Next Article in Journal
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Induced Cell Death in Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Next Article in Special Issue
Network Neuromodulation of Opioid and GABAergic Receptors Following a Combination of “Juvenile” and “Adult Stress” in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNAs and Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Impact of Early-Life Stress on Hippocampal Plasticity: Spotlight on Astrocytes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Free Your Mind: Emotional Expressive Flexibility Moderates the Effect of Stress on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155355
by Einat Levy-Gigi 1,2,*, Reut Donner 1,3 and George A. Bonanno 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155355
Submission received: 28 June 2020 / Revised: 20 July 2020 / Accepted: 21 July 2020 / Published: 28 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diverse Models of Stress: From Animal Model to Human and Back)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript submitted by Einat Levy-Gigi is very interesting but they have some problems that they should solve.

Change PTSD by Post-traumatic stress disorder in the title

Abstract:

Explain in the background why is necessary your study.

Include Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Include demographic data of firefighters (sex, age, ….)

What have you used to determine Emotional Expressive Flexibility?

Include numbers into results section

I do not understand your conclusion. Rewrite, please

Introduction

Use Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) firs time

Use adequately the journal reference style. I think this is in [number] and not as APA.

why have you used firefighters and not for example police?

Methods

Participants

Males or females?

How long experience? This data may be could be very interesting.

Procedure

Ethic committee? Helsinki treaty?

Data analysis

Wasn't it better to have used a linear regression?

What was your limit of significance? P<0.05?

Results

Could the results not be presented with tables? It would be much easier to understand them.

Discussion

The discussion is well carried out, although I still have the doubt of knowing why they have used firefighters and not other groups.

Likewise, after the conclusion it would include a section of practical application. That is, what are these results for?

Author Response

Please find a detailed response in the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  • Please provide the appreciated reader with one example of the "reappraisal in the low intensity images and distraction in the high intensity images" (p.2)
  • Methods: Do the authors assume that axis II(!) psychopathology does not interfere with their results?
  • Methods: "any substance dependence or abuse within the past 6 months": including nicotine?!
  • Methods: education and relationship status of participants? BMI?
  • Methods: To my knowledge, the PCL-5 is a 20(!)-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD.
  • Please explain this sentence in more detail:
    "However, in situations which either those in need or the social environment around them feel comfortable communicating emotions, or when the content of the expressed emotion is too intense or overwhelming, the recipients might react in a diminishing or minimizing manner and the expresser would end up feeling dismissed or rejected"
  • "It might be, that the intense life-style of male, active-duty firefighters, who are repeatedly exposed to overwhelming sights, dictates certain personal coping styles and/or social communication patterns in which being more emotionally expressive is not helpful" - or perhaps part of a certain type of male socialisation?!
  • "This finding might also seem surprising, since it is inconsistent
    with our main hypothesis" - No, I wasn´t surprised - and a result is not per se surprising for the audience when it is in conflict with an a priori hypothesis of some authors of a manuscript!
  • The discussion section in general shoud be revised and the results of the study should´t - not least because of methodological flaws - be exaggerated.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please find a detailed response to the comments attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The article has improved a lot and the authors have adequately answered my questions.

Back to TopTop