Next Article in Journal
Low Dietary Variety Is Associated with Incident Frailty in Older Adults during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study in Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Prolonged Egg Supplement Advances Growing Child’s Growth and Gut Microbiota
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021: Highlights and Future Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Moumin et al. Usual Nutrient Intake Distribution and Prevalence of Inadequacy among Australian Children 0–24 Months: Findings from the Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1381

1
Discipline of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
2
Women and Kids Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
3
Nutrition Department, Women’s and Children’s Health Network, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
4
Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(5), 1144; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051144
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OZFITS), 2021)
The authors would like to correct an error in their recently published paper [1]. The prevalence of inadequacy for iron for older infants (6–12 months) should be 75%, not 92%, as reported in the paper. The software [2] used to calculate the prevalence of inadequacy requires the user to enter the percentage bioavailability of iron. The Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for iron in older infants is 7 mg/d and is based on 10% iron bioavailability [3]. When we entered 10% bioavailability, the software set the EAR at 12.6 mg/d, not 7 mg/d; thus, the prevalence of inadequacy was overestimated.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by the changes. Although the prevalence of inadequacy for iron for older infants has fallen, 75% is still high.
1. Abstract
“Exceptions were iron and zinc where the prevalence of inadequacy was estimated to be 90% and 20%, respectively, for infants aged 6–11.9 months.”
was changed to:
“Exceptions were iron and zinc where the prevalence of inadequacy was estimated to be 75% and 20%, respectively, for infants aged 6–11.9 months.”
2. The following content in the Results section, paragraph 3
“More than 90% of older infants and one quarter of toddlers had inadequate iron intakes (Tables 3 and 4).”
was changed to:
“More than 75% of older infants and one quarter of toddlers had inadequate iron intakes (Tables 3 and 4).”
3. Table 3 in the “Iron6, mg/d” row under the “<EAR” column, the number has been changed from 92 to 75.
4. The following content in the Discussion section, paragraph 1
“Exceptions were a very high prevalence of inadequacy for iron (>90%) in infants 6–11.9 months and excessive sodium consumption in a high proportion of toddlers 12–24 m (30%).”
was changed to:
“Exceptions were a very high prevalence of inadequacy for iron (75%) in infants 6–11.9 months and excessive sodium consumption in a high proportion of toddlers 12–24 m (30%).”
5. The following content in the Discussion section, paragraph 3
“For the two nutrients with EARs, iron and zinc, the prevalence of inadequacy was estimated to be 90% and 20%, respectively.”
was changed to:
“For the two nutrients with EARs, iron and zinc, the prevalence of inadequacy was estimated to be 75% and 20%, respectively.”

References

  1. Moumin, N.A.; Netting, M.J.; Golley, R.K.; Mauch, C.E.; Makrides, M.; Green, T.J. Usual Nutrient Intake Distribution and Prevalence of Inadequacy among Australian Children 0–24 Months: Findings from the Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iowa State University. Intake Modelling, Assessment and Planning Program (IMAPP); Iowa State University: Ames, LA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand Including Recommended Dietary Intakes; National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moumin, N.A.; Netting, M.J.; Golley, R.K.; Mauch, C.E.; Makrides, M.; Green, T.J. Correction: Moumin et al. Usual Nutrient Intake Distribution and Prevalence of Inadequacy among Australian Children 0–24 Months: Findings from the Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1381. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051144

AMA Style

Moumin NA, Netting MJ, Golley RK, Mauch CE, Makrides M, Green TJ. Correction: Moumin et al. Usual Nutrient Intake Distribution and Prevalence of Inadequacy among Australian Children 0–24 Months: Findings from the Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1381. Nutrients. 2023; 15(5):1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051144

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moumin, Najma A., Merryn J. Netting, Rebecca K. Golley, Chelsea E. Mauch, Maria Makrides, and Tim J. Green. 2023. "Correction: Moumin et al. Usual Nutrient Intake Distribution and Prevalence of Inadequacy among Australian Children 0–24 Months: Findings from the Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1381" Nutrients 15, no. 5: 1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051144

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop