Next Article in Journal
Tetra-tert-Butyl-di-m-Hydroxo Digallium(III) and 1,12-Diaza-3,4:9,10-Dibenzo-5,8-Dioxo-cyclo-Pentadecane. Structure and Isomers of the Coordination Compound
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Heme Peroxidase During Phenol Derivatives Oxidation. Possible Molecular Cloaking of the Active Center
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acidity Study on 3-Substituted Pyridines

Chemistry Department, Anadolu University, 26470 Eskisehir, Turkey
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2005, 6(11), 257-275; https://doi.org/10.3390/i6110257
Submission received: 24 June 2005 / Accepted: 21 October 2005 / Published: 1 November 2005

Abstract

:
A comprehensive theoretical study for the protonation of some 3-substituted pyridines has been carried out in aqueous solution (ε=78.4) by semi empirical AM1 method in MOPAC2000 and PM5 method in MOPAC2002. Solvent effect was accounted for implicitly by means of the conductor like screening model (COSMO). The acidity constants of these pyridine derivatives have been calculated. The tautomeric and/or conformational equilibria for these compounds, where available, were also taken into account to find out the mol fractions of the species in aqueous media. The results obtained from the calculations were compared with the available experimental values, and the results indicate a considerable agreement with available experimental data.

Scheme 1. The studied pyridines.
Scheme 1. The studied pyridines.
Ijms 06 00257 g001

Introduction

As a continuation of our previous studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] on tautomerism and acidity of biologically important heterocyclic molecules, I now report a study on acidity for some 3-substituted pyridine derivatives 1-36 (Scheme 1). The tautomerism and basicity of heterocycles are great of importance in many areas of chemistry [10,11].Therefore, the tautomeric and conformational equilibria for the studied molecules should be considered to be able to predict the more accurate pKa values. In this study the possible tautomeric and conformational equilibria, where available, for 3-substituted pyridines (Scheme 1, Scheme 2, Scheme 3, and Scheme 4), which can exist as different major tautomers according to the solvent and the mode of the substitution, have been examined in water (ε=78.4) by means of AM1 [12] method in MOPAC2000 [13] and newly PM5 [14] method in MOPAC2002 [15]. The pKa values of these molecules have been calculated by using the obtained weighted average energy figures corresponding the tautomers and/or conformers.
The aim of the present study is to search for correlations between the previously reported experimental data and the calculated results by means of semi empirical methods AM1 and PM5 and also to compare the AM1 results with those obtained by newly PM5 method.

Computational methods

Theoretical calculations were carried out at the restricted Hartree-Fock level (RHF) by using AM1 semi empirical method in the MOPAC2000 and PM5 in the MOPAC2002 implemented on an Intel Pentium IV 3.2 GHz computer, using a relative permittivity of 78.4 corresponding to water, with up to 252, instead of default value 42, surface segment per atom (NSPA, which controls the number of segments) being able to get more accurate results for the COSMO [16] model being used to van der Waals radii. Initial estimates of the geometry of the all structures were obtained by Chem3D in ChemOffice [17] followed by full optimization of all geometrical variables (bond lengths, bond angles, and dihedral angles), without any symmetry constraint. All structures were optimized to a gradient norm 0.1-0.5, using the eigenvector following method (EF). The absolute entropies of all structures were calculated from a complete vibrational analysis. Enthalpies were corrected to free energies using the calculated entropies. According to MOPAC manual, the disex is in units of mean segment diameter, which is the distance up to which the interactions of two segments are calculated as the sum of the fine grid interactions. Disex controls the radius, up to which the segment-segment interactions are evaluated on the basis of the basic grid points. For accurate calculations larger values may be used. In this case the calculation time may increase as disex2. The Disex = 2, which is the default value, were implicitly used for conjugate bases 1-36 and explicitly for conjugate acids 37-71 in both AM1 and PM5 calculations. When the Disex=2 not used explicitly for conjugate acids 37-71 in both AM1 and PM5 calculations there are a little differences between the figures obtained explicitly and the ones found implicitly.
Scheme 2. The protonated forms of 3-substitued pyridines.
Scheme 2. The protonated forms of 3-substitued pyridines.
Ijms 06 00257 g002
Scheme 3. The protonated forms of 3-substitued pyridines.
Scheme 3. The protonated forms of 3-substitued pyridines.
Ijms 06 00257 g003
Scheme 4. The protonated forms of 3-substitued pyridines.
Scheme 4. The protonated forms of 3-substitued pyridines.
Ijms 06 00257 g004

Results and discussion

Conformation and tautomerism

The AM1 and PM5 calculated heats of formation, absolute entropies, and the mole fractions for the individual tautomeric forms and conformers, where available, for the conjugate bases and conjugate acids (Scheme 2, Scheme 3, and Scheme 4) are listed in Table 1, Table 2, Table 4 and Table 5. The estimation of the pKa values for the conjugate bases 5, 7-10, 12, 26-27, and 30 failed by AM1 COSMO solvation since the absolute entropy values for the protonated species of the compounds 41, 43-46, 48, 62-63, and 66 could not be calculated by MOPAC2000 in ChemOffice.
The tautomeric and/or conformational equilibria for the compounds under investigation, if available, were taken into account to find out the mol fractions of the species leading to the weighted average of ΔGf for conformers and/or tautomers (Scheme 2, Scheme 3, and Scheme 4).
The weighted averages of the free energies (ΔGf (WA)) for the tautomers and conformers have been estimated by using the following equations.
ΔGf(wa) = [Na] [ΔGf(a)] + [Nb] [ΔGf(b)] + …
Ijms 06 00257 i001
Ijms 06 00257 i005
Ijms 06 00257 i002
Ijms 06 00257 i003
Ijms 06 00257 i004
Where Nt, Ns, Na, Nb, Nc, and Nd are the mole fractions of the individual conformers and/or tautomers. ΔGf(s), ΔGf(t), ΔGf(a), ΔGf(b), ΔGf(c), and ΔGf(d) are the free energies of the syn and anti conformers and tautomers. Regarding the values of the mole fractions in Table 1, Table 2, Table 4 and Table 5 for the conformers and/or tautomers of the molecules studied in Scheme 1, Scheme 2, Scheme 3, and Scheme 4, it can be easily seen which molecule has more stable form than the other in AM1 and PM5 calculations. The PM5 COSMO in MOPAC2002 estimates that the 3-hydroxypyridine 13 exist entirely in zwitterion form 13b, whereas the AM1 COSMO in MOPAC2000 calculations gives the 3-hydroxypyridine 13 exist entirely in the hydroxy form 13a while the hydroxy form 13a experimentally is greatly dominant only in of low dielectric constant [18]. The comparison of the pKa value of the 3-hydroxypyridine 13a with those of methylated forms indicated that the two tautomeric forms 13a and 13b exist almost equally in aqueous solution [18]. Both AM1 and PM5 shows that 3-mercaptopyridine 15 exist predominantly in zwitterionic form 15b rather than the 3-mercaptopyridine 15a in aqueous solution, which is consistent with the findings found by UV spectral comparisons and pKa measurements [19]. 3-Aminopyridine 22 has been also shown to exist predominantly in amino form 22a by infrared spectroscopy [20,21], which is in good agreement with both AM1 and PM5 results. As expected both AM1 and PM5 estimated that the zwitterionic structure 31a of 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid 31 is much more stable than the 3-carboxypyridine structure 31b, which is consistent with the experimental finding [22].

Basicity

It is well known that it is impossible to measure the pKa values of the individual tautomers in the tautomeric equilibrium and it is usually difficult to prepare all the fixed model compounds of the individual tautomers in which the mobile H-atom replaced with a generally methyl group to eliminate the migration of H-atom. In aqueous solution the acidity of a given base B is the standard free energy change calculated by means of Eq. 7 for the reaction 6.
B : + H 3 O B H + + H 2 O
δΔGf (BH+) = [ΔGf (B) + ΔGf (H3O+)] - [δΔGf (BH+) + ΔGf (H2O)]
AM1 and PM5 calculated heats of formation and absolute entropy values of H3O+ and H2O in aqueous solution are given in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. These were converted to free energy by using AM1 and PM5 calculated absolute entropy values. In aqueous solution the pKa values of the studied molecules were found by using the following equation
p K a ( B H + ) = δ Δ G f ( B H + ) 2.303 RT
Where R= 1.987x10-3 kcal/mol °K and T= 298 °K. In this work pKa values of various 3-substituted pyridine derivatives were calculated in aqueous media by means of AM1 COSMO method in MOPAC2000 and PM5 COSMO method in MOPAC2002. All pKa values calculated by Eq. 8 are listed in Table 3 and Table 6. As can be seen from Table 3 and Table 6 the obtained pKa values from AM1 and PM5 calculations are generally in very good agreement with the experimental pKa values. The absolute error between experimental and calculated pKa values are within ± 0-1 kcal/mol range, exceptions of conjugate bases 15, 21-23, and 36, with AM1 calculations i.e., ± 0-2 kcal/mol, and conjugate bases 13, 15-16, 22, and 31 with PM5 calculations.
Both AM1 and PM5 overestimated the pKa value of the 3-mercaptopyridine 15 approximately in 5 pKa units giving the figures 10.58 and 10.90, respectively. Experimentally 3-aminopyridine 22 in aqueous solution undergoes predominant protonation at the ring nitrogen atom [11]. In both AM1 and PM5 calculations the protonation of 22 found to be predominantly takes place at exocyclic nitrogen atom giving cation 58b, which is not consistent with experimental data. However, the protonation of 23 occurs predominantly at the ring nitrogen atom in AM1 calculations and mostly at the exocyclic nitrogen atom in PM5 resulting in cation 59a. Due to these results, probably, the acidity constant of the 3-aminopyridine 22 was found to be 5 pKa units less than the experimental value by both AM1 and PM5. While the PM5 could calculate the pKa value for 3-cyanopyrine 36 which is very close to experimental value being approximately 1.35. However, the AM1 overestimated value of 4.21 was obtained by AM1. By AM1 method the pKa value for the conjugate base 31 was found to be as 3.32, which is consistent with the experimental values 3.13 or 3.75, but PM5 predicted the molecule 31 as much more acidic compared to the experimental data. The acidity constants for the 3-nitropyridine 21 and 3-dimethylaminopyrine 23 predicted by means of AM1 COSMO method exceeds the acceptable limit ± 0-1 pKa unit.
Table 1. The AM1 calculated thermodynamic properties of pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Table 1. The AM1 calculated thermodynamic properties of pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
CompoundΔHf (kcal/mol)ΔS (cal/mol K)ΔGf a (kcal/mol)Mol fractions of conformers or tautomersbWeighted average ΔGf c (kcal/mol)
123.8167.413.72
215.8275.27-6.61
39.9984.08-15.07
45.9490.20-20.94
6s-35.1478.17-58.43N6s = 0.08-59.74
6t-35.1283.00-59.85N6t = 0.92
11-48.81101.49-79.05
13a-24.8374.70-47.10N13a = 1.00-47.10
13b-21.6973.35-43.55N13b = 0.00
14s-17.0081.44-41.27N14s = 0.49-41.28
14t-16.8282.11-41.29N14t = 0.51
15a23.4779.34-0.17N15a = 0.00-9.62
15b13.1576.40-9.62N15b = 1.00
16a-138.9590.49-165.92N16a = 0.99-165.89
16b-135.1694.22-163.24N16b = 0.01
17-21.0073.05-42.77
1816.9475.78-5.64
1927.8978.724.43
2039.3280.6215.30
2117.1684.73-8.09
22a15.5874.66-6.67N22a = 1.00-6.67
22b39.5376.7916.65N22b = 0.00
2328.0990.571.10
24a-25.5288.95-52.03N24a = 0.10-52.72
24b-24.9291.95-51.60N24b = 0.05
24c-25.0493.73-52.97N24c = 0.52
24d-25.3591.78-52.70N24d = 0.33
25a-16.06100.30-45.95N25a = 0.32-45.82
25b-15.62100.88-45.68N25b = 0.20
25c-15.67100.63-45.66N25c = 0.20
25d-16.00100.25-45.87N25d = 0.28
28s-14.5680.42-38.53N28s = 0.51-38.52
28t-14.5880.26-38.50N28t = 0.49
29s-20.4091.34-47.62N29s = 0.82-47.46
29t-20.3488.53-46.73N29t = 0.18
31a-77.0386.63-102.84N31a = 0.84-102.62
31bs-75.8285.56-101.32N31b = 0.05
31bt-74.8185.85-100.39N31c = 0.11
31cs-75.8486.97-101.76
31ct-74.6286.45-100.38
32-173.2786.39-199.01
33ss-66.8698.59-96.24N33ss = 0.98-96.21
33st-64.1593.94-92.14N33st = 0.00
33ts-66.8990.99-94.01N33ts = 0.02
33tt-64.0794.50-92.23N33tt = 0.00
34ss-72.52103.66-103.41N34ss = 0.68-103.22
34st-69.89105.79-101.42N34st = 0.02
34ts--72.56101.89-102.92N34ts = 0.30
34tt-69.84102.97-100.53N34tt = 0.00
35s-28.5685.54-54.06N35s = 0.54-54.01
35t-28.5085.45-53.96N35t = 0.46
3652.3577.6129.22
H2O-68.8945.11-82.31
a from ΔGf = ΔHf – TΔS
b from Eq. 2-5
c from Eq. 7
Table 2. The AM1 calculated thermodynamic properties of protonated pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4)
Table 2. The AM1 calculated thermodynamic properties of protonated pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4)
CompoundΔHf (kcal/mol)ΔS (cal/mol K)ΔGfa (kcal/molMol fractions of conformers or tautomersbWeighted average ΔGf c (kcal/mol)
37118.3867.7798.18
38111.0480.4887.06
39105.2085.5579.71
40101.2092.2673.71
42s60.1778.4536.81N42s = 0.0435.07
42t60.0984.1935.00N42t = 0.96
4744.81100.3914.89
4971.2575.3548.80
50s79.8583.7054.91N50s = 0.2554.43
50t80.0386.4554.27N50t = 0.75
51119.5580.4895.57
52-40.2596.02-68.86
5375.9673.5054.06
54113.6576.2490.93
55124.4979.15100.90
56135.6081.00111.46
57a115.0684.2389.96N57a = 1.0089.96
57b141.2484.66116.01N57b = 0.00
57c141.2383.44116.36N57c = 0.00
58a112.3975.8789.79N58a = 0.0080.59
58b103.5176.9280.59N58b = 1.00
59a124.7992.1397.34N59a = 1.0097.34
59b 128.4990.59101.49N59b = 0.00
60a71.0888.6544.68N60a = 0.0142.39
60b71.2794.1643.21N60b = 0.13
60c70.9992.1143.54N60c = 0.07
60d70.7696.1242.12N60d = 0.79
61a80.6396.8651.77N61a = 0.0850.84
61b 80.77101.5450.51N61b = 0.70
61c80.5897.0951.65N61c = 0.10
61d 80.4696.5451.69N61d = 0.11
64s81.2380.9357.11N64s = 0.4156.99
64t80.9680.7456.90N64t = 0.59
65s75.6389.3049.02N65s = 0.5649.08
65t75.6088.7349.16N65t = 0.44
67ss20.1986.90-5.71N67ss = 0.50-5.47
67st21.0686.73-4.79N67st = 0.11
67ts20.0585.75-5.50N67ts = 0.35
67tt21.0084.54-4.19N67tt = 0.04
68ss29.3295.360.90N68ss = 0.821.06
68st32.0394.923.74N68st = 0.00
68ts29.1391.751.79N68ts = 0.18
68tt32.0395.303.63N68tt = 0.01
69ss23.7996.89-5.08N69ss = 0.03-6.80
69st26.9397.75-2.20N69st = 0.00
69ts23.58102.34-6.92N69ts = 0.96
69tt26.25103.35-4.55N69tt = 0.01
70s67.6685.7142.12N70s = 0.4942.10
70t67.3885.7342.09N70t = 0.51
71148.4778.16125.18
H3O+33.1346.1319.38
a from ΔGf = ΔHf – TΔS
b from Eq. 2-5
c from Eq. 7
Table 3. The AM1 calculated pKa values for pyridines in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Table 3. The AM1 calculated pKa values for pyridines in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Conjugate base (B)ΔGf Kcal/molConjugate acid (BH+)ΔGf Kcal/molδΔGfa Kcal/molpKa(BH+)bExp. pKa(BH+)cAbsolute error between pKa(calc.) and pKa(exp.)Referencesc
1 3.723798.187.235.305.27, 5.280.03, 0.0223, 24, 25
2 -6.613887.068.025.885.67, 5.70, 5.750.21, 0.18, 0.1326, 27, 28, 29
3-15.073979.716.915.075.700.6330
4-20.944073.717.045.165.72-0.5630
6-59.744235.076.885.054.90, 4.950.15, 0.1031, 32
11-79.054714.897.755.685.470.2131
13-47.104948.805.794.254.80, 4.86-0.55, -0.6127, 38, 39, 40
14 -41.285054.435.984.394.78, 4.88, 4.90-0.39, -0.49, -0.5126, 40, 38, 27
15-9.625195.57-3.5-2.572.28-4.8519
16-165.8952-68.864.663.423.220.2041
17-42.775354.064.863.562.97, 3.100.59, 0.4630, 42
18-5.645490.935.123.752.81, 2.84, 2.980.94, 0.91, 0.7726, 42, 27
194.4355100.905.223.832.80, 2.84, 2.851.03, 0.99, 0.9827, 42, 26
2015.3056111.465.534.053.250.8530
21-8.095789.963.642.670.81, 1.181.86, 1.4943, 26
22-6.675880.5914.4310.585.80, 5.98, 6.044.78, 4.60, 4.5430, 44, 26, 27
231.105997.345.383.956.45-2.5045
24-52.726042.396.584.834.460.3746
25-45.826150.845.033.693.520.1746
28-38.526456.996.184.533.70, 3.750.83, 0.7847, 48
29-47.466549.085.153.783.18, 3.260.60, 0.5230, 49
31-102.6267-5.474.533.323.13, 3.750.19, -0.4343, 50
32-199.0131-102.625.303.894.77-0.8851
33-96.21681.064.423.243.090.1526
34-103.2269-6.805.273.863.350.5142
35-54.017042.105.584.093.400.6951
3629.2271125.185.744.211.30, 1.36, 1.452.91, 2.85, 2.7627, 26, 52, 51
H2O-82.31H3O+19.38
a from Eq. 7
b from Eq. 8
c See references
Table 4. The PM5 calculated thermodynamic properties of pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Table 4. The PM5 calculated thermodynamic properties of pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
CompoundΔHf (Kcal/mol)ΔS (cal/mol K)ΔGf a (Kcal/mol)Mol fractions of conformers or tautomersbWeighted average ΔGf c (Kcal/mol)
123.2068.112.90
214.8976.07-7.78
39.8686.55-15.93
44.3893.33-23.48
5-0.4197.49-29.46
6s-25.8286.73-51.67N6s = 0.09-52.93
6t-27.7784.82-53.05N6t = 0.91
716.47112.82-17.15
8s-1.02115.97-35.58N8a = 0.57-35.51
8t-0.97115.61-35.42N8b = 0.43
9s-80.34109.42-112.95N9a = 0.44-113.03
9t-79.82111.68-113.10N9b = 0.56
10s-40.59121.95-76.93N10a = 0.00-82.08
10t-45.00124.42-82.08N10b = 1.00
11-39.97101.01-70.07
1257.30110.0224.51
13a-23.1875.95-45.81N13a = 0.00-50.34
13b-28.2374.19-50.34N13b = 1.00
14s-14.9483.20-39.74N14s = 0.28-40.14
14t-15.0984.59-40.3N14t = 0.72
15a26.9281.952.50N15a = 0.00-5.68
15b17.3277.17-5.68N15b = 1.00
16a-126.6292.81-154.28N16a = 1.00-154.28
16b-112.8793.42-140.71N16b = 0.00
17-21.6673.79-43.65
1816.3376.76-6.54
1927.5179.753.74
2040.8882.3116.35
2114.8984.82-10.39
22a16.6976.03-5.96N22a = 1.00-5.96
22b37.3678.1014.09N22b = 0.00
2327.4091.440.15
24a-32.6593.58-60.54N24a = 0.41-60.32
24b-31.3094.64-59.50N24b = 0.08
24c-31.3796.57-60.15N24c = 0.21
24d-32.4993.49-60.35N24d = 0.30
25a-26.49102.59-57.06N25a = 0.18-57.31
25b-25.71107.07-57.62N25b = 0.47
25c-25.70104.98-56.98N25c = 0.17
25d-26.36103.04-57.06N25d = 0.18
26a-2.11113.23-35.85N26a = 0.60-35.62
26b-0.69111.98-34.06N26b = 0.03
26c-0.64112.57-34.19N26c = 0.04
26d-1.97112.55-35.51N26d = 0.33
27a4.50125.10-32.78N27a = 0.54-32.56
27b4.95121.27-31.19N27b = 0.04
27c5.02121.98-31.33N27c = 0.05
27d4.68124.97-32.56N27d = 0.37
28s-12.9080.90-37.01N28s = 0.50-37.01
28t-12.8181.17-37.00N28t = 0.50
29s-23.9888.93-50.48N29s = 0.59-50.39
29t-23.8888.52-50.26N29t = 0.41
30s6.57105.44-24.85N30s = 0.47-24.89
30t6.46105.33-24.93N30t = 0.53
31a-84.1385.45-109.59N31a = 1.00-109.59
31bs-72.6486.22-98.33N31b = 0.00
31bt-71.9986.04-97.62N31c = 0.00
31cs-72.6385.32-98.06
31ct-70.9381.13-95.11
32-186.3179.52-210.13
33ss -65.4394.48-93.59N33ss = 0.48-93.52
33st-63.3095.82-91.85N33st = 0.03
33ts-65.4394.52-93.60N33ts = 0.48
33tt-63.1695.20-91.53N33tt = 0.01
34ss-71.88103.55-102.74N34ss = 0.65-102.49
34st-70.05103.73-100.96N34st = 0.03
34ts-71.86102.01-102.26N34ts = 0.29
34tt-69.86104.01-100.85N34tt = 0.03
35s-34.1586.57-59.95N35s = 0.61-59.85
35t-34.0286.13-59.69N35t = 0.39
3652.3278.4928.93
H2O-59.4444.99-72.85
a from ΔGf = ΔHf – TΔS
b from Eq. 2-5
c from Eq. 7
Table 5. The PM5 calculated thermodynamic properties of protonated pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Table 5. The PM5 calculated thermodynamic properties of protonated pyridine derivatives in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
CompoundΔHf (Kcal/mol)ΔS (cal/mol K)ΔGf a (Kcal/molMol fractions of conformers or tautomersbWeighted average ΔGf c (Kcal/mol)
37121.8068.59101.36
38113.7379.1490.15
39109.0086.5083.22
40103.3293.2775.53
4198.5896.8469.72
42s72.6786.9746.75N42s = 0.5346.78
42t72.6686.7346.81N42t = 0.47
43a115.66113.6581.79N43a = 0.001.00
43b109.85112.5576.31N43b = 1.00
44s99.68116.0065.11N44s = 0.2664.64
44t99.60117.8664.48N44t = 0.74
45s20.63113.10-13.07N45s = 0.71-12.92
45t20.69111.56-12.55N45t = 0.29
46s61.58122.1525.18N46s = 0.00
46t56.29122.4819.79N46t = 1.00
4759.29101.2729.11
48156.51109.33123.93
4977.9075.9655.26
50s86.4087.2960.39N50s = 0.9860.44
50t86.7180.4462.74N50t = 0.02
51127.9681.08103.80
52-6.4394.86-34.70
5381.7974.2259.67
54118.2477.2395.23
55129.4680.21105.56
56141.6082.75116.95
57a122.3485.3396.91N57a = 1.0096.91
57b152.0085.62126.49N57b = 0.00
57c151.9486.06126.29N57c = 0.00
58a115.7276.6692.88N58a = 0.0085.14
58b108.6178.7585.14N58b = 1.00
59a127.0992.3599.57N59a = 0.7199.72
59b127.5292.01100.10N59b = 0.29
60a69.6196.9740.71N60a = 0.5840.79
60b71.1194.9242.82N60b = 0.00
60c70.9294.3642.80N60c = 0.00
60d 69.4695.8640.89N60d = 0.42
61a76.06103.7945.13N61a = 0.4745.33
61b76.8499.3447.24N61b = 0.01
61c76.75104.2545.68N61c = 0.19
61d75.93102.6245.35N61d = 0.33
62a100.67115.0866.37N62a = 0.7166.59
62b102.48112.8668.85N62b = 0.01
62c101.96112.3768.47N62c = 0.02
62d100.51112.6066.97N62d = 0.26
63a107.58122.2771.14N63a = 0.1570.46
63b108.32122.0871.94N63b = 0.04
63c107.81121.0371.74N63c = 0.05
63d107.41124.9570.17N63d = 0.76
64s90.1981.9665.76N64s = 0.4665.71
64t90.1482.1565.66N64t = 0.54
65s78.9789.1452.41N65s = 0.3852.23
65t78.9089.8552.12N65t = 0.62
66s110.11109.0177.63N66s = 0.6477.75
66t109.97107.3677.97N66t = 0.36
67ss31.7686.715.92N67ss = 0.355.95
67st32.5286.506.74N67st = 0.09
67ts31.6587.045.71N67ts = 0.50
67tt32.6686.127.00N67tt = 0.06
68ss39.0995.3310.68N68ss = 0.4010.77
68st41.1597.4812.10N68st = 0.04
68ts39.0195.7110.49N68ts = 0.55
68tt41.1796.6312.37N68tt = 0.02
69ss 31.32105.80-0.21N69ss = 0.97-0.15
69st34.5198.565.14N69st = 0.00
69ts33.75106.831.91N69ts = 0.03
69tt34.56103.653.67N69tt = 0.00
70s68.8787.0742.92N70s = 0.5342.95
70t68.8586.8242.98N70t = 0.47
71155.7978.92132.27 133.05
H3O+46.8145.9133.13
a from ΔGf = ΔHf – TΔS
b from Eq. 2-5
c from Eq. 7
Table 6. The PM5 calculated pKa values for pyridines in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Table 6. The PM5 calculated pKa values for pyridines in aqueous solution (ε=78.4).
Conjugate base (B)ΔGf kcal/molConjugate acid (BH+)ΔGf kcal/molδΔGf a kcal/molpKa(BH+)bExp. pKa(BH+)cAbsolute error between pKa(calc.) and pKa(exp.)Referencesc
12.9037101.367.525.515.27, 5.280.24, 0.2323, 24, 25
2-7.783890.158.055.905.67, 5.70, 5.750.23, 0.20, 0.1526, 27, 28, 29
3-15.933983.226.835.015.70-0.6930
4-23.484075.536.975.115.72-0.6130
5-29.464169.726.804.995.82-0.8330
6-52.934246.786.274.594.90, 4.95-0.31, -0.3631, 32
7-17.154376.3112.529.188.550.6333
8-35.514464.645.834.284.87-0.5934
9-113.0345-12.925.874.304.67-0.3735
10-82.084619.794.113.013.67-0.6636
11-70.074729.116.804.985.47-0.4931
1224.5148123.936.564.814.750.0637
13-50.344955.260.380.284.80, 4.86-4.52, -4.5827, 38, 39, 40
14-40.145060.445.403.964.78, 4.88, 4.90-0.82, -0.92, -0.9426, 40, 38, 27
15-5.6851103.80-3.50-2.562.28-4.8419
16-154.2852-34.70-13.60-9.973.22-13.1941
17-43.655359.672.661.952.97, 3.10-1.1430, 42
18-6.545495.234.213.082.81, 2.84, 2.980.27, 0.24, 0.1026, 42, 27
193.7455105.564.163.052.80, 2.84, 2.850.15, 0.21, 0.2027, 42, 26
2016.3556116.955.383.943.250.6930
21-10.395796.91-1.32-0.970.81, 1.18-1.78, -2.1543, 26
22-5.965885.1414.8810.905.80, 5.98, 6.045.10, 4.92, 4.8630, 44, 26, 27
230.155999.726.414.706.45-1.7545
24-60.326040.794.873.574.46-0.8946
25-57.31 6145.333.342.453.52-1.0746
26-35.626266.593.772.763.80-1.0446
27-32.566370.462.962.173.66-1.4946
28-37.016465.713.262.393.70, 3.75-1.31, -1.3647, 48
29-50.396552.233.362.463.18, 3.26-0.72, -0.8030, 49
30-24.896677.753.342.453.18-0.7326
31-109.59675.95-9.56-7.003.13, 3.75-10.13, -10.7543, 50
32-210.1331-109.595.443.994.77-0.7851
33-93.526810.771.691.243.09-1.8526
34-102.4969-0.153.642.673.35-0.6842
35-59.857042.953.182.333.40-1.0751
3628.9371133.051.861.361.30, 1.36, 1.450.06, 0.00, -0.0927, 26, 52, 51
H2O-72.85H3O+33.13
a from Eq. 7
b from Eq. 8
c See references

Conclusion

Regarding the pKa values obtained by AM1 COSMO method in aqueous solution in MOPAC2000 and PM5 COSMO method in MOPAC2002 it can be said that AM1 COSMO method in MOPAC2000 seems to be still more suitable to predict the pKa values for pyridine-like heterocyclic compounds than its rival PM5 COSMO method in MOPAC2002.

Acknowledgements

I thank Anadolu University Research Fund for supporting this study (AÜAF project number: 01 1066, 2001).

References

  1. Güven, A.; Jones, R.A. J. Chem. Research. 1993, 362–363.
  2. Güven, A.; Jones, R.A. J. Chem. Research. 1993, 2411–2428.
  3. Güven, A.; Jones, R.A. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 11145–11154.
  4. Güven, A.; Öğretir, C. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 1998, 427, 65–77.
  5. Güven, A.; Öğretir, C. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 1998, 430, 85–95.
  6. Güven, A.; Öğretir, C. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 1998, 434, 7–28.
  7. Güven, A.; Kanışkan, N. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 1999, 488, 125–134.
  8. Güven, A.; Yekeler, H.; Özkan, R. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 2000, 499, 13–19.
  9. Hür, D.; Güven, A. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 2002, 583, 1–18.
  10. Güven, A. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 2004, 683, 221–229.
  11. Katritzky, A.R.; Lagowski, J.M. Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry. 1963, 1–81, 311–437. [Google Scholar]
  12. Elguero, J.; Marzin, C.; Katritzky, A.R.; Linda, P. Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry Supplement 1; Academic Press Inc., 1976. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dewar, M.J.S.; Zoebisch, E.G.; Healy, E.F.; Stewart, J.J.P. AM1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3092. [Google Scholar]
  14. Stewart, J.J.P. MOPAC 2000. Fujitsu Limited: Tokyo, Japan.
  15. Stewart, J.J.P. PM5. J. Mol. Model. 2004, 10, 6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart, J.J.P. MOPAC 2002. Fujitsu Limited: Tokyo, Japan.
  17. Klamt, A.; Schüümann, G. COSMO. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1993, 2, 799–805. [Google Scholar]
  18. ChemOffice CambridgeSoft Corporation 100 Cambridge Park Drive Cambridge, MA 021140 USA.
  19. Katritzky, A.R.; Lagowski, J.M. Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry. 1963, 352, 311–437. [Google Scholar]
  20. Albert, A.A.; Barlin, G.B. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 2384.
  21. Mason, S.F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1281.
  22. Mason, S.F. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 3619.
  23. Millero, F.J.; Ahluwalia, J.C.; Hepler, L.G. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 3435.
  24. Perkampus, H. H.; Prescher, G. Ber. Bunsenges. Che. 1968, 72, 429.
  25. Phan-Tan-Luu, R.; Surzur, J.M.; Metzger, J.; Aune, J.P.; Dupuy, C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1968, 3274.
  26. Green, R.W. Aust. J. Chem. 1969, 22, 721.
  27. Fischer, A.; Galloway, W.J.; Vaughan, J. J. Chem. Soc., B 1964, 3591.
  28. http://tera.chem.ut.ee/~manna/pkadacat/html.
  29. Phan-Tan-Luu, R.; Surzur, J.M.; Metzger, J.; Aune, J.P.; Dupuy, C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1968, 3274.
  30. Perkampus, H. H.; Prescher, G. Ber. Bunsenges. Che. 1968, 72, 429.
  31. Jencks, W.P. http://research.chem.psu.edu/brpgroup/pKa_compilation.pdf.
  32. Tissier, M.; Tissier, C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 3155.
  33. Guseva, E. A.; Porai-Koshits, B.A. Reakts Sposoboots. Org. Soedin (Tartu) 1965, 2, 29. [Google Scholar]
  34. Barlow, R.B.; Thompson, G.M. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 1969, 37, 555.
  35. Katritzky, A.R.; Kucharska, H.Z.; Rowe, J.D. J .Chem. Soc. 1965, 3093.
  36. Jones, R.A.; Katritzky, A.R. Aust. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 17, 455.
  37. Golding, S.; Katritzky, A.R.; Kucharska, H.Z. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 3090.
  38. Beggiato, G.; Favoro, G.; Mazzucato, U. J. Heterocyclic. Chem. 1970, 7, 583.
  39. Albert, A.; Philips, J. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1956, 1294.
  40. Mason, S.F. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 674.
  41. Mason, S.F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1253.
  42. Evans, R.F.; Brown, H.C. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3127.
  43. Clarke, K.; Rothwell, K. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 1885.
  44. Bryson, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 4558, 4862, 4871.
  45. Mason, S. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 219.
  46. Cruege, F.; Girault, G.; Coustal, S.; Lascombe, J.; Rumpf, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1970, 3889.
  47. Jones, R.A.; Katritzky, A.R. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1317.
  48. Laviron, E. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1961, 2325.
  49. Tirouflet, J.; Laviron, E. Compt. Rend. 1958, 247, 217.
  50. Cabani, S.; Conti, G. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1965, 95, 533.
  51. Joule, J.A.; Smith, G.F. Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2nd Ed. edVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Co. Ltd.: Berkshire, England, 1978; p. 68. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jaffe, H.H.; Doak, G.O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4441.
  53. Mason, S.F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1247.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Güven, A. Acidity Study on 3-Substituted Pyridines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2005, 6, 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3390/i6110257

AMA Style

Güven A. Acidity Study on 3-Substituted Pyridines. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2005; 6(11):257-275. https://doi.org/10.3390/i6110257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Güven, Alaattin. 2005. "Acidity Study on 3-Substituted Pyridines" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 6, no. 11: 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3390/i6110257

APA Style

Güven, A. (2005). Acidity Study on 3-Substituted Pyridines. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 6(11), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.3390/i6110257

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop