Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Interpolation Methods in the Validation of Backscattering Coefficient Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Dual-Lifetime Referencing (t-DLR) Optical Fiber Fluorescent pH Sensor for Microenvironments
Previous Article in Journal
A Method of Noise Reduction for Radio Communication Signal Based on RaGAN
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of E. coli Bacteria in Milk by an Acoustic Wave Aptasensor with an Anti-Fouling Coating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Near InfraRed Emissive Chemosensor for Zn2+ and Phosphate Derivatives Based on a Di-(2-picolyl)amine-styrylflavylium Push-Pull Fluorophore

1
LAQV-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, CQFB, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
Intracelular Microbial Infection Biology, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 471; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010471
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 1 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Developments in Chemosensors and Probes)

Abstract

:
A new Near InfraRed (NIR) fluorescent chemosensor for metal ions and anions is herein presented. The fluorophore is based on a styrylflavylium dye, a synthetic analogue of the natural anthocyanin family, with a di-(2-picolyl)amine (DPA) moiety as the metal chelating unit. The substitution pattern of the styrylflavylium core (with tertiary amines on positions 7 and 4′) shifts the optical properties of the dye towards the NIR region of the electronic spectra, due to a strong push-pull character over the π-conjugated system. The NIR chemosensor is highly sensitive to the presence of Zn2+, which induces a strong CHelation Enhanced Fluorescence (CHEF) effect upon binding to the DPA unit (2.7 fold increase). The strongest competing ion is Cu2+, with a complete fluorescence quenching, while other metals induce lower responses on the optical properties of the chemosensor. Subsequent anion screening of the Zn2+-chemosensor coordination compound has demonstrated a distinct selectivity towards adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP), with high association constants (K ~ 106 M−1) and a strong CHEF effect (2.4 and 2.9 fold fluorescence increase for ATP and ADP, respectively). Intracellular studies with the Zn2+-complexed sensor showed strong luminescence in the cellular membrane of Gram bacteria (E. coli) and mitochondrial membrane of mammalian cells (A659), which highlights its possible application for intracellular labelling.

1. Introduction

Fluorescent chemosensors have been widely investigated over the past decades, mainly due to their high sensitivity when compared to other sensor systems, allowing for a high spatio-temporal resolution and continuous monitoring of analyzed samples [1,2]. Over more recent years, a significant research effort has been directed to designing chemosensors with optical properties in the Near InfraRed (NIR) region, i.e., with absorption and emission above 650 nm. This specific class of sensors is particularly relevant for biological samples, since it is in this spectral region that light can penetrate deeper into cellular tissues, thus allowing in-vivo monitoring with minimal radiation damage [3]. Many systems have already been developed to target biologically important analytes, of which metal cations and anions represent the vast majority of reported works [4], although a strong emphasis has been directed also towards other relevant biomolecules such as enzymes or proteins [5].
Strategies for targeting metal cations generally involve coupling fluorophores with metal chelating moieties, which can be bound directly or via a spacer [6]. Amongst the many known binding units for metal cations, di-(2-picolyl)amine (DPA) emerges as one of the most commonly employed, as it has been widely reported to preferentially bind to Zn2+ cations, usually yielding a CHelation Enhancement of Fluorescence (CHEF) which is highly desirable to discard artefacts such auto-fluorescence or inner-filter effects (typically associated with emission quenching) [7,8,9]. Nevertheless, several systems based on DPA have also been developed for selective detection of Cu2+, and most of these sensors exhibit CHElation induced Quenching (CHEQ) [10].
The major breakthrough for DPA arose from the reports by Hamachi and co-workers, who used fluorescent Zn2+-DPA coordination compounds to detect phosphorylated peptides and other phosphate derivatives [11,12]. These pioneering works opened a whole sub-field of fluorescent sensors, directed to the detection of anionic species [13,14,15,16].
With respect to NIR fluorophores, some of the most noteworthy include heptamethyne cyanine [17], BODIPYs [18], squaraine [19,20], dicyanomethylene [21,22] and modified rhodamines [23,24] (Figure 1). Although not regarded as your typical fluorescent unit, synthetic flavylium dyes can be easily modified to include moieties for binding external analytes, thereby allowing for the development of new probes [25,26,27]. Furthermore, extension of the π-conjugated benzopyrilium core is readily achieved with the appropriate precursors to produce styrylflavylium derivatives [28,29] (Figure 1, blue). Indeed, these styrylflavylium dyes have been recently reported as red or NIR fluorescent probes for hydrogen sulfide [30], sulfur dioxide [31], hydrazine [32] and sensing DNA replication [33]. With this in mind, we designed a novel styrylflavylium chemosensor bearing a DPA receptor, and assessed its potential as a sensor for cations and anions.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Synthesis

All used chemicals were of analytical grade and used as purchased. Fine chemicals were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), while solvents were purchased either from Sigma-Aldrich or Carlo Erba (Barcelona, Spain).
Synthesis of 4-(4-((2-(bis(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)amino)ethyl)(methyl)amino)benzylidene)-6-(diethylamino)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroxanthylium (1)
In a 25 mL round-bottom flask, A (1 eq, 200 mg, 0.45 mmol) and 4-(Diethylamino) salicylaldehyde (1 eq, 87.7 mg, 0.45 mmol) were dissolved in 6 mL of acetic acid. Later, under vigorous stirring, a solution of sulfuric acid (1.5 mL) was added dropwise, immediately turning into a dark purple color. The reaction was followed by TLC using as eluent hexane:ethyl acetate (7:3) until the complete consumption of the starting material (~24h). The final reaction mixture had a dark blue/purple color. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the reaction mixture was dried under vacuum. Afterwards, the crude was purified by RP18 column chromatography starting with HCl 0,1 M:MeOH 75:25 as eluent and gradually changing its polarity until 100% methanol. The collected fractions were analyzed by HPLC to identify the product fractions (following absorption at 670 nm), and the solvents were removed under reduced pressure. Finally, 170 mg of 1 were obtained as a dark blue oil (η= 62.54%), which was further washed with ether and centrifugated to obtain a dark blue precipitate. 1H RMN (400 MHz, MeOD) δ (ppm): 8.31 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (s, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (q, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 6.93 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 3.82 (s, 4H), 3.61 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.24 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 2.77 (s, 3H), 2.43 (q, J = 5.5 Hz, 6H), 1.43 (q, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 0.82 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOD) δ (ppm): 163.04, 160.73, 158.23, 153.38, 149.84, 148.64, 143.01, 142.53, 137.83, 134.97, 133.94, 133.51, 131.35, 129.12, 127.86, 125.33, 122.14, 121.64, 97.00, 66.91, 56.69, 55.58, 50.84, 47.48, 46.82, 28.36, 28.17, 22.71, 12.97 (all collected spectra and peaks assignments are found in the Supporting Information, Figures S1–S5 and Table S1). HR-ESI-MS (+) m/z: 598.3547 ([M + H]+, calcd: 598.3541) (Figure S6).

2.2. UV-Vis and Fluorescence Measurements

Solutions for UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence measurements were prepared by adding an aliquot of 30 µL of a 3 × 10−4 M methanolic solution of flavylium 1, to 1470 µL of methanol, and 1100 µL of aqueous buffer, for a final chemosensor concentration of 1 µM. For all metal titrations, 10 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic sodium salt (MOPS) buffer at pH 7.0 ± 0.2 was used. pH titrations were performed using Theorell and Stenhagen universal buffer [34]. Metal ion titrations were performed by adding small aliquots of solution containing 1 and each of the studied metals to a cuvette containing solely chemosensor 1, to ensure that the concentration of the latter remained constant. Both UV-Vis as well as luminescence spectra were recorded in between additions. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of Zn2+ were determined according to IUPAC guidelines [35], by measuring five independently prepared samples of styrylflavylium 1 with no metal (blank) and applying the formulae: LOD = 3σ/b and LOQ = 10 σ/b, where σ represents the standard deviation of these measurements, and b represents the slope over a fixed linear range (0–3µM was selected). Anion titrations were performed in a similar manner but using a cuvette containing 1-Zn2+ as the starting point, to which aliquots of solution containing 1-Zn2+ and anion were successively added. Absorption spectra were acquired in a 1 cm quartz cuvette on a Varian Cary 100 Bio UV- spectrophotometer. Emission spectra were obtained in a 1 cm fluorescence quartz cuvette, using a Horiba-Jobin-Yvon SPEX Fluorolog 3.22 spectrofluorometer. Fluorescence quantum yield for 1 was determined using Cryptocyanine as reference (ϕf = 0.007 in ethanol) [36]. The binding constants for 1-Zn2+, (1-Zn2+)-ATP and (1-Zn2+)-ADP were determined by fitting the experimental data to a Henderson-Hasselbalch 1:1 binding model using the Solver Add-In from Microsoft Excel [37].

2.2.1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination

The MICs of 1 for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strain JE2 (Community-acquired Methicillin Resistant S. aureus, CA-MRSA) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain DC10B were determined in sterile 96-well microplates using Muller Hinton Broth (MHB) or Luria Broth (LB), respectively, supplemented with 4 equivalents of Zn2+ (ZnSO4) for each concentration of 1. 1 was added to each microplate well to obtain 2-fold serial dilutions of the compound with the highest concentration being 32 μg/mL. Cultures of S. aureus and E. coli were added to the wells at a final density of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. A number of wells were reserved in each plate for sterility control (no inoculum added) and inoculum viability (no 1 added). Plates were incubated at 37 °C and growth was recorded visually at 24 and 48 h. All MICs were determined in triplicate for each condition assayed.

2.2.2. Biocompatibility Assay in A549 Lung Carcinoma Cells

A549 lung carcinoma cells were seeded (1 × 105) in 8-well slides and incubated in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator for 24 h. Cells were subsequently incubated for 24 h in the presence or absence of 1 (2 and 4 μg/mL) supplemented with 4 equivalents of Zn2+ (ZnSO4). Upon 24 h incubation cells were washed (with 1X Phosphate-buffer Saline, PBS) to removed dead cells, incubated in Trypsin/EDTA solution (0.05% trypsin, 0.53 mM EDTA) and enumerated using a cell drop (DeNovix) in triplicate, following manufactures recommendations.

2.2.3. Microscopy Experiments

For microscopy experiments with A549 cells (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC), #86012804 [38]. Cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Before imaging cells were seeded at 1 × 105 on to 8-well slides and grown for 24 h. 1 was added at 4 μg/mL (with 4 equivalents of Zn2+, ZnSO4) and cells were imaged for up to 16 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified microscope incubator (Pecon).
For microscopy experiments with S. aureus JE2 [39] strain and E. coli DC10B strain [40] bacterial cells. Bacteria were grown in MHB or LB, respectively, until mid-exponential phase (OD600nm of 0.5). 1 mL of cells was pelleted (13.000 RPM, 1 min) and subsequently resuspended in 10 mM MOPS with 1 at 4 μg/mL (with 4 equivalents of Zn2+, ZnSO4) and incubated for 5 min at 23 °C. Cells were pelleted (13.000 RPM, 1 min), resuspended in 10 μL, and 2 μL were mounted on a thin layer of 1X PBS with 1.2% agarose, covered with a 1.5H coverslip, and imaged.
Imaging was performed on a motorised inverted widefield (WF) fluorescence microscopy system (Axio Observer 7, Zeiss) equipped with Colibri 7 LED illumination (Zeiss), with excitation LED of 653 nm and emission filter EM BP 681/45 (Filter set 90, Zeiss), using a Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 oil objective (Zeiss). Focus during experiments was kept using the definite focus 3 (Zeiss). Images were captured using a Prime PB 95B (Photometrics) camera using ZEN software (Blue edition, SW ZEN 3.4 pro).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Photophysical Characterization

Chemosensor 1 was designed to possess the flavylium chromophoric unit coupled to a DPA metal chelating moiety. The synthesis was performed by condensation of (E)-2-(4-((2-(bis(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)amino)ethyl)(methyl)amino)benzylidene)cyclohexanone (A) [41] with 4-(diethylamino)salicylaldehyde (B) allowed to obtain styrylflavylium 1 (Figure 2).
Flavylium and styrylflavylium salts are involved in a multi-state equilibrium which is determined by the pH of the medium. The molar fraction of each chemical species at the different pH values/ranges is highly dependent on the substitution pattern of the flavylium core [27]. Furthermore, the energetic barrier associated with the isomerization process, from the hemiketal species B to the cis-chalcone Cc may also play a key role [25]. As such, we performed pH titrations of 1, in order to get a general overview of the species present at the different pH values (Figure 3 and Figure S7).
The pH titration shows that, at moderately acid conditions (pH~4), the main species present is the styrylflavylium cation AH+ (blue in Figure 4) with an absorption maximum at around 670 nm. As the pH increases, the equilibrium is shifted towards the formation of the trans-chalcone species in its deprotonated state, Ct (red in Figure 4) revealed by the appearance of a new band at around 530 nm. The overall pKa of this transformation (pKa1) was determined to be at pH = 9.26, which tells us that the styrylflavylium is suitable for sensing applications within the physiological pH range.
At extremely acidic conditions, it is possible to observe the protonation of the styrylflavylium to form AH22+ (violet in Figure 4), with a pKa2 value of 1.41 (Figure S7B). All other species are not observable at equilibrium conditions, indicating that they exist as transient species as observed in other similar systems [28,29,42].
The fluorescence quantum yield of 1 was determined to be 0.003 (cryptocyanine was used as reference [36]), with a large Stokes shift (~75 nm, 1460 cm−1). These values indicate the presence of a deactivation mechanism related to Planar Internal Charge Transfer (PICT), as suggested previously for the 7-(N,N-diethylamino)-4′-hydroxy-flavylium analogue [43].

3.2. Metal Sensitivity/Selectivity

Styrylflavylium 1 comprises a di-(2-picolylamine) moiety (DPA), capable of binding metal cations [6]. A screening of mono- and divalent cations was performed to assess the potential selectivity and the effect of the binding event in the optical properties of 1, by adding two equivalents of each cation and monitoring the changes in UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra (Figure 5).
In the UV-Vis spectra (Figure 5A), we can observe that several cations induce a hypochromic shift on the absorption of 1, namely Ni2+, Fe2+, Pb2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Co2+ an Cu2+, with this latter ion being the one that exhibits the strongest effect, with the original absorption band disappearing and a new band rising at circa 600 nm of absorption maximum. In the emission (Figure 5B), the panorama is quite different. Indeed, while Ni2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ promote fluorescence quenching, Zn2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ (this latter to a smaller extent) induce an enhancement in the emission of 1. This effect is similar to previously reported fluorescent sensor molecules bearing DPA units [44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
It is therefore noteworthy that the ions that induce the strongest changes are Zn2+ and Cu2+, even though their effect upon binding to 1 is opposite when looking at the emission. To better understand the differences in binding strength, independent titrations of 1 with each of these two metals were made.
Addition of gradual amounts of Zn(II) to a solution of 1 led to a decrease in the UV-Vis absorption spectra, with a hypsochromic shift of the absorption maximum, from ~680 to ~660 nm (Figure S8). These changes in the absorption of 1 suggest that the nitrogen in position 4′ of the styrylflavylium core is also participating in the coordination of the metal ion (Figure S9). In terms of emission, the luminescence of 1 exhibited CHelation Enhanced Fluorescence (CHEF), with a 2.7 fold increase and a slight shift to shorter wavelengths (~15 nm), similar to the corresponding absorption spectra (Figure 6A).
The binding constant was obtained by fitting the experimental data to a 1:1 binding model, yielding a value of 1.9 × 106 M−1 (Figure 6B). This value is in line with previously reported DPA sensor systems for divalent ions [7,8,9,10]. As a comparison, the same experiments were also performed for Cd2+, since it exhibited a similar behavior as Zn2+ (see Figure 5B), resulting in a lesser fluorescence enhancement and a binding constant 4 times lower than that of Zn2+ (Figure S10). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for Zn2+ were determined according to IUPAC guidelines (see Section 2) and were found to be 0.39 µM and 1.29 µM, respectively. On the other hand, Cu2+ induced a much stronger response on the optical properties of chemosensor 1. Indeed, the UV-Vis absorption spectra changes dramatically upon increasing Cu2+ concentrations, with a new band appearing at λmax = 589 nm (Figure S11A), while the emission exhibits a CHElation induced Quenching effect (Figure 7A).
Interestingly, plotting the emission intensity (or the maximum absorbance) against the concentration of Cu2+ reveals the presence of a small plateau at the lowest metal concentration range, with the strongest changes appearing as we approach 1 equivalent of metal (Figure 7B and Figure S11B). This behavior suggests that, at an initial stage, the metal ion may be capable coordinating with the DPA units from two different fluorophore molecules without affecting the nitrogen in position 4′, which results in little effect on the optical properties of 1. After 1 equivalent, an abrupt emission quenching and absorption change is observed, signaling a disruption in the π-conjugated system, which indicates the participation of the nitrogen in position 4′ in the coordination sphere with Cu(II) (Scheme 1). The data (absorption and emission) were fitted to an equilibrium comprising the formation of a 1:1 complex and a 2:1 complex (i.e., two units of chemosensor 1 binding to one Cu2+ ion), yielding association constants with values of K1 of 4.97 × 106 M−1 and a K2 = 1.15 × 105 M−1 (see Supporting Information for details). Despite this behavior, Job’s plot indicates a 1:1 binding stoichiometry with 1 for both Zn2+ and Cu2+ (Figure S12).
Since our focus was on applying this sensor system in biological applications and free intracellular Cu(II) concentration are extremely low, we decided to direct our efforts towards Zn(II). As such, we performed a competition assay in which 1 equivalent of each competing metal cation was added to solutions containing 1 equivalent of Zn2+, and the corresponding emission was recorded (Figure 8).
The results show that Cu(II) is, by far, the strongest interferent in Zn2+ detection with 1, which is consistent with the higher association constant values obtained for this ion. Of the remaining studied metals, only Co2+ and Ni2+ induce some emission quenching (23% and 18% respectively) with respect to the emission of 1-Zn2+, while the effect of other metal cations in the emission of 1 are much smaller or negligible (≤10%).
In order to further evaluate Zn(II) coordination, NMR titration of 1 was carried out in MeOD:D2O (1:1) with zinc between 0 and 2 equivalents (Figure 9 and Figures S13 and S14). According to the results obtained in the NMR spectra, aromatic proton peaks at circa 8.6 and 6.7 ppm become gradually unshielded upon adding zinc, which translates to the appearance of new peaks at around 8.75 and 6.9 ppm (Figure 9). In addition, the singlet present at 4.4 ppm, corresponding to CH2 protons of the DPA unit, disappears in the presence of Zn2+, giving rise to two small doublets in the same spectral region. This observation is consistent with the rigidification of the DPA unit upon complexation with the metal, since these protons may behave like diastereotopic protons (Figure S9). Moreover, an additional experiment was performed, through the addition of excess (5 equivalents) of ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA), a known complexing agent for Zn2+ and other divalent metals (Figure 9c) [51]. As we expected, the protons signals of free 1 in solution were regenerated, meaning that the complexation between sensor and metal is reversible in the presence of a stronger chelating agent.

3.2.1. Anion Sensing

Many examples of metal-coordinated DPA fluorescent chemosensors are known to exhibit the ability to subsequently detect anionic species. In particular, Zn2+-DPA coordination compounds have been widely used for sensing of phosphate and phosphate derivatives [2,13]. As such, we screened the optical properties Zn(II)-coordinated chemosensor 1 (henceforth referred to as 1-Zn2+) against a series of anions (Figure S15). We observed a strong selectivity of 1-Zn2+ towards adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP), with an emission enhancement of 2.1- and 3.0-fold, respectively. Out of the other studied anions, only citrate induced some emission enhancement (~0.36 fold), while pyrophosphate (PPi) induced a slight (~22%) emission quenching. The remaining anions exerted no effect on the emission of 1-Zn2+. Fluorescence titrations with ATP and ADP fitted well to 1:1 binding stoichiometries and revealed a higher affinity towards ADP in comparison to ATP, with association constants of 6.3 × 107 M−1 and 1.5 × 106 M−1, respectively (Figure 10 and Figure S16).
The corresponding UV-Vis absorption spectra for both of these anions present an interesting feature. Indeed, as the concentration of ATP (or ADP) increases, we observe a slight bathochromic and hyperchromic shift, exactly opposite to the spectral behavior before Zn(II) complexation (Figure S17). This seems to indicate that binding the anion to the Zn(II) metal center causes the displacement of the nitrogen atom in position 4′ of the styryl flavylium core (Figure S18).
To confirm that the presence of Zn2+ is essential for anion binding, a simple test was performed. Briefly, fluorescence of 1 was recorded before and after the addition of 5 equivalents of ATP, with no changes in the acquired spectra (Figure S19). Upon subsequent addition of 2 equivalents of Zn2+, the emission from 1 registered the same behavior as previously shown in the presence of both metal and anion.

3.2.2. Biocompatibility and Live-Cell Imaging Studies Using with Chemosensor 1

To understand the viability of using chemosensor 1 for ATP localization, biocompatibility and WF live-cell microscopy studies were performed in mammalian cells (A549 lung carcinoma cells) and bacterial cells (S. aureus and E. coli, Gram positive (+) and negative (−) bacterial cells, respectively).
Incubation of A549 cells with concentrations of 1 up to 4 μg/mL revealed a high degree of biocompatibility, with a survival rate of this cell line, over a 24h time incubation period, comparable to untreated cells (Figure 11a). This was further confirmed by live-cell imaging microscopy experiments, where normal cell morphology and cell division events were observed during a 16h time-lapse in the presence of chemosensor 1 (movieS1). Fluorescence microscopy imaging showed that uptake of 1 resulted in a mitochondrial subcellular localization (Figure 11b), with no effect on mitochondrial dynamics (movieS2). The observed subcellular localization is consistent with the fact that ATP is significantly more concentrated in mitochondria [52].
To assess the viability of using chemosensor in bacterial cells we determined the MIC of 1 for two classical bacterial model organisms, the Gram (+) S. aureus and the Gram (−) E. coli. For E. coli DC10B strain (non-pathogenic lab strain) we observed no toxicity (MIC > 32 μg/mL, maximum concentration used). For S. aureus bacteria we observed that 1 has antimicrobial activity, with a MIC of 2 μg/mL. This observation is especially interesting considering the clinical importance of the JE S. aureus strain used in this assay, the most prominent CA-MRSA lineage in the United States [39]. For both bacterial models a homogeneous membrane associated localization was observed (Figure 11b), consistent with ATP synthesis in the bacterial membrane [52].

4. Conclusions

A new NIR emissive chemosensor system for the detection of cations was designed and fully characterized. Sensor 1 was capable of binding to several divalent metal ions through a di-(2-picolyl)amine (DPA) chelation moiety, presenting distinct spectral behaviors. UV-Vis spectral profile revealed participation of the nitrogen atom directly coupled to the fluorophore in the metal-coordination sphere. Of the studied metals, Zn2+ and Cd2+ induced a strong CHEF effect on 1, with Zn2+ presenting a higher binding constant and Cu2+ acting as the strongest interferent. These results are comparable to previous works that use DPA as metal binding unit. Subsequent binding of ATP and ADP to 1-Zn2+ was observed through a further fluorescence enhancement, with substitution of the ancillary nitrogen (position 4′) from the coordination sphere, a response which has been previously described in other works [47]. Intracellular studies indicate that 1-Zn2+ may be employed to label bacteria and mammalian cells, particularly targeting the cellular membrane for the case of bacteria, and mitochondrial membranes from eukaryotic cells, due to the high concentrations of ATP/ADP in these intracellular sites.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s23010471/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J.M.; methodology, L.J.G., J.P.C., P.M.P. and A.J.M.; investigation, L.J.G., J.P.C., P.M.P. and A.J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J.M.; writing—review and editing, P.M.P.; supervision, P.M.P. and A.J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Associate Laboratory for Green Chemistry—LAQV which is financed by national funds from FCT/MCTES (UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020). The NMR spectrometers are part of Rede Nacional de RMN (PTNMR), supported by FCT/MCTES (grant ROTEIRO/0031/2013—PINFRA/22161/2016) (co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE 2020, POCI, and PORL and FCT through PIDDAC). P.M.P acknowledges funding by: (1) a La Caixa Junior Leader Fellowship (LCF/BQ/PI20/11760012) financed by “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434) and by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement Nr. 847648; (2) FCT/MCTES grant (PTDC/BIA-MIC/2422/2020); (3) Project LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007660 Microbiologia Molecular, Estrutural e Celular (ITQB-NOVA); (4) MOSTMICRO—ITQB R&D Unit (UIDB/04612/2020, UIDP/04612/2020); and (5) LS4FUTURE—Associated Laboratory (LA/P/0087/2020). L.J.G. thanks FCT/MCTES for a Ph. D. grant (UI/BD/153617/2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, D.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Akkaya, E.U.; Yoon, J.; James, T.D. Fluorescent chemosensors: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7105–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Guo, C.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Hirao, T.; Sessler, J.L. Supramolecular fluorescent sensors: An historical overview and update. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 427, 213560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hang, Y.; Boryczka, J.; Wu, N. Visible-light and near-infrared fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering point-of-care sensing and bio-imaging: A review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 329–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, C.; Ji, M. Development and application of several fluorescent probes in near infrared region. Dye. Pigment. 2021, 190, 109284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, J.; Ma, T.; Chang, B.; Fang, J. Recent Progress on NIR Fluorescent Probes for Enzymes. Molecules 2022, 27, 5922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jeong, Y.; Yoon, J. Recent progress on fluorescent chemosensors for metal ions. Inorg. Chim Acta 2012, 381, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Komatsu, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Kojima, H.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. Selective zinc sensor molecules with various affinities for Zn2+, revealing dynamics and regional distribution of synaptically released Zn2+ in hippocampal slices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10197–10204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goldsmith, C.R.; Lippard, S.J. 6-Methylpyridyl for pyridyl substitution tunes the properties of fluorescent zinc sensors of the Zinpyr family. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gwizdala, C.; Kennedy, D.P.; Burdette, S.C. ZinCast-1: A photochemically active chelator for Zn2+. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6967–6969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sivaraman, G.; Iniya, M.; Anand, T.; Kotla, N.G.; Sunnapu, O.; Singaravadivel, S.; Gulyani, A.; Chellappa, D. Chemically diverse small molecule fluorescent chemosensors for copper ion. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 357, 50–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ojida, A.; Mito-Oka, Y.; Inoue, M.A.; Hamachi, I. First artificial receptors and chemosensors toward phosphorylated peptide in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6256–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ojida, A.; Mito-Oka, Y.; Sada, K.; Hamachi, I. Molecular Recognition and Fluorescence Sensing of Monophosphorylated Peptides in Aqueous Solution by Bis(zinc(II)-dipicolylamine)-Based Artificial Receptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2454–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ngo, H.T.; Liu, X.; Jolliffe, K.A. Anion recognition and sensing with Zn(II)–dipicolylamine complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4928–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Figueroa, L.E.S.; Moragues, M.E.; Climent, E.; Agostini, A.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Sancenón, F. Chromogenic and fluorogenic chemosensors and reagents for anions. A comprehensive review of the years 2010–2011. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3489–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Busschaert, N.; Caltagirone, C.; Van Rossom, W.; Gale, P.A. Applications of Supramolecular Anion Recognition. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 8038–8155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gale, P.A.; Howe, E.N.W.; Wu, X. Anion Receptor Chemistry. Chem 2016, 1, 351–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Feng, L.; Chen, W.; Ma, X.; Liu, S.H.; Yin, J. Near-infrared heptamethine cyanines (Cy7): From structure, property to application. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 9385–9397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaur, P.; Singh, K. Recent advances in the application of BODIPY in bioimaging and chemosensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 11361–11405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, G.; Wang, H. Squaraine dyes: The hierarchical synthesis and its application in optical detection. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2017, 31, 84–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ta, D.D.; Dzyuba, S.V. Squaraine-based optical sensors: Designer toolbox for exploring ionic and molecular recognitions. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y.; Shi, P.; Tian, H.; Zhu, W.-H. Rational design of novel near-infrared fluorescent DCM derivatives and their application in bioimaging. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 4683–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hou, T.T.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Tang, Y.H.; Zhu, M.Q.; Wang, Y.-L. Progress of Dicyanomethylene-4H-Pyran Derivatives in Biological Sensing Based on ICT Effect. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, Y.Q.; Liu, J.; Lv, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, W. Rhodamine-inspired far-red to near-infrared dyes and their application as fluorescence probes. Angew. Chemie. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7634–7636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, L.; Du, W.; Hu, Z.; Uvdal, K.; Li, L.; Huang, W. Hybrid Rhodamine Fluorophores in the Visible/NIR Region for Biological Imaging. Angew. Chemie. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14026–14043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pina, F.; Melo, M.J.; Laia, C.A.T.; Parola, A.J.; Lima, J.C. Chemistry and applications of flavylium compounds: A handful of colours. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 869–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Basílio, N.; Pina, F. Chemistry and photochemistry of anthocyanins and related compounds: A thermodynamic and kinetic approach. Molecules 2016, 21, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cruz, L.; Basílio, N.; Mateus, N.; De Freitas, V.; Pina, F. Natural and Synthetic Flavylium-Based Dyes: The Chemistry behind the Color. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 1416–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gomes, R.; Diniz, A.M.; Jesus, A.; Parola, A.J.; Pina, F. The synthesis and reaction network of 2-styryl-1-benzopyrylium salts: An unexploited class of potential colorants. Dye. Pigment. 2009, 81, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moro, A.; Diniz, A.M.; Petrov, V.; Pina, F. Chemistry of 7,8-dihydroxy-2-(4-dimethylaminostyryl)-1-benzopyrylium. A photochromic system switching from yellow to green. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013, 263, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, L.; Wang, Q.; Tan, Y.; Lang, M.J.; Sun, H.; Liu, X. Rational Development of Near-Infrared Fluorophores with Large Stokes Shifts, Bright One-Photon, and Two-Photon Emissions for Bioimaging and Biosensing Applications. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 8736–8740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, G.; Quan, W.; Li, Y.; Song, W.; Lin, W. Near-Infrared Mitochondria-Targetable Single-Molecule probe for Dual-Response of viscosity and sulfur dioxide in vivo. Spectrochim. Acta. Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 270, 120796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wei, Y.F.; Wu, M.X.; Wei, X.R.; Sun, R.; Xu, Y.J.; Ge, J.F. The fluorescent probe based on methyltetrahydroxanthylium skeleton for the detection of hydrazine. Talanta 2020, 218, 121164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kuba, M.; Kraus, T.; Pohl, R.; Hocek, M. Nucleotide-Bearing Benzylidene-Tetrahydroxanthylium Near-IR Fluorophore for Sensing DNA Replication, Secondary Structures and Interactions. Chem. A Eur. J. 2020, 26, 11950–11954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Küster Friedrich, W.T.A. Tabelle per Le Analisi Chimiche e Chimico-Fisiche, 14th ed.; Hoepli: Milano, Italy, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  35. McNaught, A.D.; Wilkinson, A. International Union of Pure Appl. Chem. Compendium of Chemical Terminology (“The Gold Book”); Blackwell Science: West Sussex, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dempster, D.N.; Morrow, T.; Rankin, R.; Thompson, G.F. Photochemical Characteristics of the mode-locking dyes 1,1′-diethyl-4,4′ carbocyanine iodide (cryptocayanine, DCI) and 1,1′-diethyl-2,2′ dicarb. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1973, 18, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thordarson, P. Determining association constants from titration experiments in supramolecular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1305–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Giard, D.J.; Aaronson, S.A.; Todaro, G.J.; Arnstein, P.; Kersey, J.H.; Parks, W.P. In vitro cultivation of human tumors: Establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1973, 51, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fey, P.D.; Endres, J.L.; Yajjala, V.K.; Yajjala, K.; Widhelm, T.J.; Boissy, R.J.; Bose, J.L.; Bayles, K.W. A Genetic Resource for Rapid and Comprehensive Phenotype. mBio 2013, 4, e00537-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Monk, I.R.; Shah, I.M.; Xu, M.; Tan, M.W.; Foster, T.J. Transforming the untransformable: Application of direct transformation to manipulate genetically Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. mBio 2012, 3, e00277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gomes, L.J.; Moreira, T.; Rodríguez, L.; Moro, A.J. Chalcone-based fluorescent chemosensors as new tools for detecting Cu2+ ions. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 197, 109845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moncada, M.C.; Parola, J.; Lodeiro, C.; Folgosa, F.; Pina, F. Multistate properties of 7-(N,N-diethylamino)-4 ′-hydroxyflavylium. An example of an unidirectional reaction cycle driven by pH. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Avó, J.; Petrov, V.; Basílio, N.; Jorge Parola, A.; Pina, F. Evidence against the Twisted Intramolecular Charge Transfer (TICT) model in 7-aminoflavylium derivatives. Dye. Pigment. 2016, 135, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, J.; Wu, Y.; Peng, X. A naphthalimide fluorescent sensor for Zn2+ based on photo-induced electron transfer. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1392–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Louie, M.W.; Liu, H.W.; Lam, M.H.C.; Lau, T.C.; Lo, K.K.W. Novel luminescent tricarbonylrhenium(I) polypyridine tyraminederived dipicolylamine complexes as sensors for zinc(II) and cadmium(II) Ions. Organometallics 2009, 28, 4297–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lu, X.; Zhu, W.; Xie, Y.; Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, F.; Tian, H. Near-IR core-substituted naphthalenediimide fluorescent chemosensors for zinc ions: Ligand effects on PET and ICT channels. Chem. A Eur. J. 2010, 16, 8355–8364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moro, A.J.; Cywinski, P.J.; Körsten, S.; Mohr, G.J. An ATP fluorescent chemosensor based on a Zn(ii)-complexed dipicolylamine receptor coupled with a naphthalimide chromophore. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, H.; Wu, H.; Xue, L.; Shi, Y.; Li, X. A naphthalimide fluorophore with efficient intramolecular PET and ICT Processes: Application in molecular logic. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 5436–5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, P.; Cao, J. Development of a borondipyrromethene-based Zn 2+ fluorescent probe: Solvent effects on modulation sensing ability. Dalt. Trans. 2012, 41, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, S.K.; Choi, M.G.; Choi, J.; Chang, S.K. Fluorescence signaling of Zn2+ levels in synthetic urine by dipicolylamine-armed hydroxynaphthalimide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nowack, B. Environmental chemistry of aminopolycarboxylate chelating agents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4009–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nirody, J.A.; Budin, I.; Rangamani, P. ATP synthase: Evolution, energetics, and membrane interactions. J. Gen. Physiol. 2020, 152, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Examples of NIR fluorophores. The styrylflavylium core is highlighted in blue.
Figure 1. Examples of NIR fluorophores. The styrylflavylium core is highlighted in blue.
Sensors 23 00471 g001
Figure 2. Synthesis reaction for styrylflavylium 1.
Figure 2. Synthesis reaction for styrylflavylium 1.
Sensors 23 00471 g002
Figure 3. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of 1 in neutral to basic conditions (4.8 < pH < 12.9); (B) experimental data points collected at 673 nm, with corresponding fit for the pH equilibrium. Experimental conditions: [1] = 1.7 × 10−5 M, in MeOH:Theorell and Stenhagen universal buffer:H2O 50:25:25.
Figure 3. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of 1 in neutral to basic conditions (4.8 < pH < 12.9); (B) experimental data points collected at 673 nm, with corresponding fit for the pH equilibrium. Experimental conditions: [1] = 1.7 × 10−5 M, in MeOH:Theorell and Stenhagen universal buffer:H2O 50:25:25.
Sensors 23 00471 g003
Figure 4. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of 1 in neutral to basic conditions (4.8 < pH < 12.9). Multi-state equilibria for 1, at different pH values. Styrylflavylium (AH+, blue) is stable in moderately acid to neutral pH.
Figure 4. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of 1 in neutral to basic conditions (4.8 < pH < 12.9). Multi-state equilibria for 1, at different pH values. Styrylflavylium (AH+, blue) is stable in moderately acid to neutral pH.
Sensors 23 00471 g004
Figure 5. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra and (B) emission spectra of 1 (5 µM), in the presence of different metal cations (10 µM). Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 620 nm.
Figure 5. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra and (B) emission spectra of 1 (5 µM), in the presence of different metal cations (10 µM). Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 620 nm.
Sensors 23 00471 g005
Figure 6. (A) Emission spectra and (B) corresponding changes in the total emission of 1 (5 µM), in the presence of increasing amounts of Zn2+. Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 620 nm.
Figure 6. (A) Emission spectra and (B) corresponding changes in the total emission of 1 (5 µM), in the presence of increasing amounts of Zn2+. Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 620 nm.
Sensors 23 00471 g006
Figure 7. (A) Emission spectra and (B) corresponding changes in the total emission of 1 (5 µM), in the presence of increasing amounts of Cu2+. The red line represents the best fit with the experimental data (K1 = 4.97 × 106 M−1 and K2 = 1.15 × 105 M−1). Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 680 nm.
Figure 7. (A) Emission spectra and (B) corresponding changes in the total emission of 1 (5 µM), in the presence of increasing amounts of Cu2+. The red line represents the best fit with the experimental data (K1 = 4.97 × 106 M−1 and K2 = 1.15 × 105 M−1). Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 680 nm.
Sensors 23 00471 g007
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanisms for the coordination of Cu(II) with chemosensor 1.
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanisms for the coordination of Cu(II) with chemosensor 1.
Sensors 23 00471 sch001
Figure 8. Fluorescence competition assay illustrating the influence of other metals (1 eq.) in the detection of Zn2+ ions (1 eq.) (blue). Emission intensity of 1 in the absence of any metal (grey) or in the presence of 1 eq. of Zn2+ (red) was added for comparison. Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 620 nm.
Figure 8. Fluorescence competition assay illustrating the influence of other metals (1 eq.) in the detection of Zn2+ ions (1 eq.) (blue). Emission intensity of 1 in the absence of any metal (grey) or in the presence of 1 eq. of Zn2+ (red) was added for comparison. Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 620 nm.
Sensors 23 00471 g008
Figure 9. 1H NMR spectra of [1] = 0.78 mM: (A) with no metal; (B) in the presence of 2 equiv. of zinc; (C) in the presence of 2 eqs. of zinc and 5 eqs. of EDTA. All spectra were conducted at room temperature in a mixture of MeOD:D2O (1:1).
Figure 9. 1H NMR spectra of [1] = 0.78 mM: (A) with no metal; (B) in the presence of 2 equiv. of zinc; (C) in the presence of 2 eqs. of zinc and 5 eqs. of EDTA. All spectra were conducted at room temperature in a mixture of MeOD:D2O (1:1).
Sensors 23 00471 g009
Figure 10. Emission spectra of 1-Zn2+ with increasing concentration of (A) ATP and (B) ADP. Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 680 nm.
Figure 10. Emission spectra of 1-Zn2+ with increasing concentration of (A) ATP and (B) ADP. Conditions: MeOH:MOPS 10 mM pH7 (50:50); λexc = 680 nm.
Sensors 23 00471 g010
Figure 11. (A) A549 viability in the presence of increasing concentration of 1 for 24h. (B) WF live-cell imaging of A549 lung cells, S. aureus JE2 strain bacterial cells and E. coli DC10B strain bacterial cells stained with 4 μg/mL chemosensor 1 with 4 equivalents of Zn2+. Scale bars are 20 μm for A549 and 2 μm for S. aureus and E. coli images.
Figure 11. (A) A549 viability in the presence of increasing concentration of 1 for 24h. (B) WF live-cell imaging of A549 lung cells, S. aureus JE2 strain bacterial cells and E. coli DC10B strain bacterial cells stained with 4 μg/mL chemosensor 1 with 4 equivalents of Zn2+. Scale bars are 20 μm for A549 and 2 μm for S. aureus and E. coli images.
Sensors 23 00471 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes, L.J.; Carrilho, J.P.; Pereira, P.M.; Moro, A.J. A Near InfraRed Emissive Chemosensor for Zn2+ and Phosphate Derivatives Based on a Di-(2-picolyl)amine-styrylflavylium Push-Pull Fluorophore. Sensors 2023, 23, 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010471

AMA Style

Gomes LJ, Carrilho JP, Pereira PM, Moro AJ. A Near InfraRed Emissive Chemosensor for Zn2+ and Phosphate Derivatives Based on a Di-(2-picolyl)amine-styrylflavylium Push-Pull Fluorophore. Sensors. 2023; 23(1):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes, Liliana J., João P. Carrilho, Pedro M. Pereira, and Artur J. Moro. 2023. "A Near InfraRed Emissive Chemosensor for Zn2+ and Phosphate Derivatives Based on a Di-(2-picolyl)amine-styrylflavylium Push-Pull Fluorophore" Sensors 23, no. 1: 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop