Next Article in Journal
Spatial Interaction of Local Government Debt: Evidence from China
Previous Article in Journal
Can the Circular Economy Demonstration Policy Enhance the Green Innovation Level? A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pyrolysis as a Method for Processing of Waste from Production of Cultivated Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preliminary Tests of Tomato Plant Protection Method with Ozone Gas Fumigation Supported with Hydrogen Peroxide Solution and Its Effect on Some Fruit Parameters

by
Miłosz Zardzewiały
1,*,
Natalia Matłok
1,
Tomasz Piechowiak
2,
Bogdan Saletnik
3,
Maciej Balawejder
2 and
Józef Gorzelany
1
1
Department of Food and Agriculture Production Engineering, University of Rzeszow, 4 Zelwerowicza Street, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Department of Chemistry and Food Toxicology, University of Rzeszow, 1a Ćwiklińskiej Street, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
3
Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 2D Ćwiklińskiej Street, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(8), 3481; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083481
Submission received: 16 March 2024 / Revised: 16 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 22 April 2024

Abstract

:
The aim of this research was to determine the impact of hydrogen peroxide spraying and ozone gas fumigation during the growing season of tomato plants grown under cover on the mechanical and chemical parameters of fruit harvested from these plants. Tomato plants were grown under cover in accordance with the principles of good agricultural practice in the soil and climatic conditions of southeastern Poland. During the growing season, tomato fruits were collected for testing in order to determine the impact of the applied variable factors on the modification of selected metabolic pathways of bioactive compounds. As part of the tests on the chemical properties of the fruits, the content of ascorbic acid, the total content of polyphenols, and the antioxidant potential were determined. Additionally, the influence of the tested variable factors on the mechanical properties of tomato fruits was determined. In the case of the total polyphenol content, the most beneficial effects were observed for fruits collected from plants treated with ozonation at a dose of 2 ppm for 3 min and spraying the plants with 1% hydrogen peroxide. The highest antioxidant potential was recorded for fruits of the variants ozonated with doses of 2 ppm for 1 min, 2 ppm for 1.5 min, and 2 ppm for 3 min compared to the remaining variants and controls. In turn, the vitamin C content increased significantly in the tested fruits after the ozonation of plants with a dose of 2 ppm for 1 min and ozonation with a dose of 2 ppm for 3 min combined with spraying plants with 3% hydrogen peroxide. In the case of the mechanical properties of tomato fruits, only the ozonation dose of 2 ppm for 3 min significantly improved them.

1. Introduction

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is cultivated in an area spanning 5.1 million hectares across the world. Due to their numerous properties and wide culinary use, tomato fruits are very popular among consumers [1,2]. The main producer of tomatoes is China, with a production of 64.9 million tons, followed by India with 20.6 million tons, Turkey with 13.2 million tons, and the USA with 12.2 million tons [1]. Tomatoes are consumed largely as processed products, e.g., ketchup and purees. Recently, there has been increased interest in the use of tomato seeds [3,4] to produce oils with a high content of unsaturated fatty acids [5]. Tomato is considered an excellent source of bioactive compounds, especially carotenoids, such as lycopene and β-carotene, ascorbic acid, tocopherols, and flavonoids, which have high antioxidant capabilities [6]. The high content of antioxidants present in tomatoes and tomato products is associated with a reduced risk of certain types of cancer and cardiovascular diseases [7,8,9].
Attention to the quality of the products of plant origin and the production environment in agriculture and horticulture has led to the withdrawal of many plant protection products from crops. Currently, there is increasing interest in biocides that leave no residues in the produced plant raw materials and are non-toxic to the natural environment [10]. When growing plants in both field and sheltered conditions, they are exposed to various biotic and abiotic stress factors. It is worth noting that plants have developed mechanisms that allow them to adapt to environmental stressors. Additionally, plants have developed stress tolerance mechanisms [11,12]. Currently, unconventional methods of plant protection that do not pollute the natural environment and produced food are currently in demand. Some hopes are associated with hydrogen peroxide [10] or ozone gas [13], which are perceived as stress factors, but an appropriately selected dose of each stress factor can bring benefits without causing losses during plant cultivation.
Due to its properties, hydrogen peroxide has a number of applications in the medicine, cosmetics, food, chemical, paper, and textile industries. Additionally, it is commonly used to disinfect water [14]. It is considered a “green industrial oxidant” because it leaves no harmful residues and quickly decomposes into water and oxygen molecules [15]. The use of hydrogen peroxide in sustainable agriculture is due to the fact that it fights harmful microorganisms, modifies the internal resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses, and affects plant growth. In plant production, H2O2 is used as a compound to combat viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens and plant pests. Additionally, it is an excellent agent for disinfecting storage rooms and protecting plant products intended for storage [16]. The action of hydrogen peroxide is associated with the activation of immune functions in plants. Its action results in the strengthening of cell walls, increased growth and development of plants, and production of growth regulators and phytoalexins [17,18]. In medicine, hydrogen peroxide solutions up to 3% are used, while in cosmetology 6% solutions are used, but only externally. In the case of plants, hydrogen peroxide concentrations of up to 18% have been used, but good effects are already observed at lower concentrations [19].
As a result of normal metabolic reactions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced in plants [20,21], which occur in free radical and non-radical forms. Non-radical forms, including hydrogen peroxide, have a half-life in various types of systems, including biological ones. Its action may have a longer effect on the plant. Radical forms, including the hydroxyl radical, are extremely reactive, and their presence usually leads to serious damage to tissues or cellular systems. The overproduction and accumulation of ROS is the result of primarily biotic and abiotic stresses [22,23]. The result of high levels of ROS is damage to plant cells, which may ultimately lead to the destruction of the entire plant [24,25]. H2O2 can cause damage by oxidizing various macromolecules and enzymes of the Calvin–Benson cycle. Biotic and abiotic stress contribute to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species and may be the main cause of loss of crop productivity [26,27].
Ozone was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2001 as a disinfectant, which resulted in great interest in this gas from various industrial sectors and scientists [28]. Ozone gas has antibacterial properties and is non-toxic, which is why it is widely used in the food industry [29]. It is also possible to use ozone dissolved in water [30]. It is important to determine the appropriate dose of ozone that will have a beneficial effect on selected fruits or vegetables. Ozone gas has been tested in many studies and found to have a positive effect on the storage life and quality of stored raw materials [31,32]. Ozone gas eliminates pathogen spores, thereby reducing the microbial population [28,33]. Additionally, it is used to reduce the burden of mycotoxins and pesticide residues [34,35]. The exposure of plants and harvested fruits and vegetables to O3 during vegetation causes metabolic changes. Therefore, the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites takes place, such as polyphenols in the plants themselves and products of plant origin. The amount and type of secondary metabolites produced are closely related to various factors, e.g., the dose of ozone or the variety of plant treated with this gas [36,37]. Currently, many studies are related to the possibility of using ozone as an abiotic stressor that can be used to influence the content of bioactive compounds in plants and plant products [28,38].
Currently, there are many scientific studies available that report the effects of ozone on plants. Ozone affects the growth of plants and their metabolism. The effect of ozone gas on plants depends on the concentration of this gas, the duration of exposure, and the type of plant [39,40]. Generally, plant responses to ozone exposure are determined mainly by the level of oxidative cell damage [41]. As a result of toxic doses of ozone, oxidative stress increases and leads to the reduced transcription of genes encoding proteins involved in photosynthesis and ultimately promotes leaf degradation [42,43]. Scientific reports indicate that high exposure to ozone may have a negative impact on the chlorophyll content in the green parts of plants [44,45]. In the case of plants grown for economic purposes, determining the impact of ozone gas is primarily based on yield losses [46].
In the case of ozone gas, a safe concentration cannot be clearly determined. The ozone dose, i.e., exposure time and concentration, is important. The negative effects of ozone on plants can already be observed at a few ppb during long exposure to this gas [47]. In addition, plants can withstand several hundred ppm without harm with short exposure [48].
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of foliar spraying with various concentrations of H2O2 and fumigation with ozone gas on the selected fruit parameters of tomato plants and to determine safe doses of variable factors that can be used in tomato cultivation under cover.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Tomato Growing Conditions

2.1.1. Plant Material in a Field Experiment under Cover

The field experiment was conducted for two years on tomatoes of the Remiz F1 variety (Solanum lycopersicum). The variety grown as part of the experiment in question is dedicated to cultivation in greenhouses and foil tunnels.
A field experiment under cover was assumed for four variants:
-
Control sample—no variable factors were used (control);
-
Variant of plants sprayed with hydrogen peroxide—only hydrogen peroxide sprays were used (W1—1% H2O2; W2—3% H2O2);
-
Variant of ozonated plants—fumigation with ozone gas was carried out (W3—2 ppm 1 min; W4—2 ppm 1.5 min; W5—2 ppm 3 min);
-
Variant of plants ozonated and sprayed with hydrogen peroxide—fumigation with ozone gas and hydrogen peroxide spraying were carried out (W6—2 ppm 1 min and 1% H2O2; W7—2 ppm 1.5 min and 1% H2O2; W8—2 ppm 3 min and 1% H2O2; W9—2 ppm 1 min and 3% H2O2; W10—2 ppm 1.5 min and 3% H2O2; W11—2 ppm 3 min and 3% H2O2). See Supplementary Materials: S4.

2.1.2. Tomato Growing Conditions

For each year of the experiment, the fore crop for tomatoes was garlic. Fertilization doses for tomatoes were developed based on soil analysis. In autumn, phosphorus–potassium fertilization was applied, and tillage treatments were carried out. Pre-sowing cultivation was carried out in spring. Then, the foil tunnels were installed. The gardening foil used in the experiment was made of polypropylene. Tomato seedlings were planted under cover at the beginning of May of each year of the study. The plants were planted in rows at a distance of 50 cm, leaving a 100 cm wide passage between the rows (Figure 1). Fertilization was applied based on soil tests (see Supplementary Materials: S5). During the period of intensive flowering and fruiting, sprays containing microelements were used. Tomato seedlings were grown “for one shoot”, i.e., the growing side shoots were regularly removed to obtain high fruit yields. Additionally, excess leaves were removed for better ventilation and improved light conditions in the lower parts of the plants. In mid-August, the growth tips of the main shoots, above the last developed inflorescence, were removed. No additional lighting or heating was used when growing tomatoes.

2.2. Experimental Treatments Used during Plant Vegetation

2.2.1. Ozonation of Tomatoes Plant

Before establishing the field experiment, preliminary tests were carried out to determine the tolerance threshold of tomato plants of the Remiz variety to the gaseous ozone. For this purpose, seedlings of the tested variety were produced and exposed to ozone gas at a concentration of 2, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 100 ppm for 1, 3, 5, and 10 min. Based on the results of the preliminary tests, possible doses of ozone were selected. As part of the experiment, ozone gas was used at a concentration of 2 ppm for 1, 1.5, and 3 min because no phytotoxic effects were observed on the tested plants under these conditions. The foil tunnels in which the experiment was conducted were equipped with a system of channels that enabled the supply of ozone to each plant. The foil tunnel was closed during fumigation, and ozone gas was supplied via a hose from the Korona L5 ozone generator (Korona Science and Implementation Laboratory, Piotrków Trybunalski). In the process of the fumigation of tomato seedlings, the concentration of ozone gas was measured with a 106 M 2B Technologies ozone detector (2B Technologies, Broomfield, CO, USA), the measurement range of which was 0–1000 ppm. The experiment under cover was carried out in three independent repetitions. Ozonation was carried out once a week. Then, after the fumigation process, the foil tunnels were opened and ventilated using mechanical ventilation, completely removing ozone within 20 s.

2.2.2. Spraying with Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)

Before establishing the field experiment, preliminary tests were carried out to determine the tolerance threshold of tomato plants of the Remiz variety to various concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. For this purpose, a hydrogen peroxide solution with concentrations of 1, 3, 5, and 10% was applied to the produced seedlings. Based on the results of the preliminary tests, possible doses of hydrogen peroxide were selected (solution with concentrations of 1% and 3%), which did not have a phototoxic effect on the tested plants. For the ozonated and sprayed-with-hydrogen-peroxide tomato plants variant and the variant for which only hydrogen peroxide spraying was applied during the growing season, hydrogen peroxide at concentrations of 1% and 3% was used once a week. Moreover, each time after the ozonation process for the “ozonation + hydrogen peroxide” variant, tomato plants were sprayed with a 1% and 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. A hand-held backpack sprayer was used for the spraying treatments. Depending on the growing season, from 10 to 200 mL of spray liquid was used per tomato plant. The hydrogen peroxide solution was prepared immediately before spraying. The spray solution was prepared from 40% perhydrol (Chempur, Gdańsk, Poland).

2.3. Measurement of Mechanical Properties

Tests on the tissue resistance of ripe red tomato fruits to mechanical damage in the process of uniaxial compression, taken for testing in August, were carried out on fruit samples of similar sizes. The measurements were carried out on the control raw material and the raw material tested with variable factors. Measurements were carried out in 36 repetitions for a given combination of the variable factor used. The process of the uniaxial compression of tomato fruits was carried out on a Zwick/Roell Z010 testing machine for the established operating parameters: initial sample stress force F = 2 N; module speed during compression measurement V = 0.5 mm∙s−1. Compression tests of the samples were carried out at the height of the tomato fruit, where its diameter is the largest.

2.4. Antioxidant Potential, Contents of Polyphenols, and Vitamin C

The content of polyphenols in freshly harvested tomato fruits was measured according to the methodology described by Matłok et al. [49] using the Folin–Ciocalteu method. The total ascorbic acid content and DPPH antioxidant activity in freshly harvested tomato fruits were determined according to the methodology described by Panich et al. [50]. The analysis was performed in triplicate. In order to determine chemical properties, 500 g of fruit from each experimental variant was used for the analyses. See Supplementary Materials: S1–S3.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

In order to check the significance of the effect of gaseous ozone and yeast spray on the physiological parameters and disease infestation, a two-factor analysis of variance was used for each measurement at the significance level of α = 0.05. These analyzes were performed using STATISTICA 13.1 (TIBCO Software Inc., Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The impact of the methods used to support the protection of tomato plants using gaseous ozone (O3) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on the total content of polyphenols in the collected fruits over the years of this research is shown in Figure 1. It was found that regardless of the conditions of the ozonation process (time of exposure of plants to O3) (variant W5–W3) and the concentration of H2O2 solution (variant W1–W2), no significant differences were recorded in the total content of polyphenols in tomato fruits harvested at harvest maturity (Figure 2). In the case of using a combined method consisting of the initial fumigation of tomato plants with ozone gas and then the foliar application of solutions with different H2O2 concentrations, an influence of this method on the total content of polyphenols in the fruit was found. However, this effect varied depending on the H2O2 concentration used. In the case of the application of a solution with a lower concentration (1% H2O2), a significant increase in the content of polyphenols in fruits was noted, regardless of the time of exposure of the plants to O3 (variant W6–W8).
The mechanism of the modification of the intensity of the biosynthesis of the phenolic compounds as a result of the combined method of protecting tomato plants using O3 and H2O2 is probably related to the increase in the supply of H2O2 to plant tissues as a result of the preceding action of ozone gas. It has been proven that in the event of photochemical smog, ozone gas affects the degree of the opening of the stomata, which significantly facilitates the penetration of vapors containing H2O2 or atomic oxygen resulting from its decomposition. These factors have proven activity of inducing oxidative stress, which, under controlled conditions, may lead to the modification of the biosynthesis of small molecular antioxidants, including phenolic compounds [51]. The observed effect of the increased biosynthesis of these compounds in tomato fruits harvested from plants exposed to lower concentrations of H2O2 indicates that the effect of the disturbed homeostasis caused the plant defense effect, the consequence of which was an increase in the content of phenolic compounds in the collected raw material. It cannot be ruled out that in the case of higher concentrations of H2O2, there was no intensification of the biosynthesis of this group of compounds, but they were decomposed under the influence of higher concentrations of H2O2, or its decomposition products found in plant tissues.
The group of antioxidants includes many groups of compounds that shape the total antioxidant potential of raw materials [52]. It was shown that a significant increase in this potential in tomato fruits was caused by the use of gaseous O3 only. Ozone, as a gaseous substance, has the highest ability to penetrate plant tissues among the factors used, which comprehensively influenced the modification of the biosynthesis of the compounds that contribute to the total antioxidant potential of tomato fruits. From analyzing the obtained test results (Figure 2 and Figure 3), it seems that a state of controlled oxidative stress was achieved in the case of the use of gaseous ozone (Figure 2, W3–W5) and the combined method with the use of solutions with a lower concentration of H2O2 (Figure 1, W6–W8). In other cases, the number of oxidizing agents used caused a reaction that resulted in a reduction or no significant increase in phenolic compounds compared to the control and others, shaping the total antioxidant potential.
Vitamin C is a substance belonging to the group of small molecular antioxidants, the biosynthesis of which in plants can be influenced by many factors. When the ozonation process is used, its content changes significantly depending on the conditions used (O3 concentration and exposure time). Plant raw materials which have lost the ability to metabolize have been subjected to the ozonation process, and in most cases, after the process, they show a significantly lower content of this substance [53,54]. However, when ozonated raw materials have the ability to metabolize, this process may intensify the biosynthesis of vitamin C. A similar effect may be demonstrated by H2O2, the solutions of which have a strong oxidizing effect, and its decomposition products are even more active. The analysis of the obtained results (Figure 4) on the influence of the applied factors supporting the protection of tomato plants showed that in most variants, an increase in the content of vitamin C in tomato fruits was observed. However, this increase depended on the ozonation process conditions used and the H2O2 concentration.
Vitamin C is a one of many compounds which form antioxidant potential, the biosynthesis of which in plants can be influenced by many factors. When the ozonation process is used, its content changes significantly depending on the conditions used (O3 concentration and exposure time) [55].
Fruit-bearing plants subjected to the ozonation process may undergo modifications that delay the fruit ripening process. The mechanism of this action may be complex, but decomposition or inhibition of the action of ethylene is usually observed [56]. A measure of this effect can be measuring the mechanical properties of the fruit.
The average values of the destructive force in the process of the uniaxial compression of tomato fruits after fumigation with ozone gas and hydrogen peroxide spraying with various combinations compared to the control are shown in Figure 5. Both in the first and second year of the study only for the variant treated with ozone gas at a dose of 2 ppm for 3 min, there was a significant increase in destructive force compared to the control. For the remaining combinations of variable factors used during the experiment, no positive impact was noted compared to the control sample.
In the case of sea buckthorn fruit, an appropriately selected dose of ozone (10 ppm for 15 min) increased the fruit’s resistance to mechanical damage [57]. Red currant fruits ozonated with a dose of 10 ppm 30 min after 15 days of storage were characterized by greater resistance to mechanical damage compared to the control fruits [58].
Both in field conditions and under cover, when growing Solanum lycopersicum, there is a need to provide protection, mainly against fungal pathogens [59]. Even though growing tomatoes under cover protects the plants against direct exposure to rain, which increases the infection of plants with diseases, especially fungal ones [60], it is necessary to protect them with plant protection products [61]. It should be noted that the use of pesticides affects the quality of the produced tomato fruit, mainly by generating residues [62]. Moreover, the applicable legal regulations related to the “European Green Deal” require the search for alternative methods of protecting plants against diseases and pests, which will allow for limiting the use of fungicides while maintaining the quality and quantity of the produced raw material [63]. One of such potential methods may be the use of the plant ozonation process using ozone gas. Ozone as an allotropic form of oxygen with high oxidizing potential and strong fungicidal and bactericidal properties can be an effective factor limiting the occurrence of fungal diseases in plant cultivation. Its greatest advantage is high antibacterial effectiveness with no chemical residues in the produced plant raw materials. It should be noted that standard plant protection products, by creating residues, also extend the action of the product for a certain period of time after its foliar application. The proposed methodological approach also allows for the use of spraying with a hydrogen peroxide solution, the half-life of which is much longer than in the case of the ozonation treatment carried out under controlled conditions. Moreover, during its decomposition, atomic oxygen is produced, which also has high antimicrobial effectiveness [64].
In recent years, plasma agriculture has emerged as a promising and innovative field with the potential to evaluate conventional farming practices. The application of plasma-based technologies in agriculture offers new opportunities, but the main barrier is the possibility of the generation of various active species, including reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species. Some nitrogen derivatives like nitrogen oxides could be converted to nitric acid with potential phytotoxic effects [65].

4. Conclusions

This paper describes the impact of the ozonation process and hydrogen peroxide spraying on tomato plants during two years of research. Research has shown that the selected ozonation doses, 2 ppm 1 for min and 2 ppm for 3 min, and the combination of two variable factors, 2 ppm for 3 min combined with spraying with 3% hydrogen peroxide, influence the increased concentration of vitamin C in tomato fruits. In the case of the total content of the phenolic compounds, it was observed that the ozone dose of 2 ppm for 1.5 min and 2 ppm for 3 min in combination with spraying with hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 1% significantly increased the concentration of these bioactive compounds. However, the antioxidant potential of tomato fruit increased only after each dose of the ozonation process compared to the control. The mechanical properties of the collected fruits were also examined. The research shows that the use of variable factors in most cases does not have a significant impact on the mechanical properties of the tested fruits. Only fruits harvested from ozonated plants showed significantly higher resistance to damage, which indicates a slower ripening process.
The research results show that ozonation and hydrogen peroxide can be effectively used to improve the parameters determining the quality of tomato fruit grown under cover, and after confirming their effectiveness, they can constitute an alternative to fungicides used in tomato cultivation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su16083481/s1. References [66,67,68] are citied in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; visualization, investigation, and writing—original draft preparation N.M.; methodology and investigation B.S. and T.P.; conceptualization, methodology, and review and editing, M.B.; formal analysis and investigation, J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Collins, E.J.; Bowyer, C.; Tsouza, A.; Chopra, M. Tomatoes: An extensive review of the associated health impacts of tomatoes and factors that can affect their cultivation. Biology 2022, 11, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. FAOSTAT. Crops and Livestock Products in 2020. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 16 March 2024).
  3. Giuffrè, A.M.; Capocasale, M. Policosanol in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Seed oil: The effect of cultivar. J. Oleo Sci. 2015, 64, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Giuffrè, A.M.; Capocasale, M. Sterol composition of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seed oil: The effect of cultivar. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 116–122. [Google Scholar]
  5. Akubor, P.I.; Owuse, A.U. Chemical Composition, functional and biscuit making properties of tomato peel flour. S. Asian J. Food Technol. Environ. 2020, 6, 874–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheng, H.M.; Koutsidis, G.; Lodge, J.K.; Ashor, A.W.; Siervo, M.; Lara, J. Lycopene and tomato and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, N.; Wu, X.; Zhuang, W.; Xia, L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, C.; Rao, Z.; Du, L.; Zhao, R.; Yi, M. Tomato and lycopene and multiple health outcomes: Umbrella review. Food Chem. 2020, 343, 128396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Park, H.-A.; Hayden, M.M.; Bannerman, S.; Jansen, J.; Crowe-White, K.M. Anti-apoptotic effects of carotenoids in neurodegeneration. Molecules 2020, 25, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frankel, E.N.; Finley, J.W. How to standardize the multiplicity of methods to evaluate natural antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4901–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Orlikowski, L.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Wojdyła, A.; Orlikowska, T. The Use of Hydrogen Peroxide and Silver Nanoparticles in Horticulture. J. Hortic. Res. 2023, 31, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Das, K.; Roychoudhury, A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Savvides, A.; Ali, S.; Tester, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: Mission possible? Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Özen, T.; Koyuncu, M.A.; Erbaş, D. Effect of ozone treatments on the removal of pesticide residues and postharvest quality in green pepper. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 2186–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Linley, E.; Denyer, S.P.; McDonnell, G.; Simons, C.; Maillard, J.-Y. Use of hydrogen peroxide as a biocide: New consideration of its mechanisms of biological action. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ciriminna, R.; Albanese, L.; Meneguzzo, F.; Pagliaro, M. Hydrogen peroxide: A key chemical for to-day’s sustainable development. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 3374–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McDonnell, G. The use of hydrogen peroxide for dis-infection and sterilization applications. In Patai’s Chemistry of Functional Groups; Rappoport, Z., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Volume 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dat, J.; Vandenabeele, S.; Vranová, E.; Van Montagu, M.; Inzé, D.; Van Breusegem, F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Quan, L.-J.; Zhang, B.; Shi, W.-W.; Li, H.-Y. Hydrogen peroxide in plants: A versatile mole-cule of the reactive oxygen species network. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Szpunar-Krok, E.; Jańczak-Pieniążek, M.; Skrobacz, K.; Bobrecka-Jamro, D.; Balawejder, M. Response of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Plants to Spraying by Hydrogen Peroxide. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Lea, P.J. The role of peroxisomes in the integration of metabolism and evolutionary diversity of photosynthetic organisms. Phytochemistry 2002, 60, 651–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sandalio, L.M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C. Peroxisomes sense and respond to environmental cues by regulating ROS and RNS signalling networks. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Demidchik, V. Mechanisms of oxidative stress in plants: From classical chemistry to cell biology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 109, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maldonado, E.; Morales-Pison, S.; Urbina, F.; Solari, A. Aging Hallmarks and the Role of Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Heyno, E.; Klose, C.; Krieger-Liszkay, A. Origin of cadmium-induced reactive oxygen species production: Mitochondrial electron transfer versus plasma membrane NADPH oxidase. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 687–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hossain, M.A.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Armin, S.M.; Qian, P.; Xin, W.; Li, H.Y.; Burritt, D.J.; Fujita, M.; Tran, L.S. Hydrogen peroxide priming modulates abiotic oxidative stress tolerance: Insights from ROS detoxification and scavenging. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Raja, V.; Majeed, U.; Kang, H.; Andrabi, K.I.; John, R. Abiotic stress: Interplay between ROS, hormones and MAPKs. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 137, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Karaca, H.; Velioğlu, Y.S. Effects of ozone treatments on microbial quality and some chemical properties of lettuce, spinach, and parsley. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 88, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Whangchai, K.; Saengnil, K.; Uthaibutra, K. Effect of ozone in combination with some organic acids on the control of postharvest decay and pericarp browning of longan fruit. Crop Prot. 2006, 25, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuşçu, A.; Pazır, F. Ozone application in food industry. J. Food 2004, 29, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo, A.; Bai, J.; Li, R.; Fang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Liang, J.; Huang, T.; Kou, L. Effects of ozone treatment on the quality of kiwifruit during postharvest storage affected by Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum. J. Phytopathol. 2019, 167, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bolel, H.; Koyuncu, M.A.; Erbaş, D. The effects of ozone and fungicide treatments on the fruit quality changes of pomegranate during cold storage. JIST 2019, 9, 1841–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, L.; Lu, Z.; Yu, Z.; Gao, X. Preservation fresh-cut celery by treatment of ozonated water. Food Control 2005, 16, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, J.G.; Luan, T.G.; Lan, C.Y.; Lo, T.W.H.; Chan, G.Y.S. Removal of residual pesticides on vegetable using ozonated water. Food Cont. 2007, 18, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuşvuran, E.; Yıldırım, D.; Mavruk, F.; Ceyhan, M. Removal of chloropyrifos ethyl, tetradifon and chlorothalonil pesticide residues from citrus by using ozone. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 241–242, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guzzon, R.; Nardin, T.; Micheletti, O.; Nicolini, G.; Larcher, R. Antimicrobial activity of ozone. Effectiveness against the main wine spoilage microorganisms and evaluation of impact on simple phenols in wine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2013, 19, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Río Segade, S.; Vilanova, M.; Pollon, M.; Giacosa, S.; Torchio, F.; Rolle, L. Grape VOCs response to postharvest short-term ozone treatments. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lv, Y.; Tahir, I.I.; Olsson, M.E. Effect of ozone application on bioactive compounds of apple fruit during short-term cold storage. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 253, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, A.A.; Fatima, A.; Mishra, A.K.; Chaudhary, N.; Mukherjee, A.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Assessment of ozone toxicity among 14 Indian wheat cultivars under field conditions: Growth and productivity. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Booker, F.; Muntifering, R.; McGrath, M.; Burkey, K.; Decoteau, D.; Fiscus, E.; Manning, W.; Krupa, S.; Chappelka, A.; Grantz, D. The ozone component of global change: Potential effects on agricultural and horticultural plant yield, product quality and interactions with invasive species. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2009, 51, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kangasjärvi, J.; Jaspers, P.; Kollist, H. Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buchanan-Wollaston, V.; Morris, K. Senescence and cell death in Brassica napus and Arabidopsis. Program. Cell Death Anim. Plants 2000, 52, 163–174. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pell, E.J.; Schlagnhaufer, C.D.; Arteca, R.N. Ozone-induced oxidative stress: Mechanisms of action and reaction. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 100, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Han, Y.J.; Gharibeshghi, A.; Mewis, I.; Förster, N.; Beck, W.; Ulrichs, C. Plant responses to ozone: Effects of different ozone exposure durations on plant growth and biochemical quality of Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 262, 108921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pääkkönen, E.; Günthardt-Goerg, M.; Holopainen, T. Responses of Leaf Processes in a Sensitive Birch (Betula pendula Roth.) Clone to Ozone Combined with Drought. Ann. Bot. 1998, 82, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schenone, G.; Botteschi, G.; Fumagalli, I.; Montinaro, F. Effects of ambient air pollution in open-top chambers on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) I. Effects on growth and yield. New Phytol. 1992, 122, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shahrtash, F. Photochemical reactions and surface ozone measurements in Tehran city center. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2022, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Available online: https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/5a1c43f9-ad11-4dcc-889b-48ffbfcbc6ba/resource/80369b84-eb10-47f2-8f72-e05d2127df80/download/aenv-ozone-protection-in-plants-the-potential-use-of-chemical-protectants-to-measure-6718.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2024).
  49. Matłok, N.; Piechowiak, T.; Zardzewiały, M.; Gorzelany, J.; Balawejder, M. Effects of Ozone Treatment on Microbial Status and the Contents of Selected Bioactive Compounds in Origanum majorana L. Plants. Plants 2020, 9, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Panich, S.; Amatatongchai, M. A non-toxic approach to assess total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of exotic tropical fruits from Thailand. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 3547–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, W.; Zhang, C.; Shang, M.; Lv, H.; Liang, B.; Li, J.; Zhou, W. Hydrogen peroxide regulates the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds and antioxidant quality enhancement in lettuce under low nitrogen condition. Food Chem. X 2022, 16, 100481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zehiroglu, C.; Ozturk Sarikaya, S.B. The importance of antioxidants and place in today’s scientific and technological studies. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 4757–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, H.; Xu, L.; Yu, F.; Tan, J.; Cao, L.; Xing, Y.; Xu, Q.; Yang, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, P.; et al. Effects of different ozone treatments on the storage quality and stability of fresh peeled garlic. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 22530–22543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rabie, M.A.; Soliman, A.Z.; Diaconeasa, Z.S.; Constantin, B. Effect of pasteurization and shelf life on the physicochemical properties of Physalis (Physalis peruviana L.) juice. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 1051–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Paciolla, C.; Fortunato, S.; Dipierro, N.; Paradiso, A.; De Leonardis, S.; Mastropasqua, L.; de Pinto, M.C. Vitamin C in Plants: From Functions to Biofortification. Antioxidants 2019, 29, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Matłok, N.; Piechowiak, T.; Krempa, A.; Puchalski, C.; Balawejder, M. Cyclic Storage Chamber Ozonation as a Method to Inhibit Ethylene Generation during Plum Fruit Storage. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zapałowska, A.; Matłok, N.; Zardzewiały, M.; Piechowiak, T.; Balawejder, M. Effect of Ozone Treatment on the Quality of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). Plants 2021, 10, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kuźniar, P.; Belcar, J.; Zardzewiały, M.; Basara, O.; Gorzelany, J. Effect of Ozonation on the Mechanical, Chemical, and Microbiological Properties of Organically Grown Red Currant (Ribes rubrum L.) Fruit. Molecules 2022, 27, 8231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Panno, S.; Davino, S.; Caruso, A.; Bertacca, S.; Karacic, C.; Mandić, A.; Noris, E.; Matic, S. A Review of the Most Common and Economically Important Diseases That Undermine the Cultivation of Tomato Crop in the Mediterranean Basin. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chiu, M.C.; Chen, C.L.; Chen, C.W.; Lin, H.J. Weather fluctuation can override the effects of integrated nutrient management on fungal disease incidence in the rice fields in Taiwan. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pogacean, M.; Gavrilescu, M. Plant protection products and their sustainable and environmentally friendly use. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2009, 8, 607–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nguyen, T.T.; Rosello, C.; Bélanger, R.; Ratti, C. Fate of Residual Pesticides in Fruit and Vegetable Waste (FVW) Processing. Foods 2020, 9, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Available online: https://www.pspo.com.pl/publications/ae467296bb8fcbc928d418c62301f2b8656bc104.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2024).
  64. Czyżewska, K.; Trusek-Holownia, A.; Dabrowa, M.; Sarmiento, F.; Blamey, J. A catalytic membrane used for H2O2 decomposition. Catal. Today 2019, 331, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Konchekov, E.M.; Gusein-zade, N.; Burmistrov, D.E.; Kolik, L.V.; Dorokhov, A.S.; Izmailov, A.Y.; Shokri, B.; Gudkov, S.V. Advancements in Plasma Agriculture: A Review of Recent Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Piechowiak, T.; Antos, P.; Kosowski, P.; Skrobacz, K.; Józefczyk, R.; Balawejder, M. Impact of Ozonation Process on the Microbiological and Antioxidant Status of Raspberries (Rubus Ideaeus L.) during Storage at Room Temperature. Agric. Food Sci. 2019, 28, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a Free-Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Piechowiak, T.; Grzelak-Błaszczyk, K.; Bonikowski, R.; Balawejder, M. Optimization of extraction process of antioxidant compounds from yellow onion skin and their use in functional bread production. LWT 2020, 117, 108614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experiment scheme for each variant (green circles indicate plants).
Figure 1. Experiment scheme for each variant (green circles indicate plants).
Sustainability 16 03481 g001
Figure 2. The influence of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the total polyphenol content in fruit in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the examined years; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. The influence of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the total polyphenol content in fruit in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the examined years; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 16 03481 g002
Figure 3. The impact of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the total antioxidant potential of fruit in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the examined years; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. The impact of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the total antioxidant potential of fruit in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the examined years; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 16 03481 g003
Figure 4. The influence of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the vitamin C content in fruit in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the years studied; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. The influence of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the vitamin C content in fruit in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the years studied; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 16 03481 g004
Figure 5. The influence of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the value of the destructive force when pressing tomato fruits in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the examined years; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. The influence of treatments supporting plant protection during the growing season on the value of the destructive force when pressing tomato fruits in the years of research. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between individual experimental variants in a given year, while different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the same experimental variants in the examined years; significant differences at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 16 03481 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zardzewiały, M.; Matłok, N.; Piechowiak, T.; Saletnik, B.; Balawejder, M.; Gorzelany, J. Preliminary Tests of Tomato Plant Protection Method with Ozone Gas Fumigation Supported with Hydrogen Peroxide Solution and Its Effect on Some Fruit Parameters. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083481

AMA Style

Zardzewiały M, Matłok N, Piechowiak T, Saletnik B, Balawejder M, Gorzelany J. Preliminary Tests of Tomato Plant Protection Method with Ozone Gas Fumigation Supported with Hydrogen Peroxide Solution and Its Effect on Some Fruit Parameters. Sustainability. 2024; 16(8):3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zardzewiały, Miłosz, Natalia Matłok, Tomasz Piechowiak, Bogdan Saletnik, Maciej Balawejder, and Józef Gorzelany. 2024. "Preliminary Tests of Tomato Plant Protection Method with Ozone Gas Fumigation Supported with Hydrogen Peroxide Solution and Its Effect on Some Fruit Parameters" Sustainability 16, no. 8: 3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop