1. Introduction
Tungsten trioxide (WO
3), either in bulk, thin films or as nanospheres, is widely studied for applications in catalysis [
1], electrochromic devices [
2], and gas sensing [
3], among others. For all these applications, the required physical properties are determined by the microstructure and by the present crystalline phases; however, there are very few studies on the microstructural and crystallographic characteristics of WO
3 thin films. WO
3 has a perovskite-type crystal structure, where some atomic displacements and rotations of the WO
6 octahedra normally occur so that, depending on temperature, a monoclinic, triclinic, tetragonal, orthorhombic, cubic, or hexagonal symmetries can be found. Previous studies in bulk WO
3 [
4] reported the following crystalline transitions as temperature varies: monoclinic (ε-WO
3, <−43 °C) → triclinic (δ-WO
3, from −43 °C to 17 °C) → monoclinic (γ-WO
3, from 17 °C to 330 °C) → orthorhombic (β-WO
3, from 330 °C to 740 °C) → tetragonal (α-WO
3, >740 °C).
Phase transitions between WO
3 polymorphs have been reported to be partially reversible [
5]. For WO
3 in bulk, monoclinic (γ-WO
3) and triclinic (δ-WO
3) phases have been reported to be the more stable phases at room temperature. Thermal treatment of γ-WO
3 causes a phase transformation to either orthorhombic (β-WO
3) or tetragonal (α-WO
3) phases. However, bulk samples do not retain any of these phases (α- and β-WO
3) when they are cooled to room temperature. In contrast to what happens to bulk WO
3, all of the above phases (α- and β-, γ- and δ-WO
3) can be present in WO
3 thin films at room temperature, depending on synthesis conditions, showing a diversity of morphologies, crystalline structures, and space groups [
5].
This work is focused on the study of the morphology of a reactive RF sputtered β-WO3 thin film and the effects of subsequent annealing on the orthorhombic crystal structure.
2. Experimental
WO
3 thin films were deposited on 5 × 7 mm Si(100)/SiO
2 substrates using a reactive RF magnetron sputtering system (AJA, ORION 3, 13.6 MHz) with a 2-inch diameter W target (99.99% purity). The sputtering chamber was evacuated to a base pressure of 3.19 × 10
−7 Pa. Depositions were made for 1 h with a magnetron power of 60 W. The increase of the magnetron power causes the increase of the crystallite size in the films [
6]; thus, a 60 W magnetron power was chosen to obtain small crystals sizes for gas sensing. The target-to-substrate distance was fixed to 150 mm, and the substrate temperature was kept at 300 °C. A substrate temperature of 300 °C was chosen to increase the nucleation rate and so to obtain small crystals of the β-WO3 phase [
7]. The sputtering atmosphere consisted of an Ar–O
2 gas mixture with flow rates controlled by separated gas flow-meters in order to adjust the Ar–O
2 ratio to 3:1. The total chamber pressure was fixed to 0.66 Pa. The flow rate and the total chamber pressure were chosen from a previous work, where Manno et al. [
8] concluded that the best pressure is 0.66 Pa and the flow rate is 30% O
2.
After film depositions, two successive annealing treatments were made: an initial annealing at 400 °C for 6 h with a cooling rate of 2 °C/min (T1), followed by a second annealing at 350 °C for one 1 and cooled down up to room temperature by opening the door of a Thermolyne model 4600 furnace (T2). The purposes of annealing treatments were, first, to allow the crystallization of the thin film and, secondly, to obtain the β-WO3 phase. During the first annealing treatment, the sample crystallized as krasnogorite, an allotropic form of WO3, and a second annealing treatment was necessary to obtain the desired phase β-WO3.
Samples as-deposited, the annealed at 400 °C, and the re-annealed at 350 °C were characterized by Grazing Incidence X-Ray Diffraction (GIXRD) using a PANalytical diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation; the grazing angle was set at 0.2° over an angular range from 20° to 90°, with a scan step of 0.02° and a 10 s per step counter time.
For the Rietveld refinement with the Fullprof program, the instrumental widening of the diffraction peaks was taken into account. Initial cell parameters were taken from the ICSD card #50730 for β-WO3 phase and from the ICSD card #836 for the krasnogorite phase.
Surface morphology was examined and film thickness was determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) (VEECO model SPM Multimode) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-7401F), respectively.
Specimens cross sections of WO3 films grown on Si(100)/SiO2 for HRTEM were prepared in a Focused Ion Bean system (JEM-9320FIB). High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was performed with a JEOL JEM-2200FS system.
3. Results and Discussion
Structural Characterization
The X-ray diffraction curves 1a and 1a-zoom show the amorphous nature of the as-deposited sample. During the annealing treatment T1,
Figure 1b, the WO
3 thin film crystallized into the krasnagorite orthorhombic phase [
9], with space group
Pmnb and unit-cell parameters
a = 7.341 Å,
b = 7.570 Å, and
c = 7.754 Å. The X-ray diffraction pattern shown in
Figure 1c corresponds to the WO
3 thin film after the two successive annealing treatments, T1 and T2. The β-WO
3 orthorhombic phase was identified with space group
Pcnb [
10] and unit-cell parameters of
a = 7.3612,
b = 7.5739, and
c = 7.7620. Bulk β-WO
3 is stable in the temperature range from 320 °C to 720 °C. However, in WO
3 thin films, this phase can occurs in different temperature ranges [
11].
Figure 2 shows the Fullprof Rietveld refinement of the GIXRD pattern of the β-WO
3 phase. All the peaks were indexed to the β-WO
3 phase. The sharp diffraction peaks indicate a high crystallinity degree of the sample; no impurity peaks were detected in the pattern. The strong and dominating nature of the peak corresponding to the (002) reflection indicates the preferential
c-axis orientation of crystallites. The preferential growth of
c-axis orientation in WO
3 films can be understood by the lowest surface energy [
7]. Additionally, the preferential growth orientation can be calculated from the texture coefficient,
TC (
hkl), which can be determined using the following relation [
12]:
where
I(hkl) is the measured relative intensity of diffraction in a plane (
hkl),
I0(hkl) is the standard intensity of diffraction in the plane (
hkl) taken from the ICSD data, and N is the reflection number. The
TC(
hkl) values were calculated for all diffraction planes; the (002) diffraction plane has the highest value, with
TC = 3.06, followed by the (004) diffraction plane with
TC = 1.51 and then by the (204) diffraction plane with
TC = 1.13. It is clear, from the definition of the texture coefficient, that the deviation of
TC(
hkl) from unity implies that the film growth occurs in a certain preferred orientation. The highest TC value for the (002) diffraction plane indicates that the crystallites are preferentially oriented.
Figure 3a shows a SEM image of the β-WO
3 thin film surface after the two-step annealing treatment. The surface morphology is predominantly laminar, with a length distribution from 50 nm to 150 nm. Laminar structures in WO
3 thin films are usually observed for oxygen concentrations in the sputtering chamber below 50% [
13]; in this work, the oxygen concentration was 25%. A smaller amount of rounded grains with sizes below 50 nm were also observed.
Figure 3b shows a thin film cross section taken with backscattered electrons, where the bright zone corresponds to the β-WO
3 thin film with a film thickness of 141 nm throughout the area. This film thickness was obtained after depositing for 1 h under the above described conditions.
Figure 3c is an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental microanalysis, showing the characteristic W and O lines. The absence of characteristic lines of other elements shows that the film does not contain impurities. The high intensity observed for the W characteristic line is actually due to the overlap of the W Mα line with the Kα line of the Si substrate. The oxygen characteristic line originates from both the WO
3 thin film and the small SiO
2 layer on the Si substrate [
14].
Figure 4a–d show 2D and 3D AFM images (scanning area of 1 μm × 1 μm) of the as-deposited and of the two-step annealed (T1 + T2) samples.
Figure 4a,b for the as-deposited film show a smooth film surface, some grains with grain boundaries that are not well defined and grain sizes in the range 40–60 nm. The root-mean-square (RMS) of the surface roughness is 1.4342 nm, with a highest roughness height of 15.8 nm.
Figure 4c,d for the two-step annealed film show a rough surface, grains sizes in the range 80–110 nm and well-defined grain boundaries. It has been previously reported that the surface roughness increases as the annealing temperature increases [
15]. RMS value of the surface roughness is 2.7058 nm, and the highest roughness height is 19.5 nm. In sum, the RMS surface roughness increased from 1.4342 nm for the as-deposited film to 2.7058 nm for the two-step annealed film.
Figure 5 shows a HRTEM image of the β-WO
3 film cross section, where various layers are indicated. The lower right bright corner is the (100) silicon substrate. The magnified insert with the Si/WO
3 interphase shows a 3-nm-thick amorphous layer of SiO
2, which is originated by the oxidation of the Si surface in contact with air [
16]. The next layer, above the amorphous SiO
2 layer, corresponds to the WO
3 thin film. Finally, the last layers are platinum/carbon protective layers deposited to protect the specimen from FIB damage.
Figure 6 shows cross-section bright-field and dark-field images. In the images, three crystals, labeled as C1, C2 and C3, can be identified with roughly the same orientation. In the dark-field image, the shape and width of each crystals are particularly evident.
From the substrate, the crystals grow in columnar form. This type of columnar growth has been reported in films grown epitaxially on different crystalline substrates [
17]. The β-WO
3 film, as deposited on amorphous SiO
2, is also amorphous, and the crystallinity appears during the annealing, as was shown above by X-ray diffraction. However, the β-WO
3 film has a columnar growth. Thompson [
18] proposed that, once the nuclei are formed, they grow into the external phase, as well as laterally in directions lying in the plane of the interface. Lateral growth leads to impingement and coalescence of crystals, resulting in the formation of grain boundaries and defining at least the initial grain-structure characteristics of the newly formed film. Usually, subsequent thickening occurs through epitaxial growth on these grains and columnar grain structures develop. Sometimes, the thickening occurs by the annealing, forming columnar grain structures, as the β-WO
3 film. In this work, we present a detailed study about as-deposited amorphous WO
3 on amorphous SiO
2 substrates, and its evolution to the crystalline state during annealing, and not during deposition or with epitaxial growth. This kind of study has seldom been reported in WO
3 crystal growth.
From the electron diffraction pattern of C3-crystal, shown in
Figure 7a, the crystal growth plane was determined. In fact, to define this crystal growth plane, it was necessary to identify the zone axis using the reciprocal lattice vectors (g1, g2, and g3) that represent three diffracted beams, and making their cross products. The cross product was made in the clockwise direction, because the transmitted beam is outside the circle containing the diffraction points [
19]:
According to Equation (2), the zone axis direction is [200] (in the direct beam direction that is the observation direction). Thus, by taking this observation axis perpendicular to the substrate plane, the crystal grow plane for the WO3 film is the (002) plane.
Figure 7b is a HRTEM image showing the (002) lattice planes parallel to the silicon substrate and the (020) lattice planes perpendicular to the substrate. The interplanar distances for these two sets of planes are better shown in the inserts after digital processing using the Digital Micrograph software. The calculated interplanar distances correspond with the reported in the crystal data sheet 01-089-4480. These results coincide with the results from X-ray diffraction, where the preferential reflection correspond to the (002) plane. The same results can be obtained using crystals C1 and C2, as all of them have the same crystallographic orientation.