Next Article in Journal
Thermal and Structural Characterization of Geopolymer-Coated Polyurethane Foam—Phase Change Material Capsules/Geopolymer Concrete Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Arc Pressure on the Digging Process in Variable Polarity Plasma Arc Welding of A5052P Aluminum Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Laser-Assisted Synthesis of Cu-Al-Ni Shape Memory Alloys: Effect of Inert Gas Pressure and Ni Content
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transient Liquid Phase Bonding of Ti-6Al-4V and Mg-AZ31 Alloys Using Zn Coatings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/ma12050795
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Plasma Nitriding Pretreatment on the Mechanical Properties of AlCrSiN-Coated Tool Steels

by
Yin-Yu Chang
* and
Siddhant Amrutwar
Department of Mechanical and Computer-Aided Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin 632, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(5), 795; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050795
Submission received: 19 February 2019 / Revised: 3 March 2019 / Accepted: 4 March 2019 / Published: 7 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Welding, Joining and Coating of Metallic Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Surface modification of steel has been reported to improve hardness and other mechanical properties, such as increase in resistance, for reducing plastic deformation, fatigue, and wear. Duplex surface treatment, such as a combination of plasma nitriding and physical vapor deposition, achieves superior mechanical properties and resistance to wear. In this study, the plasma nitriding process was conducted prior to the deposition of hard coatings on the SKH9 substrate. This process was done by a proper mixture of nitrogen/hydrogen gas at suitable duty cycle, pressure, and voltage with proper temperature. Later on, the deposition of gradient AlCrSiN coatings synthesized by a cathodic-arc deposition process was performed. During the deposition of AlCrSiN, CrN, AlCrN/CrN, and AlCrSiN/AlCrN were deposited as gradient interlayers to improve adhesion between the coatings and nitrided steels. A repetitive impact test (200k–400k times) was performed at room temperature and at high temperature (~500 °C) to assess impact resistance. The results showed that the tribological impact resistance for the synthesized AlCrSiN increased because of a progressive hardness support. The combination of plasma nitriding and AlCrSiN hard coatings is capable of increasing the life of molding dies and metal forging dies in mass production.

1. Introduction

For warm stamping of stainless steels and light alloys, the molds are operated at high temperature—thermal and load cycling—and often lose effectiveness early because of oxidation and wear. The plasma nitriding process (PN) is a well-known technique, which can be utilized to improve the surface properties of ferrous alloys [1,2]. Similar to PN, physical vapor deposition (PVD) techniques make coatings useful for tool steels with good tribological performance due to high hardness, anti-abrasion, and high-temperature oxidation resistance. However, their mechanical performance is restricted when they are deposited on a soft substrate due to plastic deformation under high loads without adequate support. Duplex treatments including PN and PVD are verified to be successful in creating wear and corrosion resistance with good mechanical support. The adhesion strength between the coating and the tool steel can be controlled by nitriding techniques and gradient coating designs to tailor the nitrided layer and by inserting a surface treatment method, such as polishing, before the deposition of hard coatings [3,4,5,6].
Currently, PVD hard coatings such as CrN, TiN, CrAlN, and TiAlN are used to improve the properties of tool steels and extend the lifetime of mechanical components and tools [7,8,9,10,11]. The introduction of silicon into CrAlN could decrease the grain size, change the coating structure, composition, and its mechanical properties [12,13,14]. In this CrAlSiN, silicon is apt to segregate into amorphous SiNx along the grain boundaries. Many nanocomposite and nanolayered coatings have been studied due to their excellent mechanical and tribological properties. The coating structure and chemical content of the film can influence the mechanical and tribological properties of multicomponent coatings in the form of gradient and multilayered layers. Previous studies have shown that multilayered and graded coatings, such as AlCrSiN/TiVN and TiVN/TiSiN, are very effective in reducing wear in molding, forming, and machining applications [15,16,17]. High-speed steels and hot-working steels are the universal stamping, cutting, and machining tool steels because of their good strength at high temperature and are usually used for metal forming, cutting tools, and light alloy injection. However, these tool steels have poor resistance to tribological wear with a high coefficient of friction. The demand has been increased using surface modification and coating techniques to improve the mechanical and wear performances of the tool steel. Thermal-and-chemical surface modification such as PN is applied to these steels for prolonging the lifetime of tools [18]. This study tried to develop plasma nitriding before the AlCrSiN hard coating deposition to improve the mechanical properties of tool steel substrates and the adhesion strength. An impact fatigue test was conducted at room temperature and at high temperature. The purpose was to study the microstructure, mechanical properties, and periodic impact resistance of the high-speed steels with duplex treatment combing PVD AlCrSiN coatings and PN.

2. Materials and Methods

The heat-treated SKH9 tool steels (25 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness) having hardness of 60 HRC (Rockwell Hardness scale C) were used as substrates. A nominal chemical composition of the SKH9 steel in wt.% was as follows: 0.8–0.9 wt.% C, 3.8–4.6 wt.% Cr, 5.5–7 wt.% W, 0.45 wt.% Mn, 1.5–2.2 wt.% V, 4.5–5.5 wt.% Mo, 4.3–5.2 wt.% Co, and Fe as balance. The samples were metalographically prepared using a grinding machine (SiC emery paper up to 1500-grit size, Jet measurement Co., Taichung, Taiwan) and a polishing machine (suspension with Al2O3 particle size 0.05 μm, Jet measurement Co., Taichung, Taiwan) to have a surface roughness of Ra = 0.2 ± 0.05 μm. The tool steel samples were cleaned using ultrasonic agitation in an alcoholic solution for 15 min. After that, the samples were dried by hot air. The PN treatment was conducted using an industrial ion and plasma nitriding system, as shown in Figure 1a. The reactor was equipped with a rotary pump to obtain low vacuum before the PN process. Ar was introduced and the samples were sputtered prior to plasma nitriding to remove the native oxide layer and keep clean. Afterwards, nitrogen/hydrogen mixture was introduced to form a nitride layer on samples. The detailed processing parameters are shown in Table 1 [19,20]. After PN treatment, the tool steel samples were cooled down in the furnace to the room temperature under vacuum conditions. The nitriding process usually raises the surface roughness. In this study, the as-nitrided tool steels had a surface roughness of Ra = ~0.5 μm, and the subsequent polishing after PN decreased the surface roughness effectively. The nitrided samples were polished prior to PVD to have Ra = 0.2 ± 0.05 μm. The PVD technique followed by cathodic-arc evaporation used different types of targets: AlCrSi alloy, AlCr alloy, and pure chromium (Cr), as shown in Figure 1b. Table 2 shows the deposition parameters of AlCrSiN. The deposition process was initially Ar (99.999% pure) ion bombardment followed by the deposition of a Cr adhesion layer. The introduction of nitrogen into the chamber then led to the formation of CrN on top of the Cr layer. CrN was used as the bottom interlayer, and then CrN/AlCrSiN transition layers were deposited. The contents of Al and Si increased to form an AlCrSiN top layer. The temperature of the PN treatment and PVD was measured near the specimen holder using a thermocouple whose thermal junction was insulated from the holder with a quartz cup.
A field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, JSM IT-100, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which was equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system, was used to investigate the coating morphology and microstructure. The texture and phase identification of the AlCrSiN with and without PN-treated samples were examined by X-ray diffraction MXP III MAC Science (Bruker’s) with Cu radiation. The XRD system was operated at 40 kV, using a low glancing incidence angle of 4° to identify the coating structure. The X-ray beam incidence angle was fixed while the XRD detector was moved in the 2θ between 20° and 90° to obtain the diffraction pattern of the samples.
The adhesion strength of the PN and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples was evaluated by Rockwell C indentation (HR-200, Mitutoyo Co., Japan) according to the ISO 26443 standard. The hardness of the films and PN-treated substrates was measured by the Vickers tester (MMT-X, Matsuzawa Co., Akita, Japan) with a load of 25 g and measured by an average value from seven measured points. In this study, a Calotest equipment was used to determine the thickness of the hard coatings. The coated samples were placed under an optical microscope to show a circular crater shape and then measure the coating thickness [21].
To study the impact fatigue resistance of the deposited AlCrSiN coatings with and without PN-pretreated samples, a cyclic impact test was conducted using a periodic loading device at room temperature and at a high temperature of 500 °C [22]. The distance between the sample and indenter and the impact frequency were set at 1 mm and 20 Hz, respectively. Continuous impacts of a reciprocating WC–Co ball indenter were applied onto the deposited AlCrSiN with and without PN. The test was performed without lubrication under a load of 9.8 N.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure Characterization

The nitrided layer is usually composed of the compound layer and the diffusion layer. The compound zone mainly consists of porous ε-nitrides, whereas the diffusion layer is nitric martensite [23,24]. Duplex treatments combine PN with the subsequent deposition of hard coatings to create good tribological properties. In this study, samples of plasma nitrided SKH9 steel, AlCrSiN-coated sample, and PN + AlCrSiN (with PN pretreatment) coated SKH9 steel were tested for research. Figure 2 shows typical X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of plasma nitrided (PN), AlCrSiN-coated, and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples. After plasma nitriding, it can be seen that the XRD patterns of the nitrided compound layer consists of diffraction peaks of CrN, FexN, where x = 2–3, and Fe4N, as shown in Figure 2a. The substrate α′-martensite peak at 82.4° was detected in the PN-treated layer, and it suggested that the nitrided layer was thin and less than the X-ray penetration depth, and resulted in observing the substrate α′-martensite phase. The main nitride precipitates that were identified were Fe2–3N and Fe4N. These precipitates play the main role in increasing the surface hardness and improving the wear resistance, thereby, increasing the time of fatigue fracture [25]. For the AlCrSiN, when N2 was introduced during the coating process, the Al, Cr, and Si plasma generated by arc evaporators induced the excitation of N2 to form AlCrSiN on the substrate. Figure 2b shows the XRD pattern of the AlCrSiN without plasma nitriding treatment. Regardless of the low Si content (less than 10 at.%), the sequence of crystalline phases was observed, and no corresponding peaks of crystalline silicon nitride were found. The crystallography structure of single-phase face-centered cubic (FCC) AlCrN solid solution was detected. The four main peaks correspond to reflections (111), (200), (220), and (311) consisting of nanocrystalline FCC-AlCrN [26,27,28]. Figure 2c shows the diffraction pattern of PN + AlCrSiN consisting of AlCrN and Fe4N phases. The Fe4N compound layer was obtained during the nitriding process. The compound layer led to higher hardness and improved the adhesion quality of coatings. Similar to the previous AlCrSiN without plasma nitriding, the AlCr(Si)N phases exhibited cubic B1-NaCl structure. The lattice structure of the deposited coatings showed solid solution in these coatings. The lattice parameter of the AlCrSiN was 0.424 nm, which was between the values of cubic AlN (JCPDF file No.: #251495) and CrN (JCPDF file No.: #110065). The microstructure was obtained by the formation of an FCC phase, obtained by the substitution of Al and Si in the cubic CrN phase. The Si-containing AlCrSiN coatings had better oxidation and tribological resistances than CrN and CrAlN and possessed good mechanical properties [14,29,30].
In order to study the microstructure of coating construction, Figure 3 shows the fractured cross-sectional SEM image of the AlCrSiN coating on an Si (100) wafer. Deposited at a high bias voltage of −120 V, the top AlCrSiN layer showed fine dense structures. CrN and AlCrN/CrN bottom interlayers showed obvious columnar structure. After AlCrSiN was co-deposited with AlCrN, the formation of the columnar structure was reduced. The deposited AlCrSiN with a transition layer of AlCrSiN/AlCrN possessed a much denser structure because of the presence of Al and Si to form compact nanocrystalline structures. Similar results by He et al. [31] also showed that the single-phase cubic CrAlN coatings exhibited a columnar structure, while dense and featureless characteristic morphologies for AlCrSiN coatings were observed. The total thickness of the graded AlCrSiN coating was 2.24 μm, which was similar to the result of Calotest (~2 μm), and consisted of the top AlCrSiN layer, transition layer of AlCrSiN/AlCrN, and columnar AlCrN/CrN interlayers. From the EDS measurement, the chemical composition of the deposited AlCrSiN top layer coating was 26.7 at.% Al, 17.6 at.% Cr, 4.2 at.% Si, and 51.5 at.% N. It showed atomic stoichiometries of Al0.55Cr0.37Si0.08N for the deposited AlCrSiN. Distinct interfaces were observed at the boundaries between the transition layer (AlCrSiN/AlCrN) and the columnar AlCrN/CrN interlayers. In this AlCrSiN, the addition of Si impeded grain growth and led to grain re-nucleation, and. Therefore. resulted in a compact and dense structure. The retardation of columnar growth by the incorporation of Si in the CrAlN coating was proved, and previous studies demonstrated that the overall oxidation resistance of the AlCrSiN coatings after Si doping was significantly improved at high temperature [32,33,34].

3.2. Mechanical Properties

3.2.1. Hardness Test

High surface hardness of the tool steels can increase capacities of load support and high abrasion wear resistance. In this study, the measurement was performed using a Vickers microhardness tester. The applied load on the specimen was 25 gf. Figure 4 shows the hardness of SKH9 high-speed steel substrate, PN-treated, AlCrSiN-coated, and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples under different processes. The hardness for PN samples was 1352 HV25g, which was higher than that of SKH9 high-speed steel. From the results, the PN + AlCrSiN possessed hardness of about 3256 HV25g, which was the highest hardness among all the samples, and the AlCrSiN-coated samples (without PN pretreatment) possessed lower hardness, i.e., 2285 HV25g, than PN + AlCrSiN. The hardness of the PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples was 2.4 times higher than that of the PN-treated SKH9. In this case, it revealed that the AlCrSiN-coated sample with PN pretreatment could achieve the highest hardness among the samples. The duplex treatment combining PN and hard coating exhibited higher hardness as compared to non-duplex-treated samples. The nitrided layer was helpful for the progressive hardness distribution, inducing the gradual transition of mechanical properties improving the wear resistance [35,36].

3.2.2. Adhesion Test

The adhesion strength of all the PN, AlCrSiN-, and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples was investigated using the Rockwell indentation test. This destructive test, may exhibit two distinctive properties of the coated compound [37,38]. We used Rockwell indentation with a load of 150 kg based on the ISO 26443 standard to evaluate the adhesion strength of the coatings. According to the criteria, class 0 reveals acceptable adhesion. Class 1 shows no adhesive delamination; adhesion is acceptable. In the cases of class 2 and class 3, adhesion is unacceptable [39]. Adhesive delamination is defined as a removal of the coating, whereby the underlying substrate can be clearly seen, or a removal of one or more sublayers in a multilayered or graded coating, whereby the substrate or an underlying sublayer can be clearly distinguished. Figure 5 shows optical images to reveal the crack behavior of the AlCrSiN- and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples. The optical image with high magnification shows the crack condition on the edge of the indented crater. The AlCrSiN coating (without PN) showed that, initially, circumferential cone cracks developed beneath the indenter, followed by radial and annular cracks as well as some coating spallation, which appeared at the edge of the indenter crater. The poor adhesion of class 2 is recognized on contrast. The coating was too stiff to buckle, which created the formation of compressive stress cracks at the wear interface of the coating and the specimen. These compressive stress-induced cracks propagated, and the formation of spallation in coatings occurred. This kind of adhesion failure was usually observed in brittle ceramic coatings with weak interfacial adhesion to the specimen. The plastic deformation easily took place due to its low hardness, resulting in the cracks formed in the indentation edge. If the interfacial adhesion of coatings was large in area, lesser wedge spallation occurred on the substrate coatings.
A significant change was observed in the PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples. In case of this study, PN + AlCrSiN coatings showed no cohesive failure and no coating delamination, which meant it had no cracks and good adhesion properties of class 0 due to a hard nitrided layer before the deposition of AlCrSiN coating on the substrate. The hardness was increased by the nitrided layer, which provided enough support for the hard coatings even under heavy loads. This fact was also confirmed by He and Deng et al. [35,40]. Surface hardening by plasma nitriding improved the heavier load bearing capacity for AlCrSiN-coated specimens. The nitrided layer provided good adhesion property and was useful in sustaining a high load. It may be helpful for the improvement of the adhesion on PN + AlCrSiN SKH9 substrate in this study.

3.2.3. Impact Fatigue Test

The impact tester was designed to simulate fatigue wear in tribological coating systems subjected to a dynamic stress on the coated samples [41]. In this study, we explored the anti-fatigue properties and impact resistance of the coated samples using a room temperature fatigue test and a high-temperature fatigue test (500 °C). The number of impacts was 200,000 (200k), 300,000 (300k), and 400,000 (400k). It was tested using a dynamic impact fatigue tester for the AlCrSiN- (without PN pretreatment) and the PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples. During the test, a tungsten carbide ball with a diameter of 2 mm was used as a punch. The frequency was controlled at 20 Hz and a load of 9.8 N was applied. The film was subjected to periodic reciprocating impact tests, and then the film was observed for damage, sticky and stacked conditions, and bare substrate. Referring to the previous study by Batista et al. [42], the damage of the film after the impact test was studied. During the process of the impact fatigue test, deformation of the surface takes place step by step depending upon the impacts and load. The failure zones can be divided into three types: Central zone with cohesive failure, intermediate zone with adhesion and cohesive failure, and lastly peripheral failure, which usually takes place at the boundary of the indentation area. Figure 6 shows the SEM image and EDS element mapping of the AlCrSiN film at room temperature after 200,000 (200k), 300,000 (300k), and 400,000 (400k) impacts. EDS mapping revealed that a composition signal with various compositions such as aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), silicon (Si), tungsten (W), iron (Fe), and nitrogen (N) signals was obtained. After continuous cycles of the loading and unloading process, the surface morphology was observed through element mapping. The AlCrSiN-coated samples showed smooth morphology, where no significant transfer of the WC–Co ball material was observed after 200k impacts. Chipping outside of the impacted crater was usually the main failure for ceramic hard coatings in the impact fatigue test [22]. However, in this study there were no significant changes for the wear morphology with increasing impacts from 200k to 400k cycles. But in case of impact cavity size under a continuous process of loading–unloading at room temperature and the normal load of 9.8 N after 300k impacts, formation of the cohesive and adhesive failures of the AlCrSiN film in the intermediate and central zones of the cavity was observed. No iron (Fe) signal was observed on the surface. This indicated the substrate was not exposed at this stage. The results showed that the AlCrSiN-coated samples can sustain the load of around 400k impacts at room temperature. This phenomenon indicated that, after 400k continuous impacts at room temperature, the AlCrSiN-coated sample had possible formation of cohesive failure, which might later effect the hardness and cause failures in the mechanical performance of dies.
Figure 7 reveals the results of the PN + AlCrSiN-coated sample at the same impacts of 200k, 300k, and 400k at room temperature showing the surface is not yet exposed at this stage. No obvious substrate iron (Fe) signal can be found. The benefit of the duplex treatment in terms of improving the load bearing capacity of hard coatings originated from its higher critical load than those from non-duplex-treated parts. The change in crater volume with an increase in the number of impact cycles for the PN + AlCrSiN duplex-treated sample had no significant change observed. As the impact cycles increased from 200k to 400k there was an absence of rapid increases in wear as compared to the non-duplex AlCrSiN sample. This might be the reason for the increase in load of coatings and minimizing substrate deformation, which reduced the bending and stretching of the coatings. A similar result of impact wear resistance of duplex PN-treated/PVD-coated Ti–6Al–4V alloy was revealed by Cassar et al. [43].
The high-temperature fatigue impact test at 500 °C was performed on the AlCrSiN-coated high-speed SKH9 steel. The SEM image with EDS element mapping image is shown in Figure 8. The elemental mappings of aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), silicon (Si), tungsten (W), oxygen (O), iron (Fe), and nitrogen (N) signals are shown. It showed that the surface was exposed of iron signal from the substrate of the AlCrSiN-coated SKH9 steel. Therefore the substrate was exposed to 200k impacts at the high temperature of 500 °C. On the other hand, a high-temperature impact of PN + AlCrSiN after 200k impacts was conducted. As shown in Figure 9, no iron (Fe) signal was present on the impacted surface. The duplex-treated sample (PN + AlCrSiN) had the presence of an Fe–N compound and a diffusion layer beneath the hard AlCrSiN coating. These two layers supported the top AlCrSiN layer from heavy mechanical loads at high temperature, which also improved the hardness and adhesion strength to the tool steel. The surface modification of SKH9 steels by a combination of plasma nitriding and coatings resulted in excellent mechanical load bearing capacity and strong adhesion at high temperature. Compared to the non-duplex-treated AlCrSiN sample that only resists 200k impacts at high temperature, duplex-treated AlCrSiN coatings had better performance of periodic impact fatigue resistance at high temperature.
Previous studies showed that AlCrSiN possessed good thermal stability and oxidation resistance because of the formation of the epitaxial growth structure, which inhibited atomic diffusion. The nanocomposite coatings synthesized by amorphous silicon nitride could provide a stable phase and limited grain growth in nanocrystal AlCrN at high temperature [44,45,46]. However, in this study, the non-duplex-treated AlCrSiN sample only resisted 200k impacts at 500 °C. The high-temperature fatigue impact test for the PN + AlCrSiN further was carried out by continuous impacts from 300k to 400k. No obvious iron signal was detected after 300k impacts. As shown in Figure 10, after 400k impacts, it was found that the substrate failed and the iron substrate was exposed. It is concluded that the dense PN + AlCrSiN coating with good thermal stability can resist around 400k impacts at a high temperature of 500 °C. The results showed the PN + AlCrSiN-coated tool steels exhibit an excellent result in both room and high-temperature fatigue impacts.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the AlCrSiN hard coatings were deposited on the plasma nitrided SKH9 steel using a duplex treatment combing plasma nitriding and cathodic-arc evaporation PVD technology. The deposited AlCrSiN had bottom interlayers of CrN and AlCrN and a transition layer (AlCrSiN/AlCrN). From SEM and XRD evaluation, it was observed that the AlCrSiN coating with gradient layer structure was a dense structure of nanocrystalline B1-NaCl, and it showed that the coating had obvious columnar bottom layers of AlCrN and CrN structure. AlCrSiN-coated samples (without PN pretreatment) possessed hardness of 2285 HV25g. The PN + AlCrSiN had the highest hardness of 3256 HV25g among all the samples. This significant change occurred due to the support of the modified layer formed as a result of the nitriding process and the reduction of plastic deformation under the applied load.
Impact fatigue tests for AlCrSiN- and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples at room temperature and at high temperature (500 °C) were conducted. Both the AlCrSiN and duplex-treated samples possessed good impact fatigue performance at room temperature. The PN + AlCrSiN duplex-treated sample could resist 400k impacts at a high temperature of 500 °C, where only small area of iron signal from the substrate was exposed and no cohesive failure was observed. The PN + AlCrSiN duplex-treated tool steel had high hardness, and it possessed good impact fatigue performance at room temperature and at high temperature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Y.-Y.C., S.A.; Methodology: Y.-Y.C., S.A.; Validation: Y.-Y.C.; Formal Analysis: Y.-Y.C., S.A.; Investigation: Y.-Y.C., S.A.; Resources: Y.-Y.C.; Data Curation: Y.-Y.C., S.A.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: Y.-Y.C., S.A.; Writing—Review and Editing: Y.-Y.C.; Visualization: Y.-Y.C.; Supervision: Y.-Y.C.; Project Administration: Y.-Y.C.; Funding Acquisition: Y.-Y.C.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 107-2218-E-131 -001 and MOST 107-2221-E-150-003) of Taiwan.

Acknowledgments

The instrumental assistance from the Common Lab. for Micro/Nano Sci. and Tech. of National Formosa University is sincerely appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Höck, K.; Spies, H.J.; Larisch, B.; Leonhardt, G.; Buecken, B. Wear resistance of prenitrided hardcoated steels for tools and machine components. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1997, 88, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paosawatyanyong, B.; Pongsopa, J.; Visuttipitukul, P.; Bhanthumnavin, W. Nitriding of tool steel using dual DC/RFICP plasma process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 306, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Das, K.; Alphonsa, J.; Ghosh, M.; Ghanshyam, J.; Rane, R.; Mukherjee, S. Influence of pretreatment on surface behavior of duplex plasma treated AISI H13 tool steel. Surf. Interfaces 2017, 8, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Škorić, B.; Kakaš, D.; Rakita, M.; Bibić, N.; Peruškob, D. Structure, hardness and adhesion of thin coatings deposited by PVD, IBAD on nitrided steels. Vacuum 2004, 76, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hawryluk, M.; Gronostajski, Z.; Widomski, P.; Kaszuba, M.; Ziemba, J.; Smolik, J. Influence of the application of a PN+Cr/CrN hybrid layer on the improvement of the lifetime of hot forging tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018, 258, 226–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fontes, M.A.; Pereira, R.G.; Fernandes, F.A.P.; Casteletti, L.C.; de Paula Nascente, P.A. Characterization of plasma nitrided layers produced on sintered iron. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2014, 3, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Navinšek, B.; Panjan, P.; Milošev, I. Industrial applications of CrN (PVD) coatings, deposited at high and low temperatures. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1997, 97, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, D.B.; Kim, M.H.; Lee, Y.C.; Kwon, S.C. High temperature oxidation of TiCrN coatings deposited on a steel substrate by ion plating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2001, 141, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Falsafein, M.; Ashrafizadeh, F.; Kheirandish, A. Influence of thickness on adhesion of nanostructured multilayer CrN/CrAlN coatings to stainless steel substrate. Surf. Interfaces 2018, 13, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, W.; Chu, Q.; Zeng, J.; He, R.; Wu, H.; Wu, Z.; Wu, S. PVD-CrAlN and TiAlN coated Si3N4 ceramic cutting tools—1. Microstructure, turning performance and wear mechanism. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 8999–9004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, K.; Deng, J.; Guo, X.; Sun, L.; Lei, S. Study on the adhesion and tribological behavior of PVD TiAlN coatings with a multi-scale textured substrate surface. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2018, 72, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Haršáni, M.; Sahul, M.; Zacková, P.; Čaplovič, Ľ. Study of cathode current effect on the properties of CrAlSiN coatings prepared by LARC. Vacuum 2017, 139, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, C.-C.; Duh, J.-G. Duplex coating technique to improve the adhesion and tribological properties of CrAlSiN nanocomposite coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 326, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, Y.-Y.; Chang, C.-P.; Wang, D.-Y.; Yang, S.-M.; Wu, W. High temperature oxidation resistance of CrAlSiN coatings synthesized by a cathodic arc deposition process. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 461, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leyland, A.; Matthews, A. On the significance of the H/E ratio in wear control: A nanocomposite coating approach to optimised tribological behaviour. Wear 2000, 246, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chang, Y.-Y.; Chiu, W.-T.; Hung, J.-P. Mechanical properties and high temperature oxidation of CrAlSiN/TiVN hard coatings synthesized by cathodic arc evaporation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 303, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, Y.-Y.; Chang, H.; Jhao, L.-J.; Chuang, C.-C. Tribological and mechanical properties of multilayered TiVN/TiSiN coatings synthesized by cathodic arc evaporation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 350, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Basso, R.L.O.; Pastore, H.O.; Schmidt, V.; Baumvol, I.J.R.; Abarca, S.A.C.; de Souza, F.S.; Spinelli, A.; Figueroa, C.A.; Giacomelli, C. Microstructure and corrosion behaviour of pulsed plasma-nitrided AISI H13 tool steel. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 3133–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Naeem, M.; Waqas, M.; Jan, I.; Zaka-ul-Islam, M.; Díaz-Guillén, J.C.; Rehman, N.U.; Shafiq, M.; Zakaullah, M. Influence of pulsed power supply parameters on active screen plasma nitriding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 300, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naeem, M.; Iqbal, J.; Abrar, M.; Khan, K.H.; Díaz-Guillén, J.C.; Lopez-Badillo, C.M.; Shafiq, M.; Zaka-ul-Islam, M.; Zakaullah, M. The effect of argon admixing on nitriding of plain carbon steel in N2 and N2-H2 plasma. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 350, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rother, B.; Jehn, H.A.; Gabriel, H.M. Multilayer hard coatings by coordinated substrate rotation modes in industrial PVD deposition systems. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1996, 86–87, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beake, B.D.; Isern, L.; Endrino, J.L.; Fox-Rabinovich, G.S. Micro-impact testing of AlTiN and TiAlCrN coatings. Wear 2019, 418–419, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, M.F.; Chen, B.F.; Li, B. Microstructure and mechanical properties from an attractive combination of plasma nitriding and secondary hardening of M50 steel. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tschiptschin, A.P.; Varela, L.B.; Pinedo, C.E.; Li, X.Y.; Dong, H. Development and microstructure characterization of single and duplex nitriding of UNS S31803 duplex stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 327, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Menthe, E.; Bulak, A.; Olfe, J.; Zimmermann, A.; Rie, K.T. Improvement of the mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel after plasma nitriding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2000, 133–134, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tien, S.-K.; Lin, C.-H.; Tsai, Y.-Z.; Duh, J.-G. Effect of nitrogen flow on the properties of quaternary CrAlSiN coatings at elevated temperatures. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 202, 735–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuo, Y.-C.; Wang, C.-J.; Lee, J.-W. The microstructure and mechanical properties evaluation of CrTiAlSiN coatings: Effects of silicon content. Thin Solid Films 2017, 638, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Soldán, J.; Neidhardt, J.; Sartory, B.; Kaindl, R.; Čerstvý, R.; Mayrhofer, P.H.; Tessadri, R.; Polcik, P.; Lechthaler, M.; Mitterer, C. Structure–property relations of arc-evaporated Al–Cr–Si–N coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 3555–3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chang, Y.-Y.; Lai, H.-M. Wear behavior and cutting performance of CrAlSiN and TiAlSiN hard coatings on cemented carbide cutting tools for Ti alloys. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 259, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, S.Q.; Ye, Y.W.; Wang, Y.X.; Liu, M.Q.; Liu, X.; Li, J.L.; Wang, L.P. Structure and tribological performances of CrAlSiN coatings with different Si percentages in seawater. Tribol. Int. 2017, 115, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, L.; Chen, L.; Xu, Y. Interfacial structure, mechanical properties and thermal stability of CrAlSiN/CrAlN multilayer coatings. Mater. Charact. 2017, 125, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, S.; Lee, J.-W.; Lew, W.S.; Sun, D.; Li, B. Toward hard yet tough CrAlSiN coatings via compositional grading. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 231, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chang, C.-C.; Chen, H.-W.; Lee, J.-W.; Duh, J.-G. Influence of Si contents on tribological characteristics of CrAlSiN nanocomposite coatings. Thin Solid Films 2015, 584, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, H.-W.; Chan, Y.-C.; Lee, J.-W.; Duh, J.-G. Oxidation behavior of Si-doped nanocomposite CrAlSiN coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Deng, Y.; Tan, C.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Cai, P.; Kuang, T.; Lei, S.; Zhou, K. Effects of tailored nitriding layers on comprehensive properties of duplex plasma-treated AlTiN coatings. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 8721–8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tan, C.; Kuang, T.; Zhou, K.; Zhu, H.; Deng, Y.; Li, X.; Cai, P.; Liu, Z. Fabrication and characterization of in-situ duplex plasma-treated nanocrystalline Ti/AlTiN coatings. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 10793–10800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tillmann, W.; Grisales, D.; Stangier, D. Effects of AISI H11 surface integrity on the residual stresses and adhesion of TiAlN/substrate compounds. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 357, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vidakis, N.; Antoniadis, A.; Bilalis, N. The VDI 3198 indentation test evaluation of a reliable qualitative control for layered compounds. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 143–144, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Haršáni, M.; Ghafoor, N.; Calamba, K.; Zacková, P.; Sahul, M.; Vopát, T.; Satrapinskyy, L.; Čaplovičová, M.; Čaplovič, Ľ. Adhesive-deformation relationships and mechanical properties of nc-AlCrN/a-SiNx hard coatings deposited at different bias voltages. Thin Solid Films 2018, 650, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, Y.; Apachitei, I.; Zhou, J.; Walstock, T.; Duszczyk, J. Effect of prior plasma nitriding applied to a hot-work tool steel on the scratch-resistant properties of PACVD TiBN and TiCN coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 2534–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Borodich, F.M. Chapter Three—The Hertz-Type and Adhesive Contact Problems for Depth-Sensing Indentation. In Advances in Applied Mechanics; Bordas, S.P.A., Ed.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 47, pp. 225–366. [Google Scholar]
  42. Batista, J.C.A.; Godoy, C.; Matthews, A. Impact testing of duplex and non-duplex (Ti,Al)N and Cr–N PVD coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 163–164, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cassar, G.; Banfield, S.; Avelar-Batista Wilson, J.C.; Housden, J.; Matthews, A.; Leyland, A. Impact wear resistance of plasma diffusion treated and duplex treated/PVD-coated Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 2645–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, M. A superhard CrAlSiN superlattice coating deposited by a multi-arc ion plating: II. Thermal stability and oxidation resistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 214, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, H.-W.; Chan, Y.-C.; Lee, J.-W.; Duh, J.-G. Oxidation resistance of nanocomposite CrAlSiN under long-time heat treatment. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 206, 1571–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, Y.-Y.; Cheng, C.-M.; Liou, Y.-Y.; Tillmann, W.; Hoffmann, F.; Sprute, T. High temperature wettability of multicomponent CrAlSiN and TiAlSiN coatings by molten glass. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 231, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 00795 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of plasma nitriding setup and (b) schematic diagram of physical vapor deposition (PVD) cathodic-arc evaporation system.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of plasma nitriding setup and (b) schematic diagram of physical vapor deposition (PVD) cathodic-arc evaporation system.
Materials 12 00795 g001
Materials 12 00795 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD pattern of (a) plasma nitriding (PN), (b) AlCrSiN, and (c) PN + AlCrSiN samples.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of (a) plasma nitriding (PN), (b) AlCrSiN, and (c) PN + AlCrSiN samples.
Materials 12 00795 g002
Materials 12 00795 g003 550
Figure 3. Cross-sectional SEM image of AlCrSiN coating.
Figure 3. Cross-sectional SEM image of AlCrSiN coating.
Materials 12 00795 g003
Materials 12 00795 g004 550
Figure 4. Vickers microhardnesses of the SKH9 high-speed steel substrate, PN-treated, AlCrSiN-coated, and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples.
Figure 4. Vickers microhardnesses of the SKH9 high-speed steel substrate, PN-treated, AlCrSiN-coated, and PN + AlCrSiN-coated samples.
Materials 12 00795 g004
Materials 12 00795 g005 550
Figure 5. Optical images showing crack behavior evaluated by Rockwell indentation test applied on the AlCrSiN (Left) and PN + AlCrSiN (Right) coated samples.
Figure 5. Optical images showing crack behavior evaluated by Rockwell indentation test applied on the AlCrSiN (Left) and PN + AlCrSiN (Right) coated samples.
Materials 12 00795 g005
Materials 12 00795 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) element mapping of AlCrSiN-coated samples at room temperature after (a) 200k, (b) 300k, and (c) 400k impacts.
Figure 6. SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) element mapping of AlCrSiN-coated samples at room temperature after (a) 200k, (b) 300k, and (c) 400k impacts.
Materials 12 00795 g006
Materials 12 00795 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM and EDS element mapping of PN + AlCrSiN at room temperature after (a) 200k, (b) 300k, and (c) 400k impacts.
Figure 7. SEM and EDS element mapping of PN + AlCrSiN at room temperature after (a) 200k, (b) 300k, and (c) 400k impacts.
Materials 12 00795 g007
Materials 12 00795 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM and EDS element mapping of AlCrSiN at high temperature (500 °C) after 200k impacts.
Figure 8. SEM and EDS element mapping of AlCrSiN at high temperature (500 °C) after 200k impacts.
Materials 12 00795 g008
Materials 12 00795 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM and EDS element mapping of PN + AlCrSiN at high temperature (500 °C) after 200k impacts.
Figure 9. SEM and EDS element mapping of PN + AlCrSiN at high temperature (500 °C) after 200k impacts.
Materials 12 00795 g009
Materials 12 00795 g010 550
Figure 10. SEM and EDS element mapping of PN + AlCrSiN at high temperature (500 °C) after 400k impacts.
Figure 10. SEM and EDS element mapping of PN + AlCrSiN at high temperature (500 °C) after 400k impacts.
Materials 12 00795 g010
Table
Table 1. Parameters for plasma nitriding.
Table 1. Parameters for plasma nitriding.
Parameters
Base pressure<1 Pa
Ar ion cleaningBias voltage = −700 V, Pressure = 2 Pa, Time = 30 min
NitridingT = 450 °C, Time = 7 h, Bias voltage = −500 V, N2/H2 = 80/20 sccm
Duty Cycle82%
Pressure250 Pa
Table
Table 2. Parameters for AlCrSiN thin-film deposition.
Table 2. Parameters for AlCrSiN thin-film deposition.
Parameters
TargetCr, Al0.7Cr0.3, Al0.6Cr0.3Si0.1
Base pressure <0.004 Pa
Ar ion cleaningBias voltage = −700 V, Pressure = 2 Pa, Time = 20 min
Reactive gasAr/N2
Working pressure 3 Pa
Deposition temperature250 °C
Target current 70 A
Bias voltage−120 V
Rotation speed 2 rpm
Deposition time90 min

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Y.-Y.; Amrutwar, S. Effect of Plasma Nitriding Pretreatment on the Mechanical Properties of AlCrSiN-Coated Tool Steels. Materials 2019, 12, 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050795

AMA Style

Chang Y-Y, Amrutwar S. Effect of Plasma Nitriding Pretreatment on the Mechanical Properties of AlCrSiN-Coated Tool Steels. Materials. 2019; 12(5):795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050795

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Yin-Yu, and Siddhant Amrutwar. 2019. "Effect of Plasma Nitriding Pretreatment on the Mechanical Properties of AlCrSiN-Coated Tool Steels" Materials 12, no. 5: 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050795

APA Style

Chang, Y. -Y., & Amrutwar, S. (2019). Effect of Plasma Nitriding Pretreatment on the Mechanical Properties of AlCrSiN-Coated Tool Steels. Materials, 12(5), 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050795

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop