3.1. Chemical Compositions and Physical Properties of SF and RHA
The oxide analyses for cement, SF, and RHA samples are listed in
Table 2.
Table 2 shows a significantly high content of amorphous SiO
2 in SF, with small amounts of iron, magnesium, alumina, calcium, and alkali oxides. RHA exhibits a lower SiO
2 amount (82.9%) than SF (94%). XRD analysis (
Figure 1) showed that SF and RHA possess similar mineralogical spectra, and their silica phases corresponding to 22.5° (2
) were mostly in amorphous form, which are both active.
The physical properties of cement, SF, and RHA are recorded in
Table 3. It is seen that specific gravity of SF and RHA are less than that of cement. The specific gravity of RHA increase with the increase of grinding duration. The mean particle size of RHA decreases from 9.49 to 5.69
μm with a grinding duration from 5 to 30 min and, accordingly, the specific surface area rises from 19.4 to 23.6 m
2/g. The mean particle size of FRHA (d
50 = 5.69
μm) is larger than that of SF (d
50 = 5.11
μm). However, FRHA presents a higher specific surface area compared to SF, attributed to its very porous structure of each single particle. This analysis is complemented with the SEM images in
Figure 2. As shown in
Figure 2a, spherical particles of silica fume present a smooth, dense surface. The FRHA powder surface is very porous as seen in
Figure 2b. The size of these surface pores on FRHA particles is less than 50 nm. These nano-scale pores greatly contribute to high specific surface area and high pozzolanic reactivity of RHA.
3.2. Compressive Strength of Blended Cement Pastes
The compressive strength results of cement paste and pastes with incorporation of 10% cement replaced by CRHA, FRHA, and SF is shown in
Figure 3. The SF blended paste shows the highest strength value (82.70 MPa) among all the pastes at the age of 90 days, which is 17% higher than the control paste. This is related to the high content and high surface area of pure glassy silica in SF, which exhibits excellent pozzolanic reactivity and the well packing effect of SF particles in the cement composite.
It can be seen that the paste incorporating CRHA shows the lowest compressive strength at all the testing curing ages, which may be due to the larger particle size and lower surface area of coarse RHA particles. Strength of paste incorporating RHA increases with increase of grinding duration from 5 to 30 min. The FRHA paste presents a 79.59 MPa compressive strength at the age of 90 days, which is 12.8% higher than that of the control paste and exhibits comparable strength value with SF paste (82.70 Mpa). Results show that the addition of finely ground RHA to paste gives rise to an increase of the compressive strength compared to the control concrete, due to the increasing specific surface area and pozzolanic reactivity of RHA.
3.3. Hydration Process of Blended Cement Pastes at 1, 7, and 28 Days
The thermogravimetric weight losses of control, SF paste and FRHA paste samples at 1, 7, and 28 days were plotted in
Figure 4a–c. It is seen that curves of all pastes show three rapid weight losses. The first weight loss, located between 110 and 300 °C, is mainly due to dehydration of C-S-H. The second major weight loss, observed at 450–550 °C, corresponds to the dehydroxylation of portlandite, another hydration product. The third weight loss appears at 750 °C, which corresponds to the decarbonation of calcium carbonate deriving from the cement clinker [
33]. The quantitative analysis for the first weight loss and the second weight loss can be used as an indicator of the hydration reaction degree of the cement composite matrix.
The weight losses of paste specimens are summarized in
Table 4. These values are calculated from the testing data in
Figure 4. It is observed that the weight loss of the control paste is increased from 40.57% to 44.70% with an increase in the curing age from 1 to 7 days. The weight loss of the control paste is 44.69% at the age of 28 days, indicating the weight loss for the control paste remains even at the curing age from 7 to 28 days. The weight loss of SF at the first stage is increased from 46.59% to 51.04% at the curing age from 1 to 28 days. For the FRHA paste, the weight loss caused by the dehydration reaction at the first stage is increased from 44.21% to 49.90% with increase in curing age from 1 to 28 days. Comparing the dehydration weight losses of all the paste samples at the age of 28 days, the SF presents the highest value compared to the control paste and the FRHA paste. The weight loss of dehydration of the FRHA paste follows the SF paste by second and shows 5.12% higher than that of the control paste. Results also indicate that the rate of hydration of FRHA paste is initially lower than that of SF paste but higher than the control paste. Therefore, SF particles can contribute to the high early age strength and the FRHA increases the long-term strength, although this strength is lower than SF blended paste at all ages, which is consistent with previous reports [
20].
As for the second weight loss stage corresponding to dehydroxylation, the control, the SF paste and the FRHA paste shows 33.85%, 28.67%, and 31.04%, respectively, at the age of 28 days. The SF paste and the FRHA paste show lower weight loss percentage in dehydroxylation reaction corresponding to Ca(OH)2 dehydroxylation compared to the control paste, which also indicates the excellent pozzolanic activity of SF and FRHA.
3.5. Compressive Strength of Concretes
The compressive strength results of concrete specimens are shown in
Table 5. It is seen that the compressive strength of the control concrete is 86.81 and 92.52 MPa at 28 and 90 days, respectively.
For series of SF concretes, the 28-day compressive strength of 5%SF, 10%SF, and 15%SF concrete is 91.33, 105.82, and 101.62 MPa, which is 105%, 122%, and 117% of the control concrete, respectively. However, further increasing in cement replacement ratio of SF, the compressive strength of concrete is reduced. At 90 days, the compressive strength of 5%SF, 10%SF, and 15%SF concretes is 98.56, 109.69, and 103.22 MPa, respectively. The highest compressive strength value appears on the 10%SF concrete, which was 119% of the control concrete at the age of 90 days.
Compressive strength of 5%FRHA, 10%FRHA, and 15%FRHA concretes at 28 days is 93.62, 101.97, and 97 MPa or 108%, 117%, and 112% of the control concrete, respectively. At the later age, their strengths are slightly increased, and, 90-day compressive strength of these concretes is 99.51, 106.88, and 102.19 MPa or 108%, 116%, and 110% of the control concrete, respectively. It is observed that the compressive strength of 20%FRHA concrete at 90 days is slightly lower than that of control concrete. Again, increasing the cement replacement ratio of FRHA to 25% and 30% decreases the strength of concrete. Therefore, the optimal ratio of cement replaced by FRHA is 10%. However, the normalized compressive strength of all FRHA concretes increased with the ages. This suggests that the contribution of compressive strength gain is due to the pozzolanic reaction of FRHA with Ca(OH)2 released from hydration of cement.
Comparing the compressive strength of the SF concrete and the FRHA concrete at different ages, the incorporation of up to 30% of SF or 15% of FRHA does not adversely affect the strength of cement concrete. A further increase in the cement replacement ratios to 20% FRHA and 25% SF, however, decreases the strength of concrete. For the same replacement ratio of 10%, the strengths of SF and FRHA concretes were similar to each other and significantly higher than that of control concrete. This suggests an excellent pozzolanic reactivity and filler effect of SF and FRHA which makes concrete denser. In addition, the strengths of the SF concretes are higher than those of the FRHA concretes with the same cement replacement ratio, indicating that SF is more reactive than FRHA. This is because the RHA used in this study contains certain amount of unburnt carbon particles, which impairs the purity of the amorphous SiO2 and, hence, compromising its pozzolanic activity. To overcome this, satisfactory treatment conditions such as acid leaching of rice husks prior to combustion or mechanical ultrafine grinding of RHA may minimize the effect of the residual carbon or presence of the crystalline compounds.
3.8. SEM Morphology of Concretes
The SEM morphologies of control, SF, and FRHA concrete are shown in
Figure 5,
Figure 6 and
Figure 7. The SEM images of the control concrete are shown in
Figure 5a,b. The image in
Figure 5a shows a large aggregate on the left side covering the area in the image almost diagonally. The surface is wavy and contains crests and troughs, or concave and convex areas. The adjacent areas are covered loosely porous C-S-H gel. Further magnifying the C-S-H gel area at higher magnifications of ×8131 as shown in
Figure 5b, it is seen the C-S-H gel area appears to be dense along with some pores with length of 1 to above 5
m. A slice of flake-like calcium hydroxide and needle-like crystals are found to cover the surface of C-S-H gel matrix.
Figure 6a presents the morphology of the SF concrete at the age of 28 days. The hydrated cement matrix area at magnification of ×10030 as shown in
Figure 6b presents a tightly-packed hydrated C-S-H gel only alone with a few pores with a length of 1 to 3
m, and there is no sign of calcium hydroxide and needle-like crystals. The dense hydrated area of SF concrete indicates a very compact texture.
Figure 7a shows the morphology of fractured surfaces of FRHA concrete curing at room temperature for 28 days. It is seen the cement paste penetrates into the aggregate and forms a stronger bond. Further magnifying the cement hydrate area as shown in
Figure 7b, two distinct phases can be clearly seen: the C-S-H gel and the needle-like crystals. The flake-shaped calcium hydroxide crystalline phase does not appear on the glassy phase surface of SF and FRHA concrete, indicating reactive silica in FRHA and SF can enhance and accelerate secondary hydration reaction of Ca(OH)
2 in cement matrix. However, the needle-like crystalline phase presented in FRHA is possibly due to minor crystallization of the aluminosilicate species, which, to some extent, impairs the strength gain of cement composite. These morphological differences may also be responsible for compressive strength differences among the concrete specimens.