Next Article in Journal
Lentiviral-Induced Spinal Cord Gliomas in Rat Model
Next Article in Special Issue
The SlHB8 Acts as a Negative Regulator in Stem Development and Lignin Biosynthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Certain, but Not All, Tetraether Lipids from the Thermoacidophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius Can Form Black Lipid Membranes with Remarkable Stability and Exhibiting Mthk Channel Activity with Unusually High Ca2+ Sensitivity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphophysiological and Proteomic Responses on Plants of Irradiation with Electromagnetic Waves
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Initiation and Execution of Programmed Cell Death and Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(23), 12942; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312942
by Chanjuan Ye 1,2,3, Shaoyan Zheng 1,2,3, Dagang Jiang 1,2,3, Jingqin Lu 1,2,3, Zongna Huang 1,2,3, Zhenlan Liu 1,2,3, Hai Zhou 1,2,3, Chuxiong Zhuang 1,2,3 and Jing Li 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(23), 12942; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312942
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Revised: 19 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 30 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Plant Sciences)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors provided a good overview of programmed cell death’s role and reactive oxygen species’ response in plants. Cell signal transduction and plant stress response were addressed. The role of mitochondria and chloroplasts in programmed cell death were described in detail. Diagrams and figures add value to the review.

It is suggested that the authors also add information to their manuscript and refer to recent reviews in their reference list namely the review written by Samuilov VD, et al. Mitochondrion. 2019. PMID: 29723685 and Kurusu T, et al. J Plant Res. 2017. PMID: 28364377.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments

point 1:It is suggested that the authors also add information to their manuscript and refer to recent reviews in their reference list namely the review written by Samuilov VD, et al. Mitochondrion. 2019. PMID: 29723685 and Kurusu T, et al. J Plant Res. 2017. PMID: 28364377.

Response 1: Thank you for your suggestion. We have referred to the suggested reviews and added relevant points to our article. Based on these references, we have tried to add information about the Mitochondria-targeted quinones (SkQs) and autophagy in plant PCD. Please refer to the last paragraph under the subheadings "5. Factors Regulating Plant PCD" and "6. Role of Autophagy in Plant PCD".

Reviewer 2 Report

In this review article, the authors discussed the PCD mechanisms in plants. The review is interesting but needs improvements:

1-The author should clarify the basic fundamental differences between PCD in plant cell and animal cell. Also basic differences between plant cell and animal cell.

2-Tables are required to show up-to-date information in PCD in plants under both normal and pathological conditions

3-A paragraph showing the role of autophagy in plants as antiapoptotic mechanism should be added   

4-In Fig.3, do not really understand the differences between cell death in aging plant and collapsed one. What is the signaling apoptotic pathways in both? Are they same?

5-The authors should define and mention the morphology and function of tabetum cell.

6- The paper has some grammar and language mistakes and should be checked by native English speakers

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop