Next Article in Journal
Modification Tests to Optimize Compaction Quality Control of Granite Rockfill in Highway Embankments
Previous Article in Journal
The Influencing Factor of MgAl2O4 on Heterogeneous Nucleation and Grain Refinement in Al Alloy Melts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Graphite/Graphene on the Tribological Behaviors of Self-Lubricating Fabric Composite

1
Research Center of Composite Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200000, China
2
Shanghai Bearing Technology Research Institute, Shanghai 200000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(1), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010232
Submission received: 20 November 2019 / Revised: 19 December 2019 / Accepted: 28 December 2019 / Published: 5 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Composites)

Abstract

:
Graphite/graphene particles were employed as functional fillers to modify hybrid polytetrafluoroethylene/polyisophthaloyl metaphenylene diamine (PTFE/Nomex) fabric-reinforced phenolic composites. The tribology behavior was investigated using a ball-on-disk wear tester, together with a 3D digital microscope. The graphite/graphene exhibits the synergetic effect from the results, which not only reduces the friction efficient but also improves the wear resistance of the composites. Moreover, the wear mechanisms were studied by the wear surface microstructure analysis. It is proposed that the synergetic effect includes mainly the positive rolling effect from the graphene and an improved load-carrying capacity brought by graphite. In addition, in order to obtain the optimized formulation to satisfy the bearing application, the influence of graphite and graphene content on the tribological property of the composites was studied in detail. On the basis of that, the application research was carried out on the bearing oscillating wear test, which will evaluate the engineering service life of the composite.

1. Introduction

Hybrid fabric composites composed of resin matrix and fibers have been extensively used in the fields of aviation and aerospace owing to their outstanding properties [1,2,3,4,5]. Among fabric fibers, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) fibers display a low friction factor, and polyisophthaloyl metaphenylene diamine (Nomex) fibers possess the properties of high strength, high thermal stability, and good resistance to abrasion [6,7,8,9]. These excellent features make PTFE/Nomex fabrics good candidates to be used as tribomaterials. A typical structure for PTFE/Nomex fabric is featured with two distinct faces; one is rich in PTFE fibers for friction reduction, and the other is mainly Nomex fibers for supporting [6,10,11,12]. Traditionally, to achieve the tribopotential of fabric composites, phenolic resin is designed to combine with PTFE/Nomex fabrics owing to its good anti-wear and sufficient heat resistance properties [13,14,15]. However, the wear damage of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites can be easily accelerated by the easy loss of PTFE fibers and weak bonding between the resin matrix and fabric, influencing the service life of the composites [16,17,18,19]. Thus, it is critical to seek promotion on tribological properties for the PTFE/Nomex fabric composite, which is an essential part of the bearing [20,21,22].
Adding solid lubricant particles is demonstrated to be an effective method for improving the tribological properties of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites [23,24,25], especially for layered-structure particles such as graphite and graphene [26,27,28,29]. Generally, the reinforcement filler materials work together with the matrix in specific ways to realize different functional improvement for the fabric composites [30,31]. However, in regard to friction and wear properties, fillers that significantly enhance one property may not be equally efficient at improving the other. For example, Zhang et al. [32] investigated the tribological behaviors of 5–20 wt % graphite-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites. The study found that graphite fillers significantly increase the wear resistance (up to 20%) of the composites, but at the cost of a 2–10% increase in the friction coefficient. As the building block of graphite, in addition to the laminated structure, graphene particles display smaller particle size and higher thermal conductivity, enabling themselves as friction reduction agents. Ren et al. [27] studied the influence of graphene on the tribological properties of Nomex/phenolic composites. The study found that 6 wt % graphene provided around a 9% decrease in the friction coefficient, but resulted in a slight increase in the wear rate for the composite. In fact, researchers have found that it is increasingly hard to achieve the desired comprehensive tribological properties of fabric composite through only adding one type of reinforcement filler. Unfortunately, few studies have reported on the introduction of hybrid fillers into fabric composites. In view of this, combined fillers of graphite and graphene were considered to be incorporated into the PTFE/Nomex fabric composite, which is expected to complement the tribological behavior of the composite.
In this study, we introduced graphite/graphene to the phenolic resin to improve the tribological property of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composites. The tribological behavior was investigated by the friction and wear tester and 3D digital microscope, based on which SEM was employed to study the wear mechanism of the composites. Furthermore, the optimal formulation of graphite/graphene fillers was discussed in detail. Finally, the modified composites were applied to spherical bearings, which were subjected to oscillating wear tests, and the service ability of the composite under actual working conditions was evaluated. This study is expected to improve the service life of fabric composites under low speed and overload conditions.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The twill weave hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabrics used in this study were woven out of PTFE fibers (polytetrafluoroethylene, fineness: 400 DEN) and Nomex (polyisophthaloyl metaphenylene diamine, fineness: 200 DEN) provided by DuPont Plant. The weave structure and properties of the fabrics are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, respectively. The adhesive resin (204 phenolic resin) was supplied by Shanghai XinHua Resin Co, Ltd., Shanghai, China. Micrographite (diameter: 48~75 μm) and multilayer graphene (diameter: 0.8~1 μm) were provided by the Sheng-quan Chemical Plant, China. The rest of the chemicals were all of analytical grade and used as received.

2.2. Specimen Preparation

Figure 2 shows the preparation process of the fabric composites; as is shown in the picture, the PTFE/Nomex fabrics were ultrasonically cleaned in ethanol for 30 min to remove surface impurities and dried in an oven at 70 °C for 20 min. Before immersion, the lubricant fillers were mixed uniformly with thermosetting phenolic adhesive resin at different mass fractions (shown in the composition of adhesive resin in Table 2) under high-speed mechanical stirring (5000 r/min, 10 min). Then, the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabrics were immersed in the mixed or unfilled phenolic adhesive resin repetitively until the mass fraction of the fabric was about 75–80%. Afterwards, the immersed hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabrics were dried at 70 °C for 2 h and in an air atmosphere. After being dried, the fabrics were consolidated under 3–3.5 MPa at 100 °C. Finally, a series of unfilled and filled prepregs were affixed onto the AISI-1045 stainless steel (φ 43 mm × 3 mm, Ra: 0.45 μm) at 170 °C for 4 h under 0.02–0.08 MPa.

2.3. Tensile Strength Test

The tensile strength test of pure and graphite/graphene fillers-reinforced fabric composites were investigated by an MTS-CMT-4204 universal materials test machine (provided by MTS SYSTEMS Co, Ltd., Shanghai, China) by GB/T 33613-2017 standards at a constant speed of 20 mm/min. Each sample of tensile test was cut into 200 mm in length, 25 mm in width, and 400 ± 10 μm in thickness. The tensile strength of the composites was calculated through the formula σM = F (BD)−1, where F is the maximal pull force in N, B is the width in m, and D is the thickness in m.

2.4. Friction and Wear Test

All friction and wear tests were performed in air atmosphere at room temperature and RH (relative humidity: 45–55%). The wear properties of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composites were evaluated using a MMUD-5B ball-on-disk friction and wear tester (see Figure 3) provided by Jinan HengXu Testing Machine Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan, China. In the ball-on-disk tester, three AISI-1045 stainless steel balls (Ra: 0.15 μm, hardness: HRC50) were fixed equidistantly on the upper load arm with a chuck. During the test, the stationaryballs contact the flat sample disk that was affixed with composite specimen at 30 N and rotate on the liner with a rotating radius of 11 mm.
The dry sliding tests were performed on the testing machine at room temperature for 125 min, with the normal loads and sliding speed being 30 N and 0.115 m/s, respectively. At the end of each test, the wear volume loss (V) of the PTFE/Nomex fabric composites was obtained by measuring the depth and the cross-sectional area of the wear scar using the RH-2000 3D digital microscope, as show in Figure 4. The specific wear rate (ω, m3/N/m) of the composites is expressed by the equation ω = V/(P * L), in which V is the wear volume loss in m3, P is the load in N, and L is the sliding distance in m. We used the other wear rate in order to evaluate wear resistance more accurately. The formula of the time-related depth wear rate (Wt) is as follows: Wt = Δh/t, in which t is the test time and Δh is the height loss of the specimen. The running the friction-measure software was used to obtain the friction coefficient measured directly from the torque located under the sample disk. Each experiment was performed five times repeatedly, and the average values of the tests were reported.

2.5. Oscillating Wear Test

The PLS-100 oscillating wear tester provided by Shanghai bearing technology research institute Co, Ltd., Shanghai, China was employed to investigate the oscillating wear behavior of the fabric composite under actual working conditions. On the tester (schematic diagram shown in Figure 5), a displacement sensor with a precision of 0.001 mm was fixed onto the load arm to obtain the wear loss data.

2.6. Characterization

An RH-2000 3D digital microscope (provided by Hirox China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was firstly employed to acquire an accurate 3D surface profile of the worn surfaces; then, computerized image analysis software equipped on it was adopted to quantify surface parameters such as the depth and cross-sectional area of the wear scar. The morphologies of the worn surfaces of the composites and counterpart balls were analyzed by a Phenom scanning electron microscope (Shanghai, China with back scattered-electron mode at the accelerating voltage of 5 KV.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of Graphite/Graphene on the Tribological Property of Hybrid PTFE/Nomex Fabric Composite

Sliding wear tests were performed to investigate the effect of graphite/graphene on the friction and wear performance of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites, after which the friction curve and wear rate of the unfilled and different lubricant filled composite were given in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. It indicated that the lubricant particle has a large influence on the friction and wear behaviors of fabric composites. Adding lubricant particles significantly decreased the friction coefficient and wear rate of the composite. Comparing the two particles, the graphite particle gives a greater wear resistance improvement, whereas the graphene particle is more efficient in the friction reduction of the composite. Most notably, the graphite/graphene filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composite showed a lower friction coefficient (μ: 0.042) and better anti-wear property (specific wear rate: 2.9 × 10−14 m3/(N·m), depth wear rate: 5.6 nm/s) than the graphite-filled and graphene-filled composites. The lowest friction coefficient was accompanied by the steady friction curve and a short running-in stage during the whole friction process, without compromising the friction reliability. The smallest wear rate is correspondent with the smoothest worn surface and narrowest wear scar expressed with the 3D microscopic images (see Figure 8).
Figure 9 shows the SEM images of the worn surfaces of the unfilled, graphite-filled, graphene-filled, and graphite/graphene-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites. Significant wear occurred for the unfilled composite, as the most fiber exposure and fiber pullouts are observed on the worn surface. The wear of the graphite-filled composite is milder than the unfilled and graphene-filled composites. Some short and compressed fibers are exposed out of the worn surface that displays a layered structure with cracks, resulting from the improved load-carrying capacity brought by graphite particles. The graphene-filled composite displays many pulled-out fibers and much small wear debris on its worn surface. The tiny graphene particles may lead to a positive rolling effect to reduce the friction force; however, this effect results in abrasive wear that limits the improvement in wear reduction. For graphite/graphene-filled composites, it was found the mildest wear damage occurred on the worn surface, featuring few fiber pullouts, cracks, and almost no resin detachment on it. It is believed that the improved tribological property of the graphite/graphene-filled composite is attributed to the synergistic effect of graphite/graphene particles. Figure 10 shows the wear model of the graphite/graphene-filled composite. On one hand, tiny graphene particles lead to the positive rolling effect, which decreases the friction coefficient, during which small wear debris generated can repair the voids and holes to display the smoothest worn surface. On the other hand, the improved loading-carrying capacity brought by graphite particles significantly reduced the severe abrasive wear caused by graphene particles during the sliding process, leading, together with the groove-filling debris, to the mechanical property enhancement of the composite (see Figure 11).

3.2. The Effect of Graphene Content on the Tribological Property of the Graphite/Graphene-Filled PTFE/Nomex Fabric Composite

The friction coefficient, wear rate, and tensile strength of the different graphene content filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composite is shown in Figure 12a,b (the content of graphite is constant at 2 wt %). It can be seen that the graphene content has a large influence on the friction and wear property of the PTFE/Nomex fabric composite. Compared with the 0.2 wt % graphene filling, the friction coefficient and wear rate of the composite were reduced when 0.4 wt % graphene was filled, and when the content of graphene increased to 0.8 wt %, the graphite/graphene-filled composite exhibited the lowest friction coefficient and wear rate (μ: 0.042, specific wear rate: 2.9 × 10−14 m3/(N·m), depth wear rate: 5.6 nm/s). Figure 13 shows the 3D microscopic images of the worn surface of the composites. The composite filled with graphite/0.8 wt % graphene exhibited the smoothest worn surface and narrowest wear scar, corresponding to the lowest wear rate. However, further increasing the graphene content to 1 wt %, the friction coefficient and wear rate of the composite both increased, indicating a decrease in friction and wear property.
Figure 14 and Figure 15 show the SEM images of the worn surface and its counterpart balls of the composites, respectively. When the graphene content is 0.2 wt %, resin detachment and fiber exposure were detected on the worn surface of the composite. With graphene content increasing, pulled-out fibers and adhesive resin tend to be compressed together to form a smoother worn surface that is featured with less holes and cracks. When the graphene content increased to 0.8 wt %, the composite underwent the mildest wear damage. It is proposed that the graphene content increasing leads to a strengthened rolling effect and abrasive wear for the composite, generating more small-sized wear debris. As more wear debris accumulated in the voids and cracks generated during the sliding process, the worn surface of the composite was polished and smoothed, which was evidenced by the milder scratches and less transferred polymers on the counterpart balls (see Figure 15a–d). As a result, the mechanical property of the composite was enhanced (see Figure 13c), leading to a decrease in the wear rate. However, further increasing the graphene content caused more pulled-out fibers and voids on the worn surface (see Figure 14e) and more scratches and transferred polymers on the counterpart balls (see Figure 15e). It is believed that the overabundant graphene particles result in severe abrasive wear, causing a decrease in the mechanical (see Figure 12c) and anti-wear property of the composite.

3.3. The Effect of Graphite Content on the Tribological Property of the Graphite/Graphene-Filled PTFE/Nomex Fabric Composite

The effect of graphite content on the friction coefficient and wear rate of the graphite/graphene-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composite is shown in Figure 16 (the content of graphene is constant at 0.8 wt %). It is seen that the friction coefficient and wear rate decrease significantly with the content of graphite content increasing up to 2 wt %. However, with a further increase of graphite content, the friction coefficient and wear rate increased, indicating the decreased friction and wear property of the composite. The 3D microscopic images (see Figure 17) of the worn surface of the composites show that all the composites exhibit a broader wear scar and rougher worn surface than the composite filled with 2 wt % graphite, corresponding to the friction and wear results.
Figure 18 and Figure 19 show the SEM images of the worn surface and its counterpart balls of the composites. When the graphite content is 1 wt %, the worn surface exhibited a layered structure with compressed fibers and cracks (see Figure 18a). The worn surface of the counterpart ball showed numerous scratches and a large area of transferred polymers, indicating a relatively serious wear damage (see Figure 19a). With the graphite content increasing up to 2 wt %, the exposure of fibers was scarce (see Figure 18b), and the counterpart ball was better protected, as less scratches and transferred polymers were observed on it (see Figure 19b). It is proposed that with the graphite content increasing, the strengthened effect of the interlayer slip of multilayer structured graphite improves the load-carrying capacity of the composite, leading to milder wear damage. However, after further increasing the graphite content, the worn surface of the composites exhibited masses of pulled-out fibers and cracks, resulting in an increase in surface roughness. It is believed that the overabundant graphite fillers result in a decrease in the continuity of the resin matrix, causing the increased detachment of the resin matrix and wear debris (see Figure 18c,d), as more scratches are observed on the worn surfaces of the counterpart balls (see Figure 19c,d).

3.4. Oscillating Wear Test for Bearing Application

3.4.1. Experimental

As the PTFE/Nomex fabric composite filled with 2 wt % graphite and 0.8 wt % graphene demonstrated the most favorable tribological property, the composite was used on the spherical bearing, which was then subjected to an oscillating wear test. The AISI-1045 bearing used consisted of an inner ring (diameter: 15 mm) for friction and an outer ring (diameter: 28 mm) affixed with the fabric composite.
When prepare the bearing, the composite prepreg (which was composed of the PTFE/Nomex fabric, the phenolic resin, and the graphite/graphene fillers) was firstly affixed onto the internal surface of the bearing outer ring, and then cured with a certain pressure; after that, the bearing sample was prepared.
The oscillating wear test was performed under actual working conditions, with the testing parameters shown in Table 3.

3.4.2. Wear Test Results

To further evaluate the engineering service life of the modified composite, oscillating wear tests were performed for the composite under actual working conditions. Figure 20 illustrated the wear loss changes of the composite as a function of oscillation times. It can be seen that the whole wear process was divided into two stages. After a short running-in stage, the wear of the composite quickly entered into a steady stage in which the wear loss linearly increases with the oscillation times. Based on the actual application conditions, the wear loss of the existing limited market bearing products is about 0.19 mm. After 100,000 oscillations, the wear loss was calculated at 0.134 mm, which indicates the improved anti-wear property for fabric composites used in spherical bearings.

3.4.3. Worn Surface Analysis

Figure 21 shows the SEM images of the composite surfaces before and after wear tests. It can be seen that after 100,000 oscillations, the worn surface of the composite exhibited few pulled-out fibers and wear debris. Besides, the resin matrix rarely detached from the fabric, indicating a mild wear damage. The results indicate that the composite filled with 2 wt % graphite/0.8 wt % graphene meets the requirement from actual working conditions.

4. Conclusions

Graphite/graphene particles were employed as hybrid fillers to modify hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric-reinforced phenolic composites. The tribological property and oscillating wear behavior of the modified composites were studied comprehensively. The results show that the hybrid graphite/graphene fillers achieve a comprehensive improvement in friction and wear properties for PTFE/Nomex fabric composites. SEM and 3D digital microscope analysis reveal that the improvement is mainly attributed to the positive rolling effect of graphene particles and load-carrying capacity enhancement brought by graphite particles, which is illustrated in the wear model for the composite. Oscillating wear tests under actual working conditions were performed to evaluate the service ability of graphite/graphene-filled composites, which demonstrates the advantage of hybrid fillers on engineering service life promotion and bearing application as reinforcements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.; Methodology, M.S.; Software, S.W.; Supervision, J.S.; Visualization, H.D.; Writing—original draft, F.R.; Writing—review & editing, M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB1103400), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No. 17QC1401200), and the Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2019B010929001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Xu, N.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Xiao, H.; Jia, J.; Lv, H.; Zhang, D. Preparation and tribological properties of hybrid PTFE/Kevlar fabric self-lubricating composites. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 361, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qiu, M.; Yang, Z.; Lu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhou, D. Influence of step load on tribological properties of self-lubricating radial spherical plain bearings with PTFE fabric liner. Tribol. Int. 2017, 113, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, L.-H.; Yang, Z.-G.; Li, X.-H. Tensile and tribological properties of PTFE and nanoparticles modified epoxy-based polyester fabric composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 497, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, Q.-S.; Sun, L.-H.; Yang, Z.-G.; Li, X.-H.; Jin, S.-L. Optimization on the thermal and tensile influencing factors of polyurethane-based polyester fabric composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Russo, P.; Acierno, D.; Simeoli, G.; Iannace, S.; Sorrentino, L. Flexural and impact response of woven glass fiber fabric/polypropylene composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 54, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qiu, M.; Gao, Z.L.; Yao, S.J.; Chen, L. Effects of Oscillation Frequency on the Tribological Properties of Self-Lubrication Spherical Plain Bearings with PTFE Woven Liner. Key Eng. Mater. 2011, 455, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ren, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Yang, M.; Men, X.; Jiang, W.; Liu, W. WS2-filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composites with improved antiwear property. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Yang, M.; Men, X.; Jiang, W.; Liu, W. High-temperature tribological performance of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric/phenolic composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 104, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Friedrich, K.; Zhang, Z.; Schlarb, A.K. Effects of various fillers on the sliding wear of polymer composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2329–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, W.; Gu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z. Enhanced tribological performance of hybrid polytetrafluoroethylene/Kevlar fabric composite filled with milled pitch-based carbon fibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Conte, M.; Igartua, A. Study of PTFE composites tribological behavior. Wear 2012, 296, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiu, M.; Miao, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, J. Film-forming mechanisms for self-lubricating radial spherical plain bearings with hybrid PTFE/aramid fabric liners modified by ultrasonic. Tribol. Int. 2015, 87, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, H.L.; Yin, Z.W.; Jiang, D.; Jin, L.Y.; Cao, Q.; Qu, Y.F. A Study of the Static/Kinetic Friction Behavior of PTFE-Based Fabric Composites. Tribol. Trans. 2018, 61, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, M.; Zhu, X.; Ren, G.; Men, X.; Guo, F.; Li, P.; Zhang, Z. Influence of air-plasma treatment and hexagonal boron nitride as filler on the high temperature tribological behaviors of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric/phenolic composite. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 67, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, D.; Fei, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Huang, J. Optimization of mechanical and tribological properties of carbon fabric/resin composites via controlling ZnO nanorods morphology. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 15393–15401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, V.; Sinha, S.K.; Agarwal, A.K. Tribological studies of epoxy composites with solid and liquid fillers. Tribol. Int. 2017, 105, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gu, D.; Yang, Y.; Qi, X.; Deng, W.; Shi, L. Influence of weave structures on the tribological properties of hybrid Kevlar/PTFE fabric composites. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2012, 25, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Men, X.; Jiang, W.; Liu, W. Combined effect of air-plasma treatment and lubricant filling on the dry sliding wear behavior of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric/phenolic composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 100, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, M.; Guo, F.; Men, X.; Liu, W. Surface modification of hybrid-fabric composites with amino silane and polydopamine for enhanced mechanical and tribological behaviors. Tribol. Int. 2017, 107, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, P.; Lu, R.; Huang, T.; Wang, H.; Li, T. A Study on the Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Carbon Fabric/PTFE Composites. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2012, 51, 786–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, L.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, P. Experimental study on tribological properties of carbon/polytetrafluoroethylene hybrid fabric reinforced composite under heavy loads and oil lubrication. Tribol. Int. 2016, 94, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xue, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, S.; Meng, Q.; Luo, J. Finite element simulation and experimental test of the wear behavior for self-lubricating spherical plain bearings. Friction 2018, 6, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cai, P.; Wang, T.; Wang, Q. Effect of several solid lubricants on the mechanical and tribological properties of phenolic resin-based composites. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36, 2203–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H.; Yin, Z.; Jiang, D.; Huo, Y.; Cui, Y. Tribological behavior of hybrid PTFE/Kevlar fabric composites with nano-Si3N4 and submicron size WS2 fillers. Tribol. Int. 2014, 80, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, M.; Li, P.; Men, X.; Liu, W. Graphene Oxide-Grafted Hybrid-Fabric Composites with Simultaneously Improved Mechanical and Tribological Properties. Tribol. Lett. 2018, 66, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Pei, X.; Wang, T. Friction and wear properties of solid lubricants filled/carbon fabric reinforced phenolic composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 2480–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ren, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Ge, B.; Guo, F.; Men, X.; Liu, W. Influence of functional graphene as filler on the tribological behaviors of Nomex fabric/phenolic composite. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013, 49, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, F.H.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Guo, F.; Wang, K.; Liu, W.-M. Effects of solid lubricants on friction and wear properties of Nomex fabric composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 424, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, L.Y.; Kim, D.E.; Kim, W.K.; Jun, S.C. Friction and wear characteristics of multi-layer graphene films investigated by atomic force microscopy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 4864–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Pei, X.-Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S. The friction and wear properties of carbon nanotubes/graphite/carbon fabric reinforced phenolic polymer composites. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2014, 24, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ren, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Men, X.; Liu, W. Influence of lubricant filling on the dry sliding wear behaviors of hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 3716–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.J.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Guo, F. Studies of the Influence of Graphite and MoS2 on the Tribological Behaviors of Hybrid PTFE/Nomex Fabric Composite. Tribol. Trans. 2011, 54, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Weave structure of the polytetrafluoroethylene/polyisophthaloyl metaphenylene diamine (PTFE/Nomex) fabric.
Figure 1. Weave structure of the polytetrafluoroethylene/polyisophthaloyl metaphenylene diamine (PTFE/Nomex) fabric.
Materials 13 00232 g001
Figure 2. Preparation process of the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite.
Figure 2. Preparation process of the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite.
Materials 13 00232 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the ball-on-disk wear tester.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the ball-on-disk wear tester.
Materials 13 00232 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the measurement of the cross-sectional area and wear depth.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the measurement of the cross-sectional area and wear depth.
Materials 13 00232 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the oscillating wear tester.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the oscillating wear tester.
Materials 13 00232 g005
Figure 6. Friction coefficients of unfilled and a series of lubricant-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites.
Figure 6. Friction coefficients of unfilled and a series of lubricant-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites.
Materials 13 00232 g006
Figure 7. Wear rates of unfilled and a series of lubricant-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites.
Figure 7. Wear rates of unfilled and a series of lubricant-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites.
Materials 13 00232 g007
Figure 8. 3D and profile of the worn surfaces for the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) pristine, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 0.8 wt % graphene, (d) 2 wt % graphite + 0.8 wt % graphene.
Figure 8. 3D and profile of the worn surfaces for the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) pristine, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 0.8 wt % graphene, (d) 2 wt % graphite + 0.8 wt % graphene.
Materials 13 00232 g008
Figure 9. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composites: (a) pristine, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 0.2 wt % graphene, (d) 2 wt % graphite + 0.2 wt % graphene.
Figure 9. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composites: (a) pristine, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 0.2 wt % graphene, (d) 2 wt % graphite + 0.2 wt % graphene.
Materials 13 00232 g009
Figure 10. Wear model of the graphite/graphene-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composite.
Figure 10. Wear model of the graphite/graphene-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composite.
Materials 13 00232 g010
Figure 11. Strength test results of the unfilled and a series of lubricant-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites.
Figure 11. Strength test results of the unfilled and a series of lubricant-filled PTFE/Nomex fabric composites.
Materials 13 00232 g011
Figure 12. Friction coefficient (a) and specific wear rate or depth wear rate (b) of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites with different graphene contents; the tensile strength test results (c) of the corresponding fabric composites.
Figure 12. Friction coefficient (a) and specific wear rate or depth wear rate (b) of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites with different graphene contents; the tensile strength test results (c) of the corresponding fabric composites.
Materials 13 00232 g012
Figure 13. 3D and profile of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 0.2 wt % graphene, (b) 0.4 wt % graphene, (c) 0.6 wt % graphene, (d) 0.8 wt % graphene, (e) 1.0 wt % graphene. (The content of graphite is a constant value of 2 wt %).
Figure 13. 3D and profile of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 0.2 wt % graphene, (b) 0.4 wt % graphene, (c) 0.6 wt % graphene, (d) 0.8 wt % graphene, (e) 1.0 wt % graphene. (The content of graphite is a constant value of 2 wt %).
Materials 13 00232 g013
Figure 14. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 0.2 wt % graphene, (b) 0.4 wt % graphene, (c) 0.6 wt % graphene, (d) 0.8 wt % graphene, (e) 1.0 wt % graphene. (The content of graphite is a constant value of 2 wt %).
Figure 14. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 0.2 wt % graphene, (b) 0.4 wt % graphene, (c) 0.6 wt % graphene, (d) 0.8 wt % graphene, (e) 1.0 wt % graphene. (The content of graphite is a constant value of 2 wt %).
Materials 13 00232 g014
Figure 15. SEM images of the worn surfaces of the counterpart ball: (a) 0.2 wt % graphene, (b) 0.4 wt % graphene, (c) 0.6 wt % graphene, (d) 0.8 wt % graphene, (e) 1.0 wt % graphene. (The content of graphite is a constant value of 2 wt %).
Figure 15. SEM images of the worn surfaces of the counterpart ball: (a) 0.2 wt % graphene, (b) 0.4 wt % graphene, (c) 0.6 wt % graphene, (d) 0.8 wt % graphene, (e) 1.0 wt % graphene. (The content of graphite is a constant value of 2 wt %).
Materials 13 00232 g015
Figure 16. Friction coefficient (a) and specific wear rate or depth wear rate (b) of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites with different graphite contents.
Figure 16. Friction coefficient (a) and specific wear rate or depth wear rate (b) of PTFE/Nomex fabric composites with different graphite contents.
Materials 13 00232 g016
Figure 17. 3D and profile of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 1 wt % graphite, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 5 wt % graphite, (d) 10 wt % graphite. (The content of graphene is a constant value of 0.8 wt %).
Figure 17. 3D and profile of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 1 wt % graphite, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 5 wt % graphite, (d) 10 wt % graphite. (The content of graphene is a constant value of 0.8 wt %).
Materials 13 00232 g017
Figure 18. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 1 wt % graphite, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 5 wt % graphite, (d) 10 wt % graphite. (The content of graphene is a constant value of 0.8 wt %).
Figure 18. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 1 wt % graphite, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 5 wt % graphite, (d) 10 wt % graphite. (The content of graphene is a constant value of 0.8 wt %).
Materials 13 00232 g018
Figure 19. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 1 wt % graphite, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 5 wt % graphite, (d) 10 wt % graphite. (The content of graphene is a constant value of 0.8 wt %).
Figure 19. SEM images of the worn surfaces for the filled hybrid PTFE/Nomex fabric composite: (a) 1 wt % graphite, (b) 2 wt % graphite, (c) 5 wt % graphite, (d) 10 wt % graphite. (The content of graphene is a constant value of 0.8 wt %).
Materials 13 00232 g019
Figure 20. The wear loss changes of the composite as a function of oscillation times.
Figure 20. The wear loss changes of the composite as a function of oscillation times.
Materials 13 00232 g020
Figure 21. SEM images of the modified composite surface before and after test. (a) Original surface, (b) worn surface after 100,000 oscillations.
Figure 21. SEM images of the modified composite surface before and after test. (a) Original surface, (b) worn surface after 100,000 oscillations.
Materials 13 00232 g021
Table 1. Properties of the PTFE/Nomex fabric.
Table 1. Properties of the PTFE/Nomex fabric.
Weave Density (Threads/Inch)Filament Numbers of a Yarn
FabricNomex-PTFENomexPTFENomex
PTFE/Nomex355560100
Table 2. Composition of adhesive resin.
Table 2. Composition of adhesive resin.
Final SamplePhenolic Resin (wt %)Graphite (wt %)Grapheme (wt %)
1#100
2#97.820.2
2#97.620.4
4#97.420.6
5#97.220.8
5#9721.0
6#98.210.8
7#94.250.8
8#89.2100.8
Table 3. Parameters of oscillating wear test.
Table 3. Parameters of oscillating wear test.
Applied LoadFrequencyOscillation AngleTemperatureOscillation Times
44.4 kN0.2 Hz±25°25 °C100,000

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, F.; Wang, S.; Yu, M.; Duan, H.; Su, M.; Ren, M.; Sun, J. Influence of Graphite/Graphene on the Tribological Behaviors of Self-Lubricating Fabric Composite. Materials 2020, 13, 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010232

AMA Style

Ren F, Wang S, Yu M, Duan H, Su M, Ren M, Sun J. Influence of Graphite/Graphene on the Tribological Behaviors of Self-Lubricating Fabric Composite. Materials. 2020; 13(1):232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Fang, Sha Wang, Mingming Yu, Hongyu Duan, Meng Su, Musu Ren, and Jinliang Sun. 2020. "Influence of Graphite/Graphene on the Tribological Behaviors of Self-Lubricating Fabric Composite" Materials 13, no. 1: 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop