Next Article in Journal
CRISPR Deletion of a SVA Retrotransposon Demonstrates Function as a cis-Regulatory Element at the TRPV1/TRPV3 Intergenic Region
Previous Article in Journal
The Cutinase Bdo_10846 Play an Important Role in the Virulence of Botryosphaeria dothidea and in Inducing the Wart Symptom on Apple Plant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic, Clinical, and Behavioral Characterization of 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Deletion (Burnside-Butler) Syndrome in Five Families
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) as a Biomarker of Genetic Defects in the SHANK3 Gene: A Case Report of 15-Year-Old Girl with a Rare Partial SHANK3 Duplication

by
Anastasia K. Neklyudova
1,
Galina V. Portnova
1,
Anna B. Rebreikina
1,
Victoria Yu Voinova
2,3,
Svetlana G. Vorsanova
2,3,
Ivan Y. Iourov
2,3 and
Olga V. Sysoeva
1,*
1
Laboratory of Human Higher Nervous Activity, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Science, 117485 Moscow, Russia
2
Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov, Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 125412 Moscow, Russia
3
Mental Health Research Center, 117152 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 1898; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041898
Submission received: 12 January 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2021 / Accepted: 9 February 2021 / Published: 14 February 2021

Abstract

:
SHANK3 encodes a scaffold protein involved in postsynaptic receptor density in glutamatergic synapses, including those in the parvalbumin (PV)+ inhibitory neurons—the key players in the generation of sensory gamma oscillations, such as 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR). However, 40-Hz ASSR was not studied in relation to SHANK3 functioning. Here, we present a 15-year-old girl (SH01) with previously unreported duplication of the first seven exons of the SHANK3 gene (22q13.33). SH01’s electroencephalogram (EEG) during 40-Hz click trains of 500 ms duration binaurally presented with inter-trial intervals of 500–800 ms were compared with those from typically developing children (n = 32). SH01 was diagnosed with mild mental retardation and learning disabilities (F70.88), dysgraphia, dyslexia, and smaller vocabulary than typically developing (TD) peers. Her clinical phenotype resembled the phenotype of previously described patients with 22q13.33 microduplications (≈30 reported so far). SH01 had mild autistic symptoms but below the threshold for ASD diagnosis and microcephaly. No seizures or MRI abnormalities were reported. While SH01 had relatively preserved auditory event-related potential (ERP) with slightly attenuated P1, her 40-Hz ASSR was totally absent significantly deviating from TD’s ASSR. The absence of 40-Hz ASSR in patients with microduplication, which affected the SHANK3 gene, indicates deficient temporal resolution of the auditory system, which might underlie language problems and represent a neurophysiological biomarker of SHANK3 abnormalities.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domain 3 (SHANK3), also known as proline-rich synapse-associated protein 2 (ProSAP2), is a gene that encodes scaffolding proteins that organize postsynaptic density in excitatory synapses [1,2]. This gene is in the 22nd chromosome, 22q13.33 region. Deletion of this region as well as mutations lead to 22q13 Deletion Syndrome also known as Phelan–McDermid Syndrome (PMS) [3,4,5,6,7,8]. In most PMS cases, the SHANK3 gene is affected that is believed to be the major cause of PMS.
Phelan–McDermid Syndrome (PMS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder with about 2000 cases identified so far [6]. However, many PMS cases can go unnoticed, as the diagnosis of PMS is often difficult due to the subtle appearance of the deletion of chromosome 22 and relatively mild physical and nonspecific clinical manifestation of the syndrome. Dysmorphic features in PMS include dysplastic nails, large or prominent ears, long eyelashes, wide nasal bridge, bulbous nose, and sacral dimple [3]. Major dysfunctions in PMS are hypotonia [3], global developmental delay, and severely delayed or absent speech [4]. Autistic traits are also present in most patients with PMS, suggesting PMS as a syndromic form of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [9,10]. According to a recent meta-analysis, 0.7% of patients with ASD have SHANK3 mutations, and this number is even higher (2.1%) for ASD patients with moderate to profound intellectual disability [11]. Moreover, altered methylation patterns in SHANK3 were detected in ≈15% of postmortem autistic brain tissue [12], suggesting even more widespread implication of altered SHANK3 expression to ASD development through epigenetic influence. Copy-number of variance (CNV) and point mutations of SHANK3 have been also associated with intellectual disability and schizophrenia [11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Few cases (n≈30) of duplication involving the SHANK3 gene has been described in the literature: among patients with Asperger’s syndrome, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder [20], schizophrenia [21], intellectual disabilities, delayed speech and language development [20,21,22,23,24]. While ASD is reported in patients with SHANK3 duplication, ASD prevalence seems to be smaller than in SHANK3 deletions or mutations (≈15% vs. >50%). Dysmorphic features of patients with duplications and mutations affected SHANK3 gene included full lips, slightly upturned nose/anteverted nares, protruding ears, arch-shaped eyebrows. Microcephaly was reported in 15% of reported cases [23]. Resemblances between the cases with SHANK3 duplication noticed by the researchers points to a distinct 22q13.33 duplication syndrome (for a recent update, see [23,24]). At the same time, the implication of both SHANK3 deletion and duplication in neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders suggests that SHANK3 gene dosage is essential for correct brain function. However, one must be aware that microduplications does not always mean overexpression of the coded proteins, as an insertion of genetic material within the gene can alter nucleotide sequence and lead to abnormal protein code. Thus, detailed molecular genetic analysis is needed to infer whether the microduplication leads to gain or loss of SHANK3 functioning.
Several animal models of ASD with deficient Shank3 gene were developed. Mice with Shank3 mutations/deletion exhibit ASD-like symptoms including social abnormalities and motor coordination problems [12,14,16,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The transgenic mice with mildly overexpress Shank3 proteins (≈50%) were also created [20,33,34]. These mice display manic-like hyperkinetic behaviors and decreased social interaction; however, unlike Shank3 knockout mice (KO), Shank3 transgenic mice did not exhibit repetitive behavior.
Shank3 determines the postsynaptic density of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. NMDAR is one of three ionotropic receptors to the main excitatory mediator in the brain: glutamate. Deviation in NMDAR function alters excitation/inhibition balance in neuronal circuitry and associates with autistic-like behavior in patients with ASD as well as in its animal models [26]. It is noteworthy that different Shank3 mouse lines show similar NMDAR hypofunction [14,16,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
Recent studies pointed to the abnormalities in inhibitory signaling in Shank3-mouse models of ASD. In particular, several studies [16,35] reported the reduced number of synaptic puncta containing parvalbumin (PV) as well as reduced PV expression of the PV-expressing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneuron—the most abundant subtype of the inhibitory interneurons, which contribute to the perisomatic inhibition of glutamatergic principal cells. Supporting the implication of reduced inhibition to Shank3 deficits, an enhancer of GABA-mediated inhibitory transmission, clonazepam, normalizes the abnormal network firing pattern in cultured cortical neurons of Shank3 KO mice [36].
Cortical gamma oscillations (30–100 Hz) are generated in recurrent circuits of excitatory and inhibitory neurons [37,38,39] and reflect the excitatory state of the neural network. While baseline, spontaneous gamma oscillations are studied in humans and animals, high-frequency oscillations are most reliably induced in response to sensory stimuli [40,41,42,43]. The evoked gamma-band activity can be studied with auditory steady-state response (ASSR) [41,42,43]. ASSR refers to the ability of the neural populations to synchronize the timing of neural discharges with the frequency of external periodic auditory stimulation, e.g., click trains or amplitude modulated tone. ASSR is most pronounced in response to 40 Hz stimulation [44], coinciding with an intrinsic resonance frequency of cortical PV+ fast-spiking interneurons [45,46]. This 40-Hz ASSR was recently proposed as a non-invasive biomarker of NMDA receptor function [47,48,49,50]. In mice the pharmacological modulation of NMDAR function by NMDA antagonists such as MK-801 or ketamine suggested an inverse relationship between ASSR and NMDA occupancy [48,51]. Nakao and colleagues [47] demonstrated robust ASSR deficits in the mutant mice with selective elimination of NMDARs from PV+ interneurons in neocortex (Ppp1r2-cre/fGluN1 KO mice), suggesting a causal role of the NMDA receptors on this PV+ interneurons for neural entrainment at 40 Hz. Modeling studies supported this finding, emphasizing the link between NMDAR on PV+ interneurons and 40-Hz ASSR [52,53].
ASSR is reduced in schizophrenia (for meta-analysis see [54]), bipolar disorders [55,56,57,58], and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) [59,60], which are the disorders with implicated GABAergic dysfunctions and altered NMDA signaling. The 40-Hz ASSR deficit occurs in non-psychotic first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia [61] and ASD [59], which is consistent with an effect of familial or genetic risk factors. However, recent larger sample studies in children with ASD did not confirm ASSR reduction [62,63]. Such discrepancy might be related to the well-known heterogeneity of the ASD population. Even remarkably similar behavioral manifestations can be caused by different biological underpinnings, e.g., genetic etiology. Thus, examination of ASSR for the patient with known genetic abnormalities, associated with ASD, might be the Rosetta stone for the identification of subgroups of ASD patients based on common molecular–genetic and neurophysiological causes.
Gamma oscillations have been associated with perceptual organization, attention, memory, consciousness, language processing, and motor coordination [64]. The 40-Hz ASSR has been suggested as a candidate mechanism underlying the fast temporal integration and resolution of auditory inputs [41,42,65,66]. In neurotypical controls and elderly population, ASSR was correlated with gap detection threshold [66] and attenuation of speech perception under the presence of noise [65], pointing to the relevance of ASSR to language processing. In patients with schizophrenia, the 40-Hz ASSR positively correlated with the working memory performance [67], attentional functioning [68], and predicted the future global symptomatic outcome (GAF-S2) [69]. Thus, ASSR is linked to the cognitive functioning, which is altered in patients with SHANK3 abnormalities.
The promising approach in building the causal link between genes and behavior is relating the genetic pathways converging on candidate cellular/molecular processes to the target neurophysiological phenotype. In line with this approach, here, we present the clinical and neurophysiological description of a 15-year-old girl with rare microduplication in 22q13.33, which affects the SHANK3 gene. The study focused on examination of the 40-Hz ASSR response, which is crucially dependent on PV+ interneurons activity, one of the key targets of the SHANK3 gene. At the behavioral level, ASSR is thought to reflect temporal integration and resolution of the auditory system and is linked to memory and speech-in-noise processing. Based on this logic, we hypothesize that this girl will have altered ASSR.

2. Results

2.1. Genetic Information

The girl, further referred as SH01, has normal karyotype (46, XX). Molecular genetics analysis using an SNP array revealed a duplication (size: 16,389 bp) spanning partially SHANK3. The duplication affected the first seven exons of the gene (Figure 1).

2.2. Phenotyping, Clinical Description

Anamnesis. SH01 was from full-term pregnancy from healthy parents, who were 39 years old at the time of the girl’s birth. Her weight at birth was 3.040 g and length 52 cm, Apgar score was 7/8. Motor milestones were achieved within normal limits with holding her head at 2 months, sat down at 6 months, stood with the support at 10 months, began to walk alone at 11 months. However, language milestones were slightly delayed with the first syllables appeared at 12 months followed by a relatively long time of no phrases. Short sentences appeared at the age of 3. Cognitive development was also delayed, with a lack of interest in books and cartoons until age 3. At about this age, SH01 developed aggressiveness toward peers (e.g., biting) and protest behavior. At kindergarten, she referred her bad behavior to a fictional peer-boy. Aggressive behavior was resolved when she was about 10 years old. Currently, she might have some rare periods of self-aggression (biting) when too angry and unsatisfied. SH01 started normal school together with typically developing (TD) peers, but by the end of primary school, she was referred to specialists due to the problems with dealing with the school program (especially Math). However, she managed to continue the study in the school with TD peers with the support of the specialists and parents. Menstruation was regular and started at 10 years of age.
SH01 took part in our EEG/ERP experiment at age 15.06 years old. Her official diagnoses were mild mental retardation and other deficits of behavior due to other specified causes (F70.88), and organic emotionally labile [asthenic] disorder with unspecified cause (F06.69). Diagnoses were obtained from the recent clinical reports provided by experienced psychiatrists from the Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry and Scientific and Practical Center for Mental Health of Children and Adolescents, which is a leading Moscow organization for the diagnosis of mental health problems. The report from a psychologist confirmed mild mental retardation by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Russian adaptation based on original Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children [70]): verbal IQ = 71; nonverbal/performance IQ = 64; full-scale IQ = 64. The psychologist also pointed to unstable attention, smaller memory span, a fluctuating but lower speed of performance, quicker tiredness and loss of work efficiency, as well as infantilism, protest behavior, irritability, emotional liability, problems with understanding the social context, lack of self-critique and motivation to overcome difficulties, and a preponderance of recreational entertaining interests over educational and cognitive ones. A speech therapist revealed mild forms of dysgraphia and dyslexia.
Parents’ major concerns at age 15 were learning disabilities, behavioral disorders, and irritability. The girl was sociable, and her mild cognitive impairment was hardly noticeable in daily routines. Her mild speech underdevelopment manifested in rare problems to pronounce long and complex words and smaller vocabulary than typically developing (TD) peers. She attended the 9th grade of normal middle school that required great efforts from her parents. While she hardly managed to make any homework by herself, she was considering continuing her education in high school, pointing to the lack of adequate self-assessment. Among her interests was performing in a school theater. She used her right hand to write and to eat. At EEG/ERP examination, she showed infantile childish behavior, demanding attention of others and especially her mom, which was not typical for her age (e.g., she asked her mom to stay with her in the experimental room).
Physical parameters at the age of 15: 163 cm (50–75 percentile), 50 kg (50–75 percentile), head circumference of 51.5 cm (lower than 3rd percentile). Facial phenotype included elongated face, protruding auricles. There were short 5th fingers on the hands, a sandal gap. The girl had mild scoliosis, valgus deformity of the knee joints, and planovalgus feet.
Autistic characteristics as assessed at age 15. SH01′s T-scores on social responsiveness scale (SRS) equals 63, which referred to mild autistic symptoms [71], while neither the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [72] (ADI-R, with subscale social interaction A-4 scores, Communication and language B-2, repetitive and restricted behavior C-1, early developmental problems, 1-36 months, D-1) nor psychiatric assessment support the ASD diagnosis.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at age 15: The hemispheres of the brain were symmetrical. No focal changes in the intensity of the MR signal from the substance of the brain, cerebellum, or brain stem were found. Differentiation into cortical and medullary substances was expressed satisfactorily. The lateral ventricles were symmetrical, not dilated. The hind horns were deepened. The cerebellum was typically located. The pituitary gland was not changed with preserved structure. The adeno- and neurohypophysis was clearly differentiated. Chiasma did not change. The optic nerves were clearly visible. The median structures were not displaced. The craniovertebral junction was not changed.
Other laboratory examinations at age 15. Echocardiography revealed ectopic chords and trabeculae in the left ventricular cavity, mitral valve prolapse with 1+ regurgitation, tricuspid valve prolapse with 1.5+ regurgitation. Ultrasound examination showed bilateral nephroptosis. X-ray showed a short fifth finger metacarpal bone of the left hand. Pulmonary examination revealed moderate bronchial asthma, atopic, with polyvalent sensitization.
Medications at age 15: SH01 took phenibut, 250 mg three times a day to control behavior and levothyroxine (L-thyroxine) 50 mL to treat her asthma (diagnosis J45.0—Predominantly allergic asthma).

2.3. Clinical EEG

The voltage of EEG activity was in accordance with the healthy peers’ EEG voltage; significant asymmetry of the background EEG was not detected. EEG recordings with eyes closed demonstrated normal background EEG with dominate alpha rhythm (Figure 2a). In 2018, it had an amplitude of 107 µV and 87 µV (maximal and mean, respectively) and a frequency of 9.1 Hz in the left hemisphere and amplitude of 104 µV and 69 µV (maximal and mean, respectively) and frequency 9.3 Hz in the right hemisphere. In 2020, the dominate alpha rhythm in the eyes closed condition had an amplitude of 93 µV and 67 µV (maximal and mean, respectively) and frequency of 9.5 Hz in the left hemisphere and amplitude of 94 µV and 63 µV (maximal and mean, respectively) and frequency of 9.7 Hz in the right hemisphere. The abnormalities of the background EEG (Figure 2b) could be described as intermittent theta, slowing (3.5–5.5 Hz and 80–140 µV) in the right hemisphere in 2018; in 2020, abnormalities of the background EEG could be described as sporadic spike and polyspike discharges (100–150 µV) arising from the right centrotemporal region.

2.4. ASSR/Auditory ERP

SH01′s 40-Hz ASSR and auditory ERP were compared with two control groups of typically developing (TD) children: the first one (“old”, n = 13, seven females, mean age 16.04 (SD = 1.9), ranged 12–18) was age-matched with our patient SH01 (age = 15.06). The second subgroup (“young”) consisted of 19 participants (14 female, five male) with an average age of 7.8 (SD = 2.6), ranged 3–12. Comparison groups of different ages were selected to examine if the suggested alternation in SH01′s neurophysiological responses to sounds might be linked to the developmental delay in brain maturation (as changes of auditory ERP and ASSR with age are known, see Section 3) or represent more general phenomena. Table 1 summarizes the results.
The 40-Hz ASSR was clearly identified in the TD groups and was dominant at frontal sites (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Consistent with previous reports, 40-Hz ASSR peaked about 200 ms post-train onset and persisted over the whole period of stimuli presentation in all TD participants, which were significantly higher in the older control group than in the younger one (t (30) = 2.362, p = 0.025), as can be also seen in Figure 5, which represents the individual 40-Hz ASSR values averaged over the whole period of stimuli presentation. At the same time, 40-Hz ASSR were totally absent in SH01 (Figure 3), being significantly smaller compared to any of the TD groups (old vs. SH01: t (12) = 9.6602, p < 0.0001; young vs. SH01: t (18) = 5.684, p < 0.0001). Moreover, there were no TD participant in the old, age-matched group who had 40-Hz ASSR value below that of SH01 (minimum value in the TD old group being 0.053 µV, SH01′s ASSR = −0.015 µV), suggesting a very robust effect (Figure 4, Figure A1 in Appendix A).
Figure 6 represents the auditory event-related potentials to the same stimuli that fail to elicit 40-Hz ASSR in SH01. Despite such a drastic alteration in ASSR response, auditory ERP in SH01 were much more similar to that of TD groups (Figure 6, Figure A2 for individual ERPs). The old TD group was characterized by prominent P1, N1, and N2 components, which were registered after the 40-Hz train onset. SH01′s ERP generally resembled that of the old TD ERPs, with only SH01′s P1 components being significantly smaller than that in her age-matched group (t (12) = 3.484, p = 0.005), while N1 (t (12) = 1.864, p = 0.087) and P2 (t (12) = −2.099, p = 0.058) were unremarkable as represented in Figure 6 and Figure 7. For the peak values of major ERP components, see Table 1. As for younger TD participants, their ERPs was characterized by the absence of a clear N1 response, corresponding with well-known developmental change in the ERPs structure (old TD vs. young TD: t (30) = −3.524, p = 0.0014). For all components, the SH01′s ERPs differed from the young groups (P1: t (18) = 5.683, p < 0.0001; N1: t (18) = 5.863, p < 0.0001; P2: t (18) = 2.554, p = 0.02). Thus, the auditory ERP in SH01 was more similar to her peers than to the young control group, pointing to a generally preserved development of auditory ERP structure.

3. Discussion

Our report presents a new patient with unique duplication of the first seven exons of the SHANK3 gene, adding one more case to the about 30 patients with 22q13.3 duplications described in previous studies [23]. For the first time, we describe the neurophysiological phenotype of a patient with 22q13.3 duplications. The major focus of our study was on the 40-Hz ASSR, a brain response to high-frequency auditory stimulation, which is thought to underlie temporal binding and speech-in-noise processing [65]. This choice was motivated by the studies that reported 40-Hz ASSR as a biomarker of NMDAR density and PV+ interneurons functioning, as they are dependent on SHANK3 gene activity [48,49,50,51]. Here, we report a striking absence of 40-Hz ASSR in SH01, collaborating our initial hypothesis. Below, we discuss our findings in more detail.
The clinical phenotype of SH01 resembles that described for few patients with 22q13.3 microduplication (n = 29, [23], Table 2), although clinical features in the 22q13.3 duplication syndromes show great variability. Among common features are intellectual disabilities (n = 15), attention deficits (n = 5), and language problems (n = 11). Physical dysmorphic features have been also reported in these patients previously, including sandal gap (n = 1) and protruding or low-set deformed ears (n = 3), microcephaly (n = 5). One previously described patient with 22q13.3 microduplication [21] shared with our patient irritability and scoliosis, as well as mild mental retardation and attention deficits. It is noteworthy that a girl showed normal development until 13 years old but later was diagnosed with borderline intellectual functioning and disorganized schizophrenia. At the same time, unlike few patients with 22q13.3 microduplication who were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (n = 5) and epilepsy (n = 4), our patient SH01 does not have epilepsy, only some minor epileptiform activity in EEG, and does not have enough symptoms to get a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, while her SRS score suggested some autistic features. SH01 phenotype was also compared to the more studied 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. SH01 shared with patients of this syndrome intellectual disabilities and language problems, as well as autistic features, although their manifestations are milder in SH01 [3,73,74,75]. Among the dysmorphic features reported in patients with PMS, SH01 also has an elongated skull. Thus, the clinical description of SH01 contains both common and distinct features with patients with different types of abnormalities affecting SHANK3, while it more resembles those with SHANK3 microduplications, pointing to a partially distinct phenotype of 22q13.3 duplication and deletion. For convenience, Table 2 shows the prevalence of individual clinical features in patients with SHANK3 duplication and deletion.
Our study indicates a general preservation of auditory ERP in SH01 with the pronounced N1-P2 response, which is typical for TD teens. At the same time, the P1 component that usually decreases with age [83,84] is not evident in SH01, with amplitude within P1 latency being significantly smaller in SH01 not only as compared to the younger cohort but also as compared to the age-matched control group. Unfortunately, we are not aware of any ERP study conducted in patients with the 22q13.3 microduplication. Thus, we compare our results with those obtained in patients with point mutations or deletion in 22q13.3 (PMS). Consistent with our finding of reduced P1 response to auditory stimuli, Reese and colleagues [85] found a reduction of P50 in response to the repeated tone in patients with PMS. It is noteworthy that the reduction was significant only for the female participants. Thus, there might be some common deficits in the early stage of auditory processing in the auditory cortex in patients with abnormalities related to the SHANK3 gene. The decrease in the early component of visual ERP to checkerboard stimuli, which was registered within the same latency range, 50-75 ms post-stimulus, was also reported in PMS [86,87], pointing to the fact that neurophysiological abnormalities occur in PMS at the early stages of sensory processing regardless of the modality of stimulation. Whether such deficits also spread to the visual system in our patient was not studied. It is noteworthy that the attenuation of P1 in response to auditory stimuli was also reported in patients with idiopathic autism [88,89,90], linking these behavioral and neurophysiological abnormalities.
As for the later components, patients with PMS showed a reduction of P2 component in response to the repeated tones [85,91] as well as a decrease in the latency of N250 in response to oddball stimuli [92]. In our study, neither P2 nor N250 were affected, and P2 even tended to be larger in SH01 than in the age-matched controls. Such discrepancy might indicate different neurophysiological phenotypes for 22q13.3 duplication/deletion or just be related to a methodological difference between the studies.
The focus of our study was 40-Hz ASSR, as we hypothesize its abnormality in our patient based on previous literature. Indeed, we found a striking absence of 40-Hz ASSR in SH01. Considering relatively normal auditory ERP in SH01, such finding points to specific deficits in following high-frequency auditory signals. An absence of 40-Hz ASSR might underlie a disruption of temporal integration and binding mechanism in audition that is linked with PV+ interneurons functioning [41,42]. As 40-Hz ASSR was correlated with speech-in-noise perception [65], an absence of ASSR might be related to speech decoding. At the same time, 40-Hz ASSR seems to reflect not a primary mechanism for speech comprehension, as the total absence of 40-Hz ASSR does not prevent SH01 from learning language and being fluent in everyday life. Rather, 40-Hz ASSR reflects some modulatory mechanism that helps to differentiate speech sounds, making it easier to learn and communicate. Abnormalities in such modulatory mechanism can cause low vocabulary and some complex words’ pronunciation problems, as well as mild dysgraphia and dyslexia, as observed in SH01. Further studies are needed to fully examine SH01′s phonematic abilities, which are related to speech perception, to shed light on the particular process disrupted with the absence of 40-Hz ASSR related to SHANK3 abnormality.
While ASSR is modulated by age [44,93,94], our 15-year-old patient’s 40-Hz ASSR was significantly smaller not only as compared to age-matched control group but also in relation to data obtained in children aged 3–12 years old. Thus, her 40-Hz ASSR deficiency is hard to explain by the developmental delay, or such a delay should be very profound with SH01′s ASSR corresponding to that from TD children under 5–8 years old [95,96].
While 40-Hz ASSR was previously studied neither in patients with 22q13.3 deletion/duplication nor their animal models, Engineer and colleagues [97] observed a drastic attenuation of neuronal firing rate in response to rapidly presented sounds in the Shank3-deficient rat model. These authors showed that the number of driven spikes evoked by noise bursts and speech sounds as well as the spontaneous firing rate were significantly weaker in Shank3-deficient rats compared to control rats. In relation to our results, the effect was most pronounced when the stimuli were presented with short inter-stimulus intervals below 100 ms, especially in the primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field. Taken together, the results point to the problems of following the rapidly presented auditory signal as general phenomena, which is related to SHANK3 abnormalities. This might indicate that the gain and loss of SHANK3 function share a common neurophysiological phenotype. It might also point to the potential loss-of-function effect of microduplication within the SHANK3 gene. More detailed molecular genetic analysis and modeling might help resolve these alternatives.
Our study has implications to the heterogeneous population of idiopathic ASD with a significant percentage of its cases related to SHANK3 abnormalities and having language problems. ASSR being easy to assess as a non-invasive index of functioning of PV+ neurons and NMDAR signaling, stemming from SHANK3 abnormalities, can help segregate the ASD population based on neurophysiological and molecular genetic underpinnings.
Our study is not without limitations. First, it is just a case report of one patient’s data. While SH01 is an incredibly unique patient, more studies are needed to confirm our observations. As there have been about 30 patients described so far, our study aims to promote the ASSR paradigm among other researchers and clinicians, inviting them to run 40-Hz ASSR in other patients with the 22q13.3 duplication identified world-wide. These studies are an important step toward the validation of this neurophysiological biomarker.
SH01 also took phenibut as regular medicine. As this drug is a GABA-receptor agonist, it might potentially influence ASSR. To rule out such an explanation, we compared SH01 with a kid without known genetic abnormalities, who also took Phenibut for migraine treatment. Such control kid exhibits typically pronounced 40-Hz ASSR (Appendix B, Figure A3). At the same time, more research on a larger sample is needed to examine the effects of phenibut on ASSR.
One may also relate absent 40-Hz ASSR to the hearing problems, arousal level, or attention deficits, as some researchers found ASSR modulation by these factors [44,98,99]. However, normal auditory ERP in response to the same stimuli rule out these explanations, as e.g., an N1 component was also shown to be modulated by attention and stimuli-subjective intensity [100]. Moreover, the P2 component, that was reported to be attenuated in participants with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss [101] even tended to be larger in SH01, pointing to an increased rather than decreased auditory sensitivity in SH01.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Participants

Thirty-two typically developing (TD) children were recruited from the local community to take part in a study as a comparison group. According to their parents or guardians, they did not have a history of neuropsychiatric conditions and had normal or corrected to normal vision and hearing. Except for one participant (this case is described in Appendix B), none of the participants reported to be taking any medicines. TD participants were divided into two subgroups by age (Appendix C, Table A1). The first one (“old”) was age-matched with the participant SH01 (age = 15.06). It consisted of 13 people (7 female, 6 male) with an average age of 16.04 (SD = 1.9). The second subgroup “young”) consisted of 19 participants (14 female, 5 male) with an average age of 7.8 (SD = 2.6).
Almost all participants’ guardians filled in the Russian translation of the Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition (SRS-2) [71], the school age version for the ”young” group and the school age or adult version for the “old” group. Threshold values for any social behavior deficiencies are 58 T-scores for males and 63 T-scores for females. None of the participants from the “old” group exceeded the threshold value (range 16–56, mean = 37, SD = 13), and only one participant from the “young” group had a greater value (range 11–62, mean = 27, SD = 14). Six participants did not have SRS values. More detailed characteristics of comparison samples are presented in Table A1.
The SH01 patient underwent a full clinical assessment at the Research Clinical Institute of Pediatrics by experienced clinicians. In addition, Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised [72], an investigator-based semi-structured instrument, was administered by a trained interviewer to SH01′s mom. It was used to assess autistic traits in SH01.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, protocol number 3, date of approval July, 10th, 2020, and was conducted following the ethical principles regarding human experimentation (Helsinki Declaration). All children provided their verbal consent to participate in the study and were informed about their right to withdraw from the study at any time during the testing. Written informed consent was also obtained from a parent/guardian of each child.

4.2. EEG Recording

Electroencephalographic data were recorded using the NeuroTravel system with 32-scalp electrodes arranged according to the international 10–10 system. Ear lobe electrodes were used as reference, and the grounding electrode was placed centrally. For clinical EEG, periods of resting activity were recorded as well as a test on closing and opening the eyes.

4.3. Stimuli and Paradigm

The ASSR paradigm consisted of 40-Hz click train stimuli, which were presented binaurally through foam insert earphones for 500 ms at 80 dB sound pressure level. Inter-trial intervals varied from 500 to 800 ms. The total number of trials was 150, and the duration of the whole paradigm was around three minutes. Stimuli were presented via Presentation software (NeuroBehavioral Systems, Albany, CA, USA). During the experiment, participants were sitting in a dimmed room and watching a silent video of their choice.

4.4. Data Analysis

EEG analysis was performed using MATLAB (Version—b, The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA), Fieldtrip software (https://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/, [102]), as well as customized scripts. Peak values were compared using two-tailed Student’s t-test for independent groups.

4.4.1. ASSR Analysis

First, the raw data were segmented into epochs with an interval of 200 ms before the stimulus and 800 ms after it. Then, the signal was filtered at a frequency of 35–45 Hz, and trials with amplitude within 3 STD of the mean were averaged. The mean number of selected trials was 97 ± 34 for the “old” group and 80 ± 17 for the “young” group. There were 182 good trials for SH01. To better characterize 40-Hz ASSR, we extracted the envelope of the signal using the Hilbert transform. The absolute value of this linear integral transformation reflects the envelope of the grand-average waveform (see Figure A4). Baseline correction for the 200–0 ms was applied. These steps were conducted for all participants, including the patient with microduplication affecting Shank3, SH01. For further analysis, we chose the Fz electrode, since according to topographic data (see Figure 3), ASSR has a maximum response near Fz. It is also consistent with the literature, which reports that ASSR is most pronounced in this site [103,104]. Then, we averaged the values of the envelope curve after Hilbert transform in the Fz electrode over the whole period of stimuli presentation (0–500 ms) and compared the results of SH01 with the average values of each comparison group.

4.4.2. ERP Analysis

ERP for auditory stimuli were created with filtering band-pass 1–30 Hz using the Fieldtrip function for all participants. The averaging epoch was the same as in ASSR analysis: 200 ms before the stimulus and 800 ms after it, but for later analysis, we focused on the period of –200–400 ms. Only trials with an amplitude within 3 STD of the mean were averaged. The mean number of good trials was 99 ± 43 for the old group, 96 ± 18 for the young group, and 69 for SH01. Then, we calculated ERPs peak values for all participants. The timeframes for each component were chosen based on grand-averaged peak latencies (P1: 50–80 ms; N1: 80–120 ms; P2: 130–160 ms).

4.5. Molecular Genetic Analysis

Molecular genetic analysis of SH01 was performed by CytoScan HD Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), which consists of about 2.7 million markers (resolution: >1 kbp). The results were visualized by the Affymetrix ChAS (Chromosome Analysis Suite) CytoScan® HD Array software (reference sequence GRCh37/hg19). The procedures were earlier described in detail [105,106]. All the genomic variations uncovered by the molecular genetic analysis were analyzed using a panel of bioinformatic techniques targeting the phenotypic outcome of each variation. The procedure was described previously in a step-by-step manner [107,108].

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrates a link between duplication of the first seven exons of the SHANK3 gene and alteration of brain response to high-frequency auditory input, 40-Hz ASSR: a neurophysiological phenotype believed to be mediated by hypofunctional NMDA receptor signaling on the parvalbumin (PV)+ inhibitory neurons, which depends on SHANK3 abnormality. As reported in our manuscript, the absence of 40-Hz ASSR in the patient with microduplication that affected SHANK3 gene points to a deficient temporal resolution of this patient’s auditory system, which might underlie the language problems observed in our patient as well as in many patients with abnormal functioning of the SHANK3 gene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.V.S.; methodology, O.V.S. and V.Y.V.; data collection, A.K.N., A.B.R., O.V.S. and V.Y.V.; data analysis, A.K.N., G.V.P. and O.V.S.; resources and data curation, O.V.S. and V.Y.V.; genetic analysis, I.Y.I. and S.G.V.; writing—original draft preparation, O.V.S. and A.K.N.; writing—review and editing—all authors; visualization, A.K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant #20-68-46042.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology (protocol code 3, date of approval 10 July 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

All children provided their verbal consent to participate in the study and were informed about their right to withdraw from the study at any time during the testing. Written informed consent was also obtained from a parent/guardian of each child to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants of our study and their parents for their support and dedication to science. This work would not be possible without them.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

ASDAutism Spectrum Disorders
ASSRAuditory Steady State Response
EEGElectroencephalogram
ERPEvent-related potential
GABAGamma-aminobutyric acid
TDTypically developing children
PMSPhelan-McDermid Syndrome
SRSSocial Responsiveness Scale

Appendix A

Individual ASSRs and ERPs

Figure A1. Individual values (µV) of 40-Hz ASSR obtained after Hilbert transform for age-matched comparison group (‘old’) and values of SH01 (presented in bold black). The time of stimulus presentation is 0.
Figure A1. Individual values (µV) of 40-Hz ASSR obtained after Hilbert transform for age-matched comparison group (‘old’) and values of SH01 (presented in bold black). The time of stimulus presentation is 0.
Ijms 22 01898 g0a1
Figure A2. Individual ERPs (µV) for age-matched comparison group (‘old’) and SH01′s ERP (presented in bold black).
Figure A2. Individual ERPs (µV) for age-matched comparison group (‘old’) and SH01′s ERP (presented in bold black).
Ijms 22 01898 g0a2

Appendix B

Phenibut effect on ASSR

As mentioned above, one of the participants from the young group reported to be taking Phenibut. He was 8.41 years old and had normal SRS T-scores (19). He was taking half a tablet (250 mg) twice a day and was prescribed phenibut for a migraine attack. As it can be seen in Figure A3, D038 has ASSR within the range of other TD children from the young group (t (17) = −0.333, p = 0.743) and clearly above that of SH01. Thus, we can conclude that phenibut does not cause abnormally low ASSR in SH01.
Figure A3. Comparison of ASSR values (µV) for the participant D038 who took phenibut (violet) and the participant SH01 (green). Individual amplitudes of ‘young’ group are shown in grey. The time of stimulus presentation is 0.
Figure A3. Comparison of ASSR values (µV) for the participant D038 who took phenibut (violet) and the participant SH01 (green). Individual amplitudes of ‘young’ group are shown in grey. The time of stimulus presentation is 0.
Ijms 22 01898 g0a3

Appendix C

Table A1. Description of comparison groups including age, sex and SRS T-scores.
Table A1. Description of comparison groups including age, sex and SRS T-scores.
‘Old’ Group‘Young’ Group
ParticipantAgeSexSRS, T-ScoresParticipantAgeSexSRS, T-Scores
D01512.65f16D0432.58f26
D02012.68f39D0333.04m
D02113.45f D0075.04f
D04113.94m56D0095.86f22
D00214.10f42D0226.01m23
D02514.47m24D0126.42f21
D02714.76m22D0047.93f15
D04715.18m35D0018.18f28
D04615.4m52D0068.24f41
D04815.74m49D0138.4f22
D04917, 98f38D0388.41m19
D05017.98f37D0119.04f47
D03017.99f D0359.13m62
D0169.43f11
D0459.6m12
D0179.83f
D01410.69f
D00311.98f37
D02312.04f24
Figure A4. Illustration of Hilbert transformation performed for the analysis of ASSR. Red line corresponds with the signal obtained after filtering the data (35–45 Hz) and averaging all good trials. Blue line indicates Hilbert transformation of 35–45 Hz filtered ERPs.
Figure A4. Illustration of Hilbert transformation performed for the analysis of ASSR. Red line corresponds with the signal obtained after filtering the data (35–45 Hz) and averaging all good trials. Blue line indicates Hilbert transformation of 35–45 Hz filtered ERPs.
Ijms 22 01898 g0a4

References

  1. Naisbitt, S.; Kim, E.; Tu, J.C.; Xiao, B.; Sala, C.; Valtschanoff, J.; Weinberg, R.J.; Worley, P.F.; Sheng, M. Shank, a Novel Family of Postsynaptic Density Proteins that Binds to the NMDA Receptor/PSD-95/GKAP Complex and Cortactin. Neuron 1999, 23, 569–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sheng, M.; Kim, E. The Shank Family of Scaffold Proteins. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113, 1851–1856. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Phelan, K.; McDermid, H. The 22q13.3 Deletion Syndrome (Phelan-McDermid Syndrome). Mol. Syndr. 2011, 2, 186–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sarasua, S.M.; Dwivedi, A.; Boccuto, L.; Chen, C.-F.; Sharp, J.L.; Rollins, J.D.; Collins, J.S.; Rogers, R.C.; Phelan, K.; Dupont, B.R. 22q13.2q13.32 Genomic Regions Associated with Severity of Speech Delay, Developmental Delay, and Physical Features in Phelan–McDermid Syndrome. Genet. Med. 2013, 16, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wilson, H.L.; Wong, A.C.C.; Shaw, S.R.; Tse, W.-Y.; Stapleton, A.G.; Phelan, M.C.; Hu, S.; Marshall, J.; McDermid, H.E. Molecular Characterisation of the 22q13 Deletion Syndrome Supports the Role of Haploinsufficiency of SHANK3/PROSAP2 in the Major Neurological Symptoms. J. Med. Genet. 2003, 40, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bassell, J.; Srivastava, S.; Prohl, A.K.; Scherrer, B.; Kapur, K.; Filip-Dhima, R.; Berry-Kravis, E.; Soorya, L.; Thurm, A.; Powell, C.M.; et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Abnormalities in the Uncinate Fasciculus and Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol. 2020, 106, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Costales, J.L.; Kolevzon, A. Phelan–McDermid Syndrome and SHANK3: Implications for Treatment. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harony-Nicolas, H.; De Rubeis, S.; Kolevzon, A.; Buxbaum, J.D. Phelan McDermid Syndrome. J. Child Neurol. 2015, 30, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Betancur, C.; Buxbaum, J.D. SHANK3 Haploinsufficiency: A “Common” but Underdiagnosed Highly Penetrant Monogenic Cause of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Mol. Autism 2013, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oberman, L.M.; Rotenberg, A.; Pascual-Leone, A. Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Autism Spectrum Disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013, 45, 524–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leblond, C.S.; Nava, C.; Polge, A.; Gauthier, J.; Huguet, G.; Lumbroso, S.; Giuliano, F.; Stordeur, C.; Depienne, C.; Mouzat, K.; et al. Meta-Analysis of SHANK Mutations in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Gradient of Severity in Cognitive Impairments. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, L.; Wang, X.; Li, X.-L.; Towers, A.; Cao, X.; Wang, P.; Bowman, R.; Yang, H.; Goldstein, J.; Li, Y.-J.; et al. Epigenetic Dysregulation of SHANK3 in Brain Tissues from Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 1563–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grabrucker, A.M.; Schmeisser, M.J.; Schoen, M.; Boeckers, T.M. Postsynaptic ProSAP/Shank Scaffolds in the Cross-Hair of Synaptopathies. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Duffney, L.J.; Zhong, P.; Wei, J.; Matas, E.; Cheng, J.; Qin, L.; Ma, K.; Dietz, D.M.; Kajiwara, Y.; Buxbaum, J.D.; et al. Autism-Like Deficits in Shank3-Deficient Mice Are Rescued by Targeting Actin Regulators. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 1400–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alexandrov, P.N.; Zhao, Y.; Jaber, V.; Cong, L.; Lukiw, W.J. Deficits in the Proline-Rich Synapse-Associated Shank3 Protein in Multiple Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Monteiro, P.; Feng, P.M.G. SHANK Proteins: Roles at the Synapse and in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mei, Y.; Monteiro, P.; Zhou, Y.; Kim, J.-A.; Gao, X.; Fu, Z.; Feng, Y.M.P.M.Y.Z.J.-A.K.X.G.Z.F.G. Adult Restoration of Shank3 Expression Rescues Selective Autistic-like Phenotypes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 530, 481–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sala, C.; Vicidomini, C.; Bigi, I.; Mossa, A.; Verpelli, C. Shank Synaptic Scaffold Proteins: Keys to Understanding the Pathogenesis of Autism and Other Synaptic Disorders. J. Neurochem. 2015, 135, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Moessner, R.; Marshall, C.R.; Sutcliffe, J.S.; Skaug, J.; Pinto, D.; Vincent, J.; Zwaigenbaum, L.; Fernandez, B.; Roberts, W.; Szatmari, P.; et al. Contribution of SHANK3 Mutations to Autism Spectrum Disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, K.; Jr, J.L.H.; Schaaf, C.P.; Lu, H.-C.; Chen, H.; Kang, H.; Tang, J.; Wu, Z.; Hao, S.; Cheung, S.W.; et al. SHANK3 Overexpression Causes Manic-Like Behaviour with Unique Pharmacogenetic Properties. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 503, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Failla, P.; Romano, C.; Alberti, A.; Vasta, A.; Buono, S.; Castiglia, L.; Luciano, D.; Di Benedetto, D.; Fichera, M.; Galesi, O. Schizophrenia in a Patient with Subtelomeric Duplication of Chromosome 22q. Clin. Genet. 2007, 71, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Durand, C.M.; Betancur, C.; Boeckers, T.M.; Bockmann, J.; Chaste, P.; Fauchereau, F.; Nygren, G.; Rastam, M.; Gillberg, I.C.; Anckarsäter, H.; et al. Mutations in the Gene Encoding the Synaptic Scaffolding Protein shank3 Are Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Nat. Genet. 2006, 39, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Johannessen, M.; Haugen, I.B.; Bakken, T.L.; Braaten, Ø. A 22q13.33 Duplication Harbouring the SHANK3 Gene: Does It Cause Neuropsychiatric Disorders? BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12, e228258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ujfalusi, A.; Nagy, O.; Bessenyei, B.; Lente, G.; Kántor, I.; Borbély, Á.J.; Szakszon, K. 22q13 Microduplication Syndrome in Siblings with Mild Clinical Phenotype: Broadening the Clinical and Behavioral Spectrum. Mol. Syndr. 2020, 11, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kouser, M.; Speed, H.E.; Dewey, C.M.; Reimers, J.M.; Widman, A.J.; Gupta, N.; Liu, S.; Jaramillo, T.C.; Bangash, M.; Xiao, B.; et al. Loss of Predominant Shank3 Isoforms Results in Hippocampus-Dependent Impairments in Behavior and Synaptic Transmission. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 18448–18468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, J.; Chung, C.; Ha, S.; Lee, D.; Kim, D.-Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, E. Shank3-Mutant Mice Lacking Exon 9 Show Altered Excitation/Inhibition Balance, Enhanced Rearing, and Spatial Memory Deficit. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Speed, H.E.; Kouser, M.; Xuan, Z.; Reimers, J.M.; Ochoa, C.F.; Gupta, N.; Liu, S.; Powell, C.M. Autism-Associated Insertion Mutation (InsG) of Shank3 Exon 21 Causes Impaired Synaptic Transmission and Behavioral Deficits. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 9648–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jaramillo, T.C.; Speed, H.E.; Xuan, Z.; Reimers, J.M.; Liu, S.; Powell, C.M. Altered Striatal Synaptic Function and Abnormal Behaviour inShank3Exon4-9 Deletion Mouse Model of Autism. Autism Res. 2016, 9, 350–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jiang, Y.-H.; Ehlers, M.D. Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice. Neuron 2013, 78, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yoo, J.; Bakes, J.; Bradley, C.; Collingridge, G.L.; Kaang, B.-K. Shank Mutant Mice as an Animal Model of Autism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schmeisser, M.J. Translational Neurobiology in Shank Mutant Mice—Model Systems for Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz. 2015, 200, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dhamne, S.C.; Silverman, J.L.; Super, C.E.; Lammers, S.H.T.; Hameed, M.Q.; Modi, M.E.; Copping, N.A.; Pride, M.C.; Smith, D.G.; Rotenberg, A.; et al. Replicable in Vivo Physiological and Behavioral Phenotypes of the Shank3B Null Mutant Mouse Model of Autism. Mol. Autism 2017, 8, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Choi, S.-Y.; Pang, K.; Kim, J.Y.; Ryu, J.R.; Kang, H.; Liu, Z.; Kim, W.-K.; Sun, W.; Kim, H.; Han, K. Post-transcriptional Regulation of SHANK3 Expression by MicroRNAs Related to Multiple Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Mol. Brain 2015, 8, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, S.; Lee, E.; Kim, R.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Park, H.; Yang, E.; Kim, H.; Kim, E. Shank2 Deletion in Parvalbumin Neurons Leads to Moderate Hyperactivity, Enhanced Self-Grooming and Suppressed Seizure Susceptibility in Mice. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Filice, F.; Vörckel, K.J.; Sungur, A.Ö.; Wöhr, M.; Schwaller, B. Reduction in Parvalbumin Expression Not Loss of the Parvalbumin-Expressing GABA Interneuron Subpopulation in Genetic Parvalbumin and Shank Mouse Models of Autism. Mol. Brain 2016, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lu, C.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, T.; Bozic, D.; Fu, Z.; Pan, J.Q.; Feng, G. Micro-Electrode Array Recordings Reveal Reductions in Both Excitation and Inhibition in Cultured Cortical Neuron Networks Lacking Shank3. Mol. Psychiatry 2015, 21, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bartos, M.; Vida, I.; Jonas, P. Synaptic Mechanisms of Synchronized Gamma Oscillations in Inhibitory Interneuron Networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vinck, M.; Womelsdorf, T.; Buffalo, E.A.; DeSimone, R.; Fries, P. Attentional Modulation of Cell-Class-Specific Gamma-Band Synchronization in Awake Monkey Area V4. Neuron 2013, 80, 1077–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carlen, M.; Meletis, K.; Siegle, J.; Cardin, J.; Futai, K.; Vierling-Claassen, D.; Rühlmann, C.; Jones, S.R.; Deisseroth, K.; Sheng, M.; et al. A Critical Role for NMDA Receptors in Parvalbumin Interneurons for Gamma Rhythm Induction and Behavior. Mol. Psychiatry 2011, 17, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hoogenboom, N.; Schoffelen, J.-M.; Oostenveld, R.; Parkes, L.M.; Fries, P. Localizing Human Visual Gamma-Band Activity in Frequency, Time and Space. NeuroImage 2006, 29, 764–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ross, B.; Picton, T.W.; Pantev, C. Temporal Integration in the Human Auditory Cortex as Represented by the Development of the Steady-State Magnetic Field. Hear. Res. 2002, 165, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ross, B.; Pantev, C. Auditory Steady-State Responses Reveal Amplitude Modulation Gap Detection Thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115, 2193–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Onitsuka, T.; Oribe, N.; Nakamura, I.; Kanba, S. Review of Neurophysiological Findings in Patients with Schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 67, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Picton, T.W.; John, M.S.; Dimitrijevic, A.; Purcell, D. Human Auditory Steady-State Responses: Respuestas Auditivas de Estado Estable en Humanos. Int. J. Audiol. 2003, 42, 177–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tateno, T.; Harsch, A.; Robinson, H.P.C. Threshold Firing Frequency–Current Relationships of Neurons in Rat Somatosensory Cortex: Type 1 and Type 2 Dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92, 2283–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Golomb, D.; Donner, K.; Shacham, L.; Shlosberg, D.; Amitai, Y.; Hansel, D. Mechanisms of Firing Patterns in Fast-Spiking Cortical Interneurons. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3, e156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Enakao, K.; Enakazawa, K. Brain State-Dependent Abnormal LFP Activity in the Auditory Cortex of a Schizophrenia Mouse Model. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sivarao, D.V.; Chen, P.; Senapati, A.; Yang, Y.; Fernandes, A.; Benitex, Y.; Whiterock, V.; Li, Y.-W.; Ahlijanian, M.K. 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Response Is a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Cortical NMDA Receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 2232–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sullivan, E.M.; Timi, M.P.; Hong, L.E.; O’Donnell, P. Effects of NMDA and GABA-A Receptor Antagonism on Auditory Steady-State Synchronization in Awake Behaving Rats. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 18, pyu118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Leishman, E.; O’Donnell, B.F.; Millward, J.B.; Vohs, J.L.; Rass, O.; Krishnan, G.P.; Bolbecker, A.R.; Morzorati, S.L. Phencyclidine Disrupts the Auditory Steady State Response in Rats. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sivarao, D.V.; Frenkel, M.; Chen, P.; Healy, F.L.; Lodge, N.J.; Zaczek, R. MK-801 Disrupts and Nicotine Augments 40 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses in the Auditory Cortex of the Urethane-Anesthetized Rat. Neuropharmacology 2013, 73, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kirli, K.K.; Ermentrout, G.B.; Cho, R.Y.; Kirli, K.K. Computational Study of NMDA Conductance and Cortical Oscillations in Schizophrenia. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Spencer, K.M. The Functional Consequences of Cortical Circuit Abnormalities on Gamma Oscillations in Schizophrenia: Insights from Computational Modeling. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2009, 3, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Thuné, H.; Recasens, M.; Uhlhaas, P.J. The 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response in Patients with Schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 2016, 73, 1145–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Parker, D.A.; Hamm, J.P.; McDowell, J.E.; Keedy, S.K.; Gershon, E.S.; Ivleva, E.I.; Pearlson, G.D.; Keshavan, M.S.; Tamminga, C.A.; Sweeney, J.A.; et al. Auditory Steady-State EEG Response Across the Schizo-Bipolar Spectrum. Schizophr. Res. 2019, 209, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Isomura, S.; Onitsuka, T.; Tsuchimoto, R.; Nakamura, I.; Hirano, S.; Oda, Y.; Oribe, N.; Hirano, Y.; Ueno, T.; Kanba, S. Differentiation between Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder by Auditory Steady-State Responses. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 190, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rass, O.; Krishnan, G.; Brenner, A.C.; Hetrick, W.P.; Merrill, C.C.; Shekhar, A.; O’Donnell, B.F. Auditory Steady State Response in Bipolar Disorder: Relation to Clinical State, Cognitive Performance, Medication Status, and Substance Disorders. Bipolar Disord. 2010, 12, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Oda, Y.; Onitsuka, T.; Tsuchimoto, R.; Hirano, S.; Oribe, N.; Ueno, T.; Hirano, Y.; Nakamura, I.; Miura, T.; Kanba, S. Gamma Band Neural Synchronization Deficits for Auditory Steady State Responses in Bipolar Disorder Patients. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rojas, D.C.; Teale, P.D.; Maharajh, K.; Kronberg, E.; Youngpeter, K.; Wilson, L.B.; Wallace, A.; Hepburn, S. Transient and Steady-State Auditory Gamma-Band Responses in First-Degree Relatives of People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Mol. Autism 2011, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Seymour, R.A.; Rippon, G.; Gooding-Williams, G.; Sowman, P.F.; Kessler, K. Reduced Auditory Steady State Responses in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Mol. Autism 2020, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hong, L.E. Evoked Gamma Band Synchronization and the Liability for Schizophrenia*1. Schizophr. Res. 2004, 70, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ono, Y.; Kudoh, K.; Ikeda, T.; Takahashi, T.; Yoshimura, Y.; Minabe, Y.; Kikuchi, M. Auditory Steady-State Response at 20 Hz and 40 Hz in Young Typically Developing Children and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 74, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stroganova, T.A.; Komarov, K.S.; Sysoeva, O.V.; Goiaeva, D.E.; Obukhova, T.S.; Ovsiannikova, T.M.; Prokofyev, A.O.; Orekhova, E.V. Left Hemispheric Deficit in the Sustained Neuromagnetic Response to Periodic Click Trains in Children with ASD. Mol. Autism 2020, 11, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Uhlhaas, P.J.; Haenschel, C.; Nikolić, D.; Singer, W. The Role of Oscillations and Synchrony in Cortical Networks and Their Putative Relevance for the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2008, 34, 927–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ross, B.; Fujioka, T. 40-Hz Oscillations Underlying Perceptual Binding in Young and Older Adults. Psychophysiology 2016, 53, 974–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Baltus, A.; Herrmann, C.S. Auditory Temporal Resolution Is Linked to Resonance Frequency of the Auditory Cortex. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2015, 98, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Light, G.A.; Hsu, J.L.; Hsieh, M.H.; Meyer-Gomes, K.; Sprock, J.; Swerdlow, N.R.; Braff, D.L. Gamma Band Oscillations Reveal Neural Network Cortical Coherence Dysfunction in Schizophrenia Patients. Biol. Psychiatry 2006, 60, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tada, M.; Nagai, T.; Kirihara, K.; Koike, S.; Suga, M.; Araki, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Kasai, K. Differential Alterations of Auditory Gamma Oscillatory Responses Between Pre-Onset High-Risk Individuals and First-Episode Schizophrenia. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Koshiyama, D.; Kirihara, K.; Tada, M.; Nagai, T.; Fujioka, M.; Ichikawa, E.; Ohta, K.; Tani, M.; Tsuchiya, M.; Kanehara, A.; et al. Electrophysiological Evidence for Abnormal Glutamate-GABA Association Following Psychosis Onset. Transl. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Filimonenko, Y.I.; Timofeev, V.I. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Methodological Manual; Imaton: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2006; p. 112. (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  71. Constantino, J.N.; Davis, S.A.; Todd, R.D.; Schindler, M.K.; Gross, M.M.; Brophy, S.L.; Metzger, L.M.; Shoushtari, C.S.; Splinter, R.; Reich, W. Validation of a Brief Quantitative Measure of Autistic Traits: Comparison of the Social Responsiveness Scale with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2003, 33, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lord, C.; Rutter, M.; Le Couteur, A. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A Revised Version of a Diagnostic Interview for Caregivers of Individuals with Possible Pervasive Developmental Disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 1994, 24, 659–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Philippe, A.; Boddaert, N.; Vaivre-Douret, L.; Robel, L.; Danon-Boileau, L.; Malan, V.; De Blois, M.-C.; Heron, D.; Colleaux, L.; Golse, B.; et al. Neurobehavioral Profile and Brain Imaging Study of the 22q13.3 Deletion Syndrome in Childhood. Pediatrics 2008, 122, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Soorya, L.; Kolevzon, A.; Zweifach, J.; Lim, T.; Dobry, Y.; Schwartz, L.; Frank, Y.; Wang, A.T.; Cai, G.; Parkhomenko, E.; et al. Prospective Investigation of Autism and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in 22q13 Deletion Syndrome and SHANK3 Deficiency. Mol. Autism 2013, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zwanenburg, R.J.; Ruiter, S.A.; Heuvel, E.R.V.D.; Flapper, B.C.; Van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C.M. Developmental Phenotype in Phelan-McDermid (22q13.3 Deletion) Syndrome: A Systematic and Prospective Study in 34 Children. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2016, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, C.-H.; Chen, H.-I.; Liao, H.-M.; Chen, Y.-J.; Fang, J.-S.; Lee, K.-F.; Gau, S.S.-F. Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Three Genomic Rearrangements at Chromosome 22q13.3 Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Psychiatr. Genet. 2017, 27, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Okamoto, N.; Kubota, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Murakami, R.; Nishikubo, T.; Tanaka, I.; Takahashi, Y.; Hayashi, S.; Imoto, I.; Inazawa, J.; et al. 22q13 Microduplication in Two Patients with Common Clinical Manifestations: A Recognizable Syndrome? Am. J. Med Genet. Part A 2007, 143, 2804–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Destrée, A.; Hilbert, P.; Boulanger, S. A 273-kb Duplication at 22q13.33 Encompassing the Shank3 Gene in 2 Sibs with Microcephaly, Behavioral Disorder and Learning Disabilities. In Proceedings of European Society of Human Genetics Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 28–31 May 2011, P02.034. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 19, 76. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sarasua, S.M.; Boccuto, L.; Sharp, J.L.; Dwivedi, A.; Chen, C.-F.; Rollins, J.D.; Rogers, R.C.; Phelan, K.; Dupont, B.R. Clinical and Genomic Evaluation of 201 Patients with Phelan–McDermid Syndrome. Qual. Life Res. 2014, 133, 847–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kolevzon, A.; Angarita, B.; Bush, L.; Wang, A.T.; Frank, Y.; Yang, A.; Rapaport, R.; Saland, J.; Srivastava, S.; Farrell, C.; et al. Phelan-McDermid Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Practice Parameters for Medical Assessment and Monitoring. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2014, 6, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Reierson, G.; Bernstein, J.; Froehlich-Santino, W.; Urban, A.; Purmann, C.; Berquist, S.; Jordan, J.; O’Hara, R.; Hallmayer, J. Characterizing Regression in Phelan McDermid Syndrome (22q13 Deletion Syndrome). J. Psychiatr. Res. 2017, 91, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kolevzon, A.; Delaby, E.; Berry-Kravis, E.; Buxbaum, J.D.; Betancur, C. Neuropsychiatric Decompensation in Adolescents and Adults with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Mol. Autism 2019, 10, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hileman, C.M.; Henderson, H.A.; Mundy, P.; Newell, L.C.; Jaime, M. Developmental and Individual Differences on the P1 and N170 ERP Components in Children with and without Autism. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2011, 36, 214–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Itier, R.J.; Taylor, M.J. Effects of Repetition and Configural Changes on the Development of Face Recognition Processes. Dev. Sci. 2004, 7, 469–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Reese, M. Effects of Age, Gender, and Genotype on Auditory Processing in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome. Master’s Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  86. Brittenham, C. Objective Measures of Electrophysiological Responses of Children with Idiopathic Autism Spectrum Disorder and Phelan-McDermid Syndrome to a Contrast-Reversing Checkerboard. Master’s Thesis, Hunter College, University of New York, New York, NY, USA, 18 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  87. Siper, P.; George-Jones, J.; Lurie, S.; Rowe, M.; Durkin, A.; Weissman, J.; Meyering, K.; Rouhandeh, A.; Buxbaum, J.; Kolevzon, A. 23. Biomarker Discovery in ASD: Visual Evoked Potentials as a Biomarker of Phelan-McDermid Syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 83, S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Whitehouse, A.J.; Bishop, D.V. Do Children with Autism ‘Switch off’ to Speech Sounds? An Investigation Using Event-Related Potentials. Dev. Sci. 2008, 11, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Stroganova, T.A.; Kozunov, V.V.; Posikera, I.N.; Galuta, I.A.; Gratchev, V.V.; Orekhova, E.V. Abnormal Pre-Attentive Arousal in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Contributes to Their Atypical Auditory Behavior: An ERP Study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Madsen, G.F.; Bilenberg, N.; Jepsen, J.R.; Glenthøj, B.; Cantio, C.; Oranje, B. Normal P50 Gating in Children with Autism, Yet Attenuated P50 Amplitude in the Asperger Subcategory. Autism Res. 2015, 8, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Isenstein, E.; Durkin, A.; Zhang, Y.; Feldman, E.; Servedio, N.; Harony-Nicolas, H.; Buxbaum, J.; Kolevzon, A.; Siper, P.; Foss-Feig, J. T185. Electrophysiological Evidence of Auditory Habituation Abnormalities in Young Adults with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 83, S200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ponson, L.; Gomot, M.; Blanc, R.; Barthelemy, C.; Roux, S.; Munnich, A.; Romana, S.; Aguillon-Hernandez, N.; Malan, V.; Bonnet-Brilhault, F. 22q13 Deletion Syndrome: Communication Disorder or Autism? Evidence from a Specific Clinical and Neurophysiological Phenotype. Transl. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Griskova-Bulanova, I.; Dapsys, K.; Maciulis, V. Does Brain Ability to Synchronize with 40 Hz Auditory Stimulation Change with Age? Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2013, 73, 564–570. [Google Scholar]
  94. Poulsen, C.; Picton, T.W.; Paus, T. Age-Related Changes in Transient and Oscillatory Brain Responses to Auditory Stimulation during Early Adolescence. Dev. Sci. 2009, 12, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Maurizi, M.; Almadori, G.; Paludetti, G.; Ottaviani, F.; Rosignoli, M.; Lucianob, R. 40-Hz Steady-State Responses in Newborns and in Children. Int. J. Audiol. 1990, 29, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Stapells, D.; Herdman, A.; Small, S.; Dimitrijevic, A.; Hatton, J. Current Status of the Auditory Steady-State Responses for Estimating an Infant’s Audiogram; Phonak: Zurich, Sweden, 2005; pp. 43–59. [Google Scholar]
  97. Engineer, C.T.; Rahebi, K.C.; Borland, M.S.; Buell, E.P.; Im, K.W.; Wilson, L.G.; Sharma, P.; Vanneste, S.; Harony-Nicolas, H.; Buxbaum, J.D.; et al. Shank3-Deficient Rats Exhibit Degraded Cortical Responses to Sound. Autism Res. 2017, 11, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Griškova-Bulanova, I.; Rukšėnas, O.; Dapšys, K.; Mačiulis, V.; Arnfred, S.M. Distraction Task Rather Than Focal Attention Modulates Gamma Activity Associated with Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs). Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Griskova, I.; Morup, M.; Parnas, J.; Ruksenas, O.; Arnfred, S.M. The Amplitude and Phase Precision of 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Response Depend on the Level of Arousal. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 183, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bensmann, W.; Vahid, A.; Beste, C.; Stock, A.-K. The Intensity of Early Attentional Processing, but Not Conflict Monitoring, Determines the Size of Subliminal Response Conflicts. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Martin, B.A.; Tremblay, K.L.; Korczak, P. Speech Evoked Potentials: From the Laboratory to the Clinic. Ear Hear. 2008, 29, 285–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oostenveld, R.; Fries, P.; Maris, E.; Schoffelen, J.-M. FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2010, 2011, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Griskova, I.; Morup, M.; Parnas, J.; Rukšėnas, O.; Arnfred, S.M.; Griškova-Bulanova, I. Two Discrete Components of the 20 Hz Steady-State Response Are Distinguished through the Modulation of Activation Level. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hirano, Y.; Nakamura, I.; Tamura, S.; Onitsuka, T. Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Auditory Gamma Oscillations Between Different Clinical EEG Systems. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Iourov, I.Y.; Vorsanova, S.G.; Korostelev, S.A.; Zelenova, M.A.; Yurov, Y.B. Long Contiguous Stretches of Homozygosity Spanning Shortly the Imprinted Loci Are Associated with Intellectual Disability, Autism and/or Epilepsy. Mol. Cytogenet. 2015, 8, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Iourov, I.Y.; Vorsanova, S.G.; Yurov, Y.B.; Zelenova, M.A.; Kurinnaia, O.S.; Vasin, K.S.; Kutsev, S.I. The Cytogenomic “Theory of Everything”: Chromohelkosis May Underlie Chromosomal Instability and Mosaicism in Disease and Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Iourov, I.Y.; Vorsanova, S.G.; Voinova, V.Y.; Yurov, Y.B. 3p22.1p21.31 Microdeletion Identifies CCK as Asperger Syndrome Candidate Gene and Shows the Way for Therapeutic Strategies in Chromosome Imbalances. Mol. Cytogenet. 2015, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Iourov, I.Y.; Vorsanova, S.G.; Yurov, Y.B. In Silico Molecular Cytogenetics: A Bioinformatic Approach to Prioritization of Candidate Genes and Copy Number Variations for Basic and Clinical Genome Research. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SNP array analysis demonstrating the duplication affecting the first seven exons of the SHANK3 gene.
Figure 1. SNP array analysis demonstrating the duplication affecting the first seven exons of the SHANK3 gene.
Ijms 22 01898 g001
Figure 2. (a) Dominate alpha rhythm with eyes closed, (b) the abnormalities of the background EEG.
Figure 2. (a) Dominate alpha rhythm with eyes closed, (b) the abnormalities of the background EEG.
Ijms 22 01898 g002
Figure 3. Envelope curve of 40-Hz ASSR obtained after Hilbert transform from electrode Fz. The ASSR of SH01 is shown in green, that of the young group of typically developing children (TD young) is in red, and that of the old, age-matched to SH01 group (TD old) is in blue. Opaque blue and red shading illustrate the 95% confidence interval. The time of stimulus presentation is 0.
Figure 3. Envelope curve of 40-Hz ASSR obtained after Hilbert transform from electrode Fz. The ASSR of SH01 is shown in green, that of the young group of typically developing children (TD young) is in red, and that of the old, age-matched to SH01 group (TD old) is in blue. Opaque blue and red shading illustrate the 95% confidence interval. The time of stimulus presentation is 0.
Ijms 22 01898 g003
Figure 4. Topographic map of 40-Hz ASSR amplitude averaged over the period of 0–500 ms. The “old” group is represented in (a), the “young” group is represented in (b), and the values of SH01 are represented in (c).
Figure 4. Topographic map of 40-Hz ASSR amplitude averaged over the period of 0–500 ms. The “old” group is represented in (a), the “young” group is represented in (b), and the values of SH01 are represented in (c).
Ijms 22 01898 g004
Figure 5. Individual values of 40-Hz ASSR across the groups (Fz electrode). The old TD group’s values are shown in the first column, the young TD group’s values are shown in the second, and SH01’s values are shown in the third. (* shows significant differences p < 0.05, *** shows significant differences p < 0.0001).
Figure 5. Individual values of 40-Hz ASSR across the groups (Fz electrode). The old TD group’s values are shown in the first column, the young TD group’s values are shown in the second, and SH01’s values are shown in the third. (* shows significant differences p < 0.05, *** shows significant differences p < 0.0001).
Ijms 22 01898 g005
Figure 6. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs), in Fz electrode with SH01 shown in green, the younger TD group (TD young) is shown in red, and the old, age-matched with SH01 control group (TD old) is shown in blue. Opaque blue and red shading illustrate 95% confidence interval. The time of stimulus presentation is 0. Time windows for P1 (50–80 ms), N1 (80–120 ms), and P2 (130–160 ms) are shown in rectangles.
Figure 6. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs), in Fz electrode with SH01 shown in green, the younger TD group (TD young) is shown in red, and the old, age-matched with SH01 control group (TD old) is shown in blue. Opaque blue and red shading illustrate 95% confidence interval. The time of stimulus presentation is 0. Time windows for P1 (50–80 ms), N1 (80–120 ms), and P2 (130–160 ms) are shown in rectangles.
Ijms 22 01898 g006
Figure 7. ERPs components across groups. P1 component is shown in (a), N1 is shown in (b), P2 is shown in (c). The old typically developing (TD) group’s values are shown in the first column, the young TD’s values are shown in a second, and SH01’s value is shown in the third (* shows significant differences p < 0.05, *** shows significant differences p < 0.0001).
Figure 7. ERPs components across groups. P1 component is shown in (a), N1 is shown in (b), P2 is shown in (c). The old typically developing (TD) group’s values are shown in the first column, the young TD’s values are shown in a second, and SH01’s value is shown in the third (* shows significant differences p < 0.05, *** shows significant differences p < 0.0001).
Ijms 22 01898 g007
Table 1. Amplitudes of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and event-related potential (ERP) components (mean ± STD) for two comparison groups of typically developing children and SH01 in Fz electrode.
Table 1. Amplitudes of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and event-related potential (ERP) components (mean ± STD) for two comparison groups of typically developing children and SH01 in Fz electrode.
ASSR, μVP1, μVN1, μVP2, μV
SH01
(15.1 y o)
−0.0021.3591.1023.670
Old group
(16.1 ± 1.9 y o)
0.274 ± 0.103 3.159 ± 2.0171.829 ± 1.8852.332 ± 2.241
Young group
(7.8 ± 2.6 y o)
0.158 ± 0.1554.267 ± 1.8866.059 ± 3.8016.455 ± 4.754
Table 2. Clinical phenotype of patients with 22q13.3 duplication and 22q13.3 deletion/mutations. In addition to individual cases of patients with 22q13.3 duplication (that include SHANK3 gene), the last two lines show the overall occurrence (in percentage) of the symptoms in patients with 22q13.3 duplication (based on [21] and our own review of individual cases reported previously) and 22q13.3 deletion/mutations (taken from previous reviews). Our subject, SH01, is also included for comparison. As patients of different ages are described, both IQ and developmental quotient (DQ) are used to characterize mental retardation. +/− reflects the presence/absence of the symptom.
Table 2. Clinical phenotype of patients with 22q13.3 duplication and 22q13.3 deletion/mutations. In addition to individual cases of patients with 22q13.3 duplication (that include SHANK3 gene), the last two lines show the overall occurrence (in percentage) of the symptoms in patients with 22q13.3 duplication (based on [21] and our own review of individual cases reported previously) and 22q13.3 deletion/mutations (taken from previous reviews). Our subject, SH01, is also included for comparison. As patients of different ages are described, both IQ and developmental quotient (DQ) are used to characterize mental retardation. +/− reflects the presence/absence of the symptom.
Language ProblemMental RetardationAutismMicrocephalySeizuresAttention DeficitAffective/
Psychiatric Symptoms
Physical Abnormalities/
Dysmorphism
SH01, our patientmild dyslexia, dysgraphiamild, IQ 64SRS = 63, no diagnosis++irritability, aggressivenesselongated skull, protruding auricles, sandal gap
Johannessen et al. (2019) [23]n/amildn/an/a++bipolar diseaseTourette syndrome (motor tics), mild dysmorphism
Han et al. (2013) [20]
Patient 1
n/amildn/an/a++destructive behaviordysmorphism
Han et al. (2013) [20]
Patient 2
n/amildn/an/a++bipolar disorder
Chen et al. (2017) [76]language delay, echolaliamild, IQ 62autistic traits, no diagnosisn/an/a+irritability
Ujfalusi et al. (2020) [24]
Patient 1
mild, IQ 72n/an/adysmorphism
Ujfalusi et al. (2020) [24]
Patient 2
dyslexia, dysgraphiamild, IQ 79n/a+bipolar disorder, temper tantrumsdysmorphism
Okamoto et al. (2007) [77]
Patient 1
language delaymoderate, DQ 40-hypotonia, dysmorphism
Okamoto et al. (2007) [77]
Patient 2
language delaymoderate, DQ 46hypotonia, dysmorphism
Failla et al. (2007) [21]incoherent speechmild, IQ 73++schizophrenia, irritability, aggressivenessdysmorphism
Destrée et al. (2011) [78]
Patient 1
language delaymildn/a+n/an/an/adysmorphism, growth retardation
Destrée et al. (2011) [78]
Patient 2
language delaymildn/a+n/an/an/adysmorphism, growth retardation
Duplication (n = 31), %35%80% (from mild to severe)19%17%17%16%bipolar disorder –4%
psychosis−7%
Dysmorphism-54%
Deletion/PMS, %100% (no speech in 50%) [79]96% (with profound in 53%) [74]31–84% [74,79]6–14% [80]63% [81]11% [74]bipolar disorder –54%
psychosis–12%
irritability–36% [82]
68–93% dysmorphism [74]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neklyudova, A.K.; Portnova, G.V.; Rebreikina, A.B.; Voinova, V.Y.; Vorsanova, S.G.; Iourov, I.Y.; Sysoeva, O.V. 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) as a Biomarker of Genetic Defects in the SHANK3 Gene: A Case Report of 15-Year-Old Girl with a Rare Partial SHANK3 Duplication. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041898

AMA Style

Neklyudova AK, Portnova GV, Rebreikina AB, Voinova VY, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY, Sysoeva OV. 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) as a Biomarker of Genetic Defects in the SHANK3 Gene: A Case Report of 15-Year-Old Girl with a Rare Partial SHANK3 Duplication. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(4):1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neklyudova, Anastasia K., Galina V. Portnova, Anna B. Rebreikina, Victoria Yu Voinova, Svetlana G. Vorsanova, Ivan Y. Iourov, and Olga V. Sysoeva. 2021. "40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) as a Biomarker of Genetic Defects in the SHANK3 Gene: A Case Report of 15-Year-Old Girl with a Rare Partial SHANK3 Duplication" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 4: 1898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041898

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop