Next Article in Journal
Mutant Bisexual and Wild Male Flowers Were Compared by Integrated Proteome and Transcriptome Analyses to Provide Insight into the Sex Conversion of Idesia polycarpa Maxim
Previous Article in Journal
Effects on the Synthesis and Accumulation of Triterpenes in Leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus under MeJA Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Sha et al. Differences in Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities of Chinese Cork Oak (Quercus variabilis) Seedlings in Different Growth Years. Forests 2023, 14, 1489

1
School of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Jining 273165, China
2
Institute of Dry Farming, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Key Laboratory of Crop Drought Tolerance Research of Hebei Province, Hengshui 053000, China
3
Jining Forestry Protection and Development Service Center, Jining 272000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(9), 1736; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091736
Submission received: 17 August 2023 / Accepted: 21 August 2023 / Published: 28 August 2023

Text Correction

There was an error in the last sentence in part “2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection”, and the first sentence in “2.3. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification” in the original publication [1].
The last sentence in part “2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection” has been made to “The internal tissues of the root were selected for root endophytic bacterial DNA extraction to determine the alpha diversity, beta diversity, and community composition of the root endophytic bacterial community. The soil samples were dried naturally at room temperature for determining the contents of conventional nutrients.”.
The first sentence in “2.3. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification” has been made to “The root samples were cleaned using ultrasonic waves 3 times and disinfected with sodium hypochlorite 2 times for DNA extraction.”.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Sha, W.; Hong, D.; Che, Y.; Xue, Y.; Kong, Y.; Yi, X.; Zhou, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, B. Differences in Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities of Chinese Cork Oak (Quercus variabilis) Seedlings in Different Growth Years. Forests 2023, 14, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sha, W.; Hong, D.; Che, Y.; Xue, Y.; Kong, Y.; Yi, X.; Zhou, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, B. Correction: Sha et al. Differences in Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities of Chinese Cork Oak (Quercus variabilis) Seedlings in Different Growth Years. Forests 2023, 14, 1489. Forests 2023, 14, 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091736

AMA Style

Sha W, Hong D, Che Y, Xue Y, Kong Y, Yi X, Zhou J, Yu G, Liu B. Correction: Sha et al. Differences in Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities of Chinese Cork Oak (Quercus variabilis) Seedlings in Different Growth Years. Forests 2023, 14, 1489. Forests. 2023; 14(9):1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091736

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sha, Weilai, Die Hong, Yuying Che, Yafei Xue, Yong Kong, Xianfeng Yi, Jing Zhou, Guohong Yu, and Baoxuan Liu. 2023. "Correction: Sha et al. Differences in Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities of Chinese Cork Oak (Quercus variabilis) Seedlings in Different Growth Years. Forests 2023, 14, 1489" Forests 14, no. 9: 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091736

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop