Next Article in Journal
Role of HDAC5 Epigenetics in Chronic Craniofacial Neuropathic Pain
Next Article in Special Issue
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: A Looming Threat to Current and Future Generations
Previous Article in Journal
Multimodal Imaging Using Raman Spectroscopy and FTIR in a Single Analytical Instrument with a Microscope (Infrared Raman Microscopy AIRsight, Shimadzu): Opportunities and Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bisphenol-A in Drinking Water Accelerates Mammary Cancerogenesis and Favors an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment in BALB–neuT Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regrettable Substitutes and the Brain: What Animal Models and Human Studies Tell Us about the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Bisphenol, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, and Phthalate Replacements

Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 6887; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136887
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Revised: 14 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 23 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endocrine Disruption and Human Diseases 2.0)

Abstract

:
In recent decades, emerging evidence has identified endocrine and neurologic health concerns related to exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including bisphenol A (BPA), certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl compounds (PFASs), and phthalates. This has resulted in consumer pressure to remove these chemicals from the market, especially in food-contact materials and personal care products, driving their replacement with structurally or functionally similar substitutes. However, these “new-generation” chemicals may be just as or more harmful than their predecessors and some have not received adequate testing. This review discusses the research on early-life exposures to new-generation bisphenols, PFASs, and phthalates and their links to neurodevelopmental and behavioral alterations in zebrafish, rodents, and humans. As a whole, the evidence suggests that BPA alternatives, especially BPAF, and newer PFASs, such as GenX, can have significant effects on neurodevelopment. The need for further research, especially regarding phthalate replacements and bio-based alternatives, is briefly discussed.

1. Introduction

Bisphenols, phthalate esters, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been used widely for industrial and manufacturing purposes for nearly a century [1,2]. The term “endocrine-disrupting chemical” (EDC) was first introduced in the 1970s, when increasing evidence identified adverse reproductive and hormonal effects of these and other similarly-acting chemicals in humans and wildlife [3]. Some of these EDCs, known as “legacy” EDCs, persist in the environment and continue to be found in tissues of humans and wildlife despite being decades removed from commercial production [4,5,6,7]. Since then, public interest groups, regulatory bodies, and industry have pushed to ban or phase out the manufacture and use of certain chemicals. While this represents progress in terms of advancing toxicological safety standards to better address the unique properties of endocrine disruptors (which are not always identified via standard toxicology testing) and reducing human exposure to legacy EDCs, a concerning trend has emerged wherein these chemicals are replaced in consumer products or in manufacturing with sister compounds that are structurally or functionally similar [8,9,10]. The result is a phenomenon termed “regrettable substitution”, by which a compound is replaced with a substitute chemical that may later prove to have a similar or even stronger endocrine-disrupting capability—often after it has been released into the market.
The developing brain is a target of EDCs, with far-reaching consequences on an individual’s mental and neurological health and wellness. The brain has high hormone sensitivity, especially as it undergoes rapid growth during critical periods of development including the prenatal period, infancy, and adolescence. During this time, steroid hormones such as androgens and estrogens organize the brain in a sexually dimorphic manner and later activate certain sex-specific brain processes [11,12,13]. EDCs can interfere with this by altering the normal function of these and other hormones, acting as hormone mimics, blockers, or altering synthesis and transport [14,15,16,17,18]. The disruption of hormone signaling during critical periods can have lasting effects on brain structure and function, potentially affecting later cognitive–behavioral function and increasing the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and/or learning disabilities in humans and animal models [19,20,21,22,23].
Legacy EDCs such as bisphenol A (BPA) and certain phthalate esters [i.e., butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and dibutyl phthalate (DBP), among others] alter the development of the brain and lead to disrupted cognitive–behavioral function in adulthood in zebrafish, rodents, and humans [24,25]. The same is true for legacy PFASs [26,27]. As the brain is highly sensitive to hormones and serves as a central regulatory hub for many of the body’s homeostatic functions, disrupted development has implications beyond cognitive and affective behavior, affecting a range of functions such as metabolic, sexual, and immunological health [15,18,28]. This and other scientific evidence have inspired the phasing out of such chemicals; however, new-generation bisphenols, PFASs, and phthalate esters have emerged to take their place. Because the regulatory framework that allowed the mass use of legacy EDCs also grandfathered in new-generation substitutes, there is a real concern in the scientific community that “like has replaced like” and that new-generation substitutes do not represent a lessened toxicological burden. Rather, these substitutes lack the scientific, public, and regulatory scrutiny of their predecessors and represent a new cadre of EDCs whose toxicological profile has yet to be determined [8,29,30,31].
This review collects available information on new-generation bisphenols, PFASs, and phthalate esters in the context of the developing brain. Because of the rise in bio-based alternatives such as bioplastics, we also discuss the limited evidence for their possible endocrine-disrupting activity. Here, we discuss the literature on neurodevelopmental disruption from several model organisms—zebrafish, rodents, and humans—focusing on cognitive and other neurobiological consequences. All articles discussed and cited were found on PubMed prior to March 2024 using combinations of the following search terms: bisphenol/per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance/phthalate/bio-plastic AND neuro*/behavior/replacement AND rodent/mice/rat/zebrafish/human. Only studies using in vivo models (zebrafish, mice, rats, and humans) of single-chemical exposure are discussed. Studies that only examined legacy EDCs (e.g., BPA) and no replacement or substitute EDC (as discussed below) were excluded. We also excluded studies whose EDC exposures started after 30 dpf in zebrafish, P21 in rodents, and 13 years of age in humans, as we were interested in earlier periods of development. We verified that all included studies appeared to be appropriately powered and used proper controls.

2. Legacy EDCs and New-Generation Substitutes

2.1. Bisphenols

Bisphenols are a group of chemicals made up of two phenol rings joined by an atom, often carbon (Figure 1a). They are used to make epoxy resins, acting as protective coatings in metal products, such as pipes and food cans. Bisphenols are also polymerized to make polycarbonate, a hard plastic found in everyday products, from electronics to food containers [32]. The most well-known member of this group, bisphenol A (BPA), underwent selective bans around the world in the 2000s, especially in baby bottles, after research studies linked the chemical to cancers, diabetes, obesity, and reproductive and neurodevelopmental problems and attracting public outcry [32,33,34,35,36,37]. The “BPA-free” label has since become near-ubiquitous. This label is deceptive, however, as it does not reveal that BPA has been replaced with newer analogs whose safety may not be thoroughly understood (see Table 1 for bisphenol substitute examples). Evidence suggests that some of these BPA analogues may be as or more harmful than BPA as endocrine-disrupting chemicals, acting as carcinogens, obesogens, and more [38,39,40,41].
The mechanisms of action of bisphenols are varied, with evidence showing they can act on estrogen receptors [38,42], androgen receptors [38,43], thyroid hormone receptors [44], glucocorticoid receptors [45], and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) [46]. Any or all of these are potentially relevant to neurodevelopment and behavior as these receptors are expressed in the brain [47]. Recently, certain G-protein-coupled receptors were identified as being activated by plastics including BPA and diethyl phthalate [48]. Although the half-lives of bisphenols are short, their persistence in the environment yields detectable levels in most humans. The detection of BPA in humans is decreasing while the detection of BPA alternatives, such as BPF and BPS, is increasing [39].

2.2. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of >9000 chemicals made up of a carbon–fluorine backbone and a polar functional group (Figure 1b). One of the most famous PFASs, polytetrafluoroethylene, known under its trademarked name, Teflon, is used as a nonstick coating for cookware. PFASs’ nonstick, waterproof, and stain-repellent properties drove their wide utilization in food packaging, clothing (e.g., Gore-Tex), furniture (e.g., Scotchgard, Stainmaster treatments), and even fire-suppressing foams [49,50]. Their thermal/chemical stability and amphiphilicity unfortunately also increase their persistence both in the environment and in the body [51,52]. PFAS exposure has been linked with cancer, altered immune function, reproductive deficits, and other adverse health outcomes [53,54,55,56]. PFAS interferes with the thyroid hormones and brain-derived neurotrophic factor and leads to an increase in oxidative stress and cell apoptosis, all of which are involved in neurodevelopment [31]. Because of the wide body of research demonstrating the dangers of PFASs, PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS were globally banned under the Stockholm Convention in 2009, 2019, and 2022, respectively [57]. Although now members of the legacy chemical family, their persistence makes them a lasting part of the world’s ecosystem.
Fluorinated chain length is one of the key factors considered regarding PFAS safety, as longer chain lengths are typically associated with higher toxicity and biomagnification [52,58,59]. Because of this, there has been a rise in short-chain alternatives (≤4 continuous fluorinated carbons), including GenX (hexafluoropropylene-oxide-dimer-acid) and ADONA (dodecafluoro-3H-4,8-dioxanonanoate) [60]. Unfortunately, research indicates that these alternatives may not be any safer [55,56,61]. In addition, long-chain PFAS concentrations continue to increase in living organisms, a trend that will likely continue thanks to their ubiquitousness, due to their accumulation in the food chain and their release from melting ice caps [61,62]. In this review, we will focus on short- and long-chain PFASs that are not the legacy chemicals PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS (see Table 1 for examples) and that are not as well evaluated and may prove to be “regrettable substitutions”.

2.3. Phthalates

Phthalates (also referred to as ortho-phthalate diesters and phthalic acid esters) are esters of phthalic acid, 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid (Figure 1c). They are primarily used as plasticizers for cosmetic products, medical devices, toys, and food packaging. Phthalate exposure has been linked to effects on the neuroendocrine and reproductive systems and neurodevelopment, as well as to increases in cancer, asthma, diabetes, and other health concerns [37,63]. Their effects on neurodevelopment are of special concern given the extensive phthalate exposure that premature and intensive care newborns are exposed to through medical tubing [64]. In 2017, the United States banned eight phthalates from use in children’s products, including toys. These included diisononyl phthalate (DINP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), and diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) [65]. Advocacy groups petitioned the FDA to ban the use of phthalates in food packaging, but in 2022, this petition was denied [66]. Efforts to create safer options resulted in the development of structurally similar groups, including isophthalates, terephthalates, and trimellitates, advertised as “non-phthalate alternatives”. Structurally distinct alternatives now exist as well. The most common alternatives include Bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHT), diethylhexyl adipate (DEHA), and 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester (DINCH) [67]. In this paper, we focus on alternatives to ortho-phthalates and their impacts on neurodevelopment (Table 1). However, there is little research assessing the endocrine- and neurodevelopmental-disrupting potential of phthalate replacements. Research studies do suggest that DINCH, for example, is not estrogenic or androgenic, although it can disrupt steroidogenesis [68,69]. DINCH induces oxidative stress in some cell lines, causing potential disruptions in neurodevelopment [70,71].

3. Models of Neurodevelopment

3.1. Zebrafish

Zebrafish are useful models for studying neurodevelopment and neurotoxicity. Thanks to their small size, high breeding rate, and short life cycle, they are a high-throughput screening tool that enables researchers to predict the potential neurotoxicity of chemicals in mammals [72].
The neural signaling systems of zebrafish are homologous to humans, including the GABAergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic systems. The presence of a blood–brain barrier allows for the assessment of chemical entry into the brain. Through immunostaining techniques that allow for the direct assessment of neural growth and death, in addition to the widespread analysis of gene expression patterns, zebrafish are also useful for understanding the mechanisms of neurotoxicity.
Multiple zebrafish behavioral endpoints can be used to understand the neurobehavioral effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Behaviors measured include embryonic spontaneous movements and larvae locomotion, where changes can indicate developmental motor–neural toxicity. Selderslaghs et al. looked at a wide set of known neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic chemicals and found that 9/10 of the chemicals tested demonstrated developmental neurotoxicity concordance between mammal studies and zebrafish studies assessing embryonic and larvae movement. Newer studies are also adapting classical rodent assays to zebrafish models, including the open-field assay, T-maze, and social tests to assess more complex behaviors such as anxiety, learning, reward preference, and sociability [73,74,75].
For neurodevelopmental research, zebrafish embryos are placed in well plates filled with the chemical of choice in DMSO, or another solvent. The liquid exposure media will commonly be changed throughout the duration of the exposure, which can range from a couple of hours to days. Zebrafish often undergo behavioral and molecular testing at numerous developmental stages (Figure 2a).

3.2. Rodents

As mammals, rodents share more similarities than zebrafish to humans when it comes to brain structure, physiology, and behavior [76,77]. Unlike humans, rats can undergo experimentation, allowing for the causality of the effects of EDC exposures to be determined. Homologous endocrine systems in rodents and humans also allow for the analysis of the sexually dimorphic effects of toxicants on neurodevelopment.
A wide array of tests in rodents aim to assess human-relevant behaviors, including assays for anxiety, learning and memory, and social and sexual behaviors. Many of these tests show concordance with human toxicological effects [78]. Well-established antibodies and probes allow scientists to look at specific brain regions, cell types, and markers. Advances in genetic and transcriptomic analysis in rodents also aid in understanding the effects and potential mechanisms of toxicants on the central nervous.
Rodent chemical exposures are most typically administered via oral consumption (e.g., feeding a wafer or other edible treated with the chemical, or gavage, the latter which is more stressful), drinking water treated with the chemical, or via injection. For perinatal exposures, this will often consist of administering the chemical to the dam during gestation and lactation rather than subjecting developing rodents to injections or gavage. The offspring then undergo behavioral and molecular testing at a variety of selected ages from early postnatal life through adulthood (Figure 2b).

3.3. Humans

Studies assessing the effect of toxicants on humans are nearly always correlational, with the exception of known chemical spills or certain industrial settings. Although researchers do their best to include confounding variables, such as maternal education, smoking, and socio-economic status, the nature of this research means causal effects of toxicants cannot be elucidated in the general population.
For human research studies, blood or urine samples may be collected from the mother during pregnancy, from the umbilical cord at birth, and/or from the child. Amniotic fluid can also be used as a proxy of exposure. For neurodevelopmental assessments, the children undergo a test of choice (e.g., IQ, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD assessments, social behaviors), and a statistical analysis is conducted to explore whether higher chemical concentrations are associated with scores on the given tests (Figure 2c).

4. Bisphenol Alternatives and Neurodevelopment

4.1. Bisphenols and Zebrafish

Embryonic and larval BPA analogue exposure has neurotoxic effects in zebrafish (Table 2). In general, embryonic and larval exposure to bisphenols decreases embryo spontaneous movement and larvae locomotion [26,74,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87], with the exception of BPS, which produced mixed results. According to multiple comparison studies, BPAF leads to the most severe alterations in locomotion, followed by BPF, which is similar to BPA, and then BPS [80,81]. Open-field test results did not show consistent results [74,87,88]. Instances of social behavior decreased following perinatal exposure to BPAF, BPAP, BPB, BPC, BPF, BPS, and HPP [73,89]. Studies also suggest deficits in learning and memory (BPS) [88] and response to stimuli (BPF, BPS) [87,90].
It is clear from the zebrafish studies that exposure to many BPA analogues leads to disrupted neuronal development, with immunohistochemistry and gene expression studies demonstrating decreased motor neuron lengths [80,87,91,92], alterations in neuron differentiation [79,93,94], neurogenesis [26,73,80,83,95], and neural maturation [93], in addition to a rise in brain degeneration [85] and neuron apoptosis [86]. Specific neurotransmitters including GABA, glutamine, glutamate, dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and isotocin (oxytocin-family peptide) also show changes with perinatal analogue exposure [26,80,87,88]. Changes in specific ion channel expression in the brain have also been found [73]. Further evidence suggests alterations to the hypothalamus–pituitary–thyroid (HPT) [79,85,87] and HP–gonadal (HPG) [81,85,96,97] axes, circadian rhythms [91], and the visual system [90,95,98]. Similar to the behavioral results discussed above, BPAF seems to most severely alter genes and hormones compared to BPB, BPS, and BPF [81].
Regarding mechanisms of action, increases in oxidative stress are a consistent mechanism to which alterations to neurodevelopment and behavior through bisphenols, similar to results for BPA, are attributed [73,82,83,84,98].
Table 2. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-BPA bisphenols in zebrafish.
Table 2. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-BPA bisphenols in zebrafish.
EDCTime of Exposure
(hpf)
DoseFindingsReference
BHPF4–144 300–4500 nM↓ Larvae locomotion at 3000, 4500 nM
↓ Larvae recovery to stressful stimuli at 4500 nM in light/dark challenge
↑ CNS neuron differentiation at 300 and 500 nM
↓ CNS neuron differentiation at 750, 1500, 3000, 4500 nM
↑ Expression of tshb, tg, nkx2.1, tshr, dio1, ugt1ab at all doses; tuba 1b at all doses except 1500 nM; crhb in all doses except 750 nM; dio2 at all doses except 750 nM and 1500 nM; cfos at doses above 750 nM; gap43 at doses above 3000 nM (genes related to HPT axis)
Jin et al., 2021 [79]
BHPF2–120 0.1, 10, 1000 nmol/L↓ Expression of pax2 expression in the spinal cord and mid-hindbrain at 10 and 1000 nM (genes related to brain morphology)
↑ Wake period during light periods at all doses, decreasing rest time
↓ Motor neuron length at all doses
↑ Expression of hcrt and aanat2 (genes related to circadian rhythm)
↑ Expression of hcrtr at 0.1 and 10 nM; ↓ at 1000 nM (genes related to circadian rhythm)
Mi et al., 2019 [91]
BPAF8–108 0.047, 0.47, 4.7 μM↑ Nearest neighbor distance and inter-individual distance at 0.47 μM, indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behaviorBai et al., 2023 [73]
BPAF2–144 0.1, 1 μM↓ Larvae locomotion at 1 μM (0.1 μM not measured)
↑ AroB cells in POA at 1 μM and in NRP at both doses (related to neuroendocrine system)
No effect on BrdU (mitosis marker) cells in POA and NRP
Coumailleau et al., 2020 [99]
BPAF4–144200 μg/L↓ Embryo spontaneous movement
↓ Larvae locomotion speed
↓ motor neuron length at 36 and 72 hpf
↓ neurogenesis at 36 and 72 hpf
↓ glutamine, DOPA, dopamine, norepinephrine, tyramine, serotonin, 5-Hydroxy-L-tryptophan, Acetylcholine
↑ 3-methocytyramine, mornetanephrone, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid
Gu et al., 2022 [80]
BPAF2–120 1, 100 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 100 μg/L
↑ GnRH terminal nerve and hypothalamic neurons with 100 μg/L dose
↑ Expression of ren, pth, gh at 1 μg/L; kiss1, gnrh3, fshβ, lhβ, anp, ren, pth1, gh, prl at 100 μg/L (genes related to reproductive neuroendocrinology)
No effect on expression of kiss2 at either dose
Qiu et al., 2021 [81]
BPAF2–120 5, 50, 500 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at all doses
↑ Oxidative stress at 500 μg/L
Rao et al., 2022 [82]
BPAF35,186200 μg/L↓Larvae locomotion
↓ AChE activity
↓ Neurogenesis
↓ Expression of elavl3, zn5, α-tubulin, syn2a, and mbp (genes related to neurogenesis)
↑ Expression of gap43 (gene related to neurogenesis)
↑ Oxidative stress
↑ Apoptosis in brain
Yang et al., 2023 [83]
BPAP8–108 0.041, 0.41, 4.1 μM↑ Nearest neighbor distance at 0.041 μM and inter-individual distance at 0.041 and 0.41 μM, indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behaviorBai et al., 2023 [73]
BPB8–108 0.1, 1, 10 μM↑ Nearest neighbor distance at all doses (no effect on inter-individual distance), indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behaviorBai et al., 2023 [73]
BPB2–120 1, 100 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 100 μg/L
↑ GnRH brain neurons with 100 μg/L
↑ Expression of kiss1, anp, ren, pth1, gh at 100 μg/L (genes related to reproductive neuroendocrinology)
No effect on expression of kiss2, gnrh3, fshβ, or lhβ, prl (genes related to reproductive neuroendocrinology)
Qiu et al., 2021 [81]
BPB0–144 10, 100, 1000 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 100 and 1000 μg/L
↓ Embryo spontaneous movements at 100 and 1000 μg/L
↑ Oxidative stress at 100 and 1000 μg/L
Wang et al., 2023 [100]
BPB0–144 1–1000 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 10–1000 μg/L
↑ Hypothalamus and mesencephalon degeneration at 100 and 1000 μg/L, with no change in other brain regions
↑ T3 hormone and T3/T4 hormone ratio at 10–1000 μg/L
↓ T4 hormone at 1000 μg/L
↑ Expression of dio1, dio2 and trhr1 at 1–1000 μg/L; tg, ttr, thrα at 10–1000 μg/L; thrβ at 100–1000 μg/L (genes related to the HPG axis)
↓ Expression of tshβ and trh at 1–1000 μg/L, (genes related to the HPG axis)
↓ Expression of α1-tubulin, myelin basic protein, syn2a, elavl3, zn5 at 1–1000 μg/L; gap43 at 100–1000 μg/L (genes related to neurodevelopment)
Yang et al., 2021 [85]
BPC8–108 0.049, 0.49, 4.9 μM↑ Nearest neighbor distance at all doses and inter-individual distance at 0.49 and 4.9 μM, indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behaviorBai et al., 2023 [73]
BPC0–120 4.25, 8.5, 17 μg/L↑ Larvae locomotion at all doses
↑ Time spent in well center at 8.5 μg/L
Blanc-Legendre et al., 2023 [74]
BPF8–108 0.3, 3, 30 μM↑ Embryo spontaneous movement at 3 μM
↑ Nearest neighbor distance at 0.3 and 3 μM and inter-individual distance at 3 μM, indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behavior
↑ Locomotion in the dark period at all doses and ↓ in light period at 0.3 μM at 5 dpf
↓ Locomotion in light-dark exploration test at 3 μM and ↑ time in light at 3 and 30 μM at 10 dpf
↓ Time in social contact at 0.3 and 3 μM, and ↑ number of contacts at 30 μM
↑ Intraocular distance (ID) at 3 and 30 μM, lower jaw length (LJL), and Ceratohyal cartilage length (CCL) at all doses, indicating macrocephaly
↑ Neurogenesis at 3 μM (other doses not measured)
↑ Expression of kctd12, kctd13, kcnab1a, kcnh4a, kcnj6 (K+ ion channel), ryr1a, ryr1b, ryr3 (calcium ion channel) at 3 μM (other doses not measured)
↓ Expression of chrna1 (AChr receptor) and tnnc-2 (calcium ion channel) at 3 μM (other doses not measured)
No change in expression of kctd4 (K+ ion channel), scn4bb (sodium ion channel), ryr2, tnnc-1 (calcium ion channel) at 3 μM (other doses not measured)
Bai et al., 2023 [73]
BPF2–144 0.1, 1 μMNo effect on larvae locomotion
↑AroB cells in POA at 1uM and in NRP at both doses (related to neuroendocrine disruption)
No effect on BrdU (mitosis marker) cells in POA and NRP
Coumailleau et al., 2020 [99]
BPF4–144 200 μg/L↓ Embryo spontaneous movement
↓ Larvae locomotion
↓ Neurogenesis at 36 and 72 hpf
↓ Motor neuron length at 36 hpf
↓ Glutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin
↑ DOPA, normetanephrine, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, and Acetylcholine
Gu et al., 2022 [80]
BPF0–72/144 7, 70, 700 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 70 and 700 μg/L administered until 6 dpf (not measured at 3 dpf)
↑ Apoptosis in larvae brain at 70 and 700 μg/L doses until 3 dpf (not measured at 6 dpf)
↓ Larvae expression of α1-tubulin, Syn2a at 700 μg/L, elavl3, mbp, and gfap at 70 and 700 μg/L after administering until 3 dpf.
↓ in all these genes at 70 and 700 μg/L when administered until 6 dpf (genes related to neurodevelopment)
↑ Aberrant brain nuclei arrangement in larvae
Gu et al., 2020 [86]
BPF0–1442, 20, 200 μg/L↓ Embryo spontaneous movement at 20 and 200 μg/L
↓ Larvae locomotion at 2 and 20 μg/L (200 μg/L not)
↓ Expression of Ngn1, Elavl3, mbp, at 20 μg/L and Nrd at both 2 and 20 μg/L (200 μg/L not) (genes important for neuronal differentiation and development)
↑ Expression syn2α, gfap, and gap43 at 2, and 20 μg/L and α1-tubulin at 20 μg/L (200 μg/L not measured) (genes related to neural maturation and regeneration)
Gu et al., 2022 [93]
BPF4–120 5, 10 mg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at all doses
↑ Time in center
↑ Delayed response to stimuli at 10 mg/L
↓ Motor neuron length and axonal branching at 10 mg/L
↓ Oligodendrocytes and length of myelin sheath at 10 mg/L
↓ TH, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH), allopregnanolone, testosterone at 10 mg/L (5 mg/L not measured)
↑ Progesterone at 10 mg/L (5 mg/L not measured)
Kim et al., 2023 [87]
BPF2–960.0005, 0.5, 5.0 mg/L↓ Embryo spontaneous movement at 0.5 and 5 mg/L
↓ Motor neuron length at 0.5 and 5 mg/L
↓ Expression of socs3a, fosb, and nlgn2b, at 0.0005 and 0.5 mg/L (5 mg/L not measured) (genes related to neurodevelopment)
Mu et al., 2019 [92]
BPF2–120 1, 100 μg/LNo effect on larvae locomotion at all doses
↑ GnRH hypothalamic neurons with 100 μg/L
No effect on GnRH terminal nerve neurons with 100 μg/L
↑ Expression of kiss2, anp, ren, gh at 1 μg/L; lhβ, anp, ren, pth1 at 100 μg/L (genes related to reproductive neuroendocrinology)
No effect on expression of kiss1, gnrh3, fshβ, and prl
Qiu et al., 2021 [81]
BPF2–720.25, 0.5, 1 μM↓ Size of GnRH brain neurons at 2 dpf for 0.25 μM and at 3 dpf for 0.5 and 1 μM Weiler and Ramakrishnan 2019 [97]
BPS8–108 1, 10, 100 μM↑ Nearest neighbor distance at 10 μM and inter-individual distance at 10 and 100 μM, indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behavior
↑ Locomotion in the dark period and light period at all doses at 5 dpf
↓ Locomotion in light-dark exploration test and ↑ time in light at all doses at 10 dpf
↓ Time in social contact and number of contacts at all doses
↑ Intraocular distance (ID), lower jaw length (LJL), and ceratohyal cartilage length (CCL) at 1 and 100 μM, indicating macrocephaly
↑ Neurogenesis at 1 μM (other doses not measured)
↑ Expression of kctd4, kctd12, kctd13, kcnab1a, kcnh4a, kcnj6 (K+ ion channel), ryr2, ryr3 (calcium ion channel), scn4bb (sodium ion channel) at 3 μM (other doses not measured)
↓ Expression of chrna1 (AChr receptor) and tnnc-2 (calcium ion channel) at 1 μM (other doses not measured)
No change in expression of ryr1a, ryr1b, tnnc-1 (calcium ion channel) at 3 μM (other doses not measured)
Bai et al., 2023 [73]
BPS2–144 0.03, 0.3, 3.0 mg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at all doses
No changes in apoptosis at all doses
↓ Expression of α1-tubulin and gap43 at 0.3 and 3 mg/L; elavl3, mbp, syn2a, and gap43 at 3 mg/L, indicating disruption in neurodevelopment
↑ Retinal and optic nerve disruption at all doses
Gu et al., 2019 [95]
BPS4–144200 μg/LNo effect on larvae locomotion
↓ Neurogenesis at 36 hpf but not 72 hpf
↓ Motor neuron length at 36 hpf but not 72 hpf
↓ Norepinephrine, 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan
↑ 3-methoxytyramine, tyramine
Gu et al., 2022 [80]
BPS4–24/48/72/96/1200.01–1 μM↑ Larvae locomotion at 1 μM
↑ Expression of elavl3 at 0.03 μM and 1 μM at 120 hpf; ngn1 at all doses at 120 hpf and all but 0.01 μM at 48 hpf; gfap (genes related to neurodevelopment)
Gyimah et al., 2021 [94]
BPS0–120 0.0068 μM↑ Larvae locomotion
↑ Hypothalamic neurogenesis
Kinch et al., 2015 [101]
BPS2–120 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 μM↑ Time and distance in well peripheral zone at 0.001 μM
↓ Time in “social” zone at 0.1 μM
↓ Exploration of novel object in memory task at 0.01 and 0.1 μM
↑ Expression of esr1, esr2a, it, slc12a5a, slc12a5b, slc12a2 at 0.001 μM (genes related to brain signaling pathways)
↓ Expression of esr2b at 0.01 and 0.1; it and slc12a2 at 0.1 μM (genes related to brain signaling pathways)
↑ Expression of gad1b, slc32a1, slc6a1a, gabra1 at 0.001 μM; slc17a7a, grla1a, grin1a at 0.1 μM (genes associated with GABA and glutamate signaling)
↓ Expression of slc6a1a and gabra1 at 0.1 μM; grabra2 at 0.01 and 0.1 μM (genes related to brain signaling pathways)
↑ Brain Isotocin at 0.01 μM
Naderi et al., 2022 [88]
BPS2–25/120 0.1–1000 μg/L↑ HYPO-GnRH3 neurons at 25 hpf with 100 μL/L (other doses not measured)
No changes in TN-GnRH3 neurons at 25 hpf with 100 μL/L
↑ Expression of kiss1, gnrh3, er-α at 100 μL/L at 25 hpf with 100 μL/L (genes related to reproductive neuroendocrinology)
No effect on kiss2, kiss2r, fshβ, erβ, and sv2 expression at 25 hpf with 100 μL/L
Qiu et al., 2016 [96]
BPS2–120 1, 100 μg/LNo effect on larvae locomotion at either dose
↑ GnRH hypothalamic neurons with 100 μg/L
No effect on terminal nerve GnRH neurons at 100 μg/L
↑ Expression of lhβ, anp, prl at 1 μg/L and kiss1, kiss2, lhβ, anp, ren, pth1, gh at 100 μg/L (genes involved in reproductive neuroendocrinology)
No effect on gnrh3, fshβ at all doses
Qiu et al., 2021 [81]
BPS2–120 1, 10, 100 μg/L↑ Development of optic nerve at 10 μg/L and retinal ganglion cells, hypothalamic neurons, and motor neurons at 10 and 100 μg/L
↓ Cone synapses at 10 and 100 μg/L
↑ Altered mosaic patterning of cones at 10 and 100 μg/L
↑ Oxidative stress-related genes in cones
Qiu et al., 2023 [98]
BPS2–120 1, 10, 100 μg/L↓ Yolk lipid supply and LCFA precursors which allow for brain development at all doses
↓ Brain lipid levels at 120 hpf at all doses
Wang et al.,
2023 [102]
BPS2–120 4, 400 nM↓ Retinal thickness at all layers at all doses
↓ Light-seeking behavior at 400 nM
↓ Phototransduction genes at 400 nM
Wei et al., 2023 [90]
BPS-MPE0–120 185, 570, 1140 μg/LNo effect on larvae locomotion for any of the doses
↓ Time spent in well center, indicating lower anxiety, at 570 and 1140 μg/L
Blanc-Legendre et al., 2023 [74]
DM-BPA0–120 135, 370, 540 μg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 540 μg/L
No difference in time spent in well center for any dose
Blanc-Legendre et al., 2023 [74]
HPP8–108 0.061, 0.61, 6.1 μM↑ Nearest neighbor distance and inter-individual distance at 0.61 μM, indicating alterations in shoaling (social grouping) behaviorBai et al., 2023 [73]
TMBPF4–144 0.25–8 mg/L↓ Embryo spontaneous movement at all doses
↓ Larvae locomotion at 0.5 mg/L and above
↓ Neurogenesis in larvae brain at 0.5 mg/L and above
↓ Larvae motor-neuron length at 0.5 mg/L and above
↓ Dopamine neuron development at all doses
↓ Expression of syn2a and gafp expression at 0.5 mg/L and above (genes related to neurodevelopment)
↑ Expression of th1 and th2 at 0.24 mg/L and above (genes related to neurodevelopment)
Liang et al., 2023 [26]
BPAF, BPB, BPF, BPS, BPS-MAE, TCBPA0–120 1No effect on larvae locomotion or time spent in well centerBlanc-Legendre et al., 2023 [74]
BPE, BPP, BPZ8–108 2No effect on shoaling (social grouping) behaviorBai et al., 2023 [73]
BPS, BPAP2–1440.1, 1 μMNo effect on larvae locomotion
No effect on AroB (neuroendocrine marker) and BrdU (mitosis marker) cells in POA and NRP
Coumailleau et al., 2020 [99]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control. 1 μg/L: 67.5–270 (BPAF), 150–600 (BPB), 100–400 (BPF), 15,750–63,000 (BPS), 87.5–350 (BPS-MAE), 62.5–250 (TCBPA). 2 μM: 0.31–31 (BPE), 1–100 (BPP), 0.068–6.8 (BPZ).

4.2. Bisphenols and Rodents

Research assessing the influence of early-life single-BPA-analogue exposure in rodents is limited to BPAF, BPAP, BPF, and BPS. All four of these chemicals demonstrate adverse neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects (Table 3).
Early-life BPAF, BPAP, BPF, and BPS exposure resulted in decreased time or number of entries in the center of the open field and open arms of the elevated plus maze in males [103,104,105,106,107] and females [104,105,106,108,109]. BPS produced the least consistent results of the four bisphenols, with multiple studies finding no effect on behavior in these anxiety-related tests [107,109,110,111,112]. Tests of depression-like behaviors, including the novelty-suppressed feeding test (food-deprived animal chooses between a dark chamber or light chamber with food), tail suspension test, forced swim test, and sucrose preference test indicate effects in both sexes, but primarily males, exposed to BPAF [103,104,108]. In one study, BPF exposure increased immobility in female mice in the forced swim test [106], while a study with 1/200th of the dosage found no effect in the tail suspension and forced swim tests [111]. No effects of early BPS exposure were observed on depression-like behaviors [107,111]. Multiple studies also assessed the effect of early BPA analogue exposure on learning and memory. BPAF and BPAP in both sexes affected long-term and spatial memory [103,104,105,113]. Meanwhile, a decrease in olfactory short-term memory was found with early BPF exposure [114], another study at a similar dose found no impact on cognition and memory [111]. Early BPS exposure produced no identifiable effects on memory in another study [111]. Social behavior alterations were also present after perinatal exposure to BPAF [104], BPAP [105], BPF [111], and BPS [111,112], in addition to altered maternal behavior after BPS exposure.
All of the above bisphenol analogues have been shown to influence neurodevelopment through decreasing synapse and spine densities [113]. Alterations in gene expression and the transcriptome related to neuron differentiation, synaptic signaling, and organization were also observed [104,105,114]. Studies also demonstrate the effects of specific neurotransmitters, including dopamine and serotonin [109,115], as well as the disruption of hormone systems important for neurodevelopment, such as the estrogen system [110] and 5α-reductase, an enzyme important for hormone metabolism [115]. Evidence suggests microglia and oxidative stress may be drivers in these neurodevelopmental disruptions caused by bisphenols [105,113].
Table 3. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-BPA bisphenols in rodents.
Table 3. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-BPA bisphenols in rodents.
EDCAnimalTime of ExposureDoseFindingsReference
BPAFMiceGD 0.5–18.50.4, 4 mg/kg↓ Time in center of open field at all doses in females
↑ Latency to feeding at all doses, total intake at 4 mg/kg, and ↓ total intake at 0.4 mg/kg in females in novelty-suppressed feeding test
No effect on the latency to feeding, but ↓ total intake in males at all doses in novelty-suppressed feeding test
↑ Immobility time at all doses but no effect on latency to immobility in females in the tail suspension test
↓ Immobility time at 4 mg/kg and latency to immobility at 0.4 mg/kg in males in tail suspension test
↑ Floating time at 4 mg/kg for females in forced swim test. No effect of floating time in males or latency to floating in males or females.
↓ Sucrose preference for females in 0.4 mg/kg test
No effect on short-term or long-term memory in the novel object recognition test
Gong et al., 2022 [108]
BPAFMiceGD 1–190.4, 4 mg/kg↓ Time in center of open field at both doses in males
No effect on locomotion in open field
↑ Latency to feeding at both doses in males and ↓ latency to feeding at 0.4 mg/kg in females in the novelty-suppressed feeding test
↓ Sucrose preference in males at 0.4 mg/kg
↑ Immobility in tail suspension test in males at both doses
↑ Floating time in forced swim test in females at 4 mg/kg
↓ Long-term memory at both doses for males and 0.4 mg/kg for females in novel object recognition test. No change seen in short-term memory.
↓ Freezing time in both long-term and short-term memory in contextual fear conditioning test in males at both doses
Gong et al., 2017 [103]
BPAFMiceGD 6–P 210.34, 3.4, 34 mg/kg↓ Time spent in target quadrant of MWM in males at all doses, indicating impaired spatial memory
↓ Number of quadrant crossing of MWM in females at 34 mg/kg, indicating impaired spatial memory
No effect on hippocampal neuronal damage
↓ Number of intersections in CA1 and DG neurons at all doses in males and only at 34 mg/kg in DG neurons in females
↓ Spinal density in dendrites at 3.4 and 34 mg/kg in males
No effect on spinal density in females
↓ PSD-95 at 3.4 and 34 mg/kg and Synapsin-1 at all doses in males; PSD-95 at 34 mg/kg in females
↓ Hippocampal ERα in males at all doses and ERβ in females at all doses
No effect on hippocampal ERβ in males and ERα in females
↑ Oxidative stress in male hippocampus (females not tested)
No effect on brain weight
Zhang et al., 2021 [113]
BPAFMiceGD 7–P 00.4 mg/kg↓ Entries/time in center and locomotion in open field for both males and females
↓ Open-arm time and locomotion in EPM for males
↑ Marble burying in MBT for males
↑ Latency to first immobility time and immobility in the tail suspension test for males
↓ Time with novel object in novel object recognition test for males
↓ Sociability for males
↑ Alterations in transcriptome related to synaptic signaling, organization, and structure, neurotransmitters, and neuron development for males (females not tested)
Wu et al., 2023 [104]
BPAPMiceGD 7–P 210.4 mg/kg↓ Entries and velocity in center for both males and females distance traveled in center for males in the open-field test. No effect on time in center
↓ Time in open arms for females in the elevated plus maze
↑ Number of marbles buried for males and females in marble-burying test
↓ Time spent with novel objects in males but not females. ↓ Preference index for novel object in both males and females in novel object recognition test
↓ Time spent with mouse compared to empty cage and novel mouse compared to familiar mouse in three-chamber test in both males and females
↓ Surviving neurons in male and female CA1 and DG
↑ Alterations in transcriptome related to astrocytes, microglia, neurons, oligodendrocytes, and pathways associated with Parkinson’s and neurodegeneration.
↑ Expression of C1qc, Ctss, and Iba1 (genes related to microglia)
Il1rapl1, Sgk3, Ncam2, Kirrel, Fkbp5 (genes related to neurodevelopment)
↑ Macrophages and activation of dendritic cells
Wu et al., 2023 [105]
BPFMiceGD 15–P 212, 200 µg/kg↓ Short-term olfactory memory at 200 µg/kg
No effect on serum TH levels
↓ Neurogenesis and corpus collosum thickness at 200 µg/kg
No effect on oligodendrogenesis, oligodendrocyte differentiation, or myelination
↑ Alterations in transcriptome related to brain development, neuron fate development, neuron differentiation at both doses, in addition to myelination and oligodendrogenesis at 200 µg/kg
No alterations in genes related to intracellular TH, important for brain development
Vancamp et al., 2023 [114]
BPFMiceGD 9.5–P 2850 μg/kgNo effect on sociability
↓ Time spent with novel mouse in three-chamber test
↓ Sniffing of conspecific in open field
No effect on anxiety as measured in open field and elevated plus maze
No effect on depressive behavior as measured in the tail suspension test and the forced swim test
No effect on locomotion and motor learning as measured in rotarod test
No effect on cognition and memory as measured in novel object test
Moon et al., 2023 [111]
BPFRatsGD 12–P 2110 μg/kg↓ 5α-reductase type 3 but not type 1 or 2 mRNA
↑ Expression of Cyp2d4, Htr4, Nr4a1 (dopamine and serotonin genes)
Htr1d, Pde4c, Adcy1, Ddc, Dbh, Adcy2, App, Htr1a, Comt, Syn2, Fos, Akt3, Akt1, Tph1, Adcy5, Adrb2, Bdnf (dopamine and serotonin genes)
Castro et al., 2015 [115]
BPFMiceGD 11.5–18.510 mg/kgNo effect on locomotion
↓ Time in center of open field for females
↑ Time spent in closed arm of EPM for both females and males
↑ Time immobile in forced swim test for females
Ohtani et al., 2017 [106]
BPSMice (Female only)GD 9–P 212, 200 µg/kgNo effect on the open field
↑ Infanticide, pup neglect, and improper pup care carried out by exposed female offspring at 2 μg/kg
↓ Time spent in nest at both doses
↑ Nest building at 200 μg/kg
No effect on time spent grooming, nest size
↓ Latency for pup retrieval
No effect on ERα in the MPOA and TH in the VTA
Catanese and Vandenberg, 2016 [110]
BPSMiceGD 9.5–P 2850 μg/kgNo effect on sociability
↓ Time spent with novel mouse in three-chamber test
↓ Sniffing of conspecific in open field
No effect on anxiety as measured in open field and elevated plus maze
No effect on depressive behavior as measured in the tail suspension test and the forced swim test
No effect on locomotion and motor learning as measured in rotarod test
No effect on cognition and memory as measured in novel object test
Moon et al., 2023 [111]
BPSRatsGD 12–P 2110 μg/kg↓ 5α-reductase type 3 but not type 1 or 2 mRNA
↑ Expression of Cyp2d4, Htr4, Nr4a1, Dusp1, and Pde4b (dopamine and serotonin genes)
Adct2, Adrb2, and Tph1 (dopamine and serotonin genes)
Castro et al., 2015 [115]
BPSRatsGD 0–P 2010, 50 μg/kgNo effect on open field
↓ Time and entries in open arms of males at both doses
↑ High-fat diet consumption at both doses in males and at 10 μg/kg in females
No effect on high-sugar diet consumption
Da Silva et al., 2019 [107]
BPSMiceGD 0–P 284 μg/kg↓ Open-arm time and ↑ locomotion in EPM in females but not males
No effect on time spent in center of open field for males and females, ↓ latency to first entry into center for males
↑ Serotonin neurons in DRV and serotonin fractional area in DR and DRV in males and in serotonin fractional area in DRD in females (DR = Dorsal Raphe Nucleus, DRD = dorsal region of DR, DRV = ventral region of DR). No effects in the Median Raphe Nucleus.
Bonaldo et al., 2023 [116]
BPSMiceGD 9–P 202, 200 µg/kg↓ Litters initiating nursing at 200 μg/kgLaPlante et al., 2017 [117]
BPSMiceGD 8–P 210.2 mg/kgNo effect on open-field test
↓ Time spent with familiar mice and ↑ locomotion in social test
Kim et al., 2015 [112]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.

4.3. Bisphenols and Humans

The literature on human studies is based on epidemiological and population studies relating exposure or body burden to outcomes. A wide variety of BPA analogues have been considered, although most bisphenol replacements have had levels of detection that were too low for further analysis [118]. Because of this, most studies to date have only assessed the relationship between perinatal and childhood exposure to BPAF, BPF, and BPS on measures of cognition and behavior, and results have varied, no doubt due to differences in the populations, methodology of behavioral testing, and other experimental factors (Table 4). While early BPAF exposure was associated with lower levels of social development in girls [119], no associations were found with IQ, scores of perceptual reasoning, verbal comprehension, gross and fine motor skills, adaptive skills, and language [119,120]. Early BPF exposure was linked to lower IQ, perceptual reasoning, and verbal comprehension in boys [120,121] and higher ADHD rating scores in both sexes (although higher in girls) [122]. Other studies found no association between BPF exposure and IQ and measures of infant neurodevelopment [123,124]. Early BPS exposure was correlated with increases in ADHD rating scores in both sexes [122], an increase in emotionally reactive behaviors in girls [125], and a decrease in psychomotor development in boys [123]. Multiple studies found no correlations with early BPS exposure and IQ, mental development, and other measures of cognition [118,119,120,121,123,124,126,127]. Again, the disparities in results can likely be attributed to the different characteristics of the populations studied.

5. PFAS Alternatives and Neurodevelopment

5.1. PFAS and Zebrafish

A wide array of PFAS alternatives cause behavioral and neurodevelopmental effects in zebrafish (Table 5). Commonly studied alternatives for the legacy chemicals PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS include PFBS, PFHpA, 6:2 FTS, 6:2 FTSA, Gen-X, PFBA, PFHpS, and PFNA. Embryonic exposure to all of these chemicals, except 6:2 FST, caused alterations in larvae locomotion and photomotor (movement in response to light) response [129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136]. In terms of neurodevelopmental effects, studies showed that early-life GenX and PFHxA exposure caused an alteration in genes related to neuron differentiation and growth [129,136]. PFBA exposure led to an increase in the enrichment of pathways associated with neurological disorders and neurodevelopment [132].
Truong et al. compared 139 PFASs and assessed larvae and embryonic photomotor response, a measure of neurodevelopmental toxicity. Interestingly, they found that the average mass of the compound, number of fluorinated carbons, functional head groups, and physicochemical properties (e.g., vapor pressure) were not predictive of behavior. They did find that less volatile PFASs were associated with alterations in these neurodevelopmental tests, although the implications for non-aquatic models are unknown. Rericha et al. similarly tested 58 PFASs and found no conclusive association between chain length and neurotoxicity as well, with alterations to the behavior observed among a variety of chain lengths and subclasses. Gaballah et al., who explored the effects of chain length in five aliphatic sulfonic acid PFASs, found that although chain length was generally associated with neurotoxicity, exceptions exist, bringing into question the notion that smaller chain length PFASs are safer.

5.2. PFAS and Rodents

Only limited studies have assessed the influence of new-generation PFAS on rodent neurodevelopment and behavior. In fact, we only found two studies that evaluated the effects of the perinatal administration of GenX on thyroid hormone during gestation, which is essential for the proper development of the brain (Table 6) [143,144]. Early GenX exposure altered placental thyroid hormone levels, potentially disrupting offspring neurodevelopment [143,144].

5.3. PFASs and Humans

Many PFASs measured in human subjects fall below the level of detection, making analysis difficult. PFASs with concentrations above the level of detection include 6:2Cl-PFESA, EtFOSAA, MeFOSAA, PFBS, PFDA, PFDeA, PFDoA, PFHpA, PFHpS, PFNA, and more (Table 7). PFBS, PFDeA, PFDoA, PFNA, and PFUnDA have demonstrated an inverse relationship with IQ or other measures of cognition [145,146,147,148,149,150]. Associations between early PFAS exposure and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or deficits in social behavior were observed with 6:2 Cl-PFESA, PFBS, PFDA, PFDoA, and PFNA [146,151,152,153,154]. Positive correlations have also been seen with early PFAS exposure and ADHD, specifically with exposure to PFDA, PFNA, and PFUnDA [128,155]. Deficits in cognition, social behavior, and other behavioral alterations were found with a variety of PFASs from different subclasses and with different chain lengths, including short-chain PFASs such as PFBS. Concurrently, many studies found null correlations with the chemical discussed above and measures of cognition, ASD, ADHD, and more. Differences in findings may be a result of variations in levels of exposure, participant demographics, and the timing of exposures measured.
It is surprising that some studies observed apparent beneficial relationships between PFAS exposure and neurodevelopment and behavior. Harris et al. found that early-life PFNA, EtFOSAA, and MeFOSAA exposure were associated with higher visual–motor scores. They hypothesized that PFASs at specific concentrations may be neuroprotective through their agonist activity on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), leading to reduced inflammation [156,157,158]. Luo et al. also found that PFBS, PFDoA, and PFUnDA were positively associated with social–emotional and/or adaptive scores [146]. Skogheim et al. found positive correlations between PFDA, PFNA, PFHpS, and PFUnDA with verbal working memory. Enright et al. found that early exposure to PFNA, PFDeA, and PFUdA was associated with better visual attention [159]. Finally, PFNA was positively associated with visual–spatial and working memory, in addition to vocabulary scores [160,161,162]. While the seemingly beneficial effects of certain PFASs are notable, it is important to consider that these same chemicals can (and do) have adverse effects on other biological systems.
Table 7. Associations with non-PFOA, -PFOS, and -PFHxS PFASs and neurodevelopment and behavior in humans.
Table 7. Associations with non-PFOA, -PFOS, and -PFHxS PFASs and neurodevelopment and behavior in humans.
EDCTime EDC MeasuredConcentration MeasuredFindingsReference
6:2Cl-PFESABirthMedian Serum (Cord): 2.05 μg/L↓ Association with communication and gross-motor scoresZhou et al., 2023 [152]
EtFOSAAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange Plasma (ng/mL):
Prenatal: <0.1–44.6
Childhood: NA
↑ Association with 0.8–1.1 ng/mL prenatal exposure and mid-childhood visual–motor score
No association with vocabulary scores, verbal and nonverbal IQ, and visual–spatial perception and memory
Harris et al., 2018 [156]
EtFOSAAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange plasma (ng/mL): Prenatal: <0.1–33.6
Childhood: NA
↓ Association with prenatal 0.8–1.1 ng/mL quartile and teacher-rated behavioral regulation and metacognition index problemsHarris et al., 2021 [163]
MeFOSAAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange Plasma (ng/mL): Prenatal: 0.1–29.7
Childhood: NA
↑ Association with prenatal 1.3–1.9 ng/mL and scores in an assessment of visual–motor abilities and an assessment of vocabulary
No association with verbal and nonverbal IQ or visual–spatial perception and memory
Harris et al., 2018 [156]
MeFOSAAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange plasma (ng/mL):
Prenatal: 0.1–29.7
Childhood: NA
↓ Association with prenatal 2–3.1 ng/mL quartile and parent-rated total difficulties and internalizing scores (emotional and peer problems)Harris et al., 2021 [163]
PFBSGestation (13–16 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.01–7 ng/mL↑ Association with social–emotional and adaptive scoresLuo et al., 2022 [146]
PFBSBirthRange Serum (Cord): 0.01–0.98 ng/mL↓ Association with gross motor and adaptive skills in boys
↓ Association with social score
↓ Association with TSH and FT4 hormones
No association with fine motor and language domain scores
Yao et al., 2022 [151]
PFBSGestation (9–16 weeks)Median Serum: 0.05 ng/mL↓ Association with IQWang et al., 2023 [145]
PFDABirthMedian Serum (Cord): 0.24 μg/L↓ Association with communication scoresZhou et al., 2023 [152]
PFDA2 and 4 yearsRange Serum (ng/mL):
2 years: 0.07–1.25
4 years: 0.06–1.27
↑ Association with lower exposure at 2 years old and ADHD rating scoreKim et al., 2023 [164]
PFDAGestation (12–16 weeks)Mean Plasma: 2.1 ng/mL↑ Association with personal–social skills problems in girls
No association with gross and fine motor skills and problem-solving skills
Niu et al., 2019 [153]
PFDAGestation (10–40 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.02–4.02 ng/mL↑ Association with problem behaviors
↑ Association with hyperactivity score
Hoyer et al., 2018 [165]
PFDAGestation (17 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.05–1.77 ng/mL↑ Association with verbal working memory in boys
No association with ADHD symptoms, language skills, or IQ
Skogheim et al., 2021 [166]
PFDAGestation (32 weeks), 5 and 7 yearsRange Serum (ug/L):
Gestation: 0.03–0.98
5 years: 0.05–1.2
7 years: 0.07–2.02
↑ Association with 5-year exposure and total behavioral development scores, externalizing problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and conduct problemsOulhote et al., 2016 [167]
PFDAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange Plasma (ng/mL):
Prenatal: NA
Childhood: <0.1–1.9
↑ Association with childhood 0.5–1.9 ng/mL quartile and parent-rated total difficulties, internalizing scores (emotional and peer problems), and externalizing scores (hyperactivity and conduct problems)Harris et al., 2021 [163]
PFDAGestation (18 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.19–0.24 ng/mL↓ Association with ADHD
No association with ASD
Skogheim et al., 2021 [166]
PFDAGestation (~37 weeks)Range Serum: <0.01–5.74 ng/mL↓ Association with gross motor function score
No association with fine motor function, communication, problem-solving ability, and personal–social skills
Li et al., 2023 [168]
PFDA9–11 years oldMean Blood: 0.26 ng/mL↓ Association with response inhibitionGump et al., 2012 [169]
PFDeAGestation (12–28 weeks)Mean Serum: 0.08 ng/mL↑ Association with attention
No association with information processing speed and visual recognition memory
Enright et al., 2023 [159]
PFDeAGestation (13–16 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.03–27.8 ng/mL↓ Association with cognition, language, and motor scoresLuo et al., 2022 [146]
PFDoAGestation (12–16 weeks)Mean Plasma: 0.1 ng/mL↑ Association with personal–social skills problems in girls
No association with gross and fine motor skills and problem-solving skills
Niu et al., 2019 [153]
PFDoAGestation (13–16 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.04–2.9 ng/mL↓ Association with cognition and language scores
↑ Association with adaptive scores
Luo et al., 2022 [146]
PFDoDAGestation (~37 weeks)Range Serum: <0.01–2.01 ng/mL↓ Association with problem-solving ability
No association with communication, gross and fine motor function, and personal–social skills
Li et al., 2023 [168]
PFHpAGestation (10–40 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.003–0.42 ng/mL↑ Association with hyperactivity score
No association with problem behaviors
Hoyer et al., 2018 [165]
PFHpAGestation (13–16 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.01–2.49 ng/mL↓ Association with language and motor scoresLuo et al., 2022 [146]
PFHpSGestation (18 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.17–0.23 ng/mL↑ Association with ASD in girls
No association with ADHD
Skogheim et al., 2021 [166]
PFHpSGestation (17 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.05–0.62 ng/mL↓ Association with nonverbal working memory
No association with ADHD symptoms, language skills, or IQ
Skogheim et al., 2020 [170]
PFNABirthMedian Serum (Cord): 0.34 μg/L↓ Association with communication scoresZhou et al., 2023 [152]
PFNAGestation (13–19 weeks), 3 years, and 8 yearsRange Serum (ng/mL): Prenatal: 0.1–2.9
3 years: 0.5–41.7
8 years: 0.1–5.2
↑ Association with 3- and 8-year-old exposure and completion time of a visual spatial abilities test
No association with spatial reference memory, errors of omission (inattention), and reaction time in an attention and impulsivity test
Vuong et al., 2018 [160]
PFNAGestationRange Serum: 0.2–1 ng/mL↑ Association with ASDOh et al., 2021 [154]
PFNAGestation (11–15 weeks)Median Plasma: 0.7 ng/ml↑ Association with cognitive development
↓ Association with working memory scores
Carrizosa et al., 2021 [147]
PFNAGestation (10–30 weeks)Median Serum: 0.9 ng/mL↑ Association with DNA methylation sites near genes DPAGT1, SLC6A2, and TMEM56 (related to neuromuscular transmission, ADHD, depression, and bipolar disorder)Liu et al., 2022 [171]
PFNAGestation (13–19 weeks, 26 weeks, at delivery)Mean Serum: 0.90 ng/mL↑ Association with externalizing problems, including hyperactivity; Behavior Symptoms Index
↑ Association with ADHD symptoms and criteria
Vuong et al., 2021 [155]
PFNAGestation (6–26 weeks)Median Plasma:
0.46 ng/mL
↑ Association with IQLiew et al., 2018 [172]
PFNA2 and 4 yearsRange Serum (ng/mL):
2 years: 0.15–17.4
4 years: 0.13–7.56
↑ Association with lower exposure at 2 years old and ADHD rating scoreKim et al., 2023 [164]
PFNAGestation (12–16 weeks)Mean Plasma: 1.8 ng/mL↑ Association with personal–social skills problems in girls
No association with gross and fine motor skills and problem-solving skills
Niu et al., 2019 [153]
PFNAGestation (13–19 weeks), 3 years, and 8 yearsMedian Serum (ng/mL): Prenatal: 0.9
3 years: 1.2
8 years: 0.7
↑ Association with prenatal exposure and childhood exposure and reading scoresZhang et al., 2018 [173]
PFNAGestation (13 weeks–birth), 3 years, 8 yearsMean Serum (ng/mL): Gestation: 0.9
8 years: 0.8
↑ Association with prenatal exposure and working memory
↑ Association with prenatal and child exposure and processing speed and verbal comprehension
↑ Association with child exposure and IQ and perceptual reasoning
Vuong et al., 2019 [161]
PFNAGestation (10–40 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.14–5.71 ng/mL↑ Association with problem behaviors
↑ Association with hyperactivity score
Hoyer et al., 2018 [165]
PFNAGestation (17 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.06–5.32 ng/mL↑ Association with verbal working memory in boys
No association with ADHD symptoms, language skills, or IQ
Skogheim et al., 2020 [170]
PFNAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange Plasma (ng/mL): Prenatal: <0.1–6.0
Childhood: <0.1–25.7
↑ Association with 1–6 ng/mL prenatal exposure and visual–spatial perception and memory
No association with prenatal exposure and visual–motor scores, vocabulary, and verbal and nonverbal IQ. No association with childhood exposure and visual–motor scores, vocabulary, IQ, and visual–spatial perception and memory.
Harris et al., 2018 [156]
PFNAGestation (32 weeks), 5 and 7 yearsRange Serum (ug/L):
Gestation: 0.12–1.93
5 years: 0.39–6.16
7 years: 0.47–9.49
↑ Association with 5-year exposure and total behavioral development scores, externalizing problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and conduct problems
↑ Association with 7-year exposure and total behavioral development scores in girls; ↓ association with 7-year exposure and total behavioral development scores in boys
Oulhote et al., 2016 [167]
PFNAGestation (12–28 weeks)Mean Serum: 0.28 ng/mL↑ Association with attention
No association with information processing speed and visual recognition memory
Enright et al., 2023 [159]
PFNAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange plasma (ng/mL):
Prenatal: <0.1–6.0
Childhood:<0.1–25.7
↑ Association with childhood 2.4–25.7 ng/mL and parent-rated total difficulties, internalizing (emotional and peer problems), and externalizing scores (hyperactivity and conduct problems)
↑ Association with 1.1–1.5 ng/mL childhood quartiles and teacher-rated total difficulties and the 1.6–2.3 ng/mL quartile and externalizing score
Harris et al., 2021 [163]
PFNAGestation (~16 weeks)Median Serum:
3 years: 1.9 ng/mL
8 years: 1.2 ng/mL
↓ Association with 8-year exposure and metacognition scores, including initiation, planning, and organization of materials; association with 8-year exposure; and executive function
↑ Association with risk metacognitive impairments
Vuong et al., 2018 [174]
PFNAGestation (13–16 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.05–16.97 ng/mL↓ Association with cognition, language, and motor scoresLuo et al., 2022 [146]
PFNAGestation (8–16 weeks) and 18 months oldMedian Serum (ng/mL): Prenatal: 0.65
Childhood: 0.57
↓ Association with prenatal exposure and IQ
↑ Association with childhood exposure and IQ
Beck et al., 2023 [175]
PFNAAt deliveryRange Cord blood: 0–10.3 ng/mL↓ Association with psychomotor development index and verbal IQSpratlen et al., 2020 [150]
PFNAGestationMean Serum (ng/mL): 0.48↓ Association with receptive language scoresOh et al., 2021 [176]
PFNA9–11 years oldMean Blood: 0.82 ng/mL↓ Association with response inhibitionGump et al., 2011 [169]
PFNAGestation (28–40 weeks)Median Serum: ~1.44–1.58 ng/mL↓ Association with verbal, performance, and total IQWang et al., 2015 [149]
PFNAGestation (~15 weeks)Median Serum: 0.5 ng/mL↓ Association with vocabulary score when mothers were <25 years old
↑ Association with vocabulary score when mothers were >30 years old
Jeddy et al., 2017 [162]
PFNA, PFDA, PFUA, Me-FOSAA, PFDOA, Et-FOSAAMaternal serum collected at 2–5 years to calculate maternal prenatal serumRange Reconstructed maternal prenatal serum: <0.49–>0.91 ng/mL (see paper for details)No association with ASDShin et al., 2020 [177]
PFOSA9–11 years oldMean Blood: 0.75 ng/mL↓ Association with response inhibitionGump et al., 2011 [169]
PFTrDAGestation (22–15 weeks) and at deliveryMedian Serum (ug/mL): Prenatal: 0.24
Birth (Cord Serum): 0.47
↓ Association with T3 and T4
No association with TSH
Kim et al., 2011 [178]
PFUdAGestation (12–16 weeks)Mean Plasma: 1.6 ng/mL↑ Association with personal–social skills problems in girls
No association with gross and fine motor skills and problem-solving skills
Niu et al., 2019 [153]
PFUdAGestation (12–28 weeks)Mean Serum: 0.04 ng/mL↑ Association with attention
No association with information processing speed and visual recognition memory
Enright et al., 2023 [159]
PFUnDA2 and 4 yearsRange Serum (ng/mL):
2 years: 0.08–1.8
4 years: 0.23–5.98
↑ Association with lower exposure at 2 years old and ADHD rating scoreKim et al., 2023 [164]
PFUnDAGestation (17 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.05–1.46 ng/mL↑ Association with verbal working memory in boys
No association with ADHD symptoms, language skills, or IQ
Skogheim et al., 2020 [170]
PFUnDAGestation (18 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.23–0.32 ng/mL↓ Association with ADHD
No association with ASD
Skogheim et al., 2021 [166]
PFUnDAGestation (13–16 weeks)Range Plasma: 0.04–24.46 ng/mL↓ Association with cognition, language, and motor scores
↑ Association with adaptive scores
Luo et al., 2022 [146]
PFUnDAGestation (~37 weeks)Range Serum: <0.01–3.56 ng/mL↓ Association with gross motor function score
No association with communication, problem-solving ability, fine motor function, and personal–social skills
Li et al., 2023 [168]
PFUnDAGestation (28–40 weeks)Median Serum: ~3.13–3.42 ng/mL↓ Association with performance IQWang et al., 2015 [149]
6:2 Cl-PFESA, 8:2 Cl-PFESA, PFBA, PFNA, PFTrDAGestation (~37 weeks)Range Serum (ng/mL): <0.01–8.69 (6:2 Cl-PFESA), <0.01–0.23 (8:2 Cl-PFESA), <0.01–15.36 (PFBA), <0.01–2.68 (PFNA), <0.01–3.51 (PFTrDA)No association with communication, problem-solving ability, gross and fine motor function, and personal–social skillsLi et al., 2023 [168]
FOSAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange Plasma (ng/mL):
Prenatal: NA
Childhood plasma: <0.1–0.5
No associations found with childhood exposure and parent and teacher-rated strengths, difficulties, and executive function (including emotional and conduct problems)Harris et al., 2021 [163]
Me-PFOSA-AcOHGestation (12–28 weeks)Mean Serum: 0.04 ng/mLNo association with attention, information processing speed, and visual recognition memoryEnright et al., 2023 [159]
PFDABirthRange Serum (Cord): 0.01–0.87 ng/mLNo association with gross and fine motor, adaptive, language, and social domain scores
No association with thyroid hormone levels
Yao et al., 2022 [151]
PFDA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA, MeFOSAA, EtFOSAAGestationMean Serum: 0.1–0.19 ng/mL (see paper for details)No association with scores of cognitive developmentOh et al., 2021 [176]
PFDA,
Me-PFOSA-AcOH
Gestation (~16 weeks)Median Serum (ng/mL):
3 years: 0.2–1.2
8 years: 0.2–0.7 (see paper for details)
No association with executive function or risk metacognitive impairmentsVuong et al., 2018 [174]
PFDeAGestation (<22 weeks) and 6.6–10.9 yearsRange Plasma (ng/mL):
Prenatal: <0.1–3.0
Childhood: NA
No association with visual–motor scores, vocabulary, verbal and nonverbal IQ, and visual–spatial perception and memoryHarris et al., 2018 [156]
PFDoABirthRange Serum (Cord): 0.09–0.76 ng/mLNo association with gross and fine motor, adaptive, language, and social domain scores
No association with thyroid hormone levels
Yao et al., 2022 [151]
PFHpABirthRange Serum (Cord): 0.02–1.17 ng/mLNo association with gross and fine motor, adaptive, language, and social domain scores
No association with thyroid hormone levels
Yao et al., 2022 [151]
PFNAGestationMedian Plasma (ng/mL): ~0.45–0.49No association with Cerebral PalsyVilhelmsson et al., 2023 [179]
PFTrDAGestation (12–16 weeks)Mean Plasma (ng/mL): 0.1 (PFTrDA)No association with personal–social skills, gross and fine motor skills, and problem-solving skillsNiu et al., 2019 [153]
PFDAGestation (8–16 weeks) and 18 months oldMedian Serum (ng/mL): Prenatal: 0.29 (PFDA)
Childhood: 0.18 (PFDA)
No association with prenatal and childhood exposure and IQBeck et al., 2023 [175]
PFDeA,
PFDoDA
Gestation (28–40 weeks)Median Serum (ng/mL):
0.44 (PFDeA),
~0.37 (PFDoDA)
No association with verbal, performance, and total IQWang et al., 2015 [149]
PFHpS,
PFDA,
PFOSA
Gestation (6–26 weeks)Median Plasma: 0.17–2.32 ng/mL (see paper for details)No association with IQLiew et al., 2018 [172]
PFHpS,
PFNA,
PFDA
Gestation (6–12 weeks)Range Plasma:
~0.11–0.56 (see paper for details) ng/mL
No association with ADHD or ASDLiew et al., 2015 [180]
PFHpS,
PFNA,
PFDA,
PFTeDA,
PFUnDA
Gestation (22–15 weeks) and at deliveryMedian Serum (ug/mL): Prenatal: 0.09–0.6
Infant (Cord): (PFHxS), 0.06–0.45 (see paper for details)
No association with thyroid hormonesKim et al., 2011 [178]
PFNA,
PFDA
Gestation (8–16 weeks) and 18 monthsMedian Blood (ng/mL): Gestation: 0.29–0.64
18 months:
0.18–0.58 (see paper for details)
No association between prenatal and child exposure and ADHDDalsager et al., 2021 [181]
PFNA,
PFDA
Gestation (8–16 weeks) and 18 monthsMedian Serum (ng/mL):
Gestation: 0.29–0.65
18 months: 0.18–0.58 (see paper for details)
No association between prenatal and child exposure and language developmentBeck et al., 2023 [148]
PFNABirthMedian Serum (Cord): ~0.28–0.31 ng/mLNo association with ADHDOde et al., 2014 [182]
PFNA5–18 yearsRange Serum: 0.25–24.1 ng/mLNo association with ADHDStein and Savitz, 2011 [183]
PFNABirthRange Serum (Cord): 0.08–1.76 ng/mLNo association with gross and fine motor, adaptive, language, and social domain scores
No association with thyroid hormone levels
Yao et al., 2022 [151]
PFNA, PFDeAGestation (~16 weeks–birth)Range Serum: 0.1–2.9 (PFNA), 0.1–1.3 (PFDeA) ng/mLNo association with behavioral regulation and executive functionVuong et al., 2016 [184]
PFNA,Gestation (18 weeks)Range Plasma (ng/mL): 0.39–49No association with ADHD or ASDSkogheim et al., 2021 [166]
PFNA,
PFDA,
PFUA,
PFDoA,
PFBS,
PFHpA
Gestation (9–16 weeks)Median Serum (ng/mL): 0.05–2.16 (see paper for details)No association with IQWang et al., 2023 [145]
PFNAGestation (16–26 weeks)Median Serum (ug/L):0.9No association with social responsiveness scores, a measure of ASDBraun et al., 2014 [185]
PFTrA,
PFDoA,
PFBA,
8:2Cl-PFESA
BirthMedian Serum (Cord) (ug/L): 0.04–0.25 (see paper for details)No association with communication scoresZhou et al., 2023 [152]
PFUABirthRange Serum (Cord): 0.03–0.65 ng/mLNo association with gross and fine motor, adaptive, language, and social domain scores
No association with thyroid hormone levels
Yao et al., 2022 [151]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.

6. Phthalate Alternatives and Neurodevelopment

6.1. Phthalate Alternatives and Zebrafish

Relatively little research exists looking at the effects of phthalate replacement on neurodevelopment, although what is published suggests that exposure to phthalate replacements can have adverse effects (Table 8). Early ATBC and DINCH exposure led to alterations in locomotion, while ATEC exposure did not [186,187]. Changes in gene expression related to neurodevelopment were seen in zebrafish exposed to ATBC, ATEC, and DINCH [186,187,188]. Effects were also seen in transcriptomics related to thyroid hormone pathways in DGD, DINCH, and GTA, although no effects on thyroid hormone levels were observed [189].

6.2. Phthalate Alternatives and Rodents

We were only able to identify one study assessing the effects of perinatal phthalate replacement exposure on neurodevelopment and behavior in rodents. Lee et al. observed that exposure to DEHA from GD 15–P21 at ~480–12,000 ppm led to a decrease in hypothalamic granulin precursor protein (grn) mRNA in males and p130 mRNA in females, genes related to brain sexual differentiation. The study also found an effect on sexual behavior, with fewer intromissions and ejaculations by males exposed to the chemical [190].

6.3. Phthalate Alternatives and Humans

Human studies examining the effects of phthalate replacements on neurodevelopment are, to our knowledge, limited to DEHTP, DINCH, and DEHT (Table 9). DEHTP exposure during gestation was associated with a decrease in adaptive and cognitive skills in boys, along with a decrease in communication scores in girls [191]. Early DINCH exposure, however, did not have an association with IQ [192]. Gestational exposure to DINCH and DEHT was associated with alterations in thyroid hormones, which could have implications for neurodevelopment [118,193].

7. Discussion

7.1. Bisphenols

Evidence suggests that all BPA analogues pose health risks when it comes to neurodevelopment. BPAF appears to be a particular chemical of concern, with the most adverse effects seen in zebrafish, while BPS causes the fewest disturbances to neurodevelopment. These findings are consistent with evidence suggesting BPAF has high toxicity, teratogenicity, and estrogen receptor binding ability [195,196]. The toxicity level rankings for top bisphenols are BPAF > BPA > BPF > BPS while the estrogenicity rankings are BPAF > BPA = BPF > BPS [195,196]. Rodent and human studies are not as consistent, however. For both, even lower-toxicity bisphenols, such as BPS, caused or were associated with some neurodevelopmental disturbances. BPS, however, did produce null results in many studies. Differences in results between studies may be caused by differences in dosing and timing of EDC exposure in addition to differences in when and how measures (behavioral and molecular) were taken.
In human studies, authors often excluded bisphenols that were below their defined level of detection. Although this could suggest that these chemicals may be of lesser concern, evidence shows that BPA substitutes are on the rise [39]. Furthermore, the limit of sensitivity of certain assays does not mean that lower exposures are biologically relevant. This demonstrates the need for additional assay development and further monitoring of exposures in humans. It is evident that efforts be put forth to reduce bisphenol exposure overall.

7.2. PFASs

As previously mentioned, the chain length of PFAS is one of the main factors considered regarding toxicity. Comparative studies, however, found that chain length has little to no association with neurodevelopmental endpoints in zebrafish [131,135]. A wide array of PFASs caused neurotoxicity in zebrafish, including GenX, a common short-chain PFAS substitute. While rodent research is lacking, only showing disruption in maternal thyroid levels, human association studies revealed often contradictory findings: PFASs were associated with mixed effects on measures of neurodevelopment and in many cases no effect, possibly due to differing timing of exposure, exposure concentration, and socioenvironmental factors. These findings point to the complexity of endocrine disruptor research and the importance of considering multiple chemicals in epidemiological studies. Furthermore, many endocrine disruptors follow non-monotonic dose responses [197]. Overall, findings demonstrating disruptions in neurodevelopment caused by PFASs at low concentrations, together with limitations in predicting endocrine-disrupting activity based on structural features or length, illustrate the importance of avoiding the regrettable substitution cycle.

7.3. Phthalates

Although research assessing the effects of phthalate substitutes on neurodevelopment is sparse, some studies suggested detrimental effects on neurodevelopment. The zebrafish studies pointed to disruptions in behavior and gene expression in the brain, while human studies found associations with cognition and thyroid hormone levels. A wider body of research is needed to determine whether and how phthalate replacements pose a risk to the developing brain.

7.4. Bio-Based Alternatives—Are They Any Safer?

As concerns grow over the environmental and safety repercussions of petroleum-based plastics and plasticizers, bio-based materials have emerged. These include chemicals made from plants, materials intended to degrade naturally, or both. Although they are marketed as safer alternatives, little to no research exists to support or refute this [198]. We were able to find one report that investigated the effects of polylactic acid microplastic (PLA BioMP) exposure in zebrafish larvae. de Oliveria et al. found that 3 and 9 mg/L of PLA BioMPs decreased larvae total locomotion, increased locomotion in the peripheral zone, and increased time spent immobile in the open-field test. They also found a decrease in acetylcholinesterase activity, suggesting a neurotoxic effect of the PLA microplastics [199]. A possible concern is the potential use of soy or other phytoestrogen-based alternatives, which could act on estrogen receptors and alter the developing brain [200]. Thorough testing should be conducted prior to the wide use of bio-based alternatives to ensure minimal effects on neurodevelopment. The use of plants known to act on hormone receptors should also be limited when making bio-based materials.

7.5. Conclusions and Recommendations for the Future

Legacy and new-generation EDC exposure can have developmental effects on the brain, causing functional changes in humans (Figure 3). As we continue to assess the safety of everyday chemicals and put forward important policy and legislation that restrict the use of EDCs, it is vital that we do not allow companies and corporations to substitute harmful chemicals with equally or more harmful alternatives. Toxicologists and endocrinologists play a key role in formulating guidelines that can help predict and/or identify potential harmful effects of commercial chemicals, and confirmation of the absence of endocrine-mediated and other harmful biological effects should be a prerequisite prior to their circulation in the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.-G., E.N.H. and A.C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.-G.; writing—review and editing, E.M.-G., E.N.H. and A.C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

E.M.-G. is supported by the Paglia Post-Baccalaureate fellowship from Carleton College, E.N.H. by NIH F32 ES034257, and A.C.G. by NIH R35 ES035024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brennan, N.M.; Evans, A.T.; Fritz, M.K.; Peak, S.A.; von Holst, H.E. Trends in the Regulation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Warner, G.R.; Flaws, J.A. Bisphenol A and Phthalates: How Environmental Chemicals Are Reshaping Toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 2018, 166, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Colborn, T.; vom Saal, F.S.; Soto, A.M. Developmental Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Wildlife and Humans. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993, 101, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. National Center for Environmental Health. National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Colorado-Yohar, S.M.; Castillo-González, A.C.; Sánchez-Meca, J.; Rubio-Aparicio, M.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, D.; Salamanca-Fernández, E.; Ardanaz, E.; Amiano, P.; Fernández, M.F.; Mendiola, J.; et al. Concentrations of Bisphenol-A in Adults from the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fábelová, L.; Beneito, A.; Casas, M.; Colles, A.; Dalsager, L.; Den Hond, E.; Dereumeaux, C.; Ferguson, K.; Gilles, L.; Govarts, E.; et al. PFAS Levels and Exposure Determinants in Sensitive Population Groups. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, Z.; Wu, D.; Guo, Y.; Mao, W.; Zhao, N.; Zhao, M.; Jin, H. Phthalate Metabolites in Paired Human Serum and Whole Blood. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 824, 153792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Trasande, L. Updating the Toxic Substances Control Act to Protect Human Health. JAMA 2016, 315, 1565–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sweetman, A. A Grand Challenge for Environmental Organic Chemistry: How Can We Avoid Regrettable Substitution? Front. Environ. Chem. 2020, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hilz, E.N.; Gore, A.C. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Science and Policy. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 2023, 10, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McCarthy, M.M. Molecular Aspects of Sexual Differentiation of the Rodent Brain. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1994, 19, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McCarthy, M.M.; Wright, C.L.; Schwarz, J.M. New Tricks by an Old Dogma: Mechanisms of the Organizational/Activational Hypothesis of Steroid-Mediated Sexual Differentiation of Brain and Behavior. Horm. Behav. 2009, 55, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McCARTHY, M.M. Estradiol and the Developing Brain. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 91–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. La Merrill, M.A.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Smith, M.T.; Goodson, W.; Browne, P.; Patisaul, H.B.; Guyton, K.Z.; Kortenkamp, A.; Cogliano, V.J.; Woodruff, T.J.; et al. Consensus on the Key Characteristics of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals as a Basis for Hazard Identification. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gore, A.C.; Chappell, V.A.; Fenton, S.E.; Flaws, J.A.; Nadal, A.; Prins, G.S.; Toppari, J.; Zoeller, R.T. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr. Rev. 2015, 36, E1–E150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Combarnous, Y.; Nguyen, T.M.D. Comparative Overview of the Mechanisms of Action of Hormones and Endocrine Disruptor Compounds. Toxics 2019, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dickerson, S.M.; Gore, A.C. Estrogenic Environmental Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Effects on Reproductive Neuroendocrine Function and Dysfunction across the Life Cycle. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2007, 8, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boas, M.; Feldt-Rasmussen, U.; Main, K.M. Thyroid Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 355, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schulz, K.M.; Sisk, C.L. The Organizing Actions of Adolescent Gonadal Steroid Hormones on Brain and Behavioral Development. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 70, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sisk, C.L.; Zehr, J.L. Pubertal Hormones Organize the Adolescent Brain and Behavior. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2005, 26, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Levine, S.; Mullins, R.F. Hormonal Influences on Brain Organization in Infant Rats. Science 1966, 152, 1585–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. McEwen, B.S. Actions of Sex Hormones on the Brain: ‘Organization’ and ‘Activation’ in Relation to Functional Teratology. In Progress in Brain Research; Boer, G.J., Feenstra, M.G.P., Mirmiran, M., Swaab, D.F., Van Haaren, F., Eds.; Biochemical Basis of Functional Neuroteratology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988; Volume 73, pp. 121–134. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gore, A.C.; Martien, K.M.; Gagnidze, K.; Pfaff, D. Implications of Prenatal Steroid Perturbations for Neurodevelopment, Behavior, and Autism. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 961–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hilz, E.N.; Gore, A.C. Sex-Specific Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Brain Monoamines and Cognitive Behavior. Endocrinology 2022, 163, bqac128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hernandez Scudder, M.E.; Young, R.L.; Thompson, L.M.; Kore, P.; Crews, D.; Hofmann, H.A.; Gore, A.C. EDCs Reorganize Brain-Behavior Phenotypic Relationships in Rats. J. Endocr. Soc. 2021, 5, bvab021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, M.; Deng, J.; Gu, J.; Yang, J.; Ge, F.; Huang, C.; Wu, W. TMBPF-Induced Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Zebrafish Larvae: Impacts on Central Nervous System Development and Dopamine Neurons. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 268, 115710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, D.; Yan, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Ren, S. Association of Prenatal Exposure to Perfluorinated and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances with Childhood Neurodevelopment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 271, 115939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bansal, A.; Henao-Mejia, J.; Simmons, R.A. Immune System: An Emerging Player in Mediating Effects of Endocrine Disruptors on Metabolic Health. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kassotis, C.D.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Demeneix, B.A.; Porta, M.; Slama, R.; Trasande, L. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Economic, Regulatory, and Policy Implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Trasande, L.; Attina, T.M. Association of Exposure to Di-2-Ethylhexylphthalate Replacements With Increased Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. Hypertension 2015, 66, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duh-Leong, C.; Maffini, M.V.; Kassotis, C.D.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Trasande, L. The Regulation of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals to Minimize Their Impact on Health. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2023, 19, 600–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vogel, S.A. The Politics of Plastics: The Making and Unmaking of Bisphenol A “Safety”. Am. J. Public. Health 2009, 99, S559–S566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kang, J.-H.; Asai, D.; Toita, R. Bisphenol A (BPA) and Cardiovascular or Cardiometabolic Diseases. J. Xenobiot. 2023, 13, 775–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Naomi, R.; Yazid, M.D.; Bahari, H.; Keong, Y.Y.; Rajandram, R.; Embong, H.; Teoh, S.H.; Halim, S.; Othman, F. Bisphenol A (BPA) Leading to Obesity and Cardiovascular Complications: A Compilation of Current In Vivo Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rochester, J.R. Bisphenol A and Human Health: A Review of the Literature. Reprod. Toxicol. 2013, 42, 132–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Santoro, A.; Chianese, R.; Troisi, J.; Richards, S.; Nori, S.L.; Fasano, S.; Guida, M.; Plunk, E.; Viggiano, A.; Pierantoni, R.; et al. Neuro-Toxic and Reproductive Effects of BPA. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 1109–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gore, A.C.; Krishnan, K.; Reilly, M.P. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Effects on Neuroendocrine Systems and the Neurobiology of Social Behavior. Horm. Behav. 2019, 111, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pelch, K.; Wignall, J.A.; Goldstone, A.E.; Ross, P.K.; Blain, R.B.; Shapiro, A.J.; Holmgren, S.D.; Hsieh, J.-H.; Svoboda, D.; Auerbach, S.S.; et al. A Scoping Review of the Health and Toxicological Activity of Bisphenol A (BPA) Structural Analogues and Functional Alternatives. Toxicology 2019, 424, 152235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, D.; Kannan, K.; Tan, H.; Zheng, Z.; Feng, Y.-L.; Wu, Y.; Widelka, M. Bisphenol Analogues Other Than BPA: Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Toxicity-A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 5438–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oliviero, F.; Marmugi, A.; Viguié, C.; Gayrard, V.; Picard-Hagen, N.; Mselli-Lakhal, L. Are BPA Substitutes as Obesogenic as BPA? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Edaes, F.S.; de Souza, C.B. BPS and BPF Are as Carcinogenic as BPA and Are Not Viable Alternatives for Its Replacement. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2022, 22, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Takayanagi, S.; Tokunaga, T.; Liu, X.; Okada, H.; Matsushima, A.; Shimohigashi, Y. Endocrine Disruptor Bisphenol A Strongly Binds to Human Estrogen-Related Receptor Gamma (ERRgamma) with High Constitutive Activity. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 167, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E.C.; Long, M.; Hofmeister, M.V.; Vinggaard, A.M. Endocrine-Disrupting Potential of Bisphenol A, Bisphenol A Dimethacrylate, 4-n-Nonylphenol, and 4-n-Octylphenol In Vitro: New Data and a Brief Review. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115 (Suppl. S1), 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Moriyama, K.; Tagami, T.; Akamizu, T.; Usui, T.; Saijo, M.; Kanamoto, N.; Hataya, Y.; Shimatsu, A.; Kuzuya, H.; Nakao, K. Thyroid Hormone Action Is Disrupted by Bisphenol A as an Antagonist. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 5185–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Prasanth, G.K.; Divya, L.M.; Sadasivan, C. Bisphenol-A Can Bind to Human Glucocorticoid Receptor as an Agonist: An In Silico Study. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2010, 30, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, C.-H.; Zhang, D.-H.; Jiang, L.-D.; Qi, Y.; Guo, L.-H. Binding and Activity of Bisphenol Analogues to Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor β/δ. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 226, 112849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schug, T.T.; Blawas, A.M.; Gray, K.; Heindel, J.J.; Lawler, C.P. Elucidating the Links between Endocrine Disruptors and Neurodevelopment. Endocrinology 2015, 156, 1941–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McPartland, M.; Stevens, S.; Bartosova, Z.; Vardeberg, I.G.; Völker, J.; Wagner, M. Beyond the Nucleus: Plastic Chemicals Activate G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 4872–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Panieri, E.; Baralic, K.; Djukic-Cosic, D.; Buha Djordjevic, A.; Saso, L. PFAS Molecules: A Major Concern for the Human Health and the Environment. Toxics 2022, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Glüge, J.; Scheringer, M.; Cousins, I.T.; DeWitt, J.C.; Goldenman, G.; Herzke, D.; Lohmann, R.; Ng, C.A.; Trier, X.; Wang, Z. An Overview of the Uses of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2020, 22, 2345–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. O’Hagan, D. Understanding Organofluorine Chemistry. An Introduction to the C–F Bond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brunn, H.; Arnold, G.; Körner, W.; Rippen, G.; Steinhäuser, K.G.; Valentin, I. PFAS: Forever Chemicals—Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Mobile. Reviewing the Status and the Need for Their Phase out and Remediation of Contaminated Sites. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2023, 35, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fenton, S.E.; Ducatman, A.; Boobis, A.; DeWitt, J.C.; Lau, C.; Ng, C.; Smith, J.S.; Roberts, S.M. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2021, 40, 606–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Steenland, K.; Winquist, A. PFAS and Cancer, a Scoping Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence. Environ. Res. 2021, 194, 110690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rickard, B.P.; Rizvi, I.; Fenton, S.E. Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Female Reproductive Outcomes: PFAS Elimination, Endocrine-Mediated Effects, and Disease. Toxicology 2022, 465, 153031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jane L Espartero, L.; Yamada, M.; Ford, J.; Owens, G.; Prow, T.; Juhasz, A. Health-Related Toxicity of Emerging per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Comparison to Legacy PFOS and PFOA. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (2022) Guidance for the Inventory of Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS) and Related Chemicals Listed under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Available online: https://chm.pops.int/Implementation/IndustrialPOPs/PFAS/Guidance/tabid/5225/Default.aspx (accessed on 11 March 2024).
  58. Conder, J.M.; Hoke, R.A.; de Wolf, W.; Russell, M.H.; Buck, R.C. Are PFCAs Bioaccumulative? A Critical Review and Comparison with Regulatory Criteria and Persistent Lipophilic Compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Frömel, T.; Knepper, T.P. Biodegradation of Fluorinated Alkyl Substances. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 208: Perfluorinated Alkylated Substances; De Voogt, P., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 161–177. ISBN 978-1-4419-6880-7. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, Z.; Cousins, I.T.; Scheringer, M.; Hungerbühler, K. Fluorinated Alternatives to Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids (PFCAs), Perfluoroalkane Sulfonic Acids (PFSAs) and Their Potential Precursors. Environ. Int. 2013, 60, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brase, R.A.; Mullin, E.J.; Spink, D.C. Legacy and Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Analytical Techniques, Environmental Fate, and Health Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ahrens, L.; Rakovic, J.; Ekdahl, S.; Kallenborn, R. Environmental Distribution of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) on Svalbard: Local Sources and Long-Range Transport to the Arctic. Chemosphere 2023, 345, 140463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Eales, J.; Bethel, A.; Galloway, T.; Hopkinson, P.; Morrissey, K.; Short, R.E.; Garside, R. Human Health Impacts of Exposure to Phthalate Plasticizers: An Overview of Reviews. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bernard, L.; Bouattour, Y.; Masse, M.; Boeuf, B.; Decaudin, B.; Genay, S.; Lambert, C.; Moreau, E.; Pereira, B.; Pinguet, J.; et al. Association between Urinary Metabolites and the Exposure of Intensive Care Newborns to Plasticizers of Medical Devices Used for Their Care Management. Metabolites 2021, 11, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Prohibition of Children’s Toys and Child Care Articles Containing Specified Phthalates. Fed. Regist. 2018, 82, 49938–49982. [Google Scholar]
  66. Food and Drug Administration Requests FDA Remove Its Prior Sanction of Five Ortho-Phthalates and Ban Eight Ortho-Phthalates. 2023. Available online: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2016-P-1171 (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  67. Krithivasan, R.; Miller, G.Z.; Belliveau, M.; Gearhart, J.; Krishnamoorthi, V.; Lee, S.; Kannan, K. Analysis of Ortho-Phthalates and Other Plasticizers in Select Organic and Conventional Foods in the United States. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2023, 33, 778–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Moche, H.; Chentouf, A.; Neves, S.; Corpart, J.-M.; Nesslany, F. Comparison of In Vitro Endocrine Activity of Phthalates and Alternative Plasticizers. J. Toxicol. 2021, 2021, 8815202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Engel, A.; Buhrke, T.; Kasper, S.; Behr, A.-C.; Braeuning, A.; Jessel, S.; Seidel, A.; Völkel, W.; Lampen, A. The Urinary Metabolites of DINCH® Have an Impact on the Activities of the Human Nuclear Receptors ERα, ERβ, AR, PPARα and PPARγ. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 287, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schaffert, A.; Arnold, J.; Karkossa, I.; Blüher, M.; von Bergen, M.; Schubert, K. The Emerging Plasticizer Alternative DINCH and Its Metabolite MINCH Induce Oxidative Stress and Enhance Inflammatory Responses in Human THP-1 Macrophages. Cells 2021, 10, 2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schaffert, A.; Karkossa, I.; Ueberham, E.; Schlichting, R.; Walter, K.; Arnold, J.; Blüher, M.; Heiker, J.T.; Lehmann, J.; Wabitsch, M.; et al. Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate Substitutes Accelerate Human Adipogenesis through PPARγ Activation and Cause Oxidative Stress and Impaired Metabolic Homeostasis in Mature Adipocytes. Environ. Int. 2022, 164, 107279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. d’Amora, M.; Giordani, S. The Utility of Zebrafish as a Model for Screening Developmental Neurotoxicity. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bai, C.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, L.; Lin, J.; Song, Y.; Huang, C.; Dong, Q.; Chen, J. Structure-Based Developmental Toxicity and ASD-Phenotypes of Bisphenol A Analogues in Embryonic Zebrafish. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 253, 114643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Blanc-Legendre, M.; Sire, S.; Christophe, A.; Brion, F.; Bégout, M.-L.; Cousin, X. Embryonic Exposures to Chemicals Acting on Brain Aromatase Lead to Different Locomotor Effects in Zebrafish Larvae. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 102, 104221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ngoc Hieu, B.T.; Ngoc Anh, N.T.; Audira, G.; Juniardi, S.; Liman, R.A.D.; Villaflores, O.B.; Lai, Y.-H.; Chen, J.-R.; Liang, S.-T.; Huang, J.-C.; et al. Development of a Modified Three-Day T-Maze Protocol for Evaluating Learning and Memory Capacity of Adult Zebrafish. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Robbins, T.W. From Rodent Behavioral Models to Human Disorders. In Translational Neuroscience: Toward New Therapies; Nikolich, K., Hyman, S.E., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-0-262-02986-5. [Google Scholar]
  77. Regan, S.L.; Williams, M.T.; Vorhees, C.V. Review of Rodent Models of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 132, 621–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vorhees, C.V.; Williams, M.T.; Hawkey, A.B.; Levin, E.D. Translating Neurobehavioral Toxicity Across Species from Zebrafish to Rats to Humans: Implications for Risk Assessment. Front. Toxicol. 2021, 3, 629229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jin, M.; Dang, J.; Paudel, Y.N.; Wang, X.; Wang, B.; Wang, L.; Li, P.; Sun, C.; Liu, K. The Possible Hormetic Effects of Fluorene-9-Bisphenol on Regulating Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis in Zebrafish. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 776, 145963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gu, J.; Guo, M.; Yin, X.; Huang, C.; Qian, L.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Shi, L.; Ji, G. A Systematic Comparison of Neurotoxicity of Bisphenol A and Its Derivatives in Zebrafish. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 805, 150210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qiu, W.; Liu, S.; Chen, H.; Luo, S.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, B.; Zheng, C.; Wang, K.-J. The Comparative Toxicities of BPA, BPB, BPS, BPF, and BPAF on the Reproductive Neuroendocrine System of Zebrafish Embryos and Its Mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rao, C.; Cao, X.; Li, L.; Zhou, J.; Sun, D.; Li, B.; Guo, S.; Yuan, R.; Cui, H.; Chen, J. Bisphenol AF Induces Multiple Behavioral and Biochemical Changes in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) at Different Life Stages. Aquat. Toxicol. 2022, 253, 106345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, Q.; Liu, J.; Ding, J.; Liu, J. Neurodevelopmental Toxicity of Bisphenol AF in Zebrafish Larvae and the Protective Effects of Curcumin. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2023, 43, 1806–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Song, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhang, K.; Sun, M. Developmental Neurotoxic Effects of Bisphenol A and Its Derivatives in Drosophila Melanogaster. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 260, 115098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yang, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Chen, L. Adverse Effects of Bisphenol B Exposure on the Thyroid and Nervous System in Early Life Stages of Zebrafish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 250, 109167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gu, J.; Wu, J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, L.; Fan, D.; Shi, L.; Wang, J.; Ji, G. Bisphenol F Exposure Impairs Neurodevelopment in Zebrafish Larvae (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 188, 109870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kim, Y.; Kim, S.S.; Park, B.H.; Hwang, K.-S.; Bae, M.A.; Cho, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Park, H.-C. Mechanism of Bisphenol F Affecting Motor System and Motor Activity in Zebrafish. Toxics 2023, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Naderi, M.; Puar, P.; JavadiEsfahani, R.; Kwong, R.W.M. Early Developmental Exposure to Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S Disrupts Socio-Cognitive Function, Isotocin Equilibrium, and Excitation-Inhibition Balance in Developing Zebrafish. NeuroToxicology 2022, 88, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, M.; Yin, X.; Liang, M.; Lou, X.; Chen, J.; Zhou, L.; Fan, D.; Shi, L.; et al. The Potential Mechanism of BPF-Induced Neurotoxicity in Adult Zebrafish: Correlation between Untargeted Metabolomics and Gut Microbiota. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 839, 156221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wei, S.; Qiu, L.; Ru, S.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Bisphenol S Disrupts Opsins Gene Expression and Impairs the Light-Sensing Function via Antagonizing TH-TRβ Signaling Pathway in Zebrafish Larvae. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2023, 172, 113588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mi, P.; Zhang, Q.-P.; Li, S.-B.; Liu, X.-Y.; Zhang, S.-H.; Li, M.; Chen, D.-Y.; Zhao, X.; Feng, D.-F.; Feng, X.-Z. Melatonin Protects Embryonic Development and Maintains Sleep/Wake Behaviors from the Deleterious Effects of Fluorene-9-Bisphenol in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). J. Pineal Res. 2019, 66, e12530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mu, X.; Liu, J.; Yuan, L.; Yang, K.; Huang, Y.; Wang, C.; Yang, W.; Shen, G.; Li, Y. The Mechanisms Underlying the Developmental Effects of Bisphenol F on Zebrafish. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 687, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gu, J.; Li, L.; Yin, X.; Liang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhou, L.; Fan, D.; Shi, L.; Ji, G. Long-Term Exposure of Zebrafish to Bisphenol F: Adverse Effects on Parental Reproduction and Offspring Neurodevelopment. Aquat. Toxicol. 2022, 248, 106190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gyimah, E.; Xu, H.; Dong, X.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Bu, Y.; Akoto, O. Developmental Neurotoxicity of Low Concentrations of Bisphenol A and S Exposure in Zebrafish. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gu, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Guo, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wu, S.; Shi, L.; Gu, A.; et al. Neurobehavioral Effects of Bisphenol S Exposure in Early Life Stages of Zebrafish Larvae (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 2019, 217, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qiu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, M.; Farajzadeh, M.; Pan, C.; Wayne, N.L. Actions of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S on the Reproductive Neuroendocrine System During Early Development in Zebrafish. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Weiler, K.; Ramakrishnan, S. Bisphenol F Causes Disruption of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neural Development in Zebrafish via an Estrogenic Mechanism. Neurotoxicology 2019, 71, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Qiu, L.; Wei, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Ru, S.; Zhang, X. Mechanism of Bisphenol S Exposure on Color Sensitivity of Zebrafish Larvae. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Coumailleau, P.; Trempont, S.; Pellegrini, E.; Charlier, T.D. Impacts of Bisphenol A Analogues on Zebrafish Post-Embryonic Brain. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2020, 32, e12879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, F.; Ma, X.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gu, J.; Wang, L. Bisphenol B Induces Developmental Toxicity in Zebrafish via Oxidative Stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kinch, C.D.; Ibhazehiebo, K.; Jeong, J.-H.; Habibi, H.R.; Kurrasch, D.M. Low-Dose Exposure to Bisphenol A and Replacement Bisphenol S Induces Precocious Hypothalamic Neurogenesis in Embryonic Zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1475–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ru, S. Bisphenol S Impairs Behaviors through Disturbing Endoplasmic Reticulum Function and Reducing Lipid Levels in the Brain of Zebrafish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 582–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gong, M.; Huai, Z.; Song, H.; Cui, L.; Guo, Q.; Shao, J.; Gao, Y.; Shi, H. Effects of Maternal Exposure to Bisphenol AF on Emotional Behaviors in Adolescent Mice Offspring. Chemosphere 2017, 187, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wu, X.; Li, S.; Ni, Y.; Qi, C.; Bai, S.; Xu, Q.; Fan, Y.; Ma, X.; Lu, C.; Du, G.; et al. Maternal BPAF Exposure Impaired Synaptic Development and Caused Behavior Abnormality in Offspring. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 256, 114859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wu, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, M.; Bai, S.; Ni, Y.; Xu, Q.; Fan, Y.; Lu, C.; Xu, Z.; Ji, C.; et al. Early-Life Bisphenol AP Exposure Impacted Neurobehaviors in Adulthood through Microglial Activation in Mice. Chemosphere 2023, 317, 137935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ohtani, N.; Iwano, H.; Suda, K.; Tsuji, E.; Tanemura, K.; Inoue, H.; Yokota, H. Adverse Effects of Maternal Exposure to Bisphenol F on the Anxiety- and Depression-like Behavior of Offspring. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 79, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. da Silva, B.S.; Pietrobon, C.B.; Bertasso, I.M.; Lopes, B.P.; Carvalho, J.C.; Peixoto-Silva, N.; Santos, T.R.; Claudio-Neto, S.; Manhães, A.C.; Oliveira, E.; et al. Short and Long-Term Effects of Bisphenol S (BPS) Exposure during Pregnancy and Lactation on Plasma Lipids, Hormones, and Behavior in Rats. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Gong, M.; Song, H.; Dong, Y.; Huai, Z.; Fu, Y.; Yu, P.; Huang, B.; Yang, R.; Guo, Y.; Meng, Q.; et al. Sex-Dependent and Long-Lasting Effects of Bisphenol AF Exposure on Emotional Behaviors in Mice. Physiol. Behav. 2022, 249, 113747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bonaldo, B.; Gioiosa, L.; Panzica, G.; Marraudino, M. Exposure to Either Bisphenol A or S Represents a Risk for Crucial Behaviors for Pup Survival, Such as Spontaneous Maternal Behavior in Mice. Neuroendocrinology 2022, 113, 1283–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Catanese, M.C.; Vandenberg, L.N. Bisphenol S (BPS) Alters Maternal Behavior and Brain in Mice Exposed during Pregnancy/Lactation and Their Daughters. Endocrinology 2016, 158, 516–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Moon, H.J.; Shin, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Hong, E.-J.; Ahn, C.; Yoo, Y.-M.; Jeung, E.-B.; Lee, G.-S.; An, B.-S.; Jung, E.-M. Effects of Prenatal Bisphenol S and Bisphenol F Exposure on Behavior of Offspring Mice. Anim. Cells Syst. 2023, 27, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kim, B.; Colon, E.; Chawla, S.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Suvorov, A. Endocrine Disruptors Alter Social Behaviors and Indirectly Influence Social Hierarchies via Changes in Body Weight. Environ. Health 2015, 14, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, C.; Wu, X.-C.; Li, S.; Dou, L.-J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, F.-H.; Ma, K.; Huang, D.; Pan, Y.; Gu, J.-J.; et al. Perinatal Low-Dose Bisphenol AF Exposure Impairs Synaptic Plasticity and Cognitive Function of Adult Offspring in a Sex-Dependent Manner. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 788, 147918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Vancamp, P.; Butruille, L.; Herranen, A.; Boelen, A.; Fini, J.-B.; Demeneix, B.A.; Remaud, S. Transient Developmental Exposure to Low Doses of Bisphenol F Negatively Affects Neurogliogenesis and Olfactory Behaviour in Adult Mice. Environ. Int. 2023, 172, 107770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Castro, B.; Sánchez, P.; Torres, J.M.; Ortega, E. Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S Affect Differently 5α-Reductase Expression and Dopamine-Serotonin Systems in the Prefrontal Cortex of Juvenile Female Rats. Environ. Res. 2015, 142, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bonaldo, B.; Casile, A.; Ostuni, M.T.; Bettarelli, M.; Nasini, S.; Marraudino, M.; Panzica, G.; Gotti, S. Perinatal Exposure to Bisphenol A or S: Effects on Anxiety-Related Behaviors and Serotonergic System. Chemosphere 2024, 349, 140827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. LaPlante, C.D.; Catanese, M.C.; Bansal, R.; Vandenberg, L.N. Bisphenol S Alters the Lactating Mammary Gland and Nursing Behaviors in Mice Exposed during Pregnancy and Lactation. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 3448–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Derakhshan, A.; Philips, E.M.; Ghassabian, A.; Santos, S.; Asimakopoulos, A.G.; Kannan, K.; Kortenkamp, A.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Trasande, L.; Peeters, R.P.; et al. Association of Urinary Bisphenols during Pregnancy with Maternal, Cord Blood and Childhood Thyroid Function. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Xia, Z.; Lv, C.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, R.; Lu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Lei, X.; Gao, Y. Associations of Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Substitutes with Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Infants at 12 Months of Age: A Cross-Sectional Study. Chemosphere 2023, 341, 139973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Chen, Y.; Miao, M.; Wang, Z.; Ji, H.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, H.; He, G.; Yuan, W. Prenatal Bisphenol Exposure and Intelligence Quotient in Children at Six Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study. Chemosphere 2023, 334, 139023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Tanner, E.M.; Hallerbäck, M.U.; Wikström, S.; Lindh, C.; Kiviranta, H.; Gennings, C.; Bornehag, C.-G. Early Prenatal Exposure to Suspected Endocrine Disruptor Mixtures Is Associated with Lower IQ at Age Seven. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kim, S.S.; Kim, J.L.; Hwang, K.-S.; Park, H.-C.; Bae, M.A.; Kim, K.-T.; Cho, S.-H. Mechanism of Action and Neurotoxic Effects of Chronic Exposure to Bisphenol F in Adult Zebrafish. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y.; Xiong, C.; Sun, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, W.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Alternatives and Child Neurodevelopment at 2 Years. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 121774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. van den Dries, M.A.; Guxens, M.; Spaan, S.; Ferguson, K.K.; Philips, E.; Santos, S.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Ghassabian, A.; Trasande, L.; Tiemeier, H.; et al. Phthalate and Bisphenol Exposure during Pregnancy and Offspring Nonverbal IQ. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 077009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Geiger, S.D.; Musaad, S.; Hill, J.; Aguiar, A.; Schantz, S. Sex-Specific Associations between Urinary Bisphenols Concentrations during Pregnancy and Problematic Child Behaviors at Age 2 Years. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2023, 96, 107152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liu, J.; Martin, L.J.; Dinu, I.; Field, C.J.; Dewey, D.; Martin, J.W. Interaction of Prenatal Bisphenols, Maternal Nutrients, and Toxic Metal Exposures on Neurodevelopment of 2-Year-Olds in the APrON Cohort. Environ. Int. 2021, 155, 106601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bornehag, C.-G.; Engdahl, E.; Unenge Hallerbäck, M.; Wikström, S.; Lindh, C.; Rüegg, J.; Tanner, E.; Gennings, C. Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenols and Cognitive Function in Children at 7 Years of Age in the Swedish SELMA Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 150, 106433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kim, J.I.; Lee, Y.A.; Shin, C.H.; Hong, Y.-C.; Kim, B.-N.; Lim, Y.-H. Association of Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F, and Bisphenol S with ADHD Symptoms in Children. Environ. Int. 2022, 161, 107093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ivantsova, E.; Lopez-Scarim, V.; Sultan, A.; English, C.; Biju, A.; Souders, C.L.; Padillo-Anthemides, N.E.; Konig, I.; Martyniuk, C.J. Evidence for Neurotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Zebrafish Embryos/Larvae Treated with HFPO-DA Ammonium Salt (GenX). Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 104, 104315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Wasel, O.; King, H.; Choi, Y.J.; Lee, L.S.; Freeman, J.L. Differential Developmental Neurotoxicity and Tissue Uptake of the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Alternatives, GenX and PFBS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 19274–19284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rericha, Y.; Cao, D.; Truong, L.; Simonich, M.; Field, J.A.; Tanguay, R.L. Behavior Effects of Structurally Diverse Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Zebrafish. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wasel, O.; Thompson, K.M.; Freeman, J.L. Assessment of Unique Behavioral, Morphological, and Molecular Alterations in the Comparative Developmental Toxicity Profiles of PFOA, PFHxA, and PFBA Using the Zebrafish Model System. Environ. Int. 2022, 170, 107642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ulhaq, M.; Örn, S.; Carlsson, G.; Morrison, D.A.; Norrgren, L. Locomotor Behavior in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Larvae Exposed to Perfluoroalkyl Acids. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 144–145, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Menger, F.; Pohl, J.; Ahrens, L.; Carlsson, G.; Örn, S. Behavioural Effects and Bioconcentration of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Truong, L.; Rericha, Y.; Thunga, P.; Marvel, S.; Wallis, D.; Simonich, M.T.; Field, J.A.; Cao, D.; Reif, D.M.; Tanguay, R.L. Systematic Developmental Toxicity Assessment of a Structurally Diverse Library of PFAS in Zebrafish. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 431, 128615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Annunziato, K.M.; Jantzen, C.E.; Gronske, M.C.; Cooper, K.R. Subtle Morphometric, Behavioral and Gene Expression Effects in Larval Zebrafish Exposed to PFHxA, PFHxS and 6:2 FTOH. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 208, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kim, S.; Stroski, K.M.; Killeen, G.; Smitherman, C.; Simcik, M.F.; Brooks, B.W. 8:8 Perfluoroalkyl Phosphinic Acid Affects Neurobehavioral Development, Thyroid Disruption, and DNA Methylation in Developing Zebrafish. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 736, 139600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gebreab, K.Y.; Eeza, M.N.H.; Bai, T.; Zuberi, Z.; Matysik, J.; O’Shea, K.E.; Alia, A.; Berry, J.P. Comparative Toxicometabolomics of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and next-Generation Perfluoroalkyl Substances. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Guo, X.; Zhang, S.; Lu, S.; Zheng, B.; Xie, P.; Chen, J.; Li, G.; Liu, C.; Wu, Q.; Cheng, H.; et al. Perfluorododecanoic Acid Exposure Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity in Zebrafish Embryos. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 241, 1018–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gaballah, S.; Swank, A.; Sobus, J.R.; Howey, X.M.; Schmid, J.; Catron, T.; McCord, J.; Hines, E.; Strynar, M.; Tal, T. Evaluation of Developmental Toxicity, Developmental Neurotoxicity, and Tissue Dose in Zebrafish Exposed to GenX and Other PFAS. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 047005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jantzen, C.E.; Annunziato, K.A.; Bugel, S.M.; Cooper, K.R. PFOS, PFNA, and PFOA Sub-Lethal Exposure to Embryonic Zebrafish Have Different Toxicity Profiles in Terms of Morphometrics, Behavior and Gene Expression. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 175, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Satbhai, K.; Vogs, C.; Crago, J. Comparative Toxicokinetics and Toxicity of PFOA and Its Replacement GenX in the Early Stages of Zebrafish. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Conley, J.M.; Lambright, C.S.; Evans, N.; Strynar, M.J.; McCord, J.; McIntyre, B.S.; Travlos, G.S.; Cardon, M.C.; Medlock-Kakaley, E.; Hartig, P.C.; et al. Adverse Maternal, Fetal, and Postnatal Effects of Hexafluoropropylene Oxide Dimer Acid (GenX) from Oral Gestational Exposure in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 037008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Blake, B.E.; Cope, H.A.; Hall, S.M.; Keys, R.D.; Mahler, B.W.; McCord, J.; Scott, B.; Stapleton, H.M.; Strynar, M.J.; Elmore, S.A.; et al. Evaluation of Maternal, Embryo, and Placental Effects in CD-1 Mice Following Gestational Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) or Hexafluoropropylene Oxide Dimer Acid (HFPO-DA or GenX). Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 27006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wang, H.; Luo, F.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Y.; Zheng, L. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Child Intelligence Quotient: Evidence from the Shanghai Birth Cohort. Environ. Int. 2023, 174, 107912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Luo, F.; Chen, Q.; Yu, G.; Huo, X.; Wang, H.; Nian, M.; Tian, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J. Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Neurodevelopment in 2-Year-Old Children: A Prospective Cohort Study. Environ. Int. 2022, 166, 107384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Carrizosa, C.; Murcia, M.; Ballesteros, V.; Costa, O.; Manzano-Salgado, C.B.; Ibarluzea, J.; Iñiguez, C.; Casas, M.; Andiarena, A.; Llop, S.; et al. Prenatal Perfluoroalkyl Substance Exposure and Neuropsychological Development throughout Childhood: The INMA Project. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Beck, I.H.; Bilenberg, N.; Andersen, H.R.; Trecca, F.; Bleses, D.; Jensen, T.K. Association between Prenatal or Early Postnatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Language Development in 18 to 36-Month-Old Children from the Odense Child Cohort. Environ. Health 2023, 22, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Wang, Y.; Rogan, W.J.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, P.-C.; Su, P.-H.; Chen, H.-Y.; Wang, S.-L. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluroalkyl Substances and Children’s IQ: The Taiwan Maternal and Infant Cohort Study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2015, 218, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Spratlen, M.J.; Perera, F.P.; Lederman, S.A.; Rauh, V.A.; Robinson, M.; Kannan, K.; Trasande, L.; Herbstman, J. The Association between Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Childhood Neurodevelopment. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Yao, Q.; Vinturache, A.; Lei, X.; Wang, Z.; Pan, C.; Shi, R.; Yuan, T.; Gao, Y.; Tian, Y. Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, Fetal Thyroid Hormones, and Infant Neurodevelopment. Environ. Res. 2022, 206, 112561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zhou, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, P.; Li, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, H.; Li, J.; et al. Associations of Prenatal PFAS Exposure and Early Childhood Neurodevelopment: Evidence from the Shanghai Maternal-Child Pairs Cohort. Environ. Int. 2023, 173, 107850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Niu, J.; Liang, H.; Tian, Y.; Yuan, W.; Xiao, H.; Hu, H.; Sun, X.; Song, X.; Wen, S.; Yang, L.; et al. Prenatal Plasma Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Neuropsychological Development in Children at Four Years of Age. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Oh, J.; Bennett, D.H.; Calafat, A.M.; Tancredi, D.; Roa, D.L.; Schmidt, R.J.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Shin, H.-M. Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Association with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the MARBLES Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 147, 106328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Vuong, A.M.; Webster, G.M.; Yolton, K.; Calafat, A.M.; Muckle, G.; Lanphear, B.P.; Chen, A. Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Neurobehavior in US Children through 8 Years of Age: The HOME Study. Environ. Res. 2021, 195, 110825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Harris, M.H.; Oken, E.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Calafat, A.M.; Ye, X.; Bellinger, D.C.; Webster, T.F.; White, R.F.; Sagiv, S.K. Prenatal and Childhood Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) and Child Cognition. Environ. Int. 2018, 115, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kapadia, R.; Yi, J.-H.; Vemuganti, R. Mechanisms of Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Actions of PPAR-Gamma Agonists. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 1813–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Vanden Heuvel, J.P.; Thompson, J.T.; Frame, S.R.; Gillies, P.J. Differential Activation of Nuclear Receptors by Perfluorinated Fatty Acid Analogs and Natural Fatty Acids: A Comparison of Human, Mouse, and Rat Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Alpha, -Beta, and -Gamma, Liver X Receptor-Beta, and Retinoid X Receptor-Alpha. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 92, 476–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Enright, E.A.; Eick, S.M.; Morello-Frosch, R.; Aguiar, A.; Woodbury, M.L.; Sprowles, J.L.N.; Geiger, S.D.; Trowbridge, J.; Andrade, A.; Smith, S.; et al. Associations of Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) with Measures of Cognition in 7.5-Month-Old Infants: An Exploratory Study. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2023, 98, 107182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Vuong, A.M.; Braun, J.M.; Yolton, K.; Wang, Z.; Xie, C.; Webster, G.M.; Ye, X.; Calafat, A.M.; Dietrich, K.N.; Lanphear, B.P.; et al. Prenatal and Childhood Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Measures of Attention, Impulse Control, and Visual Spatial Abilities. Environ. Int. 2018, 119, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Vuong, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Xie, C.; Dietrich, K.N.; Braun, J.M.; Webster, G.M.; Calafat, A.M.; Lanphear, B.P.; Chen, A. Prenatal and Childhood Exposure to Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Cognitive Development in Children at Age 8 Years. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jeddy, Z.; Hartman, T.J.; Taylor, E.V.; Poteete, C.; Kordas, K. Prenatal Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Early Communication Development in British Girls. Early Hum. Dev. 2017, 109, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Harris, M.H.; Oken, E.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Calafat, A.M.; Bellinger, D.C.; Webster, T.F.; White, R.F.; Sagiv, S.K. Prenatal and Childhood Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Child Executive Function and Behavioral Problems. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Kim, J.I.; Kim, B.-N.; Lee, Y.A.; Shin, C.H.; Hong, Y.-C.; Døssing, L.D.; Hildebrandt, G.; Lim, Y.-H. Association between Early-Childhood Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and ADHD Symptoms: A Prospective Cohort Study. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 879, 163081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Høyer, B.B.; Bonde, J.P.; Tøttenborg, S.S.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H.; Lindh, C.; Pedersen, H.S.; Toft, G. Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances during Pregnancy and Child Behaviour at 5 to 9years of Age. Horm. Behav. 2018, 101, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Skogheim, T.S.; Weyde, K.V.F.; Aase, H.; Engel, S.M.; Surén, P.; Øie, M.G.; Biele, G.; Reichborn-Kjennerud, T.; Brantsæter, A.L.; Haug, L.S.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Associations with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Oulhote, Y.; Steuerwald, U.; Debes, F.; Weihe, P.; Grandjean, P. Behavioral Difficulties in 7-Year Old Children in Relation to Developmental Exposure to Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances. Environ. Int. 2016, 97, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Li, Q.-Q.; Huang, J.; Cai, D.; Chou, W.-C.; Zeeshan, M.; Chu, C.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, L.; Ma, H.-M.; Tang, C.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to Legacy and Alternative Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Neuropsychological Development Trajectories over the First 3 Years of Life. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 3746–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Gump, B.B.; Wu, Q.; Dumas, A.K.; Kannan, K. Perfluorochemical (PFC) Exposure in Children: Associations with Impaired Response Inhibition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8151–8159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Skogheim, T.S.; Villanger, G.D.; Weyde, K.V.F.; Engel, S.M.; Surén, P.; Øie, M.G.; Skogan, A.H.; Biele, G.; Zeiner, P.; Øvergaard, K.R.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Associations with Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Cognitive Functions in Preschool Children. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 223, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Liu, Y.; Eliot, M.N.; Papandonatos, G.D.; Kelsey, K.T.; Fore, R.; Langevin, S.; Buckley, J.; Chen, A.; Lanphear, B.P.; Cecil, K.M.; et al. Gestational Perfluoroalkyl Substance Exposure and DNA Methylation at Birth and 12 Years of Age: A Longitudinal Epigenome-Wide Association Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022, 130, 037005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Liew, Z.; Ritz, B.; Bach, C.C.; Asarnow, R.F.; Bech, B.H.; Nohr, E.A.; Bossi, R.; Henriksen, T.B.; Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E.C.; Olsen, J. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and IQ Scores at Age 5; a Study in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2018, 126, 067004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zhang, H.; Yolton, K.; Webster, G.M.; Ye, X.; Calafat, A.M.; Dietrich, K.N.; Xu, Y.; Xie, C.; Braun, J.M.; Lanphear, B.P.; et al. Prenatal and Childhood Perfluoroalkyl Substances Exposures and Children’s Reading Skills at Ages 5 and 8 Years. Environ. Int. 2018, 111, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Vuong, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Wang, Z.; Xie, C.; Webster, G.M.; Ye, X.; Calafat, A.M.; Braun, J.M.; Dietrich, K.N.; Lanphear, B.P.; et al. Childhood Perfluoroalkyl Substance Exposure and Executive Function in Children at 8 years. Environ. Int. 2018, 119, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Beck, I.H.; Bilenberg, N.; Möller, S.; Nielsen, F.; Grandjean, P.; Højsager, F.D.; Halldorsson, T.I.; Nielsen, C.; Jensen, T.K. Association between Prenatal and Early Postnatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances and IQ Score in 7-Year-Old Children from the Odense Child Cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2023, 192, 1522–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Oh, J.; Schmidt, R.J.; Tancredi, D.; Calafat, A.M.; Roa, D.L.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Shin, H.-M. Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Cognitive Development in Infancy and Toddlerhood. Environ. Res. 2021, 196, 110939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shin, H.-M.; Bennett, D.H.; Calafat, A.M.; Tancredi, D.; Hertz-Picciotto, I. Modeled Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Association with Child Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Case-Control Study. Environ. Res. 2020, 186, 109514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Kim, S.; Choi, K.; Ji, K.; Seo, J.; Kho, Y.; Park, J.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Hwang, I.; Jeon, J.; et al. Trans-Placental Transfer of Thirteen Perfluorinated Compounds and Relations with Fetal Thyroid Hormones. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 7465–7472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Vilhelmsson, A.; Rylander, L.; Jöud, A.; Lindh, C.H.; Mattsson, K.; Liew, Z.; Guo, P.; Ritz, B.; Källén, K.; Thacher, J.D. Exposure to per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Early Pregnancy and Risk of Cerebral Palsy in Children. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 899, 165622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Liew, Z.; Ritz, B.; von Ehrenstein, O.S.; Bech, B.H.; Nohr, E.A.; Fei, C.; Bossi, R.; Henriksen, T.B.; Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E.C.; Olsen, J. Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Childhood Autism in Association with Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances: A Nested Case–Control Study in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Dalsager, L.; Jensen, T.K.; Nielsen, F.; Grandjean, P.; Bilenberg, N.; Andersen, H.R. No Association between Maternal and Child PFAS Concentrations and Repeated Measures of ADHD Symptoms at Age 2½ and 5 Years in Children from the Odense Child Cohort. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2021, 88, 107031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Ode, A.; Källén, K.; Gustafsson, P.; Rylander, L.; Jönsson, B.A.G.; Olofsson, P.; Ivarsson, S.A.; Lindh, C.H.; Rignell-Hydbom, A. Fetal Exposure to Perfluorinated Compounds and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Childhood. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Stein, C.R.; Savitz, D.A. Serum Perfluorinated Compound Concentration and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children 5-18 Years of Age. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Vuong, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Webster, G.M.; Sjödin, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Braun, J.M.; Dietrich, K.N.; Lanphear, B.P.; Chen, A. Prenatal Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether and Perfluoroalkyl Substance Exposures and Executive Function in School-Age Children. Environ. Res. 2016, 147, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Braun, J.M.; Kalkbrenner, A.E.; Just, A.C.; Yolton, K.; Calafat, A.M.; Sjödin, A.; Hauser, R.; Webster, G.M.; Chen, A.; Lanphear, B.P. Gestational Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Reciprocal Social, Repetitive, and Stereotypic Behaviors in 4- and 5-Year-Old Children: The HOME Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Yun, K.; Jeon, H.; Lee, J.; Kho, Y.; Ji, K. Effects of Two Alternative Plasticizers on the Growth Hormone-Related Endocrine System, Neurodevelopment, and Oxidative Stress of Zebrafish Larvae. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 341, 122947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Saad, N.; Bereketoglu, C.; Pradhan, A. Di(Isononyl) Cyclohexane-1,2-Dicarboxylate (DINCH) Alters Transcriptional Profiles, Lipid Metabolism and Behavior in Zebrafish Larvae. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Horie, Y.; Yap, C.K.; Okamura, H. Developmental Toxicity and Thyroid Hormone-Disrupting Effects of Acetyl Tributyl Citrate in Zebrafish and Japanese Medaka. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 8, 100199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Tan, H.; Gao, P.; Luo, Y.; Gou, X.; Xia, P.; Wang, P.; Yan, L.; Zhang, S.; Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Are New Phthalate Ester Substitutes Safer than Traditional DBP and DiBP? Comparative Endocrine-Disrupting Analyses on Zebrafish Using In Vivo, Transcriptome, and In Silico Approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 13744–13756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Lee, H.-C.; Yamanouchi, K.; Nishihara, M. Effects of Perinatal Exposure to Phthalate/Adipate Esters on Hypothalamic Gene Expression and Sexual Behavior in Rats. J. Reprod. Dev. 2006, 52, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Park, S.; Zimmerman, E.; Huerta-Montañez, G.; Rosario-Pabón, Z.; Vélez-Vega, C.M.; Cordero, J.F.; Alshwabekah, A.; Meeker, J.D.; Watkins, D.J. Gestational Exposure to Phthalates and Phthalate Replacements in Relation to Neurodevelopmental Delays in Early Childhood. Toxics 2023, 11, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Rosolen, V.; Giordani, E.; Mariuz, M.; Parpinel, M.; Ronfani, L.; Vecchi Brumatti, L.; Bin, M.; Calamandrei, G.; Mustieles, V.; Gilles, L.; et al. Concurrent Assessment of Phthalates/HEXAMOLL® DINCH Exposure and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Performance in Three European Cohorts of the HBM4EU Aligned Studies. Toxics 2022, 10, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Cathey, A.L.; Watkins, D.; Rosario, Z.Y.; Vélez, C.; Alshawabkeh, A.N.; Cordero, J.F.; Meeker, J.D. Associations of Phthalates and Phthalate Replacements With CRH and Other Hormones among Pregnant Women in Puerto Rico. J. Endocr. Soc. 2019, 3, 1127–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Derakhshan, A.; Shu, H.; Broeren, M.A.C.; Lindh, C.H.; Peeters, R.P.; Kortenkamp, A.; Demeneix, B.; Bornehag, C.-G.; Korevaar, T.I.M. Association of Phthalate Exposure with Thyroid Function during Pregnancy. Environ. Int. 2021, 157, 106795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mu, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, X.; Lei, Y.; Teng, M.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Li, Y. Developmental Effects and Estrogenicity of Bisphenol A Alternatives in a Zebrafish Embryo Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3222–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Moreman, J.; Lee, O.; Trznadel, M.; David, A.; Kudoh, T.; Tyler, C.R. Acute Toxicity, Teratogenic, and Estrogenic Effects of Bisphenol A and Its Alternative Replacements Bisphenol S, Bisphenol F, and Bisphenol AF in Zebrafish Embryo-Larvae. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 12796–12805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Vandenberg, L.N.; Colborn, T.; Hayes, T.B.; Heindel, J.J.; Jacobs, D.R.; Lee, D.-H.; Shioda, T.; Soto, A.M.; vom Saal, F.S.; Welshons, W.V.; et al. Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 378–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Zimmermann, L.; Dombrowski, A.; Völker, C.; Wagner, M. Are Bioplastics and Plant-Based Materials Safer than Conventional Plastics? In Vitro Toxicity and Chemical Composition. Environ. Int. 2020, 145, 106066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. de Oliveira, J.P.J.; Estrela, F.N.; Rodrigues, A.S.d.L.; Guimarães, A.T.B.; Rocha, T.L.; Malafaia, G. Behavioral and Biochemical Consequences of Danio Rerio Larvae Exposure to Polylactic Acid Bioplastic. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Patisaul, H.B. Endocrine Disruption by Dietary Phyto-Oestrogens: Impact on Dimorphic Sexual Systems and Behaviours. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Example chemical structures of (a) bisphenol, (b) per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance, and (c) phthalate legacy and new-generation endocrine disruptors (created with BioRender.com (accessed on 20 June 2024)).
Figure 1. Example chemical structures of (a) bisphenol, (b) per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance, and (c) phthalate legacy and new-generation endocrine disruptors (created with BioRender.com (accessed on 20 June 2024)).
Ijms 25 06887 g001
Figure 2. (a) Zebrafish, (b) rat, and (c) human models of neurodevelopmental exposure to EDCs. In a and b, EDC exposures are controlled and typically given through prenatal and/or postnatal exposure. In rats, this typically ends at or before weaning at P21. Note that the procedures in mice and rats are similar. In humans, exposures will vary across individual subjects. hpf = hours post-fertilization; dpf = days post-fertilization; GD = gestational days; P = postnatal days; YO = years old (created with BioRender.com (accessed on 5 April 2024)).
Figure 2. (a) Zebrafish, (b) rat, and (c) human models of neurodevelopmental exposure to EDCs. In a and b, EDC exposures are controlled and typically given through prenatal and/or postnatal exposure. In rats, this typically ends at or before weaning at P21. Note that the procedures in mice and rats are similar. In humans, exposures will vary across individual subjects. hpf = hours post-fertilization; dpf = days post-fertilization; GD = gestational days; P = postnatal days; YO = years old (created with BioRender.com (accessed on 5 April 2024)).
Ijms 25 06887 g002
Figure 3. Neurodevelopmental effects of legacy and new-generation endocrine disruptors (created with BioRender.com (accessed on 13 June 2024)).
Figure 3. Neurodevelopmental effects of legacy and new-generation endocrine disruptors (created with BioRender.com (accessed on 13 June 2024)).
Ijms 25 06887 g003
Table 1. Example substitute bisphenols, PFASs, and phthalate esters.
Table 1. Example substitute bisphenols, PFASs, and phthalate esters.
Bisphenols
AbbreviationCommon NameCASRN
BPAFBisphenol AF1478-61-1
BPAPBisphenol AP1571-75-1
BPBBisphenol B77-40-7
BPFBisphenol F620-92-8
BPPBisphenol P2167-51-3
BPSBisphenol S80-09-1
BPS-MAE-97042-18-7
BPZBisphenol Z843-55-0
TCBPFTetrachlorobisphenol A79-95-8
TMBPFTetramethylbisphenol F5384-21-4
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
6:2 Cl-PFESA/F-53B 6:2 chlorinated polyfluorooctane ether sulfonic acid 73606-19-6
8:2 Cl-PFESA/F-53B 8:2 chlorinated polyfluorooctane ether sulfonic acid 83329-89-9
ADONA4,8-dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoic 919005-14-4
EtFOSAA/NEtFOSAA2-(N-ethyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid2991-50-6
FOSAPerfluorooctanesulfonamide754-91-6
GenX/HFPO-DAPerfluoro-2-methyl-3-oxahexanoic acid13252-13-6
MeFOSAA/NMeFOSA/ Me-PFOSA-AcOH2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid2355-31-9
PFBAPerfluorobutanoic acid375-22-4
PFBSPerfluorobutanesulfonic acid375-73-5
PFDA/PFDeAPerfluorodecanoic acid335-76-2
PFDoA/PFDoDAPerfluorododecanoic acid307-55-1
PFHpAPerfluoroheptanoic acid375-85-9
PFHpSPerfluoroheptanesulfonic acid375-92-8
PFNAPerfluorononanoic acid375-95-1
PFTrDAPerfluorotridecanoic acid72629-94-8
PFUA/PFUdA/PFUnA, PFUnDA Perfluoroundecanoic acid 2058-94-8
Phthalate esters
DINCH1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester166412-78-8
ATBCAcetyl tributyl citrate77-90-7
ATECTriethyl 2-acetylcitrate77-89-4
DGDDipropylene glycol dibenzoate27138-31-4
GTAGlyceryl triacetate102-76-1
DEHA/DOADi-(2-ethylhexy) adipate103-23-1
DEHT/DOTP/DEHTPDi-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate6422-86-2
A list of representative substitute chemicals is provided. Note that additional chemicals not appearing here are discussed in this review.
Table 4. Associations between BPA-analogues and neurodevelopment and behavior in humans.
Table 4. Associations between BPA-analogues and neurodevelopment and behavior in humans.
EDCTime of Exposure MeasuredConc. MeasuredFindingsReference
BPAF12 months old<0.01–1.456 ng/mL↓ Association with social developmental quotient in girls
No association with other developmental quotient domains (gross and fine motor, adaptive, and language domains)
Xia et al., 2023 [119]
BPF6 and 8 years oldUrinary Mean (ug/g creatinine):
6 years: 0.2
8 years: 0.4
↑ Association with ADHD rating scores, higher in girls than boysKim et al., 2022 [128]
BPFGestation (~10 weeks)Urinary Mean (ng/mL): 0.16 ng/mL↓ Association with cognitive function, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed in boysBornehag et al., 2021 [127]
BPFGestation (<12 weeks)Urinary Mean (ng/mL): 0.16↓ Association with IQ in boysTanner et al., 2020 [121]
BPFGestation (~13 weeks)Urinary Mean (ug/L): 0.47↓ Association with scores of IQ, perceptual reasoning index, and verbal comprehension index among boysChen et al., 2023 [120]
BPS6 and 8 years oldUrinary Mean (ug/g creatinine):
6 years: 0.1
8 years: 0.16
↑ Association with ADHD rating scores, higher in girls than boysKim et al., 2022 [128]
BPS16–19 weeks of pregnancyUrinary Range (ng/mL): 0.1–3.5↑ Association with emotionally reactive behaviors in girlsGeiger et al., 2023 [125]
BPSGestation (<16 weeks)Urinary Range (ug/L): ~0.18–0.89↓ Association with psychomotor development index in boys
No association with mental development
Jiang et al., 2020 [123]
TCBPAGestation (~13 weeks)Urinary Range (ug/L): ~0.01–0.08↑ Association with IQ and perceptual reasoning index scores
No association with verbal comprehension
Chen et al., 2023 [120]
BPFGestation (<16 weeks)Urinary Range (ug/L): ~0.38–1.44No association with infant neurodevelopment (mental development, psychomotor development)Jiang et al., 2020 [123]
BPF,
BPS
Gestation (16–34 weeks)Urinary Range (ng/mL): 0.1–82.7 (BPF), 0–46.7 (BPS)No association with nonverbal IQvan den Dries et al., 2020 [124]
BPSGestation (~17 weeks)Urinary Mean (ug/g creatinine): 0.23No association with neurodevelopment test assessing cognitive, language, motor, social, emotional, and adaptive skillsLiu et al., 2021 [126]
BPSGestation (≤18 weeks)Urinary Median (ng/mL): 0.34No association with cord blood or childhood TSH and FT4.Derakhshan et al., 2021 [118]
BPSGestation (~10 weeks)Urinary Mean (ng/mL): 0.07No association with cognitive functionBornehag et al., 2021 [127]
BPSGestation (<12 weeks)Urinary Mean (ng/mL): 0.07No association with IQTanner et al., 2020 [121]
BPSGestation (~13 weeks)Urinary Range (ug/L creatinine): ~0.03–0.13 (BPAF), ~0–0.002 (BPS)No association with scores of IQ, perceptual reasoning index, and verbal comprehension indexChen et al., 2023 [120]
BPS,
BPB,
BPAP,
BPP,
BPZ
12 months oldUrinary Range (ng/mL): <0.01–54.605 (BPS),
<0.01–0.686 (BPB),
<0.01–16.195 (BPAP),
<0.01–0.511 (BPP),
<0.01–0.512 (BPZ)
No association with developmental quotients (gross and fine motor, adaptive, language, and social domains)Xia et al., 2023 [119]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.
Table 5. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-PFOS, -PFOA, and -PFHxS PFASs in zebrafish.
Table 5. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-PFOS, -PFOA, and -PFHxS PFASs in zebrafish.
EDCTime of Exposure (hpf)DoseFindingsReference
1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorohexyl iodide6–1200.015–100 μM↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
1H,1H,8H,8H-Perfluorooctane-1,8-diol6–1200.015–100 μM↓ Embryonic photomotor behavior
↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light and dark periods
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
6:2 FTOH3–1200.2, 2, 20 μM↑ Larvae locomotion at 2 μM and 20 μM
↑ Expression of bdnf and ap1s1 at 20 μM (neurodevelopment-related genes)
Annnunziato et al., 2019 [136]
6:2 FTSA~4–1440.006–180 μM↑ Larvae locomotion in dark period at 180 μM
No effect on burst activity (movements > 6 mm) or “startle response” (peak distance − mean distance)
Menger et al., 2020 [134]
Six PFASs, including GenX, PFHpS (see paper for details)8–1200.35–0.92 μM↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
8:8 PFPiA4–1440.0116–5.79 μM↓ Larvae locomotion at 0.343–5.79 μM in the dark periods
↑ Expression of chrb, dio3a, and tshr (HPT axis) at 5.79 μM;
No effect on expression of dio3b, thraa, and thrb (axis)
↓ Expression of elavl3 at 1.35–5.79 μM (neurodevelopment)
No effect on expression of mbp, syn2a, shha, and tuba1 (neurodevelopment)
Kim et al., 2020 [137]
DiSAMPAP8–1200.20 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in dark period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
Five PFASs (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↑ Embryonic photomotor behavior
No effect on larvae photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
Five PFASs (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in the dark period
No effects on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
FOSA6–1200.015–100 μM↑ Embryonic photomotor behavior
↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in the dark period
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
Four PFASs (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↓ Embryonic photomotor behavior
No effect on larvae photomotor response
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
Four PFASs, including PFUA (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light and dark periods
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
GenX6–1680.1–10,000 μg/L↑ Expression of elavl3, gap43, tubb (neuron differentiation and growth), gfap (astrocytes); ↓ expression of manf (neurotrophic signals) at 0.1 and 1 μg/L (other doses not measured)
No effect on expression of mbp (axon function), nestin (neuron structure) at 0.1 and 1 μg/L (other doses not measured)
↓ Larvae locomotion in dark period at 1000 μg/L; in light periods at 100 μg/L
No effect in light-dark preference test (anxiety)
Ivantsova et al., 2023 [129]
GenX1–1204–4000 ppb↑ Larvae locomotion at 40–4000 ppb in the dark periods; ↓ at 4000 ppb in the light period
↑ Dopamine at 40 ppb
Wasel et al., 2023 [130]
Methyl 3H-perfluoroisopropyl ether6–1200.015–100 μM↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light and dark periodTruong et al., 2022 [135]
PFBA8–1200.98–98 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light period
↑ Larvae photomotor behavior at all doses in the dark period and at 2.49, 6.32, and 34.3–98 μM in the light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFBA1–12023,360–46,720 μM↓ Larvae locomotion at 0.4 ppb in the light; at 400, 4000 ppb in the dark; ↑ at 4 in the dark.
↑ Head width at 400 ppb
↑ Enrichment of pathways associated with neurological disorders, behavior, and nervous system development and function
Wasel et al., 2022 [132]
PFBS1–1204–4000 ppb↑ Larvae locomotion at 4–4000 ppb in the dark period; at 40–4000 ppb in the light period
↓ Dopamine at 400 ppb
Wasel et al., 2023 [130]
PFBS~4–14410–3000 mg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 1000 μg/L (3000 mg/L not measured)Ulhaq et al., 2013 [133]
PFDA8–1200–100 μMNo effect on embryonic or larvae photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in the dark period at 2.49 and 34.3 μM, and in the light at 2.5 μM ↓ at 16.07 and 100 μM
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFDMMOBA4–168100–300 ppm↑ Listing (falling to one side)Gebreab et al., 2020 [138]
PFDoA~4–1200, 0.24, 1.2, 6 mg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at all doses
↓ GFP neurons at 6 mg/L
↓ ACh at 6 mg/L and AChE activity at 1.2 or 6 mg/L
↑ Dopamine at 1.2 and 6 mg/L
↓ Expression α1-tubulin, gap43, gfap, shha, syn2a, ache at 6 mg/L; mbp, elavl3 at 1.2 and 6 mg/L; ↑ manf at 6 mg/L
Guo et al., 2018 [139]
PFECHS, PFPrS8–1200.35–0.50 μM↓ Larvae startle response
No effect on embryonic or larvae photomotor behavior
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFHpA~4–1440.002–89 μM↑larvae locomotion in light period at 89 μM
No effect on burst activity (movements > 6 mm) or “startle response” (peak distance − mean distance)
Menger et al., 2020 [134]
PFHpA8–1200.69 μMNo effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
↑ Larvae photomotor behavior at 2.51 and 6.39 μM ↓ at 100 μM in the dark period
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFHpS0–1201.7–31.4 μM↑ Larvae locomotion at 3.1 and 5.5 μM in the light and dark periodsGaballah et al., 2020 [140]
PFHpS, PFOS-K, PFTrDA6–1200.015–100 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light period; ↓ in the dark
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
PFHxA8–1200.80 μM↑ Area under curve analysis (change in movement from light to dark periods) in larvae photomotor behavior
↓ Larvae photomotor behavior at 2.46, 6.32, 34.3, and 73.3 μM in the dark period and ↑ at 2.46 and 16.07 μM in the light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFHxA0–1204.4–80.0 μM↑ Larvae locomotion at 25.1 μM in the light period and at 14 and 25.1 μM in the dark periodGaballah et al., 2020 [140]
PFHxA3–1200.2, 2, 20 μMNo effect on larvae locomotion
↑ Expression of bdnf at 20 μM; ap1s1 at 2 and 20 μM (neurodevelopment-related genes)
Annnunziato et al., 2019 [136]
PFHxA1–12015,921.03–31,842.06 μMNo effect on larvae locomotion
↓ Head length at 40 and 400 ppb
No found enrichment of pathways associated with the nervous system and behaviors
Wasel et al., 2022 [132]
PFNA~4–1440.03–10 mg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 10 mg/LUlhaq et al., 2013 [133]
PFNA3–1201–2.0 μM↓ Larvae locomotion at all doses
↑ Time spent in well center at 0.2 and 2.0 μM
Jantzen et al., 2016 [141]
PFNA~4–1440.001–200 μM↓ Larvae locomotion in light period at 48uM (higher doses not measured)
↑ Burst activity (movements > 6 mm) in the dark period at 15 and 48 μM
Menger et al., 2020 [134]
PFNA8–1200–100 μM↓ Larvae startle response at 0.54 μM
↓ Larvae photomotor behavior at 33.95 μM in the dark period and at 2.46 and 33.95 μM in the light period ↑ in the light period at 0.97 and 72.56 μM
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFO2DA4–1685–100 ppm↑ Listing (falling to one side)Gebreab et al., 2020 [138]
PFO3DA4–16825–200 ppm↑ Listing (falling to one side)Gebreab et al., 2020 [138]
PFO3TDA4–1681–40 ppm↑ Listing (falling to one side)Gebreab et al., 2020 [138]
PFPeA8–1200.97–97 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior at 15.91, 33.95, and 97 μM in the dark period and 6.26–33.95 μM in the light period ↓Larvae photomotor behavior in the light period at 0.95 μM
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFPeS0–1203.1–56.0 μM↑ Larvae locomotion at 3.1 and 5.5 μM in the light periodsGaballah et al., 2020 [140]
PFTrDA8–1200–35 μM↓ Larvae photomotor behavior at 10 μM in the dark period, 35 μM at light period, and ↑ at 10 μM in the light period.
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
PFUA8–1200–75.0 μMNo effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in dark period at 52.8 μM and in light period at 0.96 and 2.44 μM
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
Six PFASs, including PFBS and PFDoA (see paper for details)8–1200.25–0.75 μM (see paper for details)↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior and larvae startle response
Rericha et al., 2021 [131]
TFAA~4–14410–3000 mg/L↓ Larvae locomotion at 1000 and 3000 mg/LUlhaq et al., 2013 [133]
Three PFASs (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in the light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
Two PFASs (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↑ Larvae photomotor behavior in the dark
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
Two PFASs (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μM↓ Larvae photomotor behavior in the dark period; ↑ in the light period
No effect on embryonic photomotor behavior
Truong et al., 2022 [135]
107 PFASs, including PFBA, PFBS, PFNA, GenX, PFDA, PFHpA, (see paper for details)6–1200.015–100 μMNo effect on embryonic or larvae photomotor behaviorTruong et al., 2022 [135]
33 PFASs, including EtFOSAA, PFNA, (see paper for details)8–1200.27–1.03 μM (see paper for details)No effect on embryonic or larvae photomotor behavior and larvae startle responseRericha et al., 2021 [131]
ADONA,
GenX
0–1204.4–80.0 μMNo effect on larvae locomotionGaballah et al., 2020 [140]
GenX5– 1200.1–150 μMNo effect on startle response to lightSatbhai et al., 2022 [142]
PFBA, PFDA~4–14410–3000 mg/LNo effect on larvae locomotionUlhaq et al., 2013 [133]
PFBS0–5dpf5.5–100.0 μMNo effect on larvae locomotionGaballah et al., 2020 [140]
PFESA10–1204.4–80.0 μMNo effect on larvae locomotionGaballah et al., 2020 [140]
PFHxA,
PFPeA,
PFBS
~4–1440.002–84 μM (see paper for details)No effect on larvae locomotion, burst activity (movements > 6 mm), or “startle response” (peak distance − mean distance)Menger et al., 2020 [134]
PFMOBA
PFO2HPA
GenX
4–16825–200 ppmNo effect on listing (falling to one side)Gebreab et al., 2020 [138]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.
Table 6. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-PFOS, -PFOA, and -PFHxS PFASs in rodents.
Table 6. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of non-PFOS, -PFOA, and -PFHxS PFASs in rodents.
EDCAnimalTime of ExposureDoseFindingsReference
GenXRatsGD14–1862.5–500 mg/kg or 1–30 mg/kg↓ maternal T3 at 30–500 mg/kg; T4 at 125–500 mg/kgConley et al., 2019 [143]
GenXRatsGD1.5–11.5 or GD 1.5–17.52, 10 mg/kg↑ placental T4 at 10 mg/kgBlake et al., 2020 [144]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.
Table 8. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of phthalate alternatives in zebrafish.
Table 8. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral effects of phthalate alternatives in zebrafish.
EDCTime of Exposure (hpf)DoseFindingsReference
ATBC0–960.03–300 μg/L↓ Locomotion at 300 μg/L in the light and dark phase
↓ AchE at 300 μg/L
No effect on dopamine
↓ Expression of ache, gap43, mbpa, and syn2a at 300 μg/L (related to neurodevelopment)
No effect on expression of gfap, shha, tuba1b (genes related to neurodevelopment)
Yun et al., 2024 [186]
ATBC4–12010–1000 μg/L↓ Expression of tshβ at 19 and 194.5 μg/L; trα at 194.5 μg/L; dio1 at 194.5 μg/L; dio2 at 71 and 194.5 μg/L (genes related to neurodevelopment)Horie et al., 2022 [188]
ATEC0–960.03–300 μg/LNo effect on locomotion
No effect on AChE or dopamine
↓ Expression of ache and mbpa at 300 μg/L (genes related to neurodevelopment)
No effect on expression of gap43, gfap, shha, syn2a, tuba1b (genes related to neurodevelopment)
Yun et al., 2024 [186]
DGD8–480.000001–1 μMNo effect on thyroid hormone levels
↑ Association with transcriptomics adverse outcome pathway related to thyroid hormone
Tan et al., 2023 [189]
DINCH2–1440.01–10 μM↑ Locomotion at 0.1–10 μM during the light period
↑ Expression of pcsk9 at all doses, dmrt3a at 0.1–10 μM, hmgcs1 at 10 μM, mbpa at 1, 10 μM; ↓ dhcr7 at all doses (genes related to cholesterol biosynthesis, myelin, neurodevelopment)
Saad et al., 2021 [187]
DINCH8–4810–1000 μg/LNo effect on thyroid hormone levels
↑ Association with transcriptomics adverse outcome pathway related to thyroid hormone
Tan et al., 2023 [189]
GTA8–480.001–1000 μMNo effect on thyroid hormone levels
↑ Association with transcriptomics adverse outcome pathway related to thyroid hormone
Tan et al., 2023 [189]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.
Table 9. Associations with phthalate alternatives and neurodevelopment and behavior in humans.
Table 9. Associations with phthalate alternatives and neurodevelopment and behavior in humans.
EDCTime EDC MeasuredConcentration MeasuredFindingsReference
DEHTPGestation (~14 weeks)Mean Urine (metabolites, ng/mL): MECPTP: 28.76
MEHHP: 5.72
↓ association with adaptive and cognitive domain in boys; association with communication scores in girlsPark et al., 2023 [191]
DINCH7–11 years oldMean Urine (Biomarkers, μg/L):
OH-MINCH: 2.3–3.6
cx-MINCH: 1.1–2.3
No association with IQRosolen et al., 2022 [192]
DINCHGestation (>14 weeks)]Mean Urine (biomarkers, ng/mL):
MOiNCH: 0.25
↑ association with TT3; ↓ association with TT4/TT3 ratioDerakhshan et al., 2021 [194]
DINCHGestation (~14 weeks)Mean Urine (metabolites, ng/mL): MHinCH: 0.47
MCOCH: 0.47
No association with thyroid hormones (TSH, T3, T4, T3/T4 ratio)Cathey et al., 2019 [193]
DEHTGestation (~14 weeks)Mean Urine (metabolites, ng/mL): MECPTP: 20.5
MEHHTP: 3.72
↑ association with T3, T3/T4 ratio
No association with TSH or T4
Cathey et al., 2019 [193]
All effects were statistically significant at p < 0.05. ↓ refers to a decrease while ↑ refers to an increase in the EDC group(s) compared to a control.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morales-Grahl, E.; Hilz, E.N.; Gore, A.C. Regrettable Substitutes and the Brain: What Animal Models and Human Studies Tell Us about the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Bisphenol, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, and Phthalate Replacements. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136887

AMA Style

Morales-Grahl E, Hilz EN, Gore AC. Regrettable Substitutes and the Brain: What Animal Models and Human Studies Tell Us about the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Bisphenol, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, and Phthalate Replacements. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):6887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morales-Grahl, Elena, Emily N. Hilz, and Andrea C. Gore. 2024. "Regrettable Substitutes and the Brain: What Animal Models and Human Studies Tell Us about the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Bisphenol, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, and Phthalate Replacements" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 6887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136887

APA Style

Morales-Grahl, E., Hilz, E. N., & Gore, A. C. (2024). Regrettable Substitutes and the Brain: What Animal Models and Human Studies Tell Us about the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Bisphenol, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, and Phthalate Replacements. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(13), 6887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop