Next Article in Journal
Conditional Variational Autoencoder for Prediction and Feature Recovery Applied to Intrusion Detection in IoT
Next Article in Special Issue
Response of a Zn2TiO4 Gas Sensor to Propanol at Room Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Synergetic Use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data for Soil Moisture Mapping at 100 m Resolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aspheric Surface Measurement Using Capacitive Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transformation from a Single Antenna to a Series Array Using Push/Pull Origami

by
Syed Imran Hussain Shah
and
Sungjoon Lim
*
School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-756, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2017, 17(9), 1968; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091968
Submission received: 11 July 2017 / Revised: 18 August 2017 / Accepted: 24 August 2017 / Published: 26 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Applications for Sensors and Transducers)

Abstract

:
We propose a push/pull origami antenna, transformable between a single antenna element and a three-element array. In limited space, the proposed origami antenna can work as a single antenna. When the space is not limited and a higher gain is required, the proposed origami antenna can be transformed to a series antenna array by pulling the frame. In order to push the antenna array back to a single antenna, the frame for each antenna element size must be different. The frame and supporting dielectric materials are built using a three-dimensional (3D) printer. The conductive patterns are inkjet-printed on paper. Thus, the proposed origami antenna is built using hybrid printing technology. The 10-dB impedance bandwidth is 2.5–2.65 GHz and 2.48–2.62 GHz for the single-antenna and array mode, respectively, and the peak gains in the single-antenna and array mode are 5.8 dBi and 7.6 dBi, respectively. The proposed antenna can be used for wireless remote-sensing applications.

1. Introduction

Origami folding enables one to transform paper into various shapes and configurations, without using any adhesives or cuts. This art is expanded by exploring various materials, cuts, and joints. Origami has attracted attention because of its advantages of deployability, portability, easy manufacturing procedure (folding), ease of miniaturization, and low-cost materials (paper sheets) [1,2]. Engineers and scientists are exploring origami applications in various fields such as architecture, energy harvesting, and spacecraft applications. The origami features are attractive for antenna design applications, where high portability and deployability are often required. Deployable origami antennas can also be used in space applications [3,4,5]. For instance, a deployable origami helical antenna can be used for nanosatellites such as CubeSat [3]. In [4,5], frequency-reconfigurable spring-shaped antennas were proposed for satellite applications. In addition, nano-sized origami can be used for medical applications [6,7]. A nano-sized origami spring was designed to serve as programmable DNA [6]. In [7], nano-sized origami device was used in self-deployable stent grafts for medical applications. In [8], an origami concept was used to design a high-gain tetrahedron-shaped antenna. A self-foldable microstrip patch antenna was presented in [9]. In [10], a mode-reconfigurable helical origami antenna was presented. In [11], a circularly polarized origami antenna was designed for military field deployment.
In addition, 3D printing technology is an additive manufacturing (AM) process used for fabricating 3D objects. In this process, successive layers of dielectric materials are printed under computer control. In comparison to conventional metal etching, AM processes have shown several advantages such as lower fabrication cost, easy and fast printing, and efficient material utilization. Various complex designs can be printed by using 3D printing technology, which are not possible with conventional etching processes. Therefore, in literature, some antenna and radio-frequency (RF) circuits have been presented by using 3D printing technology. For instance, in [12], a circularly polarized patch antenna was fabricated by using 3D printing technology. In [13], an efficient microstrip patch antenna was designed using meshed poly-lactic acid (PLA) by a 3D printer. Since conductive patterns are necessary for antennas and RF circuits, numerous metal printing methods for 3D-printed antennas have been presented in literature. For instance, an ultrasonic wire-mesh embedding method was used for printing the conductive pattern in [14]. However, handling an ultrasonic welding machine can be hazardous because of its high voltage and heat level, which can also damage the 3D-printed substrate [15]. The metallic patterns of the antenna can be printed by using an inkjet printer. Compared to conventional metal etching [16,17], this conductive printing process is fast and inexpensive, and suitable for printing planar metallic patterns such as microstrip patch antennas. In [18], nanocomposite ink was presented and characterized for RF applications. The proposed nanocomposite ink can reduce the required sintering temperature and achieve fine printing resolution. In [19], the microstrip lines were inkjet-printed on an alumina substrate, which takes advantage of the fast prototyping for high-frequency applications. In [20], a low-cost inkjet-printed microstrip patch antenna was realized on an FR4 substrate.
Therefore, considering the advantages of origami and hybrid printing technology, we designed a push/pull origami antenna by using hybrid-printing technology. The proposed antenna can be transformed to either a single antenna element or a series 3 × 1 antenna array, depending on the availability of space for the antenna and the gain requirement. Three antenna elements were fabricated with different frame sizes. In limited space, for single-antenna-element operation, the third antenna-element frame can be pushed within the frame of the second antenna element, which is pushed beneath the first antenna element. When the space is not limited and a higher gain is required, the proposed origami antenna can be transformed into a 3 × 1 series array by pulling out the second and third antenna elements. In this method, the second and third antenna elements are aligned with the first antenna element, and the antenna works in the array mode. Hence, the push/pull origami mechanism is a key feature of the proposed antenna. The second and third array elements are series-fed with a small gap in the feeding line. The antenna was fabricated using hybrid printing technology. The frame and supporting dielectric material parts were built using a 3D printer. The conductive patterns were inkjet-printed on paper. Compared to previously reported origami antennas [1,2,3,4,5,8,9,10,11], the proposed origami antenna is robust because it is built on 3D-printed PLA. The 10-dB impedance bandwidths for the single-antenna mode and array mode are 2.5–2.65 GHz and 2.48–2.62 GHz, respectively. The peak gains of the single antenna and array are 5.8 dBi and 7.6 dBi, respectively.

2. Antenna Design

We first designed a microstrip patch antenna to resonate at 2.6 GHz. The width (W) and length (L) of the rectangular patch are determined from well-known equations of microstrip patch antennas [21]:
W = c 2 ε r e f f + 1 2 f 0
L = c 2 f 0 ε r e f f 2 Δ L
ε r e f f = ε r + 1 2 ε r 1 2 ( 1 + 12 h w ) 1 2
The length (LP1) and width (WP1) of the first patch are 50 mm and 60 mm, respectively. A quarter-wave transformer with length Lms2 and width Wms2 was designed for impedance matching. Then, the second and third antenna elements were designed with different frame sizes. The frame size of the second antenna element (Ls2 × Ws2 × Hs2) is larger than that of the third antenna element (Ls3 × Ws3 × Hs3). To ensure the stability of the paper on the 3D-printed frames, supporting beams with width Wb were built in the first and third antennas. The geometries of the antenna in the single antenna mode and array mode are shown in Figure 1. The frames of all the three elements are shown in Figure 2.
The frame of the second antenna element, as shown in Figure 2c, was printed hollow with four sidewalls, so that the third element could be accommodated in the second element. The push/pull origami mechanism can be understood from Figure 3. Initially, the proposed antenna works in the array mode, as shown in Figure 3a. To transform it into the single antenna, frame 3 is first pushed into frame 2, as shown in Figure 3b, and then frame 2 is pushed into frame 1, as shown in Figure 3c. The single antenna mode can be transformed back to the array mode. Figure 3d shows the initial state of the single antenna mode. To transform it into the array mode, frame 2 is first pulled out from frame 1, as shown in Figure 3e, and then frame 3 is pulled out from frame 2, as shown in Figure 3f. To maintain the same resonance frequency for the single-element and array modes, a tapered array was designed. The tapered array also has the advantage of a lower side-lobe level. The dimensions (length and width) of the patch of the second and third antenna elements are denoted by Lp2/Wp2 and Lp3/WP3, respectively. All the patch elements are one wavelength apart. The length of the transmission line between the patch elements is equal to a half-wavelength to achieve the desired phase distribution of current on the radiating elements. An open-ended stub with length Ls was added in the series feed between the first and second antenna elements for better impedance matching in the array mode. The dimensions of all the antenna elements are given in Table 1.

3. Fabrication and Measurement Results

The proposed antenna was fabricated using 3D printing technology. The dielectric part of the antenna was built with a 3D printer. PLA was used as the 3D printer filament to fabricate the substrate of the antenna. PLA is a thermoplastic made from lactic acid. Compared to other thermoplastics, it has a much lower layer thickness and stronger bonding between layers [22]. In our previous work [13], PLA was characterized by designing a T-resonator. The dielectric constant and dielectric loss tangent of PLA were determined as 2.5 and 0.02, respectively. We used the PLA as the 3D printer filament because of its appreciable strength. Its diameter was 2.8 mm. The glass transition temperature and printing temperature of PLA are 55 °C and 180–230 °C, respectively. We used the Ultimaker 3D printer (Ultimaker B.V., Geldermalsen, The Netherlands), where the printing speed was set in the range of 40–100 mm/s. The diameter of the printer’s nozzle was 0.4 mm and it could print each layer with a thickness (Z-resolution) of 20 µm and line width (X/Y-resolution) of 400 µm. The minimum printable thickness depends on area of the printed wall. Although the minimum printable thickness is 0.3–0.4 mm, we printed minimum thickness of 0.5 mm, because of stability and repeatability. A Dimatix Materials Printer (DMP-2850, Fujifilm, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for printing the metallic pattern. DMC-11610 was used as the cartridge in the inkjet printer. The cartridge was filled with silver nanoparticle ink. Silver nanoparticle ink (JS-B25P, Novacentrix, Austin, TX, USA), which contains 25% silver, was used for the inkjet printing. Each droplet from the nozzle prints a spot of diameter 40 μm. To ensure uniform electrical conductivity, the pattern was printed thrice. Inkjet printing was performed on a photo paper. A Kodak photo paper having a thickness of 0.25 mm was used in this work. The paper was first characterized by designing a ring resonator. The dielectric constant and dielectric loss tangent of the paper were 2.1 and 0.02, respectively. The photo paper can withstand a temperature of 180 °C. Therefore, the conductivity of the silver nanoparticle ink can be improved with a sintering process. In this work, the inkjet-printed nanoparticle on paper was sintered at 150 °C for 20 min. The sintering process was performed in a drying oven (JEIO tech ON-22GW, Dongsung Science Co., Busan, Korea) before bonding the paper to 3D-printed PLA, because high temperature can damage the PLA. After the sintering process, the paper was bonded to the top side of the 3D-printed dielectric frames by using double-sided tape (31630-68338, Dongsung Science Co., Busan, Korea).
Copper tape was attached to the bottom side of the 3D-printed dielectric to serve as the antenna ground plane. Conductive silver epoxy (CW2400, Electronics Materials Co., Daejoo, Korea) was used to connect an SMA connector to the microstrip line. The volume resistivity of CW2400 is less than 0.001 Ω·cm; therefore, it has enough conductivity. The final antenna prototypes in the single antenna and array modes are shown in Figure 4. The reflection coefficient of the single antenna was measured by using an Anritsu vector network analyzer. The measured 10-dB impedance bandwidth was 2.5–2.65 GHz in the single antenna mode. Then, the second and third antenna elements were pulled out, and the reflection coefficient for the array mode was measured. In the array mode, the 10-dB impedance bandwidth was 2.48–2.62 GHz. The simulated and measured reflection coefficients for the single antenna element and array mode are shown in Figure 5.
Both modes have almost the same resonance frequency. The radiation patterns of the single and array modes were measured in an anechoic chamber. In Figure 6a,b, the simulated and measured normalized radiation patterns are shown for the single-element antenna mode in the XZ and YZ planes. The measured gain of the single antenna is 5 dBi and 5.8 dBi in the XZ and YZ planes, respectively. In Figure 6c,d, the simulated and measured normalized radiation patterns are plotted for the array mode in the XZ and YZ planes. The measured gain of the antenna is 7.44 dBi and 7.63 dBi in the XZ and YZ planes, respectively. The slight difference between the simulated and measured return losses is due to the dielectric loss of the bonding film. Bonding film is employed between the inkjet printed paper and 3D printed PLA as well as between ground plane (copper tape) and PLA. In addition, the difference between the simulated and measured radiation patterns is due to the movable frames of the fabricated antenna.

4. Conclusions

A push/pull origami antenna that provides the flexibility to be operated both as a single antenna and as a 3 × 1 series array is proposed. The antenna has three elements with different frame sizes. In limited space, the frame of the third antenna element is pushed into the frame of the second antenna element, which is pushed under the first antenna element. In this mode, the antenna operates as a single element antenna. When the available space for the antenna is not limited and a higher gain is required, the proposed origami antenna can be transformed into a series array by pulling the second and third antenna elements. The proposed origami antenna was built using hybrid printing technology. This type of antenna can play an important role in remote-sensing applications.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (IITP-2017-2012-0-00559) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2014R1A2A1A11050010).

Author Contributions

Syed Imran Hussain Shah designed, analyzed, fabricated, and measured the samples. Sungjoon Lim conceived the idea and advised regularly until the completion of the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yao, S.; Liu, X.; Georgakopoulos, S.V. Morphing Origami Conical Spiral Antenna Based on the Nojima Wrap. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 2222–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuribayashi-Shigetomi, K.; Onoe, H.; Takeuchi, S. Cell Origami: Self-Folding of Three-Dimensional Cell-Laden Microstructures Driven by Cell Traction Force. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Olson, G.M.; Pellegrino, S.; Banik, J.; Costantine, J. Deployable Helical Antennas for CubeSats. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2013, 64, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yao, S.; Liu, X.; Georgakopoulos, S.V.; Tentzeris, M.M. A novel tunable origami accordion antenna. In Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, AP-S International Symposium, Memphis, TN, USA, 6–11 July 2014; pp. 370–371. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yao, S.; Liu, X.; Georgakopoulos, S.V.; Tentzeris, M.M. A novel reconfigurable origami spring antenna. In Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, AP-S International Symposium, Memphis, TN, USA, 6–11 July 2014; Volume 2, pp. 374–375. [Google Scholar]
  6. Iwaki, M.; Wickham, S.F.; Ikezaki, K.; Yanagida, T.; Shih, W.M. A programmable DNA origami nanospring that reveals force-induced adjacent binding of myosin VI heads. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kuribayashi, K.; Tsuchiya, K.; You, Z.; Tomus, D.; Umemoto, M.; Ito, T.; Sasaki, M. Self-deployable origami stent grafts as a biomedical application of Ni-rich TiNi shape memory alloy foil. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 419, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shah, S.I.H.; Lee, D.; Tentzeris, M.; Lim, S. A Novel High-Gain Tetrahedron Origami Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 16, 848–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hayes, G.J.; Liu, Y.; Genzer, J.; Lazzi, G.; Dickey, M.D. Self-folding origami microstrip antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 5416–5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, X.; Yao, S.; Cook, B.S.; Tentzeris, M.M.; Georgakopoulos, S.V. An Origami Reconfigurable Axial-Mode Bifilar Helical Antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 5897–5903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shah, S.I.H.; Tentzeris, M.; Lim, S. Low-Cost Circularly Polarized Origami Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 2026–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jun, S.; Heirons, J.; Mao, C.X.; Gao, S.; Mcclelland, A. Circular polarised antenna fabricated with low-cost 3D and inkjet printing equipment. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 53, 370–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shah, S.I.H.; Lee, D.; Tentzeris, M.; Lim, S. Fabrication of microstrip patch antenna using novel hybrid printing technology. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2016, 58, 2602–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, M.; Shemelya, C.; MacDonald, E.; Wicker, R.; Xin, H. 3-D Printed Microwave Patch Antenna via Fused Deposition Method and Ultrasonic Wire Mesh Embedding Technique. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 1346–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, H. Effect of Loading Split-Ring Resonators in a Microstrip Antenna Ground Plane. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2015, 15, 120–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yoon, J.H.; Jae, S.; Young, H.; Rhee, C. A Novel Monopole Antenna with Two Arc-Shaped Strips for WLAN/WiMAX Application. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2015, 15, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, S.W.; Sung, Y. A Polarization Diversity Patch Antenna with a Reconfigurable Feeding Network. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2015, 15, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chiolerio, A.; Camarchia, V.; Quaglia, R.; Pirola, M.; Pandolfi, P.; Pirri, C.F. Hybrid Ag-based inks for nanocomposite inkjet printed lines: RF properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 615, S501–S504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Camarchia, V.; Chiolerio, A.; Cotto, M.; Fang, J.; Ghione, G.; Pandolfi, P.; Pirola, M.; Quaglia, R.; Ramella, C. Demonstration of inkjet-printed silver nanoparticle microstrip lines on alumina for RF power modules. Org. Electron. Phys. Mater. Appl. 2014, 15, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goh, G.L.; Ma, J.; Chua, K.L.F.; Shweta, A.; Yeong, W.Y.; Zhang, Y.P. Inkjet-printed patch antenna emitter for wireless communication application. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2016, 11, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Balanis, C.A. Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; p. 815. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakagawa, T.; Nakiri, T.; Hosoya, R.; Tajitsu, Y. Electrical Properties of Biodegradable Polylactic Acid Film. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2004, 40, 1020–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Single antenna mode and (b) Three-antenna-element array mode.
Figure 1. (a) Single antenna mode and (b) Three-antenna-element array mode.
Sensors 17 01968 g001
Figure 2. (a) 3D-printed PLA dielectric frame for the first antenna element, (b) 3D-printed hollow PLA frame for the second antenna element, and (c) 3D-printed PLA substrate frame for the third antenna element.
Figure 2. (a) 3D-printed PLA dielectric frame for the first antenna element, (b) 3D-printed hollow PLA frame for the second antenna element, and (c) 3D-printed PLA substrate frame for the third antenna element.
Sensors 17 01968 g002
Figure 3. (a) Initial array mode, (b) Push the frame toward the single antenna mode, (c) Push the frame one more step to the single antenna mode, (d) Initial single antenna mode, (e) Pull the frame toward the array mode, (f) Pull the frame one more step to the array mode.
Figure 3. (a) Initial array mode, (b) Push the frame toward the single antenna mode, (c) Push the frame one more step to the single antenna mode, (d) Initial single antenna mode, (e) Pull the frame toward the array mode, (f) Pull the frame one more step to the array mode.
Sensors 17 01968 g003
Figure 4. Fabricated prototype: (a) Single antenna mode and (b) Three-antenna-element array mode.
Figure 4. Fabricated prototype: (a) Single antenna mode and (b) Three-antenna-element array mode.
Sensors 17 01968 g004
Figure 5. Simulated and measured S-parameters for the single antenna and array mode.
Figure 5. Simulated and measured S-parameters for the single antenna and array mode.
Sensors 17 01968 g005
Figure 6. Simulated and measured normalized radiation pattern for (a) single-element antenna mode on the XZ plane (b) single-element antenna mode on the YZ plane. (c) Array mode on the XZ plane and (d) array mode on the YZ plane.
Figure 6. Simulated and measured normalized radiation pattern for (a) single-element antenna mode on the XZ plane (b) single-element antenna mode on the YZ plane. (c) Array mode on the XZ plane and (d) array mode on the YZ plane.
Sensors 17 01968 g006
Table 1. Geometric parameters of the 3D-printed frames and array elements.
Table 1. Geometric parameters of the 3D-printed frames and array elements.
ParameterDimension (mm)ParameterDimension (mm)
L72W122
Ls1127Wms28
Ws1120Lp150
Ls290.2Wp160
Ws2122Li114
Hs26.5Wp280
Ls377Lp246
Ws3120Li26
Hs35Lp346
Lms140Wp334
Wms115G0.2
Lms226Ls14
Lms322Li114
Lms422Li26

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shah, S.I.H.; Lim, S. Transformation from a Single Antenna to a Series Array Using Push/Pull Origami. Sensors 2017, 17, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091968

AMA Style

Shah SIH, Lim S. Transformation from a Single Antenna to a Series Array Using Push/Pull Origami. Sensors. 2017; 17(9):1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shah, Syed Imran Hussain, and Sungjoon Lim. 2017. "Transformation from a Single Antenna to a Series Array Using Push/Pull Origami" Sensors 17, no. 9: 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091968

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop