Next Article in Journal
Structural Evolution in Glassy Carbon Investigated Based on the Temperature Dependence of Young’s Modulus
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Chitosan Films Modified Using Caffeic Acid and a Neutralization Process
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Cooling Rate of High-Strength Thick Plate Steel during Water Quenching Based on a Dilatometric Experiment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Natural Plant-Derived Compounds in Food and Cosmetics: A Paradigm of Shikonin and Its Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Polyphenols: Natural Preservatives with Promising Applications in Food, Cosmetics and Pharma Industries; Problems and Toxicity Associated with Synthetic Preservatives; Impact of Misleading Advertisements; Recent Trends in Preservation and Legislation

1
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baba Mastnath University, Rohtak 124021, India
2
School of Medical and Allied Sciences, K.R. Mangalam University, Gurugram 122103, India
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001, India
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara 06330, Turkey
5
Vaish Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Rohtak 124001, India
6
Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001, India
7
Instituto de Investigación y Postgrado, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago 8330507, Chile
8
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(13), 4793; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134793
Submission received: 17 May 2023 / Accepted: 1 June 2023 / Published: 3 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends in Materials for Cosmetic Formulations)

Abstract

:
The global market of food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products requires continuous tracking of harmful ingredients and microbial contamination for the sake of the safety of both products and consumers as these products greatly dominate the consumer’s health, directly or indirectly. The existence, survival, and growth of microorganisms in the product may lead to physicochemical degradation or spoilage and may infect the consumer at another end. It has become a challenge for industries to produce a product that is safe, self-stable, and has high nutritional value, as many factors such as physical, chemical, enzymatic, or microbial activities are responsible for causing spoilage to the product within the due course of time. Thus, preservatives are added to retain the virtue of the product to ensure its safety for the consumer. Nowadays, the use of synthetic/artificial preservatives has become common and has not been widely accepted by consumers as they are aware of the fact that exposure to preservatives can lead to adverse effects on health, which is a major area of concern for researchers. Naturally occurring phenolic compounds appear to be extensively used as bio-preservatives to prolong the shelf life of the finished product. Based on the convincing shreds of evidence reported in the literature, it is suggested that phenolic compounds and their derivatives have massive potential to be investigated for the development of new moieties and are proven to be promising drug molecules. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the significant role of phenolic compounds and their derivatives in the preservation of perishable products from microbial attack due to their exclusive antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties and the problems associated with the use of synthetic preservatives in pharmaceutical products. This article also analyzes the recent trends in preservation along with technical norms that regulate the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products in the developing countries.

1. Introduction

Shelf life refers to the duration between manufacturing and expiry date, during which the product is expected to retain its original characteristics and remain acceptable for consumers as far as its quality is concerned. During this duration, the product is susceptible to chemical, biological, and physical deterioration, which ultimately degrade the qualitative characteristics of the product [1]. Therefore, preservatives have been extensively used in various pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food products to prevent them from deterioration [2,3]. Many factors are responsible for governing the mean life of the product such as the growth of microorganisms, heating, inappropriate temperature, long storage, change in moisture content, reaction with light and oxygen, fermentation, acidification, enzymatic changes, etc., which result in the loss of important properties of the finished product. Pharmaceutical preparation consists of a diverse range of structures and moieties that are susceptible to deterioration. Deterioration is the result of chemical reactions that occur between the various ingredients present in the formulation and the external environment. The deterioration of a product generally occurs during longer storage, affecting its stability, ultimately resulting in the product’s decline in its intended natural quality due to microbial contamination and rendering the product harmful to the consumer. In general, there are three processes by which the product degrades [4]. Chemical breakdown includes chemical incompatibilities, such as hydrolysis, oxidation, photolysis, polymerization, hydration, dehydration, and decarboxylation. [5,6]. A change in temperature, particle size, evaporation, vaporization, efflorescence, hygroscope, deliquescence, etc. are all examples of physical degradation. Everywhere we look, there are microbes that assault the product once it is opened. The product starts losing its quality quickly on a microbiological level [7].

2. Preservatives and Their Needs

An antimicrobial preservative is a natural or artificial substance added to non-sterile products in favor of preventing their decomposition due to chemical, enzymatic, or microbial activities or any undesirable chemical changes, most probably caused by microbial growth and lipid oxidation [8,9] (Figure 1). The addition of preservatives is obligatory in the case of products containing water, or organic or inorganic compounds that are at the highest risk of contamination. Products such as creams, solutions, emulsions, suspensions, parental and eye drops, etc. are likely to be perishable, which may further lead to the spoilage of products and result in the loss of some essential properties [10,11]. Therefore, preservatives are meant to be introduced during the manufacturing process to keep the essential qualitative characteristics and organoleptic properties of the product intact by retarding degradation of the product formulation during its shelf life [12]. They keep the product fresher for a longer time so that no undesirable pathogen could attack and bring about unenviable changes in the finished product.

3. Factors Monitoring the Effectiveness of Preservatives

Every product in the market, whether food, cosmetic, or pharmaceutical, comes with a shelf life. During this period, the product is expected to remain stable retaining its qualitative characteristics, but what if the effect of the preservative is lost? The effectiveness of a preservative depends upon its concentration, solubility, partition coefficient, nature of surfactants used in the formulation having antimicrobial activity, pH, etc. Consumers themselves can easily monitor the loss of effectiveness of a preservative or tarnished product by considering several factors such as the appearance of a greyish-green layer on the top surface of the product, loss of texture, bad taste and odor, change in pH, cloudiness, dryness, bleaching/fading, formation of separation layers, rancidity, staleness, etc. Additionally, some biochemical modifications that affect the organoleptic qualities of foods include hydrolysis, non-enzymatic browning (Maillard reaction), enzymatic browning, lipid oxidation, lipolysis, and proteolysis [13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, the purpose of adding preservatives is to provide stability and protection against microbial attack, prolong the shelf life, and enhance the efficacy of the product. Before incorporation into miscellaneous products, preservatives have been investigated by researchers worldwide for their decontamination efficacy. The sorting of preservatives attributed to their mechanism of action and sources [18] is depicted below in Figure 2.

4. Mechanism of Action of Preservatives

Preservatives, irrespective of their origin and whether natural or synthetic, act through different modes of action such as:
  • Cell wall lysis and leakage (phenols and organomercurials).
  • Cross linkage (glutaraldehyde).
  • Interference with the integrity of the cell membrane (EDTA, quaternary ammonium compounds).
  • Inhibition of folic acid synthesis (parabens, benzoic acid, etc.) [19].

5. Criteria for the Selection of Preservatives

As such, there is no single preservative that is effective against all microbial strains and suits all product types. Moreover, manufacturers or regulators are required to use preservatives with the maximum permitted concentration limits specified by the regulatory authorities while taking care of the pH and temperature conditions that may affect the activity. Therefore, the selection of the right preservative is of utmost significance. Several factors based on which one can choose the best preservative are: the purpose of inclusion, proof of efficacy (which in turn depends on the chemical nature, type of interaction, dose, physicochemical properties of a drug, degree of microbial contamination, the influence of pH, storage temperature of the finished product, etc.), broad or narrow spectrum of coverage against pathogens, effectiveness(antimicrobial effectiveness test as specified in different pharmacopeias), safety information, incompatibility interactions, antimicrobial functionality or microbial protection spectrum, dosage form, compliance with a product philosophy, chemical and physical stability, toxicity studies and labeling details of the end product, etc. [20].

6. Problems Associated with Preservatives

Nowadays, the use of synthetic/artificial preservatives has become common (as they are cheap and easily available), which has not been widely accepted by consumers as they are aware of the preservatives’ short- and long-term life-threatening adverse effects on health, which is the major area of concern for researchers [21]. The presence of hazardous chemicals in the product sabotages consumer health [22,23]. The various problems/adverse effects associated with the frequent use of synthetic preservatives in various formulations have been summarized in Figure 3.
Quality control and consumer safety are of utmost importance. Preservatives are therefore necessary to maintain the average life of pharmaceutical preparations, food and cosmetics products but there have also been reports of some adverse effects associated with their frequent use. There exists an immediate need for unwrapping novel and safe preservatives from natural sources for various pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food products as it is evident that natural preservatives would be better in terms of the quality, safety, and longevity of the product.

7. Preservatives Used in Cosmetics

Cosmetics products are often used by people around the world almost every day and become a part of our lifestyle. Cosmetics products comprise several products ranging from shampoos to deodorants, lotions to creams, foundations to lipsticks, mouthwashes to toothpaste [24,25], and so on, as depicted in Table 1 and Table 2, with the hope of providing protection, maintenance, cleansing, minimizing body odor, beautification and developing an attractive and charming personality [24,26]. They are meant to be frequently applied on external non-sterile parts of the body, especially the skin, and are susceptible to microbial contamination with every use. Cosmetic products containing water, oils, peptides, and carbohydrates offer an ideal environment for the microbial growth of pathogenic organisms, which may further lead to the spoilage of products and result in the loss of some essential properties [10,11]. To prevent microbial growth, undesirable changes, deterioration of the cosmetic product, and chances of skin infection, two distinct classes, namely, antimicrobial and antioxidant preservatives are generally used [24]. Moreover, special measures must be taken by consumers at their end while using cosmetic products to retard their spoilage.

8. Food Preservatives

Foodstuffs of various types such as raw food, junk food, fast food, organic food, whole food, processed or unprocessed food, and vegetarian or non-vegetarian food exist across the globe depending upon climatic and geographical conditions. Moreover, foodstuffs are subjected to storage in go downs or houses for handling emergencies [95]. Food products are perishable items with a short shelf life ranging from a few hours to a few days to a few months. For many years, food preservation has been a great challenge for the food industry in terms of ensuring quality, nutritional value, organoleptic properties, and safety [96,97]. Preservatives are generally added to decontaminate the food product and to ensure the stability and safety of the product. The consumer demands chemical-free, fresh, nutritionally rich, tasty, smells good, and ready-to-eat food, which appeals to the taste buds and has a prolonged shelf life too. This has prompted researchers/manufacturers to search and develop natural antimicrobial preservatives. Organic acids and their derivatives depicted in Table 3 are natural compounds that have been exploited by researchers as bio-preservatives for the last few decades. They are found to be inexpensive and effective at decontaminating the food product against the population of food pathogens and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Several studies reported that organic acids such as acetic, citric, lactic, propionic, benzoic, and sorbic acids possess an excellent antimicrobial potential, exhibiting a broad spectrum of activity against food pathogens such as bacteria fungi and yeast [98,99,100,101].

9. Pharmaceutical Preservatives

Pharmaceutical preparations meant to be administered in different dosage forms usually contain additives in addition to the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Additives with a certain amount of impurities show interactions with the active drug component, other additives, and packaging materials. Namely, drug–additive interactions, additive–additive interactions, and package–additive interactions, which cause drug degradation [119]. In pharmaceutical solutions, generally known as liquid or oral preparations (solutions, syrups, elixirs, suspensions, etc.), the presence of a higher water content and other ingredients such as solvents and co-solvents in the formulation provides an environment that favors the growth of microorganisms. This microbial contamination causes undesirable chemical alterations in the formulation, which eventually result in product deterioration [120].
Non-sterile dosage forms are prone to microbial contamination during the manufacturing process; even sterile dosage forms in multidose containers have access to microbial growth by repeatedly withdrawn doses. Hence, in the pharmaceutical industry, the addition of preservatives becomes necessary to hurdle the prevalence of microbial growth, provide stability, retard deterioration, and increase shelf life. Although preservatives are used in low concentrations, the health issues associated with them cannot be ignored. Some commonly used preservatives in pharmaceutical preparations along with their toxic effects are listed in Table 4. The evaluation of preservative efficacy is completed in conformity with tests prescribed in a pharmacopeia to demonstrate their effectiveness in a product—antimicrobial effectiveness test (USP), efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP), and preservation effectiveness test (JP). Based on their chemical nature and structure, preservatives are categorized as: acids (benzoic acid and its salts, sorbic acid), alcohols (benzyl alcohol, chlorobutanol), biguanides (chlorhexidine), esters (parabens), phenols (phenol, m-cresol), mercurials (thiomersal), phenolic antioxidants (BHA, BHT), quaternary ammonium compounds (benzyl alkonium chloride, cetrimide), etc. [121].

10. Natural Preservatives and Their Importance

Owing to their natural origin, bio-preservatives received lots of attention in recent years as they are much safer and more beneficial when compared to synthetic preservatives. Natural food preservatives are typically of plant, animal, and microbial origin. Natural products, derived from natural plant sources such as herbs, spices, and essential oils, are widely used to give aroma to beverages and mask the disagreeable odor of the constituents in addition to their preservative action (Figure 4) [144]. They are found to increase shelf life naturally by decreasing lipid oxidation. Some of the common conventional methods that can be used to preserve food are drying (natural and artificial), pickling (using salt or vinegar), freezing, high-pressure processing, and the edible coating technique [145].
Plant phenols are divided into different classes, including simple phenols, phenolic acids, anthocyanins, stilbenes, flavonoids, tannins, lignans, and lignins (Figure 5). Phenolic acids are aromatic secondary plant metabolites that are extensively spread across the plant kingdom. [146]. Currently, there is much scientific interest in their potential protective role against oxidative stress-related diseases. The main edible sources of phenolic acids are fruits, vegetables, cereals, seeds, berries, beverages, olives, and aromatic plants, and they can be found in almost all parts of the plant [147,148]. They occur in the form of esters, glycosides, and amides but rarely in the free form [149]. Despite their origin, these versatile molecules have been reported to possess a wider canvas of biological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, insecticidal, estrogenic, and keratolytic activities, and many more [150,151,152]. Phenolic compounds are well known for their antioxidant potential and have been extensively used as bio-preservatives to elongate their shelf life, besides their other well-established health benefits. Phenolic acids are non-flavonoid polyphenols that contain a carboxyl group with one or more hydroxyl groups linked to a benzene ring [153,154]. Phenolic acids are known to possess two distinctive carbon frameworks: hydroxybenzoic acid (benzoic acid derivatives) and hydroxycinnamic acid (cinnamic acid derivatives). In these two carbon frameworks, even though the fundamental frame remains the same, the structural variation in the numbers and orientation of hydroxyl groups on the aromatic ring results in a variety of potential derivatives. Hydroxybenzoic acids with seven carbon atoms have a general structure of C6-C1 derived directly from benzoic acid and are present in foods in glucoside form. Some common hydroxybenzoic acids are protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, and gallic acid. Hydroxycinnamic acids are natural phenylpropanoids having a general structure of C6-C3 derived directly from cinnamic acid and are mostly present in the bound form. Among hydroxycinnamic acids, sinapic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and p-coumaric acid are the most abundant compounds in foods [155,156] (Figure 5). In both these derivatives, the variation lies in their hydroxylation and methylation patterns in aromatic rings.
Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of phenolic acids reveal that the reactivity of the phenol moiety imparts antioxidant activity to a greater extent but can also be affected by some other parameters such as the chemical structure, number, position of hydroxyl groups, substituents on the phenolic ring, and esterification of the carboxyl group. They act as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, and oxygen suppressants when added to food products (Figure 6). They also can inhibit the enzymes involved in radical generation and act as free radical scavengers [157,158]. In general, they are used to prolong the shelf life by preventing oxidative rancidity, degradation, discoloration, contamination, and any other undesirable changes from occurring. Because of their presence in natural plant-based foods and their role as dietary antioxidants, along with radical scavenging abilities, they have received a lot of attention from researchers worldwide [146,159].

10.1. Natural Plant Constituents as Antimicrobial/Antioxidants

Antimicrobial agents derived from natural sources have been recognized and used anciently in preservation [160]. The importance of natural sources as antimicrobials/antioxidants is well established and this allows them to be selected as potential candidates for novel preservatives (Table 5 and Figure 7).

10.2. Applications of Phenolic Antioxidant/Antimicrobials

Over the last years, naturally occurring fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices, oils, and their extracts attract the attention of researchers as they are regarded as the ultimate sources of phenolic compounds. They have been tremendously utilized/applied by the food, cosmetics, and pharma industries for a better therapeutic efficacy and conservation of substances. Moreover, they are broadly available, reliable, and cheap with minimal toxic effects, which makes them superior to synthetic products in all aspects. Various applications of polyphenolic compounds [188,189,190,191,192,193] in the pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetics sectors have been summarized in Figure 8.

11. Permitted/Approved Preservatives

Preservatives are defined as synthetic chemical additives that increase the durability and prolong the shelf life of the product. Although preservatives are effective in preventing a microbial burden in the product, the risk of allergic reactions, sensitization, and other toxicological effects associated with their frequent use cannot be subsided. Preservatives are incorporated in a range of food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products, and are an indispensable part of our daily diet and lifestyle as well. Ideally, owing to their necessity in the product, we should either limit their use in the product or opt for natural alternatives, as is the need of the hour. As per European regulations (Directive 95/2/EC), officially recognized and only permitted preservatives have been set down in Annex four of the 7th amendment of the cosmetic directive, which is summarized in Table 6. The Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) was established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to set global standards to ensure fair food trade practices. The Codex General Standard for Food Additives [194] (Codex Stan 192–1995, Revision, 2015) enlisted additional additives, preservatives, and antioxidants, permitted for food that has been thoroughly appraised by an international expert scientific committee, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), to develop specifications on food additives. According to Codex General Standard for Food Additives, a food additive is any substance (preservatives and antioxidants) that has been found acceptable given a green signal for use in foods, such as tertiary butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ), isopropyl citrate, dimethyl decarbonate and ferrous gluconate, etc. In the EU, every additive (preservative) assigned to a code begins with the letter E followed by a three-to-four-digit number. The numbering scheme is under the International Numbering System (INS). Antimicrobial preservatives should be chemically defined and designated by the Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (RN-CAS) as determined by the Codex Alimentarius Committee [87].

Amendments in Food Additives

After considering several opinions by the expert committee, FSSAI in its gazette notification adopted an amendment to the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) 7th Amendment Regulations, 2020, with regard to regulations 3.1 dated 16 September 2020, which came into force by 1 July 2021 [195,196]. Under Food Category System 6.2 and 7.2.1 as per the new regulations, the following changes have been introduced as given below in Table 7.
After the consideration of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of sorbates as food additives/preservatives, the European regulations finally decided to adopt an amendment in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 and Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 [197,198], by excluding calcium sorbate from the list of officially permitted food additives with the backdrop of lack of appropriate genotoxicity data, based on which calcium sorbate can no longer enjoy the status of being an authorized food additive.
Climbazole (CAS 38083-17-9) is a cosmetic preservative that has been used in various cosmetic preparations such as face creams, lotions, foot cream, rinse-off shampoos, and many others, at an allowed concentration of 0.5%. Experts from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) found that the use of climbazole at 0.5% in cosmetic products is not safe and may pose serious health issues to consumers (SCCS/1506/13, 2017). To ensure consumers’ safety, the European Commission amended the cosmetic regulations and decided to impose restrictions on the use of climbazole as a preservative in cosmetic products. Considering the harmful effects associated with the use of climbazole, Europe’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), SCCS/1600/18, set new regulatory limits to climbazole for its safe use in cosmetic preparations [199,200]. This regulation took effect on 22 May 2019, while amendments to Annex V were applied from 27 November 2019. Currently, as per the new regulatory limits, the allowed maximum concentration has dropped down to 0.2% in face creams, hair lotions, and foot care products and 0.5% for rinse-off shampoo (Table 8). These restrictions were implemented for all new products as well as the products already available in the EU market containing climbazole.
Hydroxyethoxyphenyl butanone (HEPB, CAS 569646-79-3), also known as ethyl zingerone, is intended to be used as a cosmetic preservative and has been a new entry to the family of authorized preservatives in cosmetic products [89]. In 2019, based on safety assessment studies, the SCCS recommends the inclusion or entry of HEPB in the list of approved preservatives. On 6 November 2019, HEPB was officially enlisted in Annex V of the European Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009 [201] with the recommended safe maximum limit concentration of 0.7% w/v in all cosmetic products concerning eye irritation [200].

12. Unfair Practices in Trade

For holding a good market position globally, neck-to-neck competition can be seen among the brands and companies advertising their products. For ages advertising has been in practice, and companies spend a handsome amount of money just to expand their business globally by persuading consumers to buy the product [202]. Advertising through different mediums such as social media, print media, digital media, etc. provides a wider canvas to overhype a particular brand or product. Although we are progressing technologically very fast, we end up in a world where spurious realities are created by the media. Nowadays, advertising is one of the effective mediums of communication between manufacturers and consumers. It is a way to attract, connect, and capture the consumers at the other end with undeniable influence on their mindset, but becomes problematic if they are misleading in any way [203].
Today, advertising has become a necessary tool for producers to burgeon their business and for consumers to increase their awareness, to select the best out of the box [204]. Advertising is an act of selling the concept “what you see is sold” playing out with the consumer sentiments. The advertising industry is dodgy, indulged in unethical practices by running false campaigns for peddling an average product, poaching the common man with illusory wordplay [205]. Common men are vulnerable to advertising and are unceasingly bombarded with pseudo realities manufactured by very sophisticated mechanisms. Moreover, there are different means of the product packaging systems available in the market to ensure their safety. These packaging systems act as a barrier between the product and consumer as consumers do not have direct access to the facts of the product. In such circumstances, product labels are the only means of providing information about the hidden product. Before we discuss the technicalities of the matter, one must understand the meaning of “claim”. As per the Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, 1992, this claim is referred to as a message in any form that states or implies that a food has particular characteristics with regards to its quality, nutritive value, quantity, health functional food, etc. [206]. Today, many companies have adopted unethical/illegal practices to prop up their false claims to mislead consumers and to make large profits at the cost of their health, and these are under the lens [203]. Therefore, every nation appoints government officials to design and adopt policies comprised of laws, regulations, and guidelines that products need to comply with. In 2015, under the legislative framework, the Government of India appointed a self-regulatory body, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) arm that twists advertising agencies and coerces them to follow laws and regulations. ASCI analyzes and scrutinizes the advertising content and entertains the complaints against the advertisement, whether the advertisement builds any deceptive or exaggerated claim that may mislead the consumer in any way. It is a commitment to healthy and fair competition. In recent years, consumers have now become more aware of the toxic effects of synthetic chemicals on their health, therefore, they are inclined towards traditional natural alternatives being incorporated in the products. To comply with the elevating demand for natural alternatives, companies adopted tricky advertising strategies (Figure 9) to market their products to make an unfair profit [207]. An advertisement and label become deceptive or misleading if they bear a bogus claim as a part of a marketing strategy to advertise the product:
Other false claims include—hiding or misstating the number of ingredients, labeling claims of extraordinary health benefits, highlighting or overstating the nutrient value, using exaggerated claims such as best/perfect, delicious, etc.

13. Misleading Labeling and Advertising

Advertising may influence the thought process of the consumer both positively and negatively as well. The content is deemed to be negative, unethical, and unfair if it misleads consumers and represents an illusory picture of the product, making them believe that a particular product is superior to other rival products available in the market to promote the sale. Some unfair or deceptive practices based on exaggerated claims [205,208,209] are summarized as follows:
  • Falsely representing food with a name similar to the prescribed name of an oriental medicine so that consumers misperceive the food as a drug.
  • Incorrect representation of food with a mark to depict the food as a healthy functional food.
  • Labeling or advertising products as “Preservatives not added” and “Free of preservatives”.
  • Falsely representing names other than those defined under the Standards and Specifications for Food Additives announced by the Ministry of Foods and Drug Safety.
  • Purposely representing that goods are of a particular grade, quality, and standard.
  • Labeling or advertising 100% when the product contains ingredients other than the raw material specified on the label. For instance, 100% orange juice (containing citric acid and other acidity regulators).
  • Labeling or advertising food with effects or properties that it does not possess.
  • Labeling or advertising food bearing special characteristics regarding nutrient content.
As per European regulations on misleading advertising in Directive 2006/114/EC [210], misleading advertisements are deceptive based on unsubstantial and exaggerated claims that represent a false picture of the product and violate the customer’s right to know about the products they are purchasing. The sale of such a misbranded product is against the law. Misleading advertisements are a serious ill issue for society that needs to be addressed. Therefore, the advertising industry requires the following laws and regulations to ensure the credibility and authenticity of the common man [211,212].

14. Recent Trends in Preservation

Scores of preservatives, whether natural/synthetic, are used in various products available in the market. A clear trend towards mild substances can be seen, particularly organic acid-based preservatives are quite popular nowadays. Preservatives are generally incorporated to ensure the safety of the product but can deteriorate the product if used inadequately. Based on several reports on the risk of sensitization associated with the use of preservatives, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products in Europe and the Cosmetic Ingredient Review in North America introduced changes in legislation to pose restrictions on their maximum permitted concentrations or even banned them in some cases [48,213]. Companies are now looking for new natural alternatives with the potential to live up to the expectations of both producers and consumers.

14.1. Controversial Preservatives

14.1.1. Parabens

Based on early assessments, parabens are classified among the oldest and most commonly used preservatives in various food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products. Parabens and their esters are generally used in topical formulations as they are chemically stable and have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity [214,215]. In recent years, as far as safety is concerned, parabens have been the most criticized among other preservatives. Parabens are accused of causing various health issues such as skin sensitization, allergic dermatitis, endocrine disruption [216], estrogenic effects, interference with male reproductive functions, breast cancer [46], the development of malignant melanoma, gestational diabetes mellitus, etc. [217,218], and their usage in products will be questioned remain a long-lasting challenge. Darbre et al., identified the presence of different paraben esters in human breast tumor tissue samples [46]. Keeping in mind the adverse effects, consumer fear, market trends, and the inclination of consumers towards organic products, manufacturers were prompted to replace paraben or lower its limit concentration in their products [219]. Even some manufacturers set a new trend to write “Paraben-free” on the product label that flourishes in the market everywhere. It is noteworthy that the use of “preservative free” on the labels is EU compliant while “paraben free” is not. For the sake of the safety of both the product and the consumer, the use of preservatives has been subjected to certain restrictions [215]. After the thorough evaluation of parabens based on a cumulative study by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) of the European Commission, the use of parabens was restricted to lower concentration limits [220]. Based on pieces of evidence related to the toxicity of parabens, the FDA approved new limits for the use of parabens, i.e., 0.1% limit concentration in foods, 0.1% for solo, and 0.3% limit concentration for a blend of the compound in pharmaceuticals [221]. In cosmetics, the concentration limit was reduced from 0.4% to 0.14% and was prohibited in the case of children’s products [215,222,223]. In countries such as Denmark, the use of parabens is illegal and deemed to be unsafe, therefore, they were banned, but in other countries including India, the use of parabens is still legal [218,224]. In cosmetics, owing to their natural origin, parabens are preferentially replaced by phenolic compounds as they are gentle, non-irritating, and do not release formaldehyde.

14.1.2. Phenoxyethanol

Phenoxyethanol (122-99-6) is an ether and aromatic alcohol with a large antimicrobial spectrum against various bacterial strains and yeast. According to European Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety Cosmetics Regulation (EC 1223/2009) [222], phenoxyethanol is authorized as a safe preservative for all consumers including children when used at a maximum concentration of 1%. Nowadays, parabens have been largely replaced by phenoxyethanol in many cosmetic formulations [225]. Keeping in mind the elevating demand for natural ingredients by the consumer, the globally recognized cosmetic brand manufacturers took the criticism seriously and introduced synergistic blends of multi-functional natural ingredients in their products. They are all set to go completely paraben-free across the full product range shortly.

14.1.3. Formaldehyde Donors

Considering the allergic skin reactions caused by using of formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM, hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, diazolidinyl urea, sodium hydroxymethyl glycinate, and quaternium-15) in various personal care products, the EU and GSO restricted their concentration limit to 0.2% w/w in all cosmetics products and 0.1% w/w for oral hygiene products. According to Annex VI of the Cosmetics Directive 76/768 EC and Gulf Technical Regulation for Safety Requirements of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products (GSO 1943/2016) [226], final products must enumerate with a word warning “contains formaldehyde” on their label containing formaldehyde or its releasers in the concentration exceeding the maximum allowable limit, i.e., 0.05% w/w [227].

14.2. Natural Preservatives

In recent years, the market trend has changed dramatically as per the consumer’s perception and acceptance of natural alternatives over synthetic ones. Consumers are interested in fresh and natural products with no added preservatives [228]. Demands have been pouring in from all quarters for natural, herbal, and organic products. In recent decades, manufacturers have adopted different efficacious methods of extending shelf life during commercialization and have gained relevance. In this context, bio-preservatives received considerable interest and have been exploited for their antimicrobial potential by researchers worldwide to extend their shelf life.

14.3. Nanotechnology in Food Preservation

In recent years, nanotechnology is the most active and fastest growing active research field with the unique ability to manipulate matter in nano dimensions and impart novel properties to the materials. Nanotechnology has numerous applications in various fields, but its role in food preservation is remarkable. Nanotechnology deals with the synthesis of various nanomaterials of different dimensions such as nanoparticles, quantum dots, nanorods, nanotubes, nanocapsules, nanoemulsions, etc. [229,230]. Owing to their physicochemical nature and antimicrobial potential, nanomaterials can offer a solution in food packaging and preservation [231,232]. In functional foods, bioactive components such as carbohydrates, proteins, and vitamins, etc. are susceptible to microbial deterioration, which ultimately leads to the degradation of food. Nanoencapsulation protects the biologically active components by providing a protective barrier against moisture and gas exchange that enables the retarding of their chemical degradation, provides stability, and facilitates their controlled release. The nanoparticles are responsible for developing mechanical and heat-resistant properties that eventually prolong the shelf life [233]. Food ingredients are prone to degradation during processing and oxidative deterioration during storage, therefore, efficient packaging systems are required to overcome this problem. When we talk about an efficient packaging system, the packing material is of paramount significance for maintaining the quality of foodstuffs. The packaging concept has been introduced to serve important functions such as product containment, presentation and convenience, preservation, quality protection, and to provide storage history of the concerned product. Food packaging provides a protective barrier to fresh fruits and vegetables against air, light, moisture, dryness, etc., thus playing a critical role in the preservation of foodstuffs. Nano packaging includes “active”, “smart”, and intelligent food packaging systems [234] such as biodegradable nanocomposites, nanoclays, and nano edible coatings on the food surface with excellent mechanical strength and barrier properties that effectively improve food durability and contribute to the shelf life of the food product. Intelligent food packaging with nano sensors to monitor the food for pathogen detection and alert consumers to the safety status of food are now in practice [235]. Edible coatings and films on the food surface are meant to be consumed with packaged food. It becomes necessary that the ingredients used in the packaging should be classified as GRAS. The applications of various nanoparticles (NPs) and nanomaterials have been briefly summarized in Table 9.

14.4. Preservation without Preservatives

When natural food is processed, by using any means, some chemicals are added, which ultimately results in the loss of its nutritional value. The processed food needs to be consumed within a limited time as many additives were added during its processing, otherwise, the food will begin to deteriorate. The deteriorated food affects the color, taste, appearance, smell, stability, and shelf life of foods badly and diminishes their nutritional value and quality characteristics [271]. To protect these properties, several preservatives are commonly used to keep the food fresh and safe from spoiling for a longer period. The inclination of consumers toward natural additives is increasing gradually [272]. Currently, researchers are left with no other option and have been rigorously looking for incorporating different additives derived from natural sources in the products. Today, we can easily find products in the market with a label indicating “No Added Preservatives” or “100% Natural”. Well, it is not always necessary to add preservatives to the finished product. There are some conditions where preservatives are not required to be added anymore, such as when there is a lack of water, when the ingredients present in the formulation are self-preserving due to their antimicrobial capabilities, when preparations were created in a single batch and are supposed to be consumed immediately in no time, and when the pH of the medium is such that it will not stand the microbial population easily, i.e., either <3 or >9.
An alternative strategy to be exercised when preservatives are indispensable in pharmaceutical preparations is to prepare a single dose and use it instantly or devise a limited amount meant to be consumed within a short period. This way, the use of preservatives in pharmaceutical preparations can be contraindicated [273]. Although fruit juices of different brands with added preservatives are available in the market, it is always better to consume freshly prepared fruit juices to avail the maximum benefits. Otherwise, carbohydrates present in the juices lead to the formation of Maillard browning products [274,275]. The premature spoilage of cosmetics products can be minimized by disinfecting the working space and containers properly, making products in small batches, storing them in a refrigerator at low temperatures, using a spatula (instead of a finger) to use the product, avoiding exposure to moisture and sunlight, etc.

14.5. Self-Preserving System

Microbial contamination is one of the major inevitable issues that needs to be addressed. Preservatives are often added to control microbial bioburden, i.e., prevent product deterioration by inhibiting microbial proliferation and sufficiently extending the shelf life of the product. The use of preservatives is found to be associated with many toxicological effects; therefore, it is preferred to add preservatives at concentration levels as low as possible. However, the inadequate level of preservatives is again of no use as it gives room to microbial contamination and makes the product susceptible to deterioration. To achieve preservation without adding preservatives, reliable and effective methods for extending the shelf life must be considered, such as the use of bio-preservatives that offer better packaging formats [276]. An alternative approach to achieve the balance between the antimicrobial efficacy and toxicological effects of antimicrobial preservatives is to include multifunctional components in the formulation, which enhance the overall antimicrobial activity of the formulation in addition to their primary function. Self-preserving systems or formulations come into the picture, in which the traditional single chemical preservatives have been replaced by other ingredients of the formulation with strong antimicrobial properties to combat microbial growth [277]. In cosmetic products, many cosmetic ingredients other than preservatives, such as alcohol, antioxidants, biomimetic phospholipids, chelating agents, fatty acids, essential oil, and surfactants, are found to possess antimicrobial properties. Ophthalmic formulations, which are generally formulated as isotonic buffered solutions, also include multifunctional ingredients in the composition to enhance the overall antimicrobial activity of the formulation. However, these multifunctional ingredients have not yet been recognized as preservatives by European regulations and are not listed in annex four of the 7th amendment of the Cosmetic Directive among officially permitted preservatives [278,279]. The production of self-preserving systems or formulations is based on the principles of “Hurdle technology” which involves the intelligent and careful combination of multifunctional ingredients, with mild individual impact, to minimize or eliminate the use of toxic chemical preservatives [280]. The principles of self-preserving technology involve a synergistic combination of preserving factors or hurdles to keep a constant check on the microbial populations and offer high quality and safety. The stringent maintenance of aseptic conditions through the strict adherence to GMP requirements, airless packing to prevent the introduction of outside microorganisms to improve preservation, and water activity is decreased to discourage the microbial growth, bio-preservatives, and pH control to decrease or minimize the proliferation rate of microbes and multipurpose antibacterial components [281]. Below are listed some multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties (Table 10) [279]:

14.6. Pulse Electric Field (PEF)

In recent years, the non-thermal processing technique, pulse electric field (PEF) emerged as an effective and potential tool in the field of food preservation and has gained popularity over conventional thermal methods of food preservation. Studies revealed that this technology enables the inactivation of microorganisms causing spoilage of the food product [282]. Wouters et al. reported that this food preservation technology involves the application of short high-voltage pulses of electricity with a short duration ranging from micro to milliseconds, generating an electric field resulting in microbial inactivation of the product (fruits, vegetables, juice, and dairy products) placed between the electrodes at a low temperature, which disrupts the cell membrane matrix of the food, thereby extending its shelf life [283]. PEF technology has a wide range of applications in various food products such as watermelon [284], blueberries [285], apple juice [286,287], red beet [288], olive paste [289], and clover sprout [290]. This technique aims to provide high-quality food to the consumer with minimal detrimental influence on the food quality. This technology is superior in keeping the sensory, nutritional, and physical attributes of the food intact [291]. Owing to its low temperature and short treatment time, the PEF technique exhibits immense potential for shelf-life extension in addition to its microbial decontamination properties [292].

15. Legislation for Food, Cosmetics, and Pharmaceutical Products around the Globe

Every nation needs effective legislation to regulate and control the formulation of various products by imposing laws and setting up guidelines for ensuring the safety of both products and consumers as well (Figure 10). Based on the safety evaluations, some restriction limits and conditions are legally being imposed by regulatory bodies or agencies throughout the world for the use of additives in the product. It is legally required that preservatives must be used in compliance with the regulations specified in the legislation to certify the safety of the finished product. Several ICH guidelines should be taken into account for the inclusion of antioxidant and antimicrobial preservatives in the product. In the EU, every additive (preservative) assigned to a code begins with the letter E followed by a three-to-four-digit number. The numbering scheme is by the International Numbering System (INS). Antimicrobial preservatives should be chemically defined and designated by the Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (RN-CAS) as determined by the Codex Alimentarius Committee [87].

15.1. Cosmetic Legislation

Cosmetic goods have a large global market around the world. Effective legislation is required to regulate the market, trade, quality of products, and safety of the user. Therefore, every nation has legislation run by regulatory authorities, having its own rules and regulations, to regulate the overall activities. Instead of understanding the regulatory aspects in different countries, we need to understand how these regulatory bodies function [293]. Among the recommended regulations worldwide, the legislation of the USA, Europe, and India receives considerable interest and their various regulatory aspects are summarized in Table 11. In the US FDA, as per the FD&C Act, a product may be regarded either as a drug, cosmetic, or (in contrast to the position in the EU) as both a drug and a cosmetic. Both the FDA and EU declare that cosmetics need not be sterile and contain specified microorganisms within restricted limits, which may not influence the product characteristics [294,295,296]. Council Directive 1223/2009 EC of Europe listed prohibited substances [297], which cannot be a part of the formulation of a cosmetic product, in Annex II, while regulated substances in which restriction limits are set for certain allowed substances, especially preservatives, are included in Annex VI. In India, cosmetic goods are regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules of 1945, in association with the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) to set the standards.

15.2. Food Legislation

Compelling food grades and governing systems are mandatory to unify quality in every facet of food production and service to encourage the production of safe and healthier food, aid advancement in international trade, and prohibit the sale of deteriorated or unsafe/fraudulent food. Therefore, the legislation needs to be updated from time to time (Table 12). Food standards are regulated at different levels such as company standards, national standards, regional standards, and international standards (Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), International Organization for Standardization (IOS), and World Trade Organization (WTO)). Food Product Standards and Food Additives (FSS) Regulations 2011 defines “preservative” as a substance capable of retarding the deterioration process of the food item. The careful implementation of laws formed by regulatory bodies reassures impartial trade practices through adherence to the basic provisions of the food law, which avoids unfair competition. The EU defines different categories of food additives and sets a list of authorized food additives and their condition of use. The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) provides a collection of various food safety standards adopted internationally. The CAC has become the single international platform, officially recognized by WTO, for different countries to develop national standards. The CAC mainly focuses on ensuring fair food trade practices and consumer health protection. Legislative bodies restrict the number of additives/preservatives to the lowest possible level allowed to be incorporated in the food product to execute its yearning effect. The chemical preservative is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) if it is covered by food additive regulations, prescribing conditions of safe use [306,307].

15.3. Pharmaceutical Legislation

Earlier the additives were assumed to be a passive part of the formulation. Based on several reports, these assumptions were put to an end when a chemical group of additives was found to interact with other ingredients of the formulation showing toxic effects. Preservatives form an indispensable part of the formulation; they have to be used in the right proportion so that they do not dominate the pharmacological action of other active ingredients. National pharmacopeias depict quality prerequisites for pharmaceutical additives. Pharmaceutical regulations comprise legal, administrative, and technical measures to ensure the safety and efficacy of the drug. To discharge their duties effectively, regulatory authorities put a great emphasis on the manufacturing of pharmaceutical products to maintain high standards without compromising the quality, efficacy, purity, and safety of the finished product at every step. The objective of drug regulatory legislation is to lay down standards for regulating pharmaceutical products through the establishment of a drug regulatory authority. The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) provides a platform that gathers the regulatory authorities of different countries (Table 13) and experts from the pharmaceutical industry to analyze various aspects of product registration. The ICH issues guidelines on the technical requirements for drug products containing new ingredients and is subjected to revision from time to time to harmonize with the lines of the WHO and US FDA protocols for maintaining regulatory obligations to protect public health [316].

16. Conclusions

It is now evident that the consumption of natural foods containing a good amount of phenolic compounds proves to be beneficial for human health as they help in minimizing the risk of some serious ailments. Polyphenolic compounds are excellent antioxidants and bio-preservatives, which made the researchers curious to explore their immense bioactive potential and are found to be useful in a wide variety of applications. Synthetic preservatives are also able to sufficiently extend the shelf life of the perishable product, although they have been reported to have many side effects with harmful impacts on our health. Keeping this in mind, we encourage the use of preservatives made from natural plant products rather than synthetic ones. As far as food items are concerned, it is always better to consume fresh food free of preservatives, if at all possible. In an attempt to rugby-tackle illegal or deceptive practices based on unsubstantial and exaggerated claims that represent a false picture of the products, regulatory agencies posed restriction limits on the use of additives around the globe to take control over these outrageous misleading advertisements and protect the common man from being duped.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R. (Priyanka Rathee), R.S., P.R. (Pooja Rathee), S.K., N.R. and A.K.; drafting the manuscript, S.K., A.K. and E.K.A.; review and editing the paper: A.K., E.K.A., G.T. and E.S.-S.; revising, A.K., E.K.A., G.T. and E.S.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carstensen, J.T.; Rhodes, C. Drug stability, revised, and expanded: Principles and practices. Inf. Health Care 2000, 213, 223. [Google Scholar]
  2. Khatkar, A.; Nanda, A.; Narasimhan, B. Preservatives-associated problems and possible alternatives. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 100–120. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anand, S.P.; Sati, N. Artificial preservatives and their harmful effects: Looking toward nature for safer alternatives. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2013, 4, 2496. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoshioka, S.; Stella, V.J. Stability of Drugs and Dosage Form. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 273–288. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aulton, M.E.; Taylor, K.M. The Design and Manufacture of Medicines; Elsevier Health Sciences: Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Singh, Y. Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutics Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. Attwood, D.; Rolland, I.P. Chemical kinetics and drug stability. Mod. Pharm. 2009, 1, 221–270. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gokoglu, N. Novel natural food preservatives and applications in seafood preservation: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pezeshk, S.; Seyed, M.O.; Alireza, A. Effect of plant antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds on the shelf-life of seafood-a review. Czech J. Food Sci. 2015, 33, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zani, F.; Minutello, A.; Maggi, L.; Mazza, P. Evaluation of preservative effectiveness in pharmaceutical products: The use of a wild strain of Pseudomonas cepacian. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 83, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khatkar, A.; Arun, N.; Balasubramanian, N. Evaluation of preservative effectiveness of ferulic acid derivatives in Aluminium Hydroxide Gel-USP. Int. J. Pharma. Sci. Res. 2013, 4, 2721–2726. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gyawali, R.; Salam, A. Natural products as antimicrobial agents. Food Control 2014, 46, 412–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loss, C.R.; Hotchkiss, J.H. Inhibition of Microbial Growth by Low-Pressure and Ambient Pressure Gases; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  14. Himoudy, I. Preservatives and their role in Pharma and Clinical Research. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Scient. Res. 2016, 2, 68–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Remize, F. The Microbiological Quality of Food: Foodborne Spoilers; Elsevier: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kong, F.; Singh, R.P. Chemical Deterioration and Physical Instability of Foods and Beverages. In The Stability and Shelf Life of Food; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 43–76. [Google Scholar]
  17. Díaz-Montes, E.; Castro-Muñoz, R. Edible films and coatings as food-quality preservers: An overview. Foods 2021, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shaikh, S.M.; Doijad, R.C.; Shete, A.S.; Sankpal, P.S. A Review on: Preservatives used in Pharmaceuticals and impacts on Health. Pharma. Tutor. 2016, 4, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Brul, S.; Coote, P. Preservative agents in foods: Mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Meyer, B.K.; Ni, A.; Hu, B.; Shi, L. Antimicrobial preservative use in parenteral products: Past and present. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2007, 96, 3155–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rico, D.; Martin-Diana, A.B.; Barat, J.M.; Barry-Ryan, C. Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Varraso, R.; Camargo, C.A. Processed meat consumption and lung health: More evidence for harm. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 43, 943–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Etemadi, A.; Sinha, R.; Ward, M.H.; Graubard, B.I.; Inoue-Choi, M.; Dawsey, S.M.; Abnet, C.C. Mortality from different causes associated with meat, heme iron, nitrates, and nitrites in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: Population based cohort study. BMJ 2017, 357, j1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Halla, N.; Fernandes, I.P.; Heleno, S.A.; Costa, P.; Boucherit-Otmani, Z.; Boucherit, K.; Rodrigues, A.E.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barreiro, M.F. Cosmetics preservation: A review on present strategies. Molecules 2018, 23, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Barel, A.O.; Paye, M.; Maibach, H. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Siemer, E. Preparations for Cleansing and Caring for Blemished Skin. In Cosmetics and Toiletries-Development, Production and Use; Umbach, W., Ed.; Ellis Horwood: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 124–128. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sedlewicz, L.B. Cosmetic preservatives: Friend or foe? Skinmed. J. 2005, 4, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bilal, M.; Mehmood, S.; Iqbal, H.M.N. The beast of beauty: Environmental and health concerns of toxic components in cosmetics. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. De Groot, A.C.; White, I.R.; Flyvholm, M.A.; Lensen, G.; Coenraads, P.J. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: Relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy: Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Dermat. 2010, 62, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Anusree, V.; Rasheed, S.P.; Mohammed, B.K.P.; Thasleena, V.P.; Parvathy, S.L.; Khais, M. Identification and quantification of DMDM Hydantoin in selected shampoos. Der Pharma Chemica 2020, 12, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  31. Russell, K.; Jacob, S.E. Sodium hydroxymethylglycinate. Dermatitis 2010, 21, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Borisova-Jan, L.; Jönsson, S.; Fransson, D.; Tammela, M.; Johansson, M. Screening Procedure for Determination of Preservatives in Commercial Skin-Care Products; Läkemedelsverket, The Swedish Medicines Agency: Uppsala, Sweden, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  33. Siti, Z. Hazardous ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products and health concern: A review. J. Public Health Res. 2015, 5, 7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ho, C.Y.; Wu, M.C.; Lan, M.Y.; Tan, C.T.; Yang, A.H. In vitro effects of preservatives in nasal sprays on human nasal epithelial cells. Am. J. Rhinol. 2008, 22, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Świercz, R.; Hałatek, T.; Wąsowicz, W.; Kur, B.; Grzelińska, Z.; Majcherek, W. Pulmonary irritation after inhalation exposure to benzalkonium chloride in rats. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2008, 21, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiong, C.; Chen, D.; Liu, J.; Liu, B.; Li, N.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, X.; Ma, P.; Ye, C.; Ge, J.; et al. A rabbit dry eye model induced by topical medication of a preservative benzalkonium chloride. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 1850–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Mullapudi, S.; Siletzky, R.M.; Kathariou, S. Heavy-metal and benzalkonium chloride resistance of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from the environment of turkey-processing plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1464–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ferk, F.; Mišík, M.; Hoelzl, C.; Uhl, M.; Fuerhacker, M.; Grillitsch, B.; Parzefall, W.; Narseyan, A.; Micieta, K.; Grummt, T.; et al. Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and dimethyldioctadecyl-ammonium bromide (DDAB), two common quaternary ammonium compounds, cause genotoxic effects in mammalian and plant cells at environmentally relevant concentrations. Mutagenesis 2007, 22, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hagele, T.J.; Mazerik, J.N.; Gregory, A.; Kaufman, B.; Magalang, U.; Kuppusamy, M.L.; Marsh, C.B.; Kuppusamy, P.; Parinandi, N.L. Mercury activates vascular endothelial cell phospholipase D through thiols and oxidative stress. Int. J. Toxicol. 2007, 26, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dracopoulos, A.; Dixon, D.G.; Jones, L.W.; Sivak, J.G.; Bantseev, V. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: Interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-HEMA–containing hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2007, 33, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deutschle, T.; Porkert, U.; Reiter, R.; Keck, T.; Riechelmann, H. In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of benzalkonium chloride. Toxicol. Vitro 2006, 20, 1472–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Baudouin, C.; Labbé, A.; Liang, H.; Pauly, A.; Brignole-Baudouin, F. Preservatives in eyedrops: The good, the bad and the ugly. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 312–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Suzuki, D. The “Dirty Dozen” ingredients investigated in the David Suzuki Foundation Survey of chemicals in cosmetics. Backgrounder 2010, 2010, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sasseville, D. Hypersensitivity to preservatives. Dermatol. Ther. 2004, 17, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fan, X.; Kubwabo, C.; Rasmussen, P.; Jones-Otazo, H. Simultaneous quantitation of parabens, triclosan, and methyl triclosan in indoor house dust using solid phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Environ. Monitoring 2010, 12, 1891–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Darbre, P.D.; Aljarrah, A.; Miller, W.R.; Coldham, N.G.; Sauer, M.J.; Pope, G.S. Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2004, 24, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tavares, R.S.; Martins, F.C.; Oliveira, P.J.; Ramalho-Santos, J.; Peixoto, F.P. Parabens in male infertility-Is there a mitochondrial connection? Reprod. Toxicol. 2009, 27, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lundov, M.D.; Moesby, L.; Zachariae, C.; Johansen, J.D. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: A review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermat. 2009, 60, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, J.D.; Lee, J.Y.; Kwack, S.J.; Shin, C.Y.; Jang, H.J.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, M.K.; Seo, D.W.; Lee, B.M.; Kim, K.B. Risk assessment of triclosan, a cosmetic preservative. Toxicol. Res. 2019, 35, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Davison, J.; Maillard, J.Y.; Pagès, J.M. Opinion on Triclosan–Antimicrobial Resistance; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  51. Silva, E.A.; Bosco, M.R.M.; Lozano, R.R.; Latini, A.C.P.; de Souza, V.N.B. High rate of sensitization to Kathon CG, detected by patch tests in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. An. Bras. De Dermatol. 2020, 95, 94–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Isaacs, T. Skin hypersensitivity reactions to preservatives: Allergies in the workplace. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 25, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  53. Burnett, C.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Klassen, C.D. Final report of the safety assessment of methylisothiazolinone. Int. J. Toxicol. 2010, 29, 187S–213S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Scherrer, M.A.R.; Rocha, V.B. Increasing trend of sensitization to Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI). An. Bras. Dermatol. 2014, 89, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Statham, B.N.; Smith, E.V.; Bodger, O.G.; Green, C.M.; King, C.M.; Ormerod, A.D.; Sansom, J.E.; English, J.S.C.; Wilkinson, M.S.; Gawkrodger, D.J.; et al. Concomitant contact allergy to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Contact Dermat. 2010, 62, 56–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. SCCNFP/587/02; Opinion Concerning on Clarification on the Formaldehyde and Para-Formaldehyde Entry in Directive 76/768/EEC on Cosmetic Products. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the 22nd Plenary Meeting of 17 December 2002. European Commision: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
  57. Mutter, J.; Yeter, D. Kawasaki’s disease, acrodynia, and mercury. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 3000–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eke, D.; Celik, A. Genotoxicity of thimerosal in cultured human lymphocytes with and without metabolic activation sister chromatid exchange analysis proliferation index and mitotic index. Toxicol. Vitr. 2008, 22, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Berman, R.F.; Pessah, I.; Mouton, P.; Mav, D.; Harry, J. Low-level neonatal thimerosal exposure: Further evaluation of altered neurotoxic potential in SJL mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 101, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Park, E.K.; Mak, S.K.; Kültz, D.; Hammock, B.D. Evaluation of cytotoxicity attributed to thimerosal on murine and human kidney cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2007, 70, 2092–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, S.I.; Huang, C.C.; Huang, C.J.; Wang, B.W.; Chang, P.M.; Fang, Y.C.; Chen, W.C.; Wang, J.L.; Lu, Y.C.; Chu, S.T.; et al. Thimerosal-induced apoptosis in human SCM1 gastric cancer cells: Activation of p38 MAP kinase and caspase-3 pathways without involvement of [Ca2+] i elevation. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 100, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Nguyen, D.Q.; Srinivasan, S.; Hiscott, P.; Kaye, S.B. Thimerosal-induced limbal stem cell failure: Report of a case and review of the literature. Eye Contact Lens 2007, 33, 196–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dorea, J.G. Exposure to mercury during the first six months via human milk and vaccines: Modifying risk factors. Am. J. Perinatol. 2007, 24, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bigham, M.; Copes, R. Thiomersal in vaccines. Drug Saf. 2005, 28, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Knezevic, I.; Griffiths, E.; Reigel, F.; Dobbelaer, R. Thiomersal in vaccines: A regulatory perspective-WHO Consultation, Geneva, 15–16 April 2002. Vaccine 2004, 22, 1836–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chang, Y.S.; Wu, C.L.; Tseng, S.H.; Kuo, P.Y.; Tseng, S.Y. In vitro benzyl alcohol cytotoxicity: Implications for intravitreal use of triamcinolone acetonide. Exp. Eye Res. 2008, 86, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bitter, C.; Suter, K.; Figueiredo, V.; Pruente, C.; Hatz, K. Preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide suspension developed for intravitreal injection. J. Ocular. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 24, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Kaur, I.P.; Lal, S.; Rana, C.; Kakkar, S.; Singh, H. Ocular preservatives: Associated risks and newer options. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 2009, 28, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Curry, E.J.; Warshaw, E.M. Benzyl alcohol allergy: Importance of patch testing with personal products. Dermatitis 2005, 16, 203–208. [Google Scholar]
  70. Langsrud, S.; Steinhauer, K.; Lüthje, S.; Weber, K.; Goroncy-Bermes, P.; Holck, A.L. Ethylhexylglycerin impairs membrane integrity and enhances the lethal effect of phenoxyethanol. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Aerts, O.; Verhulst, L.; Goossens, A. Ethylhexylglycerin: A low-risk, but highly relevant, sensitizer in ‘hypo-allergenic’cosmetics. Contact Derm. 2016, 74, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dorschner, R.A.; Shaw, D.W. Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylhexylglycerin. Dermatitis 2012, 23, 134. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wineski, L.E.; English, A.W. Phenoxyethanol as a nontoxic preservative in the dissection laboratory. Cells Tissues Organs 1989, 136, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). Opinion on Phenoxyethanol, 16 March 2016, Final Version of 6 October 2016. SCCS/1575/16. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_195.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2019).
  75. Aranzabal, M.A.; Arruti, N.; Joral, A.; Lasa, E.M.; Martínez, S.; Echenagusia, M.A. Contact urticaria caused by phenoxyethanol in ultrasound gel. Contact Derm. 2019, 81, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dréno, B.; Zuberbier, T.; Gelmetti, C.; Gontijo, G.; Marinovich, M. Safety review of phenoxyethanol when used as a preservative in cosmetics. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019, 33, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Leikin, J.B.; Paloucek, F.P. Chlorhexidine Gluconate. In Poisoning and Toxicology Handbook; In Informa: Abingdon, UK, 2008; pp. 183–184. [Google Scholar]
  78. Lai, P.; Coulson, C.; Pothier, D.D.; Rutka, J. Chlorhexidine ototoxicity in ear surgery, part 1: Review of the literature. J. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2011, 40, 437–440. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hirata, K.; Kurokawa, A. Chlorhexidine gluconate ingestion resulting in fatal respiratory distress syndrome. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 2002, 44, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  80. Ahmad, I.; Sheraz, M.A.; Ahmed, S.; Shaikh, R.H.; Vaid, F.H.M.; Ansari, S.A. Photostability and interaction of ascorbic acid in cream formulations. Aaps. Pharmscitech. 2011, 12, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Sheraz, M.A.; Khan, M.F.; Ahmed, S.; Kazi, S.H.; Ahmad, I. Stability and stabilization of ascorbic acid. Househ. Pers. Care Today 2015, 10, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sheraz, M.A.; Khan, M.F.; Ahmed, S.; Kazi, S.H.; Rehman Khattak, S.; Ahmad, I. Factors affecting formulation characteristics and stability of ascorbic acid in water-in-oil creams. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2014, 36, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tfouni, S.A.V.; Toledo, M.C.F. Determination of benzoic and sorbic acids in Brazilian food. Food Control. 2002, 13, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. World Health Organization. Benzoic Acid and Sodium Benzoate; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  85. Anyasi, T.A.; Jideani, A.I.O.; Edokpayi, J.N.; Anokwuru, C.P. Application of Organic Acids. In Food Preservation, Organic Acids, Characteristics, Properties and Synthesis; Vargas, C., Ed.; Nova Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  86. Marz, U. World Markets for Citric, Ascorbic and Isoascorbic Acids: Highlighting Antioxidants in Food; Business Communications Company: Ridgeland, MS, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  87. Silva, M.M.; Lidon, F. Food preservatives–An overview on applications and side effects. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 28, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Richter, E.; Wick, A.; Ternes, T.A.; Coors, A. Ecotoxicity of climbazole, a fungicide contained in antidandruff shampoo. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013, 32, 2816–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Wesgate, R.; Menard-Szczebara, F.; Khodr, A.; Cupferman, S.; Maillard, J.Y. Hydroxyethoxy phenyl butanone, a new cosmetic preservative, does not cause bacterial cross-resistance to antimicrobials. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Bernauer, U.; Bodin, L.; Celleno, L.; Chaudhry, Q. SCCS Opinion on Ethylzingerone–‘Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’ (HEPB) (Cosmetics Europe No P98). 2016. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2018-03/sccs_o_203_0.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  91. Zhang, Y.; Ying, D.; Liu, H.; Yu, Z.; Han, L.; Xie, J.; Xie, Y. Serum pharmacokinetics and coagulation aberration induced by sodium dehydroacetate in male and female Wistar rats. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Foti, C.; Romita, P.; Ettorre, G.; Angelini, G.; Bonamo, D. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by resorcinol and sodium dehydroacetate in a patient with leg ulcers. Contact Derm. 2016, 74, 383–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. EFSA European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of erythorbic acid (E 315) and sodium erythorbate (E 316) as food additives. EFSA J. 2016, 14, 4360. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rahman, M.; Rashid, O.H.; Bhadra, S.; Rouf, A.S. Development and Validation of Colorimetric and RP-HPLC Methods for the Determination of Formaldehyde in Cosmetics. Am. Chem. Sci. J. 2015, 5, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sharma, S. Food preservatives and their harmful effects. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2015, 5, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  96. Baig, S.K.M.S.; Kasim, S.S. Study of Harmful Effects of Consuming Food Additives and Public Awareness. IJSRST 2018, 2, 1071–1074. [Google Scholar]
  97. WHO. Food Irradiation: A Technique for Preserving and Improving the Safety of Food; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  98. Kovanda, L.; Zhang, W.; Wei, X.; Luo, J.; Wu, X.; Atwill, E.R.; Vaessen, S.; Li, X.; Liu, Y. In vitro antimicrobial activities of organic acids and their derivatives on several species of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Molecules 2019, 24, 3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Gómez-García, M.; Sol, C.; de Nova, P.J.G.; Puyalto, M.; Mesas, L.; Puente, H.; Mencía-Ares, O.; Miranda, R.; Argüello, H.; Rubio, P.; et al. Antimicrobial activity of a selection of organic acids, their salts and essential oils against swine enteropathogenic bacteria. Porc. Health Manag. 2019, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Zapaśnik, A.; Sokołowska, B.; Bryła, M. Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Preservation and Safety. Foods 2022, 11, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hassan, R.A.; Sand, M.I.; El-Kadi Sh, M. Effect of some organic acids on fungal growth and their toxins production. J. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 2012, 3, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Trček, J.; Mira, N.P.; Jarboe, L.R. Adaptation and tolerance of bacteria against acetic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 6215–6229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Levine, A.S.; Fellers, C.R. Action of acetic acid on food spoilage microorganisms. J. Bacteriol. 1940, 39, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Hietala, J.; Vuori, A.; Johnsson, P.; Pollari, I.; Reutemann, W.; Kieczka, H. Formic acid. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  105. Alakomi, H.L.; Skytta, E.; Saarela, M.; Mattila-Sandholm, T.; Latva-Kala, K.; Helander, I.M. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2001–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Shamloo, E.; Hosseini, H.; Abdi Moghadam, Z.; Halberg Larsen, M.; Haslberger, A.; Alebouyeh, M. Importance of Listeria monocytogenes in food safety: A review of its prevalence, detection, and antibiotic resistance. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 20, 241. [Google Scholar]
  107. Mcclure, N.B. The Effect of Lactate on Nitrite in a Cured Meat System. Ph.D. Thesis, Lowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  108. USDA. Technical Evaluation Report Compiled by OMRI for the USDA National Organic Program, Lactic Acid, Sodium Lactate, and Potassium Lactate, Handling/Processing; Technical Evaluation Report; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 17 February 2015.
  109. Adler, G.K.; Hornik, E.S.; Murray, G.; Bhandari, S. Acute effects of the food preservative propionic acid on glucose metabolism in humans. BMJ Open Diabet. Res. Care 2021, 9, e002336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Directive 2008/7/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2008; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2008.
  111. Naveed, N. The perils of cosmetics. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2014, 6, 338. [Google Scholar]
  112. Dhillon, G.S.; Kaur, S.; Pulicharla, R.; Brar, S.K.; Cledón, M.; Verma, M.; Surampalli, R.Y. Triclosan: Current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 5657–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Younes, M. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food); Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 520–523. [Google Scholar]
  114. Lien, E.L. Toxicology and safety of DHA. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2009, 81, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Carocho, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C. Antioxidants: Reviewing the chemistry, food applications, legislation and role as preservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 71, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. EFSA. EFSA Panel on Food additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC, E 242) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4319. [Google Scholar]
  117. Yu, Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, G.; Zou, B. Effect of high pressure homogenization and dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) on microbial and physicochemical qualities of mulberry juice. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Costa, A.; Barata, A.; Malfeito-Ferreira, M.; Loureiro, V. Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) against wine microorganisms. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Katdare, A.; Chaubal, M. Excipient Development for Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and Drug Delivery Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  120. Beringer, P. Remington the Science & Practice of Pharmacy; Lippincott Williams: Philadelphia, PE, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  121. Fahelelbom, K.M.S.; El-Shabrawy, Y. Analysis of preservatives in pharmaceutical products. Pharm. Rev. 2007, 5, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  122. Freeman, P.D.; Kahook, M.Y. Preservatives in topical ophthalmic medications: Historical and clinical perspectives. Exp. Rev. Ophthalmol. 2009, 4, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Boimer, C.; Birt, C.M. Preservative exposure and surgical outcomes in glaucoma patients: The PESO study. J. Glaucoma 2013, 22, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Goto, Y.; Ibaraki, N.; Miyake, K. Human lens epithelial cell damage and stimulation of their secretion of chemical mediators by benzalkonium chloride rather than latanoprost and timolol. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003, 121, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Sarkar, R. Effects of preservatives used in ocular medications on the eye: A comparative review. Ophthalmol. J. 2021, 6, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Graf, P. Benzalkonium chloride as a preservative in nasal solutions: Re-examining the data. Resp. Med. 2001, 95, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Celestino, M.T.; Magalhães, U.O.; Fraga, A.G.M.; Carmo, F.A.; Lione, V.; Castro, H.C.; de Sousa, V.P.; Rodrigues, C.R.; Cabral, L.M. Rational use of antioxidants in solid oral pharmaceutical preparations. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 48, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Özgür, M.; Kalaycioğlu, Z.; Dülger, Ö. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of phenolic antioxidant (BHA and BHT) concentrations in pharmaceutical preparations and chewing gums using the H-point standard addition method. Maced. J. Chem. Chem Eng. 2017, 36, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Felter, S.P.; Zhang, X.; Thompson, C. Butylated hydroxyanisole: Carcinogenic food additive to be avoided or harmless antioxidant important to protect food supply? Regul. Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021, 121, 104887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Tade, R.S.; More, M.P.; Chatap, V.K.; Deshmukh, P.K.; Patil, P.O. Safety and toxicity assessment of parabens in pharmaceutical and food products. Invent Rapid Pharm. Pract. 2018, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  131. Pugazhendhi, D.; Pope, G.S.; Darbre, P.D. Oestrogenic activity of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (common metabolite of paraben esters) and methylparaben in human breast cancer cell lines. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2005, 25, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Latorre, N.; Silvestre, J.F.; Monteagudo, A.F. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 2011, 102, 86–97. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gołoś, A.; Lutyńska, A. Thiomersal-containing vaccines–a review of the current state of knowledge. Przegl Epidemiol. 2015, 69, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  134. Kracke, G.; Landrum, A. Chlorobutanol, a pharmaceutical preservative and sedative hypnotic, inhibits brain type voltage gated sodium channels. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, 421a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization and World Health Organization. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (meeting held in Geneva, Switzerland) Seventy-fourth Report; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 978. [Google Scholar]
  136. Nair, B. Final report on the safety assessment of Benzyl Alcohol, Benzoic Acid, and Sodium Benzoate. Int. J. Toxicol. 2001, 20, 23–50. [Google Scholar]
  137. Scognamiglio, J.; Jones, L.; Vitale, D.; Letizia, C.S.; Api, A.M. Fragrance material review on benzyl alcohol. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 140–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. European Medicines Agency. Benzyl Alcohol and Benzoic Acid Group Used as Excipients; EMA/CHMP/272866/2013; European Medicines Agency: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 2–16.
  139. Vogt, T.; Landthaler, M.; Stolz, W. Generalized eczema in an 18-month-old boy due to phenoxyethanol in DPT vaccine. Contact Derm. 1998, 38, 50–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Lowe, I.; Southern, J. The antimicrobial activity of phenoxyethanol in vaccines. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1994, 18, 115–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Komatsu, E.; Yamazaki, H.; Abe, K.; Iyama, S.; Oishi, M.; Sato, T.; Yoshino, C.; Hashimoto, H.; Watanabe, M.; Nagai, M. Influence of temperature on the efficacy of 2-phenoxyethanol as a preservative for adsorbed diphtheria-purified pertussis-tetanus combined vaccine. J. Health Sci. 2002, 48, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Hoang, T.P.N.; Ghori, M.U.; Conway, B.R. Topical antiseptic formulations for skin and soft tissue infections. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). Opinion on the Safety of Poly (Hexamethylene) Biguanide Hydrochloride or Polyaminopropyl Biguanide (PHMB) in Cosmetic Products, 18 June 2014, SCCS/1535/14, Revision of 16 December 2014, 2nd Revision of 13 July 2015. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_157.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2020).
  144. Anupama, S.; Sharma, P.K.; Garima, G. Natural products as preservatives. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2010, 1, 612. [Google Scholar]
  145. Sharif, Z.I.M.; Mustapha, F.A.; Jai, J.; Yusof, N.; Zaki, N.A.M. Review on methods for preservation and natural preservatives for extending the food longevity. Chem. Eng. Res. Bull. 2017, 19, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Robbins, R.J. Phenolic acids in foods: An overview of analytical methodology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2866–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ignat, I.; Volf, I.; Popa, V.I. A critical review of methods for characterisation of polyphenolic compounds in fruits and vegetables. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 1821–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Teodoro, G.R.; Ellepola, K.; Seneviratne, C.J.; Koga-Ito, C.Y. Potential use of phenolic acids as anti-Candida agents: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Pereira, D.M.; Valentão, P.; Pereira, J.A.; Andrade, P.B. Phenolics: From chemistry to biology. Molecules 2009, 14, 2202–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Chong, K.P.; Rossall, S.; Atong, M. In vitro antimicrobial activity and fungitoxicity of syringic acid, caffeic acid and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid against Ganoderma boninense. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Croft, K.D. The chemistry and biological effects of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 854, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Yang, C.S.; Landau, J.M.; Huang, M.T.; Newmark, H.L. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by dietary polyphenolic compounds. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 2001, 21, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Khadem, S.; Marles, R.J. Monocyclic phenolic acids; hydroxy-and polyhydroxybenzoic acids: Occurrence and recent bioactivity studies. Molecules 2010, 15, 7985–8005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lafay, S.; Gil-Izquierdo, A. Bioavailability of phenolic acids. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Clifford, M.N. Chlorogenic acids and other cinnamates–nature, occurrence and dietary burden. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 362–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Tsao, R.; Deng, Z. Separation procedures for naturally occurring antioxidant phytochemicals. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 812, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Embuscado, M.E. Spices and herbs: Natural sources of antioxidants—A mini review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Campêlo, M.C.S.; Medeiros, J.M.S.; Silva, J.B.A. Natural products in food preservation. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  159. Rice-Evans, C.A.; Miller, N.J.; Paganga, G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1996, 20, 933–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hobson, C.; Chan, A.N.; Wright, G.D. The antibiotic resistome: A guide for the discovery of natural products as antimicrobial agents. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 3464–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Link, K.P.; Angell, H.R.; Walker, J.C. The isolation of protocatechuic acid from pigmented onion scales and its significance in relation to disease resistance in onions. J. Biol. Chem. 1929, 81, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Brito, T.B.N.; Lima, L.R.S.; Santos, M.C.B.; Moreira, R.F.A.; Cameron, L.C.; Fai, A.E.C.; Ferreira, M.S.L. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, volatile and phenolic profiles of cabbage-stalk and pineapple-crown flour revealed by GC-MS and UPLC-MSE. Food Chem. 2021, 339, 127882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Jiang, Y.; Fang, Z.; Leonard, W.; Zhang, P. Phenolic compounds in Lycium berry: Composition, health benefits and industrial applications. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 77, 104340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Manach, C.; Scalbert, A.; Morand, C.; Rémésy, C.; Jiménez, L. Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 727–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Puupponen-Pimiä, R.; Nohynek, L.; Meier, C.; Kähkönen, M.; Heinonen, M.; Hopia, A.; Oksman-Caldentey, K.M. Antimicrobial properties of phenolic compounds from berries. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 90, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Alasalvar, C.; Grigor, J.M.; Zhang, D.; Quantick, P.C.; Shahidi, F. Comparison of volatiles, phenolics, sugars, antioxidant vitamins, and sensory quality of different colored carrot varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Potter, A.S.; Foroudi, S.; Stamatikos, A.; Patil, B.S.; Deyhim, F. Drinking carrot juice increases total antioxidant status and decreases lipid peroxidation in adults. Nutr. J. 2011, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Gachkar, L.; Yadegari, D.; Rezaei, M.B.; Taghizadeh, M.; Astaneh, S.A.; Rasooli, I. Chemical and biological characteristics of Cuminum cyminum and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mayachiew, P.; Devahastin, S. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Indian gooseberry and galangal extracts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Inglett, G.E.; Rose, D.J.; Chen, D.; Stevenson, D.G.; Biswas, A. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of extracts from whole buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Möench) with or without microwave irradiation. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1216–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Morishita, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Degi, K. The contribution of polyphenols to antioxidative activity in common buckwheat and tartary buckwheat grain. Plant Prod. Sci. 2007, 10, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Deleu, C.Q.; Gressier, B.; Vasseur, J.; Dine, T.; Brunet, C.; Luyckx, M.; Cazin, M.; Cazin, J.C.; Bailleul, F.; Trotin, F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 72, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Taie, H.A.A.; El-Mergawi, R.; Radwan, S. Isoflavonoids, flavonoids, phenolic acids profiles and antioxidant activity of soybean seeds as affected by organic and bioorganic fertilization. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2008, 4, 207–213. [Google Scholar]
  174. Boyer, J.; Liu, R.H. Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits. Nutr. J. 2004, 3, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Abdullah, N.; Zulkifli, K.S.; Abdullah, A.; Aziman, N.; Saidatul, S.W.K.W. Assessment on the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of selected fruit peels. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2012, 4, 1534–1542. [Google Scholar]
  176. Heleno, S.A.; Martins, A.; Queiroz, M.J.R.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Bioactivity of phenolic acids: Metabolites versus parent compounds: A review. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Pokorny, J.; Yanishlieva, N.; Gordon, M.H. Antioxidants in Food: Practical Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  178. Hudson, E.A.; Dinh, P.A.; Kokubun, T.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; Gescher, A. Characterization of potentially chemopreventive phenols in extracts of brown rice that inhibit the growth of human breast and colon cancer cells. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prevent. 2000, 9, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar]
  179. Parashar, A.; Badal, S. Pomegranate juice is potentially better than orange juice in improving antioxidant function in elderly subjects. Elixir Food Sci. J. 2011, 32, 2068–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Khanduja, K.L.; Gandhi, R.K.; Pathania, V.; Syal, N. Prevention of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced lung tumorigenesis by ellagic acid and quercetin in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999, 37, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Swami, S.B.; Thakor, N.S.J.; Patil, M.M.; Haldankar, P.M. Jamun (Syzygium cumini (L.)): A review of its food and medicinal uses. Food Nutr. Sci. 2012, 3, 1100–1117. [Google Scholar]
  182. De, S.; Chakraborty, J.; Chakraborty, R.N.; Das, S. Chemopreventive activity of quercetin during carcinogenesis in cervix uteri in mice. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wu, G.; Chang, C.; Hong, C.; Zhang, H.; Huang, J.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Phenolic compounds as stabilizers of oils and antioxidative mechanisms under frying conditions: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 92, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Canan, C.; Delaroza, F.; Casagrande, R.; Baracat, M.M.; Shimokomaki, M.; Ida, E.I. Antioxidant capacity of phytic acid purified from rice bran. Acta Sci. Technol. 2012, 34, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Vaher, M.; Matso, K.; Levandi, T.; Helmja, K.; Kaljurand, M. Phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the bran, flour and whole grain of different wheat varieties. Procedia Chem. 2010, 2, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Yang, J.; Martinson, T.E.; Liu, R.H. Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities of wine grapes. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Xia, E.Q.; Deng, G.F.; Guo, Y.J.; Li, H.B. Biological activities of polyphenols from grapes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 622–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Martillanes, S.; Rocha-Pimienta, J.; Cabrera-Bañegil, M.; Martín-Vertedor, D.; Delgado-Adámez, J. Application of Phenolic Compounds for Food Preservation: Food Additive and Active Packaging, Phenolic Compounds–Biological Activity; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 39–58. [Google Scholar]
  189. Phan, K.; Van Den Broeck, E.; Van Speybroeck, V.; De Clerck, K.; Raes, K.; De Meester, S. The potential of anthocyanins from blueberries as a natural dye for cotton: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 176, 108180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. PJ Garrido, E.M.; Cerqueira, A.S.; Chavarria, D.; Silva, T.; Borges, F.; MPJ Garrido, J. Microencapsulation of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and caffeic acid phenethyl amide by inclusion in hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Food Chem. 2018, 254, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ge, J.; Yue, P.; Chi, J.; Liang, J.; Gao, X. Formation and stability of anthocyanins-loaded nanocomplexes prepared with chitosan hydrochloride and carboxymethyl chitosan. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 74, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Yong, H.; Kan, J.; Jin, C. Recent advances in flavonoid-grafted polysaccharides: Synthesis, structural characterization, bioactivities and potential applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 1011–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. de Araújo, F.F.; de Paulo Farias, D.; Neri-Numa, I.A.; Pastore, G.M. Polyphenols and their applications: An approach in food chemistry and innovation potential. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Alimentarius, C. General standard for food additives CODEX STAN 192-1995, adopted in 1995, revision 2015; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995; Volume 36. [Google Scholar]
  195. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Gazette Notification No. Stds/Additives-1/Notification/FSSAI/2018 dated 16 Sep. 2020 on Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Seventh Amendment Regulations, 2020 to amend regulations 3.1 and Appendix A; Food Safety and Standards Authority of India: New Delhi, India, 2020.
  196. Food Safety and Standards. Food Products Standards and Food Additives Regulations, 2011; FSSAI: New Delhi, India, 2020.
  197. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 of 25 March 2010 setting up a programme for the re-evaluation of approved food additives in accordance with Regulation No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on food additives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 80, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  198. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March 2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J. Eur. Union 2012, 83, 1–295. [Google Scholar]
  199. Saltmarsh, M.; Saltmarsh, M. Essential Guide to Food Additives; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  200. Bernauer, U.; Bodin, L.; Chaudry, Q.; Coenraads, P.J.; Dusinka, M.; Ezendam, J.; Gaffet, E. Addendum to the Scientific Opinions on Climbazole (P64)/Ref. SCCS/1506/13 and SCCS/1590/1-Latest Edition SCCS/1600/18–Final Version; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019; p. 13. ISBN 978-92-76-00240-6. ISSN 1831-4767.
  201. Bernauer, U.; Bodin, L.; Chaudhry, Q.; Coenraads, P.J.; Dusinska, M.; Ezendam, E. Scientific Committee of Consumer Safety. 2017. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS)–Final version of the opinion on Ethylzingerone-‘Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’(HEPB)-Cosmetics Europe No P98-in cosmetic products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018, 88, 330–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Modi, N.; Ramarao, P. Misleading advertisements. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 2019, 6, 569–576. [Google Scholar]
  203. Hasan, U.; Noida, G.; Nasreen, R. An analysis of Policies pertaining to Deceptive advertising and Consumer protection mechanism in India. Int. J. Res. Analytic. Rev. 2018, 5, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar]
  204. Nuseir, M.T. Impact of misleading/false advertisement to consumer behaviour. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res. 2018, 16, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Morris, L.A. Manufacturer Standards for Communicating Pharmaceutical Risks and Benefits. In Improving Drug Safety—A Joint Responsibility; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  206. World Health Organization & Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Evaluation of certain contaminants in food: Eighty-third report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  207. Girimaji, P. Misleading Advertisements and Consumer; Consumer Education Monograph Series 2; Centre for Consumer Studies Indian Institute of Public Administration: New Delhi, India, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  208. Karn, R. Unfair Trade Practices. Int. J. Law Manag. Humanit. 2021, 4, 1945. [Google Scholar]
  209. Gupta, A.; Chandra, K. Misleading Drug Advertisements: Busting the Myth and Protecting Consumers. Jus Corpus Law J. 2020, 1, 235. [Google Scholar]
  210. European Parliament. Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 Concerning Misleading and Comparative Advertising, Art. 2 (a)–Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV v. Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2006; 44, p. 991. [Google Scholar]
  211. Raju, T.M. Advertising regulations in India. J. Stud. Manag. Plan. 2018, 4, 265–267. [Google Scholar]
  212. García-Nieto, M.T.; Gonzálvez-Vallés, J.E.; Viñarás-Abad, M. Social Responsibility and Misleading Advertising of Health Products on the Radio. The Opinion of the Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021, 18, 6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Pastor-Nieto, M.A.; Alcántara-Nicolás, F.; Melgar-Molero, V.; Pérez-Mesonero, R.; Vergara-Sánchez, A.; Martín-Fuentes, A.; González-Muñoz, P.; de Eusebio-Murillo, E. Preservatives in personal hygiene and cosmetic products, topical medications, and household cleaners in Spain. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 2017, 108, 758–770. (In English) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Petric, Z.; Ružić, J.; Žuntar, I. The controversies of parabens–an overview nowadays. Acta Pharm. 2021, 71, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Torfs, E.; Brackman, G. A perspective on the safety of parabens as preservatives in wound care products. Int. Wound J. 2021, 18, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Karwacka, A.; Zamkowska, D.; Radwan, M.; Jurewicz, J. Exposure to modern, widespread environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals and their effect on the reproductive potential of women: An overview of current epidemiological evidence. Hum. Fertil. 2019, 22, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Liu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Sun, X.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhao, H.; Xia, W.; Li, Y.; et al. Parabens exposure in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Garner, N.; Siol, A.; Eilks, I. Parabens as preservatives in personal care products. Chem. Action. 2014, 103, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  219. Sasseville, D.; Alfalah, M.; Lacroix, J.P. Parabenoia debunked, or who’s afraid of parabens? Dermatitis 2015, 26, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). Opinion on Propylparaben (CAS No 94-13-3, EC No 202-307-7), Preliminary Version of 27-28 October 2020, Final Version of 30-31 March 2021, SCCS/1623/20; SCCS: Luxembourg, 28 October 2022.
  221. Nowak, K.; Ratajczak–Wrona, W.; Górska, M.; Jabłońska, E. Parabens and their effects on the endocrine system. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2018, 474, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the european parliament and of the council. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 342, 59. [Google Scholar]
  223. Wei, F.; Mortimer, M.; Cheng, H.; Sang, N.; Guo, L.H. Parabens as chemicals of emerging concern in the environment and humans: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). Clarification on Opinion SCCS/1348/10 in the Light of the Danish Clause of Safeguard Banning the Use of Parabens in Cosmetic Products Intended for Children under Three Years of Age, 10 October 2011. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_069.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2020).
  225. Agrawal, A.; Pandwar, U.; Pandya, N. Are phenoxyethanol products safe for babies?–A review of current evidences. Indian J. Child Health 2022, 6, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. GSO 1943:2016; Gulf Technical Regulation Standard on Safety Requirements of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products. GCC Standardization Organization (GSO): Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2016.
  227. Jairoun, A.A.; Al-Hemyari, S.S.; Shahwan, M.; Zyoud, S.H.; Ashames, A. Hidden formaldehyde content in cosmeceuticals containing preservatives that release formaldehyde and their compliance behaviors: Bridging the gap between compliance and local regulation. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Lavilla, M.; Gayán, E.E. Consumer Acceptance and Marketing of Foods Processed through Emerging Technologies. In Innovative Technologies for Food Preservatio; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 233–253. [Google Scholar]
  229. Pathakoti, K.; Manubolu, M.; Hwang, H.M. Nanostructures: Current uses and future applications in food science. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Bajpai, V.K.; Kamle, M.; Shukla, S.; Mahata, D.K.; Chandra, P.; Hwang, S.K.; Kumar, P.; Huh, Y.S.; Han, Y.K. Prospects of using nanotechnology for food preservation, safety, and security. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Fu, P.P. Introduction to the special issue: Nanomaterials-toxicology and medical applications. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Baranwal, A.; Srivastava, A.; Kumar, P.; Bajpai, V.K.; Maurya, P.K.; Chandra, P. Prospects of nanostructure materials and their composites as antimicrobial agents. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Singh, P. Nanotechnology in food preservation. Food Sci. 2018, 9, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Hannon, J.; Kerry, J.; Cruz-Romero, M.; Morris, M.; Cummins, E. Advances and challenges for the use of engineered nanoparticles in food contact materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Mihindukulasuriya, S.D.F.; Lim, L.T. Nanotechnology development in food packaging: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 149–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Hutapea, S.; al-Shawi, S.G.; Chen, T.C.; You, X.; Bokov, D.; Abdelbasset, W.K.; Suksatan, W. Study on food preservation materials based on nano-particle reagents. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 42, 39721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Li, M.; Liu, H.; Dang, F.; Hintelmann, H.; Yin, B.; Zhou, D. Alteration of crop yield and quality of three vegetables upon exposure to silver nanoparticles in sludge-amended soil. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 2472–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Zorraquín-Peña, I.; Cueva, C.; Bartolomé, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Silver nanoparticles against foodborne bacteria. Effects at intestinal level and health limitations. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Seray, M.; Skender, A.; Hadj-Hamou, A.S. Kinetics and mechanisms of Zn2+ release from antimicrobial food packaging based on poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Polym. Bull. 2021, 78, 1021–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Sridhar, A.; Ponnuchamy, M.; Kumar, P.S.; Kapoor, A. Food preservation techniques and nanotechnology for increased shelf life of fruits, vegetables, beverages and spices: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 1715–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Emamifar, A.; Kadivar, M.; Shahedi, M.; Soleimanian-Zad, S. Effect of nanocomposite packaging containing Ag and ZnO on inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum in orange juice. Food Control 2011, 22, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Jin, T.; Gurtler, J.B. Inactivation of Salmonella in liquid egg albumen by antimicrobial bottle coatings infused with allyl isothiocyanate, nisin and zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Prakash, J.; Vignesh, K.; Anusuya, T.; Ramachandran, C.; Sudha Rani, R.; Rubab, M.; Khan, I.; Elahi, F.; Oh, D.H.; DevanandVenkatasubbu, G. Application of nanoparticles in food preservation and food processing. J. Food Hyg. Saf. 2019, 34, 317–324. [Google Scholar]
  244. Venkatasubbu, G.D.; Baskar, R.; Anusuya, T.; Seshan, C.A.; Chelliah, R. Toxicity mechanism of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles against food pathogens. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 148, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Peter, A.; Tegla, D.; Liviu, G.; Cozmuta, A.M. Development of Ag/TiO2-SiO2-coated food packaging film and its role in preservation of green lettuce during storage. Carpathian J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 88–96. [Google Scholar]
  246. Yemmireddy, V.K.; Hung, Y.C. Effect of binder on the physical stability and bactericidal property of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanocoatings on food contact surfaces. Food Control. 2015, 57, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Lim, J.H.; Sisco, P.; Mudalige, T.K.; Sanchez-Pomales, G.; Howard, P.C.; Linder, S.W. Detection and characterization of SiO2 and TiO2 nanostructures in dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3144–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Zahedi, S.M.; Karimi, M.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A. The use of nanotechnology to increase quality and yield of fruit crops. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 25–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Trifol, J.; Plackett, D.; Sillard, C.; Szabo, P.; Bras, J.; Daugaard, A.E. Hybrid poly (lactic acid)/nanocellulose/nanoclay composites with synergistically enhanced barrier properties and improved thermomechanical resistance. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Mahmoodi, A.; Ghodrati, S.; Khorasani, M. High-strength, low-permeable, and light-protective nanocomposite films based on a hybrid nanopigment and biodegradable PLA for food packaging applications. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 14947–14954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Agriopoulou, S.; Stamatelopoulou, E.; Skiada, V.; Tsarouhas, P.; Varzakas, T. Emerging nanomaterial applications for food packaging and preservation: Safety issues and risk assessment. Multidiscip. Digit. Publ. Inst. Proc. 2020, 70, 7. [Google Scholar]
  252. Ahari, H.; Anvar, A.A.; Ataee, M.; Naeimabadi, M. Employing nanosilver, nanocopper, and nanoclays in food packaging production: A systematic review. Coatings 2021, 11, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Song, H.; Li, B.; Lin, Q.-B.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y. Migration of silver from nanosilver–polyethylene composite packaging into food simulants. Food Add. Contamin. Part A 2011, 28, 1758–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Avella, M.; De Vlieger, J.J.; Errico, M.E.; Fischer, S.; Vacca, P.; Volpe, M.G. Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Bandyopadhyay, J.; Ray, S.S. Are nanoclay-containing polymer composites safe for food packaging applications?—An overview. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Calabrese, I.; Liveri, M.L.T.; Ferreira, M.J.; Bento, A.; Vaz, P.D.; Calhorda, M.J.; Nunes, C.D. Porous materials as delivery and protective agents for Vitamin A. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 66495–66504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Giménez, B.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; López-Caballero, M.E.; Gómez-Estaca, J.; Montero, P. Role of sepiolite in the release of active compounds from gelatin–egg white films. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 27, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Mahdavinia, G.R.; Hosseini, R.; Darvishi, F.; Sabzi, M. The release of cefazolin from chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/sepiolite nanocomposite hydrogel films. Iran Polym. J. 2016, 25, 933–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Massaro, M.; Colletti, C.G.; Lazzara, G.; Riela, S. The use of some clay minerals as natural resources for drug carrier applications. J. Funct. Biomater. 2018, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Arredondo-Ochoa, T.; García-Almendárez, B.E.; Escamilla-García, M.; Martín-Belloso, O.; Rossi-Márquez, G.; Medina-Torres, L.; Regalado-González, C. Physicochemical and antimicrobial characterization of beeswax–starch food-grade nanoemulsions incorporating natural antimicrobials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  261. Gundewadi, G.; Sarkar, D.J.; Rudra, S.G.; Singh, D. Preparation of basil oil nanoemulsion using Sapindus mukorossi pericarp extract: Physico-chemical properties and antifungal activity against food spoilage pathogens. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 125, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Farshi, P.; Tabibiazar, M.; Ghorbani, M.; Mohammadifar, M.; Amirkhiz, M.B.; Hamishehkar, H. Whey protein isolate-guar gum stabilized cumin seed oil nanoemulsion. Food Biosci. 2019, 28, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Ashaolu, T.J. Nanoemulsions for health, food, and cosmetics: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3381–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Azmi, N.A.N.; Elgharbawy, A.A.M.; Motlagh, S.R.; Samsudin, N.; Salleh, H.M. Nanoemulsions: Factory for food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics. Processes 2019, 7, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Jiang, X.; Valdeperez, D.; Nazarenus, M.; Wang, Z. Future perspectives towards the use of nanomaterials for smart food packaging and quality control. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2015, 32, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Kumar, V.; Guleria, P.; Mehta, S.K. Nanosensors for food quality and safety assessment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 15, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Realini, C.E.; Marcos, B. Active and intelligent packaging systems for a modern society. Meat. Sci. 2014, 98, 404–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Summo, C.; De Angelis, D. The Importance of Edible Films and Coatings for Sustainable Food Development. Foods 2022, 11, 3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Jamróz, E.; Khachatryan, G.; Kopel, P.; Juszczak, L.; Kawecka, A.; Krzyściak, P.; Kucharek, M.; Bębenek, Z.; Zimowska, M. Furcellaran nanocomposite films: The effect of nanofillers on the structural, thermal, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of biopolymer films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Zubair, M.; Ullah, A. Recent advances in protein derived bionanocomposites for food packaging applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 406–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Chiou, A.; Kalogeropoulos, N. Virgin olive oil as frying oil. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 632–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  272. Barberis, S.; Quiroga, H.G.; Barcia, C.; Talia, J.M.; Debattista, N. Natural food preservatives against microorganisms. Food Saf. Preserv. 2018, 621–658. [Google Scholar]
  273. De Villiers, M. Surfactants and Emulsifying Agents. In A Practical Guide to Contemporary Pharmacy Practice; Thompson, J.E., Ed.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PE, USA, 2009; p. 251. [Google Scholar]
  274. Friedman, M. Food browning and its prevention: An overview. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 631–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Molnar-Perl, I.; Friedman, M. Inhibiton of browning by sulfur amino acids. 2. Fruit juices and protein-containing foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 1648–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Mesías, F.J.; Martín, A.; Hernández, A. ‘Consumers’ growing appetite for natural foods: Perceptions towards the use of natural preservatives in fresh fruit. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Nadarzynski, A.; Scholz, J.; Schröder, M.S. Skin Barrier Enhancing Alternative Preservation Strategy of O/W Emulsions by Water Activity Reduction with Natural Multifunctional Ingredients. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Varvaresou, A.; Papageorgiou, S.; Tsirivas, E.; Protopapa, E. Self-preserving cosmetics. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2009, 31, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Pushpalatha, H.B.; Pramod, K.; Sundaram, R.; Shyam, R. Design and development of self-preserving and preservative-free herbal liquid oral formulation. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 5, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Leistner, L. Basic aspects of food preservation by hurdle technology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 55, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Rostami, Z.; Ahmad, M.A.; Khan, M.U.; Mishra, A.P.; Rashidzadeh, S.; Shariati, M.A. Food preservation by hurdle technology: A review of different hurdle and interaction with focus on foodstuffs. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 10, 2633–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Syed, Q.A.; Ishaq, A.; Rahman, U.U.; Aslam, S.; Shukat, R. Pulsed electric field technology in food preservation: A review. J. Nutr. Health Food Eng. 2017, 6, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
  283. Wouters, P.C.; Alvarez, I.; Raso, J. Critical factors determining inactivation kinetics by pulsed electric field food processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Aghajanzadeh, S.; Ziaiifar, A.M. A review of pectin methylesterase inactivation in citrus juice during pasteurization. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 71, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Yu, Y.; Jin, T.Z.; Xiao, G. Effects of pulsed electric fields pretreatment and drying method on drying characteristics and nutritive quality of blueberries. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e13303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Wibowo, S.; Essel, E.A.; De Man, S.; Bernaert, N.; Van Droogenbroeck, B.; Grauwet, T.; Van Loey, A.; Hendrickx, M. Comparing the impact of high pressure, pulsed electric field and thermal pasteurization on quality attributes of cloudy apple juice using targeted and untargeted analyses. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 54, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Salehi, F. Physico-chemical properties of fruit and vegetable juices as affected by pulsed electric field: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020, 23, 1036–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Luengo, E.; Martínez, J.M.; Álvarez, I.; Raso, J. Effects of millisecond and microsecond pulsed electric fields on red beet cell disintegration and extraction of betanines. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 84, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Tamborrino, A.; Urbani, S.; Servili, M.; Romaniello, R.; Perone, C.; Leone, A. Pulsed electric fields for the treatment of olive pastes in the oil extraction process. Appl. Sci. 2019, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  290. Gałązka-Czarnecka, I.; Korzeniewska, E.; Czarnecki, A.; Kiełbasa, P.; Dróżdż, T. Modelling of carotenoids content in red clover sprouts using light of different wavelength and pulsed electric field. Appl Sci. 2020, 10, 4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Quass, D.W. Pulsed Electric Field Processing in the Food Industry. In A Status Report on Pulsed Electric Field; Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1997; pp. 23–35. [Google Scholar]
  292. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Yang, R.; Zhao, W. Recent developments in the preservation of raw fresh food by pulsed electric field. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 38, 247–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Angelopoulou, P.; Giaouris, E.; Gardikis, K. Applications and prospects of nanotechnology in food and cosmetics preservation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Milstein, S.R.; Halper, A.R.; Katz, L.M. Regulatory Requirements for the Marketing of Cosmetics in the United States. In Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology; Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 833–859. [Google Scholar]
  295. Benson, L.; Reczek, K. A Guide to United States Cosmetic Products Compliance Requirements; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2021.
  296. U.S. Code. Title 21-Food and Drugs; Legal Information Institute: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2011; Subchapter VI-Cosmetics; pp. 304–306.
  297. Savić, S.; Paunović, J. Safety of cosmetic products in the light of European legislation: Cosmetic Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. Arhiv za farmaciju 2018, 68, 911–933. [Google Scholar]
  298. Ravi, P.; Reddy, D.S.; Ramu, B.; Rajkamal, B. Comparative study on cosmetics legislation in India US and EU. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 5, 1. [Google Scholar]
  299. Swagat, D.K.T.; Harish, D. Cosmetics: Regulatory scenario in USA, EU and India. J. Pharm. Technol. Res. Manag. 2015, 3, 127–139. [Google Scholar]
  300. Nagalakshmi, S.; Vaishnavi, S.; Pavithra, G.M. Regulatory prototype for cosmetics in India. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2021, 14, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  301. Raj, R.K.; Chandrul, K.K. Regulatory requirements for cosmetics in relation with regulatory authorities in India against US, Europe, Australia and Asean countries. Int. J. Pharma Res. Health Sci. 2016, 4, 1332–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Elder, R.L. The cosmetic ingredient review-a safety evaluation program. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1984, 11, 1168–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Elder, D.P.; Kuentz, M.; Holm, R. Pharmaceutical excipients-quality, regulatory and biopharmaceutical considerations. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 87, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. ISO 17516:2014; Cosmétiques-Microbiologie-Limites Microbiologiques European Committee for Standardization. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  305. Eixarch, H.; Wyness, L.; Sibanda, M. The Regulation of Personalized Cosmetics in the EU. Cosmetics 2019, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  306. Lásztity, R.; Petró-Turza, M. Locations and tasks of the main institutions and organizations for food control systems. Food Qual. Stand. 2009, 10, 292. [Google Scholar]
  307. Halabi, S.F.; Lin, C.F. Assessing the relative influence and efficacy of public and private food safety regulation regimes: Comparing codex and GlobalG. AP standards. Food Drug. LJ 2017, 72, 262. [Google Scholar]
  308. FSSAI. Manual of Methods of Analysis of Foods, Food Additives, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: New Delhi, India, 2012.
  309. F.No. 2-15015/30/2010 W; FSSAI. Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: New Delhi, India, 2011; p. 280.
  310. Yang, H. Food Safety in India: Status and Challenges. Gates Open Res. 2019, 3, 1043. [Google Scholar]
  311. Keener, L. Food Safety and Regulatory Survey of Food Additives and Other Substances in Human Food. In Ensuring Global Food Safety; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 259–273. [Google Scholar]
  312. Benard, O.; Daisy, L.; Oniang’o, R. Food Safety Legislation in Some Developing Countries. In Food Safety: Some Global Trends; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; Volume 19. [Google Scholar]
  313. Meadows, M. Promoting safe and effective drugs for 100 years. FDA Consum. Mag. 2006, 40, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  314. Robin, A.L.; Sankhla, D. European Legislative Framework Controlling the Use of Food Additives. In Essential Guide to Food Additives; RSC Publishing Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 2013; Volume 44. [Google Scholar]
  315. Ahvenainen, R. Active and Intelligent Packaging: An Introduction. In Novel Food Packaging Techniques; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2003; pp. 5–21. [Google Scholar]
  316. Haleem, R.M.; Salem, M.Y.; Fatahallah, F.A.; Abdelfattah, L.E. Quality in the pharmaceutical industry–A literature review. Saudi Pharm. J. 2015, 23, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  317. Chatterjee, B.; Dash, B.; Shrestha, B.; Bhuyan, N.R. Current Scenarios on Regulatory Landscape of Indian Pharmaceutical Industries. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res 2021, 12, 5642–5651. [Google Scholar]
  318. Yadav, P.; Bahmani, K.; Pawar, N.; Sharma, A. A Review on: Indian Pharma Regulatory System and List of New Drugs Approved by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization in the Year 2021 Till Date. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2021, 12, 5642–5651. [Google Scholar]
  319. Tsien, A.Y.; Pahl, P.E. Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act. In The Pharmaceutical Regulatory Process; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; pp. 189–264. [Google Scholar]
  320. Elizabeth O’Connor, G. Emerging promotional and pricing approaches in the US pharmaceutical market. J. Product. Brand Manag. 2014, 23, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. DiFeo, T.J. Drug product development: A technical review of chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information for the support of pharmaceutical compound licensing activities. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2003, 29, 939–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Directive 2001/83/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Off. J. Eur. Union 2004, 311, 67–128.
  323. Minghetti, P.; Pantano, D.; Gennari, C.G.M.; Casiraghi, A. Regulatory framework of pharmaceutical compounding and actual developments of legislation in Europe. Health Policy 2014, 117, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Causes of deterioration of the product.
Figure 1. Causes of deterioration of the product.
Materials 16 04793 g001
Figure 2. Classification of preservatives.
Figure 2. Classification of preservatives.
Materials 16 04793 g002
Figure 3. Problems associated with synthetic preservatives.
Figure 3. Problems associated with synthetic preservatives.
Materials 16 04793 g003
Figure 4. Natural products derived from plants.
Figure 4. Natural products derived from plants.
Materials 16 04793 g004
Figure 5. Natural phenolic antioxidants.
Figure 5. Natural phenolic antioxidants.
Materials 16 04793 g005
Figure 6. Biosynthesis of phenolic compounds with excellent antioxidant activity.
Figure 6. Biosynthesis of phenolic compounds with excellent antioxidant activity.
Materials 16 04793 g006
Figure 7. Phenolic acids and their natural sources.
Figure 7. Phenolic acids and their natural sources.
Materials 16 04793 g007
Figure 8. Applications of polyphenolic compounds in different sectors.
Figure 8. Applications of polyphenolic compounds in different sectors.
Materials 16 04793 g008
Figure 9. Some commonly used exaggerated claims.
Figure 9. Some commonly used exaggerated claims.
Materials 16 04793 g009
Figure 10. Flowchart of organizational structure of Indian pharma regulatory system (CDSCO).
Figure 10. Flowchart of organizational structure of Indian pharma regulatory system (CDSCO).
Materials 16 04793 g010
Table 1. Different classes of cosmetics and personal care products.
Table 1. Different classes of cosmetics and personal care products.
ClassProducts
Leave-on productsDeodorants
Antiperspirants
Body lotion
Face/Hand cream
Rinse-off productsShampoo/Hair Conditioner
Shower gel
Make-up/Embellishment productsLiquid Foundation
Eyeliner/Mascara
Lipstick
Perfumes
Oral care productsToothpaste
Mouthwash
Protective productsAnti-wrinkle creams
Corrective productsBeauty masks
Hair dyes
Maintenance productsShaving/Moisturizing creams
Active productsAntiseptics
Table 2. List of existing cosmetic preservatives and their problems.
Table 2. List of existing cosmetic preservatives and their problems.
Preservative and Its Chemical
Structure
CategoryToxic EffectCosmetics/Personal Care ProductsReferences
Materials 16 04793 i001
Imidazolidinyl urea
Formaldehyde
releaser
CarcinogenicEyeliners, mascara, eye shadows, foundation, shampoos, sunscreens, powders, tanning creams, make-up removers, concealers, moisturizing lotions, etc.[27,28]
Materials 16 04793 i002
Diazolidinyl Urea
Formaldehyde
releaser
CarcinogenicBlush, eyeliners, eye shadows, lipsticks, foundation, face powders, concealers, moisturizers, hand wash, sunscreens, hair colorants, etc.[28]
Materials 16 04793 i003
DMDM Hydantoin (Glydant)
Formaldehyde
releaser
Carcinogenic, dermatitisExfoliants, shampoo, hair smoothing products, liquid soaps, creams, lotions, nail polish, nail glue, etc.[29,30]
Materials 16 04793 i004
Sodiumhydroxymethyl glycinate (SHMG)
Formaldehyde
releaser
Carcinogenic, skin irritantBody sprays, baby wipes, cleaning agents, shampoo, soaps, hair conditioner, etc.[28,31]
Materials 16 04793 i005
Quaternium-15
Formaldehyde
releaser
SensitizationBlush, bronzer, eye shadow, foundation, baby products (baby oil, shampoo, wash bath), shaving creams and gels, sunscreens, etc.[28,32,33]
Materials 16 04793 i006
Benzalkonium chloride solution I.P (BAK)
Quaternary
ammonium
compound
Cytotoxicity, dry eye syndrome, pulmonary irritation, nasal mucosal damage, bacterial resistance, genotoxicity, apoptosis, leaching of eye lens, etc.Deodorants and body spray, baby wipes, moisturizers, body washes, cleansers, etc.[34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]
Materials 16 04793 i007
BHA     BHT
Phenolic
compounds
Endocrine disruptors, neurological problems, metabolic dysfunction, behavioral issues and may cause cancerLipstick, lip glosses, moisturizers, lotions, sunscreen, fragrance, clean and clear foaming face wash, face wash, soap, shampoo, deodorants, etc. [28,43]
Materials 16 04793 i008
R = an alkyl group
Methylparaben, Ethylparaben,
Propylparaben, Isobutylparaben, Butylparaben
ParabenEstrogenic effect and interfere with male reproductive functions, breast cancer, contact eczema, development of malignant melanoma, etc. Creams, face powder, blusher, face pack, face scrub, nature’s facial kit, face wash, etc.[28,43,44,45,46,47,48]
Materials 16 04793 i009
Triclosan and triclocarbans
Antimicrobial agentAntibiotic resistance in bacteria, endocrine disruptor, neurotoxicity, skin sensitization, reproductive and developmental toxicity, genotoxicity, phototoxicity, carcinogenicity etc.Foundation, lip gloss, mascara, body spray, perfume spray, medicated soaps, toothpaste, deodorants, hand wash, face wash, mouthwash, etc.[28,49,50]
Kathon CG: 3: 1 mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazoline-2-1 and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-2-oneIsothiazolinonesAllergic contact dermatitisBody washes, liquid soaps, conditioners, shampoos, wipes, etc.[51,52]
Materials 16 04793 i010
Methylisothiazolinone, Methylchloroisothiazolinones
IsothiazolinonesSkin irritantShampoos, conditioner, liquid hand wash, soaps, face wash, etc.[48,53,54,55,56]
Materials 16 04793 i011
Iodopropynylbutyl carbamate (IPBC)
Belongs to the
carbamate family of biocides
SensitizationLip balm, lotions, hair dye, hair colorants, etc.[32,52]
Materials 16 04793 i012
Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN)
Contact allergyBody lotion, hand lotion, facial lotion, sunscreen lotion, shower gels, etc.[32,52]
Materials 16 04793 i013
Thiomersal
MercurialKawasaki’s Disease, genotoxicity, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, neurodevelopmental and CVS disordersEye make-up products[57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]
Materials 16 04793 i014
Chlorobutanol
AlcoholNot used in aerosol dispensers, cytotoxicity, retinal toxic, irritationFace wash, creams mouthwashes, ointments, etc.[66,67,68]
Materials 16 04793 i015
Benzyl Alcohol
Aromatic
alcohol
Contact dermatitis, mucous membrane irritation, CNS depression lethargy, metabolic acidosis, toxicity on fatal development and respiratory abnormalities, etc.Creams, baby lotion, sunscreen SPF 50, baby wipes, etc.[69]
Materials 16 04793 i016EthylhexylglycerinGlyceryl etherContact allergen and impairs membrane integrity, etc.Baby cream, shower gel, moisturizing lotions, skin peels, face masks, body butter, shampoos, conditioner, etc.[70,71,72]
Materials 16 04793 i017
Phenoxyethanol
Glycol etherAllergic and skin irritationHand sanitizer, perfume, F-foundation, blush, lipstick, mascara, eye shadow, hand cream, hair color and spray, lip balm, nail polish, baby wipes, etc.[73,74,75,76]
Materials 16 04793 i018ChlorhexidineAmidinesOtotoxic, nausea, stomach irritation, respiratory distress syndromeConditioner, creams, toothpaste, deodorants, antiperspirants, etc.[77,78,79]
Materials 16 04793 i019
Ascorbic acid
Organic acidSkin irritationAnti-aging creams and skin toners, etc.[80,81,82]
Materials 16 04793 i020
Benzoic acid
Organic acidCarcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc.Face wash, shampoo, body wash creams, etc.[83,84,85]
Materials 16 04793 i021
Sodium benzoate
Organic acidCarcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc.Body cleanser, toothpaste, etc.[83,84,85]
Materials 16 04793 i022
Citric acid
Organic acid
(Alpha-hydroxy acid)
Sensitization and irritation, etc.Facial kit, face wash, serum, scrubbers, baby facial toners, exfoliating, cleaning products, etc.[86]
Materials 16 04793 i023
Sorbic acid
Organic acid (Monocarboxylic acid)Itching and irritation, etc.Body lotion, eye cream, anti-aging face serum, eyeshadow, cleansing wipes, bronze powder, skincare products, etc.[87]
Materials 16 04793 i024
Climbazole
Antifungal agentSkin irritation includes redness, rashes, and itchingHair lotions, face creams, foot care products, and rinse-off shampoo, etc.[88]
Materials 16 04793 i025
Hydroxyethoxyphenyl butanone
Slight ocular irritationRinse off, oral care, and leave-on cosmetic products[89,90]
Materials 16 04793 i026
Dehyderoacetic acid (DHA)
Organic acidMinimal eye irritation, allergic contact dermatitisShampoo, lotions, creams, mousses, sunscreens, baby care products, oral care products, foundations, powders, wipes, etc.[91,92]
Materials 16 04793 i027
Erythorbic acid
Stereoisomer of ascorbic acidSensitizationHair and nail products[93]
Materials 16 04793 i028
Formaldehyde
Naturally occurring organic compoundContact dermatitis, irritation and leukemia on prolonged exposure, etc.Nail polishes, hair gels, soaps, lotions, makeup products, shampoos, etc.[94]
Table 3. List of existing food preservatives and their problems.
Table 3. List of existing food preservatives and their problems.
Preservatives & Chemical
Structure
Toxic EffectFood ProductsReferences
Materials 16 04793 i029
Acetic acid
Breathing difficulty, swelling, irritationPreserved fish, preserved meat, cooking oil, curry powder, processed cheese, instant puddings, butter, bread, mozzarella cheese, baby food, etc.[102,103]
Materials 16 04793 i030
Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C)
Nausea, vomiting, headache, heartburn and crampsFruit juices, jams, beer, soft drinks, cider, cereals, canned tuna, glaze for frozen fish, etc.[81]
Materials 16 04793 i031
Benzoic acid
Carcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc.Fruit juices, soft drinks, coffee extracts, pickles; pineapple marmalade with pectin; relishes; tomato paste; tomato pulp; tomato puree, etc.[83,84,85]
Materials 16 04793 i032
Sodium benzoate
Allergy, asthma, skin rashes, hyperactivity, liver cirrhosis, Parkinson’s disease, etc.Chayavanprash, fruit juices, fruit cocktails, tomato ketchup, pasta sauce, milk products, jams, soft drinks, salad dressings, pickles, margarine, etc.[83,84,85,87]
Materials 16 04793 i033
Citric acid
Numbness, rapid weight gain, cramps, mood changes, severe stomach pain, diarrhea and convulsions, etc.Fruit juices, soft drinks, meat, frozen food, chips, biscuits, ice creams, soda, wine, etc.[86]
Materials 16 04793 i034
Formic acid
Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, skin allergy etc.Livestock feed[104]
Materials 16 04793 i035
Lactic acid
Brain fog, gas, and bloatingYoghurt, olives, cucumber pickles, salad dressing, cheese, frozen desserts, soda, etc.[105]
Materials 16 04793 i036
Potassium lactate
Brain fog, gas, and bloatingMeat and poultry products[105,106,107,108]
Materials 16 04793 i037
Propionic acid
Corrosive, increase resistance to glucagon, norepinephrine, and insulinBakery products, gelatin, milk, and milk products such as cheese, yoghurt, etc.[87,109]
Materials 16 04793 i038
Sorbic acid
Contact dermatitis and urticarial, etc.Fruit juice, wine, jams, jellies, margarine, meat products, cakes, sauces, processed cheese, salads, etc.[87]
Materials 16 04793 i039
Potassium Sorbate
Contact dermatitis and urticarial, etc.Karela amla juice, Amla-Aloe vera juice with wheatgrass, milk products, etc.[87]
Materials 16 04793 i040
Sulphur dioxide/Sulphites
Materials 16 04793 i041
Potassium bisulfate
Allergic reactions
(nausea, skin irritation, asthma, eczema, diarrhea)
Fruit juices, cider, wines, meat products, sausages, sweets, jams, jellies, glucose syrups, dry biscuits, dry mix of rasogollas, refined sugar, misri, jaggery, glucose syrup, potatoes, beverages, raisins, pickles, chutneys, etc.[87]
Nitrites & Nitrates
(Sodium & Potassium)
Genotoxicity, carcinogenic (stomach and pancreatic cancer)Meat products, hot dog, smoked fish, and many others[87,110]
Materials 16 04793 i042
BHA   BHT
Endocrine disruptors, neurological problems, metabolic dysfunction, behavioral issues, and may cause cancerHot dogs, meat, potato chips, chewing gum, vegetable oils, bread, breakfast cereals, and many others[111]
Materials 16 04793 i043
Triclosan
Antibiotic resistance in bacteria, endocrine disruptor, skin sensitization, neuro-toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, phototoxicity, etc.Active food packaging[49,111,112]
NisinNausea, pruritus, skin rash and vomiting, etc.Prepacked coconut water, canned rasgulla, baking mixes containing egg, etc.[113]
Dehyderoacetic acid (DHA)Allergic contact dermatitisCheese, meat products, squash, etc.[114]
Materials 16 04793 i044
Erythorbic acid
Hypersensitivity, nausea, vomiting, headache, diarrhea, heartburn, and crampsMeat, frozen fruits and vegetables, beverages such as soft drinks, fruit juice, grape wine, beer, etc.[115]
Materials 16 04793 i045
Dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC)
CarcinogenicNon-alcoholic beverages such as sports drinks, energy drinks and non-carbonated drinks such as ice tea, etc. [116,117,118]
Table 4. List of existing pharmaceutical preservatives and their problems.
Table 4. List of existing pharmaceutical preservatives and their problems.
Preservative & Its StructureCategoryToxic EffectPharmaceuticalsReferences
Materials 16 04793 i046
Benzalkonium chloride solution, I.P (BAK)
Ocular Preservative
Quaternary
ammonium compound
Ocular toxicity, cytotoxicity, redness, dry eye syndrome, nasal mucosal damage, conjunctiva, post-operative inflammation, bacterial resistance, impairs tear film, genotoxicity, trabeculectomy failure, leaching of the eye lens, cataract, etc.Eye/ear drops, nasal drops, multisurface disinfectants, Dettol, Savlon, Lysol, etc.[68,122,123,124,125,126]
Materials 16 04793 i047
BHA   BHT
Phenolic
compounds
Gastric irritant,
endocrine disruptors, and may cause cancer
Gels, creams, liquid and gelatin capsules
[127,128,129]
Materials 16 04793 i048
R = an alkyl group
Methyl paraben, ethyl paraben, propyl paraben, isobutyl paraben, butyl paraben
ParabenSensitization, contact dermatitis, estrogenic effect interferes with male reproductive functions, breast cancer, contact eczema, development of malignant melanoma, etc. Local anesthetic (bupivacaine hydrochloride injection I.P.), injections (Afkim 500, gentamicin, amikacin sulphate, dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection I.P.), shaving cream, etc.[130,131]
Materials 16 04793 i049
Quaternium-15
Formaldehyde releaserSensitization, allergic contact dermatitisEye drops, contact solutions[131,132]
Materials 16 04793 i050
Thiomersal
MercurialGenotoxicity, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, neurodevelopmental and CVS disordersVaccines (inactivated influenza vaccine, meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine, tetanus toxoid, DTP), contact lens solutions, disinfectant (merthiolate),[65,68,133]
Materials 16 04793 i051
Chlorobutanol
AlcoholNot used in
aerosol dispensers, cytotoxicity, retinal toxic irritation
ophthalmic ointment, ear drops, eye and nasal drops, injections, sedatives, etc.[65,134]
Materials 16 04793 i052
Benzyl Alcohol
AlcoholContact dermatitis, mucous membrane irritation, CNS depression, lethargy, metabolic acidosis,
toxicity of fatal development, and respiratory abnormalities, etc.
Injectable drugs (anti-inflammatory, neuroleptics),
cream, and lotion, etc.
[135,136,137,138]
Materials 16 04793 i053
Phenoxyethanol
Glycol etherEye and skin irritation, allergic reactions such as contact urticaria and contact dermatitis, etc., are rare.DTwP vaccines, DTaP vaccine[139,140,141]
Stabilized Oxychloro complex
(second generation ocular preservatives)
Oxidative
complexes
(soft preservatives)
CytotoxicityEye drops[68,125]
Materials 16 04793 i054
Sodium perborate (GenAqua)
Materials 16 04793 i055ChlorhexidineAmidines or
biguanides
Ototoxic, nausea, stomach irritation, respiratory distress syndromeEye drops, antiseptic mouthwashes[68,142]
Materials 16 04793 i056
Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)
PolyhexanideCarcinogenic, contact allergy, conjunctival staining, corneal staining, pain after instillation, conjunctival hyperemiaEye drops, contact lens solutions [143]
Materials 16 04793 i057
Ascorbic acid
Organic acidNausea, vomiting, headache, heartburn, and crampsEye drops[80,81,82]
Materials 16 04793 i058
Benzoic acid
Acids and their saltsCarcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc.Ointments, liquid preparations[83,84,85]
Materials 16 04793 i059
Sodium benzoate
Acids and their saltsAllergy, asthma, skin rashes, hyperactivity, liver cirrhosis, Parkinson’s disease, etc.Oral suspension, mouthwash, syrup, janam ghunti, etc.[83,84,85,87]
Materials 16 04793 i060
Citric acid
Acids and their saltsNumbness, rapid weight gain, cramps, mood changes, severe stomach pain, diarrhea and convulsions, etc.Powder and vitamins, etc.[86]
Materials 16 04793 i061
Sorbic acid
Acids and their saltsContact dermatitis, and urticariaEmulsions[87]
Table 5. List of some phenolic acids and their reported biological activities.
Table 5. List of some phenolic acids and their reported biological activities.
Natural SourcesPhenolic Content with Antioxidant/Antimicrobial ActivityReferences
Allium cepaProtocatechuic acid[161]
Ananas comosusCoumaric acid and ferulic acid[162]
Berries Hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids[163,164,165]
Coffea arabicaHydroxycinammic acids[164]
Daucus carotap-Coumaric, chlorogenic, and caffeic acids[166,167]
Emblica officinalis1,8-Cineole[168,169]
Fagopyrum esculentumRutin, quercetin, and catechins [170,171,172]
Glycine maxProtocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acids, chlorogenic acid, etc.[173]
Malus domesticaCoumaric acid, catechin, epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, procyanidin and gallic acid, etc.[174]
Mangifera indicaMyricetin, chlorogenic acid, kaempferol, gallic acid, sinapic acid, and ferulic acid[175]
Mushroom speciesp-Hydroxybenzoic, protocatechuic, gallic, vanillic, coumaric, syringic, gentisic, ferulic, cinnamic, caffeic acids[176]
Origanum vulgareRosmarinic acid[177]
Oryza sativaProtocatechuic acid[178]
Psidium guajavaChlorogenic Acid, gallic acid, Kaempferol, sinapic acid, and myricetin[175]
Punica granatumQuercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and
Myricetin, etc.
[179]
Salvia rosmarinusRosmarinic acid, carnosol, and carnosic acid[177]
Syzygium cuminiQuercetin[180,181,182]
Thymus vulgarisCaffeic and rosmarinic acids[183]
Triticum aestivumPhytic acid, ferulic acid, sinapic, syringic, vanillic and p-coumaric acids[184,185]
Vitis viniferaMalvidin, cyanidin, delphinidin, peonidin and petunidin, epigallocatechin etc.[186,187]
Table 6. List of approved/permitted preservatives with a code assigned by the International Numbering System (INS) and E numbers (EU).
Table 6. List of approved/permitted preservatives with a code assigned by the International Numbering System (INS) and E numbers (EU).
INS NumberE NumberPreservative
200E200Sorbic acid
201 Sodium sorbate
202E202Potassium sorbate
203 Calcium sorbate
209 Heptyl para-hydroxybenzoate
210E210Benzoic acid
211E211Sodium benzoate
212E212Potassium benzoate
213E213Calcium benzoate
214E214Ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate
215E215Sodium ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate
216 Propyl p-hydroxybenzoate
217 Sodium propyl p-hydroxybenzoate
218E218Methyl p-hydroxybenzoate
219E219Sodium methyl p-hydroxybenzoate
220E220Sulphur dioxide
221E221Sodium sulphite
222E222Sodium hydrogen sulphite
223E223Sodium metabisulphite
224E224Potassium metabisulphite
225 Potassium sulphite
226E226Calcium sulphite
227E227Calcium hydrogen sulphite
228E228Potassium hydrogen sulphite
230 Diphenyl
231 Ortho-phenylphenol
232 Sodium ortho-phenylphenol
233 Thiabendazole
234E234Nisin
235E235Natamycin (Pimaricin)
236 Formic acid
237 Sodium formate
238 Calcium formate
E239Hexamethylene tetramine
240 Formaldehyde
241 Gum guaiacum
E242Dimethyl dicarbonate
E243Ethyl lauryl arginate
E249Potassium nitrite
E250Sodium nitrite
E251Sodium nitrate
E252Potassium nitrate
260 Acetic acid, glacial
261 Potassium acetates
262 Sodium acetates
263 Calcium acetates
264 Ammonium acetate
265 Dehydroacetic acid (DHA)
266 Sodium dehydroacetate
270 Lactic acid
280E280Propionic acid
281E281Sodium propionate
282E282Calcium propionate
283E283Potassium propionate
E284Boric acid
E285Sodium tetraborate; borax
290 Carbon dioxide
E1105Lysozyme
344 Lecithin citrate
384 Isopropyl citrates
386 EDTA
Table 7. Amendments adopted by FSSAI gazette as per 7th Amendment Regulations, 2020.
Table 7. Amendments adopted by FSSAI gazette as per 7th Amendment Regulations, 2020.
Food AdditiveINS No.Old Maximum LimitsRecommended
Maximum Limits
Inclusion/
Omission
Pimaricin (natamycin)235 Omitted
Sorbates2002000 mg/kg1000 mg/kg
EDTA386100 mg/kg50 mg/kg
Potassium iodate Omitted
Potassium bromated Omitted
Table 8. New recommended maximum limits for some food additives.
Table 8. New recommended maximum limits for some food additives.
Food AdditiveOld Maximum LimitsRecommended
Maximum Limits
Inclusion/
Omission
Calcium sorbate Omitted
Climbazole0.5%0.2%
Hydroxyethoxyphenyl butanone (HEPB) 0.7% w/vNew entry
Table 9. Nanoparticles for food preservation.
Table 9. Nanoparticles for food preservation.
Nanomaterial/
Nanoparticles
DefinitionMatrixApplications/ActivityReference
AgParticles of matter fluctuating between 1 and 100 nm in diameter display distinctive propertiesPoultry meat, fruits, and vegetables such as apples, grapes, tomatoes, kiwi, asparagus, etc.1. Antimicrobial agents in food packaging.
2. Preservation of storage containers and refrigerators.
3. As a health supplement.
4. Active food packaging.
[230,236,237,238,239,240]
ZnOOrange juice, apple juice, peaches, mango, tomato, poultry meat, etc.1. Antimicrobial agents, as a nutritional additive in food packaging.
2. Increase the shelf life.
3. Enhancing the quality of cucumber, increasing zinc, iron, and carotene content.
[230,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249]
TiO2Strawberry, soft cheese, Chinese jujube, etc.Food additives for storage containers and food packaging.[230,237,240,243,245,246]
Silver oxideApple slicesRetard microbial spoilage[230,240,243,247,248]
NanocompositesMultiphase materials consist of two or more components in which one of the components has nanoscale dimensions to obtain the best properties of each componentBeans, pear, mushrooms, carrot, cheese, tomatoes, fresh fruits and vegetables, etc.1. Polylactic acid (PLA)/nano clay/nanocellulose hybris nanocomposite offer a reduction in oxygen transmission rate and water vapor transmission rate.
2. Biodegradable nanocomposite films (dye/clay/PLA) applied in food packaging offers excellent barrier properties.
[249,250,251,252]
Nanoclay
(natural nanolayer
structures)
Nanoparticles of layered mineral silicates (phyllosilicates) of nanoscale dimensionsCheese, processed meat, fruit juices, milk products, etc.1. Intercalation of drugs (such as sildenafil, aripiprazole) in montmorillonite (MMT) used to improve organoleptic properties.
2. Sepiolite clay efficiently applied in active food packaging, enhances antimicrobial and antioxidant properties when incorporated with essential clove oil.
3. By loading Vitamin A in sepiolite (SPT), its oxidative degradation can be prevented.
4. Cefazolin loaded in chitosan/PVA/SPT hybrid hydrogel films showed a wider zone of inhibition against Bacillus cereus bacterium.
5. Drug–clay complex increases the dissolution as well as drug release rate. For e.g., Vitamin B1 loaded montmorillonite (MMT).
[252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259]
NanoemulsionsNanosized colloidal systems designed to improve drug delivery systemsEncapsulation of bioactive components such as resveratrol, probiotics, nutraceutical, PUFAs, flavored nanoemulsions with improved curcumin digestibility.1. Encapsulation of lipophilic components such as vitamins.
2. Beeswax–starch emulsion, o/w applied as an edible coating in food preservation.
3. Nanoemulsion powder with turmeric extract, o/w enhances the shelf life of fortified milk for 3 weeks.
4. Sapindus extract and basil oil, o/w with antimicrobial activity against food pathogens.
5. Kemira nanogel enhances skin smoothness.
6. Cumin seed oil, corn oil, whey protein with antifungal activity in food preservation.
[260,261,262,263,264]
DNA biochips, electronic tongue
(Nano sensors)
Sensitive device that operates at the nanoscale level to detect and transmit chemical, biological, and physical information to the macroscopic level.Wine characterization, fruits, meat products1. To detect pathogens and toxins in foodstuffs.
2. To monitor the freshness of foodstuffs.
3. Incorporated into packaging materials for monitoring product spoilage.
[265,266,267]
Nano edible coating and filmsA thin layer of edible materials is applied on the surface of an edible product to preserve it from the external environment.Bread, frozen food, pizza, cakes, meat products, ice creams, fruits (apple, grapes, papaya, mangoes), potato, tomato, broccoli, etc.1. To regulate humidity, oxidation, and gaseous exchange to preserve the foodstuffs against invading microbes.
2. As packaging materials.
3. Pathogen inhibitor.
4. Food preservation.
[236,240,268,269,270]
Table 10. Multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties.
Table 10. Multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties.
S.No.Multifunctional IngredientsExamples
1SurfactantsAnionic (Stearic acid)
Cationic (cetyl pyridinium chloride)
Non-ionic (propylene and ethylene oxide)
2Fatty acids and estersCaprylic acid, capric acid, heptanoic acid, etc.
3Biomimetic phospholipidsLecithin
4Antioxidants as preservativesBHA, BHT, propyl gallate etc.
5Aroma chemicals as preservativesSpices and essential oils (oil of rose, lemon, clove, etc.)
6Chelating agents as preservativesEDTA, citric acid, phytic acid, etc.
7Fragrance IngredientsBenzyl acetate, phenethyl alcohol, linalool
Table 11. Legislation on cosmetic products in India, USA, and Europe.
Table 11. Legislation on cosmetic products in India, USA, and Europe.
ContentsIndiaUSAEurope
Governing authorityCentral Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO)Food Drug Administration (FDA)European Union Regulatory Authority (EUMA)
Rules and regulationsDrugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and Rules 1945
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)
Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act)
Council Directive 76/768/EEC, 1976
Revised Regulation EC 1223/2009
PurposeBIS regulates the standards for cosmetics products described under Schedule “S” of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules 1945Enforcement of laws governing the marketing of cosmetics prohibits the marketing of adulterated or misbranded cosmetics in the marketProvides comprehensive categorization of cosmetic products on the basis of function, zone of application, and product constitution
CosmeticsAny article envisaged to be poured, rubbed, sprinkled, or sprayed on, or introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body or any part thereof for cleansing, alluring, beautifying, or changing the appearance, and entails any article intended for use as a component of a cosmetic.Any article envisaged to be poured, rubbed, sprinkled, or sprayed on, or introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body or any part thereof for cleansing, alluring, beautifying, or changing the appearance, and entails any article intended for use as a component of any such articles; except that such term shall not include soap.Any substance or preparation intended to be placed in contact with the various external parts of the human body or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their appearance and/or correcting body odors and/or protecting them or keeping them in good condition.
RegistrationRequiredThrough Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program (VCRP)
(Not mandatory)
For market authorization, an applicant must provide a degree of information in the application form.
Pre-market approvalRequired under state government licensingNot requiredNot required
GMP complianceYesYes
Not mandatory
Yes
ISO 22716 is the reference guide to GMP implementation and assessment
Level of microbial contamination Follows the guidelines of the Personal Care Products Council (PCPC), formerly the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association (CTFA) Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) Guideline “SCCS Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 9th revision”
Post-marketing survey and Reporting systemNo specific guidelinesFollows Voluntary Cosmetic Regulation Program (VCRP) reporting systemNo specific guidelines
References[298,299,300][24,294,295,296,298,301,302,303][24,222,298,299,304,305]
Table 12. Legislation on food products in India, USA, and Europe.
Table 12. Legislation on food products in India, USA, and Europe.
ContentsIndiaUSAEurope
Governing authorityFSSAIFood Drug Administration (FDA)European Union Regulatory Authority (EUMA)
Rules and regulationsFood Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), 2006
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)
Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)Directive 95/2/EC
PurposeFor laying down standards for food and to regulate their manufacture, storage, distribution, sale, and import, to ensure availability of safe and wholesome food for human consumption and advancement in international tradeFDA’s Centre for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) have regulatory control by laying down standards and policies to prevent gross adulteration and contamination for ensuring the safety of foodEstablishment and effective functioning of the internal market, health, safety, environmental protection, and consumers protection
FeaturesBIS deals with the standardization of food products and runs a voluntary certification scheme known as the “ISI” mark for processed foodsAuthorized three kinds of food standards—identity, quality, and fill with containerProvides scientific advice and technical support for farming legislation and policies having a direct or indirect impact on food and food safety
Additive/
preservative
As per amendment regulation, any substance that
is capable of inhibiting, retarding, or arresting the process of fermentation, acidification or other deterioration of food but does not include: any permitted coloring matter; common salt (sodium chloride); lecithin, sugars or tocopherols; nicotinic acid or its amide
Preservatives are described as food additives that are intentionally added to the foodstuff that become a component of the foodstuff, to prolong its shelf life by preventing microbial contamination
Pre-market approvalRequiredRequiredRequired
Food safety &
management systems
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
Good Handling Practices (GHP)
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Require proof of Safety review GRAS is an American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assignment that a concoction or substance added to food is viewed as protected by specialists
References[195,308,309,310,311][312,313][197,199,314,315]
Table 13. Legislation on pharmaceutical products in India, USA, and Europe.
Table 13. Legislation on pharmaceutical products in India, USA, and Europe.
ContentsIndiaUSAEurope
Governing authorityCentral Drug Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) headed by Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of IndiaFood Drug Administration (FDA)European Union Regulatory Authority (EUMEA)
Rules and regulationsDrugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules 1945—to regulate import, manufacture, licensing, testing, distribution, and sale of the drug in India.
The Pharmacy Act, 1948—to regulate the pharmacy profession in India
Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act,1954
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act)
Directive 2001/82/EC (Veterinary medicinal products)
Directive 2001/83/EC (medicinal products for human use)
PurposeTo regulate import, manufacture, distribution, sale, clinical trials, market authorization, and post-market surveillance of drugs in IndiaTo regulate import, manufacture, distribution, and sale of drugsProvides a legal framework for authorization, manufacture, and distribution of a drug in the EU
DrugChemical substance which alters the whole-body function and has the potential for misuseDefines drugs as “articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals”Pharmaceutical preparations are defined as medicinal products consisting of active substances that may contain excipients, formulated into a dosage form suitable for the intended use
Additive/
Preservative
Any chemical or natural substance including fumigants capable of inhibiting or retarding the microbial growthAny inactive fixings that are purposefully added to the therapeutic and diagnostic items, however it is not anticipated that they would apply remedial impacts at the planned dosage, regardless of the way that they may act to improve item delivery that presents well-being data concerning the correct and now proposed level of introduction, exposure time, or route of administrationNovel additives are described as the substances that are introduced for the first time in a formulation in addition to the active drug component or may be administered through a new route administration
New additives are treated as a new entity or drug in the EU
Licensing/
Authorization
RequiredRequiredRequired
Safety &
management systems
Schedule M—GMP and requirement specifications of factory premises, plant and equipment for pharmaceutical products.
Schedule T—GMP specifications for the manufacture of Ayurveda, Siddha, and Unani medicines.
Schedule Y—specifications for clinical trials, import, and manufacture of new drugs
FDA issued guidelines for new additives entitled “Non-Clinical Studies for the Safety Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Excipients” to establish the safety of dosage formsIPEC Europe issued guidelines for evaluating the safety of new additives entitled “Guideline on additives in the dossier for application for marketing authorization of a medicinal product”. Documentation on every single novel additive is required on the principle of the CPMP Guideline (Chemistry of New Active Substances)
Regulatory aspectsGCP guidelines in accordance with WHO guidelines and ICH requirements for good clinical practicesFDA takes ICH safety testing direction papers for leading safety testsEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA) has established that pharmaceutical companies must follow GMP procedures to ensure the quality standards of medicinal products
References[317,318][319,320][321,322,323]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rathee, P.; Sehrawat, R.; Rathee, P.; Khatkar, A.; Akkol, E.K.; Khatkar, S.; Redhu, N.; Türkcanoğlu, G.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E. Polyphenols: Natural Preservatives with Promising Applications in Food, Cosmetics and Pharma Industries; Problems and Toxicity Associated with Synthetic Preservatives; Impact of Misleading Advertisements; Recent Trends in Preservation and Legislation. Materials 2023, 16, 4793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134793

AMA Style

Rathee P, Sehrawat R, Rathee P, Khatkar A, Akkol EK, Khatkar S, Redhu N, Türkcanoğlu G, Sobarzo-Sánchez E. Polyphenols: Natural Preservatives with Promising Applications in Food, Cosmetics and Pharma Industries; Problems and Toxicity Associated with Synthetic Preservatives; Impact of Misleading Advertisements; Recent Trends in Preservation and Legislation. Materials. 2023; 16(13):4793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rathee, Priyanka, Renu Sehrawat, Pooja Rathee, Anurag Khatkar, Esra Küpeli Akkol, Sarita Khatkar, Neelam Redhu, Gizem Türkcanoğlu, and Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez. 2023. "Polyphenols: Natural Preservatives with Promising Applications in Food, Cosmetics and Pharma Industries; Problems and Toxicity Associated with Synthetic Preservatives; Impact of Misleading Advertisements; Recent Trends in Preservation and Legislation" Materials 16, no. 13: 4793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop