Next Article in Journal
Comparative Effects between Oral Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation on Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Baicalin Attenuates Oxidative Stress in a Tissue-Engineered Liver Model of NAFLD by Scavenging Reactive Oxygen Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/nu14030542
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Productivity on Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism (2001–2020): Learn from the Past to Plan Future

by
Ahmad Azam Malik
1,*,
Mukhtiar Baig
2,
Nadeem Shafique Butt
1,
Muhammad Imran
3,
Sami Hamdan Alzahrani
4 and
Zohair Jamil Gazzaz
5
1
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Biochemistry and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(3), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030542
Submission received: 14 December 2021 / Revised: 20 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 27 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D has long been known for preserving bone and non-skeletal health. Despite its magnitude of impact, scarce literature has explored the evolution of the relevant published literature. This study aimed at evaluating the trends and performance of Vitamin D and bone metabolism-related publications (2001–2020). All pertinent English language 16,887 articles were searched and extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) database and “R-Bibliometrix” was used for comprehensive analysis. Around 60,149 authors contributed from 114 countries, showing the USA on top with >1/4th of all articles, followed by Japan, China, and the United Kingdom. For authors, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, and Holick MF were found to have written the most articles, citations and highest h-index, respectively. Corresponding authors from the top 20 countries collectively were responsible for around 84% of the articles. Among 2735 sources, Osteoporosis International (632), Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (569), and Bone (448) were foremost. Most prominent sources showed recent declining contributions. The increasing trend of publications with a higher spike from 2008 to 2014, followed by a gradual increase till 2017, was observed. Leading countries, affiliations, and authors showed collaborative publications and were mostly from developed countries with limited contributions, particularly from low- and middle-income countries.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D (VD) is a lipid-soluble vitamin (a micronutrient) and an essential multi-function bioactive compound for human use [1]. It is not present abundantly in food supplies. It is produced by UV radiation in the skin and is extracted from foods derived from animals (vitamin D3) and plants (vitamin D2) [2,3]. Ultraviolet B (UVB) dermal synthesis exists as the primary means to receiving VD, containing 90% of a VD refill, whereas there are few natural sources of VD, such as various species of fish (salmon, sardines, tuna, mackerel), egg yolk, cod liver oil, organ meat [4]. Nevertheless, the rate of synthesis is impaired by a range of variables, including melanin pigment density; the usage of sunscreen and UV creams and apparel; VD dermal synthesis declines in aging populations due to aging or scarring of the skin; sun-exposure time; the month of the year; and sun-exposure period [5,6,7,8,9]. The VD receptor (VDR), a part of the steroid receptor clan, mediates the biological action of 1,25(OH) 2 D [10]. VDRs are widely distributed in the body. Some fat-related hormones, such as VD, estrogens, and androgens, greatly influence bone metabolism. Additionally, parathyroid hormones, calcitonin, calcium, physical activity, and aging often influence bone metabolism [11,12]. Deficient VD has been addressed as a common and persistent global issue [13]. Low levels trigger rickets and osteomalacia in children and adults, respectively, but these problems are rare in most advanced countries. Still, a subclinical deficiency of VD is more frequent and can be related to osteoporosis and more significant fractures or falls. Deposition of bone minerals starts during pregnancy, particularly during the third quarter [14]. VD is critical for preserving bone health and facilitates in avoidance of non-skeletal illnesses like reproductive, cardiovascular, neoplastic, and metabolic diseases and reproductive disorders [15].
VD’s main functions include facilitating calcium and phosphate absorption through intestine synthesis and bone metabolism regulation. VD has an essential role along with PTH in strongly regulating serum ionized calcium concentrations [16]. Repletion of VD is linked with declines in the frequency and severity of many non-musculoskeletal diseases [17], involving diabetes mellitus (T1D and T2D), insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome [18,19], neurocognitive impairment, certain cancers, depression, infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [16,20,21,22,23]. The epidemiological trials performed with normal, long-term 25(OH)D concentrations have indicated decreased chances for these conditions higher baseline levels of VD. Still, several such observations have not been substantiated by RCTs [16]. While adequate VD is essential for muscles’ proper functioning and skeletal growth and maintenance, data shows that VD enables the prevention of many illnesses, including DM, elevated blood pressure, autoimmune disorders, and some common cancers. As a result, the body’s mechanisms cannot function optimally in the presence of inadequate VD [24]. VD deficiency, as measured by serum 25(OH)D levels of <30 ng/mL, is linked with elevated risks of disease and illness and elevated all-cause mortality even in seemingly healthy people [25,26].
Notably, over the last few decades, the scope of usability and the role of VD in health and disease is expanding with increased research output. Its implications among population and researchers across diverse health care specialties and other stakeholders, including policymakers, have been established [13]. Despite its known significance and magnitude of the already conducted research, various VD-related scientific issues still require additional and/or continued exploration and scholarly contributions. Thus, it can be considered essential to assess the research performance and trends in relevant areas to better plan and prepare for future research. Importantly, limited exploration of VD scientific output evaluation has been explored at global [27] or regional levels [28]. However, the relevance of VD with bone metabolism has established its distinct entity. Besides, the literature indicates that research trends and performance analysis related to VD and bone metabolism have not been discussed previously. The current study provides a broad overview of the available scientific literature on this topic and subjective and critical summaries of chosen scientific articles. This study explored the comprehensive research productivity of VD and bone metabolism in the last two decades (2001–2020), using a wide variety of established metrics. Bibliometrics is a recognized analytical entity used in numerous fields to assess research patterns and results [29,30]. Bibliometric studies are techniques for evaluating and characterizing research output and trends. Moreover, it identifies the leading institutions and nations, leading authors and journals, top-cited works, and other important bibliometric indices. Findings can be beneficial to researchers, physicians, veterinarians, legislators and all relevant stakeholders to improve knowledge and standardize information [31,32]. Moreover, exploring all aspects of VD was not considered in the scope of this study, and the current study is limited to a specific area—namely, VD and bone metabolism. The present study aimed to classify and evaluate research publications on VD and bone metabolism to delineate the key contributors in terms of authors, affiliations, countries, and sources. Besides, to expose the main research fields and collaborations present related to VD and bone metabolism-related literature, based on the publication and citation data.

2. Materials and Methods

This scientometric study explored all the published documents on Vitamin D and bone metabolism over the last two decades (2001–2020). Several databases are available with unique advantages and limitations for literature search, such as Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, PubMed, among others. For this study, the required literature search and data extraction were conducted on a Clavirate Analytics database “WoS” [33]. The WoS database (formerly Thomson Reuters) is mostly considered as one of the standardized, consistent [34], and comprehensive, available sources of scientific literature with the highest quality indexing [35]. Its diverse scope, ability to analyze the productivity of various organizations, authors, and countries [36,37] and better compatibility for salient data analysis tools, further add to its usability. Notably, over the last few decades, WoS has been extensively used in various scientometric studies in medicine [27,36,38,39] and other fields [37,40,41,42,43].
King Abdul Aziz University (KAU) online library and digital resources were used to access information. The search strategy was planned after vigilantly selecting the appropriate search terms from literature and having opinions from relevant field experts for its reliability and validity. The topic (TS) field was selected as it comprises the title, abstract, author keywords, and keyword plus terms. Initially, the terms were identified for a) Vitamin D (Vitamin D OR Vit D OR Calcidiol OR Calcifediol OR Calciferol OR 25OHD OR Rickets), as shown in Figure 1 and b) Bone metabolism (Bone metabolism OR Bone OR osteo*). A later search was conducted by merging the abovementioned terms as shown in Figure 1b. In the year 2021, 5437 documents were published for Vitamin D with 3773 articles in English while Vitamin D and Bone metabolism showed 1176 documents with 839 articles. However, documents for the year 2021 were not included or extracted for further detailed analysis.
A total of 23,956 documents were found to be indexed in WoS (2001–2020) on the topic “Vitamin D and Bone metabolism” (Figure 1a,b). English was the most common language (n = 23,153, 96.6%) followed by German (n = 229, 1.3%). Articles were the leading type of document with n = 17,609 representing 73.5% of all documents followed by reviews (n = 3979, 16.6%) and meeting abstracts (n = 1579, 6.6%). Some information such as the type of documents, research areas, web of science categories (WC) were extracted using the intrinsic WoS data analyzer function.
For detailed analysis, all articles in the English Language (n = 16,887) were extracted in plain text files from WoS, as shown in Figure 1b. Two researchers (AAM and MB) independently searched and extracted articles to verify the process on the same day (1st October 2021). Later, for detailed analysis, the R-Bibliometrix package [44] was used. Among several tools used in scientometrics to evaluate research performance, R-Bibliometrix is considered to provide comprehensive analysis using an extensive range of indicators at documents, authors, and sources levels.

3. Results

The search strategy yielded a total of 16,887 articles from 2735 sources on the topic of VD and bone metabolism, as shown in Table 1. The total number of authors was 60,149. The majority of the articles were multi-authored, while 4.5% (756) were single-authored articles contributed by <1% (577) of total authors. Open access articles were 44.5%. The collaborative index was 3.69. There were 8241 funding sources, supporting around 47% of total articles.
The annual evolution of scientific production is displayed in Figure 2. The number of articles was generally increasing with a maximum in 2017 (1150). A spike with increased production was observed from 2008 to 2013, followed by a gradual increase until 2017. The annual publication growth rate in the last two decades was 4.5%. Higher mean total citations per article and year were observed for the previous decade (2001–2010) with a maximum in 2004.
Figure 3 shows the top 20 most prolific authors and their impact. Author Cooper C was found to be the most productive with 82 articles. Holick MF had the most citations (15,412) while Dawson-Hughes B showed the highest h-index of 39.
Table 2 shows the top 20 contributing countries in terms of articles and corresponding authors. There were 61,095 country appearances from 115 countries while 94 countries were found to have corresponding authors. Among those, the most productive country was the USA (n = 15,838, 26.30% as CA) followed by Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Corresponding authors from the top 5, 10, and 20 countries were collectively responsible for 49%, 65.7%, and 85.2% of total articles, respectively. Most of the articles were found to be from single country representation (81%) and led by the USA while Switzerland showed relatively more multiple country publication (MCP) ratio followed by Netherland and the United Kingdom. High Income countries contribution was 81.3% (n = 49,693) followed by upper middle income, lower middle income & low income with 13.78% (n = 8418), 4.74% (n = 2894) & 0.15% (n = 90), respectively (table with countries contribution along with their socioeconomic status shared in supplementary files).
This study found that most of the multi-country publications were between authors from two countries. Among those, USA/Canada showed to have maximum (315) collaborations followed by USA/UK, USA/China, USA/Japan, and USA/Germany, with 214, 206, 150, and 143 collaborations, respectively.
Table 3 shows the top 10 most frequent affiliations and funding sources. Harvard University and McGill University were leading affiliations. The leading funding organizations were the United States Department of Health Human Services and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Figure 4 shows a Sankey diagram for the top 20 most productive countries, affiliations, and authors showing dominant contributions by institutes from the USA, followed by Canada and Australia. The Sankey diagram displays how quantities are distributed among items (countries, affiliations, and authors). Thickness of the links (connections) shows high volume of flow between set of values.
Among countries, the USA, Japan, and the United Kingdom showed maximum citations with 208,165, 32,834, and 32,007 citations, respectively. As shown in Table 4, the author Holick MF (USA) was the leading contributor with 5 highly cited articles. In terms of sources, “The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism” and “The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition” were the leading contributors with 4 articles. In terms of study types, mostly were research articles (10, including 4 animal studies) followed by clinical trials and reviews, 4 in each category, respectively. Three (3) and 10 articles showed ≥500 internal (within study selected articles) and ≥1000 global citations, respectively.
Figure 5a shows the year-wise growth of the 10 most productive sources over the last 2 decades. Osteoporosis International, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, and Bone were the leading sources with 632, 569, and 448 articles, respectively. Among research areas and web of science categories (WC), Endocrinology Metabolism was the leading contributor.
Figure 5b shows the distribution of the most frequent (top 3) keywords trends (2001–2020). In total, 16,775 author keywords were used. The 20 most frequently used keywords occurred from a minimum of 245 to a maximum of 3468 times. Vitamin D (n = 3468), osteoporosis (n = 2499), bone mineral density (n = 1474), calcium (n = 891) and vitamin D deficiency (n = 636), were the most frequently used keywords. A relatively increased frequency of leading keywords was observed between 2012 to 2015.

4. Discussion

Vitamin D is a vitamin cum steroid hormone. It was originally recognized as a biomolecule used in the body for calcium and phosphate homeostasis. However, now VD has multiple non-skeletal preventive and therapeutic applications for maintenance and improvement of health. Thus, extensive research over this prohormone seemed imperative. Quality research work in healthcare generates critical evidence to fill the gaps in our knowledge of health and disease.
This study found that since the year 1900, >2/3rd of VD-related research articles in English have been published in the last two decades (2001–2020). When explored for VD and bone metabolism, >80% (16,887) of total articles in English were published in the same timeframe. This study summarizes patterns and results over the last two decades (2001–2020) to provide a clearer understanding of the overall productivity of VD and bone metabolism research. Besides, it offers a connection to examine developments in science study on the use of the podium for bibliometrics. Only 1% of articles were single authored with a dominant majority of multi-authored articles in the last 2 decades. The annual growth rate for publications was found to be 4.5%. The trend showed a steady rise in the number of publications with maximum publications in 2017 (1150). Nearly two-thirds of the articles were published over the last 10 years (2011–2020). A spike of maximum productivity was seen from the year 2008 to 2013, producing around 31% of total articles (5218), followed by a gradual increase until 2017. During 2 months in the summer of 2011, more than 500 publications were made on VD mostly about its non-skeletal functions [15]. A similar declining trend of VD and musculoskeletal research output was also observed in a study on VD with co-word analysis [45]. The following decline in publication trend after 2014 could presumably be due to the several factors such as researchers diverted toward other aspects of VD like its role in reproduction [46], diabetes mellitus [19], gestational diabetes [47], CVD and obesity [22], asthma [48], autoimmune diseases [49], depression, hypertension, cancers [50], and many other aspects [45].
The retrieved articles were geographically distributed through 114 countries and among those, 32 contributed with ≥100 articles on the study topic. The United States, with 1/4th of the total articles, was the most productive country, followed by Japan, China, and the UK. Study findings point towards major contributions and better scientific output quality from developed countries, primarily the USA, UK, Canada, and European countries. Approximately >3/4 of the published articles related to this topic were published from the western world, especially from the USA. Study findings showed some similarities with other studies conducted on global VD [27] and osteoporosis [51] research productivity showing major contributions by western and developed countries led by the USA but a bit in a different order. Besides the western world, Japan, China, Turkey and Korea also showed decent contributions. Notably, among the top 20 contributing countries, India and Iran were the only 2 from LMICs.
Osteoporosis is the most common bone metabolic problem, and its prevalence is worldwide. In the Eastern Mediterranean Region, the overall pooled osteoporosis prevalence was 24.4% [52]. Research reports from various South and Southeast Asia countries have shown, with few exceptions, a common prevalence of hypovitaminosis D (VD deficiency/insufficiency) in both genders and all age groups of the populace [8]. The Middle East and Africa register the highest rates of rickets worldwide, amid abundant sunlight, and low VD levels are prevalent in the region [53]. VD is synthesized with sunlight. Surprisingly, despite abundant sunlight in several Asian countries, osteoporosis and osteopenia have a high incidence [53,54,55,56]. With the common prevalence of hypovitaminosis D and the high incidence of osteoporosis, one can expect high productivity in research; however, the present study results indicate that the VD and bone metabolism research publication and quality are significantly lower than the western world.
Though, VD deficiency and relevant issues are considered global affecting most parts of the world. It has been reported commonly in the developed world and growing in the Americas and Europe [13,27,57], yet the situation is worst in less developed countries. Study findings also found marginal contributions from many affected regions and low- and middle-income countries. It can also be attributed to another study which found that around 31% of funded articles were also written in the USA and other developed countries. Furthermore, open access articles made up 39.5%, indicating the limitation in terms of access for stakeholders in less developed regions. There could be multiple reasons, such as lack of available resources in terms of funding, unavailability of state-of-the-art research laboratories, lack of qualified and skilled workforce required, fewer quality journals produced from these countries, etc. Most open-access journals charge article processing charges (APC) ranging from 1500–5000 dollars per article. Such a huge APC amount may be one of the hurdles in publishing good quality research in high-impact factor journals. One of the reasons for low research output from middle-income and lower-middle-income countries could be that we conducted a search on the Web of Science only and many journals published from such countries are not indexed on the Web of Science.
Most of the top 20 prolific authors were from the USA, Europe, UK, and Canada. Among those, 19 authors contributed with ≥50 articles. Authors: Dawson Hughes B (USA), Mosekilde L (Denmark), Lips P (Netherlands), and Cooper C (UK), were found to be the most productive. In terms of impact, one author, Holick MF (USA) had the most citations, followed by Reginster JY (Belgium) and Dawson-Hughes B (USA). Seven (7) authors showed an h-index of ≥30 and were led by Dawson-Hughes B (USA), Lips P (Netherlands), Mosekilde L (Denmark), Cooper C (UK), and Holick MF (USA). Authors: Mosekilde L and Cauley JA had relatively limited numbers of articles as first or corresponding authors. Six (6) authors contributed with >30% articles as corresponding authors led by Deng HW (USA), Deluca HF (USA), and Cashman KD (Ireland), while two authors, Sato Y (Japan) and Holick MF (USA), contributed >20% as first authors.
These findings suggest that some of the authors are potentially established senior researchers in the field due to their consistent contributions throughout 2 decades, such as Holick MF and Dawson-Hughes B, among others. For corresponding authors, the most productive country was again the USA, with >1/4th of the total articles, followed by Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Corresponding authors from the top 20 countries collectively were responsible for 84.3% of the total articles. Interestingly, among these top 20 prolific authors, all had started publication year from 2000 to 2002 in the study timeframe and mostly showed notable productivity with impact. Most of the articles were found to be from single country representation and led by the USA, while Switzerland and Netherlands showed relatively more multiple country publication (MCP) ratio, followed by Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom. This finding showed a relatively increased trend of multi-country contributions from European countries. Leading countries, affiliations, and authors have produced collaborative publications, mainly from the USA, Europe, Canada, and the UK, with small contributions from low-and middle-income nations. Despite having the highest single country contribution, the USA seemed to be the hub of collaborations and affiliations dominating two of the three clusters found among leading affiliations. Similar trends were observed for countries with maximum total citations. Fourteen institutes contributed with >200 articles, and among them, four (4) showed >300 articles—namely, Harvard University, Mcgill University, University of Wisconsin, and the University of Toronto. Like leading affiliations, the leading funding organizations were also from the USA with two; United States Department of Health Human Services and National Institutes of Health NIH, as the leading funding sources with >2000 contributions. These findings are also aligned with the finding of a relevant study, which is that the USA also had the lead in funding sources and affiliations [27]. Perhaps, it aligns with the higher publication power of the USA, UK, and other resourceful and developed countries with established platforms [27,58].
For the top 20 most cited documents, 12 (60%) documents were published between 2001 and 2006. The top-cited articles cover a diverse range of topics. The author Holick MF (USA) was the leading contributor with 5 highly cited articles (25%), followed by Shimada T (Japan) with 3 articles. In terms of sources, “The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism” was the leading contributor with 4 articles (20%), followed by “The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)” and “The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition”. Six (6) and 8 articles showed ≥200 internal (within study selected articles) and ≥1000 global citations, respectively. Holick MF was also the author of the most cited article (>4000 citations), which was published by “The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism” in 2011.
Among 2617 sources, 14 journals contributed with ≥100 articles in the study timeframe. Most of the top 20 journals were in Q1 and/or Q2 category of JCR quartiles. Journals: Osteoporosis International, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, and Bone were the leading contributors. Most of the relevant productive journals were consistent contributors over the last two decades with relatively increased productivity from 2008 to 2016, followed by declining contributory trends. Among research areas and web of science categories (WC), Endocrinology Metabolism was the leading contributor, followed by Nutrition Dietetics, Urology Nephrology, Medicine General Internal, and Biochemistry Molecular Biology. A study showed that endocrine and metabolism, musculoskeletal, cancers, and neuropsychological issues were the major contributors to VD research [45]. Mainly similar trends were also observed in a relevant studies study on VD where the shift towards more extra skeletal aspects showed relatively increasing trends compared to the recent decline in bone-related issues [27,45]. A total of 16,775 keywords were used. Vitamin D, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, calcium, and vitamin D deficiency were the most frequently used ones. However, if we analyze the keywords, it is seen that the keywords cover multidisciplinary topics concerning vitamin D and bone metabolism. Besides, a relatively increased frequency of leading keywords between 2008 to 2014 also aligned with the earlier finding of increased productivity around the same period.
This study had a few limitations such as data was based on the Web of Science database only. Though data standardization might be a hindrance, adding or comparing it with other databases can potentially provide a more comprehensive picture. Secondly, this study included articles in English only that limit the contributions from certain regions. Furthermore, the lack of similar studies on the issue also limits the margin of discussion with comparisons.

5. Conclusions

This study provides a missing analysis of global research trends and performance on VD and bone metabolism and found the last two decades (2001–2020) to be the most productive. Analysis of all articles published in English showed a generally increasing trend with a higher spike from 2008 to 2013. Though most articles were published in the last decade, leading sources showed a recent decline in relevant productivity and suggested the shifting trend towards non-skeletal aspects related to VD. Major contributions were from western and developed countries led by the USA, with marginal contributions from affected regions like the Middle East, South Asia, and other less resourceful settings. Leading authors, affiliations, funding sources, and collaborations were also found to be mainly from the developed regions showing the limitation in collective global research and contributions. These findings from the past not only provide directions for relevant stakeholders, but also require consideration and suggest exploring feasible options in the future to promote research culture and support for settings with limited resources.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14030542/s1, Table S1: Countries contribution along with their socioeconomic status.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.M., M.B. and Z.J.G.; methodology, A.A.M., M.B., M.I., S.H.A. and Z.J.G.; software, A.A.M. and N.S.B.; validation, M.B., N.S.B., M.I. and S.H.A.; formal analysis, A.A.M., N.S.B. and M.I.; investigation, A.A.M., N.S.B., M.I. and S.H.A.; resources, A.A.M. and Z.J.G.; data curation, A.A.M., M.B., M.I. and S.H.A.; writing—A.A.M. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, A.A.M., M.B., N.S.B., M.I., S.H.A. and Z.J.G.; visualization, N.S.B., M.I. and S.H.A.; supervision, M.B. and Z.J.G.; project administration, A.A.M. and N.S.B.; funding acquisition, A.A.M., S.H.A. and Z.J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by Institutional Fund Projects under grant no. (IFPHI-120-828-2020). Therefore, authors gratefully acknowledge technical and financial support from the Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data file used for this study will be shared or uploaded in supplementary files when required and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Authors gratefully acknowledge technical and financial support from the Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Authors would also like to thank ‘Clarivate Analytics—Web of Science’ ‘to provide data access.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wacker, M.; Holick, M.F. Sunlight and Vitamin D: A global perspective for health. Derm. Endocrinol. 2013, 5, 51–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. DeLuca, H.F. Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin D. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 1689S–1696S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lips, P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006, 92, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Antonucci, R.; Locci, C.; Clemente, M.G.; Chicconi, E.; Antonucci, L. Vitamin D deficiency in childhood: Old lessons and current challenges. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 31, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grant, W.B.; Holick, M.F.; Wimalawansa, S.J. Vitamin D supplements and reasonable solar UVB should be recommended to prevent escalating incidence of chronic diseases. BMJ 2015, 350, h321. [Google Scholar]
  6. Holick, M.F. High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2006, 81, 353–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mark, K.A.; Dumas, K.J.; Bhaumik, D.; Schilling, B.; Davis, S.; Oron, T.R.; Sorensen, D.J.; Lucanic, M.; Brem, R.B.; Melov, S.; et al. Vitamin D promotes protein homeostasis and longevity via the stress response pathway genes skn-1, ire-1, and xbp-1. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mithal, A.; Wahl, D.A.; Bonjour, J.-P.; Burckhardt, P.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Eisman, J.A.; Fuleihan, G.E.-H.; Josse, R.G.; Lips, P.; Morales-Torres, J. Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos. Int. 2009, 20, 1807–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wimalawansa, S.J. Vitamin D in the new millennium. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2012, 10, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pike, J.W.; Christakos, S. Biology and mechanisms of action of the vitamin D hormone. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. 2017, 46, 815–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jürimäe, J.; Jürimäe, T. Adiponectin is a predictor of bone mineral density in middle-aged premenopausal women. Osteoporos. Int. 2007, 18, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sanfélix-Gimeno, G.; Sanfelix-Genovés, J.; Hurtado, I.; Reig-Molla, B.; Peiró, S. Vertebral fracture risk factors in postmenopausal women over 50 in Valencia, Spain. A population-based cross-sectional study. Bone 2013, 52, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, R.; Naughton, D.P. Vitamin D in health and disease: Current perspectives. Nutr. J. 2010, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Abrams, S.A. In utero physiology: Role in nutrient delivery and fetal development for calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 604S–607S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Rosen, C.J.; Adams, J.S.; Bikle, D.D.; Black, D.M.; Demay, M.B.; Manson, J.E.; Murad, M.H.; Kovacs, C.S. The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: An Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 456–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wimalawansa, S.J. Non-musculoskeletal benefits of vitamin D. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 175, 60–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wimalawansa, S.; Vitamin, D. What clinicians would like to know. Sri Lanka J. Diabetes. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 1, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pacifico, L.; Anania, C.; Osborn, J.; Ferraro, F.; Bonci, E.; Olivero, E.; Chiesa, C. Low 25(OH)D3 levels are associated with total adiposity, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension in Caucasian children and adolescents. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 165, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tepper, S.; Shahar, D.; Geva, D.; Ish-Shalom, S. Differences in homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) values and insulin levels after vitamin D supplementation in healthy men: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2016, 18, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giovannucci, E.; Liu, Y.; Willett, W.C. Cancer incidence and mortality and vitamin D in black and white male health professionals. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2006, 15, 2467–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gross, M.D. Vitamin D and calcium in the prevention of prostate and colon cancer: New approaches for the identification of needs. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Manousopoulou, A.; Al-Daghri, N.M.; Garbis, S.D.; Chrousos, G.P. Vitamin D and cardiovascular risk among adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 45, 1113–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Al Nozha, O.M. Vitamin D and extra-skeletal health: Causality or consequence. Int. J. Health Sci. 2016, 10, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wimalawansa, S. Biology of vitamin D. J. Steroids Horm. Sci. 2019, 10, 2. [Google Scholar]
  25. Garland, C.F.; Kim, J.J.; Mohr, S.B.; Gorham, E.D.; Grant, W.B.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Baggerly, L.; Hofflich, H.; Ramsdell, J.W.; Zeng, K.; et al. Meta-analysis of all-cause mortality according to serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Am. J. Public Health 2014, 104, e43–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, Y.-Q.; Langhammer, A.; Skorpen, F.; Chen, Y.; Mai, X.-M. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, chronic diseases and all-cause mortality in a population-based prospective cohort: The HUNT Study, Norway. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e017256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brüggmann, D.; Alafi, A.; Jaque, J.; Klingelhöfer, D.; Bendels, M.H.; Ohlendorf, D.; Quarcoo, D.; Louwen, F.; Ingles, S.A.; Wanke, E.M.; et al. World-wide research architecture of vitamin D research: Density-equalizing mapping studies and socio-economic analysis. Nutr. J. 2018, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gupta, R.; Gupta, B.; Baidwani, K.; Kaur, J. A Scientometric Assessment of Indian Publications on Vitamin D Deficiency during 2006–15. J. Young Pharm. 2016, 8, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Abramo, G.; D’Angelo, C.A. Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics 2011, 87, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ellegaard, O.; Wallin, J.A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 2015, 105, 1809–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ahmad, T.; Imran, M.; Ahmad, K.; Khan, M.; Baig, M.; Al-Rifai, R.H.; Al-Omari, B. A Bibliometric Analysis and Global Trends in Fascioliasis Research: A Neglected Tropical Disease. Animals 2021, 11, 3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ahmad, T.; Murad, M.A.; Baig, M.; Hui, J. Research trends in COVID-19 vaccine: A bibliometric analysis. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2021, 17, 2367–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. WoS. Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters), Web of Science. 2020. Available online: https://www.webofknowledge.com (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  34. Bettencourt, L.M.; Kaur, J. Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19540–19545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, K.; Rollins, J.; Yan, E. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics 2018, 115, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Jelercic, S.; Lingard, H.; Spiegel, W.; Pichlhöfer, O.; Maier, M. Assessment of publication output in the field of general practice and family medicine and by general practitioners and general practice institutions. Fam. Pract. 2010, 27, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ronda-Pupo, G.A.; Díaz-Contreras, C.; Ronda-Velázquez, G.; Ronda-Pupo, J.C. The role of academic collaboration in the impact of Latin-American research on management. Scientometrics 2015, 102, 1435–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hossain, M. Current status of global research on novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. F1000Research 2020, 9, 374. [Google Scholar]
  39. Valera-Gran, D.; Prieto-Botella, D.; Peral-Gómez, P.; Hurtado-Pomares, M.; Sánchez-Pérez, A.; Navarrete-Muñoz, E.-M. Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Telomere Length in Children: A Review of Scientific Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Merigó, J.M.; Yang, J.-B. A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega 2017, 73, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yu, D.; Xu, Z.; Pedrycz, W.; Wang, W. Information Sciences 1968–2016: A retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Inf. Sci. 2017, 418, 619–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, D.; He, X. A bibliometric study for DEA applied to energy efficiency: Trends and future challenges. Appl. Energy 2020, 268, 115048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shukla, A.K.; Muhuri, P.K.; Abraham, A. A bibliometric analysis and cutting-edge overview on fuzzy techniques in Big Data. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2020, 92, 103625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, A.; Lv, Q.; Chen, F.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Shi, W. Identification of recent trends in research on vitamin D: A quantitative and co-word analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2019, 25, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Abbasihormozi, S.; Kouhkan, A.; Alizadeh, A.; Shahverdi, A.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.; Sadighi Gilani, M.; Salman Yazdi, R.; Matinibehzad, A.; Zolfaghari, Z. Association of vitamin D status with semen quality and reproductive hormones in Iranian subfertile men. Andrology 2017, 5, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fatima, S.S.; Maqbool, M.A.; Syed, A.; Alam, F. Low vitamin D and risk for small for gestation age babies in gestational diabetes. Int. J. Diabetes Dev. Ctries. 2018, 38, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Castro, M.; King, T.S.; Kunselman, S.J.; Cabana, M.D.; Denlinger, L.; Holguin, F.; Kazani, S.D.; Moore, W.C.; Moy, J.; Sorkness, C.A.; et al. Effect of vitamin D3 on asthma treatment failures in adults with symptomatic asthma and lower vitamin D levels: The VIDA randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014, 311, 2083–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Booth, D.; Ding, N.; Parnell, G.; Shahijanian, F.; Coulter, S.; Schibeci, S.; Atkins, A.; Stewart, G.; Evans, R.; Downes, M.; et al. Cistromic and genetic evidence that the vitamin D receptor mediates susceptibility to latitude-dependent autoimmune diseases. Genes Immun. 2016, 17, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Van den Berg, K.S.; Marijnissen, R.M.; van den Brink, R.H.; Naarding, P.; Comijs, H.C.; Voshaar, R.C.O. Vitamin D deficiency, depression course and mortality: Longitudinal results from the Netherlands Study on Depression in Older persons (NESDO). J. Psychosom. Res. 2016, 83, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brüggmann, D.; Mäule, L.-S.; Klingelhöfer, D.; Schöffel, N.; Gerber, A.; Jaque, J.; Groneberg, D. World-wide architecture of osteoporosis research: Density-equalizing mapping studies and gender analysis. Climacteric 2016, 19, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zamani, M.; Zamani, V.; Heidari, B.; Parsian, H.; Esmaeilnejad-Ganji, S.M. Prevalence of osteoporosis with the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Osteoporos. 2018, 13, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. El-Hajj Fuleihan, G.; Adib, G.; Nauroy, L. The middle east & Africa regional audit, epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2011. Int. Osteoporos. Found. 2011. Available online: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/educational-hub/files/middle-east-africa-regional-audit-epidemiology-costs-burden-osteoporosis-2011 (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  54. Kaushal, N.; Vohora, D.; Jalali, R.K.; Jha, S. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population-a cross-sectional retrospective study. Osteoporos. Sarcopenia 2018, 4, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tariq, S.; Baig, M.; Tariq, S.; Shahzad, M. Status of bone health and association of socio-demographic characteristics with Bone Mineral Density in Pakistani Females. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 35, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Khan, A.H. Seven Decades of Vitamin D research in Pakistan: Too little, too much or just right! J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2018, 68, 1742–1743. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zgaga, L.; Theodoratou, E.; Farrington, S.M.; Agakov, F.; Tenesa, A.; Walker, M.; Knox, S.; Wallace, A.M.; Cetnarskyj, R.; McNeill, G.; et al. Diet, environmental factors, and lifestyle underlie the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in healthy adults in Scotland, and supplementation reduces the proportion that are severely deficient. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 1535–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Groneberg-Kloft, B.; Scutaru, C.; Kreiter, C.; Kölzow, S.; Fischer, A.; Quarcoo, D. Institutional operating figures in basic and applied sciences: Scientometric analysis of quantitative output benchmarking. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2008, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 14 00542 g001 550
Figure 1. Global Vitamin D and Bone metabolism research output (1900–2020). “*”: Wildcard search in all search fields that allow words and phrases.
Figure 1. Global Vitamin D and Bone metabolism research output (1900–2020). “*”: Wildcard search in all search fields that allow words and phrases.
Nutrients 14 00542 g001
Nutrients 14 00542 g002 550
Figure 2. Year-wise publications and total citations (2001–2020). TC—Total citations.
Figure 2. Year-wise publications and total citations (2001–2020). TC—Total citations.
Nutrients 14 00542 g002
Nutrients 14 00542 g003 550
Figure 3. Top 20 most prolific authors and their impact (2001–2020).
Figure 3. Top 20 most prolific authors and their impact (2001–2020).
Nutrients 14 00542 g003
Nutrients 14 00542 g004 550
Figure 4. Three Field Plot for top 20 most productive countries, affiliations, and authors.
Figure 4. Three Field Plot for top 20 most productive countries, affiliations, and authors.
Nutrients 14 00542 g004
Nutrients 14 00542 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Top 10 most productive sources. (b) Top 3 keywords per year trends (2001–2020).
Figure 5. (a) Top 10 most productive sources. (b) Top 3 keywords per year trends (2001–2020).
Nutrients 14 00542 g005
Table
Table 1. Summary table (2001–2020).
Table 1. Summary table (2001–2020).
Description2001–2020
Articles16,887
Annual growth rate (%)5.12%
Open access7531 (44.5%)
Sources (Journals, Books, etc.)2735
Average years from publication8.91
Average citations per article31.45
Average citations per year per doc2.884
References265,177
Article Contents
Keywords Plus (ID)16,302
Author’s Keywords (DE)16,775
Authors60,149
Author Appearances106,300
Authors of single-authored articles577 (3.4%)
Authors of multi-authored articles59,572
Authors Collaboration
Single-authored articles756 (4.5%)
Articles per Author0.281
Authors per Article3.56
Co-Authors per Article6.29
Authors’ countries114
Group Authors313
Collaboration Index3.69
Other Information
Research Areas112
Web of Science categories159
Affiliations10,177
Funding Sources8241 (48.8%)
Table
Table 2. Top 20 countries with articles and corresponding authors.
Table 2. Top 20 countries with articles and corresponding authors.
CountryTotal ArticlesAs CAPercentage ContributionSCPMCPMCP RatioTC
USA15,838441826.30%35888300.19210,348
Japan389811316.72%10301010.0932,497
China364710846.44%8961880.1713,860
United Kingdom29788264.91%5962300.2830,828
Italy29657814.64%6531280.1618,389
Canada26676273.73%4601670.2722,110
Australia22895833.46%4531300.2221,815
Turkey18056023.58%577250.046733
Germany18505022.98%3651370.2717,146
Spain19634882.90%408800.1610,190
France20054062.41%3011050.2615,424
India10834302.56%384460.116307
Korea12703722.21%334380.105197
Netherlands12493221.91%226960.3014,693
Brazil10213311.97%287440.134654
Denmark9902641.57%212520.209900
Iran9162801.66%257230.083836
SWEDEN9502291.36%168610.277052
SWITZERLAND9362211.31%1171040.478206
FINLAND10042071.23%162450.228114
CA—Corresponding author, SCP—Single or Intra-country publication, MCP—Multiple or Inter-country publications, TC—Total citations
Table
Table 3. Top 10 most frequent affiliations and funding sources.
Table 3. Top 10 most frequent affiliations and funding sources.
Top 10 Most Frequent AffiliationsArticles
Harvard Univ529
Mcgill Univ498
Univ Wisconsin339
Univ Toronto311
Univ Sydney301
Univ Calif San Francisco292
Univ Calif Los Angeles280
Massachusetts Gen Hosp256
Univ Melbourne239
Univ Pittsburgh239
Top 10 most frequent funding OrganizationsArticles
United States Department of Health Human Services2526
National Institutes of Health NIH USA2509
NIH National Institute of Diabetes Digestive Kidney Diseases NIDDK875
NIH National Institute of Arthritis Musculoskeletal Skin Diseases NIAMS626
National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC599
NIH National Center for Research Resources NCRR525
NIH National Institute on Aging NIA403
AMGEN391
Medical Research Council UK MRC313
Ministry of Education Culture Sports Science and Technology Japan MEXT303
Table
Table 4. Top 20 highly cited Articles.
Table 4. Top 20 highly cited Articles.
TitleFirst AuthorStudy TypeSourceIFYearICGC
Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice GuidelineMichael F. HolickClinical guidelinesThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism5.95820118784714
Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular diseaseMichael F HolickReview articleThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition7.04720045081643
Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosisMichael F HolickReview articleThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition7.04720045081119
Calcium plus Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of FracturesRebecca D. JacksonClinical TrialThe New England Journal of Medicine91.25320063611177
FGF-23 is a potent regulator of vitamin D metabolism and phosphate homeostasisTakashi ShimadaResearch article (Animal study)The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research6.74120043451134
Cloning and characterization of FGF23 as a causative factor of tumor-induced osteomalaciaTakashi ShimadaResearch article (Animal study)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)11.2052001329986
Targeted ablation of Fgf23 demonstrates an essential physiological role of FGF23 in phosphate and vitamin D metabolismTakashi ShimadaResearch article (Animal study)The Journal of Clinical Investigation14.80820042891050
Positive association between 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels and bone mineral density: a population-based study of younger and older adultsHeike A Bischoff-FerrariResearch articleThe American Journal of Medicine4.9652004287539
A Global Study of Vitamin D Status and Parathyroid Function in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Baseline Data from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Clinical TrialPaul LipsResearch articleThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism5.9582001283534
Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysisBenjamin MP TangMeta-analysisThe Lancet79.3232007279824
Effect of Parathyroid Hormone (1–34) on Fractures and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women with OsteoporosisRobert M. NeerResearch articleThe New England Journal of Medicine91.25320012753022
Prevalence of Vitamin D Inadequacy among Postmenopausal North American Women Receiving Osteoporosis TherapyMichael F. HolickResearch articleThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism5.9582005266609
Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequencesMichael F. HolickReview articleThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition7.04720082631467
Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin DHector F DeLucaReview articleThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition7.04720042571312
Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: Randomised double blind controlled trialDaksha P TrivediClinical TrialThe BMJ39.892003255843
Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in Oncogenic Osteomalacia and X-Linked HypophosphatemiaKenneth B. JonssonResearch articleThe New England Journal of Medicine91.2532003229617
Annual High-Dose Oral Vitamin D and Falls and Fractures in Older Women
A Randomized Controlled Trial		Kerrie M. SandersClinical TrialJAMA56.2742010227829
Klotho converts canonical FGF receptor into a specific receptor for FGF23Itaru UrakawaResearch article (Animal study)Nature49.96220062181219
Increased Circulatory Level of Biologically Active Full-Length FGF-23 in Patients with Hypophosphatemic Rickets/OsteomalaciaYuji YamazakiResearch articleThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism5.9582002213502
Effects of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation on Falls: A Randomized Controlled TrialHeike A BischoffClinical TrialThe Journal of Bone and Mineral Research6.7412003210643
IF—Impact Factor, IC—Internal Citation (Citations within study selected documents), GC—Global Citation (Citation in Web of Science).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malik, A.A.; Baig, M.; Butt, N.S.; Imran, M.; Alzahrani, S.H.; Gazzaz, Z.J. Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Productivity on Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism (2001–2020): Learn from the Past to Plan Future. Nutrients 2022, 14, 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030542

AMA Style

Malik AA, Baig M, Butt NS, Imran M, Alzahrani SH, Gazzaz ZJ. Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Productivity on Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism (2001–2020): Learn from the Past to Plan Future. Nutrients. 2022; 14(3):542. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malik, Ahmad Azam, Mukhtiar Baig, Nadeem Shafique Butt, Muhammad Imran, Sami Hamdan Alzahrani, and Zohair Jamil Gazzaz. 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Productivity on Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism (2001–2020): Learn from the Past to Plan Future" Nutrients 14, no. 3: 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030542

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop