Next Article in Journal
Efficient Interference Estimation with Accuracy Control for Data-Driven Resource Allocation in Cloud-RAN
Next Article in Special Issue
Adaptive Feedforward Compensating Self-Sensing Method for Active Flutter Suppression
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Subdivision Errors of Photoelectric Angle Encoders and Improvement of the Tracking Precision of a Telescope Control System
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Structural Health Monitoring Strategy Based on PZT Sensors and Convolutional Neural Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intrinsic Sensing Properties of Chrysotile Fiber Reinforced Piezoelectric Cement-Based Composites

1
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
3
Center for Infrastructure Engineering, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia
4
Department of Architecture Engineering, Dezhou Technology Vocational College Qingdao Campus, Qingdao 266232, China
5
School of Architecture Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(9), 2999; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092999
Submission received: 8 August 2018 / Revised: 5 September 2018 / Accepted: 6 September 2018 / Published: 7 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Piezoelectric Transducers: Advances in Structural Health Monitoring)

Abstract

:
Lead-zirconate-titanate (PZT) nanoscale powder was first synthesized by the sol-gel method, then PZT and 0–3 type PZT/chrysotile fiber (CSF)/cement composite (PZTCC) wafers were fabricated after grind-mixing PZT powder with strontium carbonate and/or cement, ductile CSF in tandem with press-sintered process, respectively. The crystal structure (XRD), microstructure (SEM), piezoelectric properties after surface silver penetration, and polarization of the PZT and PZTCC wafer were investigated. Furthermore, self-sensing responses under either impulse or cyclic loading and micro-hardness toughness of PZTCC were also investigated. Results show that the incorporation of CSF and cement admixture weakens the perovskite crystalline peak of PZTCC; reduces the corresponding piezoelectric coefficient from 119.2 pC/N to 32.5 pC/N; but effectively bridges the gap on the toughness between PZTCC and concrete since the corresponding microhardness with 202.7 MPa of PZTCC is close to that of concrete. A good linear and fast electrical response against either impulse or cyclic loading of the PZTCC is achieved with their respective sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability to 1.505 mV/N, 2.42%, and 2.11%. The sensing responses and toughness of PZTCC is encouraging as an intrinsic piezoelectric sensor for real-time health monitoring of ductile concrete structures.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The monitoring of the structural integrity of concrete structures under external static/dynamic loads ideally employ cement-embedded sensors with fast but highly-accurate responses [1,2,3,4]. As firstly documented by Chung et al. in 1993 [5], cement-based composites incorporating microscale or nanoscale conductive additives, such as steel fibers, carbon fibers [1,5,6,7], carbon blacks [8,9], nickel powders [10,11], semi-conducting nanoparticles [12], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [1,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], carbon nanofibers [19,20], and graphene [21], have been intensively explored as intrinsic embedded sensors for detecting structural stress/strains via variations in their electrical parameters. However, the polarizations arising from the considerable existing pore electrolytes, in porous cement-based sensors, have significant detrimental effects on the stability and accuracy of the embedded sensors’ electrical responses, even if these sensors are encapsulated [1,6,9]. Han et al. [22] showed that the piezoresistive sensitivity of CNT/cement composites declined with increasing water content. Kim et al. [23] improved sensitivity and stability of piezoresistive sensors for CNT/cement composites after excluding moisture.
Piezoelectric sensors, like BaTiO3, KNbO3, lead-zirconate-titanate (PZT), and polyvinylidene difluoride-based sensors are insensitive to humidity, and have fast responses and high-accuracies [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Amongst them, the PZT-type sensor has the highest piezoelectric actuating-sensing function and strain sensitivity. Being gain intensive, they have extensive applications in structural health monitoring (SHM) [26,27,28,29]. Song et al. [26] employed two low-cost PZT-based transducers as actuator-receivers of swept sine stress wave, and achieved a good relationship between the damage index, established via wavelet packet analysis, and the loading displacement of L-shaped concrete-filled variable thickness steel tube columns under cyclic loading. However, there are mismatch on the mechanical impedance responses obtained from a pure PZT-type sensor with the concrete when embedded in concrete structures. Furthermore, a pure PZT-type sensor has high density but low ductility, whose interfaces with concrete tend to fail in harsh environments under complicated loadings [27].
Li et al. first introduced a cement admixture into pure PZT to fabricate a piezoelectric cement-based composite (PCM) to compensate for these disadvantages in 2002 [30]. Dong et al. [31,32], Lan et al. [33], Huang et al. [34], Chaipanich et al. [35,36,37], Gong et al. [38,39], Pan et al. [40,41], Luo et al. [42], and Zhang et al. [43] reported that, compared with 1–3, 2–2 type PCM sensor [31,33], the 0–3 type PCM sensor had more stable piezoelectric self-sensing behaviors with age and temperature treatment, superior compatibility and impedance-matching with concrete, where PZT granules were directly but randomly distributed in three dimension cement matrix without extra cutting and embedding processes [31,41]. Moreover, PZT powder in nanoscale can be facile pressed and sintered into PCM-based sensor or actuator for SHM with accurate stoichiometric composition, uniform morphology, and proper microstructure to ensure good interface compatibility and enhanced piezoelectric sensitivity [38]. However, the ductility of PCM is still relatively low especially where PCM sensors are embedded into long slim concrete structures comprised of fiber reinforced concretes, or ductile engineering cementitious composites [44].
The fabrication processes of the PZT nanoscale powder is vital to the performance of 0–3 type PCM sensor. Compared with the synthesis processes of mechanochemical [45,46], microwave radiation [47], hydrothermal [48], and coprecipitation [49], the sol-gels process is the most widely-used synthesis process for PZT nanoscale powder due to its resulting uniform composition, accurate stoichiometric ratio, and ultra-high purity under laboratory operation [50,51,52]. Mu et al. developed a modified sol-gel method with water and a little absolute ethanol as solvents and inorganic salts as raw materials to achieve a uniform single-phase PZT powders with an average size of 70 nm after annealing for 2.5 h at 700 °C [51].
In this study, PZT nanoscale powder was first synthesized by the sol-gel method [51]. A trace of strontium carbonate was introduced to diminish shrinkage and stabilize crystal phase during PZT wafer calcination process [53]. Furthermore, ductile chrysotile fiber (CSF) was added into the PZT/cement grind-mixture to fabricate the 0–3 type PZT/CSF/cement composite (PZTCC) wafer by press-sintering method [54]. Thirdly, the piezoelectric, toughness, and self-sensing properties of PZT and PZTCC wafers were characterized to develop a type of intrinsic and ductile piezoelectric sensor for SHM in complex structure with balanced piezoelectric sensitivity and toughness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

Lead acetate (PbC4H6O4·3H2O, mass fraction ≥ 99.5%), zirconyl nitrate (ZrO(NO3)2, mass fraction ≥ 99.5%), tetrabutyl titanate (Ti(OC4H9)4, mass fraction ≥ 98%) were all purchased from Shanghai Tongya Chemical Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); Strontium carbonate (SrCO3, mass fraction ≥ 99.5%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China) Trade Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China); Ethylene glycol (HOCH2CH2OH, mass fraction ≥ 96%), glacial acetic acid (CH3COOH, mass fraction ≥ 99.5%), ammonia (NH3·H2O, mass fraction = 25–28%) were all obtained from Yantai Sanhe Reagent Co. Ltd. (Yantai, China); Dimethicone ((C2H6OSi)n, AR) and alumina (Al2O3, AR) were both obtained from Tianjin Yongda Reagent Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China); Polyvinyl alcohol was obtained from Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); Conductive silver paste (DAD-87 type) was purchased from Shanghai Synthetic Resin Research Institute (Shanghai, China); Anhydrous ethanol (C2H5OH, mass fraction ≥ 99.7%) was obtained from Shanghai Ebi Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); Distilled water was commercially available; Cement was purchased from Shanshui Cement Group Co., Ltd. (P.O. 52.5 type, Qingdao, China); CSF was obtained from Qinghai Chuangan Co. Ltd. (Mangya, China).

2.2. Preparation of PZT Nanoscale Powders, PZT Wafer, and PZTCC Composite

The sol-gel schematic method for synthesizing PZT nanoscale powders was demonstrated in Figure 1. Lead acetate, zirconyl nitrate, and tetrabutyl titanate were weighed to molar ratio for r(Pb)/r(Zr)/r(Ti) to 1:0.52:0.48. The resulting zirconyl nitrate–tetrabutyl titanate mixture was dissolved in 50 mL of water with a small amount ethylene glycol, and rigorously mixed together for 0.5 h at 60 °C in a collector thermostatic magnetic stirrer (DF-101S type, Zhengzhou Keda Machinery And Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) filled with dimethicone to prepare the precursor. Then, the lead acetate was dissolved in ethylene glycol where c(Pb2+) was 15% [51], and slowly added to the abovementioned precursor. Glacial acetic acid and ammonia was used to adjust the pH value to around 4.5, and then reacted for another 2 h at 60 °C to fabricate the PZT sol. The PZT sol was dried at 100 °C, and residual organics were incinerated in a resistance furnace to form the pre-sintering PZT. The pre-sintered PZT was sintered for 2 h at 800 °C in a high-temperature furnace (XZK-3 type, Longkou Electric Furnace Factory, Longkou, China) [34]. The PZT nanoscale powder was obtained by grinding.
The PZT nanoscale powder, strontium carbonate (0.5% of PZT amount), for crystalline stabilization and deformation suppression, were glued together with polyvinyl alcohol and compressed into a wafer using a powder metallurgy tablet machine (HY-2H type, Tianjin Sinteron Powder Metallurgy Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) for 2 min at 12 MPa. The PZT wafer had its glue removed by heating for 2 h at 300 °C, and sintered for another 2 h at 800 °C with a surface covering alumina powder. The sintered PZT wafer was cleaned with anhydrous ethanol before a silver paste overlay was twice applied then heated for 3 h at 100 °C. A 3000 kV/cm polarized voltage (DW-6000DC type, Tianjin Dongwen High Voltage Company, Tianjin, China) was applied for 30 min to the PZT wafer soaking in 120 °C dimethicone solution [37].
The PZT nanoscale powder and strontium carbonate was ground together. CSF (0.05%) and cement (25% of PZT amount) was then added to the grinding process to create the PZT/CSF/cement (PZTCC) mixture, using anhydrous ethanol as a dispersing aid. An optical microscope (OP, XC4 type, Shanghai Precision Optoelectronics Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to observe the CSF in bundle and dispersed in anhydrous ethanol (Figure 2). The PZTCC mixture was compressed, glue removed, sintered, silver penetrated, and polarized as described in the PZT wafer preparation. It is worth noting that the PZTCC wafer, after sintering, was hydrated with a close fitting wet cotton wick, and oven-dried before silver penetration.

2.3. Characterization of PZT Nanoscale Powders, PZT Wafer, and PZTCC Composite

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance type, Bruker AXS Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany) and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM, S3500N type, Hitachi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were used to characterize crystalline structures, particle sizes, and microstructures of PZT powder and PZTCC composites.
After surface polishing with different mesh sand papers, microhardness toughness measurement (HVS-1000 type, Laizhou Lyric Testing Equipment Co., Ltd., Laizhou, China) of the PZTCC composite was taken under a 1000 g load at 20 s compress duration. A quasi-static instrument (ZJ-6A type, Institute of Acoustics, CAS, Beijing, China) measured the d33 coefficients of PZT and PZTCC wafer after polarization.
A dynamic data acquisition system (DASP-V10 type, Orient Institute of Noise & Vibration, Beijing, China) measured the electricity responses versus hammer impulses at various loading levels (100 N, 200 N, 300 N, 400 N) of PZTCC wafer with the top and bottom surfaces connected to a lead wire by conductive silver paste. DASP-V10 data acquisition system in tandem with a universal testing machine (E43 type, SANS-MTS, MTS Systems (China) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) collected data from the applied loads and voltage responses of PZTCC wafer against time, and investigated the self-sensing property of PZTCC under cyclic loading with 0–100 N range at 2 N/s head speed.

3. Results and Disscussion

3.1. The Crystalline Structures of PZT and PZTCC Composite

Figure 3 demonstrates the crystalline structures of PZT and PZTCC composite.
Figure 3 shows characteristic peaks for PZT (2θ = 21.3°, 31.0°, 38.4°, 45.2°, 49.5°, and 54.8°), which represent the (100), (110), (111), (200), (201), and (211) patterns of PZT sintering for 2 h at 800 °C. Trace strontium carbonate shows no effect on the crystalline structure of PZT and the main peak (110) of PZT is Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 crystal phase, which is the classic ABO3 type perovskite [53]. Although the addition of cement and CSF in PZTCC is insignificant on the basic crystal structures of PZT, several miscellaneous peaks appear, and their corresponding main peak (110) is also reduced, contributing to an inferior perovskite structure due to cement and CSF introduction (Figure 3).

3.2. Microstructure and Piezoelectric Coefficient of PZT and PZTCC Composite

Fine and even cubic crystallizations of PZT are observed in Figure 4a, the crystal sizes are narrowly distributed in the 900–1100 nm range [38]; the corresponding d33 coefficient is up to 119.2 pC/N. In Figure 4b, CSF and cement without any piezoelectric effect are dispersed within the PZT perovskite crystals, and perovskite PZT crystals are comparatively larger than those in the PZT wafer, which reduces the corresponding piezoelectric macro-performance of the PZTCC wafer, whose d33 coefficient is only 32.5 pC/N.

3.3. Microhardness Toughness Properties of PZTCC Composite

Figure 5 show surface images of the surface-polished PZTCC composite at macro-scale and as observed in OP. The interface microhardness of the PZTCC composite is 202.7 ± 4.9 MPa and the interface width is 20 ± 0.3 μm. Compact interface connections between PZT nanoscale crystals among the cement matrix are achieved, also verified in Figure 4b. The resultant interface hardnesses are similar to common concrete [55], and suited to applications as embedded intrinsic sensors in concrete structures.

3.4. Piezoelectric Sensing Properties of PZTCC Wafer

The electrical voltage time-history of the PZTCC wafer under various impulse levels and cyclic loads are recorded and illustrated in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively.
In Figure 6, the electricity output almost retains 150 mV, 300 mV, 450 mV, and 600 mV against their corresponding 100 N, 200 N, 300 N, 400 N impulses, over four repeat tests. It shows both a good linearity and a rapidity of the electrical response to the impluse level, although the d33 coefficient is relatively lower than that of common PZT wafer [35]. Figure 7 shows that the electrical voltages vary linearly with the applied cyclic force, although there is an initial fluctuations at the initial loading cycle.
The linearity (e), sensitivity (k) and repeatability (ef) of the sensor paramters of the PZTCC wafer under cyclic loading can be calculated by the following formulas [1,8],
e = ±Δmax/UF.S × 100%
k = ΔU/ΔF
ef = ±Δ′max/2UF.S × 100%
The Δmax, UF.S, ΔU, ΔF, and Δ′max represents the maximum deviation between the electricity (U)- force (F) curve and the linear fitting line, full-scale output of U, change in U, change in F, and maximum deviation in forward and reverse stroke of U-F curve, respectively.
Table 1 shows the calculated e, k, and ef parameters with their corresponding means, derived after excluding the fluctuations of cycle 1.
It can be determined from Figure 7 and Table 1 that, the sensitivity k is 1.505 V/kN, which suits most civil engineering applications [1]. Further, both e and ef parameters are well below 5%, and their correponding means are only 2.42%, 2.11%, respectively. These sensing characteristics make PZTCC wafer suited to applications as a stress/strain sensor with stable linear responses.
Trace additions of strontium carbonate is effective in stabilizing the crystalline structure and retards volume shrinkage during the sintering of the PZT or PZTCC wafer. CSF and cement, as inorganic but fireproof admixture, lower the piezoelectric coefficient of PZTCC, whilst both equalizing the mechanical impedance factor of the PZT with concrete, and improving the fracture toughness of the corresponding PZTCC composite, where the ductile CSF achieved a fully netlike distribution. The overall results on piezoelectric sensitivity and toughness indicate a PZTCC wafer to be well suited as an intrinsic compatible sensor, which can be embedded in concrete structures for in situ monitoring.

4. Conclusions

(1) PZT nanoscale powder was successfully synthesized using the sol-gel process, from which a PZT wafer was created by sintering with trace of strontium carbonate producing fine and even cubic crystals within the 900–1100 nm range. CSF and cement were ground together with PZT nanoscale powder using ethanol as a dispersant to fabricate a PZTCC wafer in the same process as with the PZT wafer.
(2) CSF and cement incorporation weakens (110) perovskite crystallinity of PZTCC with cubic crystals, the d33 reduces from 119.2 pC/N to 32.5 pC/N, but narrows the hardness gap between the PZTCC and concrete, the corresponding microhardness is only 202.7 MPa, and improves intrinsic toughness and impedance-matching with common concrete.
(3) A good linearity and fast response between the electrical signal against the loading of PZTCC wafer in either impulse or cyclic states is achieved with their corresponding sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability to 1.505 mV/N, 2.42%, and 2.11%, respectively.
The d33 of this type of ductile piezoelectric PZTCC sensor is not high enough to enable in situ monitoring application. In the future, the corresponding piezoelectric property will be greatly improved by aging and temperature treatment method before developing as intrinsic sensor embedded in complex structures for real-time monitoring.

Author Contributions

J.L., L.L. and Q.L. conceived and designed the experiments; J.L., C.L. and C.Z. made the preliminary draft; J.L., K.L.C., B.W. and C.Z. made the revisions and discussions.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51878364, 51578297, 51678322 and 51650110509), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Project No. ZR2018MEE043 and 2017YFC0703603), and the National “111” project, and the Taishan Scholar Priority Discipline Talent Group program funded by the Shandong Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

PZTLead-zirconate-titanate
XRDX-ray powder diffraction
SEMScanning electronic microscopy
OPOptical microscope
CSFChrysotile Fiber
SHMStructural health monitoring
PZTCCPZT/CSF/cement composite
d33Piezoelectric coefficient
efRepeatability
UF.SFull-scale output of electricity (U)
ΔmaxMaximum deviation between U- force (F) curve and the linear fitting line
Δ′maxMaximum deviation in forward and reverse stroke of U-F curve

References

  1. Han, B.; Yu, X.; Ou, J. Self-Sensing Concrete in Smart Structures; Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yi, J.H.; Kim, D.; Feng, M.D. Periodic seismic performance evaluation of highway bridges using structural health monitoring system. Struct. Eng. Mech. 2009, 31, 527–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.X.; Ren, W.X.; Bi, K.M. FBG force-testing ring for bridge cable force monitoring and temperature compensation. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 223, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramakrishnan, M.; Rajan, G.; Semenova, Y.; Farrell, G. Overview of fiber optic sensor technologies for strain/temperature sensing applications in composite materials. Sensors 2016, 16, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, P.W.; Chung, D.D.L. Carbon fiber reinforced concrete for smart structures capable of non-destructive flaw detection. Smart Mater. Struct. 1993, 2, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wen, S.; Chung, D.D.L. Model of piezoresitivity in carbon fiber cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1879–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Azhari, F.; Banthia, N. Cement-based sensors with carbon fibers and carbon nanotubes for peizoresistive sensing. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, H.; Xiao, H.G.; Ou, J.P. Effect of compressive strain on electrical resistivity of carbon black-filled cement-based composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2006, 28, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiao, H.G.; Liu, M.; Wang, G.J. Anisotropic electrical and abrasion-sensing properties of cement-based composites containing aligned nickel powder. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 87, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, B.G.; Han, B.Z.; Ou, J.P. Experimental study on use of nickel powder-filled Portland cement-based composite for fabrication of piezoresistive sensors with high sensitivity. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2009, 149, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lan, C.M.; Xiao, H.G.; Liu, M.; Wang, G.J.; Ma, M.L. Improved piezoresistivity of cement-based composites filled with aligned nickel powder. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 095003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, H.; Xiao, H.G.; Ou, J.P. A study on mechanical and pressure-sensitive properties of cement mortar with nanophase materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruan, Y.F.; Han, B.G.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, D.N. Carbon nanotubes reinforced reactive powder concrete. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 112, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schumacher, T.; Thostenson, E.T. Development of structural carbon nanotube–based sensing composites for concrete structures. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2014, 25, 1331–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Camacho-Ballesta, C.; Zornoza, E.; Garcés, P. Performance of cement-based sensors with CNT for strain sensing. Adv. Cem. Res. 2016, 28, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. D’Alessandro, A.; Rallini, M.; Ubertini, F.; Materazzi, A.L.; Kenny, J.M. Investigations on scalable fabrication procedures for self-sensing carbon nanotube cement-matrix composites for SHM applications. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 65, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meoni, A.; D’Alessandro, A.; Downey, A.; García-Macías, E.; Rallini, M.; Materazzi, A.L.; Torre, L.; Laflamme, S.; Castro-Triguero, R.; Ubertini, F. An experimental study on static and dynamic strain sensitivity of embeddable smart concrete sensors doped with carbon nanotubes for SHM of large structures. Sensors 2018, 18, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Luo, J.L.; Chung, K.L.; Li, Q.Y.; Chen, S.J.; Li, L.; Hou, D.S.; Zhang, C.W. Piezoresistive properties of cement composites reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes using photo-assisted Fenton. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 035025. [Google Scholar]
  19. Konsta-Gdoutos, M.S.; Aza, C.A. Self-sensing carbon nanotube (CNT) and nanofiber (CNF) cementitious composites for real time damage assessment in smart structures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 53, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Galao, O.; Baeza, F.J.; Zornoza, E.; Garces, P. Strain and damage sensing properties on multifunctional cement composites with CNF admixture. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 46, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, Q.; Gao, R.D.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Li, W.G.; Xiao, J.Z. Strain monitoring for a bending concrete beam by using piezoresistive cement-based sensors. Constr. Bulid. Mater. 2018, 167, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, B.G.; Yu, X.; Ou, J.P. Effect of water content on the piezoresistivity of MWNT/cement composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 3714–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, H.K.; Park, I.S.; Lee, H.K. Improved piezoresistive sensitivity and stability of CNT/cement mortar composites with low water–binder ratio. Compos. Struct. 2014, 116, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Proto, A.; Penhaker, M.; Bibbo, D.; Vala, D.; Conforto, S.; Schmid, M. Measurements of generated energy/electrical quantities from locomotion activities using piezoelectric wearable sensors for body motion energy harvesting. Sensors 2016, 16, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kozielski, L.; Erhart, J.; Clemens, F.J. Light-intensity-induced characterization of elastic constants and d33 piezoelectric coefficient of PLZT single fiber based transducers. Sensors 2013, 13, 2419–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hong, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Song, G.B. Dynamic cooperative identification based on synergetic for pipe structural health monitoring with piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22, 045003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jaitanong, N.; Yimnirun, R.; Zeng, H.R.; Li, G.R.; Yin, Q.R.; Chaipanich, A. Piezoelectric properties of cement based/PVDF/PZT composites. Mater. Lett. 2014, 130, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, D.; Song, H.; Zhu, H. Embedded 3D electromechanical impedance model for strength monitoring of concrete using a PZT transducer. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 115019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Du, G.F.; Song, G.B. Damage detection of L-shaped concrete filled steel tube (L-CFST) columns under cyclic loading using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, Z.J.; Zhang, D.; Wu, K.R. Cement-based 0–3 piezoelectric composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, B.Q.; Li, Z.J. Cement-based piezoelectric ceramic smart composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Z.J.; Dong, B.Q.; Zhang, D. Influence of polarization on properties of 0–3 cement-based PZT composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lan, K.H.; Chan, H.L.W. Piezoelectric cement-based 1–3 composites. Appl. Phys. A 2005, 81, 1451–1454. [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, S.F.; Chang, J.; Lu, L.C.; Chen, X. Preparation and polarization of 0–3 cement-based piezoelectric composites. Mater. Res. Bull. 2006, 41, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaipanich, A. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of PZT-silica fume cement composites. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2007, 7, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jaitanong, N.; Chaipanich, A.; Tunkasiri, T. Properties 0–3 PZT-Portland cement composites. Ceram. Int. 2008, 34, 793–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chaipanich, A.; Rianyoi, R.; Potong, R.; Jaitanong, N. Aging of 0–3 piezoelectric PZT ceramic–Portland cement composites. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 13579–13584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.J.; Gong, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.J. Fabrication and piezoelectricity of 0–3 cement based composite with nano-PZT powder. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 588–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gong, H.Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; Che, S.W. Influence of carbon black on properties of PZT-cement piezoelectric composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2010, 44, 2547–2557. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pan, H.H.; Chiang, C.K. Effect of aged binder on piezoelectric properties of cement-based piezoelectric composites. Acta Mech. 2014, 225, 1287–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pan, H.H.; Lin, D.H.; Yang, R.H. High piezoelectric and dielectric properties of 0-3 PZT/cement composites by temperature treatment. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 72, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luo, J.L.; You, C.L.; Zhang, S.; Chung, K.L.; Li, Q.Y.; Hou, D.S.; Zhang, C.W. Numerical analysis and optimization on piezoelectric properties of 0–3 type piezoelectric cement-based materials with interdigitated electrodes. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, S.Q.; Zhang, Y.M.; Li, Z.J. Ultrasonic monitoring of setting and hardening of slag blended cement under different curing temperatures by using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Constr. Bulid. Mater. 2018, 159, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, K.; Deng, Q.S.; Cai, L.J.; Ho, S.C.; Song, G.B. Damage detection of a concrete column subject to blast loads using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xue, J.M.; Wan, D.M.; Lee, S.E.; Wang, J. Mechanochemical synthesis of lead zirconate titanate from mixed oxides. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 1687–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Brankovic, Z.; Brankovic, G.; Jovalekic, C.; Maniette, Y.; Cilense, M.; Varela, J.A. Mechanochemical synthesis of PZT powders. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 345, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sharma, P.K.; Ounaies, Z.; Varadan, V.V.; Varadan, V.K. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of microwave sintered PZT. Smart Mater. Struct. 2001, 10, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deng, Y.; Liu, L.; Cheng, Y.; Nan, C.W.; Zhao, S.J. Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline PZT powders. Mater. Lett. 2003, 57, 1675–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rao, K.R.M.; Rao, A.V.P.; Komarneni, S. Reactive PZT precursor powder by coprecipitation. Mater. Lett. 1996, 28, 463–467. [Google Scholar]
  50. Barrow, D.A.; Petroff, T.E.; Tandon, R.P.; Sayer, M. Characterization of thick lead zirconate titanate films fabricated using a new sol gel based process. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 81, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mu, G.H.; Yang, S.Y.; Li, J.F.; Gu, M.Y. Synthesis of PZT nanocrystalline powder by a modified sol-gel process using water as primary solvent source. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 182, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, Z.J.; Chu, R.Q.; Li, G.R.; Shao, X.; Yin, Q.R. Preparation of PZT powders and ceramics via a hybrid method of sol–gel and ultrasonic atomization. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2005, 117, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zheng, H.; Reaney, I.M.; Lee, W.E.; Jones, N.; Thomas, H. Effects of octahedral tilting on the piezoelectric properties of strontium/barium/niobium-doped soft lead zirconate titanate ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kusiorowski, R.; Zaremba, T.; Piotrowski, J.; Podworny, J. Utilisation of cement-asbestos wastes by thermal treatment and the potential possibility use of obtained product for the clinker bricks manufacture. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 6757–6767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cross, W.M.; Sabnis, K.H.; Kjerengtroen, L.; Kellar, J.J. Microhardness testing of fiber-reinforced cement paste. ACI Mater. J. 2000, 97, 162–167. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The sol-gel synthesis schematic procedure for lead-zirconate-titanate (PZT) nanoscale powders.
Figure 1. The sol-gel synthesis schematic procedure for lead-zirconate-titanate (PZT) nanoscale powders.
Sensors 18 02999 g001
Figure 2. The optical morphologies of chrysotile fiber: (a) in bundle (green circles) (×200); (b) dispersed state in ethanol (red arrows) after grinding for 30 min (×200).
Figure 2. The optical morphologies of chrysotile fiber: (a) in bundle (green circles) (×200); (b) dispersed state in ethanol (red arrows) after grinding for 30 min (×200).
Sensors 18 02999 g002
Figure 3. XRD crystallinity of PZT and PZTCC (PZT/CSF/cement composite).
Figure 3. XRD crystallinity of PZT and PZTCC (PZT/CSF/cement composite).
Sensors 18 02999 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of PZT and PZTCC composite: (a) PZT (yellow rectangle, PZT); (b) PZTCC (yellow rectangle, PZT; green ellipse, cement particle; red arrow, CSF).
Figure 4. SEM images of PZT and PZTCC composite: (a) PZT (yellow rectangle, PZT); (b) PZTCC (yellow rectangle, PZT; green ellipse, cement particle; red arrow, CSF).
Sensors 18 02999 g004
Figure 5. (a) An optical microscope image of the surface-polished PZTCC composite (×400) and (the insert bottom-right picture of the PZTCC composite at macro-scale); (b) Micro-hardness distributions at the PZT/CC interface.
Figure 5. (a) An optical microscope image of the surface-polished PZTCC composite (×400) and (the insert bottom-right picture of the PZTCC composite at macro-scale); (b) Micro-hardness distributions at the PZT/CC interface.
Sensors 18 02999 g005
Figure 6. Electric voltage versus time of the PZTCC wafer under various impulse levels: (a) 100 N; (b) 200 N; (c) 300 N; (d) 400 N.
Figure 6. Electric voltage versus time of the PZTCC wafer under various impulse levels: (a) 100 N; (b) 200 N; (c) 300 N; (d) 400 N.
Sensors 18 02999 g006
Figure 7. Electricity history of PZTCC wafer under cyclic loading.
Figure 7. Electricity history of PZTCC wafer under cyclic loading.
Sensors 18 02999 g007
Table 1. The linearity (e), sensitivity (k), and repeatability (ef) of the PZTCC under cyclic loading.
Table 1. The linearity (e), sensitivity (k), and repeatability (ef) of the PZTCC under cyclic loading.
ParameterCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Mean
e25.94%3.04%2.86%2.41%2.42%
16.08%2.18%2.01%2.02%
k1.17511.50801.49731.51321.505 mV/N
1.38441.50641.50491.5003
ef2.4%2.4%1.5%2.42%2.11%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Chung, K.L.; Liu, C. Intrinsic Sensing Properties of Chrysotile Fiber Reinforced Piezoelectric Cement-Based Composites. Sensors 2018, 18, 2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092999

AMA Style

Luo J, Zhang C, Li L, Wang B, Li Q, Chung KL, Liu C. Intrinsic Sensing Properties of Chrysotile Fiber Reinforced Piezoelectric Cement-Based Composites. Sensors. 2018; 18(9):2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Jianlin, Chunwei Zhang, Lu Li, Baolin Wang, Qiuyi Li, Kwok L. Chung, and Chao Liu. 2018. "Intrinsic Sensing Properties of Chrysotile Fiber Reinforced Piezoelectric Cement-Based Composites" Sensors 18, no. 9: 2999. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop