Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods: Selected Studies for This Review
3. Soil Matrix Components that Interfere with Protein Extraction
4. Soil Protein Extraction
4.1. Kit for Protein Extraction from Soil
4.2. Co-Extraction for Multiomics Approach
5. Metaproteomics Applications
5.1. Plant–Microorganism Interactions
5.2. Rhizosphere Under Environmental Factors
5.3. Contaminants, Bioremediation, and Soil Restoration
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Berendsen, R.L.; Doornbos, R.F.; Wintermans, P.C.A.; Pieterse, C.M.J. The rhizosphere revisited: Root microbiomics. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- McNear, D.H., Jr. The Rhizosphere—Roots, Soil and Everything In Between. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 2013, 4, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Vives-Peris, V.; De Ollas, C.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Pérez-Clemente, R.M. Root exudates: From plant to rhizosphere and beyond. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bais, H.P.; Weir, T.L.; Perry, L.G.; Gilroy, S.; Vivanco, J.M. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 233–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Saleh, D.; Sharma, M.; Seguin, P.; Jabaji, S. Organic acids and root exudates of Brachypodium distachyon: Effects on chemotaxis and biofilm formation of endophytic bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 2020, 66, 562–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olanrewaju, O.S.; Ayangbenro, A.S.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Plant health: Feedback effect of root exudates-rhizobiome interactions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1155–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- White, R.A.; Rivas-Ubach, A.; Borkum, M.I.; Köberl, M.; Bilbao, A.; Colby, S.M.; Hoyt, D.W.; Bingol, K.; Kim, Y.-M.; Wendler, J.P.; et al. The state of rhizospheric science in the era of multi-omics: A practical guide to omics technologies. Rhizosphere 2017, 3, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carini, P.; Marsden, P.J.; Leff, J.W.; Morgan, E.; Strickland, M.S.; Fierer, N. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 16242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prosser, J.I. Dispersing misconceptions and identifying opportunities for the use of ’omics’ in soil microbial ecology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 13, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.; Li, S.; Ye, Y. A Graph-Centric Approach for Metagenome-Guided Peptide and Protein Identification in Metaproteomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2016, 12, e1005224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zampieri, E.; Chiapello, M.; Daghino, S.; Bonfante, P.; Mello, A. Soil metaproteomics reveals an inter-kingdom stress response to the presence of black truffles. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gutleben, J.; De Mares, M.C.; Van Elsas, J.D.; Smidt, H.; Overmann, J.; Sipkema, D. The multi-omics promise in context: From sequence to microbial isolate. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 44, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Li, S.; Tang, H.; Ye, Y. A Meta-proteogenomic Approach to Peptide Identification Incorporating Assembly Uncertainty and Genomic Variation. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2019, 18, S183–S192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bastida, F.; Moreno, J.L.; Nicolás, C.; Hernandez, T.; Garcia, C. Soil metaproteomics: A review of an emerging environmental science. Significance, methodology and perspectives. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2009, 60, 845–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abiraami, T.V.; Singh, S.; Nain, L. Soil metaproteomics as a tool for monitoring functional microbial communities: Promises and challenges. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio Technol. 2019, 19, 73–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keiblinger, K.M.; Wilhartitz, I.C.; Schneider, T.; Roschitzki, B.; Schmid, E.; Eberl, L.; Riedel, K.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Soil metaproteomics—Comparative evaluation of protein extraction protocols. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 54, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arenella, M.; Giagnoni, L.; Masciandaro, G.; Ceccanti, B.; Nannipieri, P.; Renella, G. Interactions between proteins and humic substances affect protein identification by mass spectrometry. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2013, 50, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, C.; Hettich, R.L. Optimized Extraction Method To Remove Humic Acid Interferences from Soil Samples Prior to Microbial Proteome Measurements. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 2537–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandalakis, M.; Panikov, N.S.; Polymenakou, P.N.; Sizova, M.V.; Stamatakis, A. A simple cleanup method for the removal of humic substances from soil protein extracts using aluminum coagulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 23845–23856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starke, R.; Jehmlich, N.; Bastida, F. Using proteins to study how microbes contribute to soil ecosystem services: The current state and future perspectives of soil metaproteomics. J. Proteom. 2019, 198, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benndorf, D.; Balcke, G.U.; Harms, H.; Von Bergen, M. Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. ISME J. 2007, 1, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chourey, K.; Jansson, J.; Verberkmoes, N.; Shah, M.; Chavarria, K.L.; Tom, L.M.; Brodie, E.L.; Hettich, R.L. Direct Cellular Lysis/Protein Extraction Protocol for Soil Metaproteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6615–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuhn, R.; Benndorf, D.; Rapp, E.; Reichl, U. Metaproteome analysis of sewage sludge from membrane bioreactors. Proteomics 2011, 11, 2738–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giagnoni, L.; Magherini, F.; Landi, L.; Taghavi, S.; Modesti, A.; Bini, L.M.; Nannipieri, P.; Van Der Lelie, D.; Renella, G. Extraction of microbial proteome from soil: Potential and limitations assessed through a model study. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2011, 62, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keiblinger, K.M.; Fuchs, S.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Riedel, K. Soil and leaf litter metaproteomics—A brief guideline from sampling to understanding. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nannipieri, P. Role of Stabilised Enzymes in Microbial Ecology and Enzyme Extraction from Soil with Potential Applications in Soil Proteomics. Nucl. Acids Proteins Soil 2006, 8, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Rillig, M.C.; Wang, W. Improving soil protein extraction for metaproteome analysis and glomalin-related soil protein detection. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4970–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Chang, J.; Chen, M.; Li, K.; Yang, G.; He, G. TaNAC29, a NAC transcription factor from wheat, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, E.B.; Williams, M.A. Microbial Protein in Soil: Influence of Extraction Method and C Amendment on Extraction and Recovery. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 59, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Criquet, S.; Farnet, A.; Ferre, E. Protein measurement in forest litter. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2002, 35, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, P.; Song, J.; Yang, L.; Jin, X.; Wang, X.C. Selective binding behavior of humic acid removal by aluminum coagulation. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 233, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burns, R.G.; Deforest, J.L.; Marxsen, J.; Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Stromberger, M.E.; Wallenstein, M.D.; Weintraub, M.N.; Zoppini, A. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 58, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ochs, D. Protein contaminants of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1983, 135, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, A.W.; HUPO Test Sample Working Group; Deutsch, E.W.; Au, C.E.; Kearney, R.E.; Beavis, R.; Sechi, S.; Nilsson, T.; Bergeron, J.J.M.; Beardslee, T.A.; et al. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiapello, M.; Zampieri, E.; Mello, A. A Small Effort for Researchers, a Big Gain for Soil Metaproteomics. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ogunseitan, O.A. Direct extraction of proteins from environmental samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 1993, 17, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murase, A.; Yoneda, M.; Ueno, R.; Yonebayashi, K. Isolation of extracellular protein from greenhouse soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 733–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singleton, I.; Merrington, G.; Colvan, S.; Delahunty, J. The potential of soil protein-based methods to indicate metal contamination. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 23, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulze, W.X.; Gleixner, G.; Kaiser, K.; Guggenberger, G.; Mann, M.; Schulze, E.-D. A proteomic fingerprint of dissolved organic carbon and of soil particles. Oecologia 2004, 142, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Scali, M.; Vignani, R.; Spadafora, A.; Sensi, E.; Mazzuca, S.; Cresti, M. Protein extraction for two-dimensional electrophoresis from olive leaf, a plant tissue containing high levels of interfering compounds. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 2369–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirby, K.S. A new method for the isolation of ribonucleic acids from mammalian tissues. Biochem. J. 1956, 64, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Masciandaro, G.; Macci, C.; Doni, S.; Maserti, B.; Leo, A.C.-B.; Ceccanti, B.; Wellington, E. Comparison of extraction methods for recovery of extracellular β-glucosidase in two different forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 2156–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masciandaro, G.; Ceccanti, B.; Gallardo, J. Organic matter properties in cultivated versus set-aside arable soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1998, 67, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofman, J.; Dušek, L. Biochemical analysis of soil organic matter and microbial biomass composition—A pilot study. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2003, 39, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barr, J.J.; Hastie, M.L.; Fukushima, T.; Plan, M.R.; Tyson, G.; Gorman, J.J.; Bond, P.L. Metaproteomic analysis of laboratory scale phosphorus removal reactors reveals functional insights of aerobic granular sludge. IWA Biofilm Conference: Processes in Biofilms, 27–30 October 2011, Shanghai, China.
- Chourey, K.; Hettich, R.L. Utilization of a Detergent-Based Method for Direct Microbial Cellular Lysis/Proteome Extraction from Soil Samples for Metaproteomics Studies. Adv. Struct. Safety Stud. 2018, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Hernández, T.; García, C. Metaproteomics of soils from semiarid environment: Functional and phylogenetic information obtained with different protein extraction methods. J. Proteom. 2014, 101, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Jehmlich, N.; Lima, K.; Morris, B.; Richnow, H.; Hernández, T.; Von Bergen, M.; García, C. The ecological and physiological responses of the microbial community from a semiarid soil to hydrocarbon contamination and its bioremediation using compost amendment. J. Proteom. 2016, 135, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Jehmlich, N.; Martínez-Navarro, J.; Bayona, V.; García, C.; Moreno, J. The effects of struvite and sewage sludge on plant yield and the microbial community of a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Geoderma 2019, 337, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.-B.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Li, H.; He, H.-B.; Fang, C.-X.; Zhang, A.-J.; Li, Q.-S.; Chen, R.-S.; Guo, X.-K.; Lin, H.-F.; et al. Characterization of Metaproteomics in Crop Rhizospheric Soil. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.; Wu, L.; Lin, S.; Zhang, A.; Zhou, M.; Lin, R.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, R. Metaproteomic analysis of ratoon sugarcane rhizospheric soil. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tomaszewski, J.E.; Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Sander, M. Protein Encapsulation by Humic Substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6003–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicora, C.D.; Anderson, B.J.; Callister, S.J.; Norbeck, A.D.; Purvine, S.O.; Jansson, J.K.; Mason, O.U.; David, M.M.; Jurelevicius, D.; Smith, R.D.; et al. Amino acid treatment enhances protein recovery from sediment and soils for metaproteomic studies. Proteomics 2013, 13, 2776–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mattarozzi, M.; Manfredi, M.; Montanini, B.; Gosetti, F.; Sanangelantoni, A.M.; Marengo, E.; Careri, M.; Visioli, G. A metaproteomic approach dissecting major bacterial functions in the rhizosphere of plants living in serpentine soil. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 2327–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, N.; Keiblinger, K.M.; Schindlbacher, A.; Wegner, U.; Sun, H.; Fuchs, S.; Lassek, C.; Riedel, K.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Microbial functionality as affected by experimental warming of a temperate mountain forest soil—A metaproteomics survey. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 117, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speda, J.; Johansson, M.A.; Carlsson, U.; Karlsson, M. Assessment of sample preparation methods for metaproteomics of extracellular proteins. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 516, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Jehmlich, N.; Torres, I.F.; García, C. The extracellular metaproteome of soils under semiarid climate: A methodological comparison of extraction buffers. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 619, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabatabai, M. Soil Enzymes. In Agronomy Monographs; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 903–947. [Google Scholar]
- Bastida, F.; Algora, C.; Hernández, T.; García, C. Feasibility of a cell separation-proteomic based method for soils with different edaphic properties and microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 45, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenfield, L.M.; Hill, P.W.; Paterson, E.; Baggs, E.M.; Jones, D.L. Methodological bias associated with soluble protein recovery from soil. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Folch, J.; Ascoli, I.; Lees, M.; Meath, J.A.; LeBaron, N. Preparation of lipide extracts from brain tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 191, 833–841. [Google Scholar]
- Callister, S.J.; Fillmore, T.L.; Nicora, C.D.; Shaw, J.B.; Purvine, S.O.; Orton, D.J.; White, R.A.; Moore, R.J.; Burnet, M.C.; Nakayasu, E.S.; et al. Addressing the challenge of soil metaproteome complexity by improving metaproteome depth of coverage through two-dimensional liquid chromatography. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eddhif, B.; Lange, J.; Guignard, N.; Batonneau, Y.; Clarhaut, J.; Papot, S.; Geffroy-Rodier, C.; Poinot, P. Study of a novel agent for TCA precipitated proteins washing - comprehensive insights into the role of ethanol/HCl on molten globule state by multi-spectroscopic analyses. J. Proteom. 2018, 173, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eddhif, B.; Guignard, N.; Batonneau, Y.; Clarhaut, J.; Papot, S.; Geffroy-Rodier, C.; Poinot, P. TCA precipitation and ethanol/HCl single-step purification evaluation: One-dimensional gel electrophoresis, bradford assays, spectrofluorometry and Raman spectroscopy data on HSA, Rnase, lysozyme - Mascots and Skyline data. Data Brief 2018, 17, 938–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Braid, M.D.; Daniels, L.M.; Kitts, C.L. Removal of PCR inhibitors from soil DNA by chemical flocculation. J. Microbiol. Methods 2003, 52, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dong, D.; Yan, A.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y. Removal of humic substances from soil DNA using aluminium sulfate. J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 66, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Dai, J.; Wang, R.; Li, F.; Wang, W. Adsorption and desorption of divalent mercury (Hg2+) on humic acids and fulvic acids extracted from typical soils in China. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 335, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.-R.; Xue, T.; Wang, R.-Q.; Dai, J.-L. FTIR Spectroscopic Structural Characterization of Forest Topsoil Humic Substances and Their Adsorption and Desorption for Mercury. Soil Sci. 2013, 178, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renu; Gupta, S.K.; Rai, A.K.; Sarim, K.M.; Sharma, A.; Budhlakoti, N.; Arora, D.; Verma, D.K.; Singh, D.P. Metaproteomic data of maize rhizosphere for deciphering functional diversity. Data Brief 2019, 27, 104574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.-M.; Zhao, H.; Yang, T.; Ruan, S.; Wang, H.; Xiang, N.; Zhou, H.; Li, Q.X.; Diao, X. Comparative evaluation of five protocols for protein extraction from stony corals (Scleractinia) for proteomics. Electrophoresis 2018, 39, 1062–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, S.H.; Stensballe, A.; Nielsen, P.H.; Herbst, F.-A. Metaproteomics: Evaluation of protein extraction from activated sludge. Proteomics 2014, 14, 2535–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattarozzi, M.; Di Zinno, J.; Montanini, B.; Manfredi, M.; Marengo, E.; Fornasier, F.; Ferrarini, A.; Careri, M.; Visioli, G. Biostimulants applied to maize seeds modulate the enzymatic activity and metaproteome of the rhizosphere. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 148, 103480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butterfield, C.N.; Li, Z.; Andeer, P.F.; Spaulding, S.; Thomas, B.C.; Singh, A.; Hettich, R.L.; Suttle, K.B.; Probst, A.J.; Tringe, S.G.; et al. Proteogenomic analyses indicate bacterial methylotrophy and archaeal heterotrophy are prevalent below the grass root zone. PeerJ. 2016, 4, e2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hori, C.; Gaskell, J.; Cullen, D.; Sabat, G.; Stewart, P.E.; Lail, K.; Peng, Y.; Barry, K.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Kohler, A.; et al. Multi-omic Analyses of Extensively DecayedPinus contortaReveal Expression of a Diverse Array of Lignocellulose-Degrading Enzymes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e01133-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yao, Q.; Li, Z.; Song, Y.; Wright, S.J.; Guo, X.; Tringe, S.G.; Tfaily, M.M.; Paša-Tolić, L.; Hazen, T.C.; Turner, B.L.; et al. Community proteogenomics reveals the systemic impact of phosphorus availability on microbial functions in tropical soil. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 2, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bona, E.; Massa, N.; Novello, G.; Boatti, L.; Cesaro, P.; Todeschini, V.; Magnelli, V.; Manfredi, M.; Marengo, E.; Mignone, F.; et al. Metaproteomic characterization of Vitis vinifera rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Z.-F.; Wei, W.-L.; Shi, X.-J.; Liu, Y.-M.; He, X.-H.; Wang, M.-X. Twenty-six years of chemical fertilization decreased soil RubisCO activity and changed the ecological characteristics of soil cbbL-carrying bacteria in an entisol. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 141, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, W.-Y.; Su, J.-Q.; Richnow, H.H.; Adrian, L. Identification of dominant sulfamethoxazole-degraders in pig farm-impacted soil by DNA and protein stable isotope probing. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roume, H.; Heintz-Buschart, A.; Muller, E.E.; Wilmes, P. Sequential Isolation of Metabolites, RNA, DNA, and Proteins from the Same Unique Sample. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 531, pp. 219–236. [Google Scholar]
- Griffiths, R.I.; Whiteley, A.S.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Bailey, M.J. Rapid Method for Coextraction of DNA and RNA from Natural Environments for Analysis of Ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-Based Microbial Community Composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 5488–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gunnigle, E.; Ramond, J.-B.; Frossard, A.; Seeley, M.; Cowan, D.A. A sequential co-extraction method for DNA, RNA and protein recovery from soil for future system-based approaches. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 103, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feinstein, L.M.; Sul, W.J.; Blackwood, C.B. Assessment of Bias Associated with Incomplete Extraction of Microbial DNA from Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5428–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thorn, C.E.; Bergesch, C.; Joyce, A.; Sambrano, G.; McDonnell, K.; Brennan, F.; Heyer, R.; Benndorf, D.; Abram, F. A robust, cost-effective method for DNA, RNA and protein co-extraction from soil, other complex microbiomes and pure cultures. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2019, 19, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicora, C.D.; Burnum-Johnson, K.E.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Casey, C.P.; White, R.A.; Chowdhury, T.R.; Kyle, J.E.; Kim, Y.-M.; Smith, R.D.; Metz, T.O.; et al. The MPLEx Protocol for Multi-omic Analyses of Soil Samples. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, e57343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Von Bergen, M.; Jehmlich, N.; Taubert, M.; Vogt, C.; Bastida, F.; Herbst, F.-A.; Schmidt, F.; Richnow, H.-H.; Seifert, J. Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology. ISME J. 2013, 7, 1877–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Aylward, F.; Burnum, K.E.; Scott, J.J.; Suen, G.; Tringe, S.G.; Adams, S.M.; Barry, K.W.; Nicora, C.D.; Piehowski, P.D.; Purvine, S.O.; et al. Metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into bacterial communities in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1688–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bastida, F.; Torres, I.F.; Moreno, J.L.; Baldrian, P.; Ondoño, S.; Ruiz-Navarro, A.; Hernández, T.; Richnow, H.H.; Starke, R.; García, C.; et al. The active microbial diversity drives ecosystem multifunctionality and is physiologically related to carbon availability in Mediterranean semi-arid soils. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 4660–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, Z.; Okubo, T.; Kubota, K.; Kasahara, Y.; Tsurumaru, H.; Anda, M.; Ikeda, S.; Minamisawa, K. Metaproteomic Identification of Diazotrophic Methanotrophs and Their Localization in Root Tissues of Field-Grown Rice Plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5043–5052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bastida, F.; García, C.; Von Bergen, M.; Moreno, J.L.; Richnow, H.H.; Jehmlich, N. Deforestation fosters bacterial diversity and the cyanobacterial community responsible for carbon fixation processes under semiarid climate: A metaproteomics study. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 93, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Selevsek, N.; Torres, I.F.; Hernández, T.; García, C. Soil restoration with organic amendments: Linking cellular functionality and ecosystem processes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fernández-Martínez, M.A.; Severino, R.D.S.; Moreno-Paz, M.; Gallardo-Carreño, I.; Blanco, Y.; Warren-Rhodes, K.; García-Villadangos, M.; Ruiz-Bermejo, M.; Barberán, A.; Wettergreen, D.; et al. Prokaryotic Community Structure and Metabolisms in Shallow Subsurface of Atacama Desert Playas and Alluvial Fans After Heavy Rains: Repairing and Preparing for Next Dry Period. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Benndorf, D.; Vogt, C.; Jehmlich, N.; Schmidt, Y.; Thomas, H.; Woffendin, G.; Shevchenko, A.; Richnow, H.-H.; Von Bergen, M. Improving protein extraction and separation methods for investigating the metaproteome of anaerobic benzene communities within sediments. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 737–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cañizares, R.; Benitez, E.; Ogunseitan, O.A. Molecular analyses of β-glucosidase diversity and function in soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2011, 47, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Festa, S.; Coppotelli, B.; Madueño, L.; Loviso, C.L.; Macchi, M.; Tauil, R.M.N.; Valacco, M.P.; Morelli, I.S. Assigning ecological roles to the populations belonging to a phenanthrene-degrading bacterial consortium using omic approaches. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Knief, C.; Delmotte, N.; Chaffron, S.; Stark, M.; Innerebner, G.; Wassmann, R.; Von Mering, C.; Vorholt, J.A. Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, J.; Arafat, Y.; Din, I.U.; Yang, B.; Zhou, L.; Wang, J.; Letuma, P.; Wu, H.; Qin, X.; Wu, L.; et al. Nitrogen Fertilizer Amendment Alter the Bacterial Community Structure in the Rhizosphere of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Improve Crop Yield. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, W.; Wang, Z.; Xu, W.; Tian, R.; Zeng, J. Dibutyl phthalate contamination accelerates the uptake and metabolism of sugars by microbes in black soil. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keiblinger, K.M.; Schneider, T.; Roschitzki, B.; Schmid, E.; Eberl, L.; Hämmerle, I.; Leitner, S.; Richter, A.; Wanek, W.; Riedel, K.; et al. Effects of stoichiometry and temperature perturbations on beech leaf litter decomposition, enzyme activities and protein expression. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 4537–4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maron, P.-A.; Maitre, M.; Mercier, A.; Lejon, D.P.H.; Nowak, V.; Ranjard, L. Protein and DNA fingerprinting of a soil bacterial community inoculated into three different sterile soils. Res. Microbiol. 2008, 159, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chourey, K.; Nissen, S.; Vishnivetskaya, T.; Shah, M.; Pfiffner, S.; Hettich, R.L.; Löffler, F.E. Environmental proteomics reveals early microbial community responses to biostimulation at a uranium- and nitrate-contaminated site. Proteomics 2013, 13, 2921–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orellana, L.H.; Hatt, J.K.; Iyer, R.; Chourey, K.; Hettich, R.L.; Spain, J.C.; Yang, W.H.; Chee-Sanford, J.C.; Sanford, R.A.; Löffler, F.E.; et al. Comparing DNA, RNA and protein levels for measuring microbial dynamics in soil microcosms amended with nitrogen fertilizer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, D.; Li, M.; Mingxiao, L.; Zhao, Y.; Chaowei, Z.; Song, C.; Zhu, C. Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biodegradation functions in a large-scale aerobic composting plant. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 950–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martinez-Alonso, E.; Pena-Perez, S.; Serrano, S.; Garcia-Lopez, E.; Alcazar, A.; Cid, C. Taxonomic and functional characterization of a microbial community from a volcanic englacial ecosystem in Deception Island, Antarctica. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manikandan, R.; Karthikeyan, G.; Raguchander, T. Soil proteomics for exploitation of microbial diversity in Fusarium wilt infected and healthy rhizosphere soils of tomato. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 100, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Keiblinger, K.M.; Leitner, S.; Wegner, U.; Zimmermann, M.; Fuchs, S.; Lassek, C.; Riedel, K.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Response of Microbial Communities and Their Metabolic Functions to Drying–Rewetting Stress in a Temperate Forest Soil. Microorganism 2019, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Christensen, G.A.; Gionfriddo, C.M.; King, A.J.; Moberly, J.G.; Miller, C.L.; Somenahally, A.C.; Callister, S.J.; Brewer, H.; Podar, M.; Brown, S.D.; et al. Determining the Reliability of Measuring Mercury Cycling Gene Abundance with Correlations with Mercury and Methylmercury Concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 8649–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Starke, R.; Kermer, R.; Ullmann-Zeunert, L.; Baldwin, I.T.; Seifert, J.; Bastida, F.; Von Bergen, M.; Jehmlich, N. Bacteria dominate the short-term assimilation of plant-derived N in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 96, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, T.D.; Keiblinger, K.M.; Schmid, E.; Sterflinger-Gleixner, K.; Ellersdorfer, G.; Roschitzki, B.; Richter, A.; Eberl, L.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Riedel, K. Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1749–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Starke, R.; Bastida, F.; Abadía, J.; García, C.; Nicolás, E.; Jehmlich, N. Ecological and functional adaptations to water management in a semiarid agroecosystem: A soil metaproteomics approach. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guazzaroni, M.E.; Herbst, F.-A.; Lores, I.; Tamames, J.; Peláez, A.I.; López-Cortés, N.; Alcaide, M.; Del Pozo, M.V.; Vieites, J.M.; Von Bergen, M.; et al. Metaproteogenomic insights beyond bacterial response to naphthalene exposure and bio-stimulation. ISME J. 2013, 7, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, H.; Kohler, A.; Miao, R.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Xie, L.; Tang, J.; et al. Multi-omic analyses of exogenous nutrient bag decomposition by the black morel Morchella importuna reveal sustained carbon acquisition and transferring. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3909–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, B.; Thomas, B.W.; Beck, R.; Liu, K.; Zhao, M.; Hao, X. Labile soil organic matter in response to long-term cattle grazing on sloped rough fescue grassland in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, Alberta. Geoderma 2018, 318, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekhon, S.S.; Kim, M.; Um, H.-J.; Kobayashi, F.; Iwasaka, Y.; Shi, G.; Chen, B.; Cho, S.-J.; Min, J.; Kim, Y.-H. Proteomic Analysis of Microbial Community Inhabiting Asian Dust Source Region. Clean Soil Air Water 2015, 44, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yang, T.; Lin, B.; Tang, Y. Effects of salinity on the performance, microbial community, and functional proteins in an aerobic granular sludge system. Chemosphere 2017, 184, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Halter, D.; Cordi, A.; Gribaldo, S.; Gallien, S.; Goulhen-Chollet, F.; Heinrich-Salmeron, A.; Carapito, C.; Pagnout, C.; Montaut, D.; Séby, F.; et al. Taxonomic and functional prokaryote diversity in mildly arsenic-contaminated sediments. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sidibé, A.; Simao-Beaunoir, A.-M.; Lerat, S.; Giroux, L.; Toussaint, V.; Beaulieu, C. Proteome Analyses of Soil Bacteria Grown in the Presence of Potato Suberin, a Recalcitrant Biopolymer. Microbes Environ. 2016, 31, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, R.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, W. Comparative Metaproteomic Analysis on Consecutively Rehmannia glutinosa-Monocultured Rhizosphere Soil. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lechner, U.; Türkowsky, D.; Dinh, T.T.H.; Al-Fathi, H.; Schwoch, S.; Franke, S.; Gerlach, M.-S.; Koch, M.; Von Bergen, M.; Jehmlich, N.; et al. Desulfitobacterium contributes to the microbial transformation of 2,4,5-T by methanogenic enrichment cultures from a Vietnamese active landfill. Microb. Biotechnol. 2018, 11, 1137–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zecchin, S.; Mueller, R.C.; Seifert, J.; Stingl, U.; Anantharaman, K.; Von Bergen, M.; Cavalca, L.; Pester, M. Rice Paddy Nitrospirae Carry and Express Genes Related to Sulfate Respiration: Proposal of the New Genus “Candidatus Sulfobium” . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 84, e02224-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Williams, M.A.; Taylor, E.B.; Mula, H.P. Metaproteomic characterization of a soil microbial community following carbon amendment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lünsmann, V.; Kappelmeyer, U.; Benndorf, R.; Martinez-Lavanchy, P.M.; Taubert, A.; Adrian, L.; Duarte, M.; Pieper, D.H.; Von Bergen, M.; Müller, J.A.; et al. In situ protein-SIP highlightsBurkholderiaceaeas key players degrading toluene by para ring hydroxylation in a constructed wetland model. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1176–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukul, P.; Schäkermann, S.; Bandow, J.E.; Kusnezowa, A.; Nowrousian, M.; Leichert, L.I.O. Simple discovery of bacterial biocatalysts from environmental samples through functional metaproteomics. Microbiome 2017, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bastida, F.; Crowther, T.W.; Prieto, I.; Routh, D.; García, C.; Jehmlich, N. Climate shapes the protein abundance of dominant soil bacteria. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastida, F.; Torres, I.F.; Andrés-Abellán, M.; Baldrian, P.; López-Mondéjar, R.; Větrovský, T.; Richnow, H.H.; Starke, R.; Ondoño, S.; García, C.; et al. Differential sensitivity of total and active soil microbial communities to drought and forest management. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 4185–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reference | Matrix | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit/Comparative Extraction Techniques |
---|---|---|
Hansen et al. [71] | Activated Sludge | Kuhn et al. [23] Barr et al. [45] optimized Chourey et al. [22] optimized NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Butterfield et al. [73] | Grassland sub-root soil | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit + Amicon® Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Units (30 KDa) |
Mattarozzi et al. [54] | Serpentine soil | Chourey et al. [46] Keiblinger et al. [16] NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Hori et al. [74] | Pinus contorta litter | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Mandalakis et al. [19] | Agricultural surface soil | Phenol-based extraction Optimized Al3+ -based method NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Cheng et al. [70] | Stony Corals | TRIzol Phenol-based extraction Trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-acetone; Glass bead-assisted extraction NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Yao et al. [75] | Tropical Soil | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit modified by Butterfield et al. [73] |
Bona et al. [76] | Vitis vinifera rhizosphere | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Zhou et al. [77] | Entisol | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Ouyang et al. [78] | Vegetable garden surface soil | NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Mattarozzi et al. [72] | Rhizospheric maize soil | Benndorf et al. [21] NoviPure Soil Protein Kit |
Nutrient Cycle | Biomass Degradation | Soil Microbial Ecology | Plant-Microorganism Interactions | Assessment of Environmental State | Contamination, Bioremediation, and Soil Restoration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bastida et al., (2016) [48] | Aylward et al., (2012) [86] | Bastida et al., (2016 a) [87] | Bao et al., (2014) [88] | Bastida et al., (2014) [47] | Bastida et al., (2015a,b) [89,90] |
Bastida et al., (2019) [49] | Butterfield et al., (2016) [73] | Fernandez-Martinez et al., (2019) [91] | Bona et al., (2019) [76] | Bastida et al., (2018) [57] | Benndorf et al., (2009) [92] |
Canizares et al., (2011) [93] | Hori et al., (2018) [74] | Festa et al., (2017) [94] | Knief et al., (2012) [95] | Chen et al., (2019) [96] | Chen et al., (2020) [97] |
Chen et al., (2019) [96] | Keiblinger et al., (2012 b) [98] | Maron et al., (2008) [99] | Lin et al., (2013) [51] | Liu et al., (2017) [55] | Chourey et al., (2013) [100] |
Orellana et al., (2019) [101] | Liu et al., (2015) [102] | Martinez-Alonso et al., (2019) [103] | Manikandan et al., (2017) [104] | Liu et al., (2019) [105] | Christensen et al., (2019) [106] |
Starke et al., (2016) [107] | Schneider et al., (2012) [108] | Mattarozzi et al., (2020) [72] | Renu et al., (2019) [69] | Starke (2017) [109] | Guazzaroni et al., (2013) [110] |
Tan et al., (2019) [111] | Zhang et al., (2018) [112] | Sekhon et al., (2016) [113] | Wang et al., (2017) [114] | Halter et al., (2011) [115] | |
Yao et al., (2018) [75] | Sidibè et al., (2016) [116] | Wu et al., (2011) [117] | Lechner et al., (2018) [118] | ||
Zecchin et al., (2018) [119] | Williams et al., (2010) [120] | Zampieri et al., (2016) [11] | Lünsmann et al., (2016) [121] | ||
Mattarozzi et al., (2017) [54] | |||||
Ouyang et al., (2019) [78] | |||||
Singleton et al., (2003) [38] | |||||
Sukul et al., (2017) [122] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tartaglia, M.; Bastida, F.; Sciarrillo, R.; Guarino, C. Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8455. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228455
Tartaglia M, Bastida F, Sciarrillo R, Guarino C. Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(22):8455. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228455
Chicago/Turabian StyleTartaglia, Maria, Felipe Bastida, Rosaria Sciarrillo, and Carmine Guarino. 2020. "Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 22: 8455. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228455