Next Article in Journal
Genomic Analysis of Clostridium perfringens BEC/CPILE-Positive, Toxinotype D and E Strains Isolated from Healthy Children
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Sequence Analysis of TRI1 of Fusarium
Previous Article in Journal
Alkaloid Lindoldhamine Inhibits Acid-Sensing Ion Channel 1a and Reveals Anti-Inflammatory Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Altered Gene Response to Aflatoxin B1 in the Spleens of Susceptible and Resistant Turkeys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Towards Managing and Controlling Aflatoxin Producers Within Aspergillus Species in Infested Rice Grains Collected from Local Markets in Kenya

1
Institute for Basic Sciences Technology and Innovation, Pan African University, P.O. Box 62000–00200 Nairobi, Kenya
2
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844–00100 Nairobi, Kenya
3
Department of Medical Microbiology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000–00200 Nairobi, Kenya
4
Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Yaounde1, P.O. Box 812 Yaoundé, Cameroon
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(9), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11090544
Submission received: 16 July 2019 / Revised: 17 August 2019 / Accepted: 28 August 2019 / Published: 19 September 2019

Abstract

:
Rice grains can be attacked by a range of pathogens, including Aspergillus species, which can cause the accumulation of aflatoxins and represent a serious threat to the consumers. Aflatoxins are secondary metabolites synthesized by Aspergillus species and naturally occur in various foodstuffs. In this study, we sought to analyze the prevalence of aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus spp. in rice grains currently sold in Kenyan local markets. We analyzed a total of 98 samples randomly collected and primarily analyzed to observe moisture content and fungal growth. We then isolated Aspergillus species, characterized them morphologically and using the Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) primers. Finally, we screened them for aflatoxin-producing isolates targeting Norsolorinic Acid (nor-1) and Versicolorin (ver-1) specific genes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis. We observed that all tested samples were contaminated. The highest prevalence of Aspergillus species and aflatoxigenic fungal species, had values of 66% and 36.4% for nor-1 and ver-1, respectively. In total, 66% of all isolates were confirmed to be aflatoxin producers. The occurrence of high contamination levels of Aspergillus species points to the possibility of production of aflatoxins in rice grains. This work provides a baseline for future studies on the occurrence of mycotoxigenic fungal species in rice grains being sold in local markets and strategies to control these aflatoxigenic strains at pre- and post-harvest levels.
Key Contribution: This article provides insight into contamination of rice, a food staple in Africa by mycotoxin-producing fungi. It focuses on isolation of aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus from grains collected across local markets in Kenya, their identification and characterization using morphological and molecular techniques with a view of generating knowledge on minimizing exposure to the toxins.

1. Introduction

Rice is a cereal consumed by a great part of the human population throughout the world. This consumption is in many forms, including products such as white rice, parboiled rice, meal rice, and rice bran [1]. Generally, dried rice grains stored under inappropriate conditions, such as damp/misty places, insect infestation, and favorable environmental conditions of temperature and humidity, are likely to provide a viable substrate for the growth of fungi [2,3]. Mycotoxin contamination could further occur during the processing of rice grains [4]. Additionally, a delayed drying process and excess moisture (above 13%) [5] can promote the growth of fungi. Numerous species in Aspergillus section Flavi are common in plants and their processed derivatives, with some producing diverse mycotoxins, such as aflatoxins, 3-nitropropionic acid, tenuazonic acid, and cyclopiazonic acid [6]. The production of aflatoxins is associated with spore production by species of Aspergillus [7]. Four variants of aflatoxins, including aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), B2 (AFB2), G1 (AFG1), and G2 (AFG2), are produced by Aspergillus spp. and these have been described to have carcinogenic effects, as well as mutagenic and teratogenic capabilities. Furthermore, these compounds are known to result in immunosuppression [8]. Consequently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified these compounds as group I carcinogens and mutagens with immunosuppressive properties and they can inhibit several metabolic systems [9]. About 5.2 million cancer deaths occur each year, 55% of which occur in developing countries [10]. The removal of aflatoxins (AFs) is difficult due to their stability and thermal resistance in dried products [11]. In fact, AFs are resistant to food processing and thus may remain throughout the food chain [12]. Therefore, AFS are potential threats to human health, either by the direct consumption of contaminated food products or by carry over aflatoxins and their metabolites in milk and meat [13]. World health authorities warn that low doses with long-term dietary exposure to aflatoxins represent a major risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [14]. The current study therefore aimed at isolating and characterizing Aspergillus strain contaminants from rice collected from markets in Kenya, with the aim of generating knowledge on the possible consumption of and exposure of the local population to these carcinogens.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

2.1.1. Moisture Content

In the present study, mycoflora was isolated from rice grains to evaluate the contamination level in rice grains sold in the market. Samples collected were previously examined for moisture content and the prevalence of Aspergillus species. Environmental conditions, the critical ones being temperature and a high moisture content, influence fungal growth in foodstuffs. All samples were initially analyzed for moisture content to check for the relationship correlation (Y = 4.211 × X − 54.39) between the moisture level in rice grains and fungal growth. Four groups of samples were clustered according to their percentages: 14–14.5%, 15–15.5%, 15.6–16.5% and 16.6–17.9%, respectively, for group 1, group 2, group 3 and group 4, as shown in Figure 1.
Samples with high moisture contents for a length of time offer the best microclimate for the growth of mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxins production. A positive correlation between moisture content and the number of isolates was observed in this study (R2 = 0.2926). With the increase of moisture content, the number of isolates was increased, indicating a possibly higher level of fungal growth and contamination of rice grains in group 3 and 4 samples.

2.1.2. Isolation of Aspergillus Species

The fungal isolation results revealed the presence of Aspergillus in all samples. From these observations, all inoculated plates except for the negative control indicated that the rice grains were colonized by fungi.

2.1.3. Morphological Analysis

All the samples were positive for Aspergillus, with a total of eight (8) fungal strains, including, Aspergillus clavatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus nomius, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus versicolor, and Aspergillus spp., being observed. These strains were purified based on their distinct morphology on malt extract agar (MEA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and differentiated based on their macroscopic and microscopic characteristics. Macroscopic identification was based on colony and reverse color, diameter, exudates, and texture. On the basis of the macroscopic study, isolates could not be differentiated. Further microscopic study involved the arrangement, color, diameter, shape, size, wall characters, cellular contents, conidial heads, conidiophore, sterigmata, conidia, and conidial arrangements, which were observed with a microscope [15]. The macroscopy and microscopy characteristics of fungal isolates are presented in Figure 2.
Morphological analysis revealed that Aspergillus flavus (37.5%) was the most represented strain, followed by Aspergillus parasiticus (27.9%), Aspergillus fumigatus (10.8%), Aspergillus nomius (6.2%), Aspergillus oryzae (5%), Aspergillus clavatus (3.1%), Aspergillus versicolor (2.7%), and Aspergillus spp. (6.5%) (Figure 3). The ability of fungi to change their morphology at different stages of growth and reproduction renders phenotypic characterization inefficient. Therefore, these isolates were subjected to molecular analysis through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of their Internally Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions and a two gene profile of Aspergillus species involved in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway Norsolorinic Acid (NOR): aflD (nor-1), and Versicolorin: aflM (ver-1) fragments of aflatoxigenic fungal genomic DNA.

2.1.4. Molecular Characterization

Genomic DNA was isolated from 74 samples of Aspergillus strains for molecular analysis. The quantity of extracted DNA from all the samples was between 369 µg/mL and 1998 µg/mL, which is an excellent quantity range. Genomic DNA was successfully amplified, revealing the presence of three genes across various samples. The expected size of each primer pair produced a single DNA fragment of 598 bp for ITS (Figure S1), and 400 and 536 bp for nor-1 and ver-1, respectively Figures S2 and S3. The results of the amplified products are shown in Figure 4. From a total of 74 phenotypically characterized Aspergillus species isolates, all samples showed positive PCR results for the ITS primer pair. Although ITS1-ITS4 is the most commonly used primer pair for the detection of Aspergillus species [16], it does not have a sufficient discriminative power to differentiate between aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic (atoxigenic) species. Therefore, primer pairs for the specific genes profile involved in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathways nor-1 and ver-1 were amplified. Altogether, 74 samples were screened, in which 49 samples were found to be positive for nor-1 (27 for Aspergillus flavus, 8 for Aspergillus nomius, and 14 Aspergillus parasiticus), and 27 were found to be positive for ver-1 (14 for Aspergillus flavus, 5 for Aspergillus nomius, and 8 Aspergillus parasiticus). No amplification was observed for other strains, including Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus clavatus, and Aspergillus versicolor.

2.2. Discussion

Contamination of foodstuffs by mycotoxin-producing fungi is on the rise in the world, with most cereals and grains being affected. These fungi lead to the deterioration of food products through the production of harmful toxins, such as aflatoxins. Key among these is Aspergillus spp., which synthesize aflatoxins. Moisture content is one of the determining factors for the growth of Aspergillus species [17]. In the current study, rice grains from local markets showed a high moisture content (14% to 17.9%), which is above the standard levels of 12%–13% for rice grains reported [18]. These results are in line with those reported by Hina [19], who attributed the same to processing, warm and humid weather, and poor handling of grains.
In order to understand if rice grains from Kenyan local markets are contaminated by mycotoxin-producing fungi, we analyzed the prevalence of Aspergillus species. The results showed the occurrence of fungal species in all the samples, with Aspergillus flavus being the most predominant, followed by Aspergillus parasiticus, as compared to other strains. This can be attributed to the ability of Aspergillus flavus to grow on a variety of substrates across different environmental conditions, as well as its capability to produce numerous spores that remain viable, even under extreme conditions. These findings are in agreement with reports by several other studies who revealed a high prevalence of Aspergillus species in the contamination of rice grains from local markets [19,20,21]. In our case, this contamination might be due to the exposure of rice grains to fungal colonization during processing, transportation, and storage. Poor handling conditions, including improper packaging and poor ventilation, as well as increased humidity, in the ware houses could further be exacerbating the growth of fungi in stored grains, as described previously [22]. The high prevalence of Aspergillus species compared to other fungal isolates in the current study could be a pointer towards the contamination of these grains by aflatoxins [23]. Due to the toxic and carcinogenic properties of aflatoxins, there is an urgent need to develop a sensitive, rapid, and specific technique for the identification of aflatoxin produced from food samples. In our study, the PCR reaction was targeted against ITS1-ITS4 for the detection of Aspergillus species, and the nor-1 and ver-1 genes profile targeted DNA for screening aflatoxigenic strains from Aspergillus isolated. The primers ITS1 and ITS4 previously successfully amplified all the ITS region isolates selected using conventional PCR. In gel electrophoresis of the PCR product, an amplicon corresponding to 598 bp in size was only seen in a positive sample, which clearly indicated that the primers (ITS1-ITS4) were specific for Aspergillus species. This result is in concordance with that recorded by many investigators [16,24], showing that ITS1-ITS4 is the most commonly used primer pair for the detection of Aspergillus species.
A look at the process of aflatoxin production in these fungi shows that the biosynthetic pathway comprises many enzymatic steps that lead to the end product. Aspergillus species within the genus show a variation in aflatoxin production, with some species not able to synthesize aflatoxins, and these are termed atoxigenic [25]. Apart from a functional analysis of aflatoxin production in Aspergillus, several studies have reported the use of PCR technology as a rapid and sensitive method for the detection and diagnosis of aflatoxin production [26], as well as the detection of aflatoxigenic strains from non-aflatoxigenic counterparts [27,28].
In the current study, we used PCR for the detection of potential aflatoxigenic Aspergillus strains infecting rice grains currently sold at Kenyan markets. We targeted nor-1 (aflD) and ver-1 (aflM); key structural genes in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway that play a key role in the synthesis of the toxin. Our results showed that a high number of Aspergillus strains (66%) were positive for nor-1, whilst 36% of the isolates were positive for ver-1. This indicated that these isolates are potential aflatoxin producers based on the role played by the two genes during aflatoxin biosynthesis. On the other hand, isolates that showed negative PCR results for these genes indicated that these isolates could be non-aflatoxigenic. It is possible that this non-aflatoxigenicity is due to mutations or deletions of these genes that inhibit the role they play during toxin biosynthesis [29]. This is in line with Houshyarfard et al. [30], who reported that the production of aflatoxin is bound to several factors, including the presence of certain genes and the nature of these genes. This means that there should not be major deletions or insertions within the gene regions or regions flanking the gene. Otherwise, deletions of several portions of the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster have been reported to be the main cause for the lack of aflatoxin production. Keeping in view the above results, it is obvious that the contamination level of mycotoxigenic fungi in rice grains sold at the markets is very high. Our results are in accordance with other reports demonstrating the importance of PCR assay techniques for detecting the aflatoxigenic potential of Aspergillus strains [20,21,31,32,33,34].

3. Conclusions

On the basis of the achieved results, we conclude that the prevalence of Aspergillus species in rice grains sold at the markets is high, and indicates the possible high level of aflatoxigenic strains in rice grains under study. In this study, 66% of isolates were used to confirm aflatoxin production genes considered as indicators of aflatoxin production. This is indicative of exposure of population to aflatoxins and could lead to possible health problems. Amplification of aflatoxin and specific genes proved a rapid and accurate detection system to differentiate the aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic isolates. Further studies on the sequencing and quantification of aflatoxins in rice grains and their relationship with the level of contaminating Aspergillus species are in progress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Samples

Samples comprising local and imported rice grains were collected randomly (1 kg) from local retail markets and millers in Mwea and Thika (Kenya) and labelled appropriately. A total of 98 samples (local rice produced in Mwea and imported rice originating from Biriyani, India, Pakistan, and Thailand) were taken according to the alternative sampling plan for the official control of mycotoxins in food [35]. Representative samples were then put in sealed bags and transported to the Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Laboratory in Pan African University institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation (PAUSTI).

4.2. Moisture Content Analysis

To better understand the factors that may have led to aflatoxin contamination of the samples, each sample of rice grains collected was analyzed for its moisture content using a Grainer meter (Model Japonica, Miami, FL, USA).

4.3. Isolation and Enumeration of Fungal Species

Isolation of microflora from the grains was conducted following the method of Ulster [36]. Samples of rice grains were analyzed by the direct plating method described by Pitt et al. [37]. For each sample, 20 pieces (rice grains suspected to be contaminated by fungi) were placed aseptically on a layer of moistened filter paper in the Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were incubated in an upright position at 25 °C for 5–7 days in darkness and ventilated for 12 h on the 3rd day. After incubation, the plates were examined, and the number of contaminated particles was counted and reported as a percentage. Fungi growing on different seeds were isolated from emerging colonies on modified rose Bengal chloramphenicol agar (MRBA) [38]. Pure cultures were carried out for subsequent studies using two (2) culture media: malt extract agar (MEA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA), according to Pitt et al., [39] and Varga et al. [40], for seven days.

4.4. Phenotypic Characterization

Phenotypic characterization was done on the basis of the mycelium growth pattern, color, and properties of fruiting bodies of the fungi. The growth pattern of fungal colonies, colony size (diameter) and color (reverse and coarse), exudates, and colony margins were the macroscopic features used in identification. The size of the head, vesicle shape, phailides, matulae, conidiophores, and conidia (conidial diameter, wall, shape, surface, and conidia attachment with conidiophore) were employed for microscopic identification. These features were finally compared with the synoptic keys for identification of the isolated fungi [26].
The percentage occurrence of each species isolated was also calculated by the following formula:
%   Occurrence   of   species = ( No .   of   isolates   of   a   species Total   no .   of   isolates   ×   100 )

4.5. Molecular Characterization of the Isolates

The genomic DNA was extracted from seven-day-old fungi cultures grown on MEA and PDA media and the fungal mass from the pure cultures was scraped-out from the plates. A total of 50–100 mg of fungal mycelium was scraped and placed in a 2 mL tube and vortexed vigorously for 30 min with glass beads to crush the mycelial wall and to release the DNA. A volume of 500 µL of Lysis Buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM B-mercaptoethanol, and 1% Sodium dodecyl sulfate), 5 µL of RNase A, and 1 µL of Proteinase K were added. Tubes were then incubated at 65 °C for 45 min in buffer.
Thereafter, 270 µL of Sodium/Potassium acetate (3 M) was added and samples were well-mixed and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. After centrifugation supernatant (700 µL) was transferred to a fresh tube, and an equal volume of chloroform: isoamylalcohol (24:1) was added and mixed well, samples were stood on a bench for 5 min, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant (700 µL) was transferred into new tubes, and 80 µL of Sodium/Potassium acetate (3M) and 587 µL of ice cold isopropanol were added and then mixed well by inverting the tubes and then incubating them at −20 °C overnight. After that, samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 min, and the supernatant was discarded carefully. The DNA pellets were washed with 1 mL of 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The DNA pellets were air dried and dissolved in 50 µL of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer and stored at −20 °C until use.
Separation of the isolated genomic DNA was done using agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by Sybr Green visualization using Lambda (λ) as a DNA size marker. The concentration and purity of genomic DNA were measured using a Nano-drop Spectrophotometer (Model PCR Max Lambda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the purity of all extracted DNA was measured by taking their absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm.

4.6. Diagnostic PCR Using AspergillusUniversal Primers

We used Aspergillus universal primer pairs to amplify the ITS1 and ITS4 region of different isolated Aspergillus strains for characterization and primer sequences already available in the literature [32] to amplify two different genes involved in the Aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway Norsolorinic Acid (NOR): aflD (nor-1), and Versicolorin: aflM (ver-1) fragments of aflatoxigenic fungal genomic DNA. The sequences of primers are listed in Table 1.
PCR analysis was performed in a 20 µL reaction mixture comprising 1 µL of genomic DNA, 4 µL of premix Taq buffer (Solis Biodyne, Tartu, Estonia), and 0.5 µL of each forward and reverse primer. The final volume was made up to 20 µL with nuclease free water. Amplification was performed in a Proflex PCR System (Model 4483636, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the following conditions (Table 2).
The amplified PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose (Sigma, St. Loaus, MO, USA) gel stained in 10 µL of Trugel Fluorescent Dye. The DNA bands resolved on agarose gel were visualized in the UV Documentation system with a camera (Model UV Doc. HDS UITEC Cambridge, UK) transilluminator. The sizes of the amplicon were estimated by comparing them with a commercial 1 kb DNA ladder on agarose gel.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/11/9/544/s1, Figure S1: Gel images of ITS1 and ITS4, Figure S2: Gel images of aflD aflD (400bp product), Figure S3: Gel images of aflM (536bp product), Figure S4: Run of some positive samples for publication, Document S1: Screening of aflD and aflM.

Author Contributions

Methodology, J.M.; supervision, A.N., Z.A., and S.R.; writing—original draft, Y.D.

Funding

This work was funded by the African Union through Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation (PAUSTI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

References

  1. Haitham, S.A.; Ali, A.B.; Kamel, A.A.; Khalid, S.E.; Abdallah, M.E.; Alsum, B.A. Detection of Aspergillus and Penicillium species producing aflatoxin in rice grains imported into Saudi Arabia. Wulfenia 2013, 20, 313–323. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reiter, E.; Vouk, F.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E. Aflatoxins in rice a limited survey of products marketed in Austria. Food Control 2010, 21, 988–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lai, X.; He, Z.; Liu, R.; Liu, C. Potential for aflatoxin B1 and B2 production by Aspergillus flavus strains isolated from rice samples. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sohaib, A.; Ali, S.W.; Ahmed, A.; Mahmood, R. Molecular Characterization of Fungal Species Isolated from Rice Grains. Institute of Agricultural Sciences; University of the Punjab, Quid-i-Azam Campus: Lahore, Pakistan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt, M.; Zannini, E.; Arendt, E.K. Recent Advances in Physical Post-Harvest Treatments for Shelf-Life Extension of Cereal Crops. Foods 2018, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Frisvad, J.C.; Hubka, V.; Ezekiel, C.N.; Hong, S.B.; Nováková, A.; Chen, A.J.; Arzanlou, M.; Larsen, T.O.; Sklenář, F.; Mahakarnchanakul, W.; et al. Taxonomy of Aspergillus section Flavi and their production of aflatoxins, ochratoxins and other mycotoxins. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 93, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Calvo, A.M.; Wilson, R.A.; Bok, J.W.; Keller, N.P. Relationship between secondary metabolism and fungal development. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lereau, M.; Gouas, D.; Villar, S.; Besaratinia, A.; Hautefeuille, A.; Berthillon, P.; Martel-Planche, G.; da Costa, A.N.; Ortiz-Cuaran, S.; Hantz, O.; et al. Interactions between hepatitis B virus and aflatoxin B1 Effects on p53 induction in Hepa RG cells. J. Gen. Virol. 2012, 93, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. IARC Monograph Aflatoxins. IARC Monograph Aflatoxins. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to Humans. In Some Traditional Herbal Medicines, Some Mycotoxins, Naphthalene and Styrene; IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2002; Volume 82, pp. 171–300. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gemeda, N.; Woldeamanuel, Y.; Asrat, D.; Debela, A.; Lemma, H.; Belete, Y. Assessment of Aflatoxigeinic AspergillusSpecies in Food Commodities from Local Market of Addis Ababa. Research 2014, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, J.; Her, J.Y.; Lee, K.G. Reduction of aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, and G2) in soybean-based model systems. Food Chem. 2015, 189, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruadrew, S.; Craft, J.; Aidoo, K. Occurrence of toxigenic Aspergillus spp. and aflatoxins in selected food commodities of Asian origin sourced in the West of Scotland. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 55, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Naseer, R.; Sultana, B.; Khan, M.; Naseer, D.; Nigam, P. Utilization of waste fruit-peels to inhibit aflatoxins synthesis by Aspergillus flavus: A biotreatment of rice for safer storage. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 172, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tola, M.; Kebede, B. Occurrence, importance and control of mycotoxins: Bioscience; Environment & Agriculture; Environmental Studies & Management; Food Science & Technology. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1191103. [Google Scholar]
  15. Raper, K.B.; Fennell, D.I. The Genus Aspergillus; The Williams & Wilkins Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1965; pp. 370–376. [Google Scholar]
  16. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.J.; Taylor, J.L. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetic. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abbas, K.H. Aflatoxins and Food Safety; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. Magan, N.; Hope, R.; Cairns, V.; Aldred, D. Post-harvest fungal ecology: Impact of fungal growth and mycotoxin accumulation in stored grain. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shanakht, H.; Shahid, A.A.; Ali, S.W. characterization of fungal microbiota on rice grains from local markets of Lahore. J. Hyg. Eng. Des. 2014, 37, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  20. Renu, K.; Agarwal, M.K.; Bhagayavant, S.S.; Verma, P.; Nagar, D.P. Detection of Aspergillus flavus using PCR method from fungus infested food grains collected from local market. Ann. Plant Sci. 2018, 7, 2073–2077. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ibrahim, F.; Jalal, H.; Khan, A.B.; Asghar, M.A.; Iqbal, J.; Ahmed, A.; Nadeem, G. Prevalence of Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus in Food and Feed Samples from Karachi. J. Infect. Mol. Biol. Preval. 2016, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reddy, K.R.N.; Reddy, C.S.; Mangala, U.N.; Muralidharan, K. Site of Infection of Aspergillus sp. in seeds of rice cultivars. J. Mycol. 2006, 36, 271–277. [Google Scholar]
  23. Aydin, A.; Aksu, H.; Gunsen, U. Mycotoxin levels and incidence of mould in Turkish rice. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 10, 1661–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Majid, Z.; Maryam, E. Molecular variation analysis of Aspergillus flavus using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the internal transcribed spacer rDNA region. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 12, 1628–1632. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ehrlich, K.C. Non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus to prevent aflatoxin contamination in crops: advantages and limitations. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hadi, A.A.; Carter, D.; Magan, N. Discrimination between aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus section Flavi strains from Egyptian peanuts using molecular and analytical techniques. World Mycotoxin J. 2011, 4, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rodrigues, P.; Soares, C.; Kozakiewicz, Z.; Paterson, R.R.M.; Lima, N.; Venâncio, A. Identification and characterization of Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxins. In Communicating Current Research and Educational Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology; Méndez-Villas, A., Ed.; Formatex: Badajoz, Spain, 2007; pp. 527–534. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rashid, M.; Khalil, S.; Ayub, N.; Ahmed, W.; Khan, A.G. Categorization of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus isolates of stored wheat grains into aflatoxinogenics and non-aflatoxinogenics. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 40, 2177–2192. [Google Scholar]
  29. Degola, F.; Berni, E.; Dall’Asta, C.; Spotti, E.; Marchelli, R.; Ferrero, I.; Restivo, F. A multiplex RT-PCR Approach to Detect Aflatoxigenic Strains of Aspergillus flavus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Houshyarfard, M.; Rouhani, H.; Falahati-Rastegar, M.; Malekzadeh-Shafaroudi, S.; Mehdikhani Moghaddam, E.; Chang, P. Gene Deletion Patterns in non-aflatoxigenic Strains of Aspergillus flavus. Mycol. Iran. 2014, 1, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  31. Al-Shuhaib, M.B.S.; Albakri, A.H.; Alwan, S.H.; Almandil, N.B.; AbdulAzeez, S.; Borgio, J.F. Optimal pcr primers for rapid and accurate detection of Aspergillus flavus isolates. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shekhany, K.A.M.; Rostam, S.R.K. Detection of Aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus in Maize Grains and Soils in Sulaimani Province using Molecular Approaches. J. Zankoy Sulaimani 2016, 18, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hussain, A.; Afzal, A.; Irfan, M.; Malik, K.A. Molecular Detection of Aflatoxin Producing Strains of Aspergillus flavus from Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea). Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 3, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Commission Regulation (EC). Laying down the Methods of Sampling and Analysis for the Official Control of the Levels of Mycotoxins in Foodstuffs; Official Journal of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  35. Botton, B.; Breton, A.; Fèvre, M.; Gauthier, S.; Guy, P.; Larpent, J.P.; Reymond, P.; Sanglier, J.J.; Vayssier, Y.; et Veau, P. Moisissures Utiles et Nuisibles, Importance Industrielle; Masson: Paris, France, 1990; p. 349. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pitt, J.I.; Hocking, A.D. Fungi and Food Spoilage; Blackie Academic and Professional: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  37. Atlas, R.M. Handbook of Microbiological Media; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pitt, J.I.; Hocking, A.D. Fungi and Food Spoilage, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  39. Varga, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A. Two new aflatoxin producing species and an overview of Aspergillus section Flavi. Stud. Mycol. 2011, 69, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mathur, S.A.; Matur, S.B.; Neergaard, P. Detection of seed borne fungi in sorghum and location of Fusarium moniliforme in seed. Seed Sci. Technol. 1975, 3, 683–690. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Clustering of samples and the basis of their moisture content.
Figure 1. Clustering of samples and the basis of their moisture content.
Toxins 11 00544 g001
Figure 2. Left to right: 7-day-old colonies on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and malt extract agar (MEA); top to bottom: (A) Aspergillus clavatus; (B) Aspergillus flavus; (C) Aspergillus fumigatus; (D) Aspergillus parasiticus.
Figure 2. Left to right: 7-day-old colonies on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and malt extract agar (MEA); top to bottom: (A) Aspergillus clavatus; (B) Aspergillus flavus; (C) Aspergillus fumigatus; (D) Aspergillus parasiticus.
Toxins 11 00544 g002
Figure 3. Occurrence of different Aspergillus species isolated from rice grains presented as a percentage.
Figure 3. Occurrence of different Aspergillus species isolated from rice grains presented as a percentage.
Toxins 11 00544 g003
Figure 4. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplicons of (A) the 400 bp product of aflD and (B) the 536 bp product of aflM markers. M: molecular weight marker 1 kb (Solis Biodyne, Tartu, Estonia); -ve: negative control. Numbers are the code of samples Figure S4.
Figure 4. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplicons of (A) the 400 bp product of aflD and (B) the 536 bp product of aflM markers. M: molecular weight marker 1 kb (Solis Biodyne, Tartu, Estonia); -ve: negative control. Numbers are the code of samples Figure S4.
Toxins 11 00544 g004
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primer sets used for the study.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primer sets used for the study.
SetPrimer NameSequences (5′–3′)Length of PCR Product (bp)
1ITS1F-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG598
ITS4R-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC
2aflDF-ACCGCTACGCCGGCACTCTCGGCAC400
R-GTTGGCCGCCAGCTTCGACACTCCG
3aflMF-GCCGCAGGCCGCGGAGAAAGTGGT536
R-GGGGATATACTCCCGCGACACAGCC
Abbreviations: F, forward; R, reverse.
Table 2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) parameters of the oligonucleotide primer sets used for the study.
Table 2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) parameters of the oligonucleotide primer sets used for the study.
SetPCR FragmentInitial DenaturationDenaturationAnnealingElongationFinal ElongationNumber of Cycles
1ITS94 °C5 min95 °C60 s52 °C60 s72 °C60 s72 °C10 min35
2aflD94 °C5 min94 °C60 s64 °C60 s72 °C60 s72 °C10 min33
3aflM95 °C5 min95 °C60 s65 °C60 s72 °C2 min72 °C10 min33

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Douksouna, Y.; Masanga, J.; Nyerere, A.; Runo, S.; Ambang, Z. Towards Managing and Controlling Aflatoxin Producers Within Aspergillus Species in Infested Rice Grains Collected from Local Markets in Kenya. Toxins 2019, 11, 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11090544

AMA Style

Douksouna Y, Masanga J, Nyerere A, Runo S, Ambang Z. Towards Managing and Controlling Aflatoxin Producers Within Aspergillus Species in Infested Rice Grains Collected from Local Markets in Kenya. Toxins. 2019; 11(9):544. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11090544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Douksouna, Youmma, Joel Masanga, Andrew Nyerere, Steven Runo, and Zachée Ambang. 2019. "Towards Managing and Controlling Aflatoxin Producers Within Aspergillus Species in Infested Rice Grains Collected from Local Markets in Kenya" Toxins 11, no. 9: 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11090544

APA Style

Douksouna, Y., Masanga, J., Nyerere, A., Runo, S., & Ambang, Z. (2019). Towards Managing and Controlling Aflatoxin Producers Within Aspergillus Species in Infested Rice Grains Collected from Local Markets in Kenya. Toxins, 11(9), 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11090544

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop