Next Article in Journal
Predicting Sub-Forest Type Transition Characteristics Using Canopy Density: An Analysis of the Ganjiang River Basin Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Potential Habitat Distribution of Relict Plant Davidia involucrata in China Based on the MaxEnt Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling Management-Relevant Urban Forest Stand Characteristics to Optimize Carbon Storage and Sequestration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals, and Carbon Deposition Capacities of Urban Tree Species in Tehran, Iran

by
Sahar Elkaee
1,2,
Anoushirvan Shirvany
1,*,
Mazaher Moeinaddini
3 and
Farzaneh Sabbagh
4,*
1
Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 31587-77871, Iran
2
Department of Environmental & IT Engineering, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran 14179-35840, Iran
4
Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Science, Alzahra University, Tehran 19938-91176, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(2), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020273
Submission received: 18 December 2023 / Revised: 23 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 January 2024 / Published: 31 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Green Infrastructure and Urban Landscape Ecology)

Abstract

:
Air pollution is a pressing environmental concern in urban areas, with particulate matter (PM) posing serious health and environmental threats. Urban greening has emerged as a potential solution to capture and retain PM. This study assesses the PM deposition capacity of five common tree species: Morus alba (M. alba), Ailanthus altissima (A. altissima), Platanus orientalis (P. orientalis), Robinia pseudoacacia (R. pseudoacacia), and Ulmus minor (U. minor) in two highly polluted sites in Tehran, Iran. Additionally, this study investigates the accumulation of heavy metals (Ni, Fe, Cd, and Pb), Organic Carbon (OC), Elemental Carbon (EC), and Total Carbon (TC) on the leaves of these tree species. The results demonstrate species-specific differences in PM deposition capacity, with U. minor and M. alba showing high PM retention. A. altissima exhibits strong capability in adsorbing PM 0.1–2.5, while U. minor demonstrates greater retention of PM > 2.5. Moreover, the deposition of heavy metals varies among species, with R. pseudoacacia and A. altissima capturing higher levels. This study highlights the significance of appropriate tree utilization in urban environments against air pollution in order to make the air healthier in major cities. Awareness of the different tree species capacities leads urban planners and policymakers to make intelligent decisions about urban greening initiatives to improve air quality and overall well-being.

1. Introduction

Air pollution has emerged as a pressing global environmental issue, particularly in urban areas where high population densities and extensive anthropogenic activities contribute to elevated levels of pollutants in the atmosphere. The presence of particulate matter (PM) stands out among the pollutants, encompassing a diverse range of suspended solid or liquid particles with varying sizes and chemical compositions [1,2,3]. This mixture includes heavy metals, black carbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and other predominantly human-made pollutants suspended in the atmosphere [4,5].
Particles are categorized into three groups based on their sizes: coarse (2.5–10 µm), fine (0.1–2.5 µm), and ultrafine (≤0.1 µm) [3,6]. The repercussions of these minuscule particles reverberate through both human health and the environment. They have a significant role in the development of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in humans while also inflicting harm upon ecosystems and climate [2,7,8,9]. PM aerosol, originating from various sources like coal, biomass, and industrial activities, possesses a complex composition, including carbonaceous species, soot, inorganic ions, and elements. Among these, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and certain elements (Cd, Pb, Ni, As, Tl, and Hg) pose health risks due to their carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. PAHs form during incomplete combustion, while elements are emitted from sources like coal combustion and traffic. The potential harm arises when PAHs and elements in PM deposit on the lungs, dissolving into the pulmonary surfactant [10,11,12]. It is crucial to delve into the specific sources of carbon, PAHs, and heavy metals in developing countries, where PM concentrations are notably high, emphasizing their potential impact on human health. Additionally, recognizing the significance of greenery in urban areas for capturing PM is essential for a holistic understanding of the dynamics involved.
Particulate carbon, such as Organic Carbon (OC), Elemental Carbon (EC), and Total Carbon (TC), mainly in the form of Carbonate Carbon (CC), is formed through the photo-oxidation and polymerization of organic species in the environment [13,14,15]. EC, in particular, results from the incomplete combustion of carbon-based fuels, found in wood used for heating and fossil fuels used in various industrial and transportation activities [13,14]. Health concerns surrounding automobile pollution, particularly in the context of elemental carbon dominating total carbon emissions from specific vehicles, have been raised [16,17,18].
Heavy metals, some of which occur naturally in soils, rocks, waters, and organisms, and others stemming from human activities, have been widely studied for their impact on plants and the environment [19,20]. While certain heavy metals pose substantial environmental hazards, others are essential nutrients for living organisms but can become toxic at elevated levels or in specific forms [21,22,23]. The accumulation of heavy metals in biological organisms and soil poses significant risks, particularly lead, which tends to accumulate on urban roadways due to traffic emissions. Industrial and automobile emissions further impact the composition of soil, water, and air [24,25,26,27].
Recent attention has focused on the concept of “urban greening”, which involves using vegetation as a natural solution to mitigate air pollution [8,9,28,29,30]. Trees and plants can serve as natural filters, capturing and retaining particulate matter on their surfaces [31,32]. This unique capability of vegetation to act as “green lungs” for urban environments has spurred interest in exploring the potential of different tree species to combat air pollution and improve the well-being of urban inhabitants [6,33,34].
The influence of the surface properties of objects on particle immobilization has been well-established, and different plant species exhibit varying capabilities in scavenging dust-laden air [35]. The dust-retention capacities of vegetation are contingent on several factors, encompassing canopy type, leaf and branch density, and leaf micromorphology, such as roughness, trichomes, and wax [33,36,37,38]. Variations in leaf surface properties within species cultivars can also significantly impact their ability to capture PM. To comprehensively understand the relationships between species traits and their particulate matter-capturing capacity, large-scale sampling efforts are imperative [33]. While it is recognized that urban trees temporarily reduce atmospheric PM concentrations by retaining particles, the efficacy of vegetation as a long-term alternative to other mitigation measures remains a topic of ongoing debate [33,39].
Given Tehran’s ongoing air pollution challenges due to high population density, rapid urbanization, vehicular emissions, and industrial activities, the city serves as an ideal case study for urban air quality management [40,41,42]. Additionally, the presence of the Alborz Mountain range surrounding Tehran restricts air circulation, leading to the accumulation of pollutants in certain areas. These complex geographical and climatic conditions offer an opportunity to evaluate the performance of various tree species in capturing particulate matter and heavy metals, which are major contributors to air pollution [43,44,45].
This study aims to assess the PM deposition capacity of five common tree species—Morus alba (M. alba), Ailanthus altissima (A. altissima), Platanus orientalis (P. orientalis), Robinia pseudoacacia (R. pseudoacacia), and Ulmus minor (U. minor)—in two highly polluted sites within Tehran. By analyzing the potential of these tree species to capture particulate matter in three size fractions (<0.1 μm, 0.1–2.5 μm, and >2.5 μm), this study seeks insights into their effectiveness as natural air cleaner filters. Additionally, the deposition of heavy metals (Ni, Fe, Cd, and Pb) and EC, OC, and TC on the leaves of these species will be investigated, considering that heavy metals and carbon are often associated with particulate matter and can have serious health and environmental implications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Study Area

This study was conducted in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, positioned at approximately latitude 35°50′ N and longitude 51°37′ E and situated at an average elevation of around 1400 m above sea level (Figure 1). Tehran experiences a broad annual temperature range, with January recording an average low temperature of 4 °C and August reaching an average high temperature of 37 °C. Daytime relative humidity in Tehran varies significantly, from a minimum of 28% in June to a maximum of 64% in December. The presence of the Alborz Mountain range to the north and northeast of the city restricts the dispersion and ventilation of air pollutants. Tehran, ranking 19th globally in terms of population, confronts substantial air pollution challenges, primarily stemming from sources such as vehicular emissions [46].

2.2. Sampling and Analytical Methods

Sampling locations were meticulously chosen based on road types in proximity to each Air Quality Monitoring Station (AQMS), following an extensive analysis of long-term PM concentration data (Figure 1). Two highly polluted sites, identified during on-site visits, were deemed suitable for collecting samples of PM deposition on tree leaves. These sites, situated along Chamran Highway (referred to as ‘site B’) and Gandi Street (referred to as ‘site A’), are characterized as residential-commercial thoroughfares.
A total of 30 samples were gathered from the most prevalent tree species found at these locations, including M. alba, A. altissima, P. orientalis, R. pseudoacacia, and U. minor. Random sampling was conducted, ensuring a minimum distance from the street. Three individuals from each tree species were chosen, and leaves were randomly collected from four directions (east, south, west, and north) at a height of 2.0–2.5 m above the ground. Fifteen leaf pieces were collected in each direction for every species, resulting in sixty pieces per species (180 pieces in total for three plants) [47]. The sampling took place in the latter part of September, following the conclusion of the growing season, with a gap of over two months since the last rainfall event. There were no severe weather conditions, such as heavy rains or strong winds, in the week leading up to the collection. On the sampling day, the weather was sunny, and the wind speed remained below 2 m/s to prevent errors caused by external factors [5,46].
To prevent contamination, the collected leaves were meticulously labeled and securely sealed in zip-lock bags during the sampling process, ensuring no particle loss. These samples were then preserved in a laboratory refrigerator at a low temperature (4 °C) [48]. Subsequently, the leaves were cleansed with ethanol and distilled water to achieve samples in a 1.5:10 mL ratio. The ethanol in the eluted samples was evaporated in an oven set at 70 °C. The quantity of deposited PM was determined through centrifugation (utilizing the German-manufactured 2206A model) for 5 min at 3000 rpm, and the upper liquid layer was removed. The samples were subsequently oven-dried at 105 °C [46]. The suspended particles were allowed to settle, and water was removed using a pipette. The resultant particles were then placed in an oven at 135 °C for a duration of 24 h. Finally, the dry particles were weighed using a digital scale with a precision of 0.001 g. The leaves of each species were dried and scanned, and both the leaf area and average leaf area for each species were estimated using Image J software (Image J 1.44p) (Figure 2) [49].
For the determination of Total Carbon (TC) in the dry samples, a controlled process was employed. The samples underwent combustion at 550 °C within a muffle furnace for a duration of 2 h. This specific temperature was chosen because carbonates remain stable at temperatures below 550 °C [50]. Subsequent to the 2 h combustion period, the samples were transferred to an oven maintained at 105 °C for several hours to ensure complete drying. Once the samples had cooled within desiccators, their weight was recorded. The calculation of loss-on-ignition was performed using Formula (1) [50]:
d r y   s a m p l e s   m a s s   b e f o r e   c o m b u s t i o n d r y   s a m p l e   m a s s   a f t e r   c o m b u s t i o n d r y   s a m p l e   m a s s   b e f o r e   c o m b u s t i o n × 100
The Walkley and Black method was employed to determine the Organic Carbon (OC) content. In this method, a measured sample portion (0.3 g) was treated with 10 CC of a 0.4 N potassium dichromate solution (K2Cr2O7), followed by the addition of 20 CC of concentrated sulfuric acid. Subsequently, 100 CC of triple-distilled water were gently stirred into the mixture, which was then placed in a fume hood at room temperature for 16 to 18 h. To quantify the excess dichromate, a standard 0.2 N ferrous ammonium sulfate (Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O) solution was used for potentiometric back-titration [51].
The Elemental Carbon (EC) content was determined by subtracting the Organic Carbon from the Total Carbon, following Formula (2) [52]:
TC = OC + EC
For the extraction of heavy metals (Fe, Ni, Cd, and Pb) from the dry samples, 0.5 g of PM was introduced into a 25-mL laboratory flask, and the wet digestion method (utilizing HNO3–HCl in a 4:1 ratio) was employed. Heavy metal analysis was conducted using an atomic absorption/flame spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, AA-670, Kyoto, Japan) [46].
The particle dimensions of the PM collected from the leaf surfaces of these species were determined utilizing a particle size analyzer device (Brookhaven MAS-BI/90Plus Particle Size Analyzer, New York, NY, USA).
SPSS version 17 statistical software were utilized for data analysis. Two-sample independent t-tests, Games-Howell tests, and Duncan tests were performed to assess the distinctions between the samples. Any difference with a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Particulate Matter (PM) Deposition Capacity of Different Tree Species in Two Distinct Sites

This study delves into the assessment of various tree species’ proficiency in capturing particulate matter (PM) in two distinct locations, denoted as Site A (Gandi Street) and Site B (Chamran Highway). Site A is situated along a residential-commercial road with comparatively lower traffic densities, while Site B is located within a densely urbanized area characterized by high traffic volumes.
The data depicting PM deposition on the leaves of five tree species at both Site A and Site B are presented in Figure 3. It is evident that at Site A, U. minor demonstrated notably higher PM deposition, followed by M. alba, P. orientalis, and R. pseudoacacia, with A. altissima exhibiting the lowest PM deposition. At Site B, the order of PM deposition was as follows: M. alba > U. minor = P. orientalis > A. altissima = R. pseudoacacia. These findings highlight the strong capability of U. minor in Site A and M. alba in Site B to effectively capture PM on their leaves (Figure 3).
A comparison of PM deposition capacities at Site A and Site B revealed significant differences in the PM-capturing abilities of M. alba and P. orientalis. M. alba showed a higher PM deposition rate in Site B (0.512 ± 0.075 mg/cm2) than in Site A (0.280 ± 0.114 mg/cm2), while P. orientalis exhibited a greater PM deposition rate in Site B (0.399 ± 0.080 mg/cm2) than in Site A (0.275 ± 0.045 mg/cm2).

3.2. Particulate Matter Distribution on Leaves of Tree Species across Two Sites in Three Particle Size Fractions (<0.1 μm, 0.1–2.5 μm, >2.5 μm)

The examination of particulate matter (PM) deposition on leaves within various particle size fractions (<0.1 μm, 0.1–2.5 μm, and >2.5 μm) unveiled notable variations among tree species at Sites A and B (Table 1).
Table 1 provides a comprehensive comparison of PM deposition in three distinct particle size fractions at Sites A and B for various tree species. The results underscore the prevalence of PM in the 0.1–2.5 μm fraction at Site A, while Site B exhibits a higher presence of PM exceeding 2.5 μm.
In both Site A and Site B, none of the species exhibited a presence of particulate matter below 0.1 μm (PM < 0.1). At Site A, U. minor and P. orientalis displayed a remarkable 100% reduction in PM within the 0.1–2.5 μm fraction compared to R. pseudoacacia, A. altissima (99.4%), and M. alba (66.7%). Furthermore, M. alba exhibited a 33.3% reduction in PM exceeding 2.5 μm, while R. pseudoacacia and A. altissima showed a minimal reduction of 0.6% (Table 1).
Transitioning to Site B, the concentrations of PM exceeding 2.5 μm were notably higher in P. orientalis, M. alba, and U. minor, accounting for 59.7%, 55.8%, and 67.3%, respectively. Additionally, a substantial reduction in PM within the 0.1–2.5 μm fraction was observed, with values of 40.3%, 44.2%, and 32.7% for P. orientalis, M. alba, and U. minor, respectively. Notably, A. altissima exhibited a 100% average presence of PM in the 0.1–2.5 μm fraction in Site B, surpassing other species. Moreover, R. pseudoacacia demonstrated 65% presence in the 0.1–2.5 μm fraction and 35% in PM exceeding 2.5 μm (Table 1).

3.3. Variability in Heavy Metal Accumulation Capacity among Diverse Tree Species in Two Distinct Sites

This study shows the contrasting abilities of different tree species to amass heavy metals at Sites A and B. The concentrations of nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and iron (Fe) (mg/kg dry weight) within tree samples from each site are graphically depicted in Figure 4.
In Site A, A. altissima demonstrated significantly higher nickel (Ni) accumulation, with a mean value of 30.91 ± 4.1, while at Site B, R. pseudoacacia exhibited superior Ni deposition, averaging 38.88 ± 1.6. Conversely, both Sites A and B revealed lower Ni accumulation in P. orientalis, with mean values of 23.94 ± 4.5 and 22.89 ± 1.7, respectively. At Site A, U. minor, M. alba, and R. pseudoacacia displayed intermediate Ni accumulation, while at Site B, following R. pseudoacacia, U. minor, M. alba, and A. altissima exhibited higher Ni uptake (Figure 4).
In terms of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) deposition, no significant variations were observed among the species at Site A. In contrast, at Site B, R. pseudoacacia exhibited significantly higher Cd deposition with a concentration of 0.83 ± 0.1, as well as elevated Pb deposition at 190.5 ± 12.4 (Figure 4).
At Site B, A. altissima recorded the lowest Cd accumulation, measuring 0.15 ± 0.1, while P. orientalis, U. minor, and M. alba displayed intermediate Cd uptake. Furthermore, in Site B, P. orientalis exhibited the lowest Pb deposition (114.51 ± 11.1), followed by U. minor and M. alba, which showed higher Pb accumulation after R. pseudoacacia. A. altissima displayed intermediate Pb uptake at Site B (Figure 4).
Furthermore, A. altissima displayed significantly higher iron (Fe) deposition in both study locations, with Site A recording a mean of 29,229.8 ± 1242.6 and Site B recording a mean of 29,144.8 ± 5443.8. In Site B, R. pseudoacacia (33,529.1 ± 2067.2) and M. alba (28,588.9 ± 1915.6) exhibited elevated Fe deposition, surpassing U. minor and P. orientalis. In Site A, following A. altissima, P. orientalis displayed higher Fe uptake, with a mean value of 24,150.2 ± 4082.5, while R. pseudoacacia, U. minor, and M. alba demonstrated intermediate levels of Fe accumulation (Figure 4).

3.4. Evaluation of EC, OC, and TC Deposition Capacities of Various Tree Species at Two Distinct Sites

The investigation into the deposition of Elemental Carbon (EC), Organic Carbon (OC), and Total Carbon (TC) on the leaf surfaces of different tree species at Sites A and B unveiled significant variations among R. pseudoacacia, M. alba, A. altissima, U. minor, and P. orientalis (Table 2).
At Site A, the deposition sequence of EC was as follows: U. minor > P. orientalis > R. pseudoacacia = A. altissima > M. alba. Notably, U. minor demonstrated significantly higher EC deposition, while M. alba exhibited the lowest. In Site B, P. orientalis and R. pseudoacacia exhibited the highest EC deposition, while M. alba had the lowest, and U. minor and A. altissima demonstrated intermediate levels (Table 2).
Regarding OC deposition at Site A, U. minor and P. orientalis exhibited significantly higher levels, while M. alba displayed the lowest, and A. altissima and R. pseudoacacia fell in between. In Site B, no significant differences were observed among species regarding OC deposition (Table 2).
In the case of TC deposition at Site A, the order was found to be: U. minor > P. orientalis > A. altissima = R. pseudoacacia > M. alba. Similarly, at Site B, P. orientalis demonstrated significantly higher TC deposition, M. alba exhibited significantly lower TC deposition, and A. altissima, U. minor, and R. pseudoacacia displayed intermediate values (Table 2).
Table 2 highlights that Site A and Site B showed a significantly higher amount of EC deposition compared to OC deposition. The table indicates that EC was the major source of pollution in Site A, while both OC and EC contributed significantly to pollution in Site B.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Species and Regions on PM Deposition

Tree species exhibit variations in their capacity for PM deposition. This variability is influenced by several factors, including leaf morphology, canopy structure and size, ambient air particle concentrations, particle size distribution, traffic volume, and seasonal variations [29,43,47,53,54,55,56,57,58].
Leaves with larger surface areas and longer petioles have been found to deposit more PM, whereas leaves with intricate shapes, such as lobed leaves, and rough surfaces tend to capture a greater amount of PM per square centimeter [59]. Moreover, taller trees with larger leaves exhibit enhanced efficiency in absorbing small particles through processes like diffusion, facilitated by turbulent airflow and impaction. Additionally, leaves adorned with trichomes (leaf hairiness) have proven to be significant in capturing and retaining PM [60,61,62]. The deposition of PM is intricately linked to seasons, particularly during spring and summer, when crowded streets experience elevated PM concentrations owing to frequent vehicular stops and accelerations [48,56,63].
In agreement with Sharma et al. (2020), our study also found a higher deposition of PM in traffic-impacted areas, specifically for M. alba [64]. Similarly, Gupta et al. (2016) conducted research in the National Capital Territory of Delhi and reported that M. alba exhibited greater PM fall fluxes compared to Terminalia arjuna, attributable to the greater roughness of M. alba’s foliar surface [65]. Chaudhary et al. (2018) investigated the dust removal efficiency of roadside trees and identified air pollution-tolerant tree species. Their findings reinforce the idea that leaves with larger surface areas and longer petioles are more adept at depositing dust [58], whereas leaves with compound phyllotaxy, alternate arrangements, and rough surfaces exhibit heightened dust-capturing capabilities [58,64,65,66]. Tallis et al. (2011) posited that larger leaves are more effective at absorbing small particles via diffusion, thanks to turbulent air flow and impaction [67]. However, Weerakkody et al. (2018) observed that smaller leaves with intricate shapes, such as lobed leaves, are more efficient in capturing and retaining PM, with leaf hairiness (the presence of trichomes) emerging as the pivotal factor [68].
Notably, our findings align with studies conducted in diverse geographical regions. In northern China, A. altissima and M. alba displayed significantly lower total surface PM accumulation and in-wax PM accumulation, respectively [69]. Similarly, studies in Poland supported the finding that P. orientalis exhibited the highest PM accumulation capacity on its leaves. These consistent results across distinct regions underscore the robustness of our present research [48]. Koczak et al. (2021) likewise reported analogous results, indicating that P. orientalis stands out as the most efficient phytoremediation species [48]. The uniformity of these findings across diverse regions amplifies the significance of our research.
Moreover, the disparities in the capacity of tree species to capture particulate matter can be attributed to fluctuations in weather conditions associated with diverse traffic patterns and the higher wind speeds characteristic of densely trafficked urban areas. Elevated wind speeds bolster the deposition velocity of PM on roadside vegetation, leading to heightened levels of PM accumulation [70,71,72,73,74]. Chowdhury et al. (2022) conducted a study in Bangladesh to investigate particulate matter levels across six different sites. They discovered that roadside locations with less greenspace exhibited the highest atmospheric PM concentration, whereas areas with more greenspace, such as residential and park areas, displayed the lowest PM concentration. However, despite disparities in greenspace, there were no significant variations in atmospheric PM concentration levels among the sites [75].
In the present study, we observed that on both sites A and B, none of the species exceeded the fraction of particulate matter less than 0.1 μm (PM < 0.1), and PM2.5 constituted the most significant percentage of captured particulate matter. These findings corroborate previous research by Dang et al. (2022) in the southwest of Hangzhou, where plant leaves primarily trapped coarse particles (PM > 10 μm), following the order PM>10 > PM10 > PM2.5, where large particles constituted the majority of PM retained by plant leaves in a roadside environment, reinforcing our observations [76]. Elevated concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 typically result from anthropogenic activities, including the generation of secondary particles through the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. These higher values may also be linked to vehicle emissions and the formation of secondary particles through photochemical processes occurring at elevated temperatures [77]. In a study conducted by Biswas et al. (2020), the research delves into the consequences of rapid economic growth and urbanization on air quality in Kolkata and Siliguri, concentrating on three specific zones. The findings indicate significant concentrations of air pollutants, notably PM2.5 and PM10, with peak levels observed during the post-monsoon season in the Rabindra Bharati University zone in Kolkata. Monthly analyses of pollutant variations across the study areas underscore the impact of meteorological conditions and rising temperatures stemming from a variety of pollution sources [10]. In Zapletal et al.’s (2022) study, PM10 aerosols were analyzed for PAHs, hopanes, and elements during the monsoon and pre-monsoon. Pre-monsoon PM10 concentrations exceeded health limits, with major local sources identified as traffic, biomass burning, and coal combustion, plus contributions from waste incineration and a nearby cement factory. Diagnostic ratios indicated biomass and coal combustion impact post-monsoon pollution, while pre-monsoon saw petroleum combustion dominance. This study suggested pre-monsoon PM10 originated locally or regionally, contrasting with monsoon transport from larger distances [11]. The intricate chemical composition of PM, encompassing carbonaceous species, inorganic ions, elements, hopanes, and PAHs, varies depending on location and emission sources. In the context of developing countries, there is a crucial need to supplement the classification of sources of carbon, PAHs, hopanes, and elements, emphasizing their impact on human health. Considering these variations in PM deposition among tree species in different particle size fractions, this becomes highly significant for air quality management. Identifying tree species with superior capabilities to capture specific PM size fractions holds immense value for informing urban greening and pollution mitigation strategies.
In discussing the outcomes of this study, it becomes evident that various tree species exhibit diverse PM deposition capacities within urban environments. Notably, U. minor and M. alba emerge as promising candidates for phytoremediation efforts in polluted areas, demonstrating substantial potential for capturing particulate matter on their leaves. These findings emphasize the critical importance of thoughtful tree species selection in urban planning to effectively mitigate air pollution and enhance overall air quality.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge this study’s limitations. The methodological choices used to measure PM deposition and the sample size of tree species might influence the results. Additionally, the focus on two specific sites could constrain the generalizability of our findings. Further investigations are warranted to explore specific causal relationships and seasonal variations in PM deposition, which are essential for reinforcing the credibility of these results.
Looking ahead, future research endeavors could delve into assessing the long-term efficacy of different tree species in capturing PM and their overall contributions to enhancing air quality in urban environments. Exploring the combined effects of various tree species and their interactions with local meteorological conditions could provide valuable insights for optimizing urban greening strategies aimed at ameliorating air pollution.

4.2. Effect of Species and Regions on Heavy Metal Accumulation

Plants, through their leaves, can accumulate heavy metals, with particulate matter serving as the primary carrier of these contaminants. The accumulation of heavy metals in plant leaves is influenced by several factors, including the plant species, leaf structure, plant growth status, leaf structural properties, the heavy metal content within PM, and traffic volume [61,63,73,76]. Roy et al. (2020) conducted tests within the same environment, revealing varying degrees of heavy metal accumulation due to differences in the ability of five plant species to accumulate heavy metals [78].
Jia et al. (2021) observed a significant positive correlation between the concentration of toxic metals in leaves and the retention of dust. Leaves with a relatively rough surface, such as those of L. chinense, displayed enhanced particle absorption and, consequently, higher levels of heavy metal accumulation [1]. The research by Hu et al. (2017), which investigated the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in plant leaves across various regions in China, like our results, their study indicated higher heavy metal levels in areas with heavy traffic, implying a relationship between pollution levels and traffic volume [79].
Of the tree species examined, R. pseudoacacia emerged as the most effective in reducing heavy metal deposition on leaf surfaces. This finding aligns with a study by Isinkaralar et al. (2022), which also identified R. pseudoacacia as a superior choice for assessing atmospheric heavy metal levels [80]. The unique leaf characteristics of R. pseudoacacia, characterized by fewer apertures and cracks, likely contribute to its efficient surface adsorption of heavy metals, potentially inhibiting their internal absorption within the leaf [1].
Our results further coincide with a study conducted by Alahabadi et al. (2017), which focused on the heavy metal accumulation capacity of various tree species. Like our study, they found that M. alba exhibited the highest bioaccumulation capacity for heavy metals, underscoring its significant potential for capturing heavy metals [81].
Furthermore, studies conducted in Tehran, Iran, demonstrated that R. pseudoacacia exhibited the highest accumulation of Cd and Pb among the leaves and shoots of P. orientalis, R. pseudoacacia, and Fraxinus rotundifolia [82]. Another study in Isfahan, Iran, indicated that P. orientalis could serve as an indicator of heavy metal pollution, except for Pb, which exhibited lower concentrations in leaves due to its nonessential nature, unlike Ni and Fe, which are essential for plant growth and enzyme activities affecting protein synthesis [23].
It is crucial to acknowledge the complexity of heavy metal contamination in urban areas, particularly from traffic emissions. Cd is released from engine and brake pad wear, while Pb is emitted from exhaust emissions. PM particles containing Fe are prevalent due to road activity and abrasion caused by heavy vehicles [48,79,83]. The higher deposition of heavy metals in site B can be attributed to the greater traffic volume and car exhaust emissions. Site B, classified as a traffic road (highway), exhibited higher heavy metal deposition compared to Site A, which is a residential and commercial area with relatively lower heavy metal accumulation.
In our prior research, we assessed heavy metal concentrations and pollution levels in PM deposition on the leaf using enrichment factors (EF), geoaccumulation index (Igeo), modified degrees of contamination (mCd), and a new weighted degree of contamination factor (wCd). EF values indicated significant enrichment, attributing PM pollution to anthropogenic activities. Igeo values pinpointed Cd (80%–97%) and Pb (100%) as major pollutants in DS. While mCd results suggested over 67% of samples were unpolluted, a notable discrepancy emerged, with Igeo indicating high pollution for Pb and Cd [46].
These findings hold significant implications for urban planning strategies aimed at addressing heavy metal pollution. However, it is essential to recognize that contrasting results from other studies underscore the need for further research to comprehend site-specific factors influencing heavy metal accumulation in urban environments. Given the diverse sources and levels of heavy metal contamination in urban areas, interdisciplinary investigations are crucial for developing effective pollution control strategies and promoting sustainable urban development.

4.3. Effect of Species and Regions on Carbon Accumulation

In this study, we explored the deposition of EC, OC, and TC on the leaf surfaces of various tree species at sites A and B. The findings provide valuable insights into the interactions between these tree species and air quality, shedding light on their abilities to capture particulate matter. To place our results into context, we also contrasted our findings with previous research, offering a broader understanding of the intricate relationship between carbonaceous pollution and tree species.
In comparison to previous research, our findings offer a distinct perspective. Feng et al. (2009) observed higher levels of OC compared to EC in both rural and urban areas. This distinction is particularly pronounced in rural regions where carbonaceous pollution, stemming from vehicular exhaust, coal smoke, and kitchen emissions, takes on a more prominent role [84]. Similarly, Ye et al. (2003) identified significantly elevated OC levels in two sites in China, surpassing EC levels. These findings were attributed to emissions from diesel vehicles and older gasoline-powered vehicles [85]. In South Korea, Kim et al. (2022) categorized EC and OC as the third sources of pollution for mobile and coal-fired sources, respectively, in urban areas [86]. Jones et al. (2005) reported a different pattern, with higher levels of EC compared to OC at kerbside sites and a notable increase in EC levels during the week compared to weekends in North Kensington sites [87]. Observations in southeast Osaka, Japan, along three roadsides showed elevated Elemental Carbon levels in comparison to Organic Carbon levels, potentially due to diesel vehicle emissions [88].
In this specific study, we observed the unique abilities of U. minor and M. alba to effectively capture particulate matter on their leaves within the urban sites under investigation. The variation in deposition capacities among tree species was influenced by factors such as PM concentration levels, weather conditions, and wind speeds. A significant finding from our study was the absence of substantial differences between the two sites concerning OC, EC, and TC deposition, indicating consistent source emission rates.
These results underscore the crucial role that careful selection of tree species plays in urban planning to combat air pollution and enhance air quality. However, there is a need for additional research to delve into the underlying causal relationships and address potential limitations in our understanding of these complex interactions.
The unique aspect of this study is its comprehensive assessment of five tree species in Tehran, focusing on their capacity to capture particulate matter, heavy metals, and various forms of carbon, thereby offering invaluable insights into their potential as natural air purification agents. It is worth highlighting that, as of now, no prior research has undertaken a comparative analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different tree species in capturing and retaining particulate matter, heavy metals, elemental carbon, organic carbon, and total carbon in the context of Iran.
The outcomes of this study have significant implications for urban planning and green space design, not only in Tehran but also in other major cities facing similar air pollution challenges. Identifying tree species with higher PM deposition capacities can help in the selection of capable species for urban afforestation, improving air quality in heavily polluted areas. Moreover, awareness of the capacity of specific tree species to capture heavy metals and carbon creates strategies for mitigating the adverse effects of heavy metals and carbon pollution in urban environments.
In a fast-growing urbanization process all over the world where air pollution poses an escalating threat to public health and the environment, the findings of this study contribute valuable information to the growing body of research on urban greening as a sustainable solution to combat air pollution. Integrating effective phytodepuration strategies into urban planning and environmental management can pave the way for building healthier, more resilient, and sustainable cities for present and future generations. Ultimately, fostering green urban environments can not only enhance air quality but also elevate the overall quality of life for urban inhabitants, creating livable, vibrant, and environmentally friendly cities.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the particulate matter (PM) deposition capacity of different tree species at two sites within Tehran, Iran. The findings shed light on the potential of various tree species to capture PM, which is a critical aspect of urban air quality management and pollution mitigation.
Our results revealed significant differences in PM deposition capacity among the studied tree species. U. minor and M. alba demonstrated strong abilities to capture particulate matter on their leaves, making them promising candidates for urban greening and air pollution reduction initiatives. On the other hand, R. pseudoacacia and A. altissima exhibited the lowest capacity for PM deposition at both sites.
Furthermore, we explored the deposition of heavy metals, such as Ni, Fe, Cd, and Pb, on the leaves of different species. U. minor and P. orientalis displayed the highest potential for retaining PM 0.1–2.5 fractions, while M. alba exhibited greater retention of PM > 2.5 in site A. In site B, A. altissima demonstrated the strongest capacity to adsorb PM 0.1–2.5, while U. minor showed greater retention of PM > 2.5. These findings provide valuable insights into the roles of specific tree species in capturing particulate matter of varying sizes, which can inform targeted planting strategies for improving urban air quality.
Our study highlights the importance of selecting suitable tree species in urban areas to combat air pollution effectively. Planting species with higher PM deposition capacities can contribute significantly to reducing air pollution levels and enhancing the overall environmental quality of urban spaces. As cities continue to face the challenges of air pollution, incorporating the knowledge gained from this research into urban planning and green space design can contribute to a healthier and more sustainable urban environment.
While this study contributes valuable information, it is essential to recognize its limitations. The chosen study sites represent specific urban areas, and further research across various locations and climates could enhance the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, long-term monitoring and evaluation of the selected tree species’ performance would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their potential as effective air quality improvement tools.
Overall, our findings emphasize the significant role of urban vegetation in mitigating air pollution and provide valuable guidance for urban planners, policymakers, and environmentalists in promoting sustainable and healthier urban environments. By integrating appropriate tree species into urban landscapes, we can take a step closer to building more resilient and greener cities for the benefit of current and future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., S.E. and M.M.; methodology, S.E., A.S. and M.M.; software, S.E. and A.S.; validation, A.S. and F.S.; formal analysis, S.E. and A.S.; investigation, S.E., A.S., M.M. and F.S.; resources, S.E. and A.S.; data curation, A.S., M.M. and F.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.E.; writing—review and editing, S.E., A.S. and F.S.; visualization, A.S. and M.M.; supervision, A.S. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jia, M.; Zhou, D.; Lu, S.; Yu, J. Assessment of Foliar Dust Particle Retention and Toxic Metal Accumulation Ability of Fifteen Roadside Tree Species: Relationship and Mechanism. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021, 12, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cachon, F.B.; Cazier, F.; Verdin, A.; Dewaele, D.; Genevray, P.; Delbende, A.; Ayi-Fanou, L.; Aïssi, F.; Sanni, A.; Courcot, D. Physicochemical Characterization of Air Pollution Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM > 2.5) in an Urban Area of Cotonou, Benin. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dzierżanowski, K.; Popek, R.; Gawrońska, H.; Sæbø, A.; Gawroński, S.W. Deposition of Particulate Matter of Different Size Fractions on Leaf Surfaces and in Waxes of Urban Forest Species. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2011, 13, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Heshmatol Vaezin, S.M.; Juybari, M.M.; Daei, A.; Avatefi Hemmat, M.; Shirvany, A.; Tallis, M.J.; Hirabayashi, S.; Moeinaddini, M.; Hamidian, A.H.; Sadeghi, S.M.M.; et al. The Effectiveness of Urban Trees in Reducing Airborne Particulate Matter by Dry Deposition in Tehran, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sæbø, A.; Popek, R.; Nawrot, B.; Hanslin, H.M.; Gawronska, H.; Gawronski, S.W. Plant Species Differences in Particulate Matter Accumulation on Leaf Surfaces. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 427–428, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chávez-García, E.; González-Méndez, B. Particulate Matter and Foliar Retention: Current Knowledge and Implications for Urban Greening. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2021, 14, 1433–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Macchi, C.; Sirtori, C.R.; Corsini, A.; Mannuccio Mannucci, P.; Ruscica, M. Pollution from Fine Particulate Matter and Atherosclerosis: A Narrative Review. Environ. Int. 2023, 175, 107923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhao, C.; Wang, W.; Wen, H.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.; Jiao, K.; Chen, Q.; Feng, H.; Wang, Y.; Liao, J.; et al. Effects of Green Spaces on Alleviating Mortality Attributable to PM2.5 in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 14402–14412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tang, K.H.D. Green Walls as Mitigation of Urban Air Pollution: A Review of Their Effectiveness. Res. Ecol. 2023, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biswas, K.; Chatterjee, A.; Chakraborty, J. Comparison of Air Pollutants Between Kolkata and Siliguri, India, and Its Relationship to Temperature Change. J. Geovisualization Spat. Anal. 2020, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zapletal, M.; Cudlín, P.; Khadka, C.; Křůmal, K.; Mikuška, P.; Cigánková, H.; Polášek, M. Characteristics and Sources of PAHs, Hopanes, and Elements in PM10 Aerosol in Tulsipur and Charikot (Nepal). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Papanastasiou, D.K.; Melas, D. Application of PM10’s Statistical Distribution to Air Quality Management—A Case Study in Central Greece. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010, 207, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Karanasiou, A.; Minguillón, M.C.; Viana, M.; Alastuey, A.; Putaud, J.-P.; Maenhaut, W.; Panteliadis, P.; Močnik, G.; Favez, O.; Kuhlbusch, T.A.J. Thermal-Optical Analysis for the Measurement of Elemental Carbon (EC) and Organic Carbon (OC) in Ambient Air a Literature Review. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. 2015, 8, 9649–9712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, S.; Dennis, R.L.; Bhave, P.V.; Eder, B.K. Primary and Secondary Organic Aerosols over the United States: Estimates on the Basis of Observed Organic Carbon (OC) and Elemental Carbon (EC), and Air Quality Modeled Primary OC/EC Ratios. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 5257–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bae, M.-S.; Schauer, J.J.; DeMinter, J.T.; Turner, J.R.; Smith, D.; Cary, R.A. Validation of a Semi-Continuous Instrument for Elemental Carbon and Organic Carbon Using a Thermal-Optical Method. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 2885–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fushimi, A.; Kondo, Y.; Kobayashi, S.; Fujitani, Y.; Saitoh, K.; Takami, A.; Tanabe, K. Chemical Composition and Source of Fine and Nanoparticles from Recent Direct Injection Gasoline Passenger Cars: Effects of Fuel and Ambient Temperature. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 124, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Keuken, M.P.; Jonkers, S.; Zandveld, P.; Voogt, M.; van den Elshout, S. Elemental Carbon as an Indicator for Evaluating the Impact of Traffic Measures on Air Quality and Health. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 61, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Janssen, N.A.H.; Hoek, G.; Simic-Lawson, M.; Fischer, P.; van Bree, L.; ten Brink, H.; Keuken, M.; Atkinson, R.W.; Anderson, H.R.; Brunekreef, B.; et al. Black Carbon as an Additional Indicator of the Adverse Health Effects of Airborne Particles Compared with PM10 and PM2.5. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 1691–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Greksa, A.; Ljevnaić-Mašić, B.; Grabić, J.; Benka, P.; Radonić, V.; Blagojević, B.; Sekulić, M. Potential of Urban Trees for Mitigating Heavy Metal Pollution in the City of Novi Sad, Serbia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Latif, A.; Bilal, M.; Asghar, W.; Azeem, M.; Ahmad, M.I.; Abbas, A.; Zulfiqar Ahmad, M.; Shahzad, T. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Vegetables and Assessment of Their Potential Health Risk. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2018, 5, 2380–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mihailović, A.; Budinski-Petković, L.; Popov, S.; Ninkov, J.; Vasin, J.; Ralević, N.M.; Vučinić Vasić, M. Spatial Distribution of Metals in Urban Soil of Novi Sad, Serbia: GIS Based Approach. J. Geochem. Explor. 2015, 150, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ugolini, F.; Tognetti, R.; Raschi, A.; Bacci, L. Quercus Ilex L. as Bioaccumulator for Heavy Metals in Urban Areas: Effectiveness of Leaf Washing with Distilled Water and Considerations on the Trees Distance from Traffic. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Norouzi, S.; Khademi, H.; Faz Cano, A.; Acosta, J.A. Using Plane Tree Leaves for Biomonitoring of Dust Borne Heavy Metals: A Case Study from Isfahan, Central Iran. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 57, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hrotkó, K.; Gyeviki, M.; Sütöriné, D.M.; Magyar, L.; Mészáros, R.; Honfi, P.; Kardos, L. Foliar Dust and Heavy Metal Deposit on Leaves of Urban Trees in Budapest (Hungary). Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 1927–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Badamasi, H. Biomonitoring of Air Pollution Using Plants. MAYFEB J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 2, 27–39. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagajyoti, P.C.; Lee, K.D.; Sreekanth, T.V.M. Heavy Metals, Occurrence and Toxicity for Plants: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2010, 8, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z.; Lu, W.; Long, Y.; Bao, X.; Yang, Q. Assessment of Heavy Metals Contamination in Urban Topsoil from Changchun City, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2011, 108, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, D.; Zhang, Y. Influence of Avenue Trees on Traffic Pollutant Dispersion in Asymmetric Street Canyons: Numerical Modeling with Empirical Analysis. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 65, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baraldi, R.; Chieco, C.; Neri, L.; Facini, O.; Rapparini, F.; Morrone, L.; Rotondi, A.; Carriero, G. An Integrated Study on Air Mitigation Potential of Urban Vegetation: From a Multi-Trait Approach to Modeling. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 41, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paull, N.J.; Krix, D.; Irga, P.J.; Torpy, F.R. Airborne Particulate Matter Accumulation on Common Green Wall Plants. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2020, 22, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kwak, M.J.; Lee, J.; Park, S.; Lim, Y.J.; Kim, H.; Jeong, S.G.; Son, J.; Je, S.M.; Chang, H.; Oh, C.-Y.; et al. Understanding Particulate Matter Retention and Wash-Off during Rainfall in Relation to Leaf Traits of Urban Forest Tree Species. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hipsey, M.R.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M. Differences in Mass Concentration and Elemental Composition of Leaf Surface Particulate Matter: Plant Species and Particle Size Ranges. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 175, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, L.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zou, R.; Zhang, Z. Variation in Tree Species Ability to Capture and Retain Airborne Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kwak, M.J.; Lee, J.K.; Park, S.; Kim, H.; Lim, Y.J.; Lee, K.-A.; Son, J.; Oh, C.-Y.; Kim, I.; Woo, S.Y. Surface-Based Analysis of Leaf Microstructures for Adsorbing and Retaining Capability of Airborne Particulate Matter in Ten Woody Species. Forests 2020, 11, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Beckett, K.P.; Freer-Smith, P.H.; Taylor, G. Urban Woodlands: Their Role in Reducing the Effects of Particulate Pollution. Environ. Pollut. 1998, 99, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Freer-Smith, P.H.; Beckett, K.P.; Taylor, G. Deposition Velocities to Sorbus Aria, Acer Campestre, Populus Deltoides × Trichocarpa ‘Beaupré’, Pinus Nigra and × Cupressocyparis Leylandii for Coarse, Fine and Ultra-Fine Particles in the Urban Environment. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 133, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sgrigna, G.; Sæbø, A.; Gawronski, S.; Popek, R.; Calfapietra, C. Particulate Matter Deposition on Quercus Ilex Leaves in an Industrial City of Central Italy. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 197, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Beckett, K.P.; Freer-Smith, P.H.; Taylor, G. Particulate Pollution Capture by Urban Trees: Effect of Species and Windspeed: Particulate Pollution Uptake by Trees. Glob. Change Biol. 2000, 6, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Litschke, T.; Kuttler, W. On the Reduction of Urban Particle Concentration by Vegetation a Review. Meteorol. Z. 2008, 17, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Naddafi, K.; Hassanvand, M.S.; Yunesian, M.; Momeniha, F.; Nabizadeh, R.; Faridi, S.; Gholampour, A. Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution in Megacity of Tehran, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2012, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Atash, F. The Deterioration of Urban Environments in Developing Countries: Mitigating the Air Pollution Crisis in Tehran, Iran. Cities 2007, 24, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vafa-Arani, H.; Jahani, S.; Dashti, H.; Heydari, J.; Moazen, S. A System Dynamics Modeling for Urban Air Pollution: A Case Study of Tehran, Iran. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2014, 31, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shahbazi, H.; Reyhanian, M.; Hosseini, V.; Afshin, H. The Relative Contributions of Mobile Sources to Air Pollutant Emissions in Tehran, Iran: An Emission Inventory Approach. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 2016, 2, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ashrafi, K. Determining of Spatial Distribution Patterns and Temporal Trends of an Air Pollutant Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Basis Functions. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 47, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sohrabinia, M.; Khorshiddoust, A.M. Application of Satellite Data and GIS in Studying Air Pollutants in Tehran. Habitat Int. 2007, 31, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elkaee, S.; Moeinaddini, M.; Shirvany, A. Source Identification and Pollution Degree of Deposited Dust on Green Space in Tehran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, X.; Zhang, T.; Sun, F.; Song, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, F.; Yuan, C.; Yu, H.; Zhang, G.; Qi, F.; et al. The Relationship between Particulate Matter Retention Capacity and Leaf Surface Micromorphology of Ten Tree Species in Hangzhou, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 771, 144812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kończak, B.; Cempa, M.; Pierzchała, Ł.; Deska, M. Assessment of the Ability of Roadside Vegetation to Remove Particulate Matter from the Urban Air. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Behjati, S.E. A Relative Analysis of Carbon and Dust Uptake by Important Tree Species in Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 13, 222–225. [Google Scholar]
  50. Konen, M.E.; Jacobs, P.M.; Burras, C.L.; Talaga, B.J.; Mason, J.A. Equations for Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Using Loss-on-Ignition for North Central U.S. Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 1878–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gelman, F.; Binstock, R.; Halicz, L. Application of the Walkley–Black Titration for the Organic Carbon Quantification in Organic Rich Sedimentary Rocks. Fuel 2012, 96, 608–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sahan, E.; Ten Brink, H.M.; Weijers, E.P. Carbon in Atmospheric Particulate Matter; ECN Biomass, Coal and Environmental Research: Petten, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  53. Vigevani, I.; Corsini, D.; Mori, J.; Pasquinelli, A.; Gibin, M.; Comin, S.; Szwałko, P.; Cagnolati, E.; Ferrini, F.; Fini, A. Particulate Pollution Capture by Seventeen Woody Species Growing in Parks or along Roads in Two European Cities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Grote, R.; Samson, R.; Alonso, R.; Amorim, J.H.; Cariñanos, P.; Churkina, G.; Fares, S.; Thiec, D.L.; Niinemets, Ü.; Mikkelsen, T.N.; et al. Functional Traits of Urban Trees: Air Pollution Mitigation Potential. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 14, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xie, C.; Guo, J.; Yan, L.; Jiang, R.; Liang, A.; Che, S. The Influence of Plant Morphological Structure Characteristics on PM2.5 Retention of Leaves under Different Wind Speeds. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 71, 127556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fussell, J.C.; Franklin, M.; Green, D.C.; Gustafsson, M.; Harrison, R.M.; Hicks, W.; Kelly, F.J.; Kishta, F.; Miller, M.R.; Mudway, I.S.; et al. A Review of Road Traffic-Derived Non-Exhaust Particles: Emissions, Physicochemical Characteristics, Health Risks, and Mitigation Measures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 6813–6835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cai, M.; Xin, Z.; Yu, X. Spatio-Temporal Variations in PM Leaf Deposition: A Meta-Analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 231, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chaudhary, I.J.; Rathore, D. Suspended Particulate Matter Deposition and Its Impact on Urban Trees. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2018, 9, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Prusty, B.A.K.; Mishra, P.C.; Azeez, P.A. Dust Accumulation and Leaf Pigment Content in Vegetation near the National Highway at Sambalpur, Orissa, India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 60, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xu, X.; Yu, X.; Mo, L.; Xu, Y.; Bao, L.; Lun, X. Atmospheric Particulate Matter Accumulation on Trees: A Comparison of Boles, Branches and Leaves. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Muhammad, S.; Wuyts, K.; Samson, R. Immobilized Atmospheric Particulate Matter on Leaves of 96 Urban Plant Species. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 36920–36938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Soheili, F.; Woodward, S.; Abdul-Hamid, H.; Naji, H.R. The Effect of Dust Deposition on the Morphology and Physiology of Tree Foliage. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hicks, W.; Beevers, S.; Tremper, A.H.; Stewart, G.; Priestman, M.; Kelly, F.J.; Lanoisellé, M.; Lowry, D.; Green, D.C. Quantification of Non-Exhaust Particulate Matter Traffic Emissions and the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown at London Marylebone Road. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sharma, P.; Yadav, P.; Ghosh, C.; Singh, B. Heavy Metal Capture from the Suspended Particulate Matter by Morus Alba and Evidence of Foliar Uptake and Translocation of PM Associated Zinc Using Radiotracer (65Zn). Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gupta, G.P.; Kumar, B.; Singh, S.; Kulshrestha, U.C. Deposition and Impact of Urban Atmospheric Dust on Two Medicinal Plants during Different Seasons in NCR Delhi. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2016, 16, 2920–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bell, J.N.B.; Treshow, M. Air Pollution and Plant Life; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; ISBN 978-0-471-49091-3. [Google Scholar]
  67. Tallis, M.; Taylor, G.; Sinnett, D.; Freer-Smith, P. Estimating the Removal of Atmospheric Particulate Pollution by the Urban Tree Canopy of London, under Current and Future Environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 103, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Weerakkody, U.; Dover, J.W.; Mitchell, P.; Reiling, K. Evaluating the Impact of Individual Leaf Traits on Atmospheric Particulate Matter Accumulation Using Natural and Synthetic Leaves. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 30, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mo, L.; Ma, Z.; Xu, Y.; Sun, F.; Lun, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Yu, X. Assessing the Capacity of Plant Species to Accumulate Particulate Matter in Beijing, China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. He, C.; Qiu, K.; Pott, R. Reduction of Traffic-Related Particulate Matter by Roadside Plants: Effect of Traffic Pressure and Sampling Height. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2020, 22, 184–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. da Fleck, A.S.; Moresco, M.B.; Rhoden, C.R. Assessing the Genotoxicity of Traffic-Related Air Pollutants by Means of Plant Biomonitoring in Cities of a Brazilian Metropolitan Area Crossed by a Major Highway. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2016, 7, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Turkyilmaz, A.; Sevik, H.; Cetin, M.; Saleh, E.A.A. Changes in Heavy Metal Accumulation Depending on Traffic Density in Some Landscape Plants. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 2277–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Cong, L.; Ma, W.; Ma, W.; Zhang, Z. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Particulate Matter and Dry Deposition Flux in the Cuihu Wetland of Beijing. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Behera, R.R.; Satapathy, D.R.; Majhi, A.; Panda, C.R. Spatiotemporal Variation of Atmospheric Pollution and Its Plausible Sources in an Industrial Populated City, Bay of Bengal, Paradip, India. Urban Clim. 2021, 37, 100860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chowdhury, A.I.; Uddin, M.J.; Baul, T.K.; Akhter, J.; Nandi, R.; Karmakar, S.; Nath, T.K. Quantifying the Potential Contribution of Urban Trees to Particulate Matters Removal: A Study in Chattogram City, Bangladesh. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 380, 135015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dang, N.; Zhang, H.; Abdus Salam, M.M.; Li, H.; Chen, G. Foliar Dust Particle Retention and Metal Accumulation of Five Garden Tree Species in Hangzhou: Seasonal Changes. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 306, 119472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kishore, N.; Srivastava, A.K.; Nandan, H.; Pandey, C.P.; Agrawal, S.; Singh, N.; Soni, V.K.; Bisht, D.S.; Tiwari, S.; Srivastava, M.K. Long-Term (2005–2012) Measurements of near-Surface Air Pollutants at an Urban Location in the Indo-Gangetic Basin. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 128, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Roy, A.; Bhattacharya, T.; Kumari, M. Air Pollution Tolerance, Metal Accumulation and Dust Capturing Capacity of Common Tropical Trees in Commercial and Industrial Sites. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 722, 137622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hu, Y.; Wang, D.; Wei, L.; Zhang, X.; Song, B. Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Plant Leaves from Yan’an City of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 110, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Isinkaralar, K. Temporal Variability of Trace Metal Evidence in Cupressus Arizonica, Platanus Orientalis, and Robinia Pseudoacacia as Pollution-Resistant Species at an Industrial Site. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alahabadi, A.; Ehrampoush, M.H.; Miri, M.; Ebrahimi Aval, H.; Yousefzadeh, S.; Ghaffari, H.R.; Ahmadi, E.; Talebi, P.; Abaszadeh Fathabadi, Z.; Babai, F.; et al. A Comparative Study on Capability of Different Tree Species in Accumulating Heavy Metals from Soil and Ambient Air. Chemosphere 2017, 172, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Monfared, S.H.; Matinizadeh, M.; Shirvany, A.; Amiri, G.Z.; Fard, R.M.; Rostami, F. Accumulation of Heavy Metal in Platanus Orientalis, Robinia Pseudoacacia and Fraxinus Rotundifolia. J. For. Res. 2013, 24, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wilkinson, K.; Lundkvist, J.; Seisenbaeva, G.; Kessler, V. A Cost-Effective Method for Monitoring Airborne Particulate Matter Using Tabletop SEM-EDS. Air Pollut 2010, 136, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Feng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhi, G.; Xiong, S.; Li, J.; Sheng, G.; Fu, J. Characteristics of Organic and Elemental Carbon in PM2.5 Samples in Shanghai, China. Atmos. Res. 2009, 92, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ye, B.; Ji, X.; Yang, H.; Yao, X.; Chan, C.K.; Cadle, S.H.; Chan, T.; Mulawa, P.A. Concentration and Chemical Composition of PM2.5 in Shanghai for a 1-Year Period. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kim, S.; Yang, J.; Park, J.; Song, I.; Kim, D.-G.; Jeon, K.; Kim, H.; Yi, S.-M. Health Effects of PM2.5 Constituents and Source Contributions in Major Metropolitan Cities, South Korea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 82873–82887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jones, A.M.; Harrison, R.M. Interpretation of Particulate Elemental and Organic Carbon Concentrations at Rural, Urban and Kerbside Sites. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 7114–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Funasaka, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Tsuruho, K.; Tamura, K.; Mizuno, T.; Kuroda, K. Relationship between Indoor and Outdoor Carbonaceous Particulates in Roadside Households. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 110, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A map illustrating the geographical locations of the study areas in Tehran, Iran. The map specifically highlights Chamran Highway, denoted as ‘site B’, and Gandi Street, identified as ‘site A’. Site A is situated along a residential-commercial road with comparatively lower traffic densities, while Site B is located within a densely urbanized area characterized by high traffic volumes.
Figure 1. A map illustrating the geographical locations of the study areas in Tehran, Iran. The map specifically highlights Chamran Highway, denoted as ‘site B’, and Gandi Street, identified as ‘site A’. Site A is situated along a residential-commercial road with comparatively lower traffic densities, while Site B is located within a densely urbanized area characterized by high traffic volumes.
Forests 15 00273 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of particulate matter (PM) deposition quantification per leaf area.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of particulate matter (PM) deposition quantification per leaf area.
Forests 15 00273 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of total PM deposition on leaves among five species in Sites A and B: mean ± standard deviation with significance (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 3. Comparison of total PM deposition on leaves among five species in Sites A and B: mean ± standard deviation with significance (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
Forests 15 00273 g003
Figure 4. Deposition of Ni (a), Pb (b), Cd (c), and Fe (d) on the leaves of five tree species in Sites A and B. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation. Significantly different bars are marked with letters (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
Figure 4. Deposition of Ni (a), Pb (b), Cd (c), and Fe (d) on the leaves of five tree species in Sites A and B. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation. Significantly different bars are marked with letters (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences.
Forests 15 00273 g004aForests 15 00273 g004b
Table 1. Particle size fractions of PM deposition by various species in Sites A and B presented as percentage frequencies.
Table 1. Particle size fractions of PM deposition by various species in Sites A and B presented as percentage frequencies.
Frequency %
SpeciesSite ASite BSite ASite B
0.1–2.5 μm>2.5 μm
R. pseudoacacia99.40%65.00%0.60%35.00%
U. minor100%32.70%0%67.30%
M. alba66.70%44.20%33.30%55.80%
A. altissima99.40%100%0.60%0%
P. orientalis100%59.70%0%40.30%
Table 2. Mean deposition of TC, OC, and EC on the leaves of tree species at sites A and B.
Table 2. Mean deposition of TC, OC, and EC on the leaves of tree species at sites A and B.
SpeciesCarbon Deposition in Site A (mg/cm2)Carbon Deposition in Site B (mg/cm2)
TCOCECTCOCEC
R. pseudoacacia1.204 ± 0.127 c0.400 ± 0.083 b0.803 ± 0.049 a0.966 ± 0.354 b0.334 ± 0.111 a0.632 ± 0.246 ab
U. minor2.570 ± 0.576 c0.925 ± 0.173 b1.645 ± 0.414 a0.845 ± 0.224 b0.332 ± 0.065 a0.513 ± 0.147 a
M. alba0.484 ± 0.170 b0.197 ± 0.060 a0.286 ± 0.116 a0.655 ± 0.087 b0.290 ± 0.047 a0.365 ± 0.071 a
A. altissima1.115 ± 0.113 c0.392 ± 0.062 b0.722 ± 0.060 a0.846 ± 0.202 b0.309 ± 0.102 ab0.524 ± 0.226 a
P. orientalis2.057 ± 0.467 c0.780 ± 0.284 b1.276 ± 0.319 a1.092 ± 0.311 c0.358 ± 0.050 b0.733 ± 0.178 a
Data presented as mean values (mg/cm2) ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elkaee, S.; Shirvany, A.; Moeinaddini, M.; Sabbagh, F. Assessment of Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals, and Carbon Deposition Capacities of Urban Tree Species in Tehran, Iran. Forests 2024, 15, 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020273

AMA Style

Elkaee S, Shirvany A, Moeinaddini M, Sabbagh F. Assessment of Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals, and Carbon Deposition Capacities of Urban Tree Species in Tehran, Iran. Forests. 2024; 15(2):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elkaee, Sahar, Anoushirvan Shirvany, Mazaher Moeinaddini, and Farzaneh Sabbagh. 2024. "Assessment of Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals, and Carbon Deposition Capacities of Urban Tree Species in Tehran, Iran" Forests 15, no. 2: 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop