Next Article in Journal
The Structure and Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Bulk Ultrafine-Grained Cobalt Prepared Using High-Energy Ball Milling in Combination with Spark Plasma Sintering
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Na3PO4 on the Hydration Process of Alkali-Activated Blast Furnace Slag
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Hybridizing Flax and Hemp-Agave Fibers with Glass Fiber as Reinforcement in a Polyurethane Composite
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Mineral Wools as Alkali-Activated Material Precursor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/ma9050392
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimising Ambient Setting Bayer Derived Fly Ash Geopolymers

by
Evan Jamieson
1,2,
Catherine S. Kealley
3,
Arie Van Riessen
3,* and
Robert D. Hart
3
1
School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
2
Technology Delivery Group, Alcoa World Alumina, P.O. Box 161, Kwinana, WA 6966, Australia
3
John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(5), 392; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9050392
Submission received: 11 April 2016 / Revised: 5 May 2016 / Accepted: 11 May 2016 / Published: 19 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Geopolymers and Alkali-Activated Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Bayer process utilises high concentrations of caustic and elevated temperature to liberate alumina from bauxite, for the production of aluminium and other chemicals. Within Australia, this process results in 40 million tonnes of mineral residues (Red mud) each year. Over the same period, the energy production sector will produce 14 million tonnes of coal combustion products (Fly ash). Both industrial residues require impoundment storage, yet combining some of these components can produce geopolymers, an alternative to cement. Geopolymers derived from Bayer liquor and fly ash have been made successfully with a compressive strength in excess of 40 MPa after oven curing. However, any product from these industries would require large volume applications with robust operational conditions to maximise utilisation. To facilitate potential unconfined large-scale production, Bayer derived fly ash geopolymers have been optimised to achieve ambient curing. Fly ash from two different power stations have been successfully trialled showing the versatility of the Bayer liquor-ash combination for making geopolymers.

1. Introduction

Aluminosilicate inorganic polymers or geopolymers are amorphous materials that have the potential to be an alternative for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) binders. Geopolymers have high compressive and flexural strength, high temperature resistance, and impressive acid resistance [1,2,3,4]. Another potential benefit of geopolymers is the significant reduction in CO2 emissions. Geopolymer production has been reported to create as little as 6% to 64% of the CO2 output compared to OPC production, depending on assessment methodology and lifecycle analysis [5,6,7,8]. Geopolymers have also been shown to immobilise waste within their three-dimensional structure [9,10]. Geopolymers have been considered as an alternative for OPC in applications such as cement pathways, pavers, mine backfill, railway sleepers (ties), sewerage pipes and earth retaining walls [11,12,13].
Geopolymers can be produced from a range of aluminate and silicate materials including metakaolin, fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slags and mineral processing wastes. As such, most industrial precincts would produce a range of suitable feedstock to enable geopolymer production [14]. Other materials required for concrete production such as residue sand have been evaluated for construction purposes [15,16,17,18]. The use of multiple and varied geopolymer feedstock has led to a focus on understanding the chemistry of the amorphous reactive components. This in turn allows geopolymer products to be formulated with predictable performance properties, without trial and error [14,19,20,21,22]. The critical feedstock for geopolymers include: (i) caustic; (ii) soluble silica; and (iii) soluble alumina. All three materials must be available in large quantities and at appropriate cost for commercial application. In addition, sources of heat may be required as geopolymers are commonly cured at slightly elevated temperatures (60–90 °C). Thermal curing may be suitable for many product applications, but it is impractical in high volume markets such as in situ poured paths, roads and curbing. It is possible to design formulations for low calcium-based precursors that can be cured at ambient temperatures by the addition of calcium-containing compounds such as lime or ground granulated blast furnace slag [1,2,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Typical preparation of a geopolymer binder requires a highly concentrated caustic silicate solution to be added to a source of soluble silica and alumina (usually fly ash, metakaolin or ground granulated blast furnace slag) [27]. This procedure commonly targets a reactive Si/Al ratio of around two. Geopolymers may also be made by adding caustic sodium aluminate solution to sources of soluble silica [6,29,30,31,32]. Further development has shown that geopolymers can be made from silica rich, class F fly ash and alumina and caustic rich spent Bayer liquors (A “Bayer liquor” is a process solution derived from the hydrometallurgical thermal caustic extraction of alumina from bauxite ore) [10]. This achieves industrial synergies removing impurity laden liquor from Bayer process streams while providing an inexpensive source of caustic for the production of geopolymer concrete [33,34,35]. There are associated significant reductions in embodied energy of the resultant geopolymer [6].
For geopolymers to be economically viable, large volume production of products are required along with product acceptance [35,36,37]. To this aim, a variety of construction materials are envisaged, many requiring in situ and ambient temperature curing. This paper seeks to demonstrate ambient temperature curing of Bayer derived fly ash geopolymers as an enabler to further development. The present work has targeted compressive strength above 20 MPa, as this is typically specified for applications such as pathways, driveways and building footings (AS3727, 1993) [38].

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Bayer plant liquor was from Alcoa of Australia’s Kwinana or Wagerup refineries. Spent liquor (post precipitation), was evaporated to provide the correct H2O to Na2O ratios in the final product. Refinery liquors are not constant and can vary between locations, highlighting the necessity of fundamental chemical analysis to maintain geopolymer ratios. Table 1 shows the analyses of the two liquors used in this project. Class F fly ash, used as a source of reactive silica and additional alumina, was obtained from Muja or Collie Power Stations, Western Australia. The total elemental composition is presented in Table 2, the phase composition in Table 3, the reactive components of the fly ash are given in Table 4 and particle sizes are provided in Table 5. To achieve specific Si/Al ratios, silica fume (94% purity) obtained from Doral Fused Materials Pty Ltd. (Rockingham, Western Australia, Australia) was added, as required. Particle size is included in Table 5.
Calcium additives for promotion of ambient curing were ground granulated blast furnace slag (Builders Choice, BFS20, BGC Cement, Canning Vale, Western Australia, Australia) and Hylime (Cockburn Cement, Munster, Australia), a manufactured hydrated lime product, predominantly Portlandite (Ca(OH)2), that incorporates a small amount of air-entraining agent to enhance water retention and improve plasticity in mortars. Hylime contained 93 wt % Ca(OH)2 as Portlandite, and the ground granulated blast furnace slag contained approximately 43 wt % of CaO.

2.2. Synthesis

Geopolymer binder compositions were selected to target Si/Al ratios of between 1.0 and 2.4 while keeping the OH/Al ratio close to 0.8 or lower. Unless stated elsewhere in the text, the standard geopolymer binder composition utilised was Si/Al = 2.3 and OH/Al = 0.8.
The dry powders were mixed together, and then Bayer liquor and water were added by mixing for a period of ten minutes before being placed into 25 mm diameter vials. Each sample was prodded with a rod during loading in order to remove air bubbles. Samples were sealed then cured at either 20 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, 80 °C or 90 °C for 24 h, then left at room temperature for seven days prior to compressive strength testing.

2.3. Characterisation

The composition of the reactive amorphous component of the fly ash was determined by subtracting the crystalline composition of the fly ash determined by quantitative the XRD phase analysis from the bulk chemical composition total analysis determined by XRF, as described elsewhere [19].
Compressive strength tests were carried out in accordance with ASTM C39 [39] using a Lloyds Instruments 6000R compressive/tensile strength machine (Bognor Regis, UK) fitted with a 50 kN load cell. A minimum of six samples (25 mm diameter and 50 mm length) from each formulation were tested and the mean and standard deviations reported.
Polished samples for SEM/EDS analysis were mounted on an aluminium stub using carbon tape and then coated with carbon or platinum and observed using a Zeiss NEON 40 EsB scanning electron microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). The microscope was coupled with an Oxford Instruments Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (High Wycombe, UK) for elemental analysis. Analysis of collected spectra was carried out using Oxford Inca software (High Wycombe, UK).

3. Results

3.1. Curing Temperature

Sealed samples of Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer were cured for 24 h from 60 to 90 °C followed by resting for six days at ambient temperature. Different curing temperatures of sealed samples appear to have little impact upon compressive strength as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 shows that the compressive strength after seven days of Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer remains consistent at approximately 35 MPa over a curing (24 h) temperature range of 60 to 90 °C. The ability to maintain constant strength with variable curing temperature is in contrast to others who have found increased curing temperatures above 60 °C, resulting in lower compressive strength [40]. This difference may be a result of the source of fly ash but could be due to the small sample volume and the sealed curing environment. The advantage is sufficient to warrant further investigation on larger scale samples.

3.2. Silica Fume Content

Silica fume was added to geopolymer paste mixes to achieve targeted Si/Al ratios. The addition of silica fume reduced the workability of the mixture. Geopolymer samples made from Collie or Muja fly ash were oven cured at 70 °C for 24 h in a sealed vial. Figure 2 shows a linear relationship between the targeted Si/Al ratio and the compressive strength.
From Figure 2, it is clear that increasing the Si/Al ratio increases the compressive strength for both sources of fly ash. However, it is not possible to ascertain if the increased strength comes from increased geopolymer gel formation or a separate silica rich phase.
To determine the role of the silica fume, the Si/Al of the geopolymer gel was measured by SEM/EDS. The measured Si/Al ratio was then compared to the targeted ratio. For Collie fly ash geopolymers, the targeted Si/Al and measured Si/Al (EDS) are similar above ratio 1.6 (Figure 3) and are identical at Si/Al of 2.4 This suggests that all of the reactive Si and Al in the fly ash, plus all of the silica fume, has been consumed.
Comparison of the targeted Si/Al with measured Si/Al for the Muja fly ash geopolymer (Figure 3) showed that the measured values were below the targeted values, indicating that not all of the extra Si from the silica fume is being incorporated into the geopolymer. It is thought that the smaller particle size distribution of the Muja fly ash and higher reactivity may result in less added silica being utilised. It is envisaged that if the fly ash dissolves faster than the silica fume, then the geopolymer condenses with a lower than expected Si/Al leaving excess silica fume in the structure.
Analysis by XRD (Figure 4) has shown the presence of zeolite (sodalite) with peak intensity higher at lower Si/Al ratios. It is not clear if the presence of sodalite reduces the strength of the geopolymer, or if it is an artefact of incomplete geopolymerisation.
For the oven-cured geopolymer pastes, both Collie and Muja fly ash based samples (Figure 2) showed an increase in the compressive strength with increased silica fume content. However, Muja fly ash geopolymer with a low Si/Al = 1.19 (no added silica fume) still had a compressive strength of 29 MPa, well above the target of 20 MPa.

3.3. Ambient Curing

For many high volume premixed geopolymer applications, it is not feasible to cure at elevated temperatures. Thus, ambient curing is required. The incorporation of Ca(OH)2 or ground granulated blast furnace slag into the geopolymer mixture facilitates ambient curing. Ground granulated blast furnace slag is significantly less expensive than Ca(OH)2; however, larger quantities are required to achieve a compressive strength of 20 MPa.
Samples of Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer were produced with different levels of Hylime (Ca(OH)2). Figure 5 shows the seven-day compressive strength for samples cured at ambient temperature (approximately 22 °C). The strength increases with increasing Ca(OH)2 content with mixtures of 4 wt % or higher Ca(OH)2 achieving the desired level (>20 MPa).
Phase identification with XRD data (Figure 6) shows that even at the highest concentrations (5 wt % of Ca(OH)2), Portlandite is not present as a separate crystalline phase but is incorporated in the geopolymer structure. Phases identified in the geopolymer paste are quartz, mullite, hematite and magnetite. There was an absence of sodalite compared to the oven cured samples in Figure 4.
Ground granulated blast furnace slag (Builders slag) is an industrial residue that can be used as a source of calcium (42.9 wt % CaO). Samples of Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer were produced utilising ground granulated blast furnace slag or Hylime for direct comparison. Figure 7 shows the comparative compressive strengths after seven days of ambient cure.
For similar calcium content, it is evident that Hylime (Ca(OH)2) is more effective at strength generation. It is understood that the particle size of the ground granulated blast furnace slag will dictate how readily the calcium is provided for the geopolymerisation process. Having a large impact upon strength, it would appear essential for any production process to ensure strict quality control/quality assurance upon the calcium delivery reagent.
The results demonstrate that Muja fly ash derived geopolymer (Figure 7) has higher compressive strength compared to Collie fly ash derived geopolymer (Figure 5). The Muja product also requires less calcium to achieve the ambient cure compressive strengths target. It is believed that the higher surface area of Muja ash (Table 5) contributed to improved alkali reactivity leading to greater geopolymer formation.
Figure 8 shows the XRD patterns collected from 1.0 wt % and 5.5 wt % calcium addition from Ca(OH)2 to Muja fly ash based geopolymers. There is a marginal increase in the amorphous geopolymer component for the 5.5 wt % sample, recognisable from the broad elevation in the pattern centred at ~28° 2θ (Figure 8). It is clear that no new phases have been formed by adding the Ca(OH)2 at either 1 or 5.5 wt % and curing at ambient temperature. It is apparent that the presence of Ca in samples cured at ambient temperature facilitates geopolymerisation leading to a strength increase [41].
It is apparent that addition of calcium to the formulation of Bayer derived fly ash geopolymer results in ambient temperature curing with increasing calcium resulting in higher compressive strength. The target compressive strength of 20 MPa is achieved with there being no discernible changes to the formation of geopolymer.

4. Conclusions

For a geopolymer concrete binding agent to be suitable for the replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement, the ability to cure at ambient temperature is considered essential to maximise the market opportunities. The novel approach of using Bayer process liquor as the activating solution for the manufacturing of geopolymers has opened the possibility of industrial scale synergy with significant reductions in product embodied energy. This paper has demonstrated that Bayer derived fly ash geopolymer formulations can be modified to achieve ambient cure.
Calcium was added to formulations utilising Collie or Muja power station fly ash to manufacture ambient temperature cured, Bayer derived geopolymer, achieving a minimum 20 MPa compressive strength.
Geopolymers made from Muja fly ash required less calcium addition yet resulted in a higher compressive strength than those made from Collie fly ash. This is believed to be a surface area effect of the fly ash resulting in greater reactivity.
The availability of calcium to the geopolymer appears critical to the product compressive strength. This would indicate that well defined calcium reagents are required for quality control and quality assurance.
The use of multiple industrial by-products to manufacture ambient curing geopolymers is a major step forward towards introducing commercially viable alternatives to Ordinary Portland Cement.

Acknowledgments

Project funds were provided by Alcoa to the Cooperative Centre for Sustainable Resource Processing as part of support for project 132.

Author Contributions

Evan Jamieson and Arie van Riessen conceived and designed the experiments; Catherine S. Kealley.and Robert D. Hart performed the experiments and Catherine S. Kealley analysed the XRD data; Catherine S. Kealley, Evan Jamieson and Arie van Riessen wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rangan, B.V. Studies on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Malays. Constr. Res. J. 2008, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rangan, B.V. Low-Calcium, Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. In Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook; Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rickard, W.; van Riessen, A.; Walls, P. Thermal Character of Geopolymers Synthesized from Class F Fly Ash Containing High Concentrations of Iron and a-Quartz. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2010, 7, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Temuujin, J.; Minjigmaa, A.; Lee, M.; Chen-Tan, N.; van Riessen, A. Characterisation of class F fly ash geopolymer pastes immersed in acid and alkaline solutions. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 1086–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McLellan, B.; Williams, R.; Lay, J.; van Riessen, A.; Corder, G. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jamieson, E.; McLellan, B.; van Riessen, A.; Nikraz, H. Embodied energy of Bayer derived Geopolymers. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 99, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Davidovits, J. Global Warning Impact on the cement and aggregate industries. World Resour. Rev. 1994, 6, 263–278. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidovits, J. Environmentally driven geopolymer cement applications. In Proceedings of the Geopolymer 3rd International Conference: Turning Potential into Profit, Melbourne, Australia, 28–29 October 2002; Williams, J.R., Ed.; Geopolymer Institute: Melbourne, Australia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tavor, D.; Wolfson, A.; Shamaev, A.; Shvarzman, A. Recycling of industrial waste water by its immobilization in geopolymer cement. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 6801–6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jamieson, E. Method for Management of Contaminants in Alkaline Process Liquors. International Patent WO 2008/017109 A1, 14 February 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gourley, J. Geopolymers; opportunities for environmentally friendly construction materials. In Proceedings of the Materials 2003 Conference: Adaptive Materials for a Modern Society, Sydney, Australia, 1–3 October 2003.
  12. Gourley, J.; Johnson, G. Developments in Geopolymer Precast Concrete. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Geopolymers and Geopolymer Concrete, Perth, Australia, 28–29 September 2005.
  13. Southam, D.; Brent, G.; Felipe, F.; Carr, C.; Hart, R.; Wright, K. Towards More Sustainable Mine Fills—Replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement with Geopolymer Cements. In Proceedings of the World Gold Conference, Cairns, Australia, 22–24 October 2007; pp. 22–24.
  14. Hart, R.; Lowe, J.; Southam, D.; Perera, D.; Walls, P.; Vance, E.; Gourley, T.; Wright, K. Aluminosilicate inorganic polymers from waste materials. In Proceedings of the Green Processing, Third International Conference on Sustainable Processing of Minerals and Metals, Newcastle, Australia, 5–6 June 2006; pp. 93–103.
  15. Sriwahyuni, A.; Nikraz, H.; Jamieson, E.; Cooling, D. Sustainable use of bauxite residue sand (red sand) in concrete. In Proceedings of the Green Processing, Third International Conference on Sustainable Processing of Minerals and Metals, Newcastle, Australia, 5–6 June 2006; pp. 105–122.
  16. Jitsangiam, P.; Nikraz, H.; Jamieson, E. Sustainable use of a Bauxite Residue (red sand) in terms of Roadway Materials. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Science, Auckland, New Zealand, 20–23 February 2007.
  17. Jitsangiam, P.; Nikraz, H.; Jamieson, E.; Kitanovich, R.; Siripun, K. Sustainable use of a Bauxite Residue (red sand) as Highway Embankment Materials. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainability Engineering and Science, Auckland, New Zealand, 9–12 December 2008; The New Zealand Society for Sustainability Engineering and Science: Auckland, New Zealand, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  18. Attiwell, S.; Jamieson, E.; Jones, A.; Cooling, D.; Myers, L.; Lee, F.; Malley, I.; Tate, D.; MacDonald, A.; Ketelsen, T.; et al. Demonstration trials for the use of Readygrit®. In Proceedings of the 10th International Alumina Quality Workshop, Perth, Australia, 19–24 April 2015; Volume 10, pp. 187–196.
  19. Williams, R.; van Riessen, A. Determination of the Reactive Component of Fly Ashes for Geopolymer Production Using XRF and XRD. Fuel 2010, 89, 3683–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Williams, R.; Hart, R.; van Riessen, A. Quantification of the Extent of Reaction of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 2663–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen-Tan, N.; van Riessen, A.; Ly, C.; Southam, D. Determining the reactivity of a fly ash for production of Geopolymer. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rickard, W.; Williams, R.; Temuujin, J.; van Riessen, A. Assessing the suitability of three Australian fly ashes as an aluminosilicate source for geopolymers in high temperature applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 3390–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hardjito, D.; Wallah, S.; Sumajouw, D.; Rangan, B. On the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2004, 101, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  24. Davidovits, J. Geopolymer Chemistry & Applications, 2nd ed.; Institut Géopolymère: Saint-Quentin, France, 2008; Chapter 25; pp. 526–527. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu, H.; van Deventer, J. Geopolymerisation of multiple minerals. Miner. Eng. 2002, 15, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khater, H. Effect of Calcium on Geopolymerization of Aluminosilicate Wastes. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2012, 24, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ferone, C.; Colangelo, F.; Messina, F.; Santoro, L.; Cioffi, R. Recycling of pre-washed municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash in the manufacturing of low temperature setting geopolymer materials. Materials 2013, 6, 3420–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deb, P.S.; Nath, P.; Sarker, K. The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Mater. Des. 2014, 62, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brew, D.; MacKenzie, K. Geopolymer synthesis using silica fume and sodium aluminate. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 3990–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Phair, J.; van Deventer, J. Characterization of fly-ash-based geopolymeric binders activated with sodium aluminate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 4242–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Masi, G.; Rickard, W.D.A.; Bignozzi, M.C.; van Riessen, A. The effect of organic and inorganic fibres on the mechanical and thermal properties of aluminate activated geopolymers. Compos. Part B 2015, 76, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Masi, G.; Rickard, W.D.A.; Vickers, L.; Bignozzi, M.C.; van Riessen, A. A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 13891–13902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van Riessen, A.; Jamieson, E.; Kealley, C.; Hart, R.; Williams, R. Bayer-Geopolymers, an exploration of synergy between the alumina and geopolymer industries. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 41, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jamieson, E.; van Riessen, A.; Kealley, C.; Hart, R. Development of Bayer Geopolymer Paste and use as Concrete. In Proceedings of the 9th International Alumina Quality Workshop, Perth, Australia, 18–22 March 2012; Volume 9, pp. 296–299.
  35. Jamieson, E. Development and Utilisation of Bayer Process by-Products. Ph.D. Thesis, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jamieson, E.; Penna, B.; van Riessen, A.; Nikraz, H. Bayer—Fly ash geopolymers: Development and application. In Proceedings of the 10th International Alumina Quality Workshop, Perth, Australia, 19–24 April 2015; Volume 10, pp. 197–204.
  37. Van Deventer, J.; Provis, J.; Duxson, P.; Brice, D. Chemical research and climate change as drivers in the commercial adoption of alkali activated materials. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2010, 1, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guide to Residential Pavements; Australian Standard 3727; Standards Australia: Homebush, Australia, 1993.
  39. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; ASTM C39; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
  40. Hardjito, D.; Cheak, C.C.; Ing, C.H.L. Strength and Setting Times of Low Calcium Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Mortar. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2008, 2, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Temuujin, J.; van Riessen, A.; Williams, R. Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 09 00392 g001 1024
Figure 1. Seven-day compressive strength results from oven cured Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer samples.
Figure 1. Seven-day compressive strength results from oven cured Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer samples.
Materials 09 00392 g001
Materials 09 00392 g002 1024
Figure 2. Silica fume addition to Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymers. Change in compressive strength versus targeted Si/Al for oven cured samples.
Figure 2. Silica fume addition to Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymers. Change in compressive strength versus targeted Si/Al for oven cured samples.
Materials 09 00392 g002
Materials 09 00392 g003 1024
Figure 3. Variation in targeted Si/Al versus measured Si/Al of oven cured Collie and Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymers.
Figure 3. Variation in targeted Si/Al versus measured Si/Al of oven cured Collie and Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymers.
Materials 09 00392 g003
Materials 09 00392 g004 1024
Figure 4. A comparison of the XRD patterns (11°–35° 2θ) collected from Collie and Muja fly ash geopolymers with varying levels of silica fume. Note: The patterns have been offset vertically to improve clarity. The oven-cured samples were cured for 24 h at 70 °C. The most intense reflections of the sodalite phase are highlighted with arrows.
Figure 4. A comparison of the XRD patterns (11°–35° 2θ) collected from Collie and Muja fly ash geopolymers with varying levels of silica fume. Note: The patterns have been offset vertically to improve clarity. The oven-cured samples were cured for 24 h at 70 °C. The most intense reflections of the sodalite phase are highlighted with arrows.
Materials 09 00392 g004
Materials 09 00392 g005 1024
Figure 5. Seven-day compressive strength results for ambient cured Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer samples with increasing Ca(OH)2 (Hylime) content (wt %).
Figure 5. Seven-day compressive strength results for ambient cured Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer samples with increasing Ca(OH)2 (Hylime) content (wt %).
Materials 09 00392 g005
Materials 09 00392 g006 1024
Figure 6. XRD pattern showing phase identification of the Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor based geopolymer paste with 5 wt % Ca(OH)2 (Hylime).
Figure 6. XRD pattern showing phase identification of the Collie fly ash/Bayer liquor based geopolymer paste with 5 wt % Ca(OH)2 (Hylime).
Materials 09 00392 g006
Materials 09 00392 g007 1024
Figure 7. Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor—seven-day ambient cure compressive strength for calcium from different sources.
Figure 7. Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor—seven-day ambient cure compressive strength for calcium from different sources.
Materials 09 00392 g007
Materials 09 00392 g008 1024
Figure 8. A selected portion of the XRD patterns from Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer with 1.0 and 5 wt % addition of Ca(OH)2.
Figure 8. A selected portion of the XRD patterns from Muja fly ash/Bayer liquor geopolymer with 1.0 and 5 wt % addition of Ca(OH)2.
Materials 09 00392 g008
Table
Table 1. Composition of Bayer liquors used to synthesise geopolymers.
Table 1. Composition of Bayer liquors used to synthesise geopolymers.
Source of Bayer LiquorAl2O3 (g/L)NaOH (g/L)
Kwinana252.7438.5
Wagerup228.4449.1
Table
Table 2. Bulk composition (XRF) of fly ash.
Table 2. Bulk composition (XRF) of fly ash.
OxideCollieMuja
wt %wt %
SiO249.9 (2)44.9 (2)
Al2O324.8 (2)32.5 (2)
Fe2O316.60 (4)10.6 (4)
CaO1.8 (1)2.0 (1)
K2O0.61 (8)0.69 (8)
TiO21.36 (2)1.67 (3)
MgO1.31 (6)1.44 (6)
Na2O0.4 (1)0.6 (1)
P2O51.52 (4)1.52 (4)
SrO0.33 (1)0.22 (1)
BaO0.45 (1)0.53 (1)
Other (includes LOI)0.7 (1)3.33 (3)
Si/Al (molar ratio)1.71 (1)1.17 (1)
Values in parentheses in this and all further tables correspond to the least significant figure in the estimated standard deviation to the left, all in weight percent. LOI is loss on ignition.
Table
Table 3. The phase composition of the fly ash by Rietveld quantitative analysis.
Table 3. The phase composition of the fly ash by Rietveld quantitative analysis.
Mineral/PhaseCollieMuja
wt %wt %
Primary Quartz13 (1)5.9 (6)
Secondary Quartz11.0 (2)4.9 (3)
Hematite2.42 (8)1.13 (7)
Magnetite2.0 (1)3.4 (3)
Mullite14 (1)28 (1)
Maghemite C6.6 (3)–
Amorphous51 (1)57 (1)
Table
Table 4. Composition of amorphous component of the fly ash.
Table 4. Composition of amorphous component of the fly ash.
OxideCollieMuja
wt %wt %
SiO221 (2)26 (2)
Al2O315 (1)12 (1)
sum of aluminosilicates36 (3)38.1 (4)
Si/Al (molar ratio)1.21.8
Table
Table 5. Particle size and surface area of the fly ash and silica fume. Particle size (d) is presented as the cumulative volume diameter and the number in brackets represents the cut off value in percent.
Table 5. Particle size and surface area of the fly ash and silica fume. Particle size (d) is presented as the cumulative volume diameter and the number in brackets represents the cut off value in percent.
Fly Ash/FumeSurface Area (m2/cc)d (10) (µm)d (50) (µm)d (80) (µm)d (90) (µm)
Collie1.012.716.049.381.9
Muja2.241.14.413.224.6
Silica Fume (SF98)180.30.5–0.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jamieson, E.; Kealley, C.S.; Van Riessen, A.; Hart, R.D. Optimising Ambient Setting Bayer Derived Fly Ash Geopolymers. Materials 2016, 9, 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9050392

AMA Style

Jamieson E, Kealley CS, Van Riessen A, Hart RD. Optimising Ambient Setting Bayer Derived Fly Ash Geopolymers. Materials. 2016; 9(5):392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9050392

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jamieson, Evan, Catherine S. Kealley, Arie Van Riessen, and Robert D. Hart. 2016. "Optimising Ambient Setting Bayer Derived Fly Ash Geopolymers" Materials 9, no. 5: 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9050392

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop