Next Article in Journal
Hourly CO2 Emission Factors and Marginal Costs of Energy Carriers in Future Multi-Energy Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluid Retrofit for Existing Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems and Heat Pumps: Evaluation of Different Models
Previous Article in Journal
A Current-to-Voltage DC-DC Converter for Powering Backbone Devices of Scientific Cabled Seafloor Observatories
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of a Lab-Scale Heat Transformation Demonstrator Based on a Gas–Solid Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adapting the MgO-CO2 Working Pair for Thermochemical Energy Storage by Doping with Salts: Effect of the (LiK)NO3 Content †

1
Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-N1-22, Ōokayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
2
Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands
3
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Ac. Lavrentiev av. 5, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The original paper was presented in: Shkatulov, A.I., Kim, S.T., Kato, Y., Aristov, Yu.I. Adapting the MgO-CO2 working pair for thermochemical energy storage by doping with salts. Riehl, R., Preißinger, M., Eames, I., Tierney, M., Eds. In Proceedings of the Heat Powered Cycles Conference 2018, Bayreuth, Germany, 16–19 September 2018; ISBN 978-0-9563329-6-7.
Energies 2019, 12(12), 2262; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122262
Submission received: 30 April 2019 / Revised: 8 June 2019 / Accepted: 11 June 2019 / Published: 13 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from Heat Power Cycles Conference 2018)

Abstract

:
The MgO-CO2 working pair has been regarded as prospective for thermochemical energy storage (TCES) due to its relatively high heat storage capacity, low cost, and wide availability. This study is aimed at the optimization of the molar salt content, α, for the MgO modified with the eutectic mixture of LiNO3 and KNO3 (Li0.42K0.58NO3) which was earlier shown to provide high conversion, Δx, in heat-storage/release processes at 300–400 °C. The composites that have different salt content were prepared and carbonation kinetics was investigated under various conditions (carbonation temperature, Tcarb., is 290–360 °C and CO2 pressure, P(CO2), is 50–101 kPa). Significant accelerating effect was revealed at α ≥ 0.05, and the Δx value was maximized at α = 0.10–0.20. The largest conversion of 0.70 was detected at α = 0.10 and Tcarb. = 350 °C that corresponds to the specific useful heat (Qcomp.) is 1.63 MJ/kg-composite. However, the salt content of 0.20 ensures the high conversion, Δx = 0.63–0.67 and Qcomp. = 1.18–1.25 MJ/kg-composite in the whole temperature range between 290 and 350 °C. The (LiK)NO3/MgO composite with an optimal salt content of 0.20 exhibits reasonable durability through cyclic experiment at 330 °C, namely, the stabilized reacted conversion Δx = 0.34 (Qcomp. = 0.64 MJ/kg-composite). The studied (Li0.42K0.58)NO3 promoted MgO-CO2 working pair has good potential as thermochemical storage material of middle temperature heat (300–400 °C).

1. Introduction

Storage of thermal energy by means of chemical reactions with high heat effect, or thermochemical energy storage (TCES), is a promising approach to convert primary energy source due to high thermal energy storage capacity and long-term storage at ambient temperature without insulation [1,2,3]. To the date, chemical reactions that can be neatly applied to TCES at medium temperatures (200–500 °C) to store heat from industrial and renewable (e.g., solar energy) sources are not numerous. Aside from large-scale industrial processes such as ammonia production [4] there are only a few solid-gas reactions that were extensively studied specifically for TCES at medium temperatures. They are dehydration of Mg(OH)2 [5], Ca(OH)2 [6], dehydrogenation of MgH2 and some other hydrides [7].
The carbonation of MgO, Equation (1), that has the high reaction enthalpy, 116.4 kJ/mol, and suitable equilibrium temperature, Teq = 388 °C (at P(CO2) = 101 kPa), was considered for TCES since the late 70s [8].
MgO ( s )   +   CO 2   ( g )     MgCO 3   ( s ) , Δ r 0 H   =   116.4   kJ / mol ,
Figure 1 shows the principle of a MgO/CO2/sorbent TCES system. For heat storage, MgCO3 is decomposed by supplied heat energy, Qdec., at temperature, Tdec., of 300–350 °C (the backward reaction in Equation (1)). The products (MgO and CO2) are separated and decomposed CO2 moves into the sorbent reactor with generating heat of sorption, Qs; the heat is stored in a chemical form for theoretically infinite time (Figure 1a). In the heat release process, the CO2 desorbed by desorption heat, Qdes., is supplied to MgO reactor then generates heat energy, Qcarb., (the forward reaction in Equation (1)) at temperature, Tcarb., of ~400 °C (Figure 1b). Usually, carbonation pressure, Pcarb., and desorption temperature, Tdes., are higher than decarbonation pressure, Pdec., and temperature of sorption heat, Ts, respectively.
Although there are many thermodynamic advantages to MgO carbonation, TCES systems using this reaction have rarely been reported in reviews dedicated to TCES [9,10,11,12]. The reason is a strong irreversibility of reaction as the interaction of MgO with CO2 is kinetically hindered [13,14] that makes a return of the stored heat practically impossible. Due to this, the first detailed study of the MgO-CO2 working pair has appeared only recently [15]. The authors made a brief screening of salt additives to pure MgO with the aim to find a salt which increases the oxide reactivity towards carbonation. They used a powerful salt modification approach earlier suggested and tested for TCES at middle temperatures in many papers such as LiCl for hydration of MgO [16], metal nitrates for doping of MgO [17,18], and Li for hydration of CaO [19,20]. This approach was also successfully applied to synthesize MgO-based sorbents for intermediate-temperature CO2 capture [21] and high-temperature heat storage systems [9].
In total, eight salts with MgO (salt content 10 mol%) were prepared and investigated in [15]. It was found that CH3COOLi and Li0.42K0.58NO3 considerably promote the MgO carbonation. The eutectic mixture Li0.42K0.58NO3 of LiNO3 and KNO3 was chosen for further study as the most efficient and thermally stable additive. It allowed the decarbonation process to be efficiently carried out at T > 330 °C and the specific useful heat of 1.6 MJ/kg-MgO in composite to be reached at 360 °C for 300 min of carbonation.
This paper addresses a detailed investigation of the (Li0.42K0.58NO3)/MgO composites (referred to as (LiK)NO3/MgO). The composites that have different salt content are prepared and their feasibility was evaluated under various conditions: Tcarb. = 290–360 °C and P(CO2) = 50–101 kPa. Additionally, the specific useful heat was estimated to find an optimal salt content and cyclic experiments were also conducted to confirm the durability of material.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials Preparation

The composite materials of lithium nitrate (LiNO3, ≥ 99.0% Reakhim), potassium nitrate (KNO3, ≥ 99.5%, Reakhim), magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2, ≥ 99.0% Reakhim) with different mixing molar ratio between Li0.42K0.58NO3 salt and Mg(OH)2 were prepared as follows. Certain amounts of dried (160 °C) KNO3 and LiNO3 were mixed with 1.0 g of Mg(OH)2. After this, some water was added to dissolve the salts and to form slurry. This slurry was dried at 65–70 °C by using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure and vigorous stirring to ensure uniform distribution of the salt throughout the material. The (LiK)NO3/MgO material was prepared by dehydration of (LiK)NO3/Mg(OH)2 in situ. The molar salt content in the composites, α [-], was defined by the following equation, Equation (2).
α = n ( Li 0.42 K 0.58 NO 3 ) n ( Li 0.42 K 0.58 NO 3 ) + n ( Mg ( OH ) 2 ) = n ( Li 0.42 K 0.58 NO 3 ) n ( Li 0.42 K 0.58 NO 3 ) + n ( MgO )
where n [mol] is the amount of a component. The (LiK)NO3/MgO composites were prepared with the salt content of 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mol% (α = 0.02, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30).

2.2. Materials Characterization

The dynamic study of carbonation of the (LiK)NO3/MgO composites was carried out by using a TG analysis system TGD-9600 (Advance RIKO, Inc.) equipped with a flow gas control system which allowed measurements in CO2 or Ar atmosphere (Figure 2); total gas flow rate is 100 CCM for 101 kPa of total pressure. For the kinetic study of carbonation, (LiK)NO3/Mg(OH)2 composites powder was loaded into the platinum cell (D:8 mm, H:10 mm) in order to secure same amount of MgO in composites (~30.6 mg of MgO), then heated to 350 °C (5 K/min) and completely dehydrated at this temperature for 30 min. Then, the measuring cell was heated or cooled to the desired temperature Tcarb. in Ar flow and switched to the flow of CO2 which initiated carbonation. Carbon dioxide was supplied to the reaction chamber for 300 min. To evaluate the carbonation reactivity of (LiK)NO3/MgO composite, reacted mole fraction, x [-], was calculated from the balance-measured sample mass change:
x = Δ m n 0 + M CO 2
where Δm is the sample mass change [kg], n0 is the initial amount of MgO in the sample [mol], and MCO2 is the molecular weight of CO2 [kg/mol].
The heat output performance, Qcomp. [kJ/kg-composite] and Wcomp. [kW/kg-composite], of LiK(NO)3/MgO composites were also as:
Q comp . = Δ r 0 H x M comp . ( 1 α )
W comp . = d Q comp . d t
where the reaction enthalpy Δ r 0 H = 116.4 kJ/mol, Mcomp. [kg/mol] is the molar weight of (LiK)NO3/MgO composite, and t [s] is the process time.

3. Results and Discussion

The interaction of pure MgO with CO2 is kinetically hindered; therefore, namely the MgO carbonation has to be accelerated to make a return of the stored heat feasible. In this work, we have optimized the salt content keeping in mind, first of all, dynamic features of the MgO carbonation reaction.

3.1. Carbonation Kinetics for Various Salt Contents

For a general comparison of the new (LiK)NO3/MgO composites, for which salt content changes between 2 and 30 mol%, the isothermal carbonation was studied at 300 °C and 350 °C and P(CO2) = 101 kPa. The pure MgO undergoes no carbonation at Tcarb. ≤ 350 °C (Figure 3b) and only little effect was observed at α = 0.02; however, significant acceleration of carbonation was revealed at α ≥ 0.05. The carbonation conversion, Δx, reaches 0.15–0.66 and 0.33–0.70 at 300 °C and 350 °C, respectively. It demonstrates a high sensitivity of the composite reactivity to the content of doping salt at low contents. At tcarb. < 180 min, faster and reliable carbonation performance is observed for α = 0.20 compared with other materials. In contrast, for α = 0.10, good performance is observed at 350 °C which significantly reduced at lower reaction temperature. For α = 0.30, the carbonation performance is always lower.
Carbonation performance for composites with α = 0.10 and 0.20 at various CO2 partial pressure and temperature was also investigated (Tcarb. = 300 °C and 350 °C, PCO2 = 50 kPa, 70 kPa, and 101 kPa). At Tcarb. = 300 °C, the composite with α = 0.20 exhibits superior carbonation performance than that with α = 0.10 (Figure 4a). The carbonation reactivity at α = 0.20 and partial CO2 pressure of 50 kPa is even higher than that of α = 0.10 at 101 kPa (Figure 4b). At 350 °C, the composites with α = 0.10 and 0.20 exhibit similar carbonation reactivity at any CO2 partial pressure (Figure 4b).
The acceleration of carbonation is observed because the eutectic salt melts at 125 °C [22] and acts as a reaction medium in which both CO2 and MgO are dissolved [21]. The dissolution of solid MgO in the molten salt and its dissociation MgO → Mg2+ + O2− (Figure 5) helps to overcome the high energy of the MgO lattice re-construction that results in the effective activation of the MgO toward reaction with CO2 [23]. At α = 0.02, volume of the liquid phase is small and the promotion effect is negligible; the carbonation of MgO was activated when α is greater than 0.05 and the reactivity was maximized at α = 0.10–0.20. The reactivity decreases at larger α, probably, because the liquid salt film on the MgO surface becomes thicker that makes the path for diffusion of CO2, Mg2+ and O2− longer. Also, more melting salt surrounding MgO promotes ionization before crystallization of MgCO3.
At 350 °C, all the kinetic curves are S-shaped with the induction period which significantly reduces if the salt content increases to 10 mol% and then remains almost constant (Figure 3b). According to the mentioned mechanism of the salt melting, the induction period may be attributed to the low solubility of CO2 in the liquid salt film. Alternatively, this period may indicate a slow formation of critical nuclei of MgCO3 phase formed in the molten salt because of insufficient super-saturation. Indeed, the duration of this period strongly depends on the system deviation from the equilibrium (see the next Section).

3.2. Carbonation Kinetics under Various Reaction Temperatures

To elucidate the effect of temperature on the carbonation dynamics, composites with α = 0.05–0.20 were examined under isothermal conditions at Tcarb. = 290–360 °C, P(CO2) = 101 kPa and tcarb = 300 min (Figure 6).
For all tested materials, the kinetics at low temperature (290–300 °C) are convex curves, so that the synthesis rate is maximal at t = 0 and gradually decreases in time. It is quite different from the carbonation at 350 °C (Figure 3b and Figure 4b), which initial rate is zero and the process starts after a certain induction period. This fact may denote changing carbonation mechanism or its rate-limiting step with temperature. Kinetic curves at 330 °C are intermediate between the two boundary cases. The appearance and prolongation of the induction period are accompanied with the significant increase in the final conversion Δx (300 min): from 0.15 to 0.33 for α = 0.05, and from 0.37 to 0.70 at α = 0.10. For the latter material, further enlargement of the induction period is observed at 360 °C along with the Δx-reduction to 0.62 (Figure 6a). Thus, the closer the carbonation temperature to the equilibrium temperature at P(CO2) = 101 kPa (388 °C) [14], the longer the induction period. Besides this factor, the complex temperature dependence of the carbonation dynamics can be due to the interplay between other influencing factors, such as
-
the temperature effect on the CO2 and MgO solubilities in the melt. It is known that the CO2 solubility in a KNO3 melt passes a maximum at 375 °C and reduces at the higher temperature, whereas the CO2 solubility in a LiNO3 melt gradually increases with temperature [24];
-
the dependence of the CO2, Mg2+ and O2− diffusivities on temperature, as their diffusion can be responsible for very slow approaching the equilibrium.
For the material with α = 0.20, the final conversion is almost constant at 290 °C ≤ Tcarb. ≤ 350 °C, whereas the synthesis rate remarkably enhances at low temperature (Figure 6b). This material provides the high conversion (0.63–0.67) together with the good carbonation dynamics and can be recommended for TCES in this temperature range. It is worthy to mention that the carbonation conversion of 0.65–0.70, reported in this paper, is close to the maximal one’s ever reported for MgO-base materials doped with salts: e.g., the CO2 uptake 15.7 mmol/g at 340 °C and 16.8 mmol/g at 300 °C was reported for MgO doped with LiNO3-(NaK)NO3 [25] and (LiNaK)NO3 [26], respectively.

3.3. Characterization of the Materials by SEM

The morphology of the composites was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SM-200, TOPCON Inc.) with an acceleration voltage of 7 kV. The SEM images taken at 5000 magnification indicate the hexagonal morphology of MgO crystals (0.5–1.5 μm size) before carbonation. At increasing salt content, the crystal border becomes fuzzier due to a thick salt layer surrounding MgO (Figure 7a,c,e,g). This fact could support the reason why too much salt decreases the reactivity. After carbonation, the particles of the product, that is a mixture (MgCO3 + MgO + salt), are smaller and poorly crystallized with respect to the initial (MgO + salt) mixture (Figure 7b,d,f,h). This can be caused by the salt melting and coating of the (MgCO3 + MgO) crystals surface. The morphology of composite with α = 0.20 certainly differs from the other materials due to larger structural features formed by the salt coating (Figure 7f). This can create a better network for CO2 diffusion and facilitate reaction of CO2 with the dissolved MgO, and, therefore, to be a reason for the good dynamic performance of this material.

3.4. Evaluation of the Specific Useful Heat

The specific useful heat and power related to unit mass of composite, Qcomp. and Wcomp., are estimated from the measured reacted mole fraction by Equations (4) and (5). At 300 °C, the (LiK)NO3/MgO composite with α = 0.20 exhibits larger specific useful heat Qcomp. = 1.23 MJ/kg-composite than the composite with α = 0.10 (Figure 8a), even if it contains less MgO. At 350 °C, the latter material, α = 0.10, has higher Qcomp. value of 1.63 MJ/kg-composite (Figure 8b). Both values are superior to those earlier measured for other salt/MgO composite for TCES system, namely, 1.04 MJ/kg-composite and 1.17 MJ/kg-composite for the CaCl2 and LiBr modified MgO-H2O TCES material respectively [27,28].
The change of maximum specific useful heat, Qcomp.-max, according to mixing mole ratio is displayed in Figure 9. All mixing mole ratio of (LiK)NO3/MgO composite exhibits similar reaction tendency under every temperature; the overall Qcomp.-max value has increased with the increasing reaction temperature, Figure 9a. It is also confirmed that α of 0.05 and 0.10 (LiK)NO3/MgO composites are sensitive to reaction temperature change, on the other hand, α of 0.20 and 0.30 composites, show stable results, Figure 9b.

3.5. Evaluation of the Specific Power of Heat Release

Figure 10 shows the heat output rate, Wcomp., of α = 0.10 and 0.20 composites under various reaction temperature. At initial time of carbonation, both composites show high Wcomp. values that are increased as reaction temperature decreased, but this order is changed after 50 min; carbonation under high temperature exhibits better Wcomp. values. The highest Wcomp. value of α = 0.20, 0.68 kW/kg-composite, is higher by a factor of ~2 than that of α = 0.10 composite, 0.40 kW/kg-composite, at 290 °C. The composite with α = 0.20 shows generally higher Wcomp. performance than α = 0.10 composite at low temperatures (≤ 330 °C). Since its high specific useful heat capacity, Qcomp., and output rate, Wcomp., under various reaction conditions, α = 0.20 is suggested as optimized mixing mole ratio for (LiK)NO3/MgO composite.

4. Material Durability on Cyclic Experiment

The durability of the (LiK)NO3/MgO (α = 0.20) is investigated through a cyclic experiment (Figure 11). The reacted conversion value, Δx, is increased for 2 cycles and becomes stabilized with increasing number of cycles; Δx is converged to 0.34 and that value is equivalent to 0.64 MJ/kg-composite. It is also found that decarbonation for 150 min is not enough to completely decarbonize the (LiK)NO3/MgO (α = 0.20) composite. The difference of reacted mole fraction, x, during cyclic experiment are shown in Figure 12. Carbonation reactivity is significantly increased after 1st cycle by gas diffusivity enhancement. Then carbonation reactivity and reacted conversion values are gradually getting stabilized during initial 5 cycles (Figure 12a); Δx value was changed from 0.58 to 0.44. However, there is no particular change in Δx values after 10th cycle (Figure 12b), especially 18th cycle and 20th cycle showed same reacted conversion values (Δx = 0.34).

5. Conclusions

The carbonation dynamics of (LiK)NO3/MgO composites, that have various molar salt content (α = 0.02, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) was investigated for effective utilizing of the medium temperature heat (300–400 °C). A set of carbonation dynamic experiments were conducted under various reaction temperature T = 290 °C–360 °C and CO2 partial pressure P(CO2) = 50–101 kPa to find the optimal salt content.
The carbonation reactivity is revealed at α > 0.05 and reached a maximum at α = 0.10–0.20. The carbonation mechanisms are suggested and SEM measurements are also conducted for understanding carbonation behavior of the (LiK)NO3/MgO composites. The specific useful heat, Qcomp., was calculated from the measured reacted mole fraction, Δx. Despite the largest Qcomp. = 1.63 MJ/kg-composite was detected at α = 0.10 and Tcarb. = 350 °C, α = 0.20 was suggested as the optimal salt content because it ensures high and stable Qcomp. values of 1.18–1.25 MJ/kg-composite in the whole temperature range between 290 °C and 350 °C. To confirm the durability of the optimized (LiK)NO3/MgO composite (α = 0.20), cyclic experiments are conducted at 330 °C. The reacted conversion became stabilized at Δx = 0.34 (Qcomp. = 0.64 MJ/kg-composite). The studied (Li0.42K0.58)NO3 promoted MgO-CO2 working pair has good potential for thermochemical storage of middle temperature heat (300–400 °C).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.; Investigation, H.M.; Project administration, Y.K.; Resources, H.T. and A.S.; Supervision, Y.K. and Y.A.; Writing—original draft, S.T.K.; Writing—review & editing, Y.A. and S.T.K.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors deeply appreciate the Tokyo Tech World Research Hub Initiative (WRHI) for its research support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

TCESthermochemical energy storage
TGthermogravimetric
SEMscanning electron microscopy
namount of a chemical compound [mol]
n0initial amount of MgO in a composite [mol]
Mcomp.molar mass of a composite [g/mol]
Qcomp.specific useful heat [kJ/kg-composite]
Tcarb.carbonation temperature [°C]
Teqequilibrium transition temperature [°C]
Tmpmelting point [°C]
Wcomp.heat output [kW/kg]
Xreacted mole fraction, [-]
Amolar fraction of salt in a composite [-]
Δ r 0 H reaction enthalpy [kJ/mol]

References

  1. Zsembinszki, G.; Sole, A.; Barreneche, C.; Prieto, C.; Fernández, A.I.; Cabeza, L.F. Review of reactors with potential use in thermochemical energy storage in concentrated solar power plants. Energies 2018, 11, 2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gil, A.; Medrano, M.; Martorell, I.; Lázaro, A.; Dolado, P.; Zalba, B.; Cabeza, L.F. State of the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part 1-Concepts, materials and modellization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 31–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kalaiselvam, S.; Parameshwaran, R.; Kalaiselvam, S.; Parameshwaran, R. Thermal Energy Storage Technologies for Sustainability, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 127–144. ISBN 978-0124172913. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lovegrove, K.; Luzzi, A.; Soldiani, I.; Kreetz, H. Developing ammonia based thermochemical energy storage for dish power plants. Sol. Energy 2004, 76, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shkatulov, A.I.; Aristov, Y. Thermochemical Energy Storage using LiNO3-Doped Mg(OH)2: A Dehydration Study. Energy Technol. 2018, 6, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shkatulov, A.I.; Aristov, Y. Calcium hydroxide doped by KNO3 as a promising candidate for thermochemical storage of solar heat. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 42929–42939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lutz, M.; Bhouri, M.; Linder, M.; Bürger, I. Adiabatic magnesium hydride system for hydrogen storage based on thermochemical heat storage: Numerical analysis of the dehydrogenation. Appl. Energy 2019, 236, 1034–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wentworth, W.E.; Chen, E. Simple thermal decomposition reactions for storage of solar thermal energy. Solar Energy 1976, 18, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carrillo, A.J.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, J.; Romero, M.; Coronado, J.M. Solar energy on demand: A review on high temperature thermochemical heat storage systems and materials. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 4777–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. André, L.; Abanades, S.; Flamant, G. Screening of thermochemical systems based on solid-gas reversible reactions for high temperature solar thermal energy storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 64, 703–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, Z.H.; Zhao, C.Y. Gas–solid thermochemical heat storage reactors for high-temperature applications. Energy 2017, 130, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pardo, P.; Deydier, A.; Anxionnaz-Minvielle, Z.; Rougé, S.; Cabassud, M.; Cognet, P. A review on high temperature thermochemical heat energy storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 591–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. L’vov, B.V.; Ugolkov, V.L. Kinetics of free-surface decomposition of magnesium, strontium and barium carbonates analyzed thermogravimetrically by the third-law method. Thermochim. Acta 2004, 409, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhatta, L.K.G.; Subramanyam, S.; Chengala, M.D.; Olivera, S.; Venkatesh, K. Progress in hydrotalcite like compounds and metal-based oxides for CO2 capture: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 171–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shkatulov, A.I.; Kim, S.T.; Miura, H.; Kato, Y.; Aristov, Y.I. Adapting the MgO-CO2 working pair for thermochemical energy storage by doping with salts. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 185, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishitobi, H.; Uruma, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Ryu, J.; Kato, Y. Dehydration and hydration behavior of metal-salt-modified materials for chemical heat pumps. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 50, 1639–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shkatulov, A.I.; Krieger, T.; Zaikovskiy, V.; Chesalov, Y.; Aristov, Y.I. Doping magnesium hydroxide with sodium nitrate: A new approach to tune the dehydration reactivity of heat-storage materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 19966–19977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shkatulov, A.I.; Aristov, Y. Modification of magnesium and calcium hydroxides with salts: An efficient way to advanced materials for storage of middle-temperature heat. Energy 2015, 85, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yan, J.; Zhao, C.Y. First-principle study of CaO/Ca(OH)2 thermochemical energy storage system by Li or Mg cation doping. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 117, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, J.; Zhao, C.Y. Thermodynamic and kinetic study of dehydration process of CaO/Ca(OH)2 thermochemical heat storage system with Li doping. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 138, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, W.; Zhou, T.; Gao, Y.; Louis, B.; O’Hare, D.; Wang, Q. Molten salts-modified MgO-based adsorbents for intermediate-temperature CO2 capture: A review. J. Energy Chem. 2017, 26, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.; Xu, K.; Gao, Y. The phase diagram of LiNO3-KNO3. Thermochim. Acta 2002, 385, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, K.; Li, X.S.; Li, W.Z.; Rohatgi, A.; Duan, Y.; Singh, P.; Li, L.; King, D.L. Phase transfer catalyzed fast CO2 absorption by MgO-based absorbents with high cycling capacity. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 1, 1400030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sada, E.; Katoh, S.; Yoshii, H.; Takemoto, I.; Shiomi, N. Solubility of carbon dioxide in molten alkali halides and nitrates and their binary mixtures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1981, 26, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Harada, T.; Hatton, T.A. Colloidal Nanoclusters of MgO Coated with Alkali Metal Nitrates/Nitrites for Rapid, High Capacity CO2 Capture at Moderate Temperature. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 8153–8161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qiao, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.; Harada, T.; Huang, L.; Hatton, T.A.; Wang, Q. Alkali Nitrates Molten Salt Modified Commercial MgO for Intermediate-Temperature CO2 Capture: Optimization of the Li/Na/K Ratio. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, S.T.; Ryu, J.; Kato, Y. The optimization of mixing ratio of expanded graphite mixed chemical heat storage material for magnesium oxide/water chemical heat pump. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 66, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Myagmarjav, O.; Ryu, J.; Kato, Y. Waste heat recovery from iron production by using magnesium oxide/water chemical heat pump as thermal energy storage. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Principle of MgO/CO2/sorbent TCES system. (a) Heat storage process by MgCO3 decarbonation. (b) Heat output process by MgO carbonation.
Figure 1. Principle of MgO/CO2/sorbent TCES system. (a) Heat storage process by MgCO3 decarbonation. (b) Heat output process by MgO carbonation.
Energies 12 02262 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a TGA system (TGD-9600, Advance RIKO, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a TGA system (TGD-9600, Advance RIKO, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan).
Energies 12 02262 g002
Figure 3. Carbonation dynamics of the (LiK)NO3/MgO composites: isothermal experimental results at (a) 300 °C and (b) 350 °C under P(CO2) = 101 kPa.
Figure 3. Carbonation dynamics of the (LiK)NO3/MgO composites: isothermal experimental results at (a) 300 °C and (b) 350 °C under P(CO2) = 101 kPa.
Energies 12 02262 g003
Figure 4. Carbonation dynamics of α = 0.10 (empty symbols) and 0.20 (bold symbols) composite under various CO2 partial pressure: (a) 300 °C and (b) 350 °C.
Figure 4. Carbonation dynamics of α = 0.10 (empty symbols) and 0.20 (bold symbols) composite under various CO2 partial pressure: (a) 300 °C and (b) 350 °C.
Energies 12 02262 g004
Figure 5. Carbonation mechanism of (LiK)NO3/MgO [23].
Figure 5. Carbonation mechanism of (LiK)NO3/MgO [23].
Energies 12 02262 g005
Figure 6. Carbonation kinetics of (LiK)NO3/MgO at (a) α = 0.10 and (b) α = 0.05 and 0.20 at various carbonation temperatures.
Figure 6. Carbonation kinetics of (LiK)NO3/MgO at (a) α = 0.10 and (b) α = 0.05 and 0.20 at various carbonation temperatures.
Energies 12 02262 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of materials (α = 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) before and after carbonation at 350 °C for 300 min.
Figure 7. SEM images of materials (α = 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30) before and after carbonation at 350 °C for 300 min.
Energies 12 02262 g007aEnergies 12 02262 g007b
Figure 8. Specific useful heat, Qcomp., as a function of the carbonation time at (a) 300 °C and (b) 350 °C calculated from Figure 3.
Figure 8. Specific useful heat, Qcomp., as a function of the carbonation time at (a) 300 °C and (b) 350 °C calculated from Figure 3.
Energies 12 02262 g008
Figure 9. Changes of maximum specific useful heat, Qcomp.-max: (a) Qcomp.-max by salt content in the composite, α, and (b) Qcomp.-max by carbonation temperature, Tcarb..
Figure 9. Changes of maximum specific useful heat, Qcomp.-max: (a) Qcomp.-max by salt content in the composite, α, and (b) Qcomp.-max by carbonation temperature, Tcarb..
Energies 12 02262 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of heat output rate, Wcomp., under various reaction temperature: (a) α = 0.10, (b) α = 0.20.
Figure 10. Comparison of heat output rate, Wcomp., under various reaction temperature: (a) α = 0.10, (b) α = 0.20.
Energies 12 02262 g010
Figure 11. Cyclic experimental result for (LiK)NO3/MgO composite (α = 0.20) at 330 °C.
Figure 11. Cyclic experimental result for (LiK)NO3/MgO composite (α = 0.20) at 330 °C.
Energies 12 02262 g011
Figure 12. Change in the reacted mole fraction during the cyclic experiment: (a) 1st–5th cycles and (b) 7th–20th cycles.
Figure 12. Change in the reacted mole fraction during the cyclic experiment: (a) 1st–5th cycles and (b) 7th–20th cycles.
Energies 12 02262 g012

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.T.; Miura, H.; Takasu, H.; Kato, Y.; Shkatulov, A.; Aristov, Y. Adapting the MgO-CO2 Working Pair for Thermochemical Energy Storage by Doping with Salts: Effect of the (LiK)NO3 Content. Energies 2019, 12, 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122262

AMA Style

Kim ST, Miura H, Takasu H, Kato Y, Shkatulov A, Aristov Y. Adapting the MgO-CO2 Working Pair for Thermochemical Energy Storage by Doping with Salts: Effect of the (LiK)NO3 Content. Energies. 2019; 12(12):2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Seon Tae, Haruka Miura, Hiroki Takasu, Yukitaka Kato, Alexandr Shkatulov, and Yuri Aristov. 2019. "Adapting the MgO-CO2 Working Pair for Thermochemical Energy Storage by Doping with Salts: Effect of the (LiK)NO3 Content" Energies 12, no. 12: 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop