Next Article in Journal
Intestinal Barrier Function in Chronic Kidney Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Variations of Bacterial Community Composition and Functions in an Estuary Reservoir during Spring and Summer Alternation
Previous Article in Journal
Biomarker Evaluation and Toxic Effects of an Acute Oral and Systemic Fumonisin Exposure of Pigs with a Special Focus on Dietary Fumonisin Esterase Supplementation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Toxin Occurrences in Ten French Water Resource Reservoirs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Toxicity of Cyanobacteria Isolated from Marine Sponges towards Echinoderms and Crustaceans

1
CIIMAR/CIMAR, Blue Biotechnology and Ecotoxicology—Centre of Environmental and Marine Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, Matosinhos 4450-208, Portugal
2
Department of Biology, Sciences Faculty, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, Porto 4169-007, Portugal
3
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Hagi, Hofsvallagata 53, Reykjavik 107, Iceland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2018, 10(7), 297; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070297
Submission received: 28 May 2018 / Revised: 15 July 2018 / Accepted: 16 July 2018 / Published: 18 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins: New Advances and Future Challenges)

Abstract

:
Marine sponges and cyanobacteria have a long history of co-evolution, with documented genome adaptations in cyanobionts. Both organisms are known to produce a wide variety of natural compounds, with only scarce information about novel natural compounds produced by cyanobionts. In the present study, we aimed to address their toxicological potential, isolating cyanobacteria (n = 12) from different sponge species from the coast of Portugal (mainland, Azores, and Madeira Islands). After large-scale growth, we obtained both organic and aqueous extracts to perform a series of ecologically-relevant bioassays. In the acute toxicity assay, using nauplii of Artemia salina, only organic extracts showed lethality, especially in picocyanobacterial strains. In the bioassay with Paracentrotus lividus, both organic and aqueous extracts produced embryogenic toxicity (respectively 58% and 36%), pointing to the presence of compounds that interfere with growth factors on cells. No development of pluteus larvae was observed for the organic extract of the strain Chroococcales 6MA13ti, indicating the presence of compounds that affect skeleton formation. In the hemolytic assay, none of the extracts induced red blood cells lysis. Organic extracts, especially from picoplanktonic strains, proved to be the most promising for future bioassay-guided fractionation and compounds isolation. This approach allows us to classify the compounds extracted from the cyanobacteria into effect categories and bioactivity profiles.
Key Contribution: Marine sponges were used as a source for harvesting cyanobacteria. Being adapt to life inside sponges; these cyanobacteria can prove to have novel compounds produced from their secondary metabolism.

1. Introduction

Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotes, with a high morphological, physiological, and metabolic diversity, with fossil records dating back to 3.5 billion years ago [1]. Secondary metabolite production was essential for their survival allowing for adaptation to several environmental conditions such as variations in temperature, pH, salinity, UV radiation, etc.
Climate change and eutrophication increased the occurrence and frequency of cyanobacterial blooms in water bodies [2], posing human and animals’ health risks due to toxin production. Apart from toxin production, these secondary metabolites have also been shown to be a source of compounds of interest in different industries, such as pharmaceutical, cosmetics, agriculture, energy, etc. In the last decade alone, estimations point to more than 400 new natural compounds extracted from marine cyanobacteria [3]. Coastal water blooms pose another health risk concerning cyanobacterial toxins, as many of them are able to accumulate in both vertebrates and invertebrates [4].
Assessing marine cyanobacterial diversity on the Portuguese coast has already been the focus of various studies (e.g., [5,6]), with Cyanobium, Leptolyngbya and Pseudanabaena as the most abundant genera among isolates [6]. Isolated strains from the coast of Portugal were found to be a source of bioactive compounds, both with toxicological and/or pharmaceutical interest [2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Also, Brito, et al. [14] evaluated the potential to produce secondary metabolites for some strains through molecular methods.
In marine environments, cyanobacteria are known to form associations with a variety of invertebrates, such as sponges (Phylum Porifera). Sponges are filter-feeders, capable of filtering thousands of liters of water per day. During this process, some filtered microorganisms can become part of the sponge microbiota. Sponge microbiota diversity can reach up to 4 orders of magnitude, when compared to the one from water column [15]. In temperate ecosystems, it is estimated that 45–60% of sponges have cyanobacterial symbionts (cyanobionts) [16], and are able to cover up to 50% of the sponge cell volume [17]. As they are able to concentrate microorganisms, sponges can be used as a source for cyanobacteria harvesting as already stated by Regueiras, et al. [18]. Sponges are a huge source of bioactive compounds [19], most of them known to be produced by their symbiotic microorganisms [15]. Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria (alpha and gamma classes) are the main phyla producing secondary metabolites in sponges [20].
Both coccoid and filamentous cyanobacteria have been described in sponges. Recently, Konstantinou, et al. [21] made a review on the diversity of both sponge species harboring cyanobacteria, and cyanobacterial diversity. In Portugal, Xenococcus-like and Acaryochloris sp. were reported from the intertidal marine sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis [22,23]. Regueiras, et al. [18] were also able to identify cyanobacteria belonging to the genera Synechococcus, Cyanobium, Synechocystis, Nodosilinea, Pseudanabaena, Phormidesmis, Acaryochloris, and Prochlorococcus associated with the same marine sponge.
Due to a long evolutionary history of both cyanobacteria and marine sponges, co-evolution has already been documented, with some cyanobacteria being passed to new sponge generations through vertical transmission (from sponge to offspring through reproductive cells) [24]. The study of genomes from the symbiotic cyanobacteria “Ca. Synechococcus spongiarum” and its comparison with the genome of free-living ones, found adaptations to life inside sponges and the presence of different adaptations in different phylotypes [25,26]. These adaptations may also lead to the production of novel and unique natural compounds.
Bioassay-guided fractionation is a successful strategy in the isolation and discovery of novel compounds [27,28,29,30,31]. To address toxin production, several assays can be used. The use of the brine shrimp Artemia salina, has ecological relevance in marine ecosystems, as these organisms are a representation of the zooplankton community and vital on the ecology of seashores [11]. For preliminary toxicity assessment, the brine shrimp lethality assay is a standardized bioassay in marine and aquatic research [32]. For embryogenesis studies, the use of echinoids, such as the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus, is very common. They occupy an important phylogenetic position (deuterostomes) when compared to other invertebrates {Lopes, 2010 #555227}. P. lividus are also common among the Portuguese seashore and key elements on their habitats [11], capable of producing a great amount of eggs feasible to be fertilized in seawater, and to develop optically clear embryos [33]. Apart from these common assays, less is known on hemolytic toxins from cyanobacteria. Cyanobacterial toxins are able to accumulate in marine vertebrate and invertebrates [34,35], posing risks for mammals, showing the importance of the use of such assays.
The present study aims to do a preliminary assessment on the cyanotoxin potential of marine cyanobacteria isolated from marine sponges. Most studies isolate marine cyanobacteria through filtration of large volumes of water, or by scratching coastal surfaces. In the present study, we aimed to isolate cyanobacteria from marine sponges off the coast of Portugal, as they are able to concentrate microorganisms, allowing them to obtain some cyanobacteria that can be present in seawater in amounts under detection. We intend to evaluate the toxic effects of organic (lipophilic) and aqueous (hydrophilic) crude extracts towards the nauplii of the brine shrimp A. salina and embryos of the sea urchin P. lividus, and their hemolytic activity. These assays will be useful to evaluate cyanobacterial potential to produce compounds with relevant bioactivity profiles to be further investigated and possibly identified in the future. This approach allow us to classify the compounds extracted from the cyanobacteria into effect categories and bioactivity profiles.

2. Results

2.1. Acute Toxicity Assay Using Nauplii of Artemia Salina

Aqueous extracts, containing the hydrophilic compounds from the cyanobacterial strains, did not exhibit statistically significant differences against control, in the bioassay to assess mortality in Artemia salina nauplii (Figure 1). However, for the organic extracts, toxicity was found after 48 h of exposure. Cyanobacterial strains Synechoccocus sp. LEGE11381 (F = 68.80, p < 0.000), Synechocystis sp. 44B13pa (F = 21.82, p < 0.048), unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384 (F = 24.74, p < 0.018), Chroococales 6MA13ti (F = 86.73, p < 0.000), and Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375 (F = 43.50, p < 0.000) presented statistically significant differences when compared against the negative control.

2.2. Embryo—Larval Acute Toxicity Assay with Paracentrotus Lividus

The toxicity of the cyanobacterial extracts in the bioassay with P. lividus was determined by analysis of the embryogenic success, i.e., the ability of the fertilized egg to reach the stage of pluteus larvae, and through growth of pluteus larvae (Figure 2). Development arrest indicates that no normal pluteus larvae were produced. The results gathered after 48 h of incubation with cyanobacterial extracts revealed that in the control, 67.5 ± 6.1% of the sea urchin fertilized eggs developed to normal pluteus larvae, with an average length of 330.0 ± 18.8 µm. Figure 3 shows significant difference in the embryogenic development, at p < 0.05, for the organic extract of the following strains: Synechococcus sp. LEGE11381 (F = −62.78, p < 0.000), Synechocystis sp. 44B13pa (F = −41.80, p < 0.000), unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384 (F = −36.05, p < 0.000), Phormidium sp. 25J12tp (F = −27.22, p < 0.010), Leptolyngbya sp. 31H12hpa (F = 67.48, p < 0.048), and Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375 (F = −52.38, p < 0.000). The organic extract of the strain Chroococcales 6MA13ti caused development arrest with none of the larvae reaching the stage of viable pluteus. Amongst the aqueous extracts, unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384 (F = −41.75, p < 0.001), Phormidium sp. 25J12tp (F = −28.75, p < 0.033), Chroococcales 6MA13pi (F = −30.00, p < 0.024), and Cyanobacterium 34C12sp (F = −39.25, p < 0.002) strains presented significant embryogenic effect. Regarding the results from the positive control, only embryos on gastrula stage were found.
Regarding larval growth data, no significant changes in larval length was observed in the aqueous extracts at p < 0.05 [F (11, 36) = 1.039, p < 0.434)] (Figure 4). However, differences in larval length were found in organic extracts. These differences were more significant in Synechococcus sp. LEGE11381 (246.2 ± 11.5 μm, p < 0.001) and Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375 (325.7 ± 9.7 μm, p < 0.000).

2.3. Hemolytic Assay

The hemolytic activity registered during the assay was below 10%, with the highest value obtained being 7% of activity by the strain Chroococcales 6MA13ti, in the organic extract. All strains and extracts did not present significant interference with the hemoglobin content.

3. Discussion

To date, most studies exploring the bioactivity of marine cyanobacteria have been focusing on free-living forms. Cyanobacteria can live in association with a variety of marine invertebrates, such as sponges, for example, and it is known that cyanobacteria can affect the biosynthesis of compounds from the host [36] and that symbionts have specific adaptations in their genome [25,26]. The biological potential of associated and/or symbiotic cyanobacteria is still mostly unexplored. In the present study, twelve marine cyanobacterial strains were isolated from sponges of the Portuguese coast. Aqueous and organic crude extracts of the isolated cyanobacterial strains were submitted to ecologically-relevant bioassays in order to do a preliminary assessment on the production of secondary metabolites with relevant bioactivity profiles.
Artemia spp. is known for its ability to adapt to different environmental conditions, making it a crucial test organism in ecotoxicology [37]. Results from the bioassay with the brine shrimp Artemia salina nauplii did not demonstrate acute toxicity with exposure to the aqueous extracts of the tested cyanobacterial strains. The organic extracts of Synechococcus sp. LEGE11381, Synechocystis sp. 44B13pa, unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384, Chroococcales 6MA13ti, and Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375 cyanobacterial strains proved to be the most toxic to this crustacean species. In contrast with our results, most previous studies with cyanobacteria from the coast of Portugal found aqueous extracts to be more toxic. For example, Leão, et al. [10] reported lethality towards A. salina, in aqueous extracts in free-living forms from Nodosilinea, Leptolyngbya, and Pseudanabaena genera strains. Also, Frazão, et al. [2] found aqueous extracts of the genera Cyanobium, Synechococcus, Leptolyngbya, Oscillatoria, and Phormidium more toxic than organic ones. In brackish waters Lopes, et al. [33] also found aqueous extracts more toxic, and organic extracts did not induce more than 7% of mortality on A. salina. Organic extracts in our work showed a higher toxicity towards A. salina, leading to an assumption that cyanobacteria associated with marine sponges may produce different metabolites from the ones present in free-living forms of cyanobacteria, and therefore, their toxicological and pharmaceutical potential should be further investigated. The higher values of mortality here observed were all in picocyanobacterial strains. Costa, et al. [9] already reported the potential of these cyanobacteria as a source for novel metabolites. In the present work, toxicity was only found after 48 h.
In the bioassay with sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus, embryogenic toxicity occurred in 58% of the organic extracts and in 36% of the aqueous extracts tested. The unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384, Phormidium sp. 25J12tp, Chroococcales 6MA13ti cyanobacterial strains demonstrated embryogenic toxicity in both extracts, which may lead us to infer that, for the same cyanobacterial strain, chemically different bioactive compounds are produced, having the same effect on the embryogenic activity of the sea urchin. Although the Synechocystis sp. 44B13pa, unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384, Phormidium sp. 25J12tp, Leptolyngbya sp. 31H12hpa, Chroococcales 6MA13pi and Cyanobacterium 34C12sp cyanobacterial strains have demonstrated to be embryotoxic, no alteration on larval length was observed. This may suggest that the toxicity showed by these cyanobacterial strains only affected the early life stages of the sea urchin embryos development, providing strong evidence for the presence of compounds that interfere with growth factors on cells [11]. The organic extracts of Synechococcus sp. LEGE11381 and Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375 exhibited interference with the embryogenic development and also with the larval growth. From all the extracts tested, the organic extract from Chroococcales 6MA13ti seemed to have the most potent effect on P. lividus larvae, since it did not allow a normal development of any pluteus larvae. Cyanobium sp. organic extracts have already been shown to decrease P. lividus larvae length [9]. Lopes, et al. [33] found organic extracts from brackish waters to be more toxic to P. lividus, which is in accordance to our results. The inhibition of larval morphogenesis, here observed, point to the presence of compounds that affect skeleton formation.
Although hemolytic activity has already been documented in strains of Synechocystis [38], Anabaena [39], Synechococcus and Leptolyngbya [40], our results showed that in neither organic nor aqueous extracts analyzed, the lysis of the red mammalian blood cells was induced.
The present study aimed to assess a preliminary cyanotoxicological potential from twelve marine cyanobacteria isolated from the sponges of the Portuguese coast. Eight extracts from cyanobacterial strains have shown a promising potential on the performed ecologically-relevant bioassays (Synechococcus sp. LEGE11381, Synechocystis sp. 44B13pa; Unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384; Phormidium sp. 25J12tp; Chroococcales 6MA13ti; Leptolyngbya sp. 31H12hpa; Cyanobacterium 34C12sp; Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375). Furthermore, the concentrations of the extracts here used (30 μg mL−1) are an ecologically relevant concentration. This emphasizes the premise that sponges can harbor microorganisms with toxicological interest and that these invertebrates can and should be used in order to isolate new cyanobacteria. The extracts with the most promising bioactivity should be further fractionated to identify with more detail the bioactive compounds. Chemical elucidation should be performed once the purest compounds are achieved.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cyanobacterial Strains Selection and Biomass Production

Cyanobacterial strains used in this study were previously isolated from marine sponges. Marine sponges were collected both from seashore rocks and by scuba diving. A small fraction of sponge tissue was collected in flaks with ambient seawater. Figure 5 shows sampling locations, being all intertidal sites, with exception from the one in Madeira Island, Caniçal (sponges collected through scuba diving). When collected from intertidal areas, beaches were chosen with a combination of sand and rocks. Sponges substratum were rocks or sand. Preparation of sponge samples and cyanobacterial isolation and characterization was done according to Regueiras, et al. [18]. Summarizing, sponges were cleaned of debris and 1 mm of the sponge surface was discarded, using a sterile razor to avoid cultivation of superficial bacteria. Small fragments of the sponge body (<0.5 cm3) were placed in 2 different culture media, Z8 liquid media [41], supplemented with 30 g L−1 of NaCl and MN liquid medium [42]. Both culture media were supplemented with vitamin B12 and cyclohexamide [42]. After growth, through micromanipulation techniques, as described by Rippka [42], a single cell or filament of cyanobacteria were transfer to new liquid medium, until achievement of unicyanobacterial, non-axenic cultures.
The selection of cyanobacterial strains was based on growth performance rates and cyanobacterial diversity. Morphological identification followed the criteria of Komárek and Anagnostinis [43,44,45], the Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology [46] and Komárek, et al. [47]. Strains are deposited in the LEGE Culture Collection (Ramos et al., 2018). The twelve strains selected (Table 1) were cultured and up-scaled under laboratory conditions at 25 °C, light/dark cycle of 14/10 h and light intensity of approximately 25 × 10−6 E/m−2s−1. After 60 to 90 days of growth, the cyanobacterial biomass produced was collected (through centrifugation or filtration with a 20 μm pore net), frozen at −20 °C and freeze dried. Lyophilized material was kept at −20 °C.

4.2. Preparation of Cyanobacterial Extracts

The freeze dried biomass from each cyanobacterial strain was repeatedly extracted with a warm (<40 °C) mixture of dichloromethane and methanol (CH2Cl2:MeOH) (2:1) (P.A. Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Afterwards, the solvents were removed in vacuo and/or under a N2 stream. Following the organic extraction, the remaining biomass was subjected to aqueous extraction (ultra-pure water), decanted, and centrifuged at 4600 rpm for 15 min. The resulting supernatant was freeze-dried, weighed, and stored at −20 °C. Just before the tests, organic extracts were dissolved (30 mg mL−1) in dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO) and aqueous extracts in ultra-pure water.

4.3. Bioassays

4.3.1. Acute Toxiciyy Assay Using Nauplii of Artemia Salina

In the acute toxicity assay, the nauplii of the crustacean Artemia salina were used. The dried cysts (JBL Novotemia, Germany) hatched after 48 h in 35 g/L filtered seawater, at 25 °C, under conditions of continuous illumination and aeration. Toxicity was screened in a 96-well polystyrene plate, with 10–15 nauplii per well and 200 μL of organic or aqueous extract. Filtered seawater with 0.1% DMSO was used as negative control, and potassium dichromate at a concentration of 8 μg/mL as positive control. Four replicates were made for each treatment. The plates were covered with Parafilm to prevent water loss and then incubated at 25 °C, for 48 h in darkness. Dead larvae were counted in each well on an inverted microscope at 24 h and 48 h. Before determining the total number of larvae, organisms were fixed with a few drops of Lugol’s solution. Mortality was calculated through percentage as described by Martins, et al. [11].

4.3.2. Embryo-Larval Acute Toxicity Assay with Paracentrotus Lividus

For the embryo-larval acute toxicity assay, sea urchins Paracentrotus lividus were captured in the intertidal rocky shore, during low tide in Praia da Memória, Matosinhos, Portugal and immediately transported to the laboratory, in natural sea water and under refrigeration. The protocol employed was the one described by Fernández and Beiras [48]. Briefly, a couple of specimens were dissected, and gametes were collected with a pipette directly from the gonads. The optimal condition from gametes (spherical eggs and mobile sperm) was granted through careful observation under the optical microscope. Eggs were transferred to a 100 mL measuring cylinder containing natural seawater filtered through a 0.45 μm pore filter. A few microliters of sperm were added to the eggs suspension and then carefully stirred to allow fertilization. Fertilized eggs were counted in four 10 μL aliquots in order to determine the fertilization success and egg density. In a 24-well plate, a concentration of 20 fertilized eggs per mL of solution were exposed to organic and aqueous extracts, during 48 h at 20 °C, in darkness. Test solutions consisted of 2.5 mL of each cyanobacterial extract; two negative controls were used, one with only filtered seawater and the other with 0.1% DMSO; as positive control was used potassium dichromate in a concentration of 4 μg/mL. Four replicates were made for each treatment. After 48 h of incubation, the solutions were fixed with 40% formalin. Results were evaluated through percentage of pluteus larvae (embryogenic success) and larval length (larval growth) [11].

4.3.3. Hemolytic Assay

For the hemolytic assay, mice blood, stabilized with heparin, was provided by IBMC Bioterium, from healthy specimens without need to sacrifice the animals. The protocol used was an adaptation of the ones described by Rangel, et al. [49] and Slowing, et al. [50]. Summarizing, the erythrocytes solution was diluted with 30 volumes of a saline solution (0.85% NaCl with 10 mM CaCl2) and centrifuged at 1100 g for 5 min, discarding the supernatant and then washed three times with the same solution followed by centrifugations (1100 g for 5 min). After the final wash, the cells were diluted to a final concentration of 1% in sterile PBS solution. The assay was performed with 100 μL of each extract mixed with equal volume of erythrocytes suspension, using three replicates per treatment. For the negative and positive controls were used PBS and 0.1% Triton100, respectively. Eppendorfs with the mixtures were incubated for 2 h, at a temperature of 37 °C, with slow agitation. After that period, the mixtures were centrifuged at 4000 g for 1 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were transferred to a 96 well plate. Hemoglobin content was evaluated spectrophotometrically at 540 nm [49].
H e m o l y t i c   a c t i v i t y = A b s s a m p l e A b s n e g a t i v e   c o n t r o l A b s p o s i t i v e   c o n t r o l A b s n e g a t i v e   c o n t r o l × 100 %  

4.3.4. Analysis

Data collected during the bioassays were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a multi-comparisons Dunnett test (p < 0.05). The software IBM SPSS Statistics 24 (Version 24.0.0.0 edition 64-bit, IBM Corporation, New York, NY, USA, 2016) was used for statistical analysis.

Author Contributions

A.R. and V.V. conceived the conceptualization. A.R., S.P. and M.S.C. did the experimental work. Analysis of the data was done by A.R. and S.P. as well as the writing of the original draft. The review and editing of the writing was done by A.R. and V.V.

Funding

This work was financed by UID/Multi/04423/2013 and by the Structured Program of R&D&I INNOVMAR—Innovation and Sustainability in the Management and Exploitation of Marine Resources (reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000035, Research Line NOVELMAR), funded by the Northern Regional Operational Program (NORTE2020) through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).and by the grants PTDC/MAR/099642/2008, PhD grants SFRH/BD/73033/2010 and the Fellowship grant BI/PTDC/MAR/099642/2008/2011-030.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Marisa Silva, Manfred Kaufmann, Manuela Maranhão, Ana Neto, Isadora Moniz and Afonso Prestes for their help during sampling in costal continental Portugal, Madeira and Azores islands, and Vitor Ramos for helping in cyanobacteria identification.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams, D.G.; Duggan, P.S. Tansley review no. 107. Heterocyst and akinete differentiation in cyanobacteria. New Phytol. 1999, 144, 3–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Frazão, B.; Martins, R.; Vasconcelos, V. Are known cyanotoxins involved in the toxicity of picoplanktonic and filamentous north atlantic marine cyanobacteria? Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1908–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mi, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, S.; Yan, X. New peptides isolated from marine cyanobacteria, an overview over the past decade. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Buratti, F.M.; Manganelli, M.; Vichi, S.; Stefanelli, M.; Scardala, S.; Testai, E.; Funari, E. Cyanotoxins: Producing organisms, occurrence, toxicity, mechanism of action and human health toxicological risk evaluation. Arch. Toxicol. 2017, 91, 1049–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Brito, Â.; Ramos, V.; Mota, R.; Lima, S.; Santos, A.; Vieira, J.; Vieira, C.P.; Kaštovský, J.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Tamagnini, P. Description of new genera and species of marine cyanobacteria from the portuguese atlantic coast. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 111, 18–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brito, Â.; Ramos, V.; Seabra, R.; Santos, A.; Santos, C.L.; Lopo, M.; Ferreira, S.; Martins, A.; Mota, R.; Frazao, B.; et al. Culture-dependent characterization of cyanobacterial diversity in the intertidal zones of the portuguese coast: A polyphasic study. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 35, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Afonso, T.B.; Costa, M.S.; Rezende de Castro, R.; Freitas, S.; Silva, A.; Schneider, M.P.C.; Martins, R.; Leão, P.N. Bartolosides e–k from a marine coccoid cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 2504–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Costa, M.; Garcia, M.; Costa-Rodrigues, J.; Costa, M.S.; Ribeiro, M.J.; Fernandes, M.H.; Barros, P.; Barreiro, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Exploring bioactive properties of marine cyanobacteria isolated from the portuguese coast: High potential as a source of anticancer compounds. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Costa, M.S.; Costa, M.; Ramos, V.; Leao, P.N.; Barreiro, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Picocyanobacteria from a clade of marine Cyanobium revealed bioactive potential against microalgae, bacteria, and marine invertebrates. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2015, 78, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Leão, P.N.; Ramos, V.; Gonçalves, P.B.; Viana, F.; Lage, O.M.; Gerwick, W.H.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Chemoecological screening reveals high bioactivity in diverse culturable portuguese marine cyanobacteria. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 1316–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Martins, R.; Fernandez, N.; Beiras, R.; Vasconcelos, V. Toxicity assessment of crude and partially purified extracts of marine Synechocystis and Synechococcus cyanobacterial strains in marine invertebrates. Toxicon 2007, 50, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Martins, R.; Pereira, P.; Welker, M.; Fastner, J.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Toxicity of culturable cyanobacteria strains isolated from the portuguese coast. Toxicon 2005, 46, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martins, R.F.; Ramos, M.F.; Herfindal, L.; Sousa, J.A.; Skaerven, K.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic assessment of marine cyanobacteria—Synechocystis and Synechococcus. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brito, Â.; Gaifem, J.; Ramos, V.; Glukhov, E.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Gerwick, W.H.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Mendes, M.V.; Tamagnini, P. Bioprospecting portuguese atlantic coast cyanobacteria for bioactive secondary metabolites reveals untapped chemodiversity. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hentschel, U.; Usher, K.M.; Taylor, M.W. Marine sponges as microbial fermenters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 55, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lemloh, M.L.; Fromont, J.; Brümmer, F.; Usher, K.M. Diversity and abundance of photosynthetic sponges in temperate western australia. BMC Ecol. 2009, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rützler, K. Associations between caribbean sponges and photosynthetic organisms. In New Perspectives in Sponge Biology; Rutzler, K., Ed.; Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; pp. 455–466. [Google Scholar]
  18. Regueiras, A.; Alex, A.; Pereira, S.; Costa, M.S.; Antunes, A.; Vasconcelos, V. Cyanobacterial diversity in the marine sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis from a temperate region (portuguese coast, northeast atlantic). Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 79, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Blunt, J.W.; Copp, B.R.; Munro, M.H.; Northcote, P.T.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 165–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Thomas, T.; Rusch, D.; DeMaere, M.Z.; Yung, P.Y.; Lewis, M.; Halpern, A.; Heidelberg, K.B.; Egan, S.; Steinberg, P.D.; Kjelleberg, S. Functional genomic signatures of sponge bacteria reveal unique and shared features of symbiosis. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Konstantinou, D.; Gerovasileiou, V.; Voultsiadou, E.; Gkelis, S. Sponges-cyanobacteria associations: Global diversity overview and new data from the eastern mediterranean. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alex, A.; Antunes, A. Pyrosequencing characterization of the microbiota from atlantic intertidal marine sponges reveals high microbial diversity and the lack of co-occurrence patterns. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alex, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Tamagnini, P.; Santos, A.; Antunes, A. Unusual symbiotic cyanobacteria association in the genetically diverse intertidal marine sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis (demospongiae, halichondrida). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Usher, K.M.; Kuo, J.; Fromont, J.; Sutton, D.C. Vertical transmission of cyanobacterial symbionts in the marine sponge Chondrilla australiensis (demospongiae). Hydrobiologia 2001, 461, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Burgsdorf, I.; Slaby, B.M.; Handley, K.M.; Haber, M.; Blom, J.; Marshall, C.W.; Gilbert, J.A.; Hentschel, U.; Steindler, L. Lifestyle evolution in cyanobacterial symbionts of sponges. mBio 2015, 6, e00391–e00415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gao, Z.M.; Wang, Y.; Tian, R.M.; Wong, Y.H.; Batang, Z.B.; Al-Suwailem, A.M.; Bajic, V.B.; Qian, P.Y. Symbiotic adaptation drives genome streamlining of the cyanobacterial sponge symbiont “Candidatus synechococcus spongiarum”. mBio 2014, 5, e00079–e00114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Han, B.; Gross, H.; Goeger, D.E.; Mooberry, S.L.; Gerwick, W.H. Aurilides b and c, cancer cell toxins from a papua new guinea collection of the marine cyanobacterium lyngbya majuscula. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Luesch, H.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Moore, R.E.; Paul, V.J. Lyngbyastatin 2 and norlyngbyastatin 2, analogues of dolastatin g and nordolastatin g from the marine cyanobacterium lyngbya majuscula. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 1702–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Luesch, H.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Moore, R.E.; Paul, V.J.; Mooberry, S.L. Isolation, structure determination, and biological activity of lyngbyabellin a from the marine cyanobacterium lyngbya majuscula. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mundt, S.; Kreitlow, S.; Nowotny, A.; Effmert, U. Biochemical and pharmacological investigations of selected cyanobacteria. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2001, 203, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Papendorf, O.; König, G.M.; Wright, A.D. Hierridin b and 2,4-dimethoxy-6-heptadecyl-phenol, secondary metabolites from the cyanobacterium phormidium ectocarpi with antiplasmodial activity. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 2383–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Solis, P.N.; Wright, C.W.; Anderson, M.M.; Gupta, M.P.; Phillipson, J.D. A microwell cytotoxicity assay using Artemia salina. Planta Med. 1993, 59, 250–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lopes, V.R.; Fernández, N.; Martins, R.F.; Vasconcelos, V. Primary screening of the bioactivity of brackishwater cyanobacteria: Toxicity of crude extracts to Artemia salina larvae and Paracentrotus lividus embryos. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Engström-Öst, J.; Lehtiniemi, M.; Green, S.; Kozlowsky-Suzuki, B.; Viitasalo, M. Does cyanobacterial toxin accumulate in mysid shrimps and fish via copepods? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2002, 276, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ferrão-Filho, A.d.S.; Kozlowsky-Suzuki, B.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O. Accumulation of microcystins by a tropical zooplankton community. Aquat. Toxicol. 2002, 59, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ridley, C.P.; Bergquist, P.R.; Harper, M.K.; Faulkner, D.J.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Haygood, M.G. Speciation and biosynthetic variation in four dictyoceratid sponges and their cyanobacterial symbiont, Oscillatoria spongeliae. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nunes, B.S.; Carvalho, F.D.; Guilhermino, L.M.; Van Stappen, G. Use of the genus Artemia in ecotoxicity testing. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sakiyama, T.; Ueno, H.; Homma, H.; Numata, O.; Kuwabara, T. Purification and characterization of a hemolysin-like protein, sll1951, a nontoxic member of the rtx protein family from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. Strain pcc 6803. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3535–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, P.-J.; Chien, M.-S.; Wu, F.-J.; Chou, H.-N.; Lee, S.-J. Inhibition of embryonic development by microcystin-lr in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Toxicon 2005, 45, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pagliara, P.; Caroppo, C. Cytotoxic and antimitotic activities in aqueous extracts of eight cyanobacterial strains isolated from the marine sponge Petrosia ficiformis. Toxicon 2011, 57, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kótai, J. Instructions for Preparation of Modified Nutrient Solution z8 for Algae; Norwegian Institute for Water Research b-11769: Oslo, Norway, 1972; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rippka, R. Isolation and purification of cyanobacteria. Meth. Enzymol. 1988, 167, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Komárek, J. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, bd. 19/1: Cyanoprokaryota: Chroococcales; Springer Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; p. 548. [Google Scholar]
  44. Komárek, J.; Anagnostidis, K. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, bd. 19/2: Cyanoprokaryota: Oscillatoriales; Elsevier/Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; p. 759. [Google Scholar]
  45. Komárek, J. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, bd. 19/3: Cyanoprokaryota: Heterocytous Genera; Springer Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; p. 1131. [Google Scholar]
  46. Castenholz, R.W.; Wilmotte, A.; Herdman, M.; Rippka, R.; Waterbury, J.B.; Iteman, I.; Hoffmann, L. Phylum bx. Cyanobacteria. In Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume One: The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria; Boone, D.R., Castenholz, R.W., Garrity, G.M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 473–599. [Google Scholar]
  47. Komárek, J.; Kastovský, J.; Mares, J.; Johansen, J.R. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014, 86, 295–335. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fernández, N.; Beiras, R. Combined toxicity of dissolved mercury with copper, lead and cadmium on embryogenesis and early larval growth of the Paracentrotus lividus sea-urchin. Ecotoxicology 2001, 10, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rangel, M.; Malpezzi, E.L.A.; Susini, S.M.M.; De Freitas, J. Hemolytic activity in extracts of the diatom Nitzschia. Toxicon 1997, 35, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Slowing, I.I.; Wu, C.W.; Vivero-Escoto, J.L.; Lin, V.S.Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for reducing hemolytic activity towards mammalian red blood cells. Small 2009, 5, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Mortality rate (%) for the Artemia salina bioassay, after 48 h of exposure, for the organic and aqueous extracts. Controls used included filtered seawater with 0.1% DMSO for negative control and potassium dichromate (8 μg/mL) for positive control. a Assay not performed; * Statistically significant differences between extract and control.
Figure 1. Mortality rate (%) for the Artemia salina bioassay, after 48 h of exposure, for the organic and aqueous extracts. Controls used included filtered seawater with 0.1% DMSO for negative control and potassium dichromate (8 μg/mL) for positive control. a Assay not performed; * Statistically significant differences between extract and control.
Toxins 10 00297 g001
Figure 2. Effects of marine cyanobacterial extracts on embryogenesis of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. (a) Fertilized sea urchin eggs; (b) Normal pluteus larvae resulting from control treatment and (c) Abnormally developed larvae resulting from treatments with cyanobacterial extracts. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Figure 2. Effects of marine cyanobacterial extracts on embryogenesis of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. (a) Fertilized sea urchin eggs; (b) Normal pluteus larvae resulting from control treatment and (c) Abnormally developed larvae resulting from treatments with cyanobacterial extracts. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Toxins 10 00297 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of pluteus larvae developed (embryogenic success) after exposure to aqueous and organic extracts of the cyanobacterial strains. For the controls, filtered seawater was used with 0.1% DMSO (negative) and potassium dichromate at 4 μg/mL (positive). a Assay not performed; * Statistically significant differences between extract and control.
Figure 3. Percentage of pluteus larvae developed (embryogenic success) after exposure to aqueous and organic extracts of the cyanobacterial strains. For the controls, filtered seawater was used with 0.1% DMSO (negative) and potassium dichromate at 4 μg/mL (positive). a Assay not performed; * Statistically significant differences between extract and control.
Toxins 10 00297 g003
Figure 4. Larval growth from the organic extracts of the cyanobacterial strains. For the controls, filtered seawater was used with 0.1% DMSO (negative) and potassium dichromate at 4 μg/mL (positive). a Assay not performed; * Statistically significant differences between extract and control.
Figure 4. Larval growth from the organic extracts of the cyanobacterial strains. For the controls, filtered seawater was used with 0.1% DMSO (negative) and potassium dichromate at 4 μg/mL (positive). a Assay not performed; * Statistically significant differences between extract and control.
Toxins 10 00297 g004
Figure 5. Sampling locations. Two sampling locations were in Portugal mainland: Memória (N 41°13′52.27″, W 8°43′18.34″) and Porto Côvo (N 37°52′3.04″, W 8°47′37.19″). One was in Madeira Island: Caniçal (N 32°44′20.08″, W 16°44′17.55″) and the other in São Miguel Island, Azores: São Roque (N 37°45′15,35″, W 25°38′31.60″).
Figure 5. Sampling locations. Two sampling locations were in Portugal mainland: Memória (N 41°13′52.27″, W 8°43′18.34″) and Porto Côvo (N 37°52′3.04″, W 8°47′37.19″). One was in Madeira Island: Caniçal (N 32°44′20.08″, W 16°44′17.55″) and the other in São Miguel Island, Azores: São Roque (N 37°45′15,35″, W 25°38′31.60″).
Toxins 10 00297 g005
Table 1. Cyanobacterial strains selected for the present study, with information about the marine sponge it was isolated from and collection site.
Table 1. Cyanobacterial strains selected for the present study, with information about the marine sponge it was isolated from and collection site.
Cyanobacterial StrainSponge SpeciesCollection Site
Synechococcus sp. LEGE11381Polymastia sp.Memória
Synechocystis sp. 44B13paPolymastia agglutinansSão Roque, Azores
cf. Phormidesmis sp. LEGE10370Hymeniacidon perlevisMemória
Unidentified filamentous Synechococcales LEGE11384Phorbas plumosusMemória
Phormidium sp. 25J12tpTedania pilarriosaeMemória
Nodosilinea cf. nodulosa LEGE10376Hymeniacidon perlevisPorto Côvo
Chroococcales 6MA13tiTedania ignisSão Roque, Azores
Leptolyngbya sp. 31H12hpaHalichondria paniceaMemória
Cyanobacterium 34C12spUnidentified spongeCaniçal, Madeira
Cyanobium sp. LEGE10375Hymeniacidon perlevisMemória
Pseudanabaena aff. curta 12C10hpHymeniacidon perlevisMemória
Leptolyngbya sp. 31B12opOphlitaspongia papilaMemória

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Regueiras, A.; Pereira, S.; Costa, M.S.; Vasconcelos, V. Differential Toxicity of Cyanobacteria Isolated from Marine Sponges towards Echinoderms and Crustaceans. Toxins 2018, 10, 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070297

AMA Style

Regueiras A, Pereira S, Costa MS, Vasconcelos V. Differential Toxicity of Cyanobacteria Isolated from Marine Sponges towards Echinoderms and Crustaceans. Toxins. 2018; 10(7):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Regueiras, Ana, Sandra Pereira, Maria Sofia Costa, and Vitor Vasconcelos. 2018. "Differential Toxicity of Cyanobacteria Isolated from Marine Sponges towards Echinoderms and Crustaceans" Toxins 10, no. 7: 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070297

APA Style

Regueiras, A., Pereira, S., Costa, M. S., & Vasconcelos, V. (2018). Differential Toxicity of Cyanobacteria Isolated from Marine Sponges towards Echinoderms and Crustaceans. Toxins, 10(7), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop