Next Article in Journal
Configuration of Novel Experimental Fractographic Reverse Engineering Approach Based on Relationship between Spectroscopy of Ruptured Surface and Fracture Behaviour of Rubber Sample
Previous Article in Journal
Simple Model for Corrugation in Surface Alloys Based on First-Principles Calculations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 19
10.3390/ma13194443
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Microstructure, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb High-Temperature Lead-Free Solder

by
Chaojun Li
,
Yanfu Yan
*,
Tingting Gao
and
Guodong Xu
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luo Yang 471000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(19), 4443; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194443
Submission received: 4 September 2020 / Revised: 22 September 2020 / Accepted: 29 September 2020 / Published: 7 October 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To obtain Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 0, 25, 28, and 31) high-temperature lead-free solder antimony was added to Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder. The microstructure, thermal properties, and mechanical behavior of the solder alloy prepared were studied by using JSM-5610LV scanning electron microscope, Germany STA409PC differential scanning calorimeter, AG-I250KN universal tensile testing machine, and other methods. The SEM-EDS results showed that after adding Sb, SnSb phase was formed in the β-Sn matrix phase. The newly formed SnSb phase and the existing Sb in the solder alloy can inhibit the generation of IMC and refine the IMC layer. The addition of Sb significantly increased the melting temperature of the solder alloy. Among them, the thermal performance of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb is the best. The melting temperature of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb is 332.91 °C and the solid–liquid line range of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder alloy is 313.28–342.02 °C. Its pasty range is 28.74 °C, lower than 30 °C, which is beneficial for soldering. The test results of the mechanical behavior of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy show that with the increase of Sb addition, the ultimate tensile strength of the solder alloy also increases. However, the change of the elongation of the solder alloy is the opposite. The ultimate tensile strength of the solder alloy increased from 29.45 MPa of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder to 70.81 MPa of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb solder. The reason for the increase in the strength of the solder alloy is the reduction of the thickness of IMC and the solid solution hardening effect of Sb.

1. Introduction

In the past few years, the solder of Sn-Pb has been used in the electronics industry on a large scale because of its unique properties, such as lower cost, better wettability, and ideal mechanical properties [1,2]. However, lead is very harmful to the human body and the environment, and its use is prohibited [3,4,5]. Therefore, the electronics industry needs new solder alloys to replace the solder of Sn-Pb. Among the alloy systems reported by the research team, the more promising is tin-based solder alloys [6,7,8,9]. In recent years, the research on Sn-Ag-Cu (SAC) solder alloys with high silver content has increased exponentially, because they usually have good mechanical behavior and good welding ability, making them a promising material for microelectronic applications [10,11,12,13,14]. However, SAC solder alloy also has the defects of low melting point and short creep rupture life, which cannot replace high-temperature tin-lead solder [15]. Studies on high-temperature lead-free solder with melting point above 300 °C are imminent.
Accordingly, adding many alloy elements, like In, Ni, Sb, Ga, etc., to Sn-Ag-Cu solder allows obtaining a high-temperature lead-free solder that has good thermal and mechanical behavior [16,17,18,19]. According to some research studies, the addition of Sb and other elements could obtain good mechanical properties. The reasons for the improvement are the solid solution hardening effect of Sb, the hardening effect of the SnSb phase and the existence of Ag3Sn intermetallic compounds in the β-Sn matrix [7,20]. Research also showed that the addition of Sb could inhibit the formation of coarse β-Sn and refine the precipitation of Ag3Sn, thereby improving the mechanical and thermal behavior of Sn-Ag-Sb solder [8,20]. The microstructure changes of Sn-Ag solder alloys added with Sb were studied by Lee et al. [21]. The results showed that antimony changed the microstructure of Sn-3.5Ag, resulting in solid solution hardening. The addition of Sb can refine the needle-shaped Ag3Sn compound and improve the hardness, bonding strength, and thermal performance of the Sn-3.5Ag solder joint. Moreover, the addition of 1.5 wt.% Sb could narrow the temperature range of solidus and liquidus, which is an ideal result for actual welding process. Phairote and Thawatchai found that after adding Sb, the microstructure of the alloy is improved, the IMC distribution is more uniform, and new Ag3(Sn, Sb) and Cu6(Sn, Sb)5 IMC are formed around the β-Sn phase [7]. Chen and Li added Sb to the Sn-Ag-Cu solder to prepare a Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu-1Sb alloy. It was found that Ag3(Sn, Sb) intermetallic compound layer was formed, and the thickness and size of the intermetallic compound were reduced [22,23]. The study of Mahmudi and Mahin-Shirazi [1] showed that the tensile strength and plasticity of solder alloys could be improved by adding 1.5 wt.% Sb to Sn-3.5Ag alloys. The solid solution hardening effect of Sb increased the strength. This increase in plasticity is due to the refinement of the alloy structure. SnSb and Ag3Sn intermetallic compounds have important effects on the mechanical properties of Sn-Sb solders, such as tensile strength and shear resistance, because they act as obstacles to dislocation movement [24]. This study studied the thermal properties, microstructure, and mechanical behavior of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb high-temperature lead-free solder alloy.

2. Materials and Methods

In order to reduce the impurity content in the solder alloy, the raw materials used in the preparation of the solder alloy are 99.95% (purity) tin, 99.99% copper, 99.99% silver, and 99.95% antimony. The solder alloy is prepared by melting in an intermediate frequency induction heating furnace, and sodium phosphate is used as an anti-oxidation protective agent during melting. The composition of the solder alloy is listed in Table 1.
Before testing the microstructure of the alloy, the alloy was sampled, ground, polished, and corroded with a 5% HNO3, 2% HCl, and 93% CH3OH solution for 30 s. The microscopic morphology of the solder alloy was observed with JSM-560 LV scanning electron microscope (SEM). The phase composition and element diffusion were measured with an energy spectrometer (EDS) and a JSM-5610LV scanning electron microscope. The melting point of the solder alloy was measured by differential thermal analysis. A Shimadzu AG-I250KN precision universal tensile testing machine was used to test the ultimate tensile strength of the alloy. The tensile test was performed at a constant speed of 1.0 mm/min at room temperature. Three samples were tested for each ingredient, and the average value was used as the final tensile strength. The microhardness of the sample was measured with a Vickers hardness tester, measured ten times, and the average value was taken as the test result.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of Solder Alloy

Figure 1 shows the microstructure of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 0, 25, 28 and 31) solder alloy. In Figure 1a, we can observe that the microstructure of the Sn-3.0 Ag-0.5Cu solder alloy is composed of two parts: a brighter area and a darker matrix area. The brighter bulk phase is the β-Sn phase. The darker matrix region contains the intermetallic compound phase (Ag3Sn phase, Cu6Sn5 phase) and β-Sn phase. Refer to the Sn-Sb binary alloy phase diagram [25], Sn3Sb2 phase is formed when the temperature drops to 324 °C. However, the Sn3Sb2 phase is an unstable phase [26,27]. When the temperature is lower than 242 °C, Sn3Sb2 will decompose into SnSb phase and β-Sn phase. Figure 1b–d shows the microstructure of the solder alloy after adding element Sb. From these SEM images, it can be clearly seen that there are white bulk phases distributed in the matrix. Combining the element distribution diagram of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb in Figure 2 with that in [1,7], it can be determined that the white bulk phase is the SnSb phase and the matrix is the β-Sn phase. With the increase of Sb content, the white bulk SnSb phase gradually becomes larger, IMCs become thinner, and the acicular intermetallic compound increases and pinches along the grain boundary. According to previous reports [7,23], the needle-like intermetallic compounds are Ag3Sn and Ag3(Sn, Sb). These were confirmed in the subsequent EDS analysis. Ag3Sn and Ag3(Sn, Sb) intermetallic compounds are brittle phases with low plasticity, which will affect the mechanical properties and thermal fatigue life of the solder joints [20,22]. It can also be found from the SEM image that an appropriate amount of Sb can inhibit the coarsening of Ag3Sn and Ag3(Sn, Sb) intermetallic compounds, thereby improving the mechanical behavior of the solder joints.
Figure 3 shows the SEM image and element distribution maps of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder alloys. As can be seen in the figure, the red area is the β-Sn matrix phase. The purple and dark green areas are Ag and Cu element distribution areas, and Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5 IMCs are generated in these areas, which are distributed along the β-Sn matrix. Figure 4 shows the SEM image and element distribution results of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder alloy. The red area shows the Sn element distribution, and the purple area shows Ag. The dark green area and the green area are Cu and Sb elements. The Ag-rich phase and Cu-rich phase are distributed in the β-Sn matrix phase to form IMCs. A large amount of Sn and Sb are distributed in the dark gray massive area, forming the SnSb phase.
Figure 5 shows the EDS analysis positions of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder alloys. Among them, Figure 5b is an enlarged view of the partial position of Figure 5a. The EDS analysis results are listed in Table 2. It confirms that Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu is composed of β-Sn phase, needle-shaped Ag3Sn, and scallop-shaped Cu6Sn5 IMCs phase. In Figure 5c, we can observe that Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb contains SnSb phase, β-Sn phase, Cu6(Sn,Sb)5 phase, and Ag3(Sn,Sb) phase. The formation of SnSb phase and the presence of Sb in the alloy can inhibit the growth of intermetallic compounds, thereby improving the mechanical behavior of the solder alloy [20].

3.2. DSC Analysis of the Solder Alloy

In the process of semiconductor device packaging, the soldering of insulating substrates and leads, the soldering of chips and leads, and the soldering of shell packaging and other chip packaging, the solder used for connection cannot be melted in the next process. Therefore, it is necessary to use higher melting point and lower melting point solder in the semiconductor packaging process. The melting point of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 25, 28, 31) is required to be above 300 °C. The melting temperature of the experimental alloy was measured with a Germany STA409PC differential scanning calorimeter, and the heating rate was 10 °C/min. Figure 6 shows the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 25,28 and 31) solder alloy. Table 3 lists the results of the DSC heating curve. Obviously, as the amount of Sb added increased, the melting temperature and pasty range of the solder alloy also increased. This result is consistent with previous reports about the addition of Sb to Sn-Ag solder alloy [28,29]. The melting temperatures of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb, Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-28Sb, Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb solder alloys were 218.90, 332.91, 342.53, and 354.68 °C, respectively. The melting point of Sb-containing solder alloy was much higher than that of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, which is due to the formation of bulk SnSb phase. The pasty ranges of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb, Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-28Sb, Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb solder alloy were 5.19, 28.74, 38.64, and 47.78 °C, respectively. The pasty range of the solder was significantly increased with the addition of Sb. Generally, solder alloys with a small pasty range have good soldering properties. However, according to the lead-free solder project of the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS), it is recommended that the pasty range of the new lead-free solder should not exceed 30 °C [30]. Therefore, the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder alloy can be used as a high-temperature lead-free solder for soldering because its melting temperature is higher than 300 °C and the pasty range is lower than 30 °C.

3.3. Mechanical Properties of Solder Alloy

Figure 7 shows the stress–strain curve of the solder alloy. Obviously, the increase in strength and decrease in plasticity of the solder alloy can be seen. Figure 8 is the result of the ultimate tensile strength of the solder alloy. The results in Figure 8 show that as the Sb content increases, the ultimate tensile strength of the alloy also increases. The ultimate tensile strength of the alloy increased from 29.45 MPa of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder to 70.81 MPa of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb solder. It is noteworthy that after adding 25% Sb to Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, the ultimate tensile strength reached 61.62 MPa, which is twice higher than the ultimate tensile strength of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu. There are two reasons for the increase in ultimate tensile strength of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 0, 25, 28 and 31). One is the reduction of the thickness of the intermetallic compound in the solder alloy. Studies have shown that SnSb and Ag3Sn IMC act as a hindrance to the movement of dislocations, which has an important impact on creep resistance and the tensile strength of the solder alloy [3]. Chen found that the addition of Sb in the Sn-Ag-Cu alloy can significantly inhibit the formation of intermetallic compounds. It can also reduce the element diffusion caused by the grain boundary pinning effect during the aging process [20]. In addition, G.Y. Li also confirmed that the greater the thickness of the IMC, the lower the tensile strength [23]. Another reason is the solid solution hardening effect of Sb. Some studies have found that when Sb is added to SAC alloy, Sb can have a solid solution hardening effect in the β-Sn matrix phase [31,32]. After adding Sb, more Ag3(Sn, Sb) and Cu6(Sn, Sb)5 particles precipitated on the Cu6Sn5 layer, and the grain hardening effect occurred [7].
Figure 9 shows the elongation of the alloy. Obviously, as the increase of Sb addition, the elongation of the solder alloy is greatly reduced. After adding 25% Sb, the elongation of the solder alloy decreased from 37.20% of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder to 3.59% of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder. Therefore, with increasing Sb addition, the ultimate tensile strength of the solder alloy increases and the elongation decreases, which is consistent with the results of some studies [7,33].
Figure 10 is the microscopic fracture surface of the solder alloy. In Figure 10a, it can be observed that the microscopic fracture surface of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu has obvious dimple morphology, and dimple is an important feature of microvoid coalescence fracture. This shows that the solder alloy has undergone strong plastic deformation before fracture, and the fracture mode is plastic fracture. In Figure 10b–d, a fan shape can be observed, indicating that the solder alloy is cleavage fracture, which is brittle fracture. Under stress, the cracks start to grow from the brittle SnSb phase [34]. When the crack propagates to the grain boundary, the larger orientation difference between adjacent grains prevents the crack propagation. At this time, the stress concentration at the crack tip can be released in adjacent grains, causing new cleavage crack nucleation. Therefore, the cleavage crack cannot expand through the grain boundary to form a river pattern, but forms a fan shape and continues to expand. The microscopic fracture surface of the solder alloy shows that after adding Sb, the fracture mode of the solder alloy changes from the original ductile fracture to the brittle fracture. This is because the addition of Sb causes the solder alloy to generate many brittle SnSb phases and needle-like Ag3(Sn, Sb) phases.
Figure 11 shows the microhardness of the solder alloy. After adding Sb, the microhardness of the solder alloy was greatly improved. The microhardness of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu is 12.1 HV. The microhardness of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb is 38.7 HV, which is three times more than Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu. This is because the solid solution strengthening effect of Sb increase the microhardness of the solder alloy.

4. Conclusions

(1)
The microstructure study showed that after adding Sb, Sn-Sb phase, Cu6(Sn,Sb)5 phase, and Ag3(Sn,Sb) phase were formed in the solder alloy. The Ag3(Sn,Sb) phase and Cu6(Sn,Sb)5 phase are distributed in the β-Sn matrix phase. The addition of Sb suppresses and refines the formation of intermetallic compounds and improves the microstructure of the solder alloy.
(2)
The addition of Sb significantly increases the melting point and paste range of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy. The melting point of the solder alloy increases with the increase of Sb. Among them, the thermal performance of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb is the best. The melting temperature of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb is 332.91 °C, and the solid–liquid temperature is 313.28–342.02 °C. The pasty range is 28.74 °C, which is lower than the 30 °C recommended by NCMS.
(3)
With the increase of Sb addition, the ultimate tensile strength of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 0, 25, 28, and 31) solder alloy increases, while the elongation decreases. The ultimate tensile strength of the solder alloy increased from 29.45 MPa of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder to 70.81 MPa of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb solder. The increase in the ultimate tensile strength of the solder alloy is due to the reduction in the thickness of IMC by Sb and solid solution hardening effect of Sb. The solder alloy changes from plastic fracture to brittle fracture.
(4)
The microhardness of the solder alloy is greatly improved. The microhardness of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu is 12.1 HV at 100 g and the microhardness of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb is 35.1 HV at 100 g.
In summary, considering the thermal and mechanical behavior, the optimal addition of Sb in the solder alloy is 25 wt.% in this study.

Author Contributions

C.L. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript; Y.Y. provided funding and designed the study; T.G. and G.X. helped complete the experiment. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51175515) and Excellent Youth Foundation of Henan Scientific Committee (No. 144100510002).

Acknowledgments

The author is very grateful for the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51175515).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mahmudi, R.; Mahin-Shirazi, S. Effect of Sb addition on the tensile deformation behavior of lead-free Sn–3.5Ag solder alloy. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 5027–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abtew, M.; Selvaduray, G. Lead-free Solders in Microelectronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2000, 27, 95–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sobhy, M.; El-Refai, A.M.; Fawzy, A. Effect of Graphene Oxide Nano-Sheets (GONSs) on thermal, microstructure and stress–strain characteristics of Sn-5 wt% Sb-1 wt% Ag solder alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 27, 2349–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeng, K.; Tu, K. Six cases of reliability study of Pb-free solder joints in electronic packaging technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2002, 38, 55–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahmudi, R.; Geranmayeh, A.R.; Khanbareh, H.; Jahangiri, N. Indentation creep of lead-free Sn–9Zn and Sn–8Zn–3Bi solder alloys. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.; Xue, S.B.; Zeng, G.; Gao, L.L.; Ye, H. Interface reaction between SnAgCu/SnAgCuCe solders and Cu substrate subjected to thermal cycling and isothermal aging. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 510, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sungkhaphaitoon, P.; Plookphol, T. The Effects of Antimony Addition on the Microstructural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu Solder Alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2017, 49, 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tsao, L.; Chang, S.; Lee, C.; Sun, W.; Huang, C. Effects of nano-Al2O3 additions on microstructure development and hardness of Sn3.5Ag0.5Cu solder. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4831–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kotadia, H.; Mokhtari, O.; Clode, M.; Green, M.; Mannan, S. Intermetallic compound growth suppression at high temperature in SAC solders with Zn addition on Cu and Ni–P substrates. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 511, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, L.; Xue, S.; Zhang, L.; Sheng, Z.; Ji, F.; Dai, W.; Yu, S.-L.; Zeng, G. Effect of alloying elements on properties and microstructures of SnAgCu solders. Microelectron. Eng. 2010, 87, 2025–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ventura, T.; Terzi, S.; Rappaz, M.; Dahle, A.K. Effects of solidification kinetics on microstructure formation in binary Sn–Cu solder alloys. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 1651–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fakpan, K.; Canyook, R. Effects of Sb and Zn Addition on Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance of Sn–Ag–Cu Solders. Key Eng. Mater. 2017, 728, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, F.; Bi, W.; Ju, G.; Wang, W.; Wei, X. Evolution of Ag3Sn at Sn–3.0Ag–0.3Cu–0.05Cr/Cu joint interfaces during thermal aging. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 6666–6672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chantaramanee, S.; Sriwittayakul, W.; Sungkhaphaitoon, P. Effects of Antimony and Indium Addition on Wettability and Interfacial Reaction of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu Lead Free Solder on Copper Substrate. Mater. Sci. Forum 2018, 928, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xiong, M.; Zhang, L. Interface reaction and intermetallic compound growth behavior of Sn-Ag-Cu lead-free solder joints on different substrates in electronic packaging. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 54, 1741–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, H.; Qu, L.; Huang, M.; Gu, L.; Zhao, N.; Wang, L. In-situ study on growth behavior of Ag3Sn in Sn–3.5Ag/Cu soldering reaction by synchrotron radiation real-time imaging technology. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 537, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Jing, H.; Wei, J.; Zhao, L.; Xu, L. Study of mechanical properties of Ag nanoparticle-modified graphene/Sn-Ag-Cu solders by nanoindentation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 761, 138051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chou, T.-T.; Song, R.-W.; Chen, W.-Y.; Duh, J.-G. Enhancement of the mechanical strength of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu/Ni joints via doping minor Ni into solder alloy. Mater. Lett. 2019, 235, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gierlotka, W. Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Bi-Cu-Sn System. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 47, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, B.L.; Li, G.Y. Influence of Sb on IMC growth in Sn–Ag–Cu–Sb Pb-free solder joints in reflow process. Thin Solid Films 2004, 462, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, H.-T.; Chen, M.-H.; Jao, H.-M.; Hsu, C.-J. Effect of adding Sb on microstructure and adhesive strength of Sn-Ag solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 2004, 33, 1048–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, B.; Li, G. An investigation of effects of Sb on the intermetallic formation in Sn-3.5Ag-0.7Cu solder joints. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2005, 28, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, G.; Chen, B.; Shi, X.; Wong, S.C.; Wang, Z. Effects of Sb addition on tensile strength of Sn–3.5Ag–0.7Cu solder alloy and joint. Thin Solid Films 2006, 504, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. El-Daly, A.; Hammad, A.; Fawzy, A.; Nasrallh, D.A. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and deformation behavior of Sn–1.0Ag–0.5Cu solder after Ni and Sb additions. Mater. Des. 2013, 43, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Okamoto, H.; Massalski, T.B. Binary alloy phase diagrams requiring further studies. J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 1994, 15, 500–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allen, W.; Perepezko, J. Constitution of the tin-antimony system. Scr. Metall. Mater. 1990, 24, 2215–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Allen, W.P.; Perepezko, J.H. Solidification of undercooled Sn-Sb peritectic alloys: Part I. Microstructural evolution. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1991, 22, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Luo, Z.-B.; Zhao, J.; Gao, Y.-J.; Wang, L. Revisiting mechanisms to inhibit Ag3Sn plates in Sn–Ag–Cu solders with 1wt.% Zn addition. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 500, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, L.-W.; Song, J.-M.; Lai, Y.-S.; Chiu, Y.-T.; Lee, N.-C.; Uan, J.-Y. Alloying modification of Sn–Ag–Cu solders by manganese and titanium. Microelectron. Reliab. 2009, 49, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. National Center for Manufacturing Sciences. Lead-Free Solder Project Final Report; NCMS Report 0401RE96; National Center for Manufacturing Sciences: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu, F.; Zhang, H.; Guan, R.; Liu, S. Effects of temperature and strain rate on mechanical property of Sn96.5Ag3Cu0.5. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 438, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koleňák, R.; Martinkovič, M.; Koleňáková, M. Shear Strength and Dsc Analysis of High-Temperature Solders. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2013, 58, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shohji, I.; Toyama, Y. Effect of Strain Rate on Tensile Properties of Miniature Size Specimens of Several Lead-Free Alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 786, 2810–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, H.-T.; Hu, S.-Y.; Hong, T.-F.; Chen, Y.-F. The Shear Strength and Fracture Behavior of Sn-Ag-xSb Solder Joints with Au/Ni-P/Cu UBM. J. Electron. Mater. 2008, 37, 867–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 04443 g001 550
Figure 1. The microstructure of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 25, (c) x = 28, and (d) x = 31.
Figure 1. The microstructure of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 25, (c) x = 28, and (d) x = 31.
Materials 13 04443 g001
Materials 13 04443 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM image at 200x of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb (a); combined elemental map (b); and element distribution maps of Sn (c), Ag (d), Cu (e), and Sb (f).
Figure 2. SEM image at 200x of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb (a); combined elemental map (b); and element distribution maps of Sn (c), Ag (d), Cu (e), and Sb (f).
Materials 13 04443 g002
Materials 13 04443 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM image at 500x of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu (a); combined elemental map (b); and element distribution maps of Sn (c), Ag (d), and Cu (e).
Figure 3. SEM image at 500x of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu (a); combined elemental map (b); and element distribution maps of Sn (c), Ag (d), and Cu (e).
Materials 13 04443 g003
Materials 13 04443 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM image at 500x of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb (a); combined elemental map (b); and element distribution maps of Sn (c), Ag (d), Cu (e), and Sb (f).
Figure 4. SEM image at 500x of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb (a); combined elemental map (b); and element distribution maps of Sn (c), Ag (d), Cu (e), and Sb (f).
Materials 13 04443 g004
Materials 13 04443 g005 550
Figure 5. EDS analysis of (a,b) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder alloy and (c) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder alloy.
Figure 5. EDS analysis of (a,b) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder alloy and (c) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb solder alloy.
Materials 13 04443 g005
Materials 13 04443 g006 550
Figure 6. The direct scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 25, 28, 31) solder alloy.
Figure 6. The direct scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb (x = 25, 28, 31) solder alloy.
Materials 13 04443 g006
Materials 13 04443 g007 550
Figure 7. Stress–strain curves of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Figure 7. Stress–strain curves of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Materials 13 04443 g007
Materials 13 04443 g008 550
Figure 8. Ultimate tensile strength of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Figure 8. Ultimate tensile strength of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Materials 13 04443 g008
Materials 13 04443 g009 550
Figure 9. The elongation of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Figure 9. The elongation of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Materials 13 04443 g009
Materials 13 04443 g010 550
Figure 10. Microscopic fracture surface of (a) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, (b) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb, (c) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-28Sb, and (d) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb.
Figure 10. Microscopic fracture surface of (a) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, (b) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb, (c) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-28Sb, and (d) Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb.
Materials 13 04443 g010
Materials 13 04443 g011 550
Figure 11. Microhardness of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Figure 11. Microhardness of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb solder alloy.
Materials 13 04443 g011
Table
Table 1. Composition of solder alloy (wt.%).
Table 1. Composition of solder alloy (wt.%).
MaterialsSnAgCuSb
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cubalance3.110.48—
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sbbalance3.240.4725.09
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-28Sbbalance3.180.5128.17
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sbbalance3.350.4731.21
Table
Table 2. Energy spectrometer (EDS) analysis results of marked points (wt.%).
Table 2. Energy spectrometer (EDS) analysis results of marked points (wt.%).
PositionElementPossible Composition
SnAgCuSb
A99.000.410.59—β-Sn
B24.6575.35——Ag3Sn
C65.73—34.27—Cu6Sn5
D53.39——46.61SnSb
E23.3670.21—6.43Ag3 (Sn,Sb)
F60.51—33.695.80Cu6 (Sn,Sb)5
G88.93——11.07β-Sn
Table
Table 3. The solidus temperature (Tonset), liquidus temperature (Tend), and melting temperature of solder alloy from DSC heating curve.
Table 3. The solidus temperature (Tonset), liquidus temperature (Tend), and melting temperature of solder alloy from DSC heating curve.
Solder AlloysTonset (°C)Tend (°C)Pasty Range
(Tend–Tonset) (°C)		Melting
Temperature(°C)
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu216.32221.515.19218.90
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-25Sb313.28342.0228.74332.91
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-28Sb314.64353.3138.67342.53
Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-31Sb320.95368.7347.78354.68

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Yan, Y.; Gao, T.; Xu, G. The Microstructure, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb High-Temperature Lead-Free Solder. Materials 2020, 13, 4443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194443

AMA Style

Li C, Yan Y, Gao T, Xu G. The Microstructure, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb High-Temperature Lead-Free Solder. Materials. 2020; 13(19):4443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194443

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chaojun, Yanfu Yan, Tingting Gao, and Guodong Xu. 2020. "The Microstructure, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb High-Temperature Lead-Free Solder" Materials 13, no. 19: 4443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194443

APA Style

Li, C., Yan, Y., Gao, T., & Xu, G. (2020). The Microstructure, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-xSb High-Temperature Lead-Free Solder. Materials, 13(19), 4443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194443

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop