Next Article in Journal
2,3,5-Tri-O-benzyl-d-xylofuranose
Previous Article in Journal
2-((4-Phenyl-5-(2-(p-tolylamino)ethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)-N′-(1-phenylethylidene)acetohydrazide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Note

Bis(μ-iodo)-tetrakis(O-methyl N-phenylthiocarbamate)-tetraiodo-dibismuth

1
Selective Organic-Heterocyclic Synthesis-Biological Activity Evaluation (LR17ESO01), Univesité de Tunis-El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
2
Institut UTINAM UMR 6213 CNRS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 16, Route de Gray, 25030 Besançon, France
3
Anorganische Chemie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn Straße 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molbank 2022, 2022(2), M1381; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1381
Submission received: 28 April 2022 / Revised: 31 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Structure Determination)

Abstract

:
In order to investigate the coordination chemistry of O-alkyl N-aryl thiocarbamate ligands, BiI3 was reacted with two equivalents of MeOC(=S)N(H)Ph in MeCN solution to afford the dinuclear title compound complexes [{I2Bi(μ2-I)2BiI2}{κ1-MeOC(=S)N(H)Ph}4] 1. Compound 1 was characterized by IR, UV and NMR spectroscopy, the formation of a dinuclear framework is ascertained by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study performed at 100 K.

1. Introduction

Thiocarbamates, also called thiocarbamides of general formula ROC(=S)N(H)R’, play not only a role in organic chemistry as building blocks for further transformations, but found also application in various domains such biological and pharmacological activity or catalysis [1,2,3,4,5]. Furthermore, they have attracted the attention of coordination chemists, since the soft C=S thione function (according Pearson’s HSAB principle) [6] readily coordinates to a wide range of transition metal complexes giving complexes with Cu(I), Ag(I), Au(I), Pd(II), Rh(III), etc. Some crystallographically characterized complexes ligated by O-alkyl N-aryl and O-alkyl N-alkyl thiocarbamates are presented in Scheme 1 [7,8,9].
Surprisingly, despite the growing number of transition metal complexes bearing such type of thione ligands, there is a lack of p block metal complexes coordinated with O-alkyl N-aryl thiocarbamates. Since BiX3 complexes with thione-type ligand are literature-known (see below) and may even display a biological activity [10,11,12], we reacted BiI3 with O-methyl N-phenyl thiocarbamate and describe therein the crystal structure of the isolated complex. This research is a continuation of our investigations on the coordination chemistry of thione-type ligand on diverse metal centers [13,14,15,16].

2. Results

The hitherto unknown complex [{I2Bi(μ2-I)2BiI2}{κ1-MeOC(=S)N(H)Ph}4] 1 was obtained by addition of two equivalents of O-methyl N-phenyl thiocarbamate L to a suspension of BiI3 in MeCN (Scheme 2). After stirring for 3 h followed by short heating to 60 °C, a deep orange solution formed. Slow evaporation of the solvent yielded dark-orange air-stable crystals, whose IR-ATR spectrum confirmed the complexation of L on Bi(III). According to the elemental analysis, two L molecules are attached per BiI3 motif.
The 1H-NMR recorded in d6-actetone reveals a broad hump at δ 4.04 for the methoxy group, whereas the aryl signals are well resolved. Furthermore, two distinct N-H resonances are found at δ 9.32 and 10.03. A further indication of dynamic processes occurring in solution is provided by the 1H NMR spectrum of 1 recorded at 323 K, in which the OMe resonance at δ 4.05 is considerably sharpened (Figure 1). There is also a noticeable high-field shift of the N-H signals. This dynamic behavior has not been investigated in more detail.
Since according to a literature survey, no Bi(III) complexes ligated by thiocarbamates have been crystallographically characterized yet, we examined the product crystallizing in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ by an X-ray diffraction study performed at 100 K. As shown in Figure 2, a dinuclear species has formed, in which the two crystallographically different coordinated Bi(III) centers are linked mutually through two μ2-bridging I3 and I4 iodido ligands. The Bi···Bi separation of 4.720 Å excludes any intermetallic interaction. The octahedral coordination sphere around each Bi atom is completed by two terminal iodide ligands with a mean Bi–Iterm distance of 2.924(3) Å and two trans-arranged thiocarbamate ligands. Each of the four L molecules is crystallographically different with Bi–S bond lengths varying from 2.8290(10) to 2.8952(11) Å. The mean C=S bond is slightly elongated with respect to that of non-ligated MeOC(=S)N(H)Ph (1.701(4) vs. 1.6708(11) Å) [17]. The two bridging I2 and I4 atoms are quite symmetrically bridging, the mean Bi–Ibridg bond distance of 3.225(3) Å being far longer than the Bi–Iterm one.
In the packing, several secondary weak interactions are present such as between atoms I1i–H22 (3.081 Å), C14i–H24A (2.757 Å), H5–H8Bi (2.293 Å) and I3i–H29 (3.128 Å). Furthermore, as shown in Figure 3, loose intramolecular S···H and N···H contacts occur.
These interactions have also been assessed by means of a Hirshfeld surface analysis using the CrystalExplorer17 software (Figure 4) [18,19]. The Hirshfeld surface was mapped over dnorm in the range from –0.0743 to –1.2577 (arbitrary units). The corresponding fingerprints plots are presented in the Supporting Material.

3. Discussion

A survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) reveals that in addition to several mononuclear tris(thione) complexes of type [X3Bi(thione)3] such as tris(2-benzylidenehydrazine-1-carbothioamide)-tribromo-bismuth (refcode QASQAG) or tris(1,3-diazinane-2-thione)-triiodo-bismuth (refcode BOSDAR) [12], there are some other examples of dinuclear complexes with a [{X2Bi(μ2-X)2BiX2}(thione)4] motif. One example is tetrakis(1-allyl-3-(2-pyridyl)-thiourea-S)-bis(μ2-chloro)-tetrachloro-dibismuth bismuth (refcode ALPBIA), but in this compound the thione ligands on each BiCl3 unit are cis-arranged and not in trans-position as in compound 1 [20]. An example for a complex with a [{Cl2Bi(μ2-Cl)2BiCl2}] core bearing four trans-arranged thione ligands is bis(μ2-chloro)-tetrachloro-tetrakis(2-[1-(3-ethylpyrazin-2-yl)ethylidene]-N-methylhydrazine-1-carbothioamide)-di-bismuth (refcode KOTNAL). However, the only representative of a iodido complex trans-[{I2Bi(μ2-I)2BiI2}(thione)4] is bis(μ2-iodo)-tetrakis(5-methoxy-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazole-2-thione)-tetraiodo-di-bismuth (refcode MADZAW), recently described by the research group of Ozturk et al. [10]. Maybe the fluxional behavior revealed by NMR spectroscopy is due to a transcis isomerization occurring in solution, involving dissociation and re-coordination of L (facilitated by the polar solvent acetone). Alternatively, the four O-alkyl N-aryl thiocarbamate ligands may adopt somewhat different arrangements at ambient temperature due to N-H…contacts and are getting more equivalent on the NMR time-scale when rising the temperature. Formation of weak hydrogen bonding between the N-H groups of L and the O=C function of acetone used as solvent may also be taken in account.

4. Experimental

To a slurry of BiI3 (294.8 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 10 mL of acetonitrile, O-methyl N-phenylthiocarbamate L (167.2 mg, 1 mmol) was added in several portions. The reaction was first stirred at room temperature for 3h, and then heated to 60 °C for 10 min. After reaching ambient temperature, the solvent was allowed to evaporate partially. After 2 days, dark orange crystals of 1 were formed and then collected by filtration. Yield: 79%. Anal. Calc. for C32H36Bi2I6N4O4S4 (M.W = 1848.3 g.mol−1): C, 20.79; H, 1.96; N, 3.03; S, 6.93%. Found: C, 20.73; H, 1.94; N, 2.99; S, 6.89%. IR-ATR: 1230 ν(C=S), 1483 ν(C–N), 1548 ν(N–H), 3281 ν(N–H bonded) cm−1. 1H NMR (acetone-d6) at 298 K: δ 4.05 (s, br, 3H, OCH3), 7.04 −7.59 (m, 5H, aryl-H), 9.32 and 10.03 (2s, br, 1H, NH) ppm. UV-vis (acetone) [λmax nm (ε M−1 cm−1)]: 247 (30100), 275 (25900), 375 (4100), 465 (3500).
Crystal data for C32H36Bi2I6N4O4S4, M = 1848.25 g.mol−1, dark orange crystals, crystal size 0.15 × 0.113 × 0.073 mm3, triclinic, space group P 1 ¯ , a = 12.8215(6) Å, b = 13.5748(6) Å, c = 15.1534(8) Å, α = 85.829° (2), β = 73.537(2)°, γ = 68.789(2)°, V = 2356.7(2) Å3, Z = 2, Dcalc = 2.605 g/cm3, T = 100 K, R1 = 0.0286, Rw2 = 0.0470 for 104,055 reflections with I ≥ 2σ (I) and 14,441 independent reflections. Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å−3 1.48/-1.51. Data were collected using graphite-monochromated MoKα radiation l = 0.71073 Å and have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as CCDC 2165826. (Supplementary Materials). The data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares against F2 (SHELXL, 2015 [21,22]).

5. Conclusions

We have crystallographically evidenced that not only transition metals, but also p-block salts such as BiI3, can constitute interesting targets for the coordination of thiocarbamate ligands via their thione function.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded, CIF file, Check-CIF report, UV-Vis spectrum and Hirshfeld fingerprint plot.

Author Contributions

W.A. prepared the compound; C.S. and A.S. collected the X-ray data and solved the structure; A.K. and M.K. designed the study and analyzed the data and M.K. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The X-ray data are at CCDC as stated in the paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank Stéphanie Boullanger for recording the IR and NMR spectra.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Németh, A.G.; Keserű, G.M.; Ábrányi-Balogh, P. A novel three-component reaction between isocyanides, alcohols or thiols and elemental sulfur: A mild, catalyst-free approach towards O-thiocarbamates and dithiocarbamates. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, J.; Zang, Q.; Yang, F.; Zhang, H.; Sun, J.Z.; Tang, B.Z. Sulfur Conversion to Multifunctional Poly(O-thiocarbamate)s through Multicomponent Polymerizations of Sulfur, Diols, and Diisocyanides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3944–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shadap, L.; Tyagi, J.L.; Poluri, K.M.; Novikov, S.; Timothy Lo, C.W.; Mozharivskyj, Y.; Kollipara, M.R. Insights to the strained thiocarbamate derivative complexes of platinum group metals induced by azide as a co-ligand: Characterization and biological studies. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 920, 121345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krátky, M.; Volková, M.; Novotná, E.; Trejtnar, F.; Stolaříková, J.; Vinšová, J. Synthesis and biological activity of new salicylanilideN,N-disubstituted carbamates and thiocarbamates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 4073–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tan, C.K.; Le, C.; Yeung, Y.Y. Enantioselective bromolactonization of cis-1,2-disubstituted olefinic acids using an amino-thiocarbamate catalyst. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5793–5795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pearson, R.G. Recent advances in the concept of hard and soft acids and bases. J. Chem. Edu. 1987, 64, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yeo, C.I.; Halim, S.N.A.; Weng Ng, S.; Tan, S.L.; Zukerman-Schpector, J.; Ferreira, M.A.B.; Tiekink, E.R.T. Investigation of putative arene-C–H···π (quasi-chelatering) interactions in copper(I) crystal structures. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5984–5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bandoli, G.; Clemente, D.A.; Sindellari, L.; Tondello, E. Preparation, properties, and crystal structure of dichlorobis-(O-ethyl thiocarbamate) mercury(II). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1975, 5, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bardi, R.; Piazzesi, A.M.; Del, P.; Trincia, L. Platinum(II) halide complexes with thiocarbamic esters. Structure of trans-bis[O-ethyl(N-ethyl)thiocarbamate]diiodoplatinum(II), [Pt(ETC)2I2]. Acta Cryst. 1987, C43, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ozturk, I.I.; Sirinkaya, E.T.; Cakmak, M.; Gürgan, M.; Ceyhan, D.; Panagiotou, N.; Tasiopoulos, A.J. Structural and biological features of bismuth(III) halide complexes with heterocyclic thioamides. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1227, 129730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Battaglia, L.P.; Corradi, A.B. Synthesis and X-ray crystal structure of trichlorotris[1-phenyl-3-(2-pyridyl)-2-thiourea-S]bismuth(III) and di-µ-chloro-tetrachlorotetrakis (NN′-diethylimidazolidine-2-thione-S) dibismuth(III). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1983, 11, 2425–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ozturk, I.I.; Banti, C.N.; Hadjikakou, N.; Tasiopoulos, A.J. Structural architectures and biological properties of main group bismuth(III) iodide complexes with heterocyclic thioamides. Inorg. Him. Acta. 2019, 497, 119094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arar, W.; Khatyr, A.; Knorr, M.; Brieger, L.; Krupp, A.; Strohmann, C.; Efrit, M.L.; Ben Akacha, A. Synthesis, crystal Structures and hirshfeld analyses of phosphonothioamidates (EtO)2P(=O)C(=S)N(H)R (R = Cy, Bz) and their coordination on CuI and HgX2 (X = Br, I). Phosphorus Sulfur. Silicon. Relat. Elem. 2021, 196, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hameau, A.; Guyon, F.; Knorr, M.; Enescu, M.; Strohmann, C. Self-Assembly of Dithiolene-based Coordination Polymers of Mercury(II): Dithioether versus Thiocarbonyl Bonding. Monatsh. Chem. 2006, 137, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guyon, F.; Hameau, A.; Khatyr, A.; Knorr, M.; Amrouche, H.; Fortin, D.; Harvey, P.D.; Strohmann, C.; Ndiaye, A.L.; Huch, V.; et al. Syntheses, Structures, and Photophysical Properties of Mono- and Dinuclear Sulfur-Rich Gold(I) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 7483–7492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hameau, A.; Guyon, F.; Khatyr, A.; Knorr, M.; Strohmann, C. 4,5-Bis(methylthio)-1,3-dithiole-2-thione, a versatile sulphur-rich building block for the self-assembly of Cu(I) and Ag(I) coordination polymers: Dithioether versus thiocarbonyl bonding. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 388, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chian Sing Lai, S.Y.H.; Tiekink, E.R.T. O-Methyl N-phenylthiocarbamate. Acta Cryst. 2003, E59, o1155–o1156. [Google Scholar]
  18. Spackman, M.A.; Jayatilaka, D. Hirshfeld surface analysis. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2009, 11, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Turner, M.J.; McKinnon, J.J.; Wolff, S.K.; Grimwood, D.J.; Spackman, P.R.; Jayatilaka, D.; Spackman, M.A. University of Western Australia. 2017. Available online: https://crystalexplorer.scb.uwa.edu.au/ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  20. Battaglia, L.P.; Corradi, A.B. Structural investigations on bismuth–thiourea derivative adducts: Crystal structures of tetra[1-allyl-3-(2-pyridyl)thiourea-S]di-µ-chloro-tetrachlorodibismuth(III) and hexa[1-allyl-3-(2-pyridyl)thiourea-S]bismuth(III) nitrate. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1981, 1, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sheldrick, G. SHELXT- Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sheldrick, G. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Examples of some O-alkyl N-aryl(or alkyl) thiocarbamate complexes.
Scheme 1. Examples of some O-alkyl N-aryl(or alkyl) thiocarbamate complexes.
Molbank 2022 m1381 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the title compound 1.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the title compound 1.
Molbank 2022 m1381 sch002
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, acetone-d6) of compound 1 at RT and 50 °C.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, acetone-d6) of compound 1 at RT and 50 °C.
Molbank 2022 m1381 g001
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) of 1. Bi1–I1 2.9650(3), Bi1–I2 2.8848(3), Bi1–I3 3.2832(3), Bi1–I4 3.2010(3), Bi1–S1 2.8309(11), Bi1–S2 2.8733(12), Bi2–I3 3.2040(3), Bi2–I4 3.2512(3), Bi2–I5 2.8941(3), Bi2–I5 2.8941(3), Bi2–I6 2.9507(3), Bi2–S3 2.8952(11), Bi2–S4 2.8290(10), S1–C1 1.707(4), O1–C1 1.317(5), O1–C8 1.453(5), O2–C9 1.314(5), O3–C17 1.320(5), N1–C1 1.323(5), N1–C2 1.422(5); I1–Bi1–I3 88.884(8), I1–Bi1–I4 174.132(9), I2–Bi1–I1 99.236(9), I2–Bi1–I3 171.720(8), I2–Bi1–I4 85.776(9), I4–Bi1–I3 86.031(7), S1–Bi1–I1 91.54(2), S1–Bi1–I2 84.53(2), S1–Bi1–S2 178.91(3), S2–Bi1–I1 89.05(2), I3–Bi2–I4 86.520(7), I5–Bi2–I3 91.078(8), I5–Bi2–I6 95.627(9), S3–Bi2–I3 86.14(2), S4–Bi2–I3 90.37(2), O1–C1–S1 123.1(3), O1–C1–N1 115.3(3), N1–C1–S1 121.6(3), C3–C2–N1 115.9(3), C7–C2–N1 124.1(3), C7–C2–C3 120.0(3).
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 1. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) of 1. Bi1–I1 2.9650(3), Bi1–I2 2.8848(3), Bi1–I3 3.2832(3), Bi1–I4 3.2010(3), Bi1–S1 2.8309(11), Bi1–S2 2.8733(12), Bi2–I3 3.2040(3), Bi2–I4 3.2512(3), Bi2–I5 2.8941(3), Bi2–I5 2.8941(3), Bi2–I6 2.9507(3), Bi2–S3 2.8952(11), Bi2–S4 2.8290(10), S1–C1 1.707(4), O1–C1 1.317(5), O1–C8 1.453(5), O2–C9 1.314(5), O3–C17 1.320(5), N1–C1 1.323(5), N1–C2 1.422(5); I1–Bi1–I3 88.884(8), I1–Bi1–I4 174.132(9), I2–Bi1–I1 99.236(9), I2–Bi1–I3 171.720(8), I2–Bi1–I4 85.776(9), I4–Bi1–I3 86.031(7), S1–Bi1–I1 91.54(2), S1–Bi1–I2 84.53(2), S1–Bi1–S2 178.91(3), S2–Bi1–I1 89.05(2), I3–Bi2–I4 86.520(7), I5–Bi2–I3 91.078(8), I5–Bi2–I6 95.627(9), S3–Bi2–I3 86.14(2), S4–Bi2–I3 90.37(2), O1–C1–S1 123.1(3), O1–C1–N1 115.3(3), N1–C1–S1 121.6(3), C3–C2–N1 115.9(3), C7–C2–N1 124.1(3), C7–C2–C3 120.0(3).
Molbank 2022 m1381 g002
Figure 3. OLEX-generated view of the unit cell of 1 indicating several weak intra- and intermolecular interactions by dotted lines (S2···H32C 2.98094(15) Å, S3···H8A 3.05129 (15) Å and N3···H7 2.90335(11) Å).
Figure 3. OLEX-generated view of the unit cell of 1 indicating several weak intra- and intermolecular interactions by dotted lines (S2···H32C 2.98094(15) Å, S3···H8A 3.05129 (15) Å and N3···H7 2.90335(11) Å).
Molbank 2022 m1381 g003
Figure 4. View of the Hirshfeld surface of compound 1 revealing some loose contacts in the crystal structure. Molecule i was generated by the symmetry operation 1+x, +y, +z and molecule ii by the symmetry operation 1-x, 1-y, 2-z.
Figure 4. View of the Hirshfeld surface of compound 1 revealing some loose contacts in the crystal structure. Molecule i was generated by the symmetry operation 1+x, +y, +z and molecule ii by the symmetry operation 1-x, 1-y, 2-z.
Molbank 2022 m1381 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arar, W.; Khatyr, A.; Knorr, M.; Strohmann, C.; Schmidt, A. Bis(μ-iodo)-tetrakis(O-methyl N-phenylthiocarbamate)-tetraiodo-dibismuth. Molbank 2022, 2022, M1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1381

AMA Style

Arar W, Khatyr A, Knorr M, Strohmann C, Schmidt A. Bis(μ-iodo)-tetrakis(O-methyl N-phenylthiocarbamate)-tetraiodo-dibismuth. Molbank. 2022; 2022(2):M1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arar, Wafa, Abderrahim Khatyr, Michael Knorr, Carsten Strohmann, and Annika Schmidt. 2022. "Bis(μ-iodo)-tetrakis(O-methyl N-phenylthiocarbamate)-tetraiodo-dibismuth" Molbank 2022, no. 2: M1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop