Next Article in Journal
Agrobacterium sp. ZX09 β-Glucan Attenuates Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-Induced Disruption of Intestinal Epithelium in Weaned Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study on the Models of Thermoreversible Gelation
Previous Article in Journal
microRNAs Control Antiviral Immune Response, Cell Death and Chemotaxis Pathways in Human Neuronal Precursor Cells (NPCs) during Zika Virus Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Property and Stability of Astaxanthin Emulsion Based on Pickering Emulsion Templating with Zein and Sodium Alginate as Stabilizer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms231810288
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

PMMA-Based Nanocomposites for Odontology Applications: A State-of-the-Art

by
Ana M. Díez-Pascual
Universidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Química Analítica, Química Física e Ingeniería Química, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona Km. 33.6, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10288; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810288
Submission received: 19 August 2022 / Revised: 1 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biopolymer Composites 2022)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), a well-known polymer of the methacrylate family, is extensively used in biomedicine, particularly in odontological applications including artificial teeth, dentures and denture bases, obturators, provisional or permanent crowns, and so forth. The exceptional PMMA properties, including aesthetics, inexpensiveness, simple manipulation, low density, and adjustable mechanical properties, make it a perfect candidate in the field of dentistry. However, it presents some deficiencies, including weakness regarding hydrolytic degradation, poor fracture toughness, and a lack of antibacterial activity. To further enhance its properties and solve these drawbacks, different approaches can be performed, including the incorporation of nanofillers. In this regard, different types of metallic nanoparticles, metal oxide nanofillers, and carbon-based nanomaterials have been recently integrated into PMMA matrices with the aim to reduce water absorption and improve their performance, namely their thermal and flexural properties. In this review, recent studies regarding the development of PMMA-based nanocomposites for odontology applications are summarized and future perspectives are highlighted.

1. Introduction

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is the most well-known polymer of the methacrylate family, obtained from the in-chain polymerization of methyl methacrylate. It is a low-density, stable, and durable polymer that presents excellent biocompatibility and hemocompatibility, and high transparency, making it suitable for a wide variety of biomedical applications that require lasting, mechanically stable structures such as orthopedics and bone tissue engineering [1,2]. Furthermore, its aesthetics, inexpensiveness, processability, versatility in terms of shaping, simple manipulation, low density, and adjustable mechanical properties make it a perfect candidate in the field of dentistry, with applications such as the manufacture of artificial teeth, interim-fixed restorations, dentures and denture bases, obturators, provisional or permanent crowns, and occlusal splints [3,4]. Nonetheless, PMMA lacks antimicrobial properties [5], shows high water absorption, and displays poor flexural and impact strength [6], which restricts its use in certain applications. With the aim to solve these issues and expand its range of uses, different approaches have been carried out including the development of PMMA composites. In this regard, composites comprising natural or synthetic fibers [7,8], natural particles [9], metallic nanoparticles [10], metal oxide nanofillers [11,12], carbon-based nanofillers [13], and more have been developed. Filler nature, shape, size, concentration, and distribution play a key role in the performance of the resulting composites [14]. Furthermore, the interactions between the particles and the matrix also influence the properties, and these can be tailored via particle surface treatment, which enhances the interfacial adhesion between the composite components.
Despite PMMA has been used in dental applications for many years, strong efforts have recently focused on improving its properties. In this review, current studies dealing with PMMA nanocomposites incorporating different types of organic and inorganic nanomaterials for odontological applications will be summarized, and future perspectives in the field will be suggested.

2. PMMA: Properties and Applications

Poly [1-(methoxy carbonyl)-1-methyl ethylene])], PMMA, is typically synthesized via free radical addition and polymerization of methyl methacrylate (C5O2H8) to form poly methylmethacrylate (C5O2H8)n [15]. The polymerization starts via free radical formation, either chemically or with energy such as heat, light, or microwaves. During the propagation, polymerization continues through the binding of monomers, and finally, the polymerization ends via transfer of free electrons to the chain edge.
The properties of PMMA-based materials depend on the source used for the polymerization and curing. Properly cured PMMA materials have good biocompatibility and physical properties for odontological applications, including low density (1.18 g/cm3), high light transmission (92% of visible light), and transparent color. They are amorphous materials with a glass transition temperature (Tg) in the range of 95–125 °C. However, the thermal conductivity of PMMA is relatively low (5.7 × 10−4 °C·cm−1) [16], and this is a drawback since denture base materials should have adequate thermal conductivity to dissipate the food temperature to the oral tissues of the patient. If the heat is transmitted slowly, it can result in surface cracking. Additionally, the low conductivity can influence the ability to sense food temperature compared to metallic denture bases, which are highly conductive. Moreover, it presents a high coefficient of thermal expansion (81 × 10−6/°C [16]).
On the other hand, denture base materials should have good color stability and not lose color over time [17]. Nevertheless, PMMA-based materials typically show poor color stability due to the release of residual monomers that promote water absorption and consequently, discoloration. Other factors including porosity generated during the manufacturing process and regular consumption of beverages such as coffee, tea, alcohol, etc. can lead to discoloration; hence, PMMA dentures may need replacement after some time.
Another issue is the water absorption, which takes place when materials are immersed. Due to PMMA polarity, the water molecules penetrate the polymer chains and act as plasticizers [18]. The infiltrated water molecules can produce an expansion of PMMA and affect its dimensional stability. Hence, the water absorption (like the solubility) should be minimal. The absorption is typically about 0.7 mg/cm2, which, consequently, meets the requirements of the ISO 20795-1 [19].
Another important property is the polymerization shrinkage, which may result in noteworthy dimensional changes and imprecisions during denture fabrication [20]. Therefore, low levels of polymerization shrinkage are desired for these applications. In general, PMMA-based materials show a curing shrinkage in the range of −0.50 to −0.58%. Certain fillers, such as carbon nanotubes [21], can significantly reduce the polymerization shrinkage. Radiopacity is another physical property desired in dental materials. However, due to its polymeric nature, PMMA is a radiolucent material, and it is difficult to detect in radiographs [22]. Inducing radiopacity via modification is still a challenge given that salts of heavy metals are incompatible with PMMA.
Regarding mechanical performance, it is important to note that odontological base materials are subjected to complex masticatory stresses in the oral cavity. Consequently, good mechanical properties are required. In particular, a high flexural strength is required to tolerate the mastication forces without permanent deformation or fracture [4]. The flexural strength of PMMA is in the order of 90 MPa. However, it can be affected by several factors, including the curing process, degree of polymerization, storage conditions, etc. The fracture toughness of PMMA, which indicates its ability to resist crack propagation, is about 2 MN/m3/2, and the impact strength is relatively low, at around 1J. High impact strength is desired to avoid fracture when subjected to a high impact force, such as unintentional fall. The wear resistance of PMMA is low compared to molding alloys and dental porcelains [23]. The wear resistance is directly related to the surface hardness, which is about 300 MPa in neat PMMA and lower than alloys and porcelains [24].
Dentistry base materials should be inert and chemically non-reactive with oral fluids and nutrients. PMMA materials are organic resins that have low solubility (0.02 mg/cm2 in water and 0.04 mg/cm2 in hydrocarbons). However, their solubility in ketones and esters is relatively high. Besides, alcohols act as plasticizers and may decrease the Tg. Therefore, storage or cleaning of dentures with alcohols should be skipped. Taking into account the aforementioned data, it is clear that PMMA fulfills many requirements. However, several drawbacks, including the detrimental thermal properties (low thermal conductivity or diffusivity, high coefficient of thermal expansion), mechanical properties (brittleness, low hardness and wear resistance, poor fatigue strength), discoloration, susceptibility to warpage, and porosity, still require improvement and further investigations. A scheme of the ideal properties of PMMA-based materials for odontological use is depicted in Figure 1.
PMMA materials are extensively used for a range of applications, including engineering, healthcare, and dentistry. In addition to denture bases, other oral healthcare applications are artificial teeth, impression trays, temporary crowns and bridges, obturators for cleft palates, occlusal splints, denture relining, and repair, and so forth.

3. Nanofillers Used in PMMA Nanocomposites

Different types of nanomaterials have been used to improve the properties of polymeric matrices. According to their nature, these nanofillers can be classified into three main groups, as depicted in Figure 2: (1) organic, including dendrimers, micelles, liposomes, polymer nanoparticles (NPs), and ferritin; (2) inorganic, including metal NPs (Ag, Au, Cu), metal oxide NPs (e.g., Fe3O4, ZnO, MgO, TiO2), hydroxyapatite (HA), and mesoporous silica; (3) carbon-based, including fullerenes, quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, graphene, and nanodiamond [25,26]. In the following section, those typically used as nanofillers in PMMA matrices will be briefly described.

3.1. Metallic Nanoparticles

AgNPs are widely studied among metallic NPs since they have a huge range of applications in arenas, ranging from medicine and pharmacology to food technology, water purification, etc. [27,28]. They can be synthesized via numerous approaches including sol–gel, hydrothermal, thermal decomposition, CVD, microwave-assisted combustion, and so forth [28,29]. They are strong antibacterial [30] and antifungal agents [31] as well as an anticancer tool [29] due to their plasmonic features. Their specific mechanism of toxicity is still unclear, though it has been proposed that it is related to their ability to liberate silver ions (Ag+) [30], stimulating molecular pathways that provoke cell death. In particular, in the field of dental medicine, the use of AgNPs in different kinds of dental prosthesis matrices could be a fundamental tool in immunodepressed patients that suffer from different oral infections. For instance, they show a strong inhibition towards C. albicans [32], a pathogenic yeast with a high colonization ability that provokes oral cavity infection due to its ability to develop biofilms on different materials. AgNPs antifungal action is higher than fluconazole, the drug usually used against the yeast. These antibacterial and antifungal properties account for their use in the biomedical field, and, in particular, in dental prostheses, where AgNPs could reduce the oropharyngeal candidiasis.
PtNPs are low-allergy and non-genotoxic nanomaterials for the organism, and they are of great interest due to their highly catalytic activity. They are currently being evaluated for their ability to reduce inflammation and they have also been applied in the biomedical field [33]. The antibacterial activity of Pt was first reported by Rosenberg et al. [34], who demonstrated its inhibitory activity on Escherichia coli. The main mechanism of activity seems to arise from the contact between PtNPs and bacteria, which promotes chemical interactions that disintegrate the bacterial cell. Furthermore, these NPs can scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), and free radicals from antioxidant responses can induce chain reactions that harm the bacteria.

3.2. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles and Ceramic Nanofillers

TiO2 (titania) is an FDA-approved compound for food, drugs, cosmetics, and food packaging uses. It exists in three main polymorphs, namely, anatase, rutile, and brookite [35]. It shows outstanding mechanical properties, high thermal conductivity, strong UV absorption, high hydrophilicity, and very good antibacterial activity against viruses, fungi, and bacteria [36]. It has been widely used for the development of antimicrobial coatings, which can be applied in the biomedical and odontological field [37,38]. Synthetic routes for TiO2 NPs include the sol–gel, hydrothermal and solvothermal methods, precipitation, and electrochemical processes, using titanium chloride, titanium isopropoxide, or titanyl sulfate-based compounds as precursors. Nevertheless, these techniques are disadvantageous in terms of reaction time and particle size control; hence, new green and inexpensive synthesis methods are being investigated.
ZrO2 (zirconia) is a ceramic material with excellent erosion, corrosion, and abrasion resistance along with excellent fracture toughness as well as compressive and flexural strength. Its fine grain size enables excellent surface finishes and the ability to hold a sharp edge [39]. Recently, many investigations have focused on adding modified ZrO2 nanoparticles such as yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) to improve the mechanical and physical properties of conventional heat-polymerized denture base resins [40]. This type of zirconia, called “ceramic steel”, possesses superior mechanical properties, good surface properties, and high biocompatibility, thus making it an attractive option for many dental applications.
Mesoporous SiO2 (silica) particles, with a pore size between 2 and 50 nm, are promising for biomedical applications due to their excellent biocompatibility, water dispersibility, low toxicity, thermal stability, and easy and large-scale synthesis. Their particle size, pore size, crystallinity, level of porosity, and shape can be finely tuned by modifying the synthesis parameters, making them suitable for specific applications [41]. They are typically synthesized from a silica source (i.e., tetraethyl orthosilicate, TEOS), which is mixed with a surfactant and then a hydroxide is added, allowing the hydrolysis of the silicate. The surfactant can then be removed via calcination, solvent extraction, or dialysis. Frequently, a co-surfactant is added to attain nanoparticles with controlled size [42]. They can also be synthesized via a hydrothermal treatment or a sol−gel process which uses organo-silane precursors that generate the sol via hydrolysis and condensation. Also, many surface modifications of these mesoporous NPs have been reported, such as the addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or silane treatments that enable them to incorporate amino or carboxylic groups, and hence, to control the surface chemistry for the desired purposes.
Al2O3 (alumina) nanoparticles are porous nanomaterials with a corundum-like structure, and they are also biocompatible, inexpensive, and easy to handle; additionally, they show a very high surface area, high thermal stability, low electrical conductivity, and excellent biomechanical and tribological properties such as resistance to wear and abrasive environments, chemicals, and mechanical stresses [43]. In addition, their bioinertness and easy surface functionalization allows their use in the biomedical field. They can be synthesized using simple and cost-effective approaches such as mechanical ball milling, laser ablation, solution reduction, gas decomposition, and so forth. They are also well known for their antimicrobial effects [44,45]. The antimicrobial properties against E. coli, B. subtilis, P. fluorescens, and S. Epidermis have been demonstrated, ascribed to the electrostatic interactions between the NPs and the bacterial cells [45].
Calcium phosphate bioceramics such as hydroxyapatite (HA) also show extraordinary properties for biomedical applications including biodegradation, osteoconduction, osteointegration, biocompatibility, and composition and structure similar to natural bone and teeth [46]. Moreover, the stiffness, density, and bioactivity of HA, its ability to chemically bond to bone and lack of toxicity make it a preferred reinforcement as a bone cement [47]. In addition, it has been used in restorative and preventive dentistry, in periodontology, and in oral and maxillofacial surgery [48,49].

3.3. Carbon-Based Nanofillers

Diverse allotropes from carbon have been used as nanofillers in polymeric nanocomposites, including nanodiamond (ND), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene (G), and its derivatives, graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO). CNTs were initially reported in 1991 [50], and consist of 1D, cylindrical layers of carbon atoms. They can be categorized into single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), with only one carbon layer rolled up forming a cylinder; double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs), with two concentric carbon layers; or multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), with several concentric carbon layers. They are lightweight, and have outstanding mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties, which depend on their diameter, length, and chirality [51]. Their stiffness is the highest amongst any identified material, with an elastic modulus of about 1000 GPa and a tensile strength of about 35 GPa [52]. They show very high electrical conductivity (higher than metals like Ag), very high thermal conductivity (more than 103-fold that of metals such as Cu), and display very high thermal stability, up to 800 °C in an oxidative environment and 2500 °C under vacuum [53]. However, they have a great predisposition to aggregate and form ropes, which leads to a worsening of certain properties, particularly mechanical and electrical. Henceforth, functionalization with polymers [54,55] or other molecules is frequently required. The most common methods to synthesize CNTs are chemical vapor deposition (CVD), electric arc discharge, and laser ablation [54]. CVD is a technique in which the vaporized reactants (hydrocarbon gases) react chemically inside a quartz tube filled with inert gas, which is placed in a furnace kept at high temperatures (500–900 °C). The hydrocarbon gases are pumped into the quartz tube, undergo pyrolysis reaction, and form vapor carbon atoms that deposit onto a substrate with metal catalyst nanoparticles of Fe, Co, and Ni. In the arc discharge, a potential is applied across pure graphite electrodes maintained at a high pressure of inert gas filled inside a quartz chamber. When the electrodes strike each other, an electric arc is generated, and the energy is transferred to the anode, which ionizes the carbon atoms of pure graphite and produces C+ ions in the form of plasma. These positively charged ions move towards the cathode, where they are reduced, deposited, and grown as CNTs [46]. The laser ablation method is a physical vapor deposition method in which a graphite target placed in a quartz chamber filled with inert gas is vaporized by a laser source. The vaporized target atoms are swept toward a cooled copper collector by the flow of inert gas, where they are deposited and grown.
Nanodiamonds (NDs) have excellent mechanical and thermal properties, high surface area, and tunable structures. They have high strength, chemical stability, high thermal conductivity, bioinertness, and are biocompatible, non-toxic, and suitable for biomedical applications, including fixed interim prostheses [56]. They are inexpensive and have great potential for surface functionalization. They can be naturally produced by an explosion or meteoritic impacts and obtained in the laboratory via hydrothermal synthesis, laser bombardment, chemical vapor deposition, and electrochemical synthesis [57].
Graphene (G) is a 2D, atomically thick carbon nanomaterial comprised of a honeycomb lattice of sp2 carbon atoms [58]. It has outstanding electrical, optical, and thermal properties, combined with high mechanical resistance, transparency, low density, and flexibility. For instance, it has a thermal conductivity in the range of 3000–5000 W m−1 K−1 [59], about 10-fold higher than that of other metals like Cu, very high electron mobility (20,000 cm2 V−1 s−1), and exceptional electrical conductivity (up to 5000 S cm−1). Besides, it is one the strongest materials on earth, with a Young’s modulus of around 1 TPa and a tensile strength of about 120 GPa, which is significantly stiffer than steel [60]. These exceptional properties make G a perfect candidate for many applications such as sensors, supercapacitors, flexible electronic devices, and even biomedicine [61,62].
G synthesis is typically performed two ways, namely through bottom-up and top-down approaches [63]. In the top-down methods, the initial material is graphite, which can be exfoliated mechanically (scotch tape method), in the liquid phase (typically with the aid of ultrasounds to disperse the graphene layers) or electrochemically, which is based on the penetration of graphite by ions from the electrochemical solution using a potential [64,65].
On the other hand, G derivatives are currently used for numerous applications, including the fabrication of biosensors or dental resins to prevent microbial adhesion [66]. Amongst them, the most important is graphene oxide (GO), an oxidized form of G with oxygenated functional groups, mainly carboxylic groups on the edges and epoxy and hydroxyl groups on the layer plane, typically synthesized via Hummer’s method using strong oxidizing agents such as sulfuric or nitric acid [67,68]. Another well-known derivative is reduced graphene oxide (rGO), which is obtained via the thermal treatment of GO to remove functional groups or the chemical reduction of GO using synthetic reducing agents such as hydrazine or sodium borohydride, or, more recently, eco-friendly, natural reducing agents such as amino acids (i.e., ascorbic acid) or plant extracts.

4. PMMA-Based Nanocomposites for Odontological Uses

With the aim of improving PMMA properties, a variety of nanoparticles have been investigated, including metallic, ceramics, carbon nanotubes, and so forth. The studies performed demonstrated that the addition of nanoparticles did not lead to biocompatibility issues and enhanced several PMMA properties, namely mechanical and tribological [9,10,11,12,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78], thermal [10,79,80,81,82], and antimicrobial [83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92] properties. They also decreased water absorption and solubility [93,94]. The improved properties of the nanocomposites arise from their characteristic features, such as a very large surface area and uniform distribution. In the following sections, specific examples of each type of nanofiller will be briefly discussed.

4.1. PMMA Nanocomposites with Metallic Nanoparticles

Amongst the most widely used NPs for dental applications are AgNPs owed to their strong antimicrobial activity even at low concentrations, as mentioned earlier. In particular, in the field of dental medicine, the use of AgNPs in different types of dental prostheses could be an essential tool in patients that suffer from oral infections. De Matteis et al. [95] added monodispersed citrate-capped AgNPs (20 nm size) at concentrations of 3 and 3.5 wt% in PMMA. Topographical evaluation of the nanocomposites via atomic force microscopy (AFM) showed a noticeable reduction in surface roughness (Figure 3). The C. albicans colonization on PMMA surfaces was assessed via the Miles and Misra technique as well as via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 24 and 48 h, which revealed the drop in yeast viability upon contact with the AgNPs. Acosta-Torres et al. [86] developed biocompatible and antifungal PMMA/AgNP nanocomposites. Results revealed that no damaging effect on cellular viability and cell proliferation nor genotoxic harm to mouse embryonic fibroblasts were produced. Furthermore, the nanocomposites were found to strongly reduce the adhesion of C. albicans. de Souza Neto and coworkers [96] incorporated several contents of AgNPs in PMMA to reduce denture stomatitis caused by C. glabrata. The nanocomposite with 0.05 wt% NPs had a strong ability to inhibit the biofilm formed on its surface, as demonstrated by the microbiological adhesion test against this fungi. The antimicrobial activity did not grow linearly with the nanoparticle content and was influenced by the state of dispersion of the NPs within the PMMA matrix. Also, a high AgNP concentration led to a decrease in the flexural strength, although some other mechanical properties were improved.
Other studies showed that AgNPs improved the compressive strength and thermal conductivity of PMMA [10] since the metallic nature of these NPs allows very high thermal conduction. The addition of AgNPs and graphene to PMMA significantly enhanced the mechanical properties (tensile, compressive, and flexural strengths) and lowered the water absorption [94]. Conversely, another work indicated that these NPs hardly changed the flexural strength [81]. Overall, it seems that the most important improvement upon AgNP addition is the antimicrobial and antifungal activity, which has been thoroughly investigated.
PtNPs were also incorporated into PMMA to develop antimicrobial nanocomposites [97], which were tested against S. mutans and S. sobrinus. The PMMA/PtNP nanocomposites showed a bacterial anti-adherent impact rather than a bactericidal effect above a concentration of 50 mg/L when compared to bare PMMA with very small amounts of Pt+ eluted, along with superior mechanical properties. According to SEM analysis, they exhibited similar surface texture with slightly greater surface cracking and blistering than pure PMMA (Figure 4a,b). Furthermore, according to TGA and DSC analyses, the nanocomposites had comparable thermal stability and a somewhat higher melting point than the neat matrix (Figure 4c,d, respectively), demonstrating improved thermal properties. For dental applications, the long-term effect of this activity, biocompatibility, and color stability should be investigated. In another study, it was found that each metallic NP can have a different effect on the PMMA matrix: while Ag and Pt can improve bending deflection and Pd can enhance bending strength and Vickers hardness [98].
Other nanoparticles such as AuNPs have also been included in PMMA, and results revealed that the nanocomposites had improved thermal conductivity and viscoelastic response compared to the neat resin [14].

4.2. PMMA Nanocomposites with Metal Oxides and Bioceramics

Numerous ceramic nanoparticles have been recently used to reinforce PMMA resin for odontological uses. These nanofillers can aid in the development of inexpensive nanocomposites with good mechanical performance and antimicrobial behavior. In particular, the impact strength, flexural strength, and fracture toughness of the base materials can be improved by modifying the nanofiller surface with silane coupling agents [99]. Alamgir et al. [78] developed PMMA/TiO2 nanocomposites with different nanofiller percentages via melt blending, and a uniform TiO2 dispersion in the polymer matrix was observed by SEM, which was reflected in the enhanced mechanical properties, as confirmed by micro-indentation and scratch tests. The presence of TiO2 improved the hardness, modulus, creep-recovery, and relaxation behaviors of these nanocomposites. The antimicrobial activity of PMMA was also enhanced with TiO2 due to decreasing bacterial adherence. Thus, Alrahlah et al. [100] found reduced colony-forming units of P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis on nutrient agar after growing them for 48 h on the nanocomposites compared to control PMMA, and the antibacterial activity improved with increasing NP content, with the optimum for the nanocomposite being 3 wt% TiO2 (Figure 5). On the other hand, the best nanoparticle dispersion and the highest increment in tensile strength were found for the nanocomposite with 1wt% TiO2 NPs. Higher NP loading led to reduced strength due to particle agglomeration.
In another study [101], two types of PMMA were reinforced with 1 and 5 wt% TiO2, and it was found that the flexural strength and microhardness noticeably decreased and increased, respectively, with increasing TiO2 loading. Furthermore, TiO2 has been coated with fluorite and apatite and incorporated into PMMA, leading to improved antifungal effect against Candida growth [88].
Another promising NP to enhance the performance of PMMA are ZrO2. Gad and coworkers [72] investigated the effect of these NPs on the translucency and tensile strength of PMMA for removable prostheses. Upon increasing ZrO2 concentration, the strength gradually increased while the translucency was reduced. Significant improvements in mechanical properties, including fracture toughness, compressive and fatigue strengths, as well as superior thermal conductivity have also been reported in other studies [11,12]. Thus, Zidan and coworkers [12] investigated the flexural strength and fatigue of high-impact heat-polymerized PMMA resin reinforced with 3 and 5 wt% ZrO2 molded into denture specimens. Fatigue bending load was applied on the palatal surface of the denture specimen using a mastication simulator (Hounsfield universal testing machine), and equivalent flexural strength was calculated with data from bending tests with and without fatigue cyclic loading (Figure 6). Also, the fractured surface of the samples was examined by SEM. Bending tests demonstrated that the flexural strength of PMMA with 5 wt% ZrO2 increased significantly, by about 27%, compared to neat PMMA without any fatigue loading. However, the application of fatigue cyclic loading hardly enhanced the equivalent flexural strength of the samples. Other investigations [102] reported that the impact strength and surface hardness of PMMA/ZrO2 nanocomposites was lower than that of control PMMA. Taking all these into account, it can be concluded that the addition of ZrO2 is not advantageous for odontological uses.
SiO2 NPs have also been added to PMMA to form nanocomposite materials for odontological uses [74,75,76,77]. These NPs enhanced the mechanical performance i.e., flexural modulus, surface hardness, dimensional stability, and thermal properties. However, the flexural strength was compromised due to the poor NP bonding with the PMMA matrix. On the other hand, the addition of SiO2 could have led to biocompatibility issues: the cytotoxic potential toward L929 and MRC5 cell lines was on the acceptable level for specimens with SiO2 loading lower than 2 wt%. Muhammad et al. [103] mixed PMMA with different loadings of amorphous SiO2 and TiO2 to yield nanocomposites for artificial teeth. In the presence of artificial saliva and under identical conditions, the wear resistance of the nanocomposites was better than that of commercial artificial teeth.
Addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles to PMMA resulted in good biocompatibility and improved thermal conductivity. Silane-treated Al2O3 noticeably improved the mechanical properties, specially the compressive and flexural strengths, as well as the wear resistance [69,70], while no significant effect on the water sorption or surface roughness of the resin were observed. Even though several works have shown promising results from using Al2O3, Rashahmadi et al. [104] used multi-criteria decision-making procedures, and reported that alumina is a less appropriate reinforcement for PMMA dentures compared to TiO2 and SiO2. They indicated that TiO2 nanoparticles are the most suitable among these three nanoparticles for odontological uses. In addition, the main drawback of alumina is that it induces the discoloration of the PMMA matrix.
The addition of ZnO NPs also increased the flexural and compressive strength of PMMA. The best performance was found at 7.5 wt% loading, ascribed to homogenous and random NP dispersion (Figure 7). Further, it was found that this composite had no cytotoxic effect on L929 cells [105] and showed enhanced antimicrobial activity. The reduced growth of microorganisms detected in PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites could be explained by their increased hydrophilicity and hardness.
Recently, several studies have been performed to investigate the effect of HA incorporation into PMMA as a bone substitute material. Zebarjad et al. [106] studied the mechanical properties of nano HA-reinforced PMMA using three-point bending, compressive, and wear tests and concluded that the addition of HA (up to 10 wt%) hardly changed the flexural properties of the matrix. Similar observations were reported by Wen et al. [107] who reported that the flexural strength and strain decreased in the presence of HA. Conversely, other studies [9,71] which treated HA with a silane coupling agent found that this nanofiller improved the mechanical properties of PMMA, including the elastic and flexural modulus that increased up to 26% and 27.3%, respectively, for the nanocomposite with 15 wt% HA loading. However, no significant differences were found in the tensile and flexural strength upon HA addition. Only a small increase of 1.6% and 3% in the tensile and flexural strength, respectively, was achieved at 5 wt% loading [9], while the surface hardness increased by about 8% with 15 wt% HA. The effect of HA loading on fracture toughness of PMMA/HA composites was also investigated (Figure 8) [9]. Neat PMMA exhibited poor fracture toughness, ascribed to the small plastic deformation of high molecular weight polymers. Upon the addition of HA, the fracture toughness increased and reached a maximum at a filler loading of 5 wt%, ascribed to the homogenous HA dispersion that inhibits crack propagation. However, a further increase in HA content decreased the fracture toughness due to NP agglomeration in the matrix. The agglomerates can act as obstructions to chain movement; they behave as stress concentration centers which initiate failure under stress.

4.3. PMMA Nanocomposites with Carbon-Based Nanofillers

CNTs have also been used to reinforce PMMA [13,21,108,109,110,111], attributed to their superior electrical and mechanical properties, low density, and resilience. Wang et al. [13] incorporated MWCNTs to PMMA and characterized the mechanical properties. The addition of MWCNT up to 1.0 wt% enhanced the flexural strength and resilience, while higher loadings decreased them due to CNT aggregation. The state of dispersion of the MWCNTs is a key factor that conditions the range of MWCNT reinforcement. Besides, according to Raman and dynamic loading experiments, the interfacial bonding between the MWCNTs and PMMA matrix was not strong enough. Also, the fatigue resistance of the matrix slightly decreased upon addition of MWCNTs. Similar observations were reported by Mahmood et al. [109], who found an increase in mechanical properties up to 1.5 wt% loading. Qasim and coworkers [110] added SWCNTs to light-cured PMMA, and they did not observe any significant effect on flexural strength. Kim et al. [111] used CNT loadings in the range of 0.25–2.0 wt%, and found a decrease in C. albicans, S. aureus, and S. mutans adhesion in the range of 35–95%. Nonetheless, despite the fact that some improvements in mechanical and antibacterial properties have been attained, there are many concerns about the use of CNTs for clinical purposes, the color in particular, which limits the use of PMMA/CNT nanocomposites in non-aesthetic areas.
On the other hand, NDs have been incorporated into PMMA due to their excellent physical, chemical, and antibacterial properties, together with chemical stability, bioactivity, and biocompatibility [56,112,113]. The addition of 0.5 wt% ND to PMMA significantly increased its elastic modulus, flexural, and impact strength and decreased its surface roughness [56]. Mangal et al. prepared nanocomposites with 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 wt.% ND loadings via addition of the ND powder in the liquid monomer, followed by simple stirring, baht sonication, and then UV-curing (Figure 9), and the nanocomposites were tested against neat PMMA and PMMA/ZrO. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and surface hardness were evaluated, and all of them improved with increasing ND loading. Fungal adhesion and viability were studied using C. albicans, which were significantly reduced compared to the control. In addition, salivary biofilm formation was noticeably reduced compared to nanocomposites with ZrO. Hence, the incorporation of 0.1–0.5 wt.% ND improved mechanical properties and provided fungal resistance [112].
A summary of the improvements in PMMA properties upon addition of the different nanofillers is provided in Table 1.

5. Conclusions

Despite PMMA having been widely applied for odontological uses, it poses some limitations including discoloration, hydrolytic degradation, and poor resistance to impact and fracture. Therefore, a lot of work has been recently focused on the addition of different fillers to improve its properties to expand its use in dentistry. In this regard, nanofillers are highly suitable due to their low density, high specific surface area, and exceptional mechanical properties. Among the nanofillers that have been applied to reinforce PMMA are noble metals like AgNPs, AuNPs and PtNPs, metallic oxides and bioceramics such as TiO2, ZnO, ZrO2, Al2O3, and HA, as well as carbon-based nanomaterials like CNTs and NDs. These materials can provide improved mechanical and tribological characteristics, reduced water absorption, and long-term antifungal and antibacterial properties. Despite remarkable improvements in impact strength, flexural strength, wear resistance, and thermal conductivity, as well as the attainment of reduced water absorption and solubility, it remains challenging to improve one set of properties without compromising the rest. In particular, the addition of some nanoparticles compromises the aesthetics (color, translucency) or raises biocompatibility issues due to the leaching of degradation products in the oral cavity. Therefore, further investigation should be performed in this direction. The biocompatibility of the nanocomposites is sometimes questionable and requires additional examination. Further research should also focus on understanding the interactions between the nanofillers and PMMA resin at the molecular level. In addition, more studies should be carried out in vivo or under simulated oral conditions prior to the use of these novel nanocomposites in the field of dentistry.

Funding

Financial support from the Community of Madrid within the framework of the Multi-year Agreement with the University of Alcalá in the line of action, “Stimulus to Excellence for Permanent University Professors”, Ref. EPU-INV/2020/012, is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hacker, M.C.; Krieghoff, J.; Mikos, A.G. Synthetic Polymers. Principles of Regenerative Medicine; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 559–590. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jessy, R.S.; Ibrahim, M.H. Biodegradability and Biocompatibility of Polymers with Emphasis on Bone Scaffolding: A Brief Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2014, 4, 7–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sayeed, Z.; Padela, M.; El-Othmani, M.; Saleh, K. Acrylic bone cements for joint replacement. In Biomedical Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 199–214. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassan, M.; Asghar, M.; Din, S.U.; Zafar, M.S. Thermoset polymethacrylate-based materials for dental applications. In Materials for Biomedical Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 273–308. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, J.; Ge, Y.M.; Xu, L. Study of antibacterial effect of polymethyl methacrylate resin base containing Ag-TiO2 against Streptococcus mutans and Saccharomyces albicans in vitro. West China J. Stomatol. 2012, 30, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oleiwi, J.K.; Hamad, Q.A.; Kahdim, N.N. Study Compression, Hardness and Density properties of PMMA Reinforced by Natural Powder Used in Denture Base applications. Eng. Technol. J. 2019, 37, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chang, M.; Hung, C.; Chen, W.; Tseng, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J. Effects of pontic span and fiber reinforcement on fracture strength of multi-unit provisional fixed partial dentures. J. Dent. Sci. 2019, 14, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Al-Thobity, A.M. The impact of polymerization technique and glass-fiber reinforcement on the flexural properties of denture base resin material. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aldabib, J.M.; Ishak, Z.A.M. Effect of hydroxyapatite filler concentration on mechanical properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamedi-Rad, F.; Ghaffari, T.; Rezaii, F.; Ramazani, A. Effect of nanosilver on thermal and mechanical properties of acrylic base complete dentures. J. Dent. (Tehran) 2014, 11, 495–505. [Google Scholar]
  11. De Souza Leão, R.; de Moraes, S.L.D.; de Luna Gomes, J.M.; Lemos, C.A.A.; da Silva Casado, B.G.; do Egito Vasconcelos, B.C.; Pellizzer, E.P. Influence of addition of zirconia on PMMA: A systematic review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 106, 110292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zidan, S.; Silikas, N.; Haider, J.; Alhotan, A.; Jahantigh, J.; Yates, J. Evaluation of equivalent flexural strength for complete removable dentures made of zirconia-impregnated PMMA nanocomposites. Materials 2020, 13, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, R.; Tao, J.; Yu, B.; Dai, L. Characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014, 111, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Morsy, M.; Mohammed, A.-D. Gold nanoparticles-PMMA composite for denture base: Synthesis, mechanical and thermal characteristics. Mater. Sci. 2014, 14, 369–374. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ali, U.; Karim, K.J.B.A.; Buang, N.A. A Review of the properties and applications of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Polym. Rev. 2015, 55, 678–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alla, R.; Raghavendra, K.; Vyas, R.; Konakanchi, A. Conventional and contemporary polymers for the fabrication of denture prosthesis: Part I–overview, composition and properties. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2015, 1, 82. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sagsoz, N.P.; Yanıkoglu, N.; Ulu, H.; Bayındır, F. Color changes of polyamid and polymetyhl methacrylate denture base materials. Open J. Stomatol. 2014, 4, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miettinen, V.M.; Vallittu, P.K. Water sorption and solubility of glass fiber-reinforced denture polymethyl methacrylate resin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997, 77, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. ISO 20795–1:2013 Dentistry-Base Polymers-Part 1: Denture Base Polymers. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/62277.html (accessed on 5 August 2022).
  20. Anusavice, K.J.; Shen, C.; Rawls, H.R. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, R.; Kayacan, R.; Küçüke¸smen, C. Nanotubes/polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. In Carbon Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 227–240. [Google Scholar]
  22. Aldabib, J. Reinforcement of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base material. Dent. Med. J. 2020, 2, 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zafar, M.S. Wear behavior of various dental restorative materials. Mater. Technol. 2018, 33, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zafar, M.S.; Ahmed, N. Effects of wear on hardness and stiffness of restorative dental materials. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Díez-Pascual, A.M. Surface Engineering of Nanomaterials with Polymers, Biomolecules, and Small Ligands for Nanomedicine. Materials 2022, 15, 3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Díez-Pascual, A.M. Chemical Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes with Polymers: A Brief Overview. Macromol 2021, 1, 64–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vanlalveni, C.; Lallianrawna, S.; Biswas, A.; Selvaraj, M.; Changmai, B.; Rokhum, S.L. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts and their antimicrobial activities: A review of recent literature. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 2804–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. El-Nour, K.M.A.; Eftaiha, A.A.; Al-Warthan, A.; Ammar, R.A. Synthesis and applications of silver nanoparticles. Arab. J. Chem. 2010, 3, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Matteis, V.; Cascione, M.; Toma, C.C.; Leporatti, S. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthetic Routes, In Vitro Toxicity and Theranostic Applications for Cancer Disease. Nanomaterials 2018, 85, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Salomoni, R. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xia, Z.; Ma, Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, D. The antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on Trichosporon asahii. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2016, 49, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, S.W.; Jung, J.H.; Lamsal, K.; Kim, Y.S.; Min, J.S.; Lee, Y.S. Antifungal Effects of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) against Various Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Mycobiology 2012, 40, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sawosz, E.; Chwalibog, A.; Szeliga, J.; Sawosz, F.; Grodzik, M.; Rupiewicz, M.; Niemiec, T.; Kacprzyk, K. Visualization of gold and platinum nanoparticles interacting with Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 631–637. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosenberg, B.; Vancamp, L.; Krigas, T. Inhibition of cell division in Escherichia coli by electrolysis products from a platinum electrode. Nature 1965, 205, 698–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Waghmode, M.S.; Gunjal, A.B.; Mulla, J.A.; Patil, N.N.; Nawani, N.N. Studies on the titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Biosynthesis, applications and remediation. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Diez-Pascual, A.M.; Diez-Vicente, A.L. Nano-TiO2 Reinforced PEEK/PEI Blends as Biomaterials for Load-Bearing Implant Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5561–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Diez-Pascual, A.M.; Diez-Vicente, A.L. Development of linseed oil–TiO2 green nanocomposites as antimicrobial coatings. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Diez-Pascual, A.M.; Diez-Vicente, A.L. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the performance of polyphenylsulfone biomaterial for orthopaedic implants. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 7502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nazari, A.; Riahi, S. The effects of ZrO2 nanoparticles on physical and mechanical properties of high strength self compacting concrete. Mater. Res. 2010, 13, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Magalhaes, A.M.P.; Ramos-Tonello, C.M.; Zamora Galli, M.; Ponce Gomes, O.; Pacheco, L.E.; Fortulan, C.A.; Lisboa-Filho, P.N.; Lia Mondelli, R.F.; Furuse, A.Y.; Sanches Borjes, A.F. Ytria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal/resin luting agent bond strength: Influence of titanium dioxide nanotubes addition in both materials. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2020, 64, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Niculescu, V.-C. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for bio-applications. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Z.; Barnes, J.C.; Bosoy, A.; Atoddardt, J.F.; Zink, J.I. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. 2012, 41, 2590–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hassanpour, P.; Panahi, Y.; Ebrahimi-Kalan, A.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Davaran, S.; Nasibova, A.N.; Khalilov, R.; Kavetskyy, T. Biomedical applications of aluminum oxide nanomaterials. Micro Nano Lett. 2018, 13, 1227–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sadiq, I.M.; Chowdhury, B.; Chandrasekaran, N. Antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli to alumina nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2009, 5, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, W.; Mashayekhi, H.; Xing, B. Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano-and micro-scaled particles. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Eliaz, N.; Metoki, N. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: A review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials 2017, 10, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Naffakh, M.; Diez-Pascual, A.M. WS2 inorganic nanotubes reinforced poly(L-lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite hybrid composite biomaterials. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 65514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Q.; Zhu, C.; Thouas, G.A. Progress and challenges in biomaterials used for bone tissue engineering: Bioactive glasses and elastomeric composites. Prog. Biomater. 2012, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Diez-Pascual, A.M.; Diez-Vicente, A.L. Multifunctional poly(glycolic acid-co-propylene fumarate) electrospun fibers reinforced with graphene oxide and hydroxyapatite nanorods. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphite carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saito, R.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Electronic-structure of chiral Graphene tubules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 60, 2204–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, M.F.; Files, B.S.; Arepalli, S.; Ruoff, R.S. Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical Properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5552–5555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bom, D.; Andrews, R.; Jacques, D.; Anthony, J.; Chen, B.; Meier, M.S.; Selegue, J.P. Thermogravimetric Analysis of the Oxidation of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes: Evidence for the Role of Defect Sites in Carbon Nanotube Chemistry. Nano Lett. 2000, 2, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Naffakh, M.; Gómez, M.A.; Marco, C.; Ellis, G.; Martínez, M.T.; Ansón, A.; González-Domínguez, J.M.; Martínez-Rubi, Y.; Simard, B. Development and characterization of PEEK/carbon nanotube composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 3079–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Diez-Pascual, A.M. The influence of a compatibilizer on the thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of PEEK/carbon nanotube composites. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 315707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Protopapa, P.; Kontonaskasi, E.; Bikiaris, D.; Paraskevolpoulos, K.M.; Koidis, P. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for fixed interim prostheses with nanodiamonds. Dent. Mater. J. 2011, 30, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Karami, P.; Salkhi Khasraghi, S.; Hashemi, M.; Rabiei, S.; Shojaei, A. Polymer/nanodiamond composites—A comprehensive review from synthesis and fabrication to properties and applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 269, 122–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Balandin, A.A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Gómez-Fatou, M.A.; Ania, F.; Flores, A. Nanoindentation in polymer nanocomposites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 67, 1–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Sánchez, J.A.L.; Capilla, R.P.; Díaz, P.G. Recent Developments in Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites for Application in Polymer Solar Cells. Polymers 2018, 10, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Díez-Pascual, A.M. Graphene-based polymer composites: Recent advances. Polymers 2022, 14, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Morales-Narvaez, E.; Baptista-Pires, L.; Zamora-Galvez, A.; Merkoci, A. Graphene-based biosensors: Going simple. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sainz-Urruela, C.; Vera-López, S.; San Andrés, M.P.; Díez-Pascual, A.M. Graphene Oxides Derivatives Prepared by an Electrochemical Approach: Correlation between Structure and Properties. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Sainz-Urruela, C.; Vallés, C.; Vera-López, S.; San Andrés, M.P. Tailorable Synthesis of Highly Oxidized Graphene Oxides via an Environmentally-Friendly Electrochemical Process. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, J.; Jo, J.; Kim, D.; Patel, K.D.; Kim, H.; Lee, H. Nano-graphene oxide incorporated into PMMA resin to prevent microbial adhesion. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zaaba, N.; Foo, K.; Hashim, U.; Tan, S.; Liu, W.-W.; Voon, C. Synthesis of Graphene Oxide using Modified Hummers Method: Solvent Influence. Procedia Eng. 2017, 184, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Luceño-Sánchez, J.A.; Maties, G.; Gonzalez-Arellano, C.; Diez-Pascual, A.M. Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene Oxide Derivatives via Functionalization Reaction with Hexamethylene Diisocyanate. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jasim, B.S.; Ismail, I.J. The effect of silanized alumina nano-fillers addition on some physical and mechanical properties of heat cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2014, 26, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chaijareenont, P.; Takahashi, H.; Nishiyama, N.; Arksornnukit, M. Effect of different amounts of 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane on the flexural properties and wear resistance of alumina reinforced PMMA. Dent. Mater. J. 2012, 31, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tham, W.; Chow, W.; Ishak, Z.M. Simulated body fluid and water absorption effects on poly (methyl methacrylate)/hydroxyapatite denture base composites. Express Polym. Lett. 2010, 4, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gad, M.M.; Rahoma, A.; Al-Thobity, A.M.; ArRejaie, A.S. Influence of incorporation of ZrO2 nanoparticles on the repair strength of polymethyl methacrylate denture bases. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 5633–5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Salih, S.I.; Oleiwi, J.K.; Hamad, Q.A. Investigation of fatigue and compression strength for the PMMA reinforced by different system for denture applications. Int. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2015, 3, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  74. Gad, M.M.A.; Abualsaud, R.; Al-Thobity, A.M.; Almaskin, D.F.; AlZaher, Z.A.; Abushowmi, T.H.; Qaw, M.S.; Akhtar, S.; Al-Harbi, F.A. Effect of SiO2 nanoparticles addition on the flexural strength of repaired acrylic denture base. Eur. J. Dent. 2020, 14, 019–023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Safi, I.N. Evaluation the effect of nano-fillers (TiO2, Al2O3, SiO2) addition on glass transition temperature, E-Moudulus and coeffcient of thermal expansion of acrylic denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2014, 26, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Balos, S.; Puskar, T.; Potran, M.; Milekic, B.; Djurovic Koprivica, D.; Laban Terzija, J.; Gusic, I. Modulus, strength and cytotoxicity of PMMA-silica nanocomposites. Coatings 2020, 10, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Balos, S.; Pilic, B.; Markovic, D.; Pavlicevic, J.; Luzanin, O. Poly (methyl-methacrylate) nanocomposites with low silica addition. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014, 111, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Alamgir, M.; Mallick, A.; Nayak, G.; Tiwari, S.K. Development of PMMA/TiO2 nanocomposites as excellent dental materials. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 4755–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ghafari, T.; Hamedi, R.F.; Ezzati, B. Does addition of silver nanoparticles to denture base resin increase its thermal conductivity? J. Dent. Sch. 2014, 32, 144. [Google Scholar]
  80. Nejatian, T.; Johnson, A.; Van Noort, R. Reinforcement of denture base resin. In Advances in Science and Technology; Trans Tech Publ: Zurich, Switzerland, 2006; Volume 49, pp. 124–129. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kul, E.; Aladag, L.I.; Yesildal, R. Evaluation of thermal conductivity and flexural strength properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base material reinforced with different fillers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 116, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Salman, T.A.; Khalaf, H.A. The influence of adding of modified ZrO2-TiO2 nanoparticles on certain physical and mechanical properties of heat polymerized acrylic resin. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015, 325, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  83. Casemiro, L.A.; Martins, C.H.G.; Pires-de-Souza, F.d.C.; Panzeri, H. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of acrylic resins with incorporated silver–zinc zeolite—Part I. Gerodontology 2008, 25, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Flores, J.C.; Garcia, R.; Villanueva, G.; Acosta-Torres, L. Antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) with silver nanoparticles for dentistry: A systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4007. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kurt, A.; Erkose-Genc, G.; Uzun, M.; Emrence, Z.; Ustek, D.; Isik-Ozkol, G. The antifungal activity and cytotoxicity of silver containing denture base material. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2017, 20, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Mendieta, I.; Nunez-Anita, R.E.; Cajero-Juarez, M.; Castano, V.M. Cytocompatible antifungal acrylic resin containing silver nanoparticles for dentures. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 4777–4786. [Google Scholar]
  87. Monteiro, D.R.; Gorup, L.F.; Takamiya, A.S.; de Camargo, E.R.; Filho, A.C.R.; Barbosa, D.B. Silver distribution and release from an antimicrobial denture base resin containing silver colloidal nanoparticles. J. Prosthodont. 2012, 21, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sawada, T.; Sawada, T.; Kumasaka, T.; Hamada, N.; Shibata, T.; Nonami, T.; Kimoto, K. Self-cleaning effects of acrylic resin containing fluoridated apatite-coated titanium dioxide. Gerodontology 2014, 31, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Shibata, T.; Hamada, N.; Kimoto, K.; Sawada, T.; Sawada, T.; Kumada, H.; Umemoto, T.; Toyoda, M. Antifungal effect of acrylic resin containing apatite-coated TiO2 photocatalyst. Dent. Mater. J. 2007, 26, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Al-Bakri, I.; Harty, D.; Al-Omari, W.; Swain, M.; Chrzanowski, W.; Ellakwa, A. Surface characteristics and microbial adherence ability of modified polymethylmethacrylate by fluoridated glass fillers. Aust. Dent. J. 2014, 59, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tsutsumi, C.; Takakuda, K.; Wakabayashi, N. Reduction of Candida biofilm adhesion by incorporation of prereacted glass ionomer filler in denture base resin. J. Dent. 2016, 44, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, J.; El-Fiqi, A.; Jo, J.; Kim, D.; Kim, S.; Jun, S.; Kim, H.; Lee, H. Development of long-term antimicrobial poly(methyl methacrylate) by incorporating mesoporous silica nanocarriers. Dent. Mater. 2016, 32, 1564–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Alwan, S.A.; Alameer, S.S. The effect of the addition of silanized nano titania fillers on some physical and mechanical properties of heat cured acrylic denture base materials. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015, 325, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bacali, C.; Badea, M.; Moldovan, M.; Sarosi, C.; Nastase, V.; Baldea, I.; Chiorean, R.S.; Constantiniuc, M. The influence of graphene in improvement of physico-mechanical properties in PMMA denture base resins. Materials 2019, 12, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. De Matteis, V.; Cascione, M.F.; Toma, C.C.; Albanese, G.; De Giorgi, M.L.; Corsalini, M.; Rinaldi, R. Silver Nanoparticles Addition in Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Dental Matrix: Topographic and Antimycotic Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. de Souza Neto, F.N.; Sala, R.L.; Fernandes, R.A.; Xavier, T.P.O.; Cruz, S.A.; Paranhos, C.M. Effect of synthetic colloidal nanoparticles in acrylic resin of dental use. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 112, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nam, K.-Y. Characterization and bacterial anti-adherent effect on modified PMMA denture acrylic resin containing platinum nanoparticles. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2014, 6, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Aoyagi, Y.; Miyasaka, T.; Ando, N. Application of noble metal cluster to PMMA resin and influence on mechanical properties and color. Dent. Mater. J. 2015, 34, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Nejatian, T.; Nathwani, N.; Taylor, L.; Sefat, F. Denture Base Composites: Effect of Surface Modified Nano-and Micro-Particulates on Mechanical Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate. Materials 2020, 13, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Alrahlah, A.; Fouad, H.; Hashem, M.; Niazy, A.A.; AlBadah, A. Titanium oxide (TiO2)/polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture base nanocomposites: Mechanical, viscoelastic and antibacterial behavior. Materials 2018, 11, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Ahmed, M.A.; El-Shennawy, M.; Althomali, Y.M.; Omar, A.A. Effect of titanium dioxide nano particles incorporation on mechanical and physical properties on two different types of acrylic resin denture base. World J. Nanosci. Eng. 2016, 6, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Asopa, V.; Suresh, S.; Khandelwal, M.; Sharma, V.; Asopa, S.S.; Kaira, L.S. A comparative evaluation of properties of zirconia reinforced high impact acrylic resin with that of high impact acrylic resin. Saudi J. Dent. Res. 2015, 6, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Muhammad, N.; Maitra, S.; Ul Haq, I.; Farooq, M. Some studies on the wear resistance of artificial teeth in presence of amorphous SiO2 and TiO2 fillers. Cerâmica 2011, 57, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rashahmadi, S.; Hasanzadeh, R.; Mosalman, S. Improving the mechanical properties of poly methyl methacrylate nanocomposites for dentistry applications reinforced with different nanoparticles. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2017, 56, 1730–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cierech, M.; Osica, I.; Kolenda, A.; Wojnarowicz, J.; Szmigiel, D.; Łojkowski, W.; Kurzydłowski, K.; Ariga, K.; Mierzwi´ nska-Nastalska, E. Mechanical and physicochemical properties of newly formed ZnO-PMMA nanocomposites for denture bases. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zebarjad, S.M.; Sajjadi, S.A.; Sdrabadi, T.E.; Sajjadi, S.A.; Yaghmaei, A.; Naderi, B. A study on mechanical properties of pmma/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Engineering 2011, 3, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chow, W.S.; Loo, Y.K.; Ariffin, A.; Arifin, Z.; Ishak, M. Flexural properties of hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 27, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Qasim, S.B.; Al Kheraif, A.A.; Ramakrishaniah, R. An investigation into the impact and flexural strength of light cure denture resin reinforced with carbon nanotubes. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 18, 808–812. [Google Scholar]
  109. Mahmood, W.S. The effect of incorporating carbon nanotubes on impact, transverse strength, hardness, and roughness to high impact denture base material. J. Baghdad Coll. Dent. 2015, 27, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Turagam, N.; Prasad Mudrakola, D. Effect of micro-additions of carbon nanotubes to polymethylmethacrylate on reduction in polymerization shrinkage. J. Prosthodont. Implant. Esthet. Reconstr. Dent. 2013, 22, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kim, K.I.; Kim, D.A.; Patel, K.D.; Shin, U.S.; Kim, H.W.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.H. Carbon nanotube incorporation in PMMA to prevent microbial adhesion. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Mangal, U.; Kim, J.; Seo, J.; Kwon, J.; Choi, S. Novel poly (methyl methacrylate) containing nanodiamond to improve the mechanical properties and fungal resistance. Materials 2019, 12, 3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fouda, S.M.; Gad, M.M.; Ellakany, P.; Al-Thobity, A.M.; Al-Harbi, F.A.; Virtanen, J.I.; Raustia, A. The effect of nanodiamonds on candida albicans adhesion and surface characteristics of PMMA denture base material-an in vitro study. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2019, 27, 20180779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 10288 g001 550
Figure 1. Ideal properties of PMMA-based materials for odontological applications.
Figure 1. Ideal properties of PMMA-based materials for odontological applications.
Ijms 23 10288 g001
Ijms 23 10288 g002 550
Figure 2. Different types of nanomaterials used as nanofillers in polymeric nanocomposites, categorized according to their nature into inorganic, organic and carbon-based.
Figure 2. Different types of nanomaterials used as nanofillers in polymeric nanocomposites, categorized according to their nature into inorganic, organic and carbon-based.
Ijms 23 10288 g002
Ijms 23 10288 g003 550
Figure 3. Images of PMMA without NPs (control) (a); PMMA + AgNPs (3 wt%) (b) and PMMA + AgNPs (3.5 wt%) (c): The color became darker with increasing concentrations of the NPs. AFM topographical images of PMMA without NPs added (control) (d); PMMA + AgNPs (3 wt%) (e) and PMMA + AgNPs (3.5 wt%) (f). Reprinted from ref. [95], copyright 2019, MDPI.
Figure 3. Images of PMMA without NPs (control) (a); PMMA + AgNPs (3 wt%) (b) and PMMA + AgNPs (3.5 wt%) (c): The color became darker with increasing concentrations of the NPs. AFM topographical images of PMMA without NPs added (control) (d); PMMA + AgNPs (3 wt%) (e) and PMMA + AgNPs (3.5 wt%) (f). Reprinted from ref. [95], copyright 2019, MDPI.
Ijms 23 10288 g003
Ijms 23 10288 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM image of control PMMA (A) and PMMA/PtNP nanocomposite (200 mg/L) (B). TGA curves of PMMA and PMMA/PtNP (C), showing overlapping curves in the range 350–400 ℃. DSC thermograms of PMMA and PMMA/PtNP (D), ranging from 30 ℃ to 600 ℃, the melting point of the nanocomposite (389.2 ℃) is slightly higher than that of the control (384.7 ℃). Reprinted from ref. [96], copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Figure 4. SEM image of control PMMA (A) and PMMA/PtNP nanocomposite (200 mg/L) (B). TGA curves of PMMA and PMMA/PtNP (C), showing overlapping curves in the range 350–400 ℃. DSC thermograms of PMMA and PMMA/PtNP (D), ranging from 30 ℃ to 600 ℃, the melting point of the nanocomposite (389.2 ℃) is slightly higher than that of the control (384.7 ℃). Reprinted from ref. [96], copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Ijms 23 10288 g004
Ijms 23 10288 g005 550
Figure 5. C.F.U. of P. aeruginosa (A) and E. faecalis (B) on nutrient agar after growing it for 48 h on PMMA composites containing 0, 1, and 3 wt% TiO2. Reprinted from ref. [100], copyright 2018, MDPI.
Figure 5. C.F.U. of P. aeruginosa (A) and E. faecalis (B) on nutrient agar after growing it for 48 h on PMMA composites containing 0, 1, and 3 wt% TiO2. Reprinted from ref. [100], copyright 2018, MDPI.
Ijms 23 10288 g005
Ijms 23 10288 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Application of bending load on the palatal surface of PMMA/ZrO2 denture specimen using a Hounsfield universal testing machine and (B) schematic diagram of loading conditions. Reprinted from ref. [12], copyright 2020, MDPI.
Figure 6. (A) Application of bending load on the palatal surface of PMMA/ZrO2 denture specimen using a Hounsfield universal testing machine and (B) schematic diagram of loading conditions. Reprinted from ref. [12], copyright 2020, MDPI.
Ijms 23 10288 g006
Ijms 23 10288 g007 550
Figure 7. Surface topography of PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites: 3D laser microscope images (top) and optical laser-enhanced images (bottom). The scale bar (white) refers to 400 µm and it is applicable to all images. Reprinted from ref. [105], copyright 2018, MDPI.
Figure 7. Surface topography of PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites: 3D laser microscope images (top) and optical laser-enhanced images (bottom). The scale bar (white) refers to 400 µm and it is applicable to all images. Reprinted from ref. [105], copyright 2018, MDPI.
Ijms 23 10288 g007
Ijms 23 10288 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of filler loading on the fracture toughness of PMMA/HA nanocomposite compared to the conventional material and neat PMMA. Reprinted from ref. [9], copyright 2020, MDPI.
Figure 8. Effect of filler loading on the fracture toughness of PMMA/HA nanocomposite compared to the conventional material and neat PMMA. Reprinted from ref. [9], copyright 2020, MDPI.
Ijms 23 10288 g008
Ijms 23 10288 g009 550
Figure 9. Representation of the preparation of PMMA/ND nanocomposites. Reprinted from ref. [112], copyright 2019, MDPI.
Figure 9. Representation of the preparation of PMMA/ND nanocomposites. Reprinted from ref. [112], copyright 2019, MDPI.
Ijms 23 10288 g009
Table
Table 1. Improvements in PMMA/nanofiller nanocomposites used for odontological applications.
Table 1. Improvements in PMMA/nanofiller nanocomposites used for odontological applications.
Nanofiller
(wt% or mg/L*)		ModificationImprovementRef.
AgNPs Compressive strength,
thermal conductivity		[10]
AgNPsReduced bacterial adhesionBiocompatibility,
antifungal activity		[86]
AgNPs Reduced water absorption,
compressive and flexural strength		[94]
AgNPs (3.0, 3.5)Reduced surface
roughness		Antibacterial activity[95]
AgNPs (0.05)Reduced bacterial
adhesion		Antibacterial activity,
compressive strength		[96]
PtNPs (50*)Reduced bacterial
adhesion		Flexural strength, thermal
stability, melting point		[97]
PdNPs Bending strength,
Vickers hardness		[98]
AuNPsViscoelastic responseThermal conductivity[99]
TiO2 (1.0, 3.0)Relaxation behaviorHardness, modulus, creep-recovery, antibacterial activity[78]
TiO2 (1.0)Reduced bacterial
adherence		Tensile strength, antibacterial activity[100]
TiO2 (1.0, 5.0) Microhardness, antifugal activity[107]
ZrO2Reduced translucencyStrength[72]
ZrO2 (3.0, 5.0) Fracture toughness, compressive and fatigue strength, thermal conductivity[12]
SiO2 (2.0)Weaker
interfacial bonding		Flexural modulus, surface hardness, dimensional stability, thermal conductivity[74]
Al2O3 Compressive and flexural strength, wear resistance[69]
ZnO (7.5)HydrophilicityFlexural and compressive strength, hardness,
biocompatibility		[105]
HA (15) Elastic and flexural modulus[71]
HA (5.0)Surface hardnessFracture toughness[9]
MWCNT (1.0)Interfacial bondingflexural strength and resilience[13]
MWCNTColorMechanical properties[109]
MWCNT (0.25–2.0)ColorAntibacterial activity[111]
ND (0.5) Elastic modulus, flexural and impact strength[56]
ND (0.1–0.5)Reduced salivary biofilmFlexural strength, elastic
modulus, surface hardness,
antifungal activity		[112]
* concentration in mg/L.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díez-Pascual, A.M. PMMA-Based Nanocomposites for Odontology Applications: A State-of-the-Art. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810288

AMA Style

Díez-Pascual AM. PMMA-Based Nanocomposites for Odontology Applications: A State-of-the-Art. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díez-Pascual, Ana M. 2022. "PMMA-Based Nanocomposites for Odontology Applications: A State-of-the-Art" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop