Next Article in Journal
Developing Engineering Students’ Understanding of Sustainability Using Project Based Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Goal Structure, Target Areas and Means of Implementation
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental and Financial Evaluation of Passenger Vehicle Technologies in Belgium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Disabled People and the Post-2015 Development Goal Agenda through a Disability Studies Lens
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2013, 5(12), 5034-5051; doi:10.3390/su5125034

Political Criteria for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Selection and the Role of the Urban Dimension

IASS Project, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Berliner Street 130, Potsdam 14467, Germany
Received: 3 September 2013 / Revised: 8 November 2013 / Accepted: 19 November 2013 / Published: 28 November 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development Goals)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [676 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  

Abstract

A flood of ideas and proposals on the shape and selection of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has begun to rise since 2012. This article looks at some of them, trying to understand which kind of “boundary work” between science and policy is done here. Starting with a reflection on the epistemological and practical implications of “discussing SDGs”, it primarily addresses scientists, but also decision makers and activists interested in the post-2015 debate. In practical terms of SDG selection, the argument goes in favor of a self-reflective “politization of science”; i.e., against claims for broad scientific comprehensiveness of SDGs and in favor of an “exemplary” selection of thematic areas and targets, which would combine aspects of (i) political opportunity and (ii) societal visibility. These criteria are only very partially met in the proposals the article looks at. By applying them, the article emphasizes the political importance of addressing, through SDGs, the subnational level directly, thus making the case for an SDG on cities. Such an SDG should, by the same logic, be rather focused and exemplary than all-encompassing. The recently employed formula of “resilient, inclusive and connected cities” is considered useful, when accompanied by tangible and communicable indicators. View Full-Text
Keywords: Sustainable Development Goals; science policy interface; boundary work; cities Sustainable Development Goals; science policy interface; boundary work; cities
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rivera, M. Political Criteria for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Selection and the Role of the Urban Dimension. Sustainability 2013, 5, 5034-5051.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top