways, microRNAs have been identified as key mediators of cell-cell communication, playing crucial roles as autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signaling regulators.

3.2. Passive and Selective Release of miRNAs from Cells to Exosomes

Several studies have demonstrated that microRNAs can be packaged into exosomes via two mechanisms. The first is a passive mechanism dependent upon the cellular microRNA expression profile: the microRNAs are packaged passively, according to the amount present in the cell of origin (Figure 2A,B). Pigati et al. [47] were the first to focus investigation on the mechanism by which miRNAs are packed into exosomes. The authors performed a microarray analysis comparing intracellular and exosomal microRNAs in MCF7 cells. They found that about 66% of the miRNA level present in the exosomes was proportional to the intracellular microRNA content (Figure 2A). For example, the amount of miR-638 in exosomes closely reflected its level within the cell. Moreover, also the transcriptomic changes that occur in cancer or in activated cells may influence the amount of the miRNAs loaded into exosomes. The presence, for example, of a high number of miRNA target transcripts, could differentially modulate the amount of miRNA engaged by gene silencing or by MVB biogenesis (Figure 2B) [48].
Pigati and colleagues also observed that some miRNAs, such as miR-451 and miR-1246, produced by cancer mammary cells are released independently from their intracellular levels, whereas the majority of the described miRNAs produced by non-malignant cells are retained in the cells. This work opened the idea that, in addition to the passive release mechanism based on the miRNA cells amount, cells have a selective miRNA-release mechanism that is cell-dependent [47].
In this regard, there are at least three potential active mechanisms for the sorting of miRNAs into exosomes. The first mechanism involves a neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2)-dependent pathway. nSMase2 is involved in the synthesis of ceramide, a phospholipid enriched in exosomal membranes and required to promote exosomal biogenesis. Kosaka et al. found that the inhibition of nSMAse2 inhibits not only the formation of exosomes but also the amount of miRNAs uploaded (Figure 2C, left panel) [49,50,51].
The second mechanism was elucidated by Villarroya-Beltri et al. The group identified short sequence motifs (GGAG, UGAG, CCCU, and UCCU) present in the 3′ end region of the miRNAs sequences that guide their packaging into exosomes in human primary T lymphocytes. Furthermore, they found that the sumoylated chaperone protein named hnRNPA2B1 bound miRNAs presenting with “EXOmotifs” and promoted the loading of microRNAs into exosomes (Figure 2C, middle panel) [17]. The third mechanism is related to post-transcriptional modifications of the miRNAs at their 3’ end. It was found that exosomes secreted by B-cells or isolated from human urine were enriched in miRNAs with uridylated 3’-ends, while those containing adenylated 3’-ends were overrepresented in the cells of origin (Figure 2C, right panel) [52].
In addition to physiological events, cancer can alter microRNA packaging within exosomes. Although a specific mechanism linking changes in microRNA content in exosomes has not yet been identified, it is clear that cancer alters signaling pathways that control miRNA loading in exosomes. For instance, in colorectal cancer cells, mutation of KRAS has been shown to influence exosomal cargo through an nSMAse-dependent mechanism, with mutant KRAS cells loading preferentially a greater amount of miR-100, whereas wild-type KRAS cells package higher levels of miR-10 in the exosomes [53].

3.3. Exosomal miRNAs Involvement in Cancer

Recent evidence suggests that exosomes are involved in the transferring of miRNAs from donor cells to adjacent cells, acting as messengers between tumoral and stromal cells [54]. This reciprocal communication can induce the reprogramming of the target cells’ gene expression, altering tumor growth, metastasis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition [55], angiogenesis, and immune function [56] (Figure 3). For instance, a recent work by Zhang et al. demonstrated the existence of reciprocal cross-talk between tumor and the microenvironment through exo-miRNAs that support tumor proliferation and apoptosis inhibition thanks to induced loss of PTEN [57]. Another example is represented by miR-660-5p. This miR is released by exosomes and promotes tumor proliferation and viability by targeting KLF9 and, thus, sustains progression of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [58]. Moreover, studies have proved not only that different exo-miRNAs can regulate cancer aggressiveness and progression, but a single miRNA can impact different cancerous aspects at the same time. For instance, in breast cancer, miR-155 induces exosome-mediated chemoresistance to doxorubicin and paclitaxel, and simultaneously act as an oncogenic signal reprogramming cancer metabolism [59,60].
Recently, it has been shown that exosomal microRNAs released from cancer cells can influence angiogenesis by effecting cells of the tumor microenvironment or the mesenchymal stem cell population. Paggetti et al. showed that chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells released exosomes enriched in miR-21, miR-155, miR-146a, miR-148a, and let-7g, which are taken up by endothelial and mesenchymal stem cells. The transfer of the exosomal cargo induces transcriptomic changes that promote an inflammatory phenotype in the stroma cells, which resembles the phenotype of CAFs (Cancer-associated fibroblasts) [61]. In addition, lung cancer cells have been shown to vehicle miR-21 via exosomes to surrounding normal epithelial cells. This led to an increase of VEGF levels, inducing angiogenesis. Interestingly, the inhibition of exosomal miR-21 decreased VEGF production in recipient cells, blocking exosome-mediated angiogenesis [62]. In a similar manner, during hypoxia, A549 lung cancer cells release miR-494-containing exosomes to nearby endothelial cells, enhancing angiogenesis through the suppression of PTEN and the Akt/eNOS pathway [63].
Metastasis is a complex process that involves different steps such as intravasion, migration in vascular system, extravasion and invasion of distant organs. Several studies illustrate that exosomal microRNAs released by cancer cells are able to enhance tumor cell migration and promote metastasis by inducing tumor cells plasticity and manipulating local stroma cells. The components of the mir-200 family (miR-200a, -200b, -200c, -141 and -429,) were classically considered as tumor suppressor genes, thanks to the ability to downregulate Zeb1 and block EMT [64]. Interestingly, Le MT et al. demonstrated that extracellular vesicles containing miR-200 can be transferred from metastatic to non-metastatic cells. MiR-200 promoted metastatic capacity to weakly metastatic cells and conferred the ability to colonize distant tissues, inducing EMT [65]. Another example is reported by Zhou et al [66]. The authors demonstrated that miR-105 is secreted by metastatic breast cancer and destroys the vascular endothelial barrier by targeting the cellular tight junction protein ZO-1 in endothelial cells, favoring premetastatic niche formation.
Recently, it is well established that tumor growth and progression are closely linked to the immune system. Cancer is able to reprogram immune cells (macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and T cells) and suppress anti-tumor responses, promoting tumor survival, invasion, and progression. Secretion of exosomal miRs can play a crucial role in immune cell modulation, altering immune response. Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) are the predominant leukocytes infiltrating tumors and are known to produce cytokines that stimulate angiogenesis and the release of metalloproteases needed to degrade the extracellular matrix. It has been demonstrated by Fabbri et al. that miR-21 and miR-29a secreted by tumor cell exosomes can bind to TLR8 receptors expressed on macrophages, leading to NF-κB activation and secretion of inflammatory cytokines [67]. In contrast, TAMs can shuttle exosomes containing miR-223 to breast cancer cells, which promotes an aggressive and invasive phenotype of breast cancer cells. Other immune cells can also be target by exosomal communication. For instance, DCs (Dendrytic cells) are antigen-presenting cells that induce the activation of T-cells. Recently, it has been reported that pancreatic cancer cells inhibit DC activation by secreting exosomes enriched in miR-203. This miR is able to repress TLR4 expression and decrease the production of TNF-α and IL-12 [68]. Zhou M. et al. reported that nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells induce a suppressive tumor microenvironment, promoting regulatory T-cells (Treg cells) by releasing exosomal microRNAs (miR-24-3p, miR-891a, miR-106a-5p, miR-20a-5p, and miR-1908) [69]. Interestingly, it has been reported that Treg cells transferred miRNAs to T helper Th1 cells, suppressing Th1 cell proliferation and cytokine secretion through Ptgs2 inhibition [70]. Furthermore, miR-92b transferred through exosomes to natural killer (NK) cells suppresses CD69 expression and NK-mediated cytotoxicity by facilitating recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma [71].
Additional oncosuppressive and tumor-promoting miRNAs present in exosomes are summarized in Table 1.
Taken together, these studies highlight that exosomal microRNAs secreted by tumoral cells can induce gene expression changes in recipient cells and promote tumor growth and metastasis by altering tumor cell plasticity and manipulating the tumor microenvironment.

4. Exosomal miRNAs as Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Prognosis in Cancer

Liquid biopsy is a pioneering, non-invasive diagnostic approach with the potential to identify new disease-associated biomarkers for earlier diagnosis.
Already in 1965, Gold et. al. demonstrated the possibility of using blood to identify cancer cells [85]. Since then, many serum cancer biomarkers have been identified, such as CA-125 in ovarian cancer and PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) for prostate cancer. However, their diagnostic use is limited by low sensitivity [86]. Recently, researchers have isolated tumor-derived components from body fluids that could be used for diagnostic purposes, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), macrovesicles, and exosomes.
The use of exosomes in liquid biopsy is becoming appreciated for its potential to predict different diseases, such as cancer. Here, we will discuss the diagnostic value and the state of art of exo-miRNAs in cancer.
Exo-miRNAs may represent interesting biomarkers in cancer because: (i) They are loaded into exosomes at higher levels in tumor cells [87]; (ii) they are stable at different temperatures [88]; and (iii) within exosomes [89], they are protected from RNase.
In biological samples, such as liquid biopsies, exo-miRNAs can be analyzed through different techniques. Quantitative real-time PCR is the gold standard to detect specific miRNAs. This method generates fluorescence signals proportional to the quantity of the PCR product and allow the detection of a small number of miRNAs. Microarray-based technologies, often used to check a large number of miRNAs, relies on hybridization of exosomal RNA to specific probes. More recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become increasingly important for the detection of new miRNAs. The approach consists in RNA amplification followed by sequencing of the PCR products. The output data allows the identification of known and unknown miRNAs [90,91,92].
Exo-miRNAs can be considered as biomarkers for early detection and prognosis of cancer. For example, in 2017, Jin et al. selected four exosome-derived miRNAs (let-7b-5p, let-7e-5p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-486-5p) that were promising for early diagnosis of NSCLC. The profile of all identified microRNAs showed a sensitivity and specificity higher than 80% [93] (ref 80%) in NSCLC identification. In GMB, one important study by Manterola et al. described that the combination of two exo-miRNAs (miR-320 and miR574-3p) and RNU6-1 may discriminate GMB patients from healthy individuals [62]. In prostate cancer, miR-182 and miR-183 are highly expressed in cancer exosomes [94], while miR-1290 and miR-375 may predict prognosis in patients [95] with prostate cancer [96]. However, due to the simultaneous expression of some microRNAs in different types of cancer, their specificity is challenging. For example, exo-miR-21 is increased in breast cancer [97], in glioma [95], colorectal cancer [98], oesophageal squamous cell cancer [99], and ovarian cancer [100]. This suggests that some microRNAs, such as exo- miR-21, are not specific to one type of cancer, but could be considered as biomarkers for the presence or absence of cancer in general.
Moreover, the analysis of the exo-miRNA signature could be helpful in identifying cancer staging. For example, Kanaoka et al. used a retrospective analysis to identify exo-miR-451a as a promising biomarker to predict the prognosis in NSCLC patients at stages I, II, and III [101]. In breast cancer, exo-miR-223-3p is associated with histological type pT and pN, pathological stages of lymphatic invasion, and the nuclear grade (NG) of breast cancer, resulting significantly higher in the early stage [102]. This study was conducted on a small subset of 185 clinical biopsy samples; however, a large number of cases are needful to confirm the role of exo- miR-223-3p as a biomarker for BC detection. exo-miR-301a is considered a serum biomarker for diagnosis and recurrence of GMB. It correlates with the pathological grades and it is downregulated after surgical resection of the tumors, but its expression increases again at recurrence of tumor mass [103]. In ovarian cancer, Meng X et al. found higher levels of exosomal miR-200b and miR-200c in patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstretics) stage III–IV compared to patients with FIGO stages I–II [104].
Other microRNAs have also been selected for their potential use as diagnostic serum biomarkers useful in discriminating different cancer subtypes. For example, exo-miR-373 was found more expressed in Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) than in the luminal subtypes, indicating that it may represent a novel specific biomarker of TNBC [105]. In NSCLC, Jin et al. identified four exo-miRNAs (miR-181-5p, miR-30a-3p, miR-30e-3p, and miR-361-5p) and three exo-miRNAs (miR-10b-5p, miR-15b-5p, and miR-320b) that may represent a specific signature of, respectively, adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma [59].
Finally, some exo-miRNAs have been identified as recurrence-specific biomarkers. In particular, in NSCLC patients, miR-4257 and miR-21 are more expressed in patients undergoing recurrence after surgery compared to patients without recurrence [106].
In the last years, three clinical trials have been set up to investigate the role of the exosome content, including that of exo-miRNAs. In 2018, Lei Li started a prospective enrolment of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and benign gynaecologic disease patients to identify, with the aid of next-generation sequencing (NGS), miRNAs and ncRNAs that were biomarkers for the detection and prediction of progression-free survival of ovarian cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03738319).
In prostate cancer, the role of “prostasomes”, the prostate exosome cargo, is currently being investigated as a diagnostic tool in two clinical trials. Both of them aims to recruit patients with prostate cancer and analyze the prostasome content by NGS (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03694483, NCT03911999).

5. Exosomal miRNA-Based Therapy

Thanks to the particular features of exosomes—such as their ability to carry functional molecules over long distance within the body through the systemic circulation, their stability in the circulation, their compatibility with biological systems, and their ability to be recognized and taken up by specific recipient cells—they have recently been considered also for possible application in therapy. In fact, exosomes can be used as carriers for the transport of functional therapeutic molecules to unhealthy cells.
Over the last few years, different methods of exosome engineering for the encapsulation of therapeutic agents, like drugs or nucleic acids, have been developed. In particular, considering the abundantly demonstrated role of miRNAs in cancer regulation, exosomes have been identified as a valid method for the delivery of these nucleic acids to tumoral cells, opening the possibility of novel therapeutic approaches for cancer treatment.
Schmittgen et al showed the therapeutic potential of exo-miRNAs on immune escape in neuroblastoma. The author demonstrated that NK cell-derived exosomes or nanoparticles can be used to deliver and restore miR-186 levels and, thus, reduce tumor size, restoring NK-mediated cytotoxicity [107]. As proved by Le’s group, exosomes can be engineered to deliver antisense oligonucleotides, usable as RNA drugs, to inhibit cell proliferation in leukaemia and breast cancer [108].
Moreover, given the crucial role that exosomes have in cell-cell communication and, thus, in cancer progression, new strategies have been drawn up aimed to inhibit exosome releasing or their uptake. The blockage of exo-miRNA cargo could be the result of rab27 silencing: rab27 depletion leads to a reduction of miR-494 abundance and, hence, to decreased tumor growth and metastasis in melanoma [109]. Another way to inhibit exosome release is obtained by treating cells with GW4869, a blocker of exosomes biogenesis [33,110]. Alternatively, the effects of exosomes can be reduced by inhibiting their uptake. In this regard, treatment with endocytosis inhibitors interrupt multiple myeloma cell communication with bone marrow stroma, reducing proliferation and drug resistance [111].
As already mentioned before, some registered clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov database) on exo-miRNAs as diagnostic tools are currently ongoing. Additionally, a large number of trials have been registered to study the role of miRNAs or exosomes in patient outcome and therapy. Unfortunately, the field of therapeutic exo-miRNAs is at an embryonic stage, and no trials are available at the moment.
However, an ongoing interventional study aims to recruit malignant glioma patients to conduct a phase I human trial (NCT02507583) using exosomes as the carrier of an antisense RNA oligonucleotide. The purpose of this study is to activate the immune system through exosomes released by glioblastoma cells treated with an Insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide and diffused by 20 diffusion chambers implanted in the rectum of the patients. Investigators believe that the resulting immune system activation can potentially have higher benefits and lower risks compared to current glioma treatment options. Another very recent study in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients uses mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes delivering a small interference RNA (siRNA) against a mutated KRAS (NCT03608631). This study aimed to prove the clinical applicability of exosomes for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment. Anyway, the studies mentioned above and many others highlight roles for exo-miRNA cargo in all the major aspects of cancer, such as tumor growth and progression. Above all, the important role in cancer progression of exosomal miRNAs make them highly interesting in the clinical scenario as they may provide the basis for novel strategies in cancer treatment. Therefore, the great interest on exosomal microRNAs expressed over the last years could pave the way to future clinical trials that will continue to implement clinical management of cancer patients.

6. Conclusions

Exo-miRNAs engender important mechanisms in the context of cellular communication, regulating physiological as well as pathological processes. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence of how tumoral cells use exosomes to deliver oncomiRNAs, miRNAs that promote cancer growth and spread within the body. Deeper knowledge of these miRNAs may lead not only to better comprehension of tumor progression, but also to new therapeutic approaches. The capacity to find new methods for more precise diagnosis and therapy of cancer is one of most important aims of modern medicine. Generally, current methods for tumor diagnosis fail in the identification of cancer at early stages, preventing timely treatment. Furthermore, the gold-standards of cancer therapies, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, present various problems, such as an inability to act specifically on cancer cells, causing various collateral effects. However, new progress in the field of diagnosis and precision medicine has been made over the last few years. The use of blood components for early diagnosis is gaining more importance. In particular, exo-miRNAs are emerging as promising biomarkers and valuable therapeutic agents. Indeed, exosomes and their miRNA cargos, on account of their being easily detected in biological fluids like blood, can provide a non-invasive way to detect the presence of tumoral cells, classify cancers, and forecast response to specific drug treatments, avoiding invasive diagnostic techniques like tissue biopsy. Improved knowledge on these circulating biomarkers could lead to better guidance on the appropriate therapy to deploy, in line with the concept of precision medicine. By taking advantage of exosomal release into biological fluids and their interaction with specific recipient cells, exosomes can be developed into vehicles for the delivery of drugs and other functional molecules, like miRNAs, and thus they are interesting as therapeutic agents, as already tested in a large number of studies. However, additional studies in bigger cohorts and in different types of malignancies are necessary to address the robustness and the specificity of exo-miRNA detection. Identification of easier and cheaper technologies for the detection of exosomes and microRNA is really a milestone for translation to the clinical setting. Moreover, other challenges are to find additional markers for the enrichment of CAF- or tumor cell-derived exosomes, and to discriminate miRNAs derived from the tumor microenvironment from those derived from the tumor bulk. In the therapeutics setting, exosomes could represent a clever strategy to improve the accessibility of nucleic-acid therapeutics to cancer and the cells of the tumor microenvironment.
In conclusion, thanks to their features, exo-miRNAs can provide an innovative and useful tool for clinical oncology applications.

Author Contributions

Writing - original draft: F.I., G.R., A.A., S.N., C.Q.; Investigation: F.I., G.R., A.A., S.N.; review & editing: F.I., G.R., A.A., S.N., C.Q., I.S., G.C.; visualization: F.I., I.S.; Supervision: C.Q.; funding acquisition: G.C.; Project administration: G.C.

Funding

This work was supported by grants to GC from Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro AIRC (IG 2013 N.14046 and IG 2016 N. 8473), Earlier Grant to CG, POR Campania FESR 2014-2020 “SATIN” to G.C. CQ is recipient of a European GRANT (IF_MSCA n: 838988). GR is recipient of Fondazione Umberto Veronesi individual Fellowship. All images were created with Biorender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Rak, J. Extracellular vesicles—Biomarkers and effectors of the cellular interactome in cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2013, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Niel, G.; D’Angelo, G.; Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Thery, C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 255–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kalra, H.; Drummen, G.P.; Mathivanan, S. Focus on Extracellular Vesicles: Introducing the Next Small Big Thing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yuana, Y.; Sturk, A.; Nieuwland, R. Extracellular vesicles in physiological and pathological conditions. Blood Rev. 2013, 27, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Fiore, D.; Donnarumma, E.; Roscigno, G.; Iaboni, M.; Russo, V.; Affinito, A.; Adamo, A.; De Martino, F.; Quintavalle, C.; Romano, G.; et al. miR-340 predicts glioblastoma survival and modulates key cancer hallmarks through down-regulation of NRAS. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 19531–19547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pekarsky, Y.; Balatti, V.; Palamarchuk, A.; Rizzotto, L.; Veneziano, D.; Nigita, G.; Rassenti, L.Z.; Pass, H.I.; Kipps, T.J.; Liu, C.G.; et al. Dysregulation of a family of short noncoding RNAs, tsRNAs, in human cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 5071–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Quintavalle, C.; Donnarumma, E.; Iaboni, M.; Roscigno, G.; Garofalo, M.; Romano, G.; Fiore, D.; De Marinis, P.; Croce, C.M.; Condorelli, G. Effect of miR-21 and miR-30b/c on TRAIL-induced apoptosis in glioma cells. Oncogene 2013, 32, 4001–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Quintavalle, C.; Garofalo, M.; Zanca, C.; Romano, G.; Iaboni, M.; De Caro, M.D.; Martinez-Montero, J.C.; Incoronato, M.; Nuovo, G.; Croce, C.M.; et al. miR-221/222 overexpession in human glioblastoma increases invasiveness by targeting the protein phosphate PTP mu. Oncogene 2012, 31, 858–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quintavalle, C.; Mangani, D.; Roscigno, G.; Romano, G.; Diaz-Lagares, A.; Iaboni, M.; Donnarumma, E.; Fiore, D.; De Marinis, P.; Soini, Y.; et al. miR-221/222 Target the DNA Methyltransferase MGMT in Glioma Cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roscigno, G.; Puoti, I.; Giordano, I.; Donnarumma, E.; Russo, V.; Affinito, A.; Adamo, A.; Quintavalle, C.; Todaro, M.; Vivanco, M.D.; et al. MiR-24 induces chemotherapy resistance and hypoxic advantage in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 19507–19521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Roscigno, G.; Quintavalle, C.; Donnarumma, E.; Puoti, I.; Diaz-Lagares, A.; Iaboni, M.; Fiore, D.; Russo, V.; Todaro, M.; Romano, G.; et al. MiR-221 promotes stemness of breast cancer cells by targeting DNMT3b. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Van der Pol, E.; Boing, A.N.; Harrison, P.; Sturk, A.; Nieuwland, R. Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol. Rev. 2012, 64, 676–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Villarroya-Beltri, C.; Baixauli, F.; Gutierrez-Vazquez, C.; Sanchez-Madrid, F.; Mittelbrunn, M. Sorting it out: Regulation of exosome loading. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2014, 28, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Van Niel, G.; Porto-Carreiro, I.; Simoes, S.; Raposo, G. Exosomes: A common pathway for a specialized function. J. Biochem. 2006, 140, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hessvik, N.P.; Llorente, A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Villarroya-Beltri, C.; Gutierrez-Vazquez, C.; Sanchez-Cabo, F.; Perez-Hernandez, D.; Vazquez, J.; Martin-Cofreces, N.; Martinez-Herrera, D.J.; Pascual-Montano, A.; Mittelbrunn, M.; Sanchez-Madrid, F. Sumoylated hnRNPA2B1 controls the sorting of miRNAs into exosomes through binding to specific motifs. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, T.; Deng, C.X. Current Progresses of Exosomes as Cancer Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Riches, A.; Campbell, E.; Borger, E.; Powis, S. Regulation of exosome release from mammary epithelial and breast cancer cells—A new regulatory pathway. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Cao, D.; You, Y.; Shen, K.; Peng, P. Regulation of exosomes released from normal ovarian epithelial cells and ovarian cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. King, H.W.; Michael, M.Z.; Gleadle, J.M. Hypoxic enhancement of exosome release by breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Parolini, I.; Federici, C.; Raggi, C.; Lugini, L.; Palleschi, S.; De Milito, A.; Coscia, C.; Iessi, E.; Logozzi, M.; Molinari, A.; et al. Microenvironmental pH is a key factor for exosome traffic in tumor cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 34211–34222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Budnik, V.; Ruiz-Canada, C.; Wendler, F. Extracellular vesicles round off communication in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Taraboletti, G.; D’Ascenzo, S.; Giusti, I.; Marchetti, D.; Borsotti, P.; Millimaggi, D.; Giavazzi, R.; Pavan, A.; Dolo, V. Bioavailability of VEGF in tumor-shed vesicles depends on vesicle burst induced by acidic pH. Neoplasia 2006, 8, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, C.; Wang, H.; Xiong, C.; Liu, Y. Hypoxic glioblastoma release exosomal VEGF-A induce the permeability of blood-brain barrier. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 502, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Skog, J.; Wurdinger, T.; van Rijn, S.; Meijer, D.H.; Gainche, L.; Sena-Esteves, M.; Curry, W.T., Jr.; Carter, B.S.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Breakefield, X.O. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumor growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Al-Nedawi, K.; Meehan, B.; Micallef, J.; Lhotak, V.; May, L.; Guha, A.; Rak, J. Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumor cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hu, C.; Chen, M.; Jiang, R.; Guo, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, X. Exosome-related tumor microenvironment. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 3084–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Domenis, R.; Cesselli, D.; Toffoletto, B.; Bourkoula, E.; Caponnetto, F.; Manini, I.; Beltrami, A.P.; Ius, T.; Skrap, M.; Di Loreto, C.; et al. Systemic T Cells Immunosuppression of Glioma Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Is Mediated by Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, G.; Qu, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Che, X.F.; Cheng, Y.; Fan, Y.B.; Zhang, S.M.; Na, D.; Liu, Y.P.; Qu, X.J. Gastric cancer-derived exosomes promote peritoneal metastasis by destroying the mesothelial barrier. FEBS Lett. 2017, 591, 2167–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hu, Y.T.; Qi, C.S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, X.J.; et al. Malignant ascites-derived exosomes promote peritoneal tumor cell dissemination and reveal a distinct miRNA signature in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019, 457, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Qiu, J.J.; Lin, X.J.; Tang, X.Y.; Zheng, T.T.; Lin, Y.Y.; Hua, K.Q. Exosomal Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript 1 Promotes Angiogenesis and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1960–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, X.; Lu, Y.; Xu, Y.C.; Hou, S.Z.; Huang, J.L.; Wang, B.; Zhao, J.Y.; Xia, S.L.; Fan, S.J.; Yu, X.T.; et al. Exosomal transfer of miR-501 confers doxorubicin resistance and tumorigenesis via targeting of BUD in gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019, 459, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fan, J.; Wei, Q.; Koay, E.J.; Liu, Y.; Ning, B.; Bernard, P.W.; Zhang, N.; Han, H.Y.; Katz, M.H.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Chemoresistance Transmission via Exosome-Mediated EphA2 Transfer in Pancreatic Cancer. Theranostics 2018, 8, 5986–5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chan, J.A.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Kosik, K.S. MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6029–6033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, L.; Yuan, L.; Luo, J.; Gao, J.; Guo, J.; Xie, X. MiR-34a inhibits proliferation and migration of breast cancer through down-regulation of Bcl-2 and SIRT1. Clin. Exp. Med. 2013, 13, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Buechner, J.; Tomte, E.; Haug, B.H.; Henriksen, J.R.; Lokke, C.; Flaegstad, T.; Einvik, C. Tumour-suppressor microRNAs let-7 and mir-101 target the proto-oncogene MYCN and inhibit cell proliferation in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 105, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chen, X.; Ba, Y.; Ma, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noferesti, S.S.; Sohel, M.M.; Hoelker, M.; Salilew-Wondim, D.; Tholen, E.; Looft, C.; Rings, F.; Neuhoff, C.; Schellander, K.; Tesfaye, D. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation induced changes in the expression of circulatory miRNA in bovine follicular fluid and blood plasma. J. Ovarian Res. 2015, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arroyo, J.D.; Chevillet, J.R.; Kroh, E.M.; Ruf, I.K.; Pritchard, C.C.; Gibson, D.F.; Mitchell, P.S.; Bennett, C.F.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Stirewalt, D.L.; et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5003–5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chim, S.S.; Shing, T.K.; Hung, E.C.; Leung, T.Y.; Lau, T.K.; Chiu, R.W.; Lo, Y.M. Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mause, S.F.; Weber, C. Microparticles: Protagonists of a novel communication network for intercellular information exchange. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Callis, T.E.; Pandya, K.; Seok, H.Y.; Tang, R.H.; Tatsuguchi, M.; Huang, Z.P.; Chen, J.F.; Deng, Z.; Gunn, B.; Shumate, J.; et al. MicroRNA-208a is a regulator of cardiac hypertrophy and conduction in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 2772–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zernecke, A.; Bidzhekov, K.; Noels, H.; Shagdarsuren, E.; Gan, L.; Denecke, B.; Hristov, M.; Koppel, T.; Jahantigh, M.N.; Lutgens, E.; et al. Delivery of microRNA-126 by apoptotic bodies induces CXCL12-dependent vascular protection. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Valadi, H.; Ekstrom, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjostrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lotvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hunter, M.P.; Ismail, N.; Zhang, X.; Aguda, B.D.; Lee, E.J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, T.; Schafer, J.; Lee, M.L.; Schmittgen, T.D.; et al. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pigati, L.; Yaddanapudi, S.C.; Iyengar, R.; Kim, D.J.; Hearn, S.A.; Danforth, D.; Hastings, M.L.; Duelli, D.M. Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Squadrito, M.L.; Baer, C.; Burdet, F.; Maderna, C.; Gilfillan, G.D.; Lyle, R.; Ibberson, M.; De Palma, M. Endogenous RNAs Modulate MicroRNA Sorting to Exosomes and Transfer to Acceptor Cells. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 1432–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mittelbrunn, M.; Gutierrez-Vazquez, C.; Villarroya-Beltri, C.; Gonzalez, S.; Sanchez-Cabo, F.; Gonzalez, M.A.; Bernad, A.; Sanchez-Madrid, F. Unidirectional transfer of microRNA-loaded exosomes from T cells to antigen-presenting cells. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Batagov, A.O.; Kuznetsov, V.A.; Kurochkin, I.V. Identification of nucleotide patterns enriched in secreted RNAs as putative cis-acting elements targeting them to exosome nano-vesicles. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kosaka, N.; Iguchi, H.; Yoshioka, Y.; Takeshita, F.; Matsuki, Y.; Ochiya, T. Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 17442–17452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Momose, F.; Seo, N.; Akahori, Y.; Sawada, S.; Harada, N.; Ogura, T.; Akiyoshi, K.; Shiku, H. Guanine-Rich Sequences Are a Dominant Feature of Exosomal microRNAs across the Mammalian Species and Cell Types. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cha, D.J.; Franklin, J.L.; Dou, Y.; Liu, Q.; Higginbotham, J.N.; Demory Beckler, M.; Weaver, A.M.; Vickers, K.; Prasad, N.; Levy, S.; et al. KRAS-dependent sorting of miRNA to exosomes. eLife 2015, 4, e07197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Donnarumma, E.; Fiore, D.; Nappa, M.; Roscigno, G.; Adamo, A.; Iaboni, M.; Russo, V.; Affinito, A.; Puoti, I.; Quintavalle, C.; et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts release exosomal microRNAs that dictate an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 19592–19608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. He, S.; Li, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Ji, W.; Xia, W.; Lu, S. Exosomal miR-499a-5p promotes cell proliferation, migration and EMT via mTOR signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 379, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Schwarzenbach, H. The clinical relevance of circulating, exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers for cancer. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2015, 15, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Yao, J.; Lowery, F.J.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, W.C.; Li, P.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. Microenvironment-induced PTEN loss by exosomal microRNA primes brain metastasis outgrowth. Nature 2015, 527, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qi, Y.; Zha, W.; Zhang, W. Exosomal miR-660-5p promotes tumor growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. J. BUON 2019, 24, 599–607. [Google Scholar]
  59. Santos, J.C.; Lima, N.D.S.; Sarian, L.O.; Matheu, A.; Ribeiro, M.L.; Derchain, S.F.M. Exosome-mediated breast cancer chemoresistance via miR-155 transfer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wu, Q.; Sun, S.; Li, Z.; Yang, Q.; Li, B.; Zhu, S.; Wang, L.; Wu, J.; Yuan, J.; Wang, C.; et al. Breast cancer-released exosomes trigger cancer-associated cachexia to promote tumor progression. Adipocyte 2019, 8, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paggetti, J.; Haderk, F.; Seiffert, M.; Janji, B.; Distler, U.; Ammerlaan, W.; Kim, Y.J.; Adam, J.; Lichter, P.; Solary, E.; et al. Exosomes released by chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells induce the transition of stromal cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts. Blood 2015, 126, 1106–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Liu, Y.; Luo, F.; Wang, B.R.; Li, H.Q.; Xu, Y.; Liu, X.L.; Shi, L.; Lu, X.L.; Xu, W.C.; Lu, L.; et al. STAT3-regulated exosomal miR-21 promotes angiogenesis and is involved in neoplastic processes of transformed human bronchial epithelial cells. Cancer Lett. 2016, 370, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mao, G.M.; Liu, Y.; Fang, X.; Liu, Y.H.; Fang, L.; Lin, L.J.; Liu, X.M.; Wang, N.P. Tumor-derived microRNA-494 promotes angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer. Angiogenesis 2015, 18, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Title, A.C.; Hong, S.J.; Pires, N.D.; Hasenohrl, L.; Godbersen, S.; Stokar-Regenscheit, N.; Bartel, D.P.; Stoffel, M. Genetic dissection of the miR-200-Zeb1 axis reveals its importance in tumor differentiation and invasion. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Le, M.T.N.; Hamar, P.; Guo, C.Y.; Basar, E.; Perdigao-Henriques, R.; Balaj, L.; Lieberman, J. miR-200-containing extracellular vesicles promote breast cancer cell metastasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 5109–5128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhou, W.Y.; Fong, M.Y.; Min, Y.F.; Somlo, G.; Liu, L.; Palomares, M.R.; Yu, Y.; Chow, A.; O’Connor, S.T.F.; Chin, A.R.; et al. Cancer-Secreted miR-105 Destroys Vascular Endothelial Barriers to Promote Metastasis. Cancer Cell 2014, 25, 501–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Fabbri, M.; Paone, A.; Calore, F.; Galli, R.; Gaudio, E.; Santhanam, R.; Lovat, F.; Fadda, P.; Mao, C.; Nuovo, G.J.; et al. MicroRNAs bind to Toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2110–E2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Klibi, J.; Niki, T.; Riedel, A.; Pioche-Durieu, C.; Souquere, S.; Rubinstein, E.; Moulec, S.L.E.; Guigay, J.; Hirashima, M.; Guemira, F.; et al. Blood diffusion and Th1-suppressive effects of galectin-9-containing exosomes released by Epstein-Barr virus-infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Blood 2009, 113, 1957–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhou, M.; Chen, J.H.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, W.C.; Ding, G.P.; Cao, L.P. Pancreatic cancer derived exosomes regulate the expression of TLR4 in dendritic cells via miR-203. Cell Immunol. 2014, 292, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Okoye, I.S.; Coomes, S.M.; Pelly, V.S.; Czieso, S.; Papayannopoulos, V.; Tolmachova, T.; Seabra, M.C.; Wilson, M.S. MicroRNA-Containing T-Regulatory-Cell-Derived Exosomes Suppress Pathogenic T Helper 1 Cells. Immunity 2014, 41, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nakano, T.; Chen, I.H.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, P.J.; Tseng, H.P.; Huang, K.T.; Hu, T.H.; Li, L.C.; Goto, S.; Cheng, Y.F.; et al. Circulating exosomal miR-92b: Its role for cancer immunoediting and clinical value for prediction of posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Am. J. Transplant. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Singh, R.; Pochampally, R.; Watabe, K.; Lu, Z.H.; Mo, Y.Y. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-10b promotes cell invasion in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ma, J.; Cao, T.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, F.; Shi, Y.; Xia, J.; Wang, Z.P. miR-223 Regulates Cell Proliferation and Invasion via Targeting PDS5B in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Mol. Ther. Nucl. Acids 2019, 14, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Fu, X.; Liu, M.; Qu, S.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, T.; Wen, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Exosomal microRNA-32-5p induces multidrug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Feng, Y.H.; Zhong, M.Z.; Zeng, S.; Wang, L.Y.; Liu, P.; Xiao, X.Y.; Liu, Y.P. Exosome-derived miRNAs as predictive biomarkers for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma chemotherapy resistance. Epigenomics 2019, 11, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, X.; Yang, F.; Zhang, T.Z.; Wang, W.; Xi, W.J.; Li, Y.F.; Zhang, D.; Huo, Y.; Zhang, J.N.; Yang, A.G.; et al. MiR-9 promotes tumorigenesis and angiogenesis and is activated by MYC and OCT4 in human glioma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Liu, M.X.; Liao, J.; Xie, M.; Gao, Z.K.; Wang, X.H.; Zhang, Y.; Shang, M.H.; Yin, L.H.; Pu, Y.P.; Liu, R. miR-93-5p Transferred by Exosomes Promotes the Proliferation of Esophageal Cancer Cells via Intercellular Communication by Targeting PTEN. BioMed Environ. Sci. 2018, 31, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Valencia, K.; Luis-Ravelo, D.; Bovy, N.; Anton, I.; Martinez-Canarias, S.; Zandueta, C.; Ormazabal, C.; Struman, I.; Tabruyn, S.; Rebmann, V.; et al. miRNA cargo within exosome-like vesicle transfer influences metastatic bone colonization. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhao, S.; Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Q.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, H.; Sun, P.; Xiang, R.; Yang, S. Exosomal miR-451a Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeting LPIN1. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 53, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Lu, J.; Liu, Q.H.; Wang, F.; Tan, J.J.; Deng, Y.Q.; Peng, X.H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Xu, X.; Li, X.P. Exosomal miR-9 inhibits angiogenesis by targeting MDK and regulating PDK/AKT pathway in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mizoguchi, A.; Takayama, A.; Arai, T.; Kawauchi, J.; Sudo, H. MicroRNA-8073: Tumor suppressor and potential therapeutic treatment. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pakravan, K.; Babashah, S.; Sadeghizadeh, M.; Mowla, S.J.; Mossahebi-Mohammadi, M.; Ataei, F.; Dana, N.; Javan, M. MicroRNA-100 shuttled by mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes suppresses in vitro angiogenesis through modulating the mTOR/HIF-1 alpha/VEGF signaling axis in breast cancer cells. Cell Oncol. 2017, 40, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Munson, P.B.; Hall, E.M.; Farina, N.H.; Pass, H.I.; Shukla, A. Exosomal miR-16-5p as a target for malignant mesothelioma. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yu, L.; Gui, S.; Liu, Y.W.; Qiu, X.Y.; Zhang, G.Z.; Zhang, X.A.; Pan, J.; Fan, J.; Qi, S.T.; Qiu, B.H. Exosomes derived from microRNA-199a-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells inhibit glioma progression by down-regulating AGAP2. Aging 2019, 11, 5300–5318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gold, P.; Freedman, S.O. Demonstration of Tumor-Specific Antigens in Human Colonic Carcinomata by Immunological Tolerance and Absorption Techniques. J. Exp. Med. 1965, 121, 439–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kulasingam, V.; Pavlou, M.P.; Diamandis, E.P. Integrating high-throughput technologies in the quest for effective biomarkers for ovarian cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Srivastava, A.; Filant, J.; Moxley, K.M.; Sood, A.; McMeekin, S.; Ramesh, R. Exosomes: A Role for Naturally Occurring Nanovesicles in Cancer Growth, Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr. Gene Ther. 2015, 15, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ge, Q.Y.; Zhou, Y.X.; Lu, J.F.; Bai, Y.F.; Xie, X.Y.; Lu, Z.H. miRNA in Plasma Exosome is Stable under Different Storage Conditions. Molecules 2014, 19, 1568–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Koga, Y.; Yasunaga, M.; Moriya, Y.; Akasu, T.; Fujita, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Matsumura, Y. Exosome can prevent RNase from degrading microRNA in feces. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2011, 2, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chugh, P.; Dittmer, D.P. Potential pitfalls in microRNA profiling. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2012, 3, 601–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nelson, P.T.; Baldwin, D.A.; Scearce, L.M.; Oberholtzer, J.C.; Tobias, J.W.; Mourelatos, Z. Microarray-based, high-throughput gene expression profiling of microRNAs. Nat. Methods 2004, 1, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hu, Y.; Lan, W.; Miller, D. Next-Generation Sequencing for MicroRNA Expression Profile. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1617, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jin, X.C.; Chen, Y.F.; Chen, H.B.; Fei, S.R.; Chen, D.D.; Cai, X.N.; Liu, L.; Lin, B.C.; Su, H.F.; Zhao, L.H.; et al. Evaluation of Tumor-Derived Exosomal miRNA as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 5311–5319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mihelich, B.L.; Dambal, S.; Lin, S.X.; Nonn, L. miR-182, of the miR-183 cluster family, is packaged in exosomes and is detected in human exosomes from serum, breast cells and prostate cells. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shi, R.; Wang, P.Y.; Li, X.Y.; Chen, J.X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.Z.; Zhang, C.G.; Jiang, T.; Li, W.B.; Ding, W.; et al. Exosomal levels of miRNA-21 from cerebrospinal fluids associated with poor prognosis and tumor recurrence of glioma patients. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26971–26981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Huang, X.Y.; Yuan, T.Z.; Liang, M.H.; Du, M.J.; Xia, S.; Dittmar, R.; Wang, D.; See, W.; Costello, B.A.; Quevedo, F.; et al. Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as Prognostic Markers in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2015, 67, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hannafon, B.N.; Trigoso, Y.D.; Calloway, C.L.; Zhao, Y.D.; Lum, D.H.; Welm, A.L.; Zhao, Z.J.; Blick, K.E.; Dooley, W.C.; Ding, W.Q. Plasma exosome microRNAs are indicative of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2016, 18, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mousavi, S.; Moallem, R.; Hassanian, S.M.; Sadeghzade, M.; Mardani, R.; Ferns, G.A.; Khazaei, M.; Avan, A. Tumor-derived exosomes: Potential biomarkers and therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 12422–12432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tanaka, Y.; Kamohara, H.; Kinoshita, K.; Kurashige, J.; Ishimoto, T.; Iwatsuki, M.; Watanabe, M.; Baba, H. Clinical impact of serum exosomal microRNA-21 as a clinical biomarker in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Am. Cancer Soc. 2013, 119, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yeung, C.L.A.; Co, N.N.; Tsuruga, T.; Yeung, T.L.; Kwan, S.Y.; Leung, C.S.; Li, Y.; Lu, E.S.; Kwan, K.; Wong, K.K.; et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kanaoka, R.; Iinuma, H.; Dejima, H.; Sakai, T.; Uehara, H.; Matsutani, N.; Kawamura, M. Usefulness of Plasma Exosomal MicroRNA-451a as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Early Prediction of Recurrence and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncology 2018, 94, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yoshikawa, M.; Iinuma, H.; Umemoto, Y.; Yanagisawa, T.; Matsumoto, A.; Jinno, H. Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-223-3p as a minimally invasive biomarker for the early detection of invasive breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 9584–9592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Lan, F.M.; Qing, Q.; Pan, Q.; Hu, M.; Yu, H.M.; Yue, X. Serum exosomal miR-301a as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for human glioma. Cell. Oncol. 2018, 41, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Meng, X.D.; Muller, V.; Milde-Langosch, K.; Trillsch, F.; Pantel, K.; Schwarzenbach, H. Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of circulating exosomal miR-373, miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-200c in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 16923–16935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Eichelser, C.; Stuckrath, I.; Muller, V.; Milde-Langosch, K.; Wikman, H.; Pantel, K.; Schwarzenbach, H. Increased serum levels of circulating exosomal microRNA-373 in receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 9650–9663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dejima, H.; Iinuma, H.; Kanaoka, R.; Matsutani, N.; Kawamura, M. Exosomal microRNA in plasma as a non-invasive biomarker for the recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Schmittgen, T.D. Exosomal miRNA Cargo as Mediator of Immune Escape Mechanisms in Neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 1293–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Usman, W.M.; Pham, T.C.; Kwok, Y.Y.; Vu, L.T.; Ma, V.; Peng, B.; Chan, Y.S.; Wei, L.; Chin, S.M.; Azad, A.; et al. Efficient RNA drug delivery using red blood cell extracellular vesicles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Li, P.; Zheng, C.; Zhou, X.; Tao, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, A.; et al. Blockage of transferred exosome-shuttled miR-494 inhibits melanoma growth and metastasis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Matsumoto, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Nishikawa, M.; Sano, K.; Morishita, M.; Charoenviriyakul, C.; Saji, H.; Takakura, Y. Accelerated growth of B16BL6 tumor in mice through efficient uptake of their own exosomes by B16BL6 cells. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 1803–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zheng, Y.; Tu, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Inhibition of multiple myelomaderived exosomes uptake suppresses the functional response in bone marrow stromal cell. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 04687 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of exosome formation and release. Exosomal cargo from the extracellular and intracellular spaces is transported to early endosomes entering the endocytic pathway (I). During endosome maturation, the early endosomal membrane invaginates, leading to the formation of a late endosome, known as a multivesicular body (MVB), which is characterized by the presence of small, internal microvesicles. By this process, cargo is internalized into these microvesicles, now called exosomes (II). MVBs preferentially fuse with lysosomes, for the degradation of cellular components (III), or can fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane, allowing the release of the exosomes into the extracellular space (IV).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of exosome formation and release. Exosomal cargo from the extracellular and intracellular spaces is transported to early endosomes entering the endocytic pathway (I). During endosome maturation, the early endosomal membrane invaginates, leading to the formation of a late endosome, known as a multivesicular body (MVB), which is characterized by the presence of small, internal microvesicles. By this process, cargo is internalized into these microvesicles, now called exosomes (II). MVBs preferentially fuse with lysosomes, for the degradation of cellular components (III), or can fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane, allowing the release of the exosomes into the extracellular space (IV).
Ijms 20 04687 g001
Ijms 20 04687 g002 550
Figure 2. Active and passive mechanisms of miRNA loading in exosomes. miRNAs are more or less present in exosomes on the basis of either their relative abundance in cells (A) or the abundance of their target mRNAs (B). (C) Active mechanisms of miRNA loading are regulated by nSMAse2 (left panel) or by sumoylated A2B1, which recognizes an EXO motif present in the miRNA sequence (middle panel), or by a specific sequence containing uridine at the 3’UTR of the miRNA (right panel).
Figure 2. Active and passive mechanisms of miRNA loading in exosomes. miRNAs are more or less present in exosomes on the basis of either their relative abundance in cells (A) or the abundance of their target mRNAs (B). (C) Active mechanisms of miRNA loading are regulated by nSMAse2 (left panel) or by sumoylated A2B1, which recognizes an EXO motif present in the miRNA sequence (middle panel), or by a specific sequence containing uridine at the 3’UTR of the miRNA (right panel).
Ijms 20 04687 g002
Ijms 20 04687 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the roles of exo-miRNAs on distant cells and in the cancer microenvironment. Exo-miRNAs released by tumor cells move to the extracellular space to reach near-by cells, such as macrophages, normal epithelial cells, and normal fibroblast. The exosomal cargo is responsible for cellular transformation and enhanced cancer progression. Exosomes can also reach distant cells, by moving along the blood stream.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the roles of exo-miRNAs on distant cells and in the cancer microenvironment. Exo-miRNAs released by tumor cells move to the extracellular space to reach near-by cells, such as macrophages, normal epithelial cells, and normal fibroblast. The exosomal cargo is responsible for cellular transformation and enhanced cancer progression. Exosomes can also reach distant cells, by moving along the blood stream.
Ijms 20 04687 g003
Table
Table 1. Oncogenic and Oncosuppressor exo-miRNAs and their roles in cancer progression. ↑ means Increase, ↓ means Decrease.
Table 1. Oncogenic and Oncosuppressor exo-miRNAs and their roles in cancer progression. ↑ means Increase, ↓ means Decrease.
Exosomal MirTumorEffectRef
Oncogenic mir
miR-10bBreast cancerInvasion ↑[72]
miR-223Pancreatic cancerInvasion↑[73]
miR-32-5pHepatocellular carcinomaDrug resistance ↑[74]
miR-99a-5p, miR-125b-5pLarge B-cell lymphomaDrug resistance ↑[75]
miR-9GliomaAngiogenesis ↑[76]
miR-93-5pOesophageal cancerGrowth ↑[77]
miR-21,miR-378e,miR-143Breast CancerEMT and stemness ↑[54]
Oncosuppressor MIR
miR-192Lung adenocarcinomaMetastasis ↓[78]
miR-451aHepatocellular carcinomaApoptosis ↑, Angiogenesis ↓[79]
miR-9Nasopharyngeal carcinomaAngiogenesis ↓[80]
miR-8073Colorectal cancerGrowth ↓[81]
miR-100Breast cancerAngiogenesis ↓[82]
miR-16-5pMesotheliomaGrowth ↓, migration ↓, invasion ↓[83]
miR-199aGliomaGrowth ↓, migration ↓, invasion ↓[84]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ingenito, F.; Roscigno, G.; Affinito, A.; Nuzzo, S.; Scognamiglio, I.; Quintavalle, C.; Condorelli, G. The Role of Exo-miRNAs in Cancer: A Focus on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194687

AMA Style

Ingenito F, Roscigno G, Affinito A, Nuzzo S, Scognamiglio I, Quintavalle C, Condorelli G. The Role of Exo-miRNAs in Cancer: A Focus on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(19):4687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ingenito, Francesco, Giuseppina Roscigno, Alessandra Affinito, Silvia Nuzzo, Iolanda Scognamiglio, Cristina Quintavalle, and Gerolama Condorelli. 2019. "The Role of Exo-miRNAs in Cancer: A Focus on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 19: 4687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194687

APA Style

Ingenito, F., Roscigno, G., Affinito, A., Nuzzo, S., Scognamiglio, I., Quintavalle, C., & Condorelli, G. (2019). The Role of Exo-miRNAs in Cancer: A Focus on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(19), 4687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop