Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of P Doping and Mo-Ni-Based Heterostructure Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting
Previous Article in Journal
Paramagnetism in Microwave-Synthesized Metal-Free Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/ma16093409
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Withdrawal Rate on Solidification Microstructures of DD9 Single Crystal Turbine Blade

by
Yanpeng Xue
*,
Xiaoguang Wang
,
Jinqian Zhao
,
Zhenxue Shi
,
Shizhong Liu
and
Jiarong Li
*
Science and Technology on Advanced High Temperature Structural Materials Laboratory, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(9), 3409; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093409
Submission received: 8 March 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigation on As-Cast Microstructure and Characteristics of Superalloys)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Single crystal superalloys are widely used in the manufacturing of turbine blades for aero-engines due to their superior performance at high temperatures. The directional solidification process is a key technology for producing single crystal turbine blades with excellent properties. In the directional solidification process, withdrawal rate is one of the critical parameters for microstructure formation and will ultimately determine the blade’s properties. In this paper, the as-cast microstructures in the typical sections of a DD9 single crystal (SX) superalloy turbine blade were investigated with 3 mm/min and 5 mm/min withdrawal rates during the directional solidification process. With increased withdrawal rate, the dendrite morphologies tended to become more refined, and the secondary dendritic arms tended to be highly developed. The dendrite in the blade aerofoil section was more refined than that in the tenon section, given the same withdrawal rate. Additionally, with increasing withdrawal rates, the size and dispersity of the γ′ precipitates in the inter-dendritic (ID) regions and dendritic core (DC) tended to decrease; furthermore, the size distributions of the γ′ precipitates followed a normal distribution law. Compared with the ID regions, an almost 62% reduction in the average γ′ sizes was measured in the DC. Meanwhile, given the same withdrawal rate, at the blade’s leading edge closest to the heater, the γ′ sizes in the aerofoil section (AS) were more refined than those in the tenon section (TS). As compared with the decreasing cross-sectional areas, the increased withdrawal rates clearly brought down the γ′ sizes. The sizes of the γ–γ′ eutectics decreased with increasing withdrawal rates, with the γ–γ′ eutectics showing both lamellar and rosette shapes.

1. Introduction

Single crystal (SX) superalloys are widely used as blades and vanes in the hot sections of aero-engine gas turbines due to their excellent high-temperature properties [1,2,3]. In order to satisfy the ever-increasing turbine entry temperature (TET) demands required for enhancing the efficiency of engines and turbines, turbine blades and vanes need to work in high temperatures, ones very close to the melting point of the SX superalloys they are made of [4]. Compared to second generation SX superalloys, third generation SX superalloys have higher temperature capabilities, making them attractive for use in advanced gas turbine engines [1,5]. DD9 alloy is a low-cost third generation SX superalloy developed with independent intellectual property rights in China [1]. Compared with the DD6 superalloy, which is widely used in the hot end parts of aero-engine gas turbines [2,3], DD9 alloy has an approximately 30 °C improvement in temperature capability. Thus, many studies on the microstructure and properties of DD9 SX superalloy have been carried out by many researchers [6,7,8,9,10].
It is well known that directional solidification technology has played a crucial role in the development of single crystal blades and vanes [11,12]. In the directional solidification process, solidification parameters such as withdrawal rate, temperature gradient and alloy composition can prompt solidification microstructures of SX blades and vanes to align in [001] orientation, which reveals their excellent high-temperature performance [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Mirak et al. [20] suggested that an increase in the withdrawal rate reduced the fraction of porosity and eutectic phase and increased the γ′ particles, which resulted in an improvement in the hot tensile strength. Lu et al. [21] summarized their argument by saying that the addition of Re could enhance the creep property under each stress, which contributed an essential insight for optimizing the alloying design and enhancing long-term reliable service of industrial gas turbine blades. Chen et al. [22] reported that the addition of 0.5 wt.% Ti resulted in more and finer γ′ precipitates, narrower γ channels, and a higher magnitude of the γ/γ′ lattice misfit. The creep stain rate decreased significantly, and the creep life extended to twice that of the base alloy at 1030 °C and 230 MPa. Wang et al. in [23] illustrated that a thermal gradient which was 10–12 times larger than that of the Bridgman process could be achieved by using the DWDS process. As compared to the Bridgman process, a more refined microstructure was produced, one having significantly more refined dendritic structures, finer γ′ precipitates and smaller and more homogeneously distributed γ/γ′ eutectic pools in the DWDS samples. Szeliga et al. [24] indicated that refinement of the dendritic microstructure in the CMSX-4 Ni-based single crystal casting blade was manufactured using standard adjusted or novel inner radiation baffles, which increased thermal gradients in the industrial-scale Bridgman solidification process.
Fortunately, the above solidification parameters could be controlled independently during directional solidification [13]. In the directional solidification process, the withdrawal rate is one of the important solidification parameters, one which affects the temperature gradient and the dendrite growth rate at the solid–liquid interface and mainly determines the microstructure of the SX blade [25,26,27]. Wang et al. [28] stated that, with increased withdrawal rates, the average primary and secondary dendrite arm spacings decreased, the average sizes of the γ′ precipitates and the γ/γ′ eutectic of a nickel-based superalloy were reduced, and the chemical segregations were alleviated. Zhao et al. [29] reported that the segregation of elements was suppressed and the size of the γ′ phase decreased significantly in an AM3 nickel-based superalloy with increasing withdrawal rates. Liu et al. [30] studied the effect of solidification conditions on micropores formed during homogenization of a Ni-base SX superalloy. It was reported that primary dendrite arm spacing increased with increases in the withdrawal rate. Ai et al. [31] investigated the solidification behaviours of a Mo-rich Ni3Al-based SX superalloy at different withdrawal rates. It was concluded that, because of solid back diffusion during solidification, the volume fraction of inter-dendritic precipitation initially increased and then decreased with an increased withdrawal rate. Liu et al. [32] found that the size and volume fraction of the eutectics of a nickel-base SX superalloy decreased with increases in withdrawal rate during directional solidification. Zhang et al. [33] reported that the primary and secondary dendrite arm spacing of a SX Ni-base superalloy decreased with an increasing withdrawal rate. Lian et al. [34] establishes that an increased withdrawal rate reduced the dendritic arm spacing, refined the dendritic structures, aggravated element (e.g., W, Al, Ta, Ti, etc.) segregation, and reduced the size and content of the spherical γ′ phase in the dendrite core and the inter-dendritic region. Moreira et al. [35] observed that the dendritic microstructure presented a primary dendrite arm spacing around 370 µm (for a withdrawal rate of 3.33 mm/min) and 320 µm (for 5.0 mm/min).
However, in these studies, the effects of withdrawal rate on microstructural morphologies of SX nickel-based superalloys were based on simplified geometrical castings, such as rods and blade models [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Compared with simplified geometrical castings, the structures of hollow blades for aero-engines are more complex, which leads to varieties of radiation heat transfers in different positions of the turbine blades during the directional solidification process. The solidification microstructures of turbine blades will be affected by radiation heat transfers. Therefore, in order to optimize the solidification process parameters of DD9 SX blade in industry and improve the performance of aero-engines, the effects of withdrawal rates on the solidification microstructures of a DD9 SX superalloy turbine blade were investigated in this paper.

2. Experimental

A low-cost third generation SX Ni-based superalloy DD9 with the chemical composition described below was employed in this work, as shown in Table 1 [1]. The DD9 SX blade was directionally solidified by the spiral grain selector method in a vacuum-induction directional-solidification furnace with a high temperature gradient. The position of the typical section of the SX blade is shown in Figure 1. The DD9 master alloy was overheated to 1580 °C in a crucible poured into the two sets of ceramic mould shells at 1525 °C and put in contact with the chilling plate. When a stable temperature gradient was established at the solid–liquid interface, in order to maintain the continuity of the SX growth, two sets of ceramic mould shells full of melt were removed from the heating zone to the cooling zone of the furnace with the withdrawal rates of 3 mm/min and 5 mm/min, respectively. The withdrawal rate between 3 mm/min and 5 mm/min has commonly been used in the directional solidification process of turbine blade industrial production, as well as previous studies [20,26,27,29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. When the withdrawal rate was lower than 3 mm/min, it affected production efficiency of turbine blades, but when it was higher than 5 mm/min, the height of the blade’s ‘mushy zone’ was increased, and the tendency towards crystal defect formation, such as sliver grains and stray grains [26], was promoted. In addition, in order to compare the solidification mechanism with that of other projects in the literature, the withdrawal rates of 3 mm/min and 5 mm/min were considered optimal. The misorientation between the [001] growth direction and the principal stress axis of the DD9 SX blade was less than 10°.
The cross-section specimens of the DD9 SX blade parallel to the crystallographic plane (001) were taken from typical sectional positions, and polished for microstructural analysis. The polished samples were etched by a chemical etching solution of 100 mL H2O + 80 mL HCl + 25 g CuSO4 + 5 mL H2SO4. The observation sectional positions of the specimens were marked, defined as the circle area of P1 and P2 in Figure 1. The dendrite morphologies of the specimens were observed by an optical microscope (OM), and the microstructures of the γ′ precipitates and the γ–γ′ eutectics were observed through a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The various γ′ size distributions of the specimens were analysed by using metallurgical analysis software (Image Pro Plus version 6.0). Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was implemented to evaluate the element’s distribution within the dendritic structure.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Dendrite Morphologies

The dendrite morphologies in the P2 positions of the DD9 SX superalloy blade aerofoil and tenon sections with the withdrawal rates of 3 mm/min and 5 mm/min, are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. With the increase of the withdrawal rate, the dendrite morphologies of the DD9 blade aerofoil and the tenon sectional P2 positions tended to become more refined; in addition, the secondary dendrite arms tended to be highly developed and the tertiary dendrites only partly appeared, which was in agreement with the results of Szeliga et al. [36] and Gancarczyk et al. [37]. Furthermore, within the same withdrawal rate, the primary dendrite arm spacing (PDAS) in the TS was larger than that of the AS listed in Table 2. The above finding was consistent with recent research, which has suggested that the primary dendrite arm spacing increases with increasing wall thickness [36,38]. The dendrite morphologies were related to temperature gradient G and dendrite growth rate V at the solid–liquid interface during the growth of dendrite. The primary dendrite arm spacing (PDAS) and the secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) were determined by the dendritic growth laws G−1/2V−1/4 and G−1/3V−1/3 [39], respectively. Thus, at the same cross-sectional area, when the temperature gradient G was constant at the solid–liquid interface, the higher the withdrawal rate V was, the smaller the PDAS was; meanwhile, the cooling rate at the solid–liquid interface was faster, and the transverse temperature gradient was higher, which induced the secondary dendrite arms to be more developed. Furthermore, the PDAS depended on the heat dissipation at the solidification interface within the same withdrawal rate. Radiation was the main mode of heat transfer in a vacuum induction melting furnace during the dendrite growth process of the SX blade; the cross-sectional area in the TS was larger than that in the AS of the blade, which led to slow radiation heat transfer in the TS. Therefore, the longitudinal temperature gradient of the TS was smaller than that of the AS, resulting in a larger PDAS in the TS.

3.2. Sizes and Morphologies of the γ′ Precipitates

The morphologies of the γ′ precipitates in the DC and ID regions of the DD9 blades’ typical sectional positions with two withdrawing rates are illustrated in Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7. It can be seen that the sizes of the γ′ precipitates evinced a significant difference between the DC and ID regions in one dendrite area. Table 3 lists the average sizes of the γ′ precipitates in the DC and ID regions of the DD9 blades’ typical sectional positions with two withdrawing rates; it can be seen that the average sizes of the γ′ precipitates in the DC and ID regions were 0.278 μm and 0.737 μm, respectively. Thus, the average sizes of the γ′ precipitates in the DC were 62% less than those in the ID regions. In fact, the multicomponent segregations between the DC and ID regions played an important role in the differences of the γ′ sizes [37,40]. Because of the solute redistribution during the dendritic growth in the directional solidification process, some negative segregation elements of Co, W, Re would be segregated into the DC, and other positive elements, including Al and Ta, called γ′ forming elements [37], tended to be enriched in the last residual liquid, which solidified as the ID regions [29,41]. The element segregation behaviour of DD9 SX superalloy was given in Figure 8 [8].
The results shown in Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 also indicate that the average sizes of the γ′ precipitates in the same dendritic region at the same sectional positions of DD9 SX blade with a 5 mm/min withdrawal rate were smaller than those with a 3 mm/min withdrawal rate. Previous research efforts had reached the same result: that the increase in the withdrawal rate led to a decrease in the size of the γ′ precipitates [28,29]. This suggested that the variation of the γ′ precipitates’ size given different withdrawal rates was closely related to the cooling rate. There were two ways to form the γ′ precipitates from the supersaturated γ solid solutions in the DC and ID regions during the solidification of DD9 SX superalloy, namely γ → γDC + (γ′ID/γID) and γDC → γ′DC/γDC, respectively. In the nucleation stage of γ′ precipitation, with a 5 mm/min withdrawal rate, a higher cooling rate made the temperature drop below the γ′ solvus rapidly, which increased the supercooling degree of the nucleation of the γ′ precipitates [28,42,43]. The high supersaturation of the γ matrix then reduced the critical nucleation radius of the γ′ precipitates, and thus the γ matrix was rich in the nucleation cores of the γ′ precipitates. Within the process of withdrawing, a large number of nucleation cores of the γ′ precipitates entered the growth stage. The growth process of the γ′ precipitates mainly depended on the diffusion rates of the alloying elements [44], especially γ′ forming elements [28]. The growth of the γ′ precipitates was limited by the low diffusion rate, which was induced by insufficient thermal activation energy to drive the migration of γ′ forming elements from the γ matrix to the adjacent γ′ precipitates. Therefore, the γ′ precipitates were more refined within the 5 mm/min withdrawal rate.
With the growth of the γ′ precipitates, the remaining supersaturation of the γ matrix was almost exhausted, while the coarsening process of the γ′ precipitates started to dominate the size distributions of the γ′ precipitates. In the solidification process, with a relatively lower cooling rate, some larger size γ′ particles had enough time to coarsen by combining with the neighbouring smaller γ′ particles, thereby reducing the interface energy around the smaller γ′ particles, while those large size γ′ particles away from the fine γ′ particles did not have the kinetic conditions to complete the coarsening process and maintained their original sizes. On the contrary, in the solidification process of a relatively higher cooling rate, there was little time for all the γ′ particles to complete the coarsening process. Thus, with the increase of the withdrawal rate, the cooling rate increased, the size dispersibility of the γ′ particles decreased, and all the size distributions of the γ′ particles followed a normal distribution law, as shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10.
In addition, given the same withdrawal rate, compared with the tenon sectional P1 positions, the γ′ sizes in the DC of DD9 SX blade aerofoil sectional P1 positions were more refined, as shown in Figure 11. The difference in the γ′ sizes in the aerofoil and tenon sectional positions of DD9 SX blade was closely related to the cross-sectional area. A comparison of the cross-sectional areas between the aerofoil and tenon is shown in Figure 1, and the calculation results show that the ratio of the cross-sectional areas between the tenon and the aerofoil of the blade was 4.6, with a tenon cross-sectional area of 830 mm2 and an aerofoil cross-sectional area of 180 mm2. Owing to the smaller cross-sectional area of the aerofoil, the transverse radiation heat dissipation capacity of the aerofoil section was stronger, which induced a large supercooling degree, a high nucleation rate and a short growth time of the γ′ precipitates, and finally resulting in a large number of γ’ precipitates with small sizes.
Although a large reduction in the cross-sectional area would result in smaller sizes of the γ′ precipitates, at least compared with the effect of the withdrawal rate on the sizes of the γ′ precipitates, this correlation was not significant, as shown in Table 4 and Table 5. This is because the increasing withdrawal rate directly caused the enhanced cooling rate in the longitudinal direction. However, even though the reduction of the cross-section area enhanced the lateral cooling capacity of the DD9 SX blade, the lack of the thermal convection in the furnace limited the increase of the cooling rate in the longitudinal direction.

3.3. Sizes and Morphologies of the γ-γ′ Eutectics

At the same cross-sectional position, the sizes of the γ–γ′ eutectics decreased, while the withdrawal rate increased, and the morphologies of the γ–γ′ eutectics showed both lamellar and rosette shapes, as shown in Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15. Previous research has similarly suggested that the average size of the γ–γ′ eutectics decreased with an increase in the withdrawal rate [28,45]. When the SX superalloy solidified with a dendritic growth, the dendrites discharged solutes to the front in the ‘mushy zone’ at the solid–liquid interface. Meanwhile, the γ–γ′ eutectic structure formed between the dendrites when the positive segregating elements such as Al and Ta in the residual liquid reached eutectic composition. Therefore, the sizes of the γ–γ′ eutectics mainly depended on the segregation degree of composition in the final solidification zone of the SX superalloy. The transverse heat radiation increased with the increased withdrawal rate, the primary dendrites became refined, and the secondary dendrite arms were developed, which suppressed the degree of the inter-dendritic composition segregation. At the last, the diminution of residual liquid with the eutectic composition in the final solidification zone between the dendrites reduced the γ–γ′ eutectic growth space and induced the finer γ–γ′ eutectic structure.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the effect of withdrawal rate on solidification microstructures of the DD9 SX turbine blade was studied. The research findings are as follows:
  • With the increase of withdrawal rates, the dendrite morphologies tended to become more refined, and the secondary dendritic arms tended to be highly developed. Additionally, the dendrite in the blade aerofoil section was more refined than that in the tenon section, given the same withdrawal rate.
  • The size and dispersity of the γ′ precipitates in the inter-dendritic regions and the dendritic core tended to decrease with increasing withdrawal rates. Moreover, the size distributions of the γ′ precipitates followed a normal distribution law. Compared with the inter-dendritic regions, the dendritic core exhibited a 62% reduction in the average γ′ size. Meanwhile, within the same withdrawal rate, the γ′ sizes in the aerofoil section were more refined than those in the tenon section. The increasing withdrawal rates resulted in a significant decrease in the γ′ sizes compared to the decreasing cross-sectional areas.
  • The sizes of the γ–γ′ eutectics decreased with increasing withdrawal rates, and the morphologies of the γ–γ′ eutectics exhibited both lamellar and rosette shapes.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.X., J.Z., Z.S., S.L. and J.L.; Validation, Y.X.; Formal analysis, Y.X. and X.W.; Investigation, Y.X.; Writing—original draft, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2017-VI-0001-0070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.R.; Liu, S.Z.; Wang, X.G.; Shi, Z.X.; Zhao, J.Q. Development of a low-cost third generation single crystal superalloy DD9. In Superalloys 2016; Hardy, M., Huron, E., Glatzel, U., Griffin, B., Lewis, B., Rae, C., Seetharaman, V., Tin, S., Eds.; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, J.R.; Zhong, Z.G.; Tang, D.Z.; Liu, S.Z.; Wei, P.; Wei, P.Y.; Wu, Z.T.; Huang, D.; Han, M. A low-cost second generation single crystal superalloy DD6. In Superalloys 2000; Pollock, T.M., Kissinger, R.D., Bowman, R.R., Green, K.A., McLean, M., Olson, S.L., Schirra, J.J., Eds.; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2000; pp. 777–783. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, J.R.; Zhao, J.Q.; Liu, S.Z.; Han, M. Effects of low angle boundaries on the mechanical properties of single crystal superalloy DD6. In Superalloys 2008; Reed, R.C., Green, K.A., Caron, P., Gabb, T., Fahrmann, M.G., Huron, E.S., Woodard, S.A., Eds.; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2008; pp. 443–451. [Google Scholar]
  4. Krawczyk, J.; Bogdanowicz, W.; Sieniawski, J. Effect of blade geometry on γ′ lattice parameter and primary orientation of SX cored turbine blades (I). Materials 2023, 16, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rame, J.; Caron, P.; Locq, D.; Lavigne, O.; Mataveli Suave, L.; Jaquet, V.; Perrut, M.; Delautre, J.; Saboundji, A.; Guedou, J.Y. Development of AGAT, a third-generation nickel-based superalloy for single crystal turbine blade applications. In Superalloys 2020; Tin, S., Hardy, M., Clews, J., Cormier, J., Feng, Q., Marcin, J., O’Brien, C., Suzuki, A., Eds.; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shi, Z.X.; Wang, X.G.; Liu, S.Z.; Li, J.R. Rotary bending high cycle fatigue properties of DD9 single crystal superalloy at 800 °C. Mater. Mech. Eng. 2016, 40, 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shi, Z.X.; Li, J.R.; Liu, S.Z. Influence of withdrawal rate on tensile and stress rupture properties of the single crystal superalloy DD9. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2013, 747–748, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, X.G.; Li, J.R.; Shi, Z.X.; Liu, S.Z. Effect of solid solution heat treatment on microstructures of the third generation single crystal supperally DD9. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2013, 747–748, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, S.; Shi, Z.; Yue, X. Tensile anisotropy of single crystal superalloy DD9. Acta Metall. Sin. 2015, 51, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang, W.P.; Li, J.R.; Liu, S.Z.; Shi, Z.X.; Zhao, J.Q.; Wang, X.G. Orientation dependence of transverse tensile properties of nickel-based third generation single crystal superalloy DD9 from 760 to 1100 °C. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2019, 29, 558–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.; Huang, T.; Qu, M.; Liu, G.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H. High thermal gradient directional solidification and its application in the processing of nickel-based superalloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2010, 210, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lian, Y.Y.; Li, D.C.; Zhang, K. A method for flattening the solidification front in directional solidification technology. J. Cryst. Growth 2015, 426, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, H.; Chen, R.; Qin, G.; Li, X.; Su, Y.; Ding, H.; Guo, J.; Fu, H. Phase separation of AlCoCrFeNi2.1 eutectic high-entropy alloy during directional solidification and their effect on tensile properties. Intermetallics 2019, 113, 106569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ren, N.; Li, J.; Wang, B.; Zeng, L.; Xia, M.; Li, J. Design of variable withdrawal rate for superalloy single-crystal blade fabrication. Mater. Des. 2021, 198, 109347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peng, P.; Lu, L.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, H.; Guo, M.; Liu, L. Investigation on influence of Ta on microstructure evolution of directionally solidified Ni-based superalloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 927, 167009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Effect of cooling rate on carbides in directionally solidified nickel-based single crystal superalloy: X-ray tomography and U-net CNN quantification. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, Z.; Basoalto, H.; Warnken, N.; Reed, R.C. A model for the creep deformation behaviour of nickel-based single crystal superalloys. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 4888–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, A.; Dye, D.; Reed, R.C. A model for the creep deformation behaviour of single-crystal superalloy CMSX-4. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 1657–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Murakumo, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Koizumi, Y.; Harada, H. Creep behaviour of Ni-base single-crystal superalloys with various γ′ volume fraction. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 3737–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mirak, A.; Fathi, M. Effects of solidification rate and heat treatment on microstructure characterization and hot tensile strength of single crystal CMSX-4 superalloy. Mater. Charact. 2022, 194, 112449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, F.; Lu, S.; Antonov, S.; Li, L.; He, S.; Hou, M.; Wang, D.; Zhang, J.; Feng, Q. Duration-affected creep behaviors of Ni-based single crystal superalloys with/without rhenium addition designed for IGT application. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2023, 864, 144560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Li, Q.; Xiao, C.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Hui, X. Enhanced creep resistance induced by minor Ti additions to a second generation nickel-based single crystal superalloy. Acta Mater. 2022, 232, 117938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, F.; Ma, D.X.; Zhang, J.; Bogner, S.; Bührig-Polaczek, A. A high thermal gradient directional solidification method for growing superalloy single crystals. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2014, 214, 3112–3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Szeliga, D. Microstructure refinement of single crystal Ni-based superalloy by improvement of thermal radiation shielding in the industrial-scale Bridgman solidification process. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 118, 104868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huo, M.; Liu, L.; Yang, W.; Hu, S.; Sun, D.; Su, H.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H. Dendrite growth and defects formation with increasing withdrawal rates in the rejoined platforms of Ni-based single crystal single crystal alloys. Vacuum 2019, 161, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.; Liu, L.; Sun, D.; Yue, Q.; Huang, T.; Gan, B.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H. Quantitative analysis of withdrawal rate on stray grain formation in the platforms of a Ni-Based single crystal dummy blade. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 773, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rezaei, M.; Kermanpur, A.; Sadeghi, F. Effects of withdrawal rate and starter block size on crystal orientation of a single crystal Ni-based single crystal alloy. J. Cryst. Growth 2018, 485, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, F.; Wu, Z.; Ma, D.; Bührig-Polaczek, A. Effect of directional solidification variables on the microstructures of single-crystal turbine blades of nickel-based superalloy. Adv Eng. Mater. 2017, 19, 1700297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, X.; Liu, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H. Influence of directional solidification variables on the microstructure and crystal orientation of AM3 under high thermal gradient. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 6101–6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, J.L.; Meng, J.; Yu, J.J.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Sun, X.F. Influence of solidification conditions and alloying elements Re and Ti on micropores formed during homogenization of Ni base single crystal superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 746, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ai, C.; Zhao, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Ru, Y.; Pei, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, S.; Gong, S. Influence of withdrawal rate on last stage solidification path of a Mo-rich Ni3Al based single crystal superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 623, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, C.; Shen, J.; Zhang, J.; Lou, L. Effect of withdrawal rates on microstructure and creep strength of a single crystal superalloy processed by LMC. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2010, 26, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Jin, T.; Sun, X.; Hu, Z. Effect of solidification parameters on the microstructure and creep property of a single crystal Ni-base superalloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2010, 26, 889–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lian, Y.; Gao, L.; Hu, P.; Yin, Q.; Wang, X.; Wen, Z.; Wang, J. Effect of withdrawal rate on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel monocrystalline CoNibased superalloy. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 30, 103053. [Google Scholar]
  35. Moreira, M.F.; Fantin, L.B.; Azevedo, C.R.F. Microstructural Characterization of Ni-Base Superalloy As-Cast Single Crystal(CMSX-4). Int. J. Met. 2021, 15, 676–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Szeliga, D. Effect of processing parameters and shape of blade on the solidification of single-crystal CMSX-4 Ni-based superalloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 2550–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gancarczyk, K.; Zubko, M.; Hanc-Kuczkowska, A.; Kościelniak, B.; Albrecht, R.; Szeliga, D.; Motyka, M.; Ziaja, W.; Sieniawski, J. The effect of withdrawal rate on crystal structure perfection, microstructure and creep resistance of single crystal castings made of CMSX -4 nickel-based superalloy. Materials 2019, 12, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Körber, S.; Fleck, M.; Völkl, R.; Glatzel, U. Anisotropic growth of the primary dendrite arms in a single-crystal thin-walled nickel-based superalloy. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brundidge, C.L.; Miller, J.D.; Pollock, T.M. Development of dendritic structure in the liquid-metal-cooled, directional-solidification process. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2011, 44A, 2723–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pan, Q.; Zhao, X.; Yue, Q.; Xia, W.; Gu, Y.; Ding, Q.; Zhang, Z. Effects of Cobalt on solidification characteristics and as-cast microstructure of an advanced nickel-based single crystal superalloys. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 3074–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, F.; Ma, D.; Zhang, J.; Bührig-Polaczek, A. Investigation of segregation and density profiles in the mushy zone of CMSX-4 superalloys solidified during downward and upward directional solidification processes. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 620, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, F.; Ma, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Bogner, S.; Bührig-Polaczek, A. Effect of local cooling rates on the microstructures of single crystal CMSX-6 superalloy: A comparative assessment of the Bridgman and the downward directional solidification processes. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 616, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, G.; Liu, L.; Ai, C.; Ge, B.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H. Influence of withdrawal rate on the microstructure of Ni-base single-crystal superalloys containing Re and Ru. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 5866–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pyczak, F.; Devrient, B.; Neuner, F.C.; Mughrabi, H. The influence of different alloying elements on the development of the γ/γ′ microstructure of nickel-base superalloys during high-temperature annealing and deformation. Acta Mater. 2005, 53, 3879–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lu, H.; Chen, Y.; Tang, D. Effect of the withdrawal rate on the microstructure and thermal durability of a third-generation single crystal superalloy. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2021, 31, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 03409 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram of two sectional positions of the SX superalloy turbine blade in a directional solidification furnace (P1: leading edge; P2: trailing edge).
Figure 1. Diagram of two sectional positions of the SX superalloy turbine blade in a directional solidification furnace (P1: leading edge; P2: trailing edge).
Materials 16 03409 g001
Materials 16 03409 g002 550
Figure 2. Dendrite morphologies of DD9 blade aerofoil sectional P2 positions with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min and (b) 5 mm/min.
Figure 2. Dendrite morphologies of DD9 blade aerofoil sectional P2 positions with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min and (b) 5 mm/min.
Materials 16 03409 g002
Materials 16 03409 g003 550
Figure 3. Dendrite morphologies of DD9 blade tenon sectional P2 positions with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min; (b) 5 mm/min.
Figure 3. Dendrite morphologies of DD9 blade tenon sectional P2 positions with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min; (b) 5 mm/min.
Materials 16 03409 g003
Materials 16 03409 g004 550
Figure 4. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the DC of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Figure 4. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the DC of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Materials 16 03409 g004
Materials 16 03409 g005 550
Figure 5. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the DC of the DD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Figure 5. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the DC of the DD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Materials 16 03409 g005
Materials 16 03409 g006 550
Figure 6. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the ID regions of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Figure 6. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the ID regions of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Materials 16 03409 g006
Materials 16 03409 g007 550
Figure 7. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the ID regions of the DD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Figure 7. Microstructures of the γ′ precipitates in the ID regions of the DD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates: (a) 3 mm/min, P1; (b) 3 mm/min, P2; (c) 5 mm/min, P1; and (d) 5 mm/min, P2.
Materials 16 03409 g007
Materials 16 03409 g008 550
Figure 8. Segregation behaviour of the elements in the DC and ID regions of the DD9 SX superalloy.
Figure 8. Segregation behaviour of the elements in the DC and ID regions of the DD9 SX superalloy.
Materials 16 03409 g008
Materials 16 03409 g009 550
Figure 9. Size distributions of the γ′ precipitates in the DC of a DD9 SX blade aerofoil (a) and tenon (b), sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates.
Figure 9. Size distributions of the γ′ precipitates in the DC of a DD9 SX blade aerofoil (a) and tenon (b), sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates.
Materials 16 03409 g009
Materials 16 03409 g010 550
Figure 10. Size distributions of the γ′ precipitates in the ID regions of a DD9 SX blade aerofoil (a) and tenon (b), sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates.
Figure 10. Size distributions of the γ′ precipitates in the ID regions of a DD9 SX blade aerofoil (a) and tenon (b), sectional P1 and P2 positions, with two withdrawing rates.
Materials 16 03409 g010
Materials 16 03409 g011 550
Figure 11. The γ′ sizes in the DC of DD9 SX blade aerofoil and tenon, sectional P1 positions, with two withdrawal rates.
Figure 11. The γ′ sizes in the DC of DD9 SX blade aerofoil and tenon, sectional P1 positions, with two withdrawal rates.
Materials 16 03409 g011
Materials 16 03409 g012 550
Figure 12. γ–γ′ eutectics of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil, sectional P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions, with a 3 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Figure 12. γ–γ′ eutectics of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil, sectional P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions, with a 3 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Materials 16 03409 g012
Materials 16 03409 g013 550
Figure 13. γ–γ′ eutectics of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil sectional, P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions, with a 5 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Figure 13. γ–γ′ eutectics of the DD9 SX blade aerofoil sectional, P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions, with a 5 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Materials 16 03409 g013
Materials 16 03409 g014 550
Figure 14. γ–γ′ eutectics of the DD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions, with a 3 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Figure 14. γ–γ′ eutectics of the DD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions, with a 3 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Materials 16 03409 g014
Materials 16 03409 g015 550
Figure 15. γ–γ′ eutectics of the tDD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions with a 5 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Figure 15. γ–γ′ eutectics of the tDD9 SX blade tenon, sectional P1 (a) and P2 (b) positions with a 5 mm/min withdrawal rate.
Materials 16 03409 g015
Table
Table 1. Nominal composition for DD9 SX superalloy (wt/%) [1].
Table 1. Nominal composition for DD9 SX superalloy (wt/%) [1].
CrCoMoWTaReNbAlHfCYNi
3.5726.57.54.50.55.60.10.0080.001Bal
Table
Table 2. PDAS of blades’ typical sectional positions with two withdrawing rates.
Table 2. PDAS of blades’ typical sectional positions with two withdrawing rates.
Withdrawal Rate (mm/min)SectionPDAS/mm
3AS0.385
5AS0.377
3TS0.411
5TS0.405
Table
Table 3. The average sizes of γ′ in the DC and ID regions of the DD9 SX blade, typical sectional positions, with two withdrawing rates.
Table 3. The average sizes of γ′ in the DC and ID regions of the DD9 SX blade, typical sectional positions, with two withdrawing rates.
Withdrawal Rate (mm/min)SectionPositiondmean (μm)
DCID Regions
3ASP10.2890.927
3ASP20.3090.760
5ASP10.2480.592
5ASP20.2590.645
3TSP10.3040.779
3TSP20.2960.793
5TSP10.2640.675
5TSP20.2510.725
Table
Table 4. Withdrawal rate changed vs. γ′ size changed in the DC of the aerofoil and tenon, sectional P1 positions.
Table 4. Withdrawal rate changed vs. γ′ size changed in the DC of the aerofoil and tenon, sectional P1 positions.
Withdrawal Rate Changed
(mm/min)		Sectionγ′ Size Changed
(μm)
3→5AS0.289→0.248
TS0.304→0.264
Table
Table 5. Cross-sectional area changed vs. γ′ size changed in the DC of the P1 positions with the same withdrawal rate.
Table 5. Cross-sectional area changed vs. γ′ size changed in the DC of the P1 positions with the same withdrawal rate.
Cross-Sectional Area Changed
(mm2)		Withdrawal Rate
(mm/min)		γ′ Size Changed
(μm)
TS: 830→AS: 18030.304→0.289
50.264→0.248
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Shi, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, J. Effect of Withdrawal Rate on Solidification Microstructures of DD9 Single Crystal Turbine Blade. Materials 2023, 16, 3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093409

AMA Style

Xue Y, Wang X, Zhao J, Shi Z, Liu S, Li J. Effect of Withdrawal Rate on Solidification Microstructures of DD9 Single Crystal Turbine Blade. Materials. 2023; 16(9):3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Yanpeng, Xiaoguang Wang, Jinqian Zhao, Zhenxue Shi, Shizhong Liu, and Jiarong Li. 2023. "Effect of Withdrawal Rate on Solidification Microstructures of DD9 Single Crystal Turbine Blade" Materials 16, no. 9: 3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop