Next Article in Journal
Low-Temperature Performance and Damage Constitutive Model of Eco-Friendly Basalt Fiber–Diatomite-Modified Asphalt Mixture under Freeze–Thaw Cycles
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Stability and Thermoelectric Properties of NaZnSb
Previous Article in Journal
Gamma Irradiation-Induced Preparation of Graphene–Ni Nanocomposites with Efficient Electromagnetic Wave Absorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure and Chemical Bonding of the Li-Doped Polar Intermetallic RE2In1−xLixGe2 (RE = La, Nd, Sm, Gd; x = 0.13, 0.28, 0.43, 0.53) System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/ma11112146
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploratory Work in the Quaternary System of Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb: Synthesis, Crystal, and Electronic Structures of New Zintl Solid Solutions

by
Alexander Ovchinnikov
1,
Gregory M. Darone
1,2,
Bayrammurad Saparov
1,3 and
Svilen Bobev
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
2
Charter School of Wilmington, Wilmington, DE 19807, USA
3
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(11), 2146; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112146
Submission received: 17 October 2018 / Revised: 24 October 2018 / Accepted: 29 October 2018 / Published: 31 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Zintl Phases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Investigation of the quaternary system, Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb, led to a discovery of the new solid solutions, Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2, with the CaAl2Si2 structure type (x ≈ 0.3–0.9, hP5, P 3 ¯ m1, a = 4.6632(5)–4.6934(3) Å, c = 7.630(1)–7.7062(7) Å), Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 with the Yb2CdSb2 type (x ≈ 0.6, oS20, Cmc21, a = 4.646(2) Å, b = 17.733(7) Å, c = 7.283(3) Å), and Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 with the Sr11Cd6Sb12 type (x ≈ 1, mS58, C2/m, a = 32.407(4) Å, b = 4.7248(5) Å, c = 12.377(1) Å, β = 109.96(1)°). Systematic crystallographic studies of the Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 series indicated expansion of the unit cell upon an increase in the Eu content, in accordance with a larger ionic radius of Eu2+ vs. Ca2+. The Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 composition with x ≈ 0.6 adopts the non-centrosymmetric space group, Cmc21, although the parent ternary phase, Ca2CdSb2, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group, Pnma. Two non-equivalent Ca sites in the layered crystal structure of Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 get unevenly occupied by Eu, with a preference for the interlayer position, which offers a larger available volume. Similar size-driven preferred occupation is observed in the Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 solid solution with x ≈ 1.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Zintl phases constitute a unique family of intermetallic compounds with polar chemical bonding. Due to a significant electron transfer, formal charges can be assigned to parts of crystal structures in such compounds, considering that all elements in a given composition achieve a stable closed-shell (octet) electron configuration [1]. In Zintl phases, the idealized charges are balanced, which can be understood, yet within an oversimplified picture, as an optimal redistribution of electrons among the constituting elements, leading to fully occupied bonding states and empty antibonding levels. Different patterns of hetero- and homoatomic bonding can be realized in Zintl compounds. Consequently, their crystal structures frequently display a high degree of complexity. Many known intermetallic compounds, especially those with group 15 elements, represent electronically balanced phases crystallizing in structures with huge unit cells and large numbers of atoms per cell [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Group 15 elements are commonly referred to as pnictogens, and their compounds with metals are called pnictides, which is the terminology adopted in this paper.
The energetic separation of the bonding and antibonding states in Zintl phases typically result in semiconducting properties [1,8]. Since electronegativity differences for metals are not high in comparison to metal-nonmetal pairs, the magnitudes of the electronic bandgaps in Zintl compounds are rather small, suggesting the classification of these materials as narrow-gap semiconductors. This makes Zintl phases promising candidates for thermoelectric applications. High electrical conductivity, related to narrow bandgaps, and low thermal conductance, resulting from complex crystal structures, are important prerequisites for high thermoelectric efficiency. In particular, metal pnictides have been actively studied after the discovery of a high thermoelectric figure of merit in Yb14MnSb11 and related compounds [9,10,11].
Chemical modifications, such as doping, proved to be a convenient tool to optimize electronic properties of Zintl phases. In addition, introduction of extra components can sometimes yield unexpected multinary compounds with new structural features [12,13,14]. In this contribution, we report on the synthesis and the structural characterization of several quaternary phases that were discovered through exploratory work in the system, Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis

All weighing and loading manipulations were performed inside an Ar-filled glovebox with oxygen and moisture levels of less than 1 ppm. Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (x ≈ 0.3–0.9) were prepared by the flux technique, using molten lead as a flux. Elemental Ca, Eu, Cd, Sb, and Pb (all with purity >99.9 wt.%) were loaded in alumina crucibles with the molar ratio (Ca + Eu): Cd: Sb: Pb = 1:2:2:10. The crucibles were sealed in evacuated fused silica tubes. After that, the sealed tubes were moved to programmable muffle furnaces, where the reactions were carried out at 1223 K for 24 h (ramp rate 200 K/h). The Pb flux was removed at 773 K (cooling rate of 5 K/h) by centrifugation, after which the tubes were brought back into the glovebox and crack-opened. In all cases, the main products were well-formed single crystals of Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2. However, the refined Ca: Eu ratios were always different in comparison with the nominal compositions. For example, the sample with the starting ratio, Ca:Eu = 1:1, produced Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 crystals with x ≈ 0.7 (Ca:Eu ≈ 1:2.3), whereas the reaction with nominal Ca:Eu = 1:3 yielded crystals with x ≈ 0.9 (Ca:Eu ≈ 1:9). In the latter sample, small single crystals of the Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 composition with x ≈ 0.6 were also found as a side product. Attempts to produce this solid solution in larger quantities starting from the composition, Ca:Eu:Cd:Sb:Pb = 1:1:1:2:10, and using the same temperature profile as before resulted in Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 with x ≈ 1 as the main phase.

2.2. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)

PXRD patterns were collected on a Rigaku Miniflex diffractometer (filtered Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å). Data were gathered in a Θ–Θ mode between 10° and 75° with a step size of 0.05° and 2 s/step counting time. The diffractometer was operated inside a nitrogen-filled glovebox to prevent possible deterioration of the samples upon exposure to air.
A representative PXRD pattern for a Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 sample is shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. While the Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 series appear to be air-stable according to the PXRD results, Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 and Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 slowly decompose when exposed to the ambient atmosphere.

2.3. Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction (SCXRD)

Suitable single crystals were picked under dry Paratone-N oil and mounted on low-background plastic loops. Data collection was performed on a Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer equipped with monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Data were gathered at 200 K, maintained by a stream of cold nitrogen gas. The raw data were integrated using the program, SAINT [15]. Semiempirical absorption corrections were applied with the SADABS software [16]. Crystal structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full matrix least-squares methods on F2 using SHELXL [17]. Atomic coordinated were standardized with the program, STRUCTURE TIDY [18]. Full details of the data collection, atomic coordinates, and selected interatomic distances are given in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8 and in the Supporting Information. CSD 1873642, 1873643, 1873644, 1873645, 1873646, 1873647, 1873648, and 1875197 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These deposited data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033; E-mail: [email protected]).

2.4. First-Principle Calculations

Electronic structure calculations were done on the scalar relativistic level for the idealized composition, CaEuCdSb2, (a hypothetical member of the Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 solid solution with x = 1, space group Cmc21) using the SIESTA code [19]. The initial atomic coordinates and lattice parameters were taken from the refined Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 structure with x ≈ 0.6. The AE1 and AE2 sites were treated as fully occupied by Eu and Ca, respectively (see the Results and Discussion for details of the crystal structure). The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof parametrization of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional was employed [20]. At first, suitable Troullier-Martins pseudopotentials were generated with the ATOM program and carefully tested on several known compounds to achieve good reproducibility of electronic structures and optimized lattice parameters [21]. After that, atomic coordinates and lattice constants of Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 were relaxed down to residual forces of less than 10−2 eV/Å. Double zeta polarized orbitals were employed as a basis set. The Brillouin zone was sampled by a 18 × 12 × 10 k-point grid and the mesh cut-off was set to 800 Ry after checking for convergence. Strong correlations of the Eu 4f orbitals considered by applying the GGA + U approach with Ueff = 7 eV (rotationally invariant formulation [22]). For consistency with the previous theoretical work on d10 metal antimonides [23,24], we also introduced Ueff = 2 eV for the Cd 4d states. Spin polarization was treated in a simple ferromagnetic model. The forces were relaxed down to less than 10−2 eV/Å. Chemical bonding investigation was performed using the Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population analysis [25] as implemented in SIESTA.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structure of the Ca1–xEuxCd2Sb2 Solid Solution

The Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 solid solution crystallizes in the space group, P 3 ¯ m1, and adopts the CaAl2Si2 structure type (Pearson code hP5), which can be also viewed as a ternary derivative of the La2O3 type (Figure 1a). Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 with x = 0.29(1) are presented in Table 2. Crystallographic data for the other studied compositions are given in the Supporting Information.
The crystal structure accommodates two-dimensional slabs of corner- and edge-sharing CdSb4 tetrahedra alternating with hexagonal layers of AE atoms, where AE = Ca + Eu. The AE atoms are six-fold coordinated by the adjacent Sb atoms, forming almost perfectly regular octahedra. Assignment of the formal charges to the atoms in the structure yields an electron-balanced composition according to the notation (AE2+)(Cd2+)2(Sb3−)2. The end members of these series with x = 0 (CaCd2Sb2) and x = 1 (EuCd2Sb2) are also known and crystallize in the same structure [26]. In addition, various other pnictides with the AETM2Pn2 composition (AE = alkaline-earth metal, Eu, or Yb; TM = transition metal; Pn = pnictogen) adopt this type [27,28,29]. Many of these phases have been studied as potential thermoelectric materials owing to their narrow-gap semiconducting properties [30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
In the Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 series, the lattice parameters and the unit cell volume gradually increase on going from the Eu-poorer to the Eu-richer compositions (Figure 1b), in accordance with a larger ionic size of Eu2+ in comparison with Ca2+ (for the same coordination number 6 for instance, r(Ca2+) = 1.00 Å, r(Eu2+) = 1.17 Å [37]). The Vegard’s law is not strictly observed, i.e., the change of the unit cell dimensions is not linear, suggesting that local ordering may be taking place. Analysis of the single-crystal diffraction data gives no indication of superstructure reflections, thus confirming the preservation of the long-range CaAl2Si2 structure.
In line with the increasing average size of the AE2+ cation in AECd2Sb2 (AE = Ca + Eu), the AE–Sb contacts become progressively longer upon increasing the level of Eu substitution (Table 3). At the same time, the Cd–Sb bonds remain virtually unaffected. Another noteworthy structural change occurring as the Eu concentration increases concerns the Sb–AE–Sb bond angles, and the trend is suggestive of adopting a more regular octahedral environment of the AE atoms.

3.2. Crystal and Electronic Structure of the Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 Solid Solution (x ≈ 0.6)

A crystal of the new solid solution with the composition, Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 (x ≈ 0.6), was discovered as a by-product in the sample containing Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 as the main phase. The crystal structure of Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 belongs to the Yb2CdSb2 type (Pearson code oS20, space group Cmc21), in contrast to the parent ternary phase, Ca2CdSb2, crystallizing in its own type (Pearson code oP20, space group Pnma) [38]. The two prototypic structures possess no homoatomic Sb–Sb bonds and can therefore be rationalized within the Zintl concept as (AE2+)2(Cd2+)(Sb3−)2, where AE stands for Yb or Ca. The main difference between the two types stems from non-identical stacking of the layers built up of corner-sharing CdSb4 tetrahedra. Whereas in the non-centrosymmetric Yb2CdSb2, the adjacent Cd-Sb layers are related only by translation, in Ca2CdSb2, similar layers alternate along the stacking direction with their crystallographically inverted counterparts.
From another point of view, the structures of Yb2CdSb2 and Ca2CdSb2 can be understood as two different ways of occupying tetrahedral voids in otherwise isostructural Yb–Sb or Ca–Sb substructures [38]. As local atomic environments in both types appear to be almost identical, subtle electronic or size differences must be responsible for stabilization of one or another structure. As a matter of fact, several pnictides with the “2-1-2” composition have been found to crystallize in the Yb2CdSb2 structure [39,40], whereas Ca2CdSb2 remains the only representative of its type. In this regard, it is important to mention that the Zn-variants with the same composition are totally different (defect ZrBeSi-type structure) [41], and the Mn-based “2-1-2” analogs adopt their own structure [42,43]. Within this context, it also is instructive to recall that a ternary compound, “Eu2CdSb2”, with either a Ca2CdSb2 or Yb2CdSb2 structure type, is not known to exist (to date). Apparently, the Ca2CdSb2 structure becomes destabilized upon isovalent substitution of Ca with Eu, yielding a solid solution with the non-centrosymmetric Yb2CdSb2 atomic arrangement (Figure 2a). Further optimization of the synthetic procedure will be required to systematically study the structural evolution of the “2-1-2” phase in a wider compositional range and to find the critical Eu content necessary to disrupt the original Ca2CdSb2 structure.
In the crystal structure of Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 (x ≈ 0.6), two nonequivalent AE sites (AE = Ca + Eu) are located between the Cd-Sb layers (AE1) and within the layers (AE2), respectively. The former site adopts a distorted octahedral coordination by the Sb atoms, while the latter position displays a square-pyramidal coordination (Figure 2b). Due to the substantially different volumes of these two coordination polyhedra, pronounced preferred occupation is observed. The AE1 site, offering a larger available volume, accumulates most of the Eu in the structure, whereas the smaller AE2 site shows a minute Eu occupancy of about 2%, in line with a larger ionic radius of Eu2+ versus Ca2+. A similar trend was previously observed for the Yb2CdSb2-type solid solutions, Sr2−xAxCdSb2 (A = Ca, Yb), Ba2−xAxCdSb2 (A = Ca, Sr, Eu, Yb) [39], and Yb2−xEuxCdSb2 [24,39].
Electronic structure calculations were performed within the GGA+U scheme for the idealized CaEuCdSb2 composition after optimizing the lattice parameters and atomic coordinates. The electronic density of states (DOS) is shown in Figure 3a. In accordance with the simple electron counting in the frame of the Zintl concept, CaEuCdSb2 displays an electronic bandgap of about 0.5 eV. This value is larger than the 0.1 eV bandgap calculated for the isostructural YbEuCdSb2 [24]. This is likely is an electronic effect due to electronegativity differences between Yb and Ca, suggesting lower iconicity of the bonding in the latter compound. The states just below the Fermi level (EF) mainly show the Sb(5p) character, indicating a significant electron transfer onto the Sb atoms. A strong hybridization of these states with Cd(5s) and Cd(5p) occurs in the energy window, −5.5 eV < E–EF < 0. The s, p, and d states of Ca and Eu also demonstrate a sizeable contribution in this energy region. A high peak of the Eu(4f) character is localized around E–EF = −3.7 eV. The converged magnetic moment on the Eu atom is 7.0 µB, in accordance with the 4f7 ground term of the Eu2+ ion. Similar to the case of YbEuCdSb2, the Eu f orbitals cannot be considered completely inert in this case, since an apparent hybridization with the Sb(5p) states takes place around the peak position. In addition, a “tail” of the 4f peak extends up to the top of the valence band, hybridizing further with the Sb states. Well below the Fermi level, the DOS is dominated by the Sb(5s) states, corresponding to the Sb lone pairs, and by the occupied Cd(4d) states.
Analysis of the chemical bonding with the aid of the Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population curves (COHP) revealed optimized bonding interactions for the Ca–Sb and Eu–Sb pairs (Figure 3c,d). Most importantly, orbital-resolved COHP analysis showed a small, yet non-negligible contribution of the Eu(4f)–Sb orbital mixing to the overall Eu–Sb bonding. The hybridization of the Eu(4f) and Sb(5p) states around the center of the Eu(4f) peak results in a localized set of bonding states, whereas the hybridization just under EF gives rise to a broad domain of antibonding character. This finding suggests that the typically core-level 4f orbitals may play a role in the crystal structure formation/selection. The involvement of the 4f states in chemical bonding can be important, alongside atomic size factors, for understanding the stability of compounds that are known to form only with certain rare-earth elements, such as the binary RE3Bi7 phases with RE = Nd and Sm [44]. The Cd–Sb contacts display predominantly bonding interactions below EF, with a small domain of antibonding states in the near vicinity of the Fermi level (Figure 3d). A similar bonding pattern was observed for the Cd–Sb interactions in the prototypic Yb2CdSb2 structure [38].

3.3. Crystal Structure of the Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 Solid Solution (x ≈ 1)

Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 crystallizes isotypically to the parent Eu11Cd6Sb12 compound (Sr11Cd6Sb12 type, Pearson code mS58, space group C2/m (No. 12), Figure 4a) [45,46]. The refined x ≈ 1 in the studied crystal must be close to the upper limit of the Ca substitution for Eu, since the starting mixture contained a large surplus of Ca (recall that the nominal Eu: Ca ratio was 1:1). The crystal structure likely becomes unstable at higher Ca contents due to geometric/size factors. Accordingly, the pure ternary Ca phase has not been reported. This result is in line with the study on the isostructural solid solution, Eu11−xYbxCd6Sb12, where the Sr11Cd6Sb12 type is retained only up to x ≈ 2 [47]. The similarity between the two quaternary systems is likely related to the close ionic radii of Ca2+ and Yb2+: r(Ca2+) = 1.00 Å, r(Yb2+) = 1.02 Å for coordination number 6 [37].
The crystal structure of Eu11Cd6Sb12 and isostructural compositions has been described in detail previously [45,46,47,48,49]. The anionic substructure contains infinite fragments of corner sharing CdSb4 tetrahedra propagating along the monoclinic b axis (Figure 4a). Homoatomic Sb–Sb bonding develops within these fragments, resulting in Sb2 dumbbells shared between adjacent Cd atoms. In Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12, the AE atoms (AE = Eu + Ca), except AE5, are six-fold coordinated by Sb. AE5 resides in a five-fold coordination environment with an average AE–Sb bond length of 3.35 Å. A six-fold coordination of AE5 can be completed by including an Sb atom located at a much longer distance of 3.98 Å. Similarly, the six-fold coordination of the AE1 site (<d(AE–Sb)> = 3.43 Å) can be regarded as a highly distorted square antiprism (coordination number 8) with two additional Sb atoms at 4.02 Å and 4.03 Å from AE1. Although such long distances can hardly be considered bonding interactions, when considered, they provide an estimate of the available volume offered by the Sb coordination environment around each AE position. In fact, the occupancy of the AE sites by Eu correlates well with the volume of such “extended” polyhedra (Figure 4b). The largest AE1 site is occupied mainly by Eu, whereas the highest Ca occupancy is found for the most spatially confined AE2 position.

4. Conclusions

In summary, using a Pb flux synthesis, we have discovered three new series of solid solutions in the Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb system. The Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 series extend the field of quaternary compositions crystallizing in the CaAl2Si2 type. In contrast to these mixed crystals, where the ternary end members adopt the same crystal structure as their solid solution, Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 with x ≈ 0.6 crystallizes in the Yb2CdSb2 structure type, whereas Ca2CdSb2 represents its own type and the hypothetical end member “Eu2CdSb2” has not been reported. The disruption of the parent Ca2CdSb2 structure upon Eu doping may be a result of size and electronic factors. Interestingly, our first-principle calculations on the idealized CaEuCdSb2 structure indicate that the Eu(4f) states may be relevant for chemical bonding in this phase. Finally, the Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 solid solution adopts the same structure as the parent Eu11Cd6Sb12 compound (Sr11Cd6Sb12 type). The distribution of Eu over the non-equivalent AE sites (AE = Eu + Ca) correlates well with the available volume offered by these positions. Although the pure calcium counterpart does not exist, the Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 appears to extend up to x ≈ 1. In the realm of Zintl chemistry, formation of mixed crystals has been widely employed as a tool for electronic property optimization. Results of the present study demonstrate that, in addition to this capability, solid solutions may provide a way of stabilizing crystal structures not observed for the end members of the corresponding series.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/11/2146/s1, Table S1: Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (x = 0.547(4)), Table S2: Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (x = 0.731(4)), Table S3: Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (x = 0.855(5)), Table S4: Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (x = 0.924(4)), Table S5: Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters for EuCd2Sb2. Figure S1. Experimental and simulated powder diffraction patterns of Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (x = 0.924(4)).

Author Contributions

A.O., G.M.D., B.S., investigation, A.O., writing—original draft preparation, S.B., writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration.

Funding

This research was funded by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Award # DE-SC0008885.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kauzlarich, S.M.; Brown, S.R.; Snyder, G.J. Zintl Phases for Thermoelectric Devices. Dalton Trans. 2007, 2099–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xia, S.; Bobev, S. Diverse Polyanions Based on MnBi4 and MnSb4 Tetrahedra: Polymorphism, Structure, and Bonding in Ca21Mn4Bi18 and Ca21Mn4Sb18. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 874–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xia, S.-Q.; Bobev, S. Zintl Phase Variations through Cation Selection. Synthesis and Structure of A21Cd4Pn18 (A = Eu, Sr, Ba; Pn = Sb, Bi). Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1919–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. He, H.; Tyson, C.; Bobev, S. New Compounds with [As7]3− Clusters: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of the Zintl Phases Cs2NaAs7, Cs4ZnAs14 and Cs4CdAs14. Crystals 2011, 1, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, H.; Tyson, C.; Saito, M.; Bobev, S. Synthesis and Structural Characterization of the Ternary Zintl Phases AE3Al2Pn4 and AE3Ga2Pn4 (AE = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu; Pn = P, As). J. Solid State Chem. 2012, 188, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Darone, G.M.; Bobev, S. The New Zintl Phases Eu21Cd4Sb18 and Eu21Mn4Sb18. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 238, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ovchinnikov, A.; Bobev, S. Zintl Phases with Group 15 Elements and the Transition Metals: A Brief Overview of Pnictides with Diverse and Complex Structures. J. Solid State Chem. 2018. in print. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nesper, R. The Zintl-Klemm Concept—A Historical Survey. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 2639–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brown, S.R.; Kauzlarich, S.M.; Gascoin, F.; Snyder, G.J. Yb14MnSb11: New High Efficiency Thermoelectric Material for Power Generation. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1873–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aydemir, U.; Zevalkink, A.; Ormeci, A.; Wang, H.; Ohno, S.; Bux, S.; Snyder, G.J. Thermoelectric Properties of the Zintl Phases Yb5M2Sb6 (M = Al, Ga, In). Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 6767–6774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ohno, S.; Aydemir, U.; Amsler, M.; Pöhls, J.-H.; Chanakian, S.; Zevalkink, A.; White, M.A.; Bux, S.; Wolverton, C.; Snyder, G.J. Achieving zT > 1 in Inexpensive Zintl Phase Ca9Zn4+xSb9 by Phase Boundary Mapping. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saparov, B.; Broda, M.; Ramanujachary, K.V.; Bobev, S. New Quaternary Zintl Phases—Synthesis, Crystal and Electronic structures of KA2Cd2Sb3 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu, Yb). Polyhedron 2010, 29, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Stoyko, S.; Bobev, S. Quaternary Pnictides with Complex, Noncentrosymmetric Structures. Synthesis and Structural Characterization of the New Zintl Phases Na11Ca2Al3Sb8, Na4CaGaSb3, and Na15Ca3In5Sb12. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 1931–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Devlin, K.P.; Kazem, N.; Zaikina, J.V.; Cooley, J.A.; Badger, J.R.; Fettinger, J.C.; Taufour, V.; Kauzlarich, S.M. Eu11Zn4Sn2As12: A Ferromagnetic Zintl Semiconductor with a Layered Structure Featuring Extended Zn4As6 Sheets and Ethane-like Sn2As6 Units. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 7067–7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. SAINT; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  16. SADABS; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  17. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal Structure Refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gelato, L.M.; Parthé, E. STRUCTURE TIDY—A Computer Program to Standardize Crystal Structure Data. J. Appl. Cryst. 1987, 20, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soler, J.M.; Artacho, E.; Gale, J.D.; García, A.; Junquera, J.; Ordejón, P.; Sánchez-Portal, D. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 2745–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Troullier, N.; Martins, J.L. Efficient Pseudopotentials for Plane-wave Calculations. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dudarev, S.L.; Botton, G.A.; Savrasov, S.Y.; Humphreys, C.J.; Sutton, A.P. Electron-energy-loss Spectra and the Structural Stability of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+U Study. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 1505–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Flage-Larsen, E.; Diplas, S.; Prytz, Ø.; Toberer, E.S.; May, A.F. Valence Band Study of Thermoelectric Zintl-phase SrZn2Sb2 and YbZn2Sb2: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 205204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cooley, J.A.; Promkhan, P.; Gangopadhyay, S.; Donadio, D.; Pickett, W.E.; Ortiz, B.R.; Toberer, E.S.; Kauzlarich, S.M. High Seebeck Coefficient and Unusually Low Thermal Conductivity Near Ambient Temperatures in Layered Compound Yb2−xEuxCdSb2. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Steinberg, S.; Dronskowski, R. The Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population (COHP) Method as a Tool to Visualize and Analyze Chemical Bonding in Intermetallic Compounds. Crystals 2018, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, H.; Fang, L.; Tang, M.-B.; Chen, H.-H.; Yang, X.-X.; Guo, X.; Zhao, J.-T.; Grin, Y. Synthesis and properties of CaCd2Sb2 and EuCd2Sb2. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Payne, A.C.; Sprauve, A.E.; Olmstead, M.M.; Kauzlarich, S.M.; Chan, J.Y.; Reisner, B.; Lynn, J. Synthesis, Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Single Crystals of EuMn2P2. J. Solid State Chem. 2002, 163, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bobev, S.; Merz, J.; Lima, A.; Fritsch, V.; Thompson, J.D.; Sarrao, J.L.; Gillessen, M.; Dronskowski, R. Unusual Mn−Mn Spin Coupling in the Polar Intermetallic Compounds CaMn2Sb2 and SrMn2Sb2. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 4047–4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schellenberg, I.; Eul, M.; Hermes, W.; Pöttgen, R. A 121Sb and 151Eu Mössbauer Spectroscopic Investigation of EuMn2Sb2, EuZn2Sb2, YbMn2Sb2, and YbZn2Sb2. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2010, 636, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, W.; Chanakian, S.; Zevalkink, A. Crystal Chemistry and Thermoelectric Transport of Layered AM2×2 compounds. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1744–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, H.; Zhao, J.-T.; Grin, Y.; Wang, X.-J.; Tang, M.-B.; Man, Z.-Y.; Chen, H.-H.; Yang, X.-X. A New Type of Thermoelectric Material, EuZn2Sb2. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 164713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, X.-J.; Tang, M.-B.; Chen, H.-H.; Yang, X.-X.; Zhao, J.-T.; Burkhardt, U.; Grin, Y. Synthesis and High Thermoelectric Efficiency of Zintl Phase YbCd2−xZnxSb2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 092106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cao, Q.-G.; Zhang, H.; Tang, M.-B.; Chen, H.-H.; Yang, X.-X.; Grin, Y.; Zhao, J.-T. Zintl Phase Yb1−xCaxCd2Sb2 with Tunable Thermoelectric Properties Induced by Cation Substitution. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 053714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, H.; Baitinger, M.; Tang, M.-B.; Man, Z.-Y.; Chen, H.-H.; Yang, X.-X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Grin, Y.; Zhao, J.-T. Thermoelectric Properties of Eu(Zn1−xCdx)2Sb2. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 1101–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, H.; Fang, L.; Tang, M.-B.; Man, Z.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Yang, X.X.; Baitinger, M.; Grin, Y.; Zhao, J.-T. Thermoelectric Properties of YbxEu1−xCd2Sb2. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 194701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, K.; Cao, Q.-G.; Feng, X.-J.; Tang, M.-B.; Chen, H.-H.; Guo, X.; Chen, L.; Grin, Y.; Zhao, J.-T. Enhanced Thermoelectric Figure of Merit of Zintl Phase YbCd2−xMnxSb2 by Chemical Substitution. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 4043–4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shannon, R.D. Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xia, S.; Bobev, S. Cation−Anion Interactions as Structure Directing Factors: Structure and Bonding of Ca2CdSb2 and Yb2CdSb2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4049–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Saparov, B.; Saito, M.; Bobev, S. Syntheses, and Crystal and Electronic Structures of the New Zintl Phases Na2ACdSb2 and K2ACdSb2 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu, Yb): Structural Relationship with Yb2CdSb2 and the Solid Solutions Sr2−xAxCdSb2, Ba2−xAxCdSb2 and Eu2−xYbxCdSb2. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Yang, M.; Pan, M.-Y.; Xia, S.-Q.; Tao, X.-T.; He, H.; Darone, G.; Bobev, S. Synthesis, Crystal and Electronic Structures, and Properties of the New Pnictide Semiconductors A2CdPn2 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu; Pn = P, As). Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 8020–8027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wilson, D.; Saparov, B.; Bobev, S. Synthesis, Crystal Structures and Properties of the Zintl phases Sr2ZnP2, Sr2ZnAs2, A2ZnSb2 and A2ZnBi2 (A = Sr and Eu). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2011, 637, 2018–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Park, S.-M.; Kim, S.-J.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Sr2MnSb2: A New Ternary Transition Metal Zintl Phase. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 4979–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ovchinnikov, A.; Saparov, B.; Xia, S.-Q.; Bobev, S. The Ternary Alkaline-Earth Metal Manganese Bismuthides Sr2MnBi2 and Ba2Mn1−xBi2 (x ≈ 0.15). Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 12369–12378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ovchinnikov, A.; Makongo, J.P.A.; Bobev, S. Yet Again, New Compounds Found in Systems with Known Binary Phase Diagrams. Synthesis, Crystal and Electronic Structure of Nd3Bi7 and Sm3Bi7. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7089–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Park, S.-M.; Kim, S.-J. Sr11Cd6Sb12: A New Zintl Compound with Infinite Chains of Pentagonal Tubes. J. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 3418–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saparov, B.; Bobev, S.; Ozbay, A.; Nowak, E.R. Synthesis, Structure and Physical Properties of the New Zintl Phases Eu11Zn6Sb12 and Eu11Cd6Sb12. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 2690–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kazem, N.; Cooley, J.; Burks, E.C.; Liu, K.; Kauzlarich, S.M. Synthesis, Characterization, and Low Temperature Transport Properties of Eu11–xYbxCd6Sb12 Solid-Solution Zintl Phases. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 12230–12237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xia, S.-Q.; Bobev, S. Are Ba11Cd6Sb12 and Sr11Cd6Sb12 Zintl Phases or Not? A Density-functional Theory Study. J. Comp. Chem. 2008, 29, 2125–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Saparov, B.; Bobev, S. Undeca-europium Hexa-zinc Dodeca-arsenide. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online 2010, 66, i24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 11 02146 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of the CaAl2Si2-type Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 solid solution. The Ca/Eu, Cd, and Sb atoms are shown in green, red, and blue, respectively; (b) variation of the lattice parameters and unit cell volume of Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 as a function of the Eu content. The lattice parameters of the end members, i.e., the ternary phases CaCd2Sb2 and EuCd2Sb2, are included in the plot, but comparing the metrics, it must be born in mind that the literature data for CaCd2Sb2 (marked with asterisks) are from room temperature [26] and that the sample is prepared via a different synthetic route. The parameters for EuCd2Sb2 are from own data (CSD 1875197), whereby the crystal has been grown the same way as Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2.
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of the CaAl2Si2-type Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 solid solution. The Ca/Eu, Cd, and Sb atoms are shown in green, red, and blue, respectively; (b) variation of the lattice parameters and unit cell volume of Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 as a function of the Eu content. The lattice parameters of the end members, i.e., the ternary phases CaCd2Sb2 and EuCd2Sb2, are included in the plot, but comparing the metrics, it must be born in mind that the literature data for CaCd2Sb2 (marked with asterisks) are from room temperature [26] and that the sample is prepared via a different synthetic route. The parameters for EuCd2Sb2 are from own data (CSD 1875197), whereby the crystal has been grown the same way as Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2.
Materials 11 02146 g001
Materials 11 02146 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of the Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 solid solution. The AE1, AE2, Cd, and Sb atoms are shown in orange, green, red, and blue, respectively; (b) coordination environment of the AE1 and AE2 atoms.
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of the Ca2−xEuxCdSb2 solid solution. The AE1, AE2, Cd, and Sb atoms are shown in orange, green, red, and blue, respectively; (b) coordination environment of the AE1 and AE2 atoms.
Materials 11 02146 g002
Materials 11 02146 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Total and projected electronic densities of states (DOS) for the idealized CaEuCdSb2 composition; (b–d) Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population curves (COHP) averaged over selected bonds from Table 6. The inset in (c) shows the orbital resolved Eu(4f)–Sb interaction.
Figure 3. (a) Total and projected electronic densities of states (DOS) for the idealized CaEuCdSb2 composition; (b–d) Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population curves (COHP) averaged over selected bonds from Table 6. The inset in (c) shows the orbital resolved Eu(4f)–Sb interaction.
Materials 11 02146 g003
Materials 11 02146 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Crystal structure of Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 with Eu/Ca, Cd, and Sb atoms shown in orange, red, and blue, respectively; (b) variation of the Eu occupancy as a function of the available volume for the non-equivalent AE positions in Eu10.01Ca0.99(1)Cd6Sb12 (AE = Eu + Ca).
Figure 4. (a) Crystal structure of Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12 with Eu/Ca, Cd, and Sb atoms shown in orange, red, and blue, respectively; (b) variation of the Eu occupancy as a function of the available volume for the non-equivalent AE positions in Eu10.01Ca0.99(1)Cd6Sb12 (AE = Eu + Ca).
Materials 11 02146 g004
Table
Table 1. Data collection details and selected crystallographic data for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (space group P 3 ¯ m1 (No. 164), Z = 1, T = 200 K, Mo Kα λ = 0.71073 Å). The estimated standard deviations on the refined compositions are ±0.01 or better.
Table 1. Data collection details and selected crystallographic data for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 (space group P 3 ¯ m1 (No. 164), Z = 1, T = 200 K, Mo Kα λ = 0.71073 Å). The estimated standard deviations on the refined compositions are ±0.01 or better.
CompositionCa0.71Eu0.29Cd2Sb2Ca0.45Eu0.55Cd2Sb2Ca0.27Eu0.73Cd2Sb2Ca0.15Eu0.85Cd2Sb2Ca0.08Eu0.92Cd2Sb2
Formula weight/g mol−1540.83569.91590.05603.48611.31
a/Å4.6632(5)4.6811(4)4.6852(4)4.687(1)4.6934(3)
c/Å7.630(1)7.670(1)7.684(1)7.695(3)7.7062(7)
V/Å3143.68(4)145.55(3)146.07(3)146.37(8)147.01(2)
ρcalc/g cm−36.256.506.716.856.90
µMoKα/cm−1201.7224.3240.9252.0257.6
R1 [I > 2σ(I)]a0.0160.0120.0190.0210.016
wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]a0.0310.0260.0390.0380.029
R1 [all data]a0.0180.0130.0200.0230.017
wR2 [all data]a0.0310.0270.0400.0380.029
Δρmax,min/e Å−30.95, −0.960.87, −0.790.97, −1.081.63, −1.010.89, −1.27
a R1 = ∑||Fo| − |Fc||/∑|Fo|; wR2 = [∑[w(Fo2 − Fc2)2]/∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2, where w = 1/[σ2Fo2 + (AP)2 + (BP)], and P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3; A, B are the respective weight coefficients.
Table
Table 2. Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueq a) for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2, x = 0.29(1).
Table 2. Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueq a) for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2, x = 0.29(1).
AtomSitexyzUeq/Å2
Ca/Eub1a0000.0125(4)
Cd2d1/32/30.36980(7)0.0157(2)
Sb2d1/32/30.75897(6)0.0128(2)
aUeq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor. b 0.711Ca + 0.289(3) Eu.
Table
Table 3. Selected bond lengths and angles for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 with varied x.
Table 3. Selected bond lengths and angles for Ca1−xEuxCd2Sb2 with varied x.
Atomsx = 0.289(3)x = 0.547(4)x = 0.731(4)x = 0.855(5)x = 0.924(4)
Ca/Eu–Sb × 63.2604(4) Å3.2847(3) Å3.2956(4) Å3.3029(7) Å3.3097(3) Å
Cd–Sb × 32.8660(4) Å2.8694(3) Å2.8668(4) Å2.8646(7) Å2.8669(3) Å
Cd–Sb2.9692(9) Å2.9721(7) Å2.9692(9) Å2.966(1) Å2.9695(8) Å
Sb–Ca/Eu–Sb 88.69(1)°89.11(1)°89.40(1)°89.62(2)°89.69(1)°
Sb–Ca/Eu–Sb91.31(1)°90.89(1)°90.61(1)°90.38(2)°90.31(1)°
Sb–Ca/Eu–Sb 180°180°180°180°180°
Sb–Cd–Sb 108.89(1)°109.31(1)°109.34(2)°109.17(2)°109.06(2)°
Sb–Cd–Sb110.05(1)°109.63(1)°109.60(2)°109.77(2)°109.88(2)°
Table
Table 4. Data collection details and selected crystallographic data for Ca1.37Eu0.63(1)CdSb2 and Eu10.01Ca0.99(1)Cd6Sb12 (T = 200 K, Mo Kα radiation with λ = 0.71073 Å).
Table 4. Data collection details and selected crystallographic data for Ca1.37Eu0.63(1)CdSb2 and Eu10.01Ca0.99(1)Cd6Sb12 (T = 200 K, Mo Kα radiation with λ = 0.71073 Å).
CompositionCa1.37Eu0.63(1)CdSb2Eu10.01Ca0.99(1)Cd6Sb12
Formula weight/g mol−1506.263696.76
Space groupCmc21 (No. 36)C2/m (No. 12)
Z42
a/Å4.646(2)32.407(4)
b/Å17.733(7)4.7248(5)
c/Å7.283(3)12.377(1)
β/°-109.963(1)
V/Å3600.0(4)1781.2(3)
ρcalc/g cm−35.606.89
µMoKα/cm−1199.0298.7
R1 [I > 2σ(I)] a0.0380.028
wR2 [I > 2σ(I)] a0.0930.051
R1 [all data] a0.0440.037
wR2 [all data] a0.0960.054
Δρmax,min/e Å−31.52, −2.571.47, −2.02
a R1 = ∑||Fo| − |Fc||/∑|Fo|; wR2 = [∑[w(Fo2 − Fc2)2]/∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2, where w = 1/[σ2Fo2 + (AP)2 + (BP)], and P = (Fo2+2Fc2)/3; A, B are the respective weight coefficients.
Table
Table 5. Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueqa) for Ca2−xEuxCdSb2, x = 0.63(1).
Table 5. Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueqa) for Ca2−xEuxCdSb2, x = 0.63(1).
AtomSitexyzUeq/Å2
Ca/Eu1 b4a00.3019(1)0.5306(4)0.017(1)
Ca/Eu2 b4a00.4782(4)0.2217(8)0.013(2)
Cd14a00.0982(1)0.3935(4)0.014(1)
Sb14a00.0650(1)0.0026(3)0.010(1)
Sb24a00.3243(1)0.0074(4)0.014(1)
aUeq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor. b Ca/Eu1 = 0.39Ca + 0.61(1)Eu; Ca/Eu2 = 0.98Ca + 0.02(1)Eu.
Table
Table 6. Selected interatomic distances for Ca2−xEuxCdSb2, x = 0.63(1).
Table 6. Selected interatomic distances for Ca2−xEuxCdSb2, x = 0.63(1).
Atom PairDistance/Å
Ca/Eu1–Sb2 × 23.229(2)
Ca/Eu1–Sb1 × 23.319(2)
Ca/Eu1–Sb23.495(4)
Ca/Eu1–Sb23.831(4)
Ca/Eu2–Sb23.144(7)
Ca/Eu2–Sb1 × 23.188(5)
Ca/Eu2–Sb1 × 23.211(5)
Cd1–Sb2 × 22.823(2)
Cd1–Sb12.908(4)
Cd1–Sb13.001(3)
Table
Table 7. Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueqa) for Eu11–xCaxCd6Sb12, x = 0.99(1).
Table 7. Atomic coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueqa) for Eu11–xCaxCd6Sb12, x = 0.99(1).
AtomSitexyzUeq/Å2
Eu/Ca1 b4i0.01907(2)00.68106(6)0.0104(2)
Eu/Ca2 b4i0.11381(3)00.50682(7)0.0096(3)
Eu/Ca3 b4i0.12576(2)00.01564(6)0.0105(2)
Eu/Ca4 b4i0.19980(2)00.34239(6)0.0099(2)
Eu/Ca5 b4i0.27714(2)00.13201(6)0.0106(2)
Eu/Ca6 b2a0000.0095(4)
Cd14i0.21983(3)00.66546(9)0.0109(2)
Cd24i0.39866(3)00.25337(8)0.0102(2)
Cd34i0.54755(3)00.24669(9)0.0126(2)
Sb14i0.08999(3)00.23366(8)0.0100(2)
Sb24i0.15114(3)00.78495(8)0.0097(2)
Sb34i0.30966(3)00.47226(8)0.0096(2)
Sb44i0.45328(3)00.11364(8)0.0092(2)
Sb54i0.45647(3)00.49911(8)0.0093(2)
Sb64i0.70360(3)00.13391(8)0.0091(2)
aUeq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor. b Eu/Ca1 = 0.986Eu + 0.014(4)Ca; Eu/Ca2 = 0.788Eu + 0.212(4)Ca; Eu/Ca3 = 0.914Eu + 0.086(4)Ca; Eu/Ca4 = 0.945Eu + 0.055(4)Ca; Eu/Ca5 = 0.938Eu + 0.062(4)Ca; Eu/Ca6 = 0.873Eu + 0.127(5)Ca.
Table
Table 8. Selected interatomic distances for Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12, x = 0.99(1).
Table 8. Selected interatomic distances for Eu11−xCaxCd6Sb12, x = 0.99(1).
Atom PairDistance/ÅAtom PairDistance/Å
Eu/Ca1–Sb4 × 23.3594(8)Eu/Ca5–Sb2 × 23.2262(8)
Eu/Ca1–Sb5 × 23.4130(8)Eu/Ca5–Sb6 × 23.3615(8)
Eu/Ca1–Sb5 × 23.5198(9)Eu/Ca5–Sb63.553(1)
Eu/Ca2–Sb13.201(1)Eu/Ca6–Sb1 × 23.3330(9)
Eu/Ca2–Sb23.236(1)Eu/Ca6–Sb4 × 43.3623(7)
Eu/Ca2–Sb5 × 23.2649(8)Cd1–Sb62.849(1)
Eu/Ca2–Sb3 × 23.3704(9)Cd1–Sb3 × 22.8787(8)
Eu/Ca3–Sb23.230(1)Cd1–Sb23.064(1)
Eu/Ca3–Sb13.280(1)Cd2–Sb2 × 22.8085(7)
Eu/Ca3–Sb6 × 23.4008(8)Cd2–Sb42.866(1)
Eu/Ca3–Sb4 × 23.4503(9)Cd2–Sb52.978(1)
Eu/Ca4–Sb13.348(1)Cd3–Sb1 × 22.7659(7)
Eu/Ca4–Sb33.369(1)Cd3–Sb42.934(1)
Eu/Ca4–Sb3 × 23.3791(9)Cd3–Sb53.193(1)
Eu/Ca4–Sb6 × 23.5313(9)Sb5–Sb52.814(2)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ovchinnikov, A.; Darone, G.M.; Saparov, B.; Bobev, S. Exploratory Work in the Quaternary System of Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb: Synthesis, Crystal, and Electronic Structures of New Zintl Solid Solutions. Materials 2018, 11, 2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112146

AMA Style

Ovchinnikov A, Darone GM, Saparov B, Bobev S. Exploratory Work in the Quaternary System of Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb: Synthesis, Crystal, and Electronic Structures of New Zintl Solid Solutions. Materials. 2018; 11(11):2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ovchinnikov, Alexander, Gregory M. Darone, Bayrammurad Saparov, and Svilen Bobev. 2018. "Exploratory Work in the Quaternary System of Ca–Eu–Cd–Sb: Synthesis, Crystal, and Electronic Structures of New Zintl Solid Solutions" Materials 11, no. 11: 2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop