Next Article in Journal
Topology Optimization-Based Damage Identification Using Visualized Ultrasonic Wave Propagation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Transmittance Modulation of ZnO/Cu/ZnO Transparent Conductive Electrodes Prepared on Glass Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Percussion Drilling Hole in Cu, Al, Ti and Ni Alloys Using Ultra-Short Pulsed Laser Ablation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transparent ZnO Thin-Film Deposition by Spray Pyrolysis for High-Performance Metal-Oxide Field-Effect Transistors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/ma13010032
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Room-Temperature-Processed Amorphous Sn-In-O Electron Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells

by
Seungtae Baek
1,
Jeong Woo Han
1,
Devthade Vidyasagar
1,
Hanbyeol Cho
1,
Hwi-Heon HA
1,
Dong Hoe Kim
2,
Young-Woo Heo
1,* and
Sangwook Lee
1,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
2
Department of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Engineering, Sejong University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010032
Submission received: 4 November 2019 / Revised: 12 December 2019 / Accepted: 16 December 2019 / Published: 19 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced/Alternative Transparent Conducting Oxides)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report amorphous tin-indium-oxide (TIO, Sn fraction: >50 atomic percentage (at%)) thin films as a new electron transport layer (ETL) of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). TIO thin films with Sn fraction of 52, 77, 83, 92, and 100 at% were grown on crystalline indium-tin-oxide (ITO, Sn fraction: ~10 at%) thin films, a common transparent conducting oxide, by co-sputtering In2O3 and SnO2 at room temperature. The energy band structures of the amorphous TIO thin films were determined from the optical absorbance and the ultraviolet photoelectron spectra. All the examined compositions are characterized by a conduction band edge lying between that of ITO and that of perovskite (here, methylammonium lead triiodide), indicating that TIO is a potentially viable ETL of PSCs. The photovoltaic characteristics of the TIO-based PSCs were evaluated. Owing mainly to the highest fill factor and open circuit voltage, the optimal power conversion efficiency was obtained for the 77 at%-Sn TIO ETL with TiCl4 treatment. The fill factor and the open circuit voltage changes with varying the Sn fraction, despite similar conduction band edges. We attribute these differences to the considerable changes in the electrical resistivity of the TIO ETL. This would have a significant effect on the shunt and/or the series resistances. The TIO ETL can be continuously grown on an ITO TCO in a chamber, as ITO and TIO are composed of identical elements, which would help to reduce production time and costs.

1. Introduction

Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites are characterized by high absorption coefficients [1], long carrier diffusion lengths [2,3], easily tunable band gaps [4,5], low-temperature solution processes, and low costs [6,7,8]. Based on such characteristics, these perovskites have attracted considerable attention as light absorbing materials of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) [9,10]. A PSC employs one of two structural configurations, i.e., electrode/hole transport layer (HTL)/perovskite/electron transport layer (ETL)/transparent conductive oxide (TCO) or electrode/ETL/perovskite/HTL/TCO [11,12,13], referred to as regular (n-i-p) and inverted (p-i-n) type PSCs, respectively. Depending on the shape of the ETL, a PSC is classified as either a mesoscopic or a planar structure. In the former, the charge transport layer on TCO is composed of a nanoparticle-based mesoporous film, whereas in the latter, each charge transport layer is a compact thin film [11,12,14,15].
ETL plays an important role in extracting the excited electrons (or blocking the holes) from the light absorption layer (LAL) and transporting these electrons from the LAL to the electrode. The conditions required for an ETL of a PSC are summarized as follows: (i) appropriate conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM)-the CBM between those of the LAL and the TCO, to inject the electrons from the LAL to the TCO, and the VBM lower than that of the LAL to block the holes [16,17]; (ii) a high electron mobility and a moderate carrier density, to promote efficient transport of electrons [16,18]; (iii) a wide band-gap, to transmit the incident light associated with regular-type devices [16]; (iv) long-term stabilities against heat, oxygen, and humidity [19,20,21,22,23,24]. From these aspects crystalline metal oxides, such as TiO2 [25,26,27], SnO2 [28], BaSnO3 [29], Nb2O5 [30], WOx [31,32], and Zn2SnO4 [33], have been studied for use as the ETLs of PSCs.
However, to realize good electrical properties of such crystalline oxides, the oxides need in most cases a post-heat treatment [34,35,36,37]. This treatment is undesirable, owing to the additional production time and costs as well as the difficulty of realizing flexible devices, because polymer-based flexible substrates deteriorate at high temperatures. In addition, a crystallized film has a rough surface due to the formation of sharp-edged facets, grains, and grain boundaries, which trigger cracking during bending cycles [35,38,39]. Alternatively, it has been reported recently that amorphous oxide-based ETLs can be grown via low-temperature processes, such as solution spin-coating, chemical bath deposition, and vapor deposition [38,39,40]. Moreover, amorphous films exhibit greater bending durability than crystalline films [35,38,39].
In this study, we report a tin-indium-oxide (TIO; Sn fraction: >50 atomic percent (at%)) amorphous thin film as a new ETL of PSCs. Although ITO has been widely used as a TCO, its use as an ETL remains unexplored. TIO amorphous thin films were grown on ITO TCO by co-sputtering SnO2 and ITO at room temperature. The crystallinity, optical properties, and electrical properties of the films are investigated as a function of the Sn fraction. The energy band structures of the amorphous TIO thin films are determined from optical absorbance spectra and ultraviolet photoelectron spectra. Moreover, TIO-ETL-based PSCs are demonstrated with a methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI3) perovskite light absorber.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Methylammonium iodide (MAI, ≥99.5%, Polymer Light Technology Corp., Xi’an, China), Lead(II) iodide (PbI2, 99.9985%, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Nihonbashi-honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan), Lead(II) bromide (PbBr2, ≥98.0%, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Nihonbashi-honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan), Formamidinium iodide (FAI, ≥99.0%, Greatcell Solar, Queanbeyan, New South Wales, Australia), Methylammonium bromide (MABr, ≥99.0%, Greatcell Solar, Queanbeyan, New South Wales, Australia), Cesium iodide (CsI, 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ≥99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Diethyl ether (DEE, ≥99.7%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used for preparing the perovskite thin films. Spiro-MeOTAD (≥99.9978%, Luminescence Technology Corp., New Taipei City, Taiwan, China), FK 209 Co(III) TFSI salt (Cobalt compound, ≥98.0%, Luminescence Technology Corp., New Taipei City, Taiwan, China), Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) (Li-salt, 99.0%, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), 4-tert-Butylpyridine (tBP, 96%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA), Acetonitrile (99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and Chlorobenzene (CB, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich, Haverhill, MA, USA) were used for making HTL thin films. Tin(IV) oxide (SnO2 col, 15% in H2O colloidal dispersion, Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) was used for preparing SnO2 thin films. Titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4, ≥99.0%, Junsei Chemical Co., Nihonbashi-honcho, chou-ku, Tokyo) was used for the TiCl4 surface treatment.

2.2. Sn-In-O (TIO) Thin Film Deposition

TIO amorphous thin films were deposited by means of co-sputtering In2O3 and SnO2 targets using an RF magnetron sputtering system at room temperature. The substrates used were ITO (Samsung Corning®, on Eagle glass, 6–7 Ω/sq), slide glass, and sapphire wafer depending on the analysis performed. Each substrate was cleaned sequentially with acetone, deionized water, and isopropanol in an ultrasonic bath twice for 3 min each. The substrates were further cleaned for 20 min by means of a UV-Ozone (UVO) surface treatment, prior to the deposition of the TIO thin films. The composition of the films was controlled by adjusting (i) the distance between the targets and the substrates, and (ii) the gun powers of the In2O3 target (25 W to 75 W) and the SnO2 target (75 W to 200 W). A mixture gas (volume ratio of O2 to Ar = 0.001) at a flow rate of 100 sccm was used for the process gas.

2.3. Device Fabrication

Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite layers were coated on the TIO ETL. Size of the substrates were 2 cm × 2 cm. In some cases, the substrates were subjected to a TiCl4-treatment prior to the perovskite coating process. During this treatment, the films were immersed in an aqueous TiCl4 solution (0.05 M) at 70 °C for 30 min, and then rinsed with deionized water and isopropyl alcohol. All substrates were UVO treated for 20 min immediately prior to the deposition of the perovskite layer coating. A perovskite precursor solution with MAPbI3 was prepared by dissolving MAI:PbI2:DMSO at a molar ratio of 1:1:1 at 52 wt.% in DMF. The precursor was dropped onto the UVO-treated TIO film and spin-coated at 4000 rpm for 20 s. During the spinning, 0.5 mL of DEE was dropped. After the coating process, the samples were annealed at 65 °C for 1 min, and then at 130 °C for 10 min. Stability tests for the ITO-ETL-based PSCs were performed using a tri-cation perovskite. For this, a perovskite precursor solution with Cs0.05(FA0.87MA0.13)0.95Pb(Br0.13I0.87)3 was prepared by dissolving CsI, FAI, MABr, PbI2, and PbBr2 in DMF: DMSO (v/v) = 4:1 at a concentration of 1.4 M with the composition [41]. The precursor was dropped onto the UVO-treated In-Sn-O thin film and spin-coated at 5000 rpm for 30 s. During the spinning, 0.2 mL of CB was dropped. After the spin coating, the samples were annealed at 150 °C for 10 min. The HTL was coated on the perovskite layer by spin-coating 20 µL of spiro-MeOTAD mixed solution at 3000 rpm for 30 s. This mixed solution was prepared by sequentially adding 18 μL of Li-TFSI solution and 14.7 mg of Co-TFSI to 1 mL of spiro-MeOTAD solution. The Li-TFSI solution was prepared by dissolving 566 mg of Li-TFSI in 1 mL of acetonitrile. Furthermore, the spiro-MeOTAD solution was prepared by sequentially dissolving 80 mg of spiro-MeOTAD and 32 μL of 4-tert-butylpyridine in 1 mL of chlorobenzene. Afterward, the Au electrode (thickness: 100 nm) was deposited on the HTL using a thermal evaporator.

2.4. Characterization and Measurement

The composition, crystallographic structure, and optical transmittance of the TIO films were investigated via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; EX-250, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD; X’pert PRO, PANalytical, Malvern, Malvern Hills District, UK), and ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared (UV-Vis-NIR) spectroscopy (Cary 7000, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively. Furthermore, the work function and VBM of the films were determined by means of ultraviolet photoelectron spectrometry (UPS; AXIS Nova, Kratos, Wharfside, Manchester, UK). The electrical properties were measured using a Hall measurement system (HEK-3000, EGK, Pasadena, TX, USA) at room temperature. The photovoltaic properties were investigated using a source meter (Keithley 2450, Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, OH, USA) under simulated solar light generated by a solar simulator (Newport Oriel Solar AAA Class, 94023A). The AM 1.5 G sun light (100 mW cm−2) was calibrated using a standard Si reference cell (Newport, 91150V). In addition, the photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves were measured at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. The area of the shadow mask was 0.1 cm2.

3. Results and Discussion

For the EDS and XRD analyses, 250 nm-thick TIO thin films were deposited on a glass substrate at room temperature. By adjusting the target-substrate distances and gun powers, we successfully prepared various films with Sn fraction ([Sn]/([In] + [Sn])) of 52 at%, 77 at%, 83 at%, 92 at%, and 100 at%. These films are referred to as TIO-52, TIO-77, TIO-83, TIO-92, and TIO-100, hereafter. XRD patterns of the TIO thin films (see Figure 1) reveal that the films are amorphous, as evidenced by absence of any diffraction peaks for sequential lattice planes, especially at 2θ value of 30.5° and 26.6° corresponding to crystalline (222) plane of In2O3 and (110) plane of SnO2. The amorphous phase of the TIO films was also confirmed by means of Raman analysis (results excluded from this manuscript).
Figure 2a shows UV-Vis absorbance of the TIO films. 250 nm-thick TIO films were prepared on sapphire substrates having a wide band gap (~10 eV), because ITO or glass substrates absorb near-UV light near to the band edge wavelength of TIO, and this absorption may prevent the acquisition of accurate absorption edges. The samples exhibit similar absorbance levels and absorption edges. The optical band gap energies of the TIO films were determined from the Tauc plots with r = 1 (see Figure 2b), which were converted from the absorbance spectra using the Tauc equation, αhν = A(hν-Eg)r; α, hν, A, and the exponent r denote the absorption coefficient, photon energy, proportionality constant, and the nature of the transition, respectively. In this work, non-linear curves were obtained for the plots with r = 1/2 (for direct transition) and r = 2 (for indirect transition), although crystalline In2O3 and crystalline SnO2 are direct transition materials [42]. In contrast, linear curves were obtained with r=1, which relation has been reported from materials having a very narrow range of localized states [43]. The optical band gap energy increases slightly (3.49, 3.52, 3.57, 3.62, and 3.65 eV for TIO-52, 77, 83, 92, and 100, respectively) with increasing Sn fraction. The band gap energy of TIO-100 (i.e., amorphous SnO2) determined in this study is very similar to that of crystalline SnO2 (~3.7 eV) reported in the literature [44].
In order to investigate the energy band structure of TIO, the UPS spectrum was collected, as shown in Figure 3a. The Fermi level (EF) was determined through linear extrapolation of the leading edge at the cut-off region (EF = Ecut-off − 21.2 eV). The VBM was determined via linear extrapolation of the leading edge at the Fermi edge region (EVBM = EF − Efermi edge). The CBM was obtained by combining the VBM and the optical band gap energy (ECBM = EVBM + Eg). Figure 3b shows the energy levels of the TIO films. These levels exhibit no distinct dependence on the Sn fraction. The CBM of each sample is higher than that of ITO and lower than that of MAPbI3, and is therefore favorable for electron transfer from MAPbI3 to ITO through TIO. In addition, good blocking of the holes from MAPbI3 is expected, because each VBM of the TIO is positioned at lower energy levels than that of MAPbI3. Another notable point is that the energy difference between the CBM and the Fermi level increases (0.17, 0.20, 0.20, 0.32, and 0.41 eV for TIO-52, 77, 83, 92, and 100, respectively) with increasing Sn fraction. This implies that the electrical conductivity would decrease with increasing Sn fraction, owing to a reduction in the carrier concentration.
Using the TIO thin films as the ETL, regular planar-type PSC devices were fabricated. The PSCs have a glass/ITO/TIO-ETL/MAPbI3/HTL/Au structure. The thickness of the TIO-ETL (i.e., 40 nm) was controlled by adjusting the sputtering time. The ETL, HTL, and Au layers were deposited at room temperature and, hence, the highest processing temperature is 130 °C which is associated with the perovskite LAL coating. Figure 4a shows the J-V curves of the TIO-ETL-based PSCs, measured under 1 SUN (1.5 G) condition. The plots in Figure 4b–e show the photovoltaic parameters, such as the open circuit voltage (Voc), short circuit current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE), of the PSCs. The results show that the Voc and FF increase significantly (from 0.6 V to 0.98 V and 0.36 to 0.66, respectively) with increasing Sn fraction. However, the Jsc remains almost a similar level, c.a. 20 mA/cm2 with a small deviation less than 10%, regardless of composition. Consequently, the PCE increases approximately three-fold, from 4.33% (TIO-52) to 12.67% (TIO-92), owing mainly to the enhanced Voc and FF. A comparison of the J-V curve shapes reveals that the photocurrent density of the ITO-52-based PSC decreases steeply with increasing voltage. A steep slope in the low-voltage regions combined with a high Jsc and a low Voc occurs when the shunt resistance of the diode element is small. In contrast, with increasing Sn fraction, the curves transfer to more diode-like characteristics, i.e., a gentle slope up to ~0.8 V and a steep slope at voltages above this value. High Sn fractions yield curves that approach the ideal J-V curve, indicating increased shunt resistance. The interfacial charge-carrier dynamics of MAPbI3 and TIO-ETL were evaluated by impedance analysis. The Nyquist plots demonstrate substantial difference in the radius arc of semicircle (Figure S1, Supplementary Material). The semicircle in the Nyquist spectra at lower frequency is mainly ascribed to the recombination resistance (Rrec) [18]. Clearly, from the EIS plot of Figure S1, the Rrec of TIO-ETL PSCs increases monotonically as the fraction of Sn increases. Therefore, adding Sn increases the shunt resistance, leading to suppression of the interfacial charge recombination. On the other hand, the highest FF (0.66) is obtained for the TIO-92 PSC, rather than for the TIO-100 (i.e., In-free SnO2; FF = 0.63) PSC. The decrease in the FF results in a reduction (from 12.67% to 12.40%) in PCE. Compared with the slope of the TIO-92 PSC J-V curve, the slope of the TIO-100 PSC curve is gentler at voltage values over 0.8 V, but is similar at lower voltage levels. The lower FF of the TIO-100 PSC (compared with that of the TIO-92 PSC) can therefore be attributed to an increase in the series resistance of the TIO-100 PSC.
In general, crystalline commercial ITO (Sn fraction: ~10 at%) thin films used for TCO are characterized by a carrier concentration of ~1021/cm3. Many studies have considered the effect of low Sn content (Sn fraction: ~10 at%) on the properties of ITO films [47,48,49,50]. However, the effect of high Sn fraction, especially in the case of the amorphous phase, remains unexplored. In order to understand the changes in shunt and series resistances of the PSCs with varying the Sn fraction in the TIO ETL, the electrical properties such as carrier concentration, mobility and resistivity of the TIO films were investigated by Hall effect measurements with Van der Pauw configurations. Figure 5 shows that the carrier concentration of TIO decreases significantly (i.e., by four orders of magnitude) from 1.9 × 1019/cm3 to 1.3 × 1015/cm3, as the Sn fraction increases. This trend is consistent with the results shown in Figure 3b that the energy difference between the CBM and Fermi level increases as the Sn fraction increases. It is reasonable that the high carrier concentration leads to the shallow Fermi level, and vice versa. The mobility also changes considerably from 0.61 cm2/V-s to 54 cm2/V-s, but the difference is relatively small compared with that in the carrier concentration. This leads eventually to a significant increase (up to three orders of magnitude) in the resistivity of TIO. Therefore, by combining the resistivity of the TIO-ETL and the photovoltaic characteristics of the TIO-based PSCs, the shapes of the J-V curves could be explained. The very low resistivity (with very high electron density) of TIO-52 would facilitate electron back transfer from the TCO to perovskite LAL, leading to a decrease in the shunt resistance of the device. With increasing Sn fraction, the resistivity of TIO ETL increases, resulting in improved blocking of the back electron transfer. However, at a Sn fraction of 100 at%, the resistivity becomes excessively high (as in the case of an insulator) and the mobility decreases to levels lower than those of the TIO-83 and 92. This would lead to a slight increase in the series resistance of the device. Therefore, the effect of the shunt resistance and the effect of series resistances may compete, leading to the optimal Sn fraction of ~92 at%.
The best device based on the TIO ETLs exhibits still low FF and Voc, compared to common PSCs based on solution processed TiO2 or SnO2 ETLs. The low FF and Voc are attributed to the low shunt resistance of the TIO-based PSCs. To further increase the shunt resistance, we applied a TiCl4 treatment to the TIO ETLs. Figure 6a shows the J-V curves of the TiCl4-treated TIO-PSCs. The corresponding photovoltaic parameters are shown in Figure 6b–e. Interestingly, the TiCl4 treatment increases each photovoltaic parameter of the PSCs, over the entire Sn fraction range. The corresponding J-V curves are closer to that of the ideal diode, as evidenced by the flatter slope in the low-voltage region and steeper slope in the vicinity of Voc, compared with the J-V curves of the pristine TIO-PSCs shown in Figure 4a. In general, the TiCl4 treatment yields an additional very thin titanium oxide layer that shields pin holes and cracks on the ETL. This shielding prevents direct contact between the TCO and the LAL, thus reducing the charge recombination [51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. The recombination resistance of a solar cell is correlated with the shunt resistance. Therefore, the improved performances of the TiCl4-treated TIO-based PSCs are attributed to the improved diode nature resulting from the increased shunt resistance. Owing to this increase, the TiCl4 treatment leads to a significant increase in the Voc and FF of the devices (Figure 6b,d), especially those with low Sn fractions. Interestingly, the highest Voc and FF of the TiCl4-treated device are obtained from the TIO-77 PSCs, while those of the pristine devices are obtained from the TIO-92 PSCs. This difference can be understood by noting that all the samples have similar slopes (i.e., similar shunt resistance) in the low-voltage region, but very different slopes (i.e., diverse series resistance) in regions near Voc. Considering the gradually decreasing FF with increasing the Sn fraction at >77at% mainly due to becoming gentler J-V slope at the vicinity of Voc, we attribute the deteriorated Voc and FF to increased series resistance of the devices. Therefore, it can be concluded that the series resistance rather than the shunt resistance becomes more influential factor when the TIO is TiCl4-treated. Owing to this strengthened effect, the optimal Sn fraction is shifted to 77 at% of which resistivity is much lower than 92 at%. Eventually, the trend describing the PCE as a function of the Sn fraction becomes similar to that of FF, because the Voc and the Jsc change modestly, compared with the FF.
The TiCl4-treated TIO-PSC exhibits the best PCE of 14.88% with 19.95 mA/cm2 of Jsc, 1.05 V of Voc and 0.713 of FF at 77at% of Sn fraction, and the pristine TIO-PSC exhibits the best PCE of 12.67% with 19.72 mA/cm2 of Jsc, 0.977 V of Voc and 0.658 of FF at 92 at% of Sn fraction, as summarized in Table S1 (Supplementary Material). The J-V hysteresis of several devices was examined, as shown in Figure S2 (Supplementary Material), by measuring the J-V along the opposite voltage sweep directions (reverse and forward scanning). Regardless of the TiCl4 treatment, the TIO-PSCs exhibit small J-V hysteresis (HF ranging 0.16–0.25). For the last, the photovoltaic performance of the TIO-ETL-based PSC was tracked during 360 hr to examine the long term stability of the device, as shown in Figure S3 (Supplementary Material). After 360 h of storage (at room temperature, 20% of relative humidity), the PCE of the TIO-ETL-based PSC maintained 98% of its initial value, whereas the PCE of the commercial SnO2 ETL-based PSC degraded to 77%.

4. Conclusions

In summary, amorphous TIO thin films with a Sn fraction of 52 at%–100 at% were grown (via RF magnetron co-sputtering) on ITO substrates at room temperature, for application to the ETLs of PSCs. The optical band gap of the films slightly increases from 3.49 eV to 3.65 eV with increasing (from 52 at% to 100 at%) Sn fraction. The CBMs of the films are located between those of ITO and MAPbI3, a configuration that is desired for electron transport in PSCs. The electrical resistivity increases considerably (up to three orders of magnitude) with increasing Sn fraction, owing mainly to a fourth order decrease in the electron concentration. This is consistent with the widening of the energy difference between the CBM and the Fermi level with increasing Sn fraction. The PSCs based on the TIO ETLs are fabricated. Due to the competition between the shunt and series resistances, the optimal photovoltaic performance is obtained at a Sn fraction of 92 at%. The TiCl4 treatment of the TIO ETL results in increased shunt resistance, leading to improved photovoltaic performance over the entire range of Sn fractions. Furthermore, the optimal PSC performance (Jsc: 19.95 mA/cm2, Voc: 1.05 V, FF: 0.713, PCE: 14.88%) is realized at a Sn fraction of 77 at%. The TIO-based PSCs exhibit small J-V hysteresis, and good long-term stability. Our result demonstrates that the tin-indium-oxide film is a promising candidate for use as an ETL for PSCs. The TIO ETL can be continuously grown on a pre-sputtered ITO in a chamber, as ITO and TIO are composed of identical elements (In, Sn and O), which would help to reduce production time and costs. Moreover, the PCE can be further improved by developing a solution process for TIO thin films.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/1/32/s1, Figure S1: The electrochemical Nyquist plots of TIO-ETL with varied Sn (at%) fractions, Figure S2: J-V curve of the optimal PSCs based on the pristine TIO-ETL and the TiCl4-treated TIO ETL, Figure S3: Photovoltaic properties tracked for a long-term (15 days) to compare the stability of the PSCs based on our TIO (Sn-83at%) ETL with that of a commercial SnO2 ETL, Table S1: Photovoltaic parameters of the optimal PSCs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and Y.-W.H.; methodology, S.L.; formal analysis, S.L., J.W.H. and S.B.; investigation, S.L. and S.B.; resources, D.H.K. and S.L.; data curation, S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B., D.V. and H.-H.H.; writing—review and editing, S.L., H.C.; visualization, S.B. and J.W.H.; supervision, S.L. and Y.-W.H.; funding acquisition, S.L. and Y.-W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Dongil Culture and Scholarship Foundation. Financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT (NRF-2017R1A4A1015022 and NRF- 2019R1A2C1084010) is also gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. De Wolf, S.; Holovsky, J.; Moon, S.J.; Loper, P.; Niesen, B.; Ledinsky, M.; Haug, F.J.; Yum, J.H.; Ballif, C. Organometallic Halide Perovskites: Sharp Optical Absorption Edge and Its Relation to Photovoltaic Performance. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shi, D.; Adinolfi, V.; Comin, R.; Yuan, M.J.; Alarousu, E.; Buin, A.; Chen, Y.; Hoogland, S.; Rothenberger, A.; Katsiev, K.; et al. Low trap-state density and long carrier diffusion in organolead trihalide perovskite single crystals. Science 2015, 347, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Eperon, G.E.; Stranks, S.D.; Menelaou, C.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M.; Snaith, H.J. Formamidinium lead trihalide: A broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, W.; Anaya, M.; Lozano, G.; Calvo, M.E.; Johnston, M.B.; Miguez, H.; Snaith, H.J. Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells with Tunable Structural Color. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 1698–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ball, J.M.; Lee, M.M.; Hey, A.; Snaith, H.J. Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1739–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, N.G. Organometal Perovskite Light Absorbers Toward a 20% Efficiency Low-Cost Solid-State Mesoscopic Solar Cell. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 2423–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Snaith, H.J. Perovskites: The Emergence of a New Era for Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3623–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, H.S.; Lee, C.R.; Im, J.H.; Lee, K.B.; Moehl, T.; Marchioro, A.; Moon, S.J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Yum, J.H.; Moser, J.E.; et al. Lead Iodide Perovskite Sensitized All-Solid-State Submicron Thin Film Mesoscopic Solar Cell with Efficiency Exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Park, N.G. Perovskite solar cells: An emerging photovoltaic technology. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saliba, M.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Wolff, C.M.; Stolterfoht, M.; Phung, N.; Albrecht, S.; Neher, D.; Abate, A. How to Make over 20% Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells in Regular (n-i-p) and Inverted (p-i-n) Architectures. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 4193–4201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, M.Z.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 2013, 501, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, M.; Endo, M.; Shimazaki, A.; Wakamiya, A.; Tachibana, Y. Identifying an Optimum Perovskite Solar Cell Structure by Kinetic Analysis: Planar, Mesoporous Based, or Extremely Thin Absorber Structure. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 3722–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, D.Y.; Kelly, T.L. Perovskite solar cells with a planar heterojunction structure prepared using room-temperature solution processing techniques. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Green, M.A.; Ho-Baillie, A.; Snaith, H.J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, G.; Tao, H.; Qin, P.L.; Ke, W.J.; Fang, G.J. Recent progress in electron transport layers for efficient perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3970–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, W.; Wu, Y.Z.; Yue, Y.F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.J.; Yang, X.D.; Chen, H.; Bi, E.B.; Ashraful, I.; Gratzel, M.; et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 2015, 350, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ke, W.J.; Fang, G.J.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, L.B.; Qin, P.L.; Tao, H.; Wang, J.; Lei, H.W.; Li, B.R.; Wan, J.W.; et al. Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Tin Oxide as an Alternative Electron Transporting Layer for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6730–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seo, J.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.C.; Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yoon, S.C.; Sang, S.I. Benefits of very thin PCBM and LiF layers for solution-processed p-i-n perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2642–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeng, J.Y.; Chen, K.C.; Chiang, T.Y.; Lin, P.Y.; Tsai, T.D.; Chang, Y.C.; Guo, T.F.; Chen, P.; Wen, T.C.; Hsu, Y.J. Nickel Oxide Electrode Interlayer in CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite/PCBM Planar-Heterojunction Hybrid Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4107–4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chiang, C.H.; Wu, C.G. Bulk heterojunction perovskite-PCBM solar cells with high fill factor. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, H.; Xue, L.W.; Han, J.B.; Fu, Y.Q.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Z.G.; Li, Y.F.; Wang, M.K. New generation perovskite solar cells with solution-processed amino-substituted perylene diimide derivative as electron-transport Layer. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8724–8733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Norrman, K.; Madsen, M.V.; Gevorgyan, S.A.; Krebs, F.C. Degradation Patterns in Water and Oxygen of an Inverted Polymer Solar Cell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16883–16892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jorgensen, M.; Norrman, K.; Gevorgyan, S.A.; Tromholt, T.; Andreasen, B.; Krebs, F.C. Stability of Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 580–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lindblad, R.; Bi, D.Q.; Park, B.W.; Oscarsson, J.; Gorgoi, M.; Siegbahn, H.; Odelius, M.; Johansson, E.M.J.; Rensmo, H. Electronic Structure of TiO2/CH(3)NH(3)Pbl(3) Perovskite Solar Cell Interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.T.W.; Ball, J.M.; Barea, E.M.; Abate, A.; Alexander-Webber, J.A.; Huang, J.; Saliba, M.; Mora-Sero, I.; Bisquert, J.; Snaith, H.J.; et al. Low-Temperature Processed Electron Collection Layers of Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites in Thin Film Perovskite Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Etgar, L.; Gao, P.; Xue, Z.S.; Peng, Q.; Chandiran, A.K.; Liu, B.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Gratzel, M. Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17396–17399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jiang, Q.; Chu, Z.N.; Wang, P.Y.; Yang, X.L.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Yin, Z.G.; Wu, J.L.; Zhang, X.W.; You, J.B. Planar-Structure Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency beyond 21%. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shin, S.S.; Yeom, E.J.; Yang, W.S.; Hur, S.; Kim, M.G.; Im, J.; Seo, J.; Noh, J.H.; Seok, S.I. Colloidally prepared La-doped BaSnO3 electrodes for efficient, photostable perovskite solar cells. Science 2017, 356, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, J.S.; Yang, Z.; Yang, D.; Ren, X.D.; Zhu, X.J.; Jin, Z.W.; Zi, W.; Wei, Q.B.; Liu, S.Z. E-beam evaporated Nb2O5 as an effective electron transport layer for large flexible perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2017, 36, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, K.; Shi, Y.T.; Dong, Q.S.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.F.; Yu, X.F.; Wu, M.Y.; Ma, T.L. Low-Temperature and Solution-Processed Amorphous WOx as Electron-Selective Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 755–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Eze, V.O.; Seike, Y.; Mori, T. Efficient planar perovskite solar cells using solution-processed amorphous WOx/fullerene C-60 as electron extraction layers. Org. Electron. 2017, 46, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jung, K.; Lee, J.; Im, C.; Do, J.; Kim, J.; Chae, W.S.; Lee, M.J. Highly Efficient Amorphous Zn2SnO4 Electron-Selective Layers Yielding over 20% Efficiency in FAMAPbI(3)-Based Planar Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ling, X.F.; Yuan, J.Y.; Liu, D.A.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.N.; Chen, S.; Wu, H.H.; Jin, F.; Wu, F.P.; Shi, G.Z.; et al. Room-Temperature Processed Nb2O5 as the Electron-Transporting Layer for Efficient Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 23181–23188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, D.; Yang, R.X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, S.Z.; Li, C. High efficiency flexible perovskite solar cells using superior low temperature TiO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3208–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prasai, B.; Cai, B.; Underwood, M.K.; Lewis, J.P.; Drabold, D.A. Properties of amorphous and crystalline titanium dioxide from first principles. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 7515–7521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Idigoras, J.; Contreras-Bernal, L.; Cave, J.M.; Courtier, N.E.; Barranco, A.; Borras, A.; Sanchez-Valencia, J.R.; Anta, J.A.; Walker, A.B. The Role of Surface Recombination on the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells: Effect of Morphology and Crystalline Phase of TiO2 Contact. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiu, W.M.; Paetzold, U.W.; Gehlhaar, R.; Smirnov, V.; Boyen, H.G.; Tait, J.G.; Conings, B.; Zhang, W.M.; Nielsen, C.B.; McCulloch, I.; et al. An electron beam evaporated TiO2 layer for high efficiency planar perovskite solar cells on flexible polyethylene terephthalate substrates. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 22824–22829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Barbe, J.; Tietze, M.L.; Neophytou, M.; Murali, B.; Alarousu, E.; El Labban, A.; Abulikemu, M.; Yue, W.; Mohammed, O.F.; McCulloch, I.; et al. Amorphous Tin Oxide as a Low-Temperature -Processed Electron Transport Layer for Organic and Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 11828–11836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, C.Y.; Shi, Y.T.; Wang, S.; Dong, Q.S.; Feng, Y.L.; Wang, L.D.; Wang, K.; Shao, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.F. Room-temperature solution-processed amorphous NbOx as an electron transport layer in high-efficiency photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 17882–17888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Seo, J.Y.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Tress, W.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ganose, A.M.; Scanlon, D.O. Band gap and work function tailoring of SnO2 for improved transparent conducting ability in photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 1467–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Davis, E.A.M.; Mott, N.F. Conduction in non-crystalline systems V. Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amorphous semiconductors. Philos. Mag. 1970, 22, 903–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Arlinghaus, F.J. Energy bands in stannic oxide (SnO2). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1974, 35, 931–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bera, A.; Deb, K.; Kathirvel, V.; Bera, T.; Thapa, R.; Saha, B. Flexible diode of polyaniline/ITO heterojunction on PET substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 418, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dymshits, A.; Henning, A.; Segev, G.; Rosenwaks, Y.; Etgar, L. The electronic structure of metal oxide/organo metal halide perovskite junctions in perovskite based solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dixon, S.C.; Scanlon, D.O.; Carmalt, C.J.; Parkin, I.P. n-Type doped transparent conducting binary oxides: An overview. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 6946–6961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Untila, G.G.; Kost, T.N.; Chebotareva, A.B.; Timofeyev, M.A. Effect of the tin content on the composition and optical and electrical properties of ITO films deposited onto silicon and glass by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. Semiconductors 2012, 46, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shong, B.; Shin, N.; Lee, Y.-H.; Ahn, K.; Lee, Y.-W. Synthesis of indium tin oxide (ITO) nanoparticles in supercritical methanol. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 113, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, X.X.; Xu, J.; Ling, Y.; Zhu, G.; Yu, Z. Effects of tin content on structure, properties, electrical repeatability, uniformity and stability of high sheet resistance ITO thin films for touch panels. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 6954–6960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. O’Regan, B.C.; Durrant, J.R.; Sommeling, P.M.; Bakker, N.J. Influence of the TiCl4 treatment on nanocrystalline TiO2 films in dye-sensitized solar cells. 2. Charge density, band edge shifts, and quantification of recombination losses at short circuit. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14001–14010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, S.W.; Ahn, K.S.; Zhu, K.; Neale, N.R.; Frank, A.J. Effects of TiCl4 Treatment of Nanoporous TiO2 Films on Morphology, Light Harvesting, and Charge-Carrier Dynamics in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 21285–21290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Z.H.; Chen, Q.; Hong, Z.R.; Zhou, H.P.; Xu, X.B.; De Marco, N.; Sun, P.Y.; Zhao, Z.X.; Cheng, Y.B.; Yang, Y. Low-Temperature TiOx Compact Layer for Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 11076–11083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Murakami, T.N.; Miyadera, T.; Funaki, T.; Cojocaru, L.; Kazaoui, S.; Chikamatsu, M.; Segawa, H. Adjustment of Conduction Band Edge of Compact TiO2 Layer in Perovskite Solar Cells Through TiCI4 Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36708–36714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Abdi-Jalebi, M.; Dar, M.I.; Sadhanala, A.; Senanayak, S.P.; Giordano, F.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Gratzel, M.; Friend, R.H. Impact of a Mesoporous Titania-Perovskite Interface on the Performance of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 3264–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ostapchenko, V.; Huang, Q.Y.; Zhang, O.; Zhao, C.R. Effect of TiCl4 Treatment on Different TiO2 Blocking Layer Deposition Methods. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 2262–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Makuta, S.; Liu, M.; Endo, M.; Nishimura, H.; Wakamiya, A.; Tachibana, Y. Photo-excitation intensity dependent electron and hole injections from lead iodide perovskite to nanocrystalline TiO2 and spiro-OMeTAD. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 00032 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of TIO thin films with various Sn fractions.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of TIO thin films with various Sn fractions.
Materials 13 00032 g001
Materials 13 00032 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) UV-Vis absorbance and (b) Tauc plot of the ITO thin film with different Sn contents.
Figure 2. (a) UV-Vis absorbance and (b) Tauc plot of the ITO thin film with different Sn contents.
Materials 13 00032 g002
Materials 13 00032 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) UPS spectra of TIO films with different Sn contents. The middle panel, left panel, and right panel show the entire range, cut-off edge region, and Fermi-edge region, respectively. (b) CBM, VBM, and Fermi levels of the TIO films. The levels corresponding to ITO and MAPbI3 are taken from previous studies [45,46].
Figure 3. (a) UPS spectra of TIO films with different Sn contents. The middle panel, left panel, and right panel show the entire range, cut-off edge region, and Fermi-edge region, respectively. (b) CBM, VBM, and Fermi levels of the TIO films. The levels corresponding to ITO and MAPbI3 are taken from previous studies [45,46].
Materials 13 00032 g003
Materials 13 00032 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) J-V curves of the TIO-ETL-based PSCs with different Sn fractions. The curves were collected under the following conditions: solar simulated light of AM 1.5G, 100 mV cm−2, scan rate (reverse) of 100 mV s−1, active area of 0.1 cm2. The photovoltaic parameters extracted from the curves; (b) Voc, (c) Jsc, (d) FF, and (e) PCE.
Figure 4. (a) J-V curves of the TIO-ETL-based PSCs with different Sn fractions. The curves were collected under the following conditions: solar simulated light of AM 1.5G, 100 mV cm−2, scan rate (reverse) of 100 mV s−1, active area of 0.1 cm2. The photovoltaic parameters extracted from the curves; (b) Voc, (c) Jsc, (d) FF, and (e) PCE.
Materials 13 00032 g004
Materials 13 00032 g005 550
Figure 5. Carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity of the TIO thin films.
Figure 5. Carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity of the TIO thin films.
Materials 13 00032 g005
Materials 13 00032 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) J-V curves of the TiCl4-treated TIO-ETL-based PSCs with different Sn fractions. The curves were collected under the following conditions: solar simulated light of AM 1.5G, 100 mV cm−2, scan rate (reverse) of 100 mV s−1, active area of 0.1 cm2. The photovoltaic parameters extracted from the curves: (b) Voc, (c) Jsc, (d) FF, and (e) PCE. For comparison, the parameters of the untreated TIO-ETL-based PSCs (from Figure 5; indicated as pristine here) are inserted in (b–e).
Figure 6. (a) J-V curves of the TiCl4-treated TIO-ETL-based PSCs with different Sn fractions. The curves were collected under the following conditions: solar simulated light of AM 1.5G, 100 mV cm−2, scan rate (reverse) of 100 mV s−1, active area of 0.1 cm2. The photovoltaic parameters extracted from the curves: (b) Voc, (c) Jsc, (d) FF, and (e) PCE. For comparison, the parameters of the untreated TIO-ETL-based PSCs (from Figure 5; indicated as pristine here) are inserted in (b–e).
Materials 13 00032 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baek, S.; Han, J.W.; Vidyasagar, D.; Cho, H.; HA, H.-H.; Kim, D.H.; Heo, Y.-W.; Lee, S. Room-Temperature-Processed Amorphous Sn-In-O Electron Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells. Materials 2020, 13, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010032

AMA Style

Baek S, Han JW, Vidyasagar D, Cho H, HA H-H, Kim DH, Heo Y-W, Lee S. Room-Temperature-Processed Amorphous Sn-In-O Electron Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells. Materials. 2020; 13(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baek, Seungtae, Jeong Woo Han, Devthade Vidyasagar, Hanbyeol Cho, Hwi-Heon HA, Dong Hoe Kim, Young-Woo Heo, and Sangwook Lee. 2020. "Room-Temperature-Processed Amorphous Sn-In-O Electron Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells" Materials 13, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop