Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Materials on the Mechanical Properties of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC): A Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Wenzhou TE: A First-Principle-Calculated Thermoelectric Materials Database
Previous Article in Journal
Spacing Analysis of Casting Dolly Windows for Tunnel Sidewall Lining Based on the Flow Characteristics of Freshly Mixed Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties of Nb-Doped Ti(FeCoNi)Sb Pseudo-Ternary Half-Heusler Alloys Prepared Using the Microwave Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

First-Principles Study of Doped CdX(X = Te, Se) Compounds: Enhancing Thermoelectric Properties

Materials 2024, 17(8), 1797; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081797
by Junfeng Jin 1, Fang Lv 2, Wei Cao 1,2,* and Ziyu Wang 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2024, 17(8), 1797; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081797
Submission received: 18 March 2024 / Revised: 4 April 2024 / Accepted: 4 April 2024 / Published: 14 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials Physics in Thermoelectric Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper is on the computational work on doped CdX (X = Te, Ce) compounds for enhancing their thermodynamics properties. The authors are using the well-known periodic density function theory code Quantum Espresso and its extensions to calculate, among others, optimal geometries, electronic information, phonon dispersions, and thermal conductivities. The paper contains extensive calculations, is well-written, and easy for the reader to follow. This work is appropriate for the journal and the paper should be accepted after following my suggestions below (minor revisions).

 

1)        The authors are using the well-known PBE functional for their DFT calculations. How accurate are their PBE calculated band gaps? Will a hybrid functional such as the HSE06 improve these gaps? The authors need to discuss this. If computational facilities permit, I suggest that an HSE06 calculation is performed in the undoped 2x2x2 system for comparing with the PBE calculated gaps.

 

2)      It is hard to see the individual graphs in Figure 3. This needs to be revised.

Author Response

We appreciate the reviewer for their valuable feedback. A comprehensive response has been provided in the attached PDF document.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

 

The presented paper fulfils the Journal Scopus. This article is based on 41 articles in the literature. The authors have undertaken a rather difficult, yet important task from the point of view of materials engineering. Using computational techniques to predict how a material will behave and how its properties will change is quite a challenge. Nevertheless, the authors were up to the task.  The crowning element of the calculations performed was at least the comparison of the obtained data with experimental results (at least one or two properties). This paper contains a fairly comprehensive analysis of structure modification.

Apart from minor editorial errors and a minor linguistic correction, I believe that the manuscript presented may be accepted after minor revision.

Minor corrections need to be made:

  • An important element missing from the article as a whole is the lack of reference to real data (our own experimental or literature reports). How do the theoretical results obtained compare with the values obtained?

 

  • There is a lack of a summary that states in which direction further research should be carried out. Is the chosen type of admixture the correct option? The use of selenides and telurides in thermoelectric systems is not new.
  • comparison of the data obtained to experimental results (at least one or two properties).

Author Response

We appreciate the reviewer for their valuable feedback. A comprehensive response has been provided in the attached PDF document.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop