Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Urban Warming on the Mortality of Vulnerable Populations in Seoul
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative Internet Solutions for Suburban Community Farm Practices: A Study in Lowland Communities of Hangzhou, China
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Technological Convergence in Smart Textiles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Seed Soaking and Foliar Application Using Ozonated Water on Two Sweet Pepper Hybrids under Cold Stress

by
Mohamed A. Sharaf-Eldin
1,
Khalid S. Alshallash
2,*,
Khadiga R. Alharbi
3,*,
Mesfer M. Alqahtani
4,
Abdelwahab A. Etman
1,
Ali M. Yassin
1,
Enas S. Azab
5 and
Samira A. F. El-Okkiah
6
1
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr Elsheikh 33516, Egypt
2
College of Science and Humanities-Huraymila, Imam Mohammed Bin Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Humanities, Shaqra University, Ad-Dawadimi 11911, Saudi Arabia
5
Agricultural Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
6
Department of Agriculture Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr Elsheikh 33516, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13453; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013453
Submission received: 7 September 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Good Practices of Sustainable Development in Agriculture)

Abstract

:
The harmful impacts of ozone (O3) on plant development and productivity have been excessively studied. Furthermore, the positive influences of its low concentrations still need to be explored further. The present study was performed to assess the impact of low concentrations of O3 on two sweet pepper hybrids under cold stress. The ozonated water was utilized for seed soaking or foliar application at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm. Seed soaking using ozonated water for 1 h was compared to soaking in distilled water as a control. Moreover, exogenously ozonated water was sprayed thrice at three-day intervals compared with untreated control. The differences between the applied methods (seed soaking and foliar application using ozonated water) were not statistically detected in most of the evaluated parameters. On the other hand, the evaluated hybrids displayed significant differences in the studied parameters, with the superiority of the Lirica evident in most germination and seedling growth parameters. Both applied methods significantly improved germination and seedling growth parameters. In particular, the concentration of 40 ppm displayed the highest enhancement of the germination index, coefficient velocity, and seedling quality. In addition, it promoted the seedling maintenance of high relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll, proline, and ascorbate peroxidase activity under cold stress conditions. Moreover, it protected the cell wall from damage by decreasing membrane permeability (MP). Generally, the best results were obtained from 40 ppm followed by 30 ppm of O3 as seed soaking or foliar spray. The results pointed out the possible use of O3 in a low concentration to protect the plants from cold stress during germination and early plant growth.

1. Introduction

Sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an important vegetable crop extensively cultivated worldwide and with great commercial value [1]. It is utilized as a vegetable, ornamental, and medicinal plant. It has become tremendously popular for its contents of beta-carotene, vitamin C, bioactive compounds, phytochemicals, and polyphenols [2]. It exhibits high genetic diversity in terms of shapes, sizes, antioxidant properties, and biochemical compositions [3]. Furthermore, its genotypes respond differently to the negative impacts of environmental stresses [4,5,6].
Agricultural production suffers from the detrimental impacts of global climate change, particularly in arid environments [7,8,9]. The current climate changes are projected to become more frequent and severe [10,11,12]. Sweet pepper has a tropical origin and requires relatively high temperatures during its growth and development [13]. Low temperature is a widespread environmental factor restricting the production and geographical distribution of most vegetable crops. Cold stress (0–12 °C) has devastating impacts on various biochemical and physiological processes of sweet pepper [14]. It causes membrane leakiness as a result of an inability to raise membrane fluidity and inhibition of photosynthetic processes, thus strongly affecting pepper productivity [15]. These impacts reflect adversely on the production and quality of the plant [16]. Meanwhile, freezing stress (below 0 °C) causes cellular dehydration because of the formation of ice crystals in the extracellular space [17].
Seed germination and seedling establishment are sensitive stages and exhibit a vital role in plant development, growth, and productivity. Hence, it is essential to find effective, affordable, practical, and eco-friendly methods to ameliorate seed germination and seedling growth development. Seed priming is a pre-sowing treatment that is conducted to improve germination and seedling growth [18]. It can stimulate plant performance through rapid and uniform germination, and normal and vigorous seedlings, which has been reported in different crops [19,20]. Additionally, it permits seedlings for development and growth in a wide range of agro-climatic conditions and decreases sensitivity to harmful external factors [21]. Likewise, the exogenous application using biostimulants is a sustainable approach to reinforcing the growth and production of different field crops under environmental stresses [22,23,24]. Several earlier reports deduced that the exogenous application of different biostimulants ameliorated physiological, biochemical, morphological, yield, and quality parameters of field crops [25,26,27].
Ozone is a robust oxidizing agent which can virtually react with any biomacromolecule, including proteins, nucleic and fatty acids, and carbohydrates, while it is neither a radical species nor a reactive oxygen species (ROS) [28]. Ozone enters the plant through the stomata, diffuses into the apoplast, and readily decomposes to produce ROS such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and others [29]. Plants primarily deal with O3 stress via an endogenous defensive mechanism consisting of different antioxidant compounds that are able to scavenge free radicals [30]. Thus, O3 could be a beneficial tool for enhancing tolerance to various abiotic stresses without any environmental problems [31]. A detailed literature survey showed that various researchers have evaluated the harmful effect of high O3 concentrations on plants. In this context, González-Fernández et al. [32] elucidated that O3 induced leaf visible injury and reduced leaf photosynthesis, leaf N content, and leaf greenness in spinach and Swiss chard. In addition, O3 impacts on leaves reduced their marketable yield. Moreover, Sharps et al. [33] showed that O3 induced early leaf loss in Phaseolus vulgaris and accelerated senescence in Triticum aestivum. Similarly, Liang et al. [34] disclosed that O3 reduced the net photosynthetic rate, water use efficiency, kernel weight, number of kernels, and grain yield of maize. Otherwise, studies on the beneficial effects of low ozone concentration in plants are rare.
Ozone is assumed to play an integral role in mitigating the negative impacts of environmental stresses. The impact of seed soaking or exogenous application of low O3 concentration on pepper plants under cold stress is unknown. Accordingly, the objectives of the current study were as follows: to assess different concentrations of O3 in order to identify those that enhanced seed germination and seedling growth under cold stress; to investigate the difference between application methods of seed priming and foliar spraying of seedlings using ozonated water; and to explore the response of two different pepper hybrids to different concentrations or application methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Two high-yielding commercial sweet pepper hybrids, namely Zidenka and Lirica, were evaluated under controlled conditions in a growth chamber at the Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University. The studied hybrids were obtained from Rijk Zwaan Company. Healthy pepper seeds were selected with uniform size and shape, sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, and then rinsed with distilled water. Later, the seeds from each hybrid were divided into two groups; the first one was utilized to assess the effect of seed soaking in ozone-enriched water on seed germination and seedling parameters. The second one was employed to study the impact of foliar spray with ozonated water on seedling growth parameters when the seedlings had three full-grown leaves. An ozone generator (Matra–GL–2186, Dubendorf, Switzerland) was used to create ozone-enriched water. Based on a preliminary trial that included ozone concentrations from 0 to 100 ppm, the concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm were selected for the present study.

2.2. Seed Soaking in Ozonated Water

To study the seed behavior during germination, the seeds from each hybrid were soaked in distilled water for 24 h at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). After that, they were deeply soaked in distilled water (control) or O3 at the abovementioned concentrations for 1 h. At the end of these treatments, the solutions were removed, and the seeds were washed with distilled water and dried at room temperature for 3 h. Twenty-five seeds from each treatment were placed in 9 cm Petri dishes on two sheets of Whatman No.1 filter paper and moistened with 5 mL distilled water. The dishes were transferred to the incubators at 29 °C, in the dark.

2.3. Foliar Application Using Ozonated Water

To study the impact of foliar spray using O3, the un-soaked seeds were sown at seedling trays. The trays were filled with a mixture of peat moss and vermiculite (1:1 v/v). At the three full-grown leaves stage of seedling, water enriched with O3 was sprayed on the leaves. The seedlings were sprayed with O3 solutions thrice at three-day intervals. All seedlings were placed in a growth chamber; the temperature was adjusted to 20 °C for 48 h, then reduced to 18 °C during the next 48 h, and then reduced to 12 °C for 72 h. After that, the seedlings were shifted to room temperature. The lighting period was adjusted to 12 h. The samples of transplants were taken at random and separated into shoots and roots to determine the following parameters.

2.4. Germination and Seedling Parameters

Germination Percentage (GP) was measured using the following formula which was described by Hafez et al. [35]:
GP   % = Germinated   seeds Total   number   of   seeds × 100
Mean Germination Time (MGT) was calculated according to the formula:
MGT   day = Σ nd N
where n is the number of germinated seeds on each day, d is the number of days from the beginning of the test, and N is the total number of germinated seeds [35].
Germination Index (GI) was calculated using the following formula [36]:
GI   seed / day = No .   of   germinated   seeds Day   of   the   first   count   + + No . of   germinated   seeds Day   of   the   final   count
Coefficient velocity (CV) was calculated according to Edwards and Sundstrom [36]:
CV   % = 1 MGT × 100
where MGT is the mean time germination.
The roots and shoots from 10 seedlings (cotyledon stage 10-day-old seedlings) of each treatment were cut and their fresh weights were measured. Then, the obtained roots and shoots were dried at 70 °C for 48 h, and their dry weights were recorded. The shoot diameter was measured using a vernier at 1 cm above the medium surface.

2.5. Physiological Parameters

Chlorophyll content in the first fully expanded leaves without destroying them was determined by a SPADE-501 chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan). The chlorophyll meter was employed to determine leaf greenness [37] Membrane permeability (MP) was determined by estimating electrolyte leakage according to Valentovic et al. [38]. Five plants randomly chosen per replicate were cut into uniformly sized discs and 0.5 g of the discs were taken from the middle portion of the fully developed youngest leaf and washed with distilled water to remove surface contamination. The discs were placed in closed tubes containing 20 mL of deionized water and incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. The electrical conductivity (EC, mg/L) of the bathing solution (EC1) was determined. The samples were then boiled in the water bath at 120 °C for 20 min and the electrical conductivity (EC2) was determined after cooling the solution to room temperature. Membrane permeability was calculated as a ratio of (EC1/EC2) × 100.
Relative water content (RWC) was recorded following Anjum et al. [39]. Fully developed leaves were cut and weighed directly to record the fresh weight (FW) and then soaked in the deionized distilled water for 16 h. The excess surface water was dried with paper towels to determine the turgid weight (TW) of the leaf. The leaves were then oven-dried to constant weight for the dry weight (DW). The RWC was determined according to the formula RWC = FW DW TW DW × 100 .
Proline content (μmol g−1) was estimated following Bates et al. [40]. An amount of 0.5 g fresh leaves was uninformed into 10 mL of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid. Two ml of the extract was added to two ml of acid ninhydrin and two ml of glacial acetic acid. The mixture was put in a boiling water bath for an hour. The reaction ended in an ice bath. To extract the organic part, 4 mL of toluene was added to the mixture and a UV-visible spectrophotometer was utilized at 520 nm for measurements, and toluene was used as a blank. The activity of ascorbate peroxidase (APX, μmol g−1min−1) was assayed as described by Nakano and Asada [41]. An amount of 0.5 g from fresh leaves was uninformed at 0–4 °C in 3 mL of 50 mM TRIS at pH 7.8, containing 1 mM EDTA-Na2 and 7.5% polyvinylpyrrolidone. The solution was centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. A spectrophotometer (UV-160A, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to measure total soluble enzyme activities. Three ml from the reaction mixture included 50 Mm phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM ascorbate, 0.1 mM H2O2, and 0.1 mL enzyme extract. H2O2 was added to start the reaction, and then ascorbate oxidation was measured at 290 nm for 3 min. The molar extinction coefficient for ascorbate (2.8 mM−1 cm−1) was used to quantify the enzyme activity.

2.6. Data Analysis

The experimental layout was factorial in a completely randomized design (CRD) in three replicates. Statistical procedures were applied employing R statistical software version 4.1.1 (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The mean values of treatments were compared according to the Tukey HSD test at a 0.01 level. The experiments were repeated twice, and the presented results were the mean of the two experiments.

3. Results

3.1. Germination Parameters

The evaluated hybrids did not significantly differ in germination percentage (GP) (Table 1). Otherwise, the hybrids displayed significant differences in mean germination time (MGT), germination index (GI), and coefficient velocity (CV). Zidenka had the highest MGT while Lirica had the more elevated GI and CV (Table 1). Seed soaking in ozonated water did not affect the GP, while it significantly impacted the MGT, GI, and CV. Increasing O3 concentration in the water solution from 0 to 40 ppm decreased the MGT, and the highest interaction effect was observed in Zidenka soaked in 10 ppm O3. On the other hand, increasing O3 concentration increased the GI and CV with the 40 ppm application showing the highest values. The highest interaction effect of GI and CV was recorded for Lirica soaked in 40 ppm O3.

3.2. Fresh and Dry Weight

The heavier roots and shoots fresh weight were produced by the Lirica hybrid compared to Zidenka (Table 2). Otherwise, the highest root/shoot ratio was observed for Zidenka. Seed soaking in ozonated water at 30 ppm recorded the highest value of root fresh weight followed by the application of 40 ppm. The highest interaction impact was observed for Lirica soaked in 40 ppm followed by Zidenka soaked in 10 ppm. In the case of shoot fresh weight, 40 ppm of O3 achieved the highest value followed by 30 ppm. The highest fresh weight of the shoot was exhibited by Lirica soaked in 40 and 30 ppm respectively. The total weight of pepper seedlings was recorded for the application of 40 ppm followed by 30 ppm, particularly using the hybrid Lirica.
Concerning dry weight, there were non-significant differences between the two studied hybrids in the root and shoot dry weights as well as root/shoot ratio. In addition, O3 concentrations did not significantly differ in the case of roots and total seedling dry weight. On the other hand, the shoots produced from seeds treated with 40 ppm significantly exceeded all treatments in dry weight, especially the hybrid Zidenka.

3.3. Seedling Measurements

The hybrid Lirica produced a higher stem diameter and stem length compared to Zdenka under both soaking treatments or foliar application (Table 3). Among the evaluated treatments, 40 ppm O3 concentration using both application methods showed the maximum stem diameter and stem length. On the other hand, in all cases the minimum value was produced by the untreated control. The results indicated that there is no significant difference between the general means of the application methods (seed soaking and foliar spray).
The hybrid Zidenka exhibited a higher root length than Lirica (Table 3). In all cases, the untreated plants had the shortest roots. The seeds soaked at a rate of 40 ppm exhibited the highest root length, while the seedlings sprayed with 30 ppm recorded the highest values. In general, the tallest seedling was obtained from 40 ppm O3 treatment either with seed soaking or foliar spray (Table 3). The seedling spray exhibited statistically higher root and stem length compared to seed soaking.
The hybrid Zidenka exhibited the highest root fresh weight under seed soaking treatment while Lirica had the highest root fresh weight using the foliar application (Table 4). Meanwhile, Lirica under soaking application displayed the highest shoot fresh weight and total fresh weight of seedlings under the foliar application. There were significant differences among the concentration of either seed soaking or foliar spray treatments for root, shoot, and total fresh weight of pepper seedlings. In all cases, the 40 ppm O3 treatment was the best for the aforementioned parameters. The two treatments, soaking and foliar application, did not exhibit significant differences except for root fresh weight reflecting the superiority of the soaking treatment (Table 4).
Lirica produced higher root and total seedling dry weight than Zedinka under both treatments, soaking and foliar spray (Table 5). Otherwise, Zidenka had the highest shoot dry weight under both treatments. The O3 concentrations displayed significant differences in both applications (seed soaking and seedling spray) for dry matter partitioning of pepper seedlings. The concentration of 40 ppm O3 was more effective in increasing dry matter content compared to the other treatments. However, the untreated control had the lowest values (Table 5).

3.4. Physiological Parameters

The chlorophyll content and RWC of Lirica leaves under both treatments (seed soaking and foliar spray) were significantly higher than those of Zidenka (Table 6). The evaluated hybrids did not significantly differ in MP under both application methods. The O3 concentration in both treatments displayed significant differences in chlorophyll content, MP, and RWC. The concentration of 40 ppm O3 in the soaking method followed by 30 ppm displayed the highest chlorophyll content and RWC and the lowest MP. Likewise, the concentration of 30 ppm in the foliar application followed by 40 ppm exhibited the highest chlorophyll content and RWC and the lowest MP. The untreated control displayed the lowest chlorophyll content and RWC and the highest MP. In general, the seed soaking method was more effective than foliar spray which produced higher chlorophyll content and RWC (Table 6).
Lirica recorded the highest proline content and ascorbate peroxides under both treatments, seed soaking and foliar spray (Table 7). Proline content and ascorbate peroxides were increased significantly with increasing O3 concentration in both treatments. The highest values were assigned for 40 ppm followed by 30 ppm, while the untreated control gave the lowest values (Table 7). The application methods, seed soaking or foliar spray, did not display a significant difference in proline content and ascorbate peroxides.

3.5. Interrelationship among the Evaluated Treatments and Parameters

Exploring the interrelationship between the assessed treatments and parameters is a vital aspect that can provide valuable information. The heatmap is an appropriate statistical procedure to study the association among investigated treatments and parameters. In the present study, the heatmap and hierarchical clustering based on the studied seedling traits and physiological parameters divided the assessed treatments into different clusters (Figure 1). In both hybrids, the concentration of 40 ppm followed by 30 ppm using either one of the application methods possessed the highest values for most evaluated traits (depicted in blue). On the contrary, the untreated control of Lirica had the lowest values (depicted in red).

4. Discussion

The production of vegetable crops under stressful conditions becomes a great challenge, particularly under conditions of climate change. Pepper plants are adversely impacted by different biotic and abiotic stress conditions [42,43]. Sweet pepper is of tropical origin and is a warm-season crop. Therefore, cold stress has a severely adverse impact on plant development and production [44]. The present study was conducted to explore the impact of low concentrations of O3 on two sweet pepper hybrids under cold stress. The evaluated hybrids displayed considerable differences in most studied germination and seedling parameters. Generally, Lirica exhibited stronger seedling growth, indicating that it had a better adaptation to cold stress than Zidenka. Lirica’s stronger seedlings appeared with higher biomass production, dry matter, and stem length and diameter. The darker greenness of its leaf expressed as SPAD could be the reason for this enhancement via increasing photosynthesis processes. It also could retain more relative water and proline content, and its APX activity was higher under cold stress, which allows it to cope with the harmful effect of cold stress. Likewise, Lozo et al. [5], ElShamey et al. [23], Penella et al. [45] detected significant differences among sweet papers grown under abiotic stresses.
Seed priming and foliar anti-stressors are important methods for alleviating stress on the plant and were reported using different substances [46,47,48,49,50,51]. The negative effect of O3 on plant development and production was extensively studied [52,53,54]. However, it has several beneficial properties when it is applied in low concentrations. It degenerates quickly into oxygen, hence it is considered environmentally safe and has a non-toxic residue [55]. Due to its strong oxidative ability in both aqueous and gaseous phases, it is used as an effective anti-microbial agent. Moreover, it is useful for fruit preservation because it has no side effects on nutritional values and product quality [56]. It has gained much attention due to its crucial impact in enhancing secondary metabolites and bioactive properties which help ameliorate plant growth and productivity and work against many pathogens [57]. The positive impacts of exogenous O3 in mitigating stressful conditions of salinity [58], drought [59], and cold stress [60] have been reported. Yet, studies on the role of low O3 concentrations on physiological and biochemical adjustments during seed germination and early growth periods of sweet pepper plants are still lacking.
The obtained results confirmed that soaking pepper seeds in enriched water with O3, particularly at 40 ppm, seemed to improve germination parameters i.e., GI, CV, MGT, and fresh and dry weights. These improvements may be due to the role of O3 in ROS induction inside the seeds [61,62]. Consequently, when ROS accumulates in a suitable amount, it can be helpful for seed germination and seedling growth by adjusting cellular growth and enhancing antioxidant activity. In this respect, Bhattacharjee [63] and Desoky et al. [64] demonstrated that ROS are important signaling molecules in biotic stress responses, where they serve as messengers for the activation of defense genes. Antioxidants by themselves act as scavengers for excess ROS production in seed biology, which plays a vital role in the growth processes occurring at early embryogenesis during seed development. Moreover, O3 participates in the mechanisms underlying radicle protrusion during seed germination and seed aging [65,66]. It can activate the acclimation process and provide an improvement in plant tolerance to subsequent stress. These results are supported by those obtained by [67] and [68]. On the other side, extreme cold stress or high O3 concentration, especially with a too-long exposure time, can damage the cells which are considered unfavorable for seed germination and seedling growth. The resultant ROS has been considered for too-long exposure time as being very harmful, which often leads to oxidative stress at the cellular level [65]. Moreover, they can disrupt cellular membranes, and lead to enzyme inactivation, protein degradation, and ionic imbalance [69]. Nevertheless, a short time exposure was most beneficial. Similarly, Sudhakar et al. [61], Abeli et al. [70], Avdeeva et al. [71], and Rodrigues et al. [72] elucidated the positive impacts of low concentrations of O3 on the germination and seedling parameters of tomato, alpine, wheat, and soybean, respectively.
The applied methods (seed soaking and foliar application using ozonated water) did not exhibit considerable differences in most evaluated parameters. Both application methods, especially at 40 ppm, enhanced the growth parameters of pepper seedlings compared with the untreated control. It seems that the low concentrations of O3 (10–40 ppm) have protective effects against the chilling stress on pepper seedlings. These results agreed with the results of [61]. Ozone as a strong oxidative factor has adverse impacts on plant photosynthesis [62]. Otherwise, in the present study, low concentrations for a short time of exposure enhanced chlorophyll content.
In this context, Flowers et al. [29] elucidated that the plants exposed to relatively low O3 concentrations for a short time possessed higher chlorophyll intensity in comparison to untreated controls. On the contrary, several studies pointed out the negative effect of high O3 doses or exposure on plants, such as potatoes [73], beans [29], and cowpea [74]. In this context, Wilkinson et al. [75] suggested that the decrease in growth was associated with longer exposure to higher O3 concentrations, which can be a reason for the reduction in carbon transport to the roots, and nutrient and water uptake.
The results displayed that exposure to low O3 concentrations decreased membrane permeability. The reduction in permeability could protect the cells from damage during environmental stresses, including cold stress. It was considered a sensitive stress marker due to the sensitivity of cellular membranes to different environmental stresses that always cause oxidative damage accompanied by increasing permeability [76]. Moreover, the obtained results showed that the low concentrations of O3 increased the RWC, APX, and proline, which could help to preserve the leaf water and nutrient content against cold stress. Plants prone to chilling stress often show symptoms of water stress through the inhibition of water absorption and water loss. The water loss is primarily related to the loss of membrane properties or the transfer of membranes from the state of the natural fluid to a restricted, less liquid, and semi-crystalline state [77]. RWC is a quantitative indicator of the water status of plants. Plant cells have a group of antioxidants (both enzymatic and non-enzymatic) to reduce the stress caused by ROS [78]. In addition, ROS can oxidize lipids and affect the normal membrane function [79,80]. Proline is a non-enzymatic antioxidant, which accumulates in response to biotic and abiotic stresses [81]. Furthermore, it helps to save osmotic adjustment and membrane stability, and decrease the harmful effects of ROS as a free radical scavenger [82]. High concentrations of proline likely have a role in stress tolerance under low temperatures by preserving the physical characteristics to protect both membranes and proteins [79,80]. Under cold stress, proline accumulation as inert compatible osmolytes can protect subcellular structures and macromolecules [83]. Moreover, it can protect protein integrity and enhance the activities of different enzymes, which works in this case as a molecular chaperone [84].
Under abiotic stress such as chilling, drought, or salinity, antioxidant systems in plants act to prevent or alleviate the membrane peroxidation produced by ROS [85]. Ascorbate peroxidase scavenging ROS in plants has an essential role in the detoxification or scavenging of H2O2 ascorbate–glutathione cycles [86]. APX activity increased in different plants when exposed to different abiotic stresses [87], e.g., O3 exposure [88]. Similarly, Umponstira et al. [89] and Yan et al. [90] elucidated that APX activity depended on O3 dose and exposure period, while low enzyme activity was obtained with a high O3 dose with long exposure time. Thus, the observed increase in APX activity as an antioxidant enzyme could be attributed to the low O3 concentrations and the short exposure time. It may be noted that the effects of O3 stress on the antioxidant enzymes are complicated and depend on the plant species, treatment intensity, and exposure time.

5. Conclusions

The positive influences of O3 on cultivated plants still need more investigation under normal or stressful conditions. The present study confirmed that O3 in a low concentration could be effectively employed to enhance pepper germination and seedling growth against the damaging effects of cold stress. The application of seed soaking or seedling foliar spray using ozonated water enhanced germination and seedling growth parameters by elevating the antioxidant status of pepper plants compared with the untreated controls. The two applied methods (seed soaking and foliar application using ozonated water) did not display significant differences in most of the evaluated parameters. Meanwhile, the evaluated hybrids exhibited significant differences in the studied parameters, with Lirica showing superiority in most germination and seedling growth parameters. Among the tested concentrations, 30 and 40 ppm of ozonated water as seed soaking or foliar spray displayed the highest favorable impacts on germination and seedling growth. The utilization of ozonated water has a promising future in enhancing field crops against environmental stresses due to its affordability, practicality, and eco-friendly properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.S.-E., A.A.E., A.M.Y., E.S.A. and S.A.F.E.-O.; methodology, M.A.S.-E., A.A.E., A.M.Y., E.S.A. and S.A.F.E.-O.; software, K.S.A., K.R.A. and E.S.A.; validation, M.A.S.-E., K.S.A., K.R.A., A.A.E., A.M.Y. and E.S.A.; formal analysis, M.A.S.-E., A.A.E., A.M.Y., E.S.A. and S.A.F.E.-O.; investigation, M.A.S.-E., A.A.E., A.M.Y., E.S.A. and S.A.F.E.-O.; resources, K.S.A., K.R.A. and M.M.A.; data curation M.A.S.-E., K.S.A., K.R.A., A.A.E., A.M.Y., E.S.A. and S.A.F.E.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.A., K.R.A., M.M.A., A.A.E., A.M.Y. and E.S.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A.S.-E., K.S.A., K.R.A., M.M.A., A.A.E., A.M.Y. and E.S.A.; visualization, A.A.E., A.M.Y. and E.S.A.; supervision, A.A.E., A.M.Y. and E.S.A.; funding acquisition, K.S.A., K.R.A. and M.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R188), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The co-author Khalid S. Alshallash from Saudi Arabia would like to thank the deanship of scientific research at Imam Mohammed Bin Saud Islamic University. Also, the co-author Mesfer M. Alqahtani from Saudi Arabia would like to thank the deanship of scientific research at Shaqra University for supporting publishing this research work. In addition, the co-author Khadiga R. Alharbi would like to thank Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University for funding this work through the Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R188), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.; Zou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, X.; Liu, J.; Fan, S.; Liu, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Tan, Y.; et al. Environmental impacts of pepper (Capsicum annuum L) production affected by nutrient management: A case study in southwest China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deepa, N.; Kaur, C.; George, B.; Singh, B.; Kapoor, H. Antioxidant constituents in some sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes during maturity. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lahbib, K.; Dabbou, S.; Bnejdi, F.; Pandino, G.; Lombardo, S.; El Gazzah, M.; El Bok, S. Agro-morphological, biochemical and antioxidant characterization of a tunisian chili pepper germplasm collection. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gracia, M.P.; Mansour, E.; Casas, A.M.; Lasa, J.M.; Medina, B.; Molina-Cano, J.L.; Moralejo, M.A.; López, A.; López-Fuster, P.; Escribano, J.; et al. Progress in the Spanish national barley breeding program. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 10, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kamara, M.M.; Ghazy, N.A.; Mansour, E.; Elsharkawy, M.M.; Kheir, A.M.S.; Ibrahim, K.M. Molecular genetic diversity and line × tester analysis for resistance to late wilt disease and grain yield in maize. Agronomy 2021, 11, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moustafa, E.; El-Sobky, E.-S.; Farag, H.; Yasin, M.; Attia, A.; Rady, M.; Awad, M.; Mansour, E. Sowing date and genotype influence on yield and quality of dual-purpose barley in a salt-affected arid region. Agronomy 2021, 11, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moustafa, E.S.A.; Ali, M.M.A.; Kamara, M.M.; Awad, M.F.; Hassanin, A.A.; Mansour, E. Field screening of wheat advanced lines for salinity tolerance. Agronomy 2021, 11, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kamara, M.M.; Ibrahim, K.M.; Mansour, E.; Kheir, A.M.S.; Germoush, M.O.; Abd El-Moneim, D.; Motawei, M.I.; Alhusays, A.Y.; Farid, M.A.; Rehan, M. Combining ability and gene action controlling grain yield and its related traits in bread wheat under heat stress and normal conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mansour, E.; Moustafa, E.S.A.; Qabil, N.; Abdelsalam, A.; Wafa, H.A.; Kenawy, A.E.; Casas, A.M.; Igartua, E. Assessing different barley growth habits under Egyptian conditions for enhancing resilience to climate change. Field Crops Res. 2018, 224, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Omar, M.; Rabie, H.A.; Mowafi, S.A.; Othman, H.T.; El-Moneim, D.A.; Alharbi, K.; Mansour, E.; Ali, M.M.A. Multivariate analysis of agronomic traits in newly developed maize hybrids grown under different agro-environments. Plants 2022, 11, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Desoky, E.-S.M.; Elrys, A.S.; Mansour, E.; Eid, R.S.M.; Selem, E.; Rady, M.M.; Ali, E.F.; Mersal, G.A.M.; Semida, W.M. Application of biostimulants promotes growth and productivity by fortifying the antioxidant machinery and suppressing oxidative stress in faba bean under various abiotic stresses. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 288, 110340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. El-Mageed, T.A.; Belal, E.; Rady, M.; El-Mageed, S.A.; Mansour, E.; Awad, M.; Semida, W. Acidified biochar as a soil amendment to drought stressed (Vicia faba L.) plants: Influences on growth and productivity, nutrient status, and water use efficiency. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. O’Sullivan, J.; Bouw, W. Pepper seed treatment for low-temperature germination. Can. J. Plant Sci. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1984, 64, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, S.; Tang, X.-F.; Ma, N.-N.; Wang, L.-Y.; Meng, Q.-W. Heterology expression of the sweet pepper CBF3 gene confers elevated tolerance to chilling stress in transgenic tobacco. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1804–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Aidy, F.; Sharaf-Eldin, M. Modifying microclimatic conditions in plastic walk-in tunnels through solar energy system for improving yield and quality of four sweet pepper hybrids. Plasticulture 2015, 134, 6–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, L.; Hao, X.; Li, Y.; Jiang, G. Response of greenhouse tomato to varied low pre-night temperatures at the same daily integrated temperature. HortScience 2010, 45, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ensminger, I.; Busch, F.; Huner, N.P. Photostasis and cold acclimation: Sensing low temperature through photosynthesis. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El-Sanatawy, A.; Ash-Shormillesy, S.; Qabil, N.; Awad, M.; Mansour, E. Seed halo-priming improves seedling vigor, grain yield, and water use efficiency of maize under varying irrigation regimes. Water 2021, 13, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raj, A.B.; Raj, S.K. Seed priming: An approach towards agricultural sustainability. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2019, 11, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. El-Sanatawy, A.; El-Kholy, A.; Ali, M.; Awad, M.; Mansour, E. Maize seedling establishment, grain yield and crop water productivity response to seed priming and irrigation management in a Mediterranean arid environment. Agronomy 2021, 11, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M. Pre-sowing seed treatment—A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Adv. Agron. 2005, 88, 223–271. [Google Scholar]
  22. Desoky, E.-S.M.; Mansour, E.; Ali, M.M.A.; Yasin, M.A.T.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.E.; Rady, M.M.; Ali, E.F. Exogenously used 24-epibrassinolide promotes drought tolerance in maize hybrids by improving plant and water productivity in an arid environment. Plants 2021, 10, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ElShamey, E.A.Z.; Hamad, H.S.; Alshallash, K.S.; Alghuthaymi, M.A.; Ghazy, M.I.; Sakran, R.M.; Selim, M.E.; ElSayed, M.A.A.; Abdelmegeed, T.M.; Okasha, S.A.; et al. Growth regulators improve outcrossing rate of diverse rice cytoplasmic male sterile lines through affecting floral traits. Plants 2022, 11, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Desoky, E.-S.; Merwad, A.-R.; El-Maati, M.A.; Mansour, E.; Arnaout, S.; Awad, M.; Ramadan, M.; Ibrahim, S. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of exogenously applied selenium for alleviating destructive impacts induced by salinity stress in bread wheat. Agronomy 2021, 11, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Swailam, M.A.; Mowafy, S.A.E.; El-Naggar, N.Z.A.; Mansour, E. Agronomic responses of diverse bread wheat genotypes to phosphorus levels and nitrogen forms in a semiarid environment. Sabrao J. Breed. Genet. 2021, 53, 592–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Hady, A.; Mohamed, A.; Abd-Elkrem, Y.M.; Rady, M.O.; Mansour, E.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Temsah, M.E. Impact on plant productivity under low fertility sandy soil in arid environment by revitalization of lentil roots. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 937073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ElSayed, A.I.; Mohamed, A.H.; Rafudeen, M.S.; Omar, A.A.; Awad, M.F.; Mansour, E. Polyamines mitigate the destructive impacts of salinity stress by enhancing photosynthetic capacity, antioxidant defense system and upregulation of Calvin cycle-related genes in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 3675–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kelly, F.J.; Mudway, I.; Krishna, M.; Holgate, S. The free radical basis of air pollution: Focus on ozone. Respir. Med. 1995, 89, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Flowers, M.D.; Fiscus, E.L.; Burkey, K.O.; Booker, F.L.; Dubois, J.-J.B. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes differing in sensitivity to ozone. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dizengremel, P. Effects of ozone on the carbon metabolism of forest trees. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nagendra-Prasad, D.; Sudhakar, N.; Murugesan, K.; Mohan, N. Pre-exposure of calli to ozone promotes tolerance of regenerated Lycopersicon esculentum cv. PKM1 plantlets against acute ozone stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 1288–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. González-Fernández, I.; Elvira, S.; Calatayud, V.; Calvo, E.; Aparicio, P.; Sánchez, M.; Alonso, R.; Bermejo, V.B. Ozone effects on the physiology and marketable biomass of leafy vegetables under Mediterranean conditions: Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) and Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. Var. cycla). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 235, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sharps, K.; Hayes, F.; Harmens, H.; Mills, G. Ozone-induced effects on leaves in African crop species. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liang, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Christie, P. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hafez, M.; Popov, A.I.; Rashad, M. Integrated use of bio-organic fertilizers for enhancing soil fertility–plant nutrition, germination status and initial growth of corn (Zea mays L.). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Edwards, R.; Sundstrom, F. Afterripening and harvesting effects on Tabasco pepper seed germination performance. HortScience 1987, 22, 473–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coste, S.; Baraloto, C.; Leroy, C.; Marcon, É.; Renaud, A.; Richardson, A.D.; Roggy, J.-C.; Schimann, H.; Uddling, J.; Hérault, B. Assessing foliar chlorophyll contents with the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter: A calibration test with thirteen tree species of tropical rainforest in French Guiana. Ann. For. Sci. 2010, 67, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Valentovic, P.; Luxova, M.; Kolarovic, L.; Gasparikova, O. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 2006, 52, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Anjum, S.A.; Farooq, M.; Xie, X.-Y.; Liu, X.-J.; Ijaz, M.F. Antioxidant defense system and proline accumulation enables hot pepper to perform better under drought. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 140, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  42. López-Marín, J.; Gálvez, A.; del Amor, F.M.; Albacete, A.; Fernández, J.A.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Pérez-Alfocea, F. Selecting vegetative/generative/dwarfing rootstocks for improving fruit yield and quality in water stressed sweet peppers. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 214, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Motamedi, M.; Haghighi, M.; Goli, A. Physiological changes of sweet and hot peppers in vegetative and reproductive growth stages treated by Ca and H2O2 under unforeseen heat stresses. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 249, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Korkmaz, A.; Korkmaz, Y.; Demirkıran, A.R. Enhancing chilling stress tolerance of pepper seedlings by exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 67, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Penella, C.; Nebauer, S.G.; López-Galarza, S.; San Bautista, A.; Rodríguez-Burruezo, A.; Calatayud, Á. Evaluation of some pepper genotypes as rootstocks in water stress conditions. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 41, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Alam, A.; Ullah, H.; Cha-um, S.; Tisarum, R.; Datta, A. Effect of seed priming with potassium nitrate on growth, fruit yield, quality and water productivity of cantaloupe under water-deficit stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 288, 110354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kulak, M.; Jorrín-Novo, J.V.; Romero-Rodriguez, M.C.; Yildirim, E.D.; Gul, F.; Karaman, S. Seed priming with salicylic acid on plant growth and essential oil composition in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) plants grown under water stress conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 161, 113235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mansour, E.; Mahgoub, H.A.M.; Mahgoub, S.A.; El-Sobky, E.-S.E.A.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.; Kamara, M.M.; AbuQamar, S.F.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Desoky, E.-S.M. Enhancement of drought tolerance in diverse Vicia faba cultivars by inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under newly reclaimed soil conditions. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Selem, E.; Hassan, A.A.S.A.; Awad, M.F.; Mansour, E.; Desoky, E.-S.M. Impact of exogenously sprayed antioxidants on physio-biochemical, agronomic, and quality parameters of potato in salt-affected soil. Plants 2022, 11, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mannan, M.A.; Tithi, M.A.; Islam, M.R.; Al Mamun, M.A.; Mia, S.; Rahman, M.Z.; Awad, M.F.; ElSayed, A.I.; Mansour, E.; Hossain, M.S. Soil and foliar applications of zinc sulfate and iron sulfate alleviate the destructive impacts of drought stress in wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rehman, R.N.U.; Malik, A.U.; Khan, A.S.; Hasan, M.U.; Anwar, R.; Ali, S.; Haider, M.W. Combined application of hot water treatment and methyl salicylate mitigates chilling injury in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 283, 110113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, J.; Wei, Y.; Fang, Z. Ozone pollution: A major health hazard worldwide. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chaudhary, I.J.; Rathore, D. Assessment of dose–response relationship between ozone dose and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L) cultivars using Open Top Chamber (OTC) and Ethylenediurea (EDU). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yadav, A.; Bhatia, A.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, B. The effects of elevated CO2 and elevated O3 exposure on plant growth, yield and quality of grains of two wheat cultivars grown in north India. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Msayleb, N.; Ibrahim, S. Treatment of nematodes with ozone gas: A sustainable alternative to nematicides. Phys. Procedia 2011, 21, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Dong, C.; Ji, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Ban, Z.; Zhang, N.; Xue, W. Effect of ozone treatment on the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis of postharvest strawberries. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 25429–25438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Marchica, A.; Ascrizzi, R.; Flamini, G.; Cotrozzi, L.; Tonelli, M.; Lorenzini, G.; Nali, C.; Pellegrini, E. Ozone as eustress for enhancing secondary metabolites and bioactive properties in Salvia officinalis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Calzone, A.; Podda, A.; Lorenzini, G.; Maserti, B.E.; Carrari, E.; Deleanu, E.; Hoshika, Y.; Haworth, M.; Nali, C.; Badea, O. Cross-talk between physiological and biochemical adjustments by Punica granatum cv. Dente di Cavallo mitigates the effects of salinity and ozone stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pellegrini, E.; Cotrozzi, L.; Neri, L.; Baraldi, R.; Carrari, E.; Nali, C.; Lorenzini, G.; Paoletti, E.; Hoshika, Y. Stress markers and physiochemical responses of the Mediterranean shrub Phillyrea angustifolia under current and future drought and ozone scenarios. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, X.; Tang, N.; Zhang, H.; Chen, C.; Li, L.; Dong, C.; Cheng, Y. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of cantaloupe melon under cold storage with ozone treatment. Int. Food Res. J. 2021, 140, 109993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sudhakar, N.; Nagendra-Prasad, D.; Mohan, N.; Murugesan, K. A preliminary study on the effects of ozone exposure on growth of the tomato seedlings. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2008, 2, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kleiber, T.; Borowiak, K.; Schroeter-Zakrzewska, A.; Budka, A.; Osiecki, S. Effect of ozone treatment and light colour on photosynthesis and yield of lettuce. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 217, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bhattacharjee, S. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative burst: Roles in stress, senescence and signal transduction in plants. Curr. Sci. 2005, 89, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar]
  64. Desoky, E.-S.M.; Mansour, E.; El-Sobky, E.-S.E.A.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.; Taha, T.F.; Elakkad, H.A.; Arnaout, S.M.A.I.; Eid, R.S.M.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Yasin, M.A.T. Physio-biochemical and agronomic responses of faba beans to exogenously applied nano-silicon under drought stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 637783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Habibullah, M.; Sarkar, S.; Islam, M.M.; Ahmed, K.U.; Rahman, M.Z.; Awad, M.F.; ElSayed, A.I.; Mansour, E.; Hossain, M.S. Assessing the response of diverse sesame genotypes to waterlogging durations at different plant growth stages. Plants 2021, 10, 2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kibinza, S.; Vinel, D.; Côme, D.; Bailly, C.; Corbineau, F. Sunflower seed deterioration as related to moisture content during ageing, energy metabolism and active oxygen species scavenging. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 128, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signaling transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tarchoune, I.; Sgherri, C.; Izzo, R.; Lachaal, M.; Ouerghi, Z.; Navari-Izzo, F. Antioxidative responses of Ocimum basilicum to sodium chloride or sodium sulphate salinization. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abeli, T.; Guasconi, D.B.; Mondoni, A.; Dondi, D.; Bentivoglio, A.; Buttafava, A.; Cristofanelli, P.; Bonasoni, P.; Rossi, G.; Orsenigo, S. Acute and chronic ozone exposure temporarily affects seed germination in alpine plants. Plant Biosyst. 2017, 151, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Avdeeva, V.; Zorina, E.; Bezgina, J.; Kolosova, O. Influence of ozone on germination and germinating energy of winter wheat seeds. Eng. Rural Dev. 2018, 23, 543–546. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rodrigues, V.O.; Penido, A.C.; Pereira, D.D.S.; Oliveira, A.M.S.; Mendes, A.E.S.; Oliveira, J.A. Sanitary and physiological quality of soybean seeds treated with ozone. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 11, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vandermeiren, K.; Black, C.; Pleijel, H.; De Temmerman, L. Impact of rising tropospheric ozone on potato: Effects on photosynthesis, growth, productivity and yield quality. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 982–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tetteh, R.; Yamaguchi, M.; Wada, Y.; Funada, R.; Izuta, T. Effects of ozone on growth, net photosynthesis and yield of two African varieties of Vigna unguiculata. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 196, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wilkinson, S.; Mills, G.; Illidge, R.; Davies, W.J. How is ozone pollution reducing our food supply? J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mansour, E.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; Ali, M.M.A.; Abdul-Hamid, M.I.; Ullah, H.; Attia, A.; Datta, A. Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of faba bean and their agro-physiological responses to different water regimes in an arid Mediterranean environment. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 247, 106754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wright, M. The effect of chilling on ethylene production, membrane permeability and water loss of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Planta 1974, 120, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Corbineau, F. From intracellular signaling networks to cell death: The dual role of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Igarashi, Y.; Sanada, Y.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Wada, K.; Shinozaki, K. Characterization of the gene for Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and correlation between the expression of the gene and salt tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 33, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. ElShamey, E.A.Z.; Sakran, R.M.; ElSayed, M.A.A.; Aloufi, S.; Alharthi, B.; Alqurashi, M.; Mansour, E.; Abd El-Moneim, D. Heterosis and combining ability for floral and yield characters in rice using cytoplasmic male sterility system. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 3727–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, W.; Takeuchi, Y.; Yoneyama, K. Effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid on development and salt tolerance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) microtubers in vitro. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 49, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  82. Desoky, E.-S.M.; Mansour, E.; Yasin, M.A.T.; El-Sobky, E.-S.E.A.; Rady, M.M. Improvement of drought tolerance in five different cultivars of Vicia faba with foliar application of ascorbic acid or silicon. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2020, 18, e0802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Guy, C.; Kaplan, F.; Kopka, J.; Selbig, J.; Hincha, D.K. Metabolomics of temperature stress. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kishor, P.K.; Sangam, S.; Amrutha, R.; Laxmi, P.S.; Naidu, K.; Rao, K.S.; Rao, S.; Reddy, K.; Theriappan, P.; Sreenivasulu, N. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88, 424–438. [Google Scholar]
  85. Xu, P.-L.; Guo, Y.K.; Bai, J.G.; Shang, L.; Wang, X.J. Effects of long-term chilling on ultrastructure and antioxidant activity in leaves of two cucumber cultivars under low light. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Sakran, R.M.; Ghazy, M.I.; Rehan, M.; Alsohim, A.S.; Mansour, E. Molecular genetic diversity and combining ability for some physiological and agronomic traits in rice under well-watered and water-deficit conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Arbona, V.; Hossain, Z.; López-Climent, M.F.; Pérez-Clemente, R.M.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Antioxidant enzymatic activity is linked to waterlogging stress tolerance in citrus. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gillespie, K.M.; Rogers, A.; Ainsworth, E.A. Growth at elevated ozone or elevated carbon dioxide concentration alters antioxidant capacity and response to acute oxidative stress in soybean (Glycine max). J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2667–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Umponstira, C.; Pimpa, W.; Nanegrungsun, S. Physiological and biochemical responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) to ozone. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2006, 28, 861–869. [Google Scholar]
  90. Yan, K.; Chen, W.; He, X.; Zhang, G.; Xu, S.; Wang, L. Responses of photosynthesis, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant system in leaves of Quercus mongolica to elevated O3. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 69, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Heatmap and hierarchical clustering divide the assessed pepper hybrids, seed soaking, and foliar application using ozonated water into different clusters based on seedling and physiological parameters. Blue and red colors indicate high and low values for the corresponding trait, respectively. SD: stem diameter, RL: root length, SL: stem length, RFW: root fresh weight, SFW: shoot fresh weight, SFW: seedling fresh weight, RDW: root dry weight, SDW: shoot dry weight, SDW: seedling dry weight, Ch: chlorophyll content, MP: membrane permeability, RWC: relative water content, Proline: proline content, and Ascorbate: ascorbate peroxides.
Figure 1. Heatmap and hierarchical clustering divide the assessed pepper hybrids, seed soaking, and foliar application using ozonated water into different clusters based on seedling and physiological parameters. Blue and red colors indicate high and low values for the corresponding trait, respectively. SD: stem diameter, RL: root length, SL: stem length, RFW: root fresh weight, SFW: shoot fresh weight, SFW: seedling fresh weight, RDW: root dry weight, SDW: shoot dry weight, SDW: seedling dry weight, Ch: chlorophyll content, MP: membrane permeability, RWC: relative water content, Proline: proline content, and Ascorbate: ascorbate peroxides.
Sustainability 14 13453 g001
Table 1. Impact of seed soaking in ozonated water at different concentrations on germination parameters of two pepper hybrids.
Table 1. Impact of seed soaking in ozonated water at different concentrations on germination parameters of two pepper hybrids.
Studied FactorGP
(%)
MGT (Day)GI
(Seed/Day)
CV
(%)
Pepper hybrid (H)
Zidenka92.267.31 a6.35 b13.72 b
Lirica92.006.79 b7.22 a14.91 a
Seed soaking (S)
0 ppm O392.007.29 b5.73 d13.71 d
10 ppm O392.008.06 a6.76 e12.41 e
20 ppm O391.337.02 c6.71 c14.26 c
30 ppm O392.666.55 d8.04 b15.32 b
40 ppm O392.666.34 e8.68 a15.86 a
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O392.007.29 b5.73 c13.72 e
10 ppm O392.008.06 a4.77 d12.41 f
20 ppm O390.677.02 c6.17 c13.57 e
30 ppm O392.006.56 d7.22 b14.23 d
40 ppm O393.336.34 e7.87 b14.68 c
Lirica0 ppm O392.007.29 b5.73 c13.72 e
10 ppm O392.008.06 a4.77 d12.41 f
20 ppm O392.006.68 d7.25 b14.97 c
30 ppm O393.336.09 e8.87 a16.43 b
40 ppm O393.335.87 f9.48 a17.04 a
ANOVAdf
H10.539 NS<0.001<0.001<0.001
S40.284 NS<0.001<0.001<0.001
H × S40.237 NS<0.001<0.001<0.001
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. NS: Not significant, Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01). GP: germination percentage, MGT: mean germination time (day), GI: germination index, and CV: coefficient velocity.
Table 2. Impact of seed soaking in ozonated water at different concentrations on the seedling fresh and dry weight of two pepper hybrids.
Table 2. Impact of seed soaking in ozonated water at different concentrations on the seedling fresh and dry weight of two pepper hybrids.
Studied FactorFresh Weight (g/Plant)Dry Weight (g/Plant)
RootsShootsRoot/Shoot RatioRootsShootsRoot/Shoot Ratio
Pepper hybrids
Zidenka0.141 b0.211 b0.668 a0.0090.0160.563
Lirica0.150 a0.228 a0.658 b0.0140.0150.933
Seed soaking
0 ppm O30.141 c0.205 e0.688 b0.0210.015 b1.400
10 ppm O30.147 b0.195 d0.754 a0.0090.016 b0.563
20 ppm O30.136 d0.219 c0.621 d0.0070.014 c0.500
30 ppm O30.147 a0.232 b0.634 c0.0080.015 b0.53
40 ppm O30.155 b0.245 a0.633 c0.0120.017 a0.706
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O30.133 g0.192 i0.693 b0.0090.013 c0.692
10 ppm O30.159 b0.193 i0.824 a0.0100.018 a0.556
20 ppm O30.132 g0.211 g0.626 e0.0090.015 b0.600
30 ppm O30.140 e0.224 e0.625 e0.0090.016 b0.563
40 ppm O30.142 e0.236 c0.602 f0.0120.018 a0.667
Lirica0 ppm O30.151 d0.219 f0.689 b0.0330.018 a1.833
10 ppm O30.135 f0.198 h0.682 b0.0090.013 c0.692
20 ppm O30.141 e0.227 d0.621 e0.0070.013 c0.538
30 ppm O30.155 c0.241 b0.643 d0.0080.014 c0.57
40 ppm O30.169 a0.255 a0.663 c0.0080.014 c0.571
ANOVAdfp value
H1<0.001<0.001<0.0010.387 NS<0.0010.375 NS
S4<0.001<0.001<0.0010.423 NS<0.0010.388 NS
H × S4<0.001<0.001<0.0010.411 NS<0.0010.557 NS
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. NS: Not significant, Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01).
Table 3. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water on seedlings at different concentrations: stem diameter and seedling length of two pepper hybrids grown under cold stress.
Table 3. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water on seedlings at different concentrations: stem diameter and seedling length of two pepper hybrids grown under cold stress.
Studied FactorStem Diameter (mm)Root Length (cm)Stem Length (cm)
SoakingSpraySoakingSpraySoakingSpray
Pepper hybrid (H)
Zidenka2.66 b2.65 b8.17 a8.25 a11.70 b12.11
Lirica2.71 a2.71 a7.90 b7.80 b12.21 a12.21
Seed treatment (T)
0 ppm O32.55 e2.55 e7.26 e7.26 d10.90 e12.18 bc
10 ppm O32.77 b2.69 b8.26 b7.62 c12.30 b12.30 b
20 ppm O32.61 d2.60 d7.62 d8.00 b11.80 d12.06 cd
30 ppm O32.65 c2.65 c8.00 c9.03 a11.96 c11.93 d
40 ppm O32.83 a2.87 a9.03 a7.98 b12.81 a12.60 a
Mean (T)2.672.667.68 B8.02 A11.88 B12.09 A
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O32.520 f2.520 f7.000 f7.00 i12.000 cd12.000 cd
10 ppm O32.900 b2.733 c8.167 b8.40 c9.900 f12.467 b
20 ppm O32.593 g2.587 e7.233 e7.75 g11.600 e12.133 c
30 ppm O32.617 ef2.613 de7.633 d8.20 d12.133 c12.063 cd
40 ppm O32.700 c2.780 b8.133 b9.50 a12.867 a12.600 ab
Lirica0 ppm O32.597 f2.597 e7.533 d7.53 h12.600 b12.433 b
10 ppm O32.650 d2.650 d8.467 a8.13 e11.900 cd11.900 cd
20 ppm O32.630 de2.630 de7.500 d7.50 h12.000 cd12.000 cd
30 ppm O32.700 c2.700 c7.833 c7.80 f11.800 e11.800 d
40 ppm O32.973 a2.973 a8.167 b8.57 b12.767 ab12.767 a
ANOVAdfp value
H1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
H × S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. Foliar application of seedlings using ozonated water at the three full-grown leaves stage thrice at three-day intervals. Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01).
Table 4. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water at different concentrations on seedling fresh weight of two pepper hybrids grown under cold stress.
Table 4. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water at different concentrations on seedling fresh weight of two pepper hybrids grown under cold stress.
Studied FactorRoot Fresh Weight (g)Shoot Fresh Weight (g)Seedling Fresh Weight (g)
SoakingSpraySoakingSpraySoakingSpray
Pepper hybrid (H)
Zidenka0.797 a0.740 b1.76 b1.7942.562.528 b
Lirica0.774 b0.775 a1.78 a1.7842.552.558 a
Seed treatment (T)
0 ppm O30.743 c0.743 c1.77 b1.773 b2.51 c2.51 b
10 ppm O30.756 c0.680 d1.71 d1.733 b2.46 e2.45 c
20 ppm O30.752 c0.733 c1.73 c1.728 d2.48 d2.46 c
30 ppm O30.801 b0.776 b1.74 c1.743 c2.54 b2.52 b
40 ppm O30.876 a0.850 a1.91 a1.916 a2.79 a2.76 a
Mean (T)0.770 A0.752 B1.76 1.77 2.532.52
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O30.710 f0.710 e1.760 d1.760 d2.470 ef2.470 f
10 ppm O30.820 c0.667 f1.660 f1.793 c2.480 e2.460 f
20 ppm O30.750 e0.713 e1.767 d1.757 d2.517 d2.470 f
30 ppm O30.803 c0.753 d1.783 c1.780 c2.587 c2.533 d
40 ppm O30.903 a0.850 a1.863 b1.860 b2.767 b2.710 b
Lirica0 ppm O30.777 d0.777 a1.787 c1.787 c2.563 c2.563 c
10 ppm O30.693 f0.693 c1.753 d1.753 d2.447 ef2.447 f
20 ppm O30.753 e0.753 e1.700 e1.700 e2.453 f2.453 f
30 ppm O30.800 c0.800 b1.707 e1.707 e2.507 d2.507 e
40 ppm O30.850 b0.850 a1.973 a1.973 a2.823 a2.823 a
ANOVAdfp value
H1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
H × S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. Foliar application of seedlings using ozonated water at the three full-grown leaves stage thrice at three-day intervals. Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01).
Table 5. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water on seedling dry weight of two pepper hybrids under cold stress.
Table 5. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water on seedling dry weight of two pepper hybrids under cold stress.
Studied FactorRoot Dry Weight (g)Shoot Dry Weight (g)Seedling Dry Weight (g)
SoakingSpraySoakingSpraySoakingSpray
Pepper hybrid (H)
Zidenka0.055 b0.055 b0.182 a0.183 a0.237 b0.237 b
Lirica0.061 a0.061 a0.179 b0.179 b0.241 a0.240 a
Seed treatment (T)
0 ppm O30.053 d0.053 d0.175 d0.174 d0.226 d0.223 e
10 ppm O30.055 c0.053 d0.181 b0.188 b0.237 b0.241 b
20 ppm O30.058 b0.055 c0.170 e0.167 e0.229 c0.229 d
30 ppm O30.067 a0.058 b0.177 c0.175 c0.236 b0.233 c
40 ppm O30.052 e0.068 a0.200 a0.201 a0.267 a0.269 a
Mean (T)0.0570.0570.1800.1810.2390.239
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O30.052 e0.052 g0.174 f0.174 e0.226 f0.226 f
10 ppm O30.060 c0.057 e0.182 c0.195 b0.242 c0.252 c
20 ppm O30.052 e0.052 g0.176 e0.169 f0.228 f0.221 g
30 ppm O30.053 e0.052 g0.181 c0.175 e0.234 e0.227 f
40 ppm O30.060 c0.061 c0.199 b0.202 a0.259 b0.263 b
Lirica0 ppm O30.055 d0.055 f0.178 d0.178 d0.233 e0.233 e
10 ppm O30.051 e0.051 g0.181 c0.181 c0.231 e0.231 e
20 ppm O30.059 c0.059 d0.165 g0.165 e0.225 f0.225 f
30 ppm O30.065 b0.065 b0.174 f0.174 g0.239 d0.239 d
40 ppm O30.075 a0.075 a0.201 a0.201 a0.276 a0.276 a
ANOVAdfp value
H1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
H × S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. Foliar application of seedlings using ozonated water at the three full-grown leaves stage thrice at three-day intervals. Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01).
Table 6. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water at different concentrations on some physiological parameters of two pepper hybrids grown under cold stress.
Table 6. Impact of seed soaking or foliar spray using ozonated water at different concentrations on some physiological parameters of two pepper hybrids grown under cold stress.
Studied FactorChlorophyll
(SPAD Value)
Membrane Permeability
(MP %)
Relative Water Content
(RWC %)
SoakingSpraySoakingSpraySoakingSpray
Pepper hybrid (H)
Zidenka39.67 b38.48 b16.3216.0775.74 b76.25 b
Lirica43.76 a40.73 a16.3016.0777.78 a78.21 a
Seed treatment (T)
0 ppm O343.20 d37.71 c18.08 a18.08 a72.75 e72.95 e
10 ppm O337.85 e37.68 c16.46 c17.31 b72.65 c74.06 d
20 ppm O343.43 c40.13 b17.31 b15.43 c74.40 d76.96 c
30 ppm O344.15 b41.93 a15.43 d14.26 e77.43 b81.95 a
40 ppm O346.95 a40.11 b14.26 e14.88 d82.60 a81.16 b
Mean (T)41.72 A39.51 B16.31 A16.07 B77.01 B77.23 A
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O334.20 i34.30 g18.233 a18.233 a71.20 h71.50 i
10 ppm O334.80 h39.60 d16.367 c16.367 c76.60 d76.13 d
20 ppm O341.13 f36.47 f17.233 b17.233 b73.33 g73.07 h
30 ppm O342.10 d40.13 cd15.200 e15.200 e76.23 d75.70 e
40 ppm O346.13 c41.77 a14.467 f14.467 f81.37 b81.00 b
Lirica0 ppm O341.50 e41.13 b17.933 a17.933 a74.30 f74.40 g
10 ppm O337.60 g40.60 c16.567 c16.567 c76.70 d76.50 d
20 ppm O345.73 c38.90 e17.400 b17.400 b75.47 e75.07 f
30 ppm O346.20 b40.13 cd15.667 d15.667 d78.63 c78.23 c
40 ppm O347.77 a42.10 a14.067 g14.067 g83.83 a82.90 a
ANOVAdfp value
H1<0.001<0.0010.521 NS0.495 NS<0.001<0.001
S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
H × S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. Foliar application of seedling using ozonated water at the three full-grown leaves stage thrice at three-day intervals. NS: Not significant, Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01).
Table 7. Proline content and ascorbate peroxides in pepper plants as affected by evaluated hybrids and O3 treatments, seed soaking or foliar spray, at different concentrations.
Table 7. Proline content and ascorbate peroxides in pepper plants as affected by evaluated hybrids and O3 treatments, seed soaking or foliar spray, at different concentrations.
Studied FactorProline Content
(μmol g−1)
Ascorbate Peroxides
(μmol g−1 min−1)
SoakingSpraySoakingSpray
Pepper hybrid (H)
Zidenka0.959 b0.961 b0.399 b0.399 b
Lirica0.964 a0.968 a0.400 a0.402 a
Seed treatment (T)
0 ppm O30.917 d0.935 d0.381 d0.389 c
10 ppm O30.927 c0.918 c0.386 c0.382 d
20 ppm O30.864 e0.865 e0.359 e0.359 e
30 ppm O30.967 b0.967 b0.402 b0.402 b
40 ppm O31.132 a1.140 a0.471 a0.472 a
Mean (T)0.9610.9650.4000.401
Interaction
Zidenka0 ppm O30.912 g0.913 f0.379 g0.379 f
10 ppm O30.922 f0.923 e0.383 f0.384 e
20 ppm O30.912 g0.910 f0.379 g0.378 f
30 ppm O30.981 c0.979 c0.408 c0.407 c
40 ppm O31.070 b1.075 b0.445 b0.447 b
Lirica0 ppm O30.922 f0.957 d0.383 f0.398 d
10 ppm O30.933 e0.913 f0.388 e0.379 f
20 ppm O30.817 h0.819 g0.340 h0.341 g
30 ppm O30.953 d0.955 d0.396 d0.397 d
40 ppm O31.194 a1.197 a0.496 a0.497 a
ANOVAdf
H1<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
H×S4<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Seed soaking in ozonated water at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ppm for 1 h. Foliar application of seedlings using ozonated water at the three full-grown leaves stage thrice at three-day intervals. Means followed by different letters under the same factor are significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.01).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharaf-Eldin, M.A.; Alshallash, K.S.; Alharbi, K.R.; Alqahtani, M.M.; Etman, A.A.; Yassin, A.M.; Azab, E.S.; El-Okkiah, S.A.F. Influence of Seed Soaking and Foliar Application Using Ozonated Water on Two Sweet Pepper Hybrids under Cold Stress. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013453

AMA Style

Sharaf-Eldin MA, Alshallash KS, Alharbi KR, Alqahtani MM, Etman AA, Yassin AM, Azab ES, El-Okkiah SAF. Influence of Seed Soaking and Foliar Application Using Ozonated Water on Two Sweet Pepper Hybrids under Cold Stress. Sustainability. 2022; 14(20):13453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharaf-Eldin, Mohamed A., Khalid S. Alshallash, Khadiga R. Alharbi, Mesfer M. Alqahtani, Abdelwahab A. Etman, Ali M. Yassin, Enas S. Azab, and Samira A. F. El-Okkiah. 2022. "Influence of Seed Soaking and Foliar Application Using Ozonated Water on Two Sweet Pepper Hybrids under Cold Stress" Sustainability 14, no. 20: 13453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop