Next Article in Journal
Useful In Vitro Techniques to Evaluate the Mucoadhesive Properties of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Ocular Delivery Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Engineering Cocrystals of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs to Enhance Dissolution in Aqueous Medium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual Acting Polymeric Nano-Aggregates for Liver Cancer Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Designing of the Anticancer Nanocomposite with Sustained Release Properties by Using Graphene Oxide Nanocarrier with Phenethyl Isothiocyanate as Anticancer Agent

by
Dasan Mary Jaya Seema
1,
Bullo Saifullah
2,3,4,
Mariadoss Selvanayagam
1,5,
Sivapragasam Gothai
3,
Mohd Zobir Hussein
2,
Suresh Kumar Subbiah
6,
Norhaizan Mohd Esa
7 and
Palanisamy Arulselvan
3,8,9,*
1
Department of Advanced Zoology and Biotechnology, Loyola Institute of Frontier Energy (LIFE), Loyola College, Chennai 600034, India
2
Material Synthesis and characterization laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology (ITMA), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
3
Laboratory of Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
4
Henan-Macquarie Universities Joint Center for Biomedical Innovation, School of life Sciences, University of Henan Jin Ming Avenue, Kaifeng 475004, China
5
Loyola-ICAM college of engineering and Technology (LICET), Loyola Campus, Chennai 600034, India
6
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
7
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
8
Muthayammal Centre for Advanced Research, Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, Rasipuram, Namakkal, Tamilnadu 637408, India
9
Scigen Research and Innovation, Periyar Technology Business Incubator, Periyar Nagar, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu 613403, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2018, 10(3), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030109
Submission received: 16 March 2018 / Revised: 25 April 2018 / Accepted: 25 April 2018 / Published: 1 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnology Advances in Cancer Treatment)

Abstract

:
In this study anticancer nanocomposite was designed using graphene oxide (GO) as nanocarrier and Phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) as anticancer agent. The designed formulation was characterized in detailed with XRD, Raman, UV/Vis, FTIR, DLS and TEM etc. The designed anticancer nanocomposite showed much better anticancer activity against liver cancer HepG2 cells compared to the free drug PEITC and was also found to be nontoxic to the normal 3T3 cells. In vitro release of the drug from the anticancer nanocomposite formulation was found to be sustained in human body simulated phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution of pH 7.4 (blood pH) and pH 4.8 (intracellular lysosomal pH). This study suggests that GO could be developed as an efficient drug carrier to conjugate with PEITC for pharmaceutical applications in cancer chemotherapies.

1. Introduction

The application of nanotechnology for biomedical application is one of the most vital advancement in the field of science in this century. This technology not only advanced the medical diagnostics, drug delivery and drug manufacturing but also made possible simultaneous detection and cure (i.e., theranostic) of wide range of diseases [1,2,3,4]. In nanomedicine the area of drug delivery research is a subject of rapid growth and advancement due its significant role in the improvement of therapeutic efficacy of the drugs, minimization of the adverse effects of the drugs and enhancement in the bioavailability of the drugs etc. [5,6,7]. Many nanosized materials namely liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, polymers, inorganic metallic nanolayers and graphene oxides have been explored for the designing of the nanocarriers for different drugs [8,9,10,11,12].
Graphene oxide (GO) is a promising functional nanobiomaterial that is widely applied in drug delivery, biosensing, energy storage devices (supercapacitor and batteries), electronics, photocatalysis and in biomedicine [13,14,15]. GO and its modified forms have been getting more and more attention in scientific community because of its multifunctional surface and multidimensional applications in different fields. In biomedicine GO is mainly used for drug delivery, bioimaging, cancer therapy and in biosensors due to its biocompatibility and physico-chemical properties. GO has unique structure with graphene basal plane functionalized with carboxylic (COOH), hydroxyl (OH), epoxides groups etc. These functional groups enable GO for further functionalization, conjugation and/or immobilization of other nanoparticles and loading of drugs/biomolecules (RNA/DNA etc) on its surface [15].
Recently GO has been widely applied in drug delivery especially for cancer therapy and have got potential to overcome the shortcomings of current cancer chemotherapy. The drugs can easily be loaded on GO via the pi-pi stacking interaction and hydrogen bonding [15,16,17,18]. The GO and gold (Au) rod hybrid nanocomposites loaded with anticancer drugs have been reported to possess excellent drug release, improved photothermal and photo acoustic effect in killing of cancer cells [16]. Furthermore, GO also interacts with near infrared (NIR) and produces heat inside the cancer cells [15,19]. This heat generation property of GO upon NIR can be exploited in the GO nanocomposites with radionuclide which can release X-ray upon heating, can potentially be applied in cancer therapy and due to the multiple beneficial effects, the efficient eradication of tumour cells is possible [20]. Graphene oxide alone has also been utilized for delivering anticancer drugs such as Chlorogenic acid, Gallic acid and Doxorubicin etc. [3,18,21,22].
Isothiocyanates (ITCs) are the Sulfur containing natural products formed by the reaction of glucosinolates with myrosinase, an enzyme released by the disruption of plant tissues. This myrosinase-glucosinolate system is available in plant family Brassicaceae, such as broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage and mustard. The ITCs have been reported to possess anticancer and antimicrobial properties [23,24,25,26]. Phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) has been reported to have good anticancer activity in both in vitro and in vivo models [27,28,29]. In this study we designed anticancer nanocomposite by loading PEITC on graphene oxide and characterized in detail and evaluated for anticancer properties.
Several studies reported that, PEITC could potentially induce cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death in several cancer cell lines [30]. Inhibition of cell viability with same IC50 values has been achieved for both MCF-7 and MCF–12A breast cancer cell lines when treated with PEITC [31]. In human prostate cancer DU 145 Cells, PEITCs were known to induce apoptosis via the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway [32]. Hyung Shim et al., suggested PEITC as a dietary compound for cervical cancer patients due to its promising cytotoxic effects towards human cervical cancer cells [33]. PEITC has also been found to induce cytotoxicity in dose and time dependent manner by triggering apoptosis in HepG2 human liver carcinoma cells [34]. A comparative study on HepG2 and B16F10 cell lines were also reported with the maximum percent of PEITC induced inhibition on HepG2 cells [35].
In recent years, more promising and interesting results are reported, after conjugating anticancer drugs with various pharmacophoric units. Yan and coworkers encapsulated PEITC and CDDP in approximately 130 nm liposomes and observed antiproliferative effects as well as an immense decrease in tumor and reduced symptoms in lung cancer [36]. Graphene oxide-iron oxide (GO-IO) nanocomposites were prepared and studied on breast cancer 4T1 cells [37]. Highly reduced graphene oxide with silver decorated nanocomposites showed potent anticancer properties on A549 human lung cancer cells compared to that of the free drug used [38]. Highly encouraging anticancer activity was observed when HepG2 cells were treated with Graphene oxide-gallic acid (GOGA) nanocomposite [39]. Recently, graphene oxide- chlorogenic acid nanocomposite that was synthesized exhibited potential cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cell line and negligible toxicity towards the normal cell line used [40]. Above studies suggest that, much more can be done in order to further exploit the biological applications of graphene oxide nanocomposites in understanding chemotherapeutic efficacy of potentially active PEITC on various cancers. Hence, we believed that combination of GO and PEITC therefore will open door to further understand more about the potentially active PEITC and may facilitate new approaches for drug development. Keeping this in view, we designed, synthesized and characterized the graphene oxide-Phenethyl isothiocyanate (GO-PEITC) nanocomposite and investigated it’s the cytotoxic studies on HepG2 liver cancer cells and normal fibroblast 3T3 cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Graphite flakes (109 meshes), sulphuric acid (H2SO4 98%), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), potassium permanganate (KMnO4), hydrogen peroxide, and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and utilized without further purification. Phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA, diethyl ether, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), Ethyl alcohol (99.7% v/v) were bought from Friedemann Schmidt (Parkwood, WA, USA). 3-(4,5-di-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM), antibiotics penicillin-streptomycin and deionized water was used in all experiments.

2.2. Cell Culture and Maintenance

Human hepatocarcinoma (HepG–2) and 3T3 (normal standard fibroblast) cell lines were cultured under standard cell culture conditions (37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% room air/5% CO2) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), and a 1% mixture of penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were sub cultured in 75 cm2 culture flasks or in appropriate plates and used for seeding and treatment after reaching approximately 80% confluence.

2.3. Synthesis of Graphene Oxide

Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized by improved method. In brief concentrated H2SO4 (360 mL) was mixed with 40 mL concentrated H3PO4 and was added to mixture of 3 g graphite powder and 18 g KMnO4. The solution was kept on stirring at 50 °C for 12 h. After that resultant suspension was poured on the 400 g ice cubes containing 3 mL of hydrogen peroxide and then final solution was washed with 200 mL deionized water, 200 mL HCl and 200 mL ethanol. Finally, sample was coagulated with diethyl ether and then dried at 40 °C [41].

2.4. Drug loading on GO

In brief 2 mL of PEITC was dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol and to this solution 0.5 g of GO was added and solution was stirred for 24 h. After that sample was centrifuged, washed thoroughly and dried in oven at 40 °C and subjected to characterization.

2.5. Physicochemical Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using condition CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at 30 kV and 30 mA with XRD-6000 Diffractometer, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). A Perkin Elmer ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer model lambda 35 was utilized for the quantification of drug loading and in vitro release properties. High resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM model Tecnai G2 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used for the surface and morphological properties. For the Raman analysis Raman spectrometer (model Alpha 300R Witec, Ulm, Germany) with an excitation wavelength at 532 nm was utilized. Functional groups bands were recorded in the range of 500–4000 cm−1 analyzed by Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer Perkin-Elmer 100 series spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA) by a direct sample method.

2.6. Determination of Anticancer Activity

Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxicity of native PEITC and PEITC-loaded GO (GO-PEITC) on HepG2 cell line was analyzed by the MTT calorimetric assay. In brief, all the normal and HepG2 cell lines were seeded in 96 well plates at the density of 1 × 104 cells per well and kept in an incubator for up to 24 h for acclimatization. After 24 h, cells were treated with various concentrations (0–10 μg/mL) of native PEITC, GO and GO-PEITC. Cells were incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 72 h. After 48 h of incubation, medium was removed and 100 μL of fresh medium was added along with (5 mg mL−1) MTT solutions and incubated for another 4 h in a CO2 incubator. The extent of cell viability was determined by the conversion of yellow MTT into purple formazan by the living cells. After the medium was aspirated, the formed formazan crystals were dissolved in 200 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and its absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader. All assays were done in triplicate and the cytotoxicity results were expressed as the percentage of cell viability with respect to control cells.
Cytotoxicity (%) = [100 × (Absorbance of untreated group − Absorbance of treated group)/Absorbance of untreated group].

3. Results

3.1. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)

Figure 1, shows the PXRD patterns of graphite (Gr), graphene oxide (GO) and graphene oxide-phenyl isothiocyante nanocomposite (GO-PEITC). Graphite (Gr) showed the sharp and strong characteristic peak at 2θ degree 26.1° corresponding to diffraction of (002) plane with basal spacing of about 3.4 Å [18]. In the PXRD diffraction patterns of GO, the Gr peak disappeared and new characteristic GO peak appeared at about 2θ degree 10.3° with basal spacing of 8.5 Å. The increased basal spacing from 3.4 Å to 8.5 Å is attributed to the insertion of oxygenated functional groups namely carboxylic acid, epoxides and hydroxyl groups between the GO planes [18,42,43]. The disappearance of Gr peak from 26.1° and appearance characteristic GO peak at about 10.20° degrees with increased basal spacing strongly indicates the successful formation of GO [17,21]. In the nanocomposite GO-PEITC, the GO peak has been slightly shifted to lower 2θ degree i.e., 9.5° with slight increase in basal spacing which can be attributed to the loading of PEITC on GO.

3.2. Infrared Spectroscopy

Figure 2 shows the Fourier transformed infrared spectra of GO (black colour) and of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC (blue colour). The infrared spectrum of GO showed the characteristic functional group bands corresponding to hydroxyl group at about 3400 cm−1, carbonyl group (C=O) 1726 cm−1 and alkoxide group (C–O) 1072 cm−1 respectively [18,21]. The nanocomposite GO–PEITC showed the infrared absorption bands of GO as well as the characteristic functional group bands of PEITC namely N=C=S at 2290 cm−1, C=N at 1618 cm−1 and C–N band at 1350 cm−1 as reported in literature [33,34,44]. The presence of GO and PEITC bands in the nanocomposite GO-PEITC strongly suggest the successful formation of the nanocomposite.

3.3. Schematic Representation of the Structures

Figure 3 shows the structures of phenyl isothiocynate PEITC, GO and the final nanocomposite GO-PEITC. The drug can possibly interact and loaded on GO by hydrogen bonding (a) as well as pi-pi stacking (b). Here we have shown both phenomena, hydrogen bonding and pi-pi stacking separately for clarity. In the structure of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC, PEITC is represented in red colour, GO is represented in black colour and hydrogen bonding is represented in blue colour.

3.4. Raman Spectroscopic Analysis

Raman spectroscopy was used for the determination of structural changes induced during chemical reactions of the resulting materials namely GO and nanocomposite GO-PEITC. Figure 4 shows the Raman spectra of graphite (Gr), GO and of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC. The starting material Gr showed two main peaks i.e., d-band due to the disorder induced mode and the G-band (graphitic like mode) present at 1356 and 1581 cm−1 respectively. In Raman spectroscopy D-band represents the non-crystalline quality of the carbon associated with defects and disorder of the material under consideration, whereas the G-band is associated with high degree of ordering of the crystalline graphitic structure [18,30,45,46]. As it can be seen in the Raman spectrum of graphite (Gr) (Figure 4.) intensity of G-band is very high due to the high order of the crystallinity whereas d-band intensity is very low representing lesser defects present in Gr. In the Raman analysis of both GO and the nanocomposite GO-PEITC (Figure 4) the intensity of G-band is considerably decreased whereas the intensity of d-band is increased at the same time. This suggest the high degree of disordering inducted by the oxidative exfoliation of GO and by the loading of the PEITC on GO.

3.5. Transmission Electronic Microscopic (TEM) Analysis

TEM micrographs of GO and the nanocomposite GO-PEITC are presented in the Figure 5. The structural features and morphology of GO and GO-PEITC were analyzed by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The starting material graphite (Gr) exhibits large number of stacked graphene sheets, as we reported previously [18,21]. Unlike Gr the TEM image shows the smooth regular structure of GO (Figure 5A) which indicates the successful conversion of Gr into GO [30]. The Figure 5B represents the HR-TEM image of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC which is slightly different in appearance with some of the defects on the surface which may possibly be attributed to the loading of PEITC on the surface of GO.

3.6. Particle Size Analysis

Particle size of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis using Zetasizer technique. The sample was dispersed in water followed by sonication for 20 min and then analysed with Zetasizer. The GO-PEITC was found to have very narrow size distribution ranging from 0 to 15 nm (Figure 6). The Cumulative distribution frequency revealed that 60% of the particles were of the size below 6 nm.

3.7. Release Studies

Figure 7, represents the in vitro release of PEITC drug under human body simulated phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solutions of pH 7.4 (blood pH) and pH 4.8 (intracellular lysosomal pH). Figure 7A shows the release profile of the PEITC from the nanocomposite GO-PEITC in PBS solution of pH 7.4. It can been observed that initial 70% of drug release took about 1500 min and remaining 30% of release took about additional 1500 min for the sustained release. The PEITC took 3000 min overall, for 100% release. Figure 7B shows the release profile of PEITC in PBS solution of pH 4.8. Initially there is relatively faster release which took about 500 min for 50% release and remaining drug release took additional 1000 min. The overall release took 1500 min to be released completely. So the in vitro release of the PEITC from the nanocomposite GO-PEITC is sustained under both physiological conditions of pH 7.4 and pH 4.8. However, the release of the drug is more sustained in PB solution of pH 7.4 (3000 min) compared to the release profile in PBS solution of pH 4.8 (1500 min).
The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay measures the cell proliferation rate and conversely, the reduction in cell viability when metabolic events lead to apoptosis [37]. The yellow compound MTT is reduced by mitochondrial dehydrogenases to the water insoluble purple formazan compound, depending on the viability of the cells. Therefore, the efficacy of GO-PEITC nanocomposite in suppressing the growth of HepG2 cell line was assessed using colorimetric assay (MTT assay). The 3T3 normal fibroblast cells were employed as normal control to ensure the nontoxic nature of nanocomposite and also nano-carrier alone. The cytotoxicity effect on HepG2 cell line was studied at different concentration (0 μg/mL–10 μg/mL). As can be seen from Figure 8A GO-PEITC demonstrated better anti-proliferative activity than pure compound, PEITC. The IC50 value was found approximately to be 7.5 μg/mL for the pure compound PEITC. GO-PEITC was found to be much more effective inhibitor of HepG2 cells growth with IC50 value of about 2.5 μg/mL. Observation from IC50 values indicated that enhanced anti-proliferating efficiency by GO-PEITC (based on the drug loading concentration) than that of pure compound, PEITC. This shows that the introduction of GO into PEITC improved the efficacy of PEITC in HepG2 cells. It is apparent from Figure 8B that pure compound, PEITC and nanocomposite GO-PEITC did not affect normal fibroblast cell viability in the tested range, as the survival was consistently greater than 80% or similar to control. In this case, it can be indicated that GO-PEITC nanocomposite possessed beneficial anticancer activities compared to that of the pure compound, PEITC and demonstrated selectivity between cancerous and normal fibroblast cells.

4. Conclusions

In this study, anticancer nanocomposite was designed using Phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) as anticancer agent and graphene oxide (GO) as effective nanocarrier. The designed anticancer nanocomposite GO-PEITC was found to release the drug PEITC in sustained manner in blood and intercellular lysosomal condition of PBS pH 7.4 and pH 4.8, respectively. The designed anticancer nanocomposite showed better anticancer activity (i.e., IC50 value of 2.5 μg/mL) compared to pure compound, PEITC (i.e., IC50 value of 7.5 μg/mL). In addition, the nanocomposite GO-PEITC was found to be highly biocompatible with normal cells.

Author Contributions

D.M.J.S., B.S., S.G. and P.A. conceived, designed and performed the whole experiments; D.M.J.S., B.S. and S.G. analyzed the chemistry and biological data; M.S., M.Z.H., S.K.S., N.M.E., and P.A. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; and all the authors wrote the paper and revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moghimi, S.M.; Hunter, A.C.; Murray, J.C. Nanomedicine: Current status and future prospects. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Kawasaki, E.S.; Player, A. Nanotechnology, nanomedicine, and the development of new, effective therapies for cancer. Nanomedicine 2005, 1, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shi, J.; Kantoff, P.W.; Wooster, R.; Farokhzad, O.C. Cancer nanomedicine: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Mirza, A.Z.; Siddiqui, F.A. Nanomedicine and drug delivery: A mini review. Int. Nano Lett. 2014, 4, 94. [Google Scholar]
  5. Saifullah, B.; Hussein, M.Z.; Al Ali, S.H.H. Controlled-release approaches towards the chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5451–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, G.; Roy, I.; Yang, C.; Prasad, P.N. Nanochemistry and Nanomedicine for Nanoparticle-based Diagnostics and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2826–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Taghdisi, S.M.; Danesh, N.M.; Lavaee, P.; Emrani, A.S.; Hassanabad, K.Y.; Ramezani, M.; Abnous, K. Double targeting, controlled release and reversible delivery of daunorubicin to cancer cells by polyvalent aptamers-modified gold nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 61, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pattni, B.S.; Chupin, V.V.; Torchilin, V.P. New Developments in Liposomal Drug Delivery. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10938–10966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Barahuie, F.; Hussein, M.Z.; Hussein-Al-Ali, S.H.; Arulselvan, P.; Fakurazi, S.; Zainal, Z. Preparation and controlled-release studies of a protocatechuic acid-magnesium/aluminum-layered double hydroxide nanocomposite. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 1975–1987. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  10. Saifullah, B.; Arulselvan, P.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Fakurazi, S.; Webster, T.J.; Geilich, B.M.; Hussein, M.Z. Development of a biocompatible nanodelivery system for tuberculosis drugs based on isoniazid-Mg/Al layered double hydroxide. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 4749–4762. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  11. Xavier, A.C.; de Moraes, M.L.; Ferreira, M. Immobilization of aloin encapsulated into liposomes in Layer-by-layer films for transdermal drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1193–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Elgadir, M.A.; Uddin, M.S.; Ferdosh, S.; Adam, A.; Chowdhury, A.J.K.; Sarker, M.Z.I. Impact of chitosan composites and chitosan nanoparticle composites on various drug delivery systems. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015, 23, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Chung, C.; Kim, Y.K.; Shin, D.; Ryoo, S.R.; Hong, B.H.; Min, D.H. Biomedical applications of graphene and graphene oxide. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2211–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Min, D.H. Biosensors based on graphene oxide and its biomedical application. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 105, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, K.S.; Modal, M.D.; Paik, P. Graphene Oxide for Biomedical Applications. J. Nanomed. Res. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, L.; Jiang, H.; Wei, S.; Ge, X.; Zhou, J.; Shen, J. High-efficiency loading of hypocrellin B on graphene oxide for photodynamic therapy. Carbon 2012, 50, 5594–5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, T.; Zhang, H.; Huang, D.; Feng, S.; Fujita, M.; Gao, X.D. Chitosan-Functionalized Graphene Oxide as a Potential Immunoadjuvant. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xie, M.; Zhang, F.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Xie, J. Surface modification of graphene oxide nanosheets by protamine sulfate/sodium alginate for anti-cancer drug delivery application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, J.; Yang, X.; Jacobson, O.; Lin, L.; Huang, P.; Niu, G.; Ma, Q.; Chen, X. Sequential Drug Release and Enhanced Photothermal and Photoacoustic Effect of Hybrid Reduced Graphene Oxide-Loaded Ultrasmall Gold Nanorod Vesicles for Cancer Therapy. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9199–9209. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, L.; Zhong, X.; Yi, X.; Huang, M.; Ning, P.; Liu, T.; Ge, C.; Chai, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yang, K. Radionuclide (131)I labeled reduced graphene oxide for nuclear imaging guided combined radio- and photothermal therapy of cancer. Biomaterials 2015, 66, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Saikia, N.; Deka, R.C. Ab initio study on the noncovalent adsorption of camptothecin anticancer drug onto graphene, defect modified graphene and graphene oxide. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Karimzadeh, I.; Aghazadeh, M.; Doroudi, T.; Ganjali, M.R.; Kolivand, P.H. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles Coated with PEG/PEI for Biomedical Applications: A Facile and Scalable Preparation Route Based on the Cathodic Electrochemical Deposition Method. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2017, 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dufour, V.; Stahl, M.; Baysse, C. The antibacterial properties of isothiocyanates. Microbiology 2015, 161, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Conaway, C.C.; Wang, C.X.; Pittman, B.; Yang, Y.M.; Schwartz, J.E.; Tian, D.; Mclntee, E.J.; Hecht, S.S.; Chung, F.L. Phenethyl Isothiocyanate and Sulforaphane and their N-acetylcysteine Conjugates Inhibit Malignant Progression of Lung Adenomas Induced by Tobacco Carcinogens in A/J Mice. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 8548–8557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hong, E.; Kim, G.H. Anticancer and Antimicrobial Activities of β-Phenylethyl Isothiocyanate in Brassica rapa L. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2008, 14, 377. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chve, H.L.T.; Glucosinolates, M.E. Toxic Constituents of Plant StuVs; Liener, I.E., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; Volume 43. [Google Scholar]
  27. Thejass, P.; Kuttan, G. Inhibition of Endothelial Cell Differentiation and Proinflammatory Cytokine Production during Angiogenesis by Allyl Isothiocyanate and Phenyl Isothiocyanate. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Thejass, P.; Kuttan, G. Allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) and phenyl isothiocyanate inhibit tumour-specific angiogenesis by downregulating nitric oxide (NO) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production. Nitric Oxide 2007, 16, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Manesh, C.; Kuttan, G. Effect of naturally occurring allyl and phenyl isothiocyanates in the inhibition of experimental pulmonary metastasis induced by B16F-10 melanoma cells. Fitoterapia 2003, 74, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Telang, U.; Brazeau, D.A.; Morris, M.E. Comparison of the effects of phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane on gene expression in breast cancer and normal mammary epithelial cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2009, 234, 287–295. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tseng, E.; Scott-Ramsay, E.A.; Morris, M.E. Dietary organic isothiocyanates are cytotoxic in human breast cancer MCF-7 and mammary epithelial MCF-12A cell lines. Exp. Biol. Med. 2004, 229, 835–842. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tang, N.Y.; Huang, Y.T.; Yu, C.S.; Ko, Y.C.; Wu, S.H.; Ji, B.C.; Yang, J.S.; Yang, J.L.; Hsia, T.C.; Chen, Y.Y.; et al. Phenethyl Isothiocyanate (PEITC) Promotes G2/M Phase Arrest via p53 Expression and Induces Apoptosis through Caspase- and Mitochondria-dependent Signaling Pathways in Human Prostate Cancer DU 145 Cells. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 1691–1702. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Le, D.H.; Shim, J.H.; Choi, K.H.; Shin, J.A.; Choi, E.S.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, S.J.; Cho, N.P.; Cho, S.D. Effect of β-Phenylethyl Isothiocyanate from Cruciferous Vegetables on Growth Inhibition and Apoptosis of Cervical Cancer Cells through the Induction of Death Receptors 4 and 5. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8124–8131. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rose, P.; Whiteman, M.; Huang, S.H.; Halliwell, B.; Ong, C.N. beta-Phenylethyl isothiocyanate-mediated apoptosis in hepatoma HepG2 cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 1489–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bansal, P.; Medhe, S.; Ganesh, N.; Srivastava, M.M. In vitro anticancer activity of dietary bioagent (isothiocyanates) on HepG2 and B16F10 cell lines a comparative study. Ann. Plant Sci. 2013, 2, 234–237. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang, Y.T.; Shi, Y.; Jay, M.; Pasqua, A.J.D. Enhanced Toxicity of Cisplatin with Chemosensitizer Phenethyl Isothiocyanate toward Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells When Delivered in Liposomal Nanoparticles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014, 27, 946–948. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Ma, X.; Tao, H.; Yang, K. A Functionalized Graphene Oxide–Iron Oxide Nanocomposite for Magnetically Targeted Drug Delivery, Photothermal Therapy, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nano Res. 2012, 5, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  38. Khan, M.; Khan, M.; Al-Marri, A.; Al-Warthan, A.; Alkhathlan, H.Z.; Siddiqui, M.R.H.; Nayak, V.; Kamal, A.; Adil, S.F. Apoptosis inducing ability of silver decorated highly reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites in A549 lung cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 873–883. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dorniani, D.; Saifullah, B.; Barahuie, F.; Arulselvan, P.; Hussein, M.Z.B.; Fakurazi, S.; Twyman, L.J. Graphene Oxide-Gallic Acid Nanodelivery System for Cancer Therapy. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 491. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Barahuie, F.; Saifullah, B.; Dorniani, D.; Fakurazi, S.; Karthivashan, G.; Hussein, M.Z.; Elfghi, F.M. Graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled release and targeted delivery of an anticancer active agent, chlorogenic acid. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 74, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Marcano, D.C.; Kosynkin, D.V.; Berlin, J.M.; Sinitskii, A.; Sun, Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L.B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J.M. Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806–4814. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Tang, L.A.; Lee, W.C.; Shi, H.; Wong, E.Y.; Sadovoy, A.; Gorelik, S.; Hobley, J.; Lin, C.T.; Loh, K.P. Highly Wrinkled Cross-Linked Graphene Oxide Membranes for Biological and Charge-Storage Applications. Small 2012, 8, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Balachandrab, V.; Murali, M.K. FT-IR, FT raman and DFT structure, vibrational frequency analysis and mulliken charges of 2 chlorophenyl isothiocyonate. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2012, 50, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  44. Murali, M.K.; Balachandran, V. FT-IR and FT-Raman spectral analysis of 3-(trifluromethyl) phenyl isothiocyanate. Elixir Vib. Spec. 2011, 40, 5105–5107. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kalbac, M.; Hsieh, Y.P.; Farhat, H.; Kavan, L.; Hofmann, M.; Kong, J.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Defects in Individual Semiconducting Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes: Raman Spectroscopic and in Situ Raman Spectroelectrochemical Study. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4619–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dresselhaus, M.S.; Jorio, A.; Hofmann, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Saito, R. Perspectives on Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of Graphite (Gr), graphene oxide (GO) and the GO-PEITC nanocomposite.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of Graphite (Gr), graphene oxide (GO) and the GO-PEITC nanocomposite.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g001
Figure 2. Fourier transformed infrared spectra of GO and the nanocomposite Go-PEITC.
Figure 2. Fourier transformed infrared spectra of GO and the nanocomposite Go-PEITC.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g002
Figure 3. Structure of phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), GO and of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC: (a) shows the hydrogen bonding and (b) shows the pi-pi stacking between GO and PEITC.
Figure 3. Structure of phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), GO and of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC: (a) shows the hydrogen bonding and (b) shows the pi-pi stacking between GO and PEITC.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g003
Figure 4. Raman spectra of Gr, GO and the nanocomposite GO-PEITC.
Figure 4. Raman spectra of Gr, GO and the nanocomposite GO-PEITC.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g004
Figure 5. (A) HR-TEM image of GO and (B) the nanocomposite GO-PEITC.
Figure 5. (A) HR-TEM image of GO and (B) the nanocomposite GO-PEITC.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g005
Figure 6. Hydrodynamic size of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC determined by DLS.
Figure 6. Hydrodynamic size of the nanocomposite GO-PEITC determined by DLS.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g006
Figure 7. In vitro release profile of PEITC from the nanocomposite GO-PEITC in human body simulated PBS solution of pH 7.4 (A) and pH 4.8 (B) in vitro cytotoxicity analysis.
Figure 7. In vitro release profile of PEITC from the nanocomposite GO-PEITC in human body simulated PBS solution of pH 7.4 (A) and pH 4.8 (B) in vitro cytotoxicity analysis.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g007
Figure 8. Effects of GO, PEITC and PEITC-loaded GO (GO-PEITC) (0–10 µg/mL) on viability of (A) HepG2 and (B) 3T3 cell line and the cell viability was measured by MTT assay (72 h). Data represented as mean ± SE of three independent experiments made in three replicates.
Figure 8. Effects of GO, PEITC and PEITC-loaded GO (GO-PEITC) (0–10 µg/mL) on viability of (A) HepG2 and (B) 3T3 cell line and the cell viability was measured by MTT assay (72 h). Data represented as mean ± SE of three independent experiments made in three replicates.
Pharmaceutics 10 00109 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaya Seema, D.M.; Saifullah, B.; Selvanayagam, M.; Gothai, S.; Hussein, M.Z.; Subbiah, S.K.; Mohd Esa, N.; Arulselvan, P. Designing of the Anticancer Nanocomposite with Sustained Release Properties by Using Graphene Oxide Nanocarrier with Phenethyl Isothiocyanate as Anticancer Agent. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030109

AMA Style

Jaya Seema DM, Saifullah B, Selvanayagam M, Gothai S, Hussein MZ, Subbiah SK, Mohd Esa N, Arulselvan P. Designing of the Anticancer Nanocomposite with Sustained Release Properties by Using Graphene Oxide Nanocarrier with Phenethyl Isothiocyanate as Anticancer Agent. Pharmaceutics. 2018; 10(3):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaya Seema, Dasan Mary, Bullo Saifullah, Mariadoss Selvanayagam, Sivapragasam Gothai, Mohd Zobir Hussein, Suresh Kumar Subbiah, Norhaizan Mohd Esa, and Palanisamy Arulselvan. 2018. "Designing of the Anticancer Nanocomposite with Sustained Release Properties by Using Graphene Oxide Nanocarrier with Phenethyl Isothiocyanate as Anticancer Agent" Pharmaceutics 10, no. 3: 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop