Ozonized Gel Against Four Candida Species: A Pilot Study and Clinical Perspectives

Abstract

Ozone therapy can display a wide range of clinical beneficial effects, including antimicrobial, immune-stimulant, analgesic, anti-hypoxic actions. However, there is still a paucity of data regarding the ozone fungicide activity. Oral Candida is the most common fungal infection in the mouth among denture wearers and people with weakened immune systems. In the case of generalized candidiasis or immunocompromised patients, systemic therapy is needed, while localized infections are treated with topic medications. However, many Candida strains are resistant to antifungal drugs. The aim of this preliminary analysis is to evaluate the antimycotic efficacy of a new ozonided oil (GeliO₃), as a possible terapeutic alternative in local treatments of these infections, compared to chlorhexidine digluconate (Plak gel®). Chlorhexidine is a chemical synthesis disinfectant with a broad-spectrum antiseptic action, active against bacteria and fungi. Antimycotic activity was tested against the following four Candida species: C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, through an agar diffusion method. No significant differences were found between the growth inhibition zone diameters of the ozonized gel and chlorhexidine. The results indicated that the ozonized gel may help to combat Candida infections. Moreover, useful applications could be used to counteract Candida colonization of endosseous implants.

1. Introduction

Candidiasis is one of the most common human opportunistic fungal infections, caused by a genus of yeasts called Candida [1]. Candida is located in the oral cavity and on mucosal surfaces, especially those of the gastrointestinal tract [2]. Many species are commensal symbiotic microorganisms. However, when the integrity of the mucosal barriers is compromised or the immune system is weakened, they can invade tissues and cause diseases [3]. The incidence of fungal infections has been increasing in recent decades [4]. The expression of Candida virulence in the oral cavity is strongly correlated with some predisposing factors, such as the use of dentures, hypo-salivation, prolonged therapy with antibiotics or immunosuppressive drugs, local trauma, malnutrition, endocrine disorders, and people’s increased longevity, all elements that determine an impairment of the immune system [5]. Usually, the treatment of these fungal infections is based on polienes and imidazol derivative drugs [6]. Short-term treatment has demonstrated an increase in the fungal resistance to these medicaments; the high morbidity rate associated with resistant mycosis indicates that the search for new alternative treatments is very important [7]. Regarding systemic candidiasis, echinocandins represent an adequate alternative solution while, for localized oral infections, chlorhexidine is often prescribed by dentists as an antiseptic mouthwash and a denture disinfectant despite its cytotoxicity [8,9]. Previous studies demonstrated an in vitro antibacterial activity for ozonized vegetable oils against microorganisms [10,11]. Ozone (O₃) is a highly reactive molecule composed of three oxygen atoms that acts as both an oxidant and oxidizer [12]. The reliable microbiologic and metabolic properties of ozone make it a useful disinfectant with a wide range of activities [13,14]. Ozone demonstrated its antimicrobial effect on bacteria, virus, protozoa and fungi, besides its immunomodulatory, anti-hypoxic, biosynthetic, and anti-inflammatory properties [15,16]. When bacteria are exposed to ozone in vitro, the phospholipids and lipoproteins of the bacterial cell envelope are oxidized. That mechanism disrupts the cytosolic membrane integrity, leading ozone to infiltrate the microorganisms and oxidize glycoproteins and glycolipids, blocking enzymatic function. Moreover, evidence has demonstrated that ozone interacts with fungal cell walls like bacteria [17,18].

In addition, in cell culture assays, it did not show a cytotoxic effect on fibroblasts or keratinocytes and it induced fibroblast migration, which could aid the wound-healing process [19].

Ozone therapy have been experimented with for various aspects of dentistry. To date, it has shown efficacy in managing wound healing, dental caries, oral lichen planus, gingivitis and periodontitis, halitosis, osteonecrosis of the jaw, post-surgical pain, plaque and biofilms, root canal treatment, dentin hypersensitivity, temporomandibular joint disorders, and teeth whitening [20].

Moreover, the various beneficial effects of ozone therapy could be applied in both dental and orthopedic implantology. Modern strategies to prevent implant-associated infections are geared towards treatments and technologies capable of preventing/resisting infections while promoting repair and osseous integration [21,22,23,24].The promotion of peri-implant bone-healing of endosseous implants by an ozonized oil has been experimentally studied in immunosuppressed rabbits [25]. A better osseointegration process in endosseous implants treated with photobiomodulation and ozone therapy has been described [26]. Modifications have been proposed to improve their integration but also to confer anti-infective properties [27,28,29]. Ozone-ultraviolet treatment of orthopedic titanium implants improved bone-implant osseointegration. Osteoblasts cultured on ozone-ultraviolet-treated surfaces displayed a significantly higher expression of osteoblast markers, like bone morphogenetic protein 2, and osteocalcin [30]. Ozonized oils and other ozone treatments exhibited the capability to promote the bone integration of dental and orthopedic implants while expressing antimicrobial and even immunomodulatory effects [25,26,31]. However, the fungicidal potential of ozone therapy is still poorly explored. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the antimycotic activity of a new ozonized gel. The ozonized gel is obtained from the chemical reaction between ozone and unsaturated fatty acids of vegetable oils. The effectiveness of the ozonized gel (GeliO₃) was compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (Plak gel®) through an agar diffusion assay. Each treatment was tested against the four species most commonly associated with candidiasis: Candida albicans (65.3%), Candida glabrata (11.3%), Candida tropicalis (7.2%) and C. parapsilosis (6.0%). C. albicans remains the most commonly isolated, but the proportion relative to other Candida species has decreased over time (from 71 to 65%). This was accompanied by an increasing incidence of C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis [32].

2. Materials and Methods

The samples of ozonized gel (GeliO₃), composed of Bio-ozonized olive oil and a synthetic amorphous silica gel with a peroxide index of 20 mEq O₂/Kg, were supplied by Bioemmei Srl, Vicenza, Italy.

Chlorhexidine digluconate in a gel containing polyoxymethyleneand hydrogenated ricinus oil (Plak gel® 0,2%) was provided by Polifarma Benessere s.r.l., Roma (RM), Italy.

Candida strains were randomly selected from the old stocks of the Microbiology and Virology laboratory, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

A total of 12 Candida strains, belonging to the four species most implicated in human infection [32], were tested in this study: C. albicans (n = 3), C. parapsilosis (n = 3), C. glabrata (n = 3), C. tropicalis (n = 3).

All strains were subcultured on a selective chromogenic medium for the isolation of yeasts (ChromID®, BioMèrieux) and incubated at 37° for 24 h. A presumptive identification was done by ChromID® and confirmed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany; score > 2).

The trial was carried out at the Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology of the IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia.

The evaluation of the antifungal activity was performed by setting up an agar diffusion method [33,34].

It was not possible to perform a quantitative study using the methods of determination of the Minimum Inhibiting and Fungicidal Concentration (MIC and MFC), due to the insolubility of the ozonized oil in culture broth, with the product being strongly hydrophobic. Not even the addition of a detergent such as Tween 80, as indicated in the study by Sechi et al. [10], could solubilize the gel.

In order to perform the analysis, aA suspension was prepared by dissolving Candida colonies in distilled water to have a turbidity of 0.5 MacFarland.

ChromID® agar plates were seeded with a buffer soaked with the fungal suspension. Subsequently, two wells were made in each agar plate, one of which was filled with 150 μL of ozonized gel and the other with 150 μL of chlorhexidine.

The plates were then incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The results were read after 48 h, due to the different growth times of Candida strains. The efficacy of GeliO₃ and Plak gel® 0,2% was evaluated by measuring the growth inhibition diameter formed around the wells. The experiment was repeated three times for each strain.

Results were recorded in terms of the average diameter of inhibition zone (mm). Data were submitted to statistical analysis using a computer software (R version 3.1.3, R Develop-ment Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien, Austria). Descriptive statistics were calculated for all the groups tested and reported mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, and maximum values. A t-test was applied, comparing the results of the two gels in the different Candida Species tested.

Significance for all statistical tests was predetermined at P < 0.05.

3. Results

Results are summarized in

Table 1. Growth inhibition halos (mm) of the different groups. No significant differences were observed among groups (P > 0.05).

Code	Candida Species	Treatment	Mean	SD	Min	Max
ALB CHX	Candida albicans	Plak gel®	16.60	0.97	16.00	19.00
ALB OZO	Candida albicans	GeliO3	17.40	0.84	16.00	19.00
PAR CHX	Candida parapsilosis	Plak gel®	17.40	1.17	15.00	19.00
PAR OZO	Candida parapsilosis	GeliO3	16.60	0.97	16.00	19.00
GLA CHX	Candida glabrata	Plak gel®	17.50	0.71	17.00	19.00
GLA OZO	Candida glabrata	GeliO3	18.90	1.85	15.00	20.00
TRO CHX	Candida tropicalis	Plak gel®	16.90	1.20	16.00	19.00
TRO OZO	Candida tropicalis	GeliO3	16.10	1.60	15.00	19.00

. Both GeliO₃ and Plak gel® have shown an antifungal activity against all the Candida species considered (C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis). The diameters of mycotic growth inhibition were obtained from the arithmetic average of the inhibition diameters measured in the different tests. The values obtained for GeliO3 vary from a minimum of 15 mm for C. tropicalis to a maximum of 19 mm for C. glabrata, while, for the Plak gel®, the values obtained are very similar for the different species of Candida, varying from 16 to 17 mm. All the Candida species considered have been shown to be sensitive to chlorhexidine in equal measures. As for GeliO₃, Candida strains showed a slightly different sensitivity among species: greater for C. glabrata and C. albicans, lower for C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. No significant differences were reported comparing the two gels (P > 0.05) for all the Candida Species tested. However, these data show that both products have an effective antifungal activity.

4. Discussion

The GeliO₃ antimycotic activity evaluation, using an agar diffusion semi-quantitative method, has provided, as a preliminary result, its efficacy against Candida. Although the insolubility and strong hydrophobicity of GeliO₃ were a limitation of the in vitro study, they could, however, represent an advantage in the clinical scenery, where just these characteristics allow the gel to remain on the lesion without being immediately solubilized by the salivary flow. A second advantage could be the ability of GeliO₃ to penetrate the hydrophobic biofilm formed by Candida. On the contrary, Plak Gel® tends to have a limited persistence on the mucosa, being a water-based gel. The prolonged permanence of ozone on the lesion offers a great clinical advantage, and indeed, many studies highlighted that the time of exposure of microorganisms to ozone is one of the main variables in the evaluation of antifungal and antibacterial efficacy [35].

Fernandez Torres et al. [35], in a study on the fungicidal power of an ozonized vegetable oil, said that contact time has the greatest influence on killing yeasts. This consideration could raise doubts about any unwanted effects, such as tissue damage that could be caused by antiseptics left in place for a long time. Azarpazhooh et al. [36], in a literature review, stated that there is strong evidence of the biocompatibility of ozone toward epithelial cells, gingival fibroblasts and periodontal cells, supporting an absolute absence of risks for the prolonged use of ozone-based products.

This is in accordance with the observations of Tiwari et al. [37], who reported that the application of ozone has no adverse effects but, on the contrary, can offer benefits to oral tissues, such as the remission of mucosal lesions, and the increase in the turnover of oral epithelial cells with speed wound healing.

Ozone performs its action against microorganisms and not against human cells. Indeed, its germicidal action is based on a transient oxidative stress that is lethal for microorganisms due to their poor antioxidant defenses. Some microorganisms, including mycetes, lack enzymes such as catalase and glutathione peroxidase, which are instead present in human cells. These enzymes make the cellular defense system capable of neutralizing the oxidative action given by ozone [38,39].

The antimycotic effectiveness of GeliO₃ is due to the oxidation of microorganisms through the slow release of peroxides. Ozone oxidizes phospholipids and lipoproteins, which are part of the fungi cell wall, damaging their integrity so as to infiltrate inside the cell, oxidize glycoproteins and glycolipids, and block the enzymatic function. The combination of these reactions causes the inhibition of growth that occurs mainly in certain phases: proliferating cells are considered the most sensitive [40,41].

5. Conclusions

Further studies will be needed to confirm the GeliO₃ effective clinical efficacy on oral candidiasis. It would be interesting to test the ozonized gel in vivo by monitoring the lesion evolution, and also to investigate possible synergies with first-line drugs.

It may also be interesting to study its activity in comparison to that of traditional antifungal drugs, and especially to assess the sensitivity to ozone by Candida strains resistant to polyene and azole drugs. A positive result would make ozone a valid alternative local therapy in the increasingly frequent cases of drug resistance.