Next Article in Journal
Interfacial Engineering of Attractive Pickering Emulsion Gel-Templated Porous Materials for Enhanced Solar Vapor Generation
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing Uncertainties of Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions Using Hydrogen Energy for Power Generation
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Low-Cost Data Acquisition System for Very Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Household Energy Systems Including Incentives on Energy Communities and Externalities: A Case Study in Italy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/en14196078
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Direct Reduction in Greenhouse Gases by Continuous Dry (CO2) Reforming of Methane over Ni-Containing SHS Catalysts

by
Galina Xanthopoulou
1,
Savvas Varitis
1,2,
Manapkhan Zhumabek
3,4,
Konstantinos Karanasios
1,
George Vekinis
1,
Svetlana A. Tungatarova
3,5,* and
Tolkyn S. Baizhumanova
3,5
1
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NCSR Demokritos, 15310 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
D.V. Sokolsky Institute of Fuel, Catalysis and Electrochemistry, 142, Kunaev Str., Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
4
Institute of Chemical and Biological Technologies, Satbayev University, 22a, Satpaev Str., Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
5
Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71, Al-Farabi Str., Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(19), 6078; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196078
Submission received: 24 August 2021 / Revised: 14 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Aspects and Impacts of Hydrogen Technologies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The world of energy is on the cusp of profound transformation. Hydrogen or hydrogen-containing fuel mixtures in the form of synthesis gas, as carriers of clean energy, will be in the short term among the most efficient solutions to pressing environmental problems, reducing the amount of greenhouse gases as well as pollution of cities and dependence on oil-based fuels. Carbon dioxide conversion of methane is the most promising method for the production of synthesis gas due to the simultaneous consumption of two greenhouse gases and, accordingly, a successful solution to environmental problems. Ni/Mn-based catalysts have been prepared by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) for this process. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and nitrogen porosimetry. The effects of the catalysts’ composition on activity, selectivity, and product yield were investigated. The influence of the content of Ni, Mn on the behavior of catalysts has been established. Comparison of spinels with different component ratios showed that they have a defective structure. Non-stoichiometric spinels with highly defective catalyst structures were obtained due to very high heating and cooling rates during SHS. They work as active sites, which underlies the high activity of the catalysts.

1. Introduction

The catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide CH4 + CO2 → 2CO + 2H2 has attracted increasing interest as an alternative for the production of hydrogen-containing fuel mixtures and synthesis gas over the past two decades. This process is industrially attractive. The International Energy Agency (IEA) World energy outlook clearly states that “natural gas is certainly set to play a central role in meeting the world’s energy needs for at least the next two-and-a-half decades” [1]. This means that technologies based on methane will have priority. However, the future of power engineering is associated, of course, with hydrogen produced in various ways. These are “gray” technologies for the production of hydrogen, which involve the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. It is blue hydrogen that is produced from natural gas. It is also an alternative technology for the production of green hydrogen through the decomposition of water using the energy of the sun. This is the most expensive hydrogen. Since 1750, the amount of methane has doubled and may double again by 2050. Each year, 350–500 million tons of CH4 is added to the air through livestock farming, coal mining, oil and natural gas extraction, rice cultivation, and landfill disposal [2]. The contribution of CO2 to global annual emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gases is about 75%, and CH4 is about 14% [3]. Methane is a greenhouse gas that is more than 25 times more efficient at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide [4]. Reducing the sources of emissions of CH4 and other greenhouse gases can lead to a decrease in the rate of global warming, reducing the risk of abrupt climate change. Many researchers have reported that Fe-, Co-, and Ni-based catalysts are highly active. However, the deactivation of catalysts is one of the main problems that arise in this process, mainly due to the deposition of carbon. Nickel catalysts have been extensively studied in the past decades, where the CH4 conversion reached 68% at 80–90% selectivity to H2 [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. But insufficient research has been done on Co [15,16,17], Ni-Co [18,19,20,21,22], and Mn catalysts [23], for which the H2 selectivity was in the region of 50%. The catalysts described in those works show high activity and excellent anti-carbon deposition properties even without prior reduction. MnOx has multiple valence states and fluorite structures with excellent oxidation and reduction characteristics [23]. It can be assumed that the Mn-doped Ni-Al-Mg-O catalyst can provide good catalytic performance in the dry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide to hydrogen and carbon monoxide.
Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) occurs within minutes as a result of low-temperature initiation, which can lead to a high-temperature reaction. Unique materials were developed by controlled high-temperature combustion as a result of synthesis by SHS [24]. The SHS method offers a unique method for the preparation of modern, highly active ceramic catalysts, as well as carriers with controlled composition and properties which satisfy the special requirements of various types of reactions [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The combustion temperature can reach up to 3000 °C (depending on the composition of the system) due to the exothermic reactions that occur within just a few minutes after the start of SHS synthesis. As a result of SHS, high-speed self-sustaining reactions, similar to autowave combustion, arise and develop, which lead to the formation of compositions with the required structure. They completely or partially exclude external energy supply and involve the use of internal heat, which is released as a result of chemical reactions. The control of temperature, degree of conversion, rate of the process, as well as composition of the target products is carried out by changing the rates of heat release. Such features contribute to the formation of important advantages over traditional methods of synthesis: a significantly shorter process time (only a few minutes), the synthesis of new materials, including catalysts, based on various elements of the Periodic Table, the simplicity of the equipment and used technological process, significantly lower consumption energy. The formation of defect structures with multiple deformations of the crystal lattice is caused by high rates of heating and cooling during the SHS period. The strong influence of defects on catalytic properties is a well-known fact. It has been found that many SHS catalysts are very active in various processes. As a result, SHS has become a widely studied discipline around the world.
Based on our previous research, the preparation of SHS catalysts for methane reforming with CO2 has been very promising. Studies on catalysts synthesized by the new SHS method were carried out in [36,38,39,40,41,42]. In this work, we intend to study different compositions of catalysts for obtaining hydrogen-containing fuel mixtures. Systems based on Ni, Mg, Mn, and their mixtures were selected according to literature sources, and therefore, catalysts based on Ni/Mn were studied in this work in an effort at obtaining catalysts with increased activity and stability. Research on hydrogen concentration is currently underway, and the results will be presented in the future.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of SHS Catalysts

Ni-Mn-based oxides catalysts were produced on the base of the initial batch contained Μg, MgO, Mg (NO3)2, Al, Al2O3, NiO, and KMnO4. The initial batch composition for the 5 materials produced is presented in Table 1.
The required amount of metal nitrate, oxide, metal in the different ratios was mixed, formed in cylindrical molding forms of diameter 1 or 2 cm with the same length under a pressure of about 15 MPa, and placed in a furnace preheated at temperatures of 600–900 °C.
All samples were self-ignited, and their rate of speed of the combustion front was measured. After combustion in the SHS regime, the catalysts were immediately taken out of the furnace.

2.2. Characterisation

The synthesized catalysts were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with EDS analysis immediately after combustion. The specific surface area of the samples was also determined. The formation and identification of the phases were confirmed by powder X-ray powder diffraction in a SIEMENS SPELLMAN DF3 diffractometer using Cu Ka1 with wavelength λ = 1.5406 Å. The step-scans were taken over the range of 2θ from 5 to 100° in steps of 0.03°/s. Crystal lattice plane parameters were calculated according to Bragg’s law nλ = 2dsin θ. The SEM observations were carried out in a Quanta Inspect FEI scanning electron microscope, and the EDS patterns were carried out by an EDS analyzer on samples sputter-coated with gold with a coating thickness of 5–10 nm. The compressive strength of cylindrical samples with a diameter of 1 cm and a height of 2 cm was measured in a universal tester at an adjustable voltage of 100 kN and at a displacement rate of 100 μM/min. The specific surface area of the SHS catalysts was determined by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method using nitrogen adsorption on either a Micrometrics ASAP 2010 instrument or a GAPP V-Sorb 2800 Analyzer. The sample was degassed at 200 °C in high vacuum before measurement.

2.3. Catalytic Activity Studies

The catalytic activity for CH4 reforming with CO2 was measured for crushed SHS catalyst with an average granule size of 3 mm. Catalysts were placed in a quartz tube and tested in a fixed bed flow reactor Carbolite STF 16/75 with controller Eurotherm 902 without prior reduction in a standard flow installation. The studies were carried out in the reaction mixture CH4: CO2: N2 = 1:1:1 at a temperature of 700–900 °C and atmospheric pressure. The volumetric flow rate of the total flow was maintained at 860, 1720, 2580, and 3300 h−1. The effluents were analyzed in a gas chromatograph Dani GC 86.10 HT equipped with a 30 m steel column filled with HayeSep Q 80/100 Mesh, on which gases O2, N2, CO, CO2, H2, CH4 were analyzed at 125 °C with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) with high purity He as the gas carrier.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterisation of Catalysts

Figure 1 shows XRD patterns of SHS catalysts of the Ni-Mn series. The structure of the components of the catalysts as identified from the XRD spectra is the following: The spinel ΜgAl2O4 appeared in cubic and orthorhombic structure, Al2O3 also had orthorhombic structure. The rest of the spinels and oxides (Figure 1) had a cubic structure. Comparison of the spinels’ XRD peaks at different ratios of initial components showed that they had slightly shifted 2θ, which indicates a defective structure of SHS products.
The composition of catalysts’ structures, as shown in Figure 1, can be explained by the following cascade reactions which take place during SHS process:
2Mg + O2 → 2MgO
2Al + 3/2O2 → Al2O3
MgO + Al2O3 → MgAl2O4
Mg(NO3)2 6H2O → MgO + NO2 + O2 + H2O
Mg(NO3)2 6H2O + Al → MgAl2O4 + NO + NO2
NiO + Al2O3 → NiAl2O4
NiO + Al → Ni + Al2O3
MgO + NiO → MgxNiyOz
KMnO4 → KMnO2 + O2
KMnO2 → K2O + Mn2O3
Mn2O3 → Mn2O + MnO
MnO + Al2O3 → MnAl2O4
MgO + MnO → MgxMnyOz
The presence of all the above products was also confirmed by EDS analysis on the SEM, for example, as shown in Figure 2 of Ni-Mn oxides-based SHS catalysts. The EDS spectra showed the existence of oxide compounds containing Ni, Mn, Mg, and Al, for example, spinels and mixed oxides: MgAl2O4, MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, 3MgO NiO, and MgO 3NiO. The origination of these compounds can be from sintering of oxides, but also by Mg ions replacement by Ni and Mn, first originated MgAl2O4 spinel as shown in Figure 3. In Figure 3a, the EDS spectrum indicated MgAl2O4, where Mg was replaced by Ni and partially replaced by Mn. In the XRD spectra, these were presented as MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, 3MgO NiO, and MgO 3NiO. In Figure 3b, the EDS spectrum indicated MgAl2O4, where Mg was partially replaced by Ni and Mn. In the XRD spectra, these were presented as MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, MgAl2O4, 3MgO NiO, and MgO 3NiO. In Figure 3c, the EDS spectrum also indicated MgAl2O4, where Mg was nearly completely replaced by Mn and the corresponding XRD spectra showed MgAl2O4 and MnAl2O4. The degree of replacement of ions in the spinel structure depended on the concentration of Ni or Mn (Figure 4) in the initial SHS mixture and on the conditions of synthesis and cooling. These non-stoichiometric spinels originated during SHS due to the very high rate of synthesis heating and cooling which resulted in a high concentration of defects in SHS catalysts which were active centers of catalysis.
Increasing spinel formation with increasing KMnO4 in the initial batch is shown in Figure 4 and can be explained by increasing the input of the (9)–(13) reactions.
Increasing KMnO4 in the initial batch did not seem to affect the parameters of Mg6MnO8 crystal lattice because it was produced by the reaction of two oxides, as shown in Figure 5a:
MnO + 6MgO + 1/2O2 → Mg6MnO8
In the case of MnAl2O4, increasing KMnO4 led to a decrease in the crystal lattice parameters because MnAl2O4 was produced mainly by Mg ion replacement by manganese in the MgAl2O4 spinel. Since the ionic radius of Mn2+ is 0.66 Å, and that of Mg2+ is 0.8 Å, such substitutions lead to a decrease in the parameters of crystal lattice planes (Figure 5b).
Concentrations of KMnO4 and NiO in the initial batch as oxidizers influenced the velocity of SHS reactions (Figure 6a). Maximum velocity was found at 5% NiO and 13% KMnO4, while it was moderate in the sample 2 Ni-Mn and 3 Ni-Mn, which were close to the stoichiometric ratio (Table 1). At these conditions, the highest combustion temperature was measured with sintering processes became more active, and as a consequence, the maximum strength of those catalysts (Figure 6b) was observed.
The specific surface area of the SHS catalysts is shown in Figure 7 and was very low (0.82–1.26 m2/g) because the combustion temperature for all compositions exceeded 1200 °C, and in those conditions, sintering processes take place. The increase in surface area with an increase in KMnO4 connected with the gas formation reaction KMnO4 → KMnO2 + O2, which increased porosity slightly.

3.2. Catalytic Studies

The first experiments for conversion of CO2 and CH4 were carried out without catalysts and it was found that even at a temperature as high as 900 °C and low gas flow rate, the conversion of CH4 was just 12% and that of CO2, just 11.4%. Thereafter, experiments were carried out in the presence of catalysts at different flow rates. Figure 8 shows the influence of reaction temperature and catalyst composition on the methane and carbon dioxide conversion and product H2/CO ratio using a flow rate of 860 h−1. An increase in the catalysis temperature for all studied Ni-Mn SHS catalysts led to an increase in CH4 and CO2 conversion, which is expected for catalysts since, at high temperatures, processes of adsorption and desorption are more intensive. However, increasing catalysis temperature did not affect products’ H2/CO ratio, as shown in Figure 8.
Figure 9 shows that the selectivity of these catalysts was very high: between 72% and 98%. The high selectivity can also be verified by the small number of byproducts identified, including hydrocarbons (C2H6, C2H4, C) and H2O. Specifically, the catalyst made with 16.7% KMnO4 in the initial SHS batch displayed the maximum selectivity at about 98%.
As expected, increasing the flow rate resulted in decreasing conversion. As can be seen in Figure 10a, conversion of CH4 and CO2 decreased, which indicated that the limiting stage, in this case, was a very low surface area (0.2–1.3 m2/g). Increasing the flow rate also led to a decrease in the dehydrogenation process and the ratio H2/CO decreased at a flow rate of more than 2500 h−1 (Figure 10b). This is also shown by the increase in byproduct formation at those flow speeds. At a very high flow speed (3300 h−1), the product yield was low, and byproducts, such as H2O, C, and C2H6, were observed (Figure 11a). All in all, at high flow rates, the activity of those catalysts was low (Figure 11b).
In Figure 11a,b, it can be seen that the catalysts with 13% KMnO4 in the initial batch displayed high performance regarding the yield of the products and the activity per product.
The influence of the catalyst preparation method was investigated on 5 Ni-Mn catalysts. Figure 12 shows data on conversion, selectivity, and H2/CO ratio depending on temperature on catalysts prepared by the SHS method compared with the traditional incipient wetness impregnation method. It was shown that the conversion of the initial materials, selectivity, and the ratio of reaction products were higher for SHS samples. Taking into account that the SHS method leads to the formation of catalytically active composites upon initiating heating for several minutes in comparison with many hours of heat treatment by the impregnation method, the production of synthesis gas has distinct advantages and is more profitable under the above-described conditions.

4. Conclusions

This paper presents a study on the production and the properties of materials with catalytic activity for carbon dioxide reforming methane, produced using the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) method. The study was focused on the systems Ni-Mn-Mg-Al-O and Mn-Mg-Al-O, which were found to be active systems for the CO2, dry CH4 reforming process. In the Ni-Mn series tested, the max load under compression was found to increase with the increasing concentration of KMnO4 in the initial batch because there was an increase in the total amount of spinel. The surface area of the catalysts was found to be very low due to the high temperature, which resulted in the sintering of the material during SHS. It was also found that non-stoichiometric spinels were formed preferentially during SHS due to the high rate of synthesis heating and cooling, which resulted in an extensively defective structure in these SHS catalysts, which acted as active centers of catalysis and were the reason for their measured high catalytic activity.
The Ni-Mn catalysts produced displayed good performance in the conversion of the reactant gases and in their activity. Additionally, the SHS catalysts had very high selectivity that reached 98%. The catalysts of the Ni-Mn series at a low flow rate showed the best catalytic performance, which was expected because the Ni-Mn catalysts have a low surface area. Further increasing the specific surface area is necessary to increase the activity of these catalysts at a high flow rate. This can be done by using the solution combustion synthesis method (SCS). The production of CO and hydrogen was high and the yield of the products was up to 10%. The catalyst with the most promising catalytic performance had the following composition in the initial batch: MgO: 13.04%, Al2O3: 23.48%, MgNO3: 30.44%, KMnO4: 13.04%, NiO: 16.7%, Al: 4.0%, Mg: 8.0%.
In general, SHS is a very rapid and low-cost method for catalyst production, and promising results were received for active catalysts for the carbon dioxide reforming of methane process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.X. and S.A.T.; methodology, S.V.; software, M.Z.; validation, G.X. and G.V.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, K.K.; resources, T.S.B.; data curation, S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, G.X.; writing—review and editing, G.V.; visualization, T.S.B.; supervision, S.A.T.; project administration, T.S.B.; funding acquisition, S.A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number AP08855562.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are especially grateful to the Brodskii A.R. and Komashko L.V. from the laboratory of physical and chemical research methods.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. IEA World Energy Outlook. 2010. Available online: https://webstore.iea.org/world-energy-outlook-2010 (accessed on 10 September 2019).
  2. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed on 11 March 2017).
  3. IPCC Review. Available online: Chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwwf.ru%2Fupload%2Fiblock%2F790%2Fipcc_review.pdf&clen=3866352&chunk=true (accessed on 25 January 2021).
  4. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/gmi/importance-methane (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  5. Estifaee, P.; Haghighi, M.; Babaluo, A.A.; Rahemi, N.; Jafari, M.F. The beneficial use of non-thermal plasma in synthesis of Ni/Al2O3-MgO nano-catalyst used in hydrogen production from reforming of CH4/CO2 greenhouse gases. J. Power Sources 2014, 257, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Movasati, A.; Alavi, S.M.; Mazloom, G. Dry reforming of methane over CeO2-ZnAl2O4 supported Ni and Ni-Co nano-catalysts. Fuel 2019, 236, 1254–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adans, Y.F.; Ballarini, A.D.; Martins, A.R.; Coelho, R.E.; Carvalho, L.S. Performance of nickel supported on γ-alumina obtained by aluminum recycling for methane dry reforming. Catal. Lett. 2017, 147, 2057–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, S.; Khader, M.M.; Almarri, M.J.; Abdelmoneim, A.G. Ni-based nano-catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Catal. Today 2020, 343, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Larimi, S.; Alavi, S.M. Partial oxidation of methane over Ni/CeZrO2 mixed oxide solid solution catalysts. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2012, 3, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Soloviev, S.O.; Kapran, A.Y.; Orlyk, S.N.; Gubareni, E.V. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane on monolithic Ni/Al2O3-based catalysts. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2011, 20, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fidalgo, B.; Arenillas, A.; Menιndez, J.A. Synergetic effect of a mixture of activated carbon + Ni/Al2O3 used as catalysts for the CO2 reforming of CH4. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 390, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moniri, A.; Alavi, S.M.; Rezaei, M. Syngas production by combined carbon dioxide reforming and partial oxidation of methane over Ni/α-Al2O3 catalysts. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2010, 19, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ni, J.; Chen, L.; Lin, J.; Kawi, S. Carbon deposition on borated alumina supported nano-sized Ni catalysts for dry reforming of CH4. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 674–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meshkani, F.; Rezaei, M. Nanocrystalline MgO supported nickel-based bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 10295–10301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, N.; Chu, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, X.S. Manganese promoting effects on the Co–Ce–Zr–Ox nano catalysts for methane dry reforming with carbon dioxide to hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Horváth, É.; Baán, K.; Varga, E.; Oszkó, A.; Vágó, Á.; Törő, M.; Erdőhelyi, A. Dry reforming of CH4 on Co/Al2O3 catalysts reduced at different temperatures. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Özkara-Aydınoğlu, S.; Aksoylu, A.E. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Co-X/ZrO2 catalysts (X=La, Ce, Mn, Mg, K). Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aramouni, N.A.K.; Zeaiter, J.; Kwapinski, W.; Leahy, J.J.; Ahmad, M.N. Eclectic trimetallic Ni-Co-Ru catalyst for the dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 17153–17163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Turap, Y.; Wang, I.; Fu, T.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Co–Ni alloy supported on CeO2 as a bimetallic catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 6538–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Siang, T.J.; Singh, S.; Omoregbe, O.; Bach, L.G.; Phuc, N.H.H.; Vo, D.V.N. Hydrogen production from CH4 dry reforming over bimetallic Ni-Co/Al2O3 catalyst. J. Energy Inst. 2018, 91, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jalali, R.; Rezaei, M.; Nematollahi, B.; Baghalha, M. Preparation of Ni/MeAl2O4-MgAl2O4 (Me=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mg) nanocatalysts for the syngas production via combined dry reforming and partial oxidation of methane. Renew. Energy 2020, 149, 1053–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, H.; Liu, H.; Yang, W.; He, D. Synergetic effect of Ni and Co in Ni–Co/SBA-15-CD catalysts and their catalytic performance in carbon dioxide reforming of methane to syngas. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 5631–5646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, W.Y.; Jang, J.S.; Ra, E.C.; Kim, K.Y.; Kim, E.H.; Lee, J.S. Reduced perovskite LaNiO3 catalysts modified with Co and Mn for low coke formation in dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2019, 575, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Merzhanov, A.G. Worldwide evolution and present status of SHS as a branch of modern R&D. Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 1997, 6, 119–163. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xanthopoulou, G. Catalytic properties of the SHS products: Review. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2010, 63, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pramono, A.; Kommel, L.; Kollo, L.; Veinthal, R. The aluminum based composite produced by self propagating high temperature synthesis. Mater. Sci. (Medžg.) 2016, 22, 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Varma, A.; Mukasyan, A.S.; Rogachev, A.S.; Manukyan, K.V. Solution combustion synthesis of nanoscale materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14493–14586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xanthopoulou, G.; Thoda, O.; Roslyakov, S.; Steinman, A.; Kovalev, D.; Levashov, E.; Vekinis, G.; Sytschev, A.; Chroneos, A. Solution combustion synthesis of nano-catalysts with a hierarchical structure. J. Catal. 2018, 364, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khaliullin, S.M.; Zhuravlev, V.D.; Bamburov, V.G. Solution-combustion synthesis of oxide nanoparticles from nitrate solutions containing glycine and urea: Termodynamic aspects. Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 2016, 25, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thoda, O.; Xanthopoulou, G.; Vekinis, G.; Chroneos, A. The effect of the precursor solution’s pretreatment on the properties and microstructure of the SCS final nanomaterials. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Xanthopoulou, G.G.; Vekinis, G.A. Catalytic pyrolysis of naphtha on the SHS catalysts. Eurasian Chem.-Technol. J. 2010, 12, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bera, P. Solution combustion synthesis as a novel route to preparation of catalysts. Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 2019, 28, 77–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xanthopoulou, G.; Thoda, O.; Boukos, N.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Dey, A.; Roslyakov, S.; Vekinis, G.; Chroneos, A.; Levashov, E. Effects of precursor concentration in solvent and nanomaterials room temperature aging on the growth morphology and surface characteristics of Ni–NiO nanocatalysts produced by dendrites combustion during SCS. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xanthopoulou, G. Some advanced applications of SHS: An Overview. Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 2011, 20, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qiu, B.; Wang, W.; Yang, X. Computational design of SCS nickel pincer complexes for the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of 1-acetonaphthone. Catalysts 2019, 9, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tungatarova, S.; Xanthopoulou, G.; Karanasios, K.; Baizhumanova, T.; Zhumabek, M.; Kaumenova, G. New composite materials prepared by solution combustion synthesis for catalytic reforming of methane. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017, 61, 1921–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singsarothai, S.; Khanghamano, M.; Rachphet, V.; Niyomwas, S. Influence of CaO2 additives on the properties of Fe-WB-based composite lining deposited by centrifugal SHS on the inner surface of steel pipe. Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 2016, 25, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pino, L.; Vita, A.; Laganà, M.; Recupero, V. Hydrogen from biogas: Catalytic tri-reforming process with Ni/LaCeO mixed oxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 148–149, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Postole, G.; Nguyen, T.-S.; Aouine, M.; Gélin, P.; Cardenas, L.; Piccolo, L. Efficient hydrogen production from methane over iridium-doped ceria catalysts synthesized by solution combustion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 166–167, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vita, A.; Italiano, C.; Fabiano, C.; Laganà, M.; Pino, L. Influence of Ce-precursor and fuel on structure and catalytic activity of combustion synthesized Ni/CeO2 catalysts for biogas oxidative steam reforming. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 163, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xanthopoulou, G.; Karanasios, K.; Tungatarova, S.; Baizhumanova, T.; Zhumabek, M.; Kaumenova, G.; Massalimova, B.; Shorayeva, K. Catalytic methane reforming into synthesis-gas over developed composite materials prepared by combustion synthesis. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2019, 126, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Karanasios, K.; Xanthopoulou, G.; Vekinis, G.; Zoumpoulakis, L. Co-Al-O catalysts produced by SHS method for CO2 reforming of CH4. Int. J. Self-Prop. High-Temp. Synth. 2014, 23, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
Energies 14 06078 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns for Ni-Mn series of SHS catalysts. MgO—13.04%, Al2O3—23.48%, MgNO3—30.44%, KMnO4—4.34–21.04%, NiO—0–16.7%, Al—4%, Mg—8%. 1—MgAl2O4 (orthorhombic), 2—MgAl2O4 (cubic), 3—MnAl2O4 (cubic), 4—MnAl2O4, 5—MgO (cubic), 6—Al2O3, 7—Mg6MnO8, 8—Mg0,9Mn0,1O, 9—NiAl2O4, 10—MgNiO2, 11—3MgO NiO, 12—MgO 3NiO.
Figure 1. XRD patterns for Ni-Mn series of SHS catalysts. MgO—13.04%, Al2O3—23.48%, MgNO3—30.44%, KMnO4—4.34–21.04%, NiO—0–16.7%, Al—4%, Mg—8%. 1—MgAl2O4 (orthorhombic), 2—MgAl2O4 (cubic), 3—MnAl2O4 (cubic), 4—MnAl2O4, 5—MgO (cubic), 6—Al2O3, 7—Mg6MnO8, 8—Mg0,9Mn0,1O, 9—NiAl2O4, 10—MgNiO2, 11—3MgO NiO, 12—MgO 3NiO.
Energies 14 06078 g001
Energies 14 06078 g002 550
Figure 2. Initial batch: 13.04% MgO, 23.48% Al2O3, 30.44% Mg (NO3)2, 13.04% KMnO4, 8% NiO, 4% Al, 8% Mg. Preheating temperature 600 °C.
Figure 2. Initial batch: 13.04% MgO, 23.48% Al2O3, 30.44% Mg (NO3)2, 13.04% KMnO4, 8% NiO, 4% Al, 8% Mg. Preheating temperature 600 °C.
Energies 14 06078 g002
Energies 14 06078 g003 550
Figure 3. Initial batch: 13.04% MgO, 23.48% Al2O3, 30.44% Mg (NO3)2, 16.7% KMnO4, 4.34% NiO, 4% Al, 8% Mg. Preheating temperature 600 °C. (a) EDS spectrum of MgAl2O4, where Mg was replaced by Ni and partially replaced by Mn. MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, 3MgO.NiO and MgO.3NiO present in XRD; (b) EDS spectrum of MgAl2O4, where Mg was partially replaced by Ni and Mn. MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, MgAl2O4, 3MgO.NiO and MgO.3NiO present in XRD; (c) EDS spectrum of MgAl2O4, where Mg nearly completely replaced by Mn. MgAl2O4 and MnAl2O4 present in XRD.
Figure 3. Initial batch: 13.04% MgO, 23.48% Al2O3, 30.44% Mg (NO3)2, 16.7% KMnO4, 4.34% NiO, 4% Al, 8% Mg. Preheating temperature 600 °C. (a) EDS spectrum of MgAl2O4, where Mg was replaced by Ni and partially replaced by Mn. MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, 3MgO.NiO and MgO.3NiO present in XRD; (b) EDS spectrum of MgAl2O4, where Mg was partially replaced by Ni and Mn. MnAl2O4, NiAl2O4, MgAl2O4, 3MgO.NiO and MgO.3NiO present in XRD; (c) EDS spectrum of MgAl2O4, where Mg nearly completely replaced by Mn. MgAl2O4 and MnAl2O4 present in XRD.
Energies 14 06078 g003
Energies 14 06078 g004 550
Figure 4. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch on Mn spinels formation.
Figure 4. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch on Mn spinels formation.
Energies 14 06078 g004
Energies 14 06078 g005 550
Figure 5. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch: Al, Mg, KMnO4, NiO, MgO, Mg (NO3)2, Al2O3 on the Mg6MnO8 (a) and MnAl2O4 (b) crystal lattice planes parameters in SHS catalysts.
Figure 5. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch: Al, Mg, KMnO4, NiO, MgO, Mg (NO3)2, Al2O3 on the Mg6MnO8 (a) and MnAl2O4 (b) crystal lattice planes parameters in SHS catalysts.
Energies 14 06078 g005
Energies 14 06078 g006 550
Figure 6. Influence of NiO and KMnO4 concentration in the initial batches of Ni-Mn series on the velocity of combustion during SHS (a) and SHS catalysts compressive strength (b).
Figure 6. Influence of NiO and KMnO4 concentration in the initial batches of Ni-Mn series on the velocity of combustion during SHS (a) and SHS catalysts compressive strength (b).
Energies 14 06078 g006
Energies 14 06078 g007 550
Figure 7. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch on the SHS catalysts surface area.
Figure 7. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch on the SHS catalysts surface area.
Energies 14 06078 g007
Energies 14 06078 g008 550
Figure 8. Influence of reaction temperature and catalyst composition on the methane and carbon dioxide conversion and product H2/CO ratio (flow rate 860 h−1).
Figure 8. Influence of reaction temperature and catalyst composition on the methane and carbon dioxide conversion and product H2/CO ratio (flow rate 860 h−1).
Energies 14 06078 g008
Energies 14 06078 g009 550
Figure 9. Selectivity of catalysts as a function of the concentration of KMnO4 in the initial batch.
Figure 9. Selectivity of catalysts as a function of the concentration of KMnO4 in the initial batch.
Energies 14 06078 g009
Energies 14 06078 g010 550
Figure 10. Influence of gas flow speed on the CH4 and CO2 conversion (a) and H2/CO ratio (b) (catalyst 3 Mn-Ni, 900 °C).
Figure 10. Influence of gas flow speed on the CH4 and CO2 conversion (a) and H2/CO ratio (b) (catalyst 3 Mn-Ni, 900 °C).
Energies 14 06078 g010
Energies 14 06078 g011 550
Figure 11. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch on the products yields (a) and catalytic activity per product (b).
Figure 11. Influence of KMnO4 concentration in the initial batch on the products yields (a) and catalytic activity per product (b).
Energies 14 06078 g011
Energies 14 06078 g012a 550Energies 14 06078 g012b 550
Figure 12. Influence of reaction temperature and method of catalyst preparation on the CH4 (a) and CO2 (b) conversion, H2/CO ratio (c), and selectivity by H2 (d) and CO (e).
Figure 12. Influence of reaction temperature and method of catalyst preparation on the CH4 (a) and CO2 (b) conversion, H2/CO ratio (c), and selectivity by H2 (d) and CO (e).
Energies 14 06078 g012aEnergies 14 06078 g012b
Table
Table 1. Initial batch composition of the Ni-Mn series.
Table 1. Initial batch composition of the Ni-Mn series.
NameInitial Batch Composition (wt%)
1 Ni-Mn2 Ni-Mn3 Ni-Mn4 Ni-Mn5 Ni-Mn
MgO13.0413.0413.0413.0413.04
Al2O323.4823.4823.4823.4823.48
Mg (NO3)230.4430.4430.4430.4430.44
KMnO421.0416.7013.0410.524.34
NiO04.348.0010.5216.70
Al4.004.004.004.004.00
Mg8.008.008.008.008.00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xanthopoulou, G.; Varitis, S.; Zhumabek, M.; Karanasios, K.; Vekinis, G.; Tungatarova, S.A.; Baizhumanova, T.S. Direct Reduction in Greenhouse Gases by Continuous Dry (CO2) Reforming of Methane over Ni-Containing SHS Catalysts. Energies 2021, 14, 6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196078

AMA Style

Xanthopoulou G, Varitis S, Zhumabek M, Karanasios K, Vekinis G, Tungatarova SA, Baizhumanova TS. Direct Reduction in Greenhouse Gases by Continuous Dry (CO2) Reforming of Methane over Ni-Containing SHS Catalysts. Energies. 2021; 14(19):6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xanthopoulou, Galina, Savvas Varitis, Manapkhan Zhumabek, Konstantinos Karanasios, George Vekinis, Svetlana A. Tungatarova, and Tolkyn S. Baizhumanova. 2021. "Direct Reduction in Greenhouse Gases by Continuous Dry (CO2) Reforming of Methane over Ni-Containing SHS Catalysts" Energies 14, no. 19: 6078. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop