Next Article in Journal
Electrospinning of Fish Gelatin Solution Containing Citric Acid: An Environmentally Friendly Approach to Prepare Crosslinked Gelatin Fibers
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Transient State of Inductive Fault Current Limiter Based on Field-Circuit Coupling Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/ma12172807
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Electrochemical Properties of LiMn2O4-Based Cathode Material Co-Modified by Mg-Doping and Octahedral Morphology

by
Hongyuan Zhao
1,*,
Yongfang Nie
1,
Dongyang Que
2,
Youzuo Hu
3 and
Yongfeng Li
1,*
1
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
2
Zhumadian Power Supply Company, State Grid Henan Electric Power Company, Zhumadian 463500, China
3
Chemistry Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(17), 2807; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172807
Submission received: 11 August 2019 / Revised: 28 August 2019 / Accepted: 29 August 2019 / Published: 31 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, the spinel LiMn2O4 cathode material was prepared by high-temperature solid-phase method and further optimized by co-modification strategy based on the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology. The octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample belongs to the spinel cubic structure with the space group of Fd3m, and no other impurities are presented in the XRD patterns. The octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 particles show narrow size distribution with regular morphology. When used as cathode material, the obtained LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 octahedra shows excellent electrochemical properties. This material can exhibit high capacity retention of 96.8% with 100th discharge capacity of 111.6 mAh g−1 at 1.0 C. Moreover, the rate performance and high-temperature cycling stability of LiMn2O4 are effectively improved by the co-modification strategy based on Mg-doping and octahedral morphology. These results are mostly given to the fact that the addition of magnesium ions can suppress the Jahn–Teller effect and the octahedral morphology contributes to the Mn dissolution, which can improve the structural stability of LiMn2O4.

1. Introduction

With the increasingly serious environmental pollution, new energy and environmental technology have caught more and more extensive attention. Under this circumstance, the research and development of lithium-ion batteries are receiving more and more attention at home and abroad since their first commercial application in 1991 [1,2,3]. As an important cathode material, LiMn2O4 possesses a rather high cost advantage because of the abundant manganese resource and this material can be obtained by many preparation technologies [4,5,6,7,8]. Moreover, this material does not involve the use of toxic metal elements. All these advantages can promote large-scale applications of LiMn2O4. It must be noted, however, that the cycling stability and high temperature performance cannot meet the requirement of long endurance mileage [9,10,11,12].
According to the existing literature, the electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 can be severely affected by the Jahn–Teller distortion effect and Mn dissolution during the process of discharging and charging due to the fact that the Jahn–Teller distortion and Mn dissolution is closely related to the trivalent state (Mn3+), which can seriously affect the discharging process and the discharged state [13,14,15,16]. In recent years, many optimization strategies (doping, coating, morphology control, etc.) have been developed to address these problems [11,15,17,18,19,20,21]. Among them, the doping strategy usually choses other heterogeneous ions (Li+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Al3+, Cr3+, Si4+, etc.) to replace a small amount of manganese ions [2,9,22,23,24,25]. As a result, the Jahn–Teller distortion effect can be decreased, which enhances the structural stability of LiMn2O4. Among these heterogeneous ions, magnesium has a wide distribution in nature and can work as an additive in electrolyte as well as an additive in cathode slurry [26,27]. More importantly, the addition of magnesium ions in LiMn2O4 can play a positive role in improving the electrochemical properties. Huang et al. [23] have prepared Mg-doped LiMn2O4 samples and investigated the effect of introducing magnesium ions on the structure, morphology, and cycling properties. The introduction of magnesium ions can strengthen the structural stability of LiMn2O4 by reducing the cell volume, and the reduction of trivalent manganese ions further strengthens the crystal structure of LiMn2O4 by suppressing the Jahn–Teller effect. The obtained Mg-doped LiMn2O4 sample can show higher capacity retention. Many other research works have confirmed the positive effect of introducing magnesium ions on optimizing the cycling properties of LiMn2O4 [28]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the high-performance LiMn2O4 can be prepared by solid-state method using Mn3O4 with octahedral morphology [29]. Zhao et al. [30] successfully prepared the octahedral LiMn2O4 particles by using Mn3O4 octahedra as manganese source. Since the octahedral morphology can suppress the dissolution of Mn to steady crystal structure, the obtained LiMn2O4 octahedra shows excellent electrochemical properties. Based on the above analysis, it is worth considering that the simultaneous use of the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology may greatly enhance the electrochemical properties of LiMn2O4.
Herein, the Mg-doped LiMn2O4 octahedra were prepared by high temperature solid-phase method with magnesium nitrate and Mn3O4 octahedra as doping agent and manganese source. The electrochemical properties of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample as cathode material were investigated in detail. It could be found that the electrochemical properties of LiMn2O4 were greatly enhanced by jointly using the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology. This work indicates that the co-modification strategy based on Mg-doping and octahedral morphology has vital significance to promote the practical application of LiMn2O4.

2. Materials and Methods

The octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 (LMMOO) particles were prepared by high temperature solid-phase method with magnesium nitrate and Mn3O4 octahedra as doping agent and manganese source. The octahedral Mn3O4 particles were firstly prepared via a hypothermal approach according to the existing literature [30]. Subsequently, in a typical synthesis process, stoichiometric LiOH·H2O, Mn3O4 octahedra, and Mg(NO3)2·6H2O were ground to obtain the slurry mixture with the help of absolute ethanol. Then, the homogeneous mixture was dried in a drying oven and sintered at 700 °C for 10 h in air. In order to allow the comparison, the undoped LiMn2O4 (LMO) and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 (LMMO) particles were prepared by using electrolytic MnO2 as manganese precursor.
The structure and morphology usually have an important impact on the electrochemical properties of cathode material. The obtained LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples were characterized by using XRD and SEM techniques. The effects of Mg-doping and octahedral morphology on the cycling stability of LiMn2O4 were studied by fabricating the coin cells with the obtained spinels as cathode materials. The positive electrode was constituted from 85% synthesized product as cathode material, 10% acetylene black as conductive agent, and 5% polyvinylidene fluoride dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone as binder. The metallic lithium foil was used as counter electrode, the polypropylene microporous membrane was used as diaphragm, and the 1 M lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6) solution in a mixture of the ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) at a volume ratio of 1:1 was used as the electrolyte. All the electrochemical tests were carried out on LANHE CT2001A system (LANHE, Wuhan, China) and CHI660E electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments, Shanghai, China).

3. Results and Discussion

In order to confirm the structures of the obtained samples, the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples were characterized. It can be seen from Figure 1 that the diffraction peaks of the undoped LiMn2O4 are in good agreement with the standard diffraction peaks of LiMn2O4 (JCPDS No. 35-0782). No other diffraction peaks of manganese oxide and magnesium oxide can be observed, suggesting the complete transformation of electrolytic manganese dioxide to LiMn2O4 [31]. After introducing a small amount of magnesium ions, the obtained LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample was still present in the spinel cubic structure of LiMn2O4, which indicates that the addition of magnesium ions did not change the crystal structure [32,33]. For the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample obtained from Mn3O4 octahedra, the characteristic diffraction peaks were indexed to the spinel LiMn2O4. Moreover, the corresponding peak intensities are stronger than that of the LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples prepared from electrolytic manganese dioxide, suggesting the good crystalline quality of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample [9,34]. Table 1 lists the related crystal parameters of these three samples. The addition of magnesium ions leads to the reduction of the lattice parameter and shrinking of unit cell volume, suggesting the more stable structural stability of the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the octahedral Mn3O4, LiMn2O4, and Mg-doped LiMn2O4 samples. As shown in Figure 2a, the Mn3O4 particles prepared by hydrothermal approach present rather good octahedral morphology. For the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample shown in Figure 2b,c, it can be seen that it presents a narrow size distribution with regular morphology, which indicates that the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample inherits the special morphology of Mn3O4 octahedra [30]. Moreover, the particle size belongs to the submicron scale, which agrees with the particle size of Mn3O4. By contrast, the particle morphology of the undoped LiMn2O4 particles (Figure 2d) is irregular with micron grade particle size. Especially, the obvious agglomerated particle can be observed in the undoped LiMn2O4 particles. These unsatisfactory characteristics usually have a greater negative impact on the electrochemical properties of the cathode material [35,36]. For the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample (Figure 2e), it shows relatively good size distribution, which is closely related to the addition of a certain amount of magnesium ions, which agrees with the research result [23,33]. These results suggest that the combination of Mg-doping and octahedral morphology can be useful in optimizing the morphology and size distribution of LiMn2O4 particles.
To investigate the influence of jointly using the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology on the electrochemical performance, the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples were tested at a cycling rate of 1.0 C, the corresponding initial charge–discharge curves are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the undoped LiMn2O4 sample exhibits characteristic discharge curves of LiMn2O4 with two voltage plateaus. According to the research result [37,38], these two voltage plateaus correspond to the intercalation/de-intercalation processes of lithium ions, which correspond to the two-phase equilibrium of λ-MnO2/Li0.5Mn2O4 and single-phase equilibrium of Li0.5Mn2O4/LiMn2O4, respectively. For the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples, the initial charge–discharge curves show similar platform characteristics, and the potential interval of the Mg-doped spinels is less than that of the undoped spinel, suggesting the higher reaction kinetics of the Mg-doped spinels [39]. It is important to note, however, that the discharge voltage plateaus of the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples are slightly higher than that of the undoped LiMn2O4 sample, which may be related to the optimization of the Li+ intercalation/deintercalation behaviors due to the addition of other cations in the spinel structure [10,33,39,40].
The cycling performance is a very important index sign for the practical application of LiMn2O4. Figure 4 shows the cycling stability of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C. For the undoped LiMn2O4 sample, it exhibits an initial capacity of 116.6 mAh g−1 with unsatisfactory cycling stability. After 100 cycles, the discharge capacity presents much decrease with the 100th capacity of 83.5 mAh g−1. Such poor performance is mainly attributed to the wide size distribution and large agglomerated particle [35]. When adding some magnesium ions, the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample shows higher capacity retention than that of undoped LiMn2O4 sample. Although the addition of magnesium ions decreases the initial discharge capacity, the capacity retention of the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample is enhanced greatly. After 100 cycles, the discharge capacity can maintain 100.1 mAh g−1 with high retention of 89.5%. The improvement in cycling stability is attributed to the fact that the introduction of magnesium ions can strengthen the structural stability of LiMn2O4 by inhibiting the Jahn–Teller effect and reducing the cell volume [23,33]. It is important to note that the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample can show more excellent cycling performance. Compared with the undoped LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples, the capacity retention of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample can reach up to 96.8% after 100 cycles with the 100th capacity of 111.6 mAh g−1. Such excellent cycling stability mainly benefits from the synergistic effect of the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology. The Mg-doping can suppress the Jahn–Teller effect and the octahedral morphology can contribute to inhibit the Mn dissolution, which can improve the structural stability of LiMn2O4 [29,36].
To investigate the effect of jointly using the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology on the rate capability, the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples were successively cycled at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 C, respectively. Figure 5a presents the characteristic discharge curves of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample (the representative of these three samples) at different cycling rates. As shown here, the discharge capacity and voltage platform are significantly affected by the high cycling rate. When the cycling rate gradually increases, the boundary of the two voltage plateaus become smooth and fuzzy and the discharge capacity gradually decreases due to the increased polarization, which are in accordance with the existing literature [41,42,43]. Figure 5b shows the corresponding cycling performance of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at varying cycling rates. The undoped LiMn2O4 sample exhibits a discharge capacity of 126.7 mAh g−1 at low cycling rate of 0.5 C. With the increase of the cycling rates, the discharge capacity is influenced greatly. As the cycling rate increases to 5.0 C, the undoped LiMn2O4 sample only exhibits 55.0 mAh g−1 with rather low retention of 43.4%. By contrast, the Mg-doped LiMn2O4 samples present outstanding cycling stability at high cycling rate. Especially, the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample can exhibit a higher capacity of 91.8 mAh g−1 at a high cycling rate of 5.0 C. To further explore the high-rate cycling stability, the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples were cycled at 10 C. The corresponding characteristic discharge curves are shown in Figure 6a. It can be found that the characteristic voltage plateaus in the discharge curves become blurred to a large extent, which agrees with the research result [39,44,45]. Figure 6b presents the cycling performance of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 10 C. It can show satisfactory retention of 97.5% after 100 cycles with initial capacity of 72.1 mAh g−1. The above results suggest that the co-modification strategy based on Mg-doping and octahedral morphology is an important means for effectively improving the rate capability of LiMn2O4.
Figure 7a presents the high-temperature cycling stability of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C. It can be seen that the cycling stability of the undoped LiMn2O4 sample is much poorer than that of the octahedral Mg-doped LiMn2O4 sample. The initial discharge capacity of the undoped LiMn2O4 sample is comparable to the test results shown in Figure 4, but the capacity retention is rather poor. After 50 cycles, this sample only presents low capacity retention of 80.5%. It is important to note that the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 can present excellent capacity retention of 92.5% with a satisfactory 50th discharge capacity of 106.6 mAh g−1. Figure 7b shows the rate capability of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 55 °C. As shown here, the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample shows more stable high-temperature cycling stability at different rates, especially the high cycling rate. When tested at 5.0 C, the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample can maintain the discharge capacity of 95.6 mAh g−1. Unfortunately, the undoped LiMn2O4 sample presents unsatisfactory rate capability, which further confirms the synergistic effect of the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology.
Figure 8a presents the Nyquist plots of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples, and Figure 8b shows the corresponding equivalent circuit model. According to the research result [9,10,23], the charge transfer resistance (R2) in the high-frequency region has strong ties to the electrochemical properties. Therefore, we mainly studied the R2 value to confirm the effect of both the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology on the electrochemical performance. As shown in Figure 8a, the combination of Mg-doping and octahedral morphology produces an important influence on the R2 value. The addition of magnesium ions can suppress the Jahn–Teller distortion effect to improve the structural stability, and the octahedral morphology of LiMn2O4 octahedra suppresses the dissolution of Mn in electrolyte [30,36]. Moreover, the uniform particle size distribution also contributes to the diffusion efficiency of lithium ions [33,39,43]. As a result, the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample presents lower initial charge-transfer resistance than that of the undoped spinel, which suggests excellent electrochemical properties.

4. Conclusions

To summarize, the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample was prepared by high temperature solid-phase method with magnesium nitrate and Mn3O4 octahedra as the doping agent and manganese source. XRD and SEM results indicate that the Mg-doping does not change the structure of LiMn2O4 and the octahedral morphology of manganese source is inherited well in the obtained LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample. The synergistic effect of both the Mg-doping and octahedral morphology on the electrochemical performance were confirmed. The octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample can show more excellent electrochemical properties compared to the undoped LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 particles. When cycled at 1.0 C, the capacity retention of the LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample can reach up to 96.8% after 100 cycles with the initial capacity of 115.3 mAh g−1. Not only that, the combination of Mg-doping and octahedral morphology also significantly enhances the rate capability and high-temperature performance. This work is meaningful to promote the large-scale commercial application of LiMn2O4.

Author Contributions

H.Z. and Y.L. conceived and designed the experiments; H.Z. and Y.N. performed the experiments; all authors analyzed the data; H.Z. wrote the paper; all authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Research Project of Education Department of Henan Province (No. 19A150023, No. 19A430014), Research Project of Science and Technology of Henan Province (No. 192102210301, No. 192102210215), High-Level Talents Introduction Project of Henan Institute of Science and Technology (No. 203010617011), and Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province (No. 20IRTSTHN016).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Amine, K. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhao, H.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, G.; Wu, T.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Su, J. Sol-gel synthesis of silicon-doped lithium manganese oxide with enhanced reversible capacity and cycling stability. Materials 2018, 11, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Normakhmedov, O.O.; Brylev, O.A.; Petukhov, D.I.; Kurilenko, K.A.; Kulova, T.L.; Tuseeva, E.K.; Skundin, A.M. Cryochemically processed Li1+yMn1.95Ni0.025Co0.025O4 (y = 0, 0.1) cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Materials 2018, 11, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, W.; Wang, G.; Luo, C.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Eckstein, B.J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Kang, Y.; et al. Controllable growth of LiMn2O4 by carbohydrate-assisted combustion synthesis for high performance Li-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2019, 64, 103936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, J.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Z.; Lee, K.S.; Lu, L. LiMn2O4 cathode materials with large porous structure and radial interior channels for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 212, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hou, Y.; Chang, K.; Tang, H.; Li, B.; Hou, Y.; Chang, Z. Drastic enhancement in the rate and cyclic behavior of LiMn2O4 electrodes at elevated temperatures by phosphorus doping. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 319, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Han, C.G.; Zhu, C.; Saito, G.; Akiyama, T. Improved electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 surface-modified by a Mn4+-rich phase for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 209, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pyun, M.H.; Park, Y.J. Graphene/LiMn2O4 nanocomposites for enhanced lithium ion batteries with high rate capability. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 643, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, H.; Gao, X.; Li, Y.; Ran, Q.; Fu, C.; Feng, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Su, J. Synergistic effects of zinc-doping and nano-rod morphology on enhancing the electrochemical properties of spinel Li-Mn-O material. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 17591–17597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, H.; Li, F.; Bai, X.; Wu, T.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Su, J. Enhanced cycling stability of LiCuxMn1.95−xSi0.05O4 cathode material obtained by solid-state method. Materials 2018, 11, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, C.; Su, J.; Wang, T.; Yuan, K.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.; Huang, T.; Wu, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, A. Significant improvement on electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 at elevated temperature by atomic layer deposition of TiO2 nanocoating. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 7890–7901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.Q.; Lai, F.Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Huang, Y.G.; Hu, S.J.; Li, Q.Y. Excellent stability of spinel LiMn2O4-based cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 177, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodríguez, R.A.; Pérez–Cappe, E.L.; Laffita, Y.M.; Ardanza, A.C.; Salazar, J.S.; Santos, M.Á.; Aguilar Frutis, M.A.; Mohalem, N.D.S.; Alves, O.L. Structural defects in LiMn2O4 induced by gamma radiation and its influence on the Jahn-Teller effect. Solid State Ion. 2018, 324, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qiao, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, Z.; Du, S.; Cheng, Q.; Zhai, H.; Fritz, N.J.; Du, Q.; Yang, Y. Visualizing ion diffusion in battery systems by fluorescence microscopy: A case study on the dissolution of LiMn2O4. Nano Energy 2018, 45, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kasnatscheew, J.; Wagner, R.; Winter, M.; Cekic–Laskovic, I. Interfaces and Materials in Lithium Ion Batteries: Challenges for Theoretical Electrochemistry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 376, p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tao, S.; Zhao, H.; Wu, C.; Xie, H.; Cui, P.; Xiang, T.; Chen, S.; Zhang, L.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Enhanced electrochemical performance of MoO3-coated LiMn2O4 cathode for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 199, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mao, Y.; Xiao, S.; Liu, J. Nanoparticle-assembled LiMn2O4 hollow microspheres as high-performance lithium-ion battery cathode. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 96, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Cai, Y.; Tan, M.; Liu, X. Enhanced elevated-temperature performance of LiAlxSi0.05Mg0.05Mn1.90−xO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.08) cathode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 199, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tron, A.; Park, Y.D.; Mun, J. AlF3-coated LiMn2O4 as cathode material for aqueous rechargeable lithium battery with improved cycling stability. J. Power Sources 2016, 325, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Michalska, M.; Ziółkowska, D.A.; Jasiński, J.B.; Lee, P.H.; Ławniczak, P.; Andrzejewski, B.; Ostrowski, A.; Bednarski, W.; Wu, S.H.; Lin, J.Y. Improved electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 cathode material by Ce doping. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 276, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Y.; Cao, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Xu, X. Hierarchical LiMn2O4 hollow cubes with exposed {111} planes as high-power cathodes for lithium–ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 19567–19572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sheth, J.; Karan, N.K.; Abraham, D.P.; Nguyen, C.C.; Lucht, B.L.; Sheldon, B.W.; Guduru, P.R. In situ stress evolution in Li1+xMn2O4 thin films during electrochemical cycling in Li-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, J.; Yang, F.; Guo, Y.; Peng, C.; Bai, H.; Peng, J.; Guo, J. LiMgxMn2−xO4 (x ≤ 0.10) cathode materials with high rate performance prepared by molten-salt combustion at low temperature. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 9662–9667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, C.; Huang, J.; Guo, Y.; Li, Q.; Bai, H.; He, Y.; Su, C.; Guo, J. Electrochemical performance of spinel LiAlxMn2−xO4 prepared rapidly by glucose-assisted solid-state combustion synthesis. Vacuum 2015, 120, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, H.; Zhao, Y.; Niu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Hou, H. Applications of LiCrxMn2−xO4 cathode material with high capacity and high rate in high-temperature battery. Solid State Ion. 2018, 325, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wagner, R.; Streipert, B.; Kraft, V.; Reyes Jiménez, A.; Röser, S.; Kasnatscheew, J.; Gallus, D.R.; Börner, M.; Mayer, C.; Arlinghaus, H.F.; et al. Counterintuitive role of magnesium salts as effective electrolyte additives for high voltage lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wagner, R.; Kraft, V.; Streipert, B.; Kasnatscheew, J.; Gallus, D.R.; Amereller, M.; Korth, M.; Cekic–Laskovic, I.; Winter, M. Magnesium-based additives for the cathode slurry to enable high voltage application of lithium–ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 228, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, J.; Hu, L.; Su, C.; Wang, R.; Liu, X.; Peng, J.G. Effect of temperature on electrochemical performance of LiMg0.06Mn1.94O4 prepared by a molten-salt combustion method. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 4771–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jin, G.; Qiao, H.; Xie, H.; Wang, H.; He, K.; Liu, P.; Chen, J.; Tang, Y.; Liu, S.; Huang, C. Synthesis of single-crystalline octahedral LiMn2O4 as high performance cathode for Li-ion battery. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 150, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, H.; Nie, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhao, E.; Song, J.; Komarneni, S. Low-cost and eco-friendly synthesis of octahedral LiMn2O4 cathode material with excellent electrochemical performance. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 17183–17191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, H.; Li, F.; Liu, X.; Xiong, W.; Chen, B.; Shao, H.; Que, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y. A simple, low-cost and eco-friendly approach to synthesize single-crystalline LiMn2O4 nanorods with high electrochemical performance for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 166, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, G.; Yu, Y.; liu, J.; Feng, T.; Shao, M.; Su, C.; Guo, J. Study on electrochemical performance of LiMg0.06Mn1.94O4 synthesized by solid–state combustion method. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 13, 1495–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xiang, M.; Su, C.W.; Feng, L.; Yuan, M.; Guo, J. Rapid synthesis of high-cycling performance LiMgxMn2−xO4 (x ≤ 0.20) cathode materials by a low-temperature solid-state combustion method. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 125, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, S.; Zhao, H.; Tan, M.; Hu, Y.; Shu, X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, B.; Liu, X. Er-doped LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode material with enhanced cycling stability for lithium–ion batteries. Materials 2017, 10, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chand, P.; Bansal, V.; Sukriti; Singh, V. Investigations of spinel LiZnxMn2−xO4 (x ≤ 0.03) cathode materials for a lithium ion battery application. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Adv. 2018, 238, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feng, T.; Xu, W.; Liu, X.; Shao, M.; Guo, J.; Su, C. Effect of calcination time on lithium ion diffusion coefficient of LiMg0.04Mn1.96O4 prepared by a solid-state combustion method. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 13, 1027–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiong, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J. Electrochemical properties of tetravalent Ti-doped spinel LiMn2O4. J. Solid State Electr. 2010, 15, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, C. Structure and performance of dual-doped LiMn2O4 cathode materials prepared via microwave synthesis method. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 125, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wen, W.; Ju, B.; Wang, X.; Wu, C.; Shu, H.; Yang, X. Effects of magnesium and fluorine co-doping on the structural and electrochemical performance of the spinel LiMn2O4 cathode materials. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 147, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.; Tian, R.; Jiang, Y.; Tan, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Wang, H.S.; Chu, W. On the drastically improved performance of Fe-doped LiMn2O4 nanoparticles prepared by a facile solution-gelation route. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 180, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shang, Y.; Lin, X.; Lu, X.; Huang, T.; Yu, A. Nano-TiO2 coated LiMn2O4 as cathode materials for lithium–ion batteries at elevated temperatures. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 156, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, J.; Li, G.; Yu, Y.; Bai, H.; Shao, M.; Guo, J.; Su, C.; Liu, X.; Bai, W. Synthesis and electrochemical performance evaluations of polyhedra spinel LiAlxMn2−xO4 (x ≤ 0.20) cathode materials prepared by a solution combustion technique. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 1315–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xiong, L.; Xu, Y.; Tao, T.; Goodenough, J.B. Synthesis and electrochemical characterization of multi-cations doped spinel LiMn2O4 used for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 199, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lai, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Hu, S.; Wu, X.; Wu, Q.; Huang, Y.; He, Z.; Li, Q. Three-dimension hierarchical Al2O3 nanosheets wrapped LiMn2O4 with enhanced cycling stability as cathode material for lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 21656–21665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kumar, N.; Rodriguez, J.R.; Pol, V.G.; Sen, A. Facile synthesis of 2D graphene oxide sheet enveloping ultrafine 1D LiMn2O4 as interconnected framework to enhance cathodic property for Li-ion battery. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 463, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 02807 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) Mn3O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and (b) LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) Mn3O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and (b) LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
Materials 12 02807 g001
Materials 12 02807 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Mn3O4 octahedra, (b,c) LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 octahedra, (d) LiMn2O4, and (e) LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Mn3O4 octahedra, (b,c) LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 octahedra, (d) LiMn2O4, and (e) LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4.
Materials 12 02807 g002
Materials 12 02807 g003 550
Figure 3. Initial charge–discharge curves of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C.
Figure 3. Initial charge–discharge curves of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C.
Materials 12 02807 g003
Materials 12 02807 g004 550
Figure 4. Cycling stability of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C.
Figure 4. Cycling stability of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C.
Materials 12 02807 g004
Materials 12 02807 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Representative discharge curves of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample and (b) rate capability of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
Figure 5. (a) Representative discharge curves of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample and (b) rate capability of the LiMn2O4, LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4, and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
Materials 12 02807 g005
Materials 12 02807 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Initial discharge curves and (b) cycling performance of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample at 10 C.
Figure 6. (a) Initial discharge curves and (b) cycling performance of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample at 10 C.
Materials 12 02807 g006
Materials 12 02807 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Cycling stability of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C under high temperature (55 °C), and (b) representative discharge curves of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample.
Figure 7. (a) Cycling stability of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples at 1.0 C under high temperature (55 °C), and (b) representative discharge curves of the octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 sample.
Materials 12 02807 g007
Materials 12 02807 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Nyquist plots of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples and (b) equivalent circuit model of EIS.
Figure 8. (a) Nyquist plots of the LiMn2O4 and octahedral LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples and (b) equivalent circuit model of EIS.
Materials 12 02807 g008
Table
Table 1. Crystal parameters of the LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
Table 1. Crystal parameters of the LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.95Mg0.05O4 samples.
SampleSpacea (nm)V (nm3)
LMOFd-3m0.823920.55931
LMMOFd-3m0.822870.55718
LMMOOFd-3m0.822530.55649

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, H.; Nie, Y.; Que, D.; Hu, Y.; Li, Y. Improved Electrochemical Properties of LiMn2O4-Based Cathode Material Co-Modified by Mg-Doping and Octahedral Morphology. Materials 2019, 12, 2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172807

AMA Style

Zhao H, Nie Y, Que D, Hu Y, Li Y. Improved Electrochemical Properties of LiMn2O4-Based Cathode Material Co-Modified by Mg-Doping and Octahedral Morphology. Materials. 2019; 12(17):2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Hongyuan, Yongfang Nie, Dongyang Que, Youzuo Hu, and Yongfeng Li. 2019. "Improved Electrochemical Properties of LiMn2O4-Based Cathode Material Co-Modified by Mg-Doping and Octahedral Morphology" Materials 12, no. 17: 2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172807

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop