Next Article in Journal
Impact of the Different Preparation Methods to Obtain Autologous Non-Activated Platelet-Rich Plasma (A-PRP) and Activated Platelet-Rich Plasma (AA-PRP) in Plastic Surgery: Wound Healing and Hair Regrowth Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
Placenta-Specific Genes, Their Regulation During Villous Trophoblast Differentiation and Dysregulation in Preterm Preeclampsia
Previous Article in Journal
Megavoltage Radiosensitization of Gold Nanoparticles on a Glioblastoma Cancer Cell Line Using a Clinical Platform
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protein Misfolding during Pregnancy: New Approaches to Preeclampsia Diagnostics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms21020430
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Function in Young and Middle-Aged Women with Respect to a History of Pregnancy, Pregnancy-Related Complications, Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Epigenetics

by
Ilona Hromadnikova
1,*,
Katerina Kotlabova
1,
Lenka Dvorakova
1 and
Ladislav Krofta
2
1
Department of Molecular Biology and Cell Pathology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 10000 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 14700 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(2), 430; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020430
Submission received: 3 December 2019 / Revised: 6 January 2020 / Accepted: 7 January 2020 / Published: 9 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis of Pregnancy-Related Complications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of the study was to examine the effect of previous pregnancies and classical cardiovascular risk factors on vascular endothelial function in a group of 264 young and middle-aged women 3 to 11 years postpartum. We examined microvascular functions by peripheral arterial tonometry and EndoPAT 2000 device with respect to a history of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, the severity of the disease with regard to the degree of clinical signs and delivery date. Besides, we compared Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) values and the prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction among the groups of women with normal and abnormal values of BMI, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, total serum cholesterol levels, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, serum triglycerides levels, serum lipoprotein A levels, serum C-reactive protein levels, serum uric acid levels, and plasma homocysteine levels. Furthermore, we determined the effect of total number of pregnancies and total parity per woman, infertility and blood pressure treatment, presence of trombophilic gene mutations, current smoking of cigarettes, and current hormonal contraceptive use on the vascular endothelial function. We also examined the association between the vascular endothelial function and postpartum whole peripheral blood expression of microRNAs involved in pathogenesis of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases (miR-1-3p, miR-16-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-92a-3p, miR-100-5p, miR-103a-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-130b-3p, miR-133a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-145-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-210-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-342-3p, miR-499a-5p, and miR-574-3p). A proportion of overweight women (17.94% and 20.59%) and women with central obesity (18.64% and 21.19%) had significantly lower RHI values at 10.0% false positive rate (FPR) both before and after adjustment of the data for the age of patients. At 10.0% FPR, a proportion of women with vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67) was identified to have up-regulated expression profile of miR-1-3p (11.76%), miR-23a-3p (17.65%), and miR-499a-5p (18.82%) in whole peripheral blood. RHI values also negatively correlated with expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood. Otherwise, no significant impact of other studied factors on vascular endothelial function was found. We suppose that screening of these particular microRNAs associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction may help to stratify a highly risky group of young and middle-aged women that would benefit from early implementation of primary prevention strategies. Nevertheless, it is obvious, that vascular endothelial dysfunction is just one out of multiple cardiovascular risk factors which has only a partial impact on abnormal expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pregnancy-related complications such as gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PE), and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are associated with the risk of later development of diabetes mellitus [1,2,3,4,5,6], metabolic syndrome [7,8], hypertension [3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12], kidney diseases [4], atherosclerosis [13,14], ischemic heart disease [4,9,10,15,16,17,18,19], myocardial infarcts [4,5,6,11,16,17], heart failure [4,5,6,11], stroke [4,5,6,9,10,11,15,16,17,19], and deep venous thrombosis [3,9,10].
Few studies have been performed to explore postpartum vascular changes in young and middle-aged women with respect to a comprehensive history of pregnancy [20,21,22,23]. The aim of the current study was to examine the effect of previous pregnancies (total number of pregnancies per woman, total parity per woman, and infertility treatment) on vascular endothelial function. In addition, we examined microvascular functions (peripheral endothelium) in women with a prior onset of pregnancy-related complications (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction), and compared them with controls, women with a history of normally progressing pregnancies, matched for age and time elapsed since delivery (3 to 11 years).
We further studied the association between vascular endothelial function and the severity of the disease with respect to the degree of clinical signs and delivery date: PE without severe features (PE w/o SF), PE with severe features (PE w SF), PE without the presence of HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count) (PE w/o HELLP), PE with the presence of HELLP syndrome (PE w HELLP), PE without the presence of FGR (PE w/o FGR), PE with the presence of FGR (PE w FGR), PE with the onset before 34 weeks of gestation (early PE), PE with the onset after 34 weeks of gestation (late PE), FGR with the onset before 32 weeks of gestation (early FGR), and FGR with the onset after 32 weeks of gestation (late FGR).
Besides, we studied the association between classical cardiovascular risk factors and the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction. We compared Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) values and the prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction among the groups of women with normal and abnormal values of BMI, waist circumference, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, heart rate, total serum cholesterol levels, serum HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels, serum LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels, serum triglycerides levels, serum lipoprotein A Lp(a) levels, serum CRP (C-reactive protein) levels, serum uric acid levels, and plasma homocysteine levels. Furthermore, we determine the effect of the blood pressure treatment, the presence of trombophilic gene mutations, current smoking of cigarettes, and current hormonal contraceptive use on the vascular endothelial function.
The EndoPat test, the only FDA-cleared test for the non-invasive assessment of endothelial dysfunction (arterial health), clinically proven besides other things as a valuable tool in independent cardiovascular risk stratification for patients with early coronary athrosclerosis, was used [24,25].
This study is a follow-up of our previous study dedicated to the assessment and comparison of cardiovascular risk among women with normal and complicated course of gestation 3 to 11 years after the delivery [26]. In this context, women with a history of GH and PE were identified to be a risky group of patients that would benefit from implementation of early primary prevention strategies, since they had higher body mass index (BMI), waist circumferences, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, predicted 10-year cardiovascular event risk, and increased serum levels of uric acid and lipoprotein A, when compared with women with a history of normotensive term pregnancy [26]. We suggest that the extension of the study for early identification of the presence of endothelial dysfunction in young women, would be highly valuable, since endothelial dysfunction, which predicts cardiovascular events in early stages of disease, is still treatable and reversible, and usually occurs beyond any conventional risk factors. Some studies demonstrated in the group of young adult patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 36 years) that vascular endothelial dysfunction occurred earlier than arterial stiffness [27].
Recently, we have also demonstrated that epigenetic changes characteristic for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases are already present in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with a history of pregnancy-related complications and proposed a strategy to implement screening of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in primary prevention programmes to identify patients at a higher risk of later development of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases as soon as possible [28].
In view of this fact, we also examined the association between the vascular endothelial function and postpartum expression of microRNAs involved in pathogenesis of cardiovascular/ cerebrovascular diseases (miR-1-3p, miR-16-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-92a-3p, miR-100-5p, miR-103a-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-130b-3p, miR-133a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-145-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-210-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-342-3p, miR-499a-5p, and miR-574-3p) [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].

2. Results

2.1. Impact of A History of Pregnancy and Pregnancy-Related Complications on vascular Endothelial Function in Young and Middle-Aged Women

Overall, no significant effect of total number of pregnancies per woman, total parity per woman, and infertility treatment on RHI values and the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction was observed (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). In parallel, no significant differences in RHI values and the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction was observed between the groups of young and middle-aged women with a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, and FGR) and normally progressing pregnancies (Table 4 and Table 5). Furthermore, statistical analyses showed no differences in RHI values and the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction between the control group and the groups of women with a history of PE w/o SF, PE w SF, PE w/o HELLP, PE w HELLP, PE w/o FGR, PE w FGR, early PE, late PE, early FGR, and late FGR (Table 4 and Table 5). Besides, the RHI values did not correlate with any of the studied pregnancy-associated factor (total number of pregnancies per woman, total parity per woman, time elapsed since the delivery) (Table 3).

2.2. Impact of Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Vascular Endothelial Function in Young and Middle-Aged Women

In the studied group of young and middle-aged women (264 cases altogether) we did not observe any impact of the blood pressure treatment, the presence of trombophilic gene mutations, current smoking of cigarettes, current hormonal contraceptive use, SBP, and DBP on vascular endothelial function (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). Furthermore, no effect of serum levels of total cholesterol, HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein A, CRP (C-reactive protein), uric acid, and plasma levels of homocysteine on vascular endothelial function was found (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).
Nevertheless, although the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction did not significantly differ between the groups of women with the presence and absence of central obesity, women with central obesity (waist circumference values ≥ 80 cm) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of waist circumference (waist circumference values < 80 cm) (unadjusted data: p = 0.006, data adjusted for the age of patients: p = 0.008), (Table 1 and Table 2).
In parallel, the ROC curve analyses revealed significantly lower RHI values in a substantial proportion of women with central obesity at 10.0% FPR both before and after adjustment of the data for the age of patients (Figure 1). 18.64% women had RHI values ≤1.442 before adjustment of the data for the age and 21.19% women had abnormal RHI values after adjustment of the data for the age at a specificity of 90.0% (Figure 1).
Similarly, while the difference in prevalence of endothelial dysfunction between the group with a normal BMI (BMI < 25) and the overweight group (BMI ≥ 25–<30) has not yet reached a statistical significance, significantly lower RHI values were found in overweight women compared to women with normal BMI (unadjusted data: p = 0.036, data adjusted for the age of patients: p = 0.039), (Table 1 and Table 2). The ROC curve analysis was able to identify abnormal RHI values (≤1.412) in 17.94% and 20.59% of overweight women before and after adjustment of the data for the age at 10.0% FPR (Figure 2).

2.3. Association between Higher Expression Rates of miR-1–3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in Whole Peripheral Blood and the Occurrence of Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Young and Middle-Aged Women

Higher expression rates of miR-1-3p (p = 0.008), miR-23a-3p (p = 0.030), and miR-499a-5p (p = 0.010) were detected in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67, n = 86) when compared with those possessing normal vascular endothelial function (RHI > 1.67, n = 178), respectively (Table 6, Figure 3).
At 10.0% FPR, a proportion of young women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction was identified to have up-regulated expression profile of miR-1-3p (AUC 0.0601, p = 0.005, sensitivity 11.76%), miR-23a-3p (AUC 0.583, p = 0.024, sensitivity 17.65%), and miR-499a-5p (AUC 0.598, p = 0.011, sensitivity 18.82%) (Figure 3). The dysregulation of these three microRNAs was mutually independent. All these 3 microRNAs were simultaneously dysregulated just in four patients with abnormal RHI values. MiR-1-3p dysregulation was followed by miR-23a-3p dysregulation just in 1 patient with abnormal RHI values. MiR-1-3p dysregulation was followed by miR-499a-5p dysregulation also just in 1 patient with abnormal RHI values. The various combinations of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p were not superior over using only individual microRNA biomarkers. In addition, the RHI values showed a week negative correlation with expression of miR-1-3p (ρ = −0.156, p = 0.012), miR-23a-3p (ρ = −0.154, p = 0.013), and miR-499a-5p (ρ = −0.193, p = 0.002) in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. That means that women with a finding of lower RHI values showed significantly increased levels of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood (Table 7, Figure 4).

3. Discussion

The majority of studies on the assessment of vascular endothelial function using peripheral arterial tonometry and EndoPAT 2000 device was performed in women during gestation with the aim to describe potential association between vascular endothelial dysfunction and pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia [20,23,50,51,52,53], sleep-disordered breathing in women with preeclamptic toxaemia [54], and smoking status [55].
However, only few studies have been performed to explore postpartum vascular changes in young and middle-aged women with respect to a comprehensive history of pregnancy [20,21,22,23].
In general, our study indicated no significant effect of a history of pregnancy with respect to total number of pregnancies per woman, total parity per woman, infertility treatment, particular pregnancy-related complication subtypes (GH, PE, and FGR), the severity of the disease with regard to the degree of clinical signs (PE w/o SF, PE w SF, PE w/o HELLP, PE w HELLP, PE w/o FGR, and PE w FGR), and delivery date (early PE, late PE, early FGR, and late FGR) on vascular endothelial function. Neither RHI values or the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction differed between particular groups of young and middle-aged women. Parallel, no correlation between RHI values and total number of pregnancies per woman, total parity per woman, and time elapsed since the delivery was found.
These data are in agreement with the data of previous follow-up study accomplished 6–9 months postpartum [20], which observed no significant differences in RHI values between women after uncomplicated pregnancies and women who developed pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia.
The current study also produced similar findings to another follow-up study performed on young women with a history of preeclampsia from a semi-rural region of South Africa [23], where no significant differences in RHI values were found between the group of non-pregnant women, the preeclampsia group during gestation, and the group of women with a history of preeclampsia between subsequent visits after the delivery, which had been carried up from 15 weeks to 1 year postpartum.
Nevertheless, our data partially contradict the findings of other investigators [21,22], who observed that a history of PE was associated with lower levels of RHI. They demonstrated that women with previous pregnancy complicated by early PE or late PE showed a significant reduction in RHI values between 6 months and 4 years after delivery (mean time from delivery was around 2.3 years) when compared with controls [22]. However, like Orabona et al. [22] we found no significant differences in RHI values among PE groups: women who had experienced HELLP and those with a history of PE without HELLP. Concerning a history of FGR, our data are also consistent to a certain extent with the data resulting from the study of Orabona et al. [22], who described more frequent endothelial dysfunction in women, who experienced FGR that required the delivery before 34 weeks of gestation. Although the difference in prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction has not yet reached a statistical significance in our study, we observed a higher incidence of vascular endothelial dysfunction in women with a history of early FGR, whose pregnancy had to be terminated before 32 weeks of gestation, than in controls (66.67%vs. 32.43%, p = 0.057).
To clarify this matter, consecutive large scale studies are needed to examine the association between the previous occurrence of fetal growth restriction, especially with regard to the delivery date, and the vascular endothelial dysfunction. In addition, further studies, at the more advanced level, are needed to demonstrate if the appearance of vascular endothelial dysfunction is a consequence of a former onset of pregnancy-related complication or the other way around if the asymptomatic endothelial dysfunction has already appeared before gestation and might cause secondary placental insufficiency leading to fetal growth restriction. Besides, it is essential to focus the attention not only on the comparison of RHI values between particular groups, but to explore the prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction in individual groups as well.
Subsequently, we performed the association study with the aim to discover potential correlation between classical cardiovascular risk factors and the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction. We studied the effect of multiple factors such as the blood pressure treatment, the presence of trombophilic gene mutations, BMI, waist circumference, SBP, DBP, heart rate, total serum cholesterol levels, serum HDL cholesterol levels, serum LDL cholesterol levels, serum triglycerides levels, serum Lp(a) levels, serum CRP levels, serum uric acid levels, and plasma homocysteine levels on the vascular endothelial function via comparison of RHI values and the prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction among the groups of women with normal and abnormal clinical findings. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of current smoking of cigarettes and current hormonal contraceptive use on vascular endothelial function. No impact of studied factors on the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction was found and the RHI values did not correlate with any factor as well. Nevertheless, significantly decreased RHI levels were detected in overweight women (BMI ≥ 25–<30) and simultaneously in a group of women with central obesity (waist circumference values ≥ 80 cm). A substantial proportion of overweight women (17.94% and 20.59%) and women with central obesity (18.64% and 21.19%) had significantly lower RHI values at 10.0% FPR both before and after adjustment of the data for the age of patients.
Our results support the data of Lobysheva et al. [56], who observed as well no difference in RHI values between subjects consuming combined contraceptives and control subjects not using contraceptive pills, and no effect of combined contraceptives consumation on RHI values in short-term (less than 1 year usage) and long term periods (more than 3 years of usage).
A serious of studies was performed with the aim to identify potential factors affecting the vascular endothelial function [24,25,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. Nevertheless, there were substantial variations at study designs and the groups of patients, which were subjects of interest. Naturally, most studies was focused mainly on elderly patients. However, limited data concerning the association between classical cardiovascular risk factors and vascular endothelial function are available entirely in the group of healthy young and middle-aged women. Ferreira et al. [74] described negative correlation between RHI values and serum uric acid in healthy Brazilian young and middle-aged adults (age 20–55 years). Although the studied group involved both sexes, these data may be in compliance with our data obtained in the group of young and middle-aged women with a history of complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy, where a trend toward impaired endothelial function (lower RHI levels) was observed in patients with increased serum levels of uric acid (ρ = −0.111, p = 0.072).
Another study [75] examined an association between vascular endothelial function and similar parameters as our study (age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, resting heart rate, SBP, DBP, serum total cholesterol levels, serum HDL cholesterol levels, serum LDL cholesterol levels, serum triglycerides levels, serum CRP levels, the blood pressure treatment, and the smoking status) in the group of middle-aged Finnish municipal workers (mean age 44.6 years). No of the following factors (age, SBP, DBP, serum total cholesterol levels, serum LDL cholesterol levels, serum CRP levels, and the blood pressure treatment) was reported to affect RHI values in sex-adjusted models, which is in compliance with the data resulting from our study performed on the group of young and middle-aged women after complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy. Nevertheless, in a study of Konttinen et al. [75] lower RHI values were strongly associated in separate linear regression sex-adjusted models with BMI, waist circumference, serum HDL cholesterol levels, serum triglycerides levels, and current smoking of cigarettes. Konttinen et al. [75] finally created a multivariable sex-adjusted model that was able to explain 20.0% of the variability of RHI in women. This final model for women involved HDL cholesterol, BMI and smoking status. In compliance with a study of Konttinen et al. [75] our independent study found decreased RHI levels in a group of overweight women, and in women with central obesity. In contrast to a study of Konttinen et al. [75] we did not observe the influence of current smoking of cigarettes and serum HDL cholesterol levels on RHI values.
The study of Williams et al. [76] demonstrated that childhood obesity sustained into early midlelife (till the age of 38 years) was associated with chronic endothelial dysfunction that contributed to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. At the age of 38 years, after adjustment of the data for sex, endothelial dysfuntion was associated with higher BMI, higher waist circumference, low HDL cholesterol levels, low cardiorespiratory fitness, and increased CRP levels [76]. Although, we did not have any information on BMI trajectories from childhood till the beginning of pregnancy in a group of women we examined, and we could make just the analyses regardless of the fact if the women had been overweight or obese from childhood, our data partially confirmed the findings of Williams et al. [76] that lower RHI levels are more frequently present in young and middle-aged overweight women and women with central obesity with waist circumference values exceeding 80 cm.
In addition, Randby et al. [77] showed sleep apnoe as an independent predictor of an impaired vascular endothelial function in middle-aged women (mean age 48 years). Similarly, the low serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were significantly related to lower RHI values in healthy middle-aged (mean age 41 years) normotensive, non-smoker, normolipidemic and normoglycemic women [78]. In our study we did not focus on the examination of the presence of sleep apnoe or serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels, but we believe that the findings resulting from previous studies [77,78] might contribute to the explanation of low RHI values in a proportion of healthy young and middle-aged female population. But still a large part of a lowered RHI values remains accounted for unknown factors [75].
To our knowledge, no study examining association between expression profiles of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of non-pregnant women and vascular endothelial function assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry and EndoPAT 2000 device had been carried out. Just the association between serum miR-126 levels and improvement of microvascular endothelial dysfunction induced by exercise and diet was described in obese adolescents [79]. That’s why we further studied the association between the vascular endothelial function and postpartum expression of microRNAs involved in pathogenesis of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases (miR-1-3p, miR-16-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-92a-3p, miR-100-5p, miR-103a-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-130b-3p, miR-133a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-145-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-210-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-342-3p, miR-499a-5p, and miR-574-3p) [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. The expression profiles of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p were different between young and middle-aged women with normal vascular endothelial function (RHI > 1.67) and vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67), respectively. In a proportion of young and middle-aged women with vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67) higher expression rates of miR-1-3p (11.76%), miR-23a-3p (17.65%), and miR-499a-5p (18.82%) were detected at 10.0% FPR. In addition, lower RHI values correlated with increased expression levels of miR-1-3p (ρ = −0.156, p = 0.012), miR-23a-3p (ρ = −0.154, p = 0.013), and miR-499a-5p (ρ = −0.193, p = 0.002) in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. We suppose that screening of these particular microRNAs associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction may help to stratify a highly risky group of young and middle-aged women that would benefit from early implementation of primary prevention strategies.
Nevertheless, overall, it is obvious, that vascular endothelial dysfunction is one out of multiple cardiovascular risk factors which has only a partial impact on abnormal expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. That´s the reason, why we have been continuously working on the identification of all cardiovascular risk factors causing abnormal expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women.
MiR-1-3p is generated from miR-1-1 and miR-1-2 precursors whose genes are located on chromosomes 20q13.3 and 18q11.2. MiR-1 is highly expressed in heart muscle, especially in the myocardium, and in skeletal muscles [80,81,82]. Circulating miR-1 levels are significantly elevated in acute myocardial infarction and correlate with circulating troponin T levels, a marker of cardiac damage [83]. MiR-1 is a potential target of therapeutic intervention in cardiovascular diseases, cardiac ischemia and complications following myocardial infarction. Inhibition of miR-1 by oligonucleotides is cardioprotective, as it leads to a reduction in apoptosis, an increase in resistance to oxidative stress and a reduction in spontaneous arrhythmias [84,85,86]. In addition, SUR2B/Kir6.1 channel openers correct endothelial dysfunction in chronic heart failure via the miR-1-3p/ET-1 pathway [87]. We recently reported that a proportion of women with up-regulated postpartal miR-1-3p expression profile in whole peripheral venous blood, who had a history of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia in their previous pregnancies, had an increased cardiovascular risk and should be monitored long-term [28]. Parallel, up-regulated miR-1-3p profile was observed in placental tissue and umbilical cord blood samples in women with the onset of preeclampsia and FGR [88,89]. But miR-1-3p expression levels did not show any changes in whole peripheral blood of women during gestation when patients with and without pregnancy-related complications were compared [90].
MiR-23a, encoded by a gene located at chromosome 19p13.12, forms two mature microRNAs: miR-23a-5p and miR-23a-3p. MiR-23a regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis, a key pathogenesis factor of heart failure, by targeting manganese superoxide dismutase gene [91]. MiR-23a also regulates the vasculogenesis of coronary artery disease via targeting epidermal growth factor receptor [92]. Circulating miR-23a may be a new biomarker for coronary artery disease, since increased levels of miR-23a predict the presence and severity of coronary lesions in patients with coronary artery disease [92]. MiR-23a-3p also suppressed oxidative stress injury in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion [93]. Furthermore, miR-23c, but not miR-23a was reported to function as a new regulator to inhibit angiogenesis by targeting SDF-1α, which is responsible for delayed process of wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcer due to reduced expression of growth factors, persistant inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [94]. Since our recent study demonstrated upregulation of miR-23a-3p in a proportion of children with normal clinical findings born of gestational hypertension complicated pregnancies only, we suppose that compensatory effect of miR-23a-3p may appear more likely in these children to normalise cardiomyocyte state and vasculogenesis [95]. No change in miR-23a-3p expression profile was observed in various biological samples (whole peripheral venous blood, placental tissue, umbilical cord blood) when women with pregnancy-related complications and normal pregnancies were compared both during gestation or postpartum periods [88,89,90].
MiR-499a-5p, encoded by the miR-499a gene located on chromosome 20q11.22, is strongly expressed in the heart under physiological conditions. MiR-499 is involved in inhibiting cardiomyocyte apoptosis by suppressing calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of the Drp1 protein. It has also been reported that p53 downregulates the expression of miR-499 [96]. MiR-499 is also associated significantly with myocardial infarction, and together with miR-133a and miR-208a, they represent potential early diagnostic biomarkers of myocardial infarction [97,98,99,100]. Furthermore, miR-499 is significantly involved in the inflammatory signaling pathways of bronchial asthma [101]. No data on the role of miR-499a-5p in pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction are currently available. Our recent study demonstrated upregulation of miR-499a-5p in a proportion of women with a history of gestational hypertension in previous pregnancy. Considering the clinical relevance of miR-499, we concluded that the group of women with the upregulated miR-499a-5p expression profile represented a high-risk group of patients who would benefit from early implementation of prevention programs and long-term monitoring [28]. Placental tissue demonstrated up-regulated miR-499a-5p expression profile in women with the occurence of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and FGR [88]. Nevertheless, in whole periheral venous blood of women with the onset of gestational hypertension miR-499a-5p levels were significantly decreased [90].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Participants

The prospective study run from 2016 to 2019 in the Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic and Second Internal Clinics of Cardiology and Angiology, General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
All Caucasian women who delivered in the Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic within 2007–2013 and were diagnosed with gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PE) and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR) were invited to participate in the study. Finally, 264 women participated in the study (48 GH, 114 PE with or without FGR, 28 FGR, and 74 women with normal course of gestation. The recruitment rate was 27.10% (264 out of 974 invited patients). Women with normal course of gestation were chosen on the basis of equal age and time elapsed since the delivery.
Twenty-eight out of 114 patients had symptoms of preeclampsia without severe features (PE w/o SF) and 86 out of 114 patients were diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features (PE w/SF). In 40 PE patients gestation was terminated before 34 weeks of gestation (early PE) and 74 patients delivered after 34 weeks of gestation (late PE). Sixteen out of 114 patients had PE with HELLP syndrome. Nine pregnancies with growth-retarded foetuses were terminated before 32 weeks of gestation (early FGR) and 19 FGR pregnancies delivered after 32 weeks of gestation (late FGR).
Women with a history of normal pregnancies had no medical, obstetrical, or surgical complications at the time of the delivery and delivered full term, singleton healthy infants weighing > 2500 g after 37 completed weeks of gestation.
Gestational hypertension was defined as high blood pressure that developed after the twentieth week of pregnancy [11,102,103,104].
Preeclampsia was defined as blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg in two determinations 4 h apart that was associated with proteinuria > 300 mg/24 h after 20 weeks of gestation in a woman with a previously normal blood pressure. In the absence of proteinuria, any of the following can establish the diagnosis of PE: (1) new-onset thrombocytopenia, (2) impaired liver function, (3) renal insufficiency, (4) pulmonary edema, or (5) visual or cerebral disturbances. Severe features of preeclampsia were diagnosed by the presence of one or more of the following findings: (1) systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg, (2) thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000/microliter), (3) impairment of liver function as indicated by abnormally elevated blood concentrations of liver enzymes (to twice normal concentration), severe persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain unresponsive to medication and not accounted for by alternative diagnoses, or both, (4) progressive renal insufficiency (serum creatinine concentration greater than 1.1 mg/dL or a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration in the absence of other renal disease), (5) pulmonary oedema, (6) new onset cerebral or visual disturbances [11,102,103,104].
The clinical presentation of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome is one of the more severe forms of preeclampsia. The following criteria to make the diagnosis are currently used: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) elevated to 600 IU/L or more, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevated more than twice the upper limit of normal, and the platelets count less than 100,000 × 109/L. In HELLP syndrome, the main presenting symptoms are right upper quadrant pain, generalized malaise, nausea and vomiting [11,102,103,104].
Fetal growth restriction was diagnosed when the estimated fetal weight (EFW), calculated using the Hadlock formula (Astraia Software, version 1.25.2, GmbH, München, Deutschland), was below the tenth percentile for the evaluated gestational age, adjustments were made for the appropriate population standards of the Czech Republic. In addition to fetal weight below the threshold of the 10th percentile FGR foetuses had at least one of the following pathological finding: an abnormal pulsatility index in the umbilical artery, absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity waveforms in the umbilical artery, an abnormal pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery, a sign of a blood flow centralisation, and a deficiency of amniotic fluid (anhydramnios and oligohydramnios).
Centralization of the fetal circulation represents a protective reaction of the foetus against hypoxia that manifests itself in redistribution of the circulation in the brain, liver and heart at the expense of the flow reduction in the periphery [105,106]. The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) quantifies redistribution of cardiac output by dividing Doppler indices from representative cerebral and fetoplacental vessels.
Patients with a complicated gestation demonstrating premature rupture of membranes, in utero infections, fetal anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities, and fetal demise in utero or stillbirth were excluded from the study.
Written informed consent was provided for all participants enrolled in the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic (grant no. AZV 16-27761A, Long-term monitoring of complex cardiovascular profile in the mother, foetus and offspring descending from pregnancy-related complications, date of approval: 28.5.2015) and by the Ethics Committee of the Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic (grant no. AZV 16-27761A, Long-term monitoring of complex cardiovascular profile in the mother, foetus and offspring descending from pregnancy-related complications, date of approval: 27.3.2014).
The clinical characteristics of women with a history of normal and complicated pregnancies are presented in Table 8.

4.2. Assessment of Vascular Endothelial Function

Vascular endothelial function was assessed using the non-invasive PAT™ probe and the Endo PAT™2000 device (Itamar Medical Ltd., Caesarea, Israel), a new type of finger plethysmograph that measures the magnitude and dynamics of peripheral arterial tone (manufacturer´s instructions).
The patient was kept in comfortable and fully relaxed position, asked to refrain from talking throughout the entire study.
If possible, the index fingers were inserted into the probes. The blue foam anchor ring was placed on the adjacent finger to the one with the probe on, as far back as possible not to come in contact with the PAT probe. Both patients’ forearms were afterwards supported on the arm supports. Digital flow mediated dilation was assessed during reactive hyperemia using measurements from both arms–occluded side and control side.
Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI), the post-to-pre occlusion signal ratio in the occluded side, normalized to the control side and further corrected for baseline vascular tone, was reported. The normal ratio value was above 1.67, while ≤ 1.67 was considered endothelial dysfunction (manufacturer´s instructions).

4.3. Blood Pressure Measurements

For detailed information please see our previous publication [26]. Standardized blood pressure measurements were performed following New AHA Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement [107]. Blood pressure was measured 3 times in the right arm after a 5-min rest period during which the participant sits using an automated device (OMRON M6W, Omron Healthcare Co., Kyoto, Japan). The average of the last 2 systolic and diastolic pressures was used for the data analyses.

4.4. BMI and Waist Circumference Measurements

For detailed information please see our previous publication [26]. Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.05–0.1 kg using an electronic scale and height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a built-in stadiometer (calibrated balance scales, RADWAG WPT 100/200 OW, RADWAG, Prague, Czech Republic). BMI was calculated as weight divided by height squared. Waist circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a measuring tape. Each measurement was taking twice. A waist measurement of ≥80 cm was considered as an indicator of the level of internal fat deposits.

4.5. Biological Sampling

For detailed information please see our previous publication [26]. Fasting blood samples were collected at the time of the study visit, 3 to 11 years postpartum, when comprehensive examination of patient was performed (blood pressure measurements, BMI and waist circumference measurements). Patients were told not to consume anything but water for 12 h leading up to the test (collection of whole peripheral blood samples was performed within 9.00 a.m. to 10.00 a.m. GMT). Total serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein A Lp(a), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), uric acid, and plasma homocysteine were analysed using standard laboratory methods at the Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child.

4.6. Gene Expression of Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular diseAse Associated microRNAs in Whole Peripheral Blood

For detailed information please see our previous publications [28,88,89,90,95]. Epigenetic profiling of microRNAs known to be involved in the onset of diverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases (miR-1-3p, miR-16-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-92a-3p, miR-100-5p, miR-103a-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-130b-3p, miR-133a-3p, miR-143-3p, miR-145-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-210-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-342-3p, miR-499a-5p, and miR-574-3p) was the subject of our interest. In brief, homogenized cell lysates were prepared immediately after collection of whole peripheral blood samples (EDTA tubes, 200 µl) using QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, no: 52304). Total RNA was extracted from homogenized cell lysates stored at −80 °C using a mirVana microRNA Isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA, no: AM1560) and followed by an enrichment procedure for small RNAs. To minimize DNA contamination, the eluted RNA was treated for 30 min at 37 °C with 5 µL of DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA, no: EN0521).
Each microRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA by a TaqMan MicroRNA Assay (using the first generation chemistry involving miRNA-specific stem loop primer) and TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, NJ, USA, no: 4366597) in a total reaction volume of 10 µL.
Further, 3 µL of cDNA were mixed with specific primers and the TaqMan MGB probes (TaqMan MicroRNA Assays, Applied Biosystems), and the ingredients of the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, no: 4318157) in a total reaction volume of 15 µL. TaqMan PCR conditions were set on 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) as described in the TaqMan guidelines.
The expression of microRNAs was determined using the comparative Ct method [108] relative to normalization factor [geometric mean of two selected endogenous controls - two non-coding small nucleolar RNAs (RNU58A and RNU38B)] [109]. A reference sample, RNA fraction highly enriched for small RNAs isolated from the fetal part of one randomly selected placenta derived from gestation with normal course, was used throughout the study for relative quantification.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test [110]. The Chi-square test and univariate logistic regression model were used to compare the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction across the individual groups (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Data are expressed as number (percent) of patients with the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction. The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05.
ANOVA (Analysis of variance) and ANCOVA (Analysis of covariance) were used to test possible differences in mean concentrations of dependant variables (RHI) between particular groups of patients. We made adjustment for the age of patients (MedCalc Software bvba). Results were expressed as mean ± SE (standard error). The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05.
In case of ANOVA and ANCOVA significant results, Receivers operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and the best cut-off point was used in order to calculate the respective sensitivity at 90.0% specificity (MedCalc Software bvba). For every possible threshold or cut-off value, the MedCalc program reports the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio positive (LR + ), likelihood ratio negative (LR-).
Correlation between variables was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for normally distributed variables and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used for variables with skewed distribution.
Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare microRNA expression between women with normal and abnormal vascular endothelial function. Data are expressed as median (25thpercentile –75th percentile). The significance level was established at a p-value of p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

Causes of vascular endothelial dysfunction still need to be resolved in young and middle-aged population. Nevertheless, it is apparent that at least the lower RHI values occur more frequently in young and middle-aged women with higher BMI and central obesity, which are both considered as risk factors of later development of cardiovascular diseases.
Although no significant impact of the course of previous pregnancies on vascular endothelial function was found, consecutive large scale studies are needed to discover if there is any association between the occurrence of fetal growth restriction during gestation and vascular endothelial dysfunction in the mother.
Interestingly, epigenetic changes are induced in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women by vascular endothelial dysfunction. A proportion of women with vascular endothelial dysfunction had aberrant expression profiles of microRNAs associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p). Lower RHI values also correlated with increased expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood.
We suppose that screening of these particular microRNAs associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction may help to stratify a highly risky group of young and middle-aged women that would benefit from early implementation of primary prevention strategies.
Nevertheless, overall, it is obvious, that vascular endothelial dysfunction is one out of multiple cardiovascular risk factors which has only a partial impact on abnormal expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. That´s the reason, why we have been continuously working on the identification of all cardiovascular risk factors causing abnormal expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women.

6. Patent

National Patent awarded—Industrial Property Office, Czech Republic (PV 2018-597).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.H., L.K.; methodology, I.H., K.K., L.D.,L.K.; software, I.H., K.K., L.D.; validation, I.H., K.K.; formal analysis, I.H., K.K.; investigation, K.K., L.D.; resources, I.H., K.K., L.D.; data curation, I.H., K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, I.H.; writing—review and editing, I.H., K.K., L.K.; visualization, K.K.; supervision, I.H., L.K.; project administration, I.H., L.K.; funding acquisition, I.H., L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Agency of Medical Research, Ministry of Health, Czech Republic (AZV 16-27761A) and by the Charles University, Czech Republic (PROGRES Q34); all rights reserved.

Acknowledgments

We thanks to the staff of Second Internal Clinics of Cardiology and Angiology, General Faculty Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic for assessment of vascular endothelial function in our patients within the framework of complex programme to assess the cardiovascular risk in mothers after complicated pregnancy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

RHIReactive Hyperemia Index
BMIBody Mass Index
FPRFalse Positive Rate
GHGestational Hypertension
PEPreeclampsia
FGRFetal Growth Restriction
w/owithout
wwith
HELLPHemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, Low Platelet Count
WCWaist Circumference
SBPSystolic Blood Pressure
DBPDiastolic Blood Pressure
HDLHigh-density Lipoprotein
LDLLow-density Lipoprotein
Lp(a)Lipoprotein A
CRPC-reactive Protein)
FDAFood and Drug Administration
SEStandard Error
ANOVAAnalysis of Variance
ANCOVAAnalysis of Covariance
NTPNormotensive Term Pregnancies
CIConfidence Interval
OROdds Ratio
LDHLactate Dehydrogenase
ASTAspartate Aminotransferase
ALTAlanine Aminotransferase
AUCArea under the Receive Operating Characteristic Curve
EFWEstimated Fetal Weight
CSCaesarean Section
PATPeripheral Arterial Tonometry
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
LR + Positive Likelihood Ratio
LR-Negative Likelihood Ratio

References

  1. Ray, J.G.; Vermeulen, M.J.; Schull, M.J.; Redelmeier, D.A. Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): Population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2005, 366, 1797–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Libby, G.; Murphy, D.J.; McEwan, N.F.; Greene, S.A.; Forsyth, J.S.; Chien, P.W.; Morris, A.D.; DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Pre-eclampsia and the later development of type 2 diabetes in mothers and their children: An intergenerational study from the Walker cohort. Diabetologia 2007, 50, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lykke, J.A.; Langhoff-Roos, J.; Sibai, B.M.; Funai, E.F.; Triche, E.W.; Paidas, M.J. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the mother. Hypertension 2009, 53, 944–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Männistö, T.; Mendla, P.; Vääräsmäki, M.; Järvelin, M.R.; Hartikainen, A.L.; Pouta, A.; Suvanto, E. Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation 2013, 127, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Thilaganathan, B. Association of Higher Maternal Blood Pressure With Lower Infant Birthweight: Placental Cause or Cardiovascular Effect? Hypertension 2016, 67, 499–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thilaganathan, B. Placental syndromes: Getting to the heart of the matter. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, J.J.; Lee, S.A.; Choi, J.Y.; Song, M.; Han, S.; Yoon, H.S.; Lee, Y.; Oh, J.; Lee, J.K.; Kang, D. Subsequent risk of metabolic syndrome in women with a history of preeclampsia: Data from the Health Examinees Study. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Udenze, I.C. Association of pre-eclampsia with metabolic syndrome and increased risk of cardiovascular disease in women: A systemic review. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2016, 19, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bellamy, L.; Casas, J.P.; Hingorani, A.D.; Williams, D.J. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007, 335, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Craici, I.M.; Wagner, S.J.; Hayman, S.R.; Garovic, V.D. Pre-eclamptic pregnancies: An opportunity to identify women at risk for future cardiovascular disease. Womens Health 2008, 4, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 122, 1122–1131. [Google Scholar]
  12. Veerbeek, J.H.; Hermes, W.; Breimer, A.Y.; van Rijn, B.B.; Koenen, S.V.; Mol, B.W.; Franx, A.; de Groot, C.J.; Koster, M.P. Cardiovascular disease risk factors after early-onset preeclampsia, late-onset preeclampsia, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Hypertension 2015, 65, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Haukkamaa, L.; Moilanen, L.; Kattainen, A.; Luoto, R.; Kahonen, M.; Leinonen, M.; Jula, A.; Kesäniemi, Y.A.; Kaaja, R. Pre-eclampsia is a risk factor of carotid artery atherosclerosis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009, 27, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McDonald, S.D.; Ray, J.; Teo, K.; Jung, H.; Salehian, O.; Yusuf, S.; Lonn, E. Measures of cardiovascular risk and subclinical atherosclerosis in a cohort of women with a remote history of preeclampsia. Atherosclerosis 2013, 229, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Irgens, H.U.; Reisaeter, L.; Irgens, L.M.; Lie, R.T. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: Population based cohort study. BMJ 2001, 323, 1213–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Garovic, V.D.; Hayman, S.R. Hypertension in pregnancy: An emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol. 2007, 3, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mongraw-Chaffin, M.L.; Cirillo, P.M.; John, B.A. Preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease death: Prospective evidence from the child health and development studies cohort. Hypertension 2010, 56, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Borna, S.; Neamatipoor, E.; Radman, N. Risk of coronary artery disease in women with history of pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and LBW. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 25, 1114–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berks, D.; Hoedjes, M.; Raat, H.; Duvekot, J.J.; Steegers, E.A.; Habbema, J.D. Risk of cardiovascular disease after pre-eclampsia and the effect of lifestyle interventions: A literature-based study. BJOG 2013, 120, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carty, D.M.; Anderson, L.A.; Duncan, C.N.; Baird, D.P.; Rooney, L.K.; Dominiczak, A.F.; Delles, C. Peripheral arterial tone: Assessment of microcirculatory function in pregnancy. J. Hypertens. 2012, 30, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Orabona, R.; Sciatti, E.; Vizzardi, E.; Bonadei, I.; Valcamonico, A.; Metra, M.; Frusca, T. Endothelial dysfunction and vascular stiffness in women with previous pregnancy complicated by early or late pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Orabona, R.; Sciatti, E.; Vizzardi, E.; Bonadei, I.; Prefumo, F.; Valcamonico, A.; Metra, M.; Frusca, T. Maternal endothelial function and vascular stiffness after HELLP syndrome: A case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Namugowa, A.; Iputo, J.; Wandabwa, J.; Meeme, A.; Buga, G.A.B.; Abura, S.; Stofile, Y.Y. Arterial stiffness in women previously with preeclampsia from a semi-rural region of South Africa. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2019, 41, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kuvin, J.T.; Patel, A.R.; Sliney, K.A.; Pandian, N.G.; Sheffy, J.; Schnall, R.P.; Karas, R.H.; Udelson, J.E. Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function with finger arterial pulse wave amplitude. Am. Heart J. 2003, 146, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bonetti, P.O.; Pumper, G.M.; Higano, S.T.; Holmes, D.R., Jr.; Kuvin, J.T.; Lerman, A. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by assessment of digital reactive hyperemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 44, 2137–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Dvorakova, L.; Krofta, L. Maternal Cardiovascular Risk Assessment 3-to-11 Years Postpartum in Relation to Previous Occurrence of Pregnancy-Related Complications. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Llauradó, G.; Ceperuelo-Mallafré, V.; Vilardell, C.; Simó, R.; Albert, L.; Berlanga, E.; Vendrell, J.; González-Clemente, J.M. Impaired endothelial function is not associated with arterial stiffness in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2013, 39, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Dvorakova, L.; Krofta, L. Postpartum profiling of microRNAs involved in pathogenesis of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases in women exposed to pregnancy-related complications. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 291, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Elmén, J.; Lindow, M.; Silahtaroglu, A.; Bak, M.; Christensen, M.; Lind-Thomsen, A.; Hedtjärn, M.; Hansen, J.B.; Hansen, H.F.; Straarup, E.M.; et al. Antagonism of microRNA-122 in mice by systemically administered LNA-antimiR leads to up-regulation of a large set of predicted target mRNAs in the liver. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yang, K.; He, Y.S.; Wang, X.Q.; Lu, L.; Chen, Q.J.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Shen, W.F. MiR-146a inhibits oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced lipid accumulation and inflammatory response via targeting toll-like receptor 4. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Thum, T.; Gross, C.; Fiedler, J.; Fischer, T.; Kissler, S.; Bussen, M.; Galuppo, P.; Just, S.; Rottbauer, W.; Frantz, S.; et al. MicroRNA-21 contributes to myocardial disease by stimulating MAP kinase signalling in fibroblasts. Nature 2008, 456, 980–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xin, M.; Small, E.M.; Sutherland, L.B.; Qi, X.; McAnally, J.; Plato, C.F.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. MicroRNAs miR-143 and miR-145 modulate cytoskeletal dynamics and responsiveness of smooth muscle cells to injury. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 2166–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, K.; Popescu, L.M.; Ma, X.; Lau, W.B.; Rong, R.; Yu, X.; et al. Signature microRNA expression profile of essential hypertension and its novel link to human cytomegalovirus infection. Circulation 2011, 124, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Harris, T.A.; Yamakuchi, M.; Ferlito, M.; Mendell, J.T.; Lowenstein, C.J. MicroRNA-126 regulates endothelial expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1516–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, Y.S.; Wang, H.Y.; Liao, Y.C.; Tsai, P.C.; Chen, K.C.; Cheng, H.Y.; Lin, R.T.; Juo, S.H. MicroRNA-195 regulates vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype and prevents neointimal formation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 95, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kong, L.; Zhu, J.; Han, W.; Jiang, X.; Xu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, Q.; Pang, Z.; Guan, Q.; Gao, L.; et al. Significance of serum microRNAs in pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A clinical study. Acta Diabetol. 2011, 48, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ji, R.; Cheng, Y.; Yue, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Dean, D.B.; Zhang, C. MicroRNA expression signature and antisense-mediated depletion reveal an essential role of MicroRNA in vascular neointimal lesion formation. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1579–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Raitoharju, E.; Lyytikäinen, L.P.; Levula, M.; Oksala, N.; Mennander, A.; Tarkka, M.; Klopp, N.; Illig, T.; Kähönen, M.; Karhunen, P.J.; et al. miR-21, miR-210, miR-34a, and miR-146a/b are up-regulated in human atherosclerotic plaques in the Tampere Vascular Study. Atherosclerosis 2011, 219, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poliseno, L.; Tuccoli, A.; Mariani, L.; Evangelista, M.; Citti, L.; Woods, K.; Mercatanti, A.; Hammond, S.; Rainaldi, G. MicroRNAs modulate the angiogenic properties of HUVECs. Blood 2006, 108, 3068–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Doebele, C.; Bonauer, A.; Fischer, A.; Scholz, A.; Reiss, Y.; Urbich, C.; Hofmann, W.K.; Zeiher, A.M.; Dimmeler, S. Members of the microRNA-17-92 cluster exhibit a cell-intrinsic antiangiogenic function in endothelial cells. Blood 2010, 115, 4944–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fichtlscherer, S.; De Rosa, S.; Fox, H.; Schwietz, T.; Fischer, A.; Liebetrau, C.; Weber, M.; Hamm, C.W.; Röxe, T.; Müller-Ardogan, M.; et al. Circulating microRNAs in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. van Rooij, E.; Sutherland, L.B.; Liu, N.; Williams, A.H.; McAnally, J.; Gerard, R.D.; Richardson, J.A.; Olson, E.N. A signature pattern of stress-responsive microRNAs that can evoke cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18255–18260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ikeda, S.; Kong, S.W.; Lu, J.; Bisping, E.; Zhang, H.; Allen, P.D.; Golub, T.R.; Pieske, B.; Pu, W.T. Altered microRNA expression in human heart disease. Physiol. Genom. 2007, 31, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. D’Alessandra, Y.; Devanna, P.; Limana, F.; Straino, S.; Di Carlo, A.; Brambilla, P.G.; Rubino, M.; Carena, M.C.; Spazzafumo, L.; De Simone, M.; et al. Circulating microRNAs are new and sensitive biomarkers of myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2010, 31, 2765–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Beaumont, J.; López, B.; Hermida, N.; Schroen, B.; San José, G.; Heymans, S.; Valencia, F.; Gómez-Doblas, J.J.; De Teresa, E.; Díez, J.; et al. microRNA-122 down-regulation may play a role in severe myocardial fibrosis in human aortic stenosis through TGF-β1 up-regulation. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2014, 126, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maitrias, P.; Metzinger-Le Meuth, V.; Nader, J.; Reix, T.; Caus, T.; Metzinger, L. The Involvement of miRNA in Carotid-Related Stroke. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 1608–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Jiang, Y.; Zhang, M.; He, H.; Chen, J.; Zeng, H.; Li, J.; Duan, R. MicroRNA/mRNA profiling and regulatory network of intracranial aneurysm. BMC Med. Genom. 2013, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bienertova-Vasku, J.; Novak, J.; Vasku, A. MicroRNAs in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2015, 9, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Halkein, J.; Tabruyn, S.P.; Ricke-Hoch, M.; Haghikia, A.; Nguyen, N.Q.; Scherr, M.; Castermans, K.; Malvaux, L.; Lambert, V.; Thiry, M.; et al. MicroRNA-146a is a therapeutic target and biomarker for peripartum cardiomyopathy. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 2143–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Namugowa, A.V.; Meeme, A. PP017 Comparison of vascular function in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women in the rural eastern Cape province of South Africa. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012, 2, 250–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meeme, A.; Buga, G.A.; Mammen, M.; Namugowa, A. Endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness in pre-eclampsia demonstrated by the EndoPAT method. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2017, 28, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mannaerts, D.; Faes, E.; Goovaerts, I.; Stoop, T.; Cornette, J.; Gyselaers, W.; Spaanderman, M.; Van Craenenbroeck, E.M.; Jacquemyn, Y. Flow-mediated dilation and peripheral arterial tonometry are disturbed in preeclampsia and reflect different aspects of endothelial function. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2017, 313, R518–R525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mannaerts, D.; Faes, E.; Cos, P.; Briedé, J.J.; Gyselaers, W.; Cornette, J.; Gorbanev, Y.; Bogaerts, A.; Spaanderman, M.; Van Craenenbroeck, E.; et al. Oxidative stress in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia is linked to chronic inflammation, iron status and vascular function. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yinon, D.; Lowenstein, L.; Suraya, S.; Beloosesky, R.; Zmora, O.; Malhotra, A.; Pillar, G. Pre-eclampsia is associated with sleep-disordered breathing and endothelial dysfunction. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 27, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pearce, C.F.; Lain, K.; Hansen, W.F.; Curry, T., Jr.; O’Brien, J.M. The use of digital peripheral artery tonometry to detect endothelial dysfunction in pregnant women who smoke. Am. J. Perinatol. 2014, 31, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Lobysheva, I.I.; Eeckhoudt, S.V.; Zotti, F.D.; Rifahi, A.; Pothen, L.; Beauloye, C.; Balligand, J.L. Clinical and biochemical data of endothelial function in Women Consuming Combined Contraceptives. Data Brief 2017, 13, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lowenstein, L.; Damti, A.; Pillar, G.; Shott, S.; Blumenfeld, Z. Evaluation of endothelial function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2007, 134, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kuvin, J.T.; Mammen, A.; Mooney, P.; Alsheikh-Ali, A.A.; Karas, R.H. Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function in the ambulatory setting. Vasc. Med. 2007, 12, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Truschel, E.; Jarczok, M.N.; Fischer, J.E.; Terris, D.D. High-throughput ambulatory assessment of digital reactive hyperemia: Concurrent validity with known cardiovascular risk factors and potential confounding. Prev. Med. 2009, 49, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ferré, R.; Aragonès, G.; Plana, N.; Merino, J.; Heras, M.; Buixadera, C.; Masana, L. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 levels strongly influence the reactivity of small peripheral arteries. Atherosclerosis 2011, 216, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hamburg, N.M.; Palmisano, J.; Larson, M.G.; Sullivan, L.M.; Lehman, B.T.; Vasan, R.S.; Levy, D.; Mitchell, G.F.; Vita, J.A.; Benjamin, E.J. Relation of brachial and digital measures of vascular function in the community: The Framingham heart study. Hypertension 2011, 57, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gupta, A.K.; Ravussin, E.; Johannsen, D.L.; Stull, A.J.; Cefalu, W.T.; Johnson, W.D. Endothelial Dysfunction: An Early Cardiovascular Risk Marker in Asymptomatic Obese Individuals with Prediabetes. Br. J. Med. Med. Res. 2012, 2, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Aversa, A.; Bruzziches, R.; Francomano, D.; Greco, E.A.; Violi, F.; Lenzi, A.; Donini, L.M. Weight loss by multidisciplinary intervention improves endothelial and sexual function in obese fertile women. J. Sex. Med. 2013, 10, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cioni, G.; Boddi, M.; Fatini, C.; Romagnuolo, I.; Casini, A.; Gensini, G.F.; Abbate, R.; Sofi, F. Peripheral-arterial tonometry for assessing endothelial function in relation to dietary habits. J. Investig. Med. 2013, 61, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cao, C.; Hu, J.; Dong, Y.; Zhan, R.; Li, P.; Su, H.; Peng, Q.; Wu, T.; Lei, L.; Huang, X.; et al. Gender differences in the risk factors for endothelial dysfunction in Chinese hypertensive patients: Homocysteine is an independent risk factor in females. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Michelsen, M.M.; Mygind, N.D.; Pena, A.; Aziz, A.; Frestad, D.; Høst, N.; Prescott, E. Steering Committee of the iPOWER Study. Peripheral Reactive Hyperemia Index and Coronary Microvascular Function in Women With no Obstructive CAD: The iPOWER Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 9, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kurozumi, A.; Okada, Y.; Arao, T.; Tanaka, Y. Excess Visceral Adipose Tissue Worsens the Vascular Endothelial Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Intern. Med. 2016, 55, 3091–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. van der Heijden, D.J.; van Leeuwen, M.A.H.; Janssens, G.N.; Lenzen, M.J.; van de Ven, P.M.; Eringa, E.C.; van Royen, N. Body Mass Index Is Associated With Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Treated Metabolic Risk Factors and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kang, J.; Kim, H.L.; Seo, J.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Moon, M.K.; Chung, W.Y. Endothelial function estimated by digital reactive hyperemia in patients with atherosclerotic risk factors or coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels 2018, 33, 706–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mori, H.; Okada, Y.; Kawaguchi, M.; Iwata, S.; Yoshikawa, M.; Sonoda, S.; Sugai, K.; Tanaka, K.; Hajime, M.; Narisawa, M.; et al. A Study of the Vascular Endothelial Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Intern. Med. 2019, 58, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Owei, I.; Umekwe, N.; Mohamed, H.; Ebenibo, S.; Wan, J.; Dagogo-Jack, S. Ethnic Disparities in Endothelial Function and Its Cardiometabolic Correlates: The Pathobiology of Prediabetes in A Biracial Cohort Study. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Czippelova, B.; Turianikova, Z.; Krohova, J.; Wiszt, R.; Lazarova, Z.; Pozorciakova, K.; Ciljakova, M.; Javorka, M. Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function in Young Obese Patients-Vascular Resistance Matters. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2019, 26, 1015–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Taher, R.; Sara, J.D.; Heidari, B.; Toya, T.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. Metabolic syndrome is associated with peripheral endothelial dysfunction amongst men. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2019, 12, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ferreira, T.D.S.; Fernandes, J.F.R.; Araújo, L.D.S.; Nogueira, L.P.; Leal, P.M.; Antunes, V.P.; Rodrigues, M.L.G.; Valença, D.C.T.; Kaiser, S.E.; Klein, M.R.S.T. Serum Uric Acid Levels are Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Healthy Young and Middle-Aged Adults. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2018, 111, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Konttinen, J.; Lindholm, H.; Sinisalo, J.; Kuosma, E.; Halonen, J.; Hopsu, L.; Uitti, J. Association between lowered endothelial function measured by peripheral arterial tonometry and cardio-metabolic risk factors—A cross-sectional study of Finnish municipal workers at risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2013, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Williams, M.J.A.; Milne, B.J.; Ambler, A.; Theodore, R.; Ramrakha, S.; Caspi, A.; Moffitt, T.E.; Poulton, R. Childhood body mass index and endothelial dysfunction evaluated by peripheral arterial tonometry in early midlife. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 1355–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Randby, A.; Namtvedt, S.K.; Hrubos-Strøm, H.; Einvik, G.; Somers, V.K.; Omland, T. Sex-dependent impact of OSA on digital vascular function. Chest 2013, 144, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ertek, S.; Akgül, E.; Cicero, A.F.; Kütük, U.; Demirtaş, S.; Cehreli, S.; Erdoğan, G. 25-Hydroxy vitamin D levels and endothelial vasodilator function in normotensive women. Arch. Med. Sci. 2012, 8, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tang, D.; Bai, S.; Li, X.; Yao, M.; Gong, Y.; Hou, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, D. Improvement of microvascular endothelial dysfunction induced by exercise and diet is associated with microRNA-126 in obese adolescents. Microvasc. Res. 2019, 123, 86–91. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhao, Y.; Samal, E.; Srivastava, D. Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis. Nature 2005, 436, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, J.F.; Mandel, E.M.; Thomson, J.M.; Wu, Q.; Callis, T.E.; Hammond, S.M.; Conlon, F.L.; Wang, D.Z. The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rao, P.K.; Kumar, R.M.; Farkhondeh, M.; Baskerville, S.; Lodish, H.F. Myogenic factors that regulate expression of muscle-specific microRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 8721–8726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Li, Y.Q.; Zhang, M.F.; Wen, H.Y.; Hu, C.L.; Liu, R.; Wei, H.Y.; Ai, C.M.; Wang, G.; Liao, X.X.; Li, X. Comparing the diagnostic values of circulating microRNAs and cardiac troponin T in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clinics 2013, 68, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chistiakov, D.A.; Orekhov, A.N.; Bobryshev, Y.V. Cardiac-specific miRNA in cardiogenesis, heart function, and cardiac pathology (with focus on myocardial infarction). J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2016, 94, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Huang, G. MicroRNA-1 regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis by targeting Bcl-2. Int. Heart J. 2009, 50, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Terentyev, D.; Belevych, A.E.; Terentyeva, R.; Martin, M.M.; Malana, G.E.; Kuhn, D.E.; Abdellatif, M.; Feldman, D.S.; Elton, T.S.; Györke, S. miR-1 overexpression enhances Ca(2+) release and promotes cardiac arrhythmogenesis by targeting PP2A regulatory subunit B56alpha and causing CaMKII-dependent hyperphosphorylation of RyR2. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Wang, S.; Guo, X.; Long, C.L.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.F.; Wang, J.; Wang, H. SUR2B/Kir6.1 channel openers correct endothelial dysfunction in chronic heart failure via the miR-1-3p/ET-1 pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 110, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Hympanova, L.; Krofta, L. Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease Associated microRNAs Are Dysregulated in Placental Tissues Affected with Gestational Hypertension, Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Ivankova, K.; Vedmetskaya, Y.; Krofta, L. Profiling of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNA expression in umbilical cord blood in gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 249, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Hympanova, L.; Krofta, L. Gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction induce dysregulation of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in maternal whole peripheral blood. Thromb. Res. 2016, 137, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Long, B.; Gan, T.Y.; Zhang, R.C.; Zhang, Y.H. miR-23a Regulates Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis by Targeting Manganese Superoxide Dismutase. Mol. Cells 2017, 40, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Wang, S.; He, W.; Wang, C. MiR-23a Regulates the Vasculogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease by Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2016, 34, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Cong, X.; Li, Y.; Lu, N.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y. Resveratrol attenuates the inflammatory reaction induced by ischemia/reperfusion in the rat heart. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 9, 2528–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Amin, K.N.; Umapathy, D.; Anandharaj, A.; Ravichandran, J.; Sasikumar, C.S.; Chandra, S.K.R.; Kesavan, R.; Kunka Mohanram, R. miR-23c regulates wound healing by targeting stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α/CXCL12) among patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Microvasc. Res. 2020, 127, 103924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Dvorakova, L.; Krofta, L.; Sirc, J. Postnatal Expression Profile of microRNAs Associated with Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases in Children at the Age of 3 to 11 Years in Relation to Previous Occurrence of Pregnancy-Related Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Wang, J.X.; Jiao, J.Q.; Li, Q.; Long, B.; Wang, K.; Liu, J.P.; Li, Y.R.; Li, P.F. miR-499 regulates mitochondrial dynamics by targeting calcineurin and dynamin-related protein-1. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Van Rooij, E.; Olson, E.N. MicroRNAs: Powerful new regulators of heart disease and provocative therapeutic targets. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 2369–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Devaux, Y.; Vausort, M.; Goretti, E.; Nazarov, P.V.; Azuaje, F.; Gilson, G.; Corsten, M.F.; Schroen, B.; Lair, M.L.; Heymans, S.; et al. Use of circulating microRNAs to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. Clin. Chem. 2012, 58, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Cheng, C.; Wang, Q.; You, W.; Chen, M.; Xia, J. MiRNAs as biomarkers of myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Xiao, J.; Shen, B.; Li, J.; Lv, D.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, F.; Xu, J. Serum microRNA-499 and microRNA-208a as biomarkers of acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2014, 7, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  101. Toraih, E.A.; Hussein, M.H.; Al Ageeli, E.; Riad, E.; AbdAllah, N.B.; Helal, G.M.; Fawzy, M.S. Structure and functional impact of seed region variant in MIR-499 gene family in bronchial asthma. Respir. Res. 2017, 18, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Program, National High Blood Pressure Education. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 183, S1–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 99, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  104. Espinoza, J.; Vidaeff, A.; Pettker, C.M.; Simhan, H. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 133, e1–e25. [Google Scholar]
  105. Vyas, S.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Bower, S.; Campbell, S. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1990, 97, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Cohn, H.E.; Sacks, E.J.; Heymann, M.A.; Rudolph, A.M. Cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia and acidemia in fetal lambs. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1974, 120, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liz, S. Practice Guidelines: New AHA Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement. Am. Fam. Physician 2005, 72, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar]
  108. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vandesompele, J.; de Preter, K.; Pattyn, F.; Poppe, B.; Van Roy, N.; de Paepe, A.; Speleman, F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, research0034.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Shapiro, S.S.; Wilk, M.B. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika 1965, 52, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 00430 g001a 550Ijms 21 00430 g001b 550
Figure 1. Association between the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and the central obesity. (A) Young and middle-aged women with central obesity (waist circumference values ≥ 80 cm) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of waist circumference (waist circumference values < 80 cm), (unadjusted data: p = 0.006, data adjusted for the age of patients: p = 0.008). (B) At 10.0% FPR, a markedly higher proportion of women with waist circumference values above 80 cm had RHI values below cut-off values. 18.64% women before adjustment of the data for the age had RHI values ≤ 1.442. In parallel, 21.19% women after adjustment of the data for the age had significantly lower RHI values.
Figure 1. Association between the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and the central obesity. (A) Young and middle-aged women with central obesity (waist circumference values ≥ 80 cm) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of waist circumference (waist circumference values < 80 cm), (unadjusted data: p = 0.006, data adjusted for the age of patients: p = 0.008). (B) At 10.0% FPR, a markedly higher proportion of women with waist circumference values above 80 cm had RHI values below cut-off values. 18.64% women before adjustment of the data for the age had RHI values ≤ 1.442. In parallel, 21.19% women after adjustment of the data for the age had significantly lower RHI values.
Ijms 21 00430 g001aIjms 21 00430 g001b
Ijms 21 00430 g002 550
Figure 2. Association between the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and overweight. (A) Overweight women (BMI ≥ 25–<30) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of BMI (BMI < 25) (unadjusted data: p = 0.036, data adjusted for the age of women: p = 0.039). (B) At 10.0% FPR, a markedly higher proportion of overweight women had RHI values below cut-off values. 17.94% young women before adjustment of the data for the age had RHI values ≤ 1.412. In parallel, 20.59% women after adjustment of the data for the age had significantly lower RHI values.
Figure 2. Association between the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and overweight. (A) Overweight women (BMI ≥ 25–<30) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of BMI (BMI < 25) (unadjusted data: p = 0.036, data adjusted for the age of women: p = 0.039). (B) At 10.0% FPR, a markedly higher proportion of overweight women had RHI values below cut-off values. 17.94% young women before adjustment of the data for the age had RHI values ≤ 1.412. In parallel, 20.59% women after adjustment of the data for the age had significantly lower RHI values.
Ijms 21 00430 g002
Ijms 21 00430 g003a 550Ijms 21 00430 g003b 550
Figure 3. Higher expression rates of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction. (A) Higher expression rates of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p were detected in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67) when compared with those possessing normal vascular endothelial function (RHI > 1.67), respectively. (B) At 10.0% FPR, a proportion of women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction was identified to have up-regulated expression profile of miR-1-3p (11.76%), miR-23a-3p (17.65%), and miR-499a-5p (18.82%).
Figure 3. Higher expression rates of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction. (A) Higher expression rates of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p were detected in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67) when compared with those possessing normal vascular endothelial function (RHI > 1.67), respectively. (B) At 10.0% FPR, a proportion of women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction was identified to have up-regulated expression profile of miR-1-3p (11.76%), miR-23a-3p (17.65%), and miR-499a-5p (18.82%).
Ijms 21 00430 g003aIjms 21 00430 g003b
Ijms 21 00430 g004 550
Figure 4. Association between the vascular endothelial function (RHI values) and the expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. Correlation between variables was calculated using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, a nonparametric measure of rank correlation, assesses how well the relationship between two variables can be described using a monotonic function. The significance level was established at a p-value of p < 0.05. The RHI values showed a week negative correlation with the expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. That means that women with a finding of lower RHI values showed significantly increased levels of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood, respectively.
Figure 4. Association between the vascular endothelial function (RHI values) and the expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. Correlation between variables was calculated using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, a nonparametric measure of rank correlation, assesses how well the relationship between two variables can be described using a monotonic function. The significance level was established at a p-value of p < 0.05. The RHI values showed a week negative correlation with the expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. That means that women with a finding of lower RHI values showed significantly increased levels of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood, respectively.
Ijms 21 00430 g004
Table
Table 1. Impact of classical cardiovascular risk factors and a history of pregnancy on vascular endothelial function_ overview (ANOVA, ANCOVA).
Table 1. Impact of classical cardiovascular risk factors and a history of pregnancy on vascular endothelial function_ overview (ANOVA, ANCOVA).
Endothelial Function (RHI) Mean (SE)p Value
On blood pressure treatment
[no (n = 253) vs. yes (n = 11)]		Unadjusted data2.046 (0.041) vs. 1.916 (0.195)p = 0.516
Adjusted data2.046 (0.041) vs. 1.921 (0.195)p = 0.531
Trombophilic gene mutations
[no (n = 246) vs. yes (n = 18)]		Unadjusted data2.042 (0.041) vs. 2.027 (0.153)p = 0.924
Adjusted data2.041 (0.041) vs. 2.036 (0.153)p = 0.974
Current smoking of cigarettes
[non-smokers + ex-smokers (n = 228) vs. smokers (n = 36)]		Unadjusted data2.028 (0.043) vs. 2.119 (0.108)p = 0.435
Adjusted data2.029 (0.043) vs. 2.113 (0.108)p = 0.476
BMI
[normal (n = 156) vs. abnormal (n = 108)]
(<25 vs. ≥25)		Unadjusted data2.101 (0.052) vs. 1.953 (0.062)p = 0.068
Adjusted data2.099 (0.052) vs. 1.957 (0.062)p = 0.082
BMI
[normal (n = 156) vs. overweight (n = 68) vs. obese (n = 40)]
(<25 vs. ≥ 25–29.9 vs. ≥30)		Unadjusted data2.101 (0.051) vs. 1.866 (0.078) vs. 2.102 (0.101)Normal BMI vs. overweight p = 0.036
↓ RHI in overweight women
Normal BMI vs. obese p = 1.0
Adjusted data2.099 (0.051) vs. 1.865 (0.078) vs. 2.117 (0.102)Normal BMI vs. overweight p = 0.039
↓ RHI in overweight women
Normal BMI vs. obese p = 1.0
Waist circumference
[normal (n = 146) vs. abnormal (n = 118)]
(<80 cm vs. ≥ 80 cm)		Unadjusted data2.138 (0.053) vs. 1.920 (0.059)p = 0.006
↓ RHI in women with waist circumference ≥ 80 cm
Adjusted data2.135 (0.053) vs. 1.924 (0.059)p = 0.008
↓ RHI in women with waist circumference ≥ 80 cm
SBP
[normal (n = 241) vs. abnormal (n = 23)]
(<140 mmHg vs. ≥ 140 mmHg)		Unadjusted data2.033 (0.042) vs. 2.123 (0.135)p = 0.526
Adjusted data2.032 (0.042) vs. 2.134 (0.135)p = 0.471
SBP
[normal (n = 138) vs. prehypertension (n = 103) vs. hypertension (n = 23)]
(<120 mmHg vs. ≥120–139 mmHg vs. ≥ 140 mmHg)		Unadjusted data2.030 (0.055) vs. 2.037 (0.064) vs. 2.123 (0.135)Normal SBP vs. prehypertension p = 1.0
Normal SBP vs. hypertension p = 1.0
Adjusted data2.029 (0.055) vs. 2.035 (0.064) vs. 2.134 (0.136)Normal SBP vs. prehypertension p = 1.0
Normal SBP vs. hypertension p = 1.0
DBP
[normal (n = 229) vs. abnormal (n = 35)]
(< 90 mmHg vs. ≥ 90 mmHg) 		Unadjusted data2.035 (0.043) vs. 2.077 (0.110)p = 0.721
Adjusted data2.034 (0.043) vs. 2.083 (0.110)p = 0.678
DBP
[normal (n = 172) vs. prehypertension (n = 57) vs. hypertension (n = 35)]
(< 80 mmHg vs. ≥80–89 mmHg vs. ≥ 90 mmHg)		Unadjusted data2.019 (0.050) vs. 2.084 (0.086) vs. 2.077 (0.110)Normal DBP vs. prehypertension p = 1.0
Normal DBP vs. hypertension p = 1.0
Adjusted data2.020 (0.050) vs. 2.076 (0.086) vs. 2.083 (0.110)Normal DBP vs. prehypertension p = 1.0
Normal DBP vs. hypertension p = 1.0
Serum total cholesterol
[normal (n = 125) vs. abnormal (n = 139)]
(≤ 5 mmol/L vs. > 5 mmol/L)		Unadjusted data2.004 (0.058) vs. 2.074 (0.055)p = 0.386
Adjusted data1.999 (0.058) vs. 2.078 (0.055)p = 0.329
Serum HDL cholesterol
[normal (n = 230) vs. abnormal (n = 34)]
(≥ 1.2 mmol/L vs. <1.2 mmol/L)		Unadjusted data2.046 (0.043) vs. 2.002 (0.111)p = 0.710
Adjusted data2.046 (0.043) vs. 2.006 (0.111)p = 0.741
Serum LDL cholesterol
[normal (n = 100) vs. abnormal (n = 164)]
(≤ 3 mmol/L vs. > 3 mmol/L)		Unadjusted data1.983 (0.065) vs. 2.074 (0.051)p = 0.267
Adjusted data1.976 (0.065) vs. 2.079 (0.051)p = 0.217
Serum triglycerides
[normal (n = 248) vs. abnormal (n = 16)]
(≤ 1.7 mmol/L vs. > 1.7 mmol/L)		Unadjusted data2.039 (0.041) vs. 2.075 (0.162)p = 0.827
Adjusted data2.038 (0.041) vs. 2.083 (0.162)p = 0.786
Serum Lp(a)
[normal (n = 212) vs. abnormal (n = 52)]
(≤ 72.0 nmol/L vs. > 72.0 nmol/L)		Unadjusted data2.032 (0.045) vs. 2.076 (0.090)p = 0.665
Adjusted data2.031 (0.045) vs. 2.082 (0.090)p = 0.609
Serum CRP
[normal (n = 223) vs. abnormal (n = 41)]
(≤ 5 mg/L vs. > 5 mg/L)		Unadjusted data2.032 (0.043) vs. 2.089 (0.101)p = 0.608
Adjusted data2.032 (0.043) vs. 2.088 (0.101)p = 0.613
Plasma homocysteine
[normal (n = 229) vs. abnormal (n = 35)]
(≤ 13.6 μmol/L vs. > 13.6 μmol/L)		Unadjusted data2.054 (0.043) vs. 1.954 (0.109)p = 0.397
Adjusted data2.054 (0.043) vs. 1.954 (0.109)p = 0.394
Serum uric acid
[normal (n = 233) vs. abnormal (n = 31)]
(≤339 μmol/L vs. > 339 μmol/L)		Unadjusted data2.064 (0.042) vs. 1.870 (0.116)p = 0.117
Adjusted data2.063 (0.042) vs. 1.877 (0.116)p = 0.134
Current hormonal contraceptive use
[non-users + ex-users (n = 194) vs. users (n = 70)]		Unadjusted data2.038 (0.047) vs. 2.049 (0.077)p = 0.901
Adjusted data2.041 (0.047) vs. 2.041 (0.078)p = 0.991
Total number of pregnancies per patient
[1 (n = 61) vs. 2 (n = 115) vs. 3+ (n = 88)]		Unadjusted data2.050 (0.083) vs. 2.117 (0.061) vs. 1.935 (0.069)1 pregnancy vs. 2 pregnancies p = 1.0
1 pregnancy vs. 3+ pregnancies p = 0.857
Adjusted data2.044 (0.083) 2.114 (0.061) vs. 1.943 (0.071)1 pregnancy vs. 2 pregnancies p = 1.0
1 pregnancy vs. 3+ pregnancies p = 1.0
Total parity per patient
[1 (n = 77) vs. 2 (n = 150) vs. 3+ (n = 37)]		Unadjusted data2.038 (0.074) vs. 2.071 (0.053) vs. 1.927 (0.107)1 child vs. 2 children p = 1.0
1 child vs. 3+ children p = 1.0
Adjusted data2.038 (0.074) vs. 2.066 (0.053) vs. 1.943 (0.109)1 child vs. 2 children p = 1.0
1 child vs. 3+ children p = 1.0
Infertility treatment
[no (n = 226) vs. yes (n = 38)]		Unadjusted data2.021 (0.043) vs. 2.161 (0.105)p = 0.216
Adjusted data2.017 (0.043) vs. 2.183 (0.106)p = 0.149
Data are expressed as mean (SE; standard error). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for unadjusted data and Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for adjusted data. ANCOVA data were adjusted for the age of women. The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05 (Bonferroni corrected p-values). Statistically significant results are marked in bold. Women with central obesity (waist circumference values ≥ 80 cm) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of waist circumference (waist circumference values < 80 cm). Overweight women (BMI ≥25 –<30) showed significantly decreased RHI levels when compared with the group of women with normal values of BMI (BMI < 25). BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein a; SBP, systolic blood pressure; RHI, Reactive Hyperemia Index.
Table
Table 2. Impact of classical cardiovascular risk factors and a history of pregnancy on the prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction_ overview (logistic regression analyses).
Table 2. Impact of classical cardiovascular risk factors and a history of pregnancy on the prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction_ overview (logistic regression analyses).
Prevalence of Vascular Endothelial DysfunctionGroup 1 (%)Group 2 (%)p ValueOR (95% CI)
On blood pressure treatment
[no (n = 253) vs. yes (n = 11)]		83 (32.81%)3 (27.27%)0.7020.768 (0.199–2.971)
Trombophilic gene mutations
[no (n = 246) vs. yes (n = 18)]		80 (32.52%)6 (33.33%)0.9431.038 (0.376–2.865)
Current smoking of cigarettes
[non-smokers + ex-smokers (n = 228) vs. smokers (n = 36)]		78 (34.21%)8 (22.22%)0.1580.550 (0.239–1.263)
BMI
[normal (n = 156) vs. abnormal (n = 108)]
(<25 vs. ≥25)		48 (30.77%)38 (35.19%)0.4521.221 (0.725–2.057)
BMI
[normal (n = 156) vs. overweight (n = 68)]
(<25 vs. ≥25–29.9)		48 (30.77%)29 (42.65%)0.0871.673 (0.929–3.014)
[normal (n = 156) vs. obese (n = 40)]
(<25 vs. ≥30)		48 (30.77%)9 (22.50%)0.3070.653 (0.289–1.478)
Waist circumference
[normal (n = 146) vs. abnormal (n = 118)]
(<80 cm vs. ≥ 80 cm)		41 (28.08%)45 (38.14%)0.0841.579 (0.941–2.650)
SBP
[normal (n = 241) vs. abnormal (n = 23)]
(<140 mmHg vs. ≥140 mmHg)		82 (34.02%)4 (17.39%)0.1140.408 (0.134–1.240)
SBP
[normal (n = 138) vs. prehypertension (n = 103)]
(<120 mmHg vs. ≥120–139 mmHg)		49 (35.51%)33 (32.04%)0.5740.856 (0.498–1.471)
[normal (n = 138) vs. hypertension (n = 23)]
(<120 mmHg vs. ≥140 mmHg)		49 (35.51%)4 (17.39%)0.0960.382 (0.123–1.188)
DBP
[normal (n = 229) vs. abnormal (n = 35)]
(<90 mmHg vs. ≥90 mmHg) 		79 (34.50%)7 (20.0%)0.0940.475 (0.199–1.135)
DBP
[normal (n = 172) vs. prehypertension (n = 57)]
(<80 mmHg vs. ≥80–89 mmHg)		62 (36.05%)17 (29.82%)0.3930.754 (0.395–1.440)
[normal (n = 172) vs. hypertension (n = 35)]
(<80 mmHg vs. ≥90 mmHg)		62 (36.05%)7 (20.00%)0.0720.444 (0.183–1.075)
Serum total cholesterol
[normal (n = 125) vs. abnormal (n = 139)]
(≤5 mmol/L vs. >5 mmol/L)		39 (31.30%)47 (33.81%)0.6511.127 (0.672–1.888)
Serum HDL cholesterol
[normal (n = 230) vs. abnormal (n = 34)]
(≥1.2 mmol/L vs. <1.2 mmol/L)		75 (32.61%)11 (32.35)0.9760.988 (0.458–2.134)
Serum LDL cholesterol
[normal (n = 100) vs. abnormal (n = 164)]
(≤3 mmol/L vs. >3 mmol/L)		32 (32.0%)54 (32.91%)0.8081.068 (0.628–1.817)
Serum triglycerides
[normal (n = 248) vs. abnormal (n = 16)]
(≤1.7 mmol/L vs. >1.7 mmol/L)		81 (32.66%)5 (31.25%)0.9070.937 (0.315–2.787)
Serum Lp(a)
[normal (n = 212) vs. abnormal (n = 52)]
(≤72.0 nmol/L vs. >72.0 nmol/L)		71 (33.49%)15 (28.85%)0.5220.805 (0.414–1.564)
Serum CRP
[normal (n = 223) vs. abnormal (n = 41)]
(≤5 mg/L vs. >5 mg/L)		75 (33.63%)11 (26.83%)0.9740.991 (0.586–1.678)
Plasma homocysteine
[normal (n = 229) vs. abnormal (n = 35)]
(≤13.6 μmol/L vs. >13.6 μmol/L)		72 (31.44%)14 (40.0%)0.3161.454 (0.700–3.021)
Serum uric acid
[normal (n = 233) vs. abnormal (n = 31)]
(≤339 μmol/L vs. >339 μmol/L)		72 (30.90%)14 (45.16%)0.1151.842 (0.861–3.938)
Current hormonal contraceptive use
[non-users + ex-users (n = 194) vs. users (n = 70)]		64 (32.99%)22 (31.43%)0.8110.931 (0.518–1.674)
Total number of pregnancies per patient
[1 (n = 61) vs. 2 (n = 115)]17 (27.87%)32 (27.83%)0.9950.998 (0.499–1.995)
[1 (n = 61) vs. 3+ (n = 88)]17 (27.87%)37 (42.05%)0.0781.878 (0.931–3.788)
Total parity per patient
[1 (n = 77) vs. 2 (n = 150)]24 (31.17%)49 (32.67%)0.8191.071 (0.593–1.934)
[1 (n = 77) vs. 3+ (n = 37)]24 (31.17%)13 (35.14%)0.6721.196 (0.522–2.742)
Infertility treatment
[no (n = 226) vs. yes (n = 38)]		75 (33.19%)11 (28.95%)0.6060.820 (0.386–1.743)
Data are expressed as number (percent) of patients with the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction. Logistic regression was used to compare the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction between particular groups. The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05. No impact of any factor on the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction was found. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence intervals; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein a; RHI, Reactive Hyperemia Index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; OR, odds ratios.
Table
Table 3. Association between the vascular endothelial function (RHI values) and classical cardiovascular risk factors and a history of pregnancy (Pearson correlation coefficient, Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation).
Table 3. Association between the vascular endothelial function (RHI values) and classical cardiovascular risk factors and a history of pregnancy (Pearson correlation coefficient, Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation).
RHI (Non-Normal Distribution)Data DistributionPearson Correlation Coefficient, p Value Spearman’s Coefficient of Rank Correlation (rho), p Value
ageNon-normal distribution-ρ = −0.046, p = 0.457
BMI Non-normal distribution-ρ = −0.063, p = 0.307
Waist circumference Non-normal distribution-ρ = −0.081, p = 0.188
SBPNon-normal distribution-ρ = 0.079, p = 0.199
DBPNon-normal distribution-ρ = 0.044, p = 0.478
Heart rate at restNon-normal distribution-ρ = 0.051, p = 0.407
Serum total cholesterol Non-normal distribution-ρ = 0.015, p = 0.810
Serum HDL cholesterol Non-normal distribution-ρ = −0.030, p = 0.631
Serum LDL cholesterol Non-normal distribution-ρ = −0.002, p = 0.973
Serum triglyceridesNon-normal distribution-ρ = −0.008, p = 0.903
Serum Lp(a) Non-normal distribution-ρ = −0.002, p = 0.981
Serum CRPNon-normal distribution-ρ = 0.057, p = 0.357
Plasma homocysteine Non-normal distribution-ρ = −0.020, p = 0.753
Serum uric acid Normal distributionr = −0.111, p = 0.072ρ = −0.111, p = 0.072
Time elapsed since the deliveryNon-normal distribution-ρ = 0.014, p = 0.816
Total number of pregnancies per patientNon-normal distribution-ρ = −0.114, p = 0.064
Total parity per patientNon-normal distribution-ρ = −0.037, p = 0.548
Correlation between variables was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for normally distributed variables and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used for variables with skewed distribution. The significance level was established at a p-value of p < 0.05. The RHI values did not correlate with any factor. BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; Lp(a), lipoprotein a; SBP, systolic blood pressure; RHI, Reactive Hyperemia Index.
Table
Table 4. Impact of a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, FGR) with respect to the severity of the disease and delivery date on vascular endothelial function (RHI values)_ overview (ANOVA and ANCOVA analyses)
Table 4. Impact of a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, FGR) with respect to the severity of the disease and delivery date on vascular endothelial function (RHI values)_ overview (ANOVA and ANCOVA analyses)
NTP
(n = 74)		GH
(n = 48)		PE
(n = 114)		FGR
(n = 28)		Diagnostic Groups
(Normal vs. Diseased)		p Value
(ANOVA, ANCOVA)
RHIUnadjusted data2.066 (0.075)1.907 (0.093)2.094 (0.060)1.989 (0.122)NTP vs. GHp = 1.0
NTP vs. PEp = 1.0
NTP vs. FGRp = 1.0
Adjusted data2.068 (0.075) A1.910 (0.093) A2.091 (0.060) A1.987 (0.122) ANTP vs. GHp = 1.0
NTP vs. PEp = 1.0
NTP vs. FGRp = 1.0
NTP
(n = 74)		PE w/o SF
(n = 28)		PE w SF
(n = 86)		DiagnosticGroups
(Normal vs. Diseased)		p Value
(ANOVA, ANCOVA)
RHIUnadjusted data2.066 (0.075)2.200 (0.121)2.059 (0.069)NTP vs. PE w/o SFp = 1.0
NTP vs. PE w SFp = 1.0
Adjusted data2.066 (0.075) A2.201 (0.122) A2.059 (0.069) ANTP vs. PE w/o SFp = 1.0
NTP vs. PE w SFp = 1.0
NTP
(n = 74)		Early PE
(n = 40)		Late PE
(n = 74)		DiagnosticGroups
(Normal vs. Diseased)		p Value
(ANOVA, ANCOVA)
RHIUnadjusted data2.066 (0.075)2.074 (0.102)2.104 (0.075)NTP vs. early PEp = 1.0
NTP vs. late PE p = 1.0
Adjusted data2.066 (0.075) A2.074 (0.102) A2.105 (0.075) ANTP vs. early PEp = 1.0
NTP vs. late PE p = 1.0
NTP
(n = 74)		PE w/o HELLP
(n = 98)		PE w HELLP
(n = 16)		DiagnosticGroups
(Normal vs. Diseased)		p Value
(ANOVA, ANCOVA)
RHIUnadjusted data2.066 (0.075)2.067 (0.065)2.256 (0.160)NTP vs. PE w/o HELLPp = 1.0
NTP vs. PE w HELLPp = 0.848
Adjusted data2.066 (0.075) A2.067 (0.065) A2.256 (0.161) ANTP vs. PE w/o HELLPp = 1.0
NTP vs. PE w HELLPp = 0.852
NTP
(n = 74)		PE w/o FGR
(n = 98)		PE w FGR
(n = 16)		DiagnosticGroups
(Normal vs. Diseased)		p Value
(ANOVA, ANCOVA)
RHIUnadjusted data2.066 (0.075)2.104 (0.065)2.029 (0.161)NTP vs. PE w/o FGRp = 1.0
NTP vs. PE w FGRp = 1.0
Adjusted data2.066 (0.075) A2.104 (0.065) A2.028 (0.162) ANTP vs. PE w/o FGRp = 1.0
NTP vs. PE w FGRp = 1.0
NTP
(n = 74)		Early FGR
(n = 9)		Late FGR
(n = 19)		DiagnosticGroups
(Normal vs. Diseased)		p Value
(ANOVA, ANCOVA)
RHIUnadjusted data2.066 (0.085)2.038 (0.243)1.965 (0.168)NTP vs. early FGRp = 1.0
NTP vs. late FGRp = 1.0
Adjusted data2.065 (0.085) A2.037 (0.245) A1.969 (0.169) ANTP vs. early FGRp = 1.0
NTP vs. late FGRp = 1.0
Data are expressed as mean (SE; standard error). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for unadjusted data and Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for adjusted data. A ANCOVA data were adjusted for the age of women. The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05 (Bonferroni corrected p-values). No significant difference in RHI values was observed between the groups of women with a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, and FGR) and normally progressing pregnancies. No difference in RHI values was found between the control group and the groups of women with a history of PE w/o SF, PE w SF, early PE, late PE, PE w/o HELLP, PE w HELLP, PE w/o FGR, PE w FGR, early FGR, and late FGR. FGR, fetal growth restriction; GH, gestational hypertension; HELLP, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count; PE, preeclampsia; PE w/o SF, preeclampsia without severe features; PE w/SF, preeclampsia with severe features; NTP, normotensive term pregnancies; RHI, Reactive Hyperemia Index.
Table
Table 5. Impact of a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, FGR) with respect to the severity of the disease and delivery date on prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction_ overview (logistic regression analyses).
Table 5. Impact of a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, FGR) with respect to the severity of the disease and delivery date on prevalence of vascular endothelial dysfunction_ overview (logistic regression analyses).
Prevalence of Vascular Endothelial DysfunctionCase, n (%)NTP, n (%)p ValueOR (95% CI)
Pregnancy-related complications irrespective of the severity of the disease
PE 29 (25.44%)24 (32.43%)0.2990.711 (0.373–1.353)
GH 18 (37.50%)24 (32.43%)0.5651.250 (0.584–2.674)
FGR 15 (53.57%)24 (32.43%)0.0532.404 (0.989–5.842)
Women with a history of FGR with respect to the disease severity
Early FGR6 (66.67%)24 (32.43%)0.0574.167 (0.959–18.102)
Late FGR9 (47.37%)24 (32.43%)0.2291.875 (0.674–5.219)
Women with a history of PE with respect to the disease severity
PE w/o SF6 (21.43%)24 (32.43%)0.2800.568 (0.204–1.585)
PE w SF23 (26.74%)24 (32.43%)0.4320.761 (0.385–1.504)
Early PE13 (32.50%)24 (32.43%)0.9941.003 (0.441–2.281)
Late PE16 (21.62%)24 (32.43%)0.1410.575 (0.275–1.201)
PE w/o HELLP27 (27.55%)24 (32.43%)0.4880.792 (0.410–1.530)
PE w HELLP2 (12.50%)24 (32.43%)0.1280.298 (0.063–1.416)
PE w/o FGR24 (24.49%)24 (32.43%)0.2510.676 (0.346–1.320)
PE w FGR5 (31.25%)24 (32.43%)0.9270.947 (0.296–3.032)
Data are expressed as number (percent) of patients with the presence of endothelial dysfunction. Logistic regression was used to compare the presence of endothelial dysfunction between particular groups. The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05. No significant difference in the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction was observed between the groups of women with a history of pregnancy-related complications (GH, PE, and FGR) and normally progressing pregnancies. No difference in the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction between the control group and the groups of women with a history of PE w/o SF, PE w SF, early PE, late PE, PE w/o HELLP, PE w HELLP, PE w/o FGR, PE w FGR, early FGR, and late FGR was found. CI, confidence intervals; FGR, fetal growth restriction; GH, gestational hypertension; HELLP, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count; NTP, normotensive term pregnancies; PE, preeclampsia PE w/o SF, preeclampsia without severe features; PE w/SF, preeclampsia with severe features; OR, odds ratios.
Table
Table 6. Association between the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and the expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women_ overview (Mann-Whitney U test analyses).
Table 6. Association between the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and the expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women_ overview (Mann-Whitney U test analyses).
microRNA Normal Endothelial Function
RHI > 1.67 (n = 178)
Median (25th Percentile–75th Percentile)		Endothelial Dysfunction
RHI ≤ 1.67 (n = 86)
Median (25th Percentile–75th Percentile)		p Value
miR-1-3p4.170 (1.970–12.300) × 10−26.840 (3.780–13.000) × 10−2p = 0.008
miR-16-5p0.868 (0.625–1.249)0.933 (0.708–1.147)p = 0.548
miR-17-5p1.044 (0.674–1.664)1.174 (0.820–1.669)p = 0.421
miR-20a-5p1.085 (0.550–1.633)0.995 (0.549–1.521)p = 0.672
miR-20b-5p1.051 (0.595–1.535)1.111 (0.564–1.592)p = 0.677
miR-21-5p0.180 (0.101–0.293)0.200 (0.133–0.295)p = 0.215
miR-23a-3p0.109 (0.051–0.200)0.123 (0.073–0.239)p = 0.030
miR-24-3p0.204 (0.139–0.293)0.213 (0.148–0.298)p = 0.726
miR-26a-5p0.346 (0.188–0.542)0.406 (0.248–0.536)p = 0.163
miR-29a-3p0.187 (0.112–0.335)0.211 (0.119–0.388)p = 0.460
miR-92a-3p1.759 (1.208–2.560)1.704 (1.144–2.589)p = 0.759
miR-100-5p0.975 (0.554–1.880) × 10−31.000 (0.514–1.720) × 10−3p = 0.950
miR-103a-3p0.759 (0.397–1.294)0.944 (0.493–1.365)p = 0.095
miR-125b-5p0.257 (0.121–0.447) × 10−20.254 (0.140–0.449) × 10−2p = 0.808
miR-126-3p0.178 (0.097–0.279)0.191 (0.115–0.279)p = 0.442
miR-130b-3p0.345 (0.177–0.677)0.379 (0.251–0.698)p = 0.301
miR-133a-3p7.440 (2.840–15.500) × 10−27.890 (3.870–18.600) × 10−2p = 0.221
miR-143-3p1.320 (0.614–2.920) × 10−21.430 (0.792–2.990) × 10−2p = 0.485
miR-145-5p7.450 (4.710–11.100) × 10−27.860 (4.630–12.000) × 10−2p = 0.758
miR-146a-5p0.844 (0.482–1.267)0.845 (0.490–1.240)p = 0.997
miR-155-5p0.962 (0.680–1.448)1.129 (0.731–1.599)p = 0.353
miR-181a-5p0.153 (0.086–0.245)0.161 (0.093–0.254)p = 0.708
miR-195-5p3.240 (1.150–8.860) × 10−23.770 (1.360–9.730) × 10−2p = 0.600
miR-199a-5p2.420 (1.320–5.180) × 10−22.880 (1.510–5.890) × 10−2p = 0.223
miR-210-3p8.840 (5.680–14.300) × 10−29.150 (5.640–14.800) × 10−2p = 0.953
miR-221-3p0.353 (0.190–0.601)0.340 (0.212–0.550)p = 0.675
miR-342-3p2.194 (1.409–3.206)2.296 (1.752–3.532)p = 0.341
miR-499a-5p9.400 (3.160–17.000) × 10−214.600 (3.710–34.700) × 10−2p = 0.010
miR-574-3p0.108 (0.067–0.175)0.110 (0.081–0.175)p = 0.375
Data are expressed as median (25th percentile–75th percentile). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare microRNA expression between women with normal and abnormal vascular endothelial function. The significance level was established at p-value of p < 0.05 (Bonferroni corrected p-values). Statistically significant results are marked in bold. RHI, Reactive Hyperemia Index. Higher expression rates of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p were detected in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women with the occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≤ 1.67) when compared with those possessing normal vascular endothelial function (RHI > 1.67), respectively.
Table
Table 7. Association between the vascular endothelial function (RHI values) and the expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women_ overview (Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation).
Table 7. Association between the vascular endothelial function (RHI values) and the expression of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease associated microRNAs in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women_ overview (Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation).
microRNA Data Distribution
RHI (Non-Normal Distribution)		Spearman’s Coefficient of Rank Correlation (rho), p Value
miR-1-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.156, p = 0.012
weak negative correlation (↓ RHI ≈ ↑ miR-1-3p)
miR-16-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.157, p = 0.361
miR-17-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.083, p = 0.179
miR-20a-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.034, p = 0.581
miR-20b-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.060, p = 0.331
miR-21-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.102, p = 0.102
miR-23a-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.154, p = 0.013
weak negative correlation (↓ RHI ≈ ↑ miR-23a-3p)
miR-24-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.055, p = 0.381
miR-26a-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.101, p = 0.103
miR-29a-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.060, p = 0.332
miR-92a-3pNon-normal distributionρ = 0.025, p = 0.692
miR-100-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.002, p = 0.981
miR-103a-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.086, p = 0.165
miR-125b-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.001, p = 0.987
miR-126-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.047, p = 0.453
miR-130b-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.066, p = 0.291
miR-133a-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.054, p = 0.385
miR-143-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.104, p = 0.092
miR-145-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.052, p = 0.402
miR-146a-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.022, p = 0.727
miR-155-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.006, p = 0.918
miR-181a-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.051, p = 0.411
miR-195-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.073, p = 0.239
miR-199a-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.114, p = 0.065
miR-210-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.042, p = 0.505
miR-221-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.041, p = 0.512
miR-342-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.035, p = 0.572
miR-499a-5pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.193, p = 0.002
weak negative correlation (↓ RHI ≈ ↑ miR-499a-5p)
miR-574-3pNon-normal distributionρ = −0.102, p = 0.100
Correlation between variables was calculated using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, a nonparametric measure of rank correlation, assesses how well the relationship between two variables can be described using a monotonic function. The significance level was established at a p-value of p < 0.05. Statistically significant results are marked in bold. The RHI values showed a week negative correlation with expression of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood of young and middle-aged women. That means that women with a finding of lower RHI values showed significantly increased levels of miR-1-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-499a-5p in whole peripheral blood, respectively.
Table
Table 8. Characteristics of women involved in the study with respect to a history of pregnancy, pregnancy-related complications and classical cardiovascular risk factors.
Table 8. Characteristics of women involved in the study with respect to a history of pregnancy, pregnancy-related complications and classical cardiovascular risk factors.
Normal Pregnancies
(n = 74)		PE
(n = 114)		FGR
(n = 28)		GH
(n = 48)		p-Value 1p-Value 2p-Value 3
At follow-up
Age (years)
Age (range)		38.49 ± 0.40
31–50		38.05 ± 0.41
28–52		38.11 ± 0.65
32–45		38.67 ± 0.68
31–58		1.0001.0001.000
Time elapsed since delivery (years)5.74 ± 0.215.52 ± 0.215.25 ± 0.354.96 ± 0.311.0001.0000.259
Family medical history
Angina or heart attack in a first degree relative before the age of 60 years		1 (1.35%)2 (1.75%)0 (0%)1 (2.08%)---
Dispensarisation at Dpt. of Cardiology
(valve problems and heart defects)		0 (0%)1 (0.88%)
Sinus tachycardia		1 (3.45%)
Leaky heart valve		2 (4.17%)
Mitral valve prolapse		---
On blood pressure treatment1 (1.35%)7 (6.14%)0 (0%)3 (6.25%)---
Lipid-lowering medication0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)---
DM type I0 (0%)1 (0.88%)0 (0%)1 (2.08%)---
DM type II0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)---
Rheumatoid arthritis0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (3.45%)2 (4.17%)---
Chronic venous insufficiency0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.08%)---
Thrombosis1 (1.35%)2 (1.75%)1 (3.45%)0 (0%)---
Trombophilic gene mutations0 (0%)10 (8.77%)4 (14.29%)4 (8.33%)---
Presence of risk factors for chronic kidney disease0 (%)1 (0.88%)
Haematuria		0 (0%)2 (4.17%)
Abnormal kidney structure
(n = 1)
Glomerulonephritis in childhood (n = 1)		---
Chronic kidney disease 0 (%)1 (0.88%)
Nephrotic syndrome		0 (0%)0 (0%)---
Smoking of cigarettes
Non-Smoker46 (62.16%)70 (61.40%)22 (78.57%)31 (64.58%)---
Ex-smoker17 (22.97%)28 (24.56%)2 (7.14%)12 (25.0%)---
Smoker11 (14.86%)16 (14.04%)4 (14.29%)5 (10.42%)---
BMI
Normal (<25)56 (75.68%)62 (54.39%)19 (67.86%)19 (39.58%)---
Overweight (≥25-<30)15 (20.27%)32 (28.07%)3 (10.71%)18 (37.50%)---
Obese (≥30)3 (4.05%)20 (17.54%)6 (21.43%)11 (22.92%)---
Waist circumference
Normal (< 80cm)54 (72.97%)59 (51.75%)18 (64.29%)15 (31.25%)---
Central Obesity (≥80 cm)20 (27.03%)55 (48.25%)10 (35.71%)33 (68.75%)---
SBP
Normal (<120 mmHg)56 (75.68%)48 (42.11%)17 (60.71%)17 (35.42%)---
Prehypertension (≥120–<140 mmHg)18 (24.32%)53 (46.49%)11 (39.29%)21 (43.75%)---
Hypertension (≥140 mmHg)0 (0%)13 (11.40%)0 (0%)10 (20.83%)---
DBP
Normal (<80 mmHg)66 (89.19%)65 (57.01%)18 (64.29%)23 (47.92%)---
Prehypertension (≥80–<90 mmHg)6 (8.11%)30 (26.32%)7 (25.0%)14 (29.16%)---
Hypertension (≥90 mmHg)2 (2.70%)19 (16.67%)3 (10.71%)11 (22.92%)---
Heart rate at rest
Bradycardia (< 60 bpm)7 (9.46%)6 (5.26%)3 (10.71%)4 (8.33%)---
Normal (60–100 bpm)66 (89.19%)108 (94.74%)25 (89.29%)42 (87.50%)---
Tachycardia (>100 bpm)1 (1.35%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2 (4.17%)---
Serum total cholesterol
Normal (2.9–5.0 mmol/L)35 (47.30%)53 (46.49%)15 (53.57%)22 (45.83%)---
High (>5.0 mmol/L)39 (52.70%)61 (53.51%)13 (46.43%)26 (54.17%)---
Serum HDL cholesterol
Normal (1.2–2.7 mmol/L)69 (93.24%)100 (87.72%)24 (85.71%)37 (77.08%)---
Low (<1.2 mmol/L)5 (6.76%)14 (12.28%)4 (14.29%)11 (22.92%)---
Serum LDL cholesterol
Normal (1.2–3.0 mmol/L)35 (47.30%)38 (33.33%)12 (42.86%)15 (31.25%)---
High (>3.0 mmol/L)39 (52.70%)76 (66.67%)16 (57.14%)33 (68.75%)---
Serum triglycerides
Normal (0.45–1.7 mmol/L)73 (98.65%)105 (92.11%)25 (89.29%)45 (93.75%)---
High (>1.7 mmol/L)1 (1.35%)9 (7.89%)3 (10.71%)3 (6.25%)---
Serum Lp(a)
Normal (0–72.0 nmol/L)63 (85.14%)85 (74.56%)22 (78.57%)42 (87.50%)---
High (>72.0 nmol/L)11 (14.86%)29 (25.44%)6 (21.43%)6 (12.50%)---
Serum CRP
Normal (0–5.0 mg/L)69 (93.24%)93 (81.58%)20 (71.43%)41 (85.42%)---
High (>5.0 mg/L)5 (6.76%)21 (18.42%)8 (28.57%)7 (14.58%)---
Plasma homocysteine
Normal (4.4–13.6 µmol/L)64 (86.49%)98 (85.96%)23 (82.14%)44 (91.67%)---
High (>13.6 µmol/L)10 (13.51%)16 (14.04%)5 (17.86%)4 (8.33%)---
Serum uric acid
Normal (143–339 µmol/L)71 (95.95%)99 (86.84%)22 (78.57%)41 (85.42%)---
High (>339 µmol/L)3 (4.05%)15 (13.16%)6 (21.43%)7 (14.58%)---
Hormonal contraceptive use
No26 (35.14%)29 (25.44%)7 (25.0%)15 (31.25%)---
In the past25 (33.78%)54 (47.37%)12 (42.86%)26 (54.17%)---
Yes23 (31.08%)31 (27.19%)9 (32.14%)7 (14.58%)---
Total number of pregnancies per patient
17 (9.46%)37 (32.46%)8 (28.57%)9 (18.75%)---
235 (47.30%)46 (40.35%)13 (46.43%)21 (43.75%)---
3+32 (43.24%)31 (27.19%)7 (25.0%)18 (37.50%)---
Total parity per patient
111 (14.86%)39 (34.21%)11 (39.29%)16 (33.33%)---
250 (67.57%)59 (51.75%)15 (53.57%)26 (54.17%)---
3+13 (17.57%)16 (14.04%)2 (7.14%)6 (12.50%)---
Infertility treatment
Yes3 (4.05%)23 (20.18%)6 (21.43%)6 (12.50%)---
No71 (95.95%)91 (79.82%)22 (78.57%)42 (87.50%)---
During gestation
Maternal age at delivery (years)32.78 ± 0.3832.26 ± 0.4132.86 ± 0.5833.65 ± 0.611.0001.0001.000
GA at delivery (weeks)39.85 ± 0.1035.91 ± 0.3335.23 ± 0.6738.64 ± 0.21<0.001<0.0010.106
Fetal birth weight (g)3390.14 ± 41.552403.45 ± 80.991831.43 ± 125.483226.46 ± 69.50<0.001<0.0011.000
Mode of delivery
Vaginal69 (93.24%)19 (16.67%)6 (21.43%)21 (43.75%)<0.001<0.001<0.001
CS5 (6.76%)95 (83.33%)23 (78.57%)27 (56.25%)
Fetal sex
Boy37 (50.00%)49 (42.98%)15 (53.57%)23 (47.92%)0.3450.7470.822
Girl37 (50.00%)65 (57.02%)13 (46.43%)25 (52.08%)
Blood pressure (mmHg)
Systolic120.70 ± 1.13157.32 ± 1.49127.21 ± 3.06148.73 ± 2.17<0.0010.232<0.001
Diastolic75.85 ± 0.7698.71 ± 1.0178.07 ± 2.1894.96 ± 1.45<0.0011.000<0.001
Data are presented as mean ± SE for continuous variables and as number (percent) for categorical variables. Statistically significant results are marked in bold. Continuous variables were compared using ANOVA test. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared test. p-value 1,2,3: the comparison among normal pregnancies and preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction or gestational hypertension, respectively. Categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test.; PE, preeclampsia; GH, gestational hypertension; FGR, fetal growth restriction; GA, gestational age; CS, Caesarean section.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hromadnikova, I.; Kotlabova, K.; Dvorakova, L.; Krofta, L. Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Function in Young and Middle-Aged Women with Respect to a History of Pregnancy, Pregnancy-Related Complications, Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Epigenetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020430

AMA Style

Hromadnikova I, Kotlabova K, Dvorakova L, Krofta L. Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Function in Young and Middle-Aged Women with Respect to a History of Pregnancy, Pregnancy-Related Complications, Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Epigenetics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(2):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020430

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hromadnikova, Ilona, Katerina Kotlabova, Lenka Dvorakova, and Ladislav Krofta. 2020. "Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Function in Young and Middle-Aged Women with Respect to a History of Pregnancy, Pregnancy-Related Complications, Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Epigenetics" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 2: 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020430

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop