1. Introduction
Macrocyclic polyamines and their transition metal complexes are attracting increasing interest due to their clinical potential in cancer and virus treatment and in magnetic resonance imaging. Chemical modifications involving covalent attachment of polyamines to oligonucleotides (ON) create zwitterionic functional groups that can significantly improve their biological and biophysical properties, such as target affinity and cell penetration, in a manner similar to polyamine transfection agents. The introduction of such modifications was carried out using several different strand positions, including the 3′ and 5′-positions of the phosphate backbone, the 2′ and 4′-positions on the ribose ring, and within the nucleobase itself [
1,
2]. In contrast to the 3′ and 5′-positions, the stability of both oligonucleotides and duplexes is more sensitive to modifications of the ribose ring structure and conformation, although it is the 2′-position of the ribose ring that is particularly suitable for the covalent attachment of large molecules, such as polyamines, with minimal disruption of the base-paring potential. There are many examples of polyamine–oligonucleotide conjugates, but in most studies, polyamines are linear, while examples of macrocyclic polyamines that can form stable complexes with transition metals are rarer, and information on their effect on duplex stability is often lacking. Dubey et al. showed that cyclen-based transition metal complexes attached to the 5′-position of an oligo(dT) are able to hydrolyze the target oligo(dA) more efficiently; however, the effect of the cyclen moiety on the thermal stability of the duplex has not been described [
3]. Steward et al. demonstrated a four-arm, lattice-bearing, single-stranded DNA bound to the central Ni(II)–cyclen complex, which improves self-assembly at the supramolecular level, but its effect on duplexes is also unknown [
4]. On the other hand, it is known that macrocyclic polyamines such as 1,4,7,10- tetraazacyclododecane (cyclen) are potential artificial nucleases, and their derivatives can cleave double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), even without metal ions, through hydrolysis or oxidative cleavage [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. Thus, covalent attachment of a macrocyclic amine to ssDNA may provide new and useful models for studying the function and in vitro use of artificial nucleic acid-based nucleases.
The second type of modification that we introduced, intercalating dyes, have a considerable position in the chemistry of nucleic acids [
10]. These planar and aromatic molecules can intercalate between the nucleobases of dsDNA changing its topology but can also be explored as fluorescent probes for in vitro applications. Typically, oligonucleotide-based probes consist of covalently attached fluorescent dyes, including perylene [
11], pyrene and phenanthroline [
12,
13,
14,
15], or fluorescein [
16], which are known to exhibit high fluorescence and can interact noncovalently with dsDNA, e.g., by intercalation or groove-binding, leading to its stabilization. We have previously shown that covalent attachment of a carbazole moiety to the 5′-end of a 9-mer sequence increases the thermal stability of the resulting 9-mer/15-mer dsDNA by +4.2 °C [
17]. To date, the effect of the combined attachment of both molecules, an intercalator and cyclen, to double-stranded oligonucleotides on their thermal stability has not been investigated. The knowledge of the stabilizing (or destabilizing) effect will be helpful in the preparation of cyclen-containing oligonucleotides with tailored stability of the resulting hybridized duplexes. Telser et al. prepared several dsDNAs with covalently attached labels, e.g., anthraquinone or pyrene, placed at the internal positions of both strands and showed that both label–duplex and label–label interactions affect the thermal stability of the resulting duplexes [
18,
19]. Following the above studies, we also examined the mutual influence of the introduced modifications on the stability of duplexes.
Herein, we present a preliminary study of a new methodology for the covalent attachment of cyclen moieties to oligonucleotides and the assessment of their effect on the thermal stability of the resulting DNA duplexes. For this purpose, we developed a new procedure for introducing N-TFA-protected cyclen via a 2′-OMe-triazole linkage, followed by purification and deprotection of the resulting conjugate to obtain a high-purity product that is well separated from the initial oligonucleotide. We were also interested in the mutual influence of the different labels placed on opposite positions of complementary strands on their stabilizing properties, which turn out to be of significant importance in the case of cyclen groups. In summary, we tested seven labeled oligonucleotides on examples of thirty-two dsDNA combinations formed between the labeled strands, their unmodified complementary strands, and strands with a single base pair mismatch.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
All reagents and anhydrous solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification except phenol distillation. Anhydrous solvents were dried over 4 Å molecular sieves and checked using a Karl Fisher titrator to determine if the water concentration was below 12 ppm before use. The progress of the chemical reactions was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merc, Darmstadt, Germany). Spots on the TLC plate were visualized under UV light at 254 nm or by heating the plate after treatment with ninhydrin reagent made by dissolving 1.5 g of ninhydrin in 100 mL of n-butanol and adding 3.0 mL of acetic acid. Column chromatography was performed on Merck silica gel 60 (40–63 µm). Recycling preparative HPLC (prep-HPLC) was performed on a JAI LaboACE 5060 (Japan Analytic Industry, Tokyo, Japan). Depending on the type of compound to be purified, a tandem set of GPC JAIGEL-2HR+2.5 HR columns (∅20 mm × 600 mm) or a silica-based RP JAIGEL-ODS-AP-L SP-120-10 column (∅20 mm × 500 mm, 10 μm) was used for prep-HPLC. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian NMR system 600 spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 600 and 150 MHz, respectively. Peak multiplicity is expressed as follows: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, dd = doublet of doublets, ddd = doublet of doublets of doublets, m = multiplet. NMR chemical shifts are reported in ppm (δ), relative to residual nondeuterated solvents as internal standard and coupling constants (J) are given in Hz. Melting points (Mp) were determined using a Boethius microscope HMK type (Franz Küstner, Dresden, Germany). High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (HR-ESI-MS) analyses were performed on a Waters Xevo G2 QTOF apparatus (Waters-Micromass, Manchester, UK). Microwave-assisted reactions were carried out in a Biotage Initiator microwave reactor (Stockholm, Sweden) using 0.5–2.0 mL vials under the following conditions: 2 h, 90 °C, prestirring 30 s, high adsorption.
2.2. Ultraviolet Thermal Melting Studies
To determine the melting temperature (Tm) of the obtained duplexes, UV melting studies were performed on a Lambda 35 UV/Vis Spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) using 10 mm path length Hellma SUPRASIL quartz cuvettes (Müllheim, Germany), monitoring at 260 nm with a complementary DNA/DNA strands concentration of 2.5 μM and a volume of 1.0 mL. Samples were prepared as follows: The modified strands and their corresponding complementary strands were mixed 1:1 (n/n) in 2.0 mL Eppendorf tubes before medium salt buffer (2×, 11.7 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 200 mM NaCl, 0.20 mM EDTA, pH 7.0, 500 μL) was added, which was completed in 1.0 mL using Milli-Q water. Thus, all samples were dissolved in 1× buffer condition (5.8 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.10 mM EDTA). The samples were denatured by heating to 90 °C in a water bath and then slowly cooled to rt before transferring them to cuvettes. The absorbance at 260 nm was recorded as a function of time with a linear temperature increase from 6 to 80 °C at a rate of 1.0 °C/min programmed by a Peltier temperature controller. Two separate melting curves were measured, and Tm values were calculated with the UV-WinLab software, taking the mean of the two melting curves with a deviation of no more than 0.5 °C.
2.3. Circular Dichroism Studies
Samples were prepared in the same way as for the Tm measurement. The background spectrum of the buffer was recorded and subtracted from the corresponding spectra. Measurements were performed on a JASCO J-815 spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan) at 20 °C using quartz optical cells with a path length of 5 mm and a total volume of 1.0 mL. All CD spectra were recorded from 200–400 nm with a scan rate of 100 nm/min, employing 5 scans.
2.4. Synthesis of 1,1′,1″-(1,4,7,10-Tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-one); 1
TFAEt (18.0 mL, 150 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of cyclen (6.55 g, 38.0 mmol) and Et3N (5.27 mL, 38.0 mmol) in MeOH (40 mL) at rt for 30 min and left at rt overnight. All volatiles were evaporated in vacuo and the residual oil was suspended in AcOEt (10 mL), evaporated onto 10 times its weight of silica gel and purified by silica gel column (∅50 mm × 200 mm), eluting with 100% AcOEt. The fractions at Rf 0.35 (TLC, 100% AcOEt), which became slightly stained in ninhydrin reagent, were evaporated to give 1 as a white foam (15.7 g, 85%). Mp = 79–80 °C. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.91–3.78 (m, 4H), 3.66–3.42 (m, 8H), 2.82–2.67 (m, 4H), 2.33 (q, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 156.78–156.24 (m), 117.53 (q, J = 286.4 Hz), 55.28–43.00 (m). HR-ESI-MS: m/z calcd. for C14H18F9N4O3 461.1235 [M+H]+; found 461.1134. The proton-decoupled 13C-NMR spectra of TFA-protected cyclen and its derivatives are complicated by the C–F coupling and the presence of conformers at rt.
2.5. Synthesis of 1,1′,1″-(10-(5-Bromopentanoyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-one); 2
An amount of 5-Bromovaleryl chloride (562 μL, 4.23 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 1 (1.77 g, 3.84 mmol) in DCM (20 mL) with K2CO3 (585 mg, 4.23 mmol) and stirred for 40 min in an ice-water bath. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC (5% MeOH-CHCl3, v/v) for the appearance of a new spot at Rf 0.42, which turned pale brown after ninhydrin treatment, and disappearance of the substrate. After the substrate spot was completely consumed, the reaction mixture was washed with water (20 mL) and the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. The filtrate was evaporated, and the oil residue was purified on a silica gel column (∅15 mm × 400 mm) eluting with 50% AcOEt-hexane (v/v). The fractions at Rf 0.22 (TLC, 50% AcOEt-hexane, v/v) were combined and evaporated to give 2 as a viscous oil (1.94 g, 81%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.84–3.67 (m, 16H), 3.55 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.38–2.31 (m, 2H), 1.85–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.65–1.63 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 172.92, 156.59–156.01 (m), 116.04 (q, J = 286.5 Hz), 48.02–45.11 (m), 40.04, 34.74, 31.72, 23.23, 23.16.
2.6. Synthesis of 1,1′,1″-(10-(5-Azidopentanoyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triyl)tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-one); 3
NaN3 (130 mg, 2.00 mmol) was added to a solution of 2 (623 mg, 1.00 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) and stirred for 24 h at rt. TLC analysis (50% AcOEt-hexane, v/v) showed a new spot of 3 at Rf 0.45, near the substrate at Rf 0.40, which stains darker on heating with ninhydrin than the substrate spot. The mixture was partitioned between AcOEt (20 mL) and water (80 mL), the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to give a viscous oil, which was purified by prep-HPLC (JAIGEL-ODS-AP-L, 100% MeOH, flow rate 7.0 mL/min). The fraction at a tR 26.8 min was collected and evaporated to give 3 (115 mg, 94%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD): δ 3.89–3.73 (m, 16H), 3.34 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.46–2.42 (m, 2H), 1.71–1.69 (m, 2H), 1.65–1.62 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD): δ 174.88, 157.84–157.05 (m), 116.27 (q, J = 285.8), 50.79, 47.07–46.28 (m), 32.12, 28.01, 22.05.
2.7. Synthesis of 2-Hydroxy-9H-thioxanthen-9-one; 4
Freshly distilled phenol (9.00 g, 97.3 mmol) was added portionwise to a suspension of thiosalicylic acid (5.00 g, 32.4 mmol) at concd. H2SO4 (96%, 60 mL) and the mixture was heated at 90 °C for 18 h. After cooling to rt, the mixture was gently poured into 500 mL of water with crushed ice to give a yellow precipitate, which was filtrated off and dried to give a yellow solid. The crude solid was dissolved in CHCl3 (50 mL) and evaporated onto 10 times its weight of silica gel, applied to a silica gel column (∅50 mm × 200 mm), and eluted using 5% MeOH-CHCl3 (v/v). The fractions visible on TLC as yellow spots at Rf 0.32 was evaporated together to give 4 as a yellow solid (3.41 g, 46%). Mp = 245–246 °C. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD): δ 10.22 (s, 1H), 8.52 (ddd, J = 7.8, 1.2, 0.6, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 2.4, 1H), 7.65-7.70 (m, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 9.0, 1H), 7.50 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.0, 1.8, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J = 9.0, 3.0, 1H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD): δ 179.30, 156.53, 137.98, 137.45, 132.08, 129.86, 129.00, 128.12, 127.29, 125.90, 125.75, 122.32, 113.12. HR-ESI-MS: m/z calcd. for C13H7O2S 227.0172 [M-H]−; found 227.0167.
2.8. Synthesis of 2-(4-Bromobutoxy)-9H-thioxanthen-9-one; 5
An amount of 1,4-dibromobutane (1.40 mL, 11.9 mmol) was added in one portion to a mixture of K2CO3 (900 mg, 56.6 mmol) and 4 (680 mg, 2.98 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) and stirred at 100 °C for 48 h. The mixture was cooled to rt, diluted with AcOEt to 40 mL, and washed with water (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered off, and evaporated to give a yellow oil, which crystallized over time. The crude solid was purified by silica gel chromatography (∅15 mm × 450 mm) eluting with 100% CHCl3. The fractions at Rf 0.75 (TLC, 100% CHCl3) were evaporated to give 5 as a light-yellow solid (922 mg, 85%). Mp = 122–123 °C. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.61 (ddd, J = 7.8, 1.2, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (ddd, J = 7.2, 6.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (ddd, J = 8.4, 1.8, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (ddd, J = 7.2, 6.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.50 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.19–2.07 (m, 2H), 2.02–1.97 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 179.59, 157.62, 137.47, 131.99, 130.20, 129.85, 129.14, 128.57, 127.29, 126.05, 125.95, 122.88, 111.08, 67.33, 33.29, 29.44, 27.78.
2.9. Synthesis of 2-(4-Azidobutoxy)-9H-thioxanthen-9-one; 6
The reaction of NaN3 (130 mg, 2.00 mmol) with solution of 5 (363 mg, 1.00 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) was performed similar to that of 3. The crude product was purified on a silica gel column (∅15 mm × 450 mm) and the eluates at Rf 0.95 (100% CHCl3), turning grey on heating with ninhydrin, were evaporated and purified by prep-HPLC (JAIGEL-2HR+2.5HR, 100% DCM, flow rate 7.0 mL/min). The fraction at a tR 36.3 min was evaporated to give 6 (310 mg, 95%) as a yellow oil, which crystallized over time. Mp = 77–78 °C. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.46 (ddd, J = 8.4, 1.8, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (ddd, J = 8.4, 1.8, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (ddd, J = 7.2, 6.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (ddd, J = 7.2, 6.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J = 8.4, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.44 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.84–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.76–1.71 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 178.80, 157.80, 137.19, 133.07, 129.86, 129.48, 128.58, 128.39, 128.16, 126.90, 126.87, 123.02, 111.46, 67.84, 50.85, 26.28, 25.51.
2.10. Synthesis of 2-(4-Bromobutyl)-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-dione; 7
To a stirred suspension of 1,8-naphthalimide (1.12 g, 5.68 mmol) in dry DMF (20 mL), NaH (80% dispersion in mineral oil; 341 mg, 11.36 mmol) was added portionwise. The suspension was allowed to stir at rt for 1 h. Then, 1,4-dibromobutane (2.37 mL, 22.72 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture in one portion and stirred overnight at rt. The reaction mixture was then poured into a 5% HCl solution and the resulting white precipitate was filtered off and air dried. The crude solid was purified by silica gel chromatography (∅15 mm × 450 mm) eluting with 100% CHCl3. Fractions with Rf 0.90 (TLC, 100% CHCl3) were evaporated to afford 7 as a white solid (1.40 g, 74%). Mp = 115–116 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.58 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 8.21 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (dd, J = 8.2, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 4.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.48 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.96-2.03 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.95 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.11, 133.92, 131.53, 131.24, 128.11, 126.96, 122.57, 39.30, 33.11, 30.22, 26.94.
2.11. Synthesis of 2-(4-Azidobutyl)-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-dione; 8
The reaction of NaN3 (474 mg, 7.28 mmol) with solution of 7 (1.21 g, 3.64 mmol) in DMF (20 mL) was performed similar to that of 3. The crude product was purified on a silica gel column (∅15 mm × 450 mm) and the eluates at Rf 0.95 (100% CHCl3), turning grey on heating with ninhydrin, were evaporated and purified by prep-HPLC (JAIGEL-2HR + 2.5HR, 100% DCM, flow rate 7.0 mL/min). The fraction at a tR 32.1 min was evaporated to give 8 (980 mg, 91%) as a white solid. Mp = 73–74 °C. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.58 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 8.20 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.76–7.73 (m, 2H), 4.21 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 3.35 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.74–1.69 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.14, 133.93, 131.56, 131.23, 128.12, 126.90, 122.56, 51.16, 39.61, 26.49, 25.37.
2.12. Oligonucleotides Purification and Analysis
RP-HPLC purification of crude oligonucleotides was performed by Waters 600 HPLC System with a Waters XBridge BEH C18-column (∅19 mm × 100 mm, 5 μm). Elution was performed by isocratic hold of A-buffer for 5.0 min, followed by a linear gradient to 70% of B-buffer for 16.5 min at a flow rate of 5.0 mL/min (A-buffer: 0.05 M TEAA buffer, pH 7.4; B-buffer: 25% A-buffer, 75% MeCN). IE-HPLC purification of oligonucleotides was caried on a DIONEX Ultimate 3000 system with a DNAPac PA100 Semi-Preparative column (∅9 mm × 250 mm, 13 μm) at 60 °C (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Elution was performed with an isocratic hold of 10% C-buffer in Milli-Q water, starting with hold on 2% D-buffer in Milli-Q water for 2.0 min, followed by a linear gradient to 25% of D-buffer in Milli-Q water for 20.0 min at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min (C-buffer: 0.25 M Tris-Cl, pH 8.0; D-buffer: 1.0 M NaClO4). After purification, the appropriate fractions were combined and concentrated by purging with N2 at 55 °C, and the obtained samples were dissolved in Milli-Q water (100 µL), then desalted with an addition of NaClO4 solution (5.0 M, 15 µL), suspended in cold ethanol (1.5 mL) and stored at −20 °C for 1–2 h. After centrifugation (13,200 rpm, 5 min, 4 °C), the supernatant was filtered off and the pellet was washed with cold ethanol (2 × 1.0 mL), dried under N2 flow at 55 °C, and dissolved in Milli-Q water (1.0 mL). Analytical RP-HPLC was performed on a Merck-Hitachi 7000 system (Hitachi Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Waters XBridge OBD C18-column (∅10 mm × 50 mm, 2.5 µm) at 60 °C. Elution was started with an isocratic hold of A-buffer for 2 min followed by a linear gradient to 85% of B-buffer for 30 min, keeping the flow rate at 1.3 mL/min. The structure and composition of oligonucleotides was verified by the MALDI-TOF MS method performed on an Ultraflex Extreme mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Finally, the purified oligonucleotides were quantified by measuring OD as the absorbance at 260 nm of the sample in 1.0 mL of water in a 10 mm path length cuvette. The excitation coefficients for DNAs at 260 nm were estimated to be 1 × 104 M cm−1 residue−1.
2.13. Synthesis and Purification of ON1–ON5
Target
ON1–
ON5 were synthesized at the 1.0 μmol scale on polystyrene beads (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) using an automated synthesizer Expedite 8909 (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol, except for the introduction of 2′-
O-propargyl-uridine (U
P) into the
ON3–
ON5 sequence by the so-called “hand-coupling procedure”, previously used by Wengel’s group [
17]. The stepwise coupling efficiencies were >95% for standard conditions and ∼85% for hand-coupling. Cleavage from the beads and nucleobase deprotection were performed by incubation with concd. aq. NH
3 in a screw cap vial at 55 °C overnight. The supernatant was filtered and evaporated to remove NH
3 by heating the filtrate to 55 °C and purging with N
2 for 4 h. The crude samples were purified DMT-on by RP-HPLC and the 5′-DMT group was cleaved with 2% aq. trifluoroacetic acid. The deprotected oligonucleotides were eluted with a 30% MeCN soln. in water (
v/v) and purified by IE-HPLC, then the composition of the collected fractions was assessed by MALDI-TOF MS. Unmodified and 2′-
O-propargylated oligonucleotides were isolated in overall yields of 80–88% and were >98% pure by IE-HPLC analysis.
2.14. Synthesis and Purification of ON9-ON12, ON13 and ON14
To a 2.0 mL Ar purged microwave vial containing ON3 (203 nmol in 800 μL of dH2O) in a mixture of TEAA buffer (250 μL, 1.0 M, pH 7.4) and DMSO (400 μL), azide-functionalized 3 (51.0 μL, 10.0 mM DMSO soln.), freshly prepared CuSO4–TBTA equimolar complex (80.0 μL, 10.0 mM DMSO-dH2O mixture, 3:7, v/v) and sodium ascorbate (201 μL, 25.0 mM dH2O soln.) were subsequently added. The resulting mixture was vortexed and centrifuged after adding each of the reagents. The vial was equipped with a magnetic stirrer, purged with Ar, sealed with a Teflon-lined septum cap, and microwaved. After completion of the reaction, the volume was made up to 2.0 mL with dH2O and divided into two equal parts. Each sample was desalted through a NAP-10 column (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) following manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting solution contains a mixture of two major products, tris-N-TFA-protected ON6 and partially deprotected bis-N-TFA-protected ON6′. During RP-HPLC purification, the fractions ranging from tR 12.2 to 17.2 min were collected, evaporated together under a stream of N2, and used as a mixture in the next step. The resulting sample was incubated with 1.0 mL of satd. aq. NH3 at 55 °C overnight and then evaporated by gentle blowing with N2 at 30 °C for 4 h. The crude sample after deprotection was purified by IE-HPLC to give ON13 in 41% overall yield and 98% purity.
The synthesis of the intercalator-labeled
ON9–
ON12 and cyclen-labeled
ON14 was performed under the same conditions as for
ON13. After desalting through an NAP-10 column,
ON9–
ON12 samples were evaporated under a stream of N
2 and purified by RP-HPLC. These samples were obtained in high yield and purity (
Table 1) and did not require further purification by IE-HPLC. After coupling
3 with
ON4, a mixture of intermediates
ON7” was obtained which was purified by RP-HPLC by collecting the fractions at
tR from 12.2 to 17.2 min. After their joint deprotection and purification of the resulting sample by IE-HPLC, the
ON14 conjugate was obtained in an overall yield of 40% and 98% purity.
2.15. Synthesis and Purification of ON15
For the synthesis of the double-functionalized ON15, the same procedure was used as for ON13, except that the following reaction system was used: ON5 (83 nmol in 480 μL of dH2O) in a mixture of TEAA buffer (150 μL, 1.0 M, pH 7.4) and DMSO (240 μL), azide-functionalized 3 (42.0 μL, 10.0 mM DMSO soln.), freshly prepared CuSO4–TBTA equimolar complex (33.0 μL, 10.0 mM DMSO–dH2O mixture, 3:7, v/v) and sodium ascorbate (164 μL, 25.0 mM dH2O soln.). The fractions ranging from tR 12.7 to 17.5 min were collected by RP-HPLC and evaporated together under a stream of N2. After complete deprotection, a single peak was observed at m/z 3428.227 in the MALDI-TOF MS spectra assigned to ON15 (calcd. as m/z 3428.957) and a single peak in the RP-chromatogram at tR 8.39 min. This fraction was collected and purified by IE-HPLC to give ON15 in 38% overall yield and 95% purity.