Next Article in Journal
Structural Analysis of Ino2p/Ino4p Mutual Interactions and Their Binding Interface with Promoter DNA
Next Article in Special Issue
Low Light Stress Increases Chalkiness by Disturbing Starch Synthesis and Grain Filling of Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Toxicologic Concerns with Current Medical Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms23147598
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

EfABI4 Transcription Factor Is Involved in the Regulation of Starch Biosynthesis in Euryale ferox Salisb Seeds

by
Peng Wu
1,2,†,
Yue Zhu
1,2,†,
Ailian Liu
1,
Yuhao Wang
1,
Shuping Zhao
1,
Kai Feng
1 and
Liangjun Li
1,2,*
1
School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Wenhui East Road No. 48, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(14), 7598; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147598
Submission received: 16 May 2022 / Revised: 4 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 8 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Starch: Molecular Structure, Functionalities and Biosynthesis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Starch is the final product of photosynthesis and the main storage form in plants. Studies have shown that there is a close synergistic regulatory relationship between ABA signal transduction and starch biosynthesis. In this study, we employed RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to investigate transcriptomic changes of the Euryale ferox seeds treated by exogenous ABA. The differentially expressed genes engaged in the “Starch and sucrose” and “TCA cycle” pathway. Furthermore, the key transcription factor EfABI4 in ABA signaling pathway and the key genes of starch biosynthesis (EfDBE1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2, EfSS3, EfSS4 and EfGBSS1) were significantly up-regulated. Further, the Euryale ferox plant was treated with ABA, it was found that the total starch content of Euryale ferox seeds at different development stages was significantly higher than that of the control, and the key genes of starch synthesis in Euryale ferox seeds were also significantly up-regulated. Finally, yeast one-hybrid and dual luciferase assay proved that EfABI4 can promote the expression of EfSS1 by directly binding to its promoter. Subcellular localization results showed that EfABI4 protein was located at the nucleus and EfSS1 protein was located in the cytomembrane. These findings revealed that ABA promotes starch synthesis and accumulation by mediating EfABI4 to directly promote EfSS1 gene expression, which is helpful for understanding starch synthesis in seeds.

1. Introduction

ABA (abscisic acid) is one of the five major plant hormones, and plays an important role in regulating plant development [1]. ABA is closely related to the synthesis and transportation of starch and carbohydrate metabolism in plants. It affects the transport of assimilates by promoting the breakdown, absorption and unloading of sucrose from plant tissues and ultimately promotes starch formation in the sink tissues [2,3,4,5,6]. During the growth and development of gladiolus and tomato fruits, glucose and fructose contents were positively correlated with endogenous ABA content [7,8]. In addition, there was a positive correlation between ABA content and starch accumulation rate in seeds of wheat and barley at the grain filling stage [9]. Furthermore, exogenous ABA treatment can increase the starch content of banana [10], lotus [11], blueberry and peach [12,13]. However, the mechanism of ABA regulation of starch synthesis is unclear.
Starch is the main carbohydrate formed by carbon fixation during photosynthesis and plays an important physiological role in the whole growth and development of plants [14]. Starch is also a major component of human food and is widely used in wine, paper, adhesives, textiles and biodegradable plastics [15]. Starch is divided into two types: amylose and amylopectin. Amylose is linear and has no branching spiral structure; it is composed of glucose units connected by α-1,4-glycosidic bonds. Amylopectin is a highly branched glucose polymer, consisting of 24 to 30 glucose residues connected end to end by α-1,4-glycosidic bonds, with α-1,6-glycosidic bonds at the branch chain. It is the main component of starch [16]. Starch biosynthesis is regulated by different hormonal signals, such as abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellin (GA) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [17,18,19,20,21]. The biosynthesis of starch involves various enzymes, such as ADPG-pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), starch synthase (SS), starch synthase (GBSS), starch branching enzyme (SBE) and starch debranching enzyme (DBE) [22,23,24,25]. Many studies have shown that starch metabolism is closely related to ABA in plants. In cassava, the rate of starch synthesis and accumulation increased with the increase in ABA content [26]. In tomato, glucose and fructose contents in peel, parenchyma and glial tissue were positively correlated with endogenous ABA content [8]. In rice, ABA content in grains of large-grain rice varieties was higher than that of small-grain rice varieties [27].
Abscisic acid insensitive 4 (ABI4) is a key transcription factor in ABA signaling. ABI4 is mainly involved in regulating glucose metabolism and thus affecting starch synthesis [28,29,30,31]. In Arabidopsis, the abi4 mutant has a glucose and fructose insensitive phenotype [32]. ABI4 has also been shown to promote the synthesis of triacylglycerol (TAG) [33]. ABI4 regulates the expression of starch synthesis-related genes APL3 and SBE2, and starch degradation genes SEX1 and BMY8/BAM3, thus affecting the synthesis and accumulation of starch [34]. In addition, NnABI4 can activate and up-regulate the expression of NnSS1, which promotes starch synthesis in Nelumbo nucifera [11]. Moreover, in maize endosperm, overexpressed ZmABI4 can also up-regulate the expression of AGPL2, AGPLS4, Sh2, SS1, GBSS1, SBE2a, SBE2b and PHOL genes encoding AGPase, thus increasing starch content in maize endosperm [35].
Euryale ferox Salisb. (Nymphaeaceae) is an important characteristic aquatic vegetable in China, with high economic value and medical value [36,37]. It is very healthy food, abundant in nutritional and bioactive compounds such as carbohydrates, protein, flavonoids, vitamins, minerals and polyphenols. It has high medicinal value, such as reducing blood sugar, regulating blood fat, and anti-diabetic, anti-hyperlipidemic, and hepatoprotective effects. Starch is the main storage substance of E. ferox seeds [38]. In several local varieties of Euryale ferox, the starch content in seeds increases with the maturation of seeds, but the amylopectin content and the ratio of amylose to amylopectin are significantly different among varieties [39,40]. The content, composition and structure of Euryale ferox starch are closely related to the quality of E. ferox seeds [41,42]. At present, EfSBE1 expression has been proven to be related to the difference in amylopectin in different varieties of E. ferox seeds, and EfSBE3 can regulate the synthesis of amylopectin [41,43]. However, related studies on other types of starch synthase in Euryale ferox are still scarce. Therefore, studying how the starch synthesis of E. ferox seeds forms is important. In this study, the regulation mechanism of ABA on starch biosynthesis of E. ferox seeds was investigated.
To explore the physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms underlying ABA regulated starch and to clarify the influence of ABA on quality of starch from Euryale ferox. We screened candidates for key differentially expressed genes after ABA treatment of E. ferox seeds by transcriptome. We further proved the effect of ABA on starch of Euryale ferox by treating the growth and development process of Euryale ferox with exogenous ABA. Finally, we demonstrated the molecular regulatory mechanism using Y1H assays, subcellular localization and dual luciferase assay. This study provides a solid theoretical basis for ABA regulation of E. ferox seed starch synthesis.

2. Results

2.1. Transcriptome Analysis of ABA Treated on Euryale ferox Seeds

The Illumina Novaseq 6000 system was used to deeply sequence the total RNA of six samples (ABA treated and control). In total, 264,860,112 high-quality reads were obtained by sequencing, and 39.74 Gb of clean data were obtained by further quality screening and detection (Figure S1). By comparing the raw counts of the ABA-treated and control groups, 5102 genes with significant differential expression (p < 0.05 and Log2FC ≥ 1) were obtained. Among them, 2745 genes were up-regulated and 2345 genes were down-regulated in the ABA treatment group, indicating that more genes responded positively to ABA treatment (Figure S2).
In order to study the specific effects of exogenous ABA treatment on E. ferox seed, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were classified by GO function. “Vitamin binding protein” and “pyruvate kinase activity” were enriched in “cell component”. “Carboxylic acid biosynthesis”, “organic acid biosynthesis” and “fatty acid metabolism” were enriched in “biological process”. “Catalytic activity” and “binding” were enriched in “molecular function” (Figure 1A). These results suggest that the differentially expressed genes may be involved in the starch biosynthesis process of E. ferox seeds. The KEGG analysis found that the most of the up-regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in “Starch and sucrose metabolism”, “Carbon metabolism”, “TCA cycle”, “Biosynthesis of amino acids”, “Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” and “Galactose metabolism” (Figure 1B). The results of KEGG enrichment analysis were consistent with those of GO functional enrichment.

2.2. DEGs Related to Starch Biosynthesis

According to GO and KEGG enrichment analysis, the large number of markedly regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in starch and sucrose metabolic pathways. The four key enzymes of starch synthesis are GBSS, SBE, SS and DBE. Among them, EfGBSS1, EfDBE1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2 and EfSS4 were up-regulated after ABA treatment (Figure 2A). Further exploration of differentially expressed genes in the starch synthesis pathway is helpful to study the ABA regulatory mechanism of starch biosynthesis. At the same time, we found that the relative expression level of EfABI4, a key ABA response gene, was significantly higher than that of the control, indicating that the expression of EfABI4 gene in E. ferox seeds was induced by exogenous ABA.
In order to verify the accuracy of RNA-seq results, the relative expression levels of EfDBE1, EfGBSS1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS3, EfSS4, and EfABI4 were significantly up-regulated by qRT-PCR (Figure 2B and Table S2). These results were consistent with the expression level of differential genes in transcriptome results, indicating that the transcriptome analysis results were reliable.

2.3. ABA Treatment on Starch Biosynthesis during Euryale ferox Salisb Development

To further verify the transcriptome sequencing results, exogenous ABA was applied to the leaves of Euryale ferox during growth and development, and then the total starch content and the expression levels of key genes for starch synthesis were measured in E. ferox seeds at different development stages. In this experiment, the principle of triple biological repetition was strictly followed. Meanwhile, the same ecological environment conditions were maintained between control plants and ABA-treated plants, and the experimental arrangement was reasonable and rigorous. After exogenous ABA treatment, the contents of total starch, amylose, and amylopectin in E. ferox seeds at different developmental stages were higher than those in the control (Figure 3A–C and Tables S3–S5), especially at 20–40 days after flowering (Figure 3D and Table S6). In addition, the ratio of amylose to amylopectin decreased gradually and significantly at 30 days after flowering. Then, qPCR showed that after ABA treatment, the expression levels of EfABI4 gene were higher than CK at different developmental stages, and the relative expression levels of starch synthesis-related genes EfDBE1, EfGBSS1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2, EfSS3 and EfSS4 were also higher than CK, especially at 20 days after flowering (Figure 3E, Table S7). These results are consistent with the transcriptome results. Whether ABA mediates starch synthesis in E. ferox seeds by EfAB14 remains to be studied.

2.4. EfAB14 Directly Promotes the Expression of EfSS1

To verify whether EfABI4 can directly regulate the expression of EfSS1, EfSS4 and EfGBSS1, we conducted a yeast one-hybrid experiment. As shown in Figure 4A, EfABI4 can bind to the promoter of EfSS1, indicating that EfABI4 can directly regulate the expression of EfSS1. The regulation of EfAB14 on EfSS1 was studied by double luciferase method. The results showed that the co-expression of EfABI4 and EfSS1 increased the relative lucdiferin level in tobacco leaves by 1.44 times (Figure 4B and Table S8). Y1H and dual luciferase assay confirmed that EfAB14 could bind the EfSS1 promoter and promote the expression of EfSS1 in E. ferox seeds. In addition, subcellular localization results indicated that EfABI4 was located at the nucleus, and EfSS1 was located in the cytomembrane (Figure 4C).

3. Discussion

As an important plant hormone, ABA regulates many physiological processes of plant growth and development [44,45,46]. Previous studies have shown that ABA regulates sucrose transport and metabolism by inducing transcription of related genes through signal transduction into the nucleus [47]. ABA injections into strawberries could promote the content of soluble sugar in fruit [46]. ABA can promote the long-distance transport of sugar by enhancing phloem area and promoting the expression of some hexose transporter genes [48]. Moreover, treatment of wheat and barley ears with low concentration of ABA can promote assimilate transfer to grains [49]. Therefore, transcriptome sequencing was performed on E. ferox seeds after ABA treatment and we found that starch and sugar metabolic pathways were enriched. The Euryale ferox plants were treated with ABA during development, and total starch, amylose, amylopectin and expression of related genes in E. ferox seeds also increased significantly. These results were consistent with previous research results, but the specific regulation mechanism needs to be further explored.
ABI4, as a key transcription factor in ABA signaling, is associated with starch synthesis in plants [50,51]. In previous studies, AtABI4 in Arabidopsis directly binds to CE1-like elements in the promoter regions of SBE2.2 and APL3 genes, up-regulating the expression of SBE2.2 and APL3, thereby increasing starch content in seeds [34]. In rice, the expression of OsAPL3 gene is regulated by both sucrose and ABA levels [52]. ZmABI4 can up-regulate the expression of ZmSS1 and ZmGBSS1 genes and increase the starch content in maize endosperm [35]. In addition, it was recently reported that NnABI4 in Nelumbo nucifera can directly bind to the promoter of NnSS1 and up-regulate its expression, ultimately promoting starch synthesis in rhizomes [11]. AtABI4 drives the expression of downstream genes by binding to the CE1-like motif element in the promoter region of the sugar response gene, such as the large subunit ApL3 of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and the starch branch enzyme SBE2.2 in the starch synthesis pathway [53]. In our study, the promoter of EfSS1 in E. ferox seeds contains CACCG, a coupling element of CE1. Y1H assay and dual luciferase assay confirmed that EfABI4 could bind to the EfSS1 promoter and promote the expression of EfSS1 (Figure S3). These results prove that EfAB14 plays a key role in regulating the biosynthesis of starch from E. ferox seeds. Therefore, an important scientific issue is to explore the specific regulatory mechanism of ABI4 on the anabolism of starch and sugar, and further research is needed. At the same time, the expression levels of EfDBE1, EfGBSS1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2, EfSS3 and EfSS4 were also significantly up-regulated after ABA treatment, which was consistent with the increasing trend of starch content in E. ferox seeds. Therefore, the model of ABA mediating starch synthesis in E. ferox by EfAB14 was constructed (Figure 5), but whether ABA also mediates starch synthesis in E. ferox by other ABA response factors needs to be further explored.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and ABA Treatment

Euryale ferox ‘ZS_01’ was used as experimental material and planted in Yangzhou University Aquatic vegetable test base in summer 2021. Euryale ferox ‘ZS_01’ is grown in the open air under natural conditions (32°23′ N, 119°25′ E). E. ferox seeds were collected 25 days after flowering, soaked in 100 mg/L ABA (Sheng Gong, Shanghai, China) solution, and sampled after soaking for 0 h and 18 h. They were quickly washed and placed in liquid nitrogen and refrigerated at −80 ℃ for use, with three biological replicates for each sample.
In addition, after the Euryale ferox plants entered the reproductive growth stage, 50 mL 5 mg/L ABA solution was applied to the leaves once every 7 days for 3 times in total (12 August 2021, 19 August 2021, 26 August 2021). E. ferox seed samples were collected at 10, 20, 30 and 40 days after flowering. Three replicates were set for each treatment. The seeds were quickly frozen, made into powder, and stored at −80 ℃.

4.2. RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from E. ferox seeds after ABA treatment using plant RNA extraction kit (Dalian Takara, Dalian, China). The RNA integrity of ABA treated seeds at 0 h and 18 h was analyzed by agarose gel. After passing the quality inspection process, a cDNA library was constructed according to the steps of the cDNA library construction kit. After the library was constructed, the library was checked and sequenced using Illumina Novaseq 6000 system after reaching the standard. The accuracy of subsequent analysis was positively correlated with the quality of reads, so raw reads obtained by sequencing needed to be detected. In order to ensure high data quality, redundant, complex and low-quality reads were screened and cut out, and the high-quality reads obtained were called clean data. The filtered sequenced sequence was compared with the reference genome E. ferox. Trinity software was used for a series of sequence assembly of high-quality sequencing data, and long and high-quality transcripts were obtained for subsequent research and analysis [54].
In order to obtain more comprehensive gene function information, we carried out rigorous bioinformatics analysis on the obtained E. ferox Unigene, including differential expression gene analysis and differential gene GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. After differential gene expression analysis, GO enrichment analysis was performed to further annotate the genes and gene products. Finally, Unigene obtained from E. ferox was compared with KEGG, a database with genome deciphering function, for the convenience of subsequent research and analysis.

4.3. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using HiScript®IIl RT SuperMixfor qPCR (Cat No.10911; Yeasen, Shanghai, China). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) was used to analyze the key genes of the starch synthesis pathway in E. ferox seeds. The qRT-PCR reaction was 20 µL, including 10 µL 2 × ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Co., Ltd.), 0.8 µL positive and negative primer mixture, 1.0 µL cDNA template and 8.2 µL ddH2O, respectively. Primer Premier 5.0 was used for Primer design. See Supplementary Table S1 for the gene specific primer sequences. β-actin (EfUBQ5) gene was used as an internal gene expression control: the gene was amplified with forward primer 5′-GTGAAGGCGAAGATCCAGGACAAG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCACGAAGGCGAAGCACAAGG-3′. Amplification was performed on the CFX-96 Real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the following real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR program: 95 ℃ for 30 s, 95 ℃ for 10 s and 60 ℃ for 30 s for a total of 40 cycles. The relative gene expression was calculated by 2−∆∆CT [55]. Three replicates were performed for each amplification reaction.
The photosynthetic parameters of leaves were measured for six consecutive days on the second day after the first spray of exogenous ABA. The portable photosynthesis measurement system LI-6400XTP can simultaneously measure the leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate (Ts).

4.4. Determination of Starch Content in ABA Treated Leaves

Fresh E. ferox seeds were ground with a mortar. The total starch content of 3 mg sample, amylopectin content of 0.005 g sample and amylose content of 0.01 g sample were determined by visible spectrophotometry. A Solarbio Detection Kit (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to determine total starch, amylose and amylopectin contents. Starch content (mg/g) = 1.351X/0.003 × 1.11, X = (ΔAdetermination + 0.0756)/4.9517, ΔA is ΔA determination = (A determination-A blank) − (A’ determination -A’ blank); Amylose content (mg/g) = 2 × ΔA determination/ΔA standard/0.001; Amylopectin content (mg/g) = X × 5/0.005, X = (ΔAdetermination + 0.0006)/0.7564. Each measurement was repeated three times.

4.5. Y1H Assays

The full-length CDS of EfABI4 was inserted into pGADT7 (Shanghai Oebiotech, Shanghai, China) to generate the AD-EfABI4 structure. The EfSS1 promoter fragment was cloned into pAbAi (Shanghai Oebiotech, Shanghai, China) vector to generate pAbAi-EfSS1, which was linearized by BstBI (Dalian Takara, Dalian, China) and then transformed into Y1HGold yeast strain (Shanghai Oebiotech, Shanghai, China). The transformed cells were grown in the SD/-Ura plate for 3 days. After inhibiting the self-activation of the EfSS1 promoter with Aureobasidin A (Dalian Takara, Dalian, China), the prey ABI4 was transferred to the Y1HGold yeast (Shanghai Oebiotech, Shanghai, China) containing the EfSS1 promoter. Subsequently, the yeast was spread on the SD/−Leu +AbA100 plate and allowed to stand and cultivate for 3–6 days.

4.6. Subcellular Localization

The encoding sequences of EfABI4 and EfSS1 were cloned into pCAMBIA1300-GFP by SacⅠ and XbaⅠ (Dalian Takara, Dalian, China) digestion sites (pSuper: GFP-EfABI4, GFP-EfSS1). The plasmid was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 and grown under appropriate antibiotics for subcellular localization analysis. Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression in 4-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana leaves was studied by syringe osmosis. After 72 h of dark growth, the GFP fluorescence of the samples was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

4.7. Transient Dual-Luciferase Detection

To further verify the binding activity of EfABI4 protein and EfSS1 promoter, double luciferase assay was performed. Firstly, the recombinant plasmids EfABI4-pGreenII 62-SK and proEfSS1-pGreenII 0800-LUC were transferred into A. tumefaciens GV3101 strain. Secondly, the bacteria were resuspended with the infection solution (100 mM Acetosyringone, 0.5 M MES (PH5.6) and 10 mM MgCl2) until the OD600 value was 1.0, and the bacterial solution containing EfABI4-pGreenII 62-SK and the bacterial solution proEfSS1-pGreenII 0800-LUC were mixed in a ratio of 1:1, and then left to stand for 3 h. Then, the tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) was injected. According to the fluorescence value measured by the double reporting system, the fluorescence value of the target gene plasmid/the fluorescence value of the internal reference plasmid (i.e., F/R value) was calculated, and the ratio of the target gene plasmid to the control group and the standard error were calculated and the histogram was made.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified the expression profiles of a number of differentially expressed key genes, including EfABI4, EfDBE1, EfGBSS1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2, EfSS3 and EfSS4, which were highly correlated with the expression profiles of key starch biosynthesis-related genes. Moreover, we demonstrated that the EfABI4 transcription factor can directly bind to the EfSS1 promoter, up-regulate the expression of EfSS1 in E. ferox seeds, and promote the biosynthesis of starch in E. ferox seeds. This provides a practical basis for understanding the molecular regulatory network between ABA signal transduction and starch biosynthesis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23147598/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W.; formal analysis, Y.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; software, Y.Z.; methodology, P.W. and Y.Z.; project administration, P.W. and L.L.; validation, K.F. and S.Z.; visualization, A.L. and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 31902002), the China Agriculture Research System (grant number: CARS-24), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number: 2020T130706), and Jiangsu seed industry revitalization‘Jie Bang Gua Shuai’project (grant number: JBGS [2021]017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Transcriptome data have been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) as BioProject: PRJNA819226.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hsu, P.K.; Dubeaux, G.; Takahashi, Y.; Schroeder, J.I. Signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure. Plant J. 2021, 105, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ackerson, R.C. Invertase Activity and Abscisic Acid in Relation to Carbohydrate Status in Developing Soybean Reproductive Structures. Crop Sci. 1985, 25, 615–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Saftner, R.A.; Wyse, R.E. Effect of Plant Hormones on Sucrose Uptake by Sugar Beet Root Tissue Discs. Plant Physiol. 1984, 74, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rainbird, T.R.M. An In Vivo Technique for the Study of Phloem Unloading in Seed Coats of Developing Soybean Seeds. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 268–271. [Google Scholar]
  5. Karssen, C.M.; Swan, B.V.D.; Breekland, A.E.; Koornneef, M. Induction of dormancy during seed development by endogenous abscisic acid: Studies on abscisic acid deficient genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 1983, 157, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tanner, D.W. On the Possible Role of ABA on Phloem Unloading. Berichte Der. Deutschen Botanischen. 1980, 93, 349–351. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, J.; Seng, S.; Li, D.; Zhang, F.; Wu, J. Antagonism between abscisic acid and gibberellin regulates starch synthesis and corm development in Gladiolus hybridus. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 2023–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Y. Studies on Main Pigment Formation and Physiological Mechanism in Tomato by Exogenous GA3 and ABA; Shenyang Agricultural University: Shenyang, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Soderman, E.M.; Brocard, I.M.; Lynch, T.J.; Finkelstein, R.R. Regulation and function of the arabidopsis ABA-insensitive4 gene in seed and abscisic acid response signaling networks. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1752–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Miao, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, K.; Miao, H.; Liu, J.; Jin, Z.; Xu, B. Effects of ABA Treatment on Starch Metabolism in Banana Fruit. Mol. Plant Breeding. 2018, 16, 1807–1811. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, P.; Liu, A.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, K.; Zhao, S.; Li, L. NnABI4-Mediated ABA Regulation of Starch Biosynthesis in Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, T.; Li, W.; Wu, W.; Shi, C.; Xiong, Z. Quality analysis and metabolomic profiling of the effects of exogenous abscisic acid on rabbiteye blueberry. BMC Plant Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jian-Lan, X.U.; Rui-Juan, M.A.; Zhang, B.B.; Lin-Jian, N.I. Effects of Different Concentration of ABA on Fruit Quality of Peach Cultivar ‘Meixiang’. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 25, 1027–1030. [Google Scholar]
  14. Emes, M.J.; Bowsher, C.G.; Hedley, C.; Burrell, M.M.; Tetlow, I.J. Starch synthesis and carbon partitioning in developing endosperm. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Khlestkin, V.K.; Peltek, S.E.; Kolchanov, N.A. Review of direct chemical and biochemical transformations of starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 181, 460–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vamadevan, V.; Bertoft, E. Structure-function relationships of starch components. Starch-Stärke 2015, 67, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.; Guan, Y.L.; Yuan, L.Y.; Hou, J.F.; Wang, C.G.; Liu, F.F.; Yang, Y.; Lu, Z.Y.; Chen, G.H.; Zhu, S.D. Effects of exogenous IAA in regulating photosynthetic capacity, carbohydrate metabolism and yield of Zizania latifolia. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 253, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, Y.-F.; Yan, T.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.-T.; Wang, N.; Wu, Q.; Sun, F.; Xu, W.-J.; Huang, R.-D. Effects of exogenous IAA application on endogenous hormone contents and tillering in sorghum. Shengtaixue Zazhi. 2017, 36, 2191–2197. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chi, C.D.; Li, X.X.; Zhang, Y.P.; Chen, L.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.J. Digestibility and supramolecular structural changes of maize starch by non-covalent interactions with gallic acid. Food Function. 2017, 8, 720–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.H.; Yin, W.; Wu, J.X.; Chai, L.J.; Yi, H.L. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on the expression of citrus fruit ripening-related genes and fruit ripening. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 201, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Xu, C.; Cang, J.; Zeng, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J. Effects of Exogenous GA (3) on Wheat Cold Tolerance. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 17, 921–934. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pan, T.; Lin, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Wei, C. Long branch-chains of amylopectin with B-type crystallinity in rice seed with inhibition of starch branching enzyme I and IIb resist in situ degradation and inhibit plant growth during seedling development. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, G.; Zhu, Q. Activities of Key Enzymes in Sucrose-to-Starch Conversion in Wheat Grains Subjected to Water Deficit during Grain Filling. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1621–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jiang, D.; Zhen, Y.U.; Yong, L.I.; Song, Y.U. Dynamic Changes of Enzyme Activities Involving in Starch Synthesis in Superior and Inferior Grains of High-yield Winter Wheat. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2002, 35, 378–383. [Google Scholar]
  25. Keeling, P.L.; Wood, J.R.; Tyson, R.H.; Bridges, I.G. Starch biosynthesis in developing wheat grain. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Borzenkova, R.A.; Borovkova, M.P. Developmental patterns of phytohormone content in the cortex and pith of potato tubers as related to their growth and starch content. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 50, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kato, T.; Sakurai, N.; Kuraishi, S. The Changes of Endogenous Abscisic Acid in Developing Grain of Two Rice Cultivars with Different Grain Size. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1993, 62, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hu, Y.F.; Li, Y.P.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Tian, M.; Huang, Y. Binding of ABI4 to a CACCG motif mediates the ABA-induced expression of the ZmSSI gene in maize (Zea mays L.) endosperm. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5979–5989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rook, F.; Corke, F.; Baier, M.; Holman, R.; May, A.G.; Bevan, M.W. Impaired sucrose induction1 encodes a conserved plant-specific protein that couples carbohydrate availability to gene expression and plant growth. Plant J. 2006, 46, 1045–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Finkelstein, R.R.; Gampala, S.S.L.; Rock, C.D. Abscisic Acid Signaling in Seeds and Seedlings. Plant Cell. 2002, 14, S15–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Arenas-Huertero, F.; Arroyo, A.; Li, Z.; Sheen, J.; León, P. Analysis of Arabidopsis glucose insensitive mutants, gin5 and gin6, reveals a central role of the plant hormone ABA in the regulation of plant vegetative development by sugar. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 2085–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huijser, C.; Kortstee, A.; Pego, J.; Weisbeek, P.; Wisman, E.; Smeekens, S. The Arabidopsis SUCROSE UNCOUPLED-6 gene is identical to ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE-4: Involvement of abscisic acid in sugar responses. Plant J. 2010, 23, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, Y.; Yu, X.; Song, L.; An, C. ABI4 Activates DGAT1 Expression in Arabidopsis Seedlings during Nitrogen Deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 873–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ramon, M.; Rolland, F.; Thevelein, J.M.; Van Dijck, P.; Leyman, B. ABI4 mediates the effects of exogenous trehalose on Arabidopsis growth and starch breakdown. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Peng, C. The Molecular Regulation Mechanism of Starch Synthesis by ABI4 in Maize Endosperm. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, H.; Zhao, S.; Guillaume, D.; Sun, C. New cerebrosides from Euryale ferox. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, H.R.; Zhao, S.X.; Sun, C.Q.; Guillaume, D. Glucosylsterols in extracts of Euryale ferox identified by high resolution NMR and mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 1989, 30, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, L.; Guo, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Q.; Wei, C. Effects of molecular compositions on crystalline structure and functional properties of rice starches with different amylopectin extra-long chains. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, X.; He, Z.; Yin, Y.; Xu, X.; Wu, W.; Li, L. Transcriptome sequencing and analysis during seed growth and development in Euryale ferox Salisb. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, Y.; Yan, Z.J. Study on Physico-chemical Properties of Euryale ferox Salisb Starch. Food Sci. 2006, 27, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu, X. The Study of Starch Formation and the EfSBEl Expression in the Development of Gordon Euryale Seed (Euryale ferox Salisb). Master’s Thesis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, L.X.; Huang, J.; Man, J.M.; Huai, H.Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Wei, C.X. Physicochemical Properties of Euryale ferox Kernel Starches from Two Different Regions. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 19, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Q.; Yan, H.Y.S.; Jing, Z.; Liu, L.; Bao, K.; Wu, Q. Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of SBE3 gene from Euryale ferox. Mol. Plant Breed. 2021, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  44. Oh, H.D.; Yu, D.J.; Chung, S.W.; Chea, S.; Lee, H.J. Abscisic acid stimulates anthocyanin accumulation in ‘Jersey’ highbush blueberry fruits during ripening. Food Chem. 2018, 244, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sun, Y.; Pei, C.; Duan, C.; Pang, T. Transcriptional Regulation of Genes Encoding Key Enzymes of Abscisic Acid Metabolism During Melon (Cucumis melo L.) Fruit Development and Ripening. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jia, H.F.; Chai, Y.M.; Li, C.L.; Lu, D.; Shen, Y.Y. Abscisic Acid Plays an Important Role in the Regulation of Strawberry Fruit Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Afoufa-Bastien, D.; Medici, A.; Jeauffre, J.; Coutos-Thevenot, P.; Lemoine, R.; Atanassova, R.; Laloi, M. The Vitis vinifera sugar transporter gene family phylogenetic overview and macroarray expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Murcia, G.N.; Pontin, M.; Piccoli, P. Role of ABA and Gibberellin A3 on gene expression pattern of sugar transporters and invertases in Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec during berry ripening. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 84, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, Y.J.; Zhang, W.Y.; Ju, C.X.; Li, Y.Y.; Yang, J.C.; Zhang, J.H. Involvement of abscisic acid in fructan hydrolysis and starch biosynthesis in wheat under soil drying. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 80, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tripathi, P.; Rabara, R.C.; Rushton, P.J. A systems biology perspective on the role of WRKY transcription factors in drought responses in plants. Planta 2014, 239, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Eiji, N. Abscisic acid and the control of seed dormancy and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  52. Akihiro, T.; Mizuno, K.; Fujimura, T. Gene expression of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and starch contents in rice cultured cells are cooperatively regulated by sucrose and ABA. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bossi, F.; Cordoba, E.; Dupre, P.; Mendoza, M.S.; Roman, C.S.; Leon, P. The Arabidopsis ABA-INSENSITIVE (ABI) 4 factor acts as a central transcription activator of the expression of its own gene, and for the induction of ABI5 and SBE2.2 genes during sugar signaling. Plant J. 2009, 59, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, K.; Yin, Y.; Liu, A.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Sun, F.; Zhao, S.; Feng, K.; et al. The adaptive evolution of Euryale ferox to the aquatic environment through paleo-hexaploidization. Plant J. 2022, 110, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-DDCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 07598 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) GO enrichment of differentially expressed genes in Euryale ferox Salisb. (B) KEGG enrichment of differentially expressed genes in Euryale ferox Salisb.
Figure 1. (A) GO enrichment of differentially expressed genes in Euryale ferox Salisb. (B) KEGG enrichment of differentially expressed genes in Euryale ferox Salisb.
Ijms 23 07598 g001
Ijms 23 07598 g002 550
Figure 2. (A): Differentially expressed gene analysis of the starch biosynthesis pathway in response to ABA. (B): The relative expression levels of EfABI4 and starch biosynthesis-related genes after ABA treatment. The ‘**’ above the histogram indicated the statistical significance at the level of 0.01 (p < 0.01).
Figure 2. (A): Differentially expressed gene analysis of the starch biosynthesis pathway in response to ABA. (B): The relative expression levels of EfABI4 and starch biosynthesis-related genes after ABA treatment. The ‘**’ above the histogram indicated the statistical significance at the level of 0.01 (p < 0.01).
Ijms 23 07598 g002
Ijms 23 07598 g003 550
Figure 3. (A): The effects of ABA on total starch content in E. ferox seeds. (B): Effects of ABA on amylose synthesis in E. ferox seeds. (C): Effects of ABA on amylopectin synthesis in E. ferox seeds. (D): Effect of ABA on amylose to amylopectin ratio in E. ferox seeds. (E): The relative expression levels of EfABI4, EfDBE1, EfGBSS1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2, EfSS3 and EfSS4 after ABA treatment during Euryale ferox Salisb development. The ‘*’ or ‘**’ above the histogram indicated the statistical significance at the level of 0.05 or 0.01 (p < 0.05; p < 0.01).
Figure 3. (A): The effects of ABA on total starch content in E. ferox seeds. (B): Effects of ABA on amylose synthesis in E. ferox seeds. (C): Effects of ABA on amylopectin synthesis in E. ferox seeds. (D): Effect of ABA on amylose to amylopectin ratio in E. ferox seeds. (E): The relative expression levels of EfABI4, EfDBE1, EfGBSS1, EfSBE2, EfSS1, EfSS2, EfSS3 and EfSS4 after ABA treatment during Euryale ferox Salisb development. The ‘*’ or ‘**’ above the histogram indicated the statistical significance at the level of 0.05 or 0.01 (p < 0.05; p < 0.01).
Ijms 23 07598 g003
Ijms 23 07598 g004 550
Figure 4. (A): Binding activities of EfABI4 protein with the promoters of EfSS1 detected yeast one-hybrid assays. (B): The relative FLUC/RLUC activities of EfSS1 promoters activated and repressed by EfABI4 in tobacco protoplasts. The relative FLUC/RLUC activity of the negative control was set at 1. ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. (C): Subcellular localization of EfSS1 and EfABI4 (EfSS1 and EfABI4 were inserted into the pCAMBIA1300-sGFP vector). Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure 4. (A): Binding activities of EfABI4 protein with the promoters of EfSS1 detected yeast one-hybrid assays. (B): The relative FLUC/RLUC activities of EfSS1 promoters activated and repressed by EfABI4 in tobacco protoplasts. The relative FLUC/RLUC activity of the negative control was set at 1. ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. (C): Subcellular localization of EfSS1 and EfABI4 (EfSS1 and EfABI4 were inserted into the pCAMBIA1300-sGFP vector). Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 23 07598 g004
Ijms 23 07598 g005 550
Figure 5. The model of ABA regulating starch biosynthesis in E. ferox seeds.
Figure 5. The model of ABA regulating starch biosynthesis in E. ferox seeds.
Ijms 23 07598 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, P.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Feng, K.; Li, L. EfABI4 Transcription Factor Is Involved in the Regulation of Starch Biosynthesis in Euryale ferox Salisb Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147598

AMA Style

Wu P, Zhu Y, Liu A, Wang Y, Zhao S, Feng K, Li L. EfABI4 Transcription Factor Is Involved in the Regulation of Starch Biosynthesis in Euryale ferox Salisb Seeds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(14):7598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Peng, Yue Zhu, Ailian Liu, Yuhao Wang, Shuping Zhao, Kai Feng, and Liangjun Li. 2022. "EfABI4 Transcription Factor Is Involved in the Regulation of Starch Biosynthesis in Euryale ferox Salisb Seeds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 14: 7598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147598

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop