Next Article in Journal
Anchoring Mechanism for Capsule Endoscope: Mechanical Design, Fabrication and Experimental Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Red Emission from Amorphous Silicon Carbide Films via Nitrogen Doping
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Demonstration of Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on AlN/AlScN Composite Film with a Feasible Keff2

1
The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
School of Microelectronics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2044; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122044
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 1 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022

Abstract

:
Film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) with a desired effective electromechanical coupling coefficient ( K e f f 2 ) are essential for designing filter devices. Using AlN/AlScN composite film with the adjustable thickness ratio can be a feasible approach to obtain the required K e f f 2 . In this work, we research the resonant characteristics of FBARs based on AlN/AlScN composite films with different thickness ratios by finite element method and fabricate FBAR devices in a micro-electromechanical systems process. Benefiting from the large piezoelectric constants, with a 1 μm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N film, K e f f 2 can be twice compared with that of FBAR based on pure AlN films. For the composite films with different thickness ratios, K e f f 2 can be adjusted in a relatively wide range. In this case, a filter with the specific N77 sub-band is demonstrated using AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite film, which verifies the enormous potential for AlN/AlScN composite film in design filters.

1. Introduction

For achieving a high-speed and large-capacity data exchange in the wireless communication, filters as key elements in the radio-frequency front-end module are desired to possess large bandwidth, high frequency, and low insertion [1,2,3,4]. Adopting aluminum nitride (AlN)-based film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) to construct filters are a promising approach to meet these requirements due to the high acoustic velocity of AlN, achievable large effective electromechanical coupling coefficient ( K e f f 2 ) of FBAR and complementary metal oxide semiconductor compatibility [5,6]. B.P. Sorokin et al. have recently obtained an excitation of longitudinal bulk acoustic waves in a diamond-based high overtone bulk acoustic resonator at microwave and enhanced frequency bands up to 40 GHz [7,8]. However, with the rapid development of fifth-generation communication, the characteristics of AlN-based FBAR are further expected to be improved. For the design of the film bulk acoustic filters, K e f f 2 is a crucial parameter that affects the bandwidth and cutoff frequency of filters. In particular, doping method is an effective option to increase the electromechanical coupling coefficient ( K t 2 ) of piezoelectric material AlN, for example using Sc doping, thus obtaining an expected large bandwidth for AlN-based filters. Milena Moreira et al. have proved that using Sc doping with concentration of 15 at.% can achieve a two-times increase in the K e f f 2 , which is suitable for the applications needing broad bandwidth [9].
However, for specific requirements of bandwidth and frequency, we may need suitable K e f f 2 for FBARs in order to achieve the accurate control in passband of filters. Although different Sc doping concentrations in AlN can effectively obtain a different value of K e f f 2 for AlN-based FBARs, the Sc alloy targets for sputter technology are costly and it is difficult to produce arbitrary concentrations. AlN/AlScN bilayer composite film is a potential choice to realize the modulation of K e f f 2 for FBARs, since we can modify the effective piezoelectric constants of the composite film using varying thickness ratios of AlN to AlScN films. In our previous work, AlN/AlScN bilayer composite film was selected to acquire a comparatively higher K e f f 2 of 7.8% for the Lamé Mode resonator [10]. Li et al. have a detailed investigation about the effective properties of AlN/AlScN bilayer composite film based on the Reuss model and Eshelby–Mori–Tanaka micromechanics theory and built an explicit relationship between piezoelectric constant d33 and the thickness ratio of AlN to AlScN [11]. Su et al., also found that AlN as a seed layer can effectively enhance the crystal quality and (002) orientation of AlScN film, which can be adopted to further improve the properties of FBAR and filter devices [12].
In this paper, we demonstrate the modulation of K e f f 2 for FBARs using different piezoelectric materials and propose the filter designs for specific bandpass based on the AlN/AlScN bilayer composite film. We investigate the influence of different thickness ratios of AlN to AlScN layer on the resonant characteristics and K e f f 2 of FBARs via finite element simulation. FBARs based on pure AlN, AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N, and AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N bilayer composite film are fabricated and we can obtain varying K e f f 2 for FBARs consistent with the simulated results. AlScN can effectively compensate the deficiency of AlN film in electromechanical coupling in the form of AlN/AlScN composite film. With a decreased thickness ratio of AlN to AlScN, an obvious increased K e f f 2 for FBARs can be realized. It is also verified that with AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite film the filter for N77 sub-band (3.4 GHz–3.6 GHz) can be easily demonstrated, proving the feasibility using composite film to achieve the expected K e f f 2 for filter design.

2. Materials and Methods

In our work, the resonant characteristics of FBARs based on AlN and AlN/AlScN bilayer composite film were simulated using finite element method. All the piezoelectric materials were deposited by a magnet sputter (SPTS, Sigma fxP system, Newport, UK) under 200 °C. Pure Al metal, Al-Sc alloys with the atomic mass percent of Sc of 10% and 20%, respectively, were adopted when depositing the piezoelectric films [13]. Sputter power of 6 kW and bias power of 160 W were used for the film deposition with the flow rates of N2 and Ar of 60 sccm and 20 sccm, respectively. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement (Rigaku, SmartLab SE with a Cu Kα radiation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to characterize the crystal structure of piezoelectric films [13].
FBAR devices based on the micro-electromechanical systems process were fabricated on 725 μm-thick silicon substrates and the impedance curves of FBAR devices were measured using Keysight network analyzer (Keysight, N5222B, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) connecting to a Cascade Microtech’s GSG probe station (FormFactor, Beaverton, OR, USA) [10]. The fabrication process flow is shown in Figure 1 [14]. The fabrication process started with etching Si to form the cavity (Figure 1a). The SiO2 was deposited by physical vapor deposition as the sacrificial layer and chemical mechanical polishing was used to polish the surface of SiO2 layer (Figure 1b) for the deposition of subsequent films. Then, AlN seed layer with a thickness of 25 nm and bottom Mo electrode layer were deposited using magnetron sputtering as shown in Figure 1c. Next, the piezoelectric layer (AlN, AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N and AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite films) was deposited by the magnet sputter and etched by inductively coupled plasma to open the bottom electrode pad as shown in Figure 1d. Another Mo layer was deposited and patterned as the top electrode layer (Figure 1e). Subsequently, the Au layer was deposited by electron beam evaporation and patterned (Figure 1f). The release windows were opened to release SiO2 in the cavity (Figure 1g). Finally, the SiO2 layer was wet-etched by HF/NH3F mixed solution to empty the cavity and the resonators were fabricated completely (Figure 1h).

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 2a,b show the schematic structures of a typical FBAR, which consists of a piezoelectric layer sandwiched between the top and bottom electrodes. The voltage or the electrical field between the two electrodes excites the acoustic wave. An air cavity is created between the bottom electrode and the substrate to trap the acoustic wave between the electrodes, as shown in Figure 2b. Figure 2c shows the working principle of a ladder filter based on FBAR, the inset in Figure 2c is the circuit topology of the ladder filters. The resonator has two resonant frequencies, one is the series resonant frequency fs, at which the impedance Zmin can be very low, and the second one is a parallel resonant or anti-resonant frequency fp, at which the impedance Zmax can be very high. The parallel resonator in the filter is tuned to be a slightly lower frequency by adding a mass loading layer on the top electrode. When fp2 representing the anti-resonant frequency of parallel resonators is chosen to be equal to or slightly lower than fs1 representing the series resonant frequency of series resonators, a passband is formed between the frequencies near fs2and fp1. The bandwidth of the filter is mainly determined by the effective coupling coefficient K e f f 2 of FBARs, which can be calculated by Equation (1). Therefore, for the filter design with a specific requirement in the passband, we need to consider the resonant frequencies of FBAR and seek a suitable K e f f 2 carefully [15,16,17].
K e f f 2 = π 2 4 f s f p f p f s f p
For investigating the resonant characteristics of FBAR based on AlN/AlScN bilayer composite film with different thickness ratios, we used the finite element model to simulate the performances. Table 1 lists the material constants of AlN, Al0.9Sc0.1N, and Al0.8Sc0.2N piezoelectric films used for the simulation [11,18,19,20,21]. As shown in Figure 3, we obtained the impedance curves of FBARs with the pure AlN, AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N, and AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite films, respectively. The total thickness for piezoelectric layers is 1 μm, the thickness for both top and bottom Mo electrode is 200 nm. For FBAR based on 1 μm-thick AlN film, fs is 2.65 GHz and fp is 2.72 GHz. As shown in Figure 3a and Figure 3b, for FBAR with AlN/AlScN composite films, with the increased thickness ratio of AlScN to AlN, the resonant frequency decreases, which can be contributed to the lower longitudinal acoustic velocity of AlScN compared with the acoustic velocity of AlN [4,22,23]. Figure 3c shows K e f f 2 of FBARs with different piezoelectric materials calculated by Equation (1). When using AlN/AlScN composite film to replace pure AlN film, we can obtain an increased K e f f 2 , and K e f f 2 for FBAR based on 1 μm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N film can be twice of that when FBAR based on 1 μm-thick AlN film. It is also clear that using AlN/AlScN composite film with different thickness ratio can achieve an effective adjustment in K e f f 2 , which can be adopted when designing filters with the expected requirement in passband [24,25].
We also deposited the piezoelectric films and fabricated FBARs to verify the simulated results. The pure AlN, Al0.9Sc0.1N, and Al0.8Sc0.2N with a thickness of 1 μm, respectively, were deposited on Si (100) substrate first. Further characterizations of piezoelectric materials were carried out using XRD as shown in Figure 4a; it is used to assess the (002) preferred orientation and crystal quality of piezoelectric films. Significant reflection peaks at around 35° to 36.0° associated with the (002) hexagonal AlN and AlScN films in patterns indicate that the piezoelectric films are well-crystallized with the c axis. The peak positions of Al0.9Sc0.1N and Al0.8Sc0.2N films shift due to the Sc doping [13,26,27]. The results of XRD rocking curves in the insets of Figure 4a show full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.49°, 1.62°, and 1.65° for 1 μm-thick AlN, Al0.9Sc0.1N, and Al0.8Sc0.2N films, respectively, suggesting a preferred c-axis crystal orientation as well [10,13]. Figure 4b shows the morphology of 1 μm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N film caught by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, Tescan, MIRA3, Brno, The Czech republic). Although small grain growth precipitates can be observed in the relative smooth surface of Al0.8Sc0.2N film, distinct clusters of particles, normally deteriorating the film quality, are absent [28,29].
In our work, for the fabricated FBARs, three different piezoelectric layers were deposited, including 1 μm-thick pure AlN, 1 μm-thick composite piezoelectric layer comprising 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.9Sc0.1N, and 1 μm-thick composite piezoelectric layer comprising 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N. Figure 5a shows the cross-sectional view of FBAR based on 1 μm-thick AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film, in which the deposited thicknesses of AlN and Al0.9Sc0.1N layers are almost 500 nm, respectively, meaning we can achieve a delicate control for the film deposition. It can be seen that the films without obvious defects exhibit good flatness and crystal quality, which is essential for the performance of the device [27]. The vertical view of fabricated FBAR is shown in Figure 5b. It clearly shows that the resonant region is connected with signal pads via Mo anchors. The signal terminals on both sides of the resonator mean the input and output of electrical signals. Four release holes arranged at the corners of the edge are intended to etch the sacrificial layer fully and fabricate a resonant cavity.
Figure 6 shows the tested impedance curves of FBARs based on pure AlN, AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N, and AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite film, respectively. The measured resonant frequencies and calculated K e f f 2 are closed with the simulated ones shown in Figure 3, which means that the estimated parameters in FBARs, including material constants, the thickness of each layer, are under control. Therefore, we can use the simulated conditions and results to evaluate the filter design. In order verify the feasibility of composite films for filter design with specific bandwidth, we take the design of N77 sub band (3.4 GHz to 3.6 GHz) for example. Here, we adopt three piezoelectric films, including pure AlN film, AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite film, and pure Al0.8Sc0.2N film, to design the filter. Figure 7a shows the schematic circuit of the designed filters. It consists of eight elements, including four series and four parallel resonators. Table 2 summarizes the thickness information of these three filters. The simulated results of the filters are plotted in Figure 7b. We can find that filter 1 with pure AlN film cannot meet the demand of 200 MHz bandwidth due to the limited intrinsic electromechanical coupling factor. As for filter 3 with pure Al0.8Sc0.2N film, it demonstrates a bandwidth larger than 200 MHz. Remarkably, by combining the characteristics of AlN and Al0.8Sc0.2N films, the proposed filter 2 can well meet the bandwidth requirement of 200 MHz demonstrating the serviceability using AlN/AlScN composite film with different thickness ratios for specific passband and frequency.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we investigate the resonant characteristics of FBARs with different piezoelectric materials, including pure AlN, AlScN, and AlN/AlScN composite films, and explore the potential of using varying AlN/AlScN composite film to meet the requirements of filters with the expected bandwidth. We use finite element method to simulate the influence of different thickness ratio of AlN/AlScN composite film on the key parameter, K e f f 2 , and have a detailed insight in the resonant characteristics by fabricating FBARs based on AlN, AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N, and AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N films. The results show that K e f f 2 can be increased by two times for FBAR based on 1 μm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N film compared with that of FBAR based on 1 μm-thick pure AlN film. Adopting AlN/AlScN composite film with the adjustment in thickness ratio, we can achieve the delicate control on K e f f 2 , which can be an effective method for the further filter design. This work paves a way for filter demonstration using AlN/AlScN composite film with varying K e f f 2 to achieve the specific passband and frequency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C. and C.S.; Methodology, L.N.; Validation, Y.Z. (Yang Zou) and C.G.; Formal Analysis, Y.Z. (Yu Zhou) and Y.F.; Investigation, W.L. and Y.L.; Resources, J.B.S.; Writing, J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFB2008803), the fundamental research funds for the central universities under Grant No. 2042022kf1027.

Data Availability Statement

Data and code are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Core Facility of Wuhan University for access to analytical equipment (XRD), the School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, for access to analytical equipment (SEM, MIRA3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yim, M.; Jeon, B.; Yoon, G. Feasibility Study of Small-sized FBAR-based Bandpass Filter Covering Digital Dividend Band for LTE Services. J. Semicond. Technol. Sci. 2020, 20, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, H.; Wu, Y.; Lai, Z.; Wang, W.; Yang, Q. A hybrid film-bulk-acoustic-resonator/coupled-line/transmission-line high selectivity wideband bandpass FBAR filter. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 3389–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhadauria, A.; Panchal, B.; Varghese, S. RF bandpass filters using FBAR with fractal electrodes. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and RF Conference (IMaRC), Kolkata, India, 28–30 November 2018; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tovstopyat, A.; Liu, S.; Sun, C. Materials, design, and characteristics of bulk acoustic wave resonator: A review. Micromachines 2020, 11, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yi, X.; Zhao, L.; Ouyang, P.; Liu, H.; Zhang, T.; Li, G. High-Quality Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators Fabricated on AlN Films Grown by a New Two-Step Method. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2022, 43, 942–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Ansari, A. Ferroelectric Aluminum Scandium Nitride Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators with Polarization-Dependent Operating States. Physica Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res. Lett. 2021, 15, 2100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sorokin, B.P.; Asafiev, N.O.; Kvashnin, G.M.; Scherbakov, D.A.; Terentiev, S.A.; Blank, V.D. Toward 40 GHz excitation of diamond-based HBAR. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 083501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kvashnin, G.; Sorokin, B.; Asafiev, N.; Prokhorov, V.; Sotnikov, A. Peculiarities of the Acoustic Wave Propagation in Diamond-Based Multilayer Piezoelectric Structures as “Me1/(Al, Sc) N/Me2/(100) Diamond/Me3” and “Me1/AlN/Me2/(100) Diamond/Me3” under Metal Thin-Film Deposition. Electronics 2022, 11, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moreira, M.; Bjurström, J.; Katardjev, I.; Yantchev, V. Aluminum scandium nitride thin-film bulk acoustic resonators for wide band applications. Vacuum 2011, 86, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Xie, Y.; Cai, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Tovstopyat, A.; Sun, C. ScAlN/AlN Film-Based Lamé Mode Resonator With High Effective Electromechanical Coupling Coefficient. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2021, 30, 677–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, L.; Gu, X.; Gao, C.; Hu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Cai, Y.; Sun, C. Micromechanics predictions of effective elastic, piezoelectric and dielectric properties of composite piezoelectric films. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2022, 15, 095503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su, J.; Fichtner, S.; Ghori, M.Z.; Wolff, N.; Islam, M.; Lotnyk, A.; Kaden, D.; Niekiel, F.; Kienle, L.; Wagner, B. Growth of Highly c-Axis Oriented AlScN Films on Commercial Substrates. Micromachines 2022, 13, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Gao, C.; Gu, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Soon, J.B.W.; Cai, Y.; Sun, C. Effects of Electric Bias on Different Sc-Doped AlN-Based Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators. Electronics 2022, 11, 2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chauhan, S.S.; Joglekar, M.M.; Manhas, S.K. Influence of process parameters and formation of highly c-Axis oriented AlN thin films on mo by reactive sputtering. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 7520–7530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, C.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Cai, Y.; Sun, C. Influence of Etching Trench on K2 ef f of Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator. Micromachines 2022, 13, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ding, R.; Xuan, W.; Dong, S.; Zhang, B.; Gao, F.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Z.; Jin, H.; Luo, J. The 3.4 GHz BAW RF Filter Based on Single Crystal AlN Resonator for 5G Application. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nam, K.; Park, Y.; Ha, B.; Shim, D.; Song, I.; Pak, J.; Par, G.J. Piezoelectric properties of aluminum nitride for thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2005, 47, 309. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ambacher, O.; Christian, B.; Feil, N.; Urban, D.; Elsässer, C.; Prescher, M.; Kirste, L.J. Wurtzite ScAlN, InAlN, and GaAlN crystals, a comparison of structural, elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 045102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Fu, W.Y.; Holec, D.; Humphreys, C.; Moram, M. Elastic constants and critical thicknesses of ScGaN and ScAlN. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 243516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caro, M.A.; Zhang, S.; Riekkinen, T.; Ylilammi, M.; Moram, M.A.; Lopez-Acevedo, O.; Molarius, J.; Laurila, T. Piezoelectric coefficients and spontaneous polarization of ScAlN. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 245901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Wingqvist, G.; Tasnadi, F.; Zukauskaite, A.; Birch, J.; Arwin, H.; Hultman, L. Increased electromechanical coupling in w − ScxAl1−xN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 112902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Mayrhofer, P.M.; He, X.; Gillinger, M.; Ye, Z.; Wang, X.; Bittner, A.; Schmid, U.; Luo, J. High performance AlScN thin film based surface acoustic wave devices with large electromechanical coupling coefficient. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 133502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kurz, N.; Ding, A.; Urban, D.F.; Lu, Y.; Kirste, L.; Feil, N.M.; Žukauskaitė, A.; Ambacher, O. Experimental determination of the electro-acoustic properties of thin film AlScN using surface acoustic wave resonators. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 075106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Park, M.; Mertin, S.; Pensala, T.; Ayazi, F.; Ansari, A. A film bulk acoustic resonator based on ferroelectric aluminum scandium nitride films. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2020, 29, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yokoyama, T.; Iwazaki, Y.; Onda, Y.; Nishihara, T.; Sasajima, Y.; Ueda, M. Highly piezoelectric co-doped AlN thin films for wideband FBAR applications. IEEE Trans.Ultrason.Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2015, 62, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tang, J.; Niu, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Yang, C. Preparation of ScAlN films as a function of sputtering atmosphere. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 4788–4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dargis, R.; Clark, A.; Ansari, A.; Hao, Z.; Park, M.; Kim, D.; Yanka, R.; Hammond, R.; Debnath, M.; Pelzel, R. Single-Crystal Multilayer Nitride, Metal, and Oxide Structures on Engineered Silicon for New-Generation Radio Frequency Filter Applications. Phys. Phys. Phys. Status Solidi A 2020, 217, 1900813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fichtner, S.; Reimer, T.; Chemnitz, S.; Lofink, F.; Wagner, B. Stress controlled pulsed direct current co-sputtered Al1−xScxN as piezoelectric phase for micromechanical sensor applications. APL Mater. 2015, 3, 116102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sandu, C.S.; Parsapour, F.; Mertin, S.; Pashchenko, V.; Matloub, R.; LaGrange, T.; Heinz, B.; Muralt, P. Abnormal grain growth in AlScN thin films induced by complexion formation at crystallite interfaces. Phys. Status Solidi A 2019, 216, 1800569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main fabrication process steps of FBAR devices. (a) Etching Si substrate to form the cavity. (b) SiO2 sacrificial layer deposition and polished. (c) AlN seed layer and bottom Mo electrode deposition. (d) Piezoelectric layer deposition and etched. (e) Top Mo electrode deposition and patterned. (f) Au pad layer deposition. (g) Release windows opened. (h) Releasing SiO2 sacrificial layer to form the cavity.
Figure 1. Main fabrication process steps of FBAR devices. (a) Etching Si substrate to form the cavity. (b) SiO2 sacrificial layer deposition and polished. (c) AlN seed layer and bottom Mo electrode deposition. (d) Piezoelectric layer deposition and etched. (e) Top Mo electrode deposition and patterned. (f) Au pad layer deposition. (g) Release windows opened. (h) Releasing SiO2 sacrificial layer to form the cavity.
Micromachines 13 02044 g001
Figure 2. Structures of FBAR and characteristics of filters. (a) Schematic drawing of a typical FBAR. (b) The cross-sectional view of FBAR. (c) Working principle of filter based on FBARs. Inset shows the ladder circuit topology of filters.
Figure 2. Structures of FBAR and characteristics of filters. (a) Schematic drawing of a typical FBAR. (b) The cross-sectional view of FBAR. (c) Working principle of filter based on FBARs. Inset shows the ladder circuit topology of filters.
Micromachines 13 02044 g002
Figure 3. Simulated results of FBAR with different piezoelectric materials. (a) Simulated impedance curves of FBARs based on AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film with different thickness ratios. (b) Simulated impedance curves of FBARs based on AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite film with different thickness ratios. (c) Calculated K e f f 2 of different FBARs.
Figure 3. Simulated results of FBAR with different piezoelectric materials. (a) Simulated impedance curves of FBARs based on AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film with different thickness ratios. (b) Simulated impedance curves of FBARs based on AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite film with different thickness ratios. (c) Calculated K e f f 2 of different FBARs.
Micromachines 13 02044 g003
Figure 4. XRD results and morphology of piezoelectric materials. (a) XRD results of 1 μm-thick AlN, Al0.9Sc0.1N, and Al0.8Sc0.2N films, respectively. (b) Morphology of 1 μm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N film.
Figure 4. XRD results and morphology of piezoelectric materials. (a) XRD results of 1 μm-thick AlN, Al0.9Sc0.1N, and Al0.8Sc0.2N films, respectively. (b) Morphology of 1 μm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N film.
Micromachines 13 02044 g004
Figure 5. Characterization of piezoelectric film and FBAR device. (a) Cross-sectional view of AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film consisting of 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N. (b) Vertical view of fabricated FBAR based on the AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film consisting of 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N. The signal and ground pads are marked with “G” and “S” labels, respectively.
Figure 5. Characterization of piezoelectric film and FBAR device. (a) Cross-sectional view of AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film consisting of 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N. (b) Vertical view of fabricated FBAR based on the AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite film consisting of 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N. The signal and ground pads are marked with “G” and “S” labels, respectively.
Micromachines 13 02044 g005
Figure 6. Tested impedance curves of FBARs with different piezoelectric materials: 1 μm-thick pure AlN, 1 μm-thick AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite piezoelectric layer comprising 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.9Sc0.1N, and 1 μm-thick AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite piezoelectric layer comprising 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N.
Figure 6. Tested impedance curves of FBARs with different piezoelectric materials: 1 μm-thick pure AlN, 1 μm-thick AlN/Al0.9Sc0.1N composite piezoelectric layer comprising 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.9Sc0.1N, and 1 μm-thick AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N composite piezoelectric layer comprising 500 nm-thick AlN and 500 nm-thick Al0.8Sc0.2N.
Micromachines 13 02044 g006
Figure 7. The proposed filter designs. (a) Schematic ladder circuit of the filter. (b) The comparison of simulated transmission responses among the filter 1 with AlN film, filter 2 with AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N film, and filter 3 with Al0.8Sc0.2N film, respectively.
Figure 7. The proposed filter designs. (a) Schematic ladder circuit of the filter. (b) The comparison of simulated transmission responses among the filter 1 with AlN film, filter 2 with AlN/Al0.8Sc0.2N film, and filter 3 with Al0.8Sc0.2N film, respectively.
Micromachines 13 02044 g007
Table 1. Material constants of piezoelectric film used in the simulations.
Table 1. Material constants of piezoelectric film used in the simulations.
AlNAl0.9Sc0.1NAl0.8Sc0.2N
ρ (kg/m2)326034603560
εr9.510.813.4
e31 (C/m2)−0.58−0.62−0.71
e33 (C/m2)1.551.672.08
e24 (C/m2)−0.48−0.30−0.27
C11 (GPa)345320292
C12 (GPa)125127130
C13 (GPa)120126134
C33 (GPa)395324258
C44 (GPa)118108104
C66 (GPa)11011091
Table 2. Structure parameters of the designed filters.
Table 2. Structure parameters of the designed filters.
DimensionFilter 1Filter 2Filter 3
Thickness of bottom Mo(nm)184103102
Thickness of AlN (nm)686-316
Thickness of Al0.8Sc0.2N (nm)-679473
Thickness of top Mo (nm)164103100
Thickness of Mass loading Mo (nm)214130
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nian, L.; Zou, Y.; Gao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Soon, J.B.; Cai, Y.; et al. Demonstration of Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on AlN/AlScN Composite Film with a Feasible Keff2. Micromachines 2022, 13, 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122044

AMA Style

Nian L, Zou Y, Gao C, Zhou Y, Fan Y, Wang J, Liu W, Liu Y, Soon JB, Cai Y, et al. Demonstration of Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on AlN/AlScN Composite Film with a Feasible Keff2. Micromachines. 2022; 13(12):2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nian, Laixia, Yang Zou, Chao Gao, Yu Zhou, Yuchen Fan, Jian Wang, Wenjuan Liu, Yan Liu, Jeffrey Bowoon Soon, Yao Cai, and et al. 2022. "Demonstration of Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on AlN/AlScN Composite Film with a Feasible Keff2" Micromachines 13, no. 12: 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop