Next Article in Journal
Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria in Human Milk and Maternal Adiposity
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping of Outdoor Food and Beverage Advertising around Spanish Schools
Previous Article in Journal
Secondary Metabolites in the Dendrobium heterocarpum Methanolic Extract and Their Impacts on Viability and Lipid Storage of 3T3-L1 Pre-Adipocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
De-Implementation of Detrimental Feeding Practices in Childcare: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Community Partner Selected Strategies
 
 
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

The Relationships between Caregivers’ Concern about Child Weight and Their Non-Responsive Feeding Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients 2022, 14(14), 2885; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142885
by Jian Wang 1,*, Xiaoxue Wei 2, Yan-Shing Chang 1, Ayako Hiyoshi 3, Kirsty Winkley 1 and Yang Cao 3,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(14), 2885; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142885
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 11 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition Environment and Children’s Eating Behavior and Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Well-done on your research. This is a well-written manuscript on an important subject. Please see below my comments to improve the quality of your paper.

1.) Please include the databases searched in the abstract.

2.) What is the rationale behind your study? What will your study add to the body of knowledge? 

3.) You mentioned that your study aims to "...summarize the existing evidence on the associations between caregivers’ concern about child weight (including underweight and overweight) and their non-responsive feeding practices". What gap in the literature will this fill?

4.) If the inclusion criteria involved only children aged 1 to 11 years, than why include "Youth" (15-24 years) as a search term? 

5.) What are the study strengths?

6.) What is/are the study's policy implication(s)?

 

Author Response

We really appreciate your comments and guidance. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It is a well-designed research, using correct systematic review and metaanalysis methodology. The paper reviews  the attitude of parents regarding the nutritional status in their kids. Although the topic has been reviewed recently regarding overnutrition, the authors consider both undernutrition and overnutrition. The exposition is clear and conclusions are solid and based on the results of their research

Author Response

We really appreciate your comments. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop