Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Crumb Rubber Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
Silica-Gentamicin Nanohybrids: Synthesis and Antimicrobial Action
Previous Article in Special Issue
Terpyridine and Quaterpyridine Complexes as Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/ma9030171
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrated Effects of Two Additives on the Enhanced Performance of PTB7:PC71BM Polymer Solar Cells

by
Lin Wang
1,2,
Suling Zhao
1,2,*,
Zheng Xu
1,2,
Jiao Zhao
1,2,
Di Huang
1,2 and
Ling Zhao
1,2
1
Key Laboratory of Luminescence and Optical Information, Beijing Jiaotong University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100044, China
2
Institute of Optoelectronic Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(3), 171; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030171
Submission received: 19 January 2016 / Revised: 20 February 2016 / Accepted: 24 February 2016 / Published: 5 March 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photovoltaic Materials and Electronic Devices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Organic photovoltaics (OPVs) are fabricated with blended active layers of poly [[4,8-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene-2,6-diyl][3-fluoro-2-[(2-ethylhexyl)carbonyl] thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl]]: [6,6]-phenylC71-butyric acid methyl ester (PTB7:PC71BM). The active layers are prepared in chlorobenzene (CB) added different additives of 1, 8-Diiodooctane (DIO) and polystyrene (PS) with different concentrations by spin coating. A small addition, 0.5%–5% by weight relative to the BHJ components, of inert high molecular weight PS is used to increase the solution viscosity and film thickness without sacrificing desirable phase separation and structural order. The effects of the PS are studied with respect of photovoltaic parameters such as fill factor, short circuit current density, and power conversion efficiency. Together with DIO, the device with 3.0 v% DIO and 1 wt % PS shows a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.92% along with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.76 V, a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 16.37 mA/cm2, and a fill factor (FF) of 71.68%. The absorption and surface morphology of the active layers are investigated by UV-visible spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM) respectively. The positive effect of DIO and PS additives on the performance of the OPVs is attributed to the increased absorption and the charge carrier transport and collection.

1. Introduction

Molecular species with well-defined structures [1,2,3] are being considered as possible substitutions for conjugated polymer counterparts in the fabrication of bulk heterojunction (BHJ) organic photovoltaics (OPVs) [4,5,6]. High power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) have been achieved in solution-processed molecular solar cells through a combination of chemical design and deposition methods with optimized morphology [7]. Despite the advantages of the structural precision [8] and purity of materials [9,10,11], some challenges to control the thickness and morphology [12,13] of the active layer decided by the processing conditions are critical to the properties of solar cells, which reasonably influences the light absorption and recombination of carriers [14]. A representative example involves the blends comprised of PTB7/PC71BM, which is one of the highest-performing systems, based on the addition of small quantities of a high boiling point additive such as diiodooctane (DIO), a kind of commonly used additive [15] to meliorate the morphology of the blend film [16] and promote the phase separation [17]. However, the functions of DIO are still a subject of debate in both polymer and small molecule systems [18], but in the case of PTB7/PC71BM it is known to improve the charge transporting by increasing the final crystalline content of the film and allowing the donor phase more than one polymorph during the film formation [19,20]. Nonetheless, adding DIO into the blend film cannot improve the light absorption of the blend film. Even worse, up to now, there is still little research about the negative effect of DIO additives on performance of OPVs [21].
Another effective strategy for PCEs improvement of OPVs is adding a high molecular polystyrene (PS) into the pristine active layer. PS can increase not only increase the pristine solution viscosity but also the film thickness without sacrificing desirable phase separation [7] and structural order and decrease the recombination of electron-hole pairs in the blend film [22,23]. At the same time, PS can improve the light absorption of the blend film. Therefore, in this contribution, polystyrene (PS) was used to fabricate the BHJ polymer solar cell based on PTB7/PC71BM as the active layer. DIO and/or PS were varied with different ratios during the solution preparation of the organic active layer. The effect of the PS was investigated in PTB7:PC71BM blended films. The morphology of the active layer with different additive ratios has been studied and the related OPVs device performance also has been reported.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fabrication of Solar Cells

Devices used materials that were used as purchased. Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), poly[[4,8-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b'] dithiophene-2,6-diyl][3-fluoro-2-[(2-ethylhexyl) carbonyl]thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl]](PTB7) with a molecular weight of ~200 kg/mol and polydispersity of ~4, [6,6]-phenylC71-butyric acid methyl ester(PC71BM), and polystyrene(PS) with a molecular weight of ~370 kg/mol were purchased from Clevios P, 1-Material INC, Nano-C company and Sigma-Aldrich Corporation respectively. PTB7 and PC71BM were co-dissolved in chlorobenzene with a weight ratio of 1:1.5 to form the mixed solution with the concentration 20 mg/mL. All organic materials were weighed and dissolved in ambient air conditions.
The devices were fabricated with an architecture of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7:PC71BM/LiF/Al. The indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrates with a sheet resistance of 10 Ω/Sq were cleaned consecutively in ultrasonic baths containing glass lotion, ethanol and de-ionized water sequentially, and then dried by high pure nitrogen gas. The pre-cleaned ITO substrates were then treated by UV-ozone for 5 min for further cleaning the substrates and improving work function of the ITO substrates. The PEDOT: PSS (purchased from Clevios AI 4083) was spin-coated on the ITO substrates at 3000 rounds per minute (rpm) for 40 s. Then PEDOT: PSS coated ITO substrates were dried in air at 150 °C for 10 min. The substrates were then transferred to a nitrogen-filled glove box (<100 ppm O2 and <0.2 ppm H2O). On the other hand, in order to fabricate the different devices (without DIO additive) as designed in experiment, 0.5%, 1%, 2.5% and 5% of PS by weight were added into PTB7/PC71BM mixed solution respectively only half an hour apart, and then the active layers with different ratios of PS were formed by spin-coating on the PEDOT: PSS with same spin-coating parameters, 1 s for acceleration and 120 s with the rotation speed of 1000 rpm. On the top of the active layer, a 0.7 nm interfacial layer LiF was evaporation deposited under 10−4 Pa vacuum conditions. The thickness of LiF was monitored by a quartz crystal microbalance. An aluminum cathode layer about 100 nm was then evaporation deposited on LiF layer under 10−4 Pa vacuum conditions in same deposition chamber with changed target. The active area was defined by the vertical overlap of ITO anode and Al cathode which is about 4 mm2. The light mask was not used during I-V measurement, and the potential for edge effects may have an effect on the results. For the convenience of discussion, different films and devices were named and prepared to compare their performances:
  • Film 1: PTB7:PC71BM,
  • Film 2: PTB7:PC71BM, 1 wt % PS
  • Film 3: PTB7:PC71BM, 3 v% DIO
  • Film 4: PTB7:PC71BM, 1 wt % PS and 3 v% DIO
  • Device 1: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/film1/LiF/Al
  • Device 2: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/film2/LiF/Al
  • Device 3: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/film3/LiF/Al
  • Device 4: ITO/PEDOT:PSS/film4/LiF/Al

2.2. Photovoltaic Characterization

The absorption spectra of films were measured with a Shimadzu UV-3101 PC spectrometer. The thickness of the active layers is measured by an Ambios Technology XP-2 stylus Profiler. The thicknesses of Film 1, Film 2, Film 3 and Film 4 are 85 nm, 110 nm, 73 nm and 102 nm, respectively. The current–voltage (J-V) characteristics of the OPVs were measured using a Keithley 4200 semiconductor characterization system under a simulated AM 1.5G spectrum with power of 100 mW/cm2 generated by ABET Sun 2000 solar simulator. The corresponding J-V curves were recorded from −1 V to 1 V with an interval of 0.01 V. An incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectrum was measured on Zolix Solar Cell Scan 100. The morphology of the films was investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) using a multimode Nanoscope IIIa operated in tapping mode. All the samples were measured with a scan size of 5 × 5 µm2. The hole mobility and electron mobility of PTB7: PC71BM blend films were measured by space charge limited current (SCLC) method. All the tests were in ambient air conditions.

3. Results and Discussions

The J-V characteristic curves of the OPVs with different PS ratios are shown in Figure 1a. The PV performances of the OPVs are summarized according to the J-V curves and listed in Table 1. Among all the different ratios, it can be found that the device with 1 wt % of PS demonstrates the highest median PCE of 4.56% along with a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 10.60 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.79 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 54.50%. The data in Table 1 shows that the PCE improvement is mainly attributed to the enhancement in Jsc and FF. To further investigate the mechanism responsible for the enhanced performance of the OPVs with the PS additions, the optimized volume ratio of 1% was used.
It is reported that DIO can improve the morphology of the active layer and enhance the performance of organic solar cells [24]. Consequently, organic solar cells based on PTB7:PC71BM with two additives DIO and PS were prepared to improve photovoltaic properties. The concentration of DIO is 3 wt % according the reference [18], and that of PS is 1 wt % according to the above results. The J-V curves of the OPVs with different additives under illumination of simulated AM1.5G (100 mW/cm2) are shown in Figure 1b and summarized in Table 2. Device 1 demonstrates a PCE of 4.11% with a Jsc of 10.47 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.79 V, and a FF of 49.65%.
As shown in Table 2, with the addition of 1 wt % PS (weight fraction of the BHJ components) in Device 2, Jsc increases to 10.60 mA/cm2 and FF increases to 54.50%, which results in a PCE of 4.56%. If both 3.0 v% DIO and 1 wt % PS are added to the solution prior to spin casting, the PCE of Device 4 is further increased to 8.92 along with a Voc of 0.76 V, a Jsc of 16.37 mA/cm2, and a FF of 71.68%. The improved Jsc value is confirmed by measuring EQE (Figure 1c). The maximum EQE value of Device 1 is 43.72% and it is increased to 63.37% for Device 4. The single logarithmic dark current curves show that Device 4, Device 3 and Device 2 have smaller leakage current compared with Device 1, as shown in Figure 1d. It is well-known that the leakage current is determined by the shunt resistance (Rsh) [25]. The larger Rsh indicates a lower charge carrier recombination in the active layer. This indicates that DIO and/or PS can effectively restrain the leakage current under reverse bias, which may provide effective charge carrier transport in the blend layers and result in an increase of Jsc compared to that of Device 1. The smaller Rs indicates a lower resistance of the semiconductor bulk resistance and a better metal/semiconductor interface connection induced by using additives [25].
Under the same spin-coating condition, the thicknesses of films 1 and 3 are almost the same. When doped with PS, the thicknesses of films 2 and 4 increases and are almost the same. This shows that doping PS encourages an increase the thickness of the active layer without decreasing other electronic properties; for example, Rsh and Rs of corresponding devices doped with PS are improved as shown in Table 2. In order to understand the effect of high-molecular-weight insulating polymers-PS in the mixture of PTB7 and PC71BM on the optics properties and the surface morphology, further characterization has been carried out. The absorption spectra of the neat PC71BM and PTB7 films are shown in Figure 2a. PC71BM has two apparent absorption peaks at 375 nm and 480 nm. The absorption spectra of PTB7 show an apparent complementary absorption in the range from 550 nm to 750 nm. Two broad absorption peaks at around 624 and 682 nm are attributed to the characteristic π-π* transition of the PTB7 polymer [26,27]. In comparison to the absorption spectra of the films prepared with and without additives, there is no obvious peak shift observed in the film prepared with PS and in the film prepared with pristine CB, as shown in Figure 2b.
It can be found there is no significant difference between Film 1 and Film 3, while there is an increase of obvious relative absorption intensity in the region of 300–800 nm for Film 2 and Film 4. This result indicates that under the same conditions, films with PS additives can harvest solar photons more effectively than the films prepared from CB and CB: DIO. The more light absorbed, the higher photocurrent generated [28]. This is the reason why the Jsc increases after the addition of high-molecular-weight insulating polymer PS.
In order to investigate the effects of PS and DIO on the morphology of the blend films, the surface topography and phase images of the blend films have been studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in taping mode (5 μm × 5 μm), as shown in Figure 3. The roughness of Film 1, Film 2, Film 3 and Film 4 are 4.685, 4.855, 1.261 and 1.277 nm, respectively. Obviously, the roughness of the blend films decrease after the addition of DIO, and the phase separation are more finely compared with Film 1 and Film 2, as shown in the phase images. The addition of DIO to the casting solvent results in smaller domains and a more finely interpenetrating BHJ morphology, relative to blend films cast without DIO as shown in the phase diagrams. In particular, Film 4 does not reveal significant increases in roughness at the nanoscale compared to Film 3. Also, the film roughnesses of Film 1 and Film 2 are very similar. All this indicates that incorporating the insulating PS within the photovoltaic layer without negative drawbacks in phase separation.
In order to further investigate the effects of additive on the charge carrier transport, the hole-only devices have been fabricated based on pristine PTB7 films and blend PTB7:PC71BM films with/without additives, respectively. High-work-function material gold (Au) is used as the cathode to block the back injection of electrons. The dark J-V curves of the hole-only devices with the configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7/Au and ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7:PC71BM/Au are measured and shown in Figure 4. The hole transport through the polymer film is limited due to the accumulation of space charge when a sufficient voltage is applied to this hole-only device. The space charge limited current(SCLC) is described by the equation [29,30]:
J = 9 8 ε μ V 2 d 3 = 9 8 ε 0 ε r μ V 2 d 3
where ε0 is the permittivity of free space, εr is the dielectric constant of the blend material, μ is the hole mobility, V is the voltage drop across the device and d is the active layer thickness. The parameter εr is assumed to be 3, which is a typical value for conjugated polymers. The hole will be collected by the ITO electrode, which is very similar to hole transport process in the OPVs. The J-V characteristics of neat PTB7 and PTB7:PC71BM with/without additives of 3 v% DIO and 1 wt % PS fully agree with the SCLC model. According to the J-V curves, the hole current density of the hole-only devices with 1 wt % PS is larger than that of the hole-only devices without any additive, the hole current density of the hole-only devices with 3 v% DIO is larger than that of the hole-only devices with 1 wt % PS and the hole current density of the hole-only devices with additives of both 3 v% DIO and 1 wt % PS is larger than that of the hole-only devices with only 3 v% DIO. This means that hole carrier transport in the hole-only devices with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS has been improved compared with that of the hole-only devices without any additive. The result indicates that even though the thickness of the film with PS is greater than that without PS in the same fabricate condition, the hole mobility of the device with PS is better than that without PS, which shows PS can be good for hole carrier transport. Moreover it further demonstrates that the improved hole carrier transport could be one of the reason for the increased Jsc of OPVs [30,31].

4. Conclusions

A series of OPVs with PTB7:PC71BM as the active layer are fabricated to investigate the additive’s effects on the performance of the OPVs. DIO and PS are used as the additives. The experimental results of photovoltaic performance reveal an enhancement of Jsc from 10.47 to 16.37 mA/cm2 and FF from 49.65% to 71.68% by adding DIO and PS. As a result, the PCEs of the OPVs are improved from 4.11% to 8.92%, with 117% improvement compared with the OPVs based on PTB7:PC71BM without additives. The positive effect of DIO and PS additives on the performance of the OPVs should be attributed to the increased absorption and charge carrier transport and collection.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61575019, 51272022 and 11474018), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2013AA032205), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No.20120009130005 and 20130009130001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2012JBZ001).

Author Contributions

The process design, experimental work and writing of the first draft of the manuscript were all carried out by Lin Wang. Suling Zhao and Zheng Xu supervised every step of the entire work. Jiao Zhao, Di Huang and Ling Zhao collaborated with the AFM analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, H.W.; Chang, J.H.; Huang, W.C.; Lin, Y.T.; Lin, L.Y.; Lin, F.; Wong, K.T.; Wang, H.F.; Ho, R.M.; Meng, H.F. Highly efficient organic solar cells using a solution-processed active layer with a small molecule donor and pristine fullerene. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3709–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mishra, A.; Bäuerle, P. Small molecule organic semiconductors on the move: Promises for future solar energy technology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2020–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhou, J.; Zuo, Y.; Wan, X.; Long, G.; Zhang, Q.; Ni, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; He, G.; Li, C. Solution-processed and high-performance organic solar cells using small molecules with a benzodithiophene unit. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8484–8487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cabanetos, C.M.; El Labban, A.; Bartelt, J.A.; Douglas, J.D.; Mateker, W.R.; Fréchet, J.M.; McGehee, M.D.; Beaujuge, P.M. Linear side chains in benzo [1, 2-b: 4, 5-b’ 4dithiophene–thieno [3,4-c] pyrrole-4, 6-dione polymers direct self-assembly and solar cell performance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4656–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Dou, L.; Gao, J.; Richard, E.; You, J.; Chen, C.C.; Cha, K.C.; He, Y.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Systematic investigation of benzodithiophene-and diketopyrrolopyrrole-based low-bandgap polymers designed for single junction and tandem polymer solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10071–10079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. He, Z.; Zhong, C.; Su, S.; Xu, M.; Wu, H.; Cao, Y. Enhanced power-conversion efficiency in polymer solar cells using an inverted device structure. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 6, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Y.; Wen, W.; Mukherjee, S.; Ade, H.; Kramer, E.J.; Bazan, G.C. High-molecular-weight insulating polymers can improve the performance of molecular solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4168–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Walker, B.; Kim, C.; Nguyen, T.Q. Small molecule solution-processed bulk heterojunction solar cells†. Chem. Mater. 2010, 23, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, W.; Nikiforov, M.P.; Darling, S.B. Morphology characterization in organic and hybrid solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8045–8074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Betancur, R.; Romero-Gomez, P.; Martinez-Otero, A.; Elias, X.; Maymó, M.; Martorell, J. Transparent polymer solar cells employing a layered light-trapping architecture. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dennler, G.; Scharber, M.C.; Brabec, C.J. Polymer-fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1323–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nikiforov, M.P.; Lai, B.; Chen, W.; Chen, S.; Schaller, R.D.; Strzalka, J.; Maser, J.; Darling, S.B. Detection and role of trace impurities in high-performance organic solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1513–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, S.; Cao, B.; Wang, W.; Moulin, J.F.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Effect of alcohol treatment on the performance of ptb7:Pc71bm bulk heterojunction solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4641–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Foertig, A.; Kniepert, J.; Gluecker, M.; Brenner, T.; Dyakonov, V.; Neher, D.; Deibel, C. Nongeminate and geminate recombination in ptb7:Pcbm solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 1306–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liao, H.C.; Ho, C.C.; Chang, C.Y.; Jao, M.H.; Darling, S.B.; Su, W.F. Additives for morphology control in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Mater. today 2013, 16, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, W.; Darling, S.B. Understanding the role of additives in improving the performance of bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Microsc. Microanal. 2015, 21, 2439–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, S.; Herzig, E.M.; Naumann, A.; Tainter, G.; Perlich, J.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Influence of solvent and solvent additive on the morphology of ptb7 films probed via x-ray scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 118, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lou, S.J.; Szarko, J.M.; Xu, T.; Yu, L.; Marks, T.J.; Chen, L.X. Effects of additives on the morphology of solution phase aggregates formed by active layer components of high-efficiency organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20661–20663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Perez, L.A.; Chou, K.W.; Love, J.A.; van der Poll, T.S.; Smilgies, D.M.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Kramer, E.J.; Amassian, A.; Bazan, G.C. Solvent additive effects on small molecule crystallization in bulk heterojunction solar cells probed during spin casting. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 6380–6384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kniepert, J.; Lange, I.; Heidbrink, J.; Kurpiers, J.; Brenner, T.J.; Koster, L.J.A.; Neher, D. Effect of solvent additive on generation, recombination, and extraction in ptb7:Pcbm solar cells: A conclusive experimental and numerical simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 8310–8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, L.; Zhao, S.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Q.; Huang, D.; Xu, X. A simple method to adjust the morphology of gradient three-dimensional ptb7-th: Pc 71 bm polymer solar cells. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 5537–5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hsin-Yi, C.; Lan, S.; Yang, P.C.; Lin, S.H.; Sun, J.Y.; Lin, C.F. Poly (3-hexylthiophene): Indene-c60 bisadduct morphology improvement by the use of polyvinylcarbazole as additive. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 113, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bai, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, K.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, N.; Yang, S.; Yan, H. High performance inverted structure perovskite solar cells based on a pcbm: Polystyrene blend electron transport layer. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 9098–9102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, L.; Zhao, S.; Xu, Z.; Gong, W.; Yang, Q.; Fan, X.; Xu, X. Influence of morphology of pcdtbt: Pc71bm on the performance of solar cells. Appl. Phys. A 2014, 114, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Janssen, R.A.; Nelson, J. Factors limiting device efficiency in organic photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1847–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xia, J.; Tsai, S.T.; Wu, Y.; Li, G.; Ray, C.; Yu, L. For the bright future–bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E135–E138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ochiai, S.; Imamura, S.; Kannappan, S.; Palanisamy, K.; Shin, P.K. Characteristics and the effect of additives on the nanomorphology of ptb7/pc 71 bm composite films. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, S58–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, X.; Wang, M.; Huang, F.; Gong, X.; Cao, Y. 23% enhanced efficiency of polymer solar cells processed with 1-chloronaphthalene as the solvent additive. Synth. Met. 2013, 164, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Malliaras, G.; Salem, J.; Brock, P.; Scott, C. Electrical characteristics and efficiency of single-layer organic light-emitting diodes. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, R13411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Li, L.; An, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. The underlying reason of dio additive on the improvement polymer solar cells performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 305, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Zhang, F.; Li, L.; An, Q.; Zhang, J.; Tang, W.; Teng, F. Enhanced performance of polymer solar cells by dipole-assisted hole extraction. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 130, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 09 00171 g001 1024
Figure 1. (a) The J-V characteristic curves of solar cells with different doping ratios of PS under AM 1.5 light power of 100 mW/cm2; (b) The J-V characteristic curves of solar cells without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS; (c) the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the devices in the system of PTB7:PC71BM without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS; (d) The J-V characteristics cast from solar cells without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS in darkness.
Figure 1. (a) The J-V characteristic curves of solar cells with different doping ratios of PS under AM 1.5 light power of 100 mW/cm2; (b) The J-V characteristic curves of solar cells without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS; (c) the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the devices in the system of PTB7:PC71BM without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS; (d) The J-V characteristics cast from solar cells without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS in darkness.
Materials 09 00171 g001
Materials 09 00171 g002 1024
Figure 2. (a) The absorption spectra of neat PTB7 and PC71BM films; (b) absorption spectra of PTB7/PC71BM films cast from solvents with or without DIO and/or PS additives. The data was normalized by the film thickness.
Figure 2. (a) The absorption spectra of neat PTB7 and PC71BM films; (b) absorption spectra of PTB7/PC71BM films cast from solvents with or without DIO and/or PS additives. The data was normalized by the film thickness.
Materials 09 00171 g002
Materials 09 00171 g003 1024
Figure 3. The AFM surface topography and phase images of the PTB7:PC71BM films with/without 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS.
Figure 3. The AFM surface topography and phase images of the PTB7:PC71BM films with/without 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS.
Materials 09 00171 g003
Materials 09 00171 g004 1024
Figure 4. J-V characteristic curves of hole-only devices with/without 3 v% DIO and/or 1 v% PS.
Figure 4. J-V characteristic curves of hole-only devices with/without 3 v% DIO and/or 1 v% PS.
Materials 09 00171 g004
Table
Table 1. The PV performance of ITO/PEDOT: PSS/PTB7:PC71BM/LiF/Al photovoltaic devices with different doping ratios of PS.
Table 1. The PV performance of ITO/PEDOT: PSS/PTB7:PC71BM/LiF/Al photovoltaic devices with different doping ratios of PS.
Doping RatioVoc (V)Jsc (mA/cm2)FF (%)PCE (%)
0 wt %0.79 ± 0.0110.47 ± 0.0949.65 ± 0.054.11 ± 0.02
0.5 wt %0.79 ± 0.0111.15 ± 0.0846.61 ± 0.064.16 ± 0.02
1 wt %0.79 ± 0.0110.60 ± 0.0854.50 ± 0.044.56 ± 0.02
2 wt %0.80 ± 0.0111.55 ± 0.0946.68 ± 0.054.31 ± 0.02
5 wt %0.80 ± 0.0110.07 ± 0.1338.74 ± 0.083.12 ± 0.03
Table
Table 2. The summary of photovoltaic parameters of PTB7:PC71BM system solar cells without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS.
Table 2. The summary of photovoltaic parameters of PTB7:PC71BM system solar cells without or with 3 v% DIO and/or 1 wt % PS.
Voc (V)Jsc (mA/cm2)FF (%)PCE (%)Rsh (Ωcm2)Rs (Ωcm2)
Device 10.79 ± 0.0110.47 ± 0.01349.65 ± 0.024.11 ± 0.03302.818.2
Device 20.79 ± 0.0110.60 ± 0.01254.50 ± 0.094.56 ± 0.02311.58.56
Device 30.75 ± 0.0114.23 ± 0.0971.31 ± 0.057.61 ± 0.02757.65.44
Device 40.76 ± 0.0116.37 ± 0.0871.68 ± 0.048.92 ± 0.02915.84.24

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Zhao, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Huang, D.; Zhao, L. Integrated Effects of Two Additives on the Enhanced Performance of PTB7:PC71BM Polymer Solar Cells. Materials 2016, 9, 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030171

AMA Style

Wang L, Zhao S, Xu Z, Zhao J, Huang D, Zhao L. Integrated Effects of Two Additives on the Enhanced Performance of PTB7:PC71BM Polymer Solar Cells. Materials. 2016; 9(3):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Lin, Suling Zhao, Zheng Xu, Jiao Zhao, Di Huang, and Ling Zhao. 2016. "Integrated Effects of Two Additives on the Enhanced Performance of PTB7:PC71BM Polymer Solar Cells" Materials 9, no. 3: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop