Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method Simulation of Perforated Graphene Nano-Electro-Mechanical (NEM) Switches
Next Article in Special Issue
Universal Micromachining Platform and Basic Technologies for the Manufacture and Marking of Microphysiological Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of Miniature Ejector Refrigeration System Embedded with a Capillary Pump Loop
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Cell-Laden Hydrogel Fibers with Controllable Diameters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

3D Printing of Artificial Blood Vessel: Study on Multi-Parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Molding Effect in Alginate and Gelatin

1
College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2
School of Mechanical-Electronic Vehicular Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2017, 8(8), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8080237
Submission received: 30 June 2017 / Revised: 29 July 2017 / Accepted: 29 July 2017 / Published: 31 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Additive Manufacturing for Medical Applications)

Abstract

:
3D printing has emerged as one of the modern tissue engineering techniques that could potentially form scaffolds (with or without cells), which is useful in treating cardiovascular diseases. This technology has attracted extensive attention due to its possibility of curing disease in tissue engineering and organ regeneration. In this paper, we have developed a novel rotary forming device, prepared an alginate–gelatin solution for the fabrication of vessel-like structures, and further proposed a theoretical model to analyze the parameters of motion synchronization. Using this rotary forming device, we firstly establish a theoretical model to analyze the thickness under the different nozzle extrusion speeds, nozzle speeds, and servo motor speeds. Secondly, the experiments with alginate–gelatin solution are carried out to construct the vessel-like structures under all sorts of conditions. The experiment results show that the thickness cannot be adequately predicted by the theoretical model and the thickness can be controlled by changing the parameters. Finally, the optimized parameters of thickness have been adjusted to estimate the real thickness in 3D printing.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease is a common disease that seriously affects the health of human beings, especially those over 50 years old. Many scientists [1,2,3,4,5,6] have adopted a lot of measures to treat cardiovascular disease, but more than 50% of survivors cannot completely take care of themselves. The number of deaths from cardiovascular diseases is up to 15 million people each year globally, which top killer of human beings. Therefore, it is significant to develop an effective method to fabricate vessel-like structures to treat cardiovascular disease.
3D printing is a novel technology to be applied to regenerative medicine that has attracted extensive attention due to its potential to cure disease through tissue engineering and organ regeneration [7,8,9,10,11,12]. In the past few years, many functional tissues and organs were manufactured by 3D printing systems such as inkjet-based printing [13,14,15], micro-extrusion printing [16], and laser-assisted printing [17,18,19], which have different forming parameters in different 3D printing system. One important challenge is the material viscosity characteristic which can determine the types of 3D printers. The inkjet-based printing has viscosity a limit ranging from 3.5 to 12 mPa·s and the viscosity limit of laser-assisted printing ranges from 1 to 300 mPa·s, but the viscosity limit of extrusion-based printing ranges from 30 to >6 × 107 mPa·s. The different working mechanisms and parameters of nozzles results in different viscosity limits.
Many research teams have adopted the above 3D printing strategies to fabricate vessel-like structures with deposition modeling methods [20,21,22]. Cui, X. et al. [23] have used thermal inkjet printing to fabricate the human microvasculature. Then Hoch, E. et al. [24] have shown that inkjet-based 3D bioprinting can be expected to be of great use for vessel-like structures. Gaebel, R. et al. [25] have adopted laser printing to distribute the endothelial cells to fabricate blood vessels. Kucukgul, Can et al. [26] have adopted a deposition modeling method to construct vessel-like structures by extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. In those methods, the vessel-like structures have poor modeling effect and material accumulation phenomena. However, there is little research into adopting the rotary forming method to fabricate vessel-like structures. Gao, Q. et al. [27] have adopted the rotary printing method to fabricate vessel-like structures; it can proven that this method can improve the cell survival rate. Meanwhile, Liu, H. et al. [28,29] have adopted the rotary printing method to obtain vessel-like structures and analyzed the synchronization among nozzle extrusion, nozzle speed, and rotating speed based on an extrusion-based 3D bioprinter, which could improve the modeling effect in this forming method.
In this paper, we present our 3D printing device for fabricating vessel-like structures, and further optimize the thickness parameters of nozzle extrusion speed nozzle speed and rotating speed. The nozzle moving speed parameter δ and the pressure parameter have been adjusted to estimate the real thickness in the experiment.

2. System and Process

Figure 1 shows the extrusion-based 3D printing system, which is mainly composed of a motion control system, multinozzle distribution system, rotary forming system, and temperature control system. The multinozzle 3D printing system is a solid free-form fabrication system that performs extrusion-based processes. Two nozzles with different biomaterials can work effectively in this 3D printing system which can be controlled by computer. The specification of the 3D printing system is shown in Table 1.
In this 3D printing system, 3D physical models (STL) were divided into different regions, which were sliced to generate the G-code in the computer, and then each region was filled with different materials. The STL files can be obtained by CAD/CAM software or 3D scanners.
It is difficult to extrude biomaterials with a solid state or high viscosity. In order to reconstruct the digital model, the materials should be transformed into a liquid state or to a proper viscosity to ensure extrusion of biomaterials in the process of 3D printing. To that end, the biomaterials firstly have the characteristic of thermosensitivity, which can be liquefied in suitable temperatures (35–40 °C). Secondly, the temperature control system can control the material temperature to achieve the conversion between solid and liquid states. In addition, there is no heating damage for bioactivity in this temperature control system.

3. Theory

Figure 2 shows the schematic diagram of rotary printing device under the different nozzle speed. The biomaterials can be squeezed by pressure control system, the rotating rod is controlled by the motor, and the nozzle speed is controlled by linear motor. In the Figure 2a, V1, V2, and V3 denote the nozzle speed, the extrusion speed, and the motor speed respectively. When the nozzle speed is greater than V1, the biomaterials will demonstrate the dispersion phenomenon, as shown in Figure 2b. When the nozzle speed is less than V1, the biomaterials will demonstrate accumulation, as shown in Figure 2c.
In order to realize the reconstruction of vessel-like structures and avoid the phenomenon of material accumulation and material dispersion, the theoretical model can be obtained by this rotary printing device, which is given that [28]
V 3 = V 1 + V 2
Because equal time is consumed in the building process of vessel-like structures, the relationship among nozzle speed, extrusion speed, and motor speed is calculated as
S 1 V 1 = S 2 V 2 = S 3 V 3
where S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 refer to linear motor displacement, rotating rod perimeter, and material extrusion displacement.
The thickness can be derived by Equations (1) and (2)
H = α ( V 3 L / 2 V 1 ) 2 L 2 r H = α ( V 3 C / 2 V 2 ) 2 L 2 r }
where H is the thickness, L is the displacement of nozzle, α is an invariant constant, and r is the rotating rod radius.
The extrusion forming principle under the different nozzle moving speeds is shown in Figure 3. The thickness can be changed under the different control parameters. When the diameter of rotating rod and motor rotation speed remain unchanged, the displacement relation under the different nozzle moving speed can be calculated as
S 1 > S 1 > S 1 S 2 = S 2 = S 2 S 3 > S 3 > S 3 }
The goal is to predict displacement changes which have different forming effects under different nozzle moving speeds. In order to obtain the real thickness, the new thickness coefficient can be adjusted to measure the thickness range.

4. Experiment Procedure

4.1. Materials

In order to optimize the above mentioned theoretical model, we designed the experiment to fabricate the vessel-like structures. The rotating rods with different diameters of 3, 4.26, and 6.9 mm were used in this experiment. We selected alginate and gelatin as experiment materials. In the experiment, alginate and gelatin were premixed, extruded, and post crosslinked after depositing on the rotating rod in the 3D printing system. The alginate and gelatin solution was cross-linked with calcium chloride (5% w/w). The parameters of experiment materials are shown in Table 2. All of the above materials were purchased from Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China).

4.2. Experimental Procedure

The novel 3D printing system has been designed for the preliminary experiment. In this 3D printing system, the temperature control system can control the temperature of biomaterials in a range from 2 °C to 45 °C. Then, the motion control system can control the nozzle motion according to G-code document. Next, the biomaterials can be extruded by pressure control system ranged from 0.1 to 1 MPa. Finally, the biomaterials are extruded and distributed by the above-mentioned motion control system and pressure control system. Based on this, vessel-like structures can be constructed in this 3D printing system.
In order to verify the theoretical model, we used a rotating rod with different diameters to analyze the motion synchronization and the related parameters of molding effect. In this experiment, the rotating rod was set to 4.25 r/s and the moving speed of nozzle ranged from 0.8 to 8.3 mm/s. The pressure was set to 0.168–0.421 MPa, which could achieve biomaterial extrusion with different extrusion speeds.

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Material Viscosity

Viscosity is an important factor which plays a major role in fabricating the vessel-like structures. Figure 4 shows the relationship between viscosity and material concentration. In Figure 4a, the viscosity of alginate solution increases with the increase of alginate concentration. In Figure 4b, we can see that the 3% alginate with different concentrations of gelatin (4%, 6% and 8% w/w) have different viscosity characteristics. The viscosity value increased gradually along with the increase of gelatin concentration. Therefore, the alginate solution with gelatin can improve the material characteristics such as viscosity, mechanical properties, and printable.
In this experiment, the extrusion-based nozzle has been developed to fabricate the vessel-like structures. Compared with the deposition modeling, this method does not build the scaffold to sustain the vessel-like structures, which can reduce time consumption in the build process of vessel-like structure. In order to improve the forming effect, the adaptive parameters should be set to avoid the problems of material dispersion and material accumulation, as shown in Figure 5. Those problems will reduce the forming accuracy and mechanical properties.
Dependence of the extrusion pressure on molding effect: In this experiment, we have adopted a solution with 3% alginate and 8% gelatin for initial research. When the rotating speed was 4.25 r/s and nozzle moving speed was 1.62 mm/s, the vessel-like structures exhibited different molding effects under different pressures, as shown in Figure 6. The different external diameters or thicknesses can be achieved under the different extrusion pressures. Figure 6a shows the relationship between thickness and extrusion pressure. We can see that the thickness is on the increase with the increase of pressure. The molding effects are shown in Figure 6b. When the pressure exceeds the 0.31 Mpa, the molding effect appears as material accumulation, which leads to a poor forming effect. Conversely, when the pressure is below the 0.16 MPa, the vessel-like structures will not be fabricated by this 3D printing system.
Figure 7 shows the relationship between the printable area and extrusion pressure under the different diameters. We can see that the relatively stable thickness region can be derived to analyze the forming state of vessel-like structures. Based on this, the parameter of the theoretical model can be readjusted to estimate the thickness of vessel-like structures. Based on these analysis results, we can draw a conclusion that the optimized model parameter is derived
H = β
where β is α ( V 3 C / 2 V 2 ) 2 L 2 r , is the optimized parameter ranged from 0.45 to 2.45.
Dependence of the moving speed of nozzle on molding effect: The controllability of materials plays a significant role in the construction of vessel-like structures. In the case of high pressure, the materials are difficult to be controlled in this 3D printing system. Meanwhile, the materials are difficult to be extruded under low pressure circumstances. To overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks, the pressure and the rotating speed were set to 0.224 MPa and 4.25 r/s, respectively. The vessel-like structures have the different thicknesses under the different nozzle moving speed. The relationship between thickness and moving speed of nozzle is shown in Figure 8. The conclusion is that the thickness is on the decline with the increase of nozzle moving speed. When the nozzle moving speed is less than 0.75 mm/s, the vessel-like structure will present material accumulation. Conversely, when the nozzle moving speed exceeds the certain values, vessel-like structures will not form.
Parameter optimization design: Figure 9 shows the relationship between the printable area and the different diameters under different nozzle moving speeds. Similarly to the Figure 7, the vessel-like structures have a relatively stable thickness region. Based on this, the parameters of the theoretical model can be readjusted to estimate the thickness of vessel-like structures.
H = δ μ
where μ is α ( V 3 L / 2 V 1 ) 2 L 2 r , δ is the optimized parameter ranged from 0.447 to 2.44.
Based on the optimized analysis results under the different pressure and nozzle moving speed, the optimized parameters of the theoretical model can be derived from the rotating forming device. The parameter of pressure is similar to the parameter of nozzle moving speed, namely δ . It is proven that the rotating rods with different diameters have a similar range under constant viscosity. Although the thickness characteristics of vessel-like structure are similar between the different pressures and nozzle moving speeds, we will intend to control the nozzle moving speed under a constant pressure due to the time delay in the process of material extrusion.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have designed a novel 3D printing system using a rotary forming device to fabricate vessel-like structures for theoretical analysis, and its feasibility has been shown in this study. Compared with the deposition modeling method, those vessel-like structures produced by rotary forming method not only have higher forming accuracy, but also have faster molding speed. Using this rotary forming device, we have proposed a theoretical model to analyze motion synchronization. The experiments with alginate–gelatin solution are carried out to verify the theoretical results. The experiment results show that the thickness cannot be adequately predicted by the theoretical model and the thickness can be controlled by changing the correlation parameters. We have optimized the parameters under different pressures and nozzle moving speeds in the process of 3D printing, in which the parameter of pressure is similar to the parameter of nozzle moving speed, namely δ and . This optimized theoretical model can be used to predict the thickness of the alginate–gelatin material. Meanwhile, it has been proven that extrusion-based 3D printing with alginate and gelatin could afford an opportunity to treat cardiovascular disease due to the possibility of angiogenesis in tissue engineering and organ regeneration.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the national high technology research and development program of China (863 program) under Grant 2015AA020305-01.

Author Contributions

Huanbao Liu conceived the problem and designed the solution; Huixing Zhou conceived and designed the experiments; Haiming Lan and Tianyu Liu prepared the biological materials; Xiaolong Liu revised and improved the manuscript for the final submission; Huanbao Liu and Hejie Yu analyzed the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jia, W.; Gungor-Ozkerim, P.S.; Zhang, Y.S.; Yue, K.; Zhu, K.; Liu, W.; Pi, Q.; Byambaa, B.; Dokmeci, M.R.; Shin, S.R.; et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials 2016, 106, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Akkouch, A.; Dababneh, A.; Dolati, F.; Ozbolat, I.T. In Vitro Study of Directly Bioprinted Perfusable Vasculature Conduits. Biomater. Sci. 2015, 3, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Can, K.; Ozler, S.B.; Inci, I.; Karakas, E.; Irmak, S.; Gozuacik, D.; Taralp, A.; Koc, B. 3D bioprinting of biomimetic aortic vascular constructs with self-supporting cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tae-Yun, K.; Jung Ho, L.; Bum Jin, K.; Jo, A.K.; Jung Min, H.; Byoung Soo, K.; Hyung Joon, C.; Jong-Won, R.; Dong-Woo, C. In vivo endothelization of tubular vascular grafts through in situ recruitment of endothelial and endothelial progenitor cells by RGD-fused mussel adhesive proteins. Biofabrication 2015, 7, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Poldervaart, M.T.; Gremmels, H.; van Deventer, K.; Fledderus, J.O.; Oner, F.C.; Verhaar, M.C.; Dhert, W.J.; Alblas, J. Prolonged presence of VEGF promotes vascularization in 3D bioprinted scaffolds with defined architecture. J. Control. Release 2014, 184, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Martin, J.A.; Ozbolat, I.T. Evaluation of Cell Viability and Functionality in Vessel-like Bioprintable Cell-Laden Tubular Channels. J. Biomech. Eng. 2013, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Murphy, S.V.; Atala, A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 773–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mandrycky, C.; Wang, Z.; Kim, K.; Kim, D.H. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dhakshinamoorthy, S.; Rauf, S.; Hauser, C. 3D bioprinting technology for regenerative medicine applications. Int. J. Bioprint. 2016, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Falguni, P.; Gantelius, J.; Svahn, H.A. 3D Bioprinting of Tissue/Organ Models. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4650–4665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paulsen, S.J.; Miller, J.S. Tissue vascularization through 3D printing: Will technology bring us flow? Dev. Dyn. 2015, 244, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Lan, H.; Liu, T. Organ regeneration: Integration application of cell encapsulation and 3D bioprinting. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nishiyama, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Henmi, C.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mochizuki, S.; Nakagawa, H.; Takiura, K. Development of a three-dimensional bioprinter: Construction of cell supporting structures using hydrogel and state-of-the-art inkjet technology. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131, 035001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Osch, T.H.J.; Perelaer, J.; de Laat, A.W.M.; Schubert, U.S. Inkjet Printing of Narrow Conductive Tracks on Untreated Polymeric Substrates. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saunders, R.E.; Brian, D. Inkjet printing biomaterials for tissue engineering: Bioprinting. Int. Mater. Rev. 2014, 59, 430–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Mao, S.; Sun, W.; Yao, R. The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology. Biofabrication 2015, 7, 045002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lothar, K.; Brandt, O.; Deiwick, A.; Chichkov, B. Laser assisted bioprinting at different wavelengths and pulse durations with a metal dynamic release layer: A parametric study. Int. J. Bioprint. 2017, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, P.J.; Katis, I.N.; Eason, R.W.; Sones, C.L. Laser direct-write for fabrication of three-dimensional paper-based devices. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 3296–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bourget, J.M.; Kerouredan, O.; Medina, M.; Remy, M.; Thebaud, N.B.; Bareille, R.; Chassande, O.; Amedee, J.; Catros, S.; Devillard, R. Patterning of Endothelial Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Laser-Assisted Bioprinting to Study Cell Migration. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 3569843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Norotte, C.; Marga, F.S.; Niklason, L.E.; Forgacs, G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 5910–5917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Duan, B.; Hockaday, L.A.; Kang, K.H.; Butcher, J.T. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 101, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kolesky, D.B.; Truby, R.L.; Gladman, A.S.; Busbee, T.A.; Homan, K.A.; Lewis, J.A. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3124–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cui, X.; Boland, T. Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6221–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hoch, E.; Tovar, G.E.; Borchers, K. Bioprinting of artificial blood vessels: Current approaches towards a demanding goal. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 2014, 46, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gaebel, R.; Ma, N.; Liu, J.; Guan, J.; Koch, L.; Klopsch, C.; Gruene, M.; Toelk, A.; Wang, W.; Mark, P.; et al. Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 9218–9230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kucukgul, C.; Ozler, S.B.; Inci, I.; Karakas, E.; Irmak, S.; Gozuacik, D.; Taralp, A.; Koc, B. 3D bioprinting of biomimetic aortic vascular constructs with self-supporting cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Gao, Q.; Liu, Z.; Lin, Z.; Qiu, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, A.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, M.; Chen, B.; Fu, J.; et al. 3D Bioprinting of Vessel-like Structures with Multilevel Fluidic Channels. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Chairinnas. The synchronization among nozzle extrusion, nozzle speed and rotating speed based on 3D vessel bioprinter. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation (ICA), Bandung, Indonesia, 29–31 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Lan, H.; Liu, F.; Wang, X. Multinozzle Multichannel Temperature Deposition System for Construction of a Blood Vessel. SLAS Technol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The extrusion-based 3D printing system with rotary printing device.
Figure 1. The extrusion-based 3D printing system with rotary printing device.
Micromachines 08 00237 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of rotary printing device under the different nozzle speed: (a) ideal state; (b) nozzle moving speed greater than V1; (c) nozzle moving speed less than V1.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of rotary printing device under the different nozzle speed: (a) ideal state; (b) nozzle moving speed greater than V1; (c) nozzle moving speed less than V1.
Micromachines 08 00237 g002
Figure 3. The relationship between the displacement and thickness under the different nozzle moving speed due to surface wettability.
Figure 3. The relationship between the displacement and thickness under the different nozzle moving speed due to surface wettability.
Micromachines 08 00237 g003
Figure 4. Dependence of material concentration on viscosity: (a) the relationship between viscosity and concentration of alginate; (b) the relationship between viscosity and concentration of gelatin under the concentration of alginate (3% w/w).
Figure 4. Dependence of material concentration on viscosity: (a) the relationship between viscosity and concentration of alginate; (b) the relationship between viscosity and concentration of gelatin under the concentration of alginate (3% w/w).
Micromachines 08 00237 g004
Figure 5. The problems of material dispersion and material accumulation.
Figure 5. The problems of material dispersion and material accumulation.
Micromachines 08 00237 g005
Figure 6. The molding relationship and effect: (a) dependence of the extrusion pressure on thickness under different diameters; (b) the relationship between molding effect and diameter.
Figure 6. The molding relationship and effect: (a) dependence of the extrusion pressure on thickness under different diameters; (b) the relationship between molding effect and diameter.
Micromachines 08 00237 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between the printable area and diameter under the different extrusion pressure.
Figure 7. The relationship between the printable area and diameter under the different extrusion pressure.
Micromachines 08 00237 g007
Figure 8. The molding relationship and effect: (a) dependence of the nozzle moving speed on thickness under the different diameters; (b) the relationship between molding effect and diameter.
Figure 8. The molding relationship and effect: (a) dependence of the nozzle moving speed on thickness under the different diameters; (b) the relationship between molding effect and diameter.
Micromachines 08 00237 g008
Figure 9. The relationship between the printable area and diameter under the nozzle moving speed.
Figure 9. The relationship between the printable area and diameter under the nozzle moving speed.
Micromachines 08 00237 g009
Table 1. The specification of 3D printing system.
Table 1. The specification of 3D printing system.
ParametersValue
Dimensions (X × Y × Z)150 × 150 × 150 mm3
Position resolution±5 μm
Temperature range0–60 °C
Print speed0.1–50 mm/s
Pressure range0–1 MPa
Table 2. The parameters of experiment materials.
Table 2. The parameters of experiment materials.
Concentration of Alginate (% w/w)Concentration of Gelatin (% w/w)Diameter (mm)Calcium Chloride (% w/w)
3%4%35%
3%6%4.26
3%8%6.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Lan, H.; Liu, T.; Liu, X.; Yu, H. 3D Printing of Artificial Blood Vessel: Study on Multi-Parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Molding Effect in Alginate and Gelatin. Micromachines 2017, 8, 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8080237

AMA Style

Liu H, Zhou H, Lan H, Liu T, Liu X, Yu H. 3D Printing of Artificial Blood Vessel: Study on Multi-Parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Molding Effect in Alginate and Gelatin. Micromachines. 2017; 8(8):237. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8080237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Huanbao, Huixing Zhou, Haiming Lan, Tianyu Liu, Xiaolong Liu, and Hejie Yu. 2017. "3D Printing of Artificial Blood Vessel: Study on Multi-Parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Molding Effect in Alginate and Gelatin" Micromachines 8, no. 8: 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8080237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop