Next Article in Journal
Cell Distribution within Yeast Colonies and Colony Biofilms: How Structure Develops
Previous Article in Journal
A New Era in Endothelial Injury Syndromes: Toxicity of CAR-T Cells and the Role of Immunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms21113887
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

M1 Macrophages Promote TRAIL Expression in Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells, Which Suppresses Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer by Increasing Apoptosis of CD133+ Cancer Stem Cells and Decreasing M2 Macrophage Population

by
Young Woo Eom
1,2,
Rokeya Akter
3,
Wanlu Li
3,
Suji Lee
3,
Soonjae Hwang
1,
Jiye Kim
4 and
Mee-Yon Cho
2,3,*
1
Cell Therapy and Tissue Engineering Center, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26426, Korea
2
Regeneration Medicine Research Center, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26426, Korea
3
Department of Pathology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26426, Korea
4
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26426, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(11), 3887; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113887
Submission received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 22 May 2020 / Accepted: 28 May 2020 / Published: 29 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We have previously reported that adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) cultured at high cell density can induce cancer cell death through the expression of type I interferons and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligands (TRAIL). Here, we investigated whether TRAIL-expressing ASCs induced by M1 macrophages can alleviate colitis-associated cancer in an azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) animal model. M1 macrophages significantly increased the TRAIL expression in ASCs, which induced the apoptosis of LoVo cells in a TRAIL-dependent manner. However, CD133knockout LoVo cells, generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system, were resistant to TRAIL. In the AOM/DSS-induced colitis-associated cancer model, the intraperitoneal transplantation of TRAIL-expressing ASCs significantly suppressed colon cancer development. Moreover, immunohistochemical staining revealed a low CD133 expression in tumors from the AOM/DSS + ASCs group when compared with tumors from the untreated group. Additionally, the ASC treatment selectively reduced the number of M2 macrophages in tumoral (45.7 ± 4.2) and non-tumoral mucosa (30.3 ± 1.5) in AOM/DSS + ASCs-treated animals relative to those in the untreated group (tumor 71.7 ± 11.2, non-tumor 94.3 ± 12.5; p < 0.001). Thus, TRAIL-expressing ASCs are promising agents for anti-tumor therapy, particularly to alleviate colon cancer by inducing the apoptosis of CD133+ cancer stem cells and decreasing the M2 macrophage population.

1. Introduction

Death receptors (DR) targeted by the tumor necrosis factor α-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) are expressed only in tumor cells and not in normal cells [1,2,3]. TRAIL can regulate CD133+ cancer stem cells (CSC) and induce tumor cell-specific apoptosis [4,5]. CD133 is known as a potential CSC marker of tumors in the brain [6,7,8], liver [9], pancreas [10], and colon [11,12]. Furthermore, CD133 is expressed in cells that initiate colorectal cancer [13], and its expression in colorectal cancer cells has been associated with poor prognosis, metastasis, and recurrence [14,15]. Moreover, SNU-475 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells express high levels of CD133 and are highly susceptible to TRAIL compared to other HCC cells with a low CD133 expression [4]. Additionally, CD133+ CSCs of both H460 and H2170 cell lines of non-small cell lung cancer highly express death receptor 5 (DR5) and undergo apoptosis when treated with TRAIL-expressing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [5]. In contrast, Jurkat and breast cancer MCF-7 cells expressing high levels of CD133 are resistant to TRAIL owing to the up-regulation of FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP) [16]. Although TRAIL is considered a potent anti-cancer protein [17], it has limited clinical applications, owing to its low stability and short half-life in vivo [3,18]. However, the on-site expression of TRAIL could be an effective anti-tumor treatment. Since MSCs have the characteristics of homing to the tumor site [19,20], MSCs may be used for anti-cancer drug delivery or the local production of anti-tumor therapeutic proteins [21,22]. In fact, the homing property of MSCs has been shown to reduce the side effects of anticancer drugs outside the tumor site, and a small number of MSCs can achieve sufficient therapeutic effects [23]. Therefore, several studies have been conducted to treat tumors using engineered MSC-expressing genes such as TRAIL to induce tumor cell-specific apoptosis.
We previously reported that adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) cultured at a high cell density can induce the death of MCF-7, H460, and Huh7 cells through the expression of type I interferons (IFNs) and TRAIL [24,25,26]. However, in a xenograft tumor model in which human tumor cells were implanted subcutaneously in athymic nude mice with a mutation in the Foxn1 gene causing a severely compromised immune system, no significant difference in the tumor suppression effect was observed, as was also indicated by the in vitro results [25]. These results suggested that although ASCs express type I IFNs and TRAIL, xenograft tumor models using athymic nude mice have limitations for the evaluation of ASCs anti-tumor effects, maybe because of the lack of immune response in the tumor microenvironment. The tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in tumor growth; therefore, therapies targeting the cellular components, particularly tumor-associated macrophages, have been actively investigated.
Macrophages are immune cells that can be classified into M1 and M2 types and are interchangeable depending on the immune environment [27]. M1 macrophages typically promote inflammation and monitor immune response, while M2 macrophages mitigate inflammation and promote tumor growth [28]. The expression of CD163, a highly specific marker of M2 macrophages, is associated with tumor proliferation, metastasis, and prognosis [29,30,31]. Recently, Huang et al. introduced a novel therapeutic strategy for non-small cell lung cancer involving TRAIL-functionalized gold nanoparticles that had a selective cytotoxicity to M2-polarized macrophages [32].
Colitis is known to increase the incidence of colorectal cancer; therefore, we investigated whether TRAIL-expressing ASCs could alleviate colitis-associated colon cancer induced in Balb/c wild-type mice by Azoxymethane (AOM)/Dextran Sodium Sulfate (DSS). Overall, our findings support the use of TRAIL-expressing ASCs as a therapeutic approach for colitis-associated colon cancer.

2. Results

2.1. Enhanced Expression of TRAIL in ASCs Cocultured with M1 Macrophages

The influence of M1 macrophages on the TRAIL expression of ASCs was analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), immunoblotting, and ELISA. The expression of TRAIL mRNA in ASCs cultured at a high density was about 175.51 times higher than that of the control group, and approximately 1597.71 times higher in ASCs co-cultured with M1 macrophages. In other words, the expression of TRAIL mRNA increased 9.1-fold in ASCs co-cultured with M1 macrophages when compared to high-density cultured ASCs. Furthermore, while M1-macrophages did not express TRAIL, macrophages co-cultured with ASCs expressed TRAIL in levels as much as 480.31 times greater than the ones detected for the ASC control group (Figure 1A). Taken together, in macrophages and ASCs co-cultures, TRAIL was expressed by both cells. Still, the TRAIL expression in ASC was about 3.3 times higher than in macrophages, suggesting that ASCs are the major TRAIL source. In addition, the expression of TRAIL protein in cell lysate and conditioned medium (CM) was increased by 5.36 and 2.71 times in ASCs co-cultured with M1 macrophages and high-density cultured ASCs, respectively (Figure 1B). Moreover, the concentrations of the secreted TRAIL in ASCs cultured at a high density and co-cultured with M1 macrophages were 135.37 ± 12.76 and 475.22 ± 18.55 pg/mL, respectively (Figure 1C). These results suggest that M1 macrophages significantly increased the expression of TRAIL in ASCs.

2.2. Toxicity of TRAIL and CM in LoVo Cells

To evaluate the TRAIL-dependent toxicity in colon cancer cells (LoVo), we used CM obtained from high-density cultures of ASCs. TRAIL (100 ng/mL) reduced the viability of LoVo cells in a time-dependent manner (Figure 2A). Similarly, CM increased the LoVo toxicity by about 13.17% (Figure 2B). Moreover, when the TRAIL in CM was neutralized with an anti-TRAIL antibody, the toxicity of CM in the LoVo cells was reduced (Figure 2C). These results suggest that the toxicity in LoVo cells by CM was TRAIL-dependent. In addition, in LoVo cells co-cultured indirectly with ASCs, the Annexin +/7-Aminodactinomycin (7-AAD) + population (apoptotic cells) was 44.2 ± 7.8%, indicating that apoptosis was increased by 1.7 times as compared to that in the control group (26.0 ± 4.2%) (Figure 2D).

2.3. TRAIL Resistance of LoVo-CD133 KO Cells

We investigated the TRAIL sensitivity of CD133+ CSCs by comparing the TRAIL effects on CD133knockout LoVo cells (LoVo-CD133 KO). We generated the LoVo-CD133 KO cells (Figure 3A) using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system, as in our previous report [33]. Interestingly, the TRAIL-induced apoptosis was dramatically increased in the CD133+ LoVo cells, while there was no significant difference in the apoptosis of LoVo-CD133 KO cells (Figure 3B,C). In addition, the CM obtained from ASCs cultured at high density increased the apoptosis of LoVo cells, while no apparent effect was detected for LoVo-CD133 KO cells (Figure 3C).

2.4. Suppression of Colon Cancer Development and CD133 Expression by TRAIL-Expressing ASCs

Next, we investigated whether TRAIL-expressing ASCs could alleviate cancer development in AOM/DSS-induced colon cancer model. AOM was injected once into the intraperitoneal cavity on d 0, DSS was administered three times a week with drinking water, and TRAIL-expressing ASCs were transplanted i.p. 1 d before the DSS administration (Figure 4A). After 56 d, the colon length was found to be reduced in the mice from the AOM/DSS group (Figure 4B,D), and an average of 12.8 colon tumors per mouse was observed (Figure 4C). Similarly, mice from the AOM/DSS + ASCs group had a reduced colon length (Figure 4B,D); however, the average number of tumors was 1.4 per mouse, which was significantly less than that of mice from the AOM/DSS group (Figure 4C). Histologically, all the tumors induced by AOM/DSS were well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (Figure 5) and were variable in size, but AOM/DSS + ASC-treated mice exhibited tumors less than 2 mm in size. The non-tumor colonic mucosa showed multifocal scar alterations in the AOM/DSS and AOM/DSS + ASCs groups, but there was no significant active inflammation in any group.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining revealed CD133 expression in the luminal side of most tumor glands in AOM/DSS-induced colon cancer (Figure 5H) but not in normal mucosa (Figure 5G). In contrast, the AOM/DSS + ASCs group revealed focal CD133 expression in few tumor glands (Figure 5I).

2.5. Decreasing M2 Macrophage Population Using TRAIL-Expressing ASCs

IHC staining for CD163, a specific marker for M2 macrophages, was diffusely scattered in the lamina propria of mucosa in all groups, including the control (Figure 6A–C). In the AOM/DSS group, the number of CD163-positive M2 macrophages in the tumoral area was significantly increased (71.7 ± 11.2) in contrast to that of the control group (12.7 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). The AOM/DSS + ASCs group had a significantly lower number of CD163-positive M2 macrophages (45.7 ± 4.2) than that of the AOM/DSS group (Figure 6G,H; p <0.001). Moreover, non-tumoral mucosa showed similar findings to the tumoral area (AOM/DSS (94.3 ± 12.5) vs. AOM/DSS + ASCs (30.3 ± 1.5), p < 0.001). For F4/80 immunostaining, there was a higher number of F4/80-positive cells than CD163-positive macrophages in the control samples (Figure 6D,G; CD163, 12.7 ± 2.1 vs. F4/80, 35 ± 5). Further, mucosa from the AOM/DSS and AOM/DSS + ASCs groups showed intratumoral, peritumoral, and non-tumoral mucosa-infiltrating macrophages (Figure 6E,F). The ASC treatment also lowered the number of F4/80-positive macrophages to 92.3 ± 5.9 in tumor and 103.3 ± 6.1 in non-tumoral mucosa compared with 105.0 ± 8.2 in tumor and 103.3 ± 6.1 in non-tumoral mucosa following the AOM/DSS treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). These results suggest that TRAIL-expressing ASCs can suppress tumor development by selectively reducing the number of M2 macrophages during colitis-associated colon cancer development.

3. Discussion

In this study, we observed that TRAIL expression in ASCs was significantly increased by M1 macrophages, and TRAIL-expressing ASCs could effectively alleviate colon cancer by suppressing CD133+ CSCs and M2 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. TRAIL can selectively kill only cancer cells; therefore, studies using TRAIL to treat cancer have been actively conducted [4,5]. Based on the homing characteristic of MSCs into the site of inflammation or tumor, MSCs are used to treat cancers as drug and therapeutic gene carriers [5,21,34,35]. In particular, MSCs engineered with the TRAIL gene have demonstrated therapeutic effects in several tumor models [5,21,35]. We reported for the first time that ASCs co-cultured with M1 macrophages secreted high levels of TRAIL without gene manipulation. However, in this study the CM from ASCs cultured at a high density were used to evaluate the effect of TRAIL, excluding the anti-tumor activity of M1 macrophages. Although the cytotoxicity of CM in LoVo cells was about 13%, the ASC transplantation in the AOM/DSS tumor model reduced tumor development by about 90%. The difference in anti-cancer efficiency in vitro and in vivo could be explained by the presence or absence of M1 macrophages and/or expression level of TRAIL. That is, in vivo M1 macrophages might increase the TRAIL expression in ASCs and subsequently suppress the development and progression of colon cancer.
Furthermore, AOM/DSS can initiate and promote relatively strong and reproducible colitis-associated cancer through repeated cycles of colitis caused by DSS following DNA damage by AOM [36,37,38,39,40]. DSS-induced colitis induces the massive infiltration of T and B lymphocytes, neutrophils, granulocytes, and macrophages, and they express various pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α; interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-12, and IL-17; and IFN-γ [41,42]. IFN-γ plays an important role in the initiation of DSS-induced colitis by increasing the expression of three chemokines: monokines induced by IFN-γ (MIG), IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [43]. In addition, IFN-γ activates M1 macrophages, which then produce TNF-α and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and respond to the pathogenesis of colitis [44,45]. M1 macrophages are potent scavengers of invading pathogens which activate the innate immune system and then induce the activity of the acquired immune system [46]. However, in the AOM/DSS tumor model, M2 macrophages have been shown to initiate, promote, and induce migration of the colon cancer [29]. In other words, M1-to-M2 polarization occurs during colon cancer development and metastasis, and M2 macrophages exhibit a pro-tumor role [47]. In our previous report, in the DSS colitis model the M1 macrophage population increased significantly, while ASC treatment decreased the M1 population but did not increase the M2 population [45]. In this study, M2 macrophages were increased in the tumor and non-tumoral mucosa of mice from the AOM/DSS group and remarkably reduced in the AOM/DSS + ASCs group. M2 macrophages are known to have a higher sensitivity to TRAIL than M1 macrophages do [32]. Therefore, in the AOM/DSS model, TRAIL-expressing ASCs exposed to M1 macrophages were expected to lower the colon cancer development by controlling the pro-tumor M2 macrophage and CD133+ CSC populations.
Another important characteristic of MSCs is to modulate the activity of various immune cells. MSCs express various kinds of immunomodulators—including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, prostaglandin E2, TNF-α-stimulated protein/gene 6, NO, IL-6, IL-10, and HLA-G—to inhibit the activity of T- and B-cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells [48,49]. Chronic inflammation increases the risk of cancer development, promotes tumor progression, and increases metastasis [50,51,52]. In the early phase of tumor development, several cytokines and ROS secreted by tumor-infiltrating immune cells induce epigenetic changes in premalignant lesions and inhibit tumor suppressor genes [53]. Moreover, during tumor promotion, immune cells produce several cytokines and chemokines essential for tumor cell survival and proliferation, resulting in tumor progression and metastasis [54]. Therefore, modulating the activities of immune cells through MSCs may be a mechanism for reducing tumor development and progression. However, according to our previous results, the tumor-suppressive effect of ASCs cultured at a high density in the xenograft tumor model using athymic nude mice was not significant [25]. Moreover, although it has been reported that the function of macrophages and DCs is maintained in xenograft tumor models using athymic nude mice [55], it remains controversial whether the distribution and function of macrophages and DCs in the tumor microenvironment is normal. However, the current study demonstrated that in the colitis-associated cancer model, ASCs modulated the macrophage population during colon cancer development.
In summary, TRAIL-expressing ASCs were able to alleviate the development and progression of colon cancer by inducing the apoptosis of CD133+ CSCs and reducing the number of M2 macrophages. To understand the therapeutic mechanisms of MSCs in an in vivo system, future studies analyzing differences in immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment after MSC transplantation are warranted. Moreover, to optimize the effectiveness of the treatment, it is necessary to determine at which stage of the tumor development MSCs must be transplanted. These findings would help advance the treatment of colon cancer using MSCs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine (IRB n° 2011–58, approval date: 22 December 2013) and the scientific use of human adipose tissues was permitted by written informed consent from three healthy donors (24–38 years of age). ASCs were isolated using a modified protocol [24,56] and sub-cultured with low-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Rockville, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). For the experiments, ASCs were seeded at 4 × 104 cells/cm2. After the 3-day culture period, the CM was collected, filtered with syringe-driven filters (0.45 μM), and stored at −80 °C until further use.
The LoVo cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium (RPMI-1640) (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). The CD133knockout LoVo cells (LoVo-CD133 KO) were generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system, as described in our previous report [34]. For the indirect co-culture of ASCs and LoVo cells, a transwell plate (Costar, Kennebunk, ME, USA) was used. The ASCs were cultured for three days in the upper chamber without LoVo cells in the lower chamber, the LoVo cells were cultured in the lower chamber for one day without ASCs in the upper chamber, and then the upper and lower chambers were assembled to initiate the co-culture.
The human monocytic cell line THP-1 was maintained in complete RPMI-1640 (Gibco; supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine). Macrophage differentiation (from THP-1 cells) was induced with 100 nM of phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA, Sigma, San Diego, CA, USA) for 2 days. The macrophages were co-cultured with ASCs (in trans-well plates; Corning, Lowell, MA, USA) under treatment with 20 ng/mL of IFN-γ (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 10 pg/mL of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma). After indirect co-cultures, the total mRNA and proteins were recovered separately from the macrophages and ASCs.

4.2. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

The total RNA was extracted from 1 × 105 cells using TRIzol Reagent (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries were prepared for 150 bp paired-end sequencing using TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The mRNA samples were purified and fragmented from 1 μg of total RNA using oligo (dT) magnetic beads, and the fragmented mRNAs were synthesized as single-stranded cDNAs through random hexamer priming. These were used as templates for second-strand synthesis and the preparation of double-stranded cDNA. After sequential end repairing, A-tailing, and adapter ligation, cDNA libraries were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The quality of these cDNA libraries was evaluated with the Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and the cDNA libraries were quantified using the KAPA library quantification kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Following the cluster amplification of denatured templates, sequencing was performed of the paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp) using Illumina NovaSeq6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

4.3. Immunoblotting

The proteins were separately prepared from the cells or CM. The cells were lysed in a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 1% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 5% β-mercaptoethanol) and the CM was mixed (1:1) with 2× sample buffer. The proteins were boiled for 5 min, subjected to SDS–PAGE, and transferred to an Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-HCl buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and then incubated with primary antibodies against TRAIL (1:1000, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), β-actin (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and CD133 (1:1000, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), followed by peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000, Santa Cruz Biotech). Then, the membrane was treated with EZ-Western Lumi Pico (DOGEN, Seoul, Korea) and visualized using the ChemiDoc XRS+ system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.4. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The CM was recovered from ASCs cultured at a high density for 3 days, and the concentration of secreted TRAIL (sTRAIL) was measured by the human TRAIL Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.5. Cytotoxicity Assay

The LoVo cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2 in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h. The cells were treated with human recombinant TRAIL (R&D systems), incubated for 24 h, treated with 10 μL of water soluble tetrazolium salt (WST)-1 reagent (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and incubated for 1 h at standard culture conditions. Then, the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose CA, USA) at 450 nm.

4.6. Apoptosis Assay

The PE-Annexin-V apoptosis detection kit I (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were harvested, washed twice with cold PBS, and re-suspended in a binding buffer. The cells were stained with PE-Annexin-V and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark and then analyzed without washing using a flow cytometer (FACSAria III, BD Biosciences) within 1 h after the staining.

4.7. Animal Study

Six-week-old Balb/c mice (male, 18–22 g) were purchased from Orient Bio, Inc. (Seongnam, Korea). The mice were maintained in a 12-h light/12-h-dark cycle at 23 °C. All the animal care and experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guide for Animal Experiments published by the Korea Academy of Medical Sciences and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine (YWC-180117-1, approval date: 23 September 2018). The mice were divided into the following 3 groups (n = 5 per group): AOM/DSS/ASCs-untreated control, AOM/DSS, and AOM/DSS + ASCs. To prepare the AOM/DSS model of colon cancer [35], the AOM (10 mg/kg, Sigma) was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) and 7 d later mice were administered drinking water with 1.5% DSS (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) for 7 d, followed by normal water without DSS for 14 d. This DSS administration cycle was repeated twice and ASCs (1 × 106 cells/mouse) were injected i.p. 3 times, on day 6, 27, and 48. The mice were sacrificed on day 56 to analyze the colon tumor development.

4.8. Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining

IHC staining of the paraffin-embedded tissue sections was performed as described in our previous report [57]. The slides were incubated with the monoclonal antibodies against CD133 (Miltenyi Biotec) for CSCs, CD163 (Abcam) for M2 macrophages, and F4/80 (cell signaling technology) for pan macrophages for 2 h at 37 °C in an autostainer using an Ultra View Universal DAB Detection Kit (Benchmark XT, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). Then, the slides were analyzed using an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and the positive staining of CD163 and F4/80 was scored based on the number of positive cells/high power field (HPF, ×400) for comparison.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. To compare the group means, Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used, followed by Scheffe’s test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

M1 macrophages significantly increased the TRAIL expression in ASCs and subsequently induced the apoptosis of colon cancer LoVo cells. This TRAIL-dependent response alleviated the development and progression of colon cancer, particularly by inducing the apoptosis of CD133+ CSCs and reducing the M2 macrophage population. However, CD133knockout LoVo cells were resistant to TRAIL. These results suggest that CD133+ CSCs are potential targets of the TRAIL-expressing ASCs for treating colitis-associated colon cancer. In conclusion, for chronic inflammatory diseases, including colitis ASCs can be used as therapeutic agents to slow the onset and progression of tumors and relieve inflammation through TRAIL expression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W.E. and R.A.; Data curation, Y.W.E., R.A., W.L., S.L., S.H. and J.K.; Formal analysis, R.A., W.L., S.L. and S.H.; Funding acquisition, Y.W.E. and M.-Y.C.; Investigation, Y.W.E., R.A., W.L., S.L., S.H. and J.K.; Methodology, Y.W.E., R.A., W.L., S.L., S.H. and J.K.; Project administration, M.-Yon Cho; Resources, M.-Y.C.; Software, S.H. and J.K.; Supervision, Y.W.E. and M.-Y.C.; Validation, Y.W.E. and M.-Y.C.; Visualization, Y.W.E.; Writing—original draft, Y.W.E. and M.-Y.C.; Writing—review and editing, M.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1D1A1A02019212 and 2016R1D1A1A09918958).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Niidome, T.; Huang, L. Gene therapy progress and prospects: Nonviral vectors. Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 1647–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Li, S.; Huang, L. Nonviral gene therapy: Promises and challenges. Gene Ther. 2000, 7, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Guo, X.; Huang, L. Recent advances in nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lee, S.H.; Hyun, S.K.; Kim, H.B.; Kang, C.D.; Kim, S.H. Potential Role of CD133 Expression in the Susceptibility of Human Liver Cancer Stem-Like Cells to TRAIL. Oncol. Res. 2016, 24, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fakiruddin, K.S.; Lim, M.N.; Nordin, N.; Rosli, R.; Zakaria, Z.; Abdullah, S. Targeting of CD133+ Cancer Stem Cells by Mesenchymal Stem Cell Expressing TRAIL Reveals a Prospective Role of Apoptotic Gene Regulation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Uchida, N.; Buck, D.W.; He, D.; Reitsma, M.J.; Masek, M.; Phan, T.V.; Tsukamoto, A.S.; Gage, F.H.; Weissman, I.L. Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 14720–14725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lee, A.; Kessler, J.D.; Read, T.A.; Kaiser, C.; Corbeil, D.; Huttner, W.B.; Johnson, J.E.; Wechsler-Reya, R.J. Isolation of neural stem cells from the postnatal cerebellum. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Singh, S.K.; Clarke, I.D.; Hide, T.; Dirks, P.B. Cancer stem cells in nervous system tumors. Oncogene 2004, 23, 7267–7273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ma, S.; Chan, K.W.; Hu, L.; Lee, T.K.; Wo, J.Y.; Ng, I.O.; Zheng, B.J.; Guan, X.Y. Identification and characterization of tumorigenic liver cancer stem/progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 2542–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oshima, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Kawashimo, K.; Ishikawa, M.; Ohkohchi, N.; Taniguchi, H. Isolation of mouse pancreatic ductal progenitor cells expressing CD133 and c-Met by flow cytometric cell sorting. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 720–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ricci-Vitiani, L.; Lombardi, D.G.; Pilozzi, E.; Biffoni, M.; Todaro, M.; Peschle, C.; De Maria, R. Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature 2007, 445, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. O’Brien, C.A.; Pollett, A.; Gallinger, S.; Dick, J.E. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature 2007, 445, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miraglia, S.; Godfrey, W.; Yin, A.H.; Atkins, K.; Warnke, R.; Holden, J.T.; Bray, R.A.; Waller, E.K.; Buck, D.W. A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: Isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning. Blood 1997, 90, 5013–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Glumac, P.M.; LeBeau, A.M. The role of CD133 in cancer: A concise review. Clin. Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, B.B.; Li, Z.J.; Zhang, F.F.; Hou, H.T.; Yu, J.K.; Li, F. Clinical significance of stem cell marker CD133 expression in colorectal cancer. Histol. Histopathol. 2016, 31, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zobalova, R.; McDermott, L.; Stantic, M.; Prokopova, K.; Dong, L.F.; Neuzil, J. CD133-positive cells are resistant to TRAIL due to up-regulation of FLIP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 373, 567–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yin, H.; Kanasty, R.L.; Eltoukhy, A.A.; Vegas, A.J.; Dorkin, J.R.; Anderson, D.G. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruponen, M.; Honkakoski, P.; Ronkko, S.; Pelkonen, J.; Tammi, M.; Urtti, A. Extracellular and intracellular barriers in non-viral gene delivery. J. Control. Release 2003, 93, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, S.J.; Park, W.; Na, K. Photo-activatable ternary complex based on a multifunctional shielding material for targeted shRNA delivery in cancer treatment. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 8991–8999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, K.S.; Park, W.; Na, K. Gadolinium-chelate nanoparticle entrapped human mesenchymal stem cell via photochemical internalization for cancer diagnosis. Biomaterials 2015, 36, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, S.M.; Lim, J.Y.; Park, S.I.; Jeong, C.H.; Oh, J.H.; Jeong, M.; Oh, W.; Park, S.H.; Sung, Y.C.; Jeun, S.S. Gene therapy using TRAIL-secreting human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells against intracranial glioma. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9614–9623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Komarova, S.; Roth, J.; Alvarez, R.; Curiel, D.T.; Pereboeva, L. Targeting of mesenchymal stem cells to ovarian tumors via an artificial receptor. J. Ovarian Res. 2010, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Selbo, P.K.; Weyergang, A.; Hogset, A.; Norum, O.J.; Berstad, M.B.; Vikdal, M.; Berg, K. Photochemical internalization provides time- and space-controlled endolysosomal escape of therapeutic molecules. J. Control. Release 2010, 148, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ryu, H.; Oh, J.E.; Rhee, K.J.; Baik, S.K.; Kim, J.; Kang, S.J.; Sohn, J.H.; Choi, E.; Shin, H.C.; Kim, Y.M.; et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured at high density express IFN-beta and suppress the growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2014, 352, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jung, P.Y.; Ryu, H.; Rhee, K.J.; Hwang, S.; Lee, C.G.; Gwon, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Yoo, B.S.; Baik, S.K.; et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured at high density express IFN-beta and TRAIL and suppress the growth of H460 human lung cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2019, 440–441, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Byun, C.S.; Hwang, S.; Woo, S.H.; Kim, M.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.I.; Kong, J.H.; Bae, K.S.; Park, I.H.; Kim, S.H.; et al. Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Suppress Growth of Huh7 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells via Interferon (IFN)-beta-Mediated JAK/STAT1 Pathway in vitro. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gordon, S.; Pluddemann, A.; Martinez Estrada, F. Macrophage heterogeneity in tissues: Phenotypic diversity and functions. Immunol. Rev. 2014, 262, 36–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Qian, B.Z.; Pollard, J.W. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell 2010, 141, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lan, J.; Sun, L.; Xu, F.; Liu, L.; Hu, F.; Song, D.; Hou, Z.; Wu, W.; Luo, X.; Wang, J.; et al. M2 Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Promote Cell Migration and Invasion in Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hu, J.M.; Liu, K.; Liu, J.H.; Jiang, X.L.; Wang, X.L.; Chen, Y.Z.; Li, S.G.; Zou, H.; Pang, L.J.; Liu, C.X.; et al. CD163 as a marker of M2 macrophage, contribute to predicte aggressiveness and prognosis of Kazakh esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 21526–21538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shabo, I.; Olsson, H.; Elkarim, R.; Sun, X.F.; Svanvik, J. Macrophage Infiltration in Tumor Stroma is Related to Tumor Cell Expression of CD163 in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Microenviron. 2014, 7, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Huang, Y.J.; Hsu, S.H. TRAIL-functionalized gold nanoparticles selectively trigger apoptosis in polarized macrophages. Nanotheranostics 2017, 1, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, W.; Cho, M.Y.; Lee, S.; Jang, M.; Park, J.; Park, R. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated CD133 knockout inhibits colon cancer invasion through reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Park, S.J.; Na, K. The transfection efficiency of photosensitizer-induced gene delivery to human MSCs and internalization rates of EGFP and Runx2 genes. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 6485–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fakiruddin, K.S.; Ghazalli, N.; Lim, M.N.; Zakaria, Z.; Abdullah, S. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Expressing TRAIL as Targeted Therapy against Sensitised Tumour. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Parang, B.; Barrett, C.W.; Williams, C.S. AOM/DSS Model of Colitis-Associated Cancer. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1422, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tanaka, T.; Kohno, H.; Suzuki, R.; Yamada, Y.; Sugie, S.; Mori, H. A novel inflammation-related mouse colon carcinogenesis model induced by azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Robertis, M.; Massi, E.; Poeta, M.L.; Carotti, S.; Morini, S.; Cecchetelli, L.; Signori, E.; Fazio, V.M. The AOM/DSS murine model for the study of colon carcinogenesis: From pathways to diagnosis and therapy studies. J. Carcinog 2011, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, J.; Huang, X.F. The signal pathways in azoxymethane-induced colon cancer and preventive implications. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2009, 8, 1313–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Suzuki, R.; Kohno, H.; Sugie, S.; Nakagama, H.; Tanaka, T. Strain differences in the susceptibility to azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate-induced colon carcinogenesis in mice. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Egger, B.; Bajaj-Elliott, M.; MacDonald, T.T.; Inglin, R.; Eysselein, V.E.; Buchler, M.W. Characterisation of acute murine dextran sodium sulphate colitis: Cytokine profile and dose dependency. Digestion 2000, 62, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Melgar, S.; Karlsson, A.; Michaelsson, E. Acute colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium progresses to chronicity in C57BL/6 but not in BALB/c mice: correlation between symptoms and inflammation. Am. J. Phys. Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005, 288, G1328–G1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ito, R.; Shin-Ya, M.; Kishida, T.; Urano, A.; Takada, R.; Sakagami, J.; Imanishi, J.; Kita, M.; Ueda, Y.; Iwakura, Y.; et al. Interferon-gamma is causatively involved in experimental inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 146, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Heinsbroek, S.E.; Gordon, S. The role of macrophages in inflammatory bowel diseases. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2009, 11, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Park, H.J.; Kim, J.; Saima, F.T.; Rhee, K.J.; Hwang, S.; Kim, M.Y.; Baik, S.K.; Eom, Y.W.; Kim, H.S. Adipose-derived stem cells ameliorate colitis by suppression of inflammasome formation and regulation of M1-macrophage population through prostaglandin E2. Biochem. Biophys Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fremond, C.M.; Yeremeev, V.; Nicolle, D.M.; Jacobs, M.; Quesniaux, V.F.; Ryffel, B. Fatal Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection despite adaptive immune response in the absence of MyD88. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 114, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, W.; Li, X.; Zheng, D.; Zhang, D.; Peng, X.; Zhang, X.; Ai, F.; Wang, X.; Ma, J.; Xiong, W.; et al. Dynamic changes and functions of macrophages and M1/M2 subpopulations during ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis in an AOM/DSS mouse model. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 2397–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sharma, R.R.; Pollock, K.; Hubel, A.; McKenna, D. Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells: A review of clinical applications and manufacturing practices. Transfusion 2014, 54, 1418–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De Miguel, M.P.; Fuentes-Julian, S.; Blazquez-Martinez, A.; Pascual, C.Y.; Aller, M.A.; Arias, J.; Arnalich-Montiel, F. Immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stem cells: advances and applications. Curr. Mol. Med. 2012, 12, 574–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qian, S.; Golubnitschaja, O.; Zhan, X. Chronic inflammation: Key player and biomarker-set to predict and prevent cancer development and progression based on individualized patient profiles. EPMA J. 2019, 10, 365–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Multhoff, G.; Molls, M.; Radons, J. Chronic inflammation in cancer development. Front. Immunol 2011, 2, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Dite, P. Chronic inflammation is an important risk factor for the development of gastrointestinal cancer. Preface. Dig. Dis. 2010, 28, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Grivennikov, S.I.; Karin, M. Inflammation and oncogenesis: A vicious connection. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2010, 20, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. DeNardo, D.G.; Johansson, M.; Coussens, L.M. Immune cells as mediators of solid tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008, 27, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Masuda, J.; Shigehiro, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Satoh, A.; Mizutani, A.; Umemura, C.; Saito, S.; Kijihira, M.; Takayama, E.; Seno, A.; et al. Cytokine Expression and Macrophage Localization in Xenograft and Allograft Tumor Models Stimulated with Lipopolysaccharide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zuk, P.A.; Zhu, M.; Mizuno, H.; Huang, J.; Futrell, J.W.; Katz, A.J.; Benhaim, P.; Lorenz, H.P.; Hedrick, M.H. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: Implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7, 211–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Li, W.; Lee, M.R.; Choi, E.; Cho, M.Y. Clinicopathologic Significance of Survivin Expression in Relation to CD133 Expression in Surgically Resected Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2017, 51, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 03887 g001 550
Figure 1. Enhanced expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) co-cultured with M1 macrophages. ASCs were cultured at high-density or co-cultured with M1 macrophages (THP-1) for 2 days and harvested to analyze the TRAIL mRNA and protein, and conditioned media were stored after centrifugation to detect the secreted TRAIL (sTRAIL). (A) Relative expression of TRAIL in ASCs cultured at a high density or with M1 macrophages. The relative expression of TRAIL was analyzed by a next-generation sequencing assay, and the relative values are presented in Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM). ** p < 0.01. (B) Expression of TRAIL in cell lysates and conditioned medium (CM). TRAIL was detected in cell lysates and CM using immunoblotting. β-actin was used for normalization. (C) Expression of sTRAIL. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Enhanced expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) co-cultured with M1 macrophages. ASCs were cultured at high-density or co-cultured with M1 macrophages (THP-1) for 2 days and harvested to analyze the TRAIL mRNA and protein, and conditioned media were stored after centrifugation to detect the secreted TRAIL (sTRAIL). (A) Relative expression of TRAIL in ASCs cultured at a high density or with M1 macrophages. The relative expression of TRAIL was analyzed by a next-generation sequencing assay, and the relative values are presented in Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM). ** p < 0.01. (B) Expression of TRAIL in cell lysates and conditioned medium (CM). TRAIL was detected in cell lysates and CM using immunoblotting. β-actin was used for normalization. (C) Expression of sTRAIL. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 21 03887 g001
Ijms 21 03887 g002 550
Figure 2. Toxicity of TRAIL and conditioned medium (CM) in LoVo cells. LoVo cells were treated with human recombinant TRAIL or CM and indirectly co-cultured with ASCs. (A) Toxicity of LoVo cells by TRAIL at different times. Cell viability decreased in a time-dependent manner. Data are presented as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05. (B) Relative viability of LoVo cells. LoVo cells were treated with CM for 24 h and toxicity was detected using a WST-1 reagent. * p < 0.05. (C) TRAIL-dependent toxicity of CM in LoVo cells. To detect whether the toxicity of CM in LoVo cells was TRAIL-dependent, the TRAIL protein in CM was neutralized with anti-TRAIL antibodies and the cytotoxicity was evaluated using a WST-1 reagent. * p < 0.05. (D) ASC-induced apoptosis of LoVo cells. To investigate the direct effects of ASCs on the apoptosis of LoVo cells, the LoVo cells were co-cultured with ASCs and then analyzed by Annexin-V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry.
Figure 2. Toxicity of TRAIL and conditioned medium (CM) in LoVo cells. LoVo cells were treated with human recombinant TRAIL or CM and indirectly co-cultured with ASCs. (A) Toxicity of LoVo cells by TRAIL at different times. Cell viability decreased in a time-dependent manner. Data are presented as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05. (B) Relative viability of LoVo cells. LoVo cells were treated with CM for 24 h and toxicity was detected using a WST-1 reagent. * p < 0.05. (C) TRAIL-dependent toxicity of CM in LoVo cells. To detect whether the toxicity of CM in LoVo cells was TRAIL-dependent, the TRAIL protein in CM was neutralized with anti-TRAIL antibodies and the cytotoxicity was evaluated using a WST-1 reagent. * p < 0.05. (D) ASC-induced apoptosis of LoVo cells. To investigate the direct effects of ASCs on the apoptosis of LoVo cells, the LoVo cells were co-cultured with ASCs and then analyzed by Annexin-V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry.
Ijms 21 03887 g002
Ijms 21 03887 g003 550
Figure 3. TRAIL sensitivity in LoVo and CD133knockout LoVo cells (LoVo-CD133 KO cells). Three independent LoVo-CD133 KO cells (KO1, KO2, KO3) were generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system and culturing a single colony. (A) Immunoblotting of CD133 expression in LoVo-CD133 KO cells. (B) Toxicity of TRAIL in LoVo-CD133 KO cells. TRAIL reduced the viability of LoVo cells, but TRAIL-dependent toxicity was not observed in all the KO cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. (C) Sensitivity to TRAIL by LoVo and LoVo-CD133 KO1 cells. TRAIL-induced apoptosis was analyzed by Annexin-V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry.
Figure 3. TRAIL sensitivity in LoVo and CD133knockout LoVo cells (LoVo-CD133 KO cells). Three independent LoVo-CD133 KO cells (KO1, KO2, KO3) were generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system and culturing a single colony. (A) Immunoblotting of CD133 expression in LoVo-CD133 KO cells. (B) Toxicity of TRAIL in LoVo-CD133 KO cells. TRAIL reduced the viability of LoVo cells, but TRAIL-dependent toxicity was not observed in all the KO cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. (C) Sensitivity to TRAIL by LoVo and LoVo-CD133 KO1 cells. TRAIL-induced apoptosis was analyzed by Annexin-V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry.
Ijms 21 03887 g003
Ijms 21 03887 g004 550
Figure 4. Suppression of colon cancer development by ASCs. (A) Schematic timeline for azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colon cancer and ASC transplantation. (B) Gross tumor burden by AOM/DSS and inhibition of tumor development by ASCs. (C) Reduced tumor numbers by ASC transplantation. The number of tumors in colons obtained from the control, AOM/DSS, and AOM/DSS + ASCs groups (n = 5) were counted. * p < 0.05. (D) Lengths of colons obtained from the control, AOM/DSS, and AOM/DSS + ASCs groups. * p < 0.05. ns: not statistically significant.
Figure 4. Suppression of colon cancer development by ASCs. (A) Schematic timeline for azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colon cancer and ASC transplantation. (B) Gross tumor burden by AOM/DSS and inhibition of tumor development by ASCs. (C) Reduced tumor numbers by ASC transplantation. The number of tumors in colons obtained from the control, AOM/DSS, and AOM/DSS + ASCs groups (n = 5) were counted. * p < 0.05. (D) Lengths of colons obtained from the control, AOM/DSS, and AOM/DSS + ASCs groups. * p < 0.05. ns: not statistically significant.
Ijms 21 03887 g004
Ijms 21 03887 g005 550
Figure 5. (A–F) Representative histology images of colons resected from (A,D) the control, (B,E) AOM/DSS, and (C,F) AOM/DSS + ASCs groups. (A–C) Low-power view (×100) of colon tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H,E), showing most tumors are bigger in mice from (B) the AOM/DSS group compared to the small and superficial tumors in mice from (C) the AOM/DSS + ASCs group. (D–F) Higher magnification (×200) of H&E staining, showing (D) normal mucosa, (E) AOM/DSS-induced moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and (F) the tumor in AOM/DSS + ASCs group, which is similar to that of the AOM/DSS group. (G–I) The immunohistochemical staining of CD133 in (G) the control, (H) AOM/DSS, and (I) AOM/DSS + ASCs (×400). (G) No CD133 expression in the normal mucosa. (H) Strong expression of CD133 along the lumen structure of the AOM/DSS-induced tumor glands. (I) Very rare and focal CD133 positivity in the tumor from the AOM/DSS + ASCs group.
Figure 5. (A–F) Representative histology images of colons resected from (A,D) the control, (B,E) AOM/DSS, and (C,F) AOM/DSS + ASCs groups. (A–C) Low-power view (×100) of colon tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H,E), showing most tumors are bigger in mice from (B) the AOM/DSS group compared to the small and superficial tumors in mice from (C) the AOM/DSS + ASCs group. (D–F) Higher magnification (×200) of H&E staining, showing (D) normal mucosa, (E) AOM/DSS-induced moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and (F) the tumor in AOM/DSS + ASCs group, which is similar to that of the AOM/DSS group. (G–I) The immunohistochemical staining of CD133 in (G) the control, (H) AOM/DSS, and (I) AOM/DSS + ASCs (×400). (G) No CD133 expression in the normal mucosa. (H) Strong expression of CD133 along the lumen structure of the AOM/DSS-induced tumor glands. (I) Very rare and focal CD133 positivity in the tumor from the AOM/DSS + ASCs group.
Ijms 21 03887 g005
Ijms 21 03887 g006 550
Figure 6. Changes in macrophages by TRAIL-expressing ASCs. (A–C) CD163 immunostaining (×200). (A) Normal mucosa with a few scattered CD163-positive M2 macrophages in lamina propria. (B) AOM/DSS-induced tumor with numerous M2 macrophages in the peritumoral area. (C) AOM/DSS + ASC-treated group showing a reduced number of M2 macrophages. (D–F) F4/80 immunostaining (×200). (D) Normal mucosa. Tumors from (E) AOM-DSS group and (F) AOM/DSS + ASCs group showing numerous macrophages. (G,H) Comparison of the number of macrophages between the three groups. There was a significantly higher number of F4/80-positive M2 macrophages in AOM/DSS-induced tumoral (H) and non-tumoral (G) mucosa than in the CD163-positive M2 macrophages. ASCs treatment significantly reduced the number of CD163-positive M2 macrophages, but not F4/80-positive M2 macrophages in the tumor and non-tumor areas. (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05). ns: not statistically significant.
Figure 6. Changes in macrophages by TRAIL-expressing ASCs. (A–C) CD163 immunostaining (×200). (A) Normal mucosa with a few scattered CD163-positive M2 macrophages in lamina propria. (B) AOM/DSS-induced tumor with numerous M2 macrophages in the peritumoral area. (C) AOM/DSS + ASC-treated group showing a reduced number of M2 macrophages. (D–F) F4/80 immunostaining (×200). (D) Normal mucosa. Tumors from (E) AOM-DSS group and (F) AOM/DSS + ASCs group showing numerous macrophages. (G,H) Comparison of the number of macrophages between the three groups. There was a significantly higher number of F4/80-positive M2 macrophages in AOM/DSS-induced tumoral (H) and non-tumoral (G) mucosa than in the CD163-positive M2 macrophages. ASCs treatment significantly reduced the number of CD163-positive M2 macrophages, but not F4/80-positive M2 macrophages in the tumor and non-tumor areas. (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05). ns: not statistically significant.
Ijms 21 03887 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eom, Y.W.; Akter, R.; Li, W.; Lee, S.; Hwang, S.; Kim, J.; Cho, M.-Y. M1 Macrophages Promote TRAIL Expression in Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells, Which Suppresses Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer by Increasing Apoptosis of CD133+ Cancer Stem Cells and Decreasing M2 Macrophage Population. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113887

AMA Style

Eom YW, Akter R, Li W, Lee S, Hwang S, Kim J, Cho M-Y. M1 Macrophages Promote TRAIL Expression in Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells, Which Suppresses Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer by Increasing Apoptosis of CD133+ Cancer Stem Cells and Decreasing M2 Macrophage Population. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(11):3887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eom, Young Woo, Rokeya Akter, Wanlu Li, Suji Lee, Soonjae Hwang, Jiye Kim, and Mee-Yon Cho. 2020. "M1 Macrophages Promote TRAIL Expression in Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells, Which Suppresses Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer by Increasing Apoptosis of CD133+ Cancer Stem Cells and Decreasing M2 Macrophage Population" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 11: 3887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop