Next Article in Journal
Transient Impact Analysis of High Renewable Energy Sources Penetration According to the Future Korean Power Grid Scenario
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Personality Traits on Consumer Preferences: The Case of Office Chair Selection by Attractiveness
Previous Article in Journal
Iron Corrosion: Scientific Heritage in Jeopardy
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Analysis of the Sustainable Development of Environmental Education Provided by Museums
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals

Master & Doctoral Program, Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4139; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114139
Submission received: 9 October 2018 / Revised: 8 November 2018 / Accepted: 8 November 2018 / Published: 10 November 2018

Abstract

:
Fashionable clothes resource suppliers are directly linked with resource consumers through the Internet, thus replacing the traditional model. With fashionable clothes as the products for renting, this study helps relevant enterprises understand the factors influencing consumers’ adoption of renting and their attitude and behavioral intention towards clothes renting. Taking the theory of planned behavior as the theoretical foundation, this study thus adopts the technology acceptance model (TAM), the innovation diffusion theory (IDT), the structural equation model (SEM), and the collected information to develop a research methodology that is both theoretical and practical. According to the research results, compatibility matters the most in driving consumers to have a positive assessment and perception of online clothes renting in terms of behavior and attitude. Additionally, personal innovativeness has significant effects and can help relevant enterprises find their target markets. In terms of subjective norm, interpersonal relationship also has a significant influence, showing that consumers today pay much more attention to friends’ information sources. The self-efficacy of the perceived behavioral control also has a noticeable impact. Therefore, relevant enterprises need to consider the operability of online clothes renting to prevent consumers from feeling frustrated in their ability to use it, thus reducing their use intention.

1. Introduction

The sharing economy platform can be seen in food, clothes, accommodation, and travel in Taiwan in recent years. Apart from stores for clothes renting, Taiwanese consumers purchase their clothes through e-commerce or online shopping. For consumers, online shopping is convenient and saves time, and there is abundant and free information for reference. Moreover, consumers can compare the prices and products of different suppliers [1] and fashion trends have led to higher consumer demand for clothes and a higher expectation on fashionable clothes. Whether clothing rental can change the development of Taiwan’s fashion industry, spreading the idea of replacing purchases with renting.
At present, clothing rental in Taiwan is dominated by wedding and dance/drama stores, which provide rental services for consumers when they need to participate in banquets or important occasions. However, consumption patterns tend to be short-lived. The main researchers expect that more clothing rental will focus on online service, and this technology refers to the network type rather than the clothing technology. In Taiwan, Amaze Fashion established AMAZE clothing rental in 2016. The company combines e-commerce and clothing. CEO Vincent Hsu wanted to subvert the traditional clothing industry through sharing mode, allowing consumers to own the right of use instead of ownership, gradually realizing subtraction lifestyle, to avoid owning too many unnecessary things, and changing consumer spending habits.
In addition, some arguments concerning clothing rental pointed out that some customers were interested in rental, participating in design, or renewing service patterns [2,3]. Rental retailers can emphasize that leasing can provide the latest fashion products at relatively low prices, and fashion-related magazines and websites would be the ideal advertising method for those consumers. Studies of Armstrong et al. (2015) showed that in clothing consulting, renting, lending, and exchange, customers showed relatively high interest in use-oriented rental, including reducing over-consumption, satisfying themselves for change, social support and interaction, saving money, and improving product satisfaction. Also, they worry about the quality of sharing products and have doubts about the feasibility of the business model [4].
The rise of renting products, which can give many things a second life, has also contributed to the sharing economy. People deem that network-based rental service can be the center of continuous development, and that network-based rental can make save resources through resource sharing and bring benefits of environmental protection. Due to climate changes in the recent years, people’s environmental awareness has risen. Chiu (2014) also noted that the reasons for the rise of sharing economy include the following aspects: Economic downturn, rise of environmental awareness, and popularity of social media and other factors. In combination with this trend, enterprises can develop online rental services and, when communicating with target customers, take environmental protection and resource utilization as main appeals [5].
A total of 254 collective consumption websites have been collected on the website platform of collaborativeconsumption.org. In the categories of authorization and transfer of ownership, the exchange methods include renting, lending and exchanging, donation, and purchase [6]. In the category of ownership authorization, there are 131 websites with a renting operation mode, accounting for the highest proportion of the 254 collective consumption websites.
The mapping of 254 CC platforms revealed that the activities may be separated into two main categories of exchange: access over ownership and transfer of ownership. However, it is possible for a platform to facilitate both modes of exchange. This occurs when the platform has more than one type of trading activity, such as lending (access over ownership) and donating (transfer of ownership), causing an overlap between the main categories. Out of the 254 platforms, 191 were identified as facilitating access over ownership while 139 provided the transfer of ownership. A total of 76 platforms had overlapping categories.
Access over ownership is the most common mode of exchange. Access over ownership means that users may offer and share their goods and services to other users for a limited time through peer-to-peer sharing activities, such as renting and lending [7]. Most common was renting. Alternatively, the transfer of ownership passes ownership from one user to another through swapping, donating, and purchasing of primarily second-hand goods. For instance, services such as Swapstyle or ReSecond help users to swap unwanted clothes. Other examples are Zilch and ThredUp. Swapping and donating are the most popular categories followed by the least popular category, namely purchasing used goods. An overview of the mapping can be seen in Figure 1.
Furthermore, this analysis sheds light on numerous aspects of the sharing economy but particularly on the multiplicity of the term “sharing.” We want to emphasize that our definition of the sharing economy differs slightly from those of other scholars [8,9], as well as some other definitions of “sharing economy” [10,11] or “collaborative consumption” [12,13,14]. This demonstrates that the online renting mode is popular among consumers. Renting is a new form of ownership and enables people to rent and own something at a lower price [15].
Most existing studies on renting focus on house renting and car renting, with only a few that emphasize clothes renting or sharing clothes. The above studies show that if a consumer group for clothes renting has been formed and if the predisposing factors of the behavioral intention towards clothes renting can be used to adjust marketing strategies, then a better operation mode for relevant enterprises can be provided. The information about renters’ decision-making is highly important, which is the primary motive of this study. Because it is also necessary to get to know consumers in a new business mode, it is therefore essential to explore if consumers can accept this new consumption mode. What matters more are the factors influencing their acceptance of these new modes. If consumers have a simpler method and a better opportunity to choose a better consumption option in the consumer market, then they would be willing to use it continually [16]. It is hoped that those who want to offer services in relevant industries will attach more importance to these views.
To sum up, Whether or not Taiwan consumers have demand or identity of the behavioral intention of clothing rental will be the focus of this study. In the past, the relevant researches exploring the IT acceptance intention from the perspective of consumers which have been widely applied include Fishbein and Ajzen (1977) theory of reasoned action (TRA) Ajzen (1985) the theory of planned behavior (TPB), Davis (1989) technology acceptance model (TAM) and Rogers (1995) diffusion of innovation (DOI) [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, this research hopes to take the TPB as the research basis from the perspective of consumers and combine technology acceptance model and diffusion of innovation to construct the framework of this research, so as to explain the factors why the consumers accept the network clothing rental. It is very important to discuss whether consumers can accept this new consumption model and it is more important to discuss what factors will affect them to be willing to accept the new model [21]. It is hoped that people who intend to provide the relevant industries in the future can attach great importance to these viewpoints to summarize the above-mentioned main points. The purposes of this research are described as below: (1) to understand Sharing Economy and clothing market status through literature review; (2) to analyze the factors affecting new consumers’ acceptance intention for the network clothing rental and compare their importance.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Sharing Economy

Sharing economy is also called collaborative consumption, which is expected to alleviate social problems, such as excessive consumption of resources, environmental pollution, and poverty [11,21]. Privately-owned items can be shared or rented through individual-to-individual markets [14]. Stephany and Alex (2015) believed that sharing economy was to put idle assets on leasing or sale, which reduced the demands of people for asset ownership [22]. Botsman and Rogers (2010) said, “People make use of collaborative consumption for sharing, barter, lending, giving and exchanging. Collaborative consumption makes it clear that the benefits of access to products and services far exceed ownership, and doing so not only saves money, time and space, but also makes new friends. These systems also provide considerable environmental benefits by increasing use rate, encouraging development of better products, and eliminating excess production and excess consumption [14].” Rifkin (2014) held that there was a wide range of possible developments from ownership to access rights [23]. Corbo and Fraticelli, (2015) deemed that the use of Internet technology to connect groups and promote more efficient use of goods, skills and things fell into the category of sharing economy [24].
Sharing economy is not a new concept. It originated from the collaborative consumption idea proposed by Felson and Spaeth in 1978 through peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms or markets, a consumption behavior mode using exchanges, sharing, bartering, transaction, and leasing as methods to reactivate things. The concept of sharing and personal exchange was derived from American culture [25]. In the past, most of the products were shared with close people, such as neighbors, family members, and friends. In recent years, the concept of sharing has gradually evolved into a profitable business model. The growth of this sharing economy business model reflected the network relations between individuals, collaborative consumption, and authorized economies [15].
In the related research of sharing economy in recent years, benefits of sharing economy include: Reducing negative impact on environment, saving energy and reducing carbon [26,27], allowing people to have products they cannot afford [28]. Rachel Botsman (2010) classified the sharing economy into three categories: product-service systems, redistribution markets, and collaborative lifestyles [14].
(1)
Product-service systems mean that owners of certain products or services share their products or services with others by way of a fee-based rental. Consumers can enjoy the benefits of products without having to purchase, and more and more consumers begin to experience the convenience and efficiency brought by “leasing instead of purchasing”. There are multiple emerging platforms that have invested in such sharing services, such as Zipcar, Lyft and other car sharing, sharing services, and Airbnb rent sharing services.
(2)
Redistribution markets. There are often a large number of rarely used and idle assets in families. In the past, they could only be placed in storage rooms or discarded. With the rise of the Internet, these second-hand products are redistributed on online platforms to those people in need rapidly. The emergence of SwapTree, eBay, Freecycle and other second-hand exchanges, sales, or recycling platforms allows people to save resources and protect environment.
(3)
Collaborative lifestyles. The so-called collaborative lifestyles mean that multiple consumers common interests and needs may gather on social platforms to share or exchange relatively recessive assets, allowing idle resources to create greater utility, for example: Time, money, experience, and space, including P2P (peer-to-peer lending) lending platform, Zopa, Lending Club or rental services such as Airbnb.
Bockmann (2013) believed that the factors that promoted the sharing economy to create its value were community, economics, and technology. In addition, it is found that consumers have rational and emotional benefits in values of sharing economy. Finance ranks first in terms of rationality and generality ranks first in terms of emotion [15]. Through questionnaire survey, Juho et al. (2015) found that the motivation for people to participate in collaborative consumption showed that sustainability, entertainment, and economic efficiency had significant impact on attitudes of collaborative consumption. It was interesting that people thought highly of sustainability but did not take action [6]. Florian et al. 2016 adopted questionnaires to investigate the incentives for renters and renters to participate in online leasing in term of peer-to-peer leasing services. It was found that sharing fun, sharing knowledge, fashion lifestyle, product diversity, sense of belonging, community experience, community impact, and economic benefits had significantly positive impact on the incentives for renters and lessors to participate in online leasing, and significantly negative impact on expected efforts, ownership, privacy, sharing risk have a negative impact [29].

2.2. Types of Leasing

In recent years, the leasing of cars, housing, computers, home appliances, clothing, and flower baskets has become an increasingly popular model. Characterized by a combination of funding and asset finance, modern leasing first emerged in the United States in the 1950s. Leasing is an economic activity that rents the right to use without changing the ownership of the property. In other words, the property owner (lessor) lets the property for the user (lessee) to use in accordance with a contract. The lessee pays a certain rent to the lessor according to a schedule. The lessor retains property ownership, and the lessee only exercises the right to use the property. Modern leases can be divided into two categories: the first category is financed leasing set up for the purpose of funding. The second category is service leasing, also known as operating leases, which providing a specific service. The operating leasing industry, which focuses on obtaining the right to use goods, has become an important component of the economic infrastructure and people’s lives worldwide. Leasing consumption also plays an irreplaceable role in promoting the sustainable development of the national economy [30].
The amount of old apparel in Taiwan is causing environmental problems, and the handling of used clothes has become a core issue for the future. The rise of the leasing industry has opened a new path for domestic apparel leasing. It is a crossover between a second-hand exchange and an online purchasing platform that sustains the concept of renting instead of buying thereby extending the useful life cycle of clothing. According to the Council for Textile Recycling (USA), the amount of textile waste discarded by consumers increased by 40% between 1999 and 2009. By 2015, the amount increased to 25 billion lbs. or an average of 82 lbs. (approx. 37 kg) of discarded textile waste per person. Taiwan disposes approximately 72,000 tons of used clothes each year. Assuming 3.2 pieces per kg, the total amount discarded is 230.40 million pieces, which is equivalent to 438 pieces of clothing each minute. On average, each person contributes 10 pieces per year. The disposal of used clothing has become a form of environmental pollution. Moreover, increasing online shopping has further promoted rapid sales and the obsolescence of clothing. Consumers are vulnerable to impulsive shopping and often consider clothes unwearable or unsuitable after a purchase. The “Complete Waste Sorting and Zero Waste Action Plan” proposed by the Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan) states that reuse is another method of waste reduction in addition to recycling and source reduction. Achieving the goals of environmental quality and sustainable development will require efficiency in production and changes in consumption patterns in order to emphasize optimization of resource use and minimization of waste”. Therefore, if we can maximize the effect of clothing rentals by ensuring clothes are rented until they are worn out and replacing purchasing with online leasing of used clothes, could the problem of excessive consumption of clothing be temporarily solved in Taiwan?
In foreign countries, clothing rental has been developing for some time. Rent the Runway (US) was established in 2009 and has been operating for nine years. The company currently focuses on renting formal wear. It initially provided customers with a formal wear rental service for events such as banquets and weddings. Customers were only required to pay around 10% of the original price of the clothing to rent formal wear. A monthly rental service was launched in 2017. Le Tote (US) was established in 2012 and has been operating for six years. For only US$39 per month, customers receive a customized series of clothing and accessories of different brands. Each customer receives a box containing items of clothing, and the consumer may purchase or return the items after wearing them. New users are asked questions about style preferences to help determine the contents of each delivery, and they are encouraged to give feedback on the items received including whether they fit, the color, and the number of times each item is worn. AIR CLOSET (Japan) was established in 2014 and has been operating for four years. The company introduced the product subscription model to the women’s fashion apparel market and has completed JPY 1 billion of financing. Its focus is on the Japanese boutique clothing market, and it sends three sets of clothing to subscribers every month (including tops, pants, and skirts) for a monthly fee of only JPY 6800. The company caters to young professional workers and professional mothers who have limited time to follow fashion brands. Users can exchange the clothes they receive or continue to wear them as long as they pay the delivery and dry-cleaning fees. As these clothes are all recycled and reused, users can also buy them permanently at a lower price than retail. YCloset (Mainland China) was established in 2015 and has been operating for three years. This company focuses on shared leasing of women’s fashion and is engaged in the business of “monthly dressing,” providing a membership system to female consumers, and offering them an unlimited exchange service for branded clothing (three pieces each time with unlimited replacement during the membership period).
AMAZE (Taiwan) was established in 2016 and has been operating for two years. The company currently offers more than 1200 styles and more than 5000 pieces of clothing. A variety of rental pricing options are available including NT$999, NT$1999, and NT$3999, and the service is provided online. Customers can browse all the styles on the website and place orders online. They can rent clothes today and receive them two days later. Returns can even be made at the retailer 7-Eleven. Shipping is offered free of charge to provide the most convenient service to consumers. In cases where customers like a piece of clothing after renting, they can also buy it at cost. In addition, the company partners with Taiwan Washing, a dry-cleaning specialist, to ensure all rented clothing gives consumers peace of mind. In Taiwan, the rental of fashionable network clothing is rare. Thus, according to the investigation in this research, the number of the rentals of Amaze’s network clothing has reached up to 100,000 at present and there are 80,000 members. The following is a collection of various clothing rental business models for the benefit of future research (Table 1).

2.3. Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)

On the basis of social psychology, Fishbein and Ajzen developed the theory of reasoned action (TRA) to discuss the relationship between attitude and behavior. The basic hypothesis of the theory of reasoned action is that personal behavior is under the control of will. In other words, a person thinks before taking action and does not take an action until he/she knows its meaning. According to TRA, what is the most effective in predicting actual behavior is behavior intention, which is influenced by personal attitude toward behavior and subjective norm. Behavioral intention refers to the degree to which a person wants to show a specific behavior. The intensity of behavioral intention determines the occurrence of actual behavior [17]. Attitude toward behavior refers to a person’s positive or negative feeling about specific behaviors. It consists of behavioral beliefs and outcome evaluation. Subjective norm means that a person’s perception is influenced by whether he/she is expected to show specific behaviors. It depends on the combination of normative belief and motivation to comply. It has been demonstrated by researchers of many different fields that TRA is an effective model providing an effective prediction of behavioral intention or actual behavior [31,32,33,34].

2.4. Theory of Planned Behavior

Although TRA is widely used to interpret behaviors, it is restricted by its basic hypothesis that personal behavior is voluntary. In most cases, the occurrence of behavior is influenced by many factors. For instance, if a person who wants to buy the latest fashion does not have adequate money or use frequency is too low, then it would be hard to achieve use behavior. Therefore, appropriate opportunities or resources, such as time and money, will influence behavior, but not all these factors are behaviors controlled by personal will. Hence, [18] proposed the theory of planned action. The restriction on TRA is extended to predict the behaviors of those with a weak control. Different from TRA, TPB includes “perceived behavioral control”. According to TPB, “actual behavior” is determined by “behavior intention”, but perceived behavioral control also influences actual behavior; “behavior intention” is determined by three factors: “attitude toward behavior”, subjective norm”, and “perceived behavioral control”.
If individuals have the high behavior intention, they will have the higher probability to engage in this behavior. The behavior intention has a very close relationship with actual behavior, so TPB’s measurement of actual behavior is replaced by behavior intention, also known as intention model [17]. Namely, TPB’s behavior intention is the variable that is expected to have the best acceptance willingness. In many researches, it is suggested that the dimension of normative belief should be decomposed into reference groups [35,36,37]. Bhattacherjee (2000) classified the reference groups into interpersonal influence and external influence in the research on the ordering service of electronic security network. When the potential adopters attempt to adopt something, they will seek for the experience of the previous adopters (interpersonal influence) or consult the experts from the mass media in this field (external influence), so as to reduce the uncertainty. Thus, the potential adopters form their opinions for innovation according to the two sources (interpersonal and external influence) [38].
The effect of reference groups has been proved in many researches [20,38,39]. Therefore, in this research, the normative belief defined the reference groups according to Bhattacherjee’s research (2000) where the reference group is classified into interpersonal influence and external influence. The perceived behavioral control refers to the control ability in the required resource and opportunity when the perceived individuals are going to do the certain act, i.e., the difficulty degree perceived by individuals to complete one specific behavior. For instance, when individuals perceive that they possess more and more resources and opportunities, the expected obstruction will become smaller and smaller and their perception of control of the behavior will become increasingly strong. Thus, individual’s behavior intention will become stronger and the relationship between behavior intention and actual behavior will become more stable [18]. The perceived behavioral control consists of the sum of products of control belief (CB) and perceived facilitation (PF).
According to Ajzen (1985), perceived behavioral control can be classified into 2 predisposing factors: Self-Efficacy and Facilitating Condition [18]. Compeau and Higgins (1995) considered that the self-efficacy refers to one person’s self-evaluation for his ability to use the computer and it focuses on what individuals will be able to complete in the future instead of what they have completed in the past. From the perspective of IT use, the higher self-efficacy will cause the higher behavior intention and IT use [40]. Ajzen (1991) proposed that self-efficacy refers to individual’s self-evaluation for their ability whether they are able to complete the certain behavior successfully. Bhattacherjee (2000) believed that self-efficacy is like the internal restriction factor. If individuals perceive that their ability to complete this behavior is lower, their perceived behavioral control for this behavior will be lower [41]. Bhattacherjee (2000) called the Facilitating Condition the external restriction factor, namely when individuals perceive that the resources required to complete this behavior are fewer and fewer, their perceived behavioral control for this behavior will become lower. Based on the research of Bhattacherjee (2000), the predisposing factor of perceived behavioral control is classified into self-efficacy and facilitating condition [38]. The research into TPB proves the relationship between PBC and behavior intention [41] and perceived behavioral control is significantly correlated to behavior belief [38,42].
After an empirical study, Ajzen and Madden found that “theory of planned action” is more effective than “theory of reasoned action” in explaining behaviors. Many other studies have also demonstrated that TPB is a rigid behavioral theory that can predict the information technology acceptance intention [42,43,44,45]. This study targets to know the acceptance of clothes renting and find out the belief that drives consumers to use online renting, so as to give suggestions on improving consumer behavior. Therefore, this study adopts TBB to explore consumers’ acceptance of clothes renting (Figure 2).

2.5. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

The technology acceptance model (TAM) was developed by Davis from the revision of TRA (Figure 3). It was established to simplify TRA in order to propose a general theory and build a rigid theoretical foundation [19]. It is used to explain and predict the behavior of users’ information technology acceptance and to analyze the factors influencing users’ information technology acceptance.
According to TAM, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are the two factors that influence attitude. Similar to TRA, TAM assumes that the use of a computer depends on behavioral intention. In other words, TAM believes that behavioral intention has significant positive effects on actual behavior.
Lu et al. revised TAM to predict and explain consumers’ acceptance of the mobile wireless network [46]. The findings of their study show that perceived usefulness has significant positive effects on the attitude toward using the mobile wireless network. Oh et al. found in their study on the application of broadband network that perceived usefulness is the factor that determines and influences attitude [47].
In the studies on information technology, many experts have expanded TAM and discussed the other factors that may play a role [42,48]. Therefore, this study not only considers TPA and TAM, but also introduces IDT, with the hope of adding other factors that may influence consumers’ online clothes renting and discussing and explaining consumers’ behaviors of online clothes renting on a broader basis.

2.6. Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT)

Innovation means that a person or a unit perceives a new idea, habit, or object. As long as the idea is new for the person, it is innovative for that person [49,50]. Kotler believed that innovation is a new service, commodity, or creativity in the eye of people [51]. Even if creativity has existed for a long time, as long as someone regards it as new, it is still innovation for that person. Online renting provides consumers with the renting of information technology in terms of form and content. It is consistent with the definition of innovation from the perspective of all the above scholars. Hence, it is safe to say that online clothes renting is innovation. Therefore, this study makes an analysis with IDT. In the past, studies on the application of innovation proposed different views and adopted different reference norms. Applications of innovation have been tested by many researchers in different fields. The application and diffusion of innovation are influenced by three things: (1) innovation characteristic; (2) personal innovativeness; and (3) information sources and communication channels [52,53].

2.6.1. Attributes of Innovation

Rogers (1995) compiled five major attributes of innovation from literature related to innovation, namely, relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. Based on Rogers’ theory, Moore and Benbasat (1991) conducted detailed research on the attributes of innovation and eight proposed attributes in total of which relative advantage, trialability, compatibility, and ease of use (the opposite of Rogers’ complexity) were consistent with Rogers’ attributes of innovation. Observability was further divided into result demonstrability and visibility, image was derived from relative advantage, and voluntariness was added [20,52].
Tornatzky and Klein (1982) studied 75 articles on diffusion and found that only relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity were related to innovation adoption [54]. Moore and Benbasat (1991) suggested similarities between TAM and DOI and found that relative advantage is similar to perceptual usefulness in TAM. Complexity was also found to be similar to perceived ease of use in TAM [52].
During their research on consumer adoption of innovative products, Taylor and Todd (1995) found that consumers were more likely to adopt innovative products when they perceived that innovative products were superior to previous products [42]. Chin and Gopal (1995) conducted a study on the use of group decision support systems [55]. The results also showed that when potential users perceive a higher relative advantage or compatibility in an information system, their willingness to adopt that system is much higher. Liao et al. (1999) found that when consumers perceive a higher relative advantage, higher compatibility, or lower complexity in internet banking, consumers are more likely to adopt internet banking [56]. In a study of virtual stores, Chen et al. (2002) found that compatibility has a significant positive impact on consumer attitudes toward using technology [57]. Empirical studies (Adams et al. 1992; Moore and Benbasat 1991) support the importance of relative advantage or usefulness as a predictor of adoption behavior [52,58].

2.6.2. Personal Innovativeness

Personal innovativeness can be defined as an individual’s willingness to change [59]. Bommer and Jalajas (1999) believe that personal innovativeness is reflective of an individual’s tolerance to risk. If individuals are more willing to take risks, they are also more willing to engage in innovative behavior [60]. In the field of IT, the definition of personal innovation is an individual’s willingness to test new IT [39]. Agarwal and Prasad (1998) showed that personal innovativeness affects an individual’s perception of IT innovation. Personal innovativeness is a personal characteristic (Hurt et al. 1977) that promotes positive attitudes toward the formation of innovative behavior. An important aspect of personal innovativeness is the difference in perspectives on IT held by individuals [59]. This helps us understand how each viewpoint affects consumer attitude toward online clothing rental services.
Limayem et al. (2000) conducted long-term research on online shopping mainly to explore factors affecting consumers’ online shopping. Based on the TPB, the research found that personal innovativeness influences both online shopping attitudes and behavioral intentions. Subjective norms as well as subjective norms combined with perceived behavioral control affect online shopping intentions, and perceived behavioral control also significantly affects shopping behavior [61]. Jones et al. (2002) studied the use of sales automation systems by merchants and found that personal innovativeness had a positive relationship with consumer attitudes toward using the new system [62].

2.6.3. Information Resources and Communication Channels

Information resources and communication channels are similar to social influences, the essence of which is normative beliefs [62]. This is a view that has been discussed considering the TPB. In a study of perceived attributes and adoption of innovation, Tornatzky and Klein (1982) found that among the five perceived attributes of innovation, only relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity have a consistent correlation with consumer willingness to adopt [54]. Moore and Benbasat (1991) compared their eight attributes of innovation with the TAM proposed by Davis (1989) and suggested that relative advantage and ease of use are similar to the TAM’s perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, both of which have an effect on attitude [42,43,45]. Ram (1987) categorized the attributes of innovation as follows: (1) Relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity. Different possibilities for adoption arise due to the differences in the level of the adopter’s perceived attribute of innovation. (2) The trialability and observability of innovation itself [63]. Exploring the attitude factors affecting consumers’ adoption of online clothing rental services helps us study consumers’ perception of the attributes of innovation, which influences their attitude toward online clothing rental services. Therefore, relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity should be used as the influencing factors of attitude toward behavior.
This study combines TAM and IDT to develop perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, compatibility, and personal innovativeness as the factors that influence attitude toward behavior.

3. Methods

3.1. Research Procedure

This research aims to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of network clothing rental industry as well as its opportunities and discuss the connotation of use behavior of network clothing rental to further understand its possible correlation. According to the aforesaid literature review, the research procedure of this research is constructed as shown in Figure 4.
In this study, the discussion was conducted from two dimensions: on analysis of consumers’ acceptance mode, through the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, innovation diffusion theory and discussion of other literature, the paper tried to analyze if online clothes renting is easy to be accepted by consumers and the possible difficulties to be encountered. In addition, by questionnaire method, the paper analyzed the correlation degree of “behavioral attitude”, “subjective norm”, and “perceived behavioral control” and “behavior intention” of online clothes renting by using the argument on technology acceptance model. In the meanwhile, the feedback of users and potential users of online clothes renting was collected via online questionnaire survey. In the end, based on the conclusion of this study, it is hoped that the paper gives relevant suggestions to practitioners engaging in online clothes renting, the government and future researchers.

3.2. Research Structure

In clothes renting, information technology is taken as the medium. Therefore, the application of online renting is an application of information technology. Clothes renting is a behavior of innovation. Previous studies on the information technology acceptance and the innovation diffusion theory often adopted TPA by Ajzen (1985), TAM by Davis (1989), and IDT by Rogers (1995). With TPA as the theoretical foundation, this study combines IDT with TAM to predict and explain users’ acceptance of clothes renting [18,19,20]. The research structure of this study is shown in Figure 5. Currently, online clothes renting is not universal in Taiwan. Therefore, the test on behavioral intention is better than actual behavior as a dependent variable. Hence, behavioral intention rather than actual behavior is adopted to predict and explain users’ acceptance of clothes renting.

3.3. Research Scope and Subject

In the part of research industry, this research is mainly aimed to discuss the factors affecting consumer’s acceptance intention for network clothing rental. The network clothing rental in Taiwan still in early phases of development and the rental operators focus on the special modeling clothing (such as wedding dress, performance costume, etc.). The products of network clothing rental in this research are targeted at the daily popular clothing. With the Taiwan’s online clothing rental operator—AMAZE rental fashion platform as the research platform, this research was based on TPB and combined TAM and DOI to construct the framework of this research to explain the factors affecting consumer’s acceptance of network clothing rental. The research subjects were mainly the consumers of AMAZE rental fashion platform and they filled out the questionnaires were filled in by connecting with platform.

3.4. Research Subjects

In this study, by questionnaire method, the sample data were collected via online questionnaire, aiming at understanding the behavior intention of online clothes renting. Pre-test study subjects: Fifteen subjects who had and had not used the renting service were investigated. In the pre-test, some people who have the same characteristics with the research groups were chosen firstly to try to complete this questionnaire. 15 consumers have used the network clothing rental and they are also the members. The other 15 consumers have not used the network clothing rental or they ever purchased goods through online shopping.
In the official questionnaire, consumers of rental fashion platform were selected as the participants. Limited by resources, time, narrow range of study subjects and other factors, the feasible way of convenient sampling was adopted for survey. As one of the non-random sampling ways, convenient sampling is beneficial for collecting some preliminary data. Under certain conditions, some useful data can be produced.

3.5. Research Hypotheses

According to the above-mentioned research objective and structure, the following hypotheses on the relationship among the variables in the research structure are proposed.

3.5.1. Behavioral Intention

Behavioral intention refers to the tendency for which a person wants to take a specific action, and it can be measured by a person’s willingness to have a try or the effort he/she makes to take an action. In the proposal of TPA, Ajzen pointed out that behavioral intention is the best way to predict individual behavior. In other words, if a person has a stronger intention to take some action, then the probability of taking the action will be higher. The three main factors that determine behavioral intention include attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control. These three factors have a significant positive correlation with behavioral intention [18]. Klobas explored the adoption of electronic information resource, and Taylor et al. studied consumers’ adoption of innovative product. Both studies have demonstrated that attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control have positive effects on the behavioral intention of renting [43,64]. Therefore, this study assumes that “attitude toward behavior”, “subjective norm”, and “perceived behavioral control” also have positive effects on the behavioral intention of clothes renting.
Hypothesis 1.
“Attitude toward behavior” has a positive effect on the “behavioral intention of clothes renting”.
Hypothesis 2.
“Subjective norm” has a positive effect on the “behavioral intention of clothes renting”.
Hypothesis 3.
“Perceived behavioral control” has a positive effect on the “behavioral intention of clothes renting”.

3.5.2. Attitude toward Behavior

Attitude refers to a person’s evaluation of an action. Taylor and Todd further pointed out that relative advantage has a positive correlation with attitude; complexity has a negative correlation with attitude; and appropriateness has a positive correlation with attitude [42]. According to them, relative advantage is the perceived usefulness in TAM; and complexity is the perceived ease of use in TAM. Therefore, attitude toward behavior is deconstructed into the following four predisposing variables according to IDT: perceived usefulness (the degree to work performance or learning is improved by using a specific system or tool), perceived ease of use (the degree to which effort is saved by using a specific system or tool according to users), compatibility (the degree to which the innovation meets potential users’ current values, experience, and current demands), and personal innovativeness (personal innovativeness users have effects on attitude toward behavior and behavioral intention).
Hypothesis 4.
“Perceived usefulness” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.
Hypothesis 5.
“Perceived ease of use” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.
Hypothesis 6.
“Compatibility” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.
Hypothesis 7.
“Personal innovativeness” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.

3.5.3. Subjective Norm

According to Ajzen, subjective norm refers to the effects of important people or groups on a person when he/she shows specific behaviors, and the important people or groups can be regarded as a reference group [41]. Taylor and Todd argued that if the opinions of two different reference groups were placed on the same dimension, then the effects might be mutually offset or reduced, which would make it impossible to see the effects of subjective norm on behavioral intention. Hence, subjective norm is deconstructed into two predisposing variables: peer influence and superior influence [42].
Bhattacherjee divided the reference group into interpersonal influence and external influence in the study on the service of ordering e-securities online. Interpersonal influence refers to the effects of the oral account by superiors, peers, and those who have adopted innovation. External influence refers to the reports of mass media, the opinions of experts, and other non-interpersonal information [38]. According to the research results, both interpersonal influence and external influence are the factors that determine subjective norm. In practice, there are a large number of factors that influence online clothes renting. Therefore, this study adopts “interpersonal influence” and “external influence” and assumes that they have positive effects on the “subjective norm” of clothes renting.
Hypothesis 8.
“Interpersonal influence” has a positive influence on “subjective norm”.
Hypothesis 9.
“External influence” has a positive influence on “subjective norm”.

3.5.4. Perceived Behavioral Control

Taylor and Todd deconstructed perceived behavior according to the study by Ajzen. According to them, the dimension that influences perceived behavioral control can be divided into two parts: the first is the internal notion of individual or self-efficacy; the second is the limit on external resources that can be subdivided into resource facilitating conditions. Therefore, perceived behavioral control is deconstructed into the following two predisposing variables: self-efficacy (the measurement of a person’s confidence in his/her performance of a certain behavior) and resource facilitating conditions (the accessibility to time, money or other specific resources for certain behavior) [18,41,42]. In the study on the orders of e-securities traders, Bhattacherjee found that self-efficacy and resource facilitating conditions have positive effects on perceived behavioral control [38]. Hence, this study assumes that “self-efficacy” and “resource facilitating conditions” have positive effects on the “perceived behavioral control” of clothes renting.
Hypothesis 10.
“Self-efficacy” has a positive effect on “perceived behavioral control”.
Hypothesis 11.
“Resource facilitating conditions” has a positive effect on “perceived behavioral control”.

3.6. Definition and Measurement of Operability

The hypothesis structure of this study consists of 12 dimensions, and the variables of each dimension are defined and operated according to relevant literature. The questionnaire items of variables are appropriately modified according to users’ use of online clothes renting. The definition of variable operability and the reference sources of the scale are shown in Table 2.

4. Research Results and Discussion

4.1. Analysis of Pre-Test Questionnaires

The variable items of this questionnaire are created according to the research structure, while the questions and meanings are based on relevant literature and the research topic. Likert’s 7-point scale was adopted: each item scores from 1 to 7, from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”, respectively. After the questionnaire was finished, what read confusing or odd or what was mistranslated in the questionnaire was erased or modified to achieve the initial draft of questionnaire. Cronbach’s α was tested in the pre-test to measure the consistency among the items, and then the initial draft was revised to achieve the official questionnaire. The questionnaire pre-test was conducted from October 9 to 14, 2017. Fifteen subjects who had and had not used the renting service were investigated.
Cronbach’s α was adopted to test the “internal consistency reliability” of the scale. Cronbach’s α higher than 0.7 indicated “reliable”, and those items with insignificant importance were removed. The test results are shown in Table 3. Except for the items under “Attitude toward behavior” and “Self-efficacy” that needed to be removed to ensure that Cronbach’s α was over 0.7, Cronbach’s α of the items under the remaining dimensions was higher than 0.7. This indicates a certain degree of reliability.

4.2. Questionnaire Analysis

The study sample was selected from the rental platform consumer group AMAZE, and the sampling of the online questionnaire started on October 16, 2017 to December 1, 2017. Of the 328 retrieved copies, 300 were valid and 28 were invalid. The valid copies accounted for 91.46%.
As shown in the Table 4, as the investigation is mainly published on the network clothes platform, most of the samples were collected from women. The age range was from 16 to 45 years old, and most of them fell in the 35 to 44-year-old range. The monthly income was equally distributed relatively. In addition, this study mainly investigated the behavior intention of online clothes renting. Therefore, the clothing costs and network renting experience were also investigated. The average expenses of online shopping NTD 1200 were used as the dividing line. Sixty percent of people thought that they need not spend more than NTD 1200 per month. Because it is a service to rent clothing, whether they wore other people’s clothes in the past was also considered, and 80% of them had relevant experience. The renting platform was the online behavior, the frequency of online shopping may also affect the willingness of consumers to use, and the proportion of people who buy or do not buy goods online account for 50% and high-frequency purchase also account for 1/4.
This study adopted SEM for the data analysis to explore the causal relationship among the variables of the research mode. The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) was applied to estimate the parameters, and LISREL8.52 was used for the analysis. Many scholars suggested that the structural equation model (SEM)-based evaluation should be conducted from basic goodness-of-fit, general goodness-of-fit, and internal goodness-of-fit [65,66].

4.2.1. Basic Goodness-of-Fit

In this study the first step was to screen the abnormal estimates and correct the modification model. The variables were modified or removed according to the modification indicators suggested by the SEM-based data analysis, so as to enhance the explanatory ability of the model. Through repeated examination and the adjustment of the modification model, the results of the modification of the dimensions are shown in Table 5.
According to the SEM-based confirmatory factor analysis, the effects of P6 and P7, two observation items in the “perceived ease of use” of the deconstruction dimension of attitude toward behavior, were insignificant; the effect of P16, the observation item in “compatibility”, was insignificant; the effect of P31 in the “state of convenience” of control belief was insignificant. These items were removed according to the suggestion based on the modification indicators.

4.2.2. General Goodness-of-Fit

According to Hair et al., the measurement of general goodness-of-fit can be divided into three kinds: the measures of absolute fit, the incremental fit measures, and the parsimonious fit measures [66]. As is shown in Table 6, the absolute goodness of fit index (GFI) of this study was 0.87. Browne and Cudeck suggested that GFI should be higher than 0.8. The GFI of this study was 0.84, meeting the suggestion by Browne and Cudeck [67]. It is suggested that an adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) should be higher than 0.9 [68]. This study’s AGFI was 0.85, falling short of the suggested level. It is suggested that a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) should be lower than 0.05. This study’s RMSEA was 0.026, meeting the requirement. According to the results of the test on absolute goodness-of-fit, the mode established in this study and the observation data meet the fit. The incremental fit indices, which are often used to evaluate general goodness-of-fit, include the normal fit index (NFI), the non-normed fit index (NNFI), and the comparative fit index (CFI).
This study’s NFI, NNFI, and CFI were 0.98, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively, all of which were higher than the standard value of 0.9. This manifests that the general goodness-of-fit of the model and observation data of this study were ideal. The simple goodness-of-fit is a parsimony normed fit index, which must be higher than 0.5; the parsimony goodness fit index must be higher than 0.5. As is shown in Table 4, this study’s PNFI and PGFI were 0.86 and 0.73, respectively, both of which were higher than 0.5. These research results show that the model established in this study is a parsimonious one.

4.2.3. Internal Goodness-of-Fit

Hair et al. advocated evaluating the internal goodness-of-fit of the model through the measurement model fit [66]. Following the suggestion by Bagozzi and Yi, this study selected the most frequently-used individual items to evaluate the measurement model [65]. The details are as follows.
Individual item reliability: The reliability of the measurement indices reflects the degree of consistency when the measurement tool is applied to measure the research dimensions. In the LISREL model-based analysis, the reliability indices of the observation variables are R-Square, and square multiple correlation (SMC) was adopted for the analysis. If SMC is closer to 1, then it means that the observation variable is an appropriate measurement tool of potential variables; a higher SMC indicates higher reliability. The SMC values of the observation variables are shown in Table 7.
According to the table, the SMCs of P3, P4, P5, P20, and P34 were lower than 0.5, but those of most observation variables were higher than 0.5. This indicates that most of the measurement indices of this study are reliable. The composite reliability (CR) of potential variables: The CR of potential variables refers to the reliability composition of all measurement variables and indicates the internal consistency of dimensional indices. A higher level of reliability indicates a higher level of consistency among these indices. It is generally believed that 0.7 is the acceptable minimum. As is shown in Table 8 the CR values of all potential variables were higher than 0.7, which means that the dimensional reliability is high.
The variance extracted (VE) of potential variables: The VE of potential variables is the variance in the measurement of extracted variables and evaluates the ability of measurement variables to explain the variance of potential variables. It can be used to review the convergence validity of potential variables. A higher VE indicates a higher level of reliability and convergence validity of potential variables. Fornell and Larcker suggested that VE should be over 0.5. As is shown in Table 8, the VE values of the variables in the research model were all higher than 0.5, which complies with the suggestion of Fornell and Larcker. This demonstrates that this study has a high level of convergence validity [69].

4.3. Hypothesis Explanation

As for the standardized coefficients in the structure equation model, such as the regression β weight, a higher coefficient indicates great importance in the causal relationship. As is shown in Table 9 of the 11 hypotheses of the research model reached a significant level, except for H5, H9, and H11. The structural model in Figure 6 clearly shows the direct effects among the variables.

4.3.1. Verification Hypothesis 1 (t Value 15.21 **; Test Results: Valid)

The attitude of consumers toward using online clothing rental services positively affects behavioral intentions. Fishbein and Ajzen (1977) proposed that attitudes refer to the positive or negative evaluations that an individual has toward a certain behavior [17]. In other words, attitudes represent the individual’s continuous positions of liking or disliking.

4.3.2. Verification Hypothesis 2 (t Value 4.98 **; Test Results: Valid)

The subjective norms of consumers using online clothing rental services positively affect behavioral intentions. Based on the TPB, Jiang (2012) constructed the behavioral intentions of consumers who buy boutique jeans and empirically analyzed their attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control [70]. The results showed that all three factors have a significant impact on consumers’ intention to purchase jeans, particularly subjective norms. The above studies have confirmed that the subjective norms of potential users regarding the target behavior have a significant impact on behavioral intentions. Since clothing leasing is still in the early stages of innovation diffusion, this study that consumers’ subjective norms of online clothing rental services positively affect behavioral intentions.

4.3.3. Verification Hypothesis 3 (t Value 3.38 **; Test Results: Valid)

The perceived behavioral control of consumers toward online clothing rental services positively affects behavioral intentions. Explanation: Empirical studies of the TPB include the study of spreadsheets by Mathieson (1991), the study of consumer behavior in adopting innovative products by Taylor and Todd (1995), and a study based on TPB by Hsu (2009) examining how consumers’ attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control affect their willingness to buy green cars [43,45,71].
The study showed attitude toward behavior is the most important factor that influences the behavioral intention of clothes renting, followed by subjective norm and perceived behavioral control. According to this, whether online clothes renting will replace the purchase of clothes first depends on consumers’ evaluation of and feeling about online clothes renting, then the influence of surrounding reference groups, and finally the ability and resources needed.

4.3.4. Verification Hypothesis 4 (t Value 4.54 **; Test Results: Valid)

The perceived usefulness of consumers using online clothing rental services has a positive impact on their attitude toward such services. Both Oh et al.’s (2003) study of the use behavior of broadband networks and Klopping and McKinney’s (2004) study on e-commerce online shopping behaviors indicated that perceived usefulness has a positive and significant impact on their attitude toward online shopping [47,72]. When consumers perceive that online clothing rental services bring many benefits, their attitude becomes more positive.

4.3.5. Verification Hypothesis 5 (t Value 1.46; Test Results: Invalid)

Consumers’ perceived ease of use of online clothing rental services has not a positive impact on their attitude toward using such services. Mathieson and Chin’s (2001) study of bulletin board System (BBS) both found that perceived ease of use has a significant positive correlation with attitude [73]. But, study found that users perceive that online clothing rental services are not easy to use, their attitudes toward such services are affected.

4.3.6. Verification Hypothesis 6 (t Value 6.31 **; Test Results: Valid)

Consumers’ compatibility with online clothing rental services has a positive impact on their attitude toward such services. Takacs and Freiden (1998) considered the Internet to be a new product and an attribute of innovation should be used to study its diffusion and adoption. The authors suggested that when users develop a habit of computer use, they will increasingly use the Internet indicating that the higher the compatibility, the higher the willingness to adopt [74].

4.3.7. Verification Hypothesis 7 (t Value 3.08 **; Test Results: Valid)

Consumers’ personal innovativeness has a positive impact on their attitude toward online clothing rental services. Using the TPB, Limayem et al. (2000) conducted long-term research on online shopping and explored the factors affecting consumer online shopping. The results indicated that personal innovativeness had influential effects on attitudes toward online shopping and behavioral intentions. Additionally, subjective norms, attitude, and perceived behavioral control affected online shopping intentions. Perceived behavioral control also significantly affected shopping behavior. This study found that since consumers’ personal innovativeness affects their perception of IT innovation, it also affects their attitude toward the use of e-books [61].
The hypothesis of compatibility for attitude toward behavior is valid and shows positive effects and the greatest influence. This shows that what consumers are most concerned about in online clothes renting is whether it is related to personal habit and demand for renting. The hypothesis of perceived usefulness for attitude toward behavior is valid and shows positive effects. This indicates that if the effects of online clothes renting are increasingly similar to or better than those of clothes stores, then consumers are more likely to make positive comments on online clothes renting. The hypothesis of the influence of personal innovativeness on attitude toward behavior is valid and shows positive effects. This shows that those who have the desire to try something new are naturally more positive about the thing and the desire to have a try. Perceived ease of use was not supported by the hypothesis of attitude toward behavior, and the possible reason is that the subjects of this study were asked to read the procedure of online clothes renting and the use interface, and the operation was so simple that all consumers would perceive the ease of use for online renting. Hence, it is impossible to evaluate if perceived ease of use has a significant influence on attitude toward behavior.

4.3.8. Verification Hypothesis 8 (t Value 3.32 **; Test Results: Valid)

Interpersonal influences have a positive impact on consumers’ subjective norms of online clothing rental services. Bhattacherjee (2000) divided a reference group into interpersonal and external influences in a study of electronic ordering services for securities. According to the theory of diffusion of innovations, potential adopters evaluated innovation based on interpersonal and external sources of information. Interpersonal influences refer to the influences of friends, superiors, classmates, and others who have already adopted the innovation. Bhattacherjee (2000) conducted a survey of 172 electronic brokers that accepted e-commerce services and found that interpersonal influences are a determinant of subjective norms [38].

4.3.9. Verification Hypothesis 9 (t Value −0.22; Test Results: Invalid)

External influences have not a positive impact on consumers’ subjective norms in terms of online clothing rental services. Although scholar according to the theory of diffusion of innovations, potential adopters form evaluations of an innovation based on interpersonal and external sources of information. External influences refer to reports from the mass media, expert opinions, and other non-interpersonal information [38].
The hypothesis of interpersonal influence to subjective norms is supported, compared with external information, consumers were still more confident of suggestions from surrounding friends. The interpersonal influence on subjective norm was supported. The effect of external influence on subjective norm was insignificant. This demonstrates that consumers show more trust in information from acquaintances than information delivered through TV or the Internet.

4.3.10. Verification Hypothesis 10 (t Value 10.34 **; Test Results: Valid)

Consumers’ self-efficacy in using online clothing rental services has a positive impact on their perceived behavioral control. Using 111 college students as subjects, Coffin and MacIntyre (1999) showed that the level of self-efficacy is significantly related to the extent to which users accept IT [75]. Wang’s (2002) study on the use of information systems in universities, and Wen’s (2004) study of the use of text message vouchers all confirm that self-efficacy has a positive impact on perceived behavioral control [76,77].

4.3.11. Verification Hypothesis 11 (t Value 1.47; Test Results: Invalid)

The convenience of consumers who use online clothing rental services has not a positive impact on their perceived behavioral control. Although scholar Taylor and Todd (1995) divided the state of convenience into two structures in their study. The first structure related to resources such as money and time while the other structure is related to technology. The results found that when other conditions remain unchanged, the less time and money spent, the greater the users’ behavioral intentions and actual use. Bhattacherjee’s (2000) study of electronic ordering services for securities found that the state of convenience had a positive impact on positive behavioral control [38,42].
The hypothesis of the influence of self-efficacy on perceived behavioral control was valid. This means that if consumers show more confidence in their ability to rent or collocate clothes, then the control over the resources for renting will be stronger. The hypothesis of the influence of resource facilitating conditions on perceived behavioral control was invalid, and the possible reason was that consumers failed to make a timely evaluation of the control over the time, money, and other specific resources for clothes renting. In other words, the resources for clothes renting today, including the Internet, are no longer a problem for consumers, or consumers do not feel strong control of clothes renting, just because of possessing the resources for clothes renting today.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the responses to findings and conclusions will be made based on 2 study purposes in order, hoping to provide references to the future operation strategies and development guidelines in this industry and make contributions to the industry.
(1) Current market situation, bottlenecks and opportunities of online clothes renting
In Taiwan, the clothing retail industry focuses on small scale (the proportion of middle and small-sized enterprises is up to 99.51%) and it is aimed at the domestic consumption market. However, due to the realistic environment of smaller market scale, economic downturn and the decrease in actual income in Taiwan, consumption pattern changes easily to jointly affect the operational activities of clothing retail industry. At the same time, it will also exert an effect in terms of consumer’s increased awareness, diversity of brand choice and rise of the inexpensive clothing ([78] p. 13).
MIC, Institute for Information Industry has investigated and analyzed consumer’s online shopping behavior and found that consumer’s annual consumption amount in online shopping in Taiwan has presented the rising trend: from NTD 21,681 in 2014 to NTD 27,715 in 2016 and the consumption amount in 2016 has increased by 12% compared with 2015 (NTD 24,744), which is enough to prove that Taiwanese consumer’s reliance on online shopping has the trend of continuous rise. According to the investigation results, it is found that the proportion of monthly online shopping amount in the total consumption expenditure each month has been rising year by year. The proportion of online shopping amount accounted for 12.3% and 15.4% respectively in 2014 and 2015, while it reached up to 17.8% in 2016. Based on this, Xiao-Chi Chang, the industry analyst of MIC, Institute for Information Industry explained that the current net friends mainly focus on the consumption in physical store, but the proportion growth in recent 3 years has shown that the transfer from “offline” consumption to “online” consumption has been formed gradually [79].
Through overview of the current development of online clothes in Taiwan, most businesses still focus on purchasing of clothes, that is, the usage right and the ownership are consumer-oriented, which has become the main market of clothing industry. However, from the renting due to the special demands for wedding dresses and performance costumes in the early promotion of online clothes renting in Taiwan, to the renting of current fashion clothing, it cannot escape from the range of customers’ demands on clothes. Directing at the application of online clothes renting, this study paper tries to figure out if the online clothes renting can be accepted by the public. This study makes analysis by using questionnaire from the perspective of consumers or potential users, but most users have no experience in online renting. Hence, from the study, it can be seen that style diversity or practicability is constantly stressed in the industry of clothes renting, but the attraction to users is still limited. The study in this paper may provide reference to the industry of online clothes renting, to think how to make users want to touch the strange consumption model.
(2) Relationship of “behavioral attitude”, “subjective norm”, “perceived behavioral control” and “behavior intention” of online clothes renting
From the analysis on questionnaire survey in this study, the relationship of behavior intention of online clothes renting provides supports to 8 of the 11 hypotheses and has no significantly positive impact on 3 hypotheses. “Perceived ease of use” of online clothes renting consumers has no significantly positive impact on “behavioral attitude”, which indicates if the ease of use exists in usage modes, learning operation and style demands of online clothes renting platforms for consumers. “External influence” has no significantly positive impact on “subjective norm”, which indicates mass media reports of online clothes-renting platforms, online forums and celebrity endorsements have no impact on consumers’ subjective thoughts on renting. “Resource convenience” has no significantly positive impact on “perceived behavioral control”, which indicates if consumers are satisfied with the resource convenience for time and budget of online clothes renting platforms as well as universality of clothes renting.
Based on the results of questionnaire survey in this study, most consumers have not clearly recognized the perceived ease of use, external influence and resource convenience of online clothes renting, and such results are discrepant with the industrial expectations. The three items show that, in the industry of online clothes renting, the platform application interface is required to clearly present the media or spokespeople part. The most representative media or spokespeople who consumers expect can be surveyed, and consumers’ renting time and budget can refer to the formulation ways in various industries. However, the clothing renting in Taiwan lacks universality, and in the future, more clothing industries are expected to be joined in.
(3) Whether online clothes renting is easy to be accepted by the public
Online platform is a global emerging industry and online clothes renting is also one of the modes integrating clothes into innovative consumption. It can be found that the combination of clothing and network channel has become the trend of online shopping. In terms of the online shopping, this research took the network model as the discussion direction and adopted the concept of “Replace Buying with Rental” in Sharing Economy to guide consumer in rental. As for consumers, they are relatively not afraid of the excessively complicated consumption model and usually have the sufficient economic capability and their attitude towards innovation is deliberate. Meanwhile, consumers possess fewer resources, so they are not willing to accept online shopping until all the uncertainties related to innovation have been eliminated. The fashionable clothing is the necessity in daily life. However, under the circumstance that the clothing styles are changed and innovated continuously in different seasons, consumers will increase their shopping methods, i.e., the same new clothing is purchased from another consumption model and it is expected that consumers can adopt the rental method for consumption [21].
According to the results of this study, 45% participants have no experience in online clothes renting, which indicates that, at this stage, the public’s acceptance of online clothes renting is still relatively low. Some may hear of renting but not clothes renting or see family or friends use things rent, but they have no strong motivation to affect behavior intention. It remains to be achieved by firms who invest in clothing industry, to actively develop attractive application of trend renting and create consumer’s demands, so that online renting can be implemented in the future clothing industry.

5.1. Suggestions for Future Studies

5.1.1. Suggestions for Academic Studies

There are many different online clothes platforms operated by different enterprises in the market, for instance: wedding photography and special festival clothes renting etc. This study currently conducts renting studies in fashion clothing. But there is a great variety of clothing, and in various clothes, which are the rent clothes with consumer priority or in high demands. Whether the factors that influence consumers’ acceptance of online clothes renting vary from the type and form of renting can be further explored by future studies. Moreover, there are only a few consumers who have had experience in clothes renting, but online clothes renting will definitely become a trend. As the number of people who choose clothes renting increases, future studies can involve more samples and explore consumers who have used online clothes renting for a long time. They can also take the degree of consumers’ involvement in clothes renting as a variable, so as to make a more complete study on clothes renting. Therefore, it is suggested that future studies compare different online clothes renting platforms to find out if there is any difference in factors influencing the acceptance of clothes renting among different platforms.

5.1.2. Suggestions for Industrial Management

Compared with purchase in physical stores, the marketing design of online clothes renting is more diversified with more complicated demands. The market development space is larger. As for small and medium-sized clothing enterprises or designer studios good at clothing matching and design with limited styles, online clothes renting brings a brand-new way. For the market scale is still small at current stage and the industry leader has not yet appeared, the small and medium-sized clothing enterprises or designer studios have a great chance to win market recognition. Many online clothes-renting firms have been established in foreign countries (Rent the Runway, Le Tote … etc.) and online clothes renting enterprises in Taiwan are suggested to refer to the oversea operation modes. In addition to understanding consumers or industrial acceptance factors based on academic study results, discussions will be further conducted on operation modes of different countries to promote long-term sustainable development of online clothes renting in Taiwan.

Author Contributions

J.-C.T. and C.-L.H. conceived and designed the experiment; C.-L.H. performed the experiments; J.-C.T. and C.-L.H. analyzed the data; C.-L.H. wrote most parts of the paper.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This research received no materials used for experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Z.; Dubinsky, A.J. A Conceptual Model of Perceived Customer Value in E-Commerce: A Preliminary Investigation. Psychol. Mark. 2003, 20, 323–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Niinimäki, K. Sustainable consumer satisfaction in the context of clothing. In Product-Service System Design for Sustainability; Vezzoli, C., Kohtala, C., Srinivasan, A., Eds.; LeNS Publication: Sheffield, UK, 2011; pp. 218–235. ISBN 978-1-909493-69-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Niinimäki, K.; Hassi, L. Emerging design strategies in sustainable production and consumption of textiles and clothing. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1876–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Armstrong, C.M.; Niinimäki, K.; Lang, C.; Kujala, S. A Use-Oriented Clothing Economy? Preliminary Affirmation for Sustainable Clothing Consumption Alternatives. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 24, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chiu, Y. Sharing the Economic Subversion Tradition-Creating an Innovative Service Model. Taiwan Econ. Res. Mon. 2014, 37, 18–24. Available online: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=10238867-201408-201408140018-201408140018-18-24 (accessed on 10 March 2018).
  6. Hamari, J.; Sjöklint, M.; Ukkonen, A. The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bardhi, F.; Eckhardt, G.M. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. J. Consum. Res. 2012, 39, 881–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Belk, R. Why Not Share Rather Than Own? Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 2007, 611, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Belk, R. Sharing. J. Consum. Res. 2010, 36, 715–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lessig, L. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy; Penguin Books: New York, NY, USA, 2009; p. 352. ISBN 978-0143116134. [Google Scholar]
  11. The Sharing Economy. Available online: http://www.fastcompany.com/1747551/sharing-economy (accessed on 10 March 2018).
  12. Belk, R. Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0. Anthropologist 2014, 18, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Belk, R. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 1595–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Botsman, R.; Rogers, R. What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption; Harper Business: New York, NY, USA, 2010; p. 304. ISBN 9780061963544. [Google Scholar]
  15. Böckmann, M. The shared economy: It is time to start caring about sharing, value creating factors in the shared economy. In Proceedings of the 1st IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, University of Twente, Faculty of Management and Governance, Enschede, The Netherlands, 27 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lammi, M.; Repo, P.; Timonen, P. Consumerism and Citizenship in the Context of Climate Change. In Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance; Rask, M., Worthington, R., Lammi, M., Eds.; Earthscan Publications: London, UK, 2013; pp. 123–132. ISBN 978131797274. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philos. Rhetor. 1977, 10, 130–132. Available online: https://philpapers.org/rec/FISBAI (accessed on 25 March 2017).
  18. Ajzen, I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior; Kuhl, J., Bechkmann, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 11–39. ISBN 978-3-642-69746-3. [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 25, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed.; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; ISBN 9781451602470. [Google Scholar]
  21. Prothero, A.; Dobscha, S.; Freund, J.; Kilbourne, W.E.; Luchs, M.G.; Ozanne, L.K.; Thøgersen, J. Sustainable Consumption: Opportunities for Consumer Research and Public Policy. J. Public Policy Mark. 2011, 30, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stephany, A. The Business of Sharing; Making It in the New Sharing Economy; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2015; pp. 182–203. ISBN 978-1-137-37618. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rifkin, J. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism; St. Martin’s Griffin: London, UK, 2015; Reprint Edition; p. 284. ISBN 9781137280114. [Google Scholar]
  24. Corbo, C.; Fraticelli, F. The use of web-based technology as an emerging option for food waste reduction. In Envisioning a Future without Food Waste and Food Poverty: Societal Challenges; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Bilbao, Spain, 2015; pp. 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. The Sharing Economy: Where We Go from Here. Available online: https://collaborativeeconomy.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2014.The-Sharing-Economy-Where-We-Go-From-Here.-Leo-Burnett.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2018).
  26. The Environmental Case for the Sharing Economy. Bloomberg Businessweek. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09-24/the-environmental-case-for-the-sharing-economy-i0gsboom (accessed on 4 February 2018).
  27. The Collaborative Consumption on the Rise: Why Shared Economy Is Winning Over the ‘Capitalism of Me. Available online: http://popsop.com/2013/08/the-collaborative-consumption-sharing-wins-over-ownership/ (accessed on 4 February 2018).
  28. Sharing Economy Benefits Lower Income Groups, Financial Times. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/7afde9b0-d95a-11e4-a8f1-00144feab7de (accessed on 4 February 2018).
  29. Hawlitschek, F.; Teubner, T.; Gimpel, H. Understanding the Sharing Economy-Drivers and Impediments for Participation in Peer-to-Peer Rental. In Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Q. Leasing Consumer Space. Shanghai Econ. 2004, 6, 20–21. Available online: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=shjj200406007 (accessed on 10 March 2018).
  31. Ryan, M.J.; Bonfield, E.H. The Fishbein Extended Model and Consumer Behavior. J. Consum. Res. 1975, 2, 118–136. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2488753 (accessed on 25 March 2017). [CrossRef]
  32. Ryan, M.J.; Bonfield, E.H. Fishbein’s Intentions Model: A test of External and Pragmatic Validity. J. Mark. 1980, 44, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, C.; Green, R.T. Cross-Culture Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1991, 22, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Netemeyer, R.G.; Bearden, W.O. A Comparative Analysis of Two Models of Behavioral Intention. J. Acad. Mark. 1992, 20, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burnkrant, R.E.; Page, T.J. The structure and antecedents of the normative and attitudinal components of Fishbein’s Theory of Reasoned Action. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 24, 66–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shimp, T.A.; Kavas, A. The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage. J. Consum. Res. 1984, 11, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oliver, R.L.; Bearden, W.O. Disconfirmation Processes and Consumer Evaluations in Product Usage. J. Bus. Res. 1985, 13, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bhattacherjee, A. Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 2000, 30, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agarwal, R.; Prasad, J. A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Inf. Syst. Res. 1998, 9, 204–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Compeau, D.R.; Higgins, C.A. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Q. 1995, 19, 189–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6256/ca4853f44ab9acb98f91f0d7848c54185ca7.pdf?_ga=2.108631106.1735811964.1540962740-1870288720.1540962740 (accessed on 25 March 2017). [CrossRef]
  42. Taylor, S.; Todd, P.A. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6, 144–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taylor, S.; Todd, P.A. Decomposition and Cross Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1995, 12, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ajzen, I.; Madden, T.J. Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intention, and Perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 22, 453–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mathieson, K. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lu, J.; Yu, C.; Liu, C.; Yao, J.E. Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Internet Res. 2003, 13, 206–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oh, S.; Ahn, J.; Kim, B. Adoption of Broadband Internet in Korea: The role of experience in building attitudes. J. Inf. Technol. 2003, 18, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inf. Syst. Res. 2000, 11, 342–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cooper, R.B.; Zmud, R.W. Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Manag. Sci. 1990, 36, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grover, V.; Goslar, M. The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1993, 10, 141–163. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40398035 (accessed on 25 March 2017). [CrossRef]
  51. Kotler, P.; Keller, K. Marketing Management, 14th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 1–131. ISBN 978-0-13-210292-6. [Google Scholar]
  52. Moore, G.C.; Benbasat, I. Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2, 192–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brancheau, J.C.; Wetherbe, J.C. The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing. Inf. Syst. Res. 1990, 1, 115–143. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23010618 (accessed on 25 March 2017). [CrossRef]
  54. Tornatzky, L.G.; Klein, K.J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of. findings. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 1982, 29, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chin, W.W.; Gopal, A. Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. ACM SIGMIS Database DATABASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 1995, 26, 42–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liao, S.; Shao, Y.P.; Wang, H.; Chen, A. The adoption of virtual banking: An empirical study. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 1999, 19, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, L.; Gillenson, M.L.; Sherrell, D.L. Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance. perspective. Inf. Manag. 2002, 39, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Adams, D.A.; Nelson, R.R.; Todd, P.A. Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. Manag. Inf. Syst. Res. Center Univ. Minn. 1992, 16, 227–247. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/249577 (accessed on 28 March 2017).
  59. Hurt, H.T.; Joseph, K.; Cooed, C.D. Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness. Hum. Commun. Res. 1977, 4, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bommer, M.; Jalajas, D.S. The threat of organizational downsizing on the innovative propensity of R&D professionals. R&D Manag. 1999, 29, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Limayem, M.; Khalifa, M.; Frini, A. What Makes Consumers Buy from Internet? A Longitudinal Study of Online Shopping. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 2000, 30, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jones, E.; Sundaram, S.; Chin, W. Factors Leading to Sales Force Automation Use: A Longitudinal Analysis. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2002, 22, 145–156. Available online: http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/jpssm.pdf (accessed on 25 March 2017).
  63. Ram, S.; Jung, H. Forced adoption of innovation in organizations: Consequences and implications. Prod. Innov. Manag. 1991, 8, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Klobas, J.E. Beyond information quality: Fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use. J. Inf. Sci. 1995, 21, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson: London, UK, 1998; ISBN 9780133792683. [Google Scholar]
  67. Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 1993, 21, 230–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 19, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jiang, H.S. A Study on Consumer’s Behavior Intention of Buying Boutique Jeans. Master’s Thesis, College of Business and Management, Kao Yuan University, Taiwan, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hsu, H.C. An Empriical Study on Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Green Product—A Perspective of Theory of Planned Behavior. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  72. Klopping, I.M.; McKinney, E. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-Commerce. Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. J. 2004, 22, 35–48. Available online: https://cdn.ymaws.com/aisnet.org/resource/group/3f1cd2cf-a29b-4822-8581-7b1360e30c71/Spring_2004/kloppingmckinneyspring2004.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2018).
  73. Mathieson, K.; Chin, W.W. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. DATA BASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 2001, 32, 86–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Takacs, S.J.; Freiden, J.B. Changes on the Electronic Frontier: Growth and Opportunity of the World-Wide Web. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 1998, 13, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Coffin, R.J.; MacIntyre, P.D. Motivational influences on computer-related affect states. Comput. Hum. Behav. 1999, 15, 549–569. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.493.4818&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 15 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, S.C. A Study of Information System Usage Behavior-An Example of a University Information System. Master’s Thesis, Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wen, S.C. The Study of Consumer Intention on M-Coupons Usage. Master’s Thesis, Department of Marketing and Distribution Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  78. 102-103 Annual Business Activity Report Chapter V Apparel Retail Industry—Business Service Industry Information Network. Available online: ciis.cdri.org.tw/dl_file.aspx?unit=3&sid=0G046564379593623764 (accessed on 22 October 2018).
  79. [Online Shopping Consumer Survey] Average Online Shopping Spending of 27,715 Yuan in 2016. Available online: https://mic.iii.org.tw/IndustryObservations_PressRelease02.aspx?sqno=464 (accessed on 22 October 2018).
Figure 1. Overview of mapping of 254 collaborative services source: Marco Böckmann (2013).
Figure 1. Overview of mapping of 254 collaborative services source: Marco Böckmann (2013).
Sustainability 10 04139 g001
Figure 2. Theory of planned action Ajzen (1985).
Figure 2. Theory of planned action Ajzen (1985).
Sustainability 10 04139 g002
Figure 3. Technology acceptance model Davis (1986).
Figure 3. Technology acceptance model Davis (1986).
Sustainability 10 04139 g003
Figure 4. Research procedure.
Figure 4. Research procedure.
Sustainability 10 04139 g004
Figure 5. Research structure.
Figure 5. Research structure.
Sustainability 10 04139 g005
Figure 6. Research structure pattern diagram.
Figure 6. Research structure pattern diagram.
Sustainability 10 04139 g006
Table 1. Analysis of clothing rental business models.
Table 1. Analysis of clothing rental business models.
Company Name/AreaYear of Establishment/
Clothing Type
Business Model
Rent the Runway
(Offline store)/US
2009 Formal Wear1. The single rental service RTR Reserve starts at US$30, and users can rent jewelry and formal wear for special occasions.
2. RTR Update: Users can choose four commuter garments from over 200 brands for US$89/month. Each month the clothes are shipped back free of charge and dry-cleaned by Rent the Runway. Clothes can also be purchased at special discounted prices.
3. RTR Unlimited: Pricing is set at US$159/month. Users can select four items from more than 450 brands. After returning the items within the month, users can select unlimited items and purchase products at discounted prices.
Le Tote (Online Platform App)/US2012 Casual Clothing1. Subscription clothing rental where designers can provide three pieces of clothing and two accessories suitable for customers according to the data provided by customers.
2. Users can choose to rent daily commuter clothing for a monthly subscription of US$49/month.
AIR CLOSET (Online Platform)/Japan2014 Casual Clothing1. Clothing combinations matched by professionals offered for a monthly payment of JPY 6800. A JPY 9800 monthly fee is required for unlimited deliveries.
2. Each piece of clothing on the platform is accurately measured. Through the use of virtual reality (VR) technology, big data, and the artificial intelligence system Sensy Closet, the size, body shape, preferences, habits, and search contents of each user are analyzed to recommend the most suitable outfit for each user.
YCloset (Online Platform App)/Mainland China2015 Casual Clothing Formal wear1. Main consumer group consists of young white-collar workers aged 20 to 30.
2. User membership fee of CNY 499/month; newcomer fee for the first month is CNY 299; additional deposit of CNY 300.
3. Self-built ERP system to manage the placement of goods, forecast, and plan the time of goods entering and leaving the warehouse through data analysis of user orders and returns.
4. A limit of three pieces per order and a rental period of 3 to 10 days. A courier picks up the clothes after the end of the experience.
5. Cooperation with intelligent, environmentally friendly, and clean factories with efficient sanitary processes
MS Paris (Online Platform App)/Mainland China2016 Casual Clothing Formal Wear1. Newcomers’ first month’s membership fee CNY 288; special offer of CNY 98 for 18-day new members.
2. May order up to 5 pieces each time or a maximum of 30 pieces per month
3. Five-star cleaning and disinfection services; member of the China Laundry Association
4. Home deliveries and pick-ups free of charge
5. Largest consumer group is 23 to 27 years of age; professions include CEOs, white-collar workers, and students.
AMAZE (Online Platform app)/Taiwan2016 Casual Clothing1. Orders made on app or website; returns made at 7–11; package includes a return packet and logistics list
2. Monthly members (membership fee: NT$49/month, shipping: NT$80), semi-annual members (membership fee: NT$290/half year, free shipping), annual members (membership fee: NT$380/year, free shipping)
3. Celebrity endorsement
4. Offers rental fee discounts to members and referred customers
Source: Compiled from this study (in order of establishment).
Table 2. Definition of Variable Operability and Reference Scales.
Table 2. Definition of Variable Operability and Reference Scales.
Research VariablesConceptual DefinitionReference Scholars
Behavioral intention of clothes rentingThe intention of renting clothesFishbein and Ajzen (1977) [17]
Attitude toward behaviorPositive or negative comments on clothes rentingFishbein and Ajzen (1977) [17]
Subjective normSocial pressure caused by clothes rentingFishbein and Ajzen (1977) [17]
Perceived behavioral controlEvaluation of the ability to rent clothes after assessing personal environmental resourcesAjzen (1985); Taylor and Todd (1995) [18,42]
Perceived usefulnessSubjectively believe that rented clothes can make life more convenientDavis (1989); Taylor and Todd (1995) [19,42]
Perceived ease of useSubjectively believe that clothes renting does not require too much learningDavis (1989); Taylor and Todd (1995) [19,42]
CompatibilitySubjectively believe that using rented clothes is consistent with the values and demands of current lifestyleTaylor and Todd (1995) [42]
Personal innovativenessThe degree to which consumers accept new ideas and things or the intention to test new productsBommer and Jalajas (1999) [60]
Interpersonal influenceEffects of the opinions of superiors or peers (friends, brother, and sisters) on clothes rentingBhattacherjee (2000) [38]
External influenceClothes renting is influenced by the reports of mass media, the opinions of experts, the statements of celebrities, or online forumsBhattacherjee (2000) [38]
Self-efficacyDegree of confidence in the performance of renting or collocating clothesTaylor and Todd (1995) [42]
Resource facilitating conditionsAccessibility to time, money, and other specific resources for clothes rentingTaylor and Todd (1995) [42]
Table 3. Reliability of Internal Consistency of the Dimensions of the Trial Test Questionnaire.
Table 3. Reliability of Internal Consistency of the Dimensions of the Trial Test Questionnaire.
DimensionNumber of Trial Test ItemsOriginal Cronbach’s αNumber of Items after Removal/ModificationCronbach’s α after Modification
Attitude toward behavior40.6670One was removed/30.8967
subjective norm30.8013No need to remove/30.8013
Perceived behavioral control30.8451No need to remove/30.8451
Perceived usefulness80.7758No need to remove/80.7758
Perceived ease of use40.8773No need to remove/40.8773
Compatibility40.8527No need to remove/40.8527
Personal innovativeness40.8878No need to remove/40.8878
Interpersonal influence40.7591No need to remove/40.7591
External influence30.7167No need to remove/30.7167
Self-efficacy40.6522One was removed/30.8822
Resource facilitating conditions40.7466No need to remove/40.7466
Source: Compiled by this study.
Table 4. Table for sample basic data.
Table 4. Table for sample basic data.
SampleCategoryNumberPercentage
GenderMale13745.7%
Female16354.3%
Marital statusSingle15752.3%
Married14347.7%
Age16–24 (including) years old7023.3%
25–34 (including) years old9531.7%
35–44 (including) years old10033.3%
Above (including) 453511.7%
Monthly average income (NTD)Above NTD 20,0006020%
NTD 20,000~40,0005819.3%
NTD 40,000~60,0007926.3%
NTD 60,000~80,0005518.3%
Above NTD 80,0004816%
Monthly clothes expense (NTD)Below NTD 120018662%
NTD 1200~24005618.7%
Above NTD 24005819.3%
Have ever worn clothes of other peopleYES25084%
NO5016%
One year of experience in clothes renting 1NO13545%
Moderate frequency (within10 times)8528.3%
High frequency (more than 11 time)8026.7%
Source: Compiled by this study.
Table 5. Revised Questions.
Table 5. Revised Questions.
DimensionCodeQuestions
Perceived usefulness
(6 items)
P1I think clothes renting is very convenient.
P2I think clothes renting is useful for me.
P3I think clothes renting can make me more fashionable.
P4I think clothes renting can quickly bring me the products I want.
P5I think clothes renting can save my money.
P8I think I can effectively manage storage space through clothes renting.
Perceived ease of use
(4 items)
P9I think the way to use clothes renting is clear and highly understandable.
P10I think clothes renting does not require too much learning.
P11I think the learning of clothes renting is simple and easy.
P12I think I can select clothes through appropriate renting according to my needs.
Compatibility
(3 items)
P13I think the products of clothes renting are consistent with my values on renting.
P14I think the products of clothes renting are consistent with my current lifestyle.
P15I think the products of clothes renting fascinate me.
Personal innovativeness
(4 items)
P17I am more open to new ideas or creativity than my friends.
P18I enjoy trying something new.
P19If I hear of new products for renting, I would manage to try them.
P20Generally speaking, I am slow to try new products for renting.
Interpersonal influence
(4 items)
P21My family members believe that I should use clothes renting to rent products.
P22My friends believe that I should use clothes renting to rent products.
P23My family members influence my using clothes renting.
P24My friends influence my using clothes renting.
External influence
(3 items)
P25I think mass media influences my intention of renting clothes.
P26I think the views in online forums influence my intention of renting clothes.
P27I think what celebrities say influences my intention of renting clothes.
Self-efficacy
(3 items)
P28I think I can select and purchase clothes by myself if I have a catalog of products for renting.
P29I think I can rent clothes by myself if there is an introduction to the collocation of clothes.
P30I have time to use the products of clothes renting.
Resource facilitating conditions
(3 items)
P32I think I have adequate time to rent clothes.
P33I think I have adequate money to rent clothes.
P34I think I can easily rent clothes.
Attitude toward behavior
(3 items)
R1I think it is a good idea to rent clothes.
R2I think it is wise to rent clothes.
R3I enjoy renting clothes.
Subjective norm
(3 items)
R4I think the people who can influence my decision-making believe that I should rent clothes.
R5I think those who are important to me (peers or family members) support my renting clothes.
R6I think those I am concerned about hope that I will rent clothes.
Perceived behavioral control
(3 items)
R7I have the resources, knowledge, and ability to rent clothes.
R8I can make good use of clothes renting.
R9Everything is under my control when I rent clothes.
Behavioral intention of clothes renting
(4 items)
R10I choose to rent clothes rather than purchasing clothes.
R11I try to replace the purchase of clothes with the renting of clothes.
R12In the future, I will rent clothes rather than purchasing clothes.
R13In the future, I will voluntarily share my thoughts on clothes renting.
Source: Compiled by this study.
Table 6. General Goodness-of-fit.
Table 6. General Goodness-of-fit.
General Goodness-of-FitIndicatorResearch ResultsFit with the Ideal Appraisal Value
Measures of absolute fitGFI0.87Close
AGFI0.85No
RMSEA0.026Yes
Incremental fit measuresNFI0.98Yes
NNFI0.99Yes
CFI0.99Yes
Parsimonious fit measuresPNFI0.86Yes
PGFI0.73Yes
Source: Compiled by this study. GFI: Goodness of fit index; AGFI: Adjusted goodness of fit index; RMSEA: Root mean square error of approximation; NFI: Normal fit index; NNFI: Non-normed fit index; CFI: Comparative fit index; PNFI: Parsimony normed fit index; PGFI: Parsimony goodness of fit index.
Table 7. SMC Indices of Observation Variables.
Table 7. SMC Indices of Observation Variables.
DimensionObservation VariablesSMC
Perceived usefulnessP10.66
P20.65
P30.47
P40.38
P50.36
P80.67
Perceived ease of useP90.75
P100.70
P110.78
P120.78
CompatibilityP130.69
P140.80
P150.88
Personal innovativenessP170.68
P180.82
P190.75
P200.46
Interpersonal influenceP210.63
P220.67
P230.76
P240.54
External influenceP250.70
P260.79
P270.51
Self-efficacyP280.77
P290.76
P300.71
Resource facilitating conditionsP320.70
P330.54
P340.46
Attitude toward behaviorR10.79
R20.85
R30.83
Subjective normR40.51
R50.67
R60.83
Perceived behavioral controlR70.52
R80.87
R90.65
Behavioral intention of clothes rentingR100.85
R110.69
R120.70
R130.84
Source: Compiled by this study.
Table 8. Analysis of Reliability of Variables.
Table 8. Analysis of Reliability of Variables.
Research VariablesVariablesComposite ReliabilityVariance Extracted
Perceived usefulnessP1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P80.8710.533
Perceived ease of useP9, P10, P11, P120.9240.752
CompatibilityP13, P14, P150.9170.787
Personal innovativenessP17, P18, P19, P200.8940.691
Interpersonal influenceP21, P22, P23, P240.8800.647
External influenceP25, P26, P270.8570.668
Self-efficacyP28, P29, P300.8890.714
Resource facilitating conditionsP31, P32, P340.7950.566
Attitude toward behaviorR1, R2, R30.9180.705
Subjective normR4, R5, R60.8540.662
Perceived behavioral controlR7, R8, R90.8730.697
Behavioral intention of clothes rentingR10, R11, R12, R130.9320.773
Source: Compiled by this study.
Table 9. Hypothesis Test of the Dimensions.
Table 9. Hypothesis Test of the Dimensions.
HypothesesPotential Relationships Among VariablesPath Coefficientst ValueTest Results
H1“Attitude toward behavior” has a positive effect on the “Behavioral intention of clothes renting”.0.8515.21 **Valid
H2“Subjective norm” has a positive effect on the “behavioral intention of clothes renting”.0.174.98 **Valid
H3“Perceived behavioral control” has a positive effect on the “Behavioral intention of clothes renting”.0.143.38 **Valid
H4“Perceived usefulness” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.0.354.54 **Valid
H5“Perceived ease of use” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.0.061.46Invalid
H6“Compatibility” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.0.486.31 **Valid
H7“Personal innovativeness” has a positive effect on “attitude toward behavior”.0.113.08 **Valid
H8“Interpersonal influence” has a positive influence on “Subjective norm”.0.313.32 **Valid
H9“External influence” has a positive influence on “subjective norm”.−0.02−0.22Invalid
H10“Self-efficacy” has a positive effect on “perceived behavioral control”.0.8710.34 **Valid
H11“Resource facilitating conditions” has a positive effect on “Perceived behavioral control”.0.111.47Invalid
Source: Compiled by this study.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tu, J.-C.; Hu, C.-L. A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114139

AMA Style

Tu J-C, Hu C-L. A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals. Sustainability. 2018; 10(11):4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tu, Jui-Che, and Chi-Ling Hu. 2018. "A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals" Sustainability 10, no. 11: 4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop