Next Article in Journal
A Trace Carbon Monoxide Sensor Based on Differential Absorption Spectroscopy Using Mid-Infrared Quantum Cascade Laser
Next Article in Special Issue
Advanced Graphene-Based Transparent Conductive Electrodes for Photovoltaic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical and Experimental Analyses of Three-Dimensional Unsteady Flow around a Micro-Pillar Subjected to Rotational Vibration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/mi9120669
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hyaluronate-Functionalized Graphene for Label-Free Electrochemical Cytosensing

by
Aihua Jing
1,*,
Chunxin Zhang
1,
Gaofeng Liang
2,*,
Wenpo Feng
1,
Zhengshan Tian
3 and
Chenhuan Jing
4
1
School of Medical Technology and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
2
Medical College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
3
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan 467000, China
4
Pingdingshan No. 1 Middle School, Pingdingshan 467000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2018, 9(12), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120669
Submission received: 22 November 2018 / Revised: 12 December 2018 / Accepted: 15 December 2018 / Published: 18 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene Nanoelectronic Devices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Electrochemical sensors for early tumor cell detection are currently an important area of research, as this special region directly improves the efficiency of cancer treatment. Functional graphene is a promising alternative for selective recognition and capture of target cancer cells. In our work, an effective cytosensor of hyaluronate-functionalized graphene (HG) was prepared through chemical reduction of graphene oxide. The as-prepared HG nanostructures were characterized with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy coupled with cyclic voltammograms and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, respectively. The self-assembly of HG with ethylene diamine, followed by sodium hyaluronate, enabled the fabrication of a label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy cytosensor with high stability and biocompatibility. Finally, the proposed cytosensor exhibited satisfying electrochemical behavior and cell-capture capacity for human colorectal cancer cells HCT-116, and also displayed a wide linear range, from 5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1 to 5.0 × 106 cells∙mL−1, and a low detection limit of 100 cells∙mL−1 (S/N = 3) for quantification. This work paves the way for graphene applications in electrochemical cytosensing and other bioassays.

1. Introduction

Studying intact living cells efficiently using electrochemical sensing systems has fundamental significance and practical importance in biotechnology, biological device design, drug discovery, molecular medicine, and disease diagnosis. Various electrochemical sensors have been devoted to the design and fabrication of specific nanostructured biointerfaces with high conductivity and good cell adhesion for the detection of cell viability [1]. The current electrical nanostructured biointerfaces built of cytosensors have attracted considerable attention in measuring the expression of glycans on single cells [2] and immobilizing antibodies for rapid diagnosis [3], as it can clearly separate the surface bindings, easily quantify signals, and obtain a high sensitivity. Wightman et al. [4] stimulated cells by carbon fiber electrodes to release the neurotransmitter catecholamine, which was detected by converting the chemical signal to the output of the electrical signal. Giaever group [5] designed a nanoscale gold electrode biosensor based on cell adhesion growth characteristics. When the cell was attached to the electrode, the change of the interface impedance was detected along the cell changes. Zhu groups [6] immobilized carboxymethyl chitosan-functionalized graphene for a label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy cytosensor and detected HL-60 cells by an electrochemical technique. Damiati [7] presented an efficient acoustic and hybrid three-dimensional (3D)-printed electrochemical biosensor for the detection of HepG2 cells. Various rapid and label-free biomarker detection techniques, including electronic [8,9], optical [10,11,12,13], and mechanical [14,15,16,17], have been developed to detect cancer specific protein biomarkers, as well as to measure the specific gravity of food samples in real-time [18]. Bioelectronic noses are skilled at detecting odorant molecules and compounds at low detection limits, with high selectivity and sensitivity [19,20,21], and will be attractive in the fields of cancer detection [22,23]. Other non-invasive techniques, such as proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry [24] and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry [25], have been developed based on the analysis of human volatilome for medical diagnostics and for monitoring of the patients’ health [26,27]. Consequently, there is still an increasing desire to develop new novel cytosensors for detection of cells with dimensional compatibility, high sensitivity, simplicity, selectivity, and low cost.
Graphene has attracted considerable interest for its remarkable structures, electronic properties, and tunable surface functionalities [18]. The biofunctionalized nanocomposites of graphene have been applied in the fabrication of biosensors, such as DNA [28] and microRNA detection [29], small molecules [30,31,32], antigen detection [33], and living cell studies [29,34]. A table showing the advantages and disadvantages of graphene and functionalized graphene is shown in Table S1. However, the surface of graphene oxide is not suitable for constructing interfaces with large human cells for the incompatible dimensions. Hyaluronic acid (HA) widely exists in extracellular matrix and is a naturally occurring mucopolysaccharide that has been extensively designed in biomedical systems for its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and non-immunogenicity [35]. Meanwhile, studies have shown the surfaces of some tumor cells are rich in hyaluronic acid receptor protein CD44 [36]. Thus, the obtained hyaluronate-functionalized graphene (HG) composite can achieve detection of differential tumor cells by hyaluronic acid receptors on the surface, as desirable for biomedical applications.
In this paper, a composite of HG was prepared and displayed suitability for assembling on the surface of a glass carbon electrode (GCE) to a cytosensor. Accordingly, HA can express target hyaluronic receptors of high affinity, specifically, while some free carboxylic groups on the HA molecular chains cross-linked with other residual groups can act as linkers between the graphene sheets and cells. In addition, we have chosen the colorectal cancer cell HCT-116 to be detected by the as-prepared cytosensors.
The as-prepared cytosensor showed better stability and sensitivity than that of non-HG sensor, thus offering the potential of graphene for the construction of cytosensing and other impedance cell device.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Apparatus

Graphene oxide was prepared in our lab and ultrasonicated to 1.0 mg∙mL−1. Sodium hyaluronate was obtained from Sangon biotech (Shanghai, China). N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) were obtained from Tianjin BASF chemical company (Tianjin, China). All other reagents were of analytical grade and used as received without further purification, unless otherwise specified. Phosphate-buffer solutions (PBS) was prepared by mixing solutions of NaH2PO4 and Na2HPO4 and then adjusted with 0.1 mol∙L−1 NaOH or H3PO4. All solutions were prepared with Milli-Q water.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were taken at room temperature from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 using a Nicolet IS10 FTIR (Thermo Fisher Company, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphologies were characterized by a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JTM-2100, Tokyo, Japan). Microscopy images were obtained with Nikon Ti-S inverted microscopy (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.2. Synthesis of Hyaluronate-Functionalized Graphene (HG)

Firstly, EDC was added to the buffer solution of 2-(N-morpholine)ethenylsulfonic acid (MES buffer solution, pH = 6.0) [36] and stirred for 30 min at room temperature before 5.0 mg NHS was added and stirred for 2 h. The product was moved to 100 mL volumetric flask to avoid light preservation, and activated solution of carboxyl group was received. One hundred milliliters of hyaluronic acid aqueous solution (1.0 mg∙mL−1) was poured into 500 mL bottle at room temperature. Under magnetic stirring condition, nitrogen was added to the solution for 30 min to remove oxygen in the reaction system. One hundred milliliters of amino group functionalized graphene oxide (NH2/GO) made from GO powder (1.0 mg∙mL−1), as reported in Reference [37], and the above carboxyl group activation solution were slowly added into the above solution and stirred at 30 °C for 4 h. the entire process was conducted under continuous flow of nitrogen. The mixture was then treated in excess acetone and dialyzed by distilled water for 2 days using a dialysis membrane (MWCO 25 kDa, Shanghai, China) to remove unreacted reagents. Thereafter, HG was obtained [6].

2.3. Electrode Fabrication

The GCE was mirror-polished with 0.3 μm and 0.05 μm alumina slurries (Beuhler), followed by sonication in acetone, ethanol, and pure water. The electrode was dried at room temperature before 10 μL of mixture of HG solution and 1% Nafion (volume ratio 20:1) was dropped on the pretreated GCE to fabricate HG/GCE. It was rinsed 3 times in PBS solution (pH = 7.4) and placed in a clean drying box. The fabrication steps are shown in Figure 1.

2.4. Cell Culture and Maintenance

Human colorectal cancer cells HCT116 and NIH/3T3, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, were maintained in MacCoy’s 5A medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GIBCOBRL Laboratories, NY, USA), 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 L-glutamic acid, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 (Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA). The medium was changed every 3 days, and cells were pass aged using Trypsin/EDTA.

2.5. Cell Immobilization

Cells were separated from medium by centrifugation at 900 rpm for 3 min at the growth retardation stage (3 days), and washed twice with sterile PBS (pH = 7.4). The sediments were resuspended in PBS to obtain cell suspension with a final concentration of 5.0 × 105 cells∙mL−1, determined by a Hemocytometer. Two microliters of cell suspension were dropped on the HG/GCE and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h for successful immobilization on the electrodes.

2.6. Electrochemical Measurements

All electrochemical measurements were performed on a CHI660E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, Shanghai, China), with a conventional three-electrode system comprised of a platinum wire auxiliary, a saturated calomel reference, and a modified HG/GCE. Solutions were degassed with nitrogen to remove O2. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) experiments were performed in a 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 K3Fe(CN)6/K4Fe(CN)6 (1:1) mixture with 0.1 mol∙L−1 KCl as supporting electrolyte, with an alternating current voltage of 5.0 mV and the frequency range of 0.01–100 kHz.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fabrication of the Cytosensor

HG showed a good dispensability in water due to hydrophilicity of hyaluronic acid modification on its surface. Figure 2a shows morphology of the as-prepared HG. From it we found film-like shapes with little rippled wrinkles. Its inset shows corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern. The well-defined diffraction spots and rings in the pattern were confirmed by the typical hexagonal lattice of crystalline carbon in HG.
We then designed a cytosensing platform of HG interface for the immobilization and sensitive electrochemical detection of cancer cells. In the fabrication of electrochemical sensors, ethylene diamines with negative charge acted as the binding linker between HA and GO through formation of amide bond. The GO was fabricated with HA and monitored by FTIR spectra, as shown in Figure 2b. The GO curve displayed a characteristic intense peak at 1730 cm−1 (the C=O vibration), a broad peak centered at 3350 cm−1 (the O-H vibration) [38], a peak at 1220 cm−1 (the C-OH stretching), and a C-O stretching peak at 1050 cm−1 [38]. After ethylene diamine was grafted onto the GO, a characteristic peak at 1575 cm−1 (N-H bending mode) appeared in curve NH2–GO [39], confirming that NH2 had been grafted onto the surface of GO. The conjugation of HA and NH2/GO was confirmed through amidation from the COOH groups in the HA and NH2 groups in HG, as shown in curve HA–GO. A new peak at 1660 cm−1 was observed and attributed to the presence of CO–NH groups in the HG composite [40]. This further demonstrated that the electrostatic adsorption of HA onto NH2/GO was substantial.

3.2. HG Film for Adhesion of HCT-116 Cells

Figure 3 shows microscopic images of HCT-116 cells proliferated on bare glass and HG/glass for 12h, 24 h, and 48 h. The photos of HG/glass displayed a highly immobilized density of HCT-116 cells compared to that of bare glass. These results indicated that the immobilization capacity for cells in the biocompatible interface of assembled HG was highly improved. Moreover, the density of HCT-116 cells immobilized on the HG film increased noticeably from 12 h (b1), to 24 h (b2), and to 48 h (b3), in which HCT-116 cells were spread to irregular shapes cover all surface of HG film. The cells were alive, as evidenced by the morphology of the distinguishable filopodia, a good indicator of cell adhesion to material surfaces and cell viability [41]. The density of cells immobilized on the HG film increased with increased incubation time, suggesting that the HCT-116 cells were capable of not only adhering to HG film but also had a good viability on the film. This was due to HA receptors on HG cytosensors possibly recognizing the HCT-116 cells and maintaining the activity of cells. Moreover, the cell viability was detected by a scratch test (Figure S1) [42]. The HCT-116 cells had greater migration ability on the HG/Glass. From Figure S1a, in a scratch area on which no HCT-116 cell was observed in the center, the HCT-116 cells began to migrate toward the center of the scratch at 12 h. The HCT-116 cells migrated toward the center of the scratch more but did not fill the scratch by 24 h. Thus, the HG cytosensors did not show cytotoxicity and were suitable for preserving the activity of immobilized living cells with good biocompatibility and promoted cell adhesion and growth.

3.3. Electrochemical Characteristics of Cytosensor

The cyclic voltammetric (CV) were carried out in a PBS (pH = 7.4) solution containing 0.1 mol∙L−1 KCl and 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− to investigate the properties of cytosensor. Figure 4a shows CVs of Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− at the bare (curve a), HG (curve b), and cells/HG (curve c,d) modified GCE, respectively. The current of cathodic and anodic waves of HG modified GCE was lower than bare GCE, due to decelerated electron transfer [43,44]. After the HG modified electrode were incubated in HCT-116 cells (5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1 and 5.0 × 103 cells∙mL−1) for 40 min, the peak currents for redox couple decreased successively because the cells obstructed the electron transfer kinetics of Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64−.
The EIS measurement was more sensitive for monitoring changes in the surface features in the [Fe(CN)6]3−/[Fe(CN)6]4−probes system for the modified electrodes. The impedance spectra included two portions: One was a semicircle portion at higher frequencies that represented the electron transfer process, while the other was a linear portion at lower frequencies corresponding to the diffusion process. The semicircle diameter equals to the electron-transfer resistance (Ret) [45]. The charge transfer resistance change correlated with the impedance response of different assembled steps. Figure 4b shows the EIS of the electrode at different stages. For the bare GCE, the redox process of Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− probe showed a very small semicircle at high frequencies and a Ret (the electron transfer impedance) value of 160 ± 5 Ω (curve a). After the HG was assembled on the electrode, the HG modified GCE showed a higher resistance (curve b), with the Ret value increasing to 913 ± 25 Ω, implying that the presence of HG lowers the conductivity due to numerous defects on the electrode. Subsequently, different concentrations of HCT-116 cells (5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1 and 5.0 × 103 cells∙mL−1) were immobilized onto the electrode, and the Ret increased significantly to 1894 ± 50 Ω (curve c) and 2981 ± 95 Ω (curve d) as the concentration of the cells was increased, which was attributed to the fact that the poor conductivity of cells further hampered the redox probe of Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− close to the surface of the electrode. The EIS results indicate that the increased impedence signal depended on the surface coverage of the cells which was directly proportional to the concentration of the cells used. Therefore, the HG modified electrode possibly can be used to detect target cells.

3.4. Sensitivity of the Cytosensor

The designed architecture of HG electrode provides a sensitive impedance cytosensor for adhesion and immobilization of HCT-116 cells. The selectivity of the cytosensor was evaluated. Two different cells were compared by monitoring the Ret value (Figure S2). When the HG/GCE was incubated with HCT-116 cells at concentration of 1.0 × 105 cells∙mL−1, in the Ret value was observed to be much larger than when no cells were incubated. However, in the case of NIH/3T3 cells at the same concentration, a minor increase in Ret was observed, which was in accord with the microscopy results. A control test was also made with HG and NH2/GO modified GCE (Figure S3). The results showed that the Ret of HG/GCE was much higher than NH2/GO/GCE at the same HCT-116 cell concentrations. Therefore, it is reasonable that the cytosensor can detect HCT-116 cells.
In order to evaluate the efficiency of the cytosensor, various concentrations of HCT-116 cells were modified on the HG/GCE. The obtained corresponding Nyquist plots of impedance spectra are shown in Figure 5a. From Figure 5a, it can be seen that with increasing concentration of HCT-116 cells, the diameter of the Nyquist circle clearly increased. This was due to insulation of cell membranes hindering the electron transfer. The inset shows the simulated Randle’s equivalent circuit. The modified equivalent circuit was in good agreement with the measurement system over the entire measurement frequency range. The changes of Ret value by modifications was much larger than those of other impedance elements and was a suitable probe for monitoring the changes of the assembly process.
Figure 5b displays a linear relation between Ret responses and logarithmic values of cell concentrations in the range from 5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1 to 5.0 × 106 cells∙mL−1. Ret = −1291.5 + 969.1lgC, with a correlation coefficient R of 0.993 (n = 5). The limit of detection calculated from the slope of the linear plot and the five times value of standard deviation was 100 cells∙mL−1 [46]. The proposed cytosensor exhibited a low detection limit for cancer cells, presumably because HA had great cell-capture ability towards HCT-116 cells, owing to the specific reaction between HA and CD44. Moreover, cytotoxicity was not detected by the HG/GCE cytosensor, thus resulting in the capture and detection of living cells. The impedance detection performances of the HCT-116 obtained at the HG/GCE were compared with other analogous modified electrodes or sensors previously reported in literature, as summarized in Table 1. It can be seen that the simplicity of our sensor was not affected the broad working linear range and low detection limit.

3.5. Reproducibility and Stability of the Cytosensor

The reproducibility was estimated for five parallel determinations of 104 cells∙mL−1 and 105 cells∙mL−1 HCT-116 under the same experimental conditions. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 6.78% and 7.21%, respectively, indicating acceptable precision and fabrication reproducibility. The EIS and CV response of the cytosensor had no obvious changes after a week in air at 4 °C. Moreover, the change in DRet for the same amount of HCT-116 cells (105 cells∙mL−1) was less than 4.52%, indicating that the HG modified GCE possessed good stability and bioactivity. Therefore, the above results showed that the as-developed HG-based cytosensor could afford an applicable method for cancer cells detection and quantification with acceptable sensitivity, high stability, and good reproducibility.

4. Conclusions

In this work, an effective and reliable HG composite electrode with high dispersion and good biocompatibility was designed, which can be used to produce an electrochemical biosensor for label-free cancer cell detection. The composites showed high conductivity of graphene, while maintaining the good biocompatibility and adaptability of HA. The functional cytosensor uses HA receptor protein CD44 as a target to capture specific tumor cells (HCT-116) and has satisfactory performance of improved immobilization capacity for cells, as well as good biocompatibility for preserving the activity of immobilized living cells. The detection limit is 100 cells∙mL−1. Therefore, this biosensor platform is expected to further develop new applications of functionalized graphene and can be applied for clinical diagnosis in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/9/12/669/s1, Figure S1: Cell scratch assays. Scratch between HCT-116 cells at (a) 0 h, (b) 24 h, and (c) 48h. Scale bar 100 μm, Figure S2: △Ret response of the cytosensor: (a) bare GCE, (b) GCE incubated in 1.0 × 105 cells∙mL−1 NIH/3T3 cells, and (c) 1.0 × 105 cells∙mL−1 HCT-116 cells for 2 h, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviation. Every point was an average value of three models of the cytosensors for independent measurements, Figure S3: △Ret response of (a) HG and (b) NH2 modified GCE with 1.0×105 cells∙mL−1 HCT-116 cells. Error bars represent standard deviation. Every point was an average value of three models of the cytosensors for independent measurements, Table S1: The advantages and disadvantages of functionalized graphene, Table S2: Fitting values of all elements in the Randle’s equivalent circuit for the different electrodes, Table S3: This work compared with other reports of detecting cancer cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J. and G.L.; methodology, G.L.; formal analysis, Z.T.; investigation, C.Z.; data curation, C.Z. and C.J.; writing—editing, A.J. and G.L.; funding acquisition, W.F.

Funding

This research was funded by project grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number U1404824, 81741147), Young Backbone Teacher Project of Henan Provincial Universities (grant number 2015GGJS-049), and Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, W.; Bohl, C.E.; Dalton, J.T. Chemistry and structural biology of androgen receptor. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3352–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cao, J.-T.; Chen, Z.-X.; Hao, X.-Y.; Zhang, P.-H.; Zhu, J.-J. Quantum dots-based immunofluorescent microfluidic chip for the analysis of glycan expression at single-cells. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 10097–10104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, N.; Brahmendra, A.; Veloso, A.J.; Prashar, A.; Cheng, X.R.; Hung, V.W.S.; Guyard, C.; Terebiznik, M.; Kerman, K. Disposable immunochips for the detection of Legionella pneumophila using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3485–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jayakumar, K.; Rajesh, R.; Dharuman, V.; Venkatasan, R.; Hahn, J.H.; Pandian, S.K. Gold nano particle decorated graphene core first generation PAMAM dendrimer for label free electrochemical DNA hybridization sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 31, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tig, G.A.; Gunendi, G.; Pekyardimci, S. A selective sensor based on Au nanoparticles-graphene oxide-poly(2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid) composite for simultaneous electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2017, 47, 607–618. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, G.; Cao, J.; Li, L.; Rana, R.K.; Zhu, J.J. Carboxymethyl chitosan-functionalized graphene for label-free electrochemical cytosensing. Carbon 2013, 51, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Damiati, S.; Kupcu, S.; Peacock, M.; Eilenberger, C.; Zamzami, M.; Qadri, I.; Choudhry, H.; Sleytr, U.B.; Schuster, B. Acoustic and hybrid 3D-printed electrochemical biosensors for the real-time immunodetection of liver cancer cells (HepG2). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chua, J.H.; Chee, R.-E.; Agarwal, A.; Wong, S.M.; Zhang, G.-J. Acoustic and hybrid 3D-printed electrochemical biosensors for the real-time immunodetection of liver cancer cells (HepG2). Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6266–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zheng, G.; Patolsky, F.; Cui, Y.; Wang, W.U.; Lieber, C.M. Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gohring, J.T.; Dale, P.S.; Fan, X. Detection of HER2 breast cancer biomarker using the opto-fluidic ring resonator biosensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 146, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, T.; He, Y.; Wei, J.; Que, L. Nanostructured optical microchips for cancer biomarker detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 38, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Song, C.; Deng, P.; Que, L. Rapid multiplexed detection of beta-amyloid and total-tau as biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in cerebrospinal fluid. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Boil. Med. 2018, 14, 1845–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alzghoul, S.; Hailat, M.; Zivanovic, S.; Que, L.; Shah, G.V. Measurement of serum prostate cancer markers using a nanopore thin film based optofluidic chip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, J.; Lang, H.P.; Huber, F.; Bietsch, A.; Grange, W.; Certa, U.; McKendry, R.; Guntherodt, H.J.; Hegner, M.; Gerber, C. Rapid and label-free nanomechanical detection of biomarker transcripts in human RNA. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. McKendry, R.; Zhang, J.; Arntz, Y.; Strunz, T.; Hegner, M.; Lang, H.P.; Baller, M.K.; Certa, U.; Meyer, E.; Guntherodt, H.-J.; Gerber, C. Multiple label-free biodetection and quantitative DNA-binding assays on a nanomechanical cantilever array. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9783–9788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Regonda, S.; Tian, R.; Gao, J.; Greene, S.; Ding, J.; Hu, W. Silicon multi-nanochannel fets to improve device uniformity/stability and femtomolar detection of insulin in serum. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 45, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Arntz, Y.; Seelig, J.D.; Lang, H.P.; Zhang, J.; Hunziker, P.; Ramseyer, J.P.; Meyer, E.; Hegner, M.; Gerber, C. Label-free protein assay based on a nanomechanical cantilever array. Nanotechnology 2002, 14, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garifullina, A.; Bhalla, N.; Shen, A.Q. Probing specific gravity in real-time with graphene oxide plasmonics. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Breer, H. Olfactory receptors: molecular basis for recognition and discrimination of odors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wasilewski, T.; Gebicki, J.; Kamysz, W. Advances in olfaction-inspired biomaterials applied to bioelectronic noses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 257, 511–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Di Pietrantonio, F.; Benetti, M.; Cannata, D.; Verona, E.; Palla-Papavlu, A.; Fernandez-Pradas, J.M.; Serra, P.; Staiano, M.; Varriale, A.; D’Auria, S. A surface acoustic wave bio-electronic nose for detection of volatile odorant molecules. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 67, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wasilewski, T.; Gebicki, J.; Kamysz, W. Bioelectronic nose: Current status and perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 480–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Clark, P.J.; Patel, K. Noninvasive tools to assess liver disease. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2011, 27, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Amann, A.; Poupart, G.; Telser, S.; Ledochowski, M.; Schmid, A.; Mechtcheriakov, S. Applications of breath gas analysis in medicine. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 239, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abbott, S.M.; Elder, J.B.; Španěl, P.; Smith, D. Quantification of Acetonitrile in Exhaled Breath and Urinary Headspace Using Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 228, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miekisch, W.; Kischkel, S.; Sawacki, A.; Liebau, T.; Mieth, M.; Schubert, J.K. Impact of sampling procedures on the results of breath analysis. J. Breath Res. 2008, 2, 026007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Majchrzak, T.; Wojnowski, W.; Piotrowicz, G.; Gebicki, J.; Namiesnik, J. Sample preparation and recent trends in volatolomics for diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 108, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mohamad, F.S.; Zaid, M.H.M.; Abdullah, J.; Zawawi, R.M.; Lim, H.N.; Sulaiman, Y.; Rahman, N.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyaniline/Graphene Composite Nanofiber and Its Application as an Electrochemical DNA Biosensor for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sensors 2017, 17, 2789. [Google Scholar]
  29. Salahandish, R.; Ghaffarinejad, A.; Omidinia, E.; Zargartalebi, H.; Majidzadeh, A.K.; Naghib, S.M.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Label-free ultrasensitive detection of breast cancer miRNA-21 biomarker employing electrochemical nano-genosensor based on sandwiched AgNPs in PANI and N-doped graphene. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 120, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, L. Construction of a highly sensitive non-enzymatic nitrite sensor using electrochemically reduced holey graphene. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1043, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Si, Y.; Park, J.W.; Jung, S.; Hwang, G.S.; Goh, E.; Lee, H.J. Layer-by-layer electrochemical biosensors configuring xanthine oxidase and carbon nanotubes/graphene complexes for hypoxanthine and uric acid in human serum solutions. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 121, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yin, D.D.; Bo, X.J.; Liu, J.; Guo, L.P. A novel enzyme-free glucose and H2O2 sensor based on 3D graphene aerogels decorated with Ni3N nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1038, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wei, B.; Mao, K.; Liu, N.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Z.G. Graphene nanocomposites modified electrochemical aptamer sensor for rapid and highly sensitive detection of prostate specific antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 121, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Soleymani, J.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Somi, M.H.; Ozkan, S.A.; Jouyban, A. Targeting and sensing of some cancer cells using folate bioreceptor functionalized nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 1021–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xiao, C.; Chu, X.; Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. Hollow nitrogen-doped carbon microspheres pyrolyzed from self-polymerized dopamine and its application in simultaneous electrochemical determination of uric acid, ascorbic acid and dopamine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 2934–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hou, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Z. Hyaluronic acid-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes as tumor-targeting MRI contrast agent. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 4507–4520. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jing, A.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Tian, Z.; Feng, W.; Liang, G. Amine Functionalized Graphene Electrochemical Biosensor for Simultaneous Determination of Small Biomolecules. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2018, 10, 950–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, H.; Bremner, D.H.; Lei, T.; Li, H.; Hu, J.; Zhu, L. Carboxymethyl chitosan-mediated synthesis of hyaluronic acid-targeted graphene oxide for cancer drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 135, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Patel, D.K.; Gupta, V.; Dwivedi, A.; Pandey, S.K.; Aswal, V.K.; Rana, D.; Maiti, P. Superior biomaterials using diamine modified graphene grafted polyurethane. Polymer 2016, 106, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, Y.; Chen, Y.; Feng, L.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Selective and quantitative cancer cell detection using target-directed functionalized graphene and its synergetic peroxidase-like activity. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4436–4438. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ding, L.; Hao, C.; Xue, Y.; Ju, H. A bio-inspired support of gold nanoparticles-chitosan nanocomposites gel for immobilization and electrochemical study of K562 leukemia cells. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1341–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. He, X.; Li, B.; Shao, Y.; Zhao, N.; Hsu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, L. Cell fusion between gastric epithelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells results in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and malignant transformation. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rao, C.N.R.; Sood, A.K.; Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Govindaraj, A. Graphene: The new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 7752–7777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, Z.; Ren, W.; Gao, L.; Liu, B.; Pei, S.; Cheng, H.-M. Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Navratilova, I.; Skladal, P. The immunosensors for measurement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Bioelectrochemistry 2004, 62, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bhalla, N.; Sathish, S.; Sinha, A.; Shen, A.Q. Plasma-Assisted Large-Scale Nanoassembly of Metal-Insulator Bioplasmonic Mushrooms. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Micromachines 09 00669 g001 550
Figure 1. Procedure for preparing electrochemical cytosensor. EDC–1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, NHS–N-hydroxysuccinimide, GCE– glass carbon electrode, HA–Sodium hyaluronate.
Figure 1. Procedure for preparing electrochemical cytosensor. EDC–1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, NHS–N-hydroxysuccinimide, GCE– glass carbon electrode, HA–Sodium hyaluronate.
Micromachines 09 00669 g001
Micromachines 09 00669 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) TEM diagram of hyaluronate-functionalized graphene (HG), and (b) FTIR spectra of graphene oxide (GO), NH2/GO, and HG.
Figure 2. (a) TEM diagram of hyaluronate-functionalized graphene (HG), and (b) FTIR spectra of graphene oxide (GO), NH2/GO, and HG.
Micromachines 09 00669 g002
Micromachines 09 00669 g003 550
Figure 3. Microscopy images of HCT-116 cells proliferated on (a) bare glass and (b) HG/glass for (a1, b1) 12 h, (a2,b2) 24 h, and (a3,b3) 48 h respectively. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 3. Microscopy images of HCT-116 cells proliferated on (a) bare glass and (b) HG/glass for (a1, b1) 12 h, (a2,b2) 24 h, and (a3,b3) 48 h respectively. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Micromachines 09 00669 g003
Micromachines 09 00669 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Cyclic voltammograms and (b) Nyquist plots of impedance spectra at different electrodes in a solution of 1.0 × 10−2 mol∙L−1 phosphate-buffer solutions (PBS) (pH = 7.4) containing 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 K3Fe(CN)6-2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 K4Fe(CN)6-0.1 mol∙L−1 KCl. Curve a, bare GCE; curve b, HG/ glass carbon electrode (GCE); curve c,d, HG/GCE after incubation with 5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1 and 5.0 × 103 cells∙mL−1 for 40 min, respectively. Inset, displays the equivalent circuit applied in the work.
Figure 4. (a) Cyclic voltammograms and (b) Nyquist plots of impedance spectra at different electrodes in a solution of 1.0 × 10−2 mol∙L−1 phosphate-buffer solutions (PBS) (pH = 7.4) containing 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 K3Fe(CN)6-2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 K4Fe(CN)6-0.1 mol∙L−1 KCl. Curve a, bare GCE; curve b, HG/ glass carbon electrode (GCE); curve c,d, HG/GCE after incubation with 5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1 and 5.0 × 103 cells∙mL−1 for 40 min, respectively. Inset, displays the equivalent circuit applied in the work.
Micromachines 09 00669 g004
Micromachines 09 00669 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Nyquist plots in 1.0 × 10−2 mol∙L−1 PBS (pH = 7.4) solution containing 0.1 mol∙L−1 KCl and 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− recorded on the Cells/HG/GCE with the cell concentrations of 5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1, 5.0 × 103 cells∙mL−1, 5.0 × 104 cells∙mL−1, 5.0 × 105 cells∙mL−1 and 5.0 × 106 cells∙mL−1. (b) Linear relationship between electron-transfer resistance and logarithm of HCT-116 cell concentrations. Inset is the calibration curve of the impedance sensor for determination of HCT-116 cells. Error bars represent standard deviation. Every point was an average value of three models of the cytosensors for independent measurements.
Figure 5. (a) Nyquist plots in 1.0 × 10−2 mol∙L−1 PBS (pH = 7.4) solution containing 0.1 mol∙L−1 KCl and 2.0 × 10−3 mol∙L−1 Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− recorded on the Cells/HG/GCE with the cell concentrations of 5.0 × 102 cells∙mL−1, 5.0 × 103 cells∙mL−1, 5.0 × 104 cells∙mL−1, 5.0 × 105 cells∙mL−1 and 5.0 × 106 cells∙mL−1. (b) Linear relationship between electron-transfer resistance and logarithm of HCT-116 cell concentrations. Inset is the calibration curve of the impedance sensor for determination of HCT-116 cells. Error bars represent standard deviation. Every point was an average value of three models of the cytosensors for independent measurements.
Micromachines 09 00669 g005
Table
Table 1. Comparison of this work with other reported cytosensors.
Table 1. Comparison of this work with other reported cytosensors.
Modified ElectrodeDetected CellsDetection Limit (cells∙mL−1)Reference
Carboxymethyl chitosan/grapheneHL-60 cells500[6]
folic acid conjugated graphene/heminHeLa cells1000[7]
ceramic/noble metals/3D-printedHepG21000[20]
Graphene oxide/poly-L-lysineK562 cells30[33]
Hyaluronate/grapheneHCT-116100This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jing, A.; Zhang, C.; Liang, G.; Feng, W.; Tian, Z.; Jing, C. Hyaluronate-Functionalized Graphene for Label-Free Electrochemical Cytosensing. Micromachines 2018, 9, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120669

AMA Style

Jing A, Zhang C, Liang G, Feng W, Tian Z, Jing C. Hyaluronate-Functionalized Graphene for Label-Free Electrochemical Cytosensing. Micromachines. 2018; 9(12):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jing, Aihua, Chunxin Zhang, Gaofeng Liang, Wenpo Feng, Zhengshan Tian, and Chenhuan Jing. 2018. "Hyaluronate-Functionalized Graphene for Label-Free Electrochemical Cytosensing" Micromachines 9, no. 12: 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop