Next Article in Journal
Development of Photocatalytic Coatings by Thermal Hydrolysis of TiCl4 on Ceramic Roofing Tiles Made from Ferroalumina and Evaluation of De-Pollution Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Formation of Cu2O Solid Solution via High-Frequency Electromagnetic Field-Assisted Ball Milling: The Reaction Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inclusion Characteristics in 95CrMo Steels with Different Calcium and Sulfur Contents

1
College of Materials & Metallurgical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550003, China
2
School of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(3), 619; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030619
Submission received: 24 November 2019 / Revised: 9 January 2020 / Accepted: 14 January 2020 / Published: 30 January 2020

Abstract

:
In order to study the effect of Ca and sulfur contents on the characteristics of inclusions, industrial experiments using 95CrMo steel were conducted. SEM-EDS detections and stereological analysis were used to probe the characteristics of inclusions, including their compositions, morphologies, size, number density, and distribution. The results indicate that there were mainly three types of inclusions in 95CrMo steel billets with 6–18 ppm Ca and 30–100 ppm S: inclusions with single-phased morphology mainly composed of oxides; isolated MnS/CaS-only inclusions; inclusions with multi-phased morphology. The three-dimensional inclusion size distribution suggests that there were more Type-1 inclusions with a small size in low S containing steels. The average diameter of all types of inclusions increased with increasing Ca or S content in 95CrMo steel, indicating that the formation of MnS and CaS coarsened their size. The density distribution of inclusions indicates that the more inclusions there are, the more easily they aggregate and collide. Moreover, it is presumably concluded that the formation of sulfide in the outer layer of oxide inclusions weaken the attraction between oxide inclusions. The equilibrated transformation and formation of inclusions during the cooling process of 95CrMo steel was discussed based on thermodynamic calculation. The equilibrated transformation trajectory of inclusions in 95CrMo steel during the cooling process was Ca2SiO4 + MgO → Ca3MgSi2O8 → Spinel + CaS, which was corresponding to the detected results. The precipitation regular of sulfide was obtained. The formation mechanism for three types of inclusions was discussed.

1. Introduction

Inclusions are inevitable during the deoxidation process of molten steel, which affect the performance and service life of steel materials significantly. In order to control the characteristics of inclusions, suitable calcium addition is always applied to modify the hard Al2O3-based inclusions into liquid or partially liquid inclusions, which is advantageous not only for diminishing their impact effect on the continuous casting and the properties of steel, but also for improving the manufacturing process, such as reducing the nozzle clogging possibility. Some calcium addition is useful to modify the morphology of MnS, such as changing strip shaped MnS to spindle shaped, which promoting steel isotropy [1,2,3,4,5].
There are extensive researches on the formation mechanism and evolution of calcium aluminates [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Many studies were focused on the kinetic calculation of inclusions during calcium treatment [6,12]. Thermodynamic calculations also have been performed to predict the type of calcium aluminates and reliable stability phase diagram of various calcium aluminates were obtained [13]. However, the reactions in the molten steel are complex and inclusions containing CaS would form as the existence of S and CaS inclusions are undeformable [14,15]. Verma and Pistorius et al. [16,17] investigated the composition evolution of inclusions in liquid steel modified by calcium and found that CaS may form as an intermediate reaction product, which can subsequently react with Al2O3 to form calcium aluminates as reaction [1]. Zhang et al. [18] proposed that the content of sulfur content in steel affected the transient evolution of inclusions and there were more CaS–CaO formed just after the addition of calcium, and then the CaS content decreased in the case of sulfur more than 90 ppm. Yang et al. [19] studied the inclusion evolution after calcium addition in low carbon Al-killed steel with ultra low sulfur content and found that the CaS/CaO ratio of the inclusions increases linearly by increasing S/total oxygen (T.O.) of the steel. It can be concluded that the evolution of inclusions during calcium treatment are dependent on the content of sulfur and calcium in the steel. Moreover, oxide–sulfide duplex inclusions are always observed in the steel. Sridhar et al. [20] observed an inclusion core surrounded by a ring composed of Ca and S. Choudhary et al. [21] developed a thermodynamic model for predicting the formation of oxide–sulfide duplex inclusions arising out of competitive reactions between [O], [S], and [Ca] in Al-killed steel. Shin et al. [15] discussed the formation mechanism for “spinel + CaS” complex inclusions.
3 (CaO) + 2 [Al] + 3 [S] → 3CaS + Al2O3.
The modification of inclusions by calcium treatment and formation of oxide–sulfide duplex inclusions affect the size of inclusions significantly, which has an effect on the fatigue life of steel [22]. Lots of researches have been focused on the effect of Ca content and on the size and number of calcium aluminate inclusions. Wang et al. [23] observed the low melting temperature CaO–Al2O3 inclusions of 10–20 μm in cast slabs with calcium treatment and found that it can be deformed into the stringer shaped B type inclusions longer than 150–350 mm. Hu et al. [24] proposed that with the appropriate calcium treatment, the number and size of inclusions in spring steel decreased from 5.8 per mm−2 and 3.9 μm to 4.8 per mm−2 and 2.5 μm, and the inclusions changed to have a small and dispersed distribution. Wu [25] concluded that the number of inclusions in submicron scale increased as Ca content increased from 2 ppm to 25 ppm in thick plates. However, limited studies were conducted about the effect of sulfur content on the size distribution of oxide–sulfide duplex inclusions. Oxide–sulfide duplex inclusions were also detected in the steel containing certain Mn, such as semi-free-cutting steels [26,27]. MnS precipitating during cooling and solidification can dissolve with CaS and generate a solid of (Mn, Ca) S [14]. The modification of inclusions by calcium treatment is more complex in this steel containing Al, Mn, and S. It is proposed Al2O3–CaS inclusions had a detrimental effect on the magnetic properties of a Ca-treated non-oriented electrical steel [28], but the complex inclusions mCaO.nAl2O3–(Mn, Ca) S with duplex phase can be a protective film on the rack face, which improves the durability of the tool [29].
95CrMo hollow steel is made for drill rods because of its high fatigue resistance, good toughness, strong anti-vibration performance, and low notch sensitivity. It is widely used in quarries, open pit mines, and construction sites [22,30]. With the application of a high-power rock drill, a higher requirement for the quality of the drill rod is needed. The hard Al2O3 inclusions are always detected in 95CrMo hollow steel and deteriorate the steel performance [31,32,33]. In order to decrease the impact of large and hard inclusions on the service life of the drill rod, the composition of inclusions in 95CrMo steel should be controlled. In this study, we aimed to modified the hard Al2O3 inclusions into complex inclusions mCaO.nAl2O3–(Mn, Ca)S, which reduced stress concentration between hard oxide inclusion with steel matrix and inhibit the initiation and propagation of cracks around hard oxide inclusion due to good plasticity of sulfide inclusion. However, the Ca content affects the formation of calcium aluminate inclusions and the morphologies of MnS. It is of great significance to control the sulfide and oxide inclusions in the steel and to improve the performance of the final steel product. Therefore, the effect of Ca and S on the characteristics of inclusions in the 95CrMo steel was studied in the current study. The transformation and form mechanism of different types of inclusions were discussed. The results will be helpful for improving the properties and fatigue life of drill rod steel and semi-free-cutting steels.

2. Materials and Methods

The industrial experiments were carried out in a certain steel plant in China. The steelmaking route for 95CrMo steel is “60t Consteel furnace → ladle refining (LF) → vacuum degassing (VD) refining → continuous casting”. Alumina was added into the ladle during the tapping process. Billets of 150 × 150 mm in size in four heats were collected in which different amounts of calcium wires and pyrite were added after VD refining at about 1540 °C to study the effect of calcium and sulfur contents on the characteristics of inclusions. The steel samples were denoted in Table 1 according to the addition of calcium wires and pyrite. The compositions of samples cut from billets were determined and are shown in Table 1.
The steel billets were machined into steel cuttings and cylinders (φ5 mm × 100 mm) for compositional analysis. Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry method (ICP-AES) was used to analyze the contents of Al, Ca, and Mg. Total oxygen for three samples cut from each billet was detected by Leco TCH600 oxygen–nitrogen analyzer and the oxygen content in inclusions was estimated by Equation (2) [22]. Other compositions were obtained by ARL-4460 photoelectric direct reading spectrometry coming from the American Thermo Electron Corporation.
[ % O ( M ) I n s o l ] = f v · ρ M x O y ρ F e · y M o ( x M M ) M M x O y × 10 6 ,
where fV is the total volume fraction of oxide inclusions, ρFe is the density of Fe, and ρMxOy is the density of the oxide inclusions (ρFe = 7.8 g/cm3, ρAl2O3 = 3.97 g/cm−3, ρMgO = 3.65 g/cm−3, ρCaO = 3.4 g/cm−3, ρSiO2 = 2.65 g/cm−3, ρAl2O3–MgO–CaO–SiO2 = XAl2O3 ρAl2O3 + XMgO ρMgO + XCaO ρCaO + XSiO2 ρSiO2) [34]. MMxOy and XMxOy are the molecular weight of MxOy and the molar fraction of MxOy.
The metallographic samples with 15 mm × 15 mm × 15 mm were cut from steel billets and were wet grinded to 2000 grits followed by diamond polishing for SEM-EDS detection of inclusions. Three metallographic samples were prepared for each billet and were all observed by light microscope roughly to choose one sample for each billet in which the distribution of inclusion is most inhomogeneous. Then the microphotographs were taken with SEM by choosing the scanning area where there are both inhomogeneous and homogeneous distributed inclusions. The continuous 50 SEM microphotographs were taken at a magnification of 1000 corresponding to the total area of 1.4 × 2.7 mm2 to analyze the planer characteristics of inclusions, including their size, number density, and central coordinates by the Image-ProPlus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). The size of inclusions D is the equivalent diameter calculated by Equation (3) and A is the area of inclusion.
D = 2 A π .
The two-dimensional inclusion size distribution was transformed into three-dimensional inclusion size distribution based on stereological analysis (modified Schwartz–Saltykov method with the probability mass function [35,36]), which was applied in the estimation of the volume fraction inclusions in Equation (2), and the details are similar to our previous research [11,37]. The contents of Al, Ca, Mg, Si, Mn, O, and S in inclusions were detected by point EDS analysis in the center of each inclusion and they were transformed into their respective compound based on their stoichiometric relationship.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Morphologies and Compositions of Inclusion

Typical inclusions in all the samples observed by SEM-EDS are shown in Figure 1 and they can be classified into three types. Numerous inclusions with single-phased morphology were mainly composed of oxides with CaS less than 30%, such as spinel, Al2O3–CaO–SiO2 and Al2O3–MgO–CaO–SiO2–CaS (denoted Type-1 inclusion). Cr oxide in inclusions is no more than 5%, and thus it is not discussed in this study. Isolated MnS/CaS-only inclusions were also detected (denoted Type-2 inclusion) and the isolated CaS-only inclusions were only observed in Experiment 2. There were two kinds of inclusions with multi-phased morphology (denoted Type-3 inclusion), one being crystallizing complex CaS(–Mn)S adhering on oxides composed of Al2O3, MgO, CaO, and SiO2, another being MnS on oxides, which were mainly Al2O3, spinel, or complex oxides. Line scanning results of inclusions with multi-phased structure are shown in Figure 2, indicating a concentration gradient. The outer layer of inclusions was always rich in CaS and MnS. The inner layer was mainly composed of spinel, CaO–SiO2, or Al2O3–MgO–SiO2. Furthermore, it is found that the outer layer composed of MnS was thicker than that composed of CaS–MnS. The inclusions with multi-phased morphology and isolated MnS-only inclusions had a larger size compared with Type-1 inclusions.
The proportion of typical three kinds of inclusions in different experiments is illustrated in Figure 3. It is obvious that the experiments with low sulfur were rich in Type-1 inclusions and those with high sulfur were rich in Type-3 inclusions. The proportion of single-phased inclusions (Type-1 inclusion) was higher in the high Ca-containing experiments.
The composition distribution of oxides in Type-1 inclusions is displayed in Figure 4. It can be seen that the oxides were rich in Al2O3 and there were not many liquid oxides during the continuous casting process. The average CaO content in inclusions for high Ca-containing experiments (Experiments 1 and 3) was higher than that for low Ca-containing experiments (Experiments 2 and 4). The average MgO content in inclusions for Experiment 1 was higher than Experiment 2, and that for Experiment 3 was lower than Experiment 2. This is probably due to the floatation of inclusion into slag affecting the composition and properties of slag, and thus the slag with good liquidity erodes the refractory more seriously.

3.2. Size and Number Density of Inclusions

The three-dimensional size distribution of Type-1 inclusions in different experiments was obtained based on stereological analysis, as shown in Figure 5. The inclusion size distribution seemed present in normal distribution and the size of inclusions ranged from about 0.4 to 9 μm. It is obvious that the peak points of curves corresponding to the diameter of inclusions in Experiments 1–4 are 1 μm, 1 μm, 1.4 μm, and 1.2 μm, respectively, and the height of curves in Experiments 3 and 4 is lower than that in Experiments 1 and 2, which indicates that there were more small Type-1 inclusions in low S containing steels.
Figure 6 suggests that the average diameter of Type-1 inclusions was larger in the steel with high S content probably attributed to the precipitation of sulfide in oxide inclusion, especially CaS. In addition, it is found that the number density of inclusions was larger in low Ca containing steel (Experiments 2 and 4). The three-dimensional average diameter of Type-2 and 3 inclusions is shown in Figure 7. Type-2 and 3 inclusions have a larger size than Type-1 inclusions. The average diameter of Type-2 inclusions had a same change trend with that of Type-3 inclusions, i.e., it was larger in the steel with high S or Ca content. It indicates that the formation of MnS and CaS also coarsens the size of Type-2 and 3 inclusions, and thus the inclusion size increased with increasing Ca or S content in 95CrMo steel on the whole.

3.3. Inclusion Distribution

In order to study the distribution of inclusions in 95CrMo steel, the area of inclusions and their coordinates were measured by Image software combining with SEM detection. The area density (Ad) distribution of inclusions on the cross section in each experiment is shown in Figure 8. The Ad value is equal to A i n c l u s i o n A s t e e l   s a m p l e × 100 % , i.e., the ratio of inclusion area and steel sample area. The inclusions seriously segregated in certain parts of the steel for Experiment 2 in which the largest area density of inclusions accounted for 0.049 to 0.056 pct. The inclusions were prone to segregate in Experiments 2 and 4 in which the number density of inclusions is large, indicating that the more inclusions there are, the more easily they aggregate and collide. Moreover, it is presumably concluded that the formation of sulfide in the outer layer of oxide inclusions weakens the attraction between oxide inclusions, and thus the inclusions in molten steel or semi-solidification steel with less sulfide tend to attract each other and aggregate strongly.

3.4. Formation Mechanism of Inclusions

The equilibrium precipitation of inclusions during cooling of 95CrMo was estimated by Factsage 7.2 with FToxid, FactPS, and FSstel data bases based on the steel compositions in Table 1, as displayed in Figure 9, and the adding temperature of Ca and S is marked in Figure 9. The same calculated method can be found in many studies [28,38,39]. However, the calculation by Factsage 7.2 is based on a normal equilibrium cooling model, and thus there may be a deviation of the calculation for temperature below solidus. It can be seen that the inclusions composed of Ca2SiO4, MgO, and CaS precipitated firstly in molten steel, which were transformed into Ca3MgSi2O8 during the solidification process of steel, and subsequently the inclusions composed of spinel and CaS formed and their amount increased due to the reaction [4]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the equilibrated transformation trajectory of inclusions in 95CrMo steel during the cooling process was Ca2SiO4 + MgO → Ca3MgSi2O8 → Spinel + CaS, which was corresponding to the detected Type-1 inclusions. The amount of spinel increased in the order of Experiment 2 = Experiment 3 < Experiment 4 < Experiment 1, which was in good agreement with the detected MgO content in oxides inclusions in Figure 4. Furthermore, the spinel and CaS formed during a solidification process tend to be small because the inclusions are hard to aggregate and collide in the melts with high viscosity. This meets the experimental results in Figure 1a–d where the inclusions composed of spinel and CaS had a small size of no more than 1.5 μm. The calculated results indicate that there were no inclusions containing Al2O3 except for spinel formed during the cooling process of 95CrMo, but the pure Al2O3 was observed in the billets experimentally. This is due to pure Al2O3 forming during the refining process and not having been modified.
(Ca3MgSi2O8) + 2[Al] + 3[S] = (Al2O3·MgO) + 3(CaS) + 2[Si] + 4[O].
The sulfide inclusions formed in the order of CaS > MnS. CaS formed in the molten steel or two-phase region of steel which adhered to the oxides (this type of inclusion can be seen in Figure 1h,i and Figure 2e), resulting in the coarsening of inclusions. The precipitation temperature of the CaS phase was higher in the steel containing high Ca and its amount increased with the increasing concentration of Ca and S. The thermodynamic calculated results suggest that the steel started to solidify from about 147 °C at which γ-Fe formed and S element segregated in austenite phase gradually during this process. The content of S in austenite phase increased sharply from about 1350 °C which promoted the formation of MnS inclusions. The amount of MnS inclusions kept increasing with the decreasing temperature. However, the concentration of S decreased with the increasing amount of precipitated MnS after the temperature of steel was lower than solidus temperature. In addition, it is found that the segregation of S in γ-Fe only promote the formation of MnS not CaS. The reason why the outer layer of multi-phased inclusions containing MnS was thicker than those containing CaS can be attributed to the fact that the amount of precipitated MnS was much larger than of CaS. Furthermore, the amount of MnS was obviously larger in the experiments with higher S concentration, which resulted in a higher proportion of inclusion with multi-phases in Experiments 3 and 4. The proportion of Type-3 inclusions was higher in high Ca-containing steel attributed to a larger amount of precipitated CaS phase.
The formation mechanism of inclusions is illustrated in Figure 10 and different types of inclusions can be explained as following:
(1)
Type-1 inclusions include pure oxides, as illustrated in Figure 10a, and the complex oxide–sulfide inclusions, as illustrated in Figure 10b. The pure oxides were formed during the refining process or precipitated during the cooling process. The inclusions in Figure 10b composed of oxides and CaS formed during the transformation process of inclusions as reaction [4]. The generated CaS dissolved in the oxides, and the solubility degree of CaS in calcium aluminate was high;
(2)
Type-2 inclusions are pure MnS which nucleated homogeneously from about 1350 °C;
(3)
Type-3 inclusions are inclusions with multi-phase, as illustrated in Figure 10c–f. The inclusions surrounded with a CaS shell always form when the amount of CaS increases to the extent that the CaS content is more than its supersaturation degree in oxide, as illustrated in Figure 10c. Some CaS detected in the core of inclusions may be due to the aggregation or uneven distribution of S during its dissolution in liquid steel. MnS nucleated around pure oxides and complex oxides–CaS inclusions heterogeneously after about 1350 °C, as illustrated in Figure 10d–f. The calculation of lattice disregistry based on Equation (5) [40] indicated that the disregistry between MgAl2O4 and MnS had the lowest value of 4.1 [15] and that for Al2O3 was 26.9, which facilitated the heterogeneous nucleation of MnS.
δ ( h k l ) n ( h k l ) s = i = 1 3 1 3 · | ( d [ u v w ] s i · cos θ d [ u v w ] n i ) | d [ u v w ] n i × 100 ,
where (hkl)s is a low-index plane of the substrate, [uvw]s is a low-index direction in (hkl)s plane, (hkl)n is a low-index plane of the nucleated solid, [uvw]n is a low-index direction in (hkl)n plane, d[uvw]s is the distance between a nonmetallic element along [uvw]s, d[hkl]s is the distance between a nonmetallic element along [hkl]n, and θ is the angle between [uvw]s and [uvw]n.

4. Conclusions

Industrial experiments using 95CrMo were conducted to study the effect of calcium and sulfur contents on the characteristics of typical inclusions in steel, including their compositions, morphologies, size, number density, and distribution. The results are as follows:
(1)
The three-dimensional inclusion size distribution suggests that there were more Type-1 inclusions with a small size in low S containing steels. The average diameter of all types of inclusions increased with increasing Ca or S content in 95CrMo steel, indicating that the formation of MnS and CaS coarsened their size;
(2)
The density distribution of inclusions indicates that the more inclusions there are, the more easily they aggregate and collide. Moreover, it is presumably concluded that the formation of sulfide in the outer layer of oxide inclusions weaken the attraction between oxide inclusions;
(3)
The thermodynamic calculation indicates that the equilibrated transformation trajectory of inclusions in 95CrMo steel during the cooling process is Ca2SiO4 + MgO → Ca3MgSi2O8 → Spinel + CaS. The precipitation temperature of the CaS phase was higher in the steel containing high Ca, and its amount increased with the increasing concentration of Ca and S. The segregation of S in γ-Fe promotes the formation of MnS, not CaS. Furthermore, the amount of MnS was larger in the experiments with higher S concentration;
(4)
The formation mechanism on three types of inclusions was discussed. The inclusions surrounded with a CaS shell always formed when the amount of CaS increased to the extent that CaS content was more than its supersaturation degree in oxide. The low disregistry for MnS–spinel and MnS–Al2O3 facilitated the heterogeneous nucleation of MnS.

Author Contributions

X.L. (Xiang Li) and X.L. (Xiao Long) conducted the experiments and wrote the main manuscript text. L.W. designed the experimental scheme. Other authors contributed to investigation, discussions and analysis of the data and preparation of samples. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Science Foundation of China with grant No. 51704085 and 51804086. Furthermore, this project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province with grant No. [2018]1060 and was supported by the research program for talented scholars of the Guizhou Institute of Technology with grant No. XJGC20190962. The Program Foundation for Talents of Education department of Guizhou Provinc with grant No. Qian Jiao He [2018]105, Program Foundation for Talents of Guizhou University with the grant No. 2017(05), the technology planning project of Guizhou Province with grant No. Qian Ke He [2017]5788, and [2018]5781 are gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kusano, Y.; Kawauchi, Y.; Wajima, M.; Sugawara, K.; Yoshida, M.; Hayashi, H. Calcium Treatment Technologies for Special Steel Bars and Wire Rods. ISIJ Int. 1996, 36, S77–S80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Janke, D.; Ma, Z.; Valentin, P.; Heinen, A. Improvement of Castability and Quality of Continuously Cast Steel. ISIJ Int. 2000, 40, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Y.M.; Xu, Z.B.; Wang, H.T. Research on inclusions in Al-killed steel during LF refining. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan. 2007, 28, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zheng, L.; Malfliet, A.; Wollants, P.; Blanpain, B.; Guo, M. Effect of Surfactant Te on the Formation of MnS Inclusions in Steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 2447–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yashiki, H.; Kaneko, T. Effects of Mn and S on the grain growth and texture in cold rolled 0.5% Si steel. ISIJ Int. 1990, 30, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Ren, Y.; Liu, X.; Shan, Q. Characteristics of Inclusions in Low Carbon Al-Killed Steel during Ladle Furnace Refining and Calcium Treatment. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 1401–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Liu, C.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Ni, H.; Zhang, X. Solid-State Reaction Between Fe-Al-Ca Alloy and Al2O3-CaO-FeO Oxide During Heat Treatment at 1473K (1200 °C). Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 1348–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.; Chen, W. Transient Evolution of Nonmetallic Inclusions during Calcium Treatment of Molten Steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 1841–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.; Ni, H.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Ye, F. Interfacial reaction mechanism between multi-component oxides and solid alloys deoxidised by Mn and Si during heat treatment. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2018, 45, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khurana, B.; Spooner, S.; Rao, M.B.V.; Roy, G.G.; Srirangam, P. In situ Observation of Calcium Oxide Treatment of Inclusions in Molten Steel by Confocal Microscopy. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, L.; Li, J.; Yang, S.; Chen, C.; Jin, H.; Li, X. Nucleation and Ostwald Growth of Particles in Fe-O-Al-Ca Melt. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lind, M.; Holappa, L. Transformation of Alumina Inclusions by Calcium Treatment. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2010, 41, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holappa, L.; Hämäläinen, M.; Liukkonen, M.; Lind, M. Thermodynamic examination of inclusion modification and precipitation from calcium treatment to solidified steel. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2003, 30, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, Y.-T.; He, S.-P.; Chen, G.-J.; Wang, Q. Thermodynamics of Complex Sulfide Inclusion Formation in Ca-Treated Al-Killed Structural Steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2016, 47, 2549–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shin, J.H.; Park, J.H. Formation Mechanism of Oxide-Sulfide Complex Inclusions in High-Sulfur-Containing Steel Melts. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verma, N.; Pistorius, P.C.; Fruehan, R.J.; Potter, M.; Lind, M.; Story, S. Transient Inclusion Evolution during Modification of Alumina Inclusions by Calcium in Liquid Steel: Part I. Background, Experimental Techniques and Analysis Methods. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2011, 42, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verma, N.; Pistorius, P.C.; Fruehan, R.J.; Potter, M.; Lind, M.; Story, S.R. Transient Inclusion Evolution During Modification of Alumina Inclusions by Calcium in Liquid Steel: Part II. Results and Discussion. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2011, 42, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, H.; Ren, Y.; Yang, W. Effect of Sulfur in Steel on Transient Evolution of Inclusions During Calcium Treatment. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, G.; Wang, X. Inclusion Evolution after Calcium Addition in Low Carbon Al-Killed Steel with Ultra Low Sulfur Content. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, Y.; Sridhar, S.; Valdez, M. Formation of CaS on Al2O3-CaO inclusions during solidification of steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2002, 33, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Choudhary, S.K.; Ghosh, A. Thermodynamic Evaluation of Formation of Oxide–Sulfide Duplex Inclusions in Steel. ISIJ Int. 2008, 48, 1552–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, L.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Wu, T.; Liu, W.; Xiong, J. Improving Cleanliness of 95CrMo Drill Rod Steel by Slag Refining. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2016, 47, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Li, Q.; Huang, F.; Li, H.; Yang, J. Control of Stringer Shaped Non-Metallic Inclusions of CaO-Al2O3System in API X80 Linepipe Steel Plates. Steel Res. Int. 2013, 85, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, Y.; Chen, W.Q.; Han, H.B.; Bai, R.J. Influence of calcium treatment on cleanness and fatigue life of 60Si2MnA spring steel. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2017, 44, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yiquan, W. Study of Characteristics of Inclusions and Property of High Heat Input Welding for Oxide Metallurgy Steel Developed by Ca Deoxidation; Central South University: Changsha, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sui, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Che, D.; Li, J.; Chou, K. The Formation and Growth of Sulfides in Free-Cutting Stainless Steel. Steel Res. Int. 2018, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lv, Z.-A.; Ni, H.-W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, C.-S. Evolution of MnS inclusions in Ti-bearing X80 pipeline steel. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2017, 24, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, Q.; Yang, W.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, L.; Conejo, A.N. Formation and Deformation Mechanism of Al2O3-CaS Inclusions in Ca-Treated Non-Oriented Electrical Steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 51, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blais, C.; L’Espérance, G.; Lehuy, H.; Forget, C. Development of an integrated method for fully characterizing multiphase inclusions and its application to calcium-treated steels. Mater. Charact. 1997, 38, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, W.; Xie, B.S.; Wang, B.; Cai, Q.W.; Xu, S.X. Effect of Rolling Process on Microstructure and Properties of 95CrMo Drill Steel. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2016, 23, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Zhou, Y. Fatigue Life Improving of Drill Rod by Inclusion Control. High Temp. Mater. Process. 2016, 35, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.; Li, J.; Yang, S.; Chen, C.; Jin, H.; Li, X.; Zhuang, C.; Ju, J. Industrial experiment study on inclusion evolution in 95CrMo Steel. Met. Res. Technol. 2019, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, J.; Zheng, S.; Cai, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, J. The Evolution and Morphology of Sulfide Inclusions in 95CRMO Hollow Steel. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, San Diego, CA, USA, 16–20 February 2014; pp. 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ohta, H.; Suito, H. Characteristics of Particle Size Distribution of Deoxidation Products with Mg, Zr, Al, Ca, Si/Mn and Mg/Al in Fe-10mass%Ni Alloy. ISIJ Int. 2006, 46, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kanatani, K.-I.; Ishikawa, O. Error analysis for the stereological estimation of sphere size distribution: Abel type integral equation. J. Comput. Phys. 1985, 57, 229–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, T.; Shimasaki, S.-I.; Taniguchi, S.; Uesugi, K.; Narita, S. Stereological Analysis of Nonspherical Particles in Solid Metal. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2013, 44, 750–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, L.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.; Ju, J. Effect of Mg Addition on the Refinement and Homogenized Distribution of Inclusions in Steel with Different Al Contents. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 805–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, C.; Park, J.H. Evolution of Oxide Inclusions in Si-Mn-Killed Steel during Protective Atmosphere Electroslag Remelting. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 50, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lyu, S.; Ma, X.; Huang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Lee, H.-G.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, G.; Zou, J.; Zhao, B. Formation Mechanism of Al2O3-Containing Inclusions in Al-Deoxidized Spring Steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 50, 2205–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bramfitt, B.L. The effect of carbide and nitride additions on the heterogeneous nucleation behavior of liquid iron. Metall. Trans. 1970, 1, 1987–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in samples. (ad) Type-1 inclusions; (eh) Type-2 inclusions; (il) Type-3 inclusions.
Figure 1. Morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in samples. (ad) Type-1 inclusions; (eh) Type-2 inclusions; (il) Type-3 inclusions.
Materials 13 00619 g001
Figure 2. Line scanning of compositions for inclusions with multi-phased morphology. (a) SEM graph; (b) line scanning results.
Figure 2. Line scanning of compositions for inclusions with multi-phased morphology. (a) SEM graph; (b) line scanning results.
Materials 13 00619 g002
Figure 3. Proportion of three types of inclusions in each experiment.
Figure 3. Proportion of three types of inclusions in each experiment.
Materials 13 00619 g003
Figure 4. Composition distribution of inclusions in steel billets at different temperatures. (a) Experiment 1; (b) Experiment 2; (c) Experiment 3; (d) Experiment 4.
Figure 4. Composition distribution of inclusions in steel billets at different temperatures. (a) Experiment 1; (b) Experiment 2; (c) Experiment 3; (d) Experiment 4.
Materials 13 00619 g004
Figure 5. Three-dimensional inclusion size distribution with single-phased morphology. (a) Experiment 1; (b) Experiment 2; (c) Experiment 3; (d) Experiment 4.
Figure 5. Three-dimensional inclusion size distribution with single-phased morphology. (a) Experiment 1; (b) Experiment 2; (c) Experiment 3; (d) Experiment 4.
Materials 13 00619 g005
Figure 6. Three-dimensional average diameter and number density of Type-1 inclusions.
Figure 6. Three-dimensional average diameter and number density of Type-1 inclusions.
Materials 13 00619 g006
Figure 7. Three-dimensional average diameter of Type-2 and 3 inclusion.
Figure 7. Three-dimensional average diameter of Type-2 and 3 inclusion.
Materials 13 00619 g007
Figure 8. Density distribution of inclusions on the cross section in each experiment.
Figure 8. Density distribution of inclusions on the cross section in each experiment.
Materials 13 00619 g008
Figure 9. Phase transformation of inclusions and sulfur content in γ-Fe during cooling of 95CrMo steels by FACTSAGE (C2S represents 2CaO·SiO2; C3MS2 represents 3CaO·MgO·2SiO2). (a) Experiment 1; (b) Experiment 2; (c) Experiment 3; (d) Experiment 4.
Figure 9. Phase transformation of inclusions and sulfur content in γ-Fe during cooling of 95CrMo steels by FACTSAGE (C2S represents 2CaO·SiO2; C3MS2 represents 3CaO·MgO·2SiO2). (a) Experiment 1; (b) Experiment 2; (c) Experiment 3; (d) Experiment 4.
Materials 13 00619 g009aMaterials 13 00619 g009b
Figure 10. Schematic diagram for formation mechanism of Type-1 and 3 inclusions.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram for formation mechanism of Type-1 and 3 inclusions.
Materials 13 00619 g010
Table 1. Chemical compositions of steel billets for 95CrMo.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of steel billets for 95CrMo.
Exp.RemarksCSiSPMnMoCrAltAlsCaMgO.T.OInsol
Weight Percent (%)Mass (ppm)
1High Ca
Low S
0.930.350.0030.0120.330.21.06302413<58–97.6
2Low Ca
Low S
0.970.280.0030.0100.320.21.0430267<56–97.3
3High Ca
High S
0.980.260.0100.0100.310.21.04302618<57–87.7
4Low Ca
High S
0.940.230.0100.0130.310.21.0330196<57–97.8
O.T. represents total oxygen and OInsol represents oxygen in inclusions. Alt and Als represent the total alumina and soluble Al in the liquid steel, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Long, X.; Wang, L.; Tong, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. Inclusion Characteristics in 95CrMo Steels with Different Calcium and Sulfur Contents. Materials 2020, 13, 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030619

AMA Style

Li X, Long X, Wang L, Tong S, Wang X, Zhang Y, Li Y. Inclusion Characteristics in 95CrMo Steels with Different Calcium and Sulfur Contents. Materials. 2020; 13(3):619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiang, Xiao Long, Linzhu Wang, Shouhao Tong, Xiutao Wang, Yin Zhang, and Yutang Li. 2020. "Inclusion Characteristics in 95CrMo Steels with Different Calcium and Sulfur Contents" Materials 13, no. 3: 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop